Dehydrated vegetables and method for their preparation
Dehydrated vegetables are prepared by preparing the vegetables, holding them for a time and at a temperature to activate the endogenous pectinmethylesterase, blanching and drying.
Latest CPC International Inc. Patents:
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to dehydrated vegetables, to methods for their production and to comestible products containing dehydrated vegetables.
2. Description of Related Art
Dehydrated vegetables are used widely in products such as soups and other processed foods often in dehydrated, diced form. The major problem associated with dehydrated vegetables is that on rehydration they often remain collapsed and shrunk giving rise to a product of poor texture relative to the textural quality of the fresh or minimally processed vegetables. The irreversible shrinkage that occurs during drying is due to the collapse of the cell-wall structure.
Pectin is a major component of vegetable cell walls and as such makes a major contribution to the structural integrity and strength of vegetables and vegetable pieces. Native pectin is, generally, high methoxyl in structure and, as a result, is susceptible to degradation on heating under neutral pH conditions. This form of degradation occurs during cooking and is the major reason for unwanted textural softening of vegetables on heat processing. During forced-air drying of vegetable pieces, water is removed, thus releasing the turgor pressure and causing the cell wall structure to collapse. The collapse can be irreversible, if the moisture content of the materials is very high or if the cell wall structure is weak. In these cases, rehydration only causes the absorption of water into the intercellular spaces, thus leading to poor rehydratability of the dehydrated material and poor texture on rehydration.
Vegetables contain pectinmethylesterase (PME) in their cell walls. This endogenous enzyme can be activated by mild heat treatment under specific conditions of pH and ionic strength and, when activated, leads to demethoxylation of the native pectin. The resulting demethoxylated pectin has a structure that is more stable against degradation on heating at neutral pH and that more effectively cross-links in the presence of calcium ions. Both of these factors lead to the strengthening of the cell wall structure and pretreatments that activate the PME enzyme in vegetables have been shown to give improved texture after freezing and canning.
EP-A-0337621 discloses a method for producing dried fruit which involves stabilizing the color and flavor of the fruit by infusing it in a 10 to 70% carbohydrate solution prior to drying.
EP-A-0404543 also describes a process for preparing dried fruit which includes infusion in an aqueous carbohydrate solution. This document teaches that the fruit must be soaked under conditions which deactivate the enzymes and also soften the fruit before deaeration is carried out.
The present invention relates to the production of dehydrated vegetables which have improved textural qualities on rehydration. It has been found that improved texture in the rehydrated product may be achieved by preservation of the cell wall structure of vegetables on dehydration by activating the endogenous pectinmethylesterase enzyme.
According to the present invention, there is provided a method for producing dehydrated vegetables comprising preparing the vegetables, holding the prepared vegetables for a time and at a temperature to activate endogenous pectinmethylesterase, blanching and drying.
Preferably, the method of the invention comprises infusing the prepared vegetables before, during or after the holding treatment in an aqueous solution comprising from 20 to 70% of one or more carbohydrates and, optionally, up to 5.0% of a calcium salt.
Plant material such as vegetables containing pectinmethylesterase may be used in the invention and, particularly, include carrot, tomato, celery and bell pepper. Activation of the endogenous pectinmethylesterase is preferably carried out by holding the vegetable matter under specific pH conditions at an elevated temperature. The pH conditions, the temperature range and the time for which the material is held in that range to effect activation varies with the vegetable used and the optimum conditions required in each specific case may be determined if the optimal conditions to promote PME activity in the vegetable is known. The conditions and/or the methods for their determination will be well-known to those skilled in the art. Generally, the vegetable pieces are held in water or an aqueous solution at a pH of from 6 to 8 at a temperature of from 45.degree. to 70.degree. C. for from 10 to 60 minutes. For carrot, bell pepper, celery and tomato, the optimum conditions are about 60.degree. C. for 40 minutes, about 60.degree. for 30 minutes, about 60.degree. C. for 15 minutes and about 50.degree. C. for 15 minutes, respectively.
The vegetables used in the present invention may be the whole or any part of the whole vegetable and are prepared in conventional ways well-known in the art. The vegetables may be treated by cutting to any given size as required by their end use. Preferably, the vegetables are diced and have dimensions of from 0.5 to 1.5 mm. Typically, the vegetables may be prepared by washing, peeling and dicing the fresh vegetables.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the vegetables are infused with an aqueous infusion solution comprising from 20 to 70% by weight of one or more carbohydrates and, optionally, up to 5.0% by weight of a calcium salt (e.g., from 0.5% to 5.0%). The infusion may be carried out before, during or after the holding treatment but is preferably carried out either after the holding treatment or during the holding treatment by carrying out the holding treatment in the infusion solution. The infusion treatment causes osmotic dehydration and, therefore, aids drying. The carbohydrates are preferably monosaccharides or disaccharides since it is preferred that they have a relatively low molecular weight to permit ready infusion into the vegetable tissue. The most preferred carbohydrates are glucose, sucrose, fructose and mixtures thereof. Any edible calcium salt having a sufficiently high solubility to provide a 0.5 to 5.0% solution of the salt in the infusion solution may be used in the invention. Suitable salts include calcium chloride, calcium lactate and mixtures thereof. The infusion solution may include other substances, such as sodium chloride (up to 10%) that promote osmotic dehydration, and other flavorants or preservatives that do not affect the performance of the invention.
The infusion of the vegetables may take place at ambient pressure but is preferably carried out under vacuum. Vacuum infusion methods of the type used in the invention are well-known to those skilled in the art. Preferably, vacuum infusion is carried out by subjecting the vegetable matter in the infusion solution to a vacuum of from 2.67 to 5.33 MPa (20 to 40 mmHg) for a period of from 1 to 10 minutes. A typical vacuum infusion process involves holding the vegetable matter in the infusion solution, applying a vacuum of 20 mmHg for 5 minutes, slowly releasing the vacuum and holding for a further 5 minutes.
Blanching of the treated vegetable matter may be carried out by the standard commercial treatments which are used prior to dehydration in order to deactivate enzymes that are known to cause deterioration in the quality of the dried products. Suitable blanching treatments include immersion of the vegetable matter in water or an aqueous solution (e.g., a dilute sodium bicarbonate solution) at about 100.degree. C. for from 1 to 5 minutes. Preferably, blanching is carried out in the infusion solution. The skilled person will be aware of the blanching conditions which are suitable in any given case.
Drying of the blanched material may be carried out by conventional methods such as vacuum drying or forced air drying. The treated vegetables may, for example, be dried by forced air drying at a temperature of from 75.degree. to 95.degree. C. with an air velocity of 3 m/s.
The present invention will now be described with reference to the following examples.
EXAMPLES Example 1Raw carrots were peeled and then cubed to a size of about 10 mm.times.10 mm.times.10 mm. The resulting cubed carrot was held at a temperature of 60.degree. C. in a thermostat-controlled water bath for a predetermined length of time. Where the vegetables were subjected to vacuum infusion, this was carried out in a Jacketed vessel at a reduced pressure of about 20 mmHg for about 5 minutes followed by a slow return to atmospheric pressure and holding in the solution for 5 minutes. Blanching of the treated vegetables was carried out using conditions similar to those of standard commercial treatments (1000.degree. C. for 4 minutes in water). Drying was carried out by forced air drying at about 930.degree. C. with an air velocity of 3 m/s. The moisture level of the samples was determined by monitoring the loss in weight and drying was terminated when a moisture level of approximately 4% was obtained.
Product assessment--Dehydrated products were assessed for rehydration and textural characteristics.
Moisture determination--The actual moisture content of the dried pieces was measured by drying 5 g of the samples to constant weight in a vacuum oven at 70.degree. C.
Rehydration characteristics--To assess the performance of dehydrated pieces in finished products, the samples were rehydrated in boiling water. 50 ml of boiling water was added to 5 g of the sample and left for 5 minutes. The pieces were then strained and weighed to determine the rehydration ratio which is the ratio of the weight of the reconstituted sample to that of the dry sample.
Organoleptic assessment--All samples were informally assessed for organoleptic quality by a few experienced assessors, who examined the pieces for color, texture and flavor. The results are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1
__________________________________________________________________________
FORMATION OF DEHYDRATED CARROT BY THE PRESENT INVENTION
Drying
Rehydration
Shrinkage on
Organoleptic
Pretreatment
time (h)
ratio rehydration
quality
__________________________________________________________________________
60.degree. C./40 min then
3.80
1.46 Very slightly
Crunchy; sweet
infusion of 1% calcium
shrunk soft outside and a
lactate + 60% glucose
7-9 mm .times. 7 mm .times.
hard crisp center
7 mm
60.degree. C./40 min in 60%
2.50
2.03 Very slightly
Crunchy; slightly
sucrose + 10% NaCl shrunk crispy; good
9-7 mm .times. 7-5 mm .times.
flavor but salty
7-8 mm
60.degree. C./40 min in 60%
2.50
2.07 Quite shrunk
Crunch with hard
sucrose 8-9 mm .times. 8-5 mm .times.
core; sweet;
10-5 mm slight loss of
color; quite good
flavor
__________________________________________________________________________
Example 2
The method described in EXAMPLE 1 was applied to the production of dehydrated celery. Celery pieces were produced by cutting fresh celery lengthwise into 10 mm wide strips and then slicing into 10 mm segments. The thinner, greener part of the celery stalk was used in preference to the wider, whiter part in order to obtain appropriately sized pieces.
Pretreatments were carried out at 60.degree. C. and blanching in 0.5% sodium bicarbonate solution. The results are given in Table 2.
TABLE 2
__________________________________________________________________________
FORMATION OF DEHYDRATED CELERY BY THE PRESENT INVENTION
Drying
Moisture
Rehydration
Shrinkage on
Organoleptic
Pretreatment
time (h)
content (%)
ratio rehydration
quality
__________________________________________________________________________
10% NaCl + 60%
8.00
0.58 1.36 Slightly shrunk;
Bright color;
sucrose vacuum no collapse 9-
some celery
infusion 60.degree. C./15
10 mm odor; very
min + blanch in crunchy, like
same raw, very salty
10 NaCl 60%
8.00
0.77 1.77 As above 9-10 mm
Some typical
sucrose 60.degree. C./15 aroma; crunchy;
min + blanch in more flesh;
same salty
__________________________________________________________________________
Example 3
The method of EXAMPLE 1 was applied to the production of dehydrated tomato from 10 mm.times.10 mm.times.10 mm tomato pieces obtained by cutting the tomato in half, removing the seeds and dicing the resulting "shells".
Pretreatments were carried out at 50.degree. C. and the treated vegetable blanched in water at 100.degree. C. for 1 minute. The results are presented in Table 3.
TABLE 3
__________________________________________________________________________
FORMATION OF DEHYDRATED TOMATO BY METHOD OF THE
PRESENT INVENTION
Drying
Rehydration
Shrinkage on
Organoleptic
Pretreatment
time (h)
ratio rehydration
quality
__________________________________________________________________________
50.degree. C./15 min in 60%
11.25
1.90 Flesh intact
Soft flesh; crispy
sucrose center; sweet; good
flavor
Vacuum infuse 60%
19.00
1.17 Slightly
Soft outer; slight
sucrose + 2% CaCl.sub.2 and
shrunk
crisp center; flavor
hold (50.degree. C./15 min)
quite sweet; good
flesh
Vacuum infuse 60%
19.00
1.13 Slightly
Bright color; flesh as
glucose + 2% CaCl.sub.2 and
shrunk
in fresh; crisp
hold (50.degree. C./15 min)
center; sweet but
salty
50.degree./15 min in 60%
11.25
1.61 Flesh intact
Very birght color;
sucrose + 10% NaCl slight crisp center;
good flavor; salty;
flesh similar to fresh
__________________________________________________________________________
Example 4
The method of EXAMPLE 1 was applied to the production of dehydrated bell pepper (CAPSICUM ANNUM L.) from 10 mm.times.10 mm pepper pieces obtained by cutting the pepper in half, removing the seeds and then cutting the resulting "shells" into squares.
Pretreatments were carried out at 60.degree. C. and the treated vegetable blanched in either water or test solution at 100.degree. C. for 2 minutes. The result are presented in Table 4.
TABLE 4
__________________________________________________________________________
FORMATION OF DEHYDRATED BELL PEPPER BY THE
PRESENT INVENTION
Drying
Rehydration
Shrinkage on
Organoleptic
Pretreatment
Time (h)
ratio rehydration
quality
__________________________________________________________________________
60.degree. C./30 min in
7 1.9 Quite Mild peppery
a 30% sucrose/ fleshy odor;
4% NaCl followed by crunchy texture;
vacuum infusion and sweet; good
blanching in flavor
the same solution
60.degree. C./30 min in
7 1.9 Slightly
Mild peppery
2% calcium lactate fleshy firm texture;
followed by infusion of salty flavor
30% sucrose/4%
NaCl then blanching
in the same solution
__________________________________________________________________________
Example 5
Dehydrated carrot and bell pepper prepared by the method of the present invention were rehydrated by the following methods:
a) soaking in boiling water for 5 minutes;
b) microwaving in water for 2 minutes at full power; and
c) soaking in cold water for 2, 4 and 22 hours.
The carrot samples used in this example were as follows:
1. standard blanched carrot (100.degree. C./4 minutes) without pretreatment--used as a control;
2. 60.degree. C./40 minutes in deionized water, vacuum infusion of 1% calcium lactate/60% glucose and blanch in same;
3. 60.degree. C./40 minutes in deionized water, blanch in deionized water, vacuum infusion of 1% calcium lactate/60% glucose;
4. 60.degree. C./40 minutes in 60% sucrose/10% sodium chloride and blanch in same.
The results of the tests are given in Tables 5, 6 and 7.
The pepper samples used in this example were as follows:
1. Control, standard blanch 2 minutes at 100.degree. C. in deionized water.
2. Holding at 60.degree. C. for 3 minutes in deionized water, then blanching as the control.
3. Holding at 60.degree. C. for 30 minutes in 30% sucrose/4% NaCl solution, followed by vacuum infusing for 10 minutes, then blanching in the same way as the control.
4. Holding at 60.degree. C. for 30 minutes in 30% sucrose/4% NaCl solution, followed by vacuum infusing for 10 minutes, then blanching in the same way as the control.
5. Holding at 60.degree. C. for 30 minutes in 2% calcium lactate solution, followed by vacuum infusing for 10 minutes in 30% sucrose/4% NaCl solution, then blanching in 30% sucrose 4% NaCl solution, as the control.
The result of the tests involving pepper are given in Tables 8, 9 and 10.
TABLE 5
__________________________________________________________________________
REHYDRATION OF CARROT SAMPLES WITH BOILING WATER
Sample No.
1 2 3 4
__________________________________________________________________________
Rehydration (RR)
1.87 1.57 1.58 1.45
Dimensions after
5 .times. 6 .times. 5
7 .times. 7 .times. 7
7 .times. 7 .times. 7
7 .times. 6 .times. 6
rehydration (mm)
5 .times. 6 .times. 5
7 .times. 6 .times. 5
7 .times. 5 .times. 5
6 .times. 10 .times. 6
7 .times. 6 .times. 6
8 .times. 6 .times. 6
7 .times. 6 .times. 5
9 .times. 7 .times. 6
Shrinkage on
Quite shrunk &
Slightly
Very slightly
Best so far;
rehydration
collapsed
collapsed &
more shrunk
hardly any
shrunk than 2 shrinkage
Odor Carroty
Not much odor
Not much odor
Not much odor
Color Orange; bright
Orange; bright
Dark color
Orange; slightly
slightly less duller than 1
color than 1
Texture Slight crunch,
Very crunchy;
Crunchy; but
Softer than 2 &
but quite soft
slightly hard
not as crunchy
3, but crunchier
center; like
as 2; not fully
than 1; hard
fresh hydrated; hard
center
center
Flavor Only a slight
More flavor
Same as for 2
Too salty;
carrot flavor
than 1, but
except sweet
carroty
still quite
bland
__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 6
__________________________________________________________________________
REHYDRATION OF CARROT SAMPLES IN THE MICROWAVE
Sample No.
1 2 3 4
__________________________________________________________________________
Rehydration
1.83 1.48 1.48 1.43
ratio (RR)
Dimensions after
5 .times. 5 .times. 6
5 .times. 6 .times. 6
7 .times. 6 .times. 5
8 .times. 6 .times. 6
rehydration (mm)
5 .times. 5 .times. 6
4 .times. 6 .times. 6
7 .times. 5 .times. 5
7 .times. 6 .times. 6
7 .times. 6 .times. 6
5 .times. 5 .times. 5
7 .times. 5 .times. 5
8 .times. 6 .times. 6
Shrinkage on
Shrinkage worse
Similar to
Similar to
Similar to
rehydration
than with
boiling water
boiling water
boiling water
boiling water
rehydration
rehydration
rehydration
rehydration
Odor Similar to boiling water rehydrated products
Texture Drier than
Very crunchy;
Slightly
Soft outer and
boiling water
hard center; not
crunchy; quite
hard center
rehydrated
as rehydrated as
hard center; not
samples; soft;
boiling water
as rehydrated as
rubbery samples boiling water
samples
Flavor Bland; slight
Strong carrot
Some carrot
Not as salty as
carrot flavor
flavor flavor present
rehydrating in
boiling water
good carrot
flavor
__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 7
__________________________________________________________________________
REHYDRATION OF CARROT PIECES IN COLD WATER
Soaking time (h)
Sample No. 2 4 22
__________________________________________________________________________
Rehydration
1 2.94 3.38 4.09
ratio (RR)
2 2.47 2.98 3.27
3 2.34 2.85 3.24
4 2.15 2.59 2.85
Shrinkage on
1 Slightly shrunk
Very slightly shrunk
Very slightly shrunk
rehydration
2 No shrinkage
No shrinkage
No shrinkage
3 Slightly shrunk
No Shrinkage
No shrinkage
4 No shrinkage
No shrinkage
No shrinkage
Texture
1 -- -- Slightly soft; slight crunch
2 -- -- Like raw carrot
3 -- -- Quite crunchy
4 -- -- Slightly crunchy but slightly
soft
Flavor
1 -- -- Good carrot flavor
2 -- -- Slight carrot flavor; slightly
sweet
3 -- -- Quite crunchy; sweet
4 -- -- Salty; slight carrot flavor
__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 8
______________________________________
REHYDRATION OF PEPPER SAMPLES WITH BOILED WATER
Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5
______________________________________
Rehydration
2.9 3.2 1.7 1.9 1.9
ratio
Shrinkage on
Shrunk Shrunk Fleshy
Most Slightly
rehydration fleshy fleshy
Odor Hay-like; Grass Slightly
Mild; Mild;
peppery peppery
peppery peppery
Color Dark green Dark Green Lighter Green
green
Texture Slimy Skin/ Firm Crunchy Firm
tough
Flavor Bitter Bitter Salty Sweet; Salty
peppery best flavor
______________________________________
TABLE 9
______________________________________
REHYDRATION OF PEPPER SAMPLES IN THE MICROWAVE
Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5
______________________________________
Rehydration
3.2 3.4 1.9 2.1 1.9
ratio
Shrinkage on
Quite Very shrunk
Shrunk Least Shrunk
rehydration
shrunk shrunk
Odor Dried Hay-like All 3 samples were mildly peppery
grass
Color Olive/ Olive Olive Bright Light
brown green green
Texture Soft Skin/ Crunchy Most Firm
tough crunchy
Flavor Bitter; Cabbage; Sweet; Too salty
Salty;
mild bitter mild no
pleasant pepper
flavor
______________________________________
TABLE 10
__________________________________________________________________________
REHYDRATION OF PEPPER SAMPLES IN COLD WATER
Sample No.
1 2 3 4 5
__________________________________________________________________________
Rehydration
ratio after
various soaking
times
2 h 5.0 5.3 2.8 3.3 2.8
4 h 5.7 6.1 3.3 3.8 3.4
22 h 7.0 7.6 4.4 4.8 4.1
Shrinkage on
Slightly
Shrunk
Fleshy As raw
Slightly
rehydration
shrunk fleshy
Odor Hay-like
Green grass
Pepper-like
Peppery
Some
peppery
Color Dark Dark green
Pale/bright
Bright green
Green
green green
Texture
Soft Skin Crunchy
Very Crunchy
crunchy; as
raw
Flavor No flavor
Very little
Sweet, Best; Salt;
flavor
slightly
peppery
water;
peppery; slightly
watery peppery
__________________________________________________________________________
The samples infused with glucose/calcium, before blanching, showed a lower amount of shrinkage than the samples infused after blanching, when rehydrated in boiling water (Table 5). The pieces held in sucrose/salt solution showed the least amount of shrinkage, but were slightly softer in texture compared with the glucose-infused samples. The samples infused with glucose solution after blanching were found to be too sweet and samples treated with sucrose/salt were too salty but had good carrot flavor. Soaking in boiling water for 5 minutes was not adequate to rehydrate any of the treated samples completely.
Rehydration of dried carrot pieces in the microwave was not as successful as in boiling water. The rehydration ratios of samples were lower when the microwave method was used. All the rehydrated products were drier in texture but only the control samples developed a rubbery texture.
Rehydration in cold water was investigated to determine whether dried samples could be rehydrated without heating in wet products. Although the samples soaked for 2 and 4 hours were not tasted, the rehydration results indicated that 2 hours would be adequate to rehydrate the dried pieces completely. After soaking for 2 hours, the pretreated samples showed little or no shrinkage, the samples from pretreatment 2 and 4 having a swollen appearance. After 22 hours no shrinkage was seen on any of the pretreated samples. On tasting, the samples infused with glucose/calcium (pretreatment 2) were said to be the best, with a raw carrot-like texture. The samples treated in sucrose/salt were slightly soft.
Example 6Dehydrated carrot samples prepared by the method of the present invention and a control sample were tested for their rehydration properties in instant and simmered dried soup products.
In the instant soup (Knorr.RTM. low-calorie chicken noodle soup), the samples were assessed by adding approximately 3 g of dried pieces to the dried soup (about 10 g) and then rehydrating with 90 ml of boiling water and stirring.
Dried samples were assessed in the simmered soup (Knorr.RTM. cream of chicken soup) by preparing the soup according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the rehydrated pieces assessed for size and texture. The samples were prepared by adding approximately 5 g of dried pieces to 22.7 g of the dry soup, then 283 ml of cold water, bringing the mixture to boil and simmering for 5 minutes. The results are presented in Table 11.
TABLE 11
__________________________________________________________________________
ASSESSMENT OF CARROT SAMPLES IN SOUPS
Instant soup
Pretreatment
Simmered soup
Assessed instantly
Assessed after 5 mins
__________________________________________________________________________
Control Carrot soft but not
Carroty taste
Softer than 2;
soggy; good carrot
slightly soft;
slightly hard
flavor crunchy center
60.degree. C./40 min then
Very crunchy; no
Crunchy especially
Very crunchy
infusion of 1% calcium
hard center; good
in center; quite
good carrot
lactate + 60% glucose
flavor, especially
carroty taste
flavor
the aftertaste
60.degree. C./40 min in 60%
Outside of pieces
Not fully hydrated;
Not fully
sucrose very soft but hard
hard center; soft
hydrated; hard
centers; softer than
outside center; soft
2; did not taste too
outside
salty
__________________________________________________________________________
The pretreated samples did not hydrate completely in the instant soup after 5 minutes. Both pretreated samples had a firmer texture than the control samples but holding at 60.degree. C. combined with infusion of glucose/calcium gave the best result.
When assessed in the simmered soup, the control and samples held at 60.degree. C. and then infused with glucose/calcium (pretreatment 2) had hydrated completely and the latter had a very crunchy texture and good flavor. The sample treated in sucrose/NaCl did not hydrate adequately and had a softer texture.
Claims
1. A method for producing dehydrated vegetables comprising preparing the vegetables, holding the prepared vegetables for a time and at a temperature to activate endogenous pectinmethylesterase, blanching and drying, wherein the prepared vegetables are held at from 45.degree. to 70.degree. C. for from 10 to 60 minutes.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising infusing the prepared vegetables before, during or after the holding treatment in an aqueous infusion solution comprising from 20 to 70% of one or more carbohydrates.
3. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the infusion solution contains up to 5.0% of a calcium salt.
4. A method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the infusion solution comprises up to 10% sodium chloride.
5. A method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the carbohydrates are selected from the group consisting of glucose, sucrose and fructose.
6. A method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the calcium salt is calcium chloride, calcium lactate or mixtures thereof.
7. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the infusion solution comprises up to 10% sodium chloride.
8. A method as claimed in claim 7 wherein the carbohydrates are selected from the group consisting of glucose, sucrose and fructose.
9. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the carbohydrates are selected from the group consisting of glucose, sucrose and fructose.
10. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the holding treatment is carried out in the aqueous solution to effect, at least partially, the infusion of the prepared vegetables.
11. A method as claimed in claim 10 wherein the infusion is carried out before or after the holding treatment by vacuum infusion.
12. A method as claimed in claim 11 wherein the vegetables are subjected to a vacuum of from 20 to 40 mmHg for from 1 to 10 minutes.
13. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the holding treatment is carried out in water and is followed by the infusion step.
14. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the vegetable is selected from the group consisting of carrot, celery, bell pepper and tomato.
15. Dehydrated vegetable matter obtainable by the method of claim 1.
16. A dried food product reconstitutable with aqueous liquids comprising the dehydrated vegetable matter of claim 15.
17. A comestible product comprising the dehydrated vegetable matter of claim 15 in rehydrated form.
| 2534263 | December 1950 | Hills |
| 3904774 | September 1975 | Dymsza |
| 4330946 | May 25, 1982 | Courneya |
| 4361589 | November 30, 1982 | Wauters et al. |
| 4418083 | November 29, 1983 | McKinney et al. |
| 4542033 | September 17, 1985 | Agarwala |
| 4622757 | November 18, 1986 | Bernstein et al. |
| 4640020 | February 3, 1987 | Wear et al. |
| 4664924 | May 12, 1987 | Sugisawa et al. |
| 4746968 | May 24, 1988 | Wear et al. |
| 4889730 | December 26, 1989 | Roberts |
| 5000972 | March 19, 1991 | Nafisi-Movaghar |
| 5020237 | June 4, 1991 | Gross et al. |
| 5053232 | October 1, 1991 | Balestrieri et al. |
| 5113597 | May 19, 1992 | Sylla |
| 5135122 | August 4, 1992 | Gross et al. |
| 5380189 | January 10, 1995 | Clary et al. |
| 0221489 | October 1986 | EPX |
| 0337621 | March 1988 | EPX |
| 0404543 | June 1989 | EPX |
| 0413071 | August 1989 | EPX |
| 0407299 | July 1990 | EPX |
| 407299 | January 1991 | EPX |
| 413071 | February 1991 | EPX |
| 0546350 | November 1992 | EPX |
| 546350 | June 1993 | EPX |
| 2182234 | April 1973 | FRX |
| 2182234 | July 1973 | FRX |
| 2713935 | October 1977 | DEX |
| 1067967 | April 1965 | GBX |
| 1579392 | March 1976 | GBX |
- MIVAC, A Natural Food De-Hydration Process, Pitt-DesMoines, Inc. Sales Literature. MIVAC, Dried Foods Technology, Pitt-DesMoines, Inc. Sales Brochure. Microwave/Vacuum Convective Drying of Foodstuffs, by A. Heindl, W. Holley, D. Rehmann, Munich, pp. 1-14.
Type: Grant
Filed: May 31, 1996
Date of Patent: Jul 8, 1997
Assignee: CPC International Inc. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
Inventors: Persis Jebakumari Subramaniam (Surrey), Sylvia Anna Jones (London), Iain Cunningham Mutter Dea (Surrey)
Primary Examiner: Helen Pratt
Application Number: 8/656,596
International Classification: A23B 702; A23L 10524;
