Process for reducing the concentration of acetic acid in a crude alcohol product
A process for producing ethanol and, in particular, to a process for reducing the concentration of acetic acid in a crude ethanol product by esterifying unreacted acetic acid with an alcohol.
Latest Celanese International Corporation Patents:
The present invention relates generally to processes for producing alcohol and, in particular, to a process for reducing the concentration of acetic acid in a crude ethanol product.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONEthanol for industrial use is conventionally produced from petrochemical feed stocks, such as oil, natural gas, or coal, from feed stock intermediates, such as syngas, or from starchy materials or cellulose materials, such as corn or sugar cane. Conventional methods for producing ethanol from petrochemical feed stocks, as well as from cellulose materials, include the acid-catalyzed hydration of ethylene, methanol homologation, direct alcohol synthesis, and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Instability in petrochemical feed stock prices contributes to fluctuations in the cost of conventionally produced ethanol, making the need for alternative sources of ethanol production all the greater when feed stock prices rise. Starchy materials, as well as cellulose material, are converted to ethanol by fermentation. However, fermentation is typically used for consumer production of ethanol, which is suitable for fuels or human consumption. In addition, fermentation of starchy or cellulose materials competes with food sources and places restraints on the amount of ethanol that can be produced for industrial use.
Ethanol production via the reduction of alkanoic acids and/or other carbonyl group-containing compounds has been widely studied, and a variety of combinations of catalysts, supports, and operating conditions have been mentioned in the literature. During the reduction of alkanoic acid, e.g., acetic acid, other compounds are formed with ethanol or are formed in side reactions. These impurities limit the production and recovery of ethanol from such reaction mixtures. For example, during hydrogenation, esters are produced that together with ethanol and/or water form azeotropes, which are difficult to separate.
EP02060553 describes a process for converting hydrocarbons to ethanol involving converting the hydrocarbons to ethanoic acid and hydrogenating the ethanoic acid to ethanol. The stream from the hydrogenation reactor is separated to obtain an ethanol stream and a stream of acetic acid and ethyl acetate, which is recycled to the hydrogenation reactor.
In addition, when conversion is incomplete, unreacted acid remains in the crude ethanol product, which must be removed to recover ethanol. Other processes, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,599,976, involve a process for treating aqueous streams comprising up to 50 wt. % acetic acid in a catalytic distillation unit to react the acetic acid with methanol to form recyclable methyl acetate and water.
The need remains for improving the recovery of ethanol from a crude product obtained by reducing alkanoic acids, such as acetic acid, and/or other carbonyl group-containing compounds.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONIn a first embodiment, the present invention is directed to a process for reducing the concentration of acetic acid from an ethanol production process, comprising the steps of hydrogenating acetic acid in a reactor to form a crude ethanol product comprising ethanol, acetic acid, and water, separating at least a portion of the crude ethanol product in a first column into a first distillate comprising ethanol and a first residue stream comprising acetic acid and water, and reacting the acetic acid from the first residue with at least one alcohol in a reactive distillation column to produce a second distillate comprising at least one ester and a second residue comprising water.
In a second embodiment, the present invention is directed to a process for reducing the concentration of acetic acid from an ethanol production process, comprising the steps of hydrogenating acetic acid in a reactor to form a crude ethanol product comprising ethanol, acetic acid, and water, separating at least a portion of the crude ethanol product in a first column into a first distillate comprising ethanol and a first residue stream comprising acetic acid and water, reacting the acetic acid from the first residue with at least one alcohol in an esterification unit to produce at least one ester and water, and separating the at least one ester from the water to produce an ester product stream comprising the at least one ester and a second residue comprising water.
The invention is described in detail below with reference to the appended drawings, wherein like numerals designate similar parts.
Introduction
The present invention relates to processes for recovering alcohols, in particular ethanol produced by hydrogenating acetic acid in the presence of a catalyst. The hydrogenation reaction produces a crude ethanol product that comprises ethanol, water, ethyl acetate, unreacted acetic acid, and other impurities. To improve operating efficiencies, the processes of the present invention involve separating the crude ethanol product into a dilute acid stream (also hereinafter referred to as “a first residue stream”) comprising water and unreacted acetic acid and an ethanol product stream. While it may be possible to separate acetic acid from the dilute acid stream, it may be more beneficial to recover the acetic acid by reacting it with one or more alcohols to form one or more ester products. The resulting ester product(s) beneficially may be easier to separate from the water in the dilute acid stream, than acetic acid, resulting in an overall improved separation process. Additionally, the ester product(s) may be further processed and/or refined, and then recycled to the reaction process or to another reaction process such as an acetic acid production facility, an esters plant, or a hydrogenolysis unit.
Recovery of acetic acid from the dilute acid stream through an ester intermediate according to the processes of the present invention may be desirable when the dilute acid stream comprises from about 2 to about 60 wt. % acetic acid, although the present invention is not limited to such dilute acid streams. At lower concentrations, it may be preferred to neutralize and dispose of the dilute acid stream in a waste water treatment system. At greater concentrations, it may be preferred to recycle the acetic acid to the reaction process, optionally after removing some or all of the water therefrom.
In one embodiment, substantially all of the unreacted acetic acid is recovered in the dilute acid stream. By removing substantially all of the unreacted acetic acid from the crude ethanol product, the process, in some aspects, advantageously does not require further separation of acetic acid from the ethanol product stream. In this aspect, the ethanol product stream may contain some acetic acid, preferably in an amount less than 0.2 wt. %, less than 0.1 wt. % or less than 0.05 wt. %, and preferably only a trace amounts of acetic acid, such as an amount less than 100 wppm, less than 75 wppm or less than 50 wppm.
In some embodiments, the dilute acid stream is substantially free of ethanol or ethyl acetate. In this aspect, for example, the dilute acid stream may comprise less than 1 wt. % ethanol or ethyl acetate, collectively, e.g., less than 0.005 wt. %.
According to embodiments of the present invention, the acetic acid present in the dilute acid stream is reacted with an alcohol stream, e.g., comprising methanol and/or ethanol, in an esterification unit to produce at least one ester and water, and separating the at least one ester from the water to produce an ester product stream comprising the at least one ester and a residue stream comprising water.
An esterification unit of the present invention comprises a reaction zone and a separation zone. In some embodiments, an esterification unit comprises a reactor coupled to one or more distillation columns. In other embodiments, the esterification unit comprises a reactive distillation column (also referred to herein as the second column) comprising a reaction section and a distillation section, to produce a distillate stream comprising at least one ester and a residue stream comprising water.
As indicated above, acetic acid from the dilute acid stream is reacted with one or more alcohols to form at least one ester. In some embodiments, the alcohol fed to the esterification unit is selected from the group consisting of methanol, ethanol, propanol, butanol, pentanol, and isomers and mixtures thereof. The alcohol is preferably fed to the esterification unit in a counter-current flow to the dilute acid stream to facilitate the production of the ester product(s). In some embodiments, the resulting ester is selected from the group consisting of methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, butyl acetate, pentyl acetate, and isomers and mixtures thereof. The one or more esters produced by the process preferably correspond to the one or more alcohols that are fed to the esterification unit. For example, when methanol is fed to the esterfication unit, the methanol is reacted with acetic acid in the dilute acid stream to produce methyl acetate. In another embodiment, ethanol is reacted with acetic acid in the dilute acid stream to produce ethyl acetate.
The process parameters for the esterification step may vary widely depending, for example, on the catalyst employed and the ester being formed. In one embodiment, the esterification unit operates a base temperature of from 100° C. to 150° C., e.g., from 100° C. to 130° C., or from 100° C. to 120° C. In terms of pressure, the esterification unit may be operated at atmospheric pressure, subatmospheric pressure, or superatmospheric pressure. For example, in some embodiments, the reactive distillation column operates at a pressure of from 50 kPa to 500 kPa, e.g., from 50 kPa to 400 kPa, or from 50 kPa to 200 kPa.
The feed rate of the dilute acid stream to the esterification unit may be adjusted based on the mole ratio of acetic acid to alcohol being fed to the esterification unit. For example, in some embodiments, the mole ratio of acetic acid to alcohol fed to the esterification unit is from 1:1 to 1:15, e.g., from 1:1 to 1:5, or from 1:1 to 1:2.
In some embodiments, the process further comprises reducing the at least one ester in the ester product stream to provide an alcohol product stream. A portion of the alcohol product stream may then be recycled to the crude ethanol product, reacted with the acetic acid from the dilute acid stream, or a combination thereof.
By removing a relatively large portion of the acetic acid from the crude ethanol product, in one embodiment, the process beneficially reduces the energy required for additional acetic acid removal steps since less acetic acid will be contained in the ethanol-containing distillate of the first column.
Hydrogenation of Acetic Acid
The process of the present invention may be used with any hydrogenation process for producing ethanol. The materials, catalysts, reaction conditions, and separation processes that may be used in the hydrogenation of acetic acid are described further below.
The raw materials, acetic acid and hydrogen, used in connection with the process of this invention may be derived from any suitable source including natural gas, petroleum, coal, biomass, and so forth. As examples, acetic acid may be produced via methanol carbonylation, acetaldehyde oxidation, ethylene oxidation, oxidative fermentation, and anaerobic fermentation. Methanol carbonylation processes suitable for production of acetic acid are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,208,624; 7,115,772; 7,005,541; 6,657,078; 6,627,770; 6,143,930; 5,599,976; 5,144,068; 5,026,908; 5,001,259; and 4,994,608, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Optionally, the production of ethanol may be integrated with such methanol carbonylation processes.
As petroleum and natural gas prices fluctuate becoming either more or less expensive, methods for producing acetic acid and intermediates such as methanol and carbon monoxide from alternate carbon sources have drawn increasing interest. In particular, when petroleum is relatively expensive, it may become advantageous to produce acetic acid from synthesis gas (“syngas”) that is derived from more available carbon sources. U.S. Pat. No. 6,232,352, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference, for example, teaches a method of retrofitting a methanol plant for the manufacture of acetic acid. By retrofitting a methanol plant, the large capital costs associated with CO generation for a new acetic acid plant are significantly reduced or largely eliminated. All or part of the syngas is diverted from the methanol synthesis loop and supplied to a separator unit to recover CO, which is then used to produce acetic acid. In a similar manner, hydrogen for the hydrogenation step may be supplied from syngas.
In some embodiments, some or all of the raw materials for the above-described acetic acid hydrogenation process may be derived partially or entirely from syngas. For example, the acetic acid may be formed from methanol and carbon monoxide, both of which may be derived from syngas. The syngas may be formed by partial oxidation reforming or steam reforming, and the carbon monoxide may be separated from syngas. Similarly, hydrogen that is used in the step of hydrogenating the acetic acid to form the crude ethanol product may be separated from syngas. The syngas, in turn, may be derived from variety of carbon sources. The carbon source, for example, may be selected from the group consisting of natural gas, oil, petroleum, coal, biomass, and combinations thereof. Syngas or hydrogen may also be obtained from bio-derived methane gas, such as bio-derived methane gas produced by landfills or agricultural waste.
In another embodiment, the acetic acid used in the hydrogenation step may be formed from the fermentation of biomass. The fermentation process preferably utilizes an acetogenic process or a homoacetogenic microorganism to ferment sugars to acetic acid producing little, if any, carbon dioxide as a by-product. The carbon efficiency for the fermentation process preferably is greater than 70%, greater than 80% or greater than 90% as compared to conventional yeast processing, which typically has a carbon efficiency of about 67%. Optionally, the microorganism employed in the fermentation process is of a genus selected from the group consisting of Clostridium, Lactobacillus, Moorella, Thermoanaerobacter, Propionibacterium, Propionispera, Anaerobiospirillum, and Bacteriodes, and in particular, species selected from the group consisting of Clostridium formicoaceticum, Clostridium butyricum, Moorella thermoacetica, Thermoanaerobacter kivui, Lactobacillus delbrukii, Propionibacterium acidipropionici, Propionispera arboris, Anaerobiospirillum succinicproducens, Bacteriodes amylophilus and Bacteriodes ruminicola. Optionally in this process, all or a portion of the unfermented residue from the biomass, e.g., lignans, may be gasified to form hydrogen that may be used in the hydrogenation step of the present invention. Exemplary fermentation processes for forming acetic acid are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,509,180; 6,927,048; 7,074,603; 7,507,562; 7,351,559; 7,601,865; 7,682,812; and 7,888,082, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference. See also U.S. Pub. Nos. 2008/0193989 and 2009/0281354, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Examples of biomass include, but are not limited to, agricultural wastes, forest products, grasses, and other cellulosic material, timber harvesting residues, softwood chips, hardwood chips, tree branches, tree stumps, leaves, bark, sawdust, off-spec paper pulp, corn, corn stover, wheat straw, rice straw, sugarcane bagasse, switchgrass, miscanthus, animal manure, municipal garbage, municipal sewage, commercial waste, grape pumice, almond shells, pecan shells, coconut shells, coffee grounds, grass pellets, hay pellets, wood pellets, cardboard, paper, plastic, and cloth. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 7,884,253, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. Another biomass source is black liquor, a thick, dark liquid that is a byproduct of the Kraft process for transforming wood into pulp, which is then dried to make paper. Black liquor is an aqueous solution of lignin residues, hemicellulose, and inorganic chemicals.
U.S. Pat. No. RE 35,377, also incorporated herein by reference, provides a method for the production of methanol by conversion of carbonaceous materials such as oil, coal, natural gas and biomass materials. The process includes hydrogasification of solid and/or liquid carbonaceous materials to obtain a process gas which is steam pyrolized with additional natural gas to form synthesis gas. The syngas is converted to methanol which may be carbonylated to acetic acid. The method likewise produces hydrogen which may be used in connection with this invention as noted above. U.S. Pat. No. 5,821,111, which discloses a process for converting waste biomass through gasification into synthesis gas, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,685,754, which discloses a method for the production of a hydrogen-containing gas composition, such as a synthesis gas including hydrogen and carbon monoxide, are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The acetic acid fed to the hydrogenation reaction may also comprise other carboxylic acids and anhydrides, as well as acetaldehyde and acetone. Preferably, a suitable acetic acid feed stream comprises one or more of the compounds selected from the group consisting of acetic acid, acetic anhydride, acetaldehyde, ethyl acetate, and mixtures thereof. These other compounds may also be hydrogenated in the processes of the present invention. In some embodiments, the presence of carboxylic acids, such as propanoic acid or its anhydride, may be beneficial in producing propanol. Water may also be present in the acetic acid feed.
Alternatively, acetic acid in vapor form may be taken directly as crude product from the flash vessel of a methanol carbonylation unit of the class described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,657,078, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. The crude vapor product, for example, may be fed directly to the ethanol synthesis reaction zones of the present invention without the need for condensing the acetic acid and light ends or removing water, saving overall processing costs.
The acetic acid may be vaporized at the reaction temperature, following which the vaporized acetic acid may be fed along with hydrogen in an undiluted state or diluted with a relatively inert carrier gas, such as nitrogen, argon, helium, carbon dioxide and the like. For reactions run in the vapor phase, the temperature should be controlled in the system such that it does not fall below the dew point of acetic acid. In one embodiment, the acetic acid may be vaporized at the boiling point of acetic acid at the particular pressure, and then the vaporized acetic acid may be further heated to the reactor inlet temperature. In another embodiment, the acetic acid is mixed with other gases before vaporizing, followed by heating the mixed vapors up to the reactor inlet temperature. Preferably, the acetic acid is transferred to the vapor state by passing hydrogen and/or recycle gas through the acetic acid at a temperature at or below 125° C., followed by heating of the combined gaseous stream to the reactor inlet temperature.
Some embodiments of the process of hydrogenating acetic acid to form ethanol may include a variety of configurations using a fixed bed reactor or a fluidized bed reactor. In many embodiments of the present invention, an “adiabatic” reactor can be used; that is, there is little or no need for internal plumbing through the reaction zone to add or remove heat. In other embodiments, a radial flow reactor or reactors may be employed, or a series of reactors may be employed with or without heat exchange, quenching, or introduction of additional feed material. Alternatively, a shell and tube reactor provided with a heat transfer medium may be used. In many cases, the reaction zone may be housed in a single vessel or in a series of vessels with heat exchangers therebetween.
In preferred embodiments, the catalyst is employed in a fixed bed reactor, e.g., in the shape of a pipe or tube, where the reactants, typically in the vapor form, are passed over or through the catalyst. Other reactors, such as fluid or ebullient bed reactors, can be employed. In some instances, the hydrogenation catalysts may be used in conjunction with an inert material to regulate the pressure drop of the reactant stream through the catalyst bed and the contact time of the reactant compounds with the catalyst particles.
The hydrogenation reaction may be carried out in either the liquid phase or vapor phase. Preferably, the reaction is carried out in the vapor phase under the following conditions. The reaction temperature may range from 125° C. to 350° C., e.g., from 200° C. to 325° C., from 225° C. to 300° C., or from 250° C. to 300° C. The pressure may range from 10 kPa to 3000 kPa, e.g., from 50 kPa to 2300 kPa, or from 100 kPa to 1500 kPa. The reactants may be fed to the reactor at a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of greater than 500 hr−1, e.g., greater than 1000 hr−1, greater than 2500 hr−1 or even greater than 5000 hr−1. In terms of ranges the GHSV may range from 50 hr−1 to 50,000 hr−1, e.g., from 500 hr−1 to 30,000 hr−1, from 1000 hr−1 to 10,000 hr−1, or from 1000 hr−1 to 6500 hr−1.
The hydrogenation optionally is carried out at a pressure just sufficient to overcome the pressure drop across the catalytic bed at the GHSV selected, although there is no bar to the use of higher pressures, it being understood that considerable pressure drop through the reactor bed may be experienced at high space velocities, e.g., 5000 hr−1 or 6,500 hr−1.
Although the reaction consumes two moles of hydrogen per mole of acetic acid to produce one mole of ethanol, the actual molar ratio of hydrogen to acetic acid in the feed stream may vary from about 100:1 to 1:100, e.g., from 50:1 to 1:50, from 20:1 to 1:2, or from 12:1 to 1:1. Most preferably, the molar ratio of hydrogen to acetic acid is greater than 2:1, e.g., greater than 4:1 or greater than 8:1.
Contact or residence time can also vary widely, depending upon such variables as amount of acetic acid, catalyst, reactor, temperature, and pressure. Typical contact times range from a fraction of a second to more than several hours when a catalyst system other than a fixed bed is used, with preferred contact times, at least for vapor phase reactions, of from 0.1 to 100 seconds, e.g., from 0.3 to 80 seconds or from 0.4 to 30 seconds.
The hydrogenation of acetic acid to form ethanol is preferably conducted in the presence of a hydrogenation catalyst. Suitable hydrogenation catalysts include catalysts comprising a first metal and optionally one or more of a second metal, a third metal or any number of additional metals, optionally on a catalyst support. The first and optional second and third metals may be selected from Group IB, IIB, IIIB, IVB, VB, VIIB, VIIB, VIII transition metals, a lanthanide metal, an actinide metal or a metal selected from any of Groups IIIA, IVA, VA, and VIA. Preferred metal combinations for some exemplary catalyst compositions include platinum/tin, platinum/ruthenium, platinum/rhenium, palladium/ruthenium, palladium/rhenium, cobalt/palladium, cobalt/platinum, cobalt/chromium, cobalt/ruthenium, cobalt/tin, silver/palladium, copper/palladium, copper/zinc, nickel/palladium, gold/palladium, ruthenium/rhenium, and ruthenium/iron. Exemplary catalysts are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,608,744 and U.S. Pub. No. 2010/0029995, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference. In another embodiment, the catalyst comprises a Co/Mo/S catalyst of the type described in U.S. Pub. No. 2009/0069609, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In one embodiment, the catalyst comprises a first metal selected from the group consisting of copper, iron, cobalt, nickel, ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, osmium, iridium, platinum, titanium, zinc, chromium, rhenium, molybdenum, and tungsten. Preferably, the first metal is selected from the group consisting of platinum, palladium, cobalt, nickel, and ruthenium. More preferably, the first metal is selected from platinum and palladium. In embodiments of the invention where the first metal comprises platinum, it is preferred that the catalyst comprises platinum in an amount less than 5 wt. %, e.g., less than 3 wt. % or less than 1 wt. %, due to the high commercial demand for platinum.
As indicated above, in some embodiments, the catalyst further comprises a second metal, which typically would function as a promoter. If present, the second metal preferably is selected from the group consisting of copper, molybdenum, tin, chromium, iron, cobalt, vanadium, tungsten, palladium, platinum, lanthanum, cerium, manganese, ruthenium, rhenium, gold, and nickel. More preferably, the second metal is selected from the group consisting of copper, tin, cobalt, rhenium, and nickel. More preferably, the second metal is selected from tin and rhenium.
In certain embodiments where the catalyst includes two or more metals, e.g., a first metal and a second metal, the first metal is present in the catalyst in an amount from 0.1 to 10 wt. %, e.g., from 0.1 to 5 wt. %, or from 0.1 to 3 wt. %. The second metal preferably is present in an amount from 0.1 to 20 wt. %, e.g., from 0.1 to 10 wt. %, or from 0.1 to 5 wt. %. For catalysts comprising two or more metals, the two or more metals may be alloyed with one another or may comprise a non-alloyed metal solution or mixture.
The preferred metal ratios may vary depending on the metals used in the catalyst. In some exemplary embodiments, the mole ratio of the first metal to the second metal is from 10:1 to 1:10, e.g., from 4:1 to 1:4, from 2:1 to 1:2, from 1.5:1 to 1:1.5 or from 1.1:1 to 1:1.1.
The catalyst may also comprise a third metal selected from any of the metals listed above in connection with the first or second metal, so long as the third metal is different from the first and second metals. In preferred aspects, the third metal is selected from the group consisting of cobalt, palladium, ruthenium, copper, zinc, platinum, tin, and rhenium. More preferably, the third metal is selected from cobalt, palladium, and ruthenium. When present, the total weight of the third metal preferably is from 0.05 to 4 wt. %, e.g., from 0.1 to 3 wt. %, or from 0.1 to 2 wt. %.
In addition to one or more metals, in some embodiments of the present invention the catalysts further comprise a support or a modified support. As used herein, the term “modified support” refers to a support that includes a support material and a support modifier, which adjusts the acidity of the support material.
The total weight of the support or modified support, based on the total weight of the catalyst, preferably is from 75 to 99.9 wt. %, e.g., from 78 to 97 wt. %, or from 80 to 95 wt. %. In preferred embodiments that utilize a modified support, the support modifier is present in an amount from 0.1 to 50 wt. %, e.g., from 0.2 to 25 wt. %, from 0.5 to 15 wt. %, or from 1 to 8 wt. %, based on the total weight of the catalyst. The metals of the catalysts may be dispersed throughout the support, layered throughout the support, coated on the outer surface of the support (i.e., egg shell), or decorated on the surface of the support.
As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, support materials are selected such that the catalyst system is suitably active, selective and robust under the process conditions employed for the formation of ethanol.
Suitable support materials may include, for example, stable metal oxide-based supports or ceramic-based supports. Preferred supports include silicaceous supports, such as silica, silica/alumina, a Group IIA silicate such as calcium metasilicate, pyrogenic silica, high purity silica, and mixtures thereof. Other supports may include, but are not limited to, iron oxide, alumina, titania, zirconia, magnesium oxide, carbon, graphite, high surface area graphitized carbon, activated carbons, and mixtures thereof.
As indicated, the catalyst support may be modified with a support modifier. In some embodiments, the support modifier may be an acidic modifier that increases the acidity of the catalyst. Suitable acidic support modifiers may be selected from the group consisting of: oxides of Group IVB metals, oxides of Group VB metals, oxides of Group VIB metals, oxides of Group VIIB metals, oxides of Group VIIIB metals, aluminum oxides, and mixtures thereof. Acidic support modifiers include those selected from the group consisting of TiO2, ZrO2, Nb2O5, Ta2O5, Al2O3, B2O3, P2O5, and Sb2O3. Preferred acidic support modifiers include those selected from the group consisting of TiO2, ZrO2, Nb2O5, Ta2O5, and Al2O3. The acidic modifier may also include WO3, MoO3, Fe2O3, Cr2O3, V2O5, MnO2, CuO, Co2O3, or Bi2O3.
In another embodiment, the support modifier may be a basic modifier that has a low volatility or no volatility. Such basic modifiers, for example, may be selected from the group consisting of: (i) alkaline earth oxides, (ii) alkali metal oxides, (iii) alkaline earth metal metasilicates, (iv) alkali metal metasilicates, (v) Group IIB metal oxides, (vi) Group IIB metal metasilicates, (vii) Group IIIB metal oxides, (viii) Group IIIB metal metasilicates, and mixtures thereof. In addition to oxides and metasilicates, other types of modifiers including nitrates, nitrites, acetates, and lactates may be used. Preferably, the support modifier is selected from the group consisting of oxides and metasilicates of any of sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, scandium, yttrium, and zinc, as well as mixtures of any of the foregoing. More preferably, the basic support modifier is a calcium silicate, and even more preferably calcium metasilicate (CaSiO3). If the basic support modifier comprises calcium metasilicate, it is preferred that at least a portion of the calcium metasilicate is in crystalline form.
A preferred silica support material is SS61138 High Surface Area (HSA) Silica Catalyst Carrier from Saint Gobain N or Pro. The Saint-Gobain N or Pro SS61138 silica exhibits the following properties: contains approximately 95 wt. % high surface area silica; surface area of about 250 m2/g; median pore diameter of about 12 nm; average pore volume of about 1.0 cm3/g as measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry and a packing density of about 0.352 g/cm3 (22 lb/ft3).
A preferred silica/alumina support material is KA-160 silica spheres from Sud Chemie having a nominal diameter of about 5 mm, a density of about 0.562 g/ml, an absorptivity of about 0.583 g H2O/g support, a surface area of about 160 to 175 m2/g, and a pore volume of about 0.68 ml/g.
The catalyst compositions suitable for use with the present invention preferably are formed through metal impregnation of the modified support, although other processes such as chemical vapor deposition may also be employed. Such impregnation techniques are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,608,744 and 7,863,489 and U.S. Pub. No. 2010/0197485 referred to above, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In particular, the hydrogenation of acetic acid may achieve favorable conversion of acetic acid and favorable selectivity and productivity to ethanol. For purposes of the present invention, the term “conversion” refers to the amount of acetic acid in the feed that is converted to a compound other than acetic acid. Conversion is expressed as a mole percentage based on acetic acid in the feed. The conversion may be at least 10%, e.g., at least 20%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70% or at least 80%. Although catalysts that have high conversions are desirable, such as at least 80% or at least 90%, in some embodiments a low conversion may be acceptable at high selectivity for ethanol. It is, of course, well understood that in many cases, it is possible to compensate for conversion by appropriate recycle streams or use of larger reactors, but it is more difficult to compensate for poor selectivity.
Selectivity is expressed as a mole percent based on converted acetic acid. It should be understood that each compound converted from acetic acid has an independent selectivity and that selectivity is independent from conversion. For example, if 60 mole % of the converted acetic acid is converted to ethanol, we refer to the ethanol selectivity as 60%. Preferably, the catalyst selectivity to ethoxylates is at least 60%, e.g., at least 70%, or at least 80%. As used herein, the term “ethoxylates” refers specifically to the compounds ethanol, acetaldehyde, and ethyl acetate. Preferably, the selectivity to ethanol is at least 80%, e.g., at least 85% or at least 88%. Preferred embodiments of the hydrogenation process also have low selectivity to undesirable products, such as methane, ethane, and carbon dioxide. The selectivity to these undesirable products preferably is less than 4%, e.g., less than 2% or less than 1%. More preferably, these undesirable products are present in undetectable amounts. Formation of alkanes may be low, and ideally less than 2%, less than 1%, or less than 0.5% of the acetic acid passed over the catalyst is converted to alkanes, which have little value other than as fuel.
The teem “productivity,” as used herein, refers to the grams of a specified product, e.g., ethanol, formed during the hydrogenation based on the kilograms of catalyst used per hour. A productivity of at least 100 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour, e.g., at least 400 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour or at least 600 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour, is preferred. In terms of ranges, the productivity preferably is from 100 to 3,000 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour, e.g., from 400 to 2,500 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour or from 600 to 2,000 grams of ethanol per kilogram of catalyst per hour.
Operating under the conditions of the present invention may result in ethanol production on the order of at least 0.1 tons of ethanol per hour, e.g., at least 1 ton of ethanol per hour, at least 5 tons of ethanol per hour, or at least 10 tons of ethanol per hour. Larger scale industrial production of ethanol, depending on the scale, generally should be at least 1 ton of ethanol per hour, e.g., at least 15 tons of ethanol per hour or at least 30 tons of ethanol per hour. In terms of ranges, for large scale industrial production of ethanol, the process of the present invention may produce from 0.1 to 160 tons of ethanol per hour, e.g., from 15 to 160 tons of ethanol per hour or from 30 to 80 tons of ethanol per hour. Ethanol production from fermentation, due the economies of scale, typically does not permit the single facility ethanol production that may be achievable by employing embodiments of the present invention.
In various embodiments of the present invention, the crude ethanol product produced by the hydrogenation process, before any subsequent processing, such as purification and separation, will typically comprise unreacted acetic acid, ethanol and water. As used herein, the term “crude ethanol product” refers to any composition comprising from 5 to 70 wt. % ethanol and from 5 to 40 wt. % water. Exemplary compositional ranges for the crude ethanol product are provided in Table 1. The “others” identified in Table 1 may include; for example, esters, ethers, aldehydes, ketones, alkanes, and carbon dioxide.
In one embodiment, the crude ethanol product comprises acetic acid in an amount less than 20 wt. %, e.g., less than 15 wt. %, less than 10 wt. % or less than 5 wt. %. In embodiments having lower amounts of acetic acid, the conversion of acetic acid is preferably greater than 75%, e.g., greater than 85% or greater than 90%. In addition, the selectivity to ethanol may also be preferably high, and is preferably greater than 75%, e.g., greater than 85% or greater than 90%.
Ethanol Recovery
Exemplary ethanol recovery systems having esterification units in accordance with embodiments of the present invention are shown in
Hydrogen and acetic acid are fed to a vaporizer 108 via lines 104 and 105, respectively, to create a vapor feed stream in line 109 that is directed to reactor 103. In one embodiment, lin es 104 and 105 may be combined and jointly fed to the vaporizer 108. The temperature of the vapor feed stream in line 109 is preferably from 100° C. to 350° C., e.g., from 120° C. to 310° C. or from 150° C. to 300° C. Any feed that is not vaporized is removed from vaporizer 108 and may be recycled or discarded thereto. In addition, although line 109 is shown as being directed to the top of reactor 103, line 109 may be directed to the side, upper portion, or bottom of reactor 103. Further modifications and additional components to reaction zone 101 and separation zone 102 are described below.
Reactor 103 contains the catalyst that is used in the hydrogenation of the carboxylic acid, preferably acetic acid, to make ethanol. In one embodiment, one or more guard beds (not shown) may be used upstream of the reactor, optionally upstream of vaporizer 108, to protect the catalyst from poisons or undesirable impurities contained in the feed or return/recycle streams. Such guard beds may be employed in the vapor or liquid streams. Suitable guard bed materials may include, for example, carbon, silica, alumina, ceramic, or resins. In one aspect, the guard bed media is functionalized, e.g., silver functionalized, to trap particular species such as sulfur or halogens. During the hydrogenation process, a crude ethanol product stream is withdrawn, preferably continuously, from reactor 103 via line 110.
The crude ethanol product stream in line 110 may be condensed and fed to a separator 106, which, in turn, forms a vapor stream 111 and a liquid stream 112. The separator 106 may comprise a flasher or a knockout pot. The separator 106 may operate at a temperature of from 20° C. to 250° C., e.g., from 30° C. to 225° C. or from 60° C. to 200° C. The pressure of separator 106 may be from 50 kPa to 2000 kPa, e.g., from 75 kPa to 1500 kPa or from 100 kPa to 1000 kPa. Optionally, the crude ethanol product in line 110 may pass through one or more membranes to separate hydrogen and/or other non-condensable gases prior to entering separator 106.
The vapor stream 111 exiting separator 106 may comprise hydrogen and hydrocarbons, and may be purged and/or returned to reaction zone 101. As shown, vapor stream 111 is combined with the hydrogen feed 104 and co-fed to vaporizer 108. In some embodiments, the returned vapor stream 111 may be compressed before being combined with hydrogen feed 104.
The liquid stream 112 from separator 106 is withdrawn and pumped to the side of first column 107, also referred to as an “acid separation column.” In one embodiment, the contents of liquid stream 112 are substantially similar to the crude ethanol product obtained from the reactor, except that the composition has been depleted of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, methane and/or ethane, which are preferably removed by the separator 106. Accordingly, liquid stream 112 may also be referred to as a crude ethanol product. Exemplary components of liquid stream 112 are provided in Table 2. It should be understood that liquid stream 112 may contain other components, not listed in Table 2.
The amounts indicated as less than (<) in the tables throughout present specification are preferably not present and if present may be present in trace amounts or in amounts greater than 0.0001 wt. %.
The “other esters” in Table 2 may include, but are not limited to, ethyl propionate, methyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, n-propyl acetate, n-butyl acetate or mixtures thereof. The “other ethers” in Table 2 may include, but are not limited to, diethyl ether, methyl ethyl ether, isobutyl ethyl ether or mixtures thereof. The “other alcohols” in Table 2 may include, but are not limited to, methanol, isopropanol, n-propanol, n-butanol or mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the liquid stream 112 may comprise propanol, e.g., isopropanol and/or n-propanol, in an amount from 0.001 to 0.1 wt. %, from 0.001 to 0.05 wt. % or from 0.001 to 0.03 wt. %. In should be understood that these other components may be carried through in any of the distillate or residue streams described herein and will not be further described herein, unless indicated otherwise.
Liquid stream 112 is introduced in the middle portion of first column 107. In first column 107, water and unreacted acetic acid, along with any other heavy components, if present, are removed from liquid stream 112 and are withdrawn, preferably continuously, as a first residue in line 113. First column 107 also forms a first distillate, which is withdrawn in line 114, and which may be condensed and refluxed, for example, at a ratio of from 10:1 to 1:10, e.g., from 3:1 to 1:3 or from 1:2 to 2:1.
When column 107 is operated under about 170 kPa, the temperature of the residue exiting in line 113 preferably is from 90° C. to 130° C., e.g., from 95° C. to 120° C. or from 100° C. to 115° C. The base of first column 107 may be maintained at a relatively low temperature to withdraw a first residue stream 113 comprising both water and acetic acid, thereby providing an energy efficiency advantage. The temperature of the first distillate 114 exiting in line 114 preferably is from 60° C. to 90° C., e.g., from 65° C. to 85° C. or from 70° C. to 80° C. In some embodiments, the pressure of first column 107 may range from 0.1 kPa to 510 kPa, e.g., from 1 kPa to 475 kPa or from 1 kPa to 375 kPa. Exemplary compositions for the first distillate 114 and first residue 113 streams for first column 107 are provided in Table 3 below. It should also be understood that the first distillate and first residue may also contain other components, not listed in Table 3. For convenience, the distillate and residue of the first column may also be referred to as the “first distillate” or “first residue.” The distillates or residues of the other columns may also be referred to with similar numeric modifiers (second, third, etc.) in order to distinguish them from one another, but such modifiers should not be construed as requiring any particular separation order.
In one embodiment, at high conversions of greater than 95%, the acetic acid concentration in the residue may be less than 20 wt. %, e.g., from 0.5 to 15 wt. % or from 1 to 5 wt. %.
Some species, such as acetals, may decompose in column 107 such that very low amounts, or even no detectable amounts, of acetals remain in the distillate or residue. In addition, a non-catalyzed equilibrium reaction between acetic acid and ethanol or between ethyl acetate and water may occur in the crude ethanol product after it exits reactor 103. Depending on the concentration of acetic acid in the crude ethanol product, this equilibrium may be driven toward formation of ethyl acetate. This equilibrium may be regulated using the residence time and/or temperature of crude ethanol product.
In some embodiments of the present invention the first distillate in line 114 may further comprise ethyl acetate and acetaldehyde. As shown in
In
Optionally, the third column may be an extractive distillation column. Suitable extractive agents may include, for example, dimethylsulfoxide, glycerine, diethylene glycol, 1-naphthol, hydroquinone, N,N′-dimethylformamide, 1,4-butanediol; ethylene glycol-1,5-pentanediol; propylene glycol-tetraethylene glycol-polyethylene glycol; glycerine-propylene glycol-tetraethylene glycol-1,4-butanediol, ethyl ether, methyl formate, cyclohexane, N,N′-dimethyl-1,3-propanediamine, N,N′-dimethylethylenediamine, diethylene triamine, hexamethylene diamine and 1,3-diaminopentane, an alkylated thiopene, dodecane, tridecane, tetradecane, chlorinated paraffins, or a combination thereof. In another aspect, the extractive agent may be an aqueous stream comprising water. If the extraction agent comprises water, the water may be obtained from an external source or from an internal return/recycle line from one or more of the other columns. Generally, the extractive agent is fed above the entry point of the first distillate in line 114. When extractive agents are used, a suitable recovery system, such as a further distillation column, may be used to remove the extractive agent and recycle the extractive agent.
Although the temperature and pressure of third column 115 may vary, when at about 20 kPa to 70 kPa, the temperature of the third residue exiting in line 116 preferably is from 40° C. to 100° C., e.g., from 60° C. to 85° C. or from 75° C. to 100° C. The temperature of the third distillate exiting in line 117 preferably is from 30° C. to 55° C., e.g., from 35° C. to 60° C. or from 45° C. to 55° C. Third column 115 may operate at a reduced pressure, near or at vacuum conditions, to further favor separation of ethyl acetate and ethanol. In other embodiments, the pressure of third column 115 may range from 20 kPa to 510 kPa, e.g., from 70 kPa to 475 kPa or from 100 kPa to 375 kPa. Exemplary components for the distillate and residue compositions for the third column 115 are provided in Table 4, below. It should be understood that the distillate and residue may also contain other components, not listed in Table 4.
The weight ratio of ethanol in the third residue to ethanol in the third distillate preferably is at least 2:1, e.g., at least 5:1, at least 8:1, at least 10:1 or at least 15:1. The weight ratio of ethyl acetate in the third residue to ethyl acetate in the third distillate preferably is less than 0.4:1, e.g., less than 0.2:1 or less than 0.1:1. It should be understood that when an extractive agent is used, the composition of the third residue would also include the extractive agent.
The columns shown in
The associated condensers and liquid separation vessels that may be employed with each of the distillation columns may be of any conventional design and are simplified in the figures. Heat may be supplied to the base of each column or to a circulating bottom stream through a heat exchanger or reboiler. Other types of reboilers, such as internal reboilers, may also be used. The heat that is provided to the reboilers may be derived from any heat generated during the process that is integrated with the reboilers or from an external source such as another heat generating chemical process or a boiler. Although one reactor and one flasher are shown in the figures, additional reactors, flashers, condensers, heating elements, and other components may be used in various embodiments of the present invention. As will be recognized by those skilled in the art, various condensers, pumps, compressors, reboilers, drums, valves, connectors, separation vessels, etc., normally employed in carrying out chemical processes may also be combined and employed in the processes of the present invention.
The temperatures and pressures employed in the columns may vary. As a practical matter, pressures from 10 kPa to 3000 kPa will generally be employed in these zones although in some embodiments subatmospheric pressures or superatmospheric pressures may be employed. Temperatures within the various zones will normally range between the boiling points of the composition removed as the distillate and the composition removed as the residue. As will be recognized by those skilled in the art, the temperature at a given location in an operating distillation column is dependent on the composition of the material at that location and the pressure of column. In addition, feed rates may vary depending on the size of the production process and, if described, may be generically referred to in terms of feed weight ratios.
As discussed above, according to the present invention, unreacted acetic acid in the first residue stream 113 (also referred to as the dilute acid stream) is directed to esterification unit 118 for esterification. In some embodiments, the dilute acid stream 113 may comprise at least 85% of the acetic acid from the crude ethanol product stream 112, e.g., at least 90% and more preferably at least 99%. In terms of ranges, the dilute acid stream optionally comprises from 85% to 99.5% or from 90% to 99.99% of the unreacted acetic acid from the crude ethanol product stream. In some embodiments, the dilute acid stream comprises from 2 to 60 wt. % acetic acid and from 40 to 98 wt. % water. In one embodiment, substantially all of the unreacted acetic acid is reacted out of dilute acid stream 113. In one embodiment, substantially all of the unreacted acetic acid is recovered in the first residue stream 113. By removing substantially all of the unreacted acetic acid from the crude ethanol product stream 112, the process, in some aspects, advantageously does not require further separation of acetic acid from the ethanol.
In some embodiments, the first residue stream 113 is substantially free of ethanol or ethyl acetate. For example, the first residue stream 113 preferably comprises less than 1 wt. % ethanol or ethyl acetate, e.g., less than 0.005 wt. %.
According to
In some embodiments, esterification unit 118 comprises a reaction zone comprising a reactor, coupled to a separation zone comprising one or more distillation columns and/or stripping columns. Suitable reactors for use in the esterification include batch reactors, continuously-fed stirred-tank reactors, plug-flow reactors, reactive distillation towers, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, an acid catalyst is fed to the reactor to facilitate the esterification of the acetic acid. Suitable acid catalysts for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, sulfonic acids, heteropolyacids, other mineral acids and a combination thereof.
The operating parameters of esterification unit 118 may be varied to achieve a desired composition in ester product stream 121. For example, in some embodiments, temperature, pressure, feed rates, and residence times can be varied to increase conversion of acetic acid to an ester, decrease the formation of impurities, achieve more efficient separation, reduce energy consumption, or combinations thereof.
In one embodiment, esterification unit 118 operates at a base temperature of from 100° C. to 150° C., e.g., from 100° C. to 130° C., or from 100° C. to 120° C. In terms of pressure, esterification unit 118 may be operated at atmospheric pressure, subatmospheric pressure, or superatmospheric pressure. For example, in some embodiments, esterification unit 118 operates at a pressure of from 50 kPa to 500 kPa, e.g., from 50 kPa to 400 kPa, or from 50 kPa to 200 kPa.
In some embodiments, the feed rates of acetic acid and alcohol to the esterification unit 118 may be adjusted to control the mole ratio of acetic acid to alcohol being fed to the esterification unit 118. For example, in some embodiments, the mole ratio of acetic acid to alcohol fed to the esterification unit 118 is from 1:1 to 1:15, e.g., from 1:1 to 1:5, or from 1:1 to 1:2.
The processes of the present invention preferably provide for a high conversion of acetic acid to ester(s). In some embodiments, for example, at least 80%, at least 90% or at least 95% of the acetic acid in the first residue 113 is converted to an ester.
The ester product stream 121 exiting the esterification unit 118 preferably comprises at least 75 wt. % at least one ester, preferably at least 90 wt. % at least one ester or more preferably at least 95 wt. % at least one ester. In terms of ranges, the ester product stream 121 may comprise at least one ester in an amount from 40 to 99 wt. %, e.g., from 50 to 90 wt. % or from 75 to 90 wt. %. In other embodiments, the ester product stream 121 exiting the esterication unit 118 preferably comprises at least 15 wt. % at least one ester, preferably at least 35 wt. % at least one ester, or more preferably at least 65 wt. % at least one ester. In terms of ranges, the ester product stream 121 may comprise at least one ester in an amount from 5 to 75 wt. %, e.g., from 15 to 60 wt. % or from 25 to 50 wt. %.
When excess alcohol is reacted with the acetic acid from the first residue stream 113, some alcohol also may be present in the ester product stream 121. Thus, the ester product stream 121 may comprise alcohol in an amount from 0.1 to 80 wt. %, e.g., from 1 to 60 wt. %, or from 10 to 30 wt. %. In other embodiments, for example where the acetic acid is present in an excess relative to alcohols or where the acetic acid is present in about the same molar amount as the alcohol, the ester product stream 121 may be substantially free of alcohols, e.g., containing less than 10 wt %, less than 5 wt. % or less than 1 wt. % alcohols. Exemplary compositions for the product ester stream 121 and the second residue stream 120 from the esterification unit 118 are provided in Table 5, below. It should also be understood that the distillate and residue may also contain other components, not listed in Table 5.
Some impurities, such as dimethyl ether may form over the course of the reaction in esterification unit 118. These impurities may be present in very low amounts, or even no detectable amounts, in the ester product stream 121. In some embodiments, the ester product stream 121 comprises less than 1000 wppm dimethyl ether, e.g., less than 750 wppm, or less than 500 wppm.
In some embodiments, the esterification unit comprises a reactive distillation column, as shown in
When an acid catalyst is used, e.g., sulfuric acid, the acid catalyst is fed via line 124 to second column 118.
In some embodiments, first residue 113 is optionally fed to a guard bed (not shown) and then fed to second column 118. In this aspect, the guard bed comprises an ion exchange resin, such as those disclosed above. While not being bound to any particular theory, the guard bed removes one or more corrosive metals present in the first residue 113, thereby minimizing the deactivation of any ion exchange resin catalytic sites in the ion exchange resin present in the second column 118.
The residence time of second column 118 may impact acetic acid conversion. In some embodiments, for example, the residence time in second column 118 is from 1 to 5 hours, e.g., from 1 to 3 hours, or less than 1 hour.
Additionally,
In one embodiment, second column 118 operates at a base temperature of from 100° C. to 150° C., e.g., from 100° C. to 130° C., or from 100° C. to 120° C. In terms of pressure, second column 118 may be operated at atmospheric pressure, subatmospheric pressure, or superatmospheric pressure. For example, in some embodiments, second column 118 operates at a pressure of from 50 kPa to 500 kPa, e.g., from 50 kPa to 400 kPa, or from 50 kPa to 200 kPa.
In some embodiments, the feed rates of acetic acid and alcohol to second column 118 may be adjusted based to control the mole ratio of acetic acid to alcohol being fed to the second column 118. For example, in some embodiments, the mole ratio of acetic acid to alcohol fed to the second column 118 is from 1:1 to 1:15, e.g., from 1:1 to 1:5, or from 1:1 to 1:2.
The residence time of the second column may impact acetic acid conversion. In some embodiments, for example, the residence time in the second column is from 1 to 5 hours, e.g., from 1 to 3 hours, or less than 1 hour.
As described above, the ester product stream 121 may be further processed and/or refined. As shown in
In another embodiment, process 122 is a carbonylation unit for the production of acetic acid and product stream 123 is an acetic acid stream, wherein at least a portion of product stream 123 is fed to reactor 103, first residue 113, esterification unit 118, or a combination thereof. In another embodiment, process 122 is an esters synthesis process in an esters synthesis facility.
The second residue stream 120 exiting the esterification unit 118, as shown in
The finished ethanol composition produced by the embodiments of the present invention may be used in a variety of applications including applications as fuels, solvents, chemical feedstocks, pharmaceutical products, cleansers, sanitizers, hydrogenation transport or consumption. In fuel applications, the finished ethanol composition may be blended with gasoline for motor vehicles such as automobiles, boats and small piston engine aircraft. In non-fuel applications, the finished ethanol composition may be used as a solvent for toiletry and cosmetic preparations, detergents, disinfectants, coatings, inks, and pharmaceuticals. The finished ethanol composition may also be used as a processing solvent in manufacturing processes for medicinal products, food preparations, dyes, photochemicals and latex processing.
The finished ethanol composition may also be used as a chemical feedstock to make other chemicals such as vinegar, ethyl acrylate, ethyl acetate, ethylene, glycol ethers, ethylamines, aldehydes, and higher alcohols, especially butanol. In the production of ethyl acetate, the finished ethanol composition may be esterified with acetic acid. In another application, the finished ethanol composition may be dehydrated to produce ethylene. Any known dehydration catalyst can be employed to dehydrate ethanol, such as those described in copending U.S. Pub. Nos. 2010/0030002 and 2010/0030001, the entire contents and disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. A zeolite catalyst, for example, may be employed as the dehydration catalyst. Preferably, the zeolite has a pore diameter of at least about 0.6 nm, and preferred zeolites include dehydration catalysts selected from the group consisting of mordenites, ZSM-5, a zeolite X and a zeolite Y. Zeolite X is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 2,882,244 and zeolite Y in U.S. Pat. No. 3,130,007, the entireties of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Claims
1. A process for reducing the concentration of acetic acid from an ethanol production process, comprising the steps of:
- hydrogenating acetic acid in a reactor to form a crude ethanol product comprising ethanol, acetic acid, and water;
- separating at least a portion of the crude ethanol product in a first column into a first distillate comprising ethanol and a first residue stream comprising from 2 to 60 wt. % acetic acid and from 40 to 98 wt. % water;
- reacting the acetic acid from the first residue with at least one alcohol in an esterification unit to produce at least one ester and water; and
- separating the at least one ester from the water to produce an ester product stream comprising the at least one ester and a second residue comprising water.
2. The process of claim 1, wherein the first residue stream comprises from 90% to 100% of the acetic acid in the crude ethanol product.
3. The process of claim 1, wherein the conversion of acetic acid in the hydrogenating step is greater than 70%.
4. The process of claim 1, wherein the first residue stream comprises less than 1 wt. % ethanol and/or ethyl acetate.
5. The process of claim 1, wherein the conversion of acetic acid in the esterification step is greater than 90%.
6. The process of claim 1, wherein the at least one alcohol is selected from the group consisting of methanol, ethanol, propanol, butanol, pentanol, and isomers and mixtures thereof.
7. The process of claim 1, wherein the at least one ester is selected from the group consisting of methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, butyl acetate, pentyl acetate, and isomers and mixtures thereof.
8. The process of claim 1, wherein the ester product stream comprises at least 15 wt. % of the at least one ester.
9. The process of claim 1, wherein the ester product stream comprises less than 80 wt. %, of the at least one alcohol.
10. The process of claim 1, wherein the ester product stream comprises less than 1000 ppm dialkyl ether.
11. The process of claim 1, further comprising reducing a portion of the at least one ester in the ester product stream to produce an alcohol product stream.
12. The process of claim 11, further comprising feeding the alcohol product stream to the first distillation column, wherein the alcohol product stream comprises ethanol.
13. The process of claim 11, further comprising feeding the alcohol product stream to the first distillate, wherein the alcohol product stream comprises ethanol.
14. The process of claim 11, further comprising reacting at least a portion of the alcohol product stream with the acetic acid from the first residue.
15. The process of claim 1, wherein the acetic acid is formed from methanol and carbon monoxide, wherein each of the methanol, the carbon monoxide, and hydrogen for the hydrogenating step is derived from syngas, and wherein the syngas is derived from a carbon source selected from the group consisting of natural gas, oil, petroleum, coal, biomass, and combinations thereof.
16. A process for reducing the concentration of acetic acid from an ethanol production process, comprising the steps of:
- hydrogenating acetic acid in a reactor to form a crude ethanol product comprising ethanol, acetic acid, and water;
- separating at least a portion of the crude ethanol product in a first column into a first distillate comprising ethanol and a first residue stream comprising from 2 to 60 wt. % acetic acid and from 40 to 98 wt. % water;
- reacting the acetic acid from the first residue with at least one alcohol in a reactive distillation column to produce a second distillate comprising at least one ester and a second residue comprising water.
17. The process of claim 16, wherein greater than 90% of the acetic acid in the first residue stream is converted to the at least one ester.
18. The process of claim 16, wherein the first residue stream and the at least one alcohol are fed to the reactive distillation column at a mole ratio of acetic acid to alcohol of from 1:1 to 15:1.
19. The process of claim 16, wherein the reactive distillation column comprises a strongly acidic ion exchange resin bed.
20. The process of claim 16, wherein the reactive distillation column comprises an acidic catalyst.
21. The process of claim 20, wherein the acidic catalyst is sulfuric acid.
22. The process of claim 16, wherein the second distillate comprises at least 15 wt. % of the at least one ester.
23. The process of claim 16, wherein the second distillate comprises less than 80 wt. %, of the at least one alcohol.
24. The process of claim 16, wherein the second distillate comprises less than 1000 ppm dialkyl ether.
25. The process of claim 16, wherein the second residue comprises less than 5 wt. % acetic acid.
26. The process of claim 16, wherein the second residue comprises at least 95 wt. % water.
| 2607807 | August 1952 | Ford |
| 2649407 | August 1953 | Harrison et al. |
| 2702783 | February 1955 | Harrison et al. |
| 2801209 | July 1957 | Muller et al. |
| 2882244 | April 1959 | Milton |
| 3102150 | August 1963 | Hunter et al. |
| 3130007 | April 1964 | Breck |
| 3408267 | October 1968 | Miller et al. |
| 3445345 | May 1969 | Katzen et al. |
| 3478112 | November 1969 | Karl et al. |
| 3769329 | October 1973 | Knox et al. |
| 3990952 | November 9, 1976 | Katzen et al. |
| 4126539 | November 21, 1978 | Derr, Jr. et al. |
| 4149940 | April 17, 1979 | Pinto |
| 4275228 | June 23, 1981 | Gruffaz et al. |
| 4306942 | December 22, 1981 | Brush et al. |
| 4317918 | March 2, 1982 | Takano et al. |
| 4319058 | March 9, 1982 | Kulpranthipanja et al. |
| 4352940 | October 5, 1982 | Adelman et al. |
| 4379028 | April 5, 1983 | Berg et al. |
| 4395576 | July 26, 1983 | Kwantes et al. |
| 4398039 | August 9, 1983 | Pesa et al. |
| 4421939 | December 20, 1983 | Kiff et al. |
| 4422903 | December 27, 1983 | Messick et al. |
| 4443639 | April 17, 1984 | Pesa et al. |
| 4454358 | June 12, 1984 | Kummer et al. |
| 4465854 | August 14, 1984 | Pond et al. |
| 4471136 | September 11, 1984 | Larkins et al. |
| 4480115 | October 30, 1984 | McGinnis |
| 4492808 | January 8, 1985 | Hagen et al. |
| 4497967 | February 5, 1985 | Wan |
| 4517391 | May 14, 1985 | Schuster et al. |
| 4520213 | May 28, 1985 | Victor |
| 4541897 | September 17, 1985 | Sommer et al. |
| 4615806 | October 7, 1986 | Hilton |
| 4626321 | December 2, 1986 | Grethlein et al. |
| 4678543 | July 7, 1987 | Houben et al. |
| 4692218 | September 8, 1987 | Houben et al. |
| 4777303 | October 11, 1988 | Kitson et al. |
| 4804791 | February 14, 1989 | Kitson et al. |
| 4842693 | June 27, 1989 | Wheldon |
| 4886905 | December 12, 1989 | Larkins et al. |
| 4908477 | March 13, 1990 | Hartmann et al. |
| 4961826 | October 9, 1990 | Grethlein et al. |
| 4978778 | December 18, 1990 | Isshiki et al. |
| 4985572 | January 15, 1991 | Kitson et al. |
| 4990655 | February 5, 1991 | Kitson et al. |
| 4994608 | February 19, 1991 | Torrence et al. |
| 5001259 | March 19, 1991 | Smith et al. |
| 5026908 | June 25, 1991 | Smith et al. |
| 5035776 | July 30, 1991 | Knapp |
| 5061671 | October 29, 1991 | Kitson et al. |
| 5070016 | December 3, 1991 | Hallberg et al. |
| 5124004 | June 23, 1992 | Grethlein et al. |
| 5139981 | August 18, 1992 | Kurland |
| 5144068 | September 1, 1992 | Smith et al. |
| 5149680 | September 22, 1992 | Kitson et al. |
| 5185481 | February 9, 1993 | Muto et al. |
| 5198592 | March 30, 1993 | Van Beijnum et al. |
| 5215902 | June 1, 1993 | Tedder |
| 5227141 | July 13, 1993 | Kim et al. |
| 5233099 | August 3, 1993 | Tabata et al. |
| 5237108 | August 17, 1993 | Marraccini et al. |
| 5250271 | October 5, 1993 | Horizoe et al. |
| 5348625 | September 20, 1994 | Berg |
| 5414161 | May 9, 1995 | Uhm et al. |
| 5415741 | May 16, 1995 | Berg |
| 5426246 | June 20, 1995 | Nagahara et al. |
| 5437770 | August 1, 1995 | Berg |
| 5445716 | August 29, 1995 | Berg |
| 5449440 | September 12, 1995 | Rescalli et al. |
| 5502248 | March 26, 1996 | Funk et al. |
| RE35377 | November 12, 1996 | Steinberg et al. |
| 5599976 | February 4, 1997 | Scates et al. |
| 5696284 | December 9, 1997 | Baker |
| 5731252 | March 24, 1998 | Warner |
| 5762765 | June 9, 1998 | Berg |
| 5770770 | June 23, 1998 | Kim et al. |
| 5800681 | September 1, 1998 | Berg |
| 5821111 | October 13, 1998 | Grady et al. |
| 5861530 | January 19, 1999 | Atkins et al. |
| 5877347 | March 2, 1999 | Ditzel |
| 5877348 | March 2, 1999 | Ditzel |
| 5883295 | March 16, 1999 | Sunley |
| 5932764 | August 3, 1999 | Morris et al. |
| 5942460 | August 24, 1999 | Garland |
| 5973193 | October 26, 1999 | Crane et al. |
| 5993610 | November 30, 1999 | Berg |
| 6040474 | March 21, 2000 | Jobson et al. |
| 6093845 | July 25, 2000 | Van Acker et al. |
| 6121498 | September 19, 2000 | Tustin et al. |
| 6143930 | November 7, 2000 | Singh et al. |
| 6232352 | May 15, 2001 | Vidalin et al. |
| 6294703 | September 25, 2001 | Hara et al. |
| 6326515 | December 4, 2001 | Clode et al. |
| 6339171 | January 15, 2002 | Singh et al. |
| 6375807 | April 23, 2002 | Nieuwoudt et al. |
| 6458996 | October 1, 2002 | Muskett |
| 6462231 | October 8, 2002 | Yanagawa et al. |
| 6472555 | October 29, 2002 | Choudary et al. |
| 6486366 | November 26, 2002 | Ostgard et al. |
| 6495730 | December 17, 2002 | Konishi et al. |
| 6509180 | January 21, 2003 | Verser et al. |
| 6627770 | September 30, 2003 | Cheung et al. |
| 6632330 | October 14, 2003 | Colley et al. |
| 6657078 | December 2, 2003 | Scates et al. |
| 6685754 | February 3, 2004 | Kindig et al. |
| 6693213 | February 17, 2004 | Kolena et al. |
| 6696596 | February 24, 2004 | Herzog et al. |
| 6723886 | April 20, 2004 | Allison et al. |
| 6755975 | June 29, 2004 | Vane et al. |
| 6765110 | July 20, 2004 | Warner et al. |
| 6768021 | July 27, 2004 | Horan et al. |
| 6809217 | October 26, 2004 | Colley et al. |
| 6906228 | June 14, 2005 | Fischer et al. |
| 6927048 | August 9, 2005 | Verser et al. |
| 7005541 | February 28, 2006 | Cheung et al. |
| 7074603 | July 11, 2006 | Verser et al. |
| 7084312 | August 1, 2006 | Huber et al. |
| 7115772 | October 3, 2006 | Picard et al. |
| 7208624 | April 24, 2007 | Scates et al. |
| 7223886 | May 29, 2007 | Scates et al. |
| 7297236 | November 20, 2007 | Vander Griend et al. |
| 7351559 | April 1, 2008 | Verser et al. |
| 7399892 | July 15, 2008 | Rix et al. |
| 7507562 | March 24, 2009 | Verser et al. |
| 7553397 | June 30, 2009 | Colley et al. |
| 7572353 | August 11, 2009 | Vander et al. |
| 7588690 | September 15, 2009 | Tsao |
| 7601865 | October 13, 2009 | Verser et al. |
| 7608744 | October 27, 2009 | Johnston et al. |
| 7682812 | March 23, 2010 | Verser et al. |
| 7700814 | April 20, 2010 | Garton et al. |
| 7718039 | May 18, 2010 | Dirkzwager et al. |
| 7732173 | June 8, 2010 | Mairal |
| 7744727 | June 29, 2010 | Blum et al. |
| 7834223 | November 16, 2010 | Atkins |
| 7842844 | November 30, 2010 | Atkins |
| 7863489 | January 4, 2011 | Johnston et al. |
| 7884253 | February 8, 2011 | Stites et al. |
| 7888082 | February 15, 2011 | Verser et al. |
| 7906680 | March 15, 2011 | Scates et al. |
| 7947746 | May 24, 2011 | Daniel et al. |
| 20030013908 | January 16, 2003 | Horan et al. |
| 20030077771 | April 24, 2003 | Verser et al. |
| 20060019360 | January 26, 2006 | Verser et al. |
| 20060127999 | June 15, 2006 | Verser et al. |
| 20060252956 | November 9, 2006 | Miller et al. |
| 20070031954 | February 8, 2007 | Mairal et al. |
| 20070106246 | May 10, 2007 | Modesitt |
| 20070270511 | November 22, 2007 | Melnichuk et al. |
| 20080135396 | June 12, 2008 | Blum |
| 20080193989 | August 14, 2008 | Verser et al. |
| 20080207953 | August 28, 2008 | Houssin et al. |
| 20080287706 | November 20, 2008 | Powell |
| 20080293966 | November 27, 2008 | Scates |
| 20090005588 | January 1, 2009 | Hassan et al. |
| 20090014313 | January 15, 2009 | Lee et al. |
| 20090023192 | January 22, 2009 | Verser et al. |
| 20090069609 | March 12, 2009 | Kharas et al. |
| 20090081749 | March 26, 2009 | Verser et al. |
| 20090107833 | April 30, 2009 | Warner |
| 20090166172 | July 2, 2009 | Casey et al. |
| 20090221725 | September 3, 2009 | Chorney et al. |
| 20090270651 | October 29, 2009 | Zinobile et al. |
| 20090281354 | November 12, 2009 | Mariansky et al. |
| 20090299092 | December 3, 2009 | Beavis et al. |
| 20090318573 | December 24, 2009 | Stites et al. |
| 20090326080 | December 31, 2009 | Chornet et al. |
| 20100016454 | January 21, 2010 | Gracey et al. |
| 20100029980 | February 4, 2010 | Johnston et al. |
| 20100029995 | February 4, 2010 | Johnston et al. |
| 20100030001 | February 4, 2010 | Chen et al. |
| 20100030002 | February 4, 2010 | Johnston et al. |
| 20100121114 | May 13, 2010 | Johnston et al. |
| 20100130775 | May 27, 2010 | Voss et al. |
| 20100137630 | June 3, 2010 | Garton et al. |
| 20100197485 | August 5, 2010 | Johnston et al. |
| 20100197959 | August 5, 2010 | Johnston et al. |
| 20100197985 | August 5, 2010 | Johnston et al. |
| 20100204512 | August 12, 2010 | Kimmich et al. |
| 20110004033 | January 6, 2011 | Johnston et al. |
| 20110046421 | February 24, 2011 | Daniel et al. |
| 20110082322 | April 7, 2011 | Jevtic et al. |
| 20110185628 | August 4, 2011 | Johnston et al. |
| 20110190532 | August 4, 2011 | Johnston et al. |
| 20110190547 | August 4, 2011 | Jevtic et al. |
| 20110190548 | August 4, 2011 | Jevtic et al. |
| 20110275861 | November 10, 2011 | Johnston et al. |
| 20110275862 | November 10, 2011 | Johnston et al. |
| 20120010437 | January 12, 2012 | Jevtic et al. |
| 20120010438 | January 12, 2012 | Lee et al. |
| 20120010445 | January 12, 2012 | Johnston et al. |
| 20120010447 | January 12, 2012 | Warner et al. |
| 20120010448 | January 12, 2012 | Sarager et al. |
| 201768393 | March 2011 | CN |
| 102228831 | November 2011 | CN |
| 102229520 | November 2011 | CN |
| 0056488 | July 1982 | EP |
| 0104197 | April 1984 | EP |
| 0137749 | April 1985 | EP |
| 0167300 | January 1986 | EP |
| 0175558 | March 1986 | EP |
| 0192587 | August 1986 | EP |
| 0198682 | October 1986 | EP |
| 0285420 | October 1988 | EP |
| 0285786 | October 1988 | EP |
| 0400904 | May 1990 | EP |
| 0372847 | June 1990 | EP |
| 0456647 | November 1991 | EP |
| 0990638 | April 2000 | EP |
| 2060553 | May 2009 | EP |
| 2060555 | May 2009 | EP |
| 2072487 | June 2009 | EP |
| 2072488 | June 2009 | EP |
| 2072489 | June 2009 | EP |
| 2072492 | June 2009 | EP |
| 2186787 | May 2010 | EP |
| 4-193304 | July 1992 | JP |
| 6-116182 | April 1994 | JP |
| 2001-046874 | February 2001 | JP |
| WO 83/03409 | October 1983 | WO |
| WO 02/092541 | November 2002 | WO |
| WO 2005/102513 | November 2005 | WO |
| WO 2007/003897 | January 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008/135192 | November 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009/009320 | January 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009/009322 | January 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009/009323 | January 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009/048335 | April 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009/063174 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009/063176 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO2009/063176 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009/105860 | September 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010/014151 | February 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010/055285 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011/053365 | May 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011/097193 | August 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011/097219 | August 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011/097220 | August 2011 | WO |
| WO 2012/006236 | January 2012 | WO |
| WO 2012/006388 | January 2012 | WO |
- Ragaini V, et al., “Increasing the value of dilute acetic acid streams through esterification”, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 64, No. 1-2, Apr. 18, 2006, pp. 66-71.
- Xu, et al., “Kinetics of Acetic Acid Esterification over Ion Exchange Catalysts”, Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 74, Aug. 1, 1996, pp. 493-500.
- Zheng, et al. (2007). Preparation and catalytic properties of a bimetallic Sn—Pt complex in the supercages of NaY zeolite by use of surface organometallic chemistry, Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 21(10), 836-840.
- ZeaChem, Inc., Technology Overview, Lakewood, Colorado www.zeachem.com, 2008.
- Santori et al.(2000). Hydrogenation of carbonylic compounds on Pt/SiO2 catalysts modified with SnBu4, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 130, 2063-2068.
- Rachmady, Acetic Acid Reduction by H2 on Bimetallic Pt—Fe Catalysts, Journal of Catalysis 209, 87-98 (Apr. 1, 2002), Elsevier Science (USA).
- J. Jones, et al., Platinum Metals Review, vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 94-104 (Jul. 2000).
- Pallasana et al., Reaction Paths in the Hydrogenolysis of Acetic Acid to Ethanol over Pd(111), Re(0001), and RdRe Alloys, Journal of Catalysis 209, 289-305 Mar. 1, 2002.
- Hilmen, Separation of Azeotropic Mixtures: Tools for Analysis and Studies on Batch Distillation Operation (Nov. 2000) p. 17-20.
- Gursahani et al., Reaction kinetics measurements and analysis of reaction pathways for conversions of acetic acid, ethanol, and ethyl acetate over silica-supported Pt, Applied Catalysis A: General 222 (2001) 369-392.
- Amit M. Goda et al., DFT modeling of selective reduction of acetic acid to acetaldehyde on Pt-based bimetallic catalysts, 20th NAM, Houston, TX, Jun. 17-22, 2007 available online at <http://www.nacatsoc.org/20nam/abstracts/O-S9-18.pdf>.
- Alcala, et al., (2005). Experimental and DFT studies of the conversion of ethanol and acetic acid on PtSn-based catalysts, Journal of Physical Chemistry, 109(6), 2074-2085.
- Subramani et al., “A Review of Recent Literature to Search for an Efficient Catalytic Process for the Conversion of Syngas to Ethanol,” Energy & Fuels, 2008, vol. 22, pp. 814-839.
- Spivey et al., “Heterogeneous catalytic synthesis of ethanol from biomass-dervied syngas,” Chemical Society Review, 2007, vol. 36, pp. 1514-1528.
- H. Constantin et al., “Influence of C-Sources on the Denitrification Rate of a High-Nitrate Concentrated Industrial Wastewater”, Wat. Res., 1997, vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 583-589.
- Witzeman and Agreda, “Safety and Performance Assessment of Ethanol/Diesel Blends (e-blend)” NREL/SR-540-34817, at p. 1-1, Sep. 2003.
- Gaub, et al., Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with Organometallic Compounds: A Comprehensive Handbook in vol. 2, Chapter 2.1, pp. 27-200 (1st ed., 1996).
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/059887 mailed May 29, 2012.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/060014 mailed Jun. 29, 2012.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/023276 mailed Sep. 2, 2011.
- International Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/023276 mailed May 8, 2012.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/035203 mailed Jul. 11, 2012.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/059917 mailed Jul. 23, 2012.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/059909 mailed Jul. 30, 2012.
- Anonymous: “Studies in Extractive and Azeotropic Distillation Series; Study No. 4—Separation of Alcohols from the Acetate/Alcohol/Water Ternary by Extractive Distillation” May 9, 2008, pp. 1-9.
- Kita H., et al., “Synthesis of a Zeolite NAA Membrane for Pervaporation of Water/Organic Liquid Mixtures”, Journal of Materials Science Letters, vol. 14, Jan. 1, 1995, pp. 206-208.
- Jackobsson, et al., “Modeling of a side reactor Configuration combining reaction and distillation”, Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 57, 2002, pp. 12521-1524.
- Marian Simo, et al., “Adsorption/Desorption of Water and Ethanol on 3A Zeolite in Neo-Adiabatic Fixed Bed”, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 48, No. 20, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 9247-9260.
- Benson, Tracy J., et al., “Cellulose Based Adsorbent Materials for the Dehydration of Ethanol Using Thermal Swing Adsorption”, Adsorption, Kluwer Academic Publishers, vol. 11, No. 1, Jul. 1, 2005, pp. 697-701.
- Yu Huang, et al., “Low-Energy Distillation-Membrane separation Process”, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 49, No. 8, Jan. 1, 2010, pp. 3760-3768.
Type: Grant
Filed: Apr 26, 2011
Date of Patent: Apr 1, 2014
Patent Publication Number: 20120277486
Assignee: Celanese International Corporation (Dallas, TX)
Inventors: R. Jay Warner (Houston, TX), Victor J. Johnston (Houston, TX), David Lee (Seabrook, TX), Manuel Salado (Seabrook, TX), Mark O. Scates (Houston, TX)
Primary Examiner: Sikarl Witherspoon
Application Number: 13/094,643
International Classification: C07C 27/04 (20060101);
