Method and apparatus to increase audio band microphone sensitivity

- Knowles Electronics, LLC

A microphone circuit having an amplifier with an input operably coupled to a microphone motor also includes a low pass filter operably coupled to the output of the amplifier and a positive feedback network that operably couples to an output of the low-pass filter and to the amplifier input. For many useful application settings the aforementioned amplifier has unity gain while the positive feedback network has a fractional gain less than unity.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims benefits under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/254,449, filed on Nov. 12, 2015, having inventors Michael Jennings et al., titled “METHOD AND APPARATUS TO INCREASE AUDIO BAND MICROPHONE SENSITIVITY”, and is incorporated herein by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

These teachings relate generally to microphones and more particularly to microphone sensitivity.

BACKGROUND

Microphones (e.g., MEMS capacitor mics) are known in the art and typically convert sound pressure to electrical signals. The corresponding conversion factor is often referred to as the microphone's sensitivity. That sensitivity typically varies with frequency. In many cases microphones have a relatively flat response at audio frequencies while exhibiting a significant peak in the ultrasonic region due to mechanical resonances of the sensor. Although such peaks occur in the inaudible ultrasonic region, such peaks can nevertheless result in audible distortion.

In some application settings it can be desirable to increase a microphone's sensitivity. Unfortunately, typical approaches for boosting sensitivity in the audio band also boost sensitivity in the ultrasonic band. As a result, boosting sensitivity can result in increased unwanted audible distortion due to boosted peaks in the ultrasonic band.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The above needs are at least partially met through provision of the method and apparatus to increase audio band microphone sensitivity described in the following detailed description, particularly when studied in conjunction with the drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic diagram as configured in accordance with the prior art;

FIG. 2 illustrates a graph as configured in accordance with the prior art;

FIG. 3 illustrates a flow diagram as configured in accordance with various embodiments of these teachings;

FIG. 4 illustrates a block diagram as configured in accordance with various embodiments of these teachings;

FIG. 5 illustrates a graph as configured in accordance with various embodiments of these teachings;

FIG. 6 illustrates a schematic diagram as configured in accordance with various embodiments of these teachings; and

FIG. 7 is a flow chart illustrating one example of a method in accordance with the disclosure.

Elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions and/or relative positioning of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of various embodiments of the present teachings. Also, common but well-understood elements that are useful or necessary in a commercially feasible embodiment are often not depicted in order to facilitate a less obstructed view of these various embodiments of the present teachings. Certain actions and/or steps may be described or depicted in a particular order of occurrence while those skilled in the art will understand that such specificity with respect to sequence is not actually required. The terms and expressions used herein have the ordinary technical meaning as is accorded to such terms and expressions by persons skilled in the technical field as set forth above except where different specific meanings have otherwise been set forth herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Generally speaking, pursuant to these various embodiments, a microphone circuit having an amplifier with an input operably coupled to a microphone motor also includes a low pass filter operably coupled to the output of the amplifier and a positive feedback network that operably couples to output of the low-pass filter and to the microphone motor. For many useful application settings the aforementioned amplifier has unity gain while the positive feedback network has a fractional gain less than unity.

In one example, a method of operating a microphone amplifier circuit includes producing an amplified microphone signal by amplifying an electro-acoustic sensor output signal with an amplifier. The method also includes producing a filtered microphone output signal by filtering, using a low pass filter, the amplified microphone signal and feeding back the filtered microphone output signal to the electro acoustic sensor using a positive feedback network.

In one example, the amplifier has unity gain. In one example, the positive feedback network has a fractional gain less than unity. In one example, the microphone has a transfer function comprising A*H(jω)/(1+β*A*H(jω)), where A represents gain for the amplifier, H(jω) represents a transfer function of the low-pass filter, and β represents gain of the positive feedback network, wherein H(jω)=1/(jω/ωp+1) such that

Mic_out In ⁢ ( j ⁢ ⁢ ω ) = A 1 - β ⁢ ⁢ A ⁢ 1 j ⁢ ⁢ ω / ω ⁢ ⁢ p ⁡ ( 1 - β ⁢ ⁢ A ) + 1 .

In one example, an electro-mechanical transducer assembly includes an electro-acoustic sensor and an amplifier circuit. The amplifier circuit includes an amplifier having an input and an output, the input operably coupled to the electro-acoustic sensor. The amplifier circuit includes a low pass filter having an input and an output, the input operably coupled to the output of the amplifier and a positive feedback network operably coupled to the output of the low-pass filter and to the electro-acoustic sensor.

In one example the amplifier has unity gain. In one example, the positive feedback network has a fractional gain less than unity. In one example, the electro-acoustic sensor has a transfer function comprising A*H(jω)/(1+β*A*H(jω)), where A represents gain for the amplifier, H(jω) represents a transfer function of the low-pass filter, and β represents gain of the positive feedback network, wherein H(jω)=1/(jω/ωp+1) such that

Mic_out In ⁢ ( j ⁢ ⁢ ω ) = A 1 - β ⁢ ⁢ A ⁢ 1 j ⁢ ⁢ ω / ω ⁢ ⁢ p ⁡ ( 1 - β ⁢ ⁢ A ) + 1 .

In one example, the positive feedback network includes a feedback capacitor operatively coupled to the low pass filter and a bias filter capacitor operatively coupled to the feedback capacitor and to the electro-acoustic sensor.

In one example, a microphone amplifier circuit includes an amplifier having an first input and a first output, the first input configured to couple to a output of a microphone motor, a low pass filter having an second input and a second output, the second input operably coupled to the first output of the amplifier, and a positive feedback network operatively coupled to the second output of the low-pass filter and configured to couple to an input of the microphone.

In one example, the amplifier has unity gain. In one example, the positive feedback network has a fractional gain less than unity. In one example, the circuit has a transfer function comprising A*H(jω)/(1+β*A*H(jω)), where A represents gain for the amplifier, H(jω) represents a transfer function of the low-pass filter, and β represents gain of the positive feedback network wherein H(jω)=1/(jω/ωp+1) such that

Mic_out In ⁢ ( j ⁢ ⁢ ω ) = A 1 - β ⁢ ⁢ A ⁢ 1 j ⁢ ⁢ ω / ω ⁢ ⁢ p ⁡ ( 1 - β ⁢ ⁢ A ) + 1 .

In one example, the positive feedback network includes a feedback capacitor operatively coupled to the second output of the low pass filter and a bias capacitor operatively coupled to the feedback capacitor and configured to couple to the input one plate of the microphone motor.

So configured, part of the aforementioned circuit serves to boost gain while another part of the circuit provides low frequency filtering that attenuates the boosting of ultrasonic portions of the signal. Such a circuit can serve to boost sensitivity in the audio band without also boosting sensitivity in the ultrasonic band. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that these teachings do not require use of a high-gain amplifier and accordingly can avoid any corresponding additional noise or current consumption attributable to such a component.

These and other benefits may become clearer upon making a thorough review and study of the following detailed description. Referring now to the drawings, and in particular to FIGS. 1 and 2, it may be helpful to first briefly recount certain characterizing features and attributes of prior art practice in these regards.

FIG. 1 presents a simple microphone model 100 as typifies the prior art of an electro-mechanical transducer assembly such as a MEMS capacitor microphone assembly. The microphone sensor (also often referred to as the motor or an electo-acoustic sensor) 101 is represented by a variable capacitor with a high impedance 103 bias voltage 104 applied to one plate. This plate is free to move with sound pressure and is often referred to as the diaphragm. The second plate of the capacitor is immobile and connects to the input of an amplifier 102. The input of the amplifier 102 is biased through a high impedance (not shown) to ground although another voltage (not shown) can be used if desired. The amplifier 102 has unity gain.

FIG. 2 presents a graph 200 depicting typical sensitivity for such a prior art microphone. This sensitivity includes a relatively flat region 201 that occurs at audio frequencies (i.e., between about 20 Hz and 20 kHz). This sensitivity also exhibits a sharp peak 202 in the ultrasonic region. As mentioned above, that sensitivity in the ultrasonic region can lead to objectionable audible distortion.

A straight forward method of increasing the sensitivity in the audio band without increasing the ultrasonic sensitivity (or even attenuating it), is to insert a filter between the motor and the amplifier. If the filter is low pass and amplifier gain is greater than one, then the desired sensitivity modifications can be achieved. In practice however this is difficult to implement. First, because the variable motor capacitance is on the order of 1 pF, any low pass filter between the motor and the amplifier requires a capacitance <0.1 pF or else suffer an undesirable reduction in audio band sensitivity. Now in order to realize a filter with a pole at the upper audio band, for example 10 KHz, an enormous resistance is needed. The consequential thermal noise of adding large resistance dramatically decreases the dynamic range and signal to noise ratio of the microphone. The second challenge of implement the system in FIG. 3 is the potential complexity of a high gain amplifier design. A unity gain amplifier can be implemented in its simplest form with a single transistor (i.e. a source follower MOSFET). High gain generally require more circuitry, which requires more current and adds more noise, both which are preferably avoided.

Another approach to place the low pass filter after the amplifier. The benefit here is that because the filter no longer loads the motor, the low capacitance constraint is removed and the filter noise can be greatly reduced. However, now the amplifier sees the high ultrasonic output that was previously filtered in the approach where the LPF was placed in front of the amplifier. Large ultrasonic signals can cause the amplifier to produce unwanted audible distortion. The previously mentioned drawbacks of including a high gain amplifier also apply here.

FIG. 3 presents an illustrative process 300 that is compatible with overcoming one or more of the above drawbacks. At block 301 this process 300 provides an amplifier having an input that operably couples to a microphone motor. At block 302 the output of that amplifier is coupled to the output of a low-pass filter. At block 303 the output of that low-pass filter is operably coupled to a positive feedback network. And at block 304 the output of that positive feedback network operably couples to the microphone motor.

FIG. 4 presents an illustrative block diagram 400 example in the foregoing regards. In this illustrative example the microphone amplifier 102 has a gain A (which is presumed here to constitute a unity gain). The output of this amplifier 102 connects to a low-pass filter 401 having a corresponding transfer function H(jω). The output of the low-pass filter 401 connects to a positive feedback network 402 having a gain of β. The output of the positive feedback network 402 is applied to the microphone motor, which is represented by a summing block 403. The output 404 of this overall circuit comprises the output of the low-pass filter 401.

The transfer function, Mic_out/In, of the closed loop system shown in FIG. 4 is A*H(jω)/(1+β*A*H(jω)). If H(jω)=1/(jω/ωp+1) then

Mic_out In ⁢ ( j ⁢ ⁢ ω ) = A 1 - β ⁢ ⁢ A ⁢ 1 j ⁢ ⁢ ω / ω ⁢ ⁢ p ⁡ ( 1 - β ⁢ ⁢ A ) + 1 .
The first term in the foregoing equation corresponds to the gain boosting. The second term represents the low frequency filtering that attenuates the boost at ultrasonic frequencies.

A graph 500 comparing the results of the above-described gain boosting technique as generally compared to traditional methods appears in FIG. 5. A typical peak 501 in the ultrasonic region appears as a phantom line. The same peak 502 as occurs in accordance with the above-described teachings appears as a solid line.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present teachings do not adversely impact sensitivity in the audio band as compared to prior art practices but greatly reduce the ultrasonic peak and hence results in less audible distortion as a result. Accordingly, for an equal audio band sensitivity increase and equal filtering, the present teachings result in a lower ultrasonic peak than typical prior art approaches.

As one example in these regards, when the microphone amplifier 102 has unity gain and the gain β of the positive feedback network 402 is ½, the audio band sensitivity will increase by a factor of 2 (which corresponds to an increase of 6 dB) without a concurrent boost to the amplitude of the ultrasonic band.

FIG. 6 presents a more specific implementation in these regards. It will be understood that the specific details of this particular circuit 600 are not to be taken as indicating any particular limitations as this circuit 600 is intended instead to serve as an illustrative example.

In this illustrative example the aforementioned low-pass filter 401 includes a resistor 601 in combination with a capacitor 602. The aforementioned positive feedback network 402, in turn, includes a pair of capacitors that include feedback capacitor 603 and bias capacitor 604. As shown, the feedback capacitor has a node coupled to the low pass filter and in particular to the resistor 601 and capacitor 602. The feedback capacitor has another node coupled to a node of the bias capacitor 604. The bias capacitor has another node coupled to ground. The signal passing through the feedback capacitor 603 from the low pass filter is fed back to the electro-acoustic sensor 101 via the summing block 403. Any suitable values may be used and in one example, the resistor 401 may be 4 k ohms, the capacitor 602 may be 3.3 nanofarads and the feedback capacitor 603 and bias capacitor 604 may be 17 picofarads. The summing block 403 also illustrates modeling of the sound pressure displacement of the motor diaphragm.

As illustrated by the circuit of FIG. 6 and as shown, in FIG. 7. The amplifier 102 produces 701 an amplified microphone signal by amplifying an electro-acoustic sensor output signal. The microphone amplifier buffers a low impedance coupling with another component that receives the amplified microphone signal (not shown). The amplified microphone signal is provided to the low pass filter 401. The low pass filter 401 produces 702 a filtered microphone output signal by filtering the amplified microphone signal the filtered microphone output signal is provided to the positive feedback network 402 and in this example to feedback capacitor 603. The filtered microphone output signal (MIC_out) is fed back 703 through the positive feedback network 402 to the electro acoustic sensor 101.

The transfer function of the implementation presented in FIG. 6 can be show to be

SPL_in Mic_out ⁢ ( j ⁢ ⁢ ω ) = 1 1 - Cb / ( Cp + Cb ) ⁢ 1 j ⁢ ⁢ ω ⁢ ⁢ RfCf / Cb / ( Cp + Cb ) + 1 .

Here Cm is the microphone variable capacitance, Vb is the bias voltage, Rp is the bias impedance, Cp and Cb form the feedback network and Rf and Cf form the low pass filter. The amplifier in this example has unity gain. The summing block is added to model the sound pressure displacement of the motor diaphragm. These teachings provide for amplifying the sensitivity of a microphone in the audio band without increasing sensitivity at ultrasonic frequencies. In addition, a high gain amplifier is not needed thus avoiding any additional noise or current consumption. These teachings can be readily employed in a cost-effective manner and without unduly burdening form factor or space requirements.

Those skilled in the art will recognize that a wide variety of modifications, alterations, and combinations can be made with respect to the above described embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention, and that such modifications, alterations, and combinations are to be viewed as being within the ambit of the inventive concept.

Claims

1. A method of operating a microphone amplifier circuit, the method comprising:

producing an amplified microphone signal by amplifying an electro-acoustic sensor output signal that is output by an electro-acoustic sensor, with an amplifier;
producing a filtered microphone output signal to be output by the microphone amplifier circuit, by filtering the amplified microphone signal using a low pass filter; and
feeding back the filtered microphone output signal to the electro-acoustic sensor using a positive feedback network.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the amplifier has unity gain.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the positive feedback network has a fractional gain less than unity.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the microphone has a transfer function comprising A*H(jω)/(1+β*A*H(jω)), where A represents gain for the amplifier, H(jω) represents a transfer function of the low-pass filter, and β represents gain of the positive feedback network.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein H(jω)=1/(jω/ωp+1) such that Mic_out In ⁢ ( j ⁢ ⁢ ω ) = A 1 - β ⁢ ⁢ A ⁢ 1 j ⁢ ⁢ ω / ω ⁢ ⁢ p ⁡ ( 1 - β ⁢ ⁢ A ) + 1.

6. An electro-mechanical transducer assembly comprising:

an electro-acoustic sensor; and
an amplifier circuit comprising: an amplifier having an input and an output, the input operably coupled to the electro-acoustic sensor; a low pass filter having an input and an output, the input operably coupled to the output of the amplifier and the low pass filter configured to produce a filtered signal to be output, by filtering an amplified signal from the output of the amplifier; and a positive feedback network operably coupled to the output of the low-pass filter and to the electro-acoustic sensor.

7. The electro-mechanical transducer assembly of claim 6 wherein the amplifier has unity gain.

8. The electro-mechanical transducer assembly of claim 7 wherein the positive feedback network has a fractional gain less than unity.

9. The electro-mechanical transducer assembly of claim 6 wherein the electro-acoustic sensor has a transfer function comprising A*H(jω)/(1+β*A*H(jω)), where A represents gain for the amplifier, H(jω) represents a transfer function of the low-pass filter, and β represents gain of the positive feedback network.

10. The electro-mechanical transducer assembly of claim 9 wherein H(jω)=1/(jω/ωp+1) such that Mic_out In ⁢ ( j ⁢ ⁢ ω ) = A 1 - β ⁢ ⁢ A ⁢ 1 j ⁢ ⁢ ω / ω ⁢ ⁢ p ⁡ ( 1 - β ⁢ ⁢ A ) + 1.

11. The electro-mechanical transducer assembly of claim 6 wherein the positive feedback network comprises a feedback capacitor operatively coupled to the low pass filter and a bias filter capacitor operatively coupled to the feedback capacitor and to the electro-acoustic sensor.

12. A microphone amplifier circuit comprising:

an amplifier having a first input and a first output, the first input configured to couple to an output of a microphone motor;
a low pass filter having a second input and a second output, the second input operably coupled to the first output of the amplifier, the low pass filter configured to produce a filtered signal to be output, by filtering an amplified signal from the first output of the amplifier; and
a positive feedback network operatively coupled to the second output of the low-pass filter and configured to couple to an input of the microphone.

13. The microphone amplifier circuit of claim 12 wherein the amplifier has unity gain.

14. The microphone amplifier circuit of claim 13 wherein the positive feedback network has a fractional gain less than unity.

15. The microphone amplifier circuit of claim 12 wherein the circuit has a transfer function comprising A*H(jω)/(1+β*A*H(jω)), where A represents gain for the amplifier, H(jω) represents a transfer function of the low-pass filter, and β represents gain of the positive feedback network.

16. The microphone amplifier circuit of claim 15 wherein H(jω)=1/(jω/ωp+1) such that Mic_out In ⁢ ( j ⁢ ⁢ ω ) = A 1 - β ⁢ ⁢ A ⁢ 1 j ⁢ ⁢ ω / ω ⁢ ⁢ p ⁡ ( 1 - β ⁢ ⁢ A ) + 1.

17. The microphone amplifier circuit of claim 12 wherein the positive feedback network comprises a feedback capacitor operatively coupled to the second output of the low pass filter and a bias capacitor operatively coupled to the feedback capacitor and configured to couple to one plate of the microphone motor.

18. The method of claim 4 wherein the amplifier has unity gain.

19. The electro-mechanical transducer assembly of claim 9 wherein the amplifier has unity gain.

20. The microphone amplifier circuit of claim 15 wherein the amplifier has unity gain.

21. An electro-mechanical transducer assembly comprising:

an electro-acoustic sensor; and
an amplifier circuit comprising: an amplifier having an input and an output, the input operably coupled to the electro-acoustic sensor; a low pass filter having an input and an output, the input operably coupled to the output of the amplifier; a positive feedback network operably coupled to the output of the low-pass filter and to the electro-acoustic sensor; and wherein the amplifier has unity gain.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3660772 May 1972 Holt
3801933 April 1974 Teare
3927383 December 1975 Fjarlie et al.
4063050 December 13, 1977 Carlson et al.
4151480 April 24, 1979 Carlson et al.
4412097 October 25, 1983 Ishigaki et al.
4420655 December 13, 1983 Suzuki
4509022 April 2, 1985 Ridel
4622440 November 11, 1986 Slavin
4689819 August 25, 1987 Killion
4718099 January 5, 1988 Hotvet
4754232 June 28, 1988 Sasaki
5083095 January 21, 1992 Madaffari
5097224 March 17, 1992 Madaffari et al.
5193116 March 9, 1993 Mostardo
5255094 October 19, 1993 Yong et al.
5337011 August 9, 1994 French et al.
5524150 June 4, 1996 Sauer
5861779 January 19, 1999 Loeppert et al.
5978490 November 2, 1999 Choi et al.
6035049 March 7, 2000 Engh et al.
6353344 March 5, 2002 Lafort
6389142 May 14, 2002 Hagen et al.
6421448 July 16, 2002 Arndt et al.
6617925 September 9, 2003 Hoang
6654468 November 25, 2003 Thompson
6714081 March 30, 2004 Xu
7113604 September 26, 2006 Thompson
7634096 December 15, 2009 Fallesen
7679448 March 16, 2010 McAdam et al.
7920027 April 5, 2011 Keerti
8970307 March 3, 2015 Marra
9438175 September 6, 2016 Onizuka
9843292 December 12, 2017 Jennings et al.
20030128856 July 10, 2003 Boor
20050078841 April 14, 2005 Boor
20050213787 September 29, 2005 Collins
20050242791 November 3, 2005 Rajapandian et al.
20080002841 January 3, 2008 Baker et al.
20100254549 October 7, 2010 Onishi
20110025422 February 3, 2011 Marra et al.
20110050345 March 3, 2011 Quack
20110056302 March 10, 2011 Lutz
20140266458 September 18, 2014 Scott
20150035605 February 5, 2015 Lam
20150137834 May 21, 2015 Steiner
20150214908 July 30, 2015 Kim
20150244328 August 27, 2015 Toivonen
20180152147 May 31, 2018 Gabai
20180206043 July 19, 2018 Gabai
Foreign Patent Documents
108292906 July 2018 CN
69933627 August 2007 DE
0509742 August 1997 EP
0982971 January 2000 EP
1331835 July 2003 EP
0982971 October 2006 EP
2421281 February 2012 EP
S5964994 April 1984 JP
60160711 August 1985 JP
2006229336 August 2006 JP
8302862 August 1983 WO
2005/039046 April 2005 WO
2005/104603 November 2005 WO
2007103401 September 2007 WO
2014/107843 July 2014 WO
2017/083679 May 2017 WO
Other references
  • European Patent Office; International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2016/061572; dated Feb. 15, 2017.
  • Van Der Donk et al.; Amplitude-modulated electro-mechanical feedback system for silicon condenser microphones; Journal of Micromechanics & Microengineering, Institute of Physics Publishing; vol. 2, No. 3; Sep. 1, 1992.
  • Van Der Donk et al.; Preliminary results of a silicon condenser microphone with internal feedback; Transducers; Jun. 24, 1991.
  • European Patent Office; International Search Report; International Application No. PCT/US2004/033997; dated Mar. 17, 2005.
  • European Patent Office; International Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT International Application No. PCT/US2016/053728; dated Nov. 16, 2016.
Patent History
Patent number: 10616691
Type: Grant
Filed: Nov 11, 2016
Date of Patent: Apr 7, 2020
Patent Publication Number: 20180332404
Assignee: Knowles Electronics, LLC (Itasca, IL)
Inventors: Dean Badillo (Schaumburg, IL), Michael Jennings (Plano, TX)
Primary Examiner: Sonia L Gay
Application Number: 15/775,417
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: With Amplifier (381/120)
International Classification: H04R 19/00 (20060101); H04R 3/06 (20060101); H04R 29/00 (20060101); H04R 19/04 (20060101);