Spinal surgery method

A discectomy method entails removing at least a portion of a spinal lamina to form an access path in a patient. A surgical instrument is inserted along the path and a distal end of the instrument is placed in operative contact with herniated or bulging disc material of a spinal disc. The instrument is operated to remove the herniated or bulging disc material, to thereby space a remaining portion of the spinal disc from spinal nerves. A tip of an ultrasonic surgical probe is then placed into contact with an outer surface of the remaining portion of the spinal disc, and an ultrasonic mechanical standing wave generated in the probe while maintaining the operative tip in contact with the outer surface to harden the wall surface and thereby reduce chances of disc herniation at the outer surface.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to surgical procedures commonly known as discectomies. More particularly, this invention relates to a surgical procedure for treatment of herniated and bulging discs.

The spinal column is comprised in part of bones or vertebrae and in part of fibrous discs that are disposed between the vertebrae. The discs normally function as cushions separating the vertebrae. With age, owing to a drying of the disks, the cushioning effect may be reduced. More significantly for patient treatment purposes, injury can cause a disc to bulge and press on the nerve root leaving the spinal column, possibly causing extreme pain.

More specifically, when the outer wall of a disc, called the annulus fibrosis, becomes weakened through age or injury, it may tear allowing the soft inner part of the disc, the nucleus pulposus, to bulge out. This is called disc herniation, disc prolapse, or a slipped or bulging disc. In a bulging disc the annulus is still intact but lax and the disc pushes the intact annulus out. In a herniated disc there is a tear in the annulus and a fragment is extruded out. Both are candidates for this procedure if the patient is symptomatic from compression.

Once the inner disc material extends out past the regular outer margin of the disc, it can press against very sensitive nerve tissue in the spine. The “bulging” or “herniated” disc can compress or even damage the nerve tissue, and this can cause weakness, tingling, or pain in the back area and into one or both legs, arms or thorax depending on the location of the pathology.

A discectomy is a surgical procedure generally to remove part of an intervertebral disc that is putting pressure on a nerve as it leaves the spinal column. The procedure is most commonly performed on lumbar discs (located in the lower back) creating leg pain. However, it may also be used for cervical discs or thoracic discs.

Open discectomy is usually performed under general anesthesia (the patient is unconscious) and typically requires a one-day hospital stay. It is performed while the patient is lying face down or in a kneeling position. During the procedure, the surgeon will make an approximate one to four-inch incision in the skin over the affected area of the spine. Muscle tissue is disconnected from the bone at the affected disc and retractors hold the muscle and skin away from the spinal column at the surgical site so the surgeon has a clear view of the lamina and interspace of the herniated disc. In some cases bone and ligaments particularly including vertebral lamina may have to be removed for the surgeon to be able to visualize and then gain access to the bulging disc without damaging the nerve tissue, this is called a hemilaminectomy or laminotomy, depending on how much bone is removed. Access to the spinal canal may also be performed through sequentially dilating tubes through which the surgery is performed. The surgical procedural details below are regardless of the access method used.

Once the surgeon can visualize the vertebrae, disc and other surrounding structures, he or she will remove the section of the disc that is protruding from the disc wall, typically using a so-called Pituitary Rongeurs or grasping forceps, and any other disc fragments that may have been expelled from the disc or in the disc space itself. This is often done under magnification. Nothing is used to replace the disc material that is removed. The muscle and skin incision is then closed with sutures and the patient is taken to a recovery room.

The most common problem of a discectomy is that there is a chance that another fragment of disc will herniate and cause similar symptoms post surgery. This is a so-called recurrent disc herniation, and the risk of this occurring is about 10-15%

OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved discectomy procedure.

A more particular object of the present invention is to provide a discectomy procedure that reduces the rate and risk of recurrence.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a surgical discectomy method that is at least partially quicker and easier to carry out than conventional techniques.

Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a surgical discectomy method that may be carried out in a minimally invasive procedure.

These and other objects of the invention will be apparent from the drawings and descriptions herein. Although every object of the invention is attained in at least one embodiment of the invention, there is not necessarily any embodiment which attains all of the objects of the invention.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A discectomy method in accordance with the present invention comprises (a) removing at least a portion of a spinal lamina to form an access path in a patient. (b) inserting a surgical instrument along the path so that a distal end of the surgical instrument is operatively engageable with a herniated or bulging portion of a spinal disc, (c) operating the surgical instrument to remove the herniated or bulging disc material, to thereby space a remaining portion of the spinal disc from spinal nerves, (d) placing an operating tip of an ultrasonic surgical probe into contact with an outer surface of the remaining portion of the spinal disc, and (e) generating an ultrasonic mechanical standing wave in the ultrasonic surgical probe while maintaining the operative tip in contact with the outer surface to harden the outer surface and thereby reduce chances of disc herniation at the outer surface.

The generating of the ultrasonic mechanical standing wave in the ultrasonic surgical probe is preferably carried out at an ultrasonic vibratory power sufficiently low to avoid significant damage to the spinal disc material. In addition, the generating of the ultrasonic mechanical standing wave in the ultrasonic surgical probe is typically carried out with minimal or no irrigation and little or no suction applied to the outer surface of the disc. The hardening of the disc's outer surface formed by the removal of the herniated or bulging disc material is believed to result from protein denaturing in response to the application of ultrasonic vibratory energy. Preferably, the applied energy is not great enough to cause significantly detrimental disc damage.

In one contemplated embodiment of the present invention, the surgical instrument that fragments and removes the herniated or bulging portion of the target disc is an ultrasonic surgical instrument different from the ultrasonic surgical probe that hardens the surface or wall of the remaining disc material. In that case, the surgical instrument is withdrawn from the patient after removing of the herniated or bulging disc material, the ultrasonic surgical probe being inserted into the patient along the access path after removal of the surgical instrument.

The operation to remove the herniated or bulging disc material includes feeding irrigation fluid and applying suction to the operating tip during the removal of the herniated or bulging material. The irrigation serves in part to cool the ultrasonic probe as well as a surrounding sheath, thereby avoiding heat damage to adjacent tissues, but also provides a liquid matrix or carrier to generate a slurry of debris from the surgical site. The generating of the ultrasonic mechanical standing wave in the ultrasonic surgical probe to harden the disc wall is carried out with substantially less irrigation and substantially less suction than that applied to the outer surface of the disc during operating of the ultrasonic surgical instrument.

Pursuant to an ancillary feature of the present invention, the selective removal of vertebral bone includes operating an ultrasonic abrading or incising instrument different from both the ultrasonic surgical instrument and the ultrasonic surgical probe.

In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the disc-material-removal surgical instrument and the disc-hardening ultrasonic surgical probe are one and the same instrument. Thus the operating tip of the latter is the distal tip of the former. Operating the singular surgical instrument to remove the herniated or bulging disc material includes feeding irrigation fluid and applying suction to the operating tip during the removal of the herniated or bulging disc material. The method of this preferred embodiment further comprises substantially reducing both a feeding rate of the irrigation fluid and a degree of applied suction during the generating of the ultrasonic mechanical standing wave to harden the outer surface of the disc. Specifically, the feeding rate of the irrigation fluid and the degree of applied suction are respectively reduced at least 80% relative to a feeding rate of the irrigation fluid and a degree of applied suction during the operating of the surgical instrument to remove the herniated or bulging disc material. In addition, power supplied to the ultrasonic surgical probe is substantially reduced during the generating of the ultrasonic mechanical standing wave to harden the disc's outer surface. Specifically, the power of ultrasonic vibration of the ultrasonic surgical probe during the generating of the ultrasonic mechanical standing wave to harden the disc's outer surface is less than 20%, preferably much less than 20%, of the power of ultrasonic vibration of the ultrasonic surgical probe during the operating thereof to remove the herniated or bulging disc material.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of an ultrasonic bone shaving probe for performing a laminectomy in a surgical method in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 2 a side elevational view of an ultrasonic probe for removing herniated or bulging disc material and hardening a portion of remaining disc in accordance with the surgical method of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is partially a schematic perspective view of two spinal vertebrae and a distal end portion of the bone shaving probe of FIG. 1 and partially a block diagram, showing a step in the surgical method of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is partially a schematic top view of an upper spinal vertebra shown in FIG. 3 and a distal end portion of the probe of FIG. 2 and partially a block diagram, showing a subsequent step in the surgical method of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a schematic top view of the upper spinal vertebra shown in FIG. 4 and the distal end portion of the probe of FIGS. 2 and 3, showing a further step in the surgical method of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is partially an enlarged partial view of a modified instrument assembly and partially a block diagram of components that may be provided for the procedure of FIG. 5 in addition to components illustrated in FIG. 4.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As depicted in FIG. 1, an ultrasonic probe or instrument 10 for performing a laminectomy includes a shaft 12 and a head 14 provided along a cylindrical lateral surface (not separately designated) with an array of teeth 16. At a proximal end, probe 10 includes an enlarged shank portion 18 with wrench flats 20 and an externally threaded connector 22 for fastening the probe to a vibration engine comprising an ultrasonic transducer 24 (FIG. 3) typically of the piezoelectric or magnetostrictive variety. Probe 10 is used with a sheath 26 that, together with an outer surface of the probe, defines a cylindrical space 28 for conducting liquid coolant from an irrigant source 30 (FIG. 3) to the probe head 14. Probe 10 has a central lumen 32 connectable to a suction source or vacuum generator 34 (FIG. 3) and communicating with apertures (not shown) exemplarily in the lateral surface of head 14 for the removal of a slurry of irrigant and organic debris from a surgical site. A pump 36 moves the liquid coolant from source 30 through cylindrical space 28 to probe head 14. Suction source 30 removes a slurry of disc debris and irrigant from the surgical site through lumen 32.

As depicted in FIG. 2, an ultrasonic probe or instrument 40 for fragmenting and removing herniated or bulging disc material and preferably also for subsequently hardening a surface of a resulting disc remnant includes a shaft 42 and a distal or operative tip 44 provided. At a proximal end, probe 40 includes an enlarged shank portion 48 with wrench flats 50 and an externally threaded connector 52 for fastening the probe to a vibration engine comprising an ultrasonic transducer 54 (FIG. 4), exemplarily piezoelectric or magnetostrictive. Probe 40 is used with a sheath 56 that, together with an outer surface of the probe, defines a cylindrical space 58 for conducting liquid coolant moved by a pump 59 from an irrigant source 60 (FIG. 4) to the probe's distal or operative tip 44. Probe 40 has a central lumen 62 connectable to a suction source or vacuum generator 64 (FIG. 4) at a proximal end (not designated) and communicating at a distal end with an aperture (not shown) disposed in distal or operative tip 44, in a transverse plane to a longitudinal probe axis (not indicated), for the removal of a slurry of irrigant and debris from surgical site.

As illustrated in FIG. 4, a support system 66 for probe or instrument 40 includes an under-pressure control 68 for use by an operator or surgeon to modulate the strength of the suction applied by vacuum generator 64, a pump speed control 70 for use by the surgeon to adjust the rate of liquid delivery through cylindrical space 58 to probe tip 44, and a power control 72 for use by the surgeon to alternatively increase and decrease the ultrasonic motional amplitude fed by a waveform generator 74 to transducer 54. A master control 75 may be connected to vacuum generator 64, pump 59, and waveform generator 74 directly or, alternatively, indirectly via controls 68, 70 and 72 for simultaneously modifying all three operating parameters, suction level, irrigation rate, and power magnitude.

To remove a herniated or bulging portion HP (FIG. 4) of a vertebral disc, one first removes at least a portion of a spinal vertebra SV, typically a portion of the target vertebra's lamina VL (FIG. 3), to form an access path 76 (FIG. 4) into a vertebral foramen VF of the spinal column SC of a patient. Preferably, the selective removal of vertebral lamina VL includes manipulating an ultrasonic abrading or incising instrument such as probe 10, as illustrated in FIG. 3. A waveform generator 74 energizes transducer 24 to generate an ultrasonic standing wave in probe 10, vibrating head 14 and teeth 16 to thereby abrade and shave away the tissue of lamina VL and open up access path 76. During this procedure, pump 36 moves liquid coolant under pressure from source 30 through space 28 to probe head 14, while suction source 30 sucks a disc debris and irrigant from vertebral foramen VF through lumen 32.

After the formation of access path 76, surgical instrument or probe 40 is inserted along the path and distal end or tip 44 placed in operative contract with herniated or bulging disc material HP. Surgical instrument/probe is operated to fragment the herniated or bulging disc material HP. The resulting debris is suctioned by vacuum generator 64 out of vertebral foramen VF in a slurry of particles and liquid from source 60. The removal of herniated or bulging portion HP spaces a remaining portion of the spinal disc SD from spinal nerves (not shown) so that the potential for impingement of disc on nerves is reduced if not eliminated.

In a further surgical procedure, depicted in FIG. 5, operating or distal tip 44 of probe 40 is placed into contact with an outer surface 80 of the remaining portion of spinal disc SD. An ultrasonic mechanical standing wave is generated in probe 40, particularly including shaft 42 thereof while maintaining operative tip 44 in contact with outer surface 80 to harden the wall surface and thereby reduce chances of postoperative disc herniation at the wall surface.

The generating of the ultrasonic mechanical standing wave in probe 40 to harden disc surface 80 is preferably carried out at an ultrasonic vibratory power sufficiently low to avoid unduly damaging the spinal disc SD. In addition, the vibrating of probe 40 in this stage of a partial discectomy is optimally performed with minimal or no irrigation and little or no suction. To that end, the surgical personnel in the operating room may use individual controls 68, 70, and 72 to selectively reduce the degree of suction applied by vacuum generator 64, the rate of irrigant delivery by pump 70, and the power output of waveform generator 74, respectively. Alternatively, master control 75 may be operated to simultaneously reduce the operational performances of generator 64, pump 70, and generator 74, exemplarily by predetermined amounts so that applied ultrasonic vibratory energy is insufficient to cause disc disintegration or undue disc damage but great enough to harden surface 80 (FIG. 5).

The feeding rate of the irrigation fluid and the degree of applied suction are reduced at least 80% relative to a feeding rate of the irrigation fluid and a degree of applied suction, respectively, during the fragmentation and removal of herniated or bulging disc material HP. Thus the feeding rate of the irrigation fluid and the degree of applied suction during the disc hardening procedure of FIG. 5 are each at most 20% of the respective levels during the removal procedure of FIG. 4. In addition, power supplied to probe 40 is substantially reduced during the procedure to harden the wall surface 80. Specifically, the power of ultrasonic vibration of the ultrasonic surgical probe 40 during the generating of the ultrasonic mechanical standing wave to harden the wall surface 80 is less than 20%, preferably substantially less than 20%, exemplarily less than 10%, of the power of ultrasonic vibration of the ultrasonic surgical probe during the operating thereof to remove the herniated or bulging disc material HP.

Pursuant to the above description, the surgical instrument 40 that fragments and removes the herniated or bulging portion HP of spinal disc SD is the same instrument used to harden the newly created residual surface 80 of the spinal disc. However, it is possible to use two different instruments, one to fragment and remove herniated or bulging disc material HP and the other to harden the disc surface 80 along the vertebral foramen VF. In the former embodiment, as described above, the operating parameters of instrument or probe 40 are altered from a high-level fragmentation and debris removal operating mode to a low-level disc hardening operating mode. In the latter embodiment, the fragmentation and debris-removal instrument is withdrawn from the patient after removing of the herniated or bulging disc material HP before the ultrasonic disc-hardening surgical probe is inserted into the patient along access path 66.

As discussed above, irrigation serves in part to cool probe shafts 12 and 42 as well as surrounding sheaths 26 and 56, thereby avoiding heat damage to adjacent tissues. The irrigant also serves as a matrix or carrier to generate a slurry of organic debris that may be easily extracted from the surgical site. The generating of the ultrasonic mechanical standing wave in the ultrasonic surgical probe to harden the disc wall is carried out with substantially less irrigation and substantially less suction than that applied to the herniated or bulging disc material HP.

As illustrated in FIG. 6, sheath 56 may be replaced a sheath 82 provided at a distal end 83 with a lens 84 and/or a thermal sensor 86. Lens 84 focuses incoming electromagnetic radiation, exemplarily in the visible spectrum, onto a distal end of an optical fiber bundle 88. Sheath 82 may be further provided at distal end 83 with an illumination source (not illustrated) such as a light-emitting diode (LED). Optical fiber bundle 88 provides input to a charge coupled device (not separately illustrated) included in a signal processor 90. (The CCD may be provided at the distal end of sheath 82, just behind lens 84. In that case, optical fiber bundle 88 is replaced by an electrical conductor.) Signal processor 90 transmits a video signal to a video monitor 92 for providing an image of tissue structures at a predetermined distal from distal end 83 of sheath 82, facilitating the disc-material removal procedure of FIG. 4 and the disc-surface hardening procedure of FIG. 5.

Thermal sensor 86 is operatively connected to a digital comparator 94 via an analog-to-digital converter 96. Comparator 94 compares the digitized signal from converter 96 with at least one reference value stored in a register 98 and issues a warning signal via an alert signal generator 100 to indicate that a threshold temperature has been attained by disc material at the surgical site. For instance, signal generator 100 may produce an audible or visible indication that probe 62 has heated the disc material to a sufficient degree to cause the desired hardening. Signal generator 100 may produce a different audible or visible indication if the temperature detected by thermal sensor 86 exceeds a pre-established maximum.

Although the invention has been described in terms of particular embodiments and applications, one of ordinary skill in the art, in light of this teaching, can generate additional embodiments and modifications without departing from the spirit of or exceeding the scope of the claimed invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the drawings and descriptions herein are proffered by way of example to facilitate comprehension of the invention and should not be construed to limit the scope thereof.

Claims

1. A discectomy method, comprising:

removing, by operating an ultrasonic abrading or incising instrument, at least a portion of a spinal lamina to form an access path in a patient;
inserting an ultrasonic surgical instrument along said path so that a distal end of said ultrasonic surgical instrument is operatively engageable with herniated or bulging material of a spinal disc;
operating said ultrasonic surgical instrument to remove the herniated or bulging disc material, to thereby space a remaining portion of said spinal disc from spinal nerves, the operating of the ultrasonic surgical instrument to remove the herniated or bulging disc material including feeding irrigation fluid and applying suction to the distal end of the ultrasonic surgical instrument during the removal of the herniated or bulging disc material;
placing an operating tip of an ultrasonic surgical probe into contact with an outer surface of the remaining portion of said spinal disc; and
generating an ultrasonic mechanical standing wave in said ultrasonic surgical probe while maintaining said operating tip in contact with said outer surface to harden said outer surface and thereby reduce chances of disc herniation at said outer surface,
the generating of the ultrasonic mechanical standing wave in the ultrasonic surgical probe being carried out at an ultrasonic vibratory power sufficiently low to avoid significant damage to the spinal disc, with minimal or no irrigation fluid and little or no suction, and with substantially less irrigation fluid and substantially less suction than that fed or applied during the operating of the ultrasonic surgical instrument,
the ultrasonic surgical instrument, the ultrasonic surgical probe, and the ultrasonic abrading or incising instrument being different from each other.

2. A discectomy method, comprising:

removing at least a portion of a spinal lamina to form an access path in a patient;
inserting an ultrasonic surgical probe along said path so that an operating tip of the ultrasonic surgical probe is operatively engageable with herniated or bulging material of a spinal disc;
operating the ultrasonic surgical probe to remove the herniated or bulging disc material, to thereby space a remaining portion of said spinal disc from spinal nerves, the operating of the ultrasonic surgical probe to remove the herniated or bulging disc material including feeding irrigation fluid and applying suction to said operating tip during the removal of the herniated or bulging disc material,
placing the operating tip of the ultrasonic surgical probe into contact with an outer surface of the remaining portion of the spinal disc;
generating an ultrasonic mechanical standing wave in the ultrasonic surgical probe while maintaining the operating tip in contact with the outer surface to harden the outer surface and thereby reduce chances of disc herniation at the outer surface;
substantially reducing both a feeding rate of said irrigation fluid and a degree of applied suction during the generating of said ultrasonic mechanical standing wave to harden said outer surface; and
substantially reducing power to said ultrasonic surgical probe during the generating of said ultrasonic mechanical standing wave to harden said outer surface.

3. The discectomy method defined in claim 2, wherein the removing of said at least a portion of said spinal lamina includes operating an ultrasonic abrading or incising instrument different from said ultrasonic surgical probe.

4. The discectomy method defined in claim 2, wherein the feeding rate of said irrigation fluid and the degree of applied suction are respectively reduced at least 80% relative to a feeding rate of said irrigation fluid and a degree of applied suction during the operating of the ultrasonic surgical probe to remove the herniated or bulging disc material.

5. The discectomy method defined in claim 2, wherein the power of ultrasonic vibration of said ultrasonic surgical probe during the generating of said ultrasonic mechanical standing wave to harden said outer surface is less than 20% of the power of ultrasonic vibration of said ultrasonic surgical probe during the operating thereof to remove the herniated or bulging disc material.

6. The discectomy method defined in claim 1, further comprising removing said ultrasonic surgical instrument from the patient after removing of the herniated or bulging disc material, said ultrasonic surgical probe being inserted into the patient along said access path after removal of said ultrasonic surgical instrument.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
2349959 May 1944 Edward
2753666 July 1956 Sasse
3368280 February 1968 Friedman et al.
3680610 August 1972 Lindgren
3805787 April 1974 Banko
4188952 February 19, 1980 Loschilov et al.
4425115 January 10, 1984 Wuchinich
4804364 February 14, 1989 Dieras et al.
4988334 January 29, 1991 Hornlein et al.
5163433 November 17, 1992 Kagawa et al.
5176677 January 5, 1993 Wuchinich
5180363 January 19, 1993 Idemoto et al.
5222937 June 29, 1993 Kagawa
5261922 November 16, 1993 Hood
5312329 May 17, 1994 Beaty et al.
5342380 August 30, 1994 Hood
5465468 November 14, 1995 Manna
5484398 January 16, 1996 Stoddard
5517889 May 21, 1996 Logan
5527273 June 18, 1996 Manna et al.
5531597 July 2, 1996 Foulkes et al.
5695510 December 9, 1997 Hood
5769211 June 23, 1998 Manna et al.
5906595 May 25, 1999 Powell et al.
5935142 August 10, 1999 Hood
5935143 August 10, 1999 Hood
5976105 November 2, 1999 Marcove et al.
6033375 March 7, 2000 Brumbach
6036667 March 14, 2000 Manna et al.
6256859 July 10, 2001 Stoddard et al.
6270471 August 7, 2001 Hechel et al.
6352532 March 5, 2002 Kramer et al.
6375648 April 23, 2002 Edelman et al.
6379371 April 30, 2002 Novak et al.
6436114 August 20, 2002 Novak et al.
6443969 September 3, 2002 Novak et al.
6454730 September 24, 2002 Hechel et al.
6461314 October 8, 2002 Pant et al.
6492762 December 10, 2002 Pant et al.
6494714 December 17, 2002 Copeland
6582440 June 24, 2003 Brumbach
6602248 August 5, 2003 Sharps et al.
6613056 September 2, 2003 Brumbach et al.
6648839 November 18, 2003 Manna et al.
6736814 May 18, 2004 Manna et al.
6787974 September 7, 2004 Fjield et al.
6799729 October 5, 2004 Voic
6869439 March 22, 2005 White et al.
6902536 June 7, 2005 Manna et al.
7025735 April 11, 2006 Soring et al.
7223267 May 29, 2007 Isola et al.
7431704 October 7, 2008 Babaev
7442168 October 28, 2008 Novak et al.
7494488 February 24, 2009 Weber
7522955 April 21, 2009 Rontal
7608054 October 27, 2009 Söring et al.
7717913 May 18, 2010 Novak et al.
7776027 August 17, 2010 Manna et al.
7785278 August 31, 2010 Babaev
D627463 November 16, 2010 Voic et al.
7905854 March 15, 2011 Hazut et al.
7931611 April 26, 2011 Novak et al.
D644326 August 30, 2011 Voic et al.
8025672 September 27, 2011 Novak et al.
8109925 February 7, 2012 Voic et al.
8221424 July 17, 2012 Cha
D667117 September 11, 2012 Darian et al.
8343178 January 1, 2013 Novak et al.
8348880 January 8, 2013 Messerly et al.
8353912 January 15, 2013 Darian et al.
D680218 April 16, 2013 Darian et al.
8430897 April 30, 2013 Novak et al.
8562547 October 22, 2013 Babaev
8659208 February 25, 2014 Rose et al.
8690783 April 8, 2014 Sinelnikov
8698377 April 15, 2014 Sinelnikov
8814870 August 26, 2014 Paraschiv et al.
8888783 November 18, 2014 Young
8894673 November 25, 2014 Darian
8961547 February 24, 2015 Dietz et al.
9070856 June 30, 2015 Rose et al.
9211137 December 15, 2015 Voic
9226767 January 5, 2016 Stulen et al.
9320528 April 26, 2016 Voic et al.
9387005 July 12, 2016 Voic
9603656 March 28, 2017 Germain et al.
9622766 April 18, 2017 Voic
9636187 May 2, 2017 Voic
9693792 July 4, 2017 Novak et al.
9763673 September 19, 2017 Young
9861446 January 9, 2018 Lang
9872697 January 23, 2018 Voic
9949751 April 24, 2018 Voic
9962182 May 8, 2018 Dietz et al.
10016208 July 10, 2018 Gouery et al.
10076349 September 18, 2018 Voic
10092308 October 9, 2018 Mikus et al.
10092741 October 9, 2018 Darian
10117666 November 6, 2018 Voic
10182837 January 22, 2019 Isola et al.
10206704 February 19, 2019 Voic et al.
10299809 May 28, 2019 Mikus et al.
10398463 September 3, 2019 Darian et al.
10398465 September 3, 2019 Darian
10405875 September 10, 2019 Voic et al.
10463381 November 5, 2019 Voic et al.
10470788 November 12, 2019 Sinelnikov
10470789 November 12, 2019 Mikus et al.
10471281 November 12, 2019 Mikus
10543012 January 28, 2020 Pantano
10588691 March 17, 2020 Pellegrino et al.
10639733 May 5, 2020 Campbell et al.
10687824 June 23, 2020 Shiels et al.
10835276 November 17, 2020 Voic et al.
10842587 November 24, 2020 Mikus et al.
11007308 May 18, 2021 Payne et al.
11298434 April 12, 2022 Isola et al.
11324531 May 10, 2022 Voic et al.
11389183 July 19, 2022 Voic et al.
11406413 August 9, 2022 Voic et al.
11540853 January 3, 2023 Voic et al.
11672558 June 13, 2023 Voic
11737775 August 29, 2023 Voic et al.
11950790 April 9, 2024 Voic
12011190 June 18, 2024 Theodore et al.
20010029370 October 11, 2001 Hodva et al.
20030212395 November 13, 2003 Woloszko et al.
20040265776 December 30, 2004 Tipton et al.
20050033292 February 10, 2005 Teitelbaum et al.
20060030797 February 9, 2006 Zhou et al.
20060235305 October 19, 2006 Cotter et al.
20060241533 October 26, 2006 Geller
20070060926 March 15, 2007 Escaf
20070213734 September 13, 2007 Bleich et al.
20080015551 January 17, 2008 Feine
20080057470 March 6, 2008 Levy et al.
20080058775 March 6, 2008 Darian et al.
20080108985 May 8, 2008 Konesky
20080183173 July 31, 2008 Jozat
20080234709 September 25, 2008 Houser
20080234710 September 25, 2008 Neurohr et al.
20090143678 June 4, 2009 Keast et al.
20090247937 October 1, 2009 Rontal
20100022944 January 28, 2010 Wilcox
20100049188 February 25, 2010 Nelson et al.
20100076349 March 25, 2010 Babaev
20110092880 April 21, 2011 Gertner
20110105958 May 5, 2011 Babaev
20110160624 June 30, 2011 Babaev
20110264090 October 27, 2011 Shadduck et al.
20120014868 January 19, 2012 Roy
20120053492 March 1, 2012 Chang et al.
20130103021 April 25, 2013 Germain et al.
20130123774 May 16, 2013 Zadeh
20130226042 August 29, 2013 Novak et al.
20130231528 September 5, 2013 Voic
20130245638 September 19, 2013 Horton et al.
20140107537 April 17, 2014 Beaupre
20140180002 June 26, 2014 Voic
20140277030 September 18, 2014 Lauchner
20140277034 September 18, 2014 Darian
20140350567 November 27, 2014 Schmitz et al.
20140358043 December 4, 2014 Akagane
20150066032 March 5, 2015 Young
20150088137 March 26, 2015 Manna
20150094723 April 2, 2015 Darian
20150157387 June 11, 2015 OuYANG et al.
20150164534 June 18, 2015 Felder et al.
20150297246 October 22, 2015 Patel et al.
20160022283 January 28, 2016 Wallace et al.
20160135835 May 19, 2016 Onuma
20160166276 June 16, 2016 Huang et al.
20160175150 June 23, 2016 Banko
20160206302 July 21, 2016 Eckermann
20160222526 August 4, 2016 Rubinsky et al.
20160331439 November 17, 2016 Winkelman et al.
20160354559 December 8, 2016 Gavini et al.
20170340339 November 30, 2017 Madan et al.
20180008138 January 11, 2018 Thommen et al.
20190000553 January 3, 2019 Lightcap et al.
20200121374 April 23, 2020 McGahan et al.
20200246056 August 6, 2020 Bonn
20200405501 December 31, 2020 Orozco Castillo
20210145531 May 20, 2021 Gee et al.
20230048993 February 16, 2023 Levy et al.
20230144990 May 11, 2023 Voic et al.
20230210549 July 6, 2023 Voic et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
109152577 January 2022 CN
2635192 March 2019 EP
H0614934 January 1994 JP
H10127682 May 1998 JP
20120093654 August 2012 KR
WO-2004060141 July 2004 WO
WO-2007049718 May 2007 WO
WO-2008014258 January 2008 WO
WO-2008017909 February 2008 WO
WO-2008118708 October 2008 WO
WO-2008118709 October 2008 WO
WO-2009035508 March 2009 WO
WO-2009098664 August 2009 WO
WO-2009105628 August 2009 WO
WO-2010109447 September 2010 WO
WO-2013062118 May 2013 WO
WO-2014024550 February 2014 WO
WO-2015045198 April 2015 WO
WO-2015046349 April 2015 WO
WO-2015145444 October 2015 WO
WO-2017180493 October 2017 WO
WO-2017192288 November 2017 WO
WO-2018022311 February 2018 WO
WO-2018165004 September 2018 WO
WO-2019095831 May 2019 WO
WO-2019204641 October 2019 WO
WO-2022087523 April 2022 WO
WO-2022245499 November 2022 WO
WO-2023018863 February 2023 WO
WO-2023130103 July 2023 WO
Other references
  • SonicOne O.R., Ultrasonic Surgical Debridement. Brochure [online]. Misonix Ultrasonic Surgical Devices, 2012. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20150218182717/ http://www.misonix.com:80/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/SO-OR_2003-12_REV_A_SonicOne_OR_Brochure.pdf, 6 Pages.
  • SonicOne Plus, Ultrasonic Debridement System. Brochure [online]. Misonix Ultrasonic Surgical Devices, 2013. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://pdf.medicalexpo.com/pdf/misonix/sonicone-plus/79244-106567.html, 4 pages.
Patent History
Patent number: 12279787
Type: Grant
Filed: Jan 26, 2021
Date of Patent: Apr 22, 2025
Patent Publication Number: 20210267622
Assignee: Misonix, LLC (Farmingdale, NY)
Inventor: Dilantha B. Ellegala (Paradise Valley, AZ)
Primary Examiner: Christopher J Beccia
Application Number: 17/158,596
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Infrared, Visible Light, Ultraviolet, X-ray Or Electrical Energy Applied To Body (e.g., Iontophoresis, Etc.) (604/20)
International Classification: A61B 17/32 (20060101); A61B 17/00 (20060101);