Method and system utilizing inverted master for holographic recording

Abstract

Disclosed herein is methods and apparatus for recording a holographic waveguide utilizing an inverted holographic master technique. In some embodiments, an apparatus for recording a holographic waveguide is provided. The apparatus may include a source of light configured to provide a recording beam; a master substrate with a non-grating modulated surface and a grating modulated surface, wherein the grating modulated surface is opposite to the non-grating modulated surface and is configured to diffract the recording beam; a bottom substrate with opposing light transmitting surfaces coated with anti-reflection coatings overlaying the grating modulated surface of the substrate and separated from the master substrate by a gap; and an exposure cell containing holographic recording material directly facing the non-grating modulated surface of the master substrate. Advantageously, the inverted holographic master technique mitigates the effects of unwanted reflected exposure light.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 63/266,162 filed on Dec. 29, 2021, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to methods and systems for holographic recording and more specifically to methods and systems for holographic mastering.

BACKGROUND

Waveguides can be referred to as structures with the capability of confining and guiding waves (i.e., restricting the spatial region in which waves can propagate). One subclass includes optical waveguides, which are structures that can guide electromagnetic waves, typically those in the visible spectrum. Waveguide structures can be designed to control the propagation path of waves using a number of different mechanisms. For example, planar waveguides can be designed to utilize diffraction gratings to diffract and couple incident light into the waveguide structure such that the in-coupled light can proceed to travel within the planar structure via total internal reflection (TIR).

Fabrication of waveguides can include the use of material systems that allow for the recording of holographic optical elements within or on the surface of the waveguides. One class of such material includes polymer dispersed liquid crystal (PDLC) mixtures, which are mixtures containing photopolymerizable monomers and liquid crystals. A further subclass of such mixtures includes holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystal (HPDLC) mixtures. Holographic optical elements, such as volume phase gratings, can be recorded in such a liquid mixture by illuminating the material with two mutually coherent laser beams. During the recording process, the monomers polymerize, and the mixture undergoes a photopolymerization-induced phase separation, creating regions densely populated by liquid crystal (LC) micro-droplets, interspersed with regions of clear polymer. The alternating liquid crystal-rich and liquid crystal-depleted regions form the fringe planes of the grating.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Various embodiments are directed to an apparatus for recording a holographic waveguide, including: a source of light configured to provide a recording beam; a master substrate with a non-grating modulated surface and a grating modulated surface, where the grating modulated surface is opposite to the non-grating modulated surface and is configured to diffract the recording beam; a bottom substrate with opposing light transmitting surfaces coated with anti-reflection coatings overlaying the grating modulated surface of the substrate and separated from the master substrate by a gap; and an exposure cell containing holographic recording material directly facing the non-grating modulated surface of the master substrate.

In various other embodiments, said grating modulated surface supports a master grating which is configured to diffract the recording beam into a diffracted first-order beam and a refracted zero-order beam.

In still various other embodiments, the diffracted first order beam interferes with a neighboring refracted zero-order beam in the exposure cell.

In still various other embodiments, the refracted zero-order beam interferes with a neighboring diffracted first-order beam in the exposure cell.

In still various other embodiments, the master substrate is transparent.

In still various other embodiments, the grating modulated surface is coated with a reflective film which forms a master grating.

In still various other embodiments, the reflective film is chrome.

In still various other embodiments, the exposure cell includes a holographic recording material positioned between transparent substrates.

In still various other embodiments, the exposure cell includes a transparent substrate coated with a holographic recording material.

In still various other embodiments, the gap is air filled.

In still various other embodiments, the gap is filled with low refractive index material.

In still various other embodiments, a reflected beam formed by the master substrate at least partially exits the bottom substrate without being reflected back into the master substrate.

In still various other embodiments, the reflected beam includes a reflected zero-order beam and/or a reflected first-order beam.

In still various other embodiments, the reflected first-order beam is suppressed by the gap.

In still various other embodiments, the apparatus further includes a light trap which keeps the light exiting the bottom substrate from being reflected back into the master substrate.

In still various other embodiments, the light trap includes a polarization modification layer.

In still various other embodiments, the light trap includes an optical element for trapping light.

In still various other embodiments, the light trap includes a light absorber.

In still various other embodiments, the master substrate is configured to diffract the first holographic recording beam into a first order beam and a zero-order beam.

In still various other embodiments, the anti-reflection coatings have angular characteristics varying across the light trap substrate tuned to the angles of unwanted light rays incident on the light trap substrate—at different points.

In still various other embodiments, the cell incorporates a release layer.

In still various other embodiments, the non-grating modulated surface is curved.

Further, various embodiments are directed to a method of recording a holographic waveguide, the method including: providing a master substrate with a non-grating modulated surface and grating modulated surface coated, where the grating modulated surface is opposite to the non-grating modulated surface and is configured to diffract the recording beam; providing a bottom substrate with anti-reflection films applied to each optical surface; stacking the master substrate and the bottom substrate with a gap separating the grating modulated surface and a top anti-reflection film coated surface of the bottom substrate; placing an exposure cell on the non-grating modulated surface of the master substrate; and diffracting an exposure beam using the grating modulated surface of the master substrate to provide a diffracted first-order beam and a refracted zero-order beam within the exposure cell.

In various other embodiments, the master grating substrate is transparent.

In still various other embodiments, the cell includes one selected from the group of a holographic material sandwiched by transparent substrates or a transparent substrate coated with a holographic recording material.

In still various other embodiments, the gap is air filled.

In still various other embodiments, the gap is filled with low refractive index material.

In still various other embodiments, a reflected beam formed by the master substrate at least partially exits the bottom substrate without being reflected back into the master substrate.

In still various other embodiments, the method further includes providing a light trap which keeps the light exiting the bottom substrate from being reflected back into the master substrate.

In still various other embodiments, the light trap includes a polarization modification layer.

In still various other embodiments, the light trap includes an optical element for trapping light.

In still various other embodiments, the non-grating modulated surface is curved.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The description will be more fully understood with reference to the following figures and data graphs, which are presented as various embodiment of the disclosure and should not be construed as a complete recitation of the scope of the disclosure, wherein:

FIG. 1A conceptually illustrates the operation of a holographic master in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 1B is a table of an example of beam angles in glass with respect to a master substrate normal illustrated in FIG. 1A.

FIG. 2A is a schematic of an example configuration for a holographic exposure apparatus in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2B illustrates the device of FIG. 2A with light trap substrate only illustrating the unwanted reflected light paths with internal reflection points A and B labeled.

FIG. 2C conceptually illustrates in a cross section view a holographic waveguide exposure stack using an upright master with the master grating in an upright orientation.

FIG. 3A is a plot illustrating stray light interaction with the lower surface of the light trap substrate used at the interface point A illustrated in FIG. 2B.

FIG. 3B is a plot illustrating stray light interaction with the lower surface of the light trap substrate used at the interface point B illustrated in FIG. 2B.

FIG. 4 illustrates a holographic exposure apparatus including the inverted master approach in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate examples of the holographic exposure apparatus of FIG. 4 with various light traps in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.

FIGS. 6A-6D show the results of tests carried out on an example grating manufactured using the inverted master technique disclosed in connection with FIG. 4.

FIG. 7A shows a graphical display of the measured haze for a grating made using the control master where the master grating was facing the exposure cell.

FIG. 7B shows the measured haze for a grating made using an upside-down master utilizing the inverted master technique where the master grating was opposite the exposure cell.

FIG. 7C is an image of the master grating element used in producing the grating of FIG. 7A and the grating of FIG. 7B.

FIG. 8 conceptually illustrates a flow diagram illustrating a method of recording a holographic waveguide in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 9 conceptually illustrates in a cross sectional view a holographic waveguide exposure stack using an inverted master technique in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Holographic waveguide technology may enable low cost, efficient and versatile diffractive optical solutions for many applications. Holographic waveguides may be fabricated by contact copying from a high precision master grating formed as a metallized (e.g. chrome-coated) amplitude grating. In such processes, the incident laser exposure beam is diffracted into a first order (+1) diffracted beam and a zero order beam. The two beams interfere in a holographic medium in contact with the master grating to form a copy hologram. It has been discovered that mastering tools used for fabricating holographic waveguides may suffer from the problem of reflected +1 orders which may propagate at waveguide angles and create spurious gratings or ghosts in the images displayed using the finished waveguide. One solution to this problem is to place thick glass trap underneath the master to allow the unwanted orders to propagate away from grating areas. However, this solution fails when applied to the manufacture of large holograms such as the ones used in holographic waveguides for large scale waveguides such as in automotive heads up displays HUDs, where large area output gratings may result in a glass trap thickness greater than 100 mm. The use of a thick glass trap can also present a problem for near to eye (NTE) waveguides, as accumulated scatter from the glass may get recorded into the hologram during the exposure process, resulting in haze and general loss of contrast in the final viewed image. It is advantageous to have a low cost, efficient, compact, low haze mastering process for fabricating holographic waveguides for augmented reality (AR) applications.

Turning to the drawings, FIG. 1A conceptually illustrates the operation of a holographic master 100 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. FIG. 1A shows the principal beam directions relevant to the mastering process. A master grating diffracting surface 101 is positioned between an incident beam medium 102 and a diffracted beam medium 103. The incident beam 104 is diffracted into the refracted zero-order beam 105 and the diffracted first-order beam 106. Reflection at the master grating diffracting surface 101 also gives rise to unwanted reflections of a reflected first order beam 107 and a reflected zero order beam 108. The refracted zero-order beam 105 interferes with a neighboring diffracted first-order beam 106 to form the interference pattern that gives rise to the hologram. The reflected beams 107, 108 are unwanted beams.

FIG. 1B is a table of an example of beam angles in glass with respect to a master substrate normal 109 illustrated in FIG. 1A. The beams used for holographic exposure are the refracted zero-order beam and the diffracted first order beam. As described above, the reflected fir order beam may be reduced using a light trap on the bottom of an exposure stack. In various embodiments, the reflected zero order beam can be reduced by an anti-reflective coating on the underside of the exposure stack.

FIG. 2A is a schematic of an example configuration 120 for a holographic exposure apparatus in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The apparatus includes a light trap substrate 121, a master substrate 122 supporting a master grating, and an exposure cell 123 overlaying the master grating. Rays are incident at one exposure location 124. An incident exposure beam ray 124A is refracted through the light trap substrate 121 into the ray 124B incident at the exposure location 124. The ray 124B is diffracted to provide a refracted zero-order ray 127 and a diffracted first-order ray 128 which may interfere within the exposure cell to form a copy grating. Two unwanted beam paths may be incident on the exposure location 124. In a first path, another exposure beam ray 125A may be refracted through the light trap substrate 121 into the ray 125B which interacts with the master grating on the master grating substrate 122 to form a zero-order reflected ray 125C which is totally internally reflected at the bottom of the light trap substrate 121 into the ray 125D which, in turn, interacts with the master grating at the exposure location 124. In a second path, the rays 126A-126D illustrate a ray path including an unwanted reflected diffracted first order 126C, which may be totally internally reflected at the bottom of the light trap substrate 121 into unwanted reflected diffracted first order light 126D, and then interacts with the master grating at the exposure location 124. In many embodiments, unwanted ray paths incident at exposure locations across the exposure cell may form spurious gratings leading to ghost images in the finished waveguide. Reflected orders of the type illustrated in FIG. 2A may be partially mitigated using a thick glass trap substrate 121, directing the beam from the exposure cell 123 far enough away that only a small portion of the output grating is affected. A thick light trap substrate 121 may also result in a relatively large angular offset between the desired exposure beams at the exposure location and the unwanted stray light beams leading to large grating periods in the unwanted gratings significantly reducing the visibility of the ghost images in the image viewed through the eyebox. However, thick light trap substrates may not be a desired solution for many waveguide display applications as they may contribute to haze and become very cumbersome when optical designs are scaled to large wider fields of view and larger exit pupil sizes.

FIG. 2B illustrates the device of FIG. 2A with light trap substrate only illustrating the unwanted reflected light paths with internal reflection points A and B labeled. FIG. 2C conceptually illustrates in a cross section view a holographic waveguide exposure stack 200 using an upright master with the master grating in an upright orientation. The exposure stack 200 includes a master substrate 202 which may be fused silica with a thickness of 6.347 millimeters. The fused silica may have a refractive index of 1.47. The exposure stack 200 further includes a glass trap 206 which may be N-BK7 with a thickness of 30 mm. The glass trap 206 has a lower surface coated with an anti-reflection coating 208 providing a reflection coefficient less than 0.5% over ±60 degrees. The master substrate 202 may be covered by a fused silica cover 204 with a thickness of 19.041 millimeters. The master substrate 202 may include a master grating layer 210 which may be a chrome plating which may be in direct contact with the fused silica cover 204. Above the fused silica cover 204 is an exposure cell 212 which may exposed to create a waveguide.

FIG. 3A is a plot illustrating stray light interaction with the lower surface of the light trap substrate 121 used at the interface point A illustrated in FIG. 2B. FIG. 3B is a plot illustrating stray light interaction with the lower surface of the light trap substrate 121 used at the interface point B illustrated in FIG. 2B. The plots illustrate the reflection efficiency versus incidence angle at the glass air boundary of the bottom surface of the light trap substrate 121.

In FIGS. 3A and 3B, the reflection coefficient R versus incident angle may be optimized for minimum reflection at the points A and B. For example, through the structure of the light trap substrate, the form of the curve may be modified to give reflection minima at points A and B for light incident at angles 6A and 6B. However, this may include deposition of multilayer coatings onto the bottom surface of the light trap substrate 121. It has been discovered that any coatings will also disturb the incident beam which may increase haze in the exposed grating.

Disclosed herein is an inverted master approach which may be utilized to mitigate the amount of reflected light which may interfere with the exposure. FIG. 4, illustrates a holographic exposure apparatus including the inverted master approach in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The apparatus 130 for recording a holographic waveguide includes a source of light 131 configured to provide a first holographic recording beam. The apparatus 130 further includes a master grating substrate 132 including a non-grating modulated surface 133B and a grating modulated surface 133A coated with a reflective film which forms the master grating. A master grating is positioned on the grating modulated surface 133A. In many embodiments, the reflective film may be chrome. In many embodiments, the master grating substrate 132 may be transparent. In various embodiment, the non-grating modulated surface 133B may be planar or curved. A bottom substrate 134 with opposing light transmitting surfaces coated with anti-reflection coatings overlaying the grating modulated surface of the bottom substrate 134 and separated from the master substrate by a gap 135. The bottom substrate 134 may be anti-reflective double side coated. The AR coatings prevent reflections from upper and lower surface of the bottom substrate that would otherwise enter the exposure region and interact with the recording beams to form spurious gratings and other artifacts.

An exposure cell 137 may be placed on the planar non-grating modulated surface 133B of the master grating substrate 132. The planar non-grating modulated surface 133B may be the surface opposite the grating modulated surface 133A. The exposure cell 137 may be an exposure plane stack. As illustrated, an exposure beam 138A may be provided from the source of light 131. The exposure beam 138A may be diffracted using the master grating on the grating modulated surface 133A to provide a diffracted first-order beam 138C and a refracted zero-order beam 138B within the exposure cell 137. The diffracted first order beam 138C may interfere with a neighboring zero-order beam 138B in the exposure cell 137 to form a copy hologram. In some embodiments, the master grating may be curved and the exposure cell 137 may be curved.

In many embodiments, the air gap 135 may be air filled. In many embodiments, the air gap 135 may be formed with spacers 136, such as shims, located at the periphery to leave an air gap 135 across the aperture of the master grating. In some embodiments, the spacers 136 may be spacer beads. However, since spacer beads may act as scattering centers that may contribute to haze, spacer beads may not be a preferred option. In some embodiments, a low index material such as a nanoporous material may be used instead of an air gap 135. Such materials may have pores in the size range from 0.2-50 nanometers and have an effective refractive index approaching 1.0 for sufficiently high level of porosity. The achievable index also depends on pore diameter and film thickness. It has been discovered that the reflected first-order beam does not exist in air leaving only the zero-order reflected beam to be blocked. Thus, including the air gap 135 blocks the first-order beam leaving only the zero-order reflected beam to be blocked. While an air gap is illustrated, it has also been discovered that other filler in the gap 135 may be included that have a refractive index close to 1. For example, the gap may be filled with a nano-porous material. Further, inverting the master substrate such that the master grating is in contact with the air gap 135 may prevent or suppress the formation of reflected first-order beams.

In various embodiments, the exposure cell 137 may include a holographic material sandwiched by transparent substrates. In various embodiments, the exposure cell 137 may include a transparent substrate coated with a holographic recording material. In many embodiments, the exposure cell 137 may include a transparent substrate that functions as a release layer. Examples of an exposure cell 137 including a release layer are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2022/0283376, entitled “Evacuated Periodic Structures and Methods of Manufacturing” and filed Mar. 7, 2022 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

In many embodiments, the holographic recording material may be an isotropic material, that is, a conventional holographic photopolymer. In many embodiments, the holographic recording material may be anisotropic. In many embodiments, the anisotropic holographic material may include a mixture of at least one liquid crystal component and at least one monomer component. In many embodiment, the holographic material may include a monomer mixed with one of a nanoparticle or an inert fluid. In many embodiments the monomer may comprise a monomer mixed with an inert material that is at least partially removed after the grating has been recorded. The exposure cell 137 may be used as an evacuated periodic structure which is described in U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2022/0283376 and U.S. Pat. No. 11,442,222, entitled “Evacuated gratings and methods of manufacturing” and filed Aug. 28, 2020, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

In many embodiments, reflected first order light 138D and reflected zero-order light 138E are transmitted though the anti-reflection coated surfaces of the bottom substrate 134 towards a light trap (shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B).

In many embodiments, the anti-reflection coatings applied to the substrate 134 may have angular characteristics that vary across the substrate 134 tuned to the angles of unwanted light rays incident on the substrate surfaces at different points.

It has been discovered that a reflected first order beam 138D formed by the master grating substrate 132 does not exist in air. Thus, it is advantageous to have the master grating substrate 132 inverted such that the master grating 133 directly contacts the air gap 135. In many embodiments, the light trap may include a light absorbing material. In many embodiments, the light trap may include a polarization modification layer.

The inverted master approach may not include a thick light trap substrate underneath the master grating substrate 132 in the exposure stack, thereby improving haze and reducing the volume and weight of the recording apparatus. Instead, the light trap may be positioned away from the exposure apparatus.

FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate examples of the holographic exposure apparatus of FIG. 4 with various light traps in accordance with various embodiments of the invention. The light traps may be light absorbers which are positioned to absorb unwanted reflected light which may otherwise expose the exposure cell and create unwanted defects. FIG. 5A illustrates an example scanning exposure apparatus where the light source is a line or a point source. In this case, light traps 139A, 139B may be light absorbers positioned where the reflected light 138D, 138E would occur and thus the light absorbers would capture the unwanted reflected light. The light traps 139A, 139B move with the light source 131 such that the unwanted reflected light is continuously captured. FIG. 5B illustrates an example flood exposure apparatus where the light source is a flood source. In this case, the light source 131 may include a single beam 138A which may be expanded before hitting the master grating substrate 132. The light traps 140 may be a sheet of light absorber which has a hole that allows the incident beam 138A to pass through. These various light trap configurations are merely exemplary and there may be other configurations. For example, the light trap may not absorb light but also direct light away from reflected back into the exposure cell. Further, the orientation and placement of the light traps may be different. Unwanted light may be directed beyond the edges of the master onto peripherally mount absorbers or into light trapping cavities. Also, if the unwanted light has a polarization, optical set ups incorporating polarizers may be used to attenuate the light.

FIGS. 6A-6D show the results of tests carried out on an example grating manufactured using the inverted master technique disclosed in connection with FIG. 4. FIG. 6A shows a graphical display of haze data measurements. The image on the right is of a grating 151 manufactured using the inverted master technique. The image on the left is of the grating 151 filtered for haze. As illustrated, the average haze in this case was found to be 0.2145%. The haze is low and uniform.

FIG. 6B is a table of diffraction efficiency data for the grating 151 of FIG. 6A measured at different coordinates (X,Y) across the test part, including peak DE expressed as a percentage, the peak diffraction angle and the FWHM angular beam width both expressed in degrees. The average peak DE is 59.78%. Thus, the DE is high enough that this grating may be utilized in normal diffractive operations.

FIG. 6C is a chart plotting the DE versus angle characteristic for the grating 151B of FIG. 5A at each of the tabulated X, Y positions.

FIG. 6D shows transmission through crossed polarizers for the grating 151 of FIG. 6A.

The haze from gratings recorded using the inverted master were compared with the haze produced by a grating recorded using a control master. Parts were exposed in each configuration, upside down with no immersed cover, and right-side-up, with a 1.51 index immersed cover, regular procedure. FIG. 7A shows a graphical display of the measured haze for a grating 702 made using the control master where the master grating was facing the exposure cell. The average haze was measured as 0.3176% for an average diffraction efficiency of 55.62%. As illustrated, there are spots of haze scatted throughout the grating 702. FIG. 7B shows the measured haze for a grating 704 made using an upside-down master utilizing the inverted master technique where the master grating was opposite the exposure cell. The average haze was measured as 0.2156% for an average diffraction efficiency of 59.78%. As illustrated, the haze is both low and uniform throughout the grating 704. FIG. 7C is an image of the master grating element used in producing the grating 702 of FIG. 7A and the grating 704 of FIG. 7B.

Different apertures may be used in the two exposure setups of FIGS. 7A and 7B to accommodate the additional distance between master and copy plane in the inverted master case. The latter also had to take into the account the additional optical path through the master substrate. The exposure angle of incidence in each case may be 16 degrees in air. In each case, the exposed gratings are recorded in an isotropic holographic recording material and had a grating thickness of 2.0 micron. Gratings are exposed, in each configuration, upside down with no immersed cover, and right-side-up, with a 1.51 index immersed cover. The haze and diffraction efficiency data demonstrated that the upside-down master diffracts at least as well as when the master grating was facing the exposure cell. Improvement in haze performance may be achieved by elimination of spacer beads with the inverted master approach.

FIG. 8 conceptually illustrates a flow diagram illustrating a method 170 of recording a holographic waveguide in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. Referring to the flow diagram, the method 170 includes providing (171) a master substrate with a planar non-grating modulated surface and grating modulated surface coated with a reflective film which forms the master grating. The method 170 further includes providing (172) a bottom substrate with anti-reflection films applied to each optical surface. The method 170 further includes stacking (173) the master substrate and the bottom substrate with a gap separating the grating modulated surface and an anti-reflection film coated surface of the bottom substrate. The method 170 further includes placing (174) an exposure cell on the planar non-grating modulated surface of the master grating substrate. The method 170 further includes diffracting (175) an exposure beam using the grating modulated surface of the master substrate to provide a diffracted first-order beam and a refracted zero-order beam within the exposure cell. The diffracted first-order beam and a neighboring refracted zero-order beam and the refracted zero-order beam and a neighboring diffracted first-order beam interfere in the exposure cell to form a copy hologram. In various embodiment the non-grating modulated surface may be planar or curved.

Many embodiments directed at recording holographic waveguides using an inverted master may incorporate some of the embodiments and teachings related to recording holographic waveguides using master gratings disclosed in Int. Pub. No. WO 2019136473, entitled “Methods for Fabricating Optical Waveguides” and filed Jan. 8, 2019 which is incorporated herein in by reference in its entirety. Many embodiments directed at recording holographic waveguides using an inverted master may incorporate some of the embodiments and teachings related to methods of fabricating waveguides cells using coating techniques for depositing optical recording materials onto substrates as disclosed in the U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2019/0212588, entitled “Systems and Methods for Manufacturing Waveguide Cells” and filed Nov. 28, 2018, which is incorporated herein in by reference in its entirety.

FIG. 9 conceptually illustrates in a cross sectional view a holographic waveguide exposure stack 800 using an inverted master technique in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The exposure stack 800 includes a master substrate 806. The master substrate 806 may include fused silica which may include a refractive index of 1.47 with a thickness of 6.347 millimeters. The exposure stack 800 further includes a glass bottom substrate 808. The bottom substrate 808 may be N-BK7 with a thickness of 1 mm. The glass bottom substrate 808 is separated from a chrome coated surface which makes up a master grating 810 by a small air gap 812. The small air gap 812 may be created by spacer beads 814. The master substrate 806 is covered by a fused silica cover 804 of thickness 12.694 millimeters. The fused silica cover 804 may have a refractive index of 1.47. An exposure cell 802 may be positioned above the fused silica cover 804. The glass bottom substrate 808 has a lower surface coated with an anti-reflection coating 816 providing a reflection coefficient less than 0.5% over ±60 degrees.

DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS

While the above description contains many specific embodiments of the invention, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as an example of one embodiment thereof. It is therefore to be understood that the present invention may be practiced in ways other than specifically described, without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. Thus, embodiments of the present invention should be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the embodiments illustrated, but by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims

1. An apparatus for recording a holographic waveguide, comprising:

a source of light configured to provide a recording beam;

a master substrate with a non-grating modulated surface and a grating modulated surface, wherein the grating modulated surface is opposite to the non-grating modulated surface and is configured to diffract the recording beam;

a bottom substrate with opposing light transmitting surfaces coated with anti-reflection coatings overlaying the grating modulated surface of the master substrate and separated from the master substrate by a gap; and

an exposure cell containing holographic recording material directly facing the non-grating modulated surface of the master substrate.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said grating modulated surface supports a master grating which is configured to diffract the recording beam into a diffracted first-order beam and a refracted zero-order beam.

3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the diffracted first order beam interferes with a neighboring refracted zero-order beam in the exposure cell.

4. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the refracted zero-order beam interferes with a neighboring diffracted first-order beam in the exposure cell.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the master substrate is transparent.

6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the grating modulated surface is coated with a reflective film which forms a master grating.

7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the reflective film is chrome.

8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the exposure cell comprises a holographic recording material positioned between transparent substrates.

9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the exposure cell comprises a transparent substrate coated with a holographic recording material.

10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the gap is air filled.

11. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the gap is filled with low refractive index material.

12. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein a reflected beam formed by the master substrate at least partially exits the bottom substrate without being reflected back into the master substrate.

13. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the reflected beam comprises a reflected zero-order beam and/or a reflected first-order beam.

14. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the reflected first-order beam is suppressed by the gap.

15. The apparatus of claim 12, further comprising a light trap which keeps the light exiting the bottom substrate from being reflected back into the master substrate.

16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the light trap comprises a polarization modification layer.

17. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the light trap comprises an optical element for trapping light.

18. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the light trap comprises a light absorber.

19. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the master substrate is configured to diffract the recording beam into a first order beam and a zero-order beam.

20. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the anti-reflection coatings have angular characteristics varying across the bottom substrate tuned to the angles of unwanted light rays incident on the bottom substrate at different points.

21. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the exposure cell comprises a release layer.

22. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the non-grating modulated surface is curved.