Controlled release pesticidal composition and method of making

Abstract

A granular controlled-release pesticide comprising “core” granules such as ammonium sulfate, an inner polymer membrane formed in situ on said granules of ammonium sulfate, an acephate pesticide applied to the inner polymer membrane on the core granules, and an outer controlled-release polyurethane membrane formed in situ on said pesticide to permit controlled release of the pesticide.

Description

FIELD OF INVENTION

[0001] This invention is directed to a composite granular material tailored to release, upon application to soil, plants or the like, a pesticide in a controlled manner. More particularly, the invention is directed to a particulate material comprising a “core” such as ammonium sulfate which is coated under controlled conditions with a select polymeric membrane and a pesticide such as acephate. A controlled-release polymer membrane is applied as an outer membrane. The material is stable when stored, but will release pesticide at a controlled rate when applied to a plant or the like material in a field environment.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] In recent years, because of ecological concerns as well as the need for controlled release of fertilizers, pesticides and the like materials for economical reasons, there has been a concerted effort to coat fertilizers as well as pesticidal materials with polymer coatings which will permit a controlled release of the material upon application to plants or the like in a field environment.

[0003] For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,060,076 discloses methods and devices for providing long-term protection from intrusion by insects and other cold-blooded animals involving a polymeric matrix and a pesticide contained therein.

[0004] Further, U.S. Pat. No. 5,939,376 discloses a controlled-release coated agricultural product including agricultural chemicals, seed, or mixtures thereof with a coating of an environmentally degradable amorphous copolymer. A process of making such products involves making the product with a molten copolymer and then cooling to harden the coating of copolymer upon the agricultural product.

[0005] U.S. Pat. No. 4,056,610 discloses a microcapsule insecticide composition including microcapsules, each having a polyurea shell with a photostable ultraviolet light-absorbing compound as an integral part of the shell and a liquid fill capable of slowly permeating the shell of a pyrethroid and a biologically synergist thereof. When the polymer is applied as an insecticide, the pyrethroid releases slowly depending upon the thickness and porosity of the capsule wall.

[0006] U.S. Pat. No. 4,223,070 discloses filled porous granules sealed with a porous polyurethane membrane entrapping therein a liquid material. The material is allowed to diffuse from the granules at a controlled rate. The porous granules which are partially miscible with water have applied thereto an organic solution comprising the material to be entrapped, an organic polyisocyanate, and a catalytic amount of a catalyst for catalyzing the polymeric reaction.

[0007] U.S. Pat. No. 6,080,221 discloses a method of coating fertilizer particles exhibiting porous surfaces under vacuum to form controlled-release particulate fertilizers by drawing a vacuum on the fertilizer particles and applying thereto a water-insoluble resin at atmospheric pressure and then hardening the fluid resin to form a solid resin. Pesticides may be coated using the disclosed method.

[0008] While these described products are recognized to provide certain improvements with respect to the release of insecticides and the like, the formulations in most respects are difficult to produce, lack essential properties in a controlled-release product, or simply can stand improvement.

[0009] In a related field it has also been recognized that a fertilizer product, such as urea, can be applied to a soil environment in order to control the release of the fertilizer over a period of time. This permits a single application of the fertilizer which will last several months and possibly an entire growing season, avoiding the need for further applications. For example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,716,659; 4,804,403, and 4,969,947, in the name of William P. Moore and now assigned to the assignee of the present application, disclose an attrition-resistant, controlled-release fertilizer comprising a water-soluble central mass, such as urea, containing nucleophilic reaction functional groups surrounding and chemically bonded to a base coating formed by reacting a molecular excess of a coupling agent, such as a polyisocyanate, with the nucleophilic groups of the central mass and a water-insoluble layer surrounding and chemically bonded with the base coating formed by the reaction and polymerization of the excess functional groups of the coupling agent. These products provide outstanding controlled-release fertilizer products.

[0010] The present invention is directed to further improved pesticidal materials having controlled-release characteristics when compared with the known materials described in the known prior art.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0011] In accordance with the present invention, pesticidal products are manufactured having excellent controlled release of the pesticide by bonding the pesticide or a pesticide mixture to a “core” material such as ammonium sulfate using reactive polymer-forming components. Specifically, a core granule has applied thereto an inner polymer membrane. A pesticide or pesticide mixture is applied to the polymer membrane on the core material and bonded thereto, preferably using the reactive components of a polymer matrix. An outer controlled-release polymeric membrane is applied to the inner polymer matrix. The outer controlled-release membrane is formed by using reactive components, such as a polyisocyanate and a polyol such as a polyester. The components of the membrane are controlled so as to permit controlled release of the pesticide and possibly the core granular material when applied to the soil where the product is in contact with moisture.

[0012] For convenience, the present invention will be described with reference to an insecticide as the pesticide, and specifically acephate; ammonium sulfate as the granular core material, and a polyurethane as both the inner membrane and the outer controlled-release membrane. It is to be understood, however, that other granular materials such as urea, potassium chloride, clay and the like can be utilized as the core material. Ammonium sulfate is, however, a highly preferred material and provides an excellent pesticidal composition. Further, in addition to using acephate as the pesticide, other pesticides can be utilized, including other insecticides, as well as other components including herbicides, fungicides, plant growth regulators, and the like. The selection of acephate as the pesticide and ammonium sulfate as the granular core material is due to the excellent product formed with these materials and for convenience of description.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0013] The present invention will be described with respect to a controlled-release pesticidal material comprising ammonium sulfate as the “core” material, an inner polymer membrane surrounding the core granular material, acephate as the pesticide, and a polyurethane membrane as a controlled-release membrane. In Examples 1 and 2 which follow, these materials are utilized. It is to be understood, however, that modifications can be made in addition to components used with respect to the number of coatings applied to the core material and to the amount of active component utilized.

EXAMPLE 1

[0014] Description of Manufacture of Controlled-Release Acephate Referred to as Type 10 TC (Taraet Acephate Content=4.3%)

[0015] The inner “core” granule is ammonium sulfate. The application of the inner polymer membrane, the bonding procedure and the coating procedure are carried out as follows:

[0016] Application of Inner Polymer Membrane and Bondina Procedure:

[0017] (1) 2000 pounds of ammonium sulfate granules (average particle size=1.7 mm) are charged to a rotary drum. The temperature of the granules is kept at 90+10° F.

[0018] (2) The rotary drum is turned on and its speed is adjusted to 10 rpm.

[0019] (3) 0.43 pounds of polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate (p-MDI) (see specifications below) are injected beneath the surface of the rolling bed of ammonium sulfate granules. The p-MDI is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0020] (4) 2.19 pounds of a polyester polyol/triethanolamine 90%/10% blend (see specifications below) are injected beneath the surface of the rolling bed of ammonium sulfate granules and allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0021] At the conclusion of the above step (4), the p-MDI and

[0022] polyester polyol/triethanolamine blend have reacted to form

[0023] the inner polymer membrane.

[0024] (5) 9.76 pounds of a fine powder (95% of particles smaller than 0.0029 inch), composed of 1.5% precipitated silica and 98.5% of a commercial pesticide formulation of acephate containing 90% acephate active ingredient, are added to the rolling bed of granules coated with the polyurethane produced in steps (3) and (4). The added powder is allowed to spread over the surface of the coated granules for three minutes.

[0025] Acephate active ingredient is 0,S-Dimethyl acetylphosphoramidothioate.

[0026] (6) 0.67 pounds of p-MDI are injected beneath the rolling bed of granules from step (5), and allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0027] (7) 0.48 pounds of precipitated silica are added to the rolling granules from step (6), and allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0028] (8) Steps (3)-(7) are repeated once, namely

[0029] (a) 0.43 pounds of p-MDI are injected beneath the surface of the rolling bed of granules from Step (7). The p-MDI is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0030] (b) 2.19 pounds of a polyester polyol/triethanolamine 90%/10% blend are injected beneath the surface of the granules from step 8(a) and allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0031] (c) 9.76 pounds of a fine powder (95% of particles smaller than 0.0029 inch), composed of 1.5% precipitated silica and 98.5% of a commercial pesticide formulation of acephate containing 90% acephate active ingredient, added to the rolling bed of granules from step 8(b). The added powder is allowed to spread over the surface of the coated granules for three minutes.

[0032] (d) 0.67 pounds of p-MDI are injected beneath the rolling bed of granules from step 8(c), and allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0033] (e) 0.48 pounds of precipitated silica are added to the rolling granules from step 8(d), and allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0034] (9) 0.91 pounds of a p-MDI are injected into the rolling bed of granules from step (8). The p-MDI is allowed to spread over the granule surface for one minute.

[0035] (10) 4.33 pounds of a polyester polyol/triethanolamine 90%/10% blend are injected beneath the surface of the rolling bed of granules from step (9). The polyol blend is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0036] (11) 19.52 pounds of the acephate/silica powder blend are added to the rolling bed of granules from step (10), and allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for three minutes.

[0037] (12) 1.29 pounds of p-MDI are injected beneath the surface of the rolling granules from step (11). The p-MDI is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0038] (13) 0.95 pounds of precipitated silica are added to the rolling bed of granules from step (12). The silica is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0039] (14) Steps (9)-(13) are repeated four more times.

[0040] Outer Coating Procedure to Produce 10% Controlled-Release Membrane:

[0041] (1) The granules-produced via the above “Inner Polymer Membrane and Bonding Procedure” are heated to 150±10° F. and are maintained at this temperature during the coating procedure.

[0042] (2) 2.85 pounds of p-MDI are injected under the surface of the rolling bed of heated rolling granules. The p-MDI is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0043] (3) 6.42 pounds of a 90%/10% blend of polyester polyol and triethanolamine are injected under the surface of the rolling bed of heated rolling granules. The polyol blend is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for two minutes.

[0044] (4) 4.29 pounds of p-MDI are injected below the surface of the rolling bed of heated rolling granules. The p-MDI is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0045] (5) Steps (2)-(4) are repeated sixteen (16) more times to produce a total of seventeen (17) polyurethane “layers.”

[0046] (6) 2.09 pounds of molten wax (see specifications below), a plasticizer for the polyurethane coating, are injected into the hot rolling bed of granules after polyurethane “layers” 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15. Each wax injection is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0047] Theoretical Yield=2,403 pounds

[0048] Actual Yield=2,396 pounds (99.7% of theoretical yield)

[0049] Outer Coating Target=10 weight %

[0050] Target Acephate Content=4.3 weight %

[0051] Product Longevity 4 months @2° C. and (acephate activity) 2 months @30° C.

[0052] Specifications: 1 (1) p-MDI NCO content, wt. % 31-33 Viscosity @ 25° C., cps  50-200 Equivalent wt., grams 130-133 Functionality 2.4-2.8 (2) Polyester polyol Equivalent wt., grams 220-250 Viscosity @ 25° C., cps 2000-4500 Functionality 2 (3) Triethanolamine triethanolamine, wt %, min 97.0 ethanolamine, wt. %, max 0.5 diethanolamine, wt. %, max 3.0 water, wt. %, max 0.2 (4) Wax lbs/gallon 6.2-6.4 (transitional paraffin) Viscosity @ 100° C., cSt 7.1-8.5 Dropping point, ° F. 160-168 Oil content, wt. %, max 3.0 Needle penetration 13-15 @ 77° F., 0.1 mm

EXAMPLE 2

[0053] Description of Manufacture of Controlled-Release Acephate Referred to as Type 18 TC (Taraet Acephate Content=4.3%)

[0054] The inner “core” granule is ammonium sulfate. The application of the inner polymer membrane, the bonding procedure and the coating procedure are carried out as follows:

[0055] Application of Inner Polymer Membrane and Bonding Procedure:

[0056] (1) 1,808.44 pounds of ammonium sulfate granules (average particle size=1.7 mm) are charged to a rotary drum. The temperature of the granules is kept at 90±10° F.

[0057] (2) The rotary drum is turned on and its speed is adjusted to 10 rpm.

[0058] (3) 0.43 pounds of p-MDI are injected beneath the surface of the rolling bed of ammonium sulfate granules. The p-MDI is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0059] (4) 2.19 pounds of a polyester polyol/triethanolamine 90%/10% blend are injected beneath the surface of the rolling bed of ammonium sulfate granules and allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0060] At the conclusion of step (4), the p-MDI and polyester

[0061] polyol/triethanolamine blend have reacted to form the inner

[0062] polymer membrane.

[0063] (5) 9.76 pounds of a fine powder (95% of particles smaller than 0.0029 inch), composed of 1.5% precipitated silica and 98.5% of a commercial pesticide formulation of acephate containing 90% acephate active ingredient, are added to the rolling bed of granules coated with the polyurethane produced in steps (3) and (4). The added powder is allowed to spread over the surface of the coated granules for three minutes.

[0064] Acephate active ingredient is O,S-Dimethyl acetylphosphoramidothioate.

[0065] (6) 0.67 pounds of p-MDI are injected beneath the rolling bed of granules from step (5), and allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0066] (7) 0.48 pounds of precipitated silica are added to the rolling granules from step (6), and allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0067] (8) Steps (3)-(7) are repeated once, namely

[0068] (a) 0.43 pounds of p-MDI are injected beneath the surface of the rolling bed of granules from Step (7). The p-MDI is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0069] (b) 2.19 pounds of a polyester polyol/triethanolamine 90%/10% blend are injected beneath the surface of the granules from step 8(a) and allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0070] (c) 9.76 pounds of a fine powder (95% of particles smaller than 0.0029 inch), composed of 1.5% precipitated silica and 98.5% of a commercial pesticide formulation of acephate containing 90% acephate active ingredient, are added to the rolling bed of granules from step 8(b). The added powder is allowed to spread over the surface of the coated granules for three minutes.

[0071] (d) 0.67 pounds of p-MDI are injected beneath the rolling bed of granules from step 8(c), and allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0072] (e) 0.48 pounds of precipitated silica are added to the rolling granules from step 8(d), and allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0073] (9) 0.91 pounds of a p-MDI are injected into the rolling bed of granules from step (8). The p-MDI is allowed to spread over the granule surface for one minute.

[0074] (10) 4.33 pounds of a polyester polyol/triethanolamine 90%/10% blend are injected beneath the surface of the rolling bed of granules from step (9). The polyol blend is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0075] (11) 19.52 pounds of the acephate/silica powder blend are added to the rolling bed of granules from step (10), and allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for three minutes.

[0076] (12) 1.29 pounds of p-MDI are injected beneath the surface of the rolling granules from step (11). The p-MDI is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0077] (13) 0.95 pounds of precipitated silica are added to the rolling bed of granules from step (12). The silica is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0078] (14) Steps (9)-(13) are repeated four more times.

[0079] Outer Coatina Procedure to Produce 18% Controlled-Release Membrane:

[0080] (1) The granules produced via the above “Inner Polymer Membrane and Bonding Procedure” are heated to 150±10° F. and are maintained at this temperature during the coating procedure.

[0081] (2) 2.64 pounds of p-MDI are injected under the surface of the rolling bed of heated rolling granules. The p-MDI is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0082] (3) 5.94 pounds of a 90%/10% blend of polyester polyol and triethanolamine are injected below the surface of the rolling bed of heated rolling granules. The polyol is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for two minutes.

[0083] (4) 3.96 pounds of p-MDI are injected under the surface of the rolling bed of heated rolling granules. The p-MDI is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0084] (5) Steps (2)-(4) are repeated thirty-two (32) times to produce a total of thirty-three (33) polyurethane “layers.”

[0085] 2.34 pounds of molten wax, a plasticizer for the polyurethane coating, are injected into the hot rolling bed of granules after polyurethane “layers” 3, 7, 11, 15, 19, 23, 27 and 31. Each wax injection is allowed to spread over the surface of the granules for one minute.

[0086] Theoretical Yield=2,403 pounds

[0087] Actual Yield=2,384 pounds (99.2% of theoretical yield)

[0088] Outer Coating Target=18 weight %

[0089] Target Acephate Content=4.3 weight %

[0090] Product Longevity. =8 months @2° C. and (Acephate activity) 4 months @30° C.

[0091] It is to be understood with respect to the present invention that the granular “core” material can have various particle sizes. The different particle sizes are chosen in order to meet specific applications as will be known to one skilled in the art.

[0092] The effectiveness of the granular pesticides of the present invention are as illustrated in Tables A through G. The pesticides tested are those referred to above in Examples 1 and 2, namely Type 10 TC (Example 1) and Type 18 TC (Example 2). These pesticides were manufactured and tested by Pursell Technologies, Inc. (“PTI”), Sylacauga, Ala. The pesticides were tested in turf. The effectiveness of the pesticides of the invention are compared with Orthene® Tree and Ornamental 75% SP which contains 75% acephate as the active ingredient, except in Table G which also compares the pesticides of the invention with Orthene®, Tree and Ornamental Spray 97 which contains 97% acephate active ingredient; Pinpoint 15 G which contains 15% acephate active ingredient in a granular form, and Battle 9.7 CS which contains Lambda-cyhalothrin, a synthetic pyrethroid. The Orthene product is a sprayable product and was applied to the turf in the tests referred to in Tables A-E upon the detection of the presence of the pests. In some instances, the Orthene spray was applied on more than one occasion as referred to in the Tables A-E. The days after treatment in the Tables A-E refer to days after treatment of the PTI product of Examples 1 and 2. Abbreviations used in the Tables A through G are as follows:

[0093] 10% TC-4% G=Example 1 Controlled-Release Acephate

[0094] 18% TC-4% G=Example 2 Controlled-Release Acephate

[0095] PTI=Pursell Technologies, Inc. of Sylacauga, Ala.

[0096] Orthene or Orthene T&O 75% SP=Orthene® Tree and Ornamental 75% SP containing 75% acephate active ingredient

[0097] Orthene TTO 97% S=OrtheneD Turf, Tree and Ornamental Spray 97 contains, 97% acephate active ingredient

[0098] Pinpoint 15 G=PinpointO 15 G which contains 15% acephate active ingredient in granular form

[0099] Battle 9.7 CS=Battle Lamba-cyhalotrin which is a synthetic pyrethroid

[0100] Untreated=Turf check sample not treated with any pesticide

[0101] Lbs ai/A=Pounds of active ingredient applied per acre

[0102] Lbs Product/A=Pounds of product applied per acre

[0103] DAT=Days after treatment

[0104] WAT=Weeks after treatment 2 TABLE A Field Research Data on Acephate Products of Examples 1 and 2 Haig Point Golf Club - Daufuskie Island, SC PTI Treatments Applied May. 30, 2000 Orthene Sprayable Treatments Applied on June 28 and Jul. 20, 2000 PERCENT MOLE CRICKET CONTROL Rate Rate 30-May 21-Jun 12-Jul 27-Jul 14-Aug 8-Sept Treatments Lbs ai/A Lbs Product/A 0 DAT 22 DAT 43 DAT 58 DAT 76 DAT 101 DAT 10% TC - 4% G 4 100 0 93 100 89 81 83 10% TC - 4% G 8 200 0 100  100 100 98 97 18% TC - 4% G 4 100 0 96 100 84 81 81 18% TC - 4% G 8 200 0 97 100 100 98 97 Orthene T & O 75% 4 + 4 NA — — 48 54 39 34 SP Untreated 0  0 0 0  0  0 0 0

[0105] 3 TABLE B Field Research Data on Acephate Products of Examples 1 and 2 Country Club of Hilton Head - Hilton Head Island, SC PTI Treatments Applied Jun. 6, 2000 Orthene Sprayable Treatments Applied on June 29 and Jul. 21, 2000 PERCENT IMPORTED FIRE ANT CONTROL PERCENT MOLE CRICKET CONTROL Rate Rate 26-Jul 14-Aug 7-Sept 6-Jun 27-Jun 14-Jul 26-Jul 14-Aug 7-Sept Treatments Lbs ai/A Lbs Product/A 50 DAT 69 DAT 93 DAT 0 DAT 21 DAT 38 DAT 50 DAT 69 DAT 93 DAT 10% TC - 4% 4 100 93 77 58 0  78 100 89 85 76 10% TC - 4% 8 200 100 85 77 0 100 100 92 90 79 18% TC - 4% 4 100 77 100 87 0  88 100 76 93 77 18% TC - 4% 8 200 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 99 88 Orthene T & O 75% 4 + 4 NA 27 28 11 — — 0 68 25 19 SP Untreated 0  0 0 0 0 0  0 0 0 0 0

[0106] 4 TABLE C Field Research Data on Acephate Products of Examples 1 and 2 St. Simons Island Golf Club - St. Simons Island, GA PTI Treatments Applied on Jun. 12, 2000 Both Broadcast Surface Versus Subsurface Injected Orthene Sprayable Applied on June 12 and Jun. 26, 2000. PERCENT MOLE CRICKET CONTROL PERCENT MOLE CRICKET CONTROL Surface Injected Surface Injected Surface Injected Surface Injected Surface Injected Rate Lbs 12-Jun 26-Jun 10-Jul 24-Jul 7-Aug 21-Aug Treatments Lbs ai/A Product/A 0 DAT 2 WAT 4 WAT 6 WAT 8 WAT 10 WAT 10% TC - 4% G 4 100 0 59 87 91 90 92 97 86 98 68 80 10% TC - 4% G 8 200 0 92 98 93 97 100 100 99 100 85 87 18% TC - 4% G 4 100 0 82 96 52 89 84 93 88 91 68 83 18% TC - 4% G 8 200 0 100 100 95 100 100 100 97 100 83 96 Orthene T & O 4 + 4 NA 0 13 1 74 61 85 71 55 53 47 47 75% SP Untreated 0  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

[0107] 5 TABLE D Field Research Data on Acephate Products of Examples 1 and 2 St. Simons Island Golf Club - St. Simons Island, GA PTI Treatments Applied on Jun. 26, 2000 Orthene Sprayable Treatments Applied On June 26 and Jul. 10, 2000 PERCENT MOLE CRICKET CONTROL Rate Rate 26-Jun 10-Jul 24-Jul 7-Aug 21-Aug Treatments Lbs ai/A Lbs Product/A 0 WAT 2 WAT 4 WAT 6 WAT 8 WAT 10% TC - 4% G 4 100 0 50 93 84 75 10% TC - 4% G 8 200 0 62 99 96 88 18% TC - 4% G 4 100 0 69 92 83 73 18% TC - 4% G 8 200 0 83 100 98 86 Orthene T & O 75% 4 + 4 NA 0 94 95 67 31 SP Untreated 0  0 0 0 0 0 0

[0108] 6 TABLE E Field Research Data on Acephate Products of Examples 1 and 2 University of Florida - Milton, FL PTI Treatments Applied on Jul. 18, 2000 Orthene Sprayable Treatments Applied on August 10 and Sep. 1, 2000 PERCENT MOLE CRICKET CONTROL Rate Rate 18-Jul 3-Aug 25-Aug 12-Sept Treatments Lbs ai/A Lbs Product/A 0 DAT 2 WAT 5 WAT 8 WAT 10% TC - 4% G 4 100 0 0 50 64 10% TC - 4% G 8 200 0 47 79 72 18% TC - 4% G 4 100 0 0 61 76 18% TC - 4% G 8 200 0 12 72 81 Orthene T & O 75% 4 + 4 NA 0 0 26 55 SP Untreated 0  0 0 0 0 0

[0109] 7 TABLE F Field Research Data on Acephate Products of Examples 1 and 2 Imported Red Fire Ant Control at USDA, APHIS Plant Protection Station, Gulfport, MS PTI treatments applied on Aug. 10, 2000 PERCENT IMPORTED FIRE ANT CONTROL % Decrease in Number of Colonies Rate Rate Test 1 Test 2 Treatments Lbs ai/A Lbs Product/A 6 WAT 6 WAT 10% TC - 4% G 4 100 57 59 10% TC - 4% G 8 200 77 87 18% TC - 4% G 4 100 60 63 18% TC - 4% G 8 200 78 85 Untreated 0  0 43 47

[0110] 8 TABLE G Field Research Data on Acephate Products of Examples 1 and 2 Late Season Adult Mole Cricket Control - Savannah, Georgia All Treatments Applied on Sep. 28, 2000 Mole crickets = 5th Stage Adult at Application Time PERCENT MOLE CRICKET CONTROL Product Lbs ai/A PRE 1 WAT 2 WAT 3 WAT 4 WAT 8 WAT 12 WAT 16 WAT Orthene TTO 97% S 3.88 4 65 93 77 49 49 39 41 Pinpoint 15 G 4.05 9 81 100 82 89 60 59 51 Battle 9.7 CS 0.1375 0 76 99 90 90 72 67 56 10% TC - 4% G 3 0 58 100 81 80 55 75 68 10% TC - 4% G 4 0 57 99 90 92 88 100 92 10% TC - 4% G 5 0 72 100 95 98 97 100 100 Untreated Check 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

[0111] Table A compares the effectiveness of Examples 1 and 2 to commercial product, i.e., Orthene Tree and Ornamental 75% SP, with respect to mole cricket control in turf. Also shown are the results where no treatment is made. The tests were carried out by surface application to turf at Haig Point Golf Club, Daufuskie Island, S.C. As will be apparent, the products of the present invention are greatly superior to either the use of Orthene Tree and Ornamental or no treatment.

[0112] Table B similarly compares the imported fire ant control and the mole cricket control of Examples 1 and 2 of this invention to that achieved with Orthene Tree and Ornamental 75% SP. Also shown are the results where no treatment is made. The tests were carried out by surface application at Country Club of Hilton Head, Hilton Head Island, S.C.

[0113] Table C is similar to Table B, but includes a different method of application. Specifically the products of Examples 1 and 2 were applied both by the broadcast method over the surface and were applied by injection into the subsurface. However, the advantages and effectiveness of the pesticides of the present invention are readily apparent. The tests were carried out at St. Simons Island Golf Club, St. Simons Island, Ga.

[0114] Table D is similar to Tables A and B, and records tests carried out at St. Simons Island Golf Club, St. Simons Island, Ga., and again shows the effectiveness of the pesticides of the present invention over commercial products.

[0115] Table E reporting tests carried out at the University of Florida, Milton, Fla., again establishes the effectiveness of the pesticides of the present invention versus commercial products for mole cricket control.

[0116] Table F establishes the effectiveness of the products of the present invention for the control of imported red fire ants conducted at the Plant Protection Station, Gulfport, Miss.

[0117] Table G establishes the effectiveness of the products of the invention for late season adult mole cricket control. The advantages of the claimed invention over commercial products are established.

[0118] It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the granular core material can have various particle sizes, with the different particle sizes being chosen in order to meet specific applications as will be known to one skilled in the art. Further, the number of coatings applied will determine the amount of pesticide applied. The amount of pesticide applied will vary according to the needs of a particular application.

[0119] As will be apparent to one skilled in the art, various modifications can be made within the scope of the aforesaid description. Such modifications being within the ability of one skilled in the art form a part of the present invention and are embraced by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A granular pesticide comprising a core material coated with an inner polymer membrane formed in situ on the core material, a pesticide applied to the inner polymer membrane on the core material, and an outer controlled release polymer membrane formed in situ on the pesticide to permit controlled release of the pesticide.

2. The granular pesticide of claim 1 wherein the core material is ammonium sulfate.

3. The granular pesticide of claims 1 or 2 wherein the pesticide is acephate.

4. The granular pesticide of claims 1 or 2 or 3 wherein the inner polymer membrane is formed in situ from a diisocyanate and a polyol.

5. The granular pesticide of claim 4 wherein the diisocyanate is polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate.

6. The granular pesticide of claims 4 or 5 wherein the polyol is a polyester polyol.

7. The granular pesticide of claim 6 wherein the polyester polyol is blended with triethanolamine.

8. The granular pesticide of claims 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 wherein the outer controlled release polymer membrane is formed in situ from a diisocyanate and a polyol.

9. The granular pesticide of claim 8 wherein the diisocyanate is polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate.

10. The granular pesticide of claim 8 or 9 wherein the polyol is a polyester polyol.

11. The granular pesticide of claim 10 wherein the polyester polyol is blended with triethanolamine.

12. The granular pesticide of claim 7 wherein said granular pesticide is coated with a plurality of layers of pesticide.

13. A method of making a granular pesticide comprising the steps of

coating a core material with an inner polymer membrane formed in situ on the core material;

applying a pesticide to the inner polymer membrane on the core material, and

forming in situ an outer controlled release membrane on the pesticide to permit controlled release of the pesticide.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein the core material is ammonium sulfate.

15. The method of claims 13 or 14 wherein the pesticide is acephate.

16. The method of claims 13 or 14 or 15 wherein the inner polymer membrane is formed in situ from a diisocyanate and a polyol.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein the polyol is a polyester polyol.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein the polyester polyol is blended with triethanolamine.

19. The method of claims 13 or 14 or 15 or 16 wherein the outer controlled release polymer membrane is formed in situ from a diisocyanate and a polyol.

20. The method of claim 19 wherein the diisocyanate is polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate.

21. The method of claims 19 or 20 wherein the polyol is a polyester polyol.

22. The method of claim 21 wherein the polyester polyol is blended with triethanolamine.

23. The method of claim 22 wherein said granular pesticide is coated with a plurality of layers of pesticide.