VACCINE COMPOSITION FOR VACCINATING DOGS AGAINST CANINE INFECTIOUS RESPIRATORY DISEASE(CIRD)

A vaccine composition for vaccinating dogs comprising any one or more of (a) an agent capable of raising an immune response against Streptococcus equi sub species zooepidemicus in a dog, (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against Mycoplasma cynos in a dog, and (c) an agent capable of raising an immune response against a Chlamydophila in a dog.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is A Divisional of a U.S. application Ser. No. 10/563,199, filed Sep. 1, 2006, which is a National Phase of International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2004/002865, filed Jul. 1, 2004, designating the U.S. and published in English on Jan. 13, 2005 as WO 2005/002618, which claims the benefit of British Patent Application No. 0315323.6, filed Jul. 1, 2003.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a vaccine composition, and in particular to a vaccine composition for use against canine infectious respiratory disease.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Canine infectious respiratory disease (CIRD) is a highly contagious disease common in dogs housed in crowded conditions such as re-homing centers and boarding or training kennels. Many dogs suffer only from a mild cough and recover after a short time, however in some cases a severe bronchopneumonia can develop (Appel and Binn, 1987). CIRD is rarely fatal but it delays re-homing of dogs at rescue centers and it causes disruption of schedules in training kennels as well as considerable treatment costs.

The pathogenesis of CIRD is considered to be multifactorial, involving several viruses and bacteria. The infectious agents considered to be the major causative pathogens of CIRD are canine parainfluenzavirus (CPIV) (Binn et al., 1967), canine adenovirus type 2 (CAV-2) (Ditchfield et al., 1962), and canine herpesvirus (CHV) (Karpas et al., 1968a and 1986b), canine respiratory coronavirus (CRCV) (WO 2004/011651 (The Royal Veterinary College) and Erles et al., 2003) and the bacterium Bordetella bronchiseptica (B. bronchiseptica) (Bemis et al., 1977a, Keil et al., 1998).

These viruses and bacterium have frequently been isolated during outbreaks and have been shown to cause respiratory symptoms or lung lesions in experimental infections (Appel and Percy 1970, Swango et al., 1970, Karpas et al., 1986b).

Also, human reovirus and mycoplasma species have been isolated from dogs with symptoms of CIRD (Lou and Wenner 1963, Randolph et al., 1993). Additional factors like stress may also be important.

B. bronchiseptica was reported as being a primary etiological agent in the respiratory disease “kennel cough” (Bemis et al., 1977b and Thompson et al., 1976). It predisposes dogs to the influence of other respiratory agents and frequently exists concurrently with them. Kennel cough can be reproduced by challenge with virulent B. bronchiseptica. Further, environmental factors such as cold, drafts, and high humidity, often typical conditions in dog kennels, increase susceptibility to the disease (Ellis et al., 2001). Antibiotics are generally recognised as poor agents to treat the primary disease (Ellis et al., 2001). In contrast, immunoprophylaxis for B. bronchiseptica provides a relatively effective means to aid in the control of disease.

The outstanding sign of B. bronchiseptica infection is a harsh, dry cough, which is aggravated by activity or excitement. The coughing occurs in paroxysms, followed by retching or gagging in attempts to clear small amounts of mucus from the throat. Body temperature may be elevated as secondary bacterial invasion takes place. Because kennel cough is highly contagious, the disease can readily be transmitted to susceptible dogs and produce a severe cough. The most severe signs are noted beginning two to five days following infection, but can continue for extended periods. Stress, particularly of adverse environmental conditions, may cause relapse during later stages of the disease.

Kennel cough is typically a condition of the upper airways and is characterized by nasal discharge and coughing. Whereas kennel cough mainly involves upper respiratory tract changes, the pathology of CIRD indicates that it is involved in lung damage and, in some cases, bronchopneumonia. Kennel cough is a milder syndrome than CIRD and does not have the wide range of pathology noted in CIRD. CIRD is also distinguished by an increased severity and mortality.

CIRD is a syndrome in dogs which present with respiratory signs ranging from mild to fatal disease. It is characterized by involvement of upper and lower airway infection with progression from inflammatory to exudative, edematous and sometimes hemorrhagic pathology which can be widespread within the lung tissues. CIRD can also occur in the absence of B. bronchiseptica, and indeed some dogs contract CIRD whilst having no detectable B. bronchiseptica, which indicates that kennel cough and CIRD are distinct infections.

We have also confirmed the association of B. bronchiseptica with respiratory disease while concluding that other agents are involved in respiratory disease (Chalker et al., 2003).

We have now shown that Streptococcus equi sub species zooepidemicus (see Example 1), Mycoplasma cynos (see Example 2), and a Chlamydophila (see Example 3) are associated with CIRD. As all the dogs in our study populations were vaccinated against CPIV and CAV-2, we have no new data to support the involvement of these viruses in CIRD. However we have also found an increased prevalence of canine herpesvirus in dogs with more severe respiratory symptoms (see Example 4).

Streptococcus equi sub species zooepidemicus (S. zooepidemicus) is an opportunist pathogen which is frequently isolated from a variety of animal hosts, not only from horses. It is often found as a commensal of the upper respiratory tract mucosa of mammals (Timoney et al., 1988; Quinn et al., 1999) and has been associated with several disease syndromes including lower airway disease, foal pneumonia and cervicitis in horses (Chanter, 1997; Biberstein and Hirsh, 1999), pneumonia in llamas (Biberstein and Hirsh, 1999), septicemia and arthritis in pigs (Timoney, 1987), mastitis in cows and goats (Timoney et al., 1988), septicemia in poultry, pericarditis and pneumonia in lambs (Timoney, 1987), lymphadenitis in guinea pigs (Quinn et al., 1999), glomerulonephritis in humans (Balter et al., 2000) and meningitis in humans (Ural et al., 2003). In dogs S. zooepidemicus has been associated with wound infections and septicemia (Quinn et al., 1999) and acute necrotizing hemorrhagic pneumonia (Garnett et al., 1982).

Although dogs in the latter stages of hemorrhagic streptococcal pneumoniae (HSP) share some histological features with dogs with CIRD, this is not the case in its early stages (see Chalker et al., 2003) and septic thrombi are present in HSP (Garnett et al., 1982). HSP has a rapid onset that was fatal in most cases without clinical signs, whereas with CIRD we see a slow onset with a huge range of clinical signs from nasal discharge, coughing, sneezing, retching, inappetance, pneumonia and bronchopneumonia.

Mycoplasma cynos (M. cynos) has been associated with canine urinary tract infection (Lang et al., 1984). It has also been identified in the lungs of a dog with distemper (Rosendal, 1978), and endobronchial inoculation of M. cynos was found to induce pneumonia in dogs (Rosendal & Vinther, 1977).

The canine distemper described by Rosendal (1978) is a complex disease following infection with canine distemper virus, various mycoplasma species and the bacterium Pseudomonas. This is a powerful combination of microbial challenges and, not surprisingly, results in pneumonia. The proportion of pathology due to the Mycoplasma spp. was not clear. Subsequent challenge with M. cynos was characterized by no signs of illness in the dogs although some local small inflammatory lesions were noted in 4 out of the 5 dogs inoculated. The significance of M. cynos in this syndrome was, as Rosendal stated, “difficult to assess”.

The Chlamydophila species associated with CIRD is very closely related to Chlamydophila abortus (C. abortus) by comparison of a 218 nucleotide sequence in the 23S rRNA gene. The nucleotide sequence of this region in this Chlamydophila species (SEQ ID NO: 1) is over 99% identical to that of C. abortus, 98.6% identical to Chlamydophila psittaci and 96.3% identical to Chlamydophila felis.

The Chlamydophila species was identified in the trachea and lungs of dogs with CIRD. By contrast, infection with C. abortus is typically associated with reproductive disorders, often leading to unwanted abortion, especially in sheep. C. abortus has not previously been described as having a role in respiratory infection in dogs.

There are very few publications regarding Chlamydiae species infecting dogs, and therefore very little is known of the biodiversity of canine Chlamydiae species. Recently, Chlamydia pneumoniae (C. pneumoniae) has been associated with athrosclerosis in dogs (Sako et al., 2002). An unidentified Chlamydophila spp. has also been identified in a dog with septic polyarthritis (Lambrechts et al., 1999).

C. psittaci has previously been isolated from feces, brain, liver, spleen, kidney and lung tissue of household dogs (Arizmendi et al., 1992; Fraser et al., 1985 and Gresham et al., 1996). Studies have demonstrated that 20% of the pet canine population in Germany and 10% in Japan have been exposed to and raised antibodies to Chlamydiaceae (Werth et al., 1987 and Fukushi et al., 1985). The prevalence of C. psittaci seropositive dogs in the UK is unknown (Gresham et al., 1996). Dogs infected with C. psittaci may develop sub-clinical chronic infections, athrosclerosis, arthritis, conjunctivitis or even respiratory disease (Gresham et al., 1996 and Storz 1988). Gresham et al., (1996) isolated C. psittaci from a dog with symptoms of respiratory disease although these symptoms were not as severe as those. in CIRD. It has been suggested that dogs may be potential reservoirs and, thereby, important in the epidemiology of human Chlamydiae infections (Gresham et al., 1996; Werth 1989). There is only one documented case of isolation in cell culture of C. psittaci from a naturally infected dog (Arizmendi et al., 1992), and one case of isolation from experimentally infected dogs (Young et al., 1972).

Vaccines are available against some of the infectious agents associated with CIRD, namely B. bronchiseptica as well as CPIV and CAV-2. However, despite the use of these vaccines, CIRD is still prevalent in kennels world-wide, which is possibly due to the vaccines not providing protection against all the infectious agents involved in CIRD.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A first aspect of the invention thus provides a vaccine composition for vaccinating dogs comprising anyone or more of:

(a) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against S. zooepidemicus;

(b) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against M. cynos; and

(c) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a Chlamydophila.

It is appreciated that the composition may contain any two of these agents, for example (a) and (b), (a) and (c), or (b) and (c). The composition may contain all three of these agents (a), (b) and (c).

By an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a particular organism, we include the meaning that, when administered to a dog which is not immunocompromised or immunosuppressed, the agent induces the dog's immune system to produce antibodies which specifically bind to the organism. Thus the agent is capable of inducing a protective immune response against the particular organism.

Preferably, the antibody thus produced specifically binds the particular organism with a greater affinity than for any other molecule in the individual. Preferably, the antibody binds the particular organism with at least 2, or at least 5, or at least 10 or at least 50 times greater affinity than for any other molecule in the individual. More preferably, the antibody binds the particular organism with at least 100, or at least 1,000, or at least 10,000 times greater affinity than for any other molecule in the individual.

By an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a particular organism, we also include the meaning that, when administered to a dog which is not immunocompromised or immunosuppressed, the agent induces the dog's immune system to produce antibodies which specifically bind to macromolecules such as proteins that are secreted from the organism. The antibodies would specifically bind the secreted macromolecule, such as a toxin or hemolysin, and inactivate it, therefore reducing pathogenic changes in the host and disease severity, thus allowing the host to overcome infection. Thus, by an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a particular organism we include agents which are capable of raising an immune response to a part of the organism such as a secreted macromolecule.

Typically, an agent capable of raising an immune response against S. zooepidemicus in a dog comprises inactivated or attenuated S. zooepidemicus, or an immunogenic fragment of S. zooepidemicus or a derivative thereof, or a nucleic acid encoding said fragment or said derivative (in which case said fragment or said derivative comprises a polypeptide).

Streptococcus equi sub species zooepidemicus has been deposited at NCTC (Deposit No. 4676. S34), the ATCC (Deposit No. 43079) and the National Collection of Dairy Organisms (NCDO) (Deposit No. 1358), and is described by Farrow et at (1984).

By an “inactivated” component of a vaccine we include the meaning that the particular vaccine component, such as a bacteria, mycoplasma or virus, has been treated in such a way as to eliminate its capacity to cause disease, but still retains its ability to evoke protective immunity. By an “inactivated” vaccine component we include a killed organism.

Methods for inactivating and killing organisms such as bacteria, mycoplasma and viruses for use in a vaccine are well known in the art, and have been used, for example, in the preparation of some of the components for the dog vaccines described below.

There are several methods for inactivating micro-organisms for vaccine preparations. The simplest method is heat killing (for example, heating viruses to 58° C. for 30 minutes; boiling bacteria for 5 minutes or heating to 65° C. for 1 hour) or killing by mixing with formalin. You can also kill micro-organisms with a range of other chemicals, or by treatment with UV light.

By an “attenuated” component of a vaccine we include the meaning that the particular vaccine component, such as a bacteria, mycoplasma or virus, has been selected or otherwise treated in such a way as to greatly diminish its capacity to cause disease but still retains its ability to evoke protective immunity.

Methods for attenuating organisms such as bacteria, mycoplasma and viruses for use in a vaccine are well known in the art, and have been used, for example, in the preparation of some of the components for the dog vaccines described below.

You can attenuate microorganisms by prolonged passage in a different setting—i.e., cell culture for viruses or Chlamydophila, and on solid medium or a different host for bacteria, until a decline in virulence is noted. Alternatively you can point-mutate or delete specific genes in bacteria which are involved in virulence thus limiting the pathogenic potential of the organism, or mutate the organism so that it has a specific requirement for a chemical that is not present in the animal host and therefore cannot multiply and survive once in the host. Attenuation can also be performed in bacteria with chemical treatment and UV light treatment to cause point mutations in the genome.

An immunogenic fragment of S. zooepidemicus may be any fragment of S. zooepidemicus capable of raising a protective immune response in a dog. Thus when an immunogenic fragment of S. zooepidemicus is administered to a dog which is not immunocompromised or immunosuppressed, it induces the dog's immune system to produce antibodies which specifically bind to S. zooepidemicus.

Typically, the immunogenic fragment of a particular organism is a protein component of that organism. By a “protein component” of an organism we include the meaning of an entire protein, or a portion of a protein. It is appreciated that the protein fragment mayor may not be glycosylated. Thus by “protein” we also include glycoprotein. The amino acid sequence of a glycoprotein refers to the amino acid sequence of the polypeptide backbone of the glycoprotein, irrespective of the type, number, sequence and position of the sugars attached thereto.

S. zooepidemicus proteins include the cell surface protein precursors (Genbank Accession Nos. AAA86832 and BAD00711), Cpn60 (Genbank Accession No. AAM88472), M-like protein (Genbank Accession Nos. AAP33082, AAP33081, AAP33080, AAP33079, AAP22285, AAB92635, AAB92634, AAB92633, AAB92632, AAB92631, AAB92630, AAB92629, AAB92628, AAB92627, AAB92626, AAB92625, AAB92624, AAB92623, AAB92622, 2111310A and BAD00712), M-like protein precursor (Genbank Accession No. AAD37432), M-like protein Szp2 precursor (Genbank Accession No. AAF75674), M-like protein Szp3 precursor (Genbank Accession No. AAF75675), M-like protein Szp4 precursor (Genbank Accession No. AAF75676), the protein similar to Streptococcus pneumoniae ORF5 (Genbank Accession No. BAB16041), the putative metal binding/adhesin protein (Genbank Accession No. CAB56710), zoocin A immunity factor (Genbank Accession No. AAC46073) and the Szp proteins described by Walker et al. (1998, 2003; including Genbank Accession Nos. AAQ08488-AAQ08510).

Preferably, the immunogenic fragment of S. zooepidermicus, is a structural protein of S. zooepidermicus or an immunogenic portion thereof. More preferably, the immunogenic fragment of S. zooepidermicus is a secreted toxin, or hemolysin, or an adhesion/surface protein, or an immunogenic portion thereof.

Additional surface proteins can be isolated from a bacteria such as S. zooepidermicus by standard methods known to a person of skill in the art. Sambrook et al (2001) “Molecular Cloning, a Laboratory Manual”, 3rd edition, Sambrook et al (eds), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., USA, incorporated herein by reference, describes general bacterial cloning techniques that would be used for this purpose.

If the agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog is a component of an organism, such as a protein, it may be isolated from a culture of the organism. More preferably, proteins are made by expression of a suitable DNA construct encoding the protein using recombinant DNA technology.

Suitable techniques for cloning, manipulation, modification and expression of nucleic acids, and purification of expressed proteins, are well known in the art and are described for example in Sambrook et at (2001), incorporated herein by reference.

Alternatively, proteins may be made using protein chemistry techniques for example using partial proteolysis of isolated proteins (either exolytically or endolytically), or by de novo synthesis. Peptides may be synthesized by the Fmoc-polyamide mode of solid-phase peptide synthesis as disclosed by Lu et al. (1981) J Org. Chem. 46:3433 and references therein.

By “a derivative” of an immunogenic fragment of an organism we include the meaning of a protein, or portion of a protein, which has been modified from the form in which it is naturally present in that organism, but which retains the ability to raise an immune response in a dog, such as the ability to induce the production of antibodies that specifically bind to that organism.

For example, a derivative may include a sequence variant of the protein or portion thereof which can be used to induce the production of antibodies which specifically bind to that organism. Typically, amino acid substitutions are made to improve the antigenicity of the vaccine. Preferably, the sequence variant is at least 90%, or at least 91%, or at least 92%, or at least 93%, or at least 94%, or at least 95% identical to the native sequence of that protein or portion thereof. More preferably, the sequence variant is at least 96%, or at least 97%, or at least 98%, or at least 99%, or at least 99.5% identical to the native sequence of that protein or portion thereof.

The percent sequence identity between two polypeptides may be determined using suitable computer programs, for example the GAP program of the University of Wisconsin Genetic Computing Group. The percentage identity between two nucleotide or two amino acid sequences can be determined using GCG version 10 (Genetics Computer Group, (1991), Program Manual for the GCG Package, Version 7, April 1991, 575 Science Drive, Madison, Wis., USA 53711). The GCG parameters used can be: Gap creation penalty 50, gap extension penalty 3 for DNA, and Gap creation penalty 8 and Gap extension penalty 2 for Protein. The percentage identity between two nucleotide or two amino acid sequences can also be determined using FASTA version 34 (Pearson W R. (1990) “Rapid and sensitive sequence comparison with FASTP and FASTA”. Methods Enzymot. 183:63-98). FASTA settings may be Gap open penalty −16 and Gap extension penalty-4.

It will be appreciated that percent identity is calculated in relation to polypeptides whose sequence has been aligned optimally.

The alignment may alternatively be carried out using the Clustal W program (Thompson et al., (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-80). The parameters used may be as follows:

Fast pairwise alignment parameters: K-tuple(word) size; 1, window size; 5, gap penalty; 3, number of top diagonals; 5. Scoring method: x percent.

Multiple alignment parameters: gap open penalty; 10, gap extension penalty; 0.05. Scoring matrix: BLOSUM.

Typically, the sequence variant has fewer than 100, or fewer than 50, or fewer than 40, or fewer than 30, or fewer than 20 amino acid residues different from the native sequence of that protein or portion thereof. More preferably, the sequence variant has 15 or 14 or 13 or 12 or 11 or 10 or 9 or 8 or 7 or 6 or 5 or 4 or 3 or 2 or only 1 amino acid residues different from the native sequence of that protein or portion thereof.

The sequence of the derivative may have been altered to enhance the immunogenicity of the agent, or it may have no effect on its immunogenicity. For example, the derivative may have had one or more amino acid sequences that are not necessary to immunogenicity removed.

By “derivative” we also include peptides in which one or more of the amino acid residues are chemically modified, before or after the peptide is synthesized, providing that the function of the peptide, namely the production of specific antibodies in vivo, remains substantially unchanged. Such modifications include forming salts with acids or bases, especially physiologically acceptable organic or inorganic acids and bases, forming an ester or amide of a terminal carboxyl group, and attaching amino acid protecting groups such as N-t-butoxycarbonyl. Such modifications may protect the peptide from in vivo metabolism. The peptides may be present as single copies or as multiples, for example tandem repeats. Such tandem or multiple repeats may be sufficiently antigenic themselves to obviate the use of a carrier. It may be advantageous for the peptide to be formed as a loop, with the N-terminal and C-terminal ends joined together, or to add one or more Cys residues to an end to increase antigenicity and/or to allow disulphide bonds to be formed. If the peptide is covalently linked to a carrier, preferably a polypeptide, then the arrangement is preferably such that the peptide of the invention forms a loop.

According to current immunological theories, a carrier function should be present in any immunogenic formulation in order to stimulate, or enhance stimulation of, the immune system. It is thought that the best carriers embody (or, together with the antigen, create) a T-cell epitope. The peptides may be associated, for example by cross-linking, with a separate carrier, such as serum albumins, myoglobins, bacterial toxoids and keyhole limpet hemocyanin. More recently developed carriers which induce T-cell help in the immune response include the B-hepatitis core antigen (also called the nucleocapsid protein), presumed T-cell epitopes, beta-galactosidase and the 163-171 peptide of interleukin-1. The latter compound may variously be regarded as a carrier or as an adjuvant or as both. Alternatively, several copies of the same or different peptides of the invention may be cross-linked to one another; in this situation there is no separate carrier as such, but a carrier function may be provided by such cross-linking. Suitable cross-linking agents include those listed as such in the Sigma and Pierce catalogues, for example glutaraldehyde, carbodiimide and succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate, the latter agent exploiting the —SH group on the C-terminal cysteine residue (if present).

If the peptide is prepared by expression of a suitable nucleotide sequence in a suitable host, then it may be advantageous to express the peptide as a fusion product with a peptide sequence which acts as a carrier. Kabigen's “Ecosec” system is an example of such an arrangement.

Typically, the polynucleotide encoding the immunogenic fraction of S. zooepidemicus encodes a structural protein, and more preferably a surface protein of S. zooepidemicus, or an immunogenic portion thereof, or a derivative thereof. The sequences of polynucleotides encoding various S. zooepidemicus proteins can readily be ascertained by reference to the above Genbank Accession Nos. However, the sequence of a polynucleotide encoding any immunogenic S. zooepidemicus protein can readily be determined by standard molecular biology techniques.

Typically, an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog comprises inactivated or attenuated M. cynos, or an immunogenic fragment of M. cynos or a derivative thereof, or a nucleic acid encoding said fraction or said derivative.

Mycoplasma cynos been deposited at NCTC (Deposit No. 10142H831) and at the ATCC (Deposit No. 27544) and is described by Rosendal (1972).

Preferably, the immunogenic fragment of M. cynos is a structural protein of M. cynos or an immunogenic portion thereof, and more preferably, a surface protein of M. cynos or an immunogenic portion thereof or a derivative thereof. Surface proteins can be isolated from a mycoplasma such as M. cynos by standard methods known to a person of skill in the art.

Methods for identifying and isolating mycoplasma proteins are generally the same as for bacteria except that some genes may require specialized vectors that recognize the unique codon usage of mycoplasmas (see all chapters in Section B, on Genome Characterisation and Genetics, in Molecular and Diagnostic Procedures in Mycoplasmology. Vol. 1 Ed S. Razin & J. Tully. Academic Press Inc. 1995.)

The most efficacious mycoplasma vaccines tend to contain a heat- or formalin-inactivated whole cell or live attenuated vaccine, and therefore contain all, or at least the majority, of its proteins. Potential mycoplasma components for use as vaccines include proteins such the primary attachment structure membrane protein, believed to be about 45 kDA (equivalent to the P1 cytadhesin from M. pneumoniae and homologues such as MgPa from M. genitalium which are all part of a three gene operon), surface exposed proteins and other attachment proteins, membrane glycolipids, membrane polysaccharide fraction, lipoglycans and all those mentioned in the reviews of animal mycoplasma vaccines (Barile 1985 and Barile et al., 1985).

In an embodiment, the agent capable of raising an immune response against a Chlamydophila comprises inactivated or attenuated C. abortus, or an immunogenic fragment of C. abortus or a derivative thereof, or a nucleic acid encoding said fraction or said derivative.

Chlamydophila abortus (ATCC deposit no. VR-656) was deposited by Everett et al. as ovine chlamydial abortion strain B-577.

In another embodiment, the agent capable of raising an immune response against a Chlamydophila comprises inactivated or attenuated C. psittaci, or an immunogenic fragment of C. psittaci or a derivative thereof, or a nucleic acid encoding said fraction or said derivative.

Chlamydophila psittaci, also known as Chlamydia psittaci, has ATCC deposit no. VR-125 (Lillie (1930) page 1968, Int. J Syst. Bacteriol. 30:274 (AL)).

In a further embodiment, the agent capable of raising an immune response against a Chlamydophila comprises inactivated or attenuated C. felis, or an immunogenic fragment of C. felis or a derivative thereof, or a nucleic acid encoding said fraction or said derivative.

Chlamydophila felis (ATCC deposit no. VR-120) was deposited by Everett et al. as feline pneumonitis strain No. 1.

In another embodiment, the agent capable of raising an immune response against a Chlamydophila comprises inactivated or attenuated Chlamydia muridarum (ATCC VR 123, MoPn; Everett et al., 1999, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49: 431); Chlamydia pecorum (ATCC VR 628, Bo/E58; Fukushi and Hirai 1992, Int. J Syst. Bacteriol. 42: 307); Chlamydia pneumoniae (Type strain: TW-183; Grayston et al., 1989, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 39: 88); Chlamydia suis (ATCC VR 1474, 845; Everett et al., 1999, Int. J Syst. Bacteriol. 49: 431); or Chlamydia trachomatis (type species) (ATCC VR 571; Busacca 1935 Rake 1957 amend. Everett et al., 1999, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 30: 274(AL), or an immunogenic fragment thereof, or a derivative thereof, or a nucleic acid encoding said fraction or said derivative.

An immunogenic fragment of C. abortus, C. psittaci or C. felis, or of C. muridarum, C. pecorum, C. pneumoniae, C. suis or C. trachomatis, can be any fragment thereof capable of raising a protective immune response in a dog. Typically the immunogenic fragment is a protein or a portion thereof. Preferably, the immunogenic fragment is a structural protein or an immunogenic portion thereof. More preferably, the immunogenic fragment is a surface protein, or an immunogenic portion thereof or a derivative thereof. As mentioned above, surface proteins can be isolated from a bacteria such as Chlamydophila by standard methods known to a person of skill in the art.

C. abortus proteins include 60 kD heat shock protein GroEL (Genbank Accession No. AAD26144), 60 kDa cysteine-rich membrane complex protein (Genbank Accession No. AAG60550), 90-kDa protein (Genbank Accession Nos. AAC44400, AAC44401), cysteine-rich outer membrane protein Omp-2 (Genbank Accession No. AAD09597), DnaK (Genbank Accession No. AAN77259), elongation factor P (Genbank Accession No. AAK72389), GrpE (Genbank Accession No. AAN77258), HrcA (Genbank Accession No. AAN77257), major outer membrane protein (Genbank Accession Nos. AAK00237, CAA36152, CAD29327), major outer membrane protein precursor (Genbank Accession Nos. AAD29103, AAD291 02, AAG53881, P16567), MutS (Genbank Accession No. AAD25864), Omp1 (Genbank Accession Nos. CAA06182, CAA06620, CAA06621, CAA06622, CAA06624, CAA06625, CAA06183, CAA06184), outer membrane protein (Genbank Accession No. AAB02850), outer membrane protein 2 (Genbank Accession No. AAD20336), POMP90A precursor (Genbank Accession No. AAC15922), POMP90B precursor (Genbank Accession No. AAC15924), POMP91A (Genbank Accession No. AAC15921), POMP91B precursor (Genbank Accession No. AAC15923), putative 98 kDa outer membrane protein (Genbank Accession No. AABI8188), putative outer membrane protein (Genbank Accession No. AABI8187), small cysteine-rich outer membrane lipoprotein (Genbank Accession No. AAG60549), cir-ruhplus protein (Genbank Accession No. AAG60551), and OmpA (Genbank Accession Nos. AAT36355 and AAT36356).

C. psittaci proteins include 60K cysteine-rich outer membrane protein precursors (Genbank Accession Nos. P23701, B39439, JC5204 and P27606); 60K cysteine-rich proteins (Genbank Accession Nos. CAA37592 and CAA37591); chaperonin homolog (Genbank Accession No. AAB22560); early upstream open reading frame (EUO) (Genbank Accession Nos. AAA23124, Q06566 and C36909); EUa protein homologue (Genbank Accession No. JC5207); ewe abortion protein (Genbank Accession No. 1601347A); genus specific protein (Genbank Accession No. AAB22559); high molecular weight cysteine-rich envelope protein (Genbank Accession No. AAB61619); histone HI-like protein (Genbank Accession Nos. AAA23132, JH0658, Q46204); hypA protein (Genbank Accession No. JL0116); hypB protein (Genbank Accession No. JLOI17); hypothetical proteins (Genbank Accession Nos. JC5206, NP—052329, NP—052332, NP—052331, NP—052330, NP—052328, NP—052327, NP—052326, NP—052325, NP—052323, CAA44340, CAA44339, CAA44334, CAA44341, CAA44338, CAA44337, CAA44336, CAA44335, CAA44332, A39999, NP—052324, CAA44333, S61492, S18143, C39999, D39999, E39999, F39999, S18148, G39999, H39999 and 139999); inclusion membrane proteins (Genbank Accession Nos. 2108371A, S61491); low molecular weight cysteine-rich envelope protein (Genbank Accession No. AAB61618); lysine-rich hypothetical protein LRO (Genbank Accession No. B36909); major outer membrane protein and precursors (Genbank Accession Nos. CAA31177, 2006276A 1616229A, AAA23148, AAA23147, AAA17396, 140864, 140740, AAA23146, CAA40300, AAK00262, AAK00250, AAK00249, AAK00248, AAK00247, AAK00246, AAK00245, AAK00244, AAK00243, AAK00242, AAK00241, AAK00240, CAC84081, A60341, A40371, B60109, A60109, MMCWPM, MMCWP3, Q00087, P10332 and AAQ91209); major sigma factor (Genbank Accession No. AAA50747); MutS (Genbank Accession Nos. AAD25866 and AAD25863); the N-terminal part of a protein of unknown function (Genbank Accession No. CAA90624); ORF 2 (Genbank Accession No. 2108371B); outer membrane protein 1 (Genbank Accession Nos. CAA76286 and CAB96859); outer membrane protein 3 precursor (Genbank Accession No. JC5203); protein of unknown function (Genbank Accession No. CAA90623); Putative polymorphic membrane protein (Genbank Accession Nos. AAL36963, AAL36962, AAL36961, AAL36960, AAL36959, AAL36958, AAL36957, AAL36956, and AAL36955); small cysteine-rich envelope protein envA precursor (Genbank Accession No. A39439); sulphur-rich proteins (Genbank Accession Nos. P28164, AAB61620 and JC5205); unknown protein (Genbank Accession Nos. AAB22561 and AAB22558); virulence plasmid parA family protein pGP5-D; (Genbank Accession No. Q46263); virulence plasmid protein pGP2-D (Genbank Accession No. Q46260); virulence plasmid protein pGP3-D (Genbank Accession No. Q46261); virulence plasmid protein pGP4-D (Genbank Accession No. Q46262); virulence plasmid protein pGP6-D (Genbank Accession No. Q46264), OmpA (Genbank Accession Nos. AAT36351 and AAT36354) and 60 kDa chaperonin protein (Genbank Accession No. AAT38208).

C. felis proteins include heat shock protein GroEL (Genbank Accession Nos. AAL38954 and AA0241 06); the major outer membrane protein (Genbank Accession Nos. AAK00238, AAK00239, AA024108 and CAA43409); MutS (Genbank Accession No. AAD25865); and the outer membrane protein 2 (Genbank Accession Nos. AAK38113, AAK38114, AAK38115, AAL89722, AA024107, AAQ19779).

In a preferred embodiment, the Chlamydophila protein used is an outer membrane protein such as the major outer membrane protein (MOMP). Other suitable Chlamydophila proteins include LPS or the OmcB protein.

Typically, the polynucleotide encoding the immunogenic fraction of C. abortus, C. psittaci or C. felis encodes a structural protein, and more preferably a surface protein, or an immunogenic portion thereof, or a derivative thereof. The nucleic acid sequence encoding the various proteins can readily be ascertained by reference to the above Genbank Accession Nos. and can readily be determined by standard molecular biology techniques.

In an embodiment, the agent capable of raising an immune response against a Chlamydophila comprises an inactivated or attenuated Chlamydophila having a 218 nucleotide partial sequence of the 23 S rRNA gene which has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, or an immunogenic fragment thereof or a derivative thereof, or a nucleic acid encoding said fraction or derivative. A Chlamydophila having a 218 nucleotide partial sequence of the 23S rRNA gene which has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 may be found in, and isolated from, the trachea and lungs of dogs with CIRD, typically dogs with CIRD from re-homing centers and boarding or training kennels.

The Chlamydophila can be isolated from dogs by inoculating a tissue extract onto a McCoy cell line in the presence or absence of cycloheximide, culturing the cells for up to 10 days at 37° C. with 5% CO2 and then extracting the Chlamydophila by freeze-fracturing the cells. This method is routinely used for isolating Chlamydophilas from birds, cats, humans, and other hosts. The fragment of the 23S rRNA gene can be amplified from the Chlamydophila using the PCR conditions described in Example 3, and the sequence obtained can be verified by comparison to the sequences in FIG. 5 or 8.

For vaccine use, polynucleotide agents can be delivered in various replicating (e.g., recombinant adenovirus vaccine) or non-replicating (DNA vaccine) vectors.

A typical dose of a vaccine comprised of recombinant protein is about 5-μg. A typical dose of a bacterial vaccine is 108 colony forming units per ml.

Typically, the vaccine composition further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, diluent or adjuvant.

Certain carriers and adjuvants are described above. Other suitable adjuvants include Freund's complete or incomplete adjuvant, muramyl dipeptide, the “Iscoms” of EP 109942, EP 180564 and EP 231 039, aluminium hydroxide, saponin, DEAE-dextran, neutral oils (such as miglyol), vegetable oils (such as arachis oil), liposomes, Pluronic® polyols or the Ribi adjuvant system (see, for example GB-A-2 189 141).

The carrier(s) must be “acceptable” in the sense of being compatible with the agent(s) of the invention and not deleterious to the recipients thereof. Typically, the carriers will be water or saline which will be sterile and pyrogen free.

Typically, the vaccine will be administered via the oral, intramuscular, subcutaneous, intravenous, intraperitoneal or intranasal routes.

The vaccine composition may be formulated for parenteral administration, and may include aqueous or non-aqueous sterile injection solutions which may contain anti-oxidants, buffers, bacteriostats and solutes which render the formulation isotonic with the blood of the intended recipient; and/or aqueous or non-aqueous sterile suspensions which may include suspending agents and thickening agents.

The vaccine composition may be presented in unit-dose or multi-dose containers, for example sealed ampoules and vials, and may be stored in a freeze-dried (lyophilized) condition requiring only the addition of the sterile liquid carrier, for example water for injections, immediately prior to use. Extemporaneous injection solutions and suspensions may be prepared from sterile powders, granules and tablets.

The vaccine composition may be formulated for intranasal administration and may be conveniently delivered in the form of an aerosol spray presentation from a pressurized container, pump, spray or nebulizer with the use of a suitable propellant, e.g., dichlorodifluoromethane, trichlorofluoromethane, dichlorotetrafluoro-ethane, a hydrofluoroalkane such as 1,1,1,2 tetrafluoroethane (HFA 134A, or 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (HFA 227EAJ, carbon dioxide or other suitable gas. In the case of a pressurised aerosol, the dosage unit may be determined by providing a valve to deliver a metered amount. The pressurized container, pump, spray or nebulizer may contain a solution or suspension of the agent(s), e.g., using a mixture of ethanol and the propellant as the solvent, which may additionally contain a lubricant, e.g. sorbitan trioleate.

For veterinary use, the vaccine is prepared as an acceptable formulation in accordance with normal veterinary practice and the veterinary surgeon will determine the dosing regimen and route of administration which will be most appropriate for a particular animal.

Formulations for vaccines suitable for administration to dogs are well known in the art and include the formulations used in the dog vaccines described below.

As discussed above, several viral and bacterial agents are known to be associated with respiratory disease in dogs, including canine respiratory coronavirus (CRCV), canine parainfluenza virus (CPIV), canine adenovirus type 2 (CAV-2), canine herpesvirus (CHV), and Bordetella bronchiseptica (B. bronchiseptica).

Thus, in an embodiment, the vaccine composition further comprises anyone or more of:

(d) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRCV;

(e) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV;

(f) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2;

(g) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRV; and

(h) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica.

Thus the vaccine composition can optionally also comprise any two, or any three, or any four, or all five of these additional agents.

Typically, an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRCV comprises inactivated or attenuated CRCV, or an immunogenic fragment of CRCV, or a nucleic acid encoding said immunogenic fraction.

Suitable immunogenic fragments of CRCV are described in WO 2004/011651 (The Royal Veterinary College) and in Erles et 1., 2003. Suitable immunogenic fragments of CRCV include the Spike (S) and the hemagglutinin-esterase (HE) surface proteins, the membrane glycoprotein (M), and the nucleocapsid protein (N), or immunogenic portions thereof. The CRCV-like Spike and HE proteins described in WO 2004/011651 may also be suitable as agents that raise an immune response against CRCV. Closely related coronaviruses, such as bovine coronavirus and human coronavirus, and immunogenic fragments thereof, may also be suitable as agents that raise an immune response against CRCV. The entire disclosure of WO 2004/011651 relating to agents that can be used as a vaccine component against CRCV, is incorporated herein by reference.

Typically, an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV comprises inactivated or attenuated CPIV, or an immunogenic fragment thereof, or a nucleic acid encoding said immunogenic fraction.

Typically, an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2 comprises inactivated or attenuated CAV-2, or an immunogenic fragment thereof, or a nucleic acid encoding said immunogenic fraction.

Canine adenovirus type 1 causes infectious hepatitis; canine adenovirus type 2 causes respiratory disease. It has been shown that CAV-I provides cross-protection against CAV-2 and vice versa. The agent that raises an immune response in a dog against CAV-2 may therefore contain either CAV-1 or CAV-2, or an immunogenic fragment thereof. The vaccines listed below contain CAV-2 except for EURICAN® DHPPi, which does not specify the virus type used.

Suitable agents that raise an immune response in a dog against CPIV and CAV-2 are known to a person of skill in the art. For example, the following dog vaccines are licensed in the UK.

KAVAK® DA2PiP69 by Fort Dodge Animal Health is a live freeze-dried vaccine containing attenuated strains of canine distemper virus, canine adenovirus type 2, canine parainfluenza type 2 and canine parvovirus grown in tissue culture.

KAVAK® Parainfluenza by Fort Dodge Animal Health contains live freeze-dried vaccine derived from an attenuated strain of canine parainfluenza virus type 2 cultivated on an established homologous cell-line.

NOBIVAC® DHPPi by Intervet UK Limited is a live attenuated freeze-dried, virus vaccine containing canine distemper virus, canine adenovirus type 2, canine parvovirus and canine parainfluenza virus grown in cell line tissue culture.

NOBIVAC® KC by Intervet UK Limited is a modified live freeze-dried vaccine containing Bordetella bronchiseptica strain B-C2 and canine parainfluenza virus strain Cornell (this is an intranasal vaccine). Management authorisation number Vm 06376/4026.

EURICAN® DHPPi by Merial Animal Health Ltd. is a combined live freeze-dried vaccine against canine distemper, infectious canine hepatitis, canine parvovirus and canine parainfluenza virus type 2.

VANGUARD® 7 by Pfizer Ltd. contains live attenuated canine distemper virus (Snyder Hill strain), adenovirus (CA V-2 Manhattan strain), parainfluenza virus (NL-CPI-5 strain), canine parvovirus (NL-35-D) propagated in an established cell line, and an inactivated culture of Leptospira canicola and Leptospira icterohaemorrhagiae.

QUANTUM® DOG 7 by Shering-Plough Animal Health contains canine distemper, adenovirus type 2, parvovirus, parainfluenza virus type 2 vaccine (living) and inactivated Leptospira canicola and Leptospira icterohaemorrhagiae vaccine.

CANIGEN DHPPi by Virbac Ltd. is a live attenuated, freeze-dried, virus vaccine containing canine distemper virus, canine adenovirus (CAV-2), canine parvovirus and canine parainfluenza virus grown in cell line tissue culture.

CANIGEN Ppi by Virbac Ltd. is a live attenuated, freeze-dried virus vaccine containing canine parvovirus and canine parainfluenza virus grown in cell line tissue culture.

Typically, an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CHV comprises inactivated or attenuated CHV, or an immunogenic fragment thereof, or a nucleic acid encoding said immunogenic fraction.

Suitable agents that raise an immune response in a dog against CHV are known to a person of skill in the art. For example, EURICAN Herpes 205 by Merial is a purified sub-unit vaccine against CHV which is indicated for the active immunization of pregnant bitches to prevent mortality, clinical signs and lesions in puppies resulting from CHV infections acquired in the first days of life. It is not licensed for the vaccination of adult dogs for the prevention of respiratory disease.

Typically, an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica comprises inactivated or attenuated B. bronchiseptica, or an immunogenic fragment thereof, or a nucleic acid encoding said immunogenic fraction.

Suitable agents that raise an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica are known to a person of skill in the art. For example, the following dog vaccines are licensed for use.

COUGHGUARD-B® by Pfizer Animal Health (U.S. Vet. Lic. No. 189) contains an inactivated culture of B. bronchiseptica. It is for the immunization of healthy dogs against disease caused by B. bronchiseptica, in particular kennel cough. COUGHGUARD-B® is prepared from a highly antigenic strain of B. bronchiseptica which has been inactivated and processed to be nontoxic when administered to dogs. The production method is reported to leave the immunogenic properties of B. bronchiseptica intact.

VANGUARD® 5/B by Pfizer Animal Health (U.S. Vet. Lic. No. 189) contains attenuated strains of canine distemper virus (CDV), CAV-2, CPIV, and canine parvovirus (CPV) propagated on an established canine cell line. The CPV antigen was attenuated by low passage on the canine cell line and at that passage level has immunogenic properties capable of overriding maternal antibodies. The vaccine is packaged in lyophilized form with inert gas in place of vacuum. The bacterin component containing inactivated whole cultures of B. bronchiseptica which is supplied as diluent. The B. bronchiseptica component in VANGUARD® 5/B is prepared from a highly antigenic strain which has been inactivated and processed to be nontoxic when administered to dogs.

NASAGUARD-B™ by Pfizer Animal Health (U.S. Vet. Lic. No. 112) is composed of an avirulent live culture of B. bronchiseptica bacteria.

PROGARD®-KC by Intervet is a modified live intranasal vaccine containing attenuated canine parainfluenza virus and Bordetella bronchiseptica avirulent live culture. PROGARD®-KC is presented in a desiccated form with sterile diluent provided for reconstitution. PROGARD®-KC is for vaccination of healthy, susceptible puppies and dogs for prevention of canine infectious tracheobronchitis (“kennel cough”) due to canine parainfluenza virus and B. bronchiseptica.

PROGARD®-KC PLUS by Intervet contains live culture of avirulent strains of B. bronchiseptica, attenuated canine adenovirus type 2 and parainfluenza virus for intranasal administration. Vaccination with PROGARD®-KC PLUS stimulates rapid, local immunity in the respiratory tract, thereby inhibiting infection at the port of entry as well as preventing clinical signs. In addition to local immunity, it also stimulates systemic immunity within three weeks of intranasal administration. The small volume (0.4 ml) and one nostril application of PROGARD®-KC PLUS provide for ease in vaccination, particularly in small breeds and young puppies. PROGARD®-KC PLUS is presented in a desiccated form with sterile diluent provided for reconstitution. PROGARD®-KC PLUS is for vaccination of healthy dogs and puppies three weeks of age or older for prevention of canine infectious tracheobronchitis (“kennel cough”) due to canine adenovirus type 2, parainfluenza virus and B. bronchiseptica.

Intrac by Intervet is a freeze dried modified live vaccine, containing B. bronchiseptica strain S 55, for intranasal administration. Product licence number PL 020114011.

Nobivac® KC, described above, also contains B. bronchiseptica.

In an embodiment, the vaccine composition comprises:

    • (a) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against S. zooepidemicus; and/or
    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against M. cynos, and, optionally, anyone or more of:
    • (c) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a Chlamydophila;
    • (d) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRCV;
    • (e) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV;
    • (f) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2;
    • (g) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CHV; and
    • (h) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica.

In a preferred embodiment, the vaccine composition comprises:

    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog; and
    • (d) an agent capable of raising an Immune response against CRCV in a dog.

In another preferred embodiment, the vaccine composition comprises:

    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog; and
    • (d) an agent capable of raising an Immune response against CRCV in a dog; and anyone or more of:
    • (c) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a Chlamydophila;
    • (e) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV;
    • (f) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2;
    • (g) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CHV; and
    • (h) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica.

It is thus appreciated that as well as agents (b) and (d), the composition may contain any two of agents (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h), or any three or any four of all five of agents (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h).

In another preferred embodiment, the vaccine composition comprises

    • (a) an agent capable of raising an immune response against S. zooepidemicus in a dog; and
    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog; and
    • (d) an agent capable of raising an Immune response against CRCV in a dog; and anyone or more of:
    • (c) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a Chlamydophila;
    • (e) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV;
    • (f) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2;
    • (g) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CHV; and
    • (h) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica.

It is thus appreciated that as well as agents (a), (b) and (d), the composition may contain any two of agents (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h), or any three, or any four, of all five of agents (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h).

A second aspect of the invention provides a method of vaccinating a dog against CIRD comprising administering to the dog a vaccine composition according to the first aspect of the invention.

A third aspect of the invention provides a method of treating CIRD in a dog comprising administering to the dog a vaccine composition according to the first aspect of the invention.

Thus it can be seen that the vaccine composition of the first aspect of the invention may be used in combating CIRD whether prophylactically or therapeutically.

A fourth aspect of the invention provides the use of anyone or more of:

    • (a) an agent capable of raising an immune response against S. zooepidemicus in a dog;
    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog; and
    • (c) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a Chlamydophila; in the preparation of a medicament for prophylaxis or treatment of CIRD in a dog.

In an embodiment, the medicament further comprises anyone or more of:

    • (d) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRCV;
    • (e) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV;
    • (f) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2;
    • (g) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRV; and
    • (h) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica.

In this and all subsequent aspects of the invention, preferences for (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h) are as described with respect to the first aspect of the invention.

A fifth aspect of the invention provides a method of stimulating an immune response against anyone or more of S. zooepidemicus, M. cynos and a Chlamydophila in a dog, the method comprising administering to the dog a respective anyone or more of:

    • (a) an agent capable of raising an immune response against S. zooepidemicus in a dog;
    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog; and
    • (c) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a Chlamydophila.

In an embodiment, the method further comprises administering anyone or more of:

    • (d) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRCV;
    • (e) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV;
    • (f) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2;
    • (g) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRV; and
    • (h) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica.

A sixth aspect of the invention provides the use of anyone or more of:

    • (a) an agent capable of raising an immune response against S. zooepidemicus in a dog;
    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog; and
    • (c) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a Chlamydophila;
    • in the preparation of a medicament for stimulating an immune response against said respective anyone or more of S. zooepidemicus, M. cynos and a Chlamydophila in a dog.

In an embodiment, the medicament further comprises anyone or more of:

    • (d) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRCV;
    • (e) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV;
    • (f) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2;
    • (g) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRV; and
    • (h) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica.

A seventh aspect of the invention provides a composition comprising any one or more of:

    • (a) an agent capable of raising an immune response against S. zooepidemicus in a dog;
    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog; and
    • (c) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a Chlamydophila,
    • for use in medicine. Thus the composition is packaged and presented for use in medicine.

It is appreciated that the composition may contain any two of these agents, for example (a) and (b), (a) and (c), or (b) and (c). The composition may contain all three of these agents (a), (b) and (c).

In an embodiment, the composition is for use in veterinary medicine. Thus the composition is packaged and presented for use in veterinary medicine.

Typically, the composition is for use in canine veterinary medicine. Thus the composition is packaged and presented for use in canine veterinary medicine, ie it is packaged and presented for use in dogs.

In an embodiment, the composition further comprises anyone or more of:

    • (d) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRCV;
    • (e) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV;
    • (f) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2;
    • (g) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRV; and
    • (h) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica.

In an embodiment of this aspect, the composition comprises:

    • (a) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against S. zooepidemicus; and/or
    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against M. cynos, and, optionally, anyone or more of:
    • (c) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a Chlamydophila;
    • (d) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRCV;
    • (e) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV;
    • (f) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2;
    • (g) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRV; and
    • (h) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica.

In a preferred embodiment of this aspect, the composition comprises:

    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog; and
    • (d) an agent capable of raising an immune response against CRCV in a dog.

In another preferred embodiment of this aspect, the composition comprises:

    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog; and
    • (d) an agent capable of raising an Immune response against CRCV in a dog; and anyone or more of:
    • (c) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a Chlamydophila;
    • (e) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV;
    • (f) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2;
    • (g) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CHV; and
    • (h) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica.

It is thus appreciated that as well as agents (b) and (d), the composition may contain any two of agents (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h), or any three or any four of all five of agents (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h).

In another preferred embodiment of this aspect, the composition comprises

    • (a) an agent capable of raising an immune response against S. zooepidemicus in a dog; and
    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog; and
    • (d) an agent capable of raising an Immune response against CRCV in a dog; and anyone or more of:
    • (c) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a Chlamydophila;
    • (e) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV;
    • f) (an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2;
    • (g) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRV; and
    • (h) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica.

It is thus appreciated that as well as agents (a), (b) and (d), the composition may contain any two of agents (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h), or any three, or any four, of all five of agents (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h).

An eighth aspect of the invention provides a kit of parts for the vaccine composition of the first aspect of the invention, comprising anyone or more of:

    • (a) an agent capable of raising an immune response against S. zooepidemicus in a dog;
    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog; and
    • (c) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a Chlamydophila,

and optionally a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, diluent or adjuvant.

It is appreciated that the kit of parts may contain any two of these agents, for example (a) and (b), (a) and (c) or (b) and (c). The kit may contain all three of these agents (a), (b) and (c).

In an embodiment, the kit further comprises anyone or more of:

    • (d) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRCV;
    • (e) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV;
    • (f) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2;
    • (g) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRV; and
    • (h) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica.

In an embodiment of this aspect, the kit comprises:

    • (a) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against S. zooepidemicus; and/or
    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against M. cynos, and, optionally, anyone or more of:
    • (c) an agent capable of raising a dog an Immune response III against a Chlamydophila;
    • (d) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRCV;
    • (e) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV;
    • (f) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2;
    • (g) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRV; and
    • (h) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica.

In a preferred embodiment of this aspect, the kit comprises:

    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog; and
    • (d) an agent capable of raising an Immune response against CRCV in a dog.

In another preferred embodiment of this aspect, the kit comprises:

    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog; and
    • (d) an agent capable of raising an immune response against CRCV in a dog; and anyone or more of:
    • (c) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a Chlamydophila;
    • (e) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV;
    • (f) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2;
    • (g) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRV; and
    • (h) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica.

It is thus appreciated that as well as agents (b) and (d), the kit may contain any two of agents (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h), or any three or any four of all five of agents (c), (e),

    • (f), (g) and (h).

In another preferred embodiment of this aspect, the kit comprises:

    • (a) an agent capable of raising an immune response against S. zooepidemicus in a dog; and
    • (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog; and
    • (d) an agent capable of raising an Immune response against CRCV in a dog; and anyone or more of:
    • (c) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a Chlamydophila;
    • (e) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV;
    • (f) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2;
    • (g) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRV; and
    • (h) an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica.

It is thus appreciated that as well as agents (a), (b) and (d), the kit may contain any two of agents (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h), or any three, or any four, of all five of agents (c), (e), (f), (g) and (h).

In a ninth aspect, the invention provides a method of making an antibody against anyone or more of S. zooepidemicus, M. cynos or a Chlamydophila, comprising raising an immune response to said respective anyone or more of S. zooepidemicus, M. cynos or a Chlamydophila, or an immunogenic fragment thereof, in an animal, and preparing an antibody from the animal or from an immortal cell derived therefrom.

Methods and techniques for producing a monoclonal antibody are well known to a person of skill in the art, for example those disclosed in “Monoclonal Antibodies: A manual of techniques”, R Zola (CRC Press, 1988) and in “Monoclonal Hybridoma Antibodies: Techniques and Applications”, J G R Hurrell (CRC Press, 1982), incorporated herein by reference.

A tenth aspect of the invention provides a method of obtaining an antibody against anyone or more of S. zooepidemicus, M. cynos or a Chlamydophila, comprising selecting an antibody from an antibody-display library using said respective anyone or more of S. zooepidemicus, M. cynos or a Chlamydophila, or an immunogenic fragment thereof.

In an embodiment of the ninth and tenth aspects, the Chlamydophila is C. abortus or C. psittaci or C. felis. In another embodiment the Chlamydophila is C. muridarum, C. pecorum, C. pneumoniae, C. suis or C. trachomatis.

An eleventh aspect of the invention provides an antibody that specifically binds to S. zooepidemicus, M. cynos or a Chlamydophila. This can be made by the methods of the ninth and tenth aspects of the invention.

In an embodiment, the antibody that specifically binds to a Chlamydophila binds to C. abortus or C. psittaci or C. felis. In another embodiment the antibody that specifically binds to a Chlamydophila binds to C. muridarum, C. pecorum, C. pneumoniae, C. suis or C. trachomatis.

In the context of this and subsequent aspects of the invention, by “antibody” we include not only whole immunoglobulin molecules but also fragments thereof such as Fab, F(ab′)2, Fv and other fragments thereof that retain the antigen-binding site. Similarly in these contexts, the term “antibody” includes genetically engineered derivatives of antibodies such as single chain Fv molecules (scFv) and domain antibodies (dAbs). The term also includes antibody-like molecules which may be produced using phage-display techniques or other random selection techniques for molecules which bind to the particular organism or to regions of the particular organism. Thus, in these contexts, the term antibody includes all molecules which contain a structure, preferably a peptide structure, which is part of the recognition site (i.e. the part of the antibody that binds or combines with the epitope or antigen) of a natural antibody.

The variable heavy (VH) and variable light (VL) domains of the antibody are involved in antigen recognition, a fact first recognized by early protease digestion experiments. Further confirmation was found by “humanization” of rodent antibodies. Variable domains of rodent origin may be fused to constant domains of human origin such that the resultant antibody retains the antigenic specificity of the rodent parented antibody (Morrison et al. (1984) PNAS USA 81:6851-6855).

That antigenic specificity is conferred by variable domains and is independent of the constant domains is known from experiments involving the bacterial expression of antibody fragments, all containing one or more variable domains. These molecules include Fab-like molecules (Better et al. (1988) Science 240:1041); Fv molecules (Skerra et al. (1988) Science 240:1038); single-chain Fv (ScFv) molecules where the VH and VL partner domains are linked via a flexible oligopeptide (Bird et al. (1988) Science 242:423; Huston et al. (1988) PNAS USA 85:5879) and single domain antibodies (dAbs) comprising isolated V domains (Ward et al. (1989) Nature 341:544). A general review of the techniques involved in the synthesis of antibody fragments which retain their specific binding sites is to be found in Winter & Milstein (1991) Nature 349:293-299.

By “ScFv molecules” we mean molecules wherein the VH and VL partner domains are linked via a flexible oligopeptide. Engineered antibodies, such as ScFv antibodies, can be made using the techniques and approaches described in J. Huston et al., (1988) “Protein engineering of antibody binding sites: recovery of specific activity in an anti-digoxin single chain Fv analogue produced in E. coli”, PNAS USA, 85:58795883, and in A. Pluckthun, (June 1991) “Antibody engineering; Advances from use of E. coli expression systems”, Bio/technology, vol. 9, incorporated herein by reference.

The advantages of using antibody fragments, rather than whole antibodies, are several-fold. The smaller size of the fragments may lead to improved pharmacological properties, such as better penetration to the target site. Effector functions of whole antibodies, such as complement binding, are removed. Fab, Fv, ScFv and dAb antibody fragments can all be expressed in and secreted from E. coli, thus allowing the facile production of large amounts of the fragments.

Whole antibodies, and F(ab′)2 fragments are “bivalent”. By “bivalent” we mean that the antibodies and F(ab′)2 fragments have two antigen combining sites. In contrast, Fab, Fv, ScFv and dAb fragments are monovalent, having only one antigen combining site.

Although the antibody may be a polyclonal antibody, it is preferred if it is a monoclonal antibody. In some circumstance, particularly if the antibody is going to be administered repeatedly to a dog, it is preferred if the monoclonal antibody is a dog monoclonal antibody or a “caninised” antibody.

Polyclonal antibodies may be produced which are polyspecific or monospecific. It is preferred that they are monospecific. Chimeric antibodies are discussed by Neuberger et al. (1998, 8th International Biotechnology Symposium Part 2, 792-799).

It is preferred if the antibody is a “caninised” antibody. Suitably prepared non-dog antibodies can be “caninised” in known ways, for example by inserting the CDR regions of mouse antibodies into the framework of dog antibodies. Caninised antibodies can be made using techniques and approaches corresponding to those described for humanisation of antibodies in M. Verhoeyen, C. Milstein and G. Winter (1988) “Reshaping human antibodies: Grafting an anti lysozyme activity”, Science, 239:1534-1536, and in C. Kettleborough et al., (1991) “Humanisation of a mouse monoclonal antibody by CDR grafting; The importance of framework residues in loop conformation”, Protein Engineering, 14(7):773-783, incorporated herein by reference.

It is appreciated that a dog can passively acquire immunity against CIRD by being administered an antibody that reacts with an agent that is involved in the disease.

Thus, a twelfth aspect of the invention provides a method of passively immunizing a dog against CIRD comprising administering to the dog one or more antibodies that specifically bind to a respective one or more of S. zooepidemicus, M. cynos, and a Chlamydophila.

The antibodies that specifically bind to the S. zooepidemicus, M. cynos, and the Chlamydophila may be made or obtained using standard techniques such as those described above.

It is appreciated that CIRD in a dog may be treated by administering an antibody that reacts with an agent that is involved in the disease.

In a thirteenth aspect, the invention provides a method of treating CiRD in a dog comprising administering to the dog one or more antibodies that specifically bind to a respective one or more of S. zooepidemicus, M. cynos, and a Chlamydophila.

In an embodiment of the twelfth or thirteenth aspects, the antibody that specifically binds to the Chlamydophila binds to C. abortus, or C. psittaci or C. felis. In another embodiment the antibody that specifically binds to the Chlamydophila binds to C. muridarum, C. pecorum, C. pneumoniae, C. suis or C. trachomatis.

In an embodiment of the twelfth or thirteenth aspects, the method further comprises administering antibodies that specifically bind to anyone or more of CRCV, CPIV, CAV-2, CHV, and B. bronchiseptica.

The antibodies that specifically bind to CRCV, CPIV, CAV-2, CHV, and B. bronchiseptica can be made using standard techniques such as those described above.

A fourteenth aspect of the invention provides the use of one or more antibodies that specifically bind to a respective one or more of S. zooepidemicus, M. cynos, and a Chlamydophila, in the preparation of a medicament for passively immunizing a dog against CIRD.

A fifteenth aspect of the invention provides the use of one or more antibodies that specifically bind to a respective one or more of S. zooepidemicus, M. cynos, and a Chlamydophila, in the preparation of a medicament for treating CIRD in a dog.

In an embodiment of the fourteenth or fifteenth aspects, the antibody that specifically binds to the Chlamydophila binds to C. abortus, or C. psittaci or C. felis. In another embodiment the antibody that specifically binds to the Chlamydophila binds to C. muridarum, C. pecorum, C. pneumoniae, C. suis or C. trachomatis.

In an embodiment of the fourteenth or fifteenth aspects, the medicament further comprises antibodies that specifically bind to anyone or more of CRCV, CPIV, CAV-2, CHV, and B. bronchiseptica.

A sixteenth aspect of the invention provides a composition comprising any two or more of an antibody that specifically binds to S. zooepidemicus, an antibody that specifically binds to M. cynos, and an antibody that specifically binds to a Chlamydophila.

In an embodiment, the antibody that specifically binds to the Chlamydophila binds to C. abortus, or C. psittaci or C. felis. In another embodiment the antibody that specifically binds to the Chlamydophila binds to C. muridarum, C. pecorum, C. pneumoniae, C. suis or C. trachomatis.

In an embodiment, the composition further comprises antibodies that specifically bind to anyone or more of CRCV, CPIV, CAV-2, CHV, and B. bronchiseptica.

It will also be appreciated that the invention includes diagnostic methods and assays. Thus, the invention provides a method of determining whether a dog has been exposed to a Chlamydophila species associated with CIRD, the method comprising:

    • (a) obtaining a suitable sample from the dog; and
    • (b) identifying a Chlamydophila species associated with CIRD, or an antibody there to, in the sample.

Typically, the Chlamydophila species is one which has a 23S RNA comprising the sequence (when shown as RNA) of any of SEQ ID Nos: 1 to 8 (see FIGS. 5 and 8 which show partial 23S RNA sequences, and Example 3).

The invention also provides a method of determining whether a dog has or is susceptible to CIRD, the method comprising:

    • (a) obtaining a suitable sample from the dog; and
    • (b) identifying anyone or more of S. zooepidemicus or M. cynos or Chlamydophila, or an antibody to any of these, in the sample.

It will be appreciated that the methods can detect, in one embodiment, present exposure to the organism for example by detecting the organism itself or a component thereof (such as protein or nucleic acid) within the sample. The methods can also detect past exposure to the organism by detecting antibodies in the sample which are directed at the organism or to components thereof.

Typically, the sample is any suitable sample, including antibody containing samples such as serum, saliva, tracheal wash and bronchiolar lavage.

The presence of the organism in the dog from which the sample is derived may therefore be determined by analyzing the sample for the presence of the organism or component thereof. For example, for nucleic acid components, including 23S RNA, nucleic acid is extracted and may be copied into DNA if necessary, and detected, for example, using techniques involving high stringency hybridization, specific amplification, nucleotide sequencing and other methods well known to the person skilled in the art (Sambrook et al. (2001) supra). By hybridizing “at high stringency” is meant that the polynucleotide and the nucleic acid to which it hybridizes have sufficient nucleotide sequence similarity that they can hybridize under highly stringent conditions. As is well known in the art, the stringency of nucleic acid hybridization depends on factors such as length of nucleic acid over which hybridization occurs, degree of identity of the hybridizing sequences and on factors such as temperature, ionic strength and CG or AT content of the sequence.

Nucleic acids which can hybridize at high stringency to nucleic acid molecules of the organism include nucleic acids which have >90% sequence identity, preferably those with >95% or >96% or >97% or >98, more preferably those with >99% sequence identity, over at least a portion of the nucleic acid of the organism.

Typical highly stringent hybridization conditions which lead to selective hybridization are known in the art, for example those described in Sambrook et al. 2001 (supra), incorporated herein by reference.

An example of a typical hybridization solution when a nucleic acid is immobilized on a nylon membrane and the probe nucleic acid is >500 bases is:

6×SSC (saline sodium citrate)

0.5% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS)

100 μg/ml denatured, fragmented salmon sperm DNA.

The hybridization is performed at 68° C. The nylon membrane, with the nucleic acid immobilised, may be washed at 68° C. in 0.1×SSC.

20×SSC may be prepared in the following way. Dissolve 175.3 g of NaCl and 88.2 g of sodium citrate in 800 ml of H20. Adjust the pH to 7.0 with a few drops of a 10N solution of NaOH. Adjust the volume to 1 liter with H20. Dispense into aliquots. Sterilize by autoclaving.

An example of a typical hybridization solution when a nucleic acid is immobilized on a nylon membrane and the probe is an oligonucleotide of between 15 and 50 bases is:

3.0 M trimethylammonium chloride (TMACl)

0.01 M sodium phosphate (pH 6.8)

1 mm EDTA (pH 7.6)

0.5% SDS

100 μg/ml denatured, fragmented salmon sperm DNA

0.1% non-fat dried milk.

The optimal temperature for hybridization is usually chosen to be 5° C. below the Ti for the given chain length. Ti is the irreversible melting temperature of the hybrid formed between the probe and its target sequence. Jacobs et al. (1988) Nucl. Acids Res. 16:4637 discusses the determination of TiS. The recommended hybridization temperature for 17-mers in 3M TMACI is 48-50° C.; for 19-mers, it is 55-57° C.; and for 20-mers, it is 58-66° C.

Assaying a protein component of the organism in a sample from the dog can be done using any method known in the art. Typically, such methods are antibody bound, and the antibody binds to the organism or a component thereof.

For example, expression of protein from the organism can be studied with classical immunohistological methods. In these, the specific recognition is provided by the primary antibody (polyclonal or monoclonal) but the secondary detection system can utilize fluorescent, enzyme, or other conjugated secondary antibodies. As a result, an immunohistological staining of tissue section for pathological examination is obtained. Tissues can also be extracted, e.g., with urea and neutral detergent, for the liberation of protein for Western-blot or dot/slot assay (Jalkanen, M., et al. J. Cell. Biol. 101:976-985 (1985); Jalkanen, M., et al., J. Cell. Biol. 105:3087-3096 (1987). In this technique, which is based on the use of cationic solid phases, quantitation of protein can be accomplished using isolated protein as a standard. This technique can also be applied to body fluid samples.

Other antibody-based methods useful for detecting protein expression include immunoassays, such as the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the radioimmunoassay (RIA). For example, a reactive monoclonal antibody can be used both as an immunoadsorbent and as an enzyme-labeled probe to detect and quantify the protein. The amount of protein present in the sample can be calculated by reference to the amount present in a standard preparation using a linear regression computer algorithm. Such an ELISA for detecting a tumor antigen is described in Iacobelli et al. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 11:19-30 (1988). In another ELISA assay, two distinct specific monoclonal antibodies can be used to detect protein in a body fluid. In this assay, one of the antibodies is used as the immunoadsorbent and the other as the enzyme-labeled probe.

The above techniques may be conducted essentially as a “one-step” or “two-step” assay. The “one-step” assay involves contacting protein with immobilized antibody and, without washing, contacting the mixture with the labeled antibody.

The “two-step” assay involves washing before contacting the mixture with the labeled antibody. Other conventional methods may also be employed as suitable. It is usually desirable to immobilize one component of the assay system on a support, thereby allowing other components of the system to be brought into contact with the component and readily removed from the sample.

Suitable enzyme labels include, for example, those from the oxidase group, which catalyze the production of hydrogen peroxide by reacting with substrate. Glucose oxidase is particularly preferred as it has good stability and its substrate (glucose) is readily available. Activity of an oxidase label may be assayed by measuring the concentration of hydrogen peroxide formed by the enzyme-labeled antibody/substrate reaction. Besides enzymes, other suitable labels include radioisotopes, such as iodine (125I, 121I), carbon (14C), sulfur (35S), tritium (3H), indium (112In), and technetium (99 mTc), and fluorescent labels, such as fluorescein and rhodamine, and biotin.

Antibodies to the organism or component thereof may be detected using, for example, the well known technique of immunosorbent assay, such as an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Thus, a further aspect of the invention provides an immunosorbent assay for detecting antibodies associated with CIRD, the assay comprising: a solid phase coated with anyone or more of (a) an agent capable of raising an immune response against S. zooepidemicus in a dog; (b) an agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog; and (c) an agent capable of raising an immune response against a Chlamydophila in a dog; and a detectable label conjugate which will bind to the antibodies bound to the solid phase.

Preferably, the solid phase is a microtiter well. Further preferably, the conjugate comprises anti-dog antibody antibody. Preferably, the conjugate comprises an enzyme, for example horseradish peroxidase. Further preferably, the immunosorbent assay also comprises a substrate for the enzyme. The invention includes a kit of parts which include the components of the immunosorbent assay. The kit of parts may thus include a solid phase such as a microtiter plate, protein from the organism or organisms for coating the solid phase, a detectable label conjugate, such as an anti-dog antibody, which will bind to anti-organism (or component thereof) antibodies bound to the solid phase.

If the detectable label conjugate is an enzyme, the kit of parts may also include a substrate for the enzyme. The kit may also include a positive control sample that contains an antibody known to react with the antigen on the solid substrate, and a negative control sample.

The invention also includes a solid phase substrate coated with anyone or two or all three of (a), (b) and (c) as defined above and in the first aspect of the invention. Typically, the agent which is capable of raising an immune response is one which will also bind an antibody. Typically, the agent is an antigenic protein. Typically, protein is coated on microtiter plates overnight at 4° C. to 37° C., depending on the stability of the antigen. Unbound protein is washed off with a wash buffer such as phosphate buffered saline or Tris buffered saline. Serum or other samples are incubated on the plate, typically at 37° C. for between 1 and several hours. Unbound material is washed off, the plates are incubated with enzyme-labelled (e.g., horseradish peroxidase) antibody, such as anti-canine IgG or IgM for serum samples, or anti-canine IgA for lung washes, for 1 to several hours at 37° C. Unbound antibody is washed off and plates are incubated with a substrate such as OPD for about 10 min, and the optical density measured in a photometer.

Preferably, the solid substrate is a microtiter well.

All of the documents referred to herein are incorporated herein, in their entirety, by reference. The listing or discussion of a prior-published document in this specification should not necessarily be taken as an acknowledgement that the document is part of the state of the art or is common general knowledge.

The invention will now be described in more detail with the aid of the following Figures and Examples.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1: Isolation of S. canis and S. zooepidemicus from 209 kennelled dogs with clinical respiratory score (n=total number of dogs in each group). Error bars represent confidence intervals (95%).

FIG. 2: Percentage of dogs with CIRD, S. canis or S. zooepidemicus with time in the kennel (n=total number of dogs in each group from a total of 209, dogs). Error bars represent confidence intervals (95%).

FIG. 3: Percentage of dogs with tracheal and lung M. cynos infection at increasing levels of severity of CIRD.

FIG. 4: Percentage of dogs with tracheal and lung M. cynos infection after increasing lengths of time in kennels.

FIG. 5: 218 partial nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) of the 23S rRNA gene from a Chlamydophila isolated from a dog with CIRD (DHB10).

FIG. 6: Percentage of dogs with tracheal and lung Chlamydophila infection at increasing levels of severity of CIRD.

FIG. 7: Partial 23S rRNA canine sequences (DHB) aligned with the 23S rRNA of all known species of Chlamydia and Chlamydophila (Cabor—C. abortus, Cpsit —C. psittaci, Cfe1—C. felis, Ccavi—C. caviae, Cpne—C. pneumoniae, Cpec—C. pecorum, Csuis—C. suis, Ctrac—C. trachomatis, Wad—Waddlia, Sim—Simkania).

FIG. 8: 218 partial nucleotide sequences (SEQ ID NOs: 2-8) of the 23S rRNA gene from seven further isolates of a Chlamydophila species isolated from a dog with CIRD (DHB 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9).

FIG. 9: Percentage of dogs with tracheal and lung canine herpesvirus infection at increasing levels of severity of CIRD.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT Example 1 The Association of Streptococcus Equi Sub Species Zooepidemicus with Canine Infectious Respiratory Disease Summary

Canine infectious respiratory disease (CIRD) is a multi-factorial infection that affects many kennelled dogs despite the wide use of vaccination. Current vaccines aim to protect against viral agents and a single bacterial agent, Bordetella bronchiseptica. We examined the role of streptococcal species in CIRD. The isolation and identification of streptococci in the lower respiratory tract of clinically healthy dogs and those with CIRD were used to correlate the presence of specific streptococcal species with respiratory disease. We show that the presence of S. equi sub species zooepidemicus (S. zooepidemicus) is associated with increasing severity of disease in a population of kennelled dogs with endemic CIRD.

Introduction

CIRD is an infection that affects dogs of all ages and commonly occurs when large numbers of dogs are housed together in close confinement. The disease has high morbidity with the dry hacking cough characteristic of laryngitis in the early stages, nasal and/or ocular discharges, and variable anorexia and depression, which can progress to tracheobronchitis, pneumonia and even death in more severe cases. The disease has historically been regarded as a complex infection in which combined or sequential challenge with both viral (CPIV and CAV-2) and bacterial agents produces a synergistic enhancement of the clinical scores (Appel and Binn, 1987). The most common bacterial agent detected during the disease is B. bronchiseptica (McCandlish et al. 1978), but other bacterial species such as Pasteurella sp., Mycoplasma sp. and β-haemolytic streptococci (βhS) have all been associated with disease (McCandlish et al., 1978; Rosendal, 1978; Thrusfield et al., 1991).

Many studies involving bacterial isolation from the upper (oral and nasal cavity) and lower respiratory tract (trachea and lungs) of both diseased and healthy dogs mention the presence of βhS (Smith, 1967; McCandlish et al., 1978; McKieman et al., 1982; Azetaka and Konishi, 1988). However, despite the variety of species of βhS found in the upper respiratory tract of dogs, only a few investigations have focused upon the species of βhS involved in lower airway disease (Garnett et al., 1982; Angus et al., 1997). Although species of βhS in the canine respiratory tract were noted by Biberstein et al., (1980) this study neglected to distinguish between carriage in the upper and lower respiratory tract. Furthermore, even though isolation was from veterinary hospital patients the reason for referral and therefore any link to specific clinical conditions was omitted. The most common βhS in dogs, S. canis, a Lancefield Group G Streptococcus, is a normal commensal of the genital and respiratory mucosa as well as skin (Timoney, 1987; Quinn et al., 1999). Streptococcus canis (S. canis) has previously been isolated from the tonsils of 60 to 73% of healthy dogs (Smith, 1967; Sadatsune and Moreno, 1975; Biberstein and Hirsh, 1999). S. canis causes a variety of sporadic and opportunistic infections in dogs, including pneumonia, septicemia, abscesses, otitis, mastitis, pyometra, proctitis, toxic shock syndrome and necrotising fasciitis (Biberstein and Hirsh, 1999; Quinn et al., 1999).

In addition to S. canis βhS of other Lancefield Groups, such as A, C and E, have also been isolated from dogs (Biberstein et al., 1980). S. zooepidemicus Lancefield Group C, is found as a commensal of the upper respiratory tract mucosa of mammals (Timoney et al., 1988; Quinn et al., 1999). It is associated with several disease syndromes including lower airway disease, foal pneumonia and cervicitis in horses (Chanter, 1997; Biberstein and Hirsh, 1999), pneumonia in llamas (Biberstein and Hirsh, 1999), septicemia and arthritis in pigs (Timoney, 1987), mastitis in cows and goats (Timoney et al., 1988), septicemia in poultry, pericarditis and pneumonia in lambs (Timoney, 1987), lymphadenitis in guinea pigs (Quinn et al., 1999) and glomerulonephritis in humans (Balter et al., 2000). In dogs S. zooepidemicus has been associated with wound infections, septicemia (Quinn et al., 1999) and acute necrotizing hemorrhagic pneumonia (Garnett et al., 1982). In this study we sought to establish which species of βhS are present in the respiratory tract of both healthy dogs and those with CIRD.

Materials & Methods Study Populations and Sampling

The main study population (n=209, bronchial alveolar lavage, BAL) comprised animals from a well-established re-homimg kennel (˜600 dogs) with a history of endemic CIRD. On entry to the kennel all dogs were vaccinated with KAVAK DA2 PiP69 (Fort Dodge) a live attenuated vaccine for distemper virus, CAV-2, CPIV and canine parvovirus and KAVAK L against Leptospirosis. The presence of both canine coronavirus (CRCV) and B. bronchiseptica has been demonstrated in dogs with CIRD in this center (Chalker et al., 2003; Erles et al., 2003). Each week this kennel must sacrifice some dogs for welfare reasons and from these dogs 2-3 were selected arbitrarily for sampling. BAL samples were taken by the following method from a total of 209 individual dogs over a 2 year period from 1999 to 2001. Within 2 hours of euthanasia the trachea was clamped just above the bifurcation to prevent any tracheal contamination of the lung during sampling. Using sterile catheter tubing 50 ml Hanks Balanced Salt solution was then placed into the left apical lung lobe. This lung lobe was then massaged manually for 30 seconds and the BAL withdrawn. At euthanasia dogs were also graded for the severity of clinical respiratory score into the following categories: (1) No respiratory signs, n=71 (2) Mild cough, n=37 (3) Cough and nasal discharge, n=76 (4) Cough and nasal discharge with depression and/or inappetence n=9 (5) suppurative bronchopneumonia, n=16.

After BAL sampling a section of lung tissue from the right distal lobe was taken for histological analysis. Formalin fixed (10% formalin saline) tissue blocks were embedded in paraffin, and standard hemtoxylin and eosin stained sections were viewed under a light microscope (X40, XIOO, X400). The presence or absence of intra-alveolar neutrophils was noted.

The total number of days each dog spent in the kennel was recorded and time in the kennel was then calculated in weeks. The age and clinical condition on entry into the kennel of each animal was noted and a clinical condition composite score based on nutritional status, coat, demeanor, appetite and a general clinical examination (temperature, pulse rate, respiration rate) was graded as follows: good (1), poor (2), very poor (3).

An additional dog population was included as a control group that comprised of household pet dogs with clinical respiratory symptoms referred to diagnostic bacteriology at the RVC over a 2 year period (1998 to 2000) (n=71, BAL). Samples from the control group were collected using an endoscopically guided technique as described by Cocoran (1998). All samples in the study were kept at 4° C. until bacteriological testing, and testing was performed within 24 h of sampling excepting the calculation of CFU per ml that was performed on frozen BAL.

Bacterial Isolation and Identification.

A 50 μl volume of BAL was plated in duplicate onto Columbia Blood Agar (Oxoid Ltd., Hampshire, UK) plates with 5% sterile sheep blood, and incubated both aerobically and anaerobically for 24 hrs at 37° C. β-haemolytic colonies were identified and then purified to single colonies. Gram-positive catalase-negative bacteria were identified as streptococci by colonial and cellular morphology, and then serogrouped by latex bead slide agglutination (Oxoid Ltd., Hampshire, UK) into Lancefield Groups. Isolates were then identified to the species level by biochemical utilization and enzymatic action using the API20STREP manual identification kit (bioMerieux UK Ltd., Basingstoke, UK).

In order to detect mixed infections 3 colonies from the first 12 dogs in the study were tested by both latex bead slide agglutination and API20STREP. Serial dilutions of BAL in phosphate buffered saline (Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd., Dorset, UK) were plated in triplicate, incubated as described above and the CFU per ml BAL calculated. Growth of βhS was then graded as follows: none (O), <100 CFU per ml (1), 100 to 1000 CFU per ml (2), and >1 000 CFU per ml (3).

Statistical Analyses

A significance level or probability of a type I error (α) of 0.05 was assumed for all analyses. The presence of S. zooepidemicus with the age, clinical condition on entry to the kennel, weeks in the kennel, the presence of intra-alveolar neutrophils and clinical respiratory scores was analyzed using Prism (version 3.0, GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, USA) statistical analysis software X 2 testing. The correlation of bacterial growth and respiratory score was determined by use of the combined mean scores for S. zooepidemicus growth for each respiratory score, analyzed with Prism one way ANOVA (non-parametric) testing. The presence of S. canis, S. zooepidemicus and respiratory disease in the sampled kennelled dogs with time in weeks was also calculated.

Results

β-haemolytic streptococci were isolated from both study populations, and isolation from the BAL of household pets was markedly different from the 2 kennelled dogs (1.4% household, 23.9% kennel, χ2 analysis ***p=0.000). All hS isolates were found to be S. canis or S. zooepidemicus. Mixed infections with differing Lancefield Groups or species were not found, furthermore all individual plates yielded colonies of uniform morphology. Both S. canis and S. zooepidemicus were isolated from the kennelled dogs, whereas only a single isolate of S. zooepidemicus and no S. canis were isolated from the household pets. S. zooepidemicus was found to be the predominant hS species in the kennelled dogs (92.0%). The carriage of both S. canis and S. zooepidemicus was examined in the kennelled dogs within each grade of clinical respiratory score (FIG. 1). S. canis was present in dogs both with and without clinical scores, and isolation did not increase with disease severity. By contrast, healthy dogs were less likely to have S. zooepidemicus in the lower respiratory tract than diseased animals (χ2 analysis, **p=0.004) and the isolation of S. zooepidemicus increased dramatically with increasing clinical respiratory score, from 9.7% in dogs with no symptoms to 87.5% in those dogs with suppurative 2 bronchopneumonia (χ2 analysis, ***p=0.000). Dogs with higher respiratory scores were also more likely to have a greater mean S. zooepidemicus bacterial growth score than clinically healthy dogs (one way ANOVA analysis ***p=0.000. R squared=0.194, F=22.265). The age and clinical condition of the animal on entry to the kennel had no affect on the isolation of S. zooepidemicus (χ2 analysis, age p=0.341, clinical condition on entry p=0.295).

The percentage of dogs with CIRD in the kennel increased dramatically from 21.1% in week 1 to 70.1% in week 2, and CIRD did not decrease in the population until after the fourth week (FIG. 2). Although no significant difference was detected, the number of dogs with S. zooepidemicus in the lung increased by 20.6% with time in the kennel from 16.7% in week 1 to 34.4% in week 3 (FIG. 2), whereas no such trend was seen with S. canis.

Histological analysis revealed that dogs with S. zooepidemicus were more likely to have intra-alveolar neutrophils than those without S. zooepidemicus 2 (χ2 analysis, **p=0.006). In dogs with higher bacterial scores, acute suppurative or necrotizing pneumonia with moderate to marked macrophage aggregation was often noted, similar to the findings of Garnett et al., (1982) in dogs with S. zooepidemicus induced hemorrhagic streptococcal pneumonia (HSP). No bacterial cells were apparent on Hand E stained sections.

Discussion

In this study we focused upon the species of βhS present in the lower respiratory tract of household and kennelled dogs, with and without respiratory disease. Although S. canis is the predominant βhS of the respiratory tract in dogs (Biberstein et al., 1980) and was isolated from the lower respiratory tract of some kennelled dogs in this study, it was not associated with CIRD in the kennelled dogs. In contrast, an increased isolation of S. zooepidemicus was associated with increasing CIRD severity. Dogs with any respiratory symptoms were more likely to have S. zooepidemicus in the lower respiratory tract than more healthy animals in the kennel and S. zooepidemicus was found in a lower proportion of the household pets than the kennelled dogs.

Streptococcus equi sub species zooepidemicus has previously been associated with HSP in dogs (Garnett et al., 1982). The HSP syndrome was a severe infection in a closed colony of beagles, in which sudden death ensued without prior clinical scores. Necropsy findings included abundant hemorrhagic exudates within the trachea and bronchial tree, with diffuse dark reddening of the lungs. In addition, there were ecchymotic hemorrhages of a range of other tissues. The disease was reproduced by intra-tracheal inoculation with S. zooepidemicus in one dog. Interestingly in this study, dogs with higher S. zooepidemicus growth scores were more likely to have intra-alveolar neutrophils and share histological features of the lungs described by Garnett et al., (1982) in HSP than those dogs with low growth scores.

CIRD has historically been considered a complex disease, involving both bacterial and viral agents. Indeed, several other agents have been described in this kennelled population of dogs, including CRCV (Erles et al., 2003) and B. bronchiseptica (Chalker et al., 2003). Although the pathogenic potential of CRCV has not yet been clarified, data by Erles et al., (2003) shows that CRCV predominates in those dogs with mild respiratory disease (score 2) and similarly Chalker et al., (2003) found that dogs with B. bronchiseptica predominates in those dogs with moderate disease (score 3).

We found that Streptococcus zooepidemicus is associated more commonly with only the more severe cases of CIRD (score 4-5) indicating it may act as a secondary invader. Indeed, βhS species have previously been described as secondary invaders in the CIRD ‘complex’ (McCandlish et al., 1978). However, it is still not known if S. zooepidemicus plays a primary role in respiratory disease in these animals or merely invades the respiratory tract following damage by other pathogens. Epidemiological evidence suggests that in the horse S. zooepidemicus may be a primary pathogen in respiratory disease (Wood et al., 1993; Chanter, 1997) but it is generally considered to be an opportunistic pathogen (Walker and Timoney 1998; Anzai et al., 2000). Even if S. zooepidemicus is not a primary cause of CIRD in these dogs, the high isolation rate from dogs with suppurative bronchopneumonia (87.5%) supports the hypothesis that S. zooepidemicus is responsible for the more severe clinical signs seen in this kennel. The low isolation from household pets (1.4%) with respiratory disease indicates this agent may not be a common respiratory infection and could be a problem particular to this kennel. Although any previous kennelling was not taken into consideration it is likely that some of the household pet dogs in this study have been kennelled at one time. The role played by S. zooepidemicus in other cases of CIRD in kennelled dogs has not been ascertained.

The isolation of S. zooepidemicus from these dogs increases with time in the kennel, indicating the lungs of these dogs are becoming infected with this bacterium. Such infection could be occurring from either sub-clinical infections of the upper respiratory tract or from a single pathogenic strain. A PCR typing system for the gene of the variable M-like SzP protein enables the separation of the 15 known sero-types of S. zooepidemicus into five distinct groups, HV1-5 (Walker and Timoney, 1998). Analyses with this typing system by Anzai et al., (2000) found that single clonal variants of S. zooepidemicus are found in the pneumonic equine lung whereas several types are found in the tonsils of healthy horses. It would be of interest to sub-type the S. zooepidemicus isolates involved in this outbreak of CIRD to determine whether a single clonal variant is present in the diseased population, and also to examine the relationship, if any, that canine S. zooepidemicus isolates have to those causing respiratory disease in horses and other animals. S. zooepidemicus associated pneumonia occurs in horses of all ages and acute hemorrhagic pneumonia in older horses that have been stressed by transportation (Anzai et al., 2000). In this outbreak of CIRD younger dogs and those in poor clinical condition on entry to the kennel were equally susceptible to infection with S. zooepidemicus as the older dogs and those that were healthy on entry.

In this kennel antibiotic therapy is given for a range of infections, and treatment is not routinely given to dogs with CIRD except in cases of severe bronchopneumonia. It is possible that treatment could have influenced the bacterial spectrum noted in this study. However the examination of natural outbreaks of respiratory disease can provide valuable information that cannot be obtained by other means.

CIRD is known to be a multi-factorial disease involving several agents including CAV-2, CPIV, B. bronchiceptica and Mycoplasma spp. In this kennel in which large numbers of dogs from a variety of locations are brought together and housed, several pathogens are present and the severity of the disease may reflect this.

Example 2 The Association of Mycoplasma Cynos with Canine Infectious Respiratory Disease

The presence of M. cynos was investigated by culture of the organism and identification by PCR analysis. In a survey of 184 kennelled dogs we have found that the percentage of dogs with M. cynos in the trachea or lung increases with signs of respiratory disease from 10% in healthy dogs to 31% in diseased dogs (FIG. 3).

We have also noted that respiratory disease increases with time in the kennel and during the first week in the kennel dogs have no detectable M. cynos in the trachea, whereas by the second week 24% of the 184 dogs were positive for M. cynos in the trachea—indicating 24% of the population are being infected with this bacterium. A smaller but similar increase was also seen for colonization of the lung (from 15% to 23%) (see FIG. 4).

Example 3 The Association of Chlamydophila with Canine Infectious Respiratory Disease

We surveyed 210 dogs by PCR analysis for the presence of Chlamydophila.

A 218 bp fragment of the 23S rRNA gene was amplified from the Chlamydophila by the following PCR. Reaction conditions, 95° C. 5 min (×1 cycle), 95° C. 30 seconds, 50° C. 30 seconds, 72° C. 1 minute (×40 cycles) and 72° C. 5 mins. The PCR reaction mix of 50 μl total, included 5.0 μl 10× magnesium free buffer (promega), 1.5 mM MgCl2 (Promega), 0.5 μl (0.5 Units) Taq DNA polymerase (Promega), 0.2 mM PCR nucleotide mix (Promega), 0.025 μg forward primer C1 (5′-GATGCCTTGGCATTGATAGGCGATGAAG GA-3′, SEQ ID NO: 9) and reverse primer C2 (5′-TGGCTCATCATGCAAAAGGCA-3′, SEQ ID NO: 10), 40 μl water and 2 μl sample tissue DNA.

A PCR product obtained from 8 dogs was confirmed as a Chlamydophila by sequence analysis and comparison of the PCR product to all available sequences in GenBank by Fasta analysis. The partial sequence of the 23S rRNA gene of one such sequence (DHBCI0) is shown in FIG. 5 (SEQ ID NO: 1). This 218 bp sequence is 99.08% identical to the same region in Chlamydophila abortus and 98.6% identical to Chlamydophila psittaci and 96.3% identical to Chlamydophila felis and on preliminary phylogenetic analysis (clustal method with Megalign) most sequences cluster in a distinct clade (FIG. 7). The 23S rRNA partial sequences of seven other Chlamydophila isolates are shown in FIG. 8 (SEQ ID NOs: 2-8).

In this survey we found an increase in the detection of Chlamydophila with increasing respiratory disease severity in both the trachea and lung. A slight increase of detection of 10% was found in tracheal samples (from 25% to 34%). A more dramatic difference was found in detection of Chlamydophila in the lung, with an increase from 0% healthy dogs to 37.5% in dogs with CIRD (FIG. 6). Furthermore, an increase in the total number of dogs that tested positive by PCR for Chlamydophila from 25% in healthy dogs to 50% in dogs with severe disease was noted (FIG. 6).

Example 4 The Association of Canine Herpesvirus with Canine Infectious Respiratory Disease

We found an increased prevalence of canine herpesvirus in dogs with more severe respiratory symptoms (FIG. 9). When monitoring antibody responses to CHV over a yearlong period, dogs in a kennel with frequent outbreaks of respiratory disease showed seroconversions to CRV more frequently (58.3%) than dogs from a comparable kennel with no outbreaks (8.3%).

REFERENCES

  • Angus, J C., Jang, S. S., Hirsh. D. C., (1997). Microbiological study of transtracheal aspirates from dogs with suspected lower respiratory tract disease: 264 cases (1989-1995). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 210, 55-58.
  • Anzai, T., Walker, JA., Blair, M. B., Chambers, T. M., Timoney, J. F., (2000). Comparison of the phenotypes of Streptococcus zooepidemicus isolated from tonsils of healthy horses and specimens obtained from foals and donkeys with pneumonia. Am. J. Vet. Res. 61, 162-166.
  • Appel M J, Percy D R. SV-5-like parainfluenza virus in dogs. (1970) J Am Vet Med. Assoc. 1970 Jun. 15; 156(12):1778-81
  • Appel, M., Binn, L. N., 1987. Canine Infectious Tracheobronchitis Short review: Kennel Cough. In: Appel M. (Ed.), Virus Infections of Carnivores. Elsevier. Oxford. pp. 201-211.
  • Arizmendi F, Grimes J E, Relford R L. (1992). Isolation of Chlamydia psittaci from pleural effusion in a dog. J Vet gnaiD Invest. 4(4): 460-3.
  • Azetaka, M., Konishi, S., (1988). Kennel cough complex: confirmation and analysis of the outbreak in Japan. Jap. J. Vet. Sci. 50, 851-858.
  • Balter, S., Benin, A., Pinto, S. W. L., Teixeira, L. M., Alvim, G. G., Luna, E., Jackson, D., LaClaire, L., Elliot, .r Facklam, R., Schuchat, A., (2000). Epidemic nephritis in Nova Serrana, Brazil. Lancet. 355, 1776-1780.
  • Barile, M. F. (1985) Immunization against mycoplasma infections p 451-492. In S. Razin and M. F. Barile (Ed.) The Mycoplasamas, vol 4. Mycoplasma pathogenicity. Academic Press, Inc, Orlando, Fla.
  • Barile M. F. et al., (1985). Current status on the controls of mycoplasma diseases of man, animals, plants and insects. Bull. Inst. Pasteur. 83: 339373.
  • Bemis, D. A., Carmichael, L. E., and Appel, M. J. (1977a). Naturally occurring respiratory disease in a kennel caused by Bordetella bronchiseptica. Cornell Vet. 67, 282-93.
  • Bemis D A, Greisen H A, and Appel M J. (1977b). Pathogenesis of canine bordetellosis. J. Infect Dis 135:753-762.
  • Biberstein, E. L., Brown, C., Smith, T., (1980). Serogroups and Biostypes among beta-hemolytic streptococci of canine origin. J. Clin. Microbial. 11, 558-561.
  • Biberstein, E. L., Hirsh, D. C., (1999). Streptococci. In: Hirsh, D. C., Zee, Y. C., (Eds.) Veterinary Microbiology. Blackwell Science. Oxford. pp 120126.
  • Binn, L. N., Eddy, G. A., Lazar, E. C., Helms, J., and Murnane, T. (1967). Viruses recovered from laboratory dogs with respiratory disease. Proc Soc Exp Bioi Med 126, 140-5
  • Chalker V J, Toomey C, Opperman S, Brooks H W, Ibuoye M A, Brownlie J, Rycroft A N. Respiratory Disease in Kennelled Dogs: Serological Responses to Bordetella bronchiseptica Lipopolysaccharide Do Not Correlate with Bacterial Isolation or Clinical Respiratory Symptoms. ilC gnaiD Lab Immunol. 10(3):352-6. 2003
  • Chanter, N., (1997) Streptococci and enterococci as animal pathogens. J. Appl. nl.niobnronLMic Symp. Suppl. 83, 100S-109S.
  • Cocoran, B. (1998). Cytological collection techniques. In: Luis Fuentes, V. Swift, S., (Eds.), Manual of small animal cardiorespiratory medicine and surgery. British Small .minA Vet. Assoc. Cheltenham. pp. 75-79.
  • Ditchfield, 1., Macpherson, L. W., and Zbitnew, A. (1962). Association of a canine adenovirus (Toronto A 26/61) with an outbreak of laryngotracheitis (“kennel cough”). Can. Vet. Jour. 3, 238-247
  • Ellis J A, Haines D M, West K H, Burr J R, Dayton A, Townsend H G, Kanara E W, Konoby C, Crichlow A, Martin K, Headrick G. (2001) Effect of vaccination on experimental infection with Bordetella bronchiseptica in dogs. J Am Vet Med. Assoc. 218(3):367-75.2001
  • Eries, K., Toomey, C., Brooks, H. W., Brownlie, 1. (2003) Detection of a group 2 coronavirus in dogs with canine infectious respiratory disease. Virology. In press.
  • Farrow J A, et al. (1984). “Taxonomic studies on Streptococci of serological groups C, G and L and possibly related taxa”. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 5: 483-493.
  • Fraser G, Norval J, Withers A R, Gregor W W. (1985) A case history of psittacosis in the dog. Vet Rec. 196985(3): 54-8.
  • Fukushi H, Ogawa H, Minamoto N, Hashimoto A, Yagami K, Tamura H, Shimakura S, Hirai K. (1985) Seroepidemiological surveillance of Chlamydia psittaci in cats and dogs in Japan. Vet Rec. 117(19): 503-4.
  • Garnett, N. L., Eydelloth, R. S., Swindle, M. M., Vonderfecht, S. L., Strandberg, J. D., Luzarraga, M. B., (1982). Hemorrhagic streptococcal pneumonia in newly procured research dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 181, 1371-1374.
  • Gresham A C, Dixon C E, Bevan B J. (1996) Domiciliary outbreak of psittacosis in dogs: potential for zoonotic infection. Vet Rec. 138(25):622-3.
  • Jang S S, Ling G V, Yamamoto R, Wolf A M. (1984) Mycoplasma as a cause of canine urinary tract infection. J Am Vet Med Assoc 185(1):45-7
  • Karpas, A., King, N. W., Garcia, F. G., Calvo, F., and Cross, R. E. (1968a). Canine tracheobronchitis: Isolation and characterization of the agent with experimental reproduction of the disease. Proc Soc Exp BioI Med. 127,4552.
  • Karpas A, Garcia F G, Calvo F, Cross R E. (1968b) Experimental production of canine tracheobronchitis (kennel cough) with canine herpesvirus isolated from naturally infected dogs. Am J Vet Res. 29(6):1251-7.
  • Keil, D.l, and Fenwick, R (1998). Role of Bordetella bronchiseptica in infectious tracheobronchitis in dogs. J Am Vet Med. Assoc. 15, 200-7.
  • Lambrechts N, Picard J, Tustin Re. (1999) Chlamydia-induced septic polyarthritis in a dog. J S Air Vet Assoc. 70(1):40-2).
  • Lou, T. Y., and Wenner, R. A (1963). Natural and experimental infection of dogs with reovirus, type 1: pathogenicity of the strain for other animals. Am. JHyg. 77, 293-304.
  • McCandlish, I. A P., Thompson, R., Cornwell, .r. a Wright, N. G., 1978. A study of dogs with kennel cough. Vet. Rec. 102, 298-301.
  • McKieman, R C., Smith, A R., Kissil, M., 1982. Bacterial Isolates from the lower trachea of clinically healthy dogs. J. Am.minA Hosp!. Assoc. 20, 139-142.
  • Quinn, P. l, Carter, M. E., Markey, R K., Carter, G. R., (Eds.), 1999. Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. Mosby. pp. 129-130.
  • Randolph J F, Moise N S, Scarlett I M, Shin S J, Blue J T, Bookbinder PRo (1993). Prevalence of mycoplasmal and ureaplasmal recovery from tracheobronchial lavages and prevalence of mycoplasmal recovery from pharyngeal swab specimens in dogs with or without pulmonary disease. Am J Vet Res. March; 54(3):387-91.
  • Rosendal, S. (1972). Acta Vet. Scand. 13: 137.
  • Rosendal & Vinther (1977). Experimental mycoplasmal pneumonia in dogs: electron microscopy of infected tissue. Acta Pathol loiborc(Mi Scand [B] 85B(6):462-5.
  • Sadatsune, T., Moreno, G., 1975. Contribution to the study ofb-haemolytic streptococci isolated from dogs. Arq. Inst. tfrBiol. Sao. Paulo. 42, 257-264.
  • Rosendal, S. (1978). Canine Mycoplasmas: Pathogenicity of Mycoplasmas associated with distemper pneumonia. J. Infect. Dis. 138(2), 203-210.
  • Sako T, Takahashi T, Takehana K, Uchida E, Nakade T, Umemura T, Taniyama H. (2002) Chlamydial infection in canine atherosclerotic lesions. Atherosclerosis. 162(2): 253-9.
  • Smith lE., 1967. The aerobic bacteria of the nose and tonsils of healthy dogs. J Compo Path. 71, 428-433.
  • Storz, I (1988) Microbiology of Chlamydia. p. 168 Ed A. L. Barron, Boca Raton, CRC Press.
  • Swango L J, Wooding W L Jr, Binn L N. 1970. A companson of the pathogenesis and antigenicity of infectious canine hepatitis virus and the A26-61 virus strain (Toronto). J Am Vet Med. Assoc. 1970 Jun. 15; 156(12): 1687-96.
  • Thompson H, McCandlish 1AP, Wright N G: (1976) Experimental respiratory disease in dogs due to Bordetella bronchiseptica. Res Vet Sci 20:16-23.
  • Thrusfield, M. V., Aitken, e. G. G., Murihead, R. H., (1991). A field investigation of kennel cough: incubation period and clinical signs. J Small Anim. Pract. 32, 215-220.
  • Timoney, I F. (1987). The Streptococci. In: Gyles, C. L., Thoen C O., (Eds.) Pathogenesis of bacterial infections in animals. Iowa State University Press. pp. 12-13.
  • Timoney, I F., Gillespie, 1H., Scott, F. W., Barlough, I E., (Eds), 1988. The Genus Streptococcus. In: Hagan and Bruner's Microbiology and Infectious Diseases of Domestic Animals. Comstock Publishing Associates, London. pp. 181-187.
  • Ural O, Tuncer I, Dikici N, & Aridogan B. (2003). Streptococcus zooepidemicus meningitis and bacteraemia. Scand J Infect Dis. 35(3): 206207.
  • Walker, J. A., Timoney, J. F., (1998). Molecular basis of variation m protective SzP proteins of Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Am. J. Vet. Res. 59, 1129-1133.
  • Walker R L & Runyan C A (2003). Identification of variations in SzP proteins of Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus and the relationship between protein variants and clinical signs of infection in horses. Am J Vet Res. 64(8): 976-81.
  • Werth D, Schmeer N, Muller H P, Karo M, Krauss H. (1987). Demonstration of antibodies against Chlamydia psittaci and Coxiella bumetii in dogs and cats: comparison of the enzyme immunoassay, immunoperoxidase technic, complement fixation test and agar gel precipitation test Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 34(3): 165-76.
  • Wood, J. L. N., Burrell, M. H., Roberts, C A., Chanter, N., Shaw, Y, (1993). Streptococci and Pasteurella spp. associated with disease of the equme lower respiratory tract. Equine Vet. J. 25, 314-318.
  • Young S, Storz J, Maierhofer C A. (1972) Pathologic features of experimentally induced chlamydial infection in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 33(2): 377-83.

Claims

1. A method of vaccinating a dog against canine infectious respiratory disease (CIRD), the method comprising administering to the dog a vaccine composition comprising an agent capable of raising an immune response against Streptococcus equi sub species zooepidemicus (S. zooepidemicus) in a dog.

2. A method of treating CIRD in a dog, the method comprising administering to the dog a vaccine composition comprising an agent capable of raising an immune response against S. zooepidemicus in a dog.

3. A method of stimulating an immune response against S. zooepidemicus in a dog, the method comprising administering to the dog an agent capable of raising an immune response against S. zooepidemicus in a dog.

4. A method according to any of claims 1 to 3 wherein the agent capable of raising an immune response against Streptococcus equi sub species zooepidemicus (S. zooepidemicus) in a dog comprises an agent selected from the group consisting of inactivated or attenuated S. zooepidemicus, an immunogenic fragment of S. zooepidemicus or a derivative thereof, and a nucleic acid molecule encoding said fragment or said derivative.

5. The method according to claim 1 or 2 further comprising administering to the dog an agent capable of raising an immune response against Mycoplasma cynos (M. cynos) in a dog.

6. The method according to claim 5 wherein the agent capable of raising an immune response against M. cynos in a dog comprises an agent selected from the group consisting of inactivated or attenuated M. cynos, an immunogenic fragment of M. cynos or a derivative thereof, and a nucleic acid molecule encoding said fraction or said derivative.

7. The method according to claim 1 or 2 further comprising administering to the dog an agent capable of raising an immune response against a Chlamydophila in a dog.

8. The method according to claim 7 wherein the agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against a Chlamydophila comprises an agent selected from the group consisting of inactivated or attenuated Chlamydophila abortus, Chlamydophila psittaci, Chlamydophila felis, Chlamydia muridarum, Chlamydia pecorum, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia suis and Chlamydia trachomatis, an immunogenic fragment thereof or a derivative thereof, and a nucleic acid molecule encoding said fraction or said derivative.

9. The method according to claim 1 or 2 further comprising administering to the dog any one or more of:

an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against canine respiratory coronavirus (CRCV);
an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against canine parainfluenzavirus (CPIV);
an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against canine adenovirus type 2 (CAV-2);
an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against canine herpesvirus (CHV); and
an agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against Bordetella bronchiseptica (B. bronchiseptica).

10. The method according to claim 9 wherein the agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CRCV comprises an agent selected from the group consisting of inactivated or attenuated CRCV, an immunogenic fragment thereof, and a nucleic acid molecule encoding said immunogenic fraction.

11. The method according to claim 10 wherein the immunogenic fragment of CRCV comprises the Spike protein or the hemagglutinin-esterase (HE) protein, or an immunogenic portion of the Spike or HE protein.

12. The method according to claim 9 wherein the agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CPIV comprises an agent selected from the group consisting of inactivated or attenuated CPIV, an immunogenic fragment thereof, and a nucleic acid molecule encoding said immunogenic fraction.

13. The method according to claim 9 wherein the agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CAV-2 comprises an agent selected from the group consisting of inactivated or attenuated CAV-2, an immunogenic fragment thereof, and a nucleic acid encoding said immunogenic fraction.

14. The method according to claim 9 wherein the agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against CHV comprises an agent selected from the group consisting of inactivated or attenuated CHV, an immunogenic fragment thereof, and a nucleic acid molecule encoding said immunogenic fraction.

15. The method according to claim 9 wherein the agent capable of raising an immune response in a dog against B. bronchiseptica comprises an agent selected from the group consisting of inactivated or attenuated B. bronchiseptica, an immunogenic fragment thereof, and a nucleic acid molecule encoding said immunogenic fraction.

16. A method of determining whether a dog has or is susceptible to CIRD, the method comprising:

(a) obtaining a suitable sample from the dog; and
(b) identifying S. zooepidemicus, or an antibody to S. zooepidemicus, in the sample.

17. The method according to claim 16 wherein the S. zooepidemicus is identified using an antibody.

18. The method according to claim 16 wherein the S. zooepidemicus is identified using a nucleic acid molecule.

19. The method according to claim 16 wherein the anti-S. zooepidemicus antibody is identified using S. zooepidemicus or an antigenic portion thereof.

20. The method according to claim 16 wherein the sample is an antibody-containing sample such as serum, saliva, tracheal wash or branchiolar lavage.

Patent History
Publication number: 20080220018
Type: Application
Filed: Sep 4, 2007
Publication Date: Sep 11, 2008
Applicant: THE ROYAL VETERINARY COLLEGE (Hatfield)
Inventors: John Brownlie (Hatfield), Victoria Jane Chalker (Hatfield), Kerstin Erles (Hatfield)
Application Number: 11/849,931