COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF RESTENOSIS
Compositions and methods are disclosed which employ PARIS proteins that are useful for suppressing proliferation of smooth muscle cells. Preferred PARISs are soluble proteins that are secreted by vascular smooth muscle cells, and include PARIS-1 (neuronal pentraxin 1), PARIS-2 (SBP (MIC-1, GDF-15), PARIS-3 (BTG2) and PARIS-4 (soluble fractalkine). Methods of preventing or treating restenosis by administering the new compositions are disclosed. Also disclosed are methods for treating patients undergoing angioplasty procedures, patients with atherosclerosis, and patients with other proliferative disorders, in order to suppress the growth of vascular smooth muscle cells or other cells that play a role in the particular proliferative disorder or condition. A method of screening mRNAs and identifying genes encoding PARISs is also disclosed.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/462,106 filed Aug. 3, 2006, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/448,664 filed May 30, 2003, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENTThis invention was made in whole or in part with funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (Grant No. HL068024). Accordingly, the United States Government has certain rights in this invention.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION1. Technical Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to compositions and methods for prevention of proliferative disorders, including restenosis, atherosclerosis and cancer. More particularly, the invention relates to compositions containing molecules secreted by cells and which are capable of inhibiting proliferation of those and/or other cells. The invention also relates to therapeutic methods employing such compositions.
2. Description of Related Art
Percutaneous transluminal coronary interventions (“PCI”) such as angioplasty procedures are common practice today for relieving atherosclerotic blockage caused by fatty acid deposits in coronary arteries, whereby blood flow is restored in the affected arteries. A relatively common complication of angioplasty is restenosis, a renarrowing of the blood flow due to uncontrolled proliferation of smooth muscle cells at the angioplasty site. Post-angioplasty restenosis was first treated by balloon redilatation and, when stents became available1, by stent implantation2. However, close to 20% of patients developed restenosis within the stent (“in-stent restenosis”)2, due to neointimal VSMC growth3. In-stent restenosis was initially treated by repeat angioplasty, rotational atherectomy, laser angioplasty, “stent-in-stent”, and other techniques, but all of those procedures yielded suboptimal outcomes4. Brachytherapy has been investigated for preventing restenosis12,13 after primary angioplasty, however, at least 15% of patients treated with brachytherapy still develop restenosis, suggesting that the prevention of restenosis by brachytherapy is not entirely efficacious13. It has been reported that brachytherapy only moderately reduced the recurrence rate of in-stent restenosis (from 43.8% to 28.2%)5, at the expense of adverse radiation exposure both to patients and operators and of late-occurring, intralesional thrombosis.
Among a number of pharmacological interventions attempted, only a few preventive strategies, such as probucol6, trapidil7, cilostazol8, n-3 fatty acid (eicosapentaenoic acid)9, and folic acid combined with vitamin B12 and pyridoxine10, have been found acceptable. Even in the better trials, restenosis still developed in 17.9-24.2% of patients. When stent implantation was used to treat primary lesions in order to prevent restenosis, a significant number (18%) of patients who underwent stent implantation experienced restenosis nevertheless1,2,11. It has been reported that stents coated with sirolimus (also known as rapamycin) are more effective than conventional stents in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial55, and recently the FDA has approved a sirolimus-eluting coronary stent for angioplasty procedures to open clogged coronary arteries. Long-term effects and side-effect profiles of sirolimus have not been determined in a large clinical trail, however.
Although brachytherapy and sirolimus-eluting stents may effectively treat a selected group of patients with restenosis, those treatment modalities are likely to remain very expensive and exclusive. For example, the cost of sirolimus-eluting stents is estimated to be four times higher than that of conventional stents, while brachytherapy requires the involvement of radiation oncologists and nuclear physicists. It has been estimated that up to a million PCIs are being performed annually in North America alone14. A therapeutically viable, lower-cost treatment that can significantly reduce the risk of restenosis is greatly needed. It has been calculated that a treatment that reduces risk of restenosis by 25-33% risk reduction would save approximately $1,400-$2,000 per patient in hospital, procedural and professional fees, with a total savings in North America alone of $400-800 million a year15.
SUMMARY OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTSIn the course of investigations leading up to the present invention, it was discovered that certain soluble proteins (“PARISs”) normally secreted by vascular smooth muscle cells (“VSMC”) are also able to inhibit VSMC growth. Since it is well known in the field of cardiovascular medicine that VSMC cells play a critical role in restenosis and atherosclerosis, it is now proposed that PARISs can be effectively employed to treat, deter or even prevent restenosis and atherosclerosis progression. Some PARISs also appear to be normally secreted by a variety of cells, including non-vascular SMCs. In some cases the PARISs are secreted to a lesser degree than in VSMCs. However, this unique group of proteins hold promise as inhibitors of cell growth in a variety of tissues, and may find use in treating or deterring cell proliferation in a variety of proliferative disorders such as keloid formation, venous grafts, coronary arteries of transplanted hearts and cancers.
Individually, the representative proteins disclosed herein as PARIS-1, PARIS-2, PARIS-3 and PARIS-4, have little or no common homology or mutual family associations. Each has previously been assigned another name and a different implicated function has been attributed to it. While some amino acid sequence information is available for these proteins and some of their physical properties have been described by others, these proteins are not well characterized and their implicated biological functions are different than the bioactivity disclosed herein for the first time (i.e., their inhibitory effects on vascular smooth muscle cell growth and, potentially, other cells.) In accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention, compositions are provided which contain one or more purified PARIS, and may include a suitable carrier (e.g., sterile isotonic saline). For example, the composition may be suitable for direct injection at the desired site of action in a vessel. In certain embodiments the composition is useful for preventing or treating restenosis. In certain preferred embodiments the composition comprises at least one soluble protein secreted from a VSMC and capable of inhibiting VSMC growth, with or without a carrier. For the purposes of this disclosure, the term “soluble protein” has its usual meaning and includes secreted non-matrix proteins. The PARIS may be a natural or synthetic protein, or a biologically active portion thereof.
Certain preferred PARIS proteins from rat have the amino acid sequence identified as GenBank Accession No. P47971 (R. norvegicus) (H. sapiens ortholog: Q15818) (PARIS-1), GenBank Accession No. Q9Z0J6 (R. norvegicus) (H. sapiens ortholog: NP—004855) (PARIS-2), GenBank Accession No. A40443 (R. norvegicus) (H. sapiens ortholog: P78543) (PARIS-3), and GenBank Accession No. 055145 (R. norvegicus) (H. sapiens ortholog: NP—002987) (PARIS-4). Other PARIS proteins in accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention share at least 40% homology with the above-identified PARISs. 24% amino acid identity with the above-identified rat proteins, preferably sharing at least 40% identity, and still more preferably more than 50% identity.
In another embodiment of the present invention a composition is provided that contains at least two of the proteins: PARIS-1, PARIS-2, PARIS-3 and PARIS-4.
In certain other embodiments of the present invention, methods of using the above-described PARISs and compositions for treatment of patients such as those undergoing angioplasty procedures, patients with atherosclerosis, and patients with other proliferative disorders, in order to suppress the growth of vascular smooth muscle cells or other cells that play a role in the particular proliferative disorder or condition are provided. Advantageously, therapies employing PARISs are potentially less expensive and more inclusive (i.e., they may be administered without special instruments or personnel) than conventional post-angioplasty restenosis treatments and preventatives. Another advantage of employing a PARIS therapeutically is that since PARISs are native proteins, or biologically active portions thereof, no antigen-antibody immune reaction should occur. In some embodiments the proliferative disorder is cancer. In some embodiments the disorder is keloid formation.
In some embodiments a method of deterring or preventing a smooth muscle cell (“SMC”) proliferative disorder is provided which includes administering to a site at risk of overgrowth by SMCs a cell growth inhibitory amount of a composition described above. In certain embodiments a method of inhibiting VSMC growth is provided which comprises administering to a VSMC at least one PARIS protein, preferably PARIS-1, PARIS-2, PARIS-3 or PARIS-4.
In some embodiments a method of preventing post-angioplasty restenosis is provided which includes administering to an above-described protein or composition to an angioplasty site.
In some embodiments a method of deterring or preventing atherosclerosis progression is provided which includes administering to a site at risk of overgrowth by vascular smooth muscle cells a cell growth inhibitory amount of a protein or composition as described above. The PARISs may be administered via a PARIS-eluting stent or other local drug delivery system, or they may be administered systemically, percutaneously, sublingually, or rectally.
In still other embodiments of the present invention, a screening method for detecting an inhibitor of SMC proliferation is provided. The method comprises:
a) extracting RNAs from the growing vascular smooth muscle cells from a first animal model that is restenosis-resistant with respect to balloon injury to a blood vessel in the first animal model (e.g., Harlan SD rat), followed by the generation of the pool of which are labeled with a suitable fluorescent marker.
b) extracting RNAs from the growing vascular smooth muscle cells from a second animal model (e.g., Sasco SD rat) that is restenosis-prone with respect to balloon injury of a blood vessel in the second animal model, followed by the generation of the pool of cDNAs, which are labeled with a suitable fluorescent marker.
c) performing microarray analyses to identify genes that are abundantly present in the first set of cDNA pool but scarcely present in the second set of cDNA pool, followed by identification of genes that encode soluble proteins that are secreted by the vascular smooth muscle cells from the first animal model more abundantly than from the second animal model. Alternatively, another molecular biological technique could be substituted, such as subtraction cloning, to identify genes that are differentially present between the first and the second animal models.
d) assaying the protein levels to validate that proteins encoded by these genes are in fact upregulated in the vascular smooth muscle cells from the first, but not as much as in the second, animal model.
e) expressing and purifying these proteins and confirming that these proteins, in fact, suppress the growth of vascular smooth muscle cells.
The method may also include identifying homologs or biologically active portions of the/those protein(s). In certain embodiments the expression level of the upregulated gene is greater in growing cells from the first animal model than in those from the second animal model, preferably at least 1.5-fold, and more preferably at least 3-fold greater. These and other embodiments, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent with reference to the following description and drawings.
The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
Research efforts on post-angioplasty restenosis and atherosclerosis have conventionally focused primarily on the molecules that cause smooth muscle cells to grow. Little attention has been paid previously to molecules that prevent cells from growing (i.e., inhibitors or negative regulators of cell proliferation). It is believed that no molecules have been previously reported that are secreted from vascular smooth muscle cells and which inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell growth. The four proteins (PARIS 1-4) described herein are believed to be the first such inhibitors that are capable of inhibiting smooth muscle cell growth in vitro and in vivo.
Restenosis-Resistant and Restenosis-Prone Animal ModelsRat substrains with restenosis-resistant and restenosis-prone phenotypes were employed an animal models in the present investigations. It had been observed in a number of animal surgeries at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston that more robust neointima sometimes appeared to form in the carotid arteries of one substrain of rat than in those of another substrain after the same balloon angioplasty procedures were performed. In order to investigate that possibility, substrains of Sprague-Dawley rat were obtained from two different vendors (i.e., Harlan and Sasco). The degree of neointimal proliferation in 12 rats from each group was determined using a standard carotid artery balloon injury-restenosis model, as described by Clowes et al.16 Three rats from each group (a total of 6 rats) were sacrificed on days 1, 3, 7 and 14 after the surgical intervention. Right and left carotid arteries were harvested, fixed in 4% neutral buffered formalin, and then embedded in paraffin. Sectioned tissues were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and subjected to morphometric analysis and cell counting. In
The experimental protocol was as follows: Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (400-450 gram) were purchased from the Sasco branch of Charles River Laboratories (“Sasco”, Kingston, N.Y.) and from Harlan Inc. (“Harlan”, Indianapolis, Ind.). All the animals were housed individually and cared for in accordance with institutional animal welfare guidelines. Rats were allowed standard rat chow and water ad labium and were on 12 hour-light-dark cycles. In brief, individual rats (total number: 24) were weighed, then anesthetized with halothane (Halocarbon Laboratories, River Edge, N.J.), using a vaporizer (Vapomatic Sterline, Mass.). Surgical areas on the inside left hind limb and the ventral neck region were shaved, cleaned with providine, and a sterile drape placed over the animal with opening at the surgical sites. A midline neck incision was made to expose the left common carotid artery; the iliac artery was exposed through another incision above its junction with the femoral artery, then ligated at the distal end. The right common carotid artery served as a control. A 2F Fogarty arterial embolectomy catheter (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Santa Ana, Calif.) was inserted into the iliac artery and passed through the aorta to the distal portion of the left common carotid artery. Placement of the catheter was checked via midline incision in the neck. The balloon catheter was inflated with a manually driven inflator device (Encore, Scimed, Maple, Minn.) to 2.5 atmospheres, then retracted in the inflated position to the origin of the left common carotid artery at the aorta. The catheter was deflated, returned to its original position, inflated, and retracted through the carotid artery twice again. The Forgarty catheter was removed via the iliac artery, which was loigated proximal to the incision site; skin was closed in both the neck and hind limb, and the incision sites were treated with topical antibiotics. Six rats (3 each from Harlan and Sasco) were killed on the 1, 3, 7 and 14 days after the surgical intervention. Rats were euthanized with carbon dioxide gas inhalation, the abdomen opened, and a catheter inserted through the aorta to the arch. The 20 mL of heparinized PBS was infused at 5 mL/min, at which time, the right and left carotid arteries were dissected out. The middle one third of each carotid artery was harvested and placed in 4% neutral buffered formalin solution (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pa.). Paraffin embedded tissues were sectioned at 4 μm thickness and Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) staining was performed on each tissue. As is shown in
Referring now to
The counting of HE-positive nuclei in the intima revealed that the intima of Sasco SD rats contained significantly more cells on 7th and 14th days than did that of Harlan SD rats (
The Harlan and Sasco SD animal lines were investigated as to their lineage. Harlan and Sasco SD rats have the same ancestors, rats from Sprague-Dawley Co. established by Dr. Dawley in the mid 1970's. Harlan Co. and Sasco Co. (later purchased by Charles River Laboratories) initiated their own breeding programs in 1981 and 1979, respectively. The breeding protocols of their companies have not changed since colonies were first established (Communication with scientists of Harlan Co. and Charles River Laboratories). Despite sharing the same ancestors, Harlan and Sasco SD rats exhibit clearly different phenotypes, as summarized in Table 1. Notably, Sasco SD rats are significantly heavier than Harlan SD rats later in life, despite the comparable food consumption17,18. Sasco SD rats also exhibit different behavioral19, neuroanatomical20,21, endocrinological21, immunological22, and cardiovascular22 phenotypes (Table 1). These observations suggest that Harlan and Sasco SD rats represent two genetically divergent substrains derived from the same ancestors.
As described above and shown in
Equal numbers of Harlan and Sasco SD rat VSMCs were seeded in 6-well plates, synchronized, and subjected to the same growth media. As shown in
Although the VSMCs from the two substrains did not differ morphologically (
In order to test the hypothesis that the observed difference in the growth rates of Harlan and Sasco VSMCs was due to a difference in the rate of DNA synthesis, a standard thymidine incorporation assay was performed. Referring to
In order to test the hypothesis that the difference in growth between Harlan and Sasco VSMCs was not only due to a difference in DNA synthesis rate, but also due to a difference in susceptibility to cytotoxicity, we performed a cell death assay in which Harlan and Sasco SD rat VSMCs were challenged with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and the number of dead cells were assessed by a trypan-blue exclusion assay. As is shown in
In order to test the hypothesis that soluble factors from VSMCs influence the growth patterns of Harlan and Sasco VSMCs, the same growth assay was performed with conditioned media from either Harlan or Sasco VSMC cultures. Harlan conditioned media suppressed the growth of Sasco VSMCs and A7r5 VSMCs in contrast to Sasco conditioned media. Double asterisks denote P<0.001 by ANOVA (General linear model) between cells treated with Sasco conditioned media and cells treated with Harlan conditioned media.
The experimental protocol was as follows: 1×104 cells (either Sasco VSMCs or A7r5 VSMCs, which is rat vascular smooth muscle cell line [ATCC, Manassas, Va.]) were seeded on 6-well plates in duplicate. Next day, media were exchanged for Harlan or Sasco conditioned media, which were obtained by exposing 2.0 million Harlan/Sasco VSMCs to fresh Media 231 for 24 hours. The number of cells in each well was determined every 24 hours for 6 days. Strikingly, when VSMCs were incubated with the Harlan conditioned media, their growth rate was slower than that of VSMCs incubated with the Sasco conditioned media (
As described above and in
In order to evaluate the hypothesis that the significant difference in growth pattern of VSMCs observed in vitro and in vivo between Harlan and Sasco SDs (
The experimental protocol of the Affymetrix rat gene array analysis to identify the restenosis related genes was as follows:
Harlan and Sasco SD rats were purchased from Harlan Co. and Charles River Laboratories, respectively, and housed individually and cared for in an identical fashion, according to the institutional guidelines on standard rat chow (Ralston Purina, Richmond, Ind.) and water ad labium with 12 hour light-dark cycles.
(2) Right and left carotid arteries were then harvested. Adventitial layers were carefully removed by brunt dissection under dissecting microscope. The endothelial layers were removed by rubbing a cotton-tipped swab against the endothelial surface of opened arteries several times.
(3) VSMCs were allowed to grow in a 10-cm dish on M231 Media with serum supplements (Cascade Laboratories, Portland, Oreg.).
(4) When cells were confluent, they were propagated into one chamber slide and three 10-cm dishes. Cells in the chamber slide were allowed to differentiate on the Differentiation media (0.5% serum, 50 μg/mL Heparin) for 7 days and stained with anti-α-actin antibody. The purity of VSMCs over 90% was confirmed.
(5) When VSMCs on 10-cm dishes were 80% confluent, cells were harvested.
(6) The total RNA were extracted using a RNeasy™ Midi kit (Qiagen).
(7) The double-stranded complementary DNA (cDNA) was then synthesized, using SuperScript Choice™ system (Gibco BRL), followed by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Synthesis of biotin-labeled cRNA was performed using Enzo BioArray High Yield RNA Transcript Labeling Kit™ (Affymetrix), followed by the fragmentation of the cRNA.
(8)-(9) The cRNAs were then subjected to target hybridization. One array (GeneChip®; Rat Genome U34 Set, Affymetrix) per rat was used normally, except for one Harlan rat for which two arrays were used to test reproducibility of the hybridization
Hybridization was performed at 45° C. in an Affymetrix Hybridization Oven 640 for 16 hours.
Post-hybridization wash, stain, and post-stain wash were performed in Fluidics Station 400 in a standard fashion.
Finally, arrays were scanned by Affymetrix Scanner System. Then data analysis was performed using d-chip software, as described previously23. Replicate data for the same sample was weighted gene-wise using inverse squared standard error as weight23. An unpaired two-group comparison for each probe set was performed. This analysis considered both measurement error (as measured by the replicate data) and variation among samples. Genes were determined to have altered gene expression levels if they had a 2-fold or greater change in the means of the 2 groups (the “first” approach, described below) and if a gene was determined to be present in either both groups or in one of the groups (the “second” approach described below).
A profound difference in gene expression between Harlan and Sasco SD VSMCs was observed. In
First, signal intensities of certain genes were compared between Harlan and Sasco and identified genes/ESTs that had more than 3-fold increase (either in Harlan or in Sasco). Data with high standard deviations were excluded from analysis.
Second, the signals that were only present in Harlan and the signals that were only present in Sasco were examined. Genes that were identified by two different algorithms, genes that had multiple “hits” within a single algorithm, and genes that were upregulated (either in Harlan or Sasco) >10 folds were considered to be important genes in the process of restenosis.
Third, these genes were categorized by the intracellular locations and functions and tabulated (Tables 2 and 3). For ESTs without homology to rat genes, Blast search using human and mouse database was performed to identify a human/mouse homolog of the particular EST.
Fourth, for each gene identified to be important, a MedLine search was performed to determine (a) whether these genes have been implicated in restenosis or negative growth regulation, (b) how much characterization was made, and (c) if a particular gene would be a candidate gene in our hypothesis, i.e., secreted soluble non-matrix proteins that may play a role in the negative regulation of VSMC growth. There were striking differences in genes between Harlan and Sasco SD VSMCs. Secreted proteins in Sasco were predominantly growth-promoting while those in Harlan, although poorly characterized, were predominantly negative regulators of cell growth and proliferation. Sasco VSMCs had a number of extracellular matrix (ECM) genes upregulated, along with genes for adhesion molecules, receptors, housekeeping genes, kinases and survival factors. Harlan VSMCs had a number of genes upregulated for transcriptional factors (almost always negative regulator of growths), cytoskeleton and channels. Many genes identified as being associated with restenosis have already been implicated in restenosis by other investigators.
Genes that exhibited a more than 3-fold increase in signal intensity in Harlan and Sasco SD rat VSMCs are presented in simplified fashion in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. Categories of genes overexpressed in Harlan and Sasco SD VSMCs are displayed in bar graph form in
There was a marked difference in the levels of several transcripts in these animals. The microarray data show a striking difference in gene expression between Harlan and Sasco SD VSMCs. There were 34 and 32 genes whose expression levels were upregulated more than 3-fold in Harlan and Sasco SD rats, respectively. The genes upregulated in the Harlan SD rats were drastically different both categorically and functionally from those in the Sasco SD rats. While Sasco VSMCs upregulated a number of genes for ECM proteins, cell surface receptors (most of them associated with growth and proliferation), house-keeping genes, kinases, and survival factors, Harlan VSMCs upregulated only a small number of these genes. On the contrary, Harlan VSMCs upregulated many genes for transcriptional factors (most of them were associated with growth arrest and apoptosis) and cytoskeletal proteins, which were barely present in Sasco VSMCs. These data suggest that Harlan and Sasco VSMCs, when placed in the exact same growth environment, express drastically different sets of genes. The discoveries that Sasco VSMCs upregulated receptors for growth-promoting molecules, housekeeping genes and survival-related genes and that Harlan VSMCs upregulated transcriptional factors for negative growth regulation and cytoskeleton proteins are intriguingly consistent with the in vivo finding that neointimal formation was far more aggressive in Sasco than in Harlan SD rats (
The data obtained in the present studies is consistent with previous investigations of restenosis. Two striking features of the data set derived from the current microarray experiments are, first, that genes upregulated in Harlan VSMCs have been implicated by other investigators in the prevention of restenosis and, second, that genes upregulated in Sasco VSMCs have been shown to play a role in pathogenesis of postangioplasty restenosis. For example, in the array system, the number of the cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) gene transcripts was almost 10-fold larger in restenosis-resistant Harlan VSMCs than in restenosis-prone Sasco VSMCs (Table 3). COX-2 produces prostacyclin, which functions through prostacyclin receptors. Prostacyclin receptor knockout mice have been shown to exhibit exaggerated restenosis in response to vascular injury24, thereby supporting the protective role of prostacyclin against restenosis. Our array data also showed that the transcript number of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) gene was 3.36-fold larger in restenosis-prone Sasco VSMCs than in restenosis-resistant Harlan VSMCs (Table 2). MCP-1 is a chemokine produced by VSMCs in response to growth stimuli and a potent chemoattractant of monocytes. Recent studies indicated that higher plasma MCP-1 levels correlated with restenosis25. In addition, our array data indicated that the transcript of VCAM-126, Angiotensin-II receptors27,28, tissue factor29-31, PI3K32 and tenascin C33, all of which have been strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of restenosis in animal studies, were all upregulated in restenosis-prone Sasco VSMCs (3.3, 9.0-12.8, 4.7, 11.2, and 3.4-fold increase, respectively) (Table 2). Taken together, these observations further support the validity of the current data set derived from our microarray experiments.
Another striking finding derived from the present investigations is that Harlan VSMCs appear to secrete several poorly characterized molecules into extracellular space. The four molecules BTG2, SBF, petraxin, and factalkine (CX3C) (PARIS-1 through -4, respectively), stand in clear contrast to molecules secreted by restenosis-prone Sasco VSMCs (Tables 3 and 4). The secreted molecules from Sasco VSMCs, including TGF-α 34and MCP-135 (Table 2), are well characterized and have been identified as contributors to restenosis. Just as restenosis-prone Sasco VSMCs secrete growth-promoting factors into their microenvironment, it is proposed that restenosis-resistant Harlan VSMCs secrete growth-limiting factors that negatively regulate the growth of neighboring VSMCs. These soluble and secreted growth-inhibitory molecules, named PARISs, are believed to be the molecules secreted by Harlan VSMCs that were hypothesized to be identifiable by microarray analyses of genes upregulated in Harlan VSMCs. The four representative PARISs identified herein are considered especially valuable for inhibiting cell proliferation. Further analysis is expected to identify more soluble secreted PARISs (e.g., PARIS-5, and so on), which may not be as highly expressed as PARISs 1-4 but nevertheless have useful biological activity which causes inhibition of cell growth. The term “highly expressed” means at least a 1.5-fold increase in expression of a PARIS protein in growing cells from a restenosis-resistant animal model compared to the level of expression of the same protein in growing cells from a restenosis prone animal model).
To simplify this discussion, the representative molecules that were identified as described in the foregoing examples through microarray screening as potential negative regulators of VSMC growth are called PARISs 1-4. The name “PARIS” is an acronym derived from the phrase “protein associated with restenosis inhibition and secreted.” Additional identifying information and properties of these molecules are listed in Tables 4 and 5. In Table 4 the homology or protein family of each of the four proteins is identified, along with its implicated function. The fold increase in expression, number of amino acids and percent human-rat identity are shown. The GenBank accession number for the rat mRNA sequence of each PARIS 1-4 are also indicated in Table 4. The GenBank accession numbers of the amino acid and mRNA sequences PARISs 1-4 from human, mouse and rat are given in Table 5. The sequences referenced by those accession numbers are hereby incorporated herein by reference. The amino acid sequences for human PARISs 1-4 are also set out in the attached Sequence Listing as SEQ ID NO: 1, SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:3 and SEQ ID NO:4.
The identification of PARISs represents a new paradigm because a negative growth-regulatory mechanism of VSMCs by secreted molecules has never been well elucidated and because none of the molecules mentioned above has ever been implicated before in the growth regulation of VSMCs. It should be appreciated that the elucidation of secreted negative regulators of VSMC growth constitutes a significant advance in the prevention and treatment of restenosis. Although it is possible to treat restenosis by blocking the effect of soluble growth-promoting molecules (such as MCP-1, TGF-α, PDGF, and others) by abolishing their binding to their receptors or by inhibiting their intracellular signal transduction pathways, using small molecules or antibodies, these approaches are complex and time-consuming. In contrast, when fully characterized and validated, the secreted negative regulators of VSMC growth, as represented by those molecules identified herein, are expected to be suitable for simple parenteral or local administration to prevent restenosis. Advantageously, there should be little or no toxicity because they are naturally occurring molecules.
The four representative PARISs range in size from 17 to 47.4 kDa (predicted). As indicated in Table 4, the human PARISs 1-4 are orthologs of the rat PARISs, having very close amino acid sequences (i.e., human/rat identities ranging from 56-88%.) Additional exemplary orthologs are identified in Table 7. Since PARISs 1-4 were originally identified in transcripts from pure cultured VSMCs, the inventors considered their presence in the cardiovascular system is likely. In fact, recent Northern and Western blot analyses confirmed the presence of PARIS-4 in cardiovascular tissue. It was also concluded in this study that putative signal peptide sequences were present. In the following paragraphs, the properties of PARIS 1-4 are described.
PARIS-1The sequence originally identified as A1072943 (EST sequence) represents a 364-nucleotide cDNA fragment. A BLAST search showed a 100% match with the 3-terminus untranslated region of neuronal pentraxin-1 (GenBank Acc. No. U18772). The rat neuronal pentraxin-1 was originally identified as a 47-kDa protein that binds to the snake venom toxin taipoxin. Structurally, neuronal pentraxin-1 is homologous to the acute-phase proteins serum amyloid P protein and C-reactive protein of the pentraxin family36. Neuronal pentraxin-2, which has 54% amino acid identity to neuronal pentraxin-1, has been cloned by library screening using neuronal pentraxin-1 as a probe37. Both proteins are apparently secreted, since they can both be detected in conditioned media by Western blot analysis38. Recently, neuronal pentraxin-1 was shown to be upregulated, both at the transcript and protein levels, in cerebellar granule cells undergoing potassium deprivation-induced cell death39. When the cells were treated with antisense oligonucleotides directed against neuronal pentraxin-1, more cells survived upon potassium deprivation, further supporting the protein's role in negative growth regulation and cell death39. It appears that no other functional study of this molecule using either recombinant protein or overexpression strategies has ever been performed. A Medline search revealed only 6 articles that used neuronal pentraxin in their titles, however none of which indicates negative growth regulatory function. Overall, this protein has not previously been well characterized.
PARIS-2The sequence originally identified as AJ 011969 (EST sequence) represents the cDNA of the rat MIC-1 protein. This protein is also known as SBP and GDF-15 (GenBank Acc. No. NM—019216). MIC-1 was originally identified by subtraction cloning as a molecule that is upregulated in phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate-(PMA)-stimulated U937 cells as opposed to retinoic acid (RA)-differentiated U937 cells40. Structurally, MIC-1 is remotely homologous to TGF-β40. This protein is apparently secreted, since FLAG-epitope-(DYKDDDDK)-tagged MIC-1, when overexpressed in CHO cells, is successfully immunoprecipitated from conditioned media by anti-FLAG antibody40. Although the processing, secretion, and degradation pathway of MIC-1 has been fairly well investigated41, there has been no scientifically sound functional study done on this molecule. TGF-β1-knockout mice die of severe widespread inflammation42, suggesting that one of the major functions of the TGF-β family is the negative regulation of inflammation. Taken together, these data suggest that the function of MIC-1 is also anti-inflammatory. A Medline search revealed only 10 articles that used MIC-1, SBP, or GDF-15 in their titles, none of which clearly shows its growth inhibitory function. Overall, this protein is very poorly characterized.
PARIS-3The sequence identified as M60921 represents the cDNA of the rat BTG-2 protein. This protein is also known as TIS21, PC3, and NGF-inducible anti-proliferative putative secreted protein. BTG-2 was originally cloned as a molecule whose transcription is induced by nerve growth factor (NGF) stimulation of PC12 pheochromocytoma cells43. Overexpression of this protein has never been performed in tissue culture cell system. BTG-2 protein reportedly interacts with proteins of various functions, including protein-kinase-Cα-binding protein (rPICK1)44, protein-arginine N-methyltransferase45, and CCR4-associated factor 1 (CAF1)46. In addition, intracellular localization of BTG-2 has never been clearly shown, despite the presence of signal peptide sequence. Its function in negative growth regulation is vaguely implied by the fact that BTG-depleted cells are less susceptible to Adriamycin challenge and the fact that BTG-overexpressing cells are growth-suppressed47. A Medline search revealed only 23 articles that used BTG-2, TIS, PC3 or NGF-inducible anti-proliferative putative secreted protein in their titles. No previous studies definitively show its role in negative growth regulation. Overall, this protein is poorly characterized.
PARIS-4The sequence identified as AF030358 represents the cDNA of the rat fractalkine protein. Fractalkine is also known as the CX3C chemokine. This protein is unique because even though it is expressed on the cell surface, its N-terminus chemokine head can be cleaved from a mucin stalk48. Fractalkine is expressed on various cells including endothelial cells, VSMCs, and dendritic cells, while its receptor (CX3CR1) has been so far demonstrated on T cells, monocytes, macrophages, and natural killer cells49. Its expression is upregulated by TNF-α and IL-β50. Fractalkine has different functions, depending on its form: membrane-bound fractalkine is implicated in integrin-independent leukocyte migration48, while soluble fractalkine is an anti-inflammatory agent that interferes with the ligation of membrane-bound fractalkine to its receptor on the leukocyte surface51,52. It is especially interesting to note that a group of investigators has been able to show the attenuation of THP-1 cell adhesion to activated VSMCs by soluble fractalkine (50 nM)53. It is now proposed that fractalkine expressed on VSMCs may be cleaved under certain circumstances and play a role in the attenuation of inflammation. A Medline search revealed 72 articles that used fractalkine or CX3C in their titles. Only one paper investigated VSMCs and fractalkine53. Overall, the role of fractalkine in VSMC growth is poorly characterized and no previous work clearly demonstrated its negative regulatory function with respect to cell growth. For the sake of simplicity and because of the functional difference between soluble and membrane-bound fractalkine, it is the extracellular domain of fractalkine (i.e. soluble fractalkine) that is defined herein as PARIS-4.
Example 7 Initial Validation and Characterization of PARISsAfter identifying the first four PARISs, as described in the foregoing Examples, one was chosen as a representative for examination in a series of experiments designed to test the hypothesis that proliferating VSMCs secrete PARISs, chemokine-like molecules that negatively regulate the growth of neighboring VSMCs could be supported in that PARIS. Because some of the key reagents needed to test the hypothesis were already available in the inventors' laboratory for PARIS-4, it was decided to begin with PARIS-4. In brief, the rationale was that, if PARIS-4 produced by VSMCs did inhibit VSMC growth under carefully defined assay conditions, then it could be concluded that the other PARISs discovered using the same methods will very likely behave similarly in accordance the general hypothesis. The experimental data establishes that PARIS-4 is, in fact, produced by VSMCs, and that PARIS-4 causes VSMCs to grow more slowly than in the absence of PARIS-4.
Accordingly, the following discussion and experimental data focus primarily on PARIS-4 (soluble fractalkine), and is considered to be representative of PARISs 1-3 as well as any as yet unidentified soluble secreted proteins that are also highly expressed in growing vascular smooth muscle cells. In brief, it was determined that PARIS-4 is in fact secreted from vascular smooth muscle cells (
A real-time RT-PCR analysis was developed for the quantitation of PARIS-4 messages in Harlan and Sasco carotid artery VSMCs. The results are shown in
The experimental protocol was as follows: VSMCs from the carotid arteries of 4 Sasco and 4 Harlan rats were used. When VSMCs on 10-cm dishes were 80% confluent, cells were harvested. The total RNA were extracted using a RNeasy Midi kit (Qiagen). The real time RT-PCR was performed according to the instructions from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, Calif.), using the following primer and probe sets for the detection of PARIS-4 (rat fractalkine) transcripts:
The probe was labeled at the 5′-end with 6-carboxyl-fluorescein (FAM™) and at the 3′-end with a 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA™). For the detection of eukaryotic 18 S RNA for normalization, the pre-developed assay mixture for 18 S, consisting of appropriate primers and probe labeled by VIC™ and non-fluorescent quencher (PDAR, ABI) was used. The quantitative real time RT-PCRs were performed in quadruplicate, using the TaqMan RT-PCR kit (ABI) in the 7900 HT Sequence Detector system. Both PARIS-4 and 18 S critical thresholds were determined and converted to weight (ng) using a standard curve constructed on serially diluted rat normal total RNA. PARIS-4 index was then calculated as above. It is readily apparent in
Referring now to
A commercially available antibody suited for PARIS-4 Western blot was identified and used to evaluate the expression of PARIS-4 protein in various tissues. Results are shown in
The assay protocol was as follows: A ready-made rat tissue blot, containing 10 μg per lane of different rat tissue lysates were purchased from Imgenex (San Diego, Calif.). Western blot analysis was performed using a standard technique with mouse anti-rat fractalkine antibody (Clone 96834) from R&D Systems, Inc. (1:500 dilutions). Bound antibodies were detected using anti-mouse IgG-horse-raddish-peroxidase (HRP)-conjugates and West Pico HRP substrates (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.). In order to evaluate the loading condition of the samples, the same membrane was probed with anti-actin antibody (Chemicon, Temecula, Calif.). Recombinant PARIS-4 was used as positive control (r-PARIS-4,
Next, an ELISA system for PARIS-4 was developed and optimized using commercially available reagents (R&D Systems). The protocol was as follows: 96-well plates were coated with 0.8 μg/mL of goat anti-rat fractalkine antibody (R&D systems) overnight. After wash, plates were blocked with PBS supplemented with 1% BSA and 5% sucrose for 1 hr. After wash, 100 μL of samples or standards were added in quadruplicate and incubated for 2 hrs at room temperature (RT). After extensive wash, 100 μL of biotinylated goat anti-rat fractalkine antibody (0.3 μg/mL) was added and incubated for 2 hrs at RT. After wash, 100 μL of streptavidin-HRP solution was added and incubated for 20 min at RT. After wash, 100 μL of substrate solution (H2O2 plus tetramethylbenzidine) was added and incubated for 20 min. Stop solution was then added (2N H2SO4). And plates were read using a micro-plate reader set to 450 nm with a reference at 570 nm. Experiments were performed at least 3 times and results were essentially identical. The results are shown in
Using the above-described ELISA system, it was found that Harlan conditioned media had two times more PARIS-4 than did Sasco conditioned media, as shown in
Referring now to
As discussed above, VSMCs grow much more slowly in Harlan conditioned media than in Sasco conditioned media. VSMCs from Sasco SD rats grew much more slowly in Harlan conditioned media rich in PARIS-4, as shown in
Cell growth assays were carried out to evaluate the effect of addition of PARIS-4 to growing VSMCs. The protocol was as follows: 1×104 cells (either Sasco VSMCs or A7r5 VSMCs [ATCC]) were seeded on 6-well plates in duplicate. Next day, media were exchanged for media either containing recombinant rat PARIS-4 (fractalkine) at the final concentration of 10000 ng/mL (140 nM) or the same volume of PBS. The number of cells in each well was determined every 48 hours for 6 days. Graphs of the results are shown in
Next, a new immunohistochemical (IHC) method was developed using tyramide signal amplification (TSA) to more effectively detect PARIS-4 in paraffin-embedded tissues. The results are shown in
(1)(2) After standard steps of deparaffinization, rehydration, and quenching of tissue peroxidase, tissue sections were incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rat PARIS-4 antibody (R&D Systems).
(3) After wash, tissue sections were incubated with streptavidin-horse radish peroxidase (HRP), followed by
(4) application of dinitrophenyl (DNP) labeled tyramide. DNP-labeled tyramide was catalyzed to by HRP to form insoluble DNP depositions immediately adjacent to the immobilized HRP enzyme.
(5) These insolubly deposited DNP labels were detected by anti-DNP antibody conjugated to HRP.
(6) Finally, DAB, a substrate of HRP, was added. Because the added labels are deposited proximal to the initial immobilized HRP enzyme site, there is minimal loss in resolution.
A comparison of PARIS-4 expression in Harlan and Sasco restenotic tissues is shown in
ELISA assays were next carried out on sera harvested from Harlan and Sasco SD rats (N=12), as described in Example 7. Intriguingly, Harlan sera contained a slightly higher but statistically not significant level of PARIS-4 than did Sasco sera (1102±302 and 1053±153 [ng/mL] for Harlan and Sasco, respectively, NS). In light of the fact that serum PARIS-4 concentrations are not different between Harlan and Sasco rats, it is suggested that PARIS-4 functions as a chemokine in local microenvironment rather than as a hormone in systemic environment.
Example 12 Large-Scale Production of PARIS-4The feasibility of a large scale PARIS-4 protein production using baculovirus-Sf9 cell system was investigated. As illustrated in
In light of all of the evidence presented in the foregoing Examples, it is concluded that PARIS-4 is one of the proteins that are produced by VSMCs and are more abundantly produced by Harlan VSMCs (restenosis resistant), and which are present in Harlan conditioned media (
It is expected that additional PARIS proteins will be identified that share at least 24% amino acid identity with the above-identified rat PARISs, preferably sharing at least 40% identity, and still more preferably sharing about 60-100% amino acid identity. The counterpart proteins to the representative PARISs, in all mammals, are intended to be within the scope of the present invention. Furthermore, proteins having at least 40% homology to the above-identified rat amino acid sequences are also expected to provide at least some measure of cell growth inhibitory properties similar to those exemplified herein. Accordingly, all such proteins or polypeptides are considered to be PARISs. For example, homologous proteins may include a number of amino acid substitutions in which the differing amino acids have similar R-group substituents in terms of size, electrophilic character, charge, and the like. Some exemplary substitutions are listed in Table 6.
Some highly preferred PARIS proteins have the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs.: 1-4 (human PARISs 1-4), and correspond to GenBank Accession No. Q15818 (PARIS-1), GenBank Accession No. NP—004855 (PARIS-2), GenBank Accession No. P78543 (PARIS-3), and GenBank Accession No. NP—002987 (PARIS-4), respectively, are listed in Table 7, along with all of their orthologs from representative animal models. The percent identity of orthologs of the rat PARISs 1-4 was estimated using the UniGene system of the National Center for Biotechnology Information of the National Institutes of Health. The UniGene system automatically partitions GenBank sequences into a non-redundant set of gene-oriented clusters. Each UniGene cluster contains sequences that represent a unique gene, as well as related information such as the tissue types in which the gene has been expressed and map location.63
PARISs produced in sterile, endotoxin-free environment using a standard CHO cell culture system will be administered to patients undergoing angioplasty procedures in order to suppress the growth of vascular smooth muscle cells and restenosis. It is believed that use of PARISs will be less expensive and more inclusive (i.e., they may be administered without special instruments or personnel) than conventional post-angioplasty restenosis treatments and preventatives.
Production of the PARIS protein will be carried out as follows: A PARIS-cDNA will be ligated into mammalian expression vector with the neomycin resistant gene that contains the sequence to allow the addition of polyhistidine tags at the C-terminus of the PARIS protein. CHO cells will be stably transfected with the vector and selected using G418. The clones that express PARIS most abundantly will be selected. Cells will then be adjusted to serum-free medium system. PARIS will be secreted into the media since it contains a secretion marker. PARIS will then be purified using the metal ion chromatography with Ni-NTA beads to near homogeneity. To achieve the further purity, the purified protein will further be purified by ion-exchange chromatography. All the procedures will be completed under sterile and endotoxin-free conditions. Purified proteins will be tested for the endotoxin contents.
An appropriate PARIS protein dose will be determined as follows: Various amounts of proteins will be parenterally administered first to animals (then after completion of full animal studies to human) and multiple blood samplings will be performed over time (ex. 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hrs). The samples will be then evaluated by ELISA methods described earlier. The ideal dosing of the PARIS would be such that plasma concentration of PARIS is 5-10 fold higher than normal serum concentrations of PARIS. The ideal methods of parenteral administration will be determined using animals first and then validated in human. Delivery of the purified PARIS(s) will be achieved by one of following methods: intravenous injection, subcutaneous injection, intraperitoneal injection, transcutaneous delivery, local delivery using PARIS-coated stents or infusion catheters; with/without liposomal or nanomolecular delivery systems. Suitable carriers for protein drugs are well known in the art. The PARISs may be coated onto stents using known techniques that have been previously employed with other drug-eluting stents.
It is also envisioned that in a certain circumstance, the combination of two or more PARISs will be administered to enhance the anti-proliferative effect of PARISs. PARISs can be used together with drug-coated stents, plain stents, and any other interventional methods used in current and future percutaneous coronary interventions.
Example 14 Treatment of Post-Angioplasty RestenosisFor the treatment of post-angioplasty or in stent restenosis, PARISs will be delivered through routes in Example 13, before, during or after the PCI to address the restenosis, including stent (coated or noncoated) implantation, brachytherapy, and any other current and future PCI methods appropriate for the condition. Advantageously, a stent deployed in conjunction with conventional PCI methods to address restenosis may be readily coated with PARISs using substantially known techniques.
Example 15 Delaying or Arresting Progression of AtherosclerosisPurified PARISs are administered to patients with atherosclerosis in order to suppress the growth of vascular smooth muscle cells at the site of an atherosclerotic lesion. PARISs can be subcutaneously injected into patients who are at high risk for developing premature atherosclerosis, injected into patients who have already had atherosclerosis with or without its long term complications (e.g., CAD, MI, angina, etc.). Patients who are expected to benefit from long term PARIS treatment include those with cardiac transplantation (for deterring or preventing transplantation atherosclerosis) and those patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG), for deterrence or prevention of graft failure. Systemic or subcutaneous administration of PARISs is expected to offer advantages for treatment of small vessels, where conventional drug-eluting stents are not appropriate.
Example 16 Deterrence, Prevention and Treatment of Other Smooth Muscle Cell-Related Proliferative DisordersThis unique group of proteins (PARISs) are also believed to hold promise for treating a variety of other proliferative disorders. Although PARISs were originally identified as the proteins produced by VSMCs for inhibiting the growth of VSMCs, it is likely that PARISs have similar biological activity (e.g., cell growth inhibitory effects) on normal and abnormal cells other than vascular smooth muscle cells. For example, postsurgical keloid formation involves not only VSMCs but also fibroblasts and other cell types. PARISs may block keloid formation through the negative growth regulation over all of these cells. Furthermore, proliferative diabetic retinopathy represents the formation of neo-arteries in the retina, which are fragile, and tends to bleed. PARISs may be used to prevent such neo-artery formation. Certain tumors, such as hemangioma, rhabdomyoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, fibromyoma of the uterus, and other vascular and muscular tumors, either benign or malignant, may be effectively treated by PARISs. Furthermore, tumors and cancers that do not contain smooth muscle components may well respond to PARISs in a higher dose. In summary, PARISs may prove useful in any type of malignancy in humans.
While the preferred embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, modifications thereof can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and teachings of the invention. The embodiments described herein are exemplary only, and are not intended to be limiting. Many variations and modifications of the invention disclosed herein are possible and are within the scope of the invention. For example, biologically active portions of the above-described PARIS proteins are also contemplated as part of the present invention. Such bioactive polypeptides may serve as receptor ligation regions for a native PARIS, or may correspond to a region of a PARIS that participates in protein-protein interaction with another protein, which regulates the activity of the PARIS. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited by the description set out above and is intended to include all equivalents of the subject matter described herein. The disclosures of all patents, patent applications and publications cited herein are hereby specifically incorporated herein by reference, to the extent that they provide materials, methods or other details supplementary to those set forth herein.
REFERENCES
- 1. Sigwart U., Puel J., Mirkovitch V., et al., Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty, N. Engl. J. Med. 1987 316:701-6.
- 2. Erbel R., Haude M., Hopp H. W., et al., Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty, Restenosis Stent Study Group, N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 1672-8.
- 3. Kearney M., Pieczek A., Haley L., et al., Histopathology of in-stent restenosis in patients with peripheral artery disease, Circulation. 1997; 95:1998-2002.
- 4. vom Dahl J., Dietz U., Haager P. K., et al., Rotational atherectomy does not reduce recurrent in-stent restenosis: results of the angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy for treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis trial (ARTIST), Circulation. 2002; 105:583-8.
- 5. Leon M. B., Teirstein P. S., Moses J. W., et al., Localized intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy to inhibit the recurrence of restenosis after stenting, N. Engl. J. Med. 2001; 344:250-6.
- 6. Tardif J. C., Cote G., Lesperance J., et al., Probucol and multivitamins in the prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty, Multivitamins and Probucol Study Group, N. Engl J Med. 1997; 337:365-72.
- 7. Maresta A., Balducelli M., Cantini L., et al., Trapidil (triazolopyrimidine), a platelet-derived growth factor antagonist, reduces restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Results of the randomized, double-blind STARC study. Studio Trapidil versus Aspirin nella Restenosi Coronarica, Circulation. 1994; 90:2710-5.
- 8. Tsuchikane E., Fukuhara A., Kobayashi T., et al., Impact of cilostazol on restenosis after percutaneous coronary balloon angioplasty, Circulation. 1999; 100:21-6.
- 9. Dehmer G. J., Popma J. J., van den Berg E. K., et al., Reduction in the rate of early restenosis after coronary angioplasty by a diet supplemented with n-3 fatty acids, N. Engl. J. Med. 1988; 319:733-40.
- 10. Schnyder G., Roffi M., Pin R., et al., Decreased rate of coronary restenosis after lowering of plasma homocysteine levels, N. Engl. J. Med. 2001; 345:1593-600.
- 11. Fischman D. L., Leon M. B., Baim D. S., et al., A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators, N. Engl. J. Med. 1994; 331:496-501.
- 12. Teirstein P. S., Massullo V., Jani S., et al., Catheter-based radiotherapy to inhibit restenosis after coronary stenting, N Engl J Med. 1997; 336:1697-703.
- 13. Verin V., Popowski Y., de Bruyne B., et al., Endoluminal beta-radiation therapy for the prevention of coronary restenosis after balloon angioplasty, The Dose-Finding Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344:243-9.
- 14. Cannon R. O., 3rd. Restenosis after angioplasty, N Engl J Med. 2002; 346:1182-3.
- 15. Califf R. M., Restenosis: the cost to society, Am Heart J. 1995; 130:680-4.
- 16. Clowes A. W., Reidy M. A., Clowes M. M., Kinetics of cellular proliferation after arterial injury. I. Smooth muscle growth in the absence of endothelium, Lab Invest. 1983; 49:327-33.
- 17. Klinger M. M., MacCarter G. D., Boozer C. N., Body weight and composition in the Sprague Dawley rat: comparison of three outbred sources, Lab Anim Sci. 1996; 46:67-70.
- 18. Knight E., Bryant S., Keenan C., et al., Two year evaluation of clinical parameters and pathology in Sprague-Dawley rats from different suppliers, Toxicologist. 1994; 14:303-314.
- 19. Fuller D. D., Baker T. L., Behan M., et al., Expression of hypoglossal long-term facilitation differs between substrains of Sprague-Dawley rat, Physiol Genomics. 2001; 4:175-81.
- 20. Sluka K. A., Westlund K. N., Spinal projections of the locus coeruleus and the nucleus subcoeruleus in the Harlan and the Sasco Sprague-Dawley rat, Brain Res. 1992; 579:67-73.
- 21. West W. L., Yeomans D. C., Proudfit H. K., The function of noradrenergic neurons in mediating antinociception induced by electrical stimulation of the locus coeruleus in two different sources of Sprague-Dawley rats, Brain Res. 1993; 626:127-35.
- 22. Turnbull A. V., Rivier C. L., Sprague-Dawley rats obtained from different vendors exhibit distinct adrenocorticotropin responses to inflammatory stimuli, Neuroendocrinology. 1999; 70:186-95.
- 23. Li C., Wong W. H., Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: expression index computation and outlier detection, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001; 98:31-6.
- 24. Cheng Y, Austin S C, Rocca B, et al. Role of prostacyclin in the cardiovascular response to thromboxane A2. Science. 2002; 296:539-41.
- 25. Cipollone F, Marini M, Fazia M, et al. Elevated circulating levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in patients with restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21:327-34.
- 26. Oguchi S, Dimayuga P, Zhu J, et al. Monoclonal antibody against vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 inhibits neointimal formation after periadventitial carotid artery injury in genetically hypercholesterolemic mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20:1729-36.
- 27. Huckle W R, Drag M D, Acker W R, et al. Effects of subtype-selective and balanced angiotensin II receptor antagonists in a porcine coronary artery model of vascular restenosis. Circulation. 1996; 93:1009-19.
- 28. Viswanathan M, Stromberg C, Seltzer A, et al. Balloon angioplasty enhances the expression of angiotensin II AT1 receptors in neointima of rat aorta. J Clin Invest. 1992; 90:1707-12.
- 29. Asada Y, Hara S, Tsuneyoshi A, et al. Fibrin-rich and platelet-rich thrombus formation on neointima: recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor prevents fibrin formation and neointimal development following repeated balloon injury of rabbit aorta. Thromb Haemost. 1998; 80:506-11.
- 30. Atsuchi N, Nishida T, Marutsuka K, et al. Combination of a brief irrigation with tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) and adenovirus-mediated local TFPI gene transfer additively reduces neointima formation in balloon-injured rabbit carotid arteries. Circulation. 2001; 103:570-5.
- 31. Hasenstab D, Lea H, Hart C E, et al. Tissue factor overexpression in rat arterial neointima models thrombosis and progression of advanced atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2000; 101:2651-7.
- 32. Shigematsu K, Koyama H, Olson N E, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling is important for smooth muscle cell replication after arterial injury. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20:2373-8.
- 33. Imanaka-Yoshida K, Matsuura R, Isaka N, et al. Serial extracellular matrix changes in neointimal lesions of human coronary artery after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: clinical significance of early tenascin-C expression. Virchows Arch. 2001; 439:185-90.
- 34. Nikol S, Isner J M, Pickering J G, et al. Expression of transforming growth factor-beta 1 is increased in human vascular restenosis lesions. J Clin Invest. 1992; 90:1582-92.
- 35. Schmidt A M, Stern D M. Chemokines on the rise: mcp-1 and restenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21:297-9.
- 36. Schlimgen A K, Helms J A, Vogel H, et al. Neuronal pentraxin, a secreted protein with homology to acute phase proteins of the immune system. Neuron. 1995; 14:519-26.
- 37. Hsu Y C, Perin M S. Human neuronal pentraxin II (NPTX2): conservation, genomic structure, and chromosomal localization. Genomics. 1995; 28:220-7.
- 38. Kirkpatrick L L, Matzuk M M, Dodds D C, et al. Biochemical interactions of the neuronal pentraxins. Neuronal pentraxin (NP) receptor binds to taipoxin and taipoxin-associated calcium-binding protein 49 via NP 1 and NP2. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275:17786-92.
- 39. DeGregorio-Rocasolano N, Gasull T, Trullas R. Overexpression of neuronal pentraxin 1 is involved in neuronal death evoked by low K(+) in cerebellar granule cells. J Biol. Chem. 2001; 276:796-803.
- 40. Bootcov M R, Bauskin A R, Valenzuela S M, et al. MIC-1, a novel macrophage inhibitory cytokine, is a divergent member of the TGF-beta superfamily. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997; 94:11514-9.
- 41. Bauskin A R, Zhang H P, Fairlie W D, et al. The propeptide of macrophage inhibitory cytokine (MIC-1), a TGF-beta superfamily member, acts as a quality control determinant for correctly folded MIC-1. Embo J. 2000; 19:2212-20.
- 42. Shull M M, Ormsby I, Kier A B, et al. Targeted disruption of the mouse transforming growth factor-beta 1 gene results in multifocal inflammatory disease. Nature. 1992; 359:693-9.
- 43. Bradbury A, Possenti R, Shooter E M, et al. Molecular cloning of PC3, a putatively secreted protein whose mRNA is induced by nerve growth factor and depolarization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991; 88:3353-7.
- 44. Lin W J, Chang Y F, Wang W L, et al. Mitogen-stimulated TIS21 protein interacts with a protein-kinase-Calpha-binding protein rPICK1. Biochem J. 2001; 354:635-43.
- 45. Lin W J, Gary J D, Yang M C, et al. The mammalian immediate-early TIS21 protein and the leukemia-associated BTG1 protein interact with a protein-arginine N-methyltransferase. J Biol. Chem. 1996; 271:15034-44.
- 46. Prevot D, Morel A P, Voeltzel T, et al. Relationships of the antiproliferative proteins BTG1 and BTG2 with CAF 1, the human homolog of a component of the yeast CCR4 transcriptional complex: involvement in estrogen receptor alpha signaling pathway. J Biol. Chem. 2001; 276:9640-8.
- 47. Rouault J P, Falette N, Guehenneux F, et al. Identification of BTG2, an antiproliferative p53-dependent component of the DNA damage cellular response pathway. Nat. Genet. 1996; 14:482-6.
- 48. Fong A M, Erickson H P, Zachariah J P, et al. Ultrastructure and function of the fractalkine mucin domain in CX(3)C chemokine domain presentation. J Biol. Chem. 2000; 275:3781-6.
- 49. Imai T, Hieshima K, Haskell C, et al. Identification and molecular characterization of fractalkine receptor CX3CR1, which mediates both leukocyte migration and adhesion. Cell. 1997; 91:521-30.
- 50. Maciejewski-Lenoir D, Chen S, Feng L, et al. Characterization of fractalkine in rat brain cells: migratory and activation signals for CX3CR-1-expressing microglia. J. Immunol. 1999; 163:1628-35.
- 51. Feng L, Chen S, Garcia G E, et al. Prevention of crescentic glomerulonephritis by immunoneutralization of the fractalkine receptor CX3CR1 rapid communication. Kidney Int. 1999; 56:612-20.
- 52. Zujovic V, Schussler N, Jourdain D, et al. In vivo neutralization of endogenous brain fractalkine increases hippocampal TNFalpha and 8-isoprostane production induced by intracerebroventricular injection of LPS. J. Neuroimmunol. 2001; 115:135-43.
- 53. Ludwig A, Berkhout T, Moores K, et al. Fractalkine is expressed by smooth muscle cells in response to IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha and is modulated by metalloproteinase activity. J. Immunol. 2002; 168:604-12.
- 54. Nielsen H, Engelbrecht J, Brunak S, et al. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng. 1997; 10:1-6.
- 55. Morice M-C, Serruys P, Sousa E, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J. Med. 2002; 346:1773-1780.
- 56. Klinger M M, MacCarter G D, Boozer C N. Body weight and composition in the Sprague Dawley rat: comparison of three outbred sources. Lab Anim Sci. 1996; 46:67-70.
- 57. Knight E, Bryant S, Keenan C, Kimball J, Barrett D. Two year evaluation of clinical parameters and pathology in Sprague-Dawley rats from different suppliers. Toxicologist. 1994; 14:303-314.
- 58. Fuller D D, Baker T L, Behan M, Mitchell G S. Expression of hypoglossal long-term facilitation differs between substrains of Sprague-Dawley rat. Physiol Genomics. 2001; 4:175-181.
- 59. Sluka K A, Westlund K N. Spinal projections of the locus coeruleus and the nucleus subcoeruleus in the Harlan and the Sasco Sprague-Dawley rat. Brain Res. 1992; 579:67-73.
- 60. West W L, Yeomans D C, Proudfit H K. The function of noradrenergic neurons in mediating antinociception induced by electrical stimulation of the locus coeruleus in two different sources of Sprague-Dawley rats. Brain Res. 1993; 626:127-135.
- 61. Turnbull A V, Rivier C L. Sprague-Dawley rats obtained from different vendors exhibit distinct adrenocorticotropin responses to inflammatory stimuli. Neuroendocrinology. 1999; 70:186-195
- 62. Reczko M., Staub E, Fiziev P, et al. Finding Signal Peptides in Human Protein Sequences using Recurrent Neural Networks. In R. Guigo and D. Gusfield (eds.): Algorithms in Bioinformatics, Proceedings of the 2nd Int. Workshop WABI 2002, Rome, Italy, Sep. 16-21, 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Volume 2452, pp. 60-67.
- 63. NCBI News, August 1997. National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institutes of Health.
- 64. Nielsen H, Engelbrecht J, Brunak S, et al. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng. 1997; 10:1-6.
- 65. Bradbury A, Possenti R, Shooter E M, et al. Molecular cloning of PC3, a putatively secreted protein whose mRNA is induced by nerve growth factor and depolarization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991; 88:3353-7.
Claims
1. An inhibitor of smooth muscle cell proliferation comprising at least one isolated protein or polypeptide chosen from the group consisting of:
- PARIS-1, PARIS-2 and PARIS-3,
- a biologically active portion of PARIS-1, PARIS-2, PARIS-3 or PARIS-4 having activity for directly or indirectly inhibiting smooth muscle cell proliferation, and
- a biologically active addition, deletion or substitution homolog having at least 24% amino acid identity to SEQ. ID NO: 1, SEQ. ID NO:2, SEQ. ID NO:3 or SEQ ID NO:4 and having activity for inhibiting smooth muscle cell proliferation.
2. A composition for treating a cell proliferation disorder comprising:
- an inhibitor of smooth muscle cell proliferation comprising at least one isolated protein or polypeptide chosen from the group consisting of:
- PARIS-1, PARIS-2 and PARIS-3,
- biologically active portions of PARIS-1, PARIS-2, PARIS-3 or PARIS-4, wherein biological activity comprises inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation, and
- polypeptides having at least 24% amino acid identity to SEQ. ID NO:1, SEQ. ID NO:2, SEQ. ID NO:3 or SEQ ID NO:4; and
- optionally, a carrier.
3. The composition of claim 2 further comprising PARIS-4.
4. The composition of claim 2 wherein said protein or polypeptide has at least 40% amino acid identity with SEQ. ID NO:1, SEQ. ID NO:2, SEQ. ID NO:3, or SEQ ID NO: 4.
5. A method of inhibiting smooth muscle cell proliferation comprising contacting said cell with the composition of claim 2, whereby proliferation of said smooth muscle cell is inhibited.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein said smooth muscle cell is a vascular smooth muscle cell.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein said contacting comprises administering to a site at risk of undesired smooth muscle cell proliferation a cell growth inhibitory amount of said composition, whereby a smooth muscle cell proliferative disorder is deterred or prevented.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein said contacting comprises administering to a patient at risk of restenosis an effective amount of said inhibitor to inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation resulting in deterrence or prevention of restenosis.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein said patient is undergoing an angioplasty procedure and said administering comprises administering an effective amount of said inhibitor to said patient before, during or after an angioplasty procedure to deter or prevent restenosis.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein said administering includes delivering said inhibitor to an angioplasty site in said patient.
11. The method of claim 9 wherein said angioplasty procedure includes placement of a stent at an angioplasty site in said patient.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein said stent is a drug-eluting stent capable of releasing said inhibitor in situ.
13. The method of claim 10 wherein said contacting comprises administering said inhibitor to a patient at risk of atherosclerosis progression, to suppress the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells in said patient, whereby the risk of atherosclerosis progression in the patient is reduced.
14. The method of claim 5 wherein said contacting comprises administering said inhibitor to a patient at risk of keloid formation, whereby keloid formation in said patient is inhibited.
15. The method of claim 5 wherein said contacting comprises administering said inhibitor to a patient suffering from cancer originating from a smooth muscle cell, whereby proliferation of a cancer call is inhibited.
16. A method for identifying an inhibitor of smooth muscle cell proliferation comprising:
- extracting RNAs from growing vascular smooth muscle cells from a first animal model that is restenosis-resistant with respect to balloon injury to a blood vessel in said first animal model, to provide a first pool of isolated RNAs;
- generating a first cDNA pool from said first pool of RNAs;
- extracting RNAs from growing vascular smooth muscle cells from a second animal model that is restenosis-prone with respect to balloon injury of a blood vessel in said second animal model, to provide a second pool of isolated RNAs;
- generating a second cDNA pool from said second pool of isolated RNAs;
- identifying cDNAs that are present in said first cDNA pool in a greater amount than in said second cDNA pool, to provide a pool of upregulated cDNAs;
- identifying a first set of genes that correspond to said upregulated cDNAs;
- out of said first set of genes, identifying a subset of genes that encode soluble proteins which are secreted to a greater extent by vascular smooth muscle cells from said first animal model than from said second animal model, to provide a group of upregulated genes encoding soluble proteins;
- confirming that at least one said encoded soluble protein is expressed to a greater extent in vascular smooth muscle cells from said first animal model than in vascular smooth muscle cells from said second animal model, to identify at least one upregulated soluble protein inhibitor of smooth muscle cell proliferation;
- optionally, expressing at least one gene coding for said upregulated soluble protein;
- optionally, purifying said at least one upregulated soluble protein, to provide a purified upregulated soluble protein; and
- optionally, adding said purified protein to vascular smooth muscle cells in cell culture medium and confirming that said protein is active for retarding proliferation of said vascular smooth muscle cells.
17. The method of claim 16 comprising determining that at least one said upregulated gene is expressed at least 1.5-fold more in said first animal model than in said second animal model.
18. The method of claim 16 further comprising identifying a biologically active region of said upregulated soluble protein that is capable of directly or indirectly inhibiting the proliferation of smooth muscle cells.
19. The method of claim 18 comprising identifying at least one soluble protein capable of being secreted by a proliferating human vascular smooth muscle cell, having at least 24% amino acid identity to at least one of said protein or proteins encoded by said upregulated gene(s), and having activity for inhibiting smooth muscle cell proliferation.
20. The method of claim 19 comprising identifying at least one soluble protein capable of being secreted by a proliferating human vascular smooth muscle cell, having at least 40% amino acid identity to at least one of said protein or proteins encoded by said upregulated gene(s), and having activity for inhibiting smooth muscle cell proliferation.
Type: Application
Filed: Aug 21, 2008
Publication Date: Jan 22, 2009
Inventors: Kenichi FUJISE (Houston, TX), Zakar H. MNJOYAN (Houston, TX)
Application Number: 12/195,735
International Classification: A61K 9/00 (20060101); C12N 5/02 (20060101); C07K 14/435 (20060101); A61P 35/04 (20060101); C12Q 1/68 (20060101); A61K 38/16 (20060101);
