OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS
A dispersion management system for soliton or soliton-like transmission systems comprises a length of optical fibre (L) in which a plurality of sections (l) made up of components (N, A) of opposite sign dispersions are concatenated together. The duration of the dispersion compensation phase is short in comparison with the propagation interval in the remainder of the system and that the path average dispersion is anomalous.
This application claims priority to and is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/083,966, filed on May 26, 1998 and entitled “Dispersion Management System For Soliton Optical Transmission System;” which is a continuation of International Application PCT/GB96/02923, filed on Nov. 27, 1996 and entitled “Dispersion Management System For Soliton Optical Transmission System;” which claims priority to Great Britain Patent Application No. 9524203.8, filed on Nov. 27, 1995 and entitled “Optical Communications;” each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is related to U.S. Pat. No. 6,650,452, issued on Nov. 18, 2003 and entitled “Optical Communications,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUNDThis invention relates to optical communications and, in particular, to optical communications systems in which information is transmitted by soliton or soliton-like pulses.
Laboratory demonstrations have recently been reported of soliton transmission in systems where the dispersion was not uniformly anomalous along the fibre, instead being periodically compensated by fibre of opposite (normal) sign dispersion. In this manner transmission was achieved at 20 Gb/s over 9000 km in a recirculating loop, and 8100 km in a straight line experiment. These figures are substantially in excess of what has previously been achieved without the use of soliton control techniques such as sliding filters and synchronous modulators. While it is thus clear that there are significant benefits to be gained from adopting dispersion management in soliton systems, to date there has been little conceptual explanation of the mechanisms behind this improvement.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThe correct selection of dispersion is a critical issue in the design of amplified long haul optical communication systems. In the case of soliton formatted data, it is dictated by compromise between the desire to minimise timing jitter problems (implying low dispersion), and the need to maintain adequate energy per bit for successful detection. As the energy needed to form a soliton in a uniform fibre is proportional to the dispersion, the latter constraint places a lower limit on the permitted dispersion. Dispersion management is a technique in the context of non-return-to-zero (NRZ) formatted data in which fibres of opposite sign dispersions are concatenated together. This produces a high local dispersion at any given point, and yet a low path-average dispersion. We have found that, by adopting a suitable dispersion management scheme for soliton or soliton-like transmission, it is possible to increase the soliton energy substantially compared with the equivalent uniform fibre with equal path-average dispersion.
According to the present invention there is provided a dispersion management system for soliton or soliton-like transmission in which the duration of a dispersion compensation phase is short in comparison with the propagation interval in the remainder of the system.
Preferably the system excludes arrangements in which the dispersion map of one fibre is substantially closer to zero than that of its complementary fibre.
The invention will be particularly described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Our work is based upon numerical integration of the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation (NLS), using the dispersion map shown in
We have confirmed the existence of quasi-stable soliton or solitary wave solutions to this dispersion map.
There are three constraints which must be satisfied to obtain stable solutions to the periodic dispersion map. Firstly, the path average dispersion must be anomalous, in order that the Kerr induced spectral broadening can be compensated. Secondly, the period of the dispersion compensation cycle must be short compared to the nonlinear length of the system. For a 1000 Km fibre, the dispersion compensation length is preferably 100 Km or less. Finally, dispersion maps in which one of the fibres is much closer to zero dispersion than the other should be avoided as otherwise energy is rapidly coupled out of the pulse into dispersive waves.
The advantages conferred by a dispersion management scheme on soliton communications stems from the fact that more energy is required to launch a stable pulse than in the equivalent uniform system with equal path average dispersion. This is demonstrated in
Another highly novel feature of these solitary waves is that their pulse shapes are not the hyperbolic secants of regular optical fibre solitons. The example pulse profile which we have displayed is almost exactly Gaussian in nature, however this is only a special case for that particular dispersion map. As the dispersion variation is increased there-is a transition from the uniform fibre hyperbolic secant soliton (time-bandwidth-product 0.32) to Gaussian (0.44) form, and then to pulse shapes with higher still time-bandwidth-products. An interesting connection can be made at this point with the “stretched pulse” design of mode-locked fibre laser. These incorporate cavities with two opposite signs of dispersion and also produce Gaussian shaped pulses.
In cases of soliton or soliton-like transmission in dispersion compensated fibres employing a configuration with zero path average dispersion, undistorted pulse propagation was obtained in this situation due to the presence of optical filters in the recirculating loop. The stable pulses then arose from balancing SPM against filtering, rather than SPM against the path-average dispersion.
CONCLUSIONThe technique of dispersion management has the potential to make a significant impact of the realisation of soliton-communication systems. It provides major performance benefits, and has the distinct advantage of requiring only passive components. While, in a preferred embodiment, we have used equal lengths of two different fibres, alternative embodiments may use discrete dispersion compensators (C) fabricated from highly dispersive materials as shown for example in
Claims
1. A dispersion management system for soliton or soliton-like transmission systems in which fibers of opposite sign dispersions are concatenated together characterised in that the duration of a dispersion compensation phase is short in comparison with the propagation interval in the remainder of the system and that the path average dispersion is anomalous.
2. A dispersion management system for soliton or soliton-like transmission systems according to claim 1 characterised in that the system excludes arrangements in which the dispersion map of one fibre (N) is substantially closer to zero than that of is complementary fibre (A).
3. A dispersion management system for soliton or soliton-like transmission systems according to claim 2 characterised in that the difference between fibre dispersions is less than 12.0 ps2/km.
4. A dispersion management system for soliton or soliton-like transmission systems according to claim 2 characterised in that the difference between fibre dispersions is less than 4.0 ps2/km.
5. A dispersion management system for soliton or soliton-like transmission systems according to claim 2 characterised in that the difference between fibre dispersions is less than 0.1 ps2/km.
6. A dispersion management system for soliton or soliton-like transmission systems according to claim 1 characterised in that compensation is provided by discrete dispersion compensator means.
Type: Application
Filed: Mar 31, 2008
Publication Date: Apr 2, 2009
Inventors: Nicholas John Doran (Coventry), Nicholas John Smith (Canterbury)
Application Number: 12/059,221
International Classification: H04B 10/12 (20060101);