TURBINE AIRFOIL CASTING METHOD
A method for making a turbine airfoil includes: (a) providing a mold having: (i) a core; (ii) an outer shell surrounding the core such that the core and the outer shell cooperatively define a cavity in the shape of an airfoil having at least one outer wall; and (iii) a core support extending from the core to the outer shell through a portion of the cavity that defines the at least one sidewall; (b) introducing molten metal alloy into the cavity and surrounding the core support; (c) solidifying the alloy to form an airfoil casting having at least one outer wall which has at least one core support opening passing therethrough; (d) removing the mold so as to expose the airfoil; and (e) sealing the at least one core support opening in the airfoil with a metal alloy metallurgically bonded to the at least one outer wall.
Latest General Electric Patents:
- MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL CONNECTION OF ELECTRIC MACHINES AND ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS IN AN ELECTRICAL SYSTEM USING QUICK CONNECT/DISCONNECT CONNECTORS
- SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMIC RATING OF POWER GRIDS
- Electric machine
- Hybrid modular multilevel converter (HMMC) based on a neutral point pilot (NPP) topology
- Electric machines with air gap control systems, and systems and methods of controlling an air gap in an electric machine
This invention relates generally to the manufacture of gas turbine engine components and more particularly to methods for casting hollow turbine airfoils.
Cast turbine airfoils for advanced gas turbine engines have internal features that challenge the capability of current casting technologies. The castings require complex ceramic cores to form the internal features and these cores are fragile during the casting process. The result is that casting yields of 50 percent to 70 percent are not uncommon. The 30 percent to 50 percent casting scrap factors into the cost of the useable castings.
The issue is compounded by exotic alloys such as single crystal materials that drive up the cost to cast a part and thus drive up the cost caused by scrapping hardware. If a mere 5 percent to 10 percent casting yield improvement can be achieved, the impact to each gas turbine engine is in the millions of dollars per year, based on volume.
One basic casting limitation is that the ceramic core that forms the internal structure of the airfoil can only be secured by the lower (i.e. root) portion with the majority of the core “floating” within the casting wax form. The forces of the molten metal and thermally induced forces during the cooling and solidification cycle result in movement and/or breakage of the ceramic core (referred to as “core shift”). The motion can be such that the cast component no longer meets drawing requirements, for example by violating minimum casting wall thicknesses. If the core fractures during the process this will also cause the component to fail requirements.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThese and other shortcomings of the prior art are addressed by the present invention, which provides a method for supporting an airfoil core during casting, while maintaining the metallurgical integrity of the finished component.
According to an aspect of the invention, a method for making a turbine airfoil includes: (a) providing a mold having: (i) a core; (ii) an outer shell surrounding the core such that the core and the outer shell cooperatively define a cavity in the shape of an airfoil having at least one outer wall; and (iii) a core support extending from the core to the outer shell through a portion of the cavity that defines the at least one sidewall; (b) introducing molten metal alloy into the cavity and surrounding the core support; (c) solidifying the alloy to form an airfoil casting having at least one outer wall which has at least one core support opening passing therethrough; (d) removing the mold so as to expose the airfoil; and (e) sealing the at least one core support opening in the airfoil with a metal alloy metallurgically bonded to the at least one outer wall.
The invention may be best understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures in which:
Referring to the drawings wherein identical reference numerals denote the same elements throughout the various views,
The interior of the turbine blade 10 is mostly hollow and includes a number of internal cooling features of a known type, such as walls defining serpentine passages, ribs, turbulence promoters (“turbulators”), etc. While the turbine blade 10 is a high pressure turbine blade, the principles of the present invention are applicable to any type of airfoil having a hollow interior.
Components such as the turbine blade 10 are manufactured using a known investment casting process. The method includes shaping the turbine blade in wax by enveloping a conventional alumina or silica based ceramic core which defines internal coolant passages. The wax assembly then undergoes a series of dips in liquid ceramic solution. The part is allowed to dry after each dip, forming a hard outer shell, typically a conventional zirconia based ceramic shell. After all dips are complete, and the wax assembly is encased by several layers of hardened ceramic shell, the assembly is placed in a furnace where the wax in the shell is melted out.
After wax removal, the mold comprises the internal ceramic core surrounded by the outer ceramic shell. The cavity between the core and the outer shell defines the component and its interior features. The mold is again placed in the furnace, and liquid metal is poured into an opening at the top of the mold. The molten metal enters the space between the ceramic core and the ceramic shell, previously filled by the wax. After the metal is allowed to cool and solidify, the external shell is broken and removed, exposing the casting which has taken the shape of the cavity created by removal of the wax, and which encases the internal ceramic core. The casting is then placed in a leeching tank, where the core is dissolved. The component now has the shape of the wax form, and an internal cavity which was previously filled by the internal ceramic core.
The relative thermal growths of the ceramic outer shell and the ceramic core material are different, so that after the metal has been poured and is allowed to cool, the relative shrinking of the shell and core components are different. This can cause varying wall thicknesses at areas of the metal nozzle part where one side of the wall is defined by the external shell, and the other side of the wall is engaged by the internal core. Furthermore, the core is typically allowed to “float” and may thus shift its position relative to the outer shell during the casting process. This can cause the walls of a component such as an airfoil to be less than a required minimum thickness.
To avoid core shift, the turbine blade 10 is cast by a modification of the above process, which incorporates one or more core supports.
In the illustrated example, the core support 32 takes the form of a circular cross-section rod, but other cross-sectional shapes may be used to suit a particular application.
The core support 32 is constructed from a suitable material having a melting point higher than the alloy used for the turbine blade 10, which may be a known nickel- or cobalt-based “superalloy”. Examples of suitable core support materials include fused quartz, or a ceramic such as Yttria, (Y2O3) or samarium oxide (Sm2O3), as used to make the core 30.
The core support 32 remains in place during the casting process and resists motion of the core 30 during pouring and solidification. While any number of core supports 32 may be used and placed at any desired location, it is beneficial to support the core 30 in an area, denoted “A” in
An example of a suitable apparatus for sealing the core support openings 40 and 42 is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,622,638 to Schell et al., assigned to the assignee of this invention, and is schematically illustrated in
The core support openings 40 and 42 may be sealed by using this apparatus to deposit molten alloy powder in one or more passes. Alternatively, powder can be deposited and then heated to melt and fuse it to the airfoil 18. In either case, the power alloy composition is substantially the same as that of the basic turbine blade 10. This process, sometimes referred to as “reverse machining”, produces a plug or patch that is metallurgically bonded to the core support openings 40 and 42, effectively forming an integral structure with the turbine airfoil 10. With proper control of the process parameters, this process can produce the same microstructure in the plug or patch (e.g. directionally solidified or single crystal) as that of the turbine blade 10. The finished turbine blade 10 is shown in
The foregoing has described a method for making gas turbine engine airfoils. While specific embodiments of the present invention have been described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications thereto can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention and the best mode for practicing the invention are provided for the purpose of illustration only and not for the purpose of limitation.
Claims
1. A method for making a turbine airfoil, comprising:
- (a) providing a mold having: (i) a core; (ii) an outer shell surrounding the core such that the core and the outer shell cooperatively define a cavity in the shape of an airfoil having at least one outer wall; and (iii) a core support extending from the core to the outer shell through a portion of the cavity that defines the at least one sidewall;
- (b) introducing molten metal alloy into the cavity and surrounding the core support;
- (c) solidifying the alloy to form an airfoil casting having at least one outer wall which has at least one core support opening passing therethrough;
- (d) removing the mold so as to expose the airfoil; and
- (e) sealing the at least one core support opening in the airfoil with a metal alloy metallurgically bonded to the at least one outer wall.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein step (e) is carried out by:
- (a) melting an alloy power using laser energy;
- (b) introducing the melted powder into the at least one core support opening; and
- (c) allowing the melted powder to cool and solidify in the at least one core support opening.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the alloy power has a composition substantially the same as an alloy composition of the airfoil.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein step (e) is carried out by:
- (a) introducing an alloy powder into the at least one core support opening;
- (b) using laser energy, melting the alloy powder and heating the outer wall; and
- (c) allowing the melted powder to cool and solidify in the at least one core support opening.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein the alloy power has a composition substantially the same as an alloy composition of the airfoil.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the airfoil has a directionally solidified or single crystal microstructure, and the solidified powder in the at least one core support opening has substantially the same microstructure as the airfoil.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the core support is a cylindrical rod.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the core support comprises fused quartz.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the mold comprises:
- (i) a core; and
- (ii) an outer shell surrounding the core, the outer shell having two spaced-apart sidewalls disposed on opposite sides of the core; and
- (iii) a core support extending from the one of the sidewalls of the outer shell, through the core, to the other sidewall of the outer shell.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the airfoil includes spaced-apart pressure and suction side outer walls each having a core support opening therein, the core support openings being coaxial to each other.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein the mold defines an integral turbine blade including the airfoil and a shank, the airfoil and the shank respectively defining opposite ends of the turbine blade.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein the core support is positioned in the airfoil at an end of the turbine blade opposite from the shank.
Type: Application
Filed: Dec 31, 2007
Publication Date: Jul 2, 2009
Applicant: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY (Schenectady, NY)
Inventors: Todd Jay Rockstroh (Maineville, OH), Sudhir K. Tewari (West Chester, OH), Joseph Giancarlo Sabato (Morrow, OH), Donald Brett Desander (Malden, MA), David Henry Abbott , Mark Douglas Gledhill (South Hamilton, MA)
Application Number: 11/968,022
International Classification: B22D 27/02 (20060101); B22D 23/00 (20060101);