GOLF SHAFT WITH ROUGHENED SURFACE
A golf club includes a tapered shaft, a club head attached to a first end of the shaft, and a grip attached to a second end of the shaft. The exterior surface of the shaft has a surface roughness of less than 143 micro inches. The exterior surface also includes a plurality of particles having a size in the range of about 20 microns to about 100 microns.
Latest TRUE TEMPER SPORTS, INC. Patents:
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/262,788 filed Nov. 19, 2009. The disclosure of the above application is herein incorporated by reference.
FIELDThe present disclosure relates to golf shafts and, more particularly, to golf shafts having a roughened surface.
BACKGROUNDThis section provides background information related to the present disclosure which is not necessarily prior art.
Golf clubs include a golf shaft with a grip on one end and a club head on the other end. The club head speed affects the force that is imparted to a golf ball. The faster the club head speed, the greater the momentum transferred to the ball and the farther the ball can be hit. Hitting the ball farther can provide a competitive advantage. Thus, it would be advantageous to increase the club head speed of a golf club.
SUMMARYThis section provides a general summary of the disclosure, and is not a comprehensive disclosure of its full scope or all of its features.
A golf club is provided that includes a tapered shaft, a club head attached to a first end of the shaft, and a grip attached to a second end of the shaft. The exterior surface of the shaft has a surface roughness of less than 143 micro inches. The exterior surface also includes a plurality of particles having a size in the range of about 20 microns to about 100 microns.
Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. The description and specific examples in this summary are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The drawings described herein are for illustrative purposes only of selected embodiments and not all possible implementations, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
Corresponding reference numerals indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
DETAILED DESCRIPTIONExample embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In
Referring now to
Exterior surface 34 of shaft 22 may be a roughened surface by applying particles to exterior surface 34. Shaft 22 may include an exterior coating 36 to provide a desired finish or appearance for shaft 22. Exterior coating 36 may a urethane based coating, by way of non-limiting example. To provide exterior surface 34 with a desired roughness or texture, particles can be added to exterior coating 36. Preferably, particles ranging in size between 20-100 microns are utilized to provide roughened surface 34. The particles may be spherical silica particles, spherical aluminum oxide particles, ceramic particles, and the like by way of non-limiting example. The use of spherical particles may advantageously provide a more consistent surface and improve the ability to create a more precise surface roughness. Depending on the particle size, at least two different application methods may be utilized to apply exterior coating 36 in conjunction with the particles.
The coating can be prepared by mixing the particles into the coating material to form a solution. Preferably, the particles are mixed into a solution with a viscosity higher than the viscosity at which it will be applied. The mixing of the particles into a solution with a higher viscosity can reduce and/or prevent settling of the particles during the delay between mixing and application. Thinners, such as a solvent, may be added right before application to improve the flow of the solution for better application on shaft 22. A final surface roughness may be modified in at least two ways. A first way is by varying the size of the particles. A second way is by varying the amount or concentration of particles mixed into the paint solution. As the particle percentage increases, however, the chances of settling or conglomeration may also increase.
Referring to
Referring now to
Regardless of which method is utilized, a shaft 22 with a tubular shape of tapering diameter ranging between about 0.650 inches and about 0.250 inches with a surface roughness between about 50 and about 150 micro inches Ra may be achieved. In one embodiment, shaft 22 has a varying outer diameter that ranges from about 0.625 inches adjacent second end 30 to about 0.250 inches adjacent first end 26 and includes an exterior coating 36 with particles of about 50 microns in size. Preferably, shaft 22 has a surface roughness of 143 micro inches or less.
Referring to
As can be seen, the r/d ratio can range from 1.29×10−3 adjacent second end 30 to about 2.27×10−3 adjacent first end 26 for a particle size of 20 microns. The r/d ratio may also range from about 6.46×10−3 adjacent second end 30 to about 11.33×10−3 adjacent first end 26. In the embodiment wherein the particle size is 50 microns, the r/d ratio can range from about 3.23×10−3 adjacent second end 30 to about 5.66×10−3 adjacent first end 26. Thus, the shaft 22 according to the present disclosure may have an r/d ratio along its length in the range shown by the hatched area 54. The surface roughness of exterior surface 34 may reduce the coefficient of drag Cd when shaft 22 is traveling through the air, as described below.
Referring to
Fd=½ρV2ACd [1]
wherein Fd is the drag force, ρ is the density of the air, V is the velocity of the object, A is the characteristic area (diameter) of the shaft, and Cd is the drag coefficient. By reducing the drag coefficient Cd, a reduction in the drag force Fd on the shaft may be realized. In particular, there is a proportional relation between the drag force Fd and the drag coefficient Cd. Therefore, a 10% reduction in the drag coefficient Cd will result in a 10% reduction in the drag force Fd.
The lower pressure on the back side of the shaft may create a vacuum type effect wherein the lower pressure pulls backwardly on the shaft and opposes the forward movement of the shaft through the air. By reducing the size of the reduced pressure area on the back side of the shaft, a reduction in the drag force Fd is achieved and an increase in the speed of club head 24 may be realized. An increase in the speed of club head 24 may result in greater momentum transfer to a ball being hit with club 20 and result in a longer distance hit.
Referring now to
Re=ρUD/μ [2]
wherein Re is the Reynolds number, ρ is the density of the fluid (air), U is the fluid velocity, which in the instant case is the speed of the club through the air, D is the shaft diameter at the particular position along the length of shaft 22, and μ is the viscosity of the fluid (air). For the calculations in
Line 62 is representative of the Reynolds number Re for a club head speed of 90 mph while line 64 is for a club head speed of 110 mph and line 66 is for a club head speed of 135 mph. As can be seen, the Reynolds number Re increases as a function of club head speed such that line 66 is always above lines 64 and 62 along the entire distance of shaft 22. As a result, a club 20 having a shaft 22 according to an embodiment may have a Reynolds number Re that ranges from about 3.1×104 to about 5.2×104 for a club head speed of 90 mph. When the club head speed is 110 mph, the Reynolds number Re may range from about 3.8×104 to about 6.3×104. When the club head speed is 135 mph, the Reynolds number Re may range from about 4.7×104 to about 7.7×104. Furthermore, it can be seen that Reynolds number Re varies as a function of distance along shaft 22 such that the largest Reynolds number Re is achieved adjacent first end 26 while the lower Reynolds number Re is realized adjacent second end 30. Moreover, club 20 and shaft 22 according to the embodiment may have a range of Reynolds number Re as indicated in the hatched region 68 which extends between line 62 and line 66 with a club head speed between 90-135 mph.
Referring now to
Accordingly, a club 20 having a shaft 22 according to the present invention utilizes a roughened exterior surface 34 to reduce the drag coefficient Cd and the resulting drag force Fd on club 20. The shaft 22 has a decreasing exterior diameter as it extends from second end 30 to first end 26 and, as a result, has an r/d ratio that increases along its length towards club head 24. The Reynolds number Re for club 20 along its length will vary based upon the speed at which club 20 is swung. The shaft 22 can have a Reynolds number Re that ranges between 3.1×104 to about 7.7×104 for club head speeds between 90 mph to 135 mph. The larger Reynolds number can provide a significant advantage with a roughened exterior surface 34 whereby a reduction in the drag coefficient Cd may be realized. Accordingly, a club 20 utilizing a shaft 22 according to the present disclosure can advantageously incorporate a textured or roughened exterior surface 34 to reduce the drag force Fd imparted on club 20 when being swung. The reduction in the drag force Fd may result in a greater speed of club head 24 and transfer greater force to a struck ball and increase its distance travelled.
While club 20 and shaft 22 have been described with reference to specific embodiments, it should be appreciated that changes to shaft 22 and/or club 20 may be incorporated. For example, the particles, while being described as spherical silica particles may be made of different materials or have differing shapes to provide a desired roughness for exterior surface 34. Moreover, while the particles are described as being applied in conjunction with exterior coating 36, it should be appreciated that other methods for applying particles to the exterior surface 34 may be employed. By way of non-limiting example, an adhesive may be applied to the particles and the particles then applied to exterior surface 34, although this may require an additional production step. Moreover, it should be appreciated that the shaft 22 and/or club 20 may achieve different r/d ratios and Reynolds numbers than those described herein which can affect the resulting coefficient of drag Cd and drag force Fd.
The foregoing description of the embodiments has been provided for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention. Individual elements or features of a particular embodiment are generally not limited to that particular embodiment, but, where applicable, are interchangeable and can be used in a selected embodiment, even if not specifically shown or described. The same may also be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the invention, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.
Claims
1. A golf club comprising:
- a shaft having first and second ends and an exterior surface, said shaft having an outer diameter that diminishes as said shaft extends from said second end to said first end;
- a club head attached to said first end of said shaft; and
- a grip attached to said second end of said shaft,
- wherein said exterior surface has a surface roughness of less than 143 micro inches and includes a plurality of particles having a size in the range of about 20 microns to about 100 microns.
2. The golf club of claim 1, wherein said shaft has a r/d ratio in a range of about 1.29×10−3 to about 11.33×10−3, wherein “r” is particle diameter and “d” is shaft outer diameter.
3. The golf club of claim 2, wherein said r/d ratio is in a range of about 3.23×10−3 to about 5.66×10−3.
4. The golf club of claim 3, wherein the particles have a size of about 50 microns.
5. The golf club of claim 3, wherein the particles have a size of about 20 microns.
6. The golf club of claim 1, further comprising a coating on said exterior surface and wherein said particles are integral with said coating.
Type: Application
Filed: Nov 5, 2010
Publication Date: May 19, 2011
Applicant: TRUE TEMPER SPORTS, INC. (Memphis, TN)
Inventors: Donald Collins Brown, JR. (San Diego, CA), Armando Herrera (Chula Vista, CA)
Application Number: 12/940,565
International Classification: A63B 53/12 (20060101);