Method of Manufacturing a Solenoidal Magnet, and a Solenoidal Magnet Structure
A method of manufacturing a solenoidal magnet structure, comprising the steps of providing a collapsible mold in which to wind coils; winding wire into defined positions (88) in the mold to form coils (34); placing a preformed tubular mechanical support structure (102, 120) over the coils (34) so wound; 10 impregnating the coils and bonding them to the mechanical support structure by applying a thermosetting resin and allowing the thermosetting resin to harden; and collapsing the mold and removing the resultant solenoidal magnet structure comprising the resin impregnated coils and the mechanical support structure from the mold as a single solid piece.
Latest Siemens Plc. Patents:
- ASSEMBLY COMPRISING A TWO-STAGE CRYOGENIC REFRIGERATOR AND ASSOCIATED MOUNTING ARRANGEMENT
- ASSEMBLY COMPRISING A TWO-STAGE CRYOGENIC REFRIGERATOR AND ASSOCIATED MOUNTING ARRANGEMENT
- Thermal radiation shield for superconducting magnet, superconducting magnet and magnetic resonance imaging device
- Method for forming a superconducting connection structure and superconducting connection structure
- Arrangements for viewing clinical images
The present invention relates to a method of manufacture of solenoidal magnet coils, and to solenoidal magnet coils themselves. In particular, it relates to such coils for generating high strength magnetic fields, which may be applied in systems such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
The former 1 is typically constructed of aluminum, which is machined to ensure accurate dimensions of the former, in turn ensuring accurate size and position of the coils which are wound onto the former. Such accuracy is essential in ensuring the homogeneity and reliability of the resultant magnetic field. Superconducting magnets may quench due to even a small amount of movement of even one turn of the coil. The formers must therefore be very rigid. These requirements combine to render the production of formers very expensive.
Also illustrated in
The cost of producing a former 1 such as illustrated in
U.S. Pat. No. 5,917,393 describes a superconducting magnet arrangement wherein superconducting wire is mounted on an inner or outer surface of a thermally conductive cylinder, whereby cooling may be applied through the material of the former. The superconducting wire is thermally connected to, but electrically isolated from, the material of the cylinder.
The present invention aims to alleviate at least some of the problems of the prior art, and provides a relatively inexpensive and lightweight solenoidal magnet structure which is capable of withstanding the forces applied to it in use, and provides accurate and stable positioning of the coils of the solenoidal magnet.
Accordingly, the present invention provides apparatus and methods as defined in the appended claims.
The above, and further, objects, characteristics and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from consideration of the following description of certain embodiments thereof, given by way of examples only, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The present invention particularly provides a method of manufacturing a solenoidal magnet structure, An embodiment of the present invention will now be discussed with reference to
In an alternative arrangement illustrated in
In both examples, as shown in
In some conventional arrangements, slip planes were provided. These are interface surfaces along which the coils can move relatively easily over a former. Rather than trying to prevent movement, their aim is to make any movement as frictionless as possible to reduce the frictional heat produced by any such movement. In the present invention, the coils are firmly attached to the mechanical support structure, and there is no need to provide slip planes.
As illustrated in
In the arrangement of
Another alternative arrangement for forming the mechanical support structure is schematically illustrated in radial cross-section in
Patient comfort and accessibility of clinicians in MRI systems may both be improved by reducing the length of the magnet. Coil arrangements which permit this length reduction, while maintaining field quality may result in coil body forces which act in an axial direction away from the centre of the magnet. Conventional methods of restraining these forces require additional former material to be positioned on the end of the coil, which increases the length of the magnet system. By utilizing the shear strength at the interface between the coils and the mechanical support structure, such additional material can be avoided and a shorter magnet system length achieved in embodiments of the present invention.
A method of producing a magnet structure according to the present invention will now be described. Firstly, an accurate mold is required in which to wind the coils. As no former is to be provided, the accurate dimensions and relative spacing of the coils are defined by this mold, which must accordingly be very accurately made, and of a durable material, to allow a single mold to be used to produce many magnet structures. The mold is arranged to be collapsible. Superconducting wire is wound into defined positions in the mold. Typically, these positions will be recesses in the surface of the mold. A mechanical support structure 102, such as a tube of metal such as aluminum or stainless steel; or of a composite material such as fiberglass reinforced plastic, is placed over the coils 34 so wound. A layer of fiberglass cloth may be placed over the outer circumference of the coils before the mechanical support structure 102 is positioned. The layer of fiberglass cloth will provide thermal diffusion barrier 40. A further mold may be placed over the coils 34 and the mechanical support structure 102 to form an enclosed mold cavity. The coils and the mechanical support structure within the mold are monolithically impregnated with a thermosetting resin. This is allowed to harden and the resin impregnated coils and the mechanical support structure, now bonded to the coils, is removed from the mold as a single solid piece. The impregnation step is preferably performed in a vacuum, to avoid bubbles of air or other gas which might otherwise be trapped in the coil windings and cause stresses in the finished piece. The mold may be provided with a lining, such as of polytetrafluoroethylene PTFE, to aid in releasing finished articles.
A particular advantage of this method of forming the solenoidal coil arrangement is in that the coils are accurately dimensioned and positioned relative to each other by the shape of the mold. The mechanical support structure which is bonded onto the coils does not need to be accurately dimensioned, since the positioning of the coils is defined by the mold, and the mechanical support structure merely serves to securely retain the coils in their relative positions as defined by the mold.
This is particularly advantageous since the mold, which must be very accurately dimensioned, and is relatively expensive, may be re-used several times to produce a number of similar solenoidal magnet structures. Hitherto, the former has been the accurately dimensioned, expensive component, and of course can only be used for one magnet structure. Use of the method of the present invention, using an accurately machined mold to define the dimensions and relative positions of the coils, accordingly allows production of accurate solenoidal magnet structures for a reduced cost, and in reduced time, as compared to existing methods of production.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a preformed, tubular mechanical support structure 102 is positioned over the coils 34 in a mold prior to the impregnation step when thermosetting resin is applied to monolithically embed the coils and bond them to the mechanical support structure to produce a single solid article. Typically vacuum impregnation is used. The coils 34 may be over-wound with cloth 40 to bring their outer diameters to the same size as the inner diameter of the mechanical support structure, and to provide a thermal diffusion barrier layer. The cloth will be impregnated with the thermosetting resin during the molding step. Again, the moulds may be provided with a lining, such as of polytetrafluoroethylene PTFE, to aid in releasing the finished articles.
In some alternative embodiments, a wet lay-up process may be employed, where the resin is applied as a coating on the coil conductor, and as part of the mechanical support structure, either as a coating on the mechanical support structure or as an impregnated cloth at layer 40 or similar material.
The mechanical support structure 102 may be manufactured as an aluminum extrusion, or formed as rolled and welded tubes of stainless steel; it may be formed as a filament wound tube of fiberglass reinforced plastic, or may be molded from suitable materials. It may comprise one or more layers of wire wound into a cylinder and embedded in a thermoset material.
Typically in solenoidal magnet structures, some coils will be of different internal or external diameter from others. In this case, it may be necessary to bring all coils to a common diameter to enable them all to be attached to a mechanical support structure of constant internal diameter. Differences in the relevant diameters of the coils may be corrected by use of a filler layer 40 of resin-impregnated cloth overwrap. typically employing glass fiber cloth. This may be added while the coil is in a mold, and may be added either as resin impregnated cloth or as a dry cloth to be impregnated in the mold.
The coils 34 are wound within corresponding parts of the mold, according to the method described above. In the mold, a filler material 40 such as resin impregnated glass fiber may be wound over coils in order to fill the mold to the top. For example, such filler material may be provided to a depth of 5-10 mm. The mold may comprise a collapsible mandrel having at least one removable section, allowing the mold to be disassembled and removed from the interior of the molded coils 20.
The use of relatively inaccurate mechanical support structure 102 for the coils, being a preformed tube, typically of metal or composite material, and molded resin is rendered possible by use of accurate tooling. All of the important relative positions of features of the solenoidal structure are defined by the mold or other assembly tooling, resulting in a relatively low unit cost of the solenoidal magnet arrangements produced, while the relatively expensive mold and tooling may be re-used a number of times to produce several solenoidal magnet coil assemblies.
The final structure may be further strengthened to prevent any significant deformation.
As shown in
As illustrated in
The mold cavity 99 is open in certain locations 108, e.g. at its ends. Openings may also be provided through the mold outer 100. An impregnation trough 110 is affixed around the mold structure, and a thermosetting impregnation resin 122 is forced 124 through the openings 108 from the impregnation trough into the mold. The resin 122 monolithically impregnates the coils 34, leads and service components 92, and any filler material layers 40, 114, and to bond the coils to the preformed cylindrical mechanical support structure 102 and produce a single solid article, being the solenoidal magnet structure comprising coils and the preformed cylindrical mechanical support structure.
Once the assembly has been fully impregnated and the resin has set, the various pieces of the mold 82, 84, 98, 100 are moved away from the resultant single solid article, the molded structure. Firstly, the impregnation trough 110 and end pieces 98 should be removed from the mold. The mold outer 100 may also be removed at this stage, or may be removed later. Typically, and with reference to
As shown in
United Kingdom patent application GB2437114 describes methods of manufacturing solenoidal magnets, and solenoidal magnets so made, which bear some resemblance to certain embodiments of the present invention. However, significant differences of the present invention as compared to this prior art include the following. The preformed cylinders used for the mechanical support structure in the present invention may be produced in a “parallel” process. For example, a stock of preformed cylindrical mechanical support structures may be kept, avoiding the risk that a poorly formed cylindrical mechanical support structure would result in a scrap or reworked magnet, as may be the case with the methods of GB2437114. Any defective cylindrical mechanical support structures would be rejected before use, and so could not result in a reject solenoidal magnet structure. Each preformed cylindrical mechanical support structure may be tested before use to make sure that they meet the requirements of the design before being bonded to magnetic coils. The cylindrical mechanical support structures could be bought from a third party supplier, simplifying the manufacturing process for the magnet manufacturer. The cylindrical mechanical support structures themselves need not be particularly accurately formed, and so may be produced at relatively low cost.
The use of metal cylindrical mechanical support structures provides further advantages, for example that they are recyclable while composite materials are generally not recyclable; they have a relatively high thermal conductivity, which may allow cooling of the coils through or around the mechanical support structure; they have a relatively high electrical conductivity. Such conductive mechanical support structure will support eddy currents. The eddy currents are dependent on the rate of change of the magnetic field during quenching, ramping and imaging in an imaging system such as a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system. Control of the conductivity of the mechanical support structure may be used during the design process to alter stray field bursts during quench events; and can be used to control the rate of temperature increase during a quench, which would affect the pressure within a cryogen vessel containing the magnet. The mechanical support structure should also be stiff and strong. A composite material may be found to provide greater strength and/or stiffness per unit volume, or weight, than a metal, when used for the mechanical support structure of the present invention.
Claims
1. A solenoidal magnet structure, comprising:
- wire wound into coils;
- a preformed tubular mechanical support structure located over the coils, the whole structure being monolithically impregnated with a thermosetting resin.
2. A structure according to claim 1, wherein the support structure is preformed by assembly of a plurality of sections, each of arcuate radial cross-section.
3. A structure according to claim 1, wherein the preformed tubular mechanical support structure carries an axial split.
4. A structure according to claim 3, wherein the tubular mechanical support structure grips the outer diameter of the coils.
5. A solenoidal magnet structure, according to claim 1, wherein further electrical leads are retained within the thermosetting resin.
6. A solenoidal magnet structure, according to claim 1, wherein the wire is a superconducting wire.
7. A solenoidal magnet structure, according to claim 1, wherein some cons are of different outer diameter from others, and differences in the outer diameters of the coils are compensated by use of a filler layer.
8. A solenoidal magnet structure, according to claim 7, wherein the filler layer comprises a layer of resin-impregnated cloth.
9. A solenoidal magnet structure according to claim 1, wherein axially inner coils are of different outer diameter from axially outer coils, and separate mechanical support structures are provided for the axially inner coils and the axially outer coils.
10. A adenoidal magnet structure according to claim 9, wherein an axially inner mechanical support structure supports axially inner coils, and axially outer mechanical support structures support the axially outer coils.
11. A solenoidal magnet structure according to claim 9, wherein a first mechanical support structure, of a first internal diameter, supports axially inner coils, and a second mechanical support structure of a second internal diameter greater than the first internal diameter, supports the axially outer coils.
Type: Application
Filed: Jan 20, 2012
Publication Date: Jun 14, 2012
Applicant: Siemens Plc. (Frimley)
Inventors: Graham HUTTON (Oxfordshire), Jonathan Noys (Oxfordshire), Adrian Mark Thomas (Oxfordshire)
Application Number: 13/354,495
International Classification: H01F 6/06 (20060101); H01F 5/00 (20060101);