WIRE WRAP COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS RELATING THERETO

The present disclosure is directed to a wire wrap composition having a polyimide layer and a bonding layer. The polyimide layer is composed of a polyimide and a sub-micron filler. The polyimide is derived from at least one aromatic dianhydride component selected from rigid rod dianhydride, non-rigid rod dianhydride and combinations thereof, and at least one aromatic diamine component selected from rigid rod diamine, non-rigid rod diamine and combinations thereof. The mole ratio of dianhydride to diamine is 48-52:52-48 and the ratio of X:Y is 20-80:80-20 where X is the mole percent of rigid rod dianhydride and rigid rod diamine, and Y is the mole percent of non-rigid rod dianhydride and non-rigid rod diamine. The sub-micron filler is less than 550 nanometers in at least one dimension; has an aspect ratio greater than 3:1; is less than the thickness of the film in all dimensions.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
FIELD OF DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure relates generally to wire wrap compositions comprising a polyimide layer and a bonding layer. More specifically, the polyimide layer comprises a sub-micron filler and a polyimide polymer having a hybrid backbone structure.

BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE

Wire wraps need to have good electrical properties (e.g., dielectric strength), as well as good mechanical properties. High dielectric strength as well as good mechanical properties are required for the vigorous conditions associated with aerospace applications.

Typically, a wire will be bent into various shapes or directions. Thus the wire wrap covering the wire or cable needs to have the ability to do the same. Thus modulus and elongation are important properties in addition to dielectric strength in wire wrap applications. Conventional wire wrap (cable wrap) fails to provide the desired compactness, with the high mechanical strength.

A need exists for a lower cost wire wrap having improved thermal and dimensional stability.

SUMMARY

The present disclosure is directed to a wire wrap composition comprising a polyimide layer and a bonding layer. The polyimide layer has a first surface and a second surface, the polyimide layer comprises a polyimide and a sub-micron filler. The polyimide is derived from

    • i) at least one aromatic dianhydride component selected from the group consisting of rigid rod dianhydride, non-rigid rod dianhydride and combinations thereof, and
    • ii) at least one aromatic diamine component selected from the group consisting of rigid rod diamine, non-rigid rod diamine and combinations thereof;

The mole ratio of dianhydride to diamine is 48-52:52-48 and the ratio of X:Y is 20-80:80-20 where X is the mole percent of rigid rod dianhydride and rigid rod diamine, and Y is the mole percent of non-rigid rod dianhydride and non-rigid rod diamine based upon the total dianhydride component and total diamine component of the polyimide; and

The sub-micron filler is less than 550 nanometers (as a numerical average) in at least one dimension, has an aspect ratio greater than 3:1, is less than the polyimide layer thickness in all dimensions, and is present in an amount from 10 to 45 volume percent of the polyimide layer. The polyimide layer has a thickness from 5 to 150 microns.

The bonding layer has a first surface and a second surface, the bonding layer first surface being adjacent to the polyimide layer first surface, the bonding layer comprising

    • i) a poly(tetrafluoroethylene-co-perfluoro[alkyl vinyl ether]) in an amount from 65 to 100 weight percent based on the total weight of the bonding layer, or
    • ii) a polyimide adhesive.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

FIG. 1 illustrates a dielectric substrate in accordance with the present invention wrapped around a conductive wire or cable. For simplicity (i.e., to avoid unnecessary confusion), FIG. 1 illustrates a wrap having no overlap, although as a practical matter, the dielectric substrates of the present invention would typically be wrapped around a wire or cable in an overlapping fashion.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S) Definitions

“Film” is intended to mean a free-standing film or a (self-supporting or non self-supporting) coating. The term “film” is used interchangeably with the term “layer” and refers to covering a desired area.

“Dianhydride” as used herein is intended to include precursors or derivatives thereof, which may not technically be a dianhydride but would nevertheless functionally equivalent due to the capability of reacting with a diamine to form a polyamic acid which in turn could be converted into a polyimide.

“Diamine” as used herein is intended to include precursors or derivatives thereof, which may not technically be diamines but are nevertheless functionally equivalent due to the capability of reacting with a dianhydride to form a polyamic acid which in turn could be converted into a polyimide.

“Polyamic acid” as used herein is intended to include any polyimide precursor material derived from a combination of dianhydride and diamine monomers or functional equivalents thereof and capable of conversion to a polyimide.

“Sub-micron” is intended to describe particles having (as a numerical average) at least one dimension that is less than a micron.

“Chemical conversion” or “chemically converted” as used herein denotes the use of a catalyst (accelerator) or dehydrating agent (or both) to convert the polyamic acid to polyimide and is intended to include a partially chemically converted polyimide which is then dried at elevated temperatures to a solids level greater than 98%.

“Aspect ratio” is intended to mean a ratio of one dimension to another, such as a ratio of length to height.

In describing certain polymers it should be understood that sometimes applicants are referring to the polymers by the monomers used to make them or the amounts of the monomers used to make them. While such a description may not include the specific nomenclature used to describe the final polymer or may not contain product-by-process terminology, any such reference to monomers and amounts should be interpreted to mean that the polymer is made from those monomers, unless the context indicates or implies otherwise.

As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” “including,” “has,” “having” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a method, process, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such method, process, article, or apparatus. Further, unless expressly stated to the contrary, “or” refers to an inclusive or and not to an exclusive or. For example, a condition A or B is satisfied by any one of the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not present), A is false (or not present) and B is true (or present), and both A and B are true (or present).

Also, articles “a” or “an” are employed to describe elements and components of the invention. This is done merely for convenience and to give a general sense of the invention. This description should be read to include one or at least one and the singular also includes the plural unless it is obvious that it is meant otherwise.

Overview

The wire wrap compositions of the present disclosure have a polyimide layer and a bonding layer. The polyimide layer comprises a polyimide and a sub-micron filler. The polyimide has a hybrid backbone structure comprising rigid rod portions and non-rigid rod portions. The sub-micron filler can generally be incorporated into the polyimide layer at relatively high loadings without causing the polyimide layer to be unduly brittle while maintaining or decreasing coefficient of thermal expansion and increasing storage modulus.

Polyimide

The polyimides of the present disclosure are derived from the polymerization reaction of certain aromatic dianhydrides with certain aromatic diamines to provide a polymeric backbone structure that comprises both rigid rod portions and non-rigid rod portions. The rigid rod portions arise from the polymerization of aromatic rigid rod monomers into the polyimide, and the non-rigid rod portions arise from the polymerization of non-rigid rod aromatic monomers into the polyimide. Aromatic rigid rod monomers give a co-linear (about 180°) configuration to the polymer backbone, and therefore relatively little movement capability, when polymerized into a polyimide.

Examples of aromatic rigid rod diamine monomers are:

  • 1,4-diaminobenzene (PPD),
  • 4,4′-diaminobiphenyl,
  • 2,2′-bis(trifluoromethyl) 4,4′-diaminobiphenyl (TFMB),
  • 1,4-naphthalenediamine,
  • 1,5-naphthalenediamine,
  • 4,4″-diamino terphenyl,
  • 4,4′-diamino benzanilide
  • 4,4′-diaminophenyl benzoate,
  • 3,3′-dimethyl-4,4′-diaminobiphenyl,
  • 2,5-diaminotoluene, and
  • the like.

Examples of aromatic rigid rod dianhydride monomers are:

  • pyromellitic dianhydride (PMDA),
  • 2,3,6,7-Naphthalenetetracarboxylic dianhydride, and
  • 3,3′,4,4′-biphenyl tetracarboxylic dianhydride (BPDA).
    Monomers having a freedom of rotational movement or bending (once polymerized into a polyimide) substantially equal to or less than the above examples (of rigid rod diamines and rigid rod dianhydrides) are intended to be deemed rigid rod monomers for purposes of this disclosure.

Non-rigid rod monomers for purposes of this disclosure are intended to mean aromatic monomers capable of polymerizing into a polyimide backbone structure having substantially greater freedom of movement compared to the rigid rod monomers described and exemplified above. The non rigid rod monomers, when polymerized into a polyimide, provide a backbone structure having a bend or otherwise are not co-linear along the polyimide backbone they create (e.g., are not about 180°). Examples of non-rigid rod monomers in accordance with the present disclosure include any diamine and any dianhydride capable of providing a rotational or bending bridging group along the polyimide backbone. Examples of rotational or bending bridging groups include —O—, —S—, —SO2—, —C(O)—, —C(CH3)2—, —C(CF3)2—, and —C(R,R′)— where R and R′ are the same or different and are any organic group capable of bonding to a carbon.

Examples of non-rigid rod diamines include: 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether (“ODA”), 2,2-bis-(4-aminophenyl)propane, 1,3-diaminobenzene (MPD), 4,4′-diaminobenzophenone, 4,4′-diaminodiphenylmethane, 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl sulfide, 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl sulfone, 3,3′-diaminodiphenyl sulfone, bis-(4-(4-aminophenoxy)phenyl sulfone (BAPS), 4,4′-bis-(aminophenoxy)biphenyl (BAPB), 3,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether, 4,4′-diaminobenzophenone, 4,4′-isopropylidenedianiline, 2,2′-bis-(3-aminophenyl)propane, N,N-bis-(4-aminophenyl)-n-butylamine, N,N-bis-(4-aminophenyl)methylamine, m-amino benzoyl-p-amino anilide, 4-aminophenyl-3-aminobenzoate, N,N-bis-(4-aminophenyl)aniline, 2,4-diaminotoluene, 2,6-diaminotoluene, 2,4-diamine-5-chlorotoluene, 2,4-diamino-6-chlorotoluene, 2,4-bis-(beta-amino-t-butyl)toluene, bis-(p-beta-amino-t-butyl phenyl)ether, p-bis-2-(2-methyl-4-aminopentyl)benzene, m-xylylene diamine, p-xylylene diamine. 1,2-bis-(4-aminophenoxy)benzene, 1,3-bis-(4-aminophenoxy)benzene, 1,2-bis-(3-aminophenoxy)benzene, 1,3-bis-(3-aminophenoxy)benzene, 1-(4-aminophenoxy)-3-(3-aminophenoxy)benzene, 1,4-bis-(4-aminophenoxy)benzene, 1,4-bis-(3-aminophenoxy)benzene, 1-(4-aminophenoxy)-4-(3-aminophenoxy)benzene, 2,2-bis-(4-[4-aminophenoxy]phenyl)propane (BAPP), 2,2′-bis-(4-aminophenyl)-hexafluoro propane (6F diamine), 2,2′-bis-(4-phenoxy aniline)isopropylidene, 4,4′-diamino-2,2′-trifluoromethyl diphenyloxide, 3,3′-diamino-5,5′-trifluoromethyl diphenyloxide, 4,4′-trifluoromethyl-2,2′-diaminobiphenyl, 2,4,6-trimethyl-1,3-diaminobenzene, 4,4′-oxy-bis-[2-trifluoromethyl)benzene amine](1,2,4-OBABTF), 4,4′-oxy-bis-[3-trifluoromethyl)benzene amine], 4,4′-thio-bis-[(2-trifluoromethyl)benzene-amine], 4,4′-thiobis[(3-trifluoromethyl)benzene amine], 4,4′-sulfoxyl-bis-[(2-trifluoromethyl)benzene amine, 4,4′-sulfoxyl-bis-[(3-trifluoromethyl)benzene amine], and 4,4′-keto-bis-[(2-trifluoromethyl)benzene amine].

Examples of non-rigid rod aromatic dianhydrides include 2,2′,3,3′-benzophenone tetracarboxylic dianhydride, 2,3,3′,4′-benzophenone tetracarboxylic dianhydride, 3,3′,4,4′-benzophenone tetracarboxylic dianhydride (BTDA), 2,2′,3,3′-biphenyl tetracarboxylic dianhydride, 2,3,3′,4′-biphenyl tetracarboxylic dianhydride, 4,4′-thio-diphthalic anhydride, bis(3,4-dicarboxyphenyl)sulfone dianhydride (DSDA), bis(3,4-dicarboxyphenyl)sulfoxide dianhydride, 4,4′-oxydiphthalic anhydride (ODPA), bis(3,4-dicarboxyphenyl)thio ether dianhydride, 2,2-Bis[4-(3,4-dicarboxyphenoxy)phenyl]propane dianhydride (BPADA), 2,2-bis-(3,4-dicarboxyphenyl) 1,1,1,3,3,3,-hexafluoropropane dianhydride (6FDA), 5,5-[2,2,2]-trifluoro-1-(trifluoromethyl)ethylidene, bis-1,3-isobenzofurandione, bis(3,4-dicarboxyphenyl)methane dianhydride, cyclopentadienyl tetracarboxylic acid dianhydride, ethylene tetracarboxylic acid dianhydride, 2,2-bis(3,4-dicarboxyphenyl)propane dianhydride.

In some embodiments, the mole ratio of dianhydride to diamine is 48-52:52-48 and the ratio of X:Y is 20-80:80-20 where X is the mole percent of rigid rod dianhydride and rigid rod diamine, and Y is the mole percent of non-rigid rod dianhydride and non-rigid rod diamine based upon the total dianhydride component and diamine component of the polyimide. And in alternative embodiments can be any sub-range within that broad ratio (e.g., 20-80 includes any range between and optionally including 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75 and 80, and 80-20 includes any range between and optionally including 80, 75, 70, 65, 60, 55, 45, 40, 35, 30, and 25).

In one embodiment, the polyimide of the present disclosure is derived from substantially equal molar amounts of 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether (4,4′-ODA) non-rigid rod monomer, and pyromellitic dianhydride (PMDA), rigid rod monomer. In another embodiment, at least 70 mole percent of the aromatic dianhydride component is pyromellitic dianhydride; and at least 70 mole percent of the aromatic diamine component is 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether. In some embodiments, at least 70, 75, 80, 85, 90 or 95 mole percent of the aromatic dianhydride component is pyromellitic dianhydride (based upon total dianydride content of the polyimide); and at least 70, 75, 80, 85, 90 or 95 mole percent of the aromatic diamine component is 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether (based upon total diamine content of the polyimide). Such PMDA//4,4′ODA polyimides have been found to be particularly well suited for combination with the sub-micron fillers of the present disclosure, for improved properties at a relatively low cost. In another embodiment, the polyimide is derived from 100 mole percent pyromellitic dianhydride and 100 mole percent 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether. In another embodiment, the polyimide is a random copolymer derived from 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether and 1,4 diaminobenzene with pyromellitic dianhydride and 3,3′,4,4′-biphenyl tetracarboxylic dianhydride. In yet another embodiment, the polyimide is a random copolymer derived from 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether and 1,4 diaminobenzene with pyromellitic dianhydride.

In another embodiment, at least 75 mole percent of the aromatic dianhydride component is pyromellitic dianhydride and 70 mole percent 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether and 30 mole percent 1,4 diaminobenzene as the aromatic diamine component.

In another embodiment, the polyimide is a block copolymer. A block copolymer is a polymer in which there are sequences of substantially one dianhydride/diamine combination along the polymer backbone as opposed to a completely random distribution of monomer sequences. Typically this is achieved by sequential addition of different monomers during the polyamic acid preparation.

In yet another embodiment, the polyimide is block copolymer derived from 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether and 1,4-diaminobenzene with pyromellitic dianhydride. In yet another embodiment, the polyimide is a block copolymer is derived from 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether (4,4′-ODA) and 1,4-diaminobenzene (PPD) with pyromellitic dianhydride (PMDA) and 3,3′,4,4′-biphenyl tetracarboxylic dianhydride (BPDA). In yet another embodiment, the polyimide is a block copolymer consisting of substantially rigid blocks (PMDA reacted with PPD) and substantially more flexible blocks (PMDA reacted with ODA). In another embodiment, the block copolymer is derived from 10 to 40 mole percent blocks of pyromellitic dianhydride and 1,4-diaminobenzene and from 90 to 60 mole percent blocks of pyromellitic dianhydride and 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether.

Sub-Micron Filler

In accordance with the present disclosure, the filler is a sub-micron (in at least one dimension) filler or a mixture of sub-micron fillers.

In one embodiment, the polyimide layer of the present disclosure comprises a sub-micron filler:

    • 1. being less than 550 nanometers (and in some embodiments, less than 475, 450, 425, 400, 375, 350, 325, 300, 275, 250, 225, or 200 nanometers) in at least one dimension (since fillers can have a variety of shapes in any dimension and since filler shape can vary along any dimension, the “at least one dimension” is intended to be a numerical average along that dimension);
    • 2. having an average aspect ratio greater than 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, or 15 to 1;
    • 3. being less than 100, 95, 90, 85, 80, 75, 70, 65, 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 15 or 10 percent of the thickness of the polyimide layer in all dimensions; and
    • 4. being present in an amount between and optionally including any two of the following percentages: 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 45 volume percent of the polyimide layer.

Suitable sub-micron fillers are generally stable at temperatures above 300, 350, 400, 425 or 450° C., and in some embodiments do not significantly decrease the electrical insulation properties of the polyimide layer. In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler is selected from a group consisting of needle-like fillers (acicular), fibrous fillers, platelet fillers and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the sub-micron filler is substantially non-aggregated. The sub-micron filler can be hollow, porous, or solid.

In one embodiment, the sub-micron fillers of the present disclosure exhibit an aspect ratio of at least 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, or 15 to 1. In one embodiment, the sub-micron filler aspect ratio is 5:1 or greater. In another embodiment, the sub-micron filler aspect ratio is 10:1 or greater, and in another embodiment, the aspect ratio is 12:1 or greater. In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler is selected from a group consisting of oxides (e.g., oxides comprising silicon, magnesium and/or aluminum), nitrides (e.g., nitrides comprising boron and/or silicon), carbides (e.g., carbides comprising tungsten and/or silicon) and combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler is acicular titanium dioxide, talc, SiC fiber, platy Al2O3 or mixtures thereof. In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler is less than (as a numerical average) 50, 25, 20, 15, 12, 10, 8, 6, 5, 4, or 2 microns in all dimensions.

In yet another embodiment, carbon fiber and graphite can be used in combination with other sub-micron fillers to increase mechanical properties. However in one embodiment, the loading of graphite, carbon fiber and/or electrically conductive fillers may need to be below the percolation threshold (perhaps less than 10 volume percent), since graphite and carbon fiber fillers can diminish electrical insulation properties and in some embodiments, diminished electrical insulation properties are not desirable.

In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler is coated with a coupling agent. In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler is coated with an aminosilane coupling agent. In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler is coated with a dispersant. In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler is coated with a combination of a coupling agent and a dispersant. In some embodiments, the sub-micron filer is coated with a coupling agent, a dispersant or a combination thereof. Alternatively, the coupling agent and/or dispersant can be incorporated directly into the polyimide layer and not necessarily coated onto the sub-micron filler. In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler comprises a acicular titanium dioxide, at least a portion of which is coated with an aluminum oxide.

In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler is chosen so that it does not itself degrade or produce off-gasses at the desired processing temperatures. Likewise in some embodiments, the sub-micron filler is chosen so that it does not contribute to degradation of the polymer.

In one embodiment, filler composites (e.g. single or multiple core/shell structures) can be used, in which one oxide encapsulates another oxide in one particle.

Polyimide Layer

It has been discovered that relatively less expensive polyimides can be filled with sub-micron filler of the present disclosure and thereby perform, at least in some ways, more similarly to more expensive polyimides, but at a much lower cost. More expensive monomers such as BPDA or fluorinated monomers can at least in part (or entirely) be replaced with less expensive monomers. In addition to expensive monomers, some polyimides are more difficult to process commercially, such as BPDA//PPD due to blistering. Lower production rates drive up the cost of the film. Additionally, polyimides derived from all rigid rod monomers may have low CTE and high modulus but, when filled, have low elongation. It has been found that the submicron fillers that have an aspect ratio of 3:1 or greater can be incorporated at relatively high loading levels (10 to 45 volume percent) into less expensive, easily processable polyimides. The sub-micron filler of the present disclosure tends to increase the storage modulus and decrease or approximately maintain the CTE of the polyimide layer of the present disclosure with out causing the polyimide layer to become unduly brittle.

It is surprising that the sub-micron filler of the present disclosure may not behave in the same manner in all polyimides. Surprisingly in a rigid rod polyimide (BPDA//PPD) the CTE may be greater than in unfilled rigid rod polyimide.

The sub-micron filler of the present disclosure, when incorporated into the polyimides of the present disclosure, produce polyimide layers having better properties (or balance of properties) compared to their conventional non-high aspect ratio (less than 3:1 aspect ratio) counterparts.

In some embodiments, the polyimide layer comprises a polyimide derived from 100 mole percent of pyromellitic dianhydride as the aromatic dianhydride component; and 100 mole percent 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether as the aromatic diamine component and the sub-micron filler is acicular titanium dioxide, talc, SiC fiber, platy Al2O3 or mixture thereof. In some embodiments, the polyimide is a homopolymer of pyromellitic dianhydride and 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether.

In another embodiment, the polyimide layer comprises a polyimide wherein the polyimide is block copolymer derived from: 10 to 40 mole percent blocks of pyromellitic dianhydride and 1,4 diaminobenzene; from 90 to 60 mole percent blocks of pyromellitic dianhydride and 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether and the sub-micron filler is acicular titanium dioxide, talc, SiC fiber, platy Al2O3 or mixture thereof.

The polyimide layers of the present disclosure are generally useful for insulating electrical conductors, particularly electrical wires and cables, and can generally be manufactured by combining a polyimide layer with at least one bonding layer.

Thermal and Dimensional Stability

While it is generally known that the addition of filler will decrease CTE and increase storage modulus, it is surprising, that for the sub-micron fillers of the present disclosure, there is a threshold above which a significant increase in storage modulus and/or a decrease in CTE is observed. In one embodiment, the sub-micron filler will substantially maintain (within 80, 70. 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1 percent, plus or minus) the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) while improving mechanical and thermal properties.

In one embodiment, the polyimide layers of the present disclosure have an in-plane CTE in a range between (and optionally including) any two of the following: 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 ppm/° C., where the in-plane coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) is measured between 60° C. (or 50° C.) and 350° C.

Some unfilled block or random copolymers of the present disclosure can have a relatively low CTE. Thus, in some embodiments, sub-micron fillers of the present disclosure have little impact on a block copolymer CTE. In some embodiments, the sub-micron fillers of the present disclosure may increase the CTE of block or random copolymers having a low CTE but the CTE is still maintained in a desirable range.

The thickness of a polyimide layer can also impact CTE, where thinner films tend to give a lower CTE (and thicker films, a higher CTE), and therefore, polyimide layer thickness can be used to fine tune polyimide layer CTE, depending upon any particular application selected. The polyimide layers of the present disclosure have a thickness in a range between (and optionally including) any of the following thicknesses (in microns): 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150 microns. Monomers and sub-micron fillers within the scope of the present disclosure can also be selected or optimized to fine tune CTE within the above range. Ordinary skill and experimentation may be necessary in fine tuning any particular CTE of the polyimide layers of the present disclosure, depending upon the particular application. In some embodiments, the in-plane CTE of the polyimide layer can be obtained by thermomechanical analysis utilizing a TA Instruments TMA-2940 run at 10° C./min, up to 400° C., then cooled and reheated to 400° C., with the CTE in ppm/° C. obtained during the reheat scan between 50° C. and 350° C. In another embodiment, the in-plane CTE of the polyimide layer can be obtained by Thermal Mechanical Analysis (TA Instruments, TMA-2940, heat 10° C./min, up to 460° C., then cooled and reheat to 500° C.) was evaluated between 50-350° C. on the reheat. In another embodiment, the in-plane CTE of the polyimide layer can be obtained by Thermal Mechanical Analysis (TA Instruments, TMA-2940, heat 10° C./min, up to 380° C., then cooled and reheated to 380° C.) and evaluated between 50-350° C. on the reheat.

In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler increases the storage modulus above the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the polyimide. In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler of the present disclosure increases the storage modulus at 25° C. at least 20, 22, 24, 26, 28 or 30% compared to sub-micron filler having an aspect ratio less than 3:1. In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler of the present disclosure increases the storage modulus at 480° C. to 500° C. at least 40, 42, 44 or 46% compared to sub-micron filler having an aspect ration less than 3:1. In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler of the present disclosure increases the storage modulus at 25° C. at least 38, 40, 42, 44 or 46% compared to unfilled polyimide. In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler of the present disclosure increases the storage modulus at 480° C. to 500° C. at least 52, 53, 54 or 55% compared to unfilled polyimide.

Typically, as the amount of filler increases in a film, the more brittle and difficult to process the film tends to become. Typically when tensile elongation is less than 20 percent, films are difficult to process, thus, are of limited commercial value. It is surprising that when the sub-micron fillers of the present disclosure are added to a polyimide having a mole ratio of dianhydride to diamine of 48-52:52-48 and ratio of X:Y is 20-80:80-20 where X is mole percent of rigid rod dianhydride and rigid rod diamine, and Y is mole percent of non-rigid rod dianhydride and non-rigid rod diamine, the tensile elongation remains acceptable. In some embodiments, the tensile elongation remains acceptable when greater than 10 volume percent of the sub-micron filler is used. In one embodiment, the tensile elongation remains acceptable when greater than 30 volume percent of the sub-micron filler is used. In yet another embodiment, the tensile elongation remains acceptable when greater than 40 volume percent of the sub-micron filler is used.

Generally, when forming the polyimide, a chemical conversion process (as opposed to a thermal conversion process) will provide a lower CTE polyimide film. Thus, while the advantages of the present disclosure can be seen for both chemically or thermally converted polyimides, the advantages of incorporating the sub-micron filler of the present disclosure may be most useful for chemically converted polyimides of the present disclosure.

Polyimide Layer Formation

Polyimide layers of the present disclosure can be made by methods well known in the art. In some embodiments, the polyimide layer can be produced by combining the above monomers together with a solvent to form a polyamic acid (also called a polyamide acid solution). The dianhydride and diamine components are typically combined in a molar ratio of aromatic dianhydride component to aromatic diamine component of from 0.90 to 1.10. Molecular weight can be adjusted by adjusting the molar ratio of the dianhydride and diamine components.

Chemical or thermal conversion can be used in the practice of the present disclosure. In instances where chemical conversion is used, a polyamic acid casting solution is derived from the polyamic acid solution. In one embodiment, the polyamic acid casting solution comprises the polyamic acid solution combined with conversion chemicals, such as: (i) one or more dehydrating agents, such as, aliphatic acid anhydrides (acetic anhydride, etc.) and aromatic acid anhydrides; and (ii) one or more catalysts, such as, aliphatic tertiary amines (triethylamine, etc.), aromatic tertiary amines (dimethylaniline, etc) and heterocyclic tertiary amines (pyridine, picoline, isoquinoline, etc). The anhydride dehydrating material is often used in a molar excess of the amount of amide acid groups in the copolyamic acid. The amount of acetic anhydride used is typically about 2.0-3.0 moles per equivalent of amide acid. Generally, a comparable amount of tertiary amine catalyst is used.

In one embodiment, the polyamic acid is dissolved in an organic solvent at a concentration from about 5 weight percent up to and including 40 weight percent. In one embodiment, the polyamic acid is dissolved in an organic solvent at a concentration of about 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 or 40 weight percent. Examples of suitable solvents include: formamide solvents (N,N-dimethylformamide, N,N-diethylformamide, etc.), acetamide solvents (N,N-dimethylacetamide, N,N-diethylacetamide, etc.), pyrrolidone solvents (N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone, etc.), phenol solvents (phenol, o-, m- or p-cresol, xylenol, halogenated phenols, catechol, etc.), hexamethylphosphoramide and gamma-butyrolactone. It is desirable to use one of these solvents or mixtures thereof. It is also possible to use combinations of these solvents with aromatic hydrocarbons such as xylene and toluene, or ether containing solvents like diglyme, propylene glycol methyl ether, propylene glycol, methyl ether acetate, tetrahydrofuran, and the like.

In one embodiment, the prepolymer can be prepared and combined with the sub-micron filler (dispersion or colloid thereof) using numerous variations to form the polyimide layer of this disclosure. “Prepolymer” is intended to mean a lower molecular weight polymer, typically made with a small stoichiometric excess (about 2-4%) of diamine monomer (or excess dianhydride monomer). Increasing the molecular weight (and solution viscosity) of the prepolymer can be accomplished by adding incremental amounts of additional dianhydride (or additional diamine, in the case where the dianhydride monomer is originally in excess in the prepolymer) in order to approach a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio of dianhydride to diamine.

Useful methods for producing polyimide layers in accordance with the present disclosure can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,166,308 to Kreuz, et al. Numerous variations are also possible, such as: (a) a method wherein the diamine components and dianhydride components are preliminarily mixed together and then the mixture is added in portions to a solvent while stirring, (b) a method wherein a solvent is added to a stirring mixture of diamine and dianhydride components (contrary to (a) above), (c) a method wherein diamines are exclusively dissolved in a solvent and then dianhydrides are added thereto at such a ratio as allowing to control the reaction rate, (d) a method wherein the dianhydride components are exclusively dissolved in a solvent and then amine components are added thereto at such a ratio to allow control of the reaction rate, (e) a method wherein the diamine components and the dianhydride components are separately dissolved in solvents and then these solutions are mixed in a reactor, (f) a method wherein the polyamic acid with excessive amine component and another polyamic acid with excessive dianhydride component are preliminarily formed and then reacted with each other in a reactor, particularly in such a way as to create a non-random or block copolymer, (g) a method wherein a specific portion of the amine components and the dianhydride components are first reacted and then the residual diamine components are reacted, or vice versa, (h) a method wherein the conversion chemicals are mixed with the polyamic acid to form a polyamic acid casting solution and then cast to form a gel film, (i) a method wherein the components are added in part or in whole in any order to either part or whole of the solvent, also where part or all of any component can be added as a solution in part or all of the solvent, (j) a method of first reacting one of the dianhydride components with one of the diamine components giving a first polyamic acid, then reacting the other dianhydride component with the other amine component to give a second polyamic acid, and then combining the amic acids in any one of a number of ways prior to film formation, and (k) a method of creating block copolymers by sequential addition, e.g., adding a first diamine and a first dianhydride to form a polyamic acid having excess dianhydride (or excess diamine) to create a first block and then adding a second diamine and a second dianhydride to the polyamic acid to form a second block in the presence of the first block; alternatively, blocks can be made based upon different dianhydrides (and the same diamine) or based upon different dianhydrides and different diamines (in each block), depending upon the particular application or properties desired.

The sub-micron filler (dispersion or colloid thereof) can be added at several points in the polyimide layer preparation. In one embodiment, the colloid or dispersion is incorporated into a prepolymer to yield a Brookfield solution viscosity in the range of about 50-100 poise at 25° C. In an alternative embodiment, the colloid or dispersion can be combined with the monomers directly, and in this case, polymerization occurs with the filler present during the reaction. The monomers may have an excess of either monomer (diamine or dianhydride) during this “in situ” polymerization. The monomers may also be added in a 1:1 ratio. In the case where the monomers are added with either the amine (case i) or the dianhydride (case ii) in excess, increasing the molecular weight (and solution viscosity) can be accomplished, if necessary, by adding incremental amounts of additional dianhydride (case i) or diamine (case ii) to approach the 1:1 stoichiometric ratio of dianhydride to amine.

The polyamic acid casting solution can then be cast or applied onto a support, such as an endless belt or rotating drum. The polyamic acid contain conversion chemical reactants. Next, the solvent-containing film can be converted into a self-supporting film by baking at an appropriate temperature (thermal curing) to remove solvent or baking together with the chemical conversion reactants (chemical curing). The film can then be separated from the support, oriented such as by tentering, with continued thermal curing to provide a film (polyimide layer).

Generally speaking, film smoothness is desirable, since surface roughness: i. can interfere with the functionality of the layer or layers deposited on the filled polyimide layer of the present disclosure, ii. can increase the probability of electrical or mechanical defects, and iii. can diminish property uniformity along the polyimide layer. In one embodiment, the sub-micron filler (and any other discontinuous domains) are sufficiently dispersed during polyimide layer formation, such that the sub-micron filler (and any other discontinuous domains) are sufficiently between the surfaces of the polyimide layer upon polyimide layer formation to provide a final polyimide layer having an average surface roughness (Ra) of less than 1000, 750, 500 or 400 nanometers. Surface roughness as provided herein can be determined by optical surface profilometry to provide Ra values, such as, by measuring on a Veeco Wyco NT 1000 Series instrument in VSI mode at 25.4× or 51.2× utilizing Wyco Vision 32 software.

The polyamic acid (and casting solution) can further comprise any one of a number of additives, such as processing aids (e.g., oligomers), antioxidants, light stabilizers, flame retardant additives, anti-static agents, heat stabilizers, ultraviolet absorbing agents, fillers or various reinforcing agents.

An alkoxy silane coupling agent (or any conventional, nonconventional, presently known or future discovered coupling agent) can be added during the process by pretreating the sub-micron filler prior to formulation. Alkoxysilane coupling agents can also be added during the “in situ” polymerization by combining the fillers and monomers with the alkoxysilane, generally so long as the coupling agent does not interfere with the polymerization reaction.

In some cases, the dianhydride can be contacted with the sub-micron filler. While not intending to be bound to any particular theory or hypothesis, it is believed such contact between the dianhydride and the sub-micron filler can functionalize the sub-micron filler with the dianhydride prior to further reaction with the monomers or prepolymer. Ultimately, a filled polyamic acid composition is generally cast into a film, which is subjected to drying and curing (chemical and/or thermal curing) to form a filled polyimide film. Any conventional or non-conventional method of manufacturing filled polyimide films can be used in accordance with the present disclosure. The manufacture of filled polyimide films in general is well known and need not be further described here. In one embodiment, the polyimide used in polyimide layer of the present disclosure has a high glass transition temperature (Tg) of greater than 300, 310, 320, 330, 340, 350, 360, 370 380, 390 or 400° C. A high Tg generally helps maintain mechanical properties, such as storage modulus, at high temperatures.

In some embodiments, electrically insulating fillers may be added to modify the electrical properties of the polyimide layer. In some embodiments, it is important that the polyimide layer be free of pinholes or other defects (foreign particles, gels, filler agglomerates or other contaminates) that could adversely impact the electrical integrity and dielectric strength of the polyimide layer, and this can generally be addressed by filtering. Such filtering can be done at any stage of the polyimide layer manufacture, such as, filtering solvated filler before or after it is added to one or more monomers and/or filtering the polyamic acid, particularly when the polyamic acid is at low viscosity, or otherwise, filtering at any step in the manufacturing process that allows for filtering. In one embodiment, such filtering is conducted at the minimum suitable filter pore size or at a level just above the largest dimension of the selected filler material. In some embodiments, the sub-micron filler is subjected to intense dispersion energy, such as agitation and/or high shear mixing or media milling or other dispersion techniques, including the use of dispersing agents, when incorporated into the film (or incorporated into a polyimide precursor) to inhibit unwanted agglomeration above the desired maximum filler size or to break up aggregates which may be originally present in the sub-micron filler. As the aspect ratio of the sub-micron filler increases, so too does the tendency of the sub-micron filler's long axis to align or otherwise position itself parallel to the outer surfaces of the polyimide layer.

A single layer film can be made thicker in an attempt to decrease the effect of defects caused by unwanted (or undesirably large) discontinuous phase material within the film. Alternatively, multiple layers of polyimide may be used to diminish the harm of any particular defect (unwanted discontinuous phase material of a size capable of harming desired properties) in any particular layer, and generally speaking, such multilayers will have fewer defects in performance compared to a single polyimide layer of the same thickness. Using multiple layers of polyimide films can diminish or eliminate the occurrence of defects that may span the total thickness of the film, because the likelihood of having defects that overlap in each of the individual layers tends to be extremely small. Therefore, a defect in any one of the layers is much less likely to cause an electrical or other type failure through the entire thickness of the film. In some embodiments, the polyimide layer comprises two or more polyimide layers. In some embodiments, the polyimide layers are the same. In some embodiments, the polyimide layers are different. In some embodiments, the polyimide layers independently may comprise a thermally stable filler, reinforcing fabric, inorganic paper, sheet, scrim or combinations thereof. Optionally, 0-55 weight percent of the film also includes other ingredients to modify properties as desired or required for any particular application.

The polyimide layer may have its surface modified to improve adhesion of the core layer to other layers. Examples of useful surface modification is, but are not limited to, corona treatment, plasma treatment under atmospheric pressure, plasma treatment under reduced pressure, treatment with coupling agents like silanes and titanates, sandblasting, alkali-treatment, and acid-treatment.

To improve the adhesion strength between the polyimide layer and the bonding layers, it is also possible to add various organic and/or inorganic metal compounds (e.g. metal oxides and/or metal complexes). Addition of these metal compounds is disclosed for example in U.S. Pat. No. 4,742,099 (tin compounds, titanium compounds, etc.). Commonly, these metal compounds are added to the polyamic acid or are applied to an uncured wet film. Addition of organic compounds may also be used to improve adhesion strength between the polyimide layer and any adjacent layers.

Bonding Layer

The bonding layer generally provides the polyimide layer with excellent resistance to mechanical degradation, especially scrape abrasion and cut-through. Improved scrape abrasion resistance (i.e. improved resistance to ultimate mechanical failure of the insulation system) generally can be particularly useful in applications where unwanted electrical arc tracking (seen when the insulation is mechanically degraded) is of great concern. The bonding layer also provides improved bonding performance between any exterior layer (such as polytetrafluoroethylene) and the interior polyimide core layer.

In some embodiments, the bonding layer a poly(tetrafluoroethylene-co-perfluoro[alkyl vinyl ether]) in an amount between (and optionally including) any two of the following numbers: 65 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95 and 100 weight percent based on the total weight of the bonding layer. In another embodiment, when the poly(tetrafluoroethylene-co-perfluoro[alkyl vinyl ether]) can not meet the requirements of higher temperature applications, a polyimide adhesive may be used as the bonding layer. In some embodiments, the bonding layer is tetrafluoroethylene hexafluoropropylene copolymer or a poly(ethylene-co-tetrafluoroethylene).

When the bonding layer is poly(tetrafluoroethylene-co-perfluoro [alkyl vinyl ether]), the bonding layer may optionally be blended with up to 35 weight percent (based on the total weight percent of the bonding layer) of a tetrafluoroethylene hexafluoropropylene copolymer (FEP) fluoropolymer.

The bonding layer will generally have a thickness in a range between (and optionally including) any two of the following numbers: 0.25, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25 microns. A useful thickness range is oftentimes in a range from about 0.75 microns to 2.5 microns (generally in the range of about 0.03 to about 0.10 mils). In practice, the desired thickness can depend upon the particular wire specifications, particularly for military or commercial aircraft applications.

In some embodiments, the bonding layer may be applied to the polyimide layer or the optional adhesive primer layer by, but not limited to, colloidal aqueous dispersion coating or lamination.

Wire Wrap

The wire wrap of the present disclosure comprised a polyimide layer and a bonding layer. The polyimide layer has a first surface and a second surface. The bonding layer has a first and second surface. In some embodiments, the bonding layer first surface being adjacent to the polyimide layer first surface.

The wire wrap of the present disclosure may optionally contain additional adhesive layers to improve adhesion between different layers or surfaces or even to improve adhesion to the wire wrap itself (when the wire wrap is applied in an overlapping fashion). In some embodiments, the wire wrap composition comprises a polyimide-to-metal bonding layer in contact with the polyimide layer second surface, the polyimide-to-metal bonding layer comprising from 70 to 100 weight percent poly(tetrafluoroethylene-co-hexafluoropropylene) based on the total weight of the polyimide-to-metal bonding layer. The optional polyimide-to-metal bonding layer is oftentimes used as the innermost layer, generally intended for placement substantially adjacent to an electrically conductive wire (or cable) located substantially at the center of a wrapped system. The polyimide-to-metal bonding layer can be used to improve adhesion of the polyimide layer to the wire or cable.

In some embodiments, the polyimide-to-metal bonding layer may comprise up to 30 weight percent, based on the total weight of the polyimide-to-metal bonding layer, additional fluoropolymers including, but not limited to, polytetrafluoroethylene, poly(tetrafluoroethylene-co-perfluoro[alkyl vinyl ether]) (for example, Teflon® PFA) or poly(ethylene-co-tetrafluoroethylene) (ETFE).

In some embodiments, the polyimide-to-metal bonding layer thickness is between (and optionally including) any two of the following: 0.25, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25.0 microns. In another embodiment the polyimide-to-metal bonding layer thickness is from 8 to 20 microns.

In some embodiments, the wire wrap composition comprises adhesive primer layer in contact with and between the polyimide layer first surface and the bonding layer first surface, the adhesive primer layer comprising from 70 to 100 weight percent poly(tetrafluoroethylene-co-hexafluoropropylene) based on the total weight of the adhesive primer layer. The optional adhesive primer layer can be used to improve adhesion between the bonding layer and the polyimide layer.

In some embodiments, the adhesive primer layer may comprise up to 30 weight percent, based on the total weight of the adhesive primer layer, additional fluoropolymers including, but not limited to, polytetrafluoroethylene, poly(tetrafluoroethylene-co-perfluoro[alkyl vinyl ether]) or poly(ethylene-co-tetrafluoroethylene) (ETFE).

In some embodiments, the adhesive primer layer thickness is between (and optionally including) any two of the following: 0.25, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25.0 microns. In another embodiment the adhesive primer layer thickness is from 8 to 20 microns. The polyimide-to-metal bonding layer and the adhesive primer layer may be the same or different.

In some embodiments, the wire wrap composition additionally comprises an polytetrafluoroethylene exterior layer in contact with the bonding layer second surface. The exterior layer will generally provide some scrape abrasion resistance, chemical resistance, and thermal durability when the structure is wrapped about a wire or cable or the like.

In some embodiments, the exterior layer thickness is generally between (and optionally including) any two of the following: 1, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180 and 200 microns. In another embodiment the exterior layer thickness is from 2 to 50 microns. In some embodiments, other fluoropolymers can optionally be blended with polytetrafluoroethylene. In some embodiments, the polytetrafluoroethylene exterior layer is partially or wholly sintered.

In one embodiment, illustrated in FIG. 1, a wire wrap 14 in accordance with the present invention is sealed around a wire or cable 2. In this embodiment, the polyimide layer 6 generally provides mechanical toughness and dielectric strength at high temperatures. The optional polyimide-to-metal (PTM) layer 4 generally provides improved adhesion of the polyimide core layer to the metal wire or surface and/or wire wrap itself. The optional adhesive primer layer 8 generally provides improved adhesive strength between the bonding layer 10 and the polyimide core layer 6. The bonding layer 10 generally provides for improved mechanical resistance to scrape abrasion and cut through. The optional outer PTFE layer 12 generally provides improved thermal aging resistance, chemical resistance, and resistance to electrical arc tracking.

In some embodiments the optional polyimide-to-metal bonding layer and adhesive primer layer can be coated onto the polyimide layer in the form of an aqueous dispersion. The optional polytetrafluoroethylene exterior layer can be applied separately as a porous, sinterable laminate tape and then partially or wholly sintered (and heat-sealed) generally under high temperature to wholly or partially densify and adhere the polytetrafluoroethylene exterior layer to the other layers of the present disclosure.

In some embodiments, additives can be incorporated into one or more of the layers to improve the performance of any particular layer at elevated temperatures.

Wire Warp Formation

Films or sheets of the wire wrap compositions of the present disclosure can be slit into narrow widths to provide tapes. These tapes can then be wound around an electrical conductor in spiral fashion with or without an overlap. The amount of overlap can vary, depending upon the angle of the wrap. The tension employed during the wrapping operation can also vary widely, ranging from just enough tension to prevent wrinkling, to a tension high enough to stretch and neck down the tape. Even when the tension is low, a snug wrap is possible since the tape will often shrink under the influence of heat during any ensuing heat-sealing operation. Heat-sealing of the tape can be accomplished by treating the tape-wrapped conductor at a temperature and time sufficient to fuse the bonding layer to the other layers in the composite. The heat-sealing temperature required ranges generally from 240, 250, 275, 300, 325 or 350° C. to 375, 400, 425, 450, 475 or 500° C., depending upon the insulation thickness, the gauge of the metal conductor, the speed of the production line and the length of the sealing.

EXAMPLES

The invention will be further described in the following examples, which are not intended to limit the scope of the invention described in the claims.

In all examples, for calculations to convert to composition weight percentages to equivalent volume percentages, densities of 4.2 g/cc for the acicular titanium dioxide, 2.75 g/cc for talc, 3.22 g/cc for SiC and 1.42 g/cc for the polyimide were used.

Examples 1-4 demonstrate that the sub-micron filler of the present disclosure at 10 volume percent or higher significantly increase storage modulus and lower CTE when compared to unfilled Comparative Example 1, while maintaining adequate elongation to break.

Example 1 15 Vol % (34.3 Wt %) Acicular TiO2 in PMDA//ODA

25.0 grams of acicular TiO2 (FTL-110, Ishihara Corporation, USA) was combined with 141.11 grams of anhydrous DMAC. This slurry was mixed at high shear for approximately 10 to 15 minutes using Silverson Model L4RT high-shear mixer (Silverson Machines, LTD, Chesham Baucks, England) equipped with a square-hole, high-shear screen (with a blade speed of approximately 4000 rpm).

In a round bottom flask, 74.1 grams of the slurry containing acicular TiO2 was mixed with 116.94 grams of PMDA//ODA prepolymer (20 wt % solution in anhydrous DMAC), and the resulting mixture was stirred for approximately 24 hours. During this operation, a gentle nitrogen gas purge was used in the round bottom flask.

After stirring for approximately 24 hours, this material was filtered through 45 micron filter media (Millipore, 45 micron polypropylene screen, PP4504700).

In a separate container, a 6 wt % solution of pyromellitic anhydride (PMDA) was prepared by combining 9.00 g of PMDA (Aldrich 412287, Allentown, Pa.) and 15 ml of DMAC.

The PMDA solution was slowly added to the prepolymer slurry to achieve a final viscosity of 1090 poise. The formulation was stored overnight at 0° C. to allow it to degas.

The formulation was cast using a 25 mil doctor blade onto a surface of a glass plate to form a 3″×4″ film. The cast film and the glass plate are then soaked in a solution containing 110 ml of 3-picoline (beta picoline, Aldrich, 242845) and 110 ml of acetic anhydride (Aldrich, 98%, P42053).

The film was subsequently lifted off of the glass surface, and mounted on a 3″×4″ pin frame. The mounted film was placed in a furnace (Thermolyne, F6000 box furnace). The furnace was purged with nitrogen and heated according to the following temperature protocol:

40° C. to 125° C. (ramp at 4° C./min)

125° C. to 125° C. (soak 30 min)

125° C. to 250° C. (ramp at 4° C./min)

250° C. (soak 30 min)

250° C. to 400° C. (ramp at 5° C./min)

400° C. (soak 20 min)

The coefficient of thermal expansion was measured by thermomechanical analysis (TMA). A TA Instrument model 2940 was used in tension mode. The instrument was purged with N2 gas at 30-50 ml/min. A mechanical cooler was also used, which allowed temperature of the instrument to rapidly cool down between heating cycles. The film was cut to a 2.0 mm width and 6-9 mm length (in MD or casting direction). The film was clamped lengthwise to a length of 7.5-9.0 mm. A preload tension was set for 5 grams of force. The film was then subjected to heating from 0° C. to 400° C. at 10° C./min rate, held at 400° C. for 3 minutes, and cooled back down to 0° C. A second heating cycle to 400° C. was performed in the same way. The calculations of thermal expansion coefficient in the unit of μm/m-° C. (or pp/° C.) from 60° C. to 400° C. were reported for the casting direction (MD) for the second heating cycle.

Storage modulus (E′) was measured by a Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) instrument was used to characterize the mechanical behavior of the film. The DMA operation was based on the viscoelastic response of polymers subjected to a small oscillatory strain (e.g., 10 μm) as a function of temperature and time (TA Instruments, New Castle, Del., USA, DMA 2980). The films were placed under tension in a multifrequency-strain mode. A finite size of rectangular specimen was clamped between stationary jaws and movable jaws. The films were 6-6.4 mm in width, 0.03-0.05 mm thick and 10 mm in length. The MD direction was used, and the film was fastened with 3 in-lb torque force. The static force in the length direction was 0.05 N with autotension of 125%. The film was heated at frequency of 1 Hz from 0° to 500° C. at a rate of 3° C./min. The storage modulus at 25° C. was measured to be 5757 MPa.

Tensile properties (including % elongation at break) of the films were measured on an Instron model 3345 instrument. Crosshead gap (sample test length) was 1 inch (2.54 centimeters) and width was 0.5 inch (1.27 centimeters). Crosshead speed was 1 inch (2.54 centimeters)/min.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 2 10 Vol % (24.70 Wt %) Acicular TiO2 (FTL-110) in PMDA//ODA

The same procedure as described in Example 1 was followed, with the following exceptions. 54.24 grams of the slurry containing acicular TiO2 (FTL-110, 15 wt % in DMAC) was mixed with 136.15 grams of PMDA//ODA prepolymer (20 wt % in DMAC).

The material was finished with the PMDA solution to a viscosity of 899 poise.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 3 20 Vol % (42.5 Wt %) Acicular TiO2 (FTL-110) in PMDA//ODA

The same procedure as described in Example 1 was followed, with the following exceptions. 57.7 grams of the slurry containing acicular TiO2 (FTL-110, 15 wt % in DMAC, high shear mixed) was combined with 63.3 grams of PMDA//ODA prepolymer (20.6 wt % in DMAC).

The material was finished with the PMDA solution to a viscosity of 1380 poise.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 4 10 Vol % SiC Fibers (20.1 Wt %) in PMDA//ODA

The same procedure as described in Example 1 was followed, except for the following differences. 24.75 grams of SiC fibers (Silar® Silicon Carbide whiskers, beta form, Advanced Composites Materials, Greer, S.C., USA) was combined with 140.25 grams of anhydrous DMAC. The slurry was blended under high shear conditions, as described in Example 1.

45.62 grams of this slurry was combined with 144.44 grams of PMDA//ODA prepolymer (20.6 wt % in DMAC).

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 1 Unfilled PMDA//ODA

The same procedure as described in Example 1 was followed, with the following exceptions. The slurry containing the inorganic particles was not added to the PDMA//ODA prepolymer (prepolymer is 20 wt % in DMAC).

The material was finished with the PMDA solution to a viscosity of 890 poise.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Examples 2-5 demonstrate the sub-micron filler of the present disclosure present below 10 volume percent does not produce a significant increase in storage modulus (especially storage modulii at 500° C.) or decrease CTE (relatively minor improvement in storage modulus and CTE).

Comparative Example 2

2.5 Vol % (7 Wt %) Acicular TiO2 in PMDA//ODA

A procedure similar to that described in Example 1 was used, except for the following differences. 24.08 grams of acicular TiO2 (FTL-110, Ishihara Corporation, USA) was combined with 135.92 grams of anhydrous DMAC, and the slurry mixed at high shear.

10.1 grams of the slurry containing acicular TiO2 was mixed with 109.9 grams of PMDA//ODA prepolymer.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 3 5 Vol % (13.5 Wt %) Acicular TiO2 in PMDA//ODA

A procedure similar to that described in Example 1 was used, except for the following differences. 24.08 grams of acicular TiO2 (FTL-110, Ishihara Corporation, USA) was combined with 135.92 grams of anhydrous DMAC, and the slurry mixed at high shear.

19.1 grams of the slurry containing acicular TiO2 was mixed with 100.9 grams of PMDA//ODA prepolymer.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 4 6.5 Vol % (17.1 Wt %) Acicular TiO2 in PMDA//ODA

A procedure similar to that described in Example 1 was used, except for the following differences. 24.08 grams of acicular TiO2 (FTL-110, Ishihara Corporation, USA) was combined with 135.92 grams of anhydrous DMAC, and the slurry mixed at high shear.

23.96 grams of the slurry containing acicular TiO2 was mixed with 96.1 grams of PMDA//ODA prepolymer.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 5 8.5 Vol % (21.6 Wt %) Acicular TiO2 in PMDA//ODA

A procedure similar to that described in Example 1 was used, except for the following differences. 24.08 grams of acicular TiO2 (FTL-110, Ishihara Corporation, USA) was combined with 135.92 grams of anhydrous DMAC, and the slurry mixed at high shear.

30.0 grams of the slurry containing acicular TiO2 was mixed with 90.0 grams of PMDA//ODA prepolymer.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 6 15 Vol. % (34.3 Wt %) Less than 3:1 Aspect Ratio TiO2 in PMDA//ODA

Comparative Example 6 demonstrates that filler having an aspect ratio less than 3:1 produces a film with lower storage modulus and higher CTE compared to Example 1 which has sub-micron filler with an aspect ratio of at least 3:1 at 15 volume percent. The film was brittle on the edges, and would not be viable in a commercial manufacturing process.

The same procedure as described in Example 1 was followed, with the following exceptions. 33.84 grams of the slurry containing Du Pont Light Stabilized Titania, 210 (DuPont, Wilmington Del., 25 wt % in DMAC, high shear mixed) was combined with 86.2 grams of PMDA//ODA prepolymer (20.6 wt % in DMAC).

The material was finished with the PMDA solution to a viscosity of 1100 poise.

Du Pont Titania 210 is a fine white powder with a distribution of particles centered in the range of 130-140 nm on a weight basis. The particles are roughly spherical.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 7 Unfilled BPDA//PPD

The same procedure as described for Comparative Example 8 was followed, except that acicular TiO2 was not added to the formulation.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Examples 8-9 demonstrate that the sub-micron filler of the present disclosure does not behave predictably in all polyimides. In the case of a BPDA//PPD system, CTE dramatically increases (greater than a factor of 2) with approximately 15 vol % of acicular of TiO2 is introduced.

Comparative Example 8 14.64 Vol % (33.7 Wt %) Acicular TiO2 (FTL-110) in BPDA//PPD

CTE increased with the introduction of acicular TiO2.

BPDA//PPD prepolymer (69.3 g of a 17.5 wt % solution in anhydrous DMAC) was combined with 5.62 g of acicular TiO2 (FTL-110, Ishihara Corporation, USA) and the resulting slurry was stirred for 24 hours. In a separate container, a 6 wt % solution of pyromellitic anhydride (PMDA) was prepared by combining 0.9 g of PMDA (Aldrich 412287, Allentown, Pa.) and 15 ml of DMAC.

The PMDA solution was slowly added to the prepolymer slurry to achieve a final viscosity of 653 poise. The formulation was stored overnight at 0° C. to allow it to degas.

The formulation was cast using a 25 mil doctor blade onto a surface of a glass plate to form a 3″×4″ film. The glass was pretreated with a release agent to facilitate removal of the film from the glass surface. The film was allowed to dry on a hot plate at 80° C. for 20 minutes. The film was subsequently lifted off the surface, and mounted on a 3″×4″ pin frame.

After further drying at room temperature under vacuum for 12 hours, the mounted film was placed in a furnace (Thermolyne, F6000 box furnace). The furnace was purged with nitrogen and heated according to the following temperature protocol:

125° C. (30 min) 125° C. to 350° C. (ramp at 4° C./min) 350° C. (30 min) 350° C. to 450° C. (ramp at 5° C./min) 450° C. (20 min) 450° C. to 40° C. (cooling at 8° C./min)

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 9 14.64 Vol % Acicular TiO2 (FTL-110) in BPDA//PPD

The elongation to break is very low. The film is too brittle to be manufacturable.

The same procedure as described in Example 1 was used, except for the following differences. 33.99 grams of acicular TiO2 (FTL-110, Ishihara Corporation, USA) was combined with 191.9 grams of anhydrous DMAC. This slurry was mixed at high shear for approximately 10 to 15 minutes using Silverson Model L4RT high-shear mixer (Silverson Machines, LTD, Chesham Baucks, England) equipped with a square-hole, high-shear screen (with a blade speed of approximately 4000 rpm).

129.25 g of BPDA//PPD prepolymer (17.5 wt % solution in anhydrous DMAC) was combined with 69.335 grams of the slurry containing acicular TiO2. The resulting slurry was stirred for 24 hours. In a separate container, a 6 wt % solution of pyromellitic anhydride (PMDA) was prepared by combining 0.9 g of PMDA (Aldrich 412287, Allentown, Pa.) and 15 ml of DMAC.

The PMDA solution was slowly added to the prepolymer slurry to achieve a final viscosity of 998 poise.

After chemical imidization the film was lifted off of the glass surface, and mounted on a 3″×4″ pin frame. The mounted film was placed in a furnace (Thermolyne, F6000 box furnace). The furnace was purged with nitrogen and heated according to the following temperature protocol:

125° C. (30 min) 125° C. to 350° C. (ramp at 4° C./min) 350° C. (30 min) 350° C. to 450° C. (ramp at 5° C./min) 450° C. (20 min) 450° C. to 40° C. (cooling at 8° C./min)

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 10 Unfilled PMDA//ODA

Three 180 g portions of a prepolymer of PMDA and ODA (prepared in DMAC at about 20.6%, approximately 50 poise viscosity) were diluted to 18% polymer solids via the addition of 26 g of DMAC to give three 206 g portions of diluted polymers. One of these three diluted prepolymer samples was reacted (“finished”) to a viscosity of about 2100 poise (Brookfield DV-II+ viscometer with a #LV5 spindle) by stepwise additions of a 6 wt % PMDA solution in DMAC with thorough mixing to increase the molecular weight (hereafter referred to as “finished polymer”). After pressure filtering the solution through a polypropylene screen filter disk (45 micron), the solution was degassed under vacuum to remove air bubbles and then this solution was cast onto a letter size sheet of clear polyester film (approximately 3 mil thick). The polyamic acid coating on the polyester sheet was subsequently immersed in a bath containing a 1/1 v/v mixture of acetic anhydride and 3-picoline. After about 2 minutes, once the partially imidized coating began to separate from the polyester sheet, it was removed from the bath and pinned on a approximately 8″×8″ pin frame and allow to stand at room temperature in a lab hood for about 10-20 min. Next, the film on the pin frame was placed in a nitrogen purged oven and after purging at about 40° C. for 30 minutes, this oven was ramped to 320° C. over 70 minutes, held there for 30 minutes, then ramped to 450° C. over about 16 minutes, and held there for 4 minutes, in order to cure to polyimide. After cooling, the resulting 2.4 mil (61 micron) film was removed from the oven and pin frame.

Storage modulus (E′) by Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (TA Instruments, DMA-2980, 5° C./min) was measured by heating from room temperature to 500° C. at 5° C./min.

Coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) by Thermal Mechanical Analysis (TA Instruments, TMA-2940, heat 10° C./min, up to 460° C., then cool and reheat to 500° C.) was evaluated between 50-350° C. on the reheat.

% Tensile Elongation (Instron model 3345 tensile tester)—0.5 in specimen width, 1 inch (2.54 centimeters) gauge length, 1 inch (2.54 centimeters)/min crosshead speed.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 11 5.4 Vol % (10 Wt %) Talc in PMDA//ODA

Comparative Example 11 demonstrates talc below about 5.5 volume percent does not behave predictably.

In a similar manner to Comparative Example 10, a portion of a prepolymer of PMDA and ODA (prepared in DMAC at about 20.6%, approximately 50 poise viscosity) was diluted to 18% polymer solids via the addition of DMAC. Then, the prepolymer was blended with SF310 talc for several minutes in a Thinky ARE-250 centrifugal mixer to yield a dispersion of the filler in the PAA solution, to achieve about a 10 wt % loading in the PI film. Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10. A 1 mil (25 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Examples 5-9 demonstrate talc above about 5.5 volume percent significantly increase storage modulus and lower CTE while maintaining adequate elongation to break.

Example 5 14.0 Vol % (24 Wt %) Talc in PMDA//ODA

The same procedure as described in Example 1 was followed, with the following exceptions. 25 grams of talc (Flextalc 610, Kish Company, Inc., Mentor, Ohio) was mixed, at high shear, with 141 grams of anhydrous DMAC.

55.9 grams of this slurry was mixed with 134.7 grams of PMDA//ODA prepolymer.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 6 18 Vol % (30 Wt %) Talc in PMDA//ODA

In a similar manner to Comparative Example 11, the second of the 206 g portions of the diluted prepolymer from Comparative Example 10 was blended with 14.77 g of Flextalc 610 (Lot M1085, Kish Co., Mentor, Ohio). Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10. Filler loading was approximately 30 wt % in the polyimide film. A 3.2 mil (81 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 7 18.1 Vol % (30 Wt %) Talc in PMDA//ODA

In a similar manner to Comparative Example 11, the third of the 206 g portions of the diluted prepolymer from Comparative Example 10 was blended with 14.77 g of SF310 talc (Kish Co., Mentor, Ohio). Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10. Filler loading was approximately 30 wt % in the polyimide film. A 3.2 mil (81 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 8 34 Vol % (50 Wt %) Talc in PMDA//ODA

In a similar manner to Comparative Example 11, the PMDA//ODA prepolymer was blended with SF310 talc to achieve about a 50 wt % loading in the PI film. Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10 Filler loading was approximately 50 wt % in the polyimide film. A 1.8 mil (46 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 9 43.6 Vol % (60 Wt %) Talc in PMDA//ODA

In a similar manner to Comparative Example 11, the PMDA//ODA prepolymer was blended with SF310 talc to achieve about a 60 wt % loading in the PI film. Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10. A 1.3 mil (33 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Examples 10-11 demonstrate sub-micron fillers of the present disclosure in polyimide copolymers above 10 volume percent significantly increases storage modulus and lowers CTE when compared to unfilled copolymer in Comparative Example 13.

Example 10 18.1 Vol % (30 Wt %) Talc in Random Copolymer of PMDA//ODA/PPD 100//70/30

In a similar manner to Comparative Example 11, a 186.87 g portion of the prepolymer from Comparative Example 13 was blended with 13.13 g of Flextalc 610 (Lot M6734, Kish Co., Mentor, Ohio). Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10. Filler loading was approximately 30 wt % in the polyimide film. A 2.2 mil (56 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 11 12.6 Vol % (30 Wt %) Acicular TiO2 in Random Copolymer of PMDA//ODA/PPD 100//70/30

In a similar manner to Comparative Example 11, a 173 g portion of the prepolymer from Comparative Example 13 was blended with 27 g of a milled/dispersed 45 wt % slurry of acicular TiO2 (FTL-110 powder from Ishihara Corp. (USA)) in DMAC. Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10. Filler loading was approximately 30 wt % in the polyimide film. A 1.1 mil (28 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 12 Unfilled Random Copolymer of PMDA//ODA/PPD 100//70/30

In a 1.5 liter beaker inside a nitrogen purged glove box, 15.118 g of PPD (0.1398 moles) and 65.318 g (0.3262 moles) ODA were added to 779.2 g of DMAC well agitated with a mechanical stirrer. After brief mixing at room temperature, 99.612 g (0.4567 moles) of PMDA was slowly added to maintain the temperature below 40° C., followed by 41.0 g DMAC and the reaction was allowed to proceed for about 2 hours. The resulting prepolymer solution (98% overall stoichiometry of dianhydride to diamine, 18% polymer solids), was decanted into a bottle and stored in a freezer until use. A portion of this prepolymer was finished similarly as in Example A, filtered, and then a film was cast and cured similarly to Comparative Example 10. A 1.4 mil (36 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Examples 12 and 13 demonstrate that a mixture of sub-micron fillers of the present disclosure significantly increase storage modulus and lower CTE when compared to unfilled polyimide in Comparative Example 10.

Example 12 10 Wt % Talc, 20 Wt % Acicular TiO2 in Polymer of PMDA//ODA

A 168.21 g portion of a prepolymer of PMDA and ODA (prepared in DMAC at about 20.6%, approximately 50 poise viscosity) was blended together with 4.60 g SF310 talc and 20.46 g FTL-110 TiO2 (45% slurry as described in Example 11 to achieve 10 wt % and 20 wt % loading respectively of the sub-micron fillers in the PI film (30 wt % total). Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10. A 1.0 mil (25 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 13 20 Wt % Talc, 10 Wt % Acicular TiO2 in Polymer of PMDA//ODA

In a similar manner to Example 12, a 173.13 portion of the PMDA//ODA prepolymer was blended together with 9.45 g SF310 talc and 10.50 g FTL-110 TiO2 (45% slurry as described in Example 11) to achieve 20 wt % and 10 wt % loading respectively of the sub-micron fillers in the PI film (30 wt % total). Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10. A 2.2 mil (56 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Examples 14 and 15 demonstrate a TiO2 sub-micron filler of the present disclosure does not behave in the same manner in all polyimides in regards to CTE.

Example 14 11.7 Vol % Acicular TiO2 (28.23 Wt %) in Block Copolymer of PMDA//ODA/PPD 100//80/20

High aspect ratio TiO2 in the block copolymer of Example 14 significantly increases storage modulus while largely maintaining CTE compared to unfilled block copolymer of Comparative Example 13.

A similar procedure as described in Example 1 was used, except for the following differences. To prepare the prepolymer, 1.36 grams of PPD was combined with 110.0 grams of anhydrous DMAC and stirred, with gentle heating at 40° C. for approximately 20 minutes. 2.71 grams of PMDA was then added to this mixture to create the first block, which was stirred with gentle heating (35-40° C.) for approximately 2.5 hours. The mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature.

To this formulation, 10.10 grams of ODA was added and allowed to dissolve in to the formulation for about 5 minutes. An ice water bath was then used to control the temperature during the subsequent PMDA addition. 10.9 g PMDA was slowly added to this mixture. An addition 15 grams of DMAC was added to the formulation and the reaction was allowed to stir with gentle heat (30-35° C.) for 90 minutes. The mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for approximately 18 hours.

In a separate container, 20.88 grams of acicular TiO2 (FTL-11) was combined with 25.52 g of anhydrous DMAC and 0.426 g of Solplus D540 (Lubrizol) and milled for 24 hours in a jar mill using 8 mm spherical milling media.

14.2 gram of the slurry containing TiO2 was mixed with 105.8 grams of the prepolymer formulation described above.

A modified heating procedure was used, as shown below:

 40° C. to 125° C. (ramp at 4° C./min) 125° C. (soak 30 min) 125° C. to 350° C. (ramp at 4° C./min) 350° C. to 350° C. (soak 30 min) 350° C. to 450° C. (ramp at 5° C./min) 450° C. (soak 20 min)

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 15 17.5 Vol % Acicular TiO2 (38.5 Wt %) in Block Copolymer of PMDA//ODA/PPD 100//80/20

High aspect ratio TiO2 in the block copolymer of 15 significantly increases storage modulus while slightly decreasing CTE in the transverse direction compared to unfilled block copolymer of Comparative Example 13.

A similar procedure as described in Example 1 was used, except for the following differences. To prepare the prepolymer, 1.36 grams of PPD was combined with 113.0 grams of anhydrous DMAC and stirred, with gentle heating at 40° C. for approximately 20 minutes. 2.71 grams of PMDA was then added to this mixture to create the first block, which was stirred with gentle heating (35-40° C.) for approximately 2.5 hours. The mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature.

To this formulation, 10.10 grams of ODA was added and allowed to dissolve in to the formulation for about 5 minutes. An ice water bath was then used to control the temperature during the subsequent PMDA addition. 10.9 g PMDA was slowly added to this mixture. An additional 12 grams of DMAC was added to the formulation and the reaction was allowed to stir with gentle heat (30-35 degrees) for 90 minutes. The mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for approximately 18 hours.

In a separate container, 20.88 grams of acicular TiO2 (FTL-11) was combined with 25.52 g of anhydrous DMAC and 0.426 g of Solplus D540 (Lubrizol) and milled for 24 hours in a 4″ (internal diameter) nylon jar mill using 8 mm spherical milling media, turning at 80 rpm.

15.34 gram of the slurry containing TiO2 was mixed with 72.0 grams of the prepolymer formulation described above.

A modified heating procedure was used, as shown below:

 40° C. to 125° C. (ramp at 4° C./min) 125° C. (soak 30 min) 125° C. to 350° C. (ramp at 4° C./min) 350° C. to 350° C. (soak 30 min) 350° C. to 450° C. (ramp at 5° C./min) 450° C. (soak 20 min)

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 13 Unfilled Block Copolymer of PMDA//ODA/PPD 100//80/20

The same procedure was used as described in Example 15 was used, except that the acicular TiO2 slurry was not added to the formulation. The final viscosity of the formulation was 1000-1200 poise.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Example 1.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 16 12.6 Vol % Acicular TiO2 (30 Wt %) Filled Block Copolymer of PMDA//ODA/PPD 100//70/30

Example 16 demonstrates acicular TiO2 sub-micron filler of the present disclosure does not behave in the same manner in all polyimides in regards to CTE. CTE increases compared to unfilled block copolymer in Comparative Example 14 but still remains in a desirable range.

In a similar manner to Comparative Example 11, a 173 g portion of the prepolymer from Comparative Example 14 was blended with 27 g of a milled/dispersed 45 wt % slurry of acicular TiO2 (FTL-110 powder from Ishihara Corp. (USA)) in DMAC. Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10. Filler loading was approximately 30 wt % in the polyimide film. A 3.0 mil (76 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 14 Unfilled Block Copolymer of PMDA//ODA/PPD 100//70/30

In a 1.5 liter beaker inside a nitrogen purged glove box, 15.115 g of PPD were added to 396.7 g of DMAC well agitated with a mechanical stirrer. After brief mixing at room temperature (some but not all PPD had dissolved), 28.962 g of PMDA was slowly added to maintain the temperature below 40° C. The monomers dissolved and reacted and the polyamic acid (PAA) solution was allowed to stir for 1 hr. Afterwards, the solution was diluted with 382.3 g of DMAC and then 65.304 g ODA was added. This solution was stirred for 30 min and the ODA dissolved into the PAA solution. Subsequently, 70.627 g of PMDA was slowly added, followed by 41.0 g DMAC and the reaction was allowed to proceed for about 2 hours. The resulting prepolymer solution (98% overall stoichiometry of dianhydride to diamine, 18% polymer solids), was decanted into a bottle and stored in a freezer until use. A 180 g portion of this prepolymer was finished as in Comparative Example 10 to about 2200 poise, filtered, and then a film was cast and cured similarly to Comparative Example 10. Properties of the resulting 2.2 mil (56 micron) film.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Examples 17-20 demonstrate block copolymer with talc above about 5.5 volume percent significantly increase storage modulus and maintain CTE while maintaining adequate elongation to break.

Example 17 18.1 Vol % Talc (30 Wt %) Filled Block Copolymer of PMDA//ODA/PPD 100//70/30

A 186.87 g portion of the prepolymer prepared in Comparative Example 14 was blended with 13.13 g of SF-310 talc (Lot M685, Kish Co., Mentor, Ohio) in a similar manner to Comparative Example 11. This filler containing PAA solution was finished similarly as in Comparative Example 10 to yield a viscosity of ca. 2000 poise. The solution was pressured filtered through a 45 micron polypropylene screen and degassed under vacuum to remove air bubbles. A film was cast and cured similarly Comparative Example 10. Filler loading was approximately 30 wt % in the polyimide film. A 2.6 mil (66 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 18 18.1 Vol % Talc (30 Wt %) Filled Block Copolymer of PMDA//ODA/PPD 100//70/30

In a similar manner to Comparative Example 11, a 186.87 g portion of the prepolymer from Comparative Example 14 was blended with 13.13 g of Flextalc 610 (Lot M1085, Kish Co., Mentor, Ohio). Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10. Filler loading was approximately 30 wt % in the polyimide film. A 2.9 mil (74 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 19 25.6 Vol % Talc (40 Wt %) Filled Block Copolymer of PMDA//ODA/PPD 100//70/30

In a similar manner to Comparative Example 15, the PMDA//ODA/PPD 100//70/30 block prepolymer was blended with SF310 talc to achieve about a 40 wt % loading in the PI film. Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10. A 1.8 mil (46 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 20 34 Vol % Talc (50 Wt %) Filled Block Copolymer of PMDA//ODA/PPD 100//70/30

In a similar manner to Comparative Example 14, a block prepolymer was prepared with a 70/30 ratio of ODA to PPD. Then in a similar manner to Comparative Example 11, a 171.75 g portion of this prepolymer was blended with 28.255 g SF310 talc to achieve about a 50 wt % loading in the PI film. Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10. A 1.5 mil (38 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Comparative Example 15 5.4 Vol % Talc (10 Wt %) Filled Block Copolymer of PMDA//ODA/PPD 100//70/30

Comparative Example 15 demonstrates talc below about 5.5 volume percent does not significantly increase storage modulus.

In a similar manner to Comparative Example 14, a block prepolymer was prepared with a 70/30 ratio of ODA to PPD. Then in a similar manner to Comparative Example 11, a 187.16 g portion of this prepolymer was blended with 3.48 g SF310 talc to achieve about a 10 wt % loading in the PI film. Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10. A 1.7 mil (43 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Examples 21-24 illustrate the ability to include additional co-monomers in the compositions of the present invention and still achieve desirable properties.

Example 21 18.1 Vol % (30 Wt %) Talc Filled Block Copolymer of PMDA/BPDA//ODA/PPD 95/5//70/30

In a similar manner to Comparative Example 14, a prepolymer was produced from 14.988 g PPD and 28.720 g PMDA in 393.4 g DMAC, followed by dilution with 386.8 g DMAC, then addition of 64.758 g ODA, and then 6.796 g of BPDA (which was allowed to dissolve/react), then 64.998 g of PMDA, followed by 41.0 g DMAC. A 186.8 g portion of this prepolymer was blended with 13.17 g SF310 talc (Lot M685, Kish Co., Mentor, Ohio) similar to Comparative Example 11, finished as in Comparative Example 10, filtered, and then a film was cast and cured similarly to Comparative Example 10. A 2.0 mil (51 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 22 12.6 Vol % (30 Wt %) Acicular TiO2 Filled Block Copolymer of PMDA/BPDA//ODA/PPD 95/5//70/30

In a similar manner to example 21, a 172.7 g portion of the prepolymer from Example 21 was blended with a 27.3 g portion of the TiO2 slurry as described in example 16. Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10. Filler loading was approximately 30 wt % in the polyimide film. A 2.2 mil (56 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 23 18.1 Vol % (30 Wt %) Talc Filled Block Copolymer of PMDA/BPDA//ODA/PPD 75/25//70/30

In a similar manner to Comparative Example 14, a prepolymer was produced from 14.407 g PPD and 27.607 g PMDA in 378.1 g DMAC, followed by dilution with 401 g DMAC, then addition of 62.249 g ODA, and then 32.666 g of BPDA (which was allowed to dissolve/react), then 43.106 g of PMDA, followed by 41.0 g DMAC. A 186.8 g portion of this prepolymer was blended with 13.17 g SF310 talc (Lot M685, Kish Co., Mentor, Ohio) similar to Comparative Example 11, finished, cast and cured similarly to Comparative Example 10. A 1.7 mil (43 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 24 12.6 Vol % (30 Wt %) Acicular TiO2 Filled Block Copolymer of PMDA/BPDA//ODA/PPD 75/25//70/30

In a similar manner to Example 23, a 172.7 g portion of the prepolymer from Example 23 was blended with a 27.3 g portion of the TiO2 slurry as described in Example 16. Finishing, filtration, casting and curing was similar to as described in Comparative Example 10. A 2.3 mil (58 micron) film was produced.

CTE, E′ and % elongation at break were measured as in Comparative Example 10.

Results are shown in Table 1.

The following Examples demonstrate the impact on properties of a particulate (less than 3:1 aspect ratio) vs. a high aspect ratio (greater than 3:1 aspect) ratio platelet filler on the properties of a polyimide film. The platelet filler results in advantageously higher modulus and lower CTE at equivalent weight loadings. (Note that although the average particle sizes of these two fillers appear significantly different (platelet is significantly larger) via particle size analysis (Horiba LA-930 particle size analyzer), it is believed that the effect on properties is largely due to the filler shape, rather than any differences in average particle size).

Comparative Example 16 (40 Wt %) Less than 3:1 Aspect Ratio Al2O3 (Particulate) in PMDA//ODA

A portion of a polyamic acid prepolymer of PMDA and ODA (prepared in DMAC at about 20.6%, approximately 50 poise viscosity) was blended with particulate alumina filler (Martoxid MZS-1, Albermarle Corporation) in a Silverson (model L4RT-A) high shear mixer. The amount of alumina was chosen so as to ultimately yield a final polyimide film with a 40 wt % loading of alumina in polyimide. The polyamic acid was then further reacted (“finished”) to a viscosity of about 537 poise (Brookfield DV-II+ viscometer with a #LV5 spindle) by stepwise additions of a 6 wt % PMDA solution in DMAC with thorough mixing via a high torque mechanical mixer/stir blade. The polymer was subsequently cast onto a glass plate and heated to about 80° C. until a tack free film was obtained. The film was carefully peeled from the glass and placed on a pin frame and placed in a circulating air oven and the temperature slowly ramped to 320° C. and held there for 30 minute. Next, the film was removed from the 320° C. oven and place in a 400° C. air oven for 5 minutes. Afterwards, the polyimide film on the pin frame was removed from the oven and allowed to cool to room temperature. The film was then separated from the pin frame.

E′ was measured as in Comparative Example 10. CTE was measured on the same instrument and at the same rate as Comparative Example 10 except that the sample was heated to 380° C., then cooled and reheated to 380° C.) and evaluated between 50-350° C. on the reheat.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Example 25 (40 Wt %) Greater than 3:1 Aspect Ratio Al2O3 (Platy) in PMDA//ODA

In a similar manner to Comparative Example 16, a portion of the PMDA//ODA prepolymer was blended with a platelet-shaped alumina (“Platyl” from Advanced Nanotechnology Limited, Australia) at the same loading level as the particular alumina from Comparative Example 16 and finished to a Brookfield viscosity of 502 poise). This filled polymer solution was cast and thermally cured as in Comparative Example 16.

E′ was measured as in Comparative Example 10. CTE was measured on the same instrument and at the same rate as Comparative Example 16.

Results are shown in Table 1.

Note that not all of the activities described above in the general description or the examples are required, that a portion of a specific activity may not be required, and that further activities may be performed in addition to those described. Still further, the order in which each of the activities are listed are not necessarily the order in which they are performed. After reading this specification, skilled artisans will be capable of determining what activities can be used for their specific needs or desires.

In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and any figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.

Benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described above with regard to specific embodiments. However, the benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or element of any or all the claims.

When an amount, concentration, or other value or parameter is given as either a range, preferred range or a list of upper values and lower values, this is to be understood as specifically disclosing all ranges formed from any pair of any upper range limit or preferred value and any lower range limit or preferred value, regardless of whether ranges are separately disclosed. Where a range of numerical values is recited herein, unless otherwise stated, the range is intended to include the endpoints thereof, and all integers and fractions within the range. It is not intended that the scope of the invention be limited to the specific values recited when defining a range.

TABLE 1 Equivalent vol %, using density of 1.42 g/c for polymer, 4.2 g/cc % for acicular TENSILE TiO2, E′ at 50° C. ELON- 2.75 g/cc (unless E′ at CTE CTE GATION POLYMER for talc, 3.22 otherwise 300° C., E′ at 480° C. MD, TD, to Break (ODA/PPD ratio) Filler wt % g/cc for SiC noted) GPa GPa GPa ppm/C. ppm/C. MD/TD  1 PMDA/ODA Acicular TiO2, 34.3 15.00 5.7 (25° C.) 3.2 0.854 (500° C.)  24.0 26.4 35.6 MD  2 PMDA/ODA Acicular TiO2, 24.7 10.00 6.2 (25° C.) 3.5 0.875 (500° C.)  24.6 32.4  3 PMDA/ODA Acicular TiO2, 42.5 20.00 6.14 (25° C.)  3.6 1.02 (500° C.) 27.1 17.4  4 PMDA/ODA SiC fiber 20.1 10.00 5.3 (25° C.) 2.7 0.27 (500° C.) 22.0 31.2 35.8 MD Comp. 1 PMDA/ODA None 0 0.00 3.5 (25° C.) 1.8  0.4 (500° C.) 38.4 39.6 Comp. 2 PMDA/ODA acicular TiO2, 7 2.50 3.9 (25° C.) 2.1 0.51 (500° C.) 38.0 38.6 Comp. 3 PMDA/ODA acicular TiO2, 13.5 5.00 4.4 (25° C.) 2.3 0.55 (500° C.) 31.0 36.8 Comp. 4 PMDA/ODA acicular TiO2, 17.1 6.50 4.4 (25° C.) 2.4 0.61 (500° C.) 30.0 33.8 Comp. 5 PMDA/ODA acicular TiO2, 21.6 8.50 4.3 (25° C.) 2.2 0.51 (500° C.) 32.9 34.1 Comp 6 PMDA/ODA Spherical 34.3 15.00 4.42 (25° C.)  2.2 0.48 (500° C.) 37.7 43.5 TiO2, Comp. 7 BPDA/PPD None 0 0.00 10.8 Comp. 8 BPDA/PPD acicular TiO2, 33.7 14.64 23.0 Comp. 9 BPDA/PPD all acicular TiO2, 33.7 14.64 6 rigid rod Comp. PMDA/ODA None 0 0.00 2.9 0.29 43.0 42.0 10 Comp. PMDA/ODA Talc 10 5.42 3.0 0.21 29.0 23.0 126/136 11  5 PMDA/ODA Talc 24 14.02 5.7 (25° C.) 25.4  6 PMDA/ODA Talc 30 18.08 5.8 0.78 24.0 23.0 178/181  7 PMDA/ODA Talc 30 18.08 5.4 0.86 21.0 19.0 171/148  8 PMDA/ODA Talc 50 34.00 8.9 1.20 11.0 13.0 56/73  9 PMDA/ODA Talc 60 43.60 11.1  1.96 8.0 9.0 42/56 10 PMDA//ODA/PPD Talc 30 18.08 7.1 1.17 13.0 17.0 63/41 Random (70/30) 11 PMDA//ODA/PPD acicular TiO2, 30 12.64 6.3 0.87 18.0 25.0 27/45 Random (70/30) Comp. PMDA//ODA/PPD None 0 0.00 4.5 0.45 23.0 25.0 122/123 12 Random (70/30) 12 PMDA/ODA Talc 10 wt % 7.3 0.94 21.0 29.0 69/72 TiO2, 20 wt % 13 PMDA/ODA Talc 20 wt % 5.9 0.94 19.0 21.0 76/78 TiO2, 10 wt % 14 PMDA//ODA/PPD acicular TiO2, 28.23 11.74 6.8 (25° C.) 4.0  1.5 (500° C.) 23.0 21.0 80/20 15 PMDA//ODA/PPD acicular TiO2, 38.5 17.50 7.1 (25° C.) 4.1  1.3 (500° C.) 20.0 17.5 80/20 Comp. PMDA//ODA/PPD None 0 0.00 3.5 2.0  1.2 (500° C.) 23.0 24.0 13 80/20 16 PMDA//ODA/PPD acicular TiO2, 30 12.64 7.5 1.22 15.0 14.0 41/53 70/30 Comp. PMDA//ODA/PPD None 0 0.00 5.2 0.70 7.0 9.0 107/124 14 70/30 17 PMDA//ODA/PPD Talc 30 18.08 6.9 1.24 9.0 9.0 84/69 70/30 18 PMDA//ODA/PPD Talc 30 18.08 7.4 1.34 8.0 13.0 62/54 70/30 19 PMDA//ODA/PPD Talc 40 25.62 9.5 1.80 10.0 9.0 58/52 70/30 20 PMDA//ODA/PPD Talc 50 34.00 11.1  2.60 8.0 7.0 31/41 70/30 Comp. PMDA//ODA/PPD Talc 10 5.42 5.4 0.72 9.0 4.0 60/66 15 70/30 21 PMDA/BPDA// Talc 30 18.08 9.7 (25° C.) 1.42 (498° C.) 6.0 10.0 60/80 ODA/PPD 95/5//70/30 22 PMDA/BPDA// acicular TiO2, 30 12.64 8.3 (25° C.) 1.26 (498° C.) 11.0 17.0 40/56 ODA/PPD 95/5//70/30 23 PMDA/BPDA// Talc 30 18.08 10.9 (25° C.)  0.88 (498° C.) 8.0 11.0 51/38 ODA/PPD 75/25//70/30 24 PMDA/BPDA// acicular TiO2, 30 12.64   9 (25° C.) 0.61 (498° C.) 11.0 20.0 32/68 ODA/PPD 75/25//70/30 Comp. PMDA/ODA particle Al2O3 40 4.1 0.28 52.0 16 25 PMDA/ODA platy Al2O3 40 6.6 1.10 20.0

Claims

1. A wire wrap composition comprising:

A) a polyimide layer, having a first surface and a second surface, the polyimide layer having a thickness from 5 to 150 microns, the polyimide layer comprising: a) a polyimide derived from: i) at least one aromatic dianhydride component selected from the group consisting of rigid rod dianhydride, non-rigid rod dianhydride and combinations thereof, and ii) at least one aromatic diamine component selected from the group consisting of rigid rod diamine, non-rigid rod diamine and combinations thereof; wherein the mole ratio of dianhydride to diamine is 48-52:52-48 and the ratio of X:Y is 20-80:80-20 where X is the mole percent of rigid rod dianhydride and rigid rod diamine, and Y is the mole percent of non-rigid rod dianhydride and non-rigid rod diamine based upon the total dianhydride component and total diamine component of the polyimide; and b) a sub-micron filler: i) being less than 550 nanometers (as a numerical average) in at least one dimension; ii) having an aspect ratio greater than 3:1; iii) being less than the polyimide layer thickness in all dimensions; and iv) being present in an amount from 10 to 45 volume percent of the polyimide layer; and
B) a bonding layer having a first surface and a second surface, the bonding layer first surface being adjacent to the polyimide layer first surface, the bonding layer comprising: i) a poly(tetrafluoroethylene-co-perfluoro[alkyl vinyl ether]) in an amount from 65 to 100 weight percent based on the total weight of the bonding layer, or ii) a polyimide adhesive.

2. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 1, wherein the sub-micron filler is less than 400 nanometers in at least one dimension.

3. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 1, wherein the sub-micron filler is selected from the group consisting of oxides, nitrides, carbides and combinations thereof.

4. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 1, wherein the sub-micron filler is acicular titanium dioxide, talc, SiC fiber, platy Al2O3 or mixtures thereof.

5. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 1, wherein:

a) at least 70 mole percent of the aromatic dianhydride component is pyromellitic dianhydride; and
b) at least 70 mole percent of the aromatic diamine component is 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether.

6. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 5, wherein the sub-micron filler is acicular titanium dioxide, talc, SiC fiber, platy Al2O3 or mixtures thereof.

7. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 1, wherein:

a) at least 75 mole percent of the aromatic dianhydride component is pyromellitic dianhydride; and
b) 70 mole percent 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether and 30 mole percent 1,4 diaminobenzene as the aromatic diamine component.

8. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 1 wherein the polyimide is a block copolymer.

9. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 8 wherein the block copolymer is derived from 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether and 1,4 diaminobenzene with pyromellitic dianhydride and 3,3′,4,4′-biphenyl tetracarboxylic dianhydride.

10. The wire wrap in accordance with claim 8 wherein the block copolymer is derived from:

a) 10 to 40 mole percent blocks of pyromellitic dianhydride and 1,4 diaminobenzene;
b) 90 to 60 mole percent blocks of pyromellitic dianhydride and 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether.

11. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 10, wherein the sub-micron filler is acicular titanium dioxide, talc, SiC fiber, platy Al2O3 or mixtures thereof.

12. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 1, wherein the sub-micron filler is coated with a coupling agent, a dispersant or a combination thereof.

13. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 1 additionally comprising a polyimide-to-metal bonding layer in contact with the polyimide layer second surface, the polyimide-to-metal bonding layer comprising from 70 to 100 weight percent poly(tetrafluoroethylene-co-hexafluoropropylene) based on the total weight of the polyimide-to-metal bonding layer.

14. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 1 additionally comprising adhesive primer layer in contact with and between the polyimide layer first surface and the bonding layer first surface, the adhesive primer layer comprising from 70 to 100 weight percent poly(tetrafluoroethylene-co-hexafluoropropylene) based on the total weight of the adhesive primer layer.

15. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 1 additionally comprising a polytetrafluoroethylene exterior layer in contact with the bonding layer second surface.

16. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 15 wherein the polytetrafluoroethylene exterior layer is partially or wholly sintered.

17. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 1 wherein the polyimide is a random copolymer derived from 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether and 1,4 diaminobenzene with pyromellitic dianhydride and 3,3′,4,4′-biphenyl tetracarboxylic dianhydride.

18. The wire wrap composition in accordance with claim 1 wherein the polyimide is a random copolymer derived from 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether and 1,4 diaminobenzene with pyromellitic dianhydride.

Patent History
Publication number: 20120231264
Type: Application
Filed: Nov 19, 2010
Publication Date: Sep 13, 2012
Applicant: E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company (Wilmington)
Inventors: Brian C. Auman (Avondale, PA), Meredith L. Dunbar (Canal Winchester, OH), Tao He (Wilmington, DE), Kostantinos Kourtakis (Media, PA)
Application Number: 13/510,662