Method and System for Unified Searching and Incremental Searching Across and Within Multiple Documents
A user-interface system and method for searching among multiple documents and searching for subsections within individual documents using a single search interface on an input-constrained user device having a screen and a keypad.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/867,384, filed Apr. 22, 2013, entitled Method and System for Unified Searching and Incremental Searching Across and Within Multiple Documents, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/657,429, filed Oct. 22, 2012, entitled Method and System for Unified Searching and Incremental Searching Across and Within Multiple Documents, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,429,158, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/126,409 filed on May 23, 2008, entitled Method and System for Unified Searching and Incremental Searching Across and Within Multiple Documents, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,296,294, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/940,136, filed on May 25, 2007, the contents of each of which are incorporated by reference herein.
FIELD OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention relates to user interfaces for searching and browsing and, more specifically, to user interfaces for searching within a document and across multiple documents.
DISCUSSION OF RELATED ARTCurrently, searching within a document and searching across documents requires two separate interfaces. Users typically search across documents using either a search engine, such as Google or a site specific search (such as Wikipedia search, Amazon search, etc.). Users typically search within a document using the functionality provided by web browsers, such as Internet Explorer or Firefox. There has not been a great need from a usability standpoint to combine these two interfaces, particularly on desktop or laptop computers, because they have enough screen space to display both at the same time, a full QWERTY keypad, and easy random access to any point on the screen using a mouse/touch pad interface. The need to display all matches for an input search term is addressed by Google (via a browser add-in) by highlighting the search matches in a document (see FIG. 1)—the user then must visually identify the right section of the document by looking for the highlighted matched locations (which may require the user to scroll through the document).
This approach works well on devices with large displays, but on display constrained devices, the user must expend considerable effort to navigate through pages to find the matches. The Firefox browser's find interface (see prior Art II) reduces the effort to find the matches by navigating to each match sequentially with the touch of an interface button (“Next”). However, the matches can span across pages, making the navigation process cumbersome. The context information surrounding the match in some cases can be more than a page of information, which, in most cases, is too much information to visually scan quickly. This is particularly true on display constrained devices, where a “page” of information is a relatively small amount of text.
To summarize, a common approach of the various search interfaces (e.g. web sites such as Google, Amazon, US Patent Office, and browsers such as Firefox browser, Internet Explorer, etc.), for handling searches within a document and across a document is separating the text input interfaces for searching across the document and for searching within the document. The former is typically done using a search engine or a web site and the latter using a browser search interface applied to the downloaded document. Furthermore, the process of searching within a document is typically a sequential traversal of “within document” matches with surrounding context information associated with each match being the actual document content itself. These interface approaches, while they may be convenient for personal computer devices with large screens and full, unambiguous keyboards, are highly cumbersome on mobile and television-like devices that are input and/or display constrained.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThis invention provides user-interface methods and systems for searching among multiple documents and searching for subsections within individual documents using a single searching interface on an input-constrained user device having a screen and a keypad, the method comprising displaying a text input component, receiving a set of query terms in said text input component, receiving, responsive to the received query terms, a set of document bookmarks and a set of document pointers referring to documents within a widely-distributed computer network, allowing the user to select from among these document bookmarks and pointers, and displaying the selected document beginning at a point within said document, if a document bookmark is selected, or at the beginning of the document, if a document pointer is selected.
Under another aspect of the invention, the document bookmarks are generated by retrieving the contents of the document and inferring its structure.
Under another aspect of the invention, the document bookmarks relate to documents that have been previously selected by the user.
Under another aspect of the invention, the document bookmarks are generated by retrieving the contents of the document and inferring its structure, after the user has selected said document.
Under another aspect of the invention, indicators are displayed adjacent to the displayed document pointers, in order to distinguish the displayed document pointers from the displayed document bookmarks.
Under another aspect of the invention, the keypad of the device may be an overloaded keypad that produced ambiguous text input.
For a more complete understanding of various embodiments of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
Embodiments of the present invention provide a unified interface that enables a user to search across multiple documents and within a particular document using a single search query input. The interface enables the user to identify possible documents of interest as well as specific sections within those identified documents that are relevant to the user's query input. The interface enables a user to maintain and refine query information as the user moves among searching for documents, searching within a selected document, and viewing the content of the documents. The unified interface operates on an “index” associated with a document, described below, in order to present the most relevant sections of multiple documents in a small display area. Thus, the interface is particularly beneficial to a user of a display-constrained device in the sense that it enables the user to quickly identify sections of interest in various documents.
As used herein, the term “index” is intended to represent any organization of the contents of a document. The index on which the interface operates can be created, for example, by the document author, by another individual, or by a separate document indexing step or process. The index can be a separate entity or can be incorporated in the document itself. For example, an index could simply be headings of a document, or an index could be named anchors within an HTML document. This indexing can be performed in advance, or on-the-fly during the search process. The document may be of any type: standard techniques may be used to parse plain text and HTML documents, and there are many tools that permit on-the-fly extraction of data from binary files in proprietary formats (e.g., Microsoft Word, Adobe PDF, etc.).
For example, when the user enters an incremental search input query “dopam” [404], a search engine connected to the interface [401] returns a set of results [405] matching “dopamine”. These results [405] are presented in results section [403]. As described in the applications incorporated above, results can be selected based on descriptive terms and/or metadata associated with the documents.
Referring to
Screens 600, 610, and 620 of
In this example, the user finds the biochemistry section to be of interest. Thus, the user acts on one of an array of selectable actions [604] to retrieve and view the contents of the biochemistry section of the document [501]. The interface responds by presenting the contents of the document, starting at the biochemistry section [601], in place of the results list portion of the screen. Meanwhile, because the user is still within the same overall document [501], the context has not changed, and thus the text input portion [602] remains set to “dopamine”.
The user is then able to read the portion of the document [501] describing the biochemistry of dopamine. Because the interface has presented the entire contents of the document, the user is able to scroll within the document to review other sections of that document. In addition, the interface enables the user to initiate a new search, starting with the context of the current document, namely, the “dopamine” context. Referring to screen [620] of
In the illustration, the user has entered “parkin”, to represent “Parkinson's disease”, as an additional search criterion. The interface adds this search term to text input portion [602] and submits the query to the search engine. Again, as described above, this query can be an incremental query.
The search engine searches both the current document [501], as well as the search space outside the current document. Thus, the result set for the new combined query presented in the content display portion [601] includes links to sections of the current document [501] as well as links to new documents. The interface can optionally provide an indication [606] to shown which results are external to the current document. In screen [620], the result “Disorders (Parkinson's)” does not have the indication [606] because it is linked to a section of the document [501] that is relevant to the combined query. By automatically getting results that do not belong to the current document and listing them after the results in the current document, it enables the user to get to his desired result faster.
Upon the user selecting the result [607], “Disorders (Parkinson's)”, the interface presents the contents of the document [501], starting at the “Disorders (Parkinson's)” section, as described above in connection with the biochemistry section. This is illustrated in screen 700 of
From this screen [710], the user may select an external result [703], “Parkinson's disease”, which corresponds to document 503 of
As for the fourth criterion above, if the user had searched for “Parkinson's” (or an incremental entry that matches “Parkinson's”) outside of any document context, the interface would have returned a set of results that included links to documents 501 and 503 because these documents contain content relevant to Parkinson's. However, because the indexed subject for document 501 is “dopamine” rather “Parkinson's”, the entries in the result set for document 501 would link to the sections within the document that match the “Parkinson's” query term. However, because the indexed subject for document 503 and the query term match (i.e. both contain “Parkinson's”) the entry in the result set for document 503 would link directly to the content of that document. Documents are preferably indexed under only one subject. However, in systems where documents are indexed under a number of subjects, the content of the document will be directly linked if the search terms match any of the subjects associated with the document.
Thus, implementations of the invention enable the reordering of sections of documents in a way that presents the information most relevant to the search query in an easily accessible manner. Documents whose indexed subjects do not match the query terms, but have sections within them that do match the query terms, are represented so as to enable the user to link directly to the relevant material without having to scan through less relevant sections. As mentioned above, these aspects are particularly helpful when implemented on display constrained devices, on which scanning through large amounts of information is particularly burdensome.
To summarize, embodiments of the present invention provide for a single user interface that enables the user to search across and within documents. The matches within a document are presented in the same manner as those results of searches across multiple documents. This unified interface enables the user to quickly identify matches within a document for a query and select it. Furthermore, the interface seamlessly enables the user to switch between searching within a document and searching across documents simply by clearing the document context displayed in the text input portion of the interface.
It will be appreciated that the scope of the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, but rather is defined by the appended claims; and that these claims will encompass modifications of and improvements to what has been described.
Claims
1-16. (canceled)
17. A method for searching media, the method comprising:
- receiving a first search query;
- receiving user selection of a first query result generated based on the first search query;
- setting, responsive to the user selection, a query context associated with the selected first query result; and
- in response to receiving a second search query, generating for display a second query result based on the second search query and the query context.
18. The method of claim 17, further comprising receiving a set of document index section indicators responsive to the received first search query, wherein each document index section indicator specifically identifies a point within an associated document.
19. The method of claim 18, further comprising generating for display a document index section indicator of the set of document index section indicators as the first query result.
20. The method of claim 19, further comprising generating for display, in response to receiving the user selection of the document index section indicator, the associated document beginning at the identified point.
21. The method of claim 18, wherein the received set of document index section indicators point to documents that have been previously selected by the user.
22. The method of claim 17, further comprising:
- receiving a set of document pointers responsive to the received first search query, wherein each document pointer specifically identifies a document; and
- generating for display a document pointer of the set of document pointers as the first query result.
23. The method of claim 22, further comprising generating for display an identified document corresponding to the first query result selected by the user.
24. The method of claim 17, further comprising generating for display the query context prior to receiving the second search query.
25. The method of claim 17, wherein the query context is the first query result.
26. The method of claim 17, wherein the first search query and the second search query are received from an overloaded keyboard.
27. A system for searching media, the system comprising:
- processing circuitry configured to:
- receive a first search query;
- receive user selection of a first query result; and
- receive a second search query; generate the first query result based on the first search query; set a query context associated with the selected first query result responsive to receiving the user selection; and
- display circuitry configured to generate for display a second query result based on the second search query and the query context in response to the user input circuitry receiving the second search query.
28. The system of claim 27, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to receive a set of document index section indicators responsive to the received first search query, wherein each document index section indicator specifically identifies a point within an associated document.
29. The system of claim 28, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to generate for display a document index section indicator of the set of document index section indicators as the first query result.
30. The system of claim 29, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to generate for display, in response to receiving the user selection of the document index section indicator, the associated document beginning at the identified point.
31. The system of claim 28, wherein the received set of document index section indicators point to documents that have been previously selected by the user.
32. The system of claim 27, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to receive a set of document pointers responsive to the received first search query, wherein each document pointer specifically identifies a document, and wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to generate for display a document pointer of the set of document pointers as the first query result.
33. The system of claim 32, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to generate for display an identified document corresponding to the first query result selected by the user.
34. The system of claim 27, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to generate for display the query context prior to receiving the second search query.
35. The system of claim 27, wherein the query context is the first query result.
36. The system of claim 27, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to receive the first search query and the second search query from an overloaded keyboard.
Type: Application
Filed: Nov 10, 2014
Publication Date: May 21, 2015
Inventors: Rakesh BARVE (Bangalore), Sashikumar VENKATARAMAN (Andover, MA)
Application Number: 14/536,914