SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT PORTAL
A project management portal includes a graphical user interface (GUI) that includes a task list window that displays a plurality of selectable task cards, each corresponding to an assigned task, and a task details window that displays information for a task corresponding to a selected task card within the a task list window. The task details window may include an activity field that allows comments about the selected task to be exchanged between multiple users. Some tasks within the task list window may be dependent upon other tasks. Further, completion of the selected task may activate a follow-up task.
This application claims priority from and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/668,038, entitled “INTEGRATED TOOL AND APPLICATION SUPPORT,” filed May 7, 2018, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes.
BACKGROUNDThe present disclosure relates generally to tools for managing completion of a project by multiple people. Specifically, the present disclosure relates to software tools for assigning and monitoring the performance of tasks by multiple people during the undertaking and completion of the project.
This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art that may be related to various aspects of the present disclosure, which are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present disclosure. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
Organizations, regardless of size, rely upon access to information technology (IT) and data and services for their continued operation and success. A respective organization's IT infrastructure may have associated hardware resources (e.g. computing devices, load balancers, firewalls, switches, etc.) and software resources (e.g. productivity software, database applications, custom applications, and so forth). Over time, more and more organizations have turned to cloud computing approaches to supplement or enhance their IT infrastructure solutions.
Cloud computing relates to the sharing of computing resources that are generally accessed via the Internet. In particular, a cloud computing infrastructure allows users, such as individuals and/or enterprises, to access a shared pool of computing resources, such as servers, storage devices, networks, applications, and/or other computing based services. By doing so, users are able to access computing resources on demand that are located at remote locations, which resources may be used to perform a variety computing functions (e.g., storing and/or processing large quantities of computing data). For enterprise and other organization users, cloud computing provides flexibility in accessing cloud computing resources without accruing large up-front costs, such as purchasing expensive network equipment or investing large amounts of time in establishing a private network infrastructure. Instead, by utilizing cloud computing resources, users are able redirect their resources to focus on their enterprise's core functions.
In modern communication networks, examples of cloud computing services a user may utilize include so-called infrastructure as a service (IaaS), software as a service (SaaS), and platform as a service (PaaS) technologies. IaaS is a model in which providers abstract away the complexity of hardware infrastructure and provide rapid, simplified provisioning of virtual servers and storage, giving enterprises access to computing capacity on demand. In such an approach, however, a user may be left to install and maintain platform components and applications. SaaS is a delivery model that provides software as a service rather than an end product. Instead of utilizing a local network or individual software installations, software is typically licensed on a subscription basis, hosted on a remote machine, and accessed by client customers as needed. For example, users are generally able to access a variety of enterprise and/or information technology (IT)-related software via a web browser. PaaS acts an extension of SaaS that goes beyond providing software services by offering customizability and expandability features to meet a user's needs. For example, PaaS can provide a cloud-based developmental platform for users to develop, modify, and/or customize applications and/or automating enterprise operations without maintaining network infrastructure and/or allocating computing resources normally associated with these functions.
Managing the undertaking and completion of a project by a team of people that includes people internal to an enterprise (e.g., employees) and people external to the enterprise (e.g., contractors, auditors, vendors, partners, etc.) may be slowed down and made less efficient by the unavailability or dispersed nature of relevant data and excessive communication. A project manager may communicate with members of a team via multiple channels, some of which may not leave a record of the communication. For example, exchanges may take place in person, via telephone, text message, email, a chat or message client, etc. This dispersed communication may make it difficult for the project management to maintain records of tasks being performed as part of the project. In some cases, the project manager may opt to send another status inquiry rather than spend time finding a record of a previous exchange with a team member. Moreover, the dispersed nature of information regarding the status of tasks within the project may cause the project manager to send an excessive number of status update inquiries to team members, such that team members spend more time providing status updates and less time completing tasks that advance the project toward completion.
SUMMARYA summary of certain embodiments disclosed herein is set forth below. It should be understood that these aspects are presented merely to provide the reader with a brief summary of these certain embodiments and that these aspects are not intended to limit the scope of this disclosure. Indeed, this disclosure may encompass a variety of aspects that may not be set forth below.
The present disclosure includes a project management portal with a graphical user interface (GUI) having a task list window that displays a plurality of selectable task cards, each corresponding to a task that has been assigned to a user, and a task details window that displays information for the task corresponding to a selected task card within the a task list window. The task details window may include an activity field that allows comments about the selected task to be exchanged between multiple users. In some embodiments, some tasks within the task list window may be dependent upon other tasks, such that data produced during performance of a first task acts as an input to be used during performance of a second task. Further, completion of a first selected task may generate or activate a follow-up task. The project management portal may allow for tasks to be scheduled, either on a one-time or recurring basis. Further, in some embodiments, the project management portal may be configured to integrate with one or more enterprise resource planning (ERP) products. Specifically, the project management portal may allow for mapping various aspects of multiple ERPs to facilitate the sharing of data, either between ERPs or between one or more ERPs and the project management portal.
Various refinements of the features noted above may exist in relation to various aspects of the present disclosure. Further features may also be incorporated in these various aspects as well. These refinements and additional features may exist individually or in any combination. For instance, various features discussed below in relation to one or more of the illustrated embodiments may be incorporated into any of the above-described aspects of the present disclosure alone or in any combination. The brief summary presented above is intended only to familiarize the reader with certain aspects and contexts of embodiments of the present disclosure without limitation to the claimed subject matter.
Various aspects of this disclosure may be better understood upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings in which:
One or more specific embodiments will be described below. In an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, not all features of an actual implementation are described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and enterprise-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
As used herein, the term “computing system” refers to an electronic computing device such as, but not limited to, a single computer, virtual machine, virtual container, host, server, laptop, and/or mobile device, or to a plurality of electronic computing devices working together to perform the function described as being performed on or by the computing system. As used herein, the term “medium” refers to one or more non-transitory, computer-readable physical media that together store the contents described as being stored thereon. Embodiments may include non-volatile secondary storage, read-only memory (ROM), and/or random-access memory (RAM). As used herein, the term “application” refers to one or more computing modules, programs, processes, workloads, threads and/or a set of computing instructions executed by a computing system. Example embodiments of an application include software modules, software objects, software instances and/or other types of executable code.
An enterprise may wish to complete a project or other series of tasks (e.g., a joint venture, collaborative project, financial close, audit, consulting, etc.) using a team of individuals that includes one or more individuals that are internal to the enterprise (e.g., employees of the enterprise) and one or more individuals that are external to the enterprise (e.g., contractors, consultants, vendors, partners, etc.). Accordingly, the disclosed techniques include a project management portal (e.g., a graphical user interface or GUI) by which individuals internal and external to the enterprise may coordinate performance of tasks and communicate with one another to complete the project. The GUI may include a task list window that displays a plurality of selectable task cards, each corresponding to a task that has been assigned to a user, and a task details window that displays information for the task corresponding to a selected task card within the a task list window. The task details window may include an activity field that allows comments about the selected task to be exchanged between multiple users. In some embodiments, some tasks may be dependent upon other tasks, such that data produced during performance of a first task is input or otherwise utilized during performance of a second task. Further, completion of a first selected task may activate a follow-up task. The project management portal may allow for tasks to be scheduled, either on a one-time or recurring basis. Further, the project management portal may allow for mapping various aspects of multiple enterprise resource planning (ERPs) products to facilitate the sharing of data, either between ERPs or between one or more ERPs and the project management portal. By enabling communication within the portal, progress may be easily tracked within the portal rather than relying on one or more various types of other communication (e.g., email, one or more chat clients, SMS text message, phone call, etc.).
With the preceding in mind, the following figures relate to various types of generalized system architectures or configurations that may be employed to provide services to an organization in a multi-instance framework and on which the present approaches may be employed. Correspondingly, these system and platform examples may also relate to systems and platforms on which the techniques discussed herein may be implemented or otherwise utilized. Turning now to
For the illustrated embodiment,
In
To utilize computing resources within the platform 16, network operators may choose to configure the data centers 18 using a variety of computing infrastructures. In one embodiment, one or more of the data centers 18 are configured using a multi-tenant cloud architecture, such that one of the server instances 26 handles requests from and serves multiple customers. Data centers 18 with multi-tenant cloud architecture commingle and store data from multiple customers, where multiple customer instances are assigned to one of the virtual servers 26. In a multi-tenant cloud architecture, the particular virtual server 26 distinguishes between and segregates data and other information of the various customers. For example, a multi-tenant cloud architecture could assign a particular identifier for each customer in order to identify and segregate the data from each customer. Generally, implementing a multi-tenant cloud architecture may suffer from various drawbacks, such as a failure of a particular one of the server instances 26 causing outages for all customers allocated to the particular server instance.
In another embodiment, one or more of the data centers 18 are configured using a multi-instance cloud architecture to provide every customer its own unique customer instance or instances. For example, a multi-instance cloud architecture could provide each customer instance with its own dedicated application server and dedicated database server. In other examples, the multi-instance cloud architecture could deploy a single physical or virtual server 26 and/or other combinations of physical and/or virtual servers 26, such as one or more dedicated web servers, one or more dedicated application servers, and one or more database servers, for each customer instance. In a multi-instance cloud architecture, multiple customer instances could be installed on one or more respective hardware servers, where each customer instance is allocated certain portions of the physical server resources, such as computing memory, storage, and processing power. By doing so, each customer instance has its own unique software stack that provides the benefit of data isolation, relatively less downtime for customers to access the platform 16, and customer-driven upgrade schedules. An example of implementing a customer instance within a multi-instance cloud architecture will be discussed in more detail below with reference to
Although
As may be appreciated, the respective architectures and frameworks discussed with respect to
By way of background, it may be appreciated that the present approach may be implemented using one or more processor-based systems such as shown in
With this in mind, an example computer system may include some or all of the computer components depicted in
The one or more processors 202 may include one or more microprocessors capable of performing instructions stored in the memory 206. Additionally or alternatively, the one or more processors 202 may include application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and/or other devices designed to perform some or all of the functions discussed herein without calling instructions from the memory 206.
With respect to other components, the one or more busses 204 include suitable electrical channels to provide data and/or power between the various components of the computing system 200. The memory 206 may include any tangible, non-transitory, and computer-readable storage media. Although shown as a single block in
With the preceding in mind,
In some cases, an enterprise may wish to complete a project or other series of tasks (e.g., a joint venture, collaborative project, financial close, audit, consulting, etc.) using a team of individuals that includes one or more individuals that are internal to the enterprise (e.g., employees of the enterprise) and one or more individuals that are external to the enterprise (e.g., contractors, consultants, vendors, partners, etc.). Accordingly, the disclosed techniques include a project management portal (e.g., a graphical user interface or GUI) by which individuals internal and external to the enterprise may coordinate activities and communicate with one another to complete the project.
The top region 302 provides a summary of the project. As shown, the top region 302 may include, for example, an indication of the projected project completion date 308, a percentage complete value 310, and a task summary 312. The projected project completion date 308 may display a projected or a scheduled completion date and/or a number of days until the projected or scheduled completion date. The percentage complete value 310 may display the percentage of project completion. The percentage complete may be based on time, tasks, weighted tasks, per-task time estimates, etc. In some embodiments, the percentage complete value 310 may also include a comparison of the current completion percentage to the planned completion percentage at the date in question. The task summary 312 may include an indication of the total number of tasks and an indication of the number of tasks that are completed, pending, overdue, follow-ups, etc. As shown, the task summary 312 may include a pie chart or some other graphical representation of the breakdown of tasks into various categories (e.g., not yet started, pending, completed, etc.)
The middle region 304 includes one or more widgets, which may be customizable by the user. In the instant embodiments, three widgets may be displayed at a time, in a horizontal row. The arrows 314 on either side of the middle region 304 indicate that the middle region may include more than three widgets. The user may then use the arrows 314 to control which widgets are displayed by the middle region 304 at a given time. In the instant embodiment, the displayed widgets include a calendar widget 316, a task status by function widget 318, and a my tasks widget 320. As shown, the calendar widget 316 displays the current date and all tasks and/or events listed for that day. The task status by function widget 318 breaks down tasks by type and then displays the status of tasks (e.g., pending or completed) within each task type. The my tasks widget 320 displays tasks assigned to the user. In the instant embodiment, the my tasks widget 320 includes a pie chart showing all tasks assigned to the user, according to different breakdowns. For example, in the embodiments shown in
The bottom region 306 includes a row of tabs 322, selectable by the user, to control what is displayed in the bottom region 306. In the instant embodiment, the task tab 322 has been selected. When the task tab 322 is selected, the bottom region displays a task list window 324 and a task details window 326. As shown, the task list window 324 includes a column of stacked cards 328, each corresponding to a task. If the number of task cards 328 exceeds the number of cards that can be displayed within the task list window 324 at once, the task list window 324 may be scrollable.
Further, in some embodiments, the user may utilize a filtering feature to control which tasks cards 328 are displayed in the task list window 324 (e.g., show tasks that have not been completed). As shown, each task card 328 may display summary information about the task, such as the task type, the assignee, and assignor, the task name, a brief description, the completion date, etc. Additionally, in some embodiments, the task cards 328 may be displayed within the task list window 324 according to some kind of sorting operation (e.g., sort by due date, sort by type, sort by status, etc.).
When a task card 328 is selected from the task list window 324, the task details window 326 displays more detailed information about the task associated with the selected task card 328. If a user is external to the enterprise (e.g., a contractor, auditor, etc.), the task details window 326 may be configured to display a pared down version of the task information based upon the permissions of the user. The task details window 326 includes a row of tabs 330, selectable by the user, to control what is displayed within the task details window 326. As shown, when the task details tab 330 is selected, the task details window 326 may display data fields, such as short description, task type, due date, owner, detailed description, whether review is needed, whether the task is a one-time task or a recurring task, the schedule (if the task is a scheduled or recurring task), the applicable months of the task, the associated entity, work notes, a task timeline, activity, etc. The activity window may be used by the user, the task assignor, the task assignee, or other party to the task to provide portions of text to provide status updates, ask questions, provide explanations, etc. Accordingly, the activity window may be used in place of other communication channels (in person, via telephone, text message, email, a chat or message client, etc.) in order to keep a record on communication within the project management portal. In some embodiments, if a user has authority to edit a task, the user may edit the data fields displayed in the task details tab 330.
The applicable months field may be used to schedule one-off events and/or recurring events. As such, the project management portal may include the capability to schedule a task or a group of tasks to occur on a recurring basis (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, annually, etc.). Accordingly, the user may utilize the applicable months field to specify a date on which a task is created or activated and a period after which the task recurs.
As shown, other available task detail tabs 330 may include a dependencies tab and a follow-ups tab. When the dependencies tab is selected, the task details window 326 may display the tasks that depend from the selected tasks and/or the task or tasks from which the selected task depends. Dependency between tasks may be defined as a parent-child relationship in which one or more tasks are parents and one or more tasks are children. Dependency relationships may be stacked up to string together any number of tasks via multiple parent-child relationships. In some embodiments, data generated or output during performance of a first task may be act as an input or be otherwise used in performance of a second task. In one embodiment, a first application or software module may be used to perform tasks that, upon completion, cause a related task in a second, different application or software module to be performed (e.g., completed). By way of example, in the context of Financial Close Automation (FCA), certain tasks may be performed regularly as part of closing out and/or reconciling financial records for a respective time frame, e.g., a month, a quarter, fiscal year, and so forth. As used herein, such a FCA, or the aspect of such a suite related to closing out or reconciling records for a period of time, may also be referred to as a closing application. Along these lines, completion of a first task may cause the first task to be marked as completed or removed from a user's task list window 324. Completion of the first task may cause a second task to be created or activated and added to the task list window 324 of either the user or a different user. Accordingly, it should be understood that parent and child tasks may be assigned to different users such that completion of the parent task by a first user causes the child task to appear in the task list window 324 of a second user.
When the follow-ups tab is selected, the task details window 326 may display any follow-up tasks associated with the selected task. Similar to dependent tasks, the project management portal may also have a capability to create follow-up tasks. For example, completion of a first task may trigger creation of a follow up task. Further, if the user needs additional information to perform a task, or needs another user to take some action before a task can be performed, a follow-up task may be created and assigned to the other user. Upon creation of the follow-up task by the user, the follow-up task may appear in the task list window 324 of the other user for completion. In some embodiments, the project management portal may allow for subtasks to be created within a task.
In some embodiments, the user may select the new task button or otherwise select a task to edit, causing the dashboard to open a window to create a new task or edit an existing task.
Below the task status bar 352, the task window 350 includes a number of data fields that define the task. For example, the task window 350 includes a task name/number field 354, a short description field 356, an owner field 358, a description field 360, a task type field 362, a state field 364, and a parent field 366. The task name/number field 354 includes the name and/or number assigned to the task. The short description field 356 includes a short description of the task. The owner field 358 identifies the user that is designated as the owner of the task. The description field 360 provides a longer description of the task. The task type field 362 identifies the type of the task. The state field 364 identifies the status of the task, which is also communicated via the task status bar. The parent field 366 identifies one or more parent tasks of the selected task, if any.
As shown in
Disposed below the general information window 368 is a related tasks window 372. The related tasks window 372 may list one or more tasks that are related to the selected task. For example, in the embodiment shown in
Returning to
In accordance with the present approach, the FCA system is integrated with the GRC application to automatically attest to or certify a respective control based on a review of a task status in the FCA system. In this manner, when a designated task, such as a closing or reconciliation task, is performed in the FCA system, this is automatically detected and a pre-configured, the linked task is performed in the GRC application, such as automatically entering an attestation or certification for a respective control corresponding to the task in the FCA system. In this way, the user will not have to separately log into a different application or system (e.g., a GRC application) to attest to a control when a corresponding task is completed in the FCA system (or, more generally, when a finance specific process tied to the control is performed).
In practice, this may be accomplished by mapping one or more tasks in the FCA system to corresponding controls in the GRC application. In this manner, once a mapped task in the FCA system is completed by an accountant or manager (depending on the task), the control mapped to that task in the GRC application is automatically updated (e.g., attested to or certified).
As illustrated, the row of tabs 322 includes additional tabs for policies, controls, attestations, and issues. In the embodiment shown in
When a policy card 504 is selected from the policy list window 500, the policy details window 502 displays more detailed information about the policy associated with the selected policy card 504. The policy details window 502 may display data fields, such as short description, state, number, valid from date, department, valid to date, category, reviewers, description, owner, classification, article template, KB article, etc. In some embodiments, if a user has authority to edit a policy, the user may edit the data fields displayed.
When a control card 554 is selected from the control list window 550, the control details window 552 displays more detailed information about the control associated with the selected control card 554. The control details window 552 may display data fields, such as short description, state, number, valid from date, department, valid to date, category, reviewers, description, owner, classification, article template, KB article, etc. In some embodiments, if a user has authority to edit a control, the user may edit the data fields displayed.
When an attestation card 584 is selected from the attestations list window 580, the attestations details window 582 displays more detailed information about the attestation associated with the selected attestation card 584. The attestations details window 582 may display data fields, such as short description, state, and reliant controls. Additionally, the attestations details window 582 may allow the user to certify that they are the owner, the flow chart remains accurate, as the control is being performed based on the specified description and frequency, as well as an indication that controls were operating effectively during the process.
In addition to the project management portal's integrations with GRC products described with regard to
In this embodiment, the project management portal may function as a normalizing top-layer that creates and/or maintains an underlying set of data commonly used by the various ERP platforms and translates or wraps the maintained data for use by the differing ERP platforms in a way that is transparent to the user. In this manner, the project management portal may function as a single gateway by which a user interacts with or updates multiple ERP platforms without having to individually manipulate or interact with each ERP platform, with the project management portal translating, based upon known ERP configurations and data formatting preferences, the stored data needed by each ERP platform to service a given request by a user or update a journal entry or other record. Thus, the user may, via the project management portal, send data or request reports from different ERP packages used by the user's organization, with the project management portal parsing the data and/or formatting communications for each respective ERP package such that the user need only be familiar with the project management portal commands and interface. Alternatively, work performed on the project management portal, such as performing a monthly closing operation on an account, may be seamlessly and transparently updated to each ERP package used by the client without logging into or working in the ERP package itself. For example, if a user has multiple different ERP or multi-ERP instances in their landscape, the user can perform their work in the single project management portal and all the journal entries made using the project management portal may be automatically posted in the ERP packages used by the client.
The present disclosure includes a project management portal for completing a project or other series of tasks (e.g., a joint venture, collaborative project, financial close, audit, consulting, etc.) using a team of individuals that includes one or more individuals that are internal to the enterprise (e.g., employees of the enterprise) and one or more individuals that are external to the enterprise (e.g., contractors, consultants, vendors, partners, etc.). The project management portal may include a graphical user interface (GUI) by which individuals internal and external to the enterprise may coordinate performance of tasks and communicate with one another to complete the project. The GUI may include a task list window that displays a plurality of selectable task cards, each corresponding to a task that has been assigned to a user, and a task details window that displays information for the task corresponding to a selected task card within the a task list window. The task details window may include an activity field that allows comments about the selected task to be exchanged between multiple users. In some embodiments, some tasks within the task list window may be dependent upon other tasks, such that data produced during performance of a first task acts as an input to be used during performance of a second task. Further, completion of a first selected task may activate a follow-up task. The project management portal may allow for tasks to be scheduled, either on a one-time or recurring basis. Further, in some embodiments, the project management portal may be configured to integrate with one or more enterprise resource planning (ERP) products. Specifically, the project management portal may allow for mapping various aspects of multiple ERPs to facilitate the sharing of data, either between ERPs or between one or more ERPs and the project management portal.
The specific embodiments described above have been shown by way of example, and it should be understood that these embodiments may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms. It should be further understood that the claims are not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed, but rather to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
The techniques presented and claimed herein are referenced and applied to material objects and concrete examples of a practical nature that demonstrably improve the present technical field and, as such, are not abstract, intangible or purely theoretical. Further, if any claims appended to the end of this specification contain one or more elements designated as “means for [perform]ing [a function] . . . ” or “step for [perform]ing [a function] . . . ”, it is intended that such elements are to be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f). However, for any claims containing elements designated in any other manner, it is intended that such elements are not to be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f).
Claims
1. A system, comprising:
- a processor;
- a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: retrieve task data representative of a plurality of tasks assigned to a user; generate a graphical user interface (GUI) based on the retrieved task data, wherein the GUI comprises: a task list window populated with a plurality of task cards, wherein each task card corresponds to a respective task of the plurality of tasks; a task detail window configured to display a plurality of data fields for a task of the plurality of tasks; display the GUI; receive an input selecting a selected task card of the plurality of task cards; and update the task detail window of the GUI to display the plurality of data fields for a selected task that corresponds to the selected task card.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the selected task is dependent upon a parent task, such that performance of the parent task generates an output that acts as a task input for the selected task.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein completion of the selected task activates a follow-up task.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of data fields displayed within the task detail window includes an activity field configured to display comments provided by the user or a task assignor.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the selected task is configured to recur according to a designated schedule.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the instructions cause the processor to receive mapping inputs defining a mapping between a first enterprise resource planning (ERP) product and a second ERP product.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein the instructions cause the processor to retrieve data from the second ERP product based on the defined mapping.
8. A method, comprising:
- receiving, via a processor, assigned task data defining an assigned task and assigning the task to a user;
- retrieving, via the processor, task data representative of a plurality of tasks assigned to the user, including the assigned task;
- generating, via the processor, a graphical user interface (GUI) based on the retrieved task data, wherein the GUI comprises: a task list window populated with a plurality of task cards, wherein each task card corresponds to a respective task of the plurality of tasks, wherein the plurality of tasks includes the assigned task; a task detail window configured to display a plurality of data fields for a task of the plurality of tasks; display the GUI; receive an input selecting a selected task card of the plurality of task cards; and update the task detail window of the GUI to display the plurality of data fields for a selected task that corresponds to the selected task card.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the assigned task data defines that assigned task as dependent upon a parent task, such that performance of the parent task generates an output that acts as a task input for the assigned task.
10. The method of claim 8, wherein completion of the assigned task activates a follow-up task.
11. The method of claim 8, wherein the plurality of data fields displayed within the task detail window includes an activity field configured to display comments provided by the user or a task assignor.
12. The method of claim 8, wherein the assigned task is configured to recur according to a schedule defined by the assigned task data.
13. The method of claim 8, comprising receiving mapping inputs defining a mapping between a first enterprise resource planning (ERP) product and a second ERP product.
14. The method of claim 13, comprising retrieving data from the second ERP product based on the defined mapping.
15. A non-transitory, tangible, computer readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to:
- retrieve task data representative of a plurality of tasks assigned to a user;
- generate a graphical user interface (GUI) based on the retrieved task data, wherein the GUI comprises: a task list window populated with a plurality of task cards, wherein each task card corresponds to a respective task of the plurality of tasks; a task detail window configured to display a plurality of data fields for a task of the plurality of tasks;
- display the GUI;
- receive an input selecting a selected task card of the plurality of task cards;
- update the task detail window of the GUI to display the plurality of data fields for a selected task that corresponds to the selected task card;
- receive an input indicating that the selected task has been completed; and
- activate a follow up task based on completion of the selected task.
16. The non-transitory, tangible, computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein the selected task is dependent upon a parent task, such that performance of the parent task generates an output that acts as a task input for the selected task.
17. The non-transitory, tangible, computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein the plurality of data fields displayed within the task detail window includes an activity field configured to display comments provided by the user or a task assignor.
18. The non-transitory, tangible, computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein the selected task is configured to recur according to a designated schedule.
19. The non-transitory, tangible, computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein the instructions cause the processor to receive mapping inputs defining a mapping between a first enterprise resource planning (ERP) product and a second ERP product.
20. The non-transitory, tangible, computer readable medium of claim 19, wherein the instructions cause the processor to retrieve data from the second ERP product based on the defined mapping.
Type: Application
Filed: May 7, 2019
Publication Date: Nov 7, 2019
Inventors: Ankur Tayal (San Jose, CA), Amir Vakili Jafari (Los Gatos, CA), Ellen Frances Espinosa (Morgan Hill, CA)
Application Number: 16/405,695