Inert stemming materials
A stemming agent is provided comprising: A) a neutralized acrylic acid polymer; B) a neutralized mixture of sodium silicate and a silicon oxide-containing material such as sand, clay, stones, volcanic ash, or the like; or C) a mixture of materials A) and B). The stemming agents produced are low cost, easily made, and preferably are free of nitrate salts. Accordingly, the use of these preferred stemming agents eliminates the contamination of ground water by nitrate salts. The stemming agents of the invention may be used in either bulk-delivered or packaged applications.
Latest ICI Explosives USA Inc. Patents:
This invention relates to explosives blasting technology, and more particularly, to the stemming material used during such blasting.
DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ARTIn explosive blasting operations, such as in mining or construction, the blast is usually conducted by partially filling a drilled borehole with packaged or bulk explosives. In order to minimize the loss of explosive energy out of the borehole, it is normally desirable to provide a stemming material at, or near, the top of the borehole. This stemming material is generally gravel or drill cuttings which are poured or packed into the top of the borehole, after the explosive material has been loaded into the bottom of the borehole. The stemming material thus forms a blockage to prevent the force of the explosive, and the explosive itself, from being propelled out of the borehole, when the explosive material is detonated. Stemming may also be used to control the location of the explosive charge in the borehole, in, for example, decking applications, up-hole plugs, drill-through plugs and the like.
Stemming may thus be defined as any inert, or more generally, any non-detonable material placed in the borehole in order to prevent premature release of gasses, or to control the location of, or properties of the explosive in the borehole. Control of the location of the explosive is self-explanatory. However, it is also of interest to control the release of gas, since if the detonation gases escape prematurely, the gas versus time profile in the hole will be compromised. This will result in poor fragmentation and poor movement of the burden rock. In some applications the stemming is also used to minimize the amount of hot particles/gas which are ejected from the hole. The hot material has, under certain conditions, ignited gasses in underground mines.
A feature of desirable stemming materials is that they must be essentially free from shrinkage after loading into the borehole. Any such shrinkage could result in the creation of a loose mass which would be projected from the borehole when the explosive is detonated. Further, premature ejection of the stemming may also result in increased noise levels from the blast.
The "classical" stemming materials are drill cuttings, gravel, mud or clay. However, almost all current packaged and pumpable stemming compositions are gelled solutions of nitrate salts, or are formulations containing nitrate salts. Since the stemming material is not consumed in the detonation and remains in the muck pile, the components of the stemming are then free to disperse and possibly enter the ground water system if they are water soluble. This entry in the ground water system creates the possibility of significant ground water nitrate contamination.
Accordingly, in its preferred embodiment, it would be desirable to provide a nitrate-free stemming material for use in bulk or packaged explosive blasting.
Further, during bulk applications, such as in a mine, a stemming crew is usually employed to manually load the stemming into the borehole. This procedure can be time consuming and labour intensive, and thus, expensive for the mine. An automated means of loading stemming material would significantly improve productivity for the mine and thereby reduce operating costs.
In summary, it would be desirable to provide a stemming material which was nitrate-free; which could be used in both packaged or bulk pumpable applications; which had reduced labour costs for bulk applications; provided improved efficiency for bulk applications; and/or which could be formulated to provide any given stiffness required.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThese, and other features of the present invention are provided by a stemming agent comprising:
A) 0-100% by weight of a solution of a neutralized acrylic acid polymer,and
B) 0-100% by weight of a mixture of from about 1 to 95, and preferably 10 to 75, weight percent of a silicon oxide-containing material combined with a neutralized silicate solution, and combinations thereof.
In a preferred embodiment, the stemming agent comprises 100 weight percent of an aqueous neutralized acrylic acid polymer.
In an alternative embodiment, the stemming agent of the present invention comprises 100 weight percent of a mixture of from about 1 to 95, and preferably 10 to 70, weight percent silicon oxide, and preferably, a silicon dioxide-containing material combined with a neutralized silicate solution.
It is particularly preferred that the stemming agent be nitrate free.
One possible combination, according to the present invention, is one wherein the acrylic acid polymer of A) is combined with the silicon oxide/silicate solution material described in B).
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTSThe invention in this application consists of two materials which are designated as material "A" or material "B" which individually, or in combination, can be used as inert stemming materials.
Material AMaterial A is a acrylic acid polymer, which may be generally defined as any polymer, or copolymer, which contains an acrylic acid residue. A preferred acrylic acid polymer of use in the present invention are materials sold under the trade name Carbopol*. Chemically, Carbopol resins are acrylic acid polymers wherein the individual resins may vary by molecular weight and degree of crosslinking. Differences in molecular weight and crosslinking account for variations in thickening efficiency and flow among the individual Carbopol products. Preferred acrylic acid polymers have a molecular weight of from about 400,000 to about 5,000,000, and have an un-neutralized aqueous solution pH of about 2 to 4. As neutralizing agent is added (generally a basic material), the viscosity of the aqueous solution increases rapidly.
*Trade Mark
While it is preferable that the acrylic acid polymer solution is an aqueous solution, it is possible for the acrylic acid solution to be a non-aqueous system.
These polymers are generally tightly coiled in their presolvated state, thus limiting their thickening capability. When dispersed in water, the molecule begins to hydrate and uncoils to some extent, generating an increase in viscosity. However, to achieve the highest possible viscosity with these polymers, the molecule is preferably completely uncoiled. This is accomplished by neutralizing the polymer with a base. The degree of neutralization can thus control the viscosity of the solution. Suitable bases may be any compatible basic material. Preferred basic material include, for example diethanolamine or sodium carbonate.
Neutralization ionizes the acidic groups of the polymer, generating negative charges along the polymer backbone. Repulsions of these like negative charges cause the molecule to completely uncoil into an extended structure. This reaction is rapid and gives essentially instantaneous thickening.
Resins comprising acrylic acid polymers may also be used to thicken non-aqueous mediums. However, in these solvent systems, the neutralizing agent must be chosen more carefully.
Generally, only a small amount of the acrylic acid polymer is required in order to provide the desired viscosity level. Accordingly, a thickened material prepared from material "A" preferably consists of 99.0 to 9.9% water and 0.1 to 1.0% acrylic acid polymer (on solids), by weight. This thickened material can be used as an effective stemming material for packaged and bulk pumpable applications. Higher polymer concentrations, such as up to 3, 5 or even up to 20%, can be used to further increase the viscosity and yield (e.g. the apparent viscosity) values.
Another means of increasing yield, or the apparent viscosity, is to incorporate 1 to 95% by weight of solid additives such as clays, sand, ceramic or plastic beads, etc., to give the gel a "stiffer" consistency. Preferably, however, the solids level will be in the range of from 1 to 50%, and more preferably, at a level of from 5 to 20%. At these solid levels the blend will remain pumpable and provide a firm gel. The amount of added material will be dependent on the particle size of the material added, and its effect on the desired viscosity of the stemming material.
A preferred method for the utilization of the stemming material provided by material "A", is its use as a packaged material. For example, the material may be formed and loaded into suitable containers, wherein the viscosity of the product will increase. The container may then be shipped to the borehole site, where it is loaded into the borehole, and tamped into place.
Material BThe formation of silica based gels has been well documented and the reactions of sodium silicate solutions, in particular, in acidic media, has been thoroughly studied. One application of this technology has been to increase the strength of sand mounds. However, the use of this type of material as a stemming agent has heretofore not been described. Accordingly, the production of material "B" of the present invention, involves the blending of 1 to 95%, and preferably 10 to 70%, of a silicon oxide-containing material, preferably a silicon dioxide-containing material such as sand, and most preferably a fine sand, with 99 to 5%, or more preferably 90 to 30%, by weight, of a silicate solution. Preferably, the silicate solution is a concentrated sodium silicate solution.
These ingredients are mixed until a uniform slurry forms. The slurry, or more particularly, the silicate solution, is then partially or completely, neutralized by the addition of an acidic material, which acidic material is preferably a weak mineral acid, an organic acid, an acid anhydride, or a carbonate, preferably propylene carbonate.
In order to provide stability for stemming material which is in contact with standing water in the borehole, it is preferable that the selected acid have a low water solubility.
When added, the acid initiates the growth of fibre-like silicate strands between the particles of silicon oxide-containing materials, effectively cementing the mixture.
While sand is a preferred material as the silicon oxide-containing material, it should be noted that other silicon oxide-containing materials, such as, for example, drill hole cuttings, clay, stones, volcanic ash, or any of the naturally occurring minerals such as feldspar or quartz, or the like, or combinations thereof, may be used.
The preferred concentrated sodium silicate solution typically contains from 30 to 60% of a mixture of SiO.sub.2 and Na.sub.2 O in a 3:1 ratio.
Those skilled in the art will be aware that the cementing time depends on, inter alia, the ratio of silicon oxide-containing material to silicate, the concentration of the silicate solution, the concentration of the neutralizing acid, and the amount of acid used.
Preferably, the slurry is poured, pumped or augured into a borehole while the neutralizing acid is added in-line. The blend will typically solidify in the borehole within 15 to 30 minutes. It should be noted, that, in general, the stemming material formed by material "B" is typically more rigid than the stemming material of material "A". Thus, material "B" is preferable for large scale bulk applications wherein the stemming material is formed on-site. This increased rigidity of the stemming agent produced by material "B" might provide a stemming agent which would be difficult to load into a borehole and/or tamp into place for package stemming materials. Other thickening materials, known within the industry, such as guar, and the like, may also be added to the stemming material provided by material "B". However, a preferred thickening material is that provided in the present invention as material "A", as described hereinbelow.
Blends of Material A and Material BIt should also be noted that the stemming material resulting from material "B" may be adversely affected by the presence of water in the borehole. Since the presence of ground water, and the like, is not uncommon in boreholes, it is possible that the silicate solution, will be diluted. This dilution will retard the reaction and may even prevent sufficient cementing from taking place.
One means of overcoming the problem of dilution is to gel the sodium silicate solution with an acrylic acid polymer and blend the silicon oxide-containing material with the gelled solution. The gelled slurry will be pumpable and a weak acid or acid solution can be added in-line to initiate the cementing reaction.
The level of neutralizing agent utilized in the practise of the present invention may vary depending on the nature of the conditions in the bore hole. For example, the composition of the surrounding rock in the bore hole may affect the pH of the stemming material. Accordingly, the level of neutralizing agent or neutralizing material may need to be adjusted to suit the conditions of the bore hole.
The silicate solution used, and in particular, the sodium silicate solutions used, will typically have high pH values. At these pH values, conventional gelling agents such as guar gum, carboxymethyl cellulose, or xantham gum either do not function at all, or large amounts (>10%) must be used to obtain even marginal thickening. Currently, the majority of pumpable inert stemming compositions use guar gum to thicken nitrate salt solutions. These nitrate salts are added to allow the guars to function properly, act as freezing point depressants, and for their good solubility characteristics at very low temperatures.
Acrylic acid polymer gels typically form at concentrations of <1% and preferably at pH values of less than 10. The freezing point of the solution can be reduced using conventional depressants such as ethylene glycol or alcohols, which do not effect the gel structure, and thus, will eliminate the contamination of the ground water with nitrate salts. Further, since the amount of acrylic polymer is small, there is little overall contamination of the ground water by the stemming material.
The stemming materials of the present invention thus provides desirable advantages over the prior art stemming materials.
The invention will now be described by way of example only, with reference to the following examples.
EXAMPLE Mixture AA system of nitrate-free stemming material was prepared in accordance with Mixture A of the present invention by neutralization of a acrylic acid polymer in water. The neutralizing agent was typically diethanolamine (DEA) which was added in incremental amounts. The viscosity of the mixture was measured after each addition of DEA.
The acrylic acid polymer used throughout these examples are sold under the trade mark "Carbopol", and are available from B. F. Goodrich. Various Carbopol resins were used in the following examples. These resins have the following molecular weights:
______________________________________
Carbopol 676 4,500,000
Carbopol 690 4,000,000
Carbopol 679 450,000
______________________________________
Other resins having different molecular weights are also available.
1) The effect of pH on the viscosity of an acrylic acid polymer is demonstrated in the following example.
______________________________________
Formula: 99.5% tap H.sub.2 O
.5% Carbopol 690
200 gram batch
______________________________________
Total DEA*
Added pH Visc. (CPS)
Comments
______________________________________
-- 3-4 --
.2 g 5 31,000
0.4 g 6 45,000
0.6 g 7 47,000
0.8 g 8 47,000
1.0 g 9 51,000 Transparent Gel
After 4 hrs. 51,000 Transparent Gel
______________________________________
* -- Diethanolamine
The sample prepared was retained for testing of long term storage in cold temperatures. The sample was placed in a freezer at -10.degree. F. (-23.degree. C.) for 24 hrs. The sample froze solid, but after 4 hrs. at 70.degree. F. (21.degree. C.), returned to good condition.
2) The effect of different water sources (i.e. tap versus deionized water) was studied.
______________________________________
Formula: 99.5% Deionized H.sub.2 O
200 gram batch
.5% Carbopol 690
______________________________________
Total DEA
Added pH Visc. (CPS)
Comments
______________________________________
-- 4 --
.2 g 5-6 38,000
0.4 g 6 45,000
0.6 g 7 52,000
0.8 g 8 53,000
1.0 g 9 53,000 Transparent Gel
After 4 hrs. 54,000 Transparent Gel
______________________________________
3) The effect of a freezing point depressant was studied.
______________________________________
Formula: 99.5% 25/75 EG (ethylene glycol)/H.sub.2 O
0.5% Carbopol 690
200 gram batch
______________________________________
Total DEA
Added pH Visc. (CPS)
Comments
______________________________________
-- 4-5 --
.2 g 6 33,000
0.4 g 7 41,000
0.6 g 8 51,000
0.8 g 9 52,000 Transparent Gel
After 4 hrs. 55,000 Transparent Gel
______________________________________
The sample was placed in a -10.degree. F. (-23.degree. C.) freezer for 24 hrs. The sample was slushy, but was not frozen. After 4 hrs. at 70.degree. F. (21.degree. C.), the sample returned to good condition.
4) Further testing was conducted on a system using a freezing point depressant.
______________________________________
Formula: 99.5% 50/50 EG/H.sub.2 O (tap)
.5% Carbopol 690
______________________________________
Total DEA
Added pH Visc. (CPS)
Comments
______________________________________
-- 5 --
.2 g 6 13,000
0.4 g 7 34,000
0.6 g 7-8 42,000
0.8 g 8 48,000
1.0 g 9 52,000 Transparent Gel
After 3 hrs. 58,000 Transparent Gel
______________________________________
The sample was placed in a -10.degree. F. (-23.degree. C.) freezer for 24 hrs. The sample remained in excellent condition, and did not freeze. The sample was also tested at -30.degree. F. (-34.degree. C.) freezer, and remained in excellent condition without freezing.
5) A further test utilizing a different freezing point depressant was tested.
______________________________________
Formula: 74.6% H.sub.2 O (tap)
24.9% Methanol
0.5% Carbopol 690
100.0% 200 gram batch
______________________________________
Total DEA
Added pH Visc. (CPS)
Comments
______________________________________
-- 4 --
.2 g 5-6 22,000
0.4 g 6 32,000
0.6 g 7 40,000
0.8 g 7-8 45,000
1.0 g 8 48,000 Transparent Gel
+2 hrs. 51,000 Transparent Gel
______________________________________
The sample was placed in a -10.degree. F. (-23.degree. C.) freezer for 24 hrs., and froze to a slushy state. After 4 hrs. at 70.degree. F. (21.degree. C.) the sample returned to its normal state.
6) A further test using methanol as a freezing point depressant was conducted.
______________________________________
Formula: 49.75% H.sub.2 O (tap)
49.75% Methanol
0.50% Carbopol 690
100.0% 200 gram batch
______________________________________
Total DEA
Added pH Visc. (CPS)
Comments
______________________________________
-- 4 --
.2 g 5-6 18,000
0.4 g 6 26,000
0.6 g 6 36,000
0.8 g 6-7 40,000
1.0 g 7-8 41,000
1.2 g 9 41,000 Transparent Gel
After 1 hr. 42,000 Transparent Gel
______________________________________
Sample taken for long term storage. After 24 hrs at -10.degree. F. (-23.degree. C.), the sample remained in good condition.
7)
______________________________________
Formula: 49.75% H.sub.2 O (tap)
49.75% Methanol
0.50% Carbopol 676
100.0% 200 gram batch
______________________________________
Total DEA
Added pH Visc. (CPS)
Comments
______________________________________
-- 4 --
.2 g 5 32,000
0.4 g 6 51,000
0.6 g 6-7 56,000
0.8 g 7 60,000
1.0 g 9 63,000 Transparent Gel
______________________________________
Sample taken for long term storage. After 24 hrs. at -10.degree. F. (-23.degree. C.), the sample had frozen solid. When returned to 70.degree. F. (21.degree. C.) the sample returned to its normal state.
8)
______________________________________
Formula: 49.75% H.sub.2 O (tap)
49.75% Ethyl Glycol
0.50% Carbopol 676
200 gram batch
______________________________________
Total DEA
Added pH Visc. (CPS)
Comments
______________________________________
-- 5 --
.2 g 6 23,000
0.4 g 6-7 45,000
0.6 g 7 57,000
0.8 g 8 62,000
1.0 g 8-9 64,000 Transparent Gel
______________________________________
Sample taken for long term storage. After 24 hrs at -10.degree. F. (-23.degree. C.), the sample remained in good condition.
9 )
______________________________________
Formula: 50.0% H.sub.2 O (tap)
49.5% Methanol
0.5% Carbopol 676
200 gram batch
______________________________________
Total DEA
Added pH Visc. (CPS)
Comments
______________________________________
-- 5 --
.2 g 5 17,000
0.4 g 6 37,000
0.6 g 6-7 48,000
0.8 g 7 51,000
1.0 g 8 52,000
1.2 g 9 55,000 Transparent Gel
______________________________________
Sample taken for long term storage. After 24 hrs at -10.degree. F. (-23.degree. C.), the sample remained in good condition.
10) A series of experiments were conducted wherein the acrylic acid copolymer was neutralized with a sodium silicate (available from PQ corp.) having a SiO.sub.2 to Na.sub.2 O ratio, and concentration as shown. The samples were mixed for 5 minutes at 50.degree. C., with the exception of test No. 4 which was mixed for 10 minutes at 21.degree. C.
______________________________________
Test
No. Formulation Result
______________________________________
1 95% Sodium silicate
Hard gel forms upon
(Ratio of 3.22:1,
cooling -- viscosity in
41Be) excess of 200,000 CPS
5% Carbopol 679
2 95% Sodium silicate
Hard gel forms upon
(Ratio of 2.88:1,
cooling -- viscosity in
47Be) excess of 200,000 CPS
5% Carbopol 679
3 97.5% Sodium silicate
Hard gel forms upon
(as in Test 1) cooling -- viscosity in
2.5% Carbopol 679 excess of 200,000 CPS
4 300 parts Sodium Hard gel forms --
silicate viscosity in excess of
(as in Test 1) 100,000 CPS
8 parts Carbopol 679
8 parts clay
______________________________________
11) Packaged Inert Stemming + Clay
This example was performed to study the effect of Celetom (clay) to increase viscosity in packaged stemming in small diameters.
______________________________________
Test No. 1 Test No. 2 Test No. 3
______________________________________
98.5% H.sub.2 O 94.5% H.sub.2 O
89.5% H.sub.2 O
.5% Carbopol .5% Carbopol
.5% Carbopol
690 690 690
1.0% Clay 5.0% Clay 10.0% Clay
58,000 CPS @ 73,000 CPS @ 85,000 CPS* @
pH 9 pH 9 pH 9
______________________________________
* -- After 1 week storage, the viscosity was 84,000 CPS
12) This example is a continuation of the study of Example 11 with the addition of Ethylene Glycol as a freezing point depressant for Winter storage.
______________________________________
Formula: 50.0% H.sub.2 O (tap)
49.5% EG 200 gram batch
0.5% Carbopol 690
with an additional 10% clay added
______________________________________
Total DEA
Added pH Visc. (CPS)
Comments
______________________________________
-- 4 --
.2 g +5 18,000
0.4 g 6 49,000
0.6 g 6-7 80,000
0.8 g 7 100,000
1.0 g 7 106,000
1.2 g 8-9 111,000 Excellent
Rubbery Gel
______________________________________
Sample taken for long term storage. After 24 hrs at -10.degree. F. (-23.degree. C.), the sample remained in good condition. After 1 week at ambient temperatures, the sample had a viscosity of 120,000 CPS.
13) This example was conducted in order to evaluate a system wherein the neutralizing agent used was sodium carbonate. A 10% solution of sodium carbonate (S.C.) in water was used.
______________________________________
Formula: 88.5% H.sub.2 O
10.0% clay
.5% Carbopol 676
1.0% S.C. SOLN (10%)
______________________________________
The resulting mixture had a viscosity of 76,000cps at a pH of 6.
14) A further series of tests were conducted using sodium carbonate. The results are as shown hereinbelow:
______________________________________
14-i) Formula: 88.0% H.sub.2 O
10.0% clay
.5% Carbopol 676
1.5% S.C. SOLN
Result: 75,000 cps, pH 7
14-ii) 87.0% H.sub.2 O
10.0% clay
.5% Carbopol 676
2.5% S.C. SOLN (10%)
Result: 60,000 cps, pH 7
14-iii) 84.5% H.sub.2 O
10.0% clay
.5% Carbopol 676
5.0% S.C. SOLN (10%)
Result: 30,000 cps, pH 8
______________________________________
It should be noted, that the formulations of Examples 13 and 14 provide materials which are suitable for underground, re-pumpable applications. In general, however, Examples 1 to 14 clearly demonstrate the ability of the acrylic acid polymers to form a gelled material having a high viscosity, and thus, which would be suitable for application as a nitrate-free stemming material. The gels formed are preferably utilized as packaged stemming agents.
Material B15) Bulk Stemming Formulation
Various formulations were prepared having a propylene carbonate concentration of from 1 to 4% by weight. The level of SiO.sub.2 was adjusted accordingly.
______________________________________
Formula: 56 to 59% SiO.sub.2 "N"
40% Standard Sand
1 to 4% Prop. Carb.
______________________________________
% Prop. Carb.
Result
______________________________________
4 Product hardened quickly in air, and
under water -- 10 minutes
3 Same as for 4%
2 Hardened slightly slower -- 15 minutes
in air and under water
1 Rubber-like set in 15 minutes in air
and under water
______________________________________
SiO.sub.2 "N" is a mixture of SiO.sub.2 /Na.sub.2 O in the ratio of 3.22:1
16) Dilute SiO.sub.2 Test
This experiment was conducted to test the hardening properties of bulk stemming using various concentrations of SiO.sub.2 "N" soln. The ratio of sand to SiO.sub.2 was held constant at 60/40. Water was added to the SiO.sub.2 in controlled amounts. The mixture was hardened using 2% propylene carbonate as neutralizing agent.
______________________________________
Ratio of SiO.sub.2 to H.sub.2 O
Result
______________________________________
100/0 (Control) Hardened in 20 seconds
90/10 Hardened in 50 seconds
80/20 Hardened in 70 seconds
70/30 Hardened in 120 seconds
60/40 Hardened in 150 seconds
50/50 Hardened in 180 seconds
40/60 Hardened in 300 seconds
______________________________________
17) Samples were tested for the effect of the concentration of the SiO.sub.2 solution on the hardening properties of the stemming material, using a 5 second spatula mix time in order to mimic field applications. Otherwise, this experiment uses the same conditions as described in Example 16.
______________________________________
Ratio of SiO.sub.2 to H.sub.2 O
Result
______________________________________
100/0 Hard in 15 minutes -- Thin
layer of liquid on top
90/10 Hard in 20 minutes -- Thin
layer of liquid on top
80/20 Hard in 20 minutes -- Thin
layer of liquid on top
70/30 Hard in 20 minutes -- Thin
layer of liquid on top
60/40 Hard in 20 minutes -- Thin
layer of liquid on top
50/50 Hard in 25 minutes -- Thin
layer of soft material,
liquid on top
______________________________________
18) Bulk Stemming
______________________________________
Test #1
______________________________________
Formula: Sand 60%
SiO.sub.2 N
38%
Prop. Carb.
2%
100%
______________________________________
Result: Hard set under water after 5 minutes,
______________________________________
Test #2
______________________________________
Formula: Sand 60.0%
SiO.sub.2 N
26.6%
H.sub.2 O 11.4%
Prop. Carb.
2.0%
100.0%
______________________________________
Result: Hard set under water after 20-25 minutes,
______________________________________
Test #3
______________________________________
Formula: Sand 60%
SiO.sub.2 N
19%
H.sub.2 O 19%
Prop. Carb.
2%
100%
______________________________________
Result: Hard rubber-like after 30 minutes--slightly squeezable
19) Bulk Stemming
______________________________________
Formula: Sand 60%
Prop. Carb.
2%
SiO.sub.2 N
38%
100%
______________________________________
Product hardened in 5 minutes in air and under water
______________________________________
Formula: Sand 60.0%
Prop. Carb.
1.5%
SiO.sub.2 N
38.5%
100%
______________________________________
Product hardened in <10 minutes in air and under water
______________________________________
Formula: Sand 60%
Prop. Carb.
1%
SiO.sub.2 N
39%
100%
______________________________________
Product hardened in 15-20 minutes in air and under water (hard rubber-like)
20) In this example, a stemming material that will quickly set to a hard mass, and which is suitable for underground applications, is demonstrated.
______________________________________
Formula: 86.0% "N" Sodium Silicate
10.0% Clay
4.0% Propylene Carbonate
______________________________________
Procedure: Mixed clay into sodium silicate solution with a spatula. Prop. carb. was added and stirred for 10 seconds.
Result: The product became pasty quickly and set hard in 5 minutes.
21) A further series of experiments, similar to that shown in Example 20, was conducted wherein the amount and concentration of propylene carbonate, was studied in a clay-containing system.
______________________________________
Formula A
Clay 10.0% Did not set hard under
Prop. Carb.
2.0% water after 30 minutes
SiO.sub.2 N
79.2%
H.sub.2 O 8.8%
100.0%
Formula B
Clay 10.0% Set hard under water
Prop. Carb.
4.0% after 20 minutes
SiO.sub.2 N
77.4%
H.sub.2 O 8.6%
100.0%
Formula C
Clay 10.0% Did not set hard under
Prop. Carb.
2.0% water after 30 minutes
SiO.sub.2 N
61.6%
H.sub.2 O 26.4%
100.0%
Formula D
Clay 10.0% Set hard rubber-like
Prop. Carb.
4.0% after 30 minutes
SiO.sub.2 N
60.2%
H.sub.2 O 25.8%
100.0%
Formula E
Clay 10% Did not set under
Prop. Carb.
2% water after 30 minutes
SiO.sub.2 N
44%
H.sub.2 O 44%
100%
Formula F
Clay 10% Product set rubber-
Prop. Carb.
4% like after 30 minutes
Na SiO.sub.2 "N"
43%
H.sub.2 O 43%
100%
Formula G
Clay 20% Product set hard <10
Prop. Carb.
4% minutes under water
Na SiO.sub.2 "N"
66%
H.sub.2 O 10%
100%
Formula H
Clay 20% Product set hard
Prop. Carb.
2% rubber-like after
Na SiO.sub.2 "N"
68% 10 minutes under water
H.sub.2 O 10%
100%
Formula I
Clay 20% Rubber-like set after
Prop. Carb.
4% 15 minutes under water
Na SiO.sub.2 "N"
38%
H.sub.2 O 38%
100%
______________________________________
Examples 15 to 21 demonstrate that the system of silicate, sodium silicate solution and neutralizing material provides a nitrate-free stemming material that can set to a hard mass, even under water. The system is particularly adapted for bulk stemming operations.
Blends of Materials A and B
22) Bulk Stemming
______________________________________
Formula: 89.5% "K" Sodium Silicate soln.
.5% Carbopol 690
10.0% Clay (Celetom)
100%
neutralized with 4% Propylene Carbonate
______________________________________
Procedure: Mix clay and Carbopol 690 in beaker Add SiO.sub.2 SOLN and mix well by hand. Add propylene carbonate and mix by hand Results: Final product became very pasty quickly.
Poured part of batch through water to test water resistance. The product hardened, under water, after 10 minutes.
23) Bulk Stemming
______________________________________
Formula: 25.0% sand
74.5% SIO.sub.2 "K"
SiO.sub.2 /Na.sub.2 O = 2.88
.5% Carbopol 690
100.0% Total
______________________________________
The mixture was then neutralized with propylene carbonate, as indicated below.
______________________________________
Level of Prop.
Carbonate Result
______________________________________
1% Set rubbery in air and in water
4% Set hard in air and under water
______________________________________
24) Bulk Stemming
______________________________________
Formula: 50.0% sand
49.5% SIO.sub.2 "K"
SiO.sub.2 /Na.sub.2 O = 2.88
.5% Carbopol 690
100.0% Total
______________________________________
Result: With 1% propylene carbonate - pasty mix, set (hard) rubber-like after 10 minutes in air and under H.sub.2 0
25) Bulk Stemming
______________________________________
Formula: 75.0% sand
24.5% SIO.sub.2 "K"
SiO.sub.2 /Na.sub.2 O = 2.88
.5% Carbopol 690
100.0% Total
______________________________________
Result: With 1% propylene carbonate - very dry and clumpy - did not form a solid single mass. Did not harden under water.
With 4% propylene carbonate - very dry and clumpy - did not form a solid single mass. Did not harden under water.
26 ) Bulk Stemming
______________________________________
Formula: 40.0% sand
59.5% SIO.sub.2 "K"
SiO.sub.2 /Na.sub.2 O = 2.88
.5% Carbopol 690
100.0% Total
______________________________________
Results: With 4% propylene carbonate - Good, hard set after 10 minutes - in air and under H.sub.2 O
27) Bulk Stemming
______________________________________
Formula: 47.5% sand
2.5% clay
49.5% SIO.sub.2 "K"
SiO.sub.2 /Na.sub.2 O = 2.88
.5% Carbopol 690
100.0% Total
______________________________________
Result: With 2% propylene carbonate -- taffy-like, dry mix set hard after 10 minutes in air and under H.sub.2 O
With 4% propylene carbonate -- taffy-like, dry mix set hard after 20 minutes in air and under H.sub.2 O
With 1% - propylene carbonate -- taffy-like, dry mix set hard after 10 minutes -- in air and under H.sub.2 O (Soft under water -- did not totally set to a hard mass -- rubbery)
In an additional experiment with 1% clay, 1% propylene carbonate, the formulation given above produced a taffy-like, dry mix which set to a hard mass after 10 minutes in air (Soft under water -- did not set -- rubbery)
28) Bulk Stemming - Sample formulations and results
______________________________________
Test 1
Test 2 Test 3 Test 4
Test 5
______________________________________
Sand 60 60 60 50 50
Carbopol 676 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Propylene Carbonate
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
SiO.sub.2 "N"
18.75 16.25 37.5 23.75 33.25
H.sub.2 O 18.75 11.25 -- 23.75 14.25
Result: Time to hard
25* 25 7 20* 20
set (min.)
______________________________________
* -- Rubberlike hard set
29) Bulk Stemming - Sample formulations and results
______________________________________
Test 1 Test 2 Test 3
______________________________________
Sand 60 60 60
Carbopol 676 0.2 0.2 0.2
Propylene Carbonate
2.0 2.0 2.0
SiO.sub.2 "N" 37.8 18.9 22.68
H.sub.2 O -- 18.9 15.12
Result: Time to hard set
10 20* 20*
(min.)
______________________________________
* -- Rubberlike hard set
30) This experiment is similar to experiment No. 29 except that the propylene carbonate is replaced by acetic anhydride (A.A.)
______________________________________
Test No. 1:
______________________________________
Formula: Sand 60.0%
A.A. 2.0
SiO.sub.2 "N"
38.0
______________________________________
Result: Hard set in air very quickly (<10 sec.) When tested under water, the water solubility of the acetic anhydride interfered with the ability of the system to set to a hard mass. These results are presented hereinbelow, as tests 2, 3 and 4.
______________________________________
Test 2 Test 3 Test 4
______________________________________
Sand 60 60 60
Carbopol 676 0.2 2.0 2.0
Acetic Anhydride
2.0 1.0 0.66
Methanol -- 1.0 1.34
SiO.sub.2 "N" 18.9 18.9 18.9
H.sub.2 O 18.9 18.9 18.9
______________________________________
All formulations (for Tests 2 to 4) failed to set under water. Under dry conditions, the system provided a stemming material suitable for use.
Accordingly, Examples 22 to 30 provide evidence of the ability of mixtures of a silicon oxide-containing material, a silicate solution and an acrylic acid polymer, together with an acidic material, to form a nitrate-free stemming material.
Having described specific embodiments of the present invention, it will be understood that modifications thereof may be suggested to those skilled in the art, and it is intended to cover all such modifications as fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Claims
1. A stemming agent comprising at least one of the following components:
- A) 0-100% by weight of a solution of a neutralized acrylic acid polymer, and
- B) 0-100% by weight of a mixture of from about 1 to 95 weight percent of a silicon oxide-containing material combined with a neutralized silicate solution, and combinations thereof.
2. A stemming agent as claimed in claim 1 wherein said agent is nitrate-free.
3. A stemming agent as claimed in claim 1 comprising 0-100% by weight of a mixture of from about 10 to 70 weight percent of a silicon oxide-containing material combined with a neutralized silicate solution.
4. A stemming agent as claimed in claim 1 wherein said agent is 100 weight percent of an aqueous neutralized acrylic acid polymer.
5. A stemming agent as claimed in claim 1 wherein said agent is 100 weight percent of a mixture of from about 1 to 95 weight percent silicon dioxide containing material combined with a neutralized silicate solution.
6. A stemming agent as claimed in claim 1 wherein said agent is 100 weight percent of a mixture of from about 10 to 70 weight percent silicon dioxide containing material combined with a neutralized silicate solution.
7. A stemming agent as claimed in claim 1 wherein said solution of acrylic acid polymer is neutralized by diethanolamine or sodium carbonate.
8. A stemming agent as claimed in claim 4 comprising 9.0 to 99.8% water and 0.2 to 1.0% by weight of an acrylic acid polymer which has been partially or completely neutralized.
9. A stemming agent as claimed in claim 1 wherein said silicate solution is a sodium silicate solution having from 30 to 60%, by weight, of a mixture of SiO.sub.2 and Na.sub.2 O in a 3:1 ratio.
10. A stemming agent as claimed in claim 3 wherein said silicate solution is a sodium silicate solution having from about 30 to 60%, by weight, of a mixture of Si.sub.2 and Na.sub.2 O in a 3:1 ratio.
11. A stemming agent as claimed in claim 1 wherein said silicate solution is neutralized by a mineral acid, an organic acid, an organic acid anhydride, or propylene carbonate.
12. A bulk nitrate-free stemming agent comprising a mixture of from about 1 to 95% of a silicon oxide-containing material with 99 to 5% of a sodium silicate solution which has been neutralized by the addition of a mineral acid, an organic acid, an organic acid anhydride or propylene carbonate.
13. A bulk nitrate-free stemming agent comprising a mixture of from about 10 to 70% of a silicon oxide-containing material with 90 to 30% of a sodium silicate solution which has been neutralized by the addition of a mineral acid, an organic acid, an organic acid anhydride or propylene carbonate.
14. A bulk nitrate-free stemming agent as claimed in claim 12 comprising a mixture of from about 1 to 95% of a silicon oxide-containing material with 99 to 5% of a sodium silicate solution which has been neutralized by the addition of an acrylic acid polymer.
15. A bulk nitrate-free stemming agent as claimed in claim 13 comprising a mixture of from about 10 to 70% of a silicon oxide-containing material with 90 to 30% of a sodium silicate solution which has been neutralized by the addition of an acrylic acid polymer.
Type: Grant
Filed: Apr 11, 1994
Date of Patent: Dec 17, 1996
Assignee: ICI Explosives USA Inc. (Tamaqua, PA)
Inventors: Fortunato Villamagna (Slatington, PA), Melvin A. McNicol (Quebec), Curtis P. Link (Tamaqua, PA)
Primary Examiner: Peter A. Nelson
Attorney: Charles Q. Buckwalter, Jr.
Application Number: 8/225,850
International Classification: F42D 300;
