WDM optical network with passive pass-through at each node

- Nortel Networks Limited

A communications network has a plurality of nodes interconnected by an optical transmission medium. The transmission medium is capable of a carrying a plurality of wavelengths organized into bands. A filter at each node for drops a band associated therewith and passively forwards other bands through the transmission medium. A device is provided at each node for adding a band to the transmission medium. Communication can be established directly between a pair of nodes in the network sharing a common band without the active intervention of any intervening node. This allows the network to be protocol independent. Also, the low losses incurred by the passive filters permit relatively long path lengths without optical amplification.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

This is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/917,784 filed Aug. 27, 1997.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for establishing communication over an optical network employing wavelength division multiplexing.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The ever-increasing demand for bandwidth has spurred the growth of high speed transport networks. Currently, the key standard for use in such networks is SONET, which is an acronym for Synchronous Optical Network. The SONET standard defines a hierarchy of optical transmission rates over point-to-point and ring network topologies. For example, the SONET optical carrier-level 3 (OC-3) transmits at 155 Mb/s and OC-12 transmits at 622 Mb/s.

SONET was developed to provide a survivable transport infrastructure that could carry a range of different payload protocols and payload bit rates.

Survivability is achieved in SONET using a ring topology with a SONET-defined standard protocol for coordinating traffic restoration in the event of a failure. On a ring, there are always two diverse routes that can be used to interconnect any two nodes on the ring. In the event of a failure of one of those routes, spare capacity on the other route is used to restore the traffic affected by the failure. In SONET, every node must terminate the entire optical signal in order to be able to access every payload, even though typically a node would only access a small subset of the payloads and pass the rest of them downstream to other nodes. Termination of the entire optical signal is also required to give each node access to an automatic protection switching (APS) protocol that coordinates access to the spare capacity by the node during failure events. Unfortunately, this requirement of SONET to terminate the entire optical signal at every node makes upgrading the capacity of the ring a slow and costly process, because every node must be upgraded even though it may be that only one node requires the additional capacity.

In order to carry a variety of payloads and payload bit rates, the SONET standard defines a payload envelope structure into which all payloads must be mapped. This envelope is then carried within one timeslot within the time division multiplexed SONET signal. Although this provides a SONET network with the ability to carry a variety of payloads, a new payload cannot be transported until a mapping is defined and the interface circuit is developed and deployed. In addition, if there is insufficient spare capacity in the network to handle the new payload bit rate, then the entire network may have to be upgraded. Thus, SONET networks are not responsive to the needs of today's services, which are demanding greater capacity and introducing a wide range of protocols.

The networks of today's telecommunications carriers typically consist of an access portion that connects end-users to the carrier's network, and a transport portion (sometimes called backbone or core network) that provides the interconnection between the access networks. The access portion of the network is under pressure to provide a greater variety of signal types such as asynchronous transfer mode (ATM), asynchronous digital subscriber loops (ADSL), and SONET, to handle the emerging diversity of services. These new payloads also tend to require greater bit rates to support the underlying services. Transport networks are under pressure to provide more capacity due to the higher bit rate services coming out of the access networks as well as the growth in the number and size of the access networks reflecting the growth in the number of end-users.

An object of the invention is to alleviate the limitations in SONET-based networks.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the present invention there is provided a communications network employing wavelength division multiplexing, comprising a plurality of nodes; an optical transmission medium interconnecting said nodes, said transmission medium being capable of a carrying a plurality of wavelengths organized into bands; and an interface at each node for dropping a band associated therewith, adding a band carrying traffic for another node, and passively forwarding other bands; whereby communication can be established directly between a pair of nodes in said network sharing a common band without the active intervention of any intervening node.

A network in accordance with the invention is protocol and bit rate independent and is therefore more responsive than SONET to the demands placed on the access and transport networks of telecommunications carriers. Each payload is carried on separate optical wavelengths and payloads are multiplexed using wavelength division multiplexing techniques.

A band consists of a group of closely spaced wavelengths. A guard space normally exists between the bands to allow for simple filtering of a band out of the overall spectrum. For example, a band may consist of four wavelengths spaced at 1.6 nm intervals giving a total width for the band of 4×1.6=6.4 nm. With a guard band of 3.2 nm, the overall band spacing would be 6.4+3.2=9.6 nm.

A band is associated with the connection between two nodes, such that if, for example, node A wishes to communicate with node C via intervening node B, both node A and node C must access (add/drop) the same band, say band X. Node A would transmit to node C on band X, which would be passively forwarded by intervening node.

The use of bands as distinct from discrete wavelengths allows the filter specifications to be relaxed in the area of sideband roll-off slope since there are cascaded filters involved at each node. A primary (or band) filter discriminates a band of wavelengths. Further sub-division into specific channels is done with a narrow width filter(s) that is sub-tended after the band filter.

The use of a multi-level filtering approach is more energy efficient than other arrangements for ring networks. This is due to the fact that the band filter is the primary filter element that is repeated around the ring. As nodes are added to the ring, the attenuation loss due to the band filter element does not rise as fast as the case where individual wavelengths are filtered out at a node with the residual band being passed on.

The interface is typically in the form of a filter which separates out the band to be dropped and forwards the other bands by reflection. The filter acts as a multiplexer/demultiplexer which drops and adds the band associated with the node from the transmission medium.

The filter is preferably an interference filter with minimal loss, preferably less than 1 dB, and typically 0.5 dB. The division of the wavelength spectrum into bands, each associated with a node, is an important factor in reducing the loss at the passive filter. If individual wavelengths were employed, losses in the order of 3 to 6 dB could be expected, and the maximum size of the network would be very much restricted.

An important advantage of the present invention is that each wavelength essentially provides a protocol independent high speed bit pipe between a pair of nodes with minimal loss.

A node in one embodiment ma y also include a cross connect switch f or changing wavelengths. For example, if a path is established between node A and node C over band c, and between node C and node F over band f, and no path exists between node A and node F, node A can send traffic for node F first to node C, which drops the band c, detects that the traffic is for node F, and passes it through the cross connect to forward the traffic in band f, which will be dropped by node F.

The optical path for the network is thus passive except for nodes where wavelengths are add/dropped. The system also has low overall loss in any wavelength path so that no optical amplifiers need be employed to achieve a 30 km ring circumference. The overall power loss budget is estimated at 30 dB.

In a typical maximum configuration system, approximately ⅓ of the optical loss is in the fiber (˜9 dB) and approximately ⅓ the loss is in the optical add/drop filters (16 band filters @0.5db=8 dB). The remainder of the 30 dB optical power budget is reserved for connect or loss, splices and aging of components.

According to another aspect of the invention there is provided a method of establishing communication over an network employing wavelength division multiplexing and having a plurality of nodes interconnected by an optical transmission medium capable of carrying a plurality of wavelengths organized into bands, the method comprising the steps of sending traffic destined for a remote node in a band associated with the remote node; passively forwarding said band at any intervening nodes; and dropping said band at said remote node to extract said traffic destined therefor.

The invention still further provides an interface device for use in an optical network employing wavelength division multiplexing, comprising a demultiplexer for dropping a predetermined band of wavelengths from the network at a node, means for converting optical input signals from said demultiplexer to electrical output signals, means for generating optical output signals from electrical input signals, a multiplexer for adding said optical output signals in a predetermined band to the network, said demultiplexer and multiplexer being arranged to forward passively optical signals in bands other than said band that is dropped.

In another aspect the invention provides a fiber optic wavelength division multiplexed ring comprising a plurality of switching nodes, means for generating a plurality of wavelengths organized in to bands on said ring, and means for transmitting maintenance channel data on at least one of said wavelengths as a pilot tone.

The maintenance channel can conveniently be injected by modulating the bias current of the device generating the wavelengths, normally a laser.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention will now be described in more detail, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the physical layout of a wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) bi-directional ring network;

FIG. 2 is a chart of the bands of wavelengths employed in a typical system in accordance with the invention;

FIG. 3 is a block functional diagram of a network node;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram network node with an optical cross connect switch;

FIG. 5 illustrates a ring showing the waveband connections;

FIG. 6 illustrates a ring showing protection switching;

FIG. 7 is an example of a hubbed connection pattern;

FIG. 8 is an example of a meshed connection pattern;

FIG. 9 illustrates a ring showing examples of payload signals;

FIG. 10 shows a bit rate consistency monitor;

FIG. 11 is a block diagram of a maintenance channel signal driver;

FIG. 12 is a graph showing the spectral density of each wavelength; and

FIG. 13 is a block diagram of a distributed ATM switch.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring now to FIG. 1, a WDM (Wavelength division Multiplexed) ring network generally referenced 1 consists of two counter rotating rings 2, 3 containing a plurality of nodes 4, 5, 6, 7 ,8 providing interfaces to the rings 2, 3. It will be understood that FIG. 1 shows the physical layout of the network. The rings 2, 3 physically consist of optical fibers, which are capable of carrying multiple wavelengths generated by lasers in the nodes. The interconnectivity between the nodes is provided by WDM connections in a manner to be described.

Each ring may carry, for example, 16 or 32 wavelengths divided into eight bands, which provide the interconnectivity between the nodes. Typically there are either two or four wavelengths per band. With eight bands, there are therefore a total of 16 wavelengths per ring for two wavelengths per band or 32 wavelengths in the case of four wavelengths per band, for example, spaced at 1.6 nm with a guard band of 3.2 nm for a total spacing of 9.6 nm per band. FIG. 2 shows a typical distribution of bands and wavelengths. Typically the maximum number of nodes is eight, assuming eight bands.

Each node 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, adds/drops a predetermined band of wavelengths specific to that node. For example, node 6 might drop the 1.52411 to 1.51948 &mgr;m band, which includes wavelengths at 1.52411, 1.52256, 1.52102, and 1.51948 &mgr;m. In order to establish a path between node 4 and node 6, node 4 transmits to node 6 in this band on both counter rotating rings 2, 3. This band is passively reflected by nodes 5, 7, 8 and forwarded to node 6, which drops the band and extracts the traffic. In accordance with the principles of the invention, the bands of wavelength thus permit direct, protocol independent connections to be made between any nodes on the ring without the intervention of any intermediate node. The nodes on the ring can be interconnected in any traditional manner, for example, in star or mesh connections, by establishing waveband connections between desired pairs of nodes.

A typical node with a wavelength conversion function will be described in more detail with reference to FIG. 3.

Demultiplexers 10 and multiplexers 11 are shown connected into the fiber optic rings 2, 3. Demultipexers 10 drop, and multiplexers 11 add, a specific band of wavelengths associated with the node. Physically the MUX/DEMUX 10, 11 each consist of a single high performance optical interference filter that transmits the selected band to be dropped/added and passively reflects the remaining bands. The filters can be, for example, dichroic filters, Bragg grating filters based on circulators, and Bragg grating based on fused biconic taper. A suitable filter is made by JDS Fitel of Ottawa, Canada. Such filters offer low through-path loss (<1 dB), and reasonable (<2 db) add/drop loss. The bands 13 not dropped by the demultiplexers 10 are passively forwarded through the node.

In physical terms, the bands 13 of wavelengths that are not destined for a particular node are passively reflected on to the next node and so on until they reach the destination node where they are dropped in the manner described.

The dropped band 12 from each ring 2, 3 is passed to a second fine optical filter 19, which separates the dropped band into the individual wavelengths. The subdivided wavelengths are passed to electro-optic converters 14, which generate electrical signals from the optical inputs. The electric signals are then passed to digital cross connect switch, which connects them to payload interface devices 16 providing access to the network. Alternatively, cross connect 15 permits switching between different wavelengths or bands. In the latter case, the cross connect 15 can be connected to additional MUX/DEMUX filters (not shown) provided at the same node for adding/dropping different bands either on the same ring or a different ring.

The adding of a band works in the same way as the dropping of a band in reverse. Electrical signals are converted to optical form in electro-optic converters 14 and passed to fine channel filters 18, which combine the specific band of wavelengths that it is desired to add. The output 18 of these filters is passed to MUX 11 and combined with the forwarded bands 13. In physical terms, the added band(s) is/are transmitted through the optical filter and combined with the forwarded bands 13, which are passively reflected.

The ‘optimum’ construction for a node filter is a 4, 6 or 10 port device having an in port, out port and 1, 2 or 4 ‘drop’ ports and 1, 2 or 4 ‘add’ ports. As there are eight bands, there will be eight varieties of the device, one per band. One such device is used where ever a band is to be add/dropped. Each port corresponds to a specific wavelength.

The filter is a highly integrated passive optical device. The design and construction of the filter is such that 1 wavelength (approx. 1 nm Bandwidth) is available from a ‘drop’ port and 1 wavelength (approx. 1 nm Bandwidth) is added to an ‘add’ port. By using identical band filters at two points on the ring, 1, 2 or 4 wavelengths can be used to implement a bi-directional ‘communications’ pipe between those points. These pipes are independent of any other wavelengths on the fiber ring so long as no other nodes use the same band filters. Each wavelength used in the system in effect serves as a transparent digital “bit pipe”. Any specific formatting of data in a wavelength is to be carried out by sub-tending equipment. The system is not protocol dependent. The present invention employs bands to provide protocol independent direct connections between nodes on a physical ring, which in physical terms need not be adjacent.

FIG. 4 shows a similar arrangement to FIG. 3, except that the electro-optical converters have been omitted and the cross connect switch 115 is an optical switching device that performs optical switching and provides optical outputs to optical interfaces 116. With optical switching, wavelength conversion can be realized optically. Electro-absorption devices and/or semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOAs) may be used to perform the conversion.

Each node typically has at least one band filter, at least one laser diode, driver and MTCE (maintenance channel modulator), at least one PIN diode receiver, transimpedance amplifier, limit amplifier and MTCE demodulator, fine optical filters, a maintenance channel control processor, with Ethernet port and node control HW, and a per wavelength interface to subtending equipment or test data generator (option module). Optionally, a PLL data regenerator and cross-connect matrix can be provided. A low frequency bandpass filter picks off the maintenance channel data and it is demodulated by a PLL type FSK demodulator. The data stream then goes to the maintenance processor.

Each wavelength is driven by a DFB (Distributed Feedback) laser or Bragg grating reflector laser at a specific wavelength chosen to match the filter characteristics. The output power of the laser is in the range of −3 dbm to a possible high of +6 dbm. Laser components may require thermal stabilization (also providing a means of micro-tuning to specific wavelengths). The laser is driven by a single chip control circuit that combines the monitor diode and bias requirements of the device. Typically these devices have a PECL differential input.

FIG. 5 shows one example of a connectivity diagram of a network operating in accordance with the invention. The nodes are physically interconnected in a ring by counter-rotating optic fiber rings as described with reference to FIG. 1. The bands of wavelengths provided direct WDM protocol independent connections between non adjacent rings. In FIG. 5, band X connects node 5 to node 8 in both directions. This means that node 5 and 8 add and drop band X., that is band X is passively reflected by the interference filter at node 4.

The invention also allows protection switching, with the bands acting as direct connections between the nodes. FIG. 6 is an example of protection switching.

In FIG. 6, a band connects X two nodes via two diverse paths on opposite arcs 40, 41 of the ring 1. One of these arcs can be used to provide a restoration path for all of the wavelengths in the band in the event of a failure of the other path. In FIG. 6, a band connects nodes A and C. The arc 40 via node B is used normally and the arc via nodes D-Z is spare. Node A and node C monitor the quality of the signals dropped from the band at each end of the connection. In the event of a failure of the connections via node B, nodes A and C re-establish the connections via nodes D-Z.

The drop nodes may use optical power measurements on each wavelength as a quality measure. If the optical power drops below a preset threshold, then a protection switch is triggered. This measurement is not dependent on the protocol or bit rate of the information carried on the wavelength.

Another quality measure that is protocol and bit-rate independent is a Bit Rate Consistency Monitor. The drop node counts the number of bits received over a given unit of time (long relative to the bit time of the lowest expected bit rate) and records the value of this count. If the value varies by more than some nominal amount, it is an indication that the channel is carrying noise and has therefore failed.

An example of a Bit Rate Consistency Monitor is shown in FIG. 10. Incoming serial data 50 is fed to edge counter 51, which inputs an M-bit count to register 53. A reference clock, which has a repetition rate low relative to the minimum serial data rate, is input to register 53 and 54 to latch the count samples n and n−1 and also to the counter to reset it between samples. Sample n from register 53 and sample n−1 from register 54 are compared in comparator 55 ,which generates a true/output depending on the consistency of the incoming bit rate.

In order to coordinate the switching of the traffic, the nodes at each end of the connection must communicate directly For example, in FIG. 6, if a failure of the connection is observed only at node C, then node C may have to communicate with node A to get the wavelengths that were being sent across the band via node B to be sent across the band via node D-Z. This can be accomplished using one or more of the maintenance channels that are carried on a pilot tone on each wavelength.

FIG. 7 shows a hubbed connection pattern as a further example of the manner in which the nodes can be interconnected in accordance with the principles of the present invention. In FIG. 7, node C (5) acts as the hub from which “connections” are established to other nodes over dedicated wavebands extending between the hub node 5 and the remaining nodes.

FIG. 8 shows a meshed arrangement, where the nodes are connected in the form of a mesh pattern. In all cases the wavebands act as bit pipes establishing protocol independent high speed connections directly between nodes, which may be non-adjacent.

FIG. 9 shows examples of a signal payload that may be carried by a ring operating in accordance with the invention. In FIG. 9, band 30 establishes a protocol independent connection between nodes 4 and 7. This connection can carry SONET OC-3 traffic and Fiber channel traffic directly between the nodes. The system architecture does not need to know anything about the protocols. The band 7 merely delivers a high speed bit stream at node 7, which can be resolved into SONET and Fiber channel streams at the far end node.

FIG. 9 also shows Gigabit Ethernet and SONET OC-48 traffic between sent between nodes 5 and 8. Again the ring is indifferent to the protocols involved. The data is merely transported as a high speed bit stream over the carrier wavelength without regard to the underlying protocol.

It is of course possible to cascade multiple rings, interconnecting them at common nodes. However, if many rings are cascaded, dispersion effects and jitter effects on the electrical/optical signals may accumulate. In order to compensate for this, a re-generation stage may need to be added to the cross-connect matrix at selected interconnect points. This re-generation device is a wide range PLL (phase-locked loop) that locks onto the incoming digital data stream, recovers a clock and uses the clock to re-generate the digital stream. It is not necessary for the re-generator to know the specific format of the data in the stream, only to be able to lock onto the digital transitions and clean up the edges with respect to dispersion and jitter.

If the PLL requires setting for lock range or center frequency, this can be accommodated by maintenance channel configuration messages that are directed to the hardware that needs to be controlled.

A variety of external data sources can be connected to the data path for each wavelength. This can include OC-3, OC-12, a proprietary interface such as Newbridge ISL (Inter Shelf Links) and possibly Gigabit Ethernet sources.

As mentioned above, the wavelengths carry a maintenance channel, which is driven by an FSK modulator originating directly from the maintenance channel data stream.

In a multi-node WDM ring network the opportunity exists for overall optimization economies that can be facilitated by the individual nodes being able to communicate with each other to exchange information that is used to control the laser device by adjusting the fundamental operating parameters of the device and other optical elements that may be used in such a network. Methods of local optimization of laser parameters have been discussed in the literature. However, this approach uses and end-to-end approach which is more complete in terms of being able to adjust for network operating parameters. It also allows consideration to be given for specification tolerance reduction of other network elements e.g. filter roll off, centre frequency position and gain elements that may be present in such a ring configuration.

For each wavelength operating between two points in the WDM ring, there is a laser source, an add filter (or portion of an add/drop filter), fibre transmission media a drop filter (or portion of an add/drop filter), an optical detector and ancillary receive electronics to route the signal to other portions of the system.

The laser source is controlled by setting a laser current threshold, modulation current level and operating temperature. The operating wavelength is adjusted (by temp control) so as to provide maximum signal energy to the detector at the far end. This procedure aligns the emitted wavelength with the combined cascade filter response so as to minimizes the losses due to individual component tolerances. It also has the benefit of any medium to long term wavelength variation of the laser from the system loss plan calculations.

The peak optical power and the extinction ratio (ER) is regulated and controlled by special electronic circuits or by an embedded microcontroller. Laser slope efficiencies at bias level and at peak level can be measured by varying bias current and peak current in very small steps respectively. Such measurement allows the laser ER and peak power to be frequently monitored and controlled.

Wavelength stability is attained by adjusting the laser operating wavelength (e.g. adjusting laser operating temperature) while monitoring the received power level at the receiving node. Since the WDM filter modules have a narrow pass band (approximately 1 nm) for each wavelength channel and possesses other optical characteristics, it is possible to precisely re-align the laser operating wavelength on a regular basis.

In certain circumstances when operating the same wavelength on two different segments of the ring it may be necessary to set the operating wavelengths at slightly different points so as to minimize ‘beat noise’ (a coherent interference effect between optical sources). This noise factor is overcome by having the operating wavelengths separated by come small amount (0.05 nm to 0.2 nm).

The other parameters of laser operation (threshold) and modulation depth are controlled end-to-end in such a way as to optimize the receive eye signal for a given data rate. The maintenance signal that is superimposed on the optical wavelength gives a means of measuring the error performance of the mtce channel (which is directly proportional to the error rate of the main data channel on the optical beam.). By means of message feedback, the received signal condition state can be sent back to the laser transmitter so that corrective actions or stabilization routines can be run. The specific control routines are software algorithms that run on the embedded processor that is associated with the laser control circuitry. These control algorithms will include both wavelength stabilization routines and received eye signal optimization.

In a network of WDM laser sources and receivers (including drop/add filters) it may be necessary to add amplification to individual wavelengths or groups of wavelengths so as to obtain sufficient optical energy to achieve a desired bit error rate at the receiver. In a known topology situation a number of EDFA elements could be added to the system to overcome transmission losses due to fibre and filter loss. Due to the topology of the ring and the fact that it is a ring configuration, fixed gain blocks such as EDFA's may bc difficult to specify and may in fact impair the performance of some wavelengths in the system.

A solution to the problem exists in the form of a SOA element combined with an electrically programmable attenuator element. This technology can be obtained in discrete element form or integrated onto a silicon waveguide structure. Thc SOA provides the pure gain required. The programmable attenuator allows for signal level optimization on a node to node basis, independent of the levels required for any other node to node level on the ring. The SOA/Attenuator combination may be applied at the laser source (as a post-amplifier), the receiver (as a pre-amplifier) or both.

In the event that it was desired to use EDFA elements as the gain block in a fibre based ring system, the programmable attenuator could be used to optimize the receive signal level at the receiver. It is felt that this would not provide as flexible a solution as the SOA/attenuator system but would overcome the problem of individual channels gain adjustment that is required in such an amplified add/drop system.

In all cases the key to the system optimization is the ability for the system to communicate on the mtce channels between source/receiver pairs and to optimize via control algorithms the operating level of the signal in such a way as to obtain the best end-to-end performance and WDM network management.

The maintenance and control processor of each node is a small computer board that contains processor, ram, flash memory for program and application store and several serial interfaces (one per MTCE link). The processor has an embedded DOS that is augmented with a TCP/IP routing and control module (Flexcom router and control switch). Since the Flexcom product is actually a multi-tasking O/S operating in conjunction with the embedded DOS, several monitor and control functions specific to laser operation and maintenance are integrated into this SW. A status and reporting function is also incorporated.

By means of this switch, all nodes in a system may be controlled and monitored by a remote PC that operates a Telnet session to each processor. Maintenance traffic may also be routed through a maintenance processor to other nodes or subtending equipment.

FIG. 11 shows the arrangement for creating the maintenance channel. Driver 90 for laser 91 has a bias input 92 that is modulated by FSK modulator 93 receiving at its input the maintenance channel 95. The data channel, which is all digital, is applied to the main input of the driver 90.

The arrangement shown in FIG. 11 embeds a pilot tone on each wavelength, which may be of low bit rate (<256 kbps). This pilot tone is injected into the wavelength channel by modulation of the bias current by the FSK modulator 93 that modulates the MTCE channel data stream into a sequence of tones. Other carrier modulation systems such as QAM-64 or QAM-256 or OFDM may be used. The level of the pilot tone is approximately 20 dB below the main data path. The effect of the pilot tone on the BER of the main data channel, which is purely digital, is minimal since it is carried on a portion of the spectral distribution curve well outside the portion carrying the high bit rate data (see FIG. 12).

The MTCE channel modulation ensures wavelength integrity between nodes, provides a power level estimate of wavelength link, provides node status and monitoring (SNMP, RMON type messaging), distribution of network level timing synchronization, and SW & FW downloads for node processors and sub-tended equipment.

Since the MTCE channel is modulated independently from the regular ‘data pipe’ channel, the MTCE does not need to know what the format of data in the main channel is. This is extremely important in allowing format independence of end user applications and access.

The described arrangement provides a network capable of carrying data in the terabit/sec range over distances of up to 30 km, and more when cascaded rings are provided. It also allows the components of high speed switches, such as ATM switches, to be distributed over a campus wide network, resulting in substantial savings in trunk cards and processors. FIG. 13 is an example of such a distributed switch. Switch components 100 are interconnected over ring 1 using nodes 110 interconnected in the manner described above.

Claims

1. A distributed packet switch comprising:

a plurality of switching components distributed over a geographical area;
a fiber optic wavelength division multiplexed ring interconnecting said switching components, said fiber optic ring carrying a plurality of wavelengths organized into bands; and
means for adding/dropping a band at each switching component associated therewith, said adding/drolpping means passively forwarding other bands;
wherein pairs of said switching components forming part of said switch directly communicate on wavelengths in bands associated therewith.

2. A distributed packet switch as claimed in claim 1, wherein said switch is an ATM switch.

3. A distributed packet switch comprising:

a plurality of switching components distributed over a geographical area;
a fiber optic wavelength division multiplexed ring interconnecting said switching components, said fiber optic ring carrying a plurality of wavelengths organized into bands; and
an interface at each switching component that operates to add/drop a band associated therewith, said interfaces passively forwarding other bands;
wherein pairs of said switching components forming part of said switch directly communicate on wavelengths in bands associated therewith.

4. A distributed packet switch as claimed in claim 3, wherein said switch is an ATM switch.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
4244045 January 6, 1981 Nosu et al.
4380061 April 12, 1983 Mori et al.
4451916 May 29, 1984 Casper et al.
4542496 September 17, 1985 Takeyama et al.
4561088 December 24, 1985 Champlin et al.
4648088 March 3, 1987 Cagle et al.
4763317 August 9, 1988 Lehrnan et al.
4815803 March 28, 1989 Faulkner et al.
4835763 May 30, 1989 Lau
4837856 June 6, 1989 Glista
4880289 November 14, 1989 Imoto et al.
4927225 May 22, 1990 Levinson
4956836 September 11, 1990 Boatwright
5000531 March 19, 1991 Burrberry
5119223 June 2, 1992 Panzer et al.
5144465 September 1, 1992 Smith
5191457 March 2, 1993 Yamazaki
5216666 June 1, 1993 Stalick
5289302 February 22, 1994 Eda
5317198 May 31, 1994 Husbands
5319435 June 7, 1994 Melle et al.
5319485 June 7, 1994 Yasui et al.
5333130 July 26, 1994 Weissmann et al.
5365344 November 15, 1994 Eda et al.
5400163 March 21, 1995 Mizuochi et al.
5406401 April 11, 1995 Kremer
5438445 August 1, 1995 Nakano
5440416 August 8, 1995 Cohen et al.
5442623 August 15, 1995 Wu
5448501 September 5, 1995 Hablov et al.
5452124 September 19, 1995 Baker
5469265 November 21, 1995 Measures et al.
5488500 January 30, 1996 Glance
5488501 January 30, 1996 Barnsley
5502589 March 26, 1996 Yamamoto et al.
5504609 April 2, 1996 Alexander et al.
5548431 August 20, 1996 Shin et al.
5550818 August 27, 1996 Brackett et al.
5576875 November 19, 1996 Chawki et al.
5583683 December 10, 1996 Scobey et al.
5600466 February 4, 1997 Tsushima et al.
5625478 April 29, 1997 Doerr et al.
5631758 May 20, 1997 Knox et al.
5647035 July 8, 1997 Cadeddu et al.
5673129 September 30, 1997 Mizrahi
5680234 October 21, 1997 Darcie et al.
5715076 February 3, 1998 Alexander et al.
5717795 February 10, 1998 Sharma et al.
5717796 February 10, 1998 Glendening
5726784 March 10, 1998 Alexander et al.
5737104 April 7, 1998 Lee et al.
5742416 April 21, 1998 Mizrahi
5748349 May 5, 1998 Mizrahi
5751454 May 12, 1998 MacDonald et al.
5751456 May 12, 1998 Koonen
5760934 June 2, 1998 Sutter et al.
5771112 June 23, 1998 Hamel et al.
5774245 June 30, 1998 Baker
5778118 July 7, 1998 Sridhar
5784184 July 21, 1998 Alexander et al.
5786915 July 28, 1998 Scobey
5793507 August 11, 1998 Giles et al.
5793508 August 11, 1998 Meli
5796502 August 18, 1998 Haller et al.
5808763 September 15, 1998 Duck et al.
5812306 September 22, 1998 Mizrahi
5812711 September 22, 1998 Glass et al.
5822095 October 13, 1998 Taga et al.
5822474 October 13, 1998 Hara
5838848 November 17, 1998 Laude
5850301 December 15, 1998 Mizuochi et al.
5867289 February 2, 1999 Gerstel et al.
5870212 February 9, 1999 Nathan et al.
5889600 March 30, 1999 McGuire
5903371 May 11, 1999 Arecco et al.
5903691 May 11, 1999 Wisseman et al.
5905827 May 18, 1999 Naganuma et al.
5912751 June 15, 1999 Ford et al.
5915051 June 22, 1999 Damask et al.
5917625 June 29, 1999 Ogusu et al.
5920411 July 6, 1999 Duck et al.
5920412 July 6, 1999 Chang
5930016 July 27, 1999 Brorson et al.
5938309 August 17, 1999 Taylor
5940208 August 17, 1999 Blaszyk et al.
5943150 August 24, 1999 Deri et al.
5953141 September 14, 1999 Liu et al.
5959749 September 28, 1999 Danagher et al.
5963350 October 5, 1999 Hill
5963685 October 5, 1999 Nishino
5982516 November 9, 1999 Murphy et al.
5982517 November 9, 1999 Fishman
5986783 November 16, 1999 Sharma et al.
5999290 December 7, 1999 Li
5999322 December 7, 1999 Cushing et al.
6002503 December 14, 1999 Mizrahi
6002504 December 14, 1999 Tillerot et al.
6043914 March 28, 2000 Cook et al.
6069719 May 30, 2000 Mizrahi
6091529 July 18, 2000 Fischer et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
1248193 January 1989 CA
2108305 April 1994 CA
2181362 July 1995 CA
2218089 October 1996 CA
2188208 April 1997 CA
2196121 August 1997 CA
2264395 March 1998 CA
197 00 682 January 1998 DE
197 00 682 January 1998 DE
0400 959 December 1990 EP
0620694 October 1994 EP
0 651 529 May 1995 EP
0720411 July 1996 EP
2 305 041 July 1996 GB
2 305 041 March 1997 GB
A-S56-114457 September 1981 JP
A-S59-182638 October 1984 JP
0183927 July 1989 JP
0065838 March 1991 JP
A-H4-117042 April 1992 JP
04167634 June 1992 JP
A-H4-14283 January 1993 JP
07250356 September 1995 JP
09051560 February 1997 JP
09083495 March 1997 JP
WO97/22190 June 1997 WO
WO99/07097 February 1999 WO
99/07097 February 1999 WO
Other references
  • “Logically Rearrangeable Multihop Lightwave Networks” by Labourdette, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 39, No. 8, Aug. 1991.*
  • “Design of Logical Topologies for Wavelength-Routed Optical Networks” by Ramaswami, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 14, No. 5, Jun. 1996.*
  • “Performance Analysis of Multihop Lightwave Networks with Hot Potato Routing and Distance-Age-Priorities” by Zhang, et al., IEEE, vol. Conf. 10,1991, pp. 1012-1021.*
  • “Self-healing WDM Ring Networks with AII-Optical Protection Path” by Elrefaie, OFC Conference, vol. 5, Feb. 1992, pp. 255-256.*
  • “Multiwavelength Survivable Ring Network Architectures” by Elrefaie, ICC Conference, IEEE, 1993, pp. 1245-1251.*
  • Textbook Fiber Network Service Survivability by Wu, Artech House, Norwood, MA, 1992, pp. 189-209.*
  • “Wavelength-addressed Optical Network Using an ATM Cell-Based Access Scheme” by Shimosaka, et al, Technical Digest, Conference on Optical Fiber Communication/International Conference on Integrated Optics and Optical Fiber Communications, 1993 Technical Digest Series, vol. 4, OSA, 1993, pp. 49-50.*
  • “Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing Networks: Principles and Applications” by Brackett, IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 8, No. 6, Aug. 1990, pp. 948-964.*
  • “Terabit Lightwave Networks: The Multihop Approach” by Acampora et al., AT &T Technical I Journal, vol. 66, Issue 6, Nov./Dec. 1987, pp. 21-34.
  • “The Lambdanet Multiwavelength Network: Architecture, Applications, and Demonstrations” by Goodman. et al.,IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 8, No. 6, Aug. 1990, pp. 995-11 04.
  • “Fiber-optic Loop Bypass Via Dual Source Coupling” by Balliet, et al., mM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 26, No. 10B, Mar. 1984, pp. 5369-5370.
  • “On Survivable Rings” by Beardsley, et al., FOC/LAN 83, 7th International Fiber Optic Communications and Local Area Networks Expo, Oct. 1983, pp. 117-122.
  • “A Fiber-Optic Broadband LAN/OCS Using a PBX” by E. Hara, IEEE Communication Magazine, vol. 21 No. 7, Oct. 1983, pp. 22-27.
  • “Network Survivability Analysis” by R. Talbott, FOC/LAN '87 and MFOC-West: 11th Annual International Fiber Optic Communications and Local Area Networks Expo, Oct. 1987, pp. 259-274.
  • “A Shunted Ring Fiber Optic Network Topology Providing Fault Detection, Isolation and Circumvention”by Glista, IEEE 1993 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, NAECON, May 1993, vol. 1, pp. 144-151.
  • “Optical Cross-Connect Architecture Using Free-Space Optical Switches Based On PI-Loss Topology” by Kuroyanagi, et al., GLOBECOM '95: Communications for Global Harmony, Nov. 1995, vol. 3, pp. 2112-2117.
  • “Fiber Optic Local-Area Networks” by Stanley, Proceedings of the National Electronics Conference, Sep./Oct. 1986, vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 482-490.
  • “Reduction of Restoration Capacity Requirements In Advanced Optical Networks” by Ayanoglu GLOBECOM '95 Communications for Global Harmony, Nov. 1995, vol. 2, pp. 1018-1022.
  • “A Novel Passive Protected SONET Bi-Directional Self-Healing Ring Architecture” by Wu, et al., Military Communications in a Changing World MILCOM, Nov. 1991, vol. 3, pp. 894-900.
  • “Yes, But How Do You Use It?” by King, Telephone Engineer and Management, Apr., 15, 1990, vol. 94, No. 8,pp. 114, 117-118, 120.
  • “Photonic Switching in Ring-Based Optic Networks” by Khurshid, et al., INFOCOM '89, Conference on Computer Communications, Apr. 1989, vol. 3, pp. 867-876.
  • “The Uses of Optical Switches in Fibre Optic Local Area Networks” by Hunter, et al., IEE Colloquium on ‘Fibre Optic LANS and Techniques for the Local Loop’, Mar. 1989, pp. 7/1-4.
  • “16ch Optical Add/Drop Multiplexer Using Silica-Based Arrayed- Waveguide Gratings” by Okamoto, et al., OFC '95: Optical Fiber Communication, Feb./Mar. 1995, vol. 8, pp. 363-366.
  • “Multilayer Add-Drop Multiplexers in A Self-Healing WDM Ring Network” by Hamel, et al., OFC '95: Optical Fiber Communication, vol. 8, Feb./Mar., 1995, pp. 84-85.
  • “Optical Filters in WDM Ring Network Architectures” by Hamel, et al., Proceedings of the SPIE, 1995, vol. 2449, pp. 70-77.
  • “Subarrier Multiplexing Based Signaling and Access Control in Optical FDM Networks” by Kitayama, GLOBECOM '95: Communications for Global Harmony, Nov. 1995, vol. 3, pp. 1996-2002.
  • “Network Performance and Integrity Enhancement With Optical Path Layer Technologies” by Sato, et aL., IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 159-170.
  • “Laboratory Demonstration of a 2.5-GBit/s SDH-Compatible Optical Cross-Connect Network” by Depovere, et al., ECOC '94:20th European Conference on Optical Communication, Sep. 1994, vol. 2, pp. 571-574.
  • “Multiwavelength Line-Rate-Independent Optical Digital Cross-Connects Based on Low-Gain Fiber Amplifiers” by Chen, et al., IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Sep. 1994, vol. 6, No. 9, pp. 1122-1125.
  • “Photonic Transport Networks Based on Optical Paths” by Sato, et al., International Journal of Communication Systems, Wiley, vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 377-389.
  • “New Optical Path Cross-Connect Architecture Offering High Modularity” by Watanabe, et al., 2nd Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications, APCC '95, Jun. 1995, vol. 1, pp. 89-92.
  • “Multiwavelength Self-Healing Ring Transparent Networks” by Wuttisittikulkij, et al., GLOBECOM '95: Communications for Global Harmony, Nov. 1995, vol. 1, pp. 45-49.
  • “An Engineering Perspective on the Applications of Photonic Switching Technology” by Personick, GLOBECOM '84: Communication in the Information Age, Nov. 1984, pp. 871-873.
  • “Optical Path Cross-Connect Node Architecture With High Modularity for Photonic Transport Networks” by Watanabe, et al., IEICE Transactions on Communication, Oct. 1994, vol. E77-B, Part 10, pp. 1220-1229.
  • “Cross Talks in Multiwavelength Optical Cross-Connect Networks” by Zhou, et al., OFC '95 Optical Fiber Communication, Feb./Mar. 1995, vol. 8, pp. 278-280.
  • “Optical Cross-Connect Based on WDM and Space-Division Multiplexing” by Jin, et al., IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 7, No. 11, pp. 1300-1302.
  • “Optical Crossconnect/ADM Based Networks” by Fujiwara, LEOS '94: 7th Annual Meeting of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society, Oct./Nov. 1994, vol. 2, pp. 111-112.
  • “Optical Paths and Realization Technologies” by Sato, et al., 1994 IEEE GLOBECOM: Communications: The Global Bridge, Nov./Dec. 1994, vol. 3, pp. 1513-1520.
  • “Optical Path Cross-Connect Systems Transport Experiment with Simulated Five-Node Network” by Koga, et al., Electronics Letters, vol. 31, No. 17, pp. 1470-1472.
  • “Reliability Model of the Optical Cross-Connect” by Sever.Informacija Telekomunikacije Automati, 1995. vol. 14, Part 1-3, pp. 39-47.
  • “A New Optical Path Cross-Connect System Architecture Utilizing Delivery and Coupling Matrix Switch” by Okamoto. et al., IEICE Transactions on Communications. Oct. 1994, vol. E77-B, No. 10, pp. 1272-1274.
  • “Functional Architecture for Optical Networks” by McGuire. et al., BT Technology Journal. Apr. 1995, vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 145-155.
  • “Optical Path Cross-Connect Node Architecture Offering High Modularity for Virtual Wavelength Paths” by Watanabe. et al., IEICE Transactions on Communications. vol. E78-B. Part 5. pp. 686-693.
  • Optical Path Cross-Connect Systems for Photonic Transport Networks. by Okamoto.et al.. GLOBECOM.93. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference. Nov./Dec. 1993, vol. 1. pp. 474-480.
  • “Reconfigurable Segmentation and Subnetworking for All-Optical Transmission Using an Optical Cross-Connect” by Rice. et al.. Proceedings of the SPIE, 1995, vol. 2614, pp. 183.191.
  • “Technologies and Architectures for Multiwavelength Optical Cross-Connects”. by Tomlinson. et al.. LEOS.95: IEEE Lasers and Elector-Optics Society 8th Annual Meeting. Oct. 1995, vol. 1. pp. 53-54.
  • “Monet: Multiwavelength Otpical Networking” by Wagner. et al.. Journal of Lightwave Technology. vol. 14, No. 6. Jun. 1996, pp. 1349-1355.
  • “Optical Services in Future Broadband Networks” by Finn, IEEE Network, vol. 10, No. 6. Nov./Dec. 1996. pp. 7-13.
  • Multiwavelength Optical Networks with Limited Wavelength Conversion. by Ramaswami. et al.. IEEE INFOCOM 1997, vol. 2, pp. 489-498.
  • “A Wideband All-Optical WDM Network” by Kaminow. et al.. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications. vol. 14. No. 5. Jun. 1996. pp. 780-797.
  • “On the Future of Wavelength Routing Networks” by Gerstel et al.. mEE Network. vol. 10, No. 6. Nov./Dec. 1996. pp. 14-20.
  • “On the Number of Wavelengths and Switches in All-Optical Networks” by Barry. et al.. IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 42, No. 2-4. Feb./Mar./Apr. 1994. pp. 583-591.
  • “Some Principles for Designing a Wide-Area WDM Optical Network” by Mukherjee. et al.. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. vol. 4, No. 5. Oct. 1996. pp. 684-696.
  • “Routing and Wavelength Assignment in All-Optical Networks” by Ramaswami. et al.. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. vol. 3, No. 5, Oct. 1995. pp. 489-500.
  • “Optical Path Accomodation Designs Applicable to Large Scale Networks” by Nagatsu. et al. IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. E78-B, No. 4, Apr. 1995, pp. 597-607.
  • “Optical Wavelength Routing, Translation, and Packet/Cell Switched Networks” by Bala, et al., Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 14, No. 3, Mar. 1996, pp. 336-343.
  • “Multi-Wavelength Transport Networks” by Chidgey, IEEE Comminications Magazine, Dec. 1994, vol. 32, No. 12, pp. 28-35.
  • “A New Model for Optimal Routing and Wavelength Assignment in Wavelength Division Multiplexed Optical Networks” by Chen, et al., UEEE INFOCOM 1996, vol. I, Mar. 1996, pp. 164-171.
  • “A Scalable Multiwavelength Multihop Optical Network: A Proposal for Research on All- Optical Networks” by gt, et al., Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 11, No. 5/6, May-Jun. 1993, pp. 736-753.
  • “A Transport Network Layer Based on Optical Network Elements” by Hill, et al., Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 11, No. 5/6, May-Jun. 1993, pp. 667-679.
  • “A Precompetitive Consortium on Wide-Band AlI-Optical Networks” by Alexander, et al., Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 11, No. 516, May-Jun. 1993, pp. 714-735.
  • “Optical Versus Electronic Switching for Broadband Networks” by Hui, et al., IEEE Network, vol. 10, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1996, pp. 21-25.
  • “On the Limits of Electronic ATM Switching” by Butner, et al., IEEE Network, vol. 10, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1996, pp. 26-31.
  • “Local Access Optical Networks” by Frigo, et al., IEEE Network, vol. 10, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1996, pp. 32-36.
  • “Benefits of All-Optical Routing in Transport Networks” by Roorda, et al., OFC '95 Technical Digest, vol. 8, Feb.-Mar. 1995, pp. 164-165.
  • “Connectivity and Sparse Wavelength Conversion in Wavelength-Routing Networks” by Subramaniam, et al., 15th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Soc., INFOCOM '96, Mar. 1996, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 148-155.
  • “Efficient Routing in All-Optical Networks” by Raghavan, et al., 26th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing; May 1994, pp. 134-143.
  • “Wavelength Assignments in Fixed Routing WDM Networks” by Subramaniam, et al., IEEE International Conference on Communications, vol. 1, Jun. 1997, pp. 406-410.
  • “Efficient Routing and Scheduling Algorithms for Optical Networks” by Aggarawal, et al., 5th—Annual Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, Jan. 1994, Chapter 46, pp. 412-423.
  • “Bounds on the Number of Wavelengths Needed in WDM Networks” by Barry, et al., LEOS 92 Summer Tropical Meeting Digest, Aug. 1992, pp. 21-22.
  • Dynamic Wavelength Allocation in A11-Optical Ring Networks. by Gerstel, et al., IEEE. International Conference on Communications, vol. I, 1997, pp. 432-436.
  • “Optical Networking in the European ACTS Program” by Hill, et al., Optical Fiber Communication OFC '96, vol. 2, Feb.-Mar. 1996, pp. 238-239.
  • “Effects of Wavelength Routing and Selection Algorithms on Wavelength Conversion Gain in WDM Optical Networks” by Karasan, et al., ICC '96, Workshop on WDM Network Management and Control, Jun. 1996,299-305.
  • “Design of the Optical Path Layer in Multiwavelength Cross-Connected Networks” by Wauters, et al., IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 14, No. 5, Jun. 1996, pp. 881-892.
  • “A Wavelength Routing Approach to Optical Communications Networks,” by Hill, Proc. IEEE INFOCOM '88, 1998.
  • “Models of Blocking Probability in A11-Optical Networks with and without Wavelength Changers” by Barry, et al, 14th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Soc., INFOCOM '95, Apr. 1995, vol. 2, pp. 402-412.
  • “Routing and Wavelength Assignment Methods in single-Hop All-Optical Networks with Blocking” by Birman, et al., 14 Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Soc., INFOCOM '95, Apr., 1995, vol. 2, pp. 431-438.
  • “Routing in a Linear Lightwave Network” by Bala, et al., IEEF/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 3, No. 4, Aug. 1995, pp. 459-469.
  • “Benefits of ‘Minimal’ Wavelength Interchange in WDM Rings” by Bala, et al., 1997 Conference on Optical Fiber Communications, Feb. 1997, pp. 120-121.
  • “Design of Wavelength-Routed Optical Networks for Circuit Switched Traffic” by Banerjee, et al., GLOBECOM: Global Telecommunications Conference, Nov. 1996, pp. 306-310.
  • “Project Learn- Light Exchangeable, Add/Drop Ring Network” by Hofmeister, et al., OFC '97, Dallas, Texas, Feb. 16-21, 1997.
  • “WDM All-Optical Networks” by Hudgings, et al., EE 228A Project Report, University of CA at Berkley, Fall 1996, pp. 1-25.
  • “WDM All-Optical Networks” by Hudgings, et al., EE 228A Project Report, University of CA at Berkley, Fall 1996, pp. 1-26.
  • “Dense WDM Mandates Advanced Passive Component Requirements” by Polinsky, Lightwave Magazine, Feb. 1996, vol. 13, Issue. 2.
  • “Design, Analysis, and Implementation of Wavelength-Routed All-Optical Networks: Routing and Wavelength Assignment Approach” by Yoo, et al., Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, May 1997.
  • “Design and Analysis of a Hierarchical Scalable Photonic Architecture” by Dowd, et al., Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, Jul. 20-23, 1993, pp. 289-295.
  • “First Multiwavelength Network Demonstrated” Optoelectronics, Mar. 1995, V 01.5, No. 7.
  • “Wavelength Division Multiplexing” by McCann, et al., Enterprise Systems Journal, Jul. 1997, vol. 12, No. 7.
  • “WDM Ring Network Using a Centralized Multiwavelength Light Source and Add- Drop Multiplexing Filters” by Sharma, et al., Journal of Lightwave Technology, Jun. 1997, vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 917-929.
  • “Optical Interconnection Using Shuffle Net Multihop Networks in Multi-Connect Ring Topologies” by Karol, AT&T Bell Laboratories, ACM, 1988, pp. 25-34.
  • “High-Speed Local Area Networks and Their Performance: A Survey” by Abeysundara, et al., ACM Computing Surveys, Jun. 1991, vol. 23, No. 2, p. 221-264.
  • “High Performance Interprocessor Communication Through Optical Wavelength Division Multiple Access Channels” by Dowd, ACM, 1991, pp. 96-105.
  • “Topologies for Wavelength-Routing All-Optical Networks” by Marsan, et al., IEEF/ACM Transactions on Networking, Oct. 1993, vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 534-546.
  • “Demonstrating Next-Generation Optical Transmissions” by Scott, et al., Telesis Bell-Northern Research Ltd., Dec. 1994, Issue 99, Start p. 15.
  • “Next-Generation Network Architectures and Technology Platforms” by Beaumont, et al., Telesis Bell-Northern Research Ltd., Oct. 1995, Issue 100, start p. 164.
  • “Sonet Transport Catches a Wave” by Wirbel, Electronic Engineering Times, Sep. 16, 1996.
  • “New Functional Multiaddress Channel Selective Terminal Using an Arrayed Waveguide Grating Multiplexer With Cross-Connect Loopback Paths” by Tachikawa, et al., IEEE Proceedings, Optoelectron, Oct. 1995, vol. 142, No. 5, pp. 219-224.
  • “GEMNET: A Generalized, Shuffle-Exchange-Based, Regular, Scalable, Modular, Multihop, WDM Lightwave Network” by loess, et al., IEEF/ACM Transaction on Networking, Aug. 1995, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 470-476.
  • “A Comparative Study of Single Hop WDM Interconnections for Multiprocessors” by Desai, et al., ACM, 1995, pp. 154-163.
  • “AII-Optical Path Protection in the ‘Prometo’ Test Bed: An Unidirectional WDM Transparent Self Healing Ring in a Field Environment” by Arecco, et al., IEEE, 1997, pp. 392-393.
  • “Optical Path Technologies: A Comparison Amond Different Cross-Connect Architectures” by Iannone, et al., IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology, Oct. 1996, vol. 14, No. 10, pp. 2184-2196.
  • “Optical Digital Cross-Connect System Using Photonic Switch Matrices and Optical Amplifiers” by Shiragaki, et al., IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology, Aug. 1994, vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 1490-1496.
  • “Optical Path Cross-Connect System Architecture Suitable for Large Scale Expansion” by Watanabe, et al., IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology, Oct. 1996, vol. 14, No. 10, pp. 2162-2172.
  • “A Passive Protected Self-Healing Mesh Network Architecture and Applications” by Wu, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Feb. 1994, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 40-52.
  • “Comparison of Classical and WDM based Ring Architecture” by Blain, et al., Broadband Superhighway, 1996, pp. 261-268.
  • “A Fully Transparent Fiber-Optic Ring Architecture for WDM Networks” by M. Irshid, et al., Journal of Lightwave Technology) vol. 10, No. 1, Jan. 1992.
  • “Acoustooptic Tunable Filters in Narrowband WDM Networks: System Issues and Network Applications” by K. Cheung, et al., IEEE Journal Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 8, No. 6, Aug. 1990.
  • “Integrated Optical Amplifier for Fast Phase Modulated Signals” by M. Kull, et al., Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 7, No. 2, Feb. 1989.
  • “Optically Restorable WDM Ring Network Using Simple Add/Drop Circuitry” by B. Glance, et al., Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 14, No. 11, Nov. 1996.
  • “Scalable Multihop WDM Passive Ring with Optimal Wavelength Routing” by D. Guo, et al., Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 14, No. 6, Jun. 1996.
  • “Wavelength- Tunable Optical Filters: Applications and Technologies” by H. Kobrinski, et al. IEEE Communications Magazine, Oct. 1989.
  • “A Fast- Tunable Optical Transmitter for Ultrahigh-Speed AII-Optical Time-Division Multiaccess Networks” by C. Chan, et al., IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 14, No. 5, Jun. 1996.
  • “Architectural Analysis of Multiple Fiber Ring Networks” Employing Optical Paths by N. Nagatsu, et al., Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 15, No. n10, Oct. 1997.
  • “Two-Stage Fabry-Perot Filters as Demultiplexers in Optical FDMA LAN's” by A. Saleh, et al., Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 7, No. 2, Feb. 1989.
  • “Waveguide Electrooptic Switch Arrays” by R Alferness, et al., IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, vol. 6, No. 7, Aug. 1988.
  • “A Photonic Wavelength-Division Switching System Using Tunable Laser Diode Filters” by Suzuki, et al., Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 8, No. 5, May 1990.
  • “Issues in Routing for Large and Dynamic Networks,” by Hagouel, Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, NY 1983.
  • “An 8 mm length Nonblocking 4 x4 Optical Switch Array” by H. Inoue, et al., IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, vol. 8, No. 6, Aug. 1990.
  • “Multi-wavelength Lightwave Networks for Computer Communication,” by Ramaswarni, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 31, pp. 78-88, Feb. 1993.
  • “Cross-connect network demonstration in a HDWDM Optical network using two-electrode DFB LDs as tunable sources” by A. Hamel, et al., Eleventh Annual Conference on European Fibre Optic Communications and Networks, The Hague, Jun. 30-Jul. 2, 1993.
  • “Efficient N x N Star Couplers Using Fourier Optics” by C. Dragone, et al., Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 7, No. 3, Mar. 1989.
  • “Integrated Optical Multi-/Demultiplexer Using Acoustooptic Effect for Multiwavelength Optical Communications” by N. Goto, et al., IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, vol. 8, No. 6, Aug. 1990.
  • “L.E.D. Wavelength Division Multiplexing” by A. Hamel, et al., Proceedings Fiber Optics Broadband Networks, Cannes, France Nov. 28-29, 1985.
  • Integrated-Optic Acoustically-Tunable Filters for WDM Networks'. by D. Smith, et al., IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 8, No. 6, Aug. 1990.
  • “Stable ultra-narrow bandpass filters” by M. Scobey, et al., Proceedings SPIE; Optical Thin Films IV New Developments, San Diego, CA. Jul. 25-27, 1994.
  • “Silica-Based Integrated Optic Mach-Zehnder Multi/Demultiplexer Family with Channel Spacing of 0.01-250 nm” by N. Takato, et al., IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, vol. 8, No. 6, Aug. 1990.
  • “Star-Coupler Optical Cross-Connect Switch Experiments with Tunable Receivers” by K. Eng, et al., IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, vol. 8, No. 6, Aug. 1990.
  • “A Reconfigurable Optoelectric Wavelength Converter based on an Integrated Eletroabsorption Modulated Laser Array,” by Raybon, Aug. 15, 1997, pp. 38-39.
  • “The Fiber-Optic Challenge of Information Infrastructures” by P. Green, Jr., et al., National Information Infrastructure White Paper, Sep. 26, 2000.
  • “Viabilities of the Wavelength-Division-Multiplexing Transmission System Over an Optical Fiber Cable” by T.Miki, et al., IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. Com-26, No. 7, Jul. 1978.
  • “Wavelength Division Multiplexing” by H. Hendricks, et al., SPffi; Fiber Optic Communication Technology, vol. 512, 1984.
  • “WDM Passive Star Networks: Receiver Collisions avoidance Algorithms Using Multifeedback Learning Automata” by G. Papdimitrou, et al., Computer Communications, vol. 19 (6-7), Jun. 1996.
  • “Wavelength-Division Multiplexers/Demultiplexers” by S. Ishikawa, et al., NEC Research and Development, No. 59, act. 1980.
  • “Properties of optical switching networks with passive or active space switches” by L. Gillner, et al., IEEE Proceedings-J. vol. 140, No. S, Oct. 1993.
  • “Review and Status of Wavelength-Division-Multiplexing Technology and Its Application” by H. Ishio, et al., Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. LT-2, No. 4, Aug. 1984.
  • “A four channel 10-nanometer spacing wavelength demultiplexer” by H. Hendricks, et al., Proceedings SPIE; Fiber Optics Multiplexing and Modulation, Arlington, VA, Apr. 7, 1983.
  • “Monolithic Integration of an InGaAs PIN Photodiode, Two InGaAs Column Gate FETs and an InGaAsP Laser for Optical Regeneration” by S. Rata, et al., 17th Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials, Tokyo, 1985.
  • “WDM-Based Local Lightwave Networks: Part I: Single-Hop Systems,” by Mukhetjee, IEEE Commun. Mag., val. 6, pp 12-27, May 1992.
  • “Transport Network Involving a Reconfigurable WDM Network Layer-A European Demonstration,” by S. Johansson, IEEF/OSA J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 14, pp. 1341-1348, Jun. 1996.
  • “Purely Optical Networks for Terbit Communication.” by Chlamtac, A. Ganz, and G. Kanni, I Proc. IEEE INFOCOM '89,1989.
  • “Lightpath (Wavelength) Routing in Large WDM Networks,” by Chlamtac, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 14, pp. 909-913, Jun. 1996.
  • “Multiwavelength Reconfigurable WDM/ATM/SONET Network Testbed,” by Chang, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Jun. 1996, vol. 14, No. 6.
  • “Optical Components for WDM Lightwave Networks,” by Borella, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 85, No. 8, Aug. 1997.
  • “Novel Wavelength-Division-Multiplexed Ring Network Architecture Using Optical Path Technology for Multiple Services and Simple Media Access Control Procedure,” by Oguchi, Fiber and Integrated Optics, 1997.
  • “Linear Lightwave Networks: Performance Issues,” by T.Stem, et al., IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 11, May/Jun. 1993.
  • “Linear Lightwave Networks: How far can they go?,” by T. Stern, Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM '89, 1989.
  • “Data Structures and Network Algorithms,” by Tarjan, Philadelphia. PA: SIAM, 1983.
  • “A Wavelength Convertible Optical Network,” by K. Lee, et al., IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 11, May/Jun. 1993.
  • “Multireflection Optical Multi/Demultiplexer Using Interference Filters,” by Nosu, Electronic Letters, vol. 15, No. 14, Jul. S, 1979.
  • “Tunable Optical- Wavelength Conversion Using a Multielectrode Distributed-Feedback Laser Diode With a Saturable Absorber,” by Kawaguchi, Electronic Letters, vol. 23, No. 20, Sep. 24, 1987.
  • “Narrowband Position-Tuned Multilayer Interference Filter For Use In Single-Mode-Fibre Systems,” by Lissberger, Electronic Letters, vol. 21, No. 18, Aug. 29, 1985.
  • “Optical Multiplexer/Demultiplexers Using Thin-Film Optical Filters,” by Miyazaki, Dec. 1980.
  • “The Evolution of the Existing Carrier Infrastructure,” by Traupman, IEEE Communications Magazine, Jun. 1999.
  • “Performance Evaluation of CROWNs: WDM Multiring Topologies,” by Wong, IEEE International Conference on Communications, Jun. 18-22, 1995.
  • “A minimum interference routing algorithm for a linear lightwave network” K. Bala and T. Stern Proc. IEEE Globecom, Phoenix, Dec. 1991.
  • “The case for opaque multiwavelength optical networks,” by K. Bala, R Cordell, and E. Goldstein, Proc. LEOS Summer Topical Meeting, Keystone, CO, Aug. 1995.
  • “Algorithms for routing in a linear lightwave network,” by K. Dala and T.E. Stern, Proc. IEEE Infocom '91, Miami, Apr. 1991.
  • “Cost Effective Traffic Grooming in WDM Rings,” by Gerstel, Ramaswami and Sasaki, IEEE Infocom, San Francisco, Mar. 29-Apr. 2, 1998, pp. 69-77.
  • “Multicasting in linear lightwave networks,” by K. Bala, K. Petropoulos, and T. E. Stern Proc. IEEE Infocom '93, San Francisco, Mar. 1993.
  • “Some quantum effects in information channels,” by T.E. Stern, IRE Transactions on Information Theory, IT-6:435-440, 1960.
Patent History
Patent number: 6347000
Type: Grant
Filed: Aug 12, 1999
Date of Patent: Feb 12, 2002
Assignee: Nortel Networks Limited (Montreal)
Inventors: David Milton (Kanata), Tomas Valis (Ottawa), Gino Totti (Kanata), Kexing Liu (Nepean), Michel Pigeon (Nepean)
Primary Examiner: Kinfe-Michael Negash
Attorney, Agent or Law Firm: Aprilia U. Diaconescu
Application Number: 09/372,575
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: 359/119; 359/128
International Classification: H04B/1020; H04J/1402;