Motion detecting system for use in a safety system for power equipment

- SD3, LLC

A woodworking machine including a detection system adapted to detect a dangerous condition between a person and a working portion of the machine is disclosed. The machine includes a reaction system associated with the detection system to cause a predetermined action to take place relative to the working portion upon detection of the dangerous condition. A motion detection system is adapted to detect motion of the working portion and to disable the reaction system when the working portion is not moving. The motion detection system may include a sensor, such as a Hall effect sensor, an electromagnetic field sensor, an optical sensor, or an electrical sensor. The woodworking machine may take the form of a saw, the working portion may be a blade adapted to cut when spinning, and the dangerous condition may be a person contacting the blade.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of and priority from the following U.S. Provisional Patent Applications: Ser. No. 60/225,056, filed Aug. 14, 2000, Ser. No. 60/225,057, filed Aug. 14, 2000, Ser. No. 60/225,058, filed Aug. 14, 2000, Ser. No. 60/225,059, filed Aug. 14, 2000, Ser. No. 60/225,089, filed Aug. 14, 2000, Ser. No. 60/225,094, filed Aug. 14, 2000, Ser. No. 60/225,169, filed Aug. 14, 2000, Ser. No. 60/225,170, filed Aug. 14, 2000, Ser. No. 60/225,200, filed Aug. 14, 2000, Ser. No. 60/225,201, filed Aug. 14 , 2000, Ser. No. 60/225,206, filed Aug. 14 , 2000, Ser. No. 60/225,210, filed Aug. 14, 2000, Ser. No. 60/225,211, filed Aug. 14, 2000, and Ser. No. 60/225,212, filed Aug. 14, 2000.

FIELD

The present invention relates to safety systems, and more particularly to a high-speed safety system for use on power equipment.

BACKGROUND

Beginning with the industrial revolution and continuing to the present, mechanized equipment has allowed workers to produce goods with greater speed and less effort than possible with manually-powered tools. Unfortunately, the power and high operating speeds of mechanized equipment creates a risk for those operating such machinery. Each year thousands of people are maimed or killed by accidents involving power equipment.

As might be expected, many systems have been developed to minimize the risk of injury when using power equipment. Probably the most common safety feature is a guard that physically blocks an operator from making contact with dangerous components of machinery, such as belts, shafts or blades. In many cases, guards are effective to reduce the risk of injury, however, there are many instances where the nature of the operations to be performed precludes using a guard that completely blocks access to hazardous machine parts.

Various systems have been proposed to prevent accidental injury where guards cannot effectively be employed. For instance, U.S. Pat. Nos. 941,726, 2,978,084, 3,011,610, 3,047,116, 4,195,722 and 4,321,841, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference, all disclose safety systems for use with power presses. These systems utilize cables attached to the wrists of the operator that either pull back a user's hands from the work zone upon operation or prevent operation until the user's hands are outside the danger zone. U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,953,770, 4,075,961, 4,470,046, 4,532,501 and 5,212,621, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference, disclose radio-frequency safety systems which utilize radio-frequency signals to detect the presence of a user's hand in a dangerous area of the machine and thereupon prevent or interrupt operation of the machine.

U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,959,909, 5,025,175, 5,122,091, 5,198,702, 5,201,684, 5,272,946, and 5,510,685 disclose safety systems for use with meat-skinning equipment, and are incorporated herein by reference. These systems interrupt or reverse power to the motor, or disengage a clutch, upon contact with a user's hand by any dangerous portion of the machine. Typically, contact between the user and the machine is detected by monitoring for electrical contact between a fine wire mesh in a glove worn by the user and some metal component in the dangerous area of the machine.

U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,785,230 and 4,026,177, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference, disclose a safety system for use on circular saws to stop the blade when a user's hand approaches the blade. The system uses the blade as an antenna in an electromagnetic proximity detector to detect the approach of a user's hand prior to actual contact with the blade. Upon detection of a user's hand, the system engages a brake using a standard solenoid. U.S. Pat. No. 4,117,752, which is herein incorporated by reference, discloses a similar braking system for use with a band saw, where the brake is triggered by actual contact between the user's hand and the blade.

It is often necessary for an equipment operator to touch the blade or other cutting device of power equipment when the blade or device is not moving (e.g., to adjust the blade, perform equipment maintenance, etc.). Thus, it would be desirable to disable the safety system when the blade is not moving since there is no danger to the user from contact with the blade.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a machine with a fast-acting safety system according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary safety system in the context of a machine having a circular blade.

FIG. 3 is a partial cross-section view of an exemplary magnetic sensor assembly according to the present invention, where the arbor is not in cross-sectional view.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary circuit according to the present invention for use with a magnetic sensor assembly.

FIG. 5 is a schematic view of an exemplary EMF sensor assembly according to the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a partial cross-section view of an exemplary optical sensor assembly according to the present invention, where the arbor is not in cross-sectional view.

FIG. 7 is a side elevation of an alternative optical sensor assembly according to the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a cross-section view of the alternative optical sensor assembly of FIG. 7, taken generally along the line 8—8.

FIG. 9. is a schematic diagram of an exemplary circuit according to the present invention for use with an optical sensor assembly.

FIG. 10 is a partial cross-section view of an exemplary electrical sensor assembly according to the present invention, where the arbor is not in cross-sectional view.

FIG. 11 is a schematic side elevation of an alternative electrical sensor assembly according to the present invention.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A machine is shown schematically in FIG. 1 and indicated generally at 10. Machine 10 may be any of a variety of different machines adapted for cutting workpieces, such as wood, including a table saw, miter saw (chop saw), radial arm saw, circular saw, band saw, jointer, planer, etc. Machine 10 includes an operative structure 12 having a cutting tool 14 and a motor assembly 16 adapted to drive the cutting tool. Machine 10 also includes a safety system 18 configured to minimize the potential of a serious injury to a person using machine 10. Safety system 18 is adapted to detect the occurrence of one or more dangerous conditions during use of machine 10. If such a dangerous condition is detected, safety system 18 is adapted to engage operative structure 12 to limit any injury to the user caused by the dangerous condition.

Machine 10 also includes a suitable power source 20 to provide power to operative structure 12 and safety system 18. Power source 20 may be an external power source such as line current, or an internal power source such as a battery. Alternatively, power source 20 may include a combination of both external and internal power sources. Furthermore, power source 20 may include two or more separate power sources, each adapted to power different portions of machine 10.

It will be appreciated that operative structure 12 may take any one of many different forms, depending on the type of machine 10. For example, operative structure 12 may include a stationary housing configured to support motor assembly 16 in driving engagement with cutting tool 14. Alternatively, operative structure 12 may include a movable structure configured to carry cutting tool 14 between multiple operating positions. As a further alternative, operative structure 12 may include one or more transport mechanisms adapted to convey a workpiece toward and/or away from cutting tool 14.

Motor assembly 16 includes one or more motors adapted to drive cutting tool 14. The motors may be either directly or indirectly coupled to the cutting tool, and may also be adapted to drive workpiece transport mechanisms. Cutting tool 14 typically includes one or more blades or other suitable cutting implements that are adapted to cut or remove portions from the workpieces. The particular form of cutting tool 14 will vary depending upon the various embodiments of machine 10. For example, in table saws, miter saws, circular saws and radial arm saws, cutting tool 14 will typically include one or more circular rotating blades having a plurality of teeth disposed along the perimetrical edge of the blade. For a jointer or planer, the cutting tool typically includes a plurality of radially spaced-apart blades. For a band saw, the cutting tool includes an elongate, circuitous tooth-edged band.

Safety system 18 includes a detection subsystem 22, a reaction subsystem 24 and a control subsystem 26. Control subsystem 26 may be adapted to receive inputs from a variety of sources including detection subsystem 22, reaction subsystem 24, operative structure 12 and motor assembly 16. The control subsystem may also include one or more sensors adapted to monitor selected parameters of machine 10. In addition, control subsystem 26 typically includes one or more instruments operable by a user to control the machine. The control subsystem is configured to control machine 10 in response to the inputs it receives.

Detection subsystem 22 is configured to detect one or more dangerous, or triggering, conditions during use of machine 10. For example, the detection subsystem may be configured to detect that a portion of the user's body is dangerously close to, or in contact with, a portion of cutting tool 14. As another example, the detection subsystem may be configured to detect the rapid movement of a workpiece due to kickback by the cutting tool, as is described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/182,866, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference. In some embodiments, detection subsystem 22 may inform control subsystem 26 of the dangerous condition, which then activates reaction subsystem 24. In other embodiments, the detection subsystem may be adapted to activate the reaction subsystem directly.

Once activated in response to a dangerous condition, reaction subsystem 24 is configured to engage operative structure 12 quickly to prevent serious injury to the user. It will be appreciated that the particular action to be taken by reaction subsystem 24 will vary depending on the type of machine 10 and/or the dangerous condition that is detected. For example, reaction subsystem 24 may be configured to do one or more of the following: stop the movement of cutting tool 14, disconnect motor assembly 16 from power source 20, place a barrier between the cutting tool and the user, or retract the cutting tool from its operating position, etc. The reaction subsystem may be configured to take a combination of steps to protect the user from serious injury. Placement of a barrier between the cutting tool and teeth is described in more detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,206, entitled “Cutting Tool Safety System,” filed Aug. 14, 2000 by SD3, LLC, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference. Retraction of the cutting tool from its operating position is described in more detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,089, entitled “Retraction System For Use In Power Equipment,” filed Aug. 14, 2000 by SD3, LLC, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference.

The configuration of reaction subsystem 24 typically will vary depending on which action(s) are taken. In the exemplary embodiment depicted in FIG. 1, reaction subsystem 24 is configured to stop the movement of cutting tool 14 and includes a brake mechanism 28, a biasing mechanism 30, a restraining mechanism 32, and a release mechanism 34. Brake mechanism 28 is adapted to engage operative structure 12 under the urging of biasing mechanism 30. During normal operation of machine 10, restraining mechanism 32 holds the brake mechanism out of engagement with the operative structure. However, upon receipt of an activation signal by reaction subsystem 24, the brake mechanism is released from the restraining mechanism by release mechanism 34, whereupon, the brake mechanism quickly engages at least a portion of the operative structure to bring the cutting tool to a stop.

It will be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the exemplary embodiment depicted in FIG. 1 and described above may be implemented in a variety of ways depending on the type and configuration of operative structure 12. Turning attention to FIG. 2, one example of the many possible implementations of safety system 18 is shown. System 18 is configured to engage an operative structure having a cutting tool in the form of a circular blade 40 mounted on a rotating shaft or arbor 42. Blade 40 includes a plurality of cutting teeth (not shown) disposed around the outer edge of the blade. As described in more detail below, braking mechanism 28 is adapted to engage the teeth of blade 40 and stop the rotation of the blade. U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,210, entitled “Translation Stop For Use In Power Equipment,” filed Aug. 14, 2000 by SD3, LLC, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference, describes other systems for stopping the movement of the cutting tool. U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,058, entitled “Table Saw With Improved Safety System,” filed Aug. 14, 2000 by SD3, LLC, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,057, entitled “Miter Saw With Improved Safety System,” filed Aug. 14, 2000 by SD3, LLC, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference, describe safety system 18 in the context of particular types of machines 10.

In the exemplary implementation, detection subsystem 22 is adapted to detect the dangerous condition of the user coming into contact with blade 40. The detection subsystem includes a sensor assembly, such as contact detection plates 44 and 46, capacitively coupled to blade 40 to detect any contact between the user's body and the blade. Typically, the blade, or some larger portion of cutting tool 14 is electrically isolated from the remainder of machine 10. Alternatively, detection subsystem 22 may include a different sensor assembly configured to detect contact in other ways, such as optically, resistively, etc. In any event, the detection subsystem is adapted to transmit a signal to control subsystem 26 when contact between the user and the blade is detected. Various exemplary embodiments and implementations of detection subsystem 22 are described in more detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,200, entitled “Contact Detection System For Power Equipment,” filed Aug. 14, 2000 by SD3, LLC, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,211, entitled “Apparatus And Method For Detecting Dangerous Conditions In Power Equipment,” filed Aug. 14, 2000 by SD3, LLC, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.

Control subsystem 26 includes one or more instruments 48 that are operable by a user to control the motion of blade 40. Instruments 48 may include start/stop switches, speed controls, direction controls, etc. Control subsystem 26 also includes a logic controller 50 connected to receive the user's inputs via instruments 48. Logic controller 50 is also connected to receive a contact detection signal from detection subsystem 22. Further, the logic controller may be configured to receive inputs from other sources (not shown) such as blade motion sensors, workpiece sensors, etc. In any event, the logic controller is configured to control operative structure 12 in response to the user's inputs through instruments 48. However, upon receipt of a contact detection signal from detection subsystem 22, the logic controller overrides the control inputs from the user and activates reaction subsystem 24 to stop the motion of the blade. Various exemplary embodiments and implementations of control subsystem 26 are described in more detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,059, entitled “Logic Control For Fast Acting Safety System,” filed Aug. 14, 2000 by SD3, LLC, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference.

In the exemplary implementation, brake mechanism 28 includes a pawl 60 mounted adjacent the edge of blade 40 and selectively moveable to engage and grip the teeth of the blade. Pawl 60 may be constructed of any suitable material adapted to engage and stop the blade. As one example, the pawl may be constructed of a relatively high strength thermoplastic material such as polycarbonate, ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMW) or Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), etc., or a metal such as aluminum, etc. It will be appreciated that the construction of pawl 60 will vary depending on the configuration of blade 40. In any event, the pawl is urged into the blade by a biasing mechanism in the form of a spring 66. In the illustrative embodiment shown in FIG. 2, pawl 60 is pivoted into the teeth of blade 40. It should be understood that sliding or rotary movement of pawl 60 may also be used. The spring is adapted to urge pawl 60 into the teeth of the blade with sufficient force to grip the blade and quickly bring it to a stop.

The pawl is held away from the edge of the blade by a restraining mechanism in the form of a fusible member 70. The fusible member is constructed of a suitable material adapted to restrain the pawl against the bias of spring 66, and also adapted to melt under a determined electrical current density. Examples of suitable materials for fusible member 70 include NiChrome wire, stainless steel wire, etc. The fusible member is connected between the pawl and a contact mount 72. Preferably, fusible member 70 holds the pawl relatively close to the edge of the blade to reduce the distance the pawl must travel to engage the blade. Positioning the pawl relatively close to the edge of the blade reduces the time required for the pawl to engage and stop the blade. Typically, the pawl is held approximately 1/32-inch to ¼-inch from the edge of the blade by fusible member 70, however other pawl-to-blade spacings may also be used within the scope of the invention.

Pawl 60 is released from its unactuated, or cocked, position to engage blade 40 by a release mechanism in the form of a firing subsystem 76. The firing subsystem is coupled to contact mount 72, and is configured to melt fusible member 70 by passing a surge of electrical current through the fusible member. Firing subsystem 76 is coupled to logic controller 50 and activated by a signal from the logic controller. When the logic controller receives a contact detection signal from detection subsystem 22, the logic controller sends an activation signal to firing subsystem 76, which melts fusible member 70, thereby releasing the pawl to stop the blade. Various exemplary embodiments and implementations of reaction subsystem 24 are described in more detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,056, entitled “Firing Subsystem For Use In Fast Acting Safety System,” filed Aug. 14, 2000 by SD3, LLC, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,170, entitled “Spring-Biased Brake Mechanism for Power Equipment,” filed Aug. 14, 2000 by SD3, LLC, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,169, entitled “Brake Mechanism For Power Equipment,” filed Aug. 14, 2000 by SD3, LLC, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.

It will be appreciated that activation of the brake mechanism will require the replacement of one or more portions of safety system 18. For example, pawl 60 and fusible member 70 typically must be replaced before the safety system is ready to be used again. Thus, it may be desirable to construct one or more portions of safety system 18 in a cartridge that can be easily replaced. For example, in the exemplary implementation depicted in FIG. 2, safety system 18 includes a replaceable cartridge 80 having a housing 82. Pawl 60, spring 66, fusible member 70 and contact mount 72 are all mounted within housing 82. Alternatively, other portions of safety system 18 may be mounted within the housing. In any event, after the reaction system has been activated, the safety system can be reset by replacing cartridge 80. The portions of safety system 18 not mounted within the cartridge may be replaced separately or reused as appropriate. Various exemplary embodiments and implementations of a safety system using a replaceable cartridge are described in more detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,201, entitled “Replaceable Brake Mechanism For Power Equipment,” filed Aug. 14, 2000 by SD3, LLC, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,212, entitled “Brake Positioning System,” filed Aug. 14, 2000 by SD3, LLC, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.

While one particular implementation of safety system 18 has been described, it will be appreciated that many variations and modifications are possible within the scope of the invention. Many such variations and modifications are described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/182,866, filed Feb. 16, 2000 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/157,340, filed Oct. 1, 1999, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.

As mentioned above, safety system 18 may include a sensor or sensor assembly for detecting motion of the blade or cutting tool. The sensor assembly typically is coupled to send a signal to logic controller 50 indicating whether the blade is in motion. The logic controller may be configured to respond differently to the detection of a dangerous condition based on whether the blade is moving. For example, it is often necessary for a user of machine 10 to touch blade 40 when preparing the machine for use, and when installing or removing the blade. Usually, the user would disconnect all power from machine 10 while performing such operations. However, in the event that the user neglects to disconnect the machine from power source 20 before touching the blade, logic controller 50 would receive a contact detection signal from detection subsystem 22. If safety system 18 includes a blade motion sensor, then logic controller 50 may be configured not to actuate firing subsystem 76 when the blade is not moving. Instead, the logic controller may be configured to take one or more other actions such as disabling motor assembly 16, sounding an alarm, displaying an error, etc. Alternatively, the logic controller may be configured to take no action if contact is detected while the blade is not moving.

In addition to detecting whether the blade is moving, safety system 18 may also be configured to determine the speed at which the blade is moving. This allows the logic controller to distinguish between rapid blade movement which could cause injury to the user, and slow blade movement which generally would not cause injury to the user. Thus, for example, a user could move the blade by hand without actuating firing subsystem 76. In some embodiments, the blade motion sensor may be configured to determine relative blade speed. In alternative embodiments, logic controller 50 may be configured to analyze the signal from the blade motion sensor to determine relative blade speed.

It will be appreciated that the speed at which a blade is considered likely to cause injury will vary depending on the type of machine 10 and blade 40. For example, a 14-inch carbide tooth blade on a table saw will cause serious injury at a lower speed than a 5⅜-inch plywood blade on a cordless trim saw. Thus, an embodiment of safety system 18 for use on the table saw may be configured to actuate the firing subsystem only at blade speeds above approximately 10, 25, 60, or 90 rpm, while an alternative embodiment of safety system 18 for use on the trim saw may be configured to actuate the firing subsystem only at blade speeds above approximately 40, 100, or 240 rpm.

Alternatively or additionally, the logic controller may be configured to interpret blade motion as being dangerous only when detected during or soon after motor assembly 16 was in operation. In other words, the blade motion detection would only be active while the blade was being moved by the motor assembly and during a relatively brief period afterward while the blade was coasting to a stop. Any blade motion detected at other times would be ignored.

Safety system 18 may include any of a wide variety of sensor assemblies to detect blade movement. Furthermore, each sensor assembly may be adapted as necessary depending on the particular type of blade 40 and/or the configuration of machine 10. While several exemplary sensor assemblies are described herein, it will be understood that all methods and mechanisms suitable for automatically detecting the motion of a blade are within the scope of the invention.

One exemplary embodiment of safety system 18 includes a magnetic sensor assembly 1000 configured to detect movement of the blade. It will be appreciated that the blade movement may be detected by monitoring the blade or any other portion of the safety system that moves with the blade, including the arbor, bearings, motor assembly, arbor pulley, etc. In the exemplary implementation depicted in FIG. 3, magnetic sensor assembly 1000 includes a Hall effect sensor 1001 and one or more magnets 1002. A coil could also be used to detect magnetic field fluctuations from rotation. The magnets are mounted on arbor 42. Sensor 1001 is mounted and configured to detect blade motion by detecting the movement of the magnets on the arbor. Sensor 1001 may be any suitable Hall effect sensor such as, for example, the sensor available from Micronas Intermetall of San Jose, Calif., under the part no. HAL114.

Hall effect sensor 1001 may be mounted adjacent the arbor by any suitable method. In the exemplary implementation, the sensor is mounted in a recessed region 272 of an insulating tube 268. The insulating tube also supports charge plates 44 and 46, as is described in more detail in U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/225,211, entitled “Apparatus and Method for Detecting Dangerous Conditions in Power Equipment,” filed Aug. 14, 2000, by SD3, LLC. The recessed region is disposed at least partially over a hole 273 in charge plate 44. Alternatively the recessed region may be disposed over a hole 273 in charge plate 46. In any event, magnet 1002 is disposed on arbor 42 to pass beneath or adjacent hole 273 as the arbor rotates within the insulating tube. Hole 273 allows sensor 1001 to detect the field created by magnet 1002 as it passes. Sensor 1001 includes one or more connector leads 1003 connectable to receive power from, and transmit signals to, logic controller 50.

Magnets 1002 may be mounted on the arbor in any suitable fashion. Typically, the magnets are mounted so as not to extend above the surface of the arbor. For example, the magnets may be press-fit and/or glued in a recess formed on the arbor. Alternatively, one or more of the magnets may be mounted to extend above the surface of the arbor. The size and number of magnets 1002 may be varied to control the signal produced by sensor 1001. In alternative embodiments, magnets 1002 may be mounted at other locations such as an end of arbor 42, on blade 40, etc.

Sensor 1001 may be connected to send signals to logic controller 50 via any suitable circuitry. For example, FIG. 4 illustrates one exemplary rotation sense circuit 177 adapted to couple the signals from sensor 1001 to logic controller 50. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that circuit 177 may be modified as needed for a particular application.

Another example of a suitable method for detecting blade motion is through electromagnetic field (EMF) measurements. As is known to those of skill in the art, when power to an electric motor is shut off, the motor will produce EMF pulses on the input power cables as the motor spins down. Thus, where blade 40 is driven by an electric motor assembly 16, the blade may be assumed to be in motion whenever an EMF pulse is detected on the power supply cables, as well as whenever power is being supplied to the motor assembly.

Thus, in another exemplary embodiment depicted in FIG. 5, safety system 18 includes an EMF sensor assembly 1005 configured to detect motion of blade 40. Sensor assembly 1005 includes an EMF detection circuit 1006 disposed in the power supply path between motor assembly 16 and power source 20. Circuit 1006 is adapted to monitor power cables 1007 which extend between the power source and the motor assembly, and to detect the presence of EMF pulses on the cables. Alternatively, circuit 1006 may be disposed at any other location suitable for detecting EMF pulses from motor assembly 16. Circuit 1006 may be any circuit or mechanism adapted to detect EMF pulses, such as are known to those of skill in the art. Circuit 1006 is also coupled to logic controller 50, and adapted to convey a signal to the logic controller indicating the presence and/or absence of EMF pulses on cables 1007. Optionally, circuit 1006 and/or logic controller 50 may be adapted to analyze the detected EMF emissions, and evaluate the speed of blade 40. In such case, the logic controller may be configured not to actuate firing subsystem 76 when the speed of the blade is unlikely to cause serious injury to the user.

In another exemplary embodiment, safety system 18 includes an optical sensor assembly adapted to optically detect movement of blade 40. Safety system 18 may be configured to optically detect blade motion in a variety of ways. For example, a rotary optical encoder may be coupled to the arbor to detect rotation of the arbor. Any rotary encoder may be used, such as those available from Omron Electronics Inc., of Schaumburg, Ill. Alternatively, other optical sensor assemblies may be used as described below.

Typically, the optical sensor assembly will be at least partially enclosed to prevent saw dust or other debris from interfering with the detection. One exemplary implementation of an optical sensor assembly is indicated generally at 1010 in FIG. 6. Sensor assembly 1010 includes an optical detector 1011 adapted to detect light from an optical source 1012. Alternatively, plural optical sources and/or plural optical detectors may be used. It will be appreciated that any of a variety of different optical sources may be used which are known to those of skill in the art, including an incandescent or fluorescent bulb, light emitting diode (LED), laser diode, etc. Similarly, any of a variety of different optical detectors may be used which are known to those of skill in the art, including a photodiode, phototransistor, etc.

In any event, the optical source is arranged so that the signal received at the optical detector when the blade is moving is different than the signal received when the blade is stationary. For example, the source and detector may be arranged so that a signal is received only when the blade is moving, or only when the blade is stationary. Alternatively, source 1012 and detector 1011 may be arranged so that the amount of emitted light that reaches the detector varies when the blade is in motion.

The implementation depicted in FIG. 6 uses this latter arrangement. Sensor assembly 1010 includes an LED 1012 mounted in insulating tube 268 to emit light through hole 273 in charge plate 44 or 46. The light reflects off arbor 42 and is detected by a photodiode 1011 which is also mounted in insulating tube 268 adjacent hole 273. The arbor includes one or more reduced-reflection regions 1013 adapted to reduce the amount of light reflected to photodiode 1011. Regions 1013 may be formed by coating the arbor with a light-absorbing coating, roughening the arbor to cause random scattering of the light, etc. In any event, the reduced reflecting regions create a varying signal at the photodiode when the arbor is rotating. In contrast, a constant signal is produced at the photodiode when the arbor is stationary.

The minimal clearance between arbor 42 and charge plates 44, 46 tends to maintain the space between the arbor and the photodiode/LED relatively free of debris which could block the signal. Alternatively, the insulating tube assembly may be sealed in a protective housing (not shown).

In another alternative implementation depicted in FIGS. 7 and 8, optical sensor assembly 1010 includes a barrier member 1014 mounted on the arbor and disposed between photodiode 1011 and LED 1012. Alternatively, the barrier member may be mounted on any other portion of cutting tool 14 or motor assembly 16 adapted to move with the blade. Barrier member 1014 includes one or more light-transmitting regions or holes 1015, which may take any desired shape or size. The photodiode and LED are mounted in a support member 1016 attached to an arbor block 250, and disposed on either side of barrier member 1014. The photodiode is aligned so that emitted light will pass through holes 1015. Likewise, the LED is aligned to detect the light which passes through the holes. Thus, as arbor 42 rotates, light from the LED is alternately blocked and transmitted by the barrier member, thereby creating a varying signal at the photodiode.

Photodiode 1011 and LED 1012 may be connected to any suitable driving circuitry such as are known to those of skill in the art. FIG. 9 shows one exemplary circuitry for producing an optical signal at LED 1012 and detecting the signal at photodiode 1011. The particular values of the circuit components and voltage supplies may be selected as desired for a specific application. In any event, the photodiode is coupled to transmit a signal to logic controller 50 to indicate whether blade 40 is moving.

In another exemplary embodiment, safety system 18 includes an electrical sensor assembly adapted to electrically detect movement of blade 40. There are numerous methods and mechanisms for electrically detecting blade movement within the scope of the invention. The particular method and/or mechanism selected will typically depend on the specific type and configuration of machine 10. For example, where charge plate 46 is configured to capacitively detect a signal induced in the blade, any incidental eccentricity in the blade or the blade rotation will cause the capacitance between the blade and charge plate 46 to vary as the blade rotates. As a result, charge plate 46 will detect a varying signal amplitude when the blade is rotating. Thus, a single sensor may be configured to detect both contact with the user and rotation of the blade. Preferably, the incidental variation fluctuation is insufficient in magnitude and/or rate of change to trigger reaction subsystem 24.

Rather than rely on incidental eccentricities, safety system 18 may include an exemplary electrical sensor assembly adapted to detect a signal variation caused by a designed eccentricity or non-uniformity in the blade. Alternatively, the sensor assembly may be adapted to detect the signal from an eccentricity in some portion of cutting tool 14 that moves with the blade and is electrically coupled to the blade. One exemplary implementation of such a sensor assembly is indicated generally at 1020 in FIG. 10. Sensor assembly 1020 includes a detection electrode 1021 capacitively coupled to detect an electrical signal on arbor 42. Electrode 1021 may be mounted in any suitable fashion to provide electrical insulation from arbor 42 as well as the remainder of cutting tool 14 and machine 10. In the exemplary implementation, electrode 1021 is mounted in insulating tube 268 and arranged to extend to a point closely adjacent the arbor between charge plates 44 and 46. Sensor assembly 1020 also includes one or more eccentricities 1022 disposed on the arbor and substantially aligned with electrode 1021 so as to pass by the electrode as the arbor rotates.

It will be appreciated that eccentricities 1022 may be configured in any desired quantity, size, shape or form adapted to cause a variation in the capacitance between the arbor and the electrode as the arbor rotates. In the exemplary implementation, eccentricities 1022 take the form of beveled regions formed on the surface of arbor 42. Thus, the space between the electrode and the arbor is greater (and therefore the capacitance is less) when an eccentricity is positioned beneath the electrode than when an eccentricity is not positioned beneath the electrode. Alternatively, eccentricities 1022 may take other forms adapted to vary the capacitance between the arbor and electrode, including raised regions, dielectric pads, etc. In any event, if an electrical signal is induced in the arbor (e.g., by charge plate 44 of contact detection subsystem 22), then electrode 1021 will detect variations in that signal if the arbor is rotating. Conversely, the electrode will detect no variations in the signal if the arbor is stationary.

Turning attention now to FIG. 11, another exemplary implementation of electrical sensor assembly 1020 is shown in which electrode 1021 is disposed adjacent the teeth 1023 of blade 40. Electrode 1021 may be mounted on arbor block 250 or any other suitable portion of machine 10. Additionally, the electrode may be positioned at the side of the blade (as shown in FIG. 11) or at the perimeter of the blade facing in toward the arbor. The size, shape and position of the electrode may vary depending on the position and size of teeth 1023. In any event, as teeth 1023 pass by electrode 1021, the capacitance between the blade and the electrode varies, thereby varying the amplitude of the signal detected by the electrode. Alternatively, a plurality of electrodes may be positioned at various points adjacent the teeth so that blade motion would be detected by modulations in the relative signal amplitudes at the electrodes. Such an alternative detection mechanism may also be used with other implementations of sensor assembly 1020.

While a few exemplary magnetic, EMF, optical and electrical sensor assemblies have been described for detecting blade motion, it will be appreciated that many modifications and variations to such sensor assemblies are included within the scope of the invention. Furthermore, safety system 18 may include other types of motion detection sensors such as mechanical sensors, sonic and ultra-sonic sensors, etc. In any event, the invention provides effective and reliable means for discriminating between conditions which are, and are not, likely to cause injury to a user of power machinery.

It is believed that the disclosure set forth above encompasses multiple distinct inventions with independent utility. While each of these inventions has been disclosed in its preferred form, the specific embodiments thereof as disclosed and illustrated herein are not to be considered in a limiting sense as numerous variations are possible. The subject matter of the inventions includes all novel and non-obvious combinations and subcombinations of the various elements, features, functions and/or properties disclosed herein. No single feature, function, element or property of the disclosed embodiments is essential to all of the disclosed inventions. Similarly, where the claims recite “a” or “a first” element or the equivalent thereof, such claims should be understood to include incorporation of one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements.

It is believed that the following claims particularly point out certain combinations and subcombinations that are directed to one of the disclosed inventions and are novel and non-obvious. Inventions embodied in other combinations and subcombinations of features, functions, elements and/or properties may be claimed through amendment of the present claims or presentation of new claims in this or a related application. Such amended or new claims, whether they are directed to a different invention or directed to the same invention, whether different, broader, narrower or equal in scope to the original claims, are also regarded as included within the subject matter of the inventions of the present disclosure.

Claims

1. A woodworking machine comprising:

a support;
a movable blade coupled to the support;
a control system configured to detect a dangerous condition between a person and the blade by imparting an electric signal to the blade and monitoring the electric signal for at least one change indicative of the dangerous condition; and
a brake mechanism triggerable by the control system to stop movement of the blade upon detection of the dangerous condition by the control system;
where the control system is further configured to determine if the blade is moving, and configured not to trigger the brake mechanism if the blade is not moving.

2. The woodworking machine of claim 1, where the blade is coupled to the support by a rotatable arbor, and where the control system is configured to determine if the blade is moving by detecting whether the arbor is rotating.

3. The woodworking machine of claim 1, where the control system includes a magnetic sensor adapted to determine if the blade is moving.

4. The woodworking machine of claim 3, where the magnetic sensor includes a Hall effect sensor.

5. The woodworking machine of claim 1, where the control system includes an electronic sensor adapted to determine if the blade is moving.

6. The woodworking machine of claim 5, where the electronic sensor includes a capacitive sensor.

7. The woodworking machine of claim 1, where the control system includes an optical sensor adapted to determine if the blade is moving.

8. A woodworking machine comprising:

a working portion adapted to work when moving;
a detection system adapted to detect a dangerous condition between a person and the working portion by imparting an electric signal to the working portion and monitoring the electric signal for at least one change indicative of the dangerous condition;
a reaction system associated with the detection system to cause a predetermined action to take place relative to the working portion upon detection of the dangerous condition; and
a motion detection system adapted to detect motion of the working portion and to disable the reaction system when the working portion is not moving.

9. The woodworking machine of claim 8, where the working portion is a spinning blade and where the motion detection system detects whether the blade is spinning.

10. The woodworking machine of claim 8, where the motion detection system detects the speed of the motion and considers the working portion to be not moving if the working portion is moving below a threshold speed.

11. The woodworking machine of claim 8, where the motion detection system includes a sensor.

12. The woodworking machine of claim 11, where the sensor is a Hall effect sensor.

13. The woodworking machine of claim 11, where the sensor is an electromagnetic field sensor.

14. The woodworking machine of claim 11, where the sensor is an optical sensor.

15. The woodworking machine of claim 11, where the sensor is an electrical sensor.

16. The woodworking machine of claim 8, where the working portion is a cutter, where the reaction system is a brake system, and where the predetermined action is to engage and stop the cutter.

17. A woodworking machine comprising:

a working portion adapted to work when moving;
a motor to move the working portion;
a detection system adapted to detect a dangerous condition between a person and the working portion by imparting an electric signal to the working portion and monitoring the electric signal for at least one change indicative of the dangerous condition; and
a reaction system associated with the detection system to cause a predetermined action to take place relative to the working portion upon detection of the dangerous condition;
where the detection system and reaction system are configured to function when the motor is moving the working portion and for a defined period of time after the motor has been turned off, and where the reaction system is configured not to cause the predetermined action to take place after the defined period of time has past until the motor starts moving the working portion.

18. A woodworking machine comprising:

a cutting tool;
a motor to spin the cutting tool;
a detection system adapted to detect a dangerous condition between a person and the cutting tool by imparting an electric signal to the cutting tool and monitoring the electric signal for at least one change indicative of the dangerous condition;
a reaction system associated with the detection system to cause a predetermined action to take place relative to the working portion upon detection of the dangerous condition; and
a control system adapted to monitor the detection system and control actuation of the reaction system, where the control system is adapted to trigger the reaction system if the dangerous condition is detected when the motor is spinning the cutting tool or during coast-down of the cutting tool after the motor is turned off and to deactivate the reaction system after coast-down.

19. The woodworking machine of claim 18, where the reaction system is a brake system, and where the predetermined action is to engage and stop the culling tool.

20. The woodworking machine of claim 18, where the control system is adapted to re-activate the reaction system when the motor starts spinning the cutting tool after deactivation of the reaction system.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
146886 January 1874 Doane et al.
162814 May 1875 Graves et al.
261090 July 1882 Grill
264412 September 1882 Kuhlmann
299480 May 1884 Kuhlmann et al.
302041 July 1884 Sill
307112 October 1884 Groff
509253 November 1893 Shields
545504 September 1895 Hoover
869513 October 1907 Pfeil
941726 November 1909 Pfalzgraf
997720 July 1911 Troupenat
1037843 September 1912 Ackley
1050649 January 1913 Harrold et al.
1054558 February 1913 Jones
1074198 September 1913 Phillips
1082870 December 1913 Humason
1101515 June 1914 Adam
1126970 February 1915 Folmer
1132129 March 1915 Stevens
1148169 July 1915 Howe
1154209 September 1915 Rushton
1205246 November 1916 Mowry
1228047 May 1917 Reinhold
1240430 September 1917 Erickson
1244187 October 1917 Frisbie
1255886 February 1918 Jones
1258961 March 1918 Tattersall
1311508 July 1919 Harrold
1324136 December 1919 Turner
1381612 June 1921 Anderson
1397606 November 1921 Smith
1427005 August 1922 McMichael
1430983 October 1922 Granberg
1464924 August 1923 Drummond
1465224 August 1923 Lantz
1496212 June 1924 French
1511797 October 1924 Berghold
1526128 February 1925 Flohr
1527587 February 1925 Hutchinson
1551900 September 1925 Morrow
1553996 September 1925 Federer
1582483 April 1926 Runyan
1600604 September 1926 Sorlien
1616478 February 1927 Watson
1640517 August 1927 Procknow
1662372 March 1928 Ward
1701948 February 1929 Crowe
1711490 May 1929 Drummond
1712828 May 1929 Klehm
1774521 September 1930 Neighbour
1807120 May 1931 Lewis
1811066 June 1931 Tannewitz
1879280 September 1932 James
1896924 February 1933 Ulrich
1902270 March 1933 Tate
1904005 April 1933 Masset
1910651 May 1933 Tautz
1938548 December 1933 Tautz
1938549 December 1933 Tautz
1963688 June 1934 Tautz
1988102 January 1935 Woodward
1993219 March 1935 Merrigan
2007887 July 1935 Tautz
2010851 August 1935 Drummond
2020222 November 1935 Tautz
2038810 April 1936 Tautz
2075282 March 1937 Hedgpeth
2095330 October 1937 Hedgpeth
2106288 January 1938 Tautz
2106321 January 1938 Guertin
2121069 June 1938 Collins
2131492 September 1938 Ocenasek
2163320 June 1939 Hammond
2168282 August 1939 Tautz
2241556 May 1941 MacMillin et al.
2261696 November 1941 Ocenasek
2265407 December 1941 Tautz
2286589 June 1942 Tannewitz
2292872 August 1942 Eastman
2299262 October 1942 Uremovich
2312118 February 1943 Neisewander
2313686 March 1943 Uremovich
2328244 August 1943 Woodward
2352235 June 1944 Tautz
2377265 March 1945 Rady
2402232 June 1946 Baker
2425331 August 1947 Kramer
2434174 January 1948 Morgan
2452589 November 1948 McWhirter et al.
2466325 April 1949 Ocenasek
2496613 February 1950 Woodward
2509813 May 1950 Dineen
2517649 August 1950 Frechtmann
2518684 August 1950 Harris
2530290 November 1950 Collins
2554124 May 1951 Salmont
2562396 July 1951 Schutz
2572326 October 1951 Evans
2590035 March 1952 Pollak
2593596 April 1952 Olson
2601878 July 1952 Anderson
2623555 December 1952 Eschenburg
2625966 January 1953 Copp
2626639 January 1953 Hess
2661777 December 1953 Hitchcock
2661780 December 1953 Morgan
2675707 April 1954 Brown
2678071 May 1954 Odlum et al.
2690084 September 1954 Van Dam
2695638 November 1954 Gaskell
2704560 March 1955 Woessner
2711762 June 1955 Gaskell
2722246 November 1955 Arnoldy
2731049 January 1956 Akin
2736348 February 1956 Nelson
2737213 March 1956 Richards et al.
2758615 August 1956 Mastriforte
2785710 March 1957 Mowery, Jr.
2786496 March 1957 Eschenburg
2810408 October 1957 Boice et al.
2844173 July 1958 Gaskell
2850054 September 1958 Eschenburg
2852047 September 1958 Odlum et al.
2873773 February 1959 Gaskell
2883486 April 1959 Mason
2894546 July 1959 Eschenburg
2913025 November 1959 Richards
2913581 November 1959 Simonton et al.
2945516 July 1960 Edgemond, Jr. et al.
2954118 September 1960 Anderson
2957166 October 1960 Gluck
2978084 April 1961 Vilkaitis
2984268 May 1961 Vuichard
2991593 July 1961 Cohen
3005477 October 1961 Sherwen
3011529 December 1961 Copp
3011610 December 1961 Stiebel et al.
3013592 December 1961 Ambrosio et al.
3021881 February 1962 Edgemond, Jr. et al.
3035995 May 1962 Seeley et al.
3047116 July 1962 Stiebel et al.
3085602 April 1963 Gaskell
3105530 October 1963 Peterson
3129731 April 1964 Tyrrell
3163732 December 1964 Abbott
3184001 May 1965 Reinsch et al.
3186256 June 1965 Reznick
3207273 September 1965 Jurin
3213731 October 1965 Renard
3224474 December 1965 Bloom
3232326 February 1966 Speer et al.
3246205 April 1966 Miller
3249134 May 1966 Vogl et al.
3306149 February 1967 John
3313185 April 1967 Drake et al.
3315715 April 1967 Mytinger
3323814 June 1967 Phillips
3337008 August 1967 Trachte
3356111 December 1967 Mitchell
3386322 June 1968 Stone et al.
3439183 April 1969 Hurst, Jr.
3445835 May 1969 Fudaley
3454286 July 1969 Anderson et al.
3456696 July 1969 Gregory et al.
3512440 May 1970 Frydmann
3538964 November 1970 Warrick et al.
3540338 November 1970 McEwan et al.
3554067 January 1971 Scutella
3566996 March 1971 Crossman
3580376 May 1971 Loshbough
3581784 June 1971 Warrick
3613748 October 1971 De Pue
3670788 June 1972 Pollak et al.
3675444 July 1972 Whipple
3680609 August 1972 Menge
3688815 September 1972 Ridenour
3695116 October 1972 Baur
3696844 October 1972 Bernatschek
3745546 July 1973 Struger et al.
3749933 July 1973 Davidson
3754493 August 1973 Niehaus et al.
3772590 November 1973 Mikulecky et al.
3785230 January 1974 Lokey
3805639 April 1974 Peter
3805658 April 1974 Scott et al.
3808932 May 1974 Russell
3829850 August 1974 Guetersloh
3858095 December 1974 Friemann et al.
3861016 January 1975 Johnson et al.
3863208 January 1975 Balban
3880032 April 1975 Green
3882744 May 1975 McCarroll
3886413 May 1975 Dow et al.
3889567 June 1975 Sato et al.
3922785 December 1975 Fushiya
3924688 December 1975 Cooper et al.
3931727 January 13, 1976 Luenser
3935777 February 3, 1976 Bassett
3945286 March 23, 1976 Smith
3946631 March 30, 1976 Malm
3947734 March 30, 1976 Fyler
3949636 April 13, 1976 Ball et al.
3953770 April 27, 1976 Hayashi
3960310 June 1, 1976 Nussbaum
3967161 June 29, 1976 Lichtblau
3974565 August 17, 1976 Ellis
3975600 August 17, 1976 Marston
3978624 September 7, 1976 Merkel et al.
3994192 November 30, 1976 Faig
4007679 February 15, 1977 Edwards
4016490 April 5, 1977 Weckenmann et al.
4026174 May 31, 1977 Fierro
4026177 May 31, 1977 Lokey
4029159 June 14, 1977 Nymann
4047156 September 6, 1977 Atkins
4048886 September 20, 1977 Zettler
4060160 November 29, 1977 Lieber
4070940 January 31, 1978 McDaniel et al.
4075961 February 28, 1978 Harris
4077161 March 7, 1978 Wyle et al.
4085303 April 18, 1978 McIntyre et al.
4090345 May 23, 1978 Harkness
4091698 May 30, 1978 Obear et al.
4106378 August 15, 1978 Kaiser
4117752 October 3, 1978 Yoneda
4145940 March 27, 1979 Woloveke et al.
4152833 May 8, 1979 Phillips
4161649 July 17, 1979 Klos et al.
4175452 November 27, 1979 Idel
4190000 February 26, 1980 Shaull et al.
4195722 April 1, 1980 Anderson et al.
4199930 April 29, 1980 Lebet et al.
4249117 February 3, 1981 Leukhardt et al.
4249442 February 10, 1981 Fittery
4262278 April 14, 1981 Howard et al.
4267914 May 19, 1981 Saar
4270427 June 2, 1981 Colberg et al.
4276799 July 7, 1981 Muehling
4291794 September 29, 1981 Bauer
4305442 December 15, 1981 Currie
4321841 March 30, 1982 Felix
4372202 February 8, 1983 Cameron
4391358 July 5, 1983 Haeger
4418597 December 6, 1983 Krusemark et al.
4466233 August 21, 1984 Thesman
4470046 September 4, 1984 Betsill
4510489 April 9, 1985 Anderson, III et al.
4512224 April 23, 1985 Terauchi
4518043 May 21, 1985 Anderson et al.
4532501 July 30, 1985 Hoffman
4532844 August 6, 1985 Chang et al.
4557168 December 10, 1985 Tokiwa
4560033 December 24, 1985 DeWoody et al.
4566512 January 28, 1986 Wilson
4573556 March 4, 1986 Andreasson
4576073 March 18, 1986 Stinson
4589047 May 13, 1986 Gaus et al.
4589860 May 20, 1986 Brandenstein et al.
4599597 July 8, 1986 Rotbart
4599927 July 15, 1986 Eccardt et al.
4606251 August 19, 1986 Boileau
4615247 October 7, 1986 Berkeley
4621300 November 4, 1986 Summerer
4625604 December 2, 1986 Handler et al.
4637188 January 20, 1987 Crothers
4637289 January 20, 1987 Ramsden
4644832 February 24, 1987 Smith
4653189 March 31, 1987 Andreasson
4657428 April 14, 1987 Wiley
4672500 June 9, 1987 Tholome et al.
4675664 June 23, 1987 Cloutier et al.
4679719 July 14, 1987 Kramer
4722021 January 26, 1988 Hornung et al.
4751603 June 14, 1988 Kwan
4756220 July 12, 1988 Olsen et al.
4757881 July 19, 1988 Jonsson et al.
4792965 December 20, 1988 Morgan
4805504 February 21, 1989 Fushiya
4840135 June 20, 1989 Yamauchi
4845476 July 4, 1989 Rangeard et al.
4864455 September 5, 1989 Shimomura et al.
4875398 October 24, 1989 Taylor et al.
4896607 January 30, 1990 Hall et al.
4906962 March 6, 1990 Duimstra
4934233 June 19, 1990 Brundage et al.
4936876 June 26, 1990 Reyes
4937554 June 26, 1990 Herman
4965909 October 30, 1990 McCullough et al.
4975798 December 4, 1990 Edwards et al.
5020406 June 4, 1991 Sasaki et al.
5025175 June 18, 1991 Dubois, III
5046426 September 10, 1991 Julien et al.
5052255 October 1, 1991 Gaines
5074047 December 24, 1991 King
5081406 January 14, 1992 Hughes et al.
5082316 January 21, 1992 Wardlaw
5083973 January 28, 1992 Townsend
5086890 February 11, 1992 Turczyn et al.
5094000 March 10, 1992 Becht et al.
5119555 June 9, 1992 Johnson
5122091 June 16, 1992 Townsend
5174349 December 29, 1992 Svetlik et al.
5184534 February 9, 1993 Lee
5198702 March 30, 1993 McCullough et al.
5199343 April 6, 1993 OBanion
5201684 April 13, 1993 DeBois, III
5207253 May 4, 1993 Hoshino et al.
5212621 May 18, 1993 Panter
5218189 June 8, 1993 Hutchison
5231359 July 27, 1993 Masuda et al.
5231906 August 3, 1993 Kogej
5239978 August 31, 1993 Plangetis
5245879 September 21, 1993 McKeon
5257570 November 2, 1993 Shiotani et al.
5265510 November 30, 1993 Hoyer-Ellefsen
5272946 December 28, 1993 McCullough et al.
5276431 January 4, 1994 Piccoli et al.
5285708 February 15, 1994 Bosten et al.
5320382 June 14, 1994 Goldstein et al.
5321230 June 14, 1994 Shanklin et al.
5331875 July 26, 1994 Mayfield
5353670 October 11, 1994 Metzger, Jr.
5377554 January 3, 1995 Reulein et al.
5377571 January 3, 1995 Josephs
5392568 February 28, 1995 Howard, Jr. et al.
5392678 February 28, 1995 Sasaki et al.
5401928 March 28, 1995 Kelley
5411221 May 2, 1995 Collins et al.
5436613 July 25, 1995 Ghosh et al.
5451750 September 19, 1995 An
5453903 September 26, 1995 Chow
5471888 December 5, 1995 McCormick
5480009 January 2, 1996 Wieland et al.
5503059 April 2, 1996 Pacholok
5510685 April 23, 1996 Grasselli
5513548 May 7, 1996 Garuglieri
5534836 July 9, 1996 Schenkel et al.
5572916 November 12, 1996 Takano
5587618 December 24, 1996 Hathaway
5592353 January 7, 1997 Shinohara et al.
5606889 March 4, 1997 Bielinski et al.
5623860 April 29, 1997 Schoene et al.
5648644 July 15, 1997 Nagel
5659454 August 19, 1997 Vermesse
5667152 September 16, 1997 Mooring
5671633 September 30, 1997 Wagner
5695306 December 9, 1997 Nygren, Jr.
5700165 December 23, 1997 Harris et al.
5724875 March 10, 1998 Meredith et al.
5730165 March 24, 1998 Philipp
5741048 April 21, 1998 Eccleston
5755148 May 26, 1998 Stumpf et al.
5771742 June 30, 1998 Bokaie et al.
5782001 July 21, 1998 Gray
5787779 August 4, 1998 Garuglieri
5791057 August 11, 1998 Nakamura et al.
5791223 August 11, 1998 Lanzer
5791224 August 11, 1998 Suzuki et al.
5791441 August 11, 1998 Matos et al.
5819619 October 13, 1998 Miller et al.
5852951 December 29, 1998 Santi
5861809 January 19, 1999 Eckstein et al.
5875698 March 2, 1999 Ceroll et al.
5921367 July 13, 1999 Kashioka et al.
5930096 July 27, 1999 Kim
5937720 August 17, 1999 Itzov
5942975 August 24, 1999 Sorensen
5943932 August 31, 1999 Sberveglieri
5950514 September 14, 1999 Benedict et al.
5963173 October 5, 1999 Lian et al.
5974927 November 2, 1999 Tsune
5989116 November 23, 1999 Johnson et al.
6018284 January 25, 2000 Rival et al.
6037729 March 14, 2000 Woods et al.
6052884 April 25, 2000 Steckler et al.
6095092 August 1, 2000 Chou
6119984 September 19, 2000 Devine
6133818 October 17, 2000 Hsieh et al.
6141192 October 31, 2000 Garzon
6148504 November 21, 2000 Schmidt et al.
6150826 November 21, 2000 Hokodate et al.
6170370 January 9, 2001 Sommerville
6244149 June 12, 2001 Ceroll et al.
6257061 July 10, 2001 Nonoyama et al.
6330848 December 18, 2001 Nishio et al.
6352137 March 5, 2002 Stegall et al.
6366099 April 2, 2002 Reddi
6376939 April 23, 2002 Suzuki et al.
6404098 June 11, 2002 Kayama et al.
6405624 June 18, 2002 Sutton
6418829 July 16, 2002 Pilchowski
6420814 July 16, 2002 Bobbio
6427570 August 6, 2002 Miller et al.
6430007 August 6, 2002 Jabbari
6431425 August 13, 2002 Moorman et al.
6450077 September 17, 2002 Ceroll et al.
6453786 September 24, 2002 Ceroll et al.
6460442 October 8, 2002 Talesky et al.
6471106 October 29, 2002 Reining
6479958 November 12, 2002 Thompson et al.
D466913 December 10, 2002 Ceroll et al.
6492802 December 10, 2002 Bielski
D469354 January 28, 2003 Curtsinger
6502493 January 7, 2003 Eccardt et al.
6536536 March 25, 2003 Gass et al.
6543324 April 8, 2003 Dils
6546835 April 15, 2003 Wang
6575067 June 10, 2003 Parks et al.
6578460 June 17, 2003 Sartori
6578856 June 17, 2003 Kahle
6595096 July 22, 2003 Ceroll et al.
D478917 August 26, 2003 Ceroll et al.
6601493 August 5, 2003 Crofutt
6607015 August 19, 2003 Chen
D479538 September 9, 2003 Welsh et al.
6617720 September 9, 2003 Egan, III et al.
6619348 September 16, 2003 Wang
6640683 November 4, 2003 Lee
6644157 November 11, 2003 Huang
6647847 November 18, 2003 Hewitt et al.
6659233 December 9, 2003 DeVlieg
6736042 May 18, 2004 Behne et al.
6742430 June 1, 2004 Chen
6796208 September 28, 2004 Jorgensen
6826988 December 7, 2004 Gass et al.
6857345 February 22, 2005 Gass et al.
6874397 April 5, 2005 Chang
6874399 April 5, 2005 Lee
6920814 July 26, 2005 Gass et al.
6945148 September 20, 2005 Gass et al.
6945149 September 20, 2005 Gass et al.
20010032534 October 25, 2001 Cerroll et al.
20020096030 July 25, 2002 Wang
20020109036 August 15, 2002 Denen et al.
20030037655 February 27, 2003 Chin-Chin
20030074873 April 24, 2003 Freiberg et al.
20030089212 May 15, 2003 Parks et al.
20030101857 June 5, 2003 Chuang
20030109798 June 12, 2003 Kermani
20040011177 January 22, 2004 Huang
20040060404 April 1, 2004 Metzger, Jr.
20040104085 June 3, 2004 Lang et al.
20040159198 August 19, 2004 Peot et al.
20040194594 October 7, 2004 Dils et al.
20040200329 October 14, 2004 Sako
20040226424 November 18, 2004 O'Banion et al.
20040226800 November 18, 2004 Pierga et al.
20050057206 March 17, 2005 Uneyama
20050092149 May 5, 2005 Hartmann
20050139051 June 30, 2005 Gass et al.
20050139056 June 30, 2005 Gass et al.
20050139057 June 30, 2005 Gass et al.
20050139058 June 30, 2005 Gass et al.
20050139459 June 30, 2005 Gass et al.
20050155473 July 21, 2005 Gass
20050166736 August 4, 2005 Gass et al.
20050178259 August 18, 2005 Gass et al.
20050204885 September 22, 2005 Gass et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
297525 June 1954 CH
76186 August 1921 DE
2800403 July 1979 DE
3427733 January 1986 DE
4235161 May 1993 DE
4326313 February 1995 DE
19609771 June 1998 DE
146460 November 1988 EP
0362937 April 1990 EP
2152184 January 2001 ES
2556643 June 1985 FR
2570017 March 1986 FR
598204 February 1948 GB
1132708 November 1968 GB
2096844 October 1982 GB
2142571 January 1985 GB
Other references
  • Analog Devices, Inc., 3-Axis Capacitive Sensor—Preliminary Technical Data AD7103, pp. 1-40, © 1998.
Patent History
Patent number: 7225712
Type: Grant
Filed: Aug 13, 2001
Date of Patent: Jun 5, 2007
Patent Publication Number: 20020017178
Assignee: SD3, LLC (Wilsonville, OR)
Inventors: Stephen F. Gass (Wilsonville, OR), Robert L. Chamberlain (Raleigh, NC), J. David Fulmer (Tualatin, OR), Joel F. Jensen (Redwood City, CA), Benjamin B. Schramm (Los Gatos, CA)
Primary Examiner: Boyer D. Ashley
Assistant Examiner: Ghassem Alie
Application Number: 09/929,234
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Responsive To Tool Characteristic (83/62.1); Tool Angularly Adjustable Relative To Work-support (83/471.3); By Movement Of The Tool (83/477.1); 83/DIG.01
International Classification: B26D 1/14 (20060101); B27B 5/00 (20060101);