Method and system for providing busy override service in a SIP-based network
A method and system of an embodiment of the present invention may include sending an override signal to a first user wherein the first user is having a first dialog with a second user; establishing a second dialog with the first user; receiving a signal from the second user; and establishing a third dialog with the second user, in response to the signal, wherein the first dialog is terminated after the third dialog is established.
Latest Verizon Services Organization Inc. Patents:
This patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/719,465, filed Sep. 22, 2005, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
BACKGROUND INFORMATIONSession Initiation Protocol (SIP) is a call control signaling protocol for Internet Protocol (IP) networks. SIP is designed to be device-agnostic—that is, it is intended to provide a highly flexible call signaling capability that is not tailored to the capabilities of any particular device. Analog telephone signaling, on the other hand, is device-specific and highly constrained because of the historical legacy of the services delivered to the device. As a result, many call features available in traditional analog telephone devices are not easily integrated in a SIP-based network.
In order to facilitate a fuller understanding of the exemplary embodiments of the present inventions, reference is now made to the appended drawings. These drawings should not be construed as limiting, but are intended to be exemplary only.
A system and process of an exemplary embodiment of the present invention provides a Busy Override service that allows a user to override a busy signal and create a conference with an already-established call. In addition, the user may leave the call, force one party out of the call and/or perform another action. An embodiment of the present invention may implement the Busy Override service using distributed SIP signaling.
SIP Device 110 may represent a device that manages User Interface 114. User Interface 114 may include a traditional telephone and other data communication device using voiceband or other signaling, including but not limited to data modems, facsimile devices, teletype (TTY) equipment, etc. SIP Device 110 may contain SIP User Agent 112. SIP User Agent 112 may be integrated with SIP Device 110 or remote from SIP Device 110. SIP User Agent 112 may perform interworking between SIP signaling and user interface actions. For example, SIP User Agent 112 may manage an exchange of media (e.g., audio, etc.) between User Interface 114 and a Real Time Protocol (RTP) media stream of a media session set up by the SIP signaling. SIP Device 110 may originate calls to and receive calls from other users. SIP Device 110 may communicate through IP Network 120 to SIP Server 122. In addition, SIP Device 110 may include a Network Port N for communicating through IP Network 120 and an Audio Port P for communication with User Interface 114.
SIP Server 122 may represent a SIP proxy or application server that acts on behalf of SIP Device 110. For example, SIP Server 122 may manage a SIP Address of Record (AOR) on behalf of SIP Device 110. SIP Device 110 may register with SIP Server 122 and send SIP signaling through SIP Server 122 to other SIP elements, such as SIP Element 130 and SIP Element 132. For example, a call to the SIP AOR may be delivered to SIP Server 122, which in turn delivers the call to SIP Device 110. SIP Server 122 may perform some service on behalf of SIP Device 110, or may simply forward SIP messages to and from SIP Device 110. SIP Device 110 communicates through IP Network 124 to SIP Element 130 and/or SIP Element 132.
SIP Element 130 and SIP Element 132 may represent users with which the user of SIP Device 110 communicates. SIP Element may be a SIP Device, SIP Server, and/or other SIP enabled device. In addition, SIP Element may also represent a PSTN device that may be reached by a gateway that, directly or indirectly, acts as a SIP User Agent.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, SIP Device 110 may enable a user to override a busy signal and create a conference with an already-established call.
As shown in
The various components of systems 200 and 300 as shown in
In an Internet Protocol (IP) network using the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for voice call control signaling, it may be desired to provide a Busy Override service using peer-to-peer distributed SIP signaling and further deliver the service to a user interface. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the Busy Override service allows a user to override a busy signal and create a conference with an already-established call. In addition, the user may leave the call, force one party out of the call and/or perform another action. An embodiment of the present invention may implement the Busy Override service using distributed SIP signaling, relying upon SIP standards and/or using capabilities that exist in a SIP User Agent that manages a device, such as a SIP-enabled device or connected to, for example, an existing analog device. An embodiment of the present invention may manipulate the SIP dialogs such that a conference is created with the overriding user as the controller so that the overriding user has the ability to perform various actions, such as drop a party. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the Busy Override service may be implemented by reusing mechanisms for a call transfer that may exist in the User Agent.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, a Busy Override service may provide users with certain privileges to break into a call and optionally to remove one party from that call. Other privileges and/or actions may also be available. For example, this feature may be implemented in a group environment where executive level users (e.g., supervisors, executives, team leader, security personnel, etc.) may have this privilege. In addition, certain users may be given this privilege based on circumstances (e.g., an emergency circumstance, etc.).
An exemplary application of an embodiment of the present invention may involve an overriding user initiating a communication with a first user where the first user's line is busy. The first user may be communicating with a second user. In this example, the overriding user may have privileges that entitle the user to invoke a busy override service. Other access to or assignment of this privilege may be provided to an overriding user. The overriding user may activate the Busy Override service by selecting a function key, dialing a code, voicing a command or performing some other action to invoke this service. For example, the overriding user may dial a service code that activates the Busy Override service, and then dial the number of the first user whose line is busy. The first user and/or the second user may receive an alert indication, which may be heard or viewed by the user(s). For example, the alert indication may include an alert signal (e.g., alert tone, audio file, voice signal, etc.). In addition, the alert indication may be viewed as an alert signal (e.g., light signal, text, etc.). Thereafter, the overriding user may be placed into a conference call with the first user and the second user. The overriding user may perform certain actions. For example, the overriding user may hang up and allow the original call to continue. In addition, the overriding user may perform a hookswitch flash (or other action) which may disconnect the second user thereby leaving the overriding user in a two-party call with the first user. According to another example, the overriding user may disconnect the first user thereby leaving the overriding user in a call with the second user. In addition, the overriding user may disconnect both users at the same time or sequentially.
The Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) is evolving from its legacy technology base of analog and time-division multiplex (TDM) transport and signaling to a technology base using Internet Protocol (IP) transport and signaling protocols. However, the IP-based network may continue to support legacy analog subscriber equipment (e.g., analog phones, faxes, modems). A mechanism for supporting analog equipment in the IP network may include a line media gateway deployed at the “edge” of the network, which uses IP signaling protocols that may be designed specifically for the gateway application. Gateway signaling protocols may operate at a relatively low level, and may thus easily support services, such as Busy Override, with respect to analog subscriber equipment.
As IP signaling reaches more edge devices, SIP may be implemented as a call control signaling protocol for analog subscriber devices. For example, SIP signaling may meet analog subscriber devices at devices such as Integrated Access Devices, Analog Telephone Adapters, and Optical Network Terminals. Such devices may manage one or more connections to analog devices, and contain SIP User Agents that perform the translation between the analog line signaling expected by such analog devices and SIP protocol messages. In addition, SIP may also replace gateway control protocols in line media gateways. In contrast with gateway control protocols, which may be described as device control protocols, SIP may be considered a relatively high-level call control protocol.
The implementation in SIP of services, such as Busy Override, that may use a hookswitch flash to signal call control events may be made difficult because SIP standards generally do not provide a way to transmit the flash from the device to a network-based application. SIP is intentionally device-agnostic, and the flash is a device-specific signal.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, implementation of the Busy Override service in SIP may rely on SIP standards, such as IETF SIP standards and/or proposed standards. For example, an exemplary implementation may rely on one or more of RFC 3261 as a baseline SIP standard, RFC 3515 which may define the REFER method, RFC 3891 which may define the “Replaces” header field, and/or RFC 3911 which may define the “Join” header field. Other standards may also be implemented in accordance with the various embodiments of the present invention.
First User 412 may recognize the Busy Override service code and establish a Second Dialog 422 with Overriding User 412. An alert tone or other indicator may be injected into an audio of a dialog, e.g., First Dialog 416. For example, this alert tone may be produced by First User 412 prior to establishing a Second Dialog 422. First User 412 may then send a REFER message 424 to Second User 414. The REFER message may include a “Refer-To” header field that specifies a contact address of Overriding User 410 and a “Join” header field with a Second Dialog 422 identifier. Other information may be included in the REFER message. The REFER message may create a subscription by First User 412 to the “REFER” event package in Second User 414, and Second User 414 may send a NOTIFY to First User 412 to indicate an establishment of the subscription.
Upon receipt of the REFER message, Second User 414 may send an INVITE message 426 to Overriding User 410, including a “Join” header field that specifies an identifier associated with Second Dialog 422.
Upon receipt of the INVITE message, Overriding User 410 may establish a Third Dialog 428 with Second User 414 and create a conference that includes the Second Dialog 422 and the Third Dialog 428. The conference may be locally mixed by Overriding User 410 or may be created in a conference server, which may be constructed using standard SIP mechanisms. Other implementations may be realized.
When Overriding User 410 accepts the INVITE message 426, a response (e.g., a 1xx or 2xx response) sent to Second User 414 may be included in the body of a NOTIFY message 430 sent from Second User 414 to First User 412, notifying First User 412 of the success of the REFER. Upon receipt of that NOTIFY message 430, First User 412 may end the first dialog, as shown by END 432.
At this point, all three users may be in a conference. Because the conference was “created” by Overriding User 410 (both dialogs include Overriding User 410), this user may be considered a controller of the conference. As the controller, Overriding User 410 has several options. For example, Overriding User 410 may drop out of the call, allowing First User 412 and Second User 414 to continue their conversation. In this scenario, Overriding User 410 may restore the original call, as shown by dialog 416, by sending a REFER message to First User 412, which may include a “Refer-To” header field that specifies a contact address of Second User 414 and a header parameter that specifies the “Replaces” header field with a dialog identifier for Third Dialog 428. The REFER message may implicitly create a subscription by Overriding User 410 to the “refer” event package in First User 412 and First User 412 may send a NOTIFY to Overriding User 410 to indicate the establishment of the subscription.
Upon receipt of the REFER message, First User 412 may send an INVITE message to Second User 414, including a “Replaces” header field that specifies a dialog identifier identifying Third Dialog 428. Upon receipt of the INVITE message, Second User 414 may establish a dialog with First User 412 and end the Third Dialog 428.
When Second User 414 accepts the INVITE E message, the response (e.g., a 1xx or 2xx response) sent to First User 412 may be included in the body of a NOTIFY message sent from First User 412 to Overriding User 410. As a result, Overriding User 410 may be notified of the success of the REFER. Upon receipt of that NOTIFY, Overriding User 410 may end Second Dialog 422 and is out of the call.
According to another example, Overriding User 410 may choose to force Second User 414 out of the call. In this example, First User 412 may perform a hookswitch flash (or other similar action). Because Overriding User 410 may be considered the controller of the conference, that action may be interpreted (e.g., by the SIP Device 110 and SIP User Agent 112 supporting Overriding User 410) as a request to drop the most recently added participant from the conference. Other functions may result from that action. Thus, Overriding User 410 may end the Third Dialog 428 and eliminate the conference, thereby leaving Second Dialog 422 active. According to another example, Overriding User 410 may force First User 410 out of the call.
While the illustrative examples involve three users, additional users may also be involved. For example, multiple users may participate in a multi-party conference call where one or more overriding users may invoke the Busy Override service, in accordance with the various embodiments of the present invention. In addition, multiple overriding users may invoke the busy override service to the same or different participants of various calls. The Busy Override service may be applied to calls as well as other forms of communication that involve an exchange or transmission of data between and/or among various users. For example, users may communicate via text message, instant messaging, video streams, sound files, etc. through various devices, such as mobile devices, computer interfaces, etc.
An embodiment of the present invention for performing the Busy Override service may be implemented in SIP devices that provide conference and transfer services using a PSTN user interface. An embodiment of the present invention may implement standard SIP extensions and standard protocols thereby using existing SIP standards. By causing the conference to be created with the overriding user as the controller, an embodiment of the present invention requires minimal behavior to be implemented specifically for this service.
The behavior of the conference controller, e.g., Overriding User 410, may be a call transfer, as opposed to a three-way call. A transfer may, if the transferring user chooses, go through a stage where it is a three-way call before the transferring user gets out of the call and allows the transfer to complete. In contrast, on a three-way call, the entire call ends when the controlling party gets out of the call.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the User Agent that becomes the controller of the conference may do so on receipt of or in response to an INVITE with a “Join” header field. The User Agent may recognize that this occurs in the context of a call that was initiated with the Busy Override service code as a prefix, appendix or other attachment. Therefore, the code may be interpreted as an indication that a transfer is taking place.
An embodiment of the present invention may provide the Busy Override service to a device that models an analog line, as the service exploits capabilities in place to support such devices. Further, an embodiment of the present invention may use a peer-to-peer, distributed call control to cause a conference to be created with the overriding user as the controller.
In the preceding specification, various preferred embodiments have been described with reference to the accompanying drawings. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto, and additional embodiments may be implemented, without departing from the broader scope of the invention as set forth in the claims that follow. The specification and drawings are accordingly to be regarded in an illustrative rather than restrictive sense.
Claims
1. A method, comprising:
- sending, via a SIP device associated with an overriding user, an override signal to a SIP device associated with a first user wherein the first user is having a first dialog with a second user and the override signal includes at least one of a prefix of an address associated with the first user and an appendix of an address associated with the first user;
- establishing a second dialog between the SIP device associated with the overriding user and the SIP device associated with the first user, wherein the SIP device associated with the first user sends a refer signal with contact information of the overriding user to the SIP device associated with the second user;
- receiving, via the SIP device associated with the overriding user, an invite signal from a SIP device associated with the second user;
- establishing a third dialog between the SIP device associated with the overriding user and the SIP device associated with the second user, in response to the invite signal, wherein the first dialog is terminated after the third dialog is established, wherein the second dialog and the third dialog are controlled by the overriding user, and wherein control by the overriding user comprises at least one of: participating in at least one of the second dialog and the third dialog, dropping out of at least one of the second dialog and the third dialog, forcing out at least one of the first user from the second dialog and the second user from the third dialog, and terminating at least of the second dialog and the third dialog.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the override signal is sent in response to a busy condition.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the invite signal comprises a message comprising a join header field.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising terminating the third dialog with the second user.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising terminating the second dialog with the first user.
6. A computer readable storage media for storing code for executing a computer process to perform the method of claim 1.
7. A system, comprising:
- a device comprising a user agent configured to:
- send an override signal to a first user wherein the first user is having a first dialog with a second user and the override signal includes at least one of a prefix of an address associated with the first user and an appendix of an address associated with the first user;
- establish a second dialog with the first user;
- receive an invite signal from the second user; and
- establish a third dialog with the second user, in response to the invite signal sent by the second user based on a refer signal with contact information of the user agent from the first user, wherein the first dialog is terminated after the third dialog is established, wherein a refer signal is sent from the first user to the second user with a contact address of the user agent the third dialog with the second user, and wherein the second dialog and the third dialog are controlled by the user agent such that controlling the second dialog and the third dialog comprises at least one of: participating in at least one of the second dialog and the third dialog, dropping out of at least one of the second dialog and the third dialog, forcing out at least one of the first user from the second dialog and the second user from the third dialog, and terminating at least of the second dialog and the third dialog.
8. The system of claim 7, wherein the override signal is sent in response to a busy condition.
9. The system of claim 7, wherein the invite signal comprises a message comprising a join header field.
10. The system of claim 7, wherein the third dialog with the second user is terminated.
11. The system of claim 7, wherein the second dialog with the first user is terminated.
12. A method, comprising:
- receiving, via a SIP device associated with a first user, an override signal from an overriding user while the first user is engaged in a first dialog with a second user and the override signal includes at least one of a prefix of an address associated with the first user and an appendix of an address associated with the first user;
- establishing a second dialog between the SIP device associated with the first user and a SIP device associated with the overriding user; and
- sending, via the SIP device associated with the first user, a message to the second user wherein the message comprises a contact address of the overriding user and an identifier identifying the first dialog;
- wherein a third dialog is established between the SIP device associated with the second user and the SIP device associated with the overriding user based on the message, wherein the first dialog is terminated after the third dialog is established, wherein the second dialog and the third dialog are controlled by the overriding user, wherein control of the second dialog and the third dialog comprises at least one of: participating in at least one of the second dialog and the third dialog, dropping out of at least one of the second dialog and the third dialog, forcing out at least one of the first user from the second dialog and the second user from the third dialog, and terminating at least of the second dialog and the third dialog.
13. A computer readable storage media for storing code for executing a computer process to perform the method of claim 12.
14. A method, comprising:
- sending, via a SIP device associated with an overriding user, an override signal to a SIP device associated with a first user wherein the first user is having a first dialog with a second user and the override signal includes at least one of a prefix of an address associated with the first user and an appendix of an address associated with the first user;
- establishing a second dialog between the SIP device associated with the overriding user and the SIP device associated with the first user, wherein the SIP device associated with the first user sends a refer signal with contact information of the overriding user to the SIP device associated with the second user;
- receiving, via the SIP device associated with the overriding user, an invite signal from the SIP device associated with the second user, wherein the invite signal includes a header field for identification of the second user;
- establishing a third dialog between the SIP device associated with the overriding user and the SIP device associated with the second user, in response to the invite signal;
- transmitting, via the SIP device associated with the overriding user, a response signal the second user; and
- controlling the second dialog and the third dialog, wherein controlling the second dialog and the third dialog comprises at least one of participating in the first dialog and the second dialog, and dropping and ending at least one of the first dialog and the second dialog.
3737587 | June 1973 | Romero |
4154987 | May 15, 1979 | Rosenberg et al. |
4528424 | July 9, 1985 | Middleton et al. |
4723271 | February 2, 1988 | Grundtisch |
4741024 | April 26, 1988 | Del Monte et al. |
4950011 | August 21, 1990 | Borcea et al. |
5165095 | November 17, 1992 | Borcherding |
5323444 | June 21, 1994 | Ertz et al. |
5471519 | November 28, 1995 | Howe et al. |
5619561 | April 8, 1997 | Reese |
5815550 | September 29, 1998 | Miller |
5835570 | November 10, 1998 | Wattenbarger |
5913166 | June 15, 1999 | Buttitta et al. |
5970134 | October 19, 1999 | Highland et al. |
5999610 | December 7, 1999 | Lin et al. |
6021176 | February 1, 2000 | McKendry et al. |
6026156 | February 15, 2000 | Epler et al. |
6031896 | February 29, 2000 | Gardell et al. |
6072865 | June 6, 2000 | Haber et al. |
6208726 | March 27, 2001 | Bansal et al. |
6219414 | April 17, 2001 | Maciejewski et al. |
6337898 | January 8, 2002 | Gordon |
6339639 | January 15, 2002 | Henderson |
6404876 | June 11, 2002 | Smith et al. |
6484196 | November 19, 2002 | Maurille |
6510315 | January 21, 2003 | Arnson |
6636594 | October 21, 2003 | Oran |
6735295 | May 11, 2004 | Brennan et al. |
6741695 | May 25, 2004 | McConnell et al. |
6744877 | June 1, 2004 | Edwards |
6754325 | June 22, 2004 | Silver et al. |
6801604 | October 5, 2004 | Maes et al. |
6807259 | October 19, 2004 | Patel et al. |
6834048 | December 21, 2004 | Cho et al. |
6856616 | February 15, 2005 | Schuster et al. |
6857072 | February 15, 2005 | Schuster et al. |
6870830 | March 22, 2005 | Schuster et al. |
6876632 | April 5, 2005 | Takeda |
6879673 | April 12, 2005 | Creamer et al. |
6954521 | October 11, 2005 | Bull et al. |
6954524 | October 11, 2005 | Gibson |
6961332 | November 1, 2005 | Li et al. |
6963633 | November 8, 2005 | Diede et al. |
6996605 | February 7, 2006 | Low et al. |
7020130 | March 28, 2006 | Krause et al. |
7031700 | April 18, 2006 | Weaver et al. |
7082193 | July 25, 2006 | Barclay et al. |
7085253 | August 1, 2006 | Yang |
7130282 | October 31, 2006 | Black |
7145997 | December 5, 2006 | Poikselka et al. |
7203293 | April 10, 2007 | Bedingfield |
7224792 | May 29, 2007 | Fusco |
7257837 | August 14, 2007 | Xu et al. |
7260201 | August 21, 2007 | Jorasch et al. |
7274662 | September 25, 2007 | Kalmanek et al. |
7283517 | October 16, 2007 | Yan et al. |
7290288 | October 30, 2007 | Gregg et al. |
7295577 | November 13, 2007 | Moody et al. |
7301913 | November 27, 2007 | Corrao et al. |
7406696 | July 29, 2008 | Burger et al. |
7426265 | September 16, 2008 | Chen et al. |
7440440 | October 21, 2008 | Abichandani et al. |
7460657 | December 2, 2008 | Baeza |
7489771 | February 10, 2009 | McMurry et al. |
7580497 | August 25, 2009 | Wang et al. |
7593389 | September 22, 2009 | Vance |
7599355 | October 6, 2009 | Sunstrum |
7609700 | October 27, 2009 | Ying et al. |
7609706 | October 27, 2009 | Scott et al. |
7630481 | December 8, 2009 | Kafka |
7715413 | May 11, 2010 | Vaziri et al. |
7743141 | June 22, 2010 | Wang et al. |
7773581 | August 10, 2010 | Punj et al. |
7860089 | December 28, 2010 | Tripathi et al. |
20020038388 | March 28, 2002 | Netter |
20020114318 | August 22, 2002 | Rines |
20020131447 | September 19, 2002 | Krishnamurthy et al. |
20020136359 | September 26, 2002 | Stumer et al. |
20020136363 | September 26, 2002 | Stumer et al. |
20020141548 | October 3, 2002 | Boda |
20030028806 | February 6, 2003 | Govindarajan et al. |
20030043992 | March 6, 2003 | Wengrovitz |
20030088421 | May 8, 2003 | Maes et al. |
20030231759 | December 18, 2003 | Bedingfield, Sr. et al. |
20040030750 | February 12, 2004 | Moore et al. |
20040051900 | March 18, 2004 | Sagiya et al. |
20040082324 | April 29, 2004 | Ayoub |
20040090954 | May 13, 2004 | Zhang et al. |
20040148395 | July 29, 2004 | Schulzrinne |
20040207724 | October 21, 2004 | Crouch et al. |
20040240656 | December 2, 2004 | Poustchi |
20040249951 | December 9, 2004 | Grabelsky et al. |
20040264406 | December 30, 2004 | Pattenden et al. |
20050013421 | January 20, 2005 | Chavez et al. |
20050043014 | February 24, 2005 | Hodge |
20050069104 | March 31, 2005 | Hanson et al. |
20050078642 | April 14, 2005 | Mayer et al. |
20050123104 | June 9, 2005 | Bishop et al. |
20050129219 | June 16, 2005 | Williamson |
20050147227 | July 7, 2005 | Chervirala et al. |
20050190721 | September 1, 2005 | Pershan |
20050193338 | September 1, 2005 | Hawkins et al. |
20050195802 | September 8, 2005 | Klein et al. |
20050201530 | September 15, 2005 | Koch et al. |
20050213716 | September 29, 2005 | Zhu et al. |
20050215243 | September 29, 2005 | Black et al. |
20050226217 | October 13, 2005 | Logemann et al. |
20050237978 | October 27, 2005 | Segal |
20050249196 | November 10, 2005 | Ansari et al. |
20050286466 | December 29, 2005 | Tagg et al. |
20060033809 | February 16, 2006 | Farley |
20060039389 | February 23, 2006 | Burger et al. |
20060062210 | March 23, 2006 | Dharanikota |
20060062251 | March 23, 2006 | Lim et al. |
20060067300 | March 30, 2006 | Poustchi et al. |
20060067504 | March 30, 2006 | Goldman et al. |
20060140379 | June 29, 2006 | Yamamoto et al. |
20060140380 | June 29, 2006 | Croak et al. |
20060146737 | July 6, 2006 | Ohrstrom Sandgren et al. |
20060177030 | August 10, 2006 | Rajagopalan et al. |
20060177044 | August 10, 2006 | O'Neil et al. |
20060178130 | August 10, 2006 | Makrygiannis |
20060203986 | September 14, 2006 | Gibson |
20060218283 | September 28, 2006 | Jones et al. |
20060221176 | October 5, 2006 | Di Pietro et al. |
20060251229 | November 9, 2006 | Gorti et al. |
20060285533 | December 21, 2006 | Divine et al. |
20060286984 | December 21, 2006 | Bonner |
20070025270 | February 1, 2007 | Sylvain |
20070058613 | March 15, 2007 | Beckemeyer |
20070083658 | April 12, 2007 | Hanna et al. |
20070092073 | April 26, 2007 | Olshansky et al. |
20070111723 | May 17, 2007 | Ahmed et al. |
20070143858 | June 21, 2007 | Hearty |
20080049724 | February 28, 2008 | Tsujino et al. |
20080126549 | May 29, 2008 | Khanchandani et al. |
- www.carrollcommunications.com/ipoffice/5donotdisturb.html, p. 1 of 2.
- www.cisco.com/en/U/s/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products—administration—guide, pp. 3-5 of 26.
- Rosenberg et al. “RFC 3261, SIP: Session Initiation Protocol”, The Internet Society, Jun. 2002.
- Newton's Telecom Dictionary 22nd Edition, p. 829, Feb. 2006.
- Sparks, “RFC 3515—The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Refer Method,” The Internet Society, Apr. 2003.
- Mahy et al., “RFC 3891—The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) ‘Replaces’ Header,” The Internet Society, Sep. 2004.
- Mahy et al, “RFC 3911—The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) ‘Join’ Header,” The Internet Society, Oct. 2004.
- Handley et al., “RFC 2327—SDP: Session Description Protocol,” The Internet Society, Apr. 1998.
- Schulzrinne et al., “RFC 1889—RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications,” The Internet Society, Jan. 1996.
- Schulzrinne et al., “RFC 2833—RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones and Telephony Signals,” The Internet Society, May 2000.
- Mahy et al., “draft-ietf-sip-join-03—The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) “Join” Header,” The Internet Society, Feb. 2004.
- Mahy et al., “draft-ietf-sipping-cc-framework-03—A Call Control and Multi-party usage framework for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),” The Internet Society, Oct. 27, 2003.
- Rosenberg, “RFC 3311—The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Update Method,” The Internet Society, Sep. 2002.
- Rosenberg et al., “RFC 3262—Reliability of Provisional Responses in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),” The Internet Society, Jun. 2002.
- Jennings et al., “RFC 3325—Private Extensions to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for Asserted Identity within Trusted Networks,” The Internet Society, Nov. 2002.
- Harrington et al., “RFC 3411—An Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks,” The Internet Society, Dec. 2002.
- Rosenberg et al., “RFC 3840—Indicating User Agent Capabilities in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),” The Internet Society, Aug. 2004.
- Mahy, “RFC 3842—A Message Summary and Message Waiting Indication Event Package for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),” The Internet Society, Aug. 2004.
- “SR-504: SPCS Capabilities and Features,” Telcordia Technologies, Issue 1, Mar. 1996.
- “SR-3065: LSSGR Guide,” Telcordia Technologies, Issue 7, Aug. 2003.
- Mahy et al., “draft-ietf-sip-replaces-05—The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) “Replaces” Header,” The Internet Society, Feb. 16, 2004.
- Schulzrinne, “draft-ietf-sipping-sos-00—Emergency Services URI for the Session Initiation Protocol,” The Internet Society, Feb. 8, 2004.
- Rosenberg et al., “draft-ietf-sipping-dialog-package-04—An INVITE Initiated Dialog Event Package for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),” The Internet Society, Feb. 13, 2004.
- Lingle et al., “draft-ietf-sip-mib-08—Management Information Base for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),” The Internet Society, Jul. 16, 2004.
- Johnston et al., “draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-04—Session Initiation Protocol Call Control—Conferencing for User Agents,” The Internet Society, Jul. 18, 2004.
- Sparks et al., “draft-ietf-sipping-cc-transfer-02—Session Initiation Protocol Call Control—Transfer,” The Internet Society, Feb. 15, 2004.
- Rosenberg et al., “draft-ietf-sipping-conference-package-04—A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Package for Conference State,” The Internet Society, May 21, 2004.
- Petrie, “draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-04—A Framework for Session Initiation Protocol User Agent Profile Delivery,” The Internet Society.
- “GR-1298-CORE—AINGR: Switching Systems,” Telcordia Technologies, Issue 6, Nov. 2000.
Type: Grant
Filed: Sep 22, 2006
Date of Patent: Apr 24, 2012
Assignee: Verizon Services Organization Inc. (Irving, TX)
Inventor: David C Robbins (Grafton, MA)
Primary Examiner: Rasha S Al Aubaidi
Application Number: 11/534,291
International Classification: H04M 3/42 (20060101);