Cosmetic applicator with torque limiter
A cosmetic applicator includes a handle, a drive coupled to the handle, an applicator head coupled to the drive, and a torque limiter. The torque limiter includes a magnetic coupling, the magnetic coupling being coupled to at least one of the drive and the applicator head such that the torque applied via the applicator head does not exceed a predetermined allowable torque.
Latest The Procter & Gamble Company Patents:
The present disclosure is directed to a cosmetic applicator with a torque limiter, and in particular to an applicator having an applicator head with a rotational motion component for use in applying cosmetic material, such as mascara, to keratinous fibers, such as eyelashes, and a torque limiter for use with such an applicator.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONVarious types of cosmetic applicators are known in the art. Brushes or wands for applying mascara to eyelashes, for example, generally include an applicator head with a stem having a first end attached to a handle. The applicator head also includes one or more applicator elements coupled to a second end of the stem. In use, the applicator elements are loaded with mascara and applied to the eyelashes.
Conventional mascara brushes typically require manipulation of the handle or other member, and often require repeated passes of the brush across the eyelash, to completely and uniformly coat each eyelash with mascara while maintaining or promoting separation of the eyelashes from one another. To coat the entire eyelash, for example, a user may move the brush in a vertical direction to ensure that the entire eyelash is covered. In addition, a user may rotate the brush to place different portions of the brush head in contact with the eyelash, depending on the desired amount of mascara to be applied to the eyelashes. Still further, a user may also reciprocate the brush in a horizontal direction to promote separation of the eyelashes and/or to ensure better coverage of the eyelashes. Consequently, a user must provide the motive force for applying the brush to the eyelashes and must have sufficient dexterity to manipulate the brush as needed to cover the eyelashes in a satisfactory manner. In addition, mascara application with conventional brushes requires several brush passes and therefore is inefficient.
More recently, rotating mascara brushes have been proposed in which a stem of the brush is supported for rotational motion relative to the handle. The force for rotating the stem and attached brush head may be either manual, such as for the brushes described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,145,514 to Clay and U.S. Pat. No. 5,937,871 to Clay, or may be electrically driven, such as the brush described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,056,111 to Mantelet. Such brushes assist the user by automating, at least to some degree, the process of application of the mascara to the eyelash, and thereby address some of the difficulties and inefficiencies experienced with brushes where the applicator head is fixed to the handle.
It will be recognized that it is possible, under certain circumstances, for eyelashes to become bound to the applicator head or become enmeshed with the applicator elements during application of mascara. For example, as an applicator head is rotated, the eyelashes may become coupled to the applicator elements, and may begin to wrap about the applicator head. As the rotational motion of the applicator head continues, the applicator may begin to pull or tug on the eyelashes, and even on the eyelid. Automation may increase the speed at which this effect occurs, and thereby decrease the time window for the user to take corrective action.
Accordingly, it may be desirable to provide a system or an article that limits the amount of force applied to eyelashes that are in contact with a rotating element of the system or article. It may also be desirable to provide a system or an article that automatically limits uncontrolled binding or enmeshment of the applicator elements and the eyelash (i.e., without user intervention). It may also be desirable to provide a system or an article that facilitates the efforts of the user while overcoming one or more of the drawbacks of conventional technology.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONA cosmetic applicator includes a handle, a drive coupled to the handle, an applicator head coupled to the drive, and a torque limiter. The torque limiter includes a magnetic coupling, the magnetic coupling being coupled to at least one of the drive and the applicator head such that the torque applied via the applicator head does not exceed a predetermined allowable torque.
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter that is regarded as the present invention, it is believed that the invention will be more fully understood from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Some of the figures may have been simplified by the omission of selected elements for the purpose of more clearly showing other elements. Such omissions of elements in some figures are not necessarily indicative of the presence or absence of particular elements in any of the exemplary embodiments, except as may be explicitly delineated in the corresponding written description. None of the drawings are necessarily to scale.
The present disclosure details a variety of torque limiters for use with a cosmetic applicator having applicator elements that at least in certain states are moveable with at least a rotational motion component. While various embodiments of torque limiters are discussed with reference to
The term “cosmetic applicator” or “applicator” refers to an apparatus, device or system used to apply cosmetic material, such as mascara, to a keratinous material, such as eyelashes.
The term “applicator element” refers to a structure from which a cosmetic material, such as mascara, is transferred to a keratinous material, such as eyelashes.
The term “applicator head” refers to one or more applicator elements and a structure that supports the applicator element(s). According to certain embodiments, the applicator head may include protrusions and a core from which the protrusions extend or depend.
The term “attached” refers to elements being connected or united by adhering, fastening, bonding, etc. by any method suitable for the elements being joined together. Many suitable methods for attaching elements together are well-known, including adhesive bonding, mechanical fastening, etc. Such attachment methods may be used to attach elements together over a particular area either continuously or intermittently.
The term “coupled” refers to configurations whereby an element is directly secured to another element by attaching the element directly to the other element, and to configurations whereby an element is indirectly secured to another element by attaching the element to intermediate member(s) that is(are) in turn attached to the other element.
The term “disposed” is used to mean that an element(s) is exists in a particular place or position as a unitary structure with other elements or as a separate element coupled to other elements.
The term “drive” refers to an apparatus, device or system that moves a driven element, such as an applicator head or applicator element, that is coupled to the drive. The drive may include a motor, a transmission and a source of power for the motor.
The term “protrusion” refers to a member that extends or depends generally away from or into a base surface, such as of an applicator head. As such, a protrusion provides a localized area that is not continuous with the surrounding base surface.
Applicator with Torque LimiterAs seen in
In all or only in certain operative states, the drive 104 may move the applicator head 106 (in whole or in part) at rotational speeds suitable for applying mascara to keratinous fibers. That is, in certain operative states, the drive 104 may be disengaged and/or decoupled from the applicator head 106 such that the applicator head 106 has no or limited rotational motion (or no or limited motion) relative to the handle 102, while in other states the drive 104 may be engaged and/or coupled to the head 106 to move the head 106 with a rotational motion component relative to the handle 102. Alternatively, the drive 104 and/or the head 106 may be secured against at least rotation motion in certain operative states. In regard to such alternative embodiments, the drive 104 or head 106 may be engaged, in whole or in part, by an element, such as a switch, that couples the drive or the head 106 fixedly to the handle 102, such that no or only limited relative rotational motion (or no or limited motion) may occur between the head 106 and the handle 102.
As to the operational speeds possible for the head 106, a speed of approximately 1 to 200 rpm may be used. According to certain embodiments, a speed of approximately 5 to 100 rpm may be used. In fact, according to particular embodiments, speeds within the range of approximately 10 to 60 rpm may be used. The speed may be fixed, or may be adjustable within the appropriate range, as explained in greater detail below.
The drive 104 may include a motor or actuator 120. The motor 120 may be mechanical motor with a source of potential mechanical energy in the form of a resilient member—a spring or rubber band, for example. Alternatively, the motor 120 may be an electric motor, in which case the drive 104 may also include a power source 124 (such as a battery, for example) coupled to the motor 120 to provide the necessary voltage and current. Where the motor 120 is an electric motor, the voltage and current may even be provided by an power source external to the handle 102, such as an embodiment wherein to the motor 120 is coupled to the electric mains via an electrical outlet, for example. According to certain embodiments, a drive circuit may be coupled to the motor 120 and the source 124 to control operation of the motor 120. The drive circuit may include a switch 128 to turn the motor 120 on and off, or couple and decouple the motor 120 to the source 124.
The drive 104 may also include a transmission 130 that is coupled to a shaft 132 of the motor 120. The transmission 130 may transform, in whole or in part, the motion of the motor 120 (or, more particularly, the motor shaft 132) prior to coupling to the applicator head 106. For example, linear motion of the motor 120 may be transformed, at least in part, to rotational motion. In addition or in the alternative, the transmission 130 may reduce the speed of the motor 120 to a rotational speed appropriate for the applicator head 106. In certain embodiments, the transmission 130 may not be required because the motor shaft 132 does not rotate faster than the desired rotational speed of the applicator head 106. In other embodiments, the transmission 130 may not be required because the motor 120 is capable of providing variable motions or speeds.
It will be recognized that the torque limiter 108 has a predetermined torque at which it is triggered, decoupling the head 106 from the drive 104, for example. The predetermined torque for the limiter 108 in such embodiments may represent a maximum allowable torque at which the applicator head 106 will remain coupled to the drive 104. It is presently believed that the predetermined torque should be no greater than approximately 5 oz-in. Accordingly, the predetermined torque (maximum allowable torque) may be approximately 2 oz-in, approximately 1.5 oz-in or even approximately 0.5 oz-in. On the other hand, it is presently also believed that the predetermined torque should not be less than approximately 0.1 oz-in, or in any event not less than approximately 0.05 oz-in. Thus, one acceptable range of predetermined torques (maximum allowable torques) may be between approximately 0.1 oz-in and approximately 1.5 oz-in. Alternatively, an acceptable range of allowable torques may be between approximately 0.1 oz-in and approximately 0.5 oz-in.
Upon reaching the predetermined torque, the response of the torque limiter according to the present disclosure may vary among the embodiments disclosed. According to certain embodiments, a certain level of torque may be permitted, which torque may assist in signaling to the user that a condition exists that needs to be resolved. For example, the torque limiter may be in the form a weak torque motor that simply stalls when a certain torque is achieved. According to alternative embodiments, when the predetermined torque is exceeded, the torque limiter operates to decouple the head 106 from the drive 102, or to deactivate the drive 102, or a combination thereof. Thus, a torque limiter seeks to limit the torque, but does not necessarily decouple or deactivate the drive.
The torque limiter 108 may take any of a number of different forms. For example, the torque limiter 108 may include a slip coupling (
It will be recognized that a torque limiter 108 that includes combinations of structures from each of these groups may be possible (e.g., a torque limiter 108 that includes a slip coupling and a magnetic coupling). It will also be recognized that additional embodiments of torque limiters may exist. However, it would be impractical, if not impossible, to recite every combination and every embodiment. Consequently, the following exemplary combinations and embodiments are discussed below.
Slip Coupling as Torque LimiterThe frictional connection will be determined, at least in part, according to the static and kinetic coefficients of friction of the materials used for the coupling. According to certain embodiments, the static and kinetic coefficients of friction for the materials used in the slip coupling may be substantially equal (a ratio of one or nearly one). According to other embodiments, however, the coefficients may not be substantially equal. For example, materials having a higher static coefficient of friction that kinetic coefficient of friction may be used such that torque is transmitted past the coupling only after the relative motion between the opposing surfaces stops.
The coefficients of friction for a material on one side of the frictional connection may be varied by applying a coating to one or more of the opposing surfaces. For example, a material such a TEFLON may be used to vary the coefficients of friction. It will be recognized that other alternative materials could be used.
The coefficients of friction may also be varied by altering the surface characteristics of one or more of the opposing surfaces through texturing. The surfaces may be smooth or substantially smooth. Alternatively, the surfaces may be rough or substantially rough.
A considerable number of alternative embodiments may exist to the coupling 450. For example, it will be recognized that the detents 458 could be resilient, and the arm 460 stiff. Also, a greater or lesser number of detents 458 may be included, which may cause the relative motion to stop once per revolution or every quarter revolution, for example. Further, the detents 458 may be formed separately from the shaft 452 and attached to the surface 456, or formed integrally with the shaft 452 and surface 456. Additionally, rather than having an arm 460 with ends 464 that may cooperate with detents 458, the arm 460 may have a single, cantilevered end 464.
With the legs 470 in the second state, the free ends 476 of the legs 466 may abut an inner surface 482 of the shaft 468. In this fashion, a frictional connection may be formed between the free ends 476 of the legs 466 and the inner surface 482, the ends 476 and the surface 482 defining a pair of opposing surfaces. As noted relative to the other embodiments discussed in this section, when a predetermined torque is achieved at the head 106, the ends 476 and surface 482 slip past each other to limit the torque transmitted.
The coupling 490 includes a first wheel 492 coupled to a first shaft 494, and a second wheel 496 coupled to a second shaft 498. Each of the wheels 492, 496 has a rim 500, 502 with a surface 504, 506. The surfaces 504, 506 may be smooth, or the surfaces 504, 506 may be knurled or otherwise textured. A belt 508 is fitted about the wheels 492, 496, and in particular the rims 500, 502, such that a surface 509 of the belt abuts and cooperates with the surfaces 504, 506 of the wheels 492, 496. The surfaces 504, 506 and the surface 509 may be complementary to each other, according to certain embodiments where the surfaces 504, 506 have a groove formed therein and the belt has a cross-section that is complementary to that groove. The tension may be maintained on the belt 509 by maintaining a particular distance between the shafts 494, 498, which distance may be fixed or adjustable (for example, through the use of a resilient member to bias the shafts 494, 498 apart).
The coupling 510 also includes shafts 512, 514 coupled to wheels 516, 518. The wheels have rims 520, 522 with surfaces 524, 526 that are in frictional connection with a surface 528 of a belt 530. An idler wheel 534 may have a surface 536 in contact with the opposite surface 538 of the belt 530. The idler wheel 534 may be coupled to an arm 540 and biased such that the surface 536 abuts the surface 538 through the function of the resilient member 542. The idler wheel 534 may thus be used to control the tension on the belt 530.
While it will be recognized that still other embodiments are possible for the slip coupling, these embodiments are included as exemplary forms of this coupling.
Magnetic Coupling as Torque LimiterAt the outset, it should be noted that the magnet or magnets used in the embodiments of magnetic coupling described herein may be of that variety that is commonly termed “permanent” magnets, although the strength of the magnet may vary with time. Alternatively, the magnet may be an electromagnet, where the magnetic field is generated by running current through a wire, for example. Such an electromagnet may be used, for example, where a battery is provided to power the drive 104 of the applicator 100. One or both of the magnets may be permanent magnet or electromagnets.
A first embodiment of magnetic coupling 600 is illustrated in
While it will be recognized that still other embodiments are possible for the magnetic coupling, these embodiments are included as exemplary forms of this coupling.
Fluidic or Viscous Coupling as Torque LimiterA variety of materials may be used in the fluidic or viscous coupling according to the present disclosure. As noted above, gases, such as air, or liquids, such as water or oil, may be used. Alternatively, a semi-solid material, such as a gel, may be used. Moreover, a solid material may be dispersed in a liquid and used in embodiments of the present disclosure. For that matter, a solid material may exhibit fluid-like characteristics, so as to be useful in a fluidic or viscous coupling according to the present disclosure. For example, it is believed that microbeads of a solid material may exhibit sufficient fluid-like characteristics so as to be useful in the fluidic or viscous couplings according to the present disclosure. As one example, ceramic beads may be used where the mass of the bead does not greatly contribute to the interbead effects.
According to certain embodiments, a finned device, such as a propeller, impeller, or pump, may be used in the coupling. According to other embodiments, the viscous substance alone provides the coupling between the shafts.
While it will be recognized that still other embodiments are possible for the fluidic or viscous coupling, these embodiments are included as exemplary forms of this coupling.
Alternative Torque LimitersThe decoupling or deactivation may be maintained, for example, for a predetermined amount of time, so as to permit the user an opportunity to manipulate the switch and open the electrical circuit. Alternatively, the decoupling or deactivation may be maintained until the switch is manipulated and the circuit is opened at the switch, thereby permitting the user an opportunity to manipulate the applicator 900 to unbind the lashes without having to remember to manipulate the switch first. In other embodiments, an action beyond that required to open the circuit (i.e., depress the on/off switch) may be required to reset the drive circuit 920 and permit operation of the applicator 900.
Similarly, reversal may be maintained for a predetermined amount of time, and then the motor 904 may be decoupled or deactivated. Alternatively, reversal may be maintained through a predetermined angle, at which point the motor 904 may be decoupled or deactivated. As a further alternative, the speed of reversal may be different than the speed in the forward direction, such that reversal may not be halted until the user manipulates the switch 914, but the difference in speeds may permit the user a greater time window to manipulate the switch 914 with the motor 904 in reverse.
Further, the drive 976 also includes contacts 996 coupled to the sleeve 984 and contacts 998 coupled to a switch 1000. With the drive 976 in a first, operative state, as is illustrates in
The disclosure now will discuss several embodiments of the aspects of the applicator other than the torque limiter 108, such as the applicator head 106, the drive 102, and so on. It will be recognized that not all embodiments disclosed below may be used with every embodiment of torque limiter 108 discussed above. However, combinations of the various embodiments below with the torque limiters 108 discussed above will be recognized. In this regard, the disclosure of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/143,829 is hereby incorporated herein by reference as to potential variations on the applicator described herein.
First, various embodiments of the applicator head 106 will be discussed relative to
The applicator head 106 may include one or more elements projecting from the stem for separating and applying cosmetic to keratinous fibers, such as eyelashes. While the applicator element may be provided as a conventional twisted wire brush, the applicator element may instead be in the form of molded protrusions. While protrusions typically extend outwardly away from the base surface, they may also be inverted to project inwardly to form a recess.
According to one embodiment, the molded protrusions are formed as elongate fingers having a base end coupled to the stem and an opposite free end. According to certain embodiments, the cross-sectional area of each finger gradually narrows from the base end to the free end, and each finger is oriented to extend substantially perpendicular with respect to an axis of the stem. It will be appreciated that the fingers may diverge from the base so that the tip is larger, or the fingers may not taper at all but instead have substantially consistent dimensions. Furthermore, the fingers may extend at oblique angles with respect to the stem axis.
The fingers are spaced along the stem and have a free end sized such that each finger may penetrate between adjacent keratinous fibers. The spacing allows the fingers to be inserted between fibers even as the applicator head 106 is rotated, thereby maximizing the fiber surface area engaged by each finger and promoting separation of adjacent fibers. The protrusions should be spaced far enough to allow eyelashes to penetrate between adjacent protrusions yet close enough to separate adjacent eyelashes. Accordingly, the gap between adjacent protrusions may be approximately 0.2 to 3.0 mm.
While in certain embodiments each of the protrusions extends from a localized area of the stem circumference, other areas of engagement between the stem and the protrusions may be used. As illustrated in
While the disc-shaped protrusion 1030 is illustrated in
The cross-sectional shape of the protrusions 1030 may be varied without departing from the scope of this disclosure. As illustrated in
The ends of the protrusions may be formed with various shapes or include various structures. Where appropriate, the protrusions may be subjected to treatment for forming respective end balls 1050 as shown in
The protrusions may have an exterior surface particularly adapted to transfer cosmetic material from a base of the protrusion to a free end. For example, each protrusion may include an exterior coating having a low surface energy to more readily transfer product to the lashes. The coating may be particularly suited for use with cosmetic material, such as the mascara materials noted above in the background.
In addition to the elongate profile, at least some of the protrusions may be somewhat shorter, such as protruding discs 1056, dimples, or ridges 1058 extending from an exterior surface of the stem, as illustrated in
The applicator head 106 may include a variety of protrusions having different shapes or displaying different properties. For example, the applicator head 106 may include a first set of protrusions having a first cross-sectional shape and a second set of protrusions having a second cross-sectional shape. Also, the first set of protrusions 1030a may have a first stiffness while the second set of protrusions 1030b has a second, different stiffness. By using protrusions of varying stiffness, rotation of the applicator head will cause the more flexible protrusions to deflect to a greater degree than the stiffer protrusions, as illustrated in
The stem also may have one of a variety of cross-sectional shapes, as illustrated in
The protrusions may have a variety of lengths so as to define a variety of applicator head profiles. For example, the protrusions may be of uniform length to define a circular applicator head profile 1064, as shown in
Alternatively, the shape of the stem and/or the length and spacing of the protrusions may be varied to define a non-circular applicator head profile. For example, the length of the protrusions may alternate between short and long lengths around the circumference of the stem to define a cross-sectional applicator head profile 1066 having recesses, as shown in
In addition to varying the circumferential spacing of the protrusions, the axial spacing of the protrusions along the applicator head 106 may also be varied.
The applicator head 106 may include patterns of protrusions having different lengths. As shown in
The applicator may include visible indicia to identify portions of the applicator having different characteristics. An asymmetrical applicator head, for example, may include a first area having protrusions with a first characteristic and a second area having protrusions with a second characteristic. The applicator head may have a first visible indicia, such as color, texture, text, or other visually discernable quality, to identify the first area and a second visible indicia to identify the second area. The different visible indicia communicate to a user that the different areas have protrusions with different characteristics, such as relative flexibilities, lengths, or motions. The visible indicia may be provided as different colors in the first and second areas. For example, the protrusion tip, entire protrusion body, or applicator head surface including protrusions associated with the first area may have a first color, while similar structure in the second area has a second color. Similarly, the first area may have a first color scheme, such as an applicator head surface with a first color and protrusions or portions thereof with a second color, while the second area has a second color scheme, such as an applicator head surface with a third color and protrusions or portions thereof with a fourth color.
Having discussed various embodiments of the applicator head, the disclosure now references several embodiments of the drive 104.
As noted above, according to certain embodiments of the motor, the speed may vary.
As also noted above, a variety of different drives exist for generating a rotational motion component. For example, an applicator 1130 is illustrated in
More specifically, the transmission 1144 includes a motor disc 1146 coupled to the rotating motor shaft 1142. As best seen in
In operation, the pin 1148 may first be positioned adjacent a lower end of the slot 1150 as shown in
Another exemplary embodiment of an applicator 1160 with a rotational movement is illustrated in
Another further exemplary embodiment of an applicator 1180 is illustrated in
It will be recognized that the applicator 100 may include a drive 102 that moves the applicator head 106 not only in a rotational motion, but an axial motion as well. An exemplary embodiment of an applicator 1230 capable of producing a composite motion including both rotational and axial oscillation is illustrated in
In operation, the coil actuator 1238 reciprocates the drive shaft 1240 along a vertical direction between retracted and extended positions, illustrated in
Furthermore, the rotational motion of the applicator head 106 may be combined with axial or vibrational motion. For example, an exemplary embodiment of an applicator 1310 for producing rotational and axial or vibrational motion of the applicator head 106 is illustrated in
In operation, rotation of the motor disc 1324 rotates the applicator head disc 1326. As the applicator head disc 1326 rotates, the cam follower 1328 slides along the cam driver surface 1330 to simultaneously push the applicator head disc 1326 downwardly against the force of the spring 1332. As a result, the elevation of the applicator head disc 1326 moves above and below a center of rotation of the motor disc 1324 as it rotates. When the center of motor disc rotation is above the elevation of the applicator head disc 1326 as shown in
An applicator 1420 capable of producing a composite vibrational and rotational motion is illustrated at
In operation, the rotating eccentric weight 1430 generates a vibratory force that is substantially isolated from the handle 1422 by the spring 1426. The force is transferred via the boss 1436 to the applicator head 1438, which causes the applicator head to rotate. In this embodiment, where the motor shaft 1428 is substantially parallel to the applicator head axis, rotation of the motor shaft 1428 in one direction causes rotation of the applicator head 1438 in the opposite direction. The direction of motor shaft rotation may be reversed by switching the polarity of the battery 1434. Accordingly, the applicator 1420 is capable of moving the applicator head 1444 in a composite motion including both a vibrational element and a rotational element.
An applicator 1450 capable of producing a composite applicator head motion including one or more vibrational, radial, and rotational components is illustrated in
In operation, rotation of the motor 1456 generates a rotational force that is isolated from the handle 1452 by one end of the spring 1458 and transferred to the applicator head 1468 by the other end of the spring 1458. The spring 1458 allows the applicator head 1468 to radially translated (i.e., to move in a circular path with respect to the inner sleeve 1454 without rotating). The applicator head 1472, in turn, is free to rotate with respect to the applicator head 1468. As a result, the applicator 1450 is capable of moving the applicator head 1472 in a composite motion including a radial translation component, a vibrational component, and/or a rotational component.
In the embodiments illustrated in
An applicator may have an applicator head or combined applicator head and applicator head that may be independently removable from the handle to allow a variety of customized applicators to be used with the same handle. The removable head or head/applicator head combination may include a locking mechanism. The applicator head may further be adapted to provide a combination of both moving (i.e., rotating, axial moving, etc.) and stationary protrusions.
Assembly and Use of the ApplicatorThe applicator 100, according to any of the embodiments described above, may be manufactured as a single unit. That is, the applicator head 106 may be coupled to the drive 104 in such a fashion that attempts to decouple the applicator head 106 from the drive 104 may result in damage to one or both of the head 106 and the drive 104, rendering the head 106 and/or drive 104 inoperable. Alternatively, the applicator head and/or drive 104 may be coupled to the handle 102 to the same effect. The applicator 100 may be packaged and sold together with a bottle of the cosmetic, mascara for example.
However, the components of the applicator 100 may also be manufactured so as to be packaged and sold separately.
For example, the applicator head 106 may be selectively detachable from the drive 104 and/or handle 102, such that a variety of heads 106 may be used with a given drive 104 and handle 102. After this fashion, the user may be permitted to change between applicator heads 106 having different applicator element profiles (see
Moreover, following along these lines, the applicator head 106 may be packaged and sold as a unit 1700 with the a bottle of cosmetic material (for example, mascara) 1702, as shown in
It will be recognized that the head 106 is not the only component of the applicator that may be packaged and sold separately. For example, as also illustrated in
All documents cited in the Detailed Description are, in relevant part, incorporated herein by reference; the citation of any document is not to be construed as an admission that it is prior art with respect to the present invention.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.
Claims
1. A mascara applicator comprising:
- a handle;
- a drive coupled to the handle;
- an applicator head coupled to the drive by a first shaft and a second shaft that are aligned along a common axis, the applicator head comprising an applicator surface and a plurality of applicator elements that extend radially away from the applicator surface, the applicator elements being configured to separate keratinous fibers and apply a mascara composition thereto; and
- a torque limiter comprising a magnetic coupling, the magnetic coupling including a first magnet and a second magnet, the first magnet being coupled to one of the first and second shafts, the second magnet being coupled to the other of the first and second shafts, and the first and second magnets being magnetically coupled to each other such that the torque limiter prevents the torque applied via the applicator head from exceeding a predetermined allowable torque that is from 0.05 to 5 ounce inches;
- wherein the applicator head is configured to be driven by the drive and to rotate at a speed of 1-200 rpm.
2. The cosmetic applicator according to claim 1, wherein the drive comprises an electric motor.
3. The cosmetic applicator according to claim 1, wherein the drive comprises a mechanical motor.
4. The cosmetic applicator according to claim 1, wherein the magnetic coupling is coupled between the applicator head and the drive to transmit motion between the drive and the applicator head.
5. The cosmetic applicator according to claim 1, wherein the magnetic coupling comprises at least one electromagnet.
6. The cosmetic applicator according to claim 1, wherein the magnetic coupling comprises at least one permanent magnet.
7. The cosmetic applicator according to claim 1, wherein the first and second magnets are aligned along a common axis in a first, coupled state, and aligned along parallel axes in a second, decoupled state.
8. The cosmetic applicator according to claim 1, wherein the first and second magnets are disposed with opposing surfaces of the first and second magnets abutting.
9. The cosmetic applicator according to claim 8, at least one of the opposing surfaces of the first and second magnets comprising a coating having a static coefficient of friction and a kinetic coefficient of friction.
10. The cosmetic applicator according to claim 1, wherein the first and second magnets are disposed with a gap therebetween, and wherein the magnetic coupling comprises a spacer disposed in the gap.
11. The cosmetic applicator according to claim 10, wherein the spacer comprises a first layer and a second layer, the first and second layers having opposing surfaces frictionally coupled to each other.
12. A mascara applicator comprising:
- a handle;
- a drive coupled to the handle;
- an applicator head coupled to the drive by a first shaft and a second shaft that share a common axis, the applicator head comprising an applicator surface and a plurality of applicator elements that extend radially away from the applicator surface, the applicator elements being configured to separate keratinous fibers and apply a mascara composition thereto; and
- a torque limiter comprising a magnetic coupling, the magnetic coupling including a first magnet and a material having a medium to high magnetic permeability, the first magnet being coupled to one of the first and second shafts, the material being coupled to the other of the first and second shafts, and the first magnet and the material being magnetically coupled to each other such that the torque limiter prevents the torque applied via the applicator head from exceeding a predetermined allowable torque that is from 0.05 to 5 ounce inches;
- wherein the applicator head is configured to be driven by the drive and to rotate at a speed of 1-200 rpm.
13. The cosmetic applicator according to claim 12, wherein the material comprises iron.
14. The applicator of claim 12, wherein the predetermined allowable torque is from 0.1 to 2 ounce inches.
15. The applicator of claim 12, wherein the predetermined allowable torque is from 0.5 to 1.5 ounce inches.
16. The applicator of claim 12, wherein the applicator head is configured to rotate at a speed of 10-60 rpm.
17. The applicator of claim 1, wherein the predetermined allowable torque is from 0.1 to 2 ounce inches.
18. The applicator of claim 1, wherein the predetermined allowable torque is from 0.5 to 1.5 ounce inches.
19. The applicator of claim 1, wherein the applicator head is configured to rotate at a speed of 5-100 rpm.
20. The applicator of claim 1, wherein the applicator head is configured to rotate at a speed of 10-60 rpm.
| 386453 | July 1888 | Roberts |
| 474795 | May 1892 | Hantman |
| 2290454 | July 1942 | Leon |
| D145158 | July 1946 | Derham |
| D154653 | August 1949 | Beckler |
| 2625157 | January 1953 | Lockhart |
| D185339 | May 1959 | Wolff |
| 2975467 | March 1961 | Stanzel |
| 3132743 | May 1964 | Wolff |
| 3156335 | November 1964 | Richard |
| 2154812 | April 1967 | Hauser |
| 3431571 | March 1969 | Kraus |
| 3432069 | March 1969 | Craig |
| 3661018 | May 1972 | Keefer |
| 3699952 | October 1972 | Waters |
| 3998235 | December 21, 1976 | Kingsford |
| 4056111 | November 1, 1977 | Mantelet |
| 4186733 | February 5, 1980 | Mogaki |
| 4302901 | December 1, 1981 | Psyras |
| 4370771 | February 1, 1983 | Gonzalvo |
| 4397326 | August 9, 1983 | Formica |
| 4428338 | January 31, 1984 | Skatsche |
| D272952 | March 6, 1984 | Holloway |
| 4490877 | January 1, 1985 | Drumm |
| 4498490 | February 12, 1985 | Seidler |
| 4632136 | December 30, 1986 | Kingsford |
| 4679271 | July 14, 1987 | Field |
| 4687364 | August 18, 1987 | Kingsford |
| 4691720 | September 8, 1987 | Schmitz |
| 4698869 | October 13, 1987 | Mierau |
| 4744377 | May 17, 1988 | Dolan, Jr. |
| 4766432 | August 23, 1988 | Field |
| D304095 | October 17, 1989 | Gavin |
| D306967 | April 3, 1990 | Matsuura |
| 4914988 | April 10, 1990 | Chang |
| 4922934 | May 8, 1990 | Gatti |
| 4974980 | December 4, 1990 | Gueret |
| 4988502 | January 29, 1991 | Ounanian et al. |
| 5007442 | April 16, 1991 | Hirzel |
| 5061103 | October 29, 1991 | Walsh-Smith |
| 5078157 | January 7, 1992 | Golan et al. |
| 5086793 | February 11, 1992 | Kingsford |
| 5172992 | December 22, 1992 | Ackermann |
| 5186728 | February 16, 1993 | Fong |
| 5189751 | March 2, 1993 | Giuliani et al. |
| 5253382 | October 19, 1993 | Beny |
| 5263218 | November 23, 1993 | Giuliani et al. |
| 5372444 | December 13, 1994 | Lhuisset |
| 5378153 | January 3, 1995 | Giuliani et al. |
| 5383242 | January 24, 1995 | Bigler |
| 5407093 | April 18, 1995 | McGill |
| D358294 | May 16, 1995 | Letica |
| 5435034 | July 25, 1995 | Bigler |
| 5492136 | February 20, 1996 | Edmonds |
| 5575579 | November 19, 1996 | Joulia |
| D383980 | September 23, 1997 | Abfier |
| 5784742 | July 28, 1998 | Giuliani |
| 5794296 | August 18, 1998 | Wong |
| 5816728 | October 6, 1998 | Nardolillo et al. |
| 5822821 | October 20, 1998 | Sham |
| 5864911 | February 2, 1999 | Arnoux et al. |
| D408283 | April 20, 1999 | Tucker |
| D409800 | May 11, 1999 | Litton |
| 5937871 | August 17, 1999 | Clay |
| 5956791 | September 28, 1999 | Bassi |
| D420767 | February 15, 2000 | Coates |
| D424937 | May 16, 2000 | Tucker |
| 6142692 | November 7, 2000 | Garcia |
| 6145514 | November 14, 2000 | Clay |
| 6199242 | March 13, 2001 | Masterman |
| 6295994 | October 2, 2001 | Thayer et al. |
| 6345626 | February 12, 2002 | Bouix |
| RE37605 | March 26, 2002 | Clay |
| 6412496 | July 2, 2002 | Gueret |
| 6450178 | September 17, 2002 | Clay |
| 6454674 | September 24, 2002 | Krzesicki et al. |
| 6565276 | May 20, 2003 | Diaz |
| 6652888 | November 25, 2003 | Rhoades |
| 6691716 | February 17, 2004 | Neuner et al. |
| 6811340 | November 2, 2004 | Petit |
| 6948780 | September 27, 2005 | Litman et al. |
| 7025068 | April 11, 2006 | Dumler |
| 7089946 | August 15, 2006 | Rousselet |
| D530857 | October 24, 2006 | Black |
| 7165906 | January 23, 2007 | Dieudonat et al. |
| D548973 | August 21, 2007 | Dawson |
| D550078 | September 4, 2007 | Henry |
| 20010018061 | August 30, 2001 | Rhoades |
| 20010046506 | November 29, 2001 | Rhoades |
| 20010050089 | December 13, 2001 | Fitjer |
| 20020069726 | June 13, 2002 | Adler et al. |
| 20020157680 | October 31, 2002 | Postal et al. |
| 20020195117 | December 26, 2002 | Bailly |
| 20030165550 | September 4, 2003 | Rhoades |
| 20040195063 | October 7, 2004 | Simonis et al. |
| 20040234323 | November 25, 2004 | Albisetti et al. |
| 20040244809 | December 9, 2004 | Gueret |
| 20050086752 | April 28, 2005 | Lee |
| 20050142093 | June 30, 2005 | Skover |
| 20050250076 | November 10, 2005 | Rhoades |
| 20050268409 | December 8, 2005 | Blaustein et al. |
| 20060032512 | February 16, 2006 | Kress et al. |
| 20060042647 | March 2, 2006 | Vogel |
| 20060051155 | March 9, 2006 | Delage |
| 20060076033 | April 13, 2006 | Bouix |
| 20060228157 | October 12, 2006 | Dieudonat et al. |
| 20060272666 | December 7, 2006 | Wyatt et al. |
| 20060272667 | December 7, 2006 | Wyatt et al. |
| 20060272668 | December 7, 2006 | Wyatt et al. |
| 20070186948 | August 16, 2007 | Kim et al. |
| 20070231050 | October 4, 2007 | Thiebaut |
| 20070261868 | November 15, 2007 | Gross |
| 20070272269 | November 29, 2007 | Wyatt et al. |
| 20070289602 | December 20, 2007 | Simmons |
| 20080011316 | January 17, 2008 | Malvar et al. |
| 20080087296 | April 17, 2008 | Gueret |
| 20080196735 | August 21, 2008 | Wyatt et al. |
| 20080196736 | August 21, 2008 | Wyatt et al. |
| 20080236607 | October 2, 2008 | Lee |
| 20090071499 | March 19, 2009 | Wyatt et al. |
| 20090071500 | March 19, 2009 | Wyatt et al. |
| 20090154985 | June 18, 2009 | Wyatt et al. |
| 20100000566 | January 7, 2010 | Wyatt |
| 20100089414 | April 15, 2010 | Wyatt |
| 20100269846 | October 28, 2010 | Wyatt |
| 585047 | February 1977 | CH |
| 609238 | February 1979 | CH |
| 3833358 | January 1996 | DE |
| 19950665 | May 2000 | DE |
| 20210482 | October 2002 | DE |
| 0289726 | November 1988 | EP |
| 0371501 | June 1990 | EP |
| 0289726 | August 1992 | EP |
| 0848920 | June 1998 | EP |
| 0845305 | October 2002 | EP |
| 0 848 920 | March 2003 | EP |
| 1621104 | May 2006 | EP |
| 1565296 | April 1969 | FR |
| 2345964 | October 1977 | FR |
| 2701197 | March 1995 | FR |
| 200216283 | June 2004 | FR |
| 846639 | August 1960 | GB |
| 1502532 | March 1978 | GB |
| 2132884 | July 1984 | GB |
| 2304645 | March 1997 | GB |
| 2284750 | October 1997 | GB |
| 61-253006 | November 1986 | JP |
| 04-040905 | February 1992 | JP |
| 5329024 | December 1993 | JP |
| 07-116026 | May 1995 | JP |
| 8289815 | November 1996 | JP |
| 1996289815 | November 1996 | JP |
| 09-262123 | October 1997 | JP |
| 2005-095531 | April 2005 | JP |
| 2005095531 | April 2005 | JP |
| 20-0326065 | August 2003 | KR |
| 200326065 | August 2003 | KR |
| 2020030012684 | August 2003 | KR |
| 20-0334143 | November 2003 | KR |
| 200334143 | November 2003 | KR |
| 2020030025327 | November 2003 | KR |
| 20-0341762 | February 2004 | KR |
| 200341762 | February 2004 | KR |
| 2020030030514 | February 2004 | KR |
| 20-0356837 | July 2004 | KR |
| 200356837 | July 2004 | KR |
| 2020040011077 | July 2004 | KR |
| 20-0358513 | August 2004 | KR |
| 200358513 | August 2004 | KR |
| 2020040010980 | August 2004 | KR |
| 20-0393379 | August 2005 | KR |
| 2020050016644 | August 2005 | KR |
| 20-0396785 | September 2005 | KR |
| 2020050016643 | September 2005 | KR |
| 20-0404002 | December 2005 | KR |
| 2020050028145 | December 2005 | KR |
| 20-0416525 | May 2006 | KR |
| 20-0416536 | May 2006 | KR |
| 2020060004384 | May 2006 | KR |
| 2020060004826 | May 2006 | KR |
| WO 9403125 | February 1994 | WO |
| WO 9700650 | January 1997 | WO |
| WO 00/54623 | September 2000 | WO |
| WO-2004/077987 | September 2004 | WO |
| WO 2006130643 | May 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006/090343 | August 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006/090343 | August 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006/130644 | December 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006/132459 | December 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006/132459 | December 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007/060438 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007/094552 | August 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008/051067 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008/102317 | August 2008 | WO |
- http://coolmagnetman.com/magtypes.html.
- www.coolmagnetman.com.
- How are magnets made? Magnet Basics. Webpage [online] Coolmagnetman.com [retrieved on May 16, 2011]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://replay.web.archive.org/20060112024222/http://www.coolmagnetman.com/magtypes.htm>.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/677,350, filed Feb. 21, 2007, Wyatt et al.
- USPTO Office Action rejections/objections from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/677,326, filed Feb. 21, 2007, Inventor: Peter Jonathan Wyatt et al , mail date Aug. 14, 2009; 6 pages.
- USPTO Office Action rejections/objections from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/677,350, filed Feb. 21, 2007; Inventor: Peter Jonathan Wyatt et al., mail date Jun. 18, 2009; 6 pages.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/677,350, filed Feb. 21, 2007, Peter Jonathan Wyatt, et al.
- International Search Report, PCT/US2008/054525, dated Jul. 23, 2008 (6 pages).
- USPTO Office Action rejections/objections from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/677,326, filed Feb. 21, 2007, Inventor: Peter Jonathan Wyatt et al., mail date Mar. 11, 2010 (7 pages).
- USPTO Office Action rejections/objections from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/677,326, filed Feb. 21, 2007, Inventor: Peter Jonathan Wyatt et al., mail date May 18, 2010 (10 pages).
- USPTO Office Action rejections/objections from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/677,326, filed Feb. 21, 2007, Inventor: Peter Jonathan Wyatt et al., mail date Nov. 17, 2010 (7 pages).
- USPTO Office Action rejections/objections from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/677,350, filed Feb. 21, 2007; Inventor: Peter Jonathan Wyatt et al., mail date Feb. 2, 2010 (11 pages).
- USPTO Office Action rejections/objections from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/677,350, filed Feb. 21, 2007; Inventor: Peter Jonathan Wyatt et al., mail date Sep. 14, 2010 (9 pages).
- USPTO Office Action rejections/objections from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/677,350, filed Feb. 21, 2007; Inventor: Peter Jonathan Wyatt et al., mail date Nov. 29, 2010 (3 pages).
- USPTO Office Action rejections/objections from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/677,350, filed Feb. 21, 2007; Inventor: Peter Jonathan Wyatt et al., mail date Jan. 4, 2011 (8 pages).
- USPTO Office Action rejections/objections from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/677,350, filed Feb. 21, 2007; Inventor: Peter Jonathan Wyatt et al., mail date Apr. 4, 2011 (3 pages).
- USPTO Office Action rejections/objections from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/677,350, filed Feb. 21, 2007; Inventor: Peter Jonathan Wyatt et al., mail date Oct. 21, 2011 (9 pages).
- USPTO Office Action rejections/objections from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/677,350, filed Feb. 21, 2007; Inventor: Peter Jonathan Wyatt et al., mail date Jun. 1, 2012 (2 pages).
Type: Grant
Filed: Feb 21, 2007
Date of Patent: Jul 16, 2013
Patent Publication Number: 20080196735
Assignee: The Procter & Gamble Company (Cincinnati, OH)
Inventors: Peter Jonathan Wyatt (Forest Hill, MD), David Edward Wilson (Reisterstown, MD), Donald Frank Rainey (Owings Mills, MD), Tamela Suzanne Jadin (Cincinnati, OH)
Primary Examiner: Todd Manahan
Assistant Examiner: Brianne Kalach
Application Number: 11/677,338
International Classification: A45D 40/26 (20060101);