Oedema detection

- Impedimed Limited

A method of detecting tissue oedema in a subject. The method includes determining a measured impedance for first and second body segments. An index indicative of a ratio of the extra-cellular to intra-cellular fluid is then calculated for each body segment, with these being used to determine an index ratio based on the index for the first and second body segments. The index ratio can in turn be used to determine the presence, absence or degree of tissue oedema, for example by comparing the index ratio to a reference or previously determined index ratios.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a U.S. National Phase under 35 USC §371 of the International Application No.: PCT/AU2005/000876, filed on Jun. 17, 2005, designating the U.S. and published in English on Dec. 15, 2005 as WO/2005/122888, which claims the benefit of priority of Australian Application No. 2004903314, filed on Jun. 18, 2004, each of which is incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for detecting tissue oedema, and in particular, to a method and apparatus for detecting tissue oedema using impedance measurements.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART

The reference to any prior art in this specification is not, and should not be taken as, an acknowledgment or any form of suggestion that the prior art forms part of the common general knowledge.

Lymphoedema is a condition characterised by excess protein and oedema in the tissues as a result of reduced lymphatic transport capacity and/or reduced tissue proteolytic capacity in the presence of a normal lymphatic load. Acquired, or secondary lymphoedema, is caused by damaged or blocked lymphatic vessels. “The commonest inciting events are surgery and/or radiotherapy. However, onset of lymphoedema is unpredictable and may develop within days of its cause or at any time during a period of many years after that cause.

WO00/79255 describes a method of detection of oedema by measuring bioelectrical impedance at two different anatomical regions in the same subject at a single low frequency alternating current. The two measurements are analysed to obtain an indication of the presence of tissue oedema by comparing with data obtained from a normal population.

Other known methods of analysis of bioelectrical impedance measurements involve determining a phase and amplitude value for the measured signals. The measurement of amplitude is straightforward but the measurement of phase is more complicated and therefore the required equipment is costly.

SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

In a first broad form the present invention provides a method of detecting tissue oedema in a subject, the method including, in a processing system:

    • a) determining a measured impedance for first and second body segments;
    • b) for each body segment, and using the measured impedance, determining an index indicative of a ratio of the extra-cellular to intra-cellular fluid;
    • c) determining an index ratio based on the index for the first and second body segments;
    • d) determining the presence, absence or degree of tissue oedema based on the index ratio.

Typically the method includes, in the processing system:

    • a) comparing the index ratio to at least one reference; and,
    • b) determining the presence, absence or degree of tissue oedema based on the results of the comparison.

Typically the reference includes at least one of:

    • a) a predetermined threshold;
    • b) a tolerance determined from a normal population; and,
    • c) a predetermined range.

Typically the reference includes an index ratio previously determined for the subject.

Typically the previously determined index ratio is determined prior to the subject undergoing at least one of:

    • a) surgery; and,
    • b) treatment.

Typically the first and second body segments are different types of body segment.

Typically the first and second body segments are limbs.

Typically the first body segment is a leg and the second body segment is an arm.

Typically the method includes, in the processing system:

    • a) determining a plurality of measured impedances for each body segment, each measured impedance being measured at a corresponding measurement frequency; and,
    • b) determining the index ratio based on the plurality of measured impedances.

Typically the method includes, in the processing system:

    • a) determining values for parameters R0 and R∞ from the measured impedance values; and,
    • b) calculating the index (I) using the equation:

I = R ∞ R 0 - R ∞

      • where:
        • R0 is the resistance at zero frequency; and,
        • R∞ is the resistance at infinite frequency.

Typically the method includes, in the processing system, determining the parameter values using the equation:

Z = R ∞ + R 0 - R ∞ 1 + ( j ⁢ ⁢ ω ⁢ ⁢ τ ) ( 1 - α )

    • where:
      • Z is the measured impedance at angular frequency ω,
      • τ is a time constant, and
      • α has a value between 0 and 1; and

Typically the method includes, in the processing system:

    • a) determining the impedance of each body segment at four discrete frequencies; and,
    • b) determining values for the parameters by solving the equation using four simultaneous equations.

Typically the method includes, in the processing system, determining the parameter values by:

    • a) determining an impedance locus using the measured impedance values; and,
    • b) using the impedance locus to determine the parameter values.

Typically the method includes, in the computer system, displaying an indication of at least one of:

    • a) the parameter values;
    • b) the ratio of extra-cellular to intra-cellular fluid; and,
    • c) an indication of the at least one of the presence, absence or degree of tissue oedema in the subject.

In a second broad form the present invention provides apparatus for detecting tissue oedema in a subject, the apparatus including a processing system for:

    • a) determining a measured impedance for first and second body segments;
    • b) for each body segment, and using the measured impedance, determining an index indicative of a ratio of the extra-cellular to intra-cellular fluid;
    • c) determining an index ratio based on the index for the first and second body segments;
    • d) determining the presence, absence or degree of tissue oedema based on the index ratio.

Typically the apparatus includes:

    • a) a current supply for generating an alternating current at each of a plurality of frequencies;
    • b) at least two supply electrodes for applying the generated alternating current to a subject;
    • c) at least two measurement electrodes for detecting a voltage across the subject; and,
    • d) a sensor coupled to the measurement electrodes for determining the voltage, the sensor being coupled to the processing system to thereby allow the processing system to determine the measured impedances.

Typically the apparatus is adapted to perform the method of the first broad form of the invention.

In a third broad form the present invention provides a method of diagnosing tissue oedema in a body region, the method including:

    • a) applying an alternating current signal at four or more discrete frequencies;
    • b) measuring an impedance at each frequency;
    • c) solving the equation:

Z = R ∞ + R 0 - R ∞ 1 + ( j ⁢ ⁢ ω ⁢ ⁢ τ ) ( 1 - α )
to obtain parameters R0, R∞, τ and α,

    • where:
      • Z is the measured impedance at angular frequency ω,
      • R0 is the resistance at zero frequency,
      • R∞ is the resistance at infinite frequency,
      • τ is a time constant, and
      • α has a value between 0 and 1; and
    • d) using one or more of the parameters R0, R∞, α and α to diagnose tissue oedema in the body region.

Typically the method includes diagnosing tissue oedema by determining the presence, absence or degree of tissue oedema.

Typically the method includes:

    • a) determining the impedance at four discrete frequencies; and,
    • b) determining values for the parameters by solving the equation using four simultaneous equations.

Typically the method includes:

    • a) determining values of one or more of the parameters R0, R∞, τ and α for first and second body regions;
    • b) comparing the results from the first body region with the results from the second body region to obtain an indication of the presence of tissue oedema.

Typically the method includes:

    • a) comparing the parameters Ro and R∞ for each body region; and,
    • b) indicating tissue oedema if the difference is outside a tolerance determined from a normal population.

Typically the method includes:

    • a) calculating an index Ri/Re as indicative of the ratio of extracellular fluid to intracellular fluid;
      • where
        • Re is the resistance of extracellular fluid determined from Re=R0; and,
        • Ri is the resistance of intracellular fluid determined from

R i = R ∞ ⁢ R e R e - R ∞ ; and

    • b) diagnosing tissue oedema in accordance with the determined index.

Typically the method includes indicating tissue oedema by displaying the indication as a position on a scale.

Typically the method is a method according to the first broad form of the invention.

In a fourth broad form the present invention provides apparatus for detecting tissue oedema, the apparatus including:

    • a) a current supply for applying an alternating current to an anatomical region at four or more discrete frequencies across a frequency range;
    • b) a monitor for monitoring the bioelectrical impedance of said region; and
    • c) a processing system for:
      • i) analysing the bioelectrical impedance by solving:

Z = R ∞ + R 0 - R ∞ 1 + ( j ⁢ ⁢ ω ⁢ ⁢ τ ) ( 1 - α )
to obtain parameters R0, R∞, τ and α,

    • where:
      • Z is the measured impedance at angular frequency ω,
      • R0 is the resistance at zero frequency,
      • R∞ is the resistance at infinite frequency,
      • τ is a time constant, and
      • α has a value between 0 and 1; and
      • ii) using one or more of the parameters R0, R∞, τ and α to provide an indication of tissue oedema.

Typically the current supply includes a proximal electrode and distal electrode in electrical correction with a power source.

Typically the monitor includes a first connection and second connection for location on or near the anatomical region.

Typically the monitor includes display means to display the signals indicative of bioimpedance.

Typically the processing system is suitably programmed to perform analysis of data to provide an indication of the presence of tissue oedema.

Typically the apparatus is adapted to perform the method of the third broad form of the invention.

In a fifth broad form the present invention provides a method of diagnosing tissue oedema in a body region, the method including:

    • a) calculating an index Ri/Re as indicative of the ratio of extracellular fluid to intracellular fluid;
      • where:
        • Re is the resistance of extracellular fluid determined from Re=R0; and,
        • Ri is the resistance of intracellular fluid determined from

R i = R ∞ ⁢ R e R e - R ∞ ; and

    • b) indicating the presence of tissue oedema if there is a change in the index Ri/Re over time.

Typically the method includes:

    • a) measuring of Ri/Re is made prior to an event likely to cause oedema; and,
    • b) comparing to a measurement of Ri/Re made after the event.

Typically the method is a method according to the first or third broad forms of the invention.

In a sixth broad form the present invention provides apparatus for diagnosing tissue oedema in a body region, the apparatus including a processing system for:

    • a) calculating an index Ri/Re as indicative of the ratio of extracellular fluid to intracellular fluid;
      • where:
        • Re is the resistance of extracellular fluid determined from Re=R0; and,
        • Ri is the resistance of intracellular fluid determined from

R i = R ∞ ⁢ R e R e - R ∞ ; and

    • b) indicating the presence of tissue oedema if there is a change in the index Ri/Re over time.

Typically the apparatus is adapted to perform the method of the fifth broad form of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

An example of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: —

FIG. 1 is a schematic of an example of a theoretical equivalent circuit for biological tissue;

FIG. 2 is an example of a locus of impedance known as a Cole-Cole plot;

FIG. 3 is a schematic of an example of a single channel bioimpedance apparatus;

FIG. 4 is a schematic of an example of a dual channel bioimpedance apparatus; and,

FIG. 5 is a flow chart of an example of a process for evaluating tissue oedema.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is an example of an equivalent circuit that effectively models the electrical behaviour of biological tissue. The equivalent circuit has two branches that represent current flow through extracellular fluid and intracellular fluid. The extracellular component of biological impedance is represented by Re and the intracellular component is represented by Ri. Capacitance of the cell membrane in the intracellular path is represented by C.

The relative magnitudes of the extracellular and intracellular components of impedance of an alternating current (AC) are frequency dependent. At zero frequency the capacitor acts as a perfect insulator and all current flows through the extracellular fluid, hence the resistance at zero frequency, R0, equals Re. At infinite frequency the capacitor acts as a perfect conductor and the current passes through the parallel resistive combination. The resistance at infinite frequency is given by R∞=RiRe/(Ri+Re). The measured values of R0 and R∞ would therefore directly provide the values of Re and Ri. required for estimation of extracellular water (ECW) and intracellular water (ICW), which lead to identification of oedema by comparison between affected and unaffected body regions. However, as is well known, the practical constraints of skin-electrode impedance do not permit application of DC or very high frequency AC currents, hence the values of the frequencies commonly used can only approximate the ideal measurement frequencies.

The impedance of the equivalent circuit of FIG. 1 at an angular frequency ω, where ω=2π*frequency, is given by:

Z = R ∞ + R 0 - R ∞ 1 + ( j ⁢ ⁢ ω ⁢ ⁢ τ ) ( 1 )
where:

    • R∞=RiRe/(Ri+Re),
    • R0=Re and,
    • τ is the time constant of the capacitive circuit.

These values can be estimated by extrapolating what is known as a Cole-Cole plot, which is a plot of the vector sum of the resistance R and reactance X that sum to impedance Z. A Cole-Cole plot of reactance against resistance is shown in FIG. 2 with an impedance vector Z at a given frequency.

It is also known that biological specimens deviate from the equivalent circuit because the cell membrane is an imperfect capacitor and there is a large variation between cell types in the current path. This results in a Cole-Cole plot of a biological specimen having a depressed centre compared to the equivalent circuit plot shown in FIG. 2. A more accurate expression for impedance in a biological sample is therefore given by:

Z = R ∞ + R 0 - R ∞ 1 + ( j ⁢ ⁢ ω ⁢ ⁢ τ ) ( 1 - α ) ( 2 )
where α has a value between 0 and 1 and can be thought of as an indicator of the deviation of a real system from the ideal model.

Another important value is the impedance Zc at the peak of the locus in FIG. 2. This peak occurs when ω=1/τ which is referred to as the characteristic angular frequency, ωc which equals 2πfc.

As explained above, the prior art approach to determining the desired values of R0 and R∞ has been to make impedance measurements at multiple frequencies and to construct a section of a Cole-Cole plot. The plot can be extrapolated to determine R0, R∞ and Zc. This procedure takes a significant amount of processing time and therefore makes real time monitoring of bioimpedance problematic. Furthermore, the measurements require determination of both phase and amplitude values which require relatively sophisticated, and therefore expensive, equipment.

Equation (2) has four, unknowns, R0, R∞ and α. The values of these unknowns can be determined by taking measurements at four discrete frequencies, and solving four simultaneous equations. Any of the established methods such as matrix inversion or numerical iteration can be used to solve the equations for the unknown values.

The values determined by this process compare favourably with the values obtained by the conventional curve fitting technique, in which measured impedances are used to plot a locus similar to that shown in FIG. 2, thereby allowing values of R0 and R∞ to be obtained.

Greater, accuracy can be achieved by taking measurements at a larger number of frequencies, albeit at a cost in processing overhead. Furthermore, accurate results can usefully be derived by selecting discrete frequencies that span the range of frequencies normally used in multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (51 KHz to 1000 KHz).

Once the values of R0, R∞ and Zc are determined they can be used in various ways to detect and quantify oedema in a body region. One approach to this quantification is to compare measurements taken at a first body region against measurements taken at a second body region.

The second measurements may be taken in a paired unaffected body region. For example, a first measurement may be made at a location on the left leg and a second measurement made at the same location on the right leg of the same patient where the right leg is unaffected by tissue oedema. It is clear to a skilled addressee that other paired anatomical regions may be similarly used when performing the above described methodology. For example, paired areas of the thorax may be assessed.

It is, however, possible to take the second measurement at a dissimilar body region. For example, the first reading may be taken on a leg, and a second reading may be taken on an arm. The analysis of these readings will necessarily involve some different considerations. Again, it is clear to a skilled addressee that a wide range of dissimilar anatomical structures may be used for these measurements, such as a leg and the chest wall. This form of the method is of particular use where two paired anatomical sites are both affected by tissue oedema. The comparison of readings taken in two such affected sites will be distorted and will not produce a reliable indicator of tissue oedema.

As a further alternative, the method may be applied to two or more measurements on the same anatomical region of a subject where those readings are separated in time. For example, a series of readings may be taken on a single limb prior to and subsequent to surgery with a known risk of lymphoedema as a side effect. Analysis of any two or more readings may indicate the early stage of developing lymphoedema and thereby provide a distinct advantage in that the prognosis may be greatly improved by early and aggressive therapeutic intervention. This technique may also be used to monitor the progress of oedema with comparison made between measurements of an affected site.

In the case of comparison of any two dissimilar regions it is known that a correcting factor may be required. A correcting factor may be established by surveying a population of clinically unaffected subjects:

Another approach is a modification of the technique described in a publication, (Cornish, B. H.; Thomas B. J.; Ward L. C.; Angiology Vol 53, No 1, pp 41-47 2002). In this approach the measured parameters are used to calculate an index Ri/Re. as indicative of the ratio of extracellular fluid to intracellular fluid. The extracellular fluid resistance Re is determined from
Re=R0
and intracellular fluid resistance Ri is determined from

R i = R ∞ ⁢ R e R e - R ∞ .

Thus, the index I, which is indicative of the ratio of extra- to intra-cellular fluid is given by the equation:

I = R i R e = R ∞ R 0 - R ∞ ( 3 )

This approach has particular application to monitoring oedema overtime as a plot of the index against time can disclose the onset and rate of advance of oedema.

Referring to FIG. 3, there is shown a schematic of an apparatus for measuring impedance, including an oscillator 20, divider 21 and filter 22 connected in series to produce alternating current at a number of discrete frequencies when connected to a power, source (not shown). The alternating current passes through cable 23 to electrode 24 through intervening tissue (not shown) to electrode 25, which is connected to a reference 26 via cable 27.

Monitoring electrodes 28, 29 are in connection with bioimpedance measuring meter 30 via cables 31, 32. Signals from bioimpedance measuring meter 30 are passed to analogue/digital converter 33, which is in signal connection with data storing unit 34, which retains the digitised reading of bioimpedance.

The applied signal is suitably derived from a constant current source to ensure that the generated current does not exceed the Australian Standard of a maximum of 32V and a maximum current of 100 μA at 10 kHz. The current limit increases to an upper threshold of 1 mA at 1000 kHz. The applied signal could be derived from a constant voltage source rather than a constant current source providing a mechanism is provided to maintain the safety standard.

A first reading of bioelectrical impedance is taken from a first anatomical region of a subject and stored in data storing unit 34.

The processor 35 calculates the values R0, R∞, τ and α by solving the equation (2) and transfers the result to second data storing unit 36. The values may also be presented on display 37.

The processor may also calculate an indicator of oedema, such as the Ri/Re index, and display this on a scale with a movable indicator. There may also be a simple series of lights which, when illuminated, indicate any one of “unaffected”, “possibly affected” or “affected”. The display may be any other suitable form of indicator.

It is more convenient for many of the techniques for assessing oedema to use a two-channel bioimpedance meter as shown in FIG. 4. In this case, current is passed between the electrodes 24, 25 on, for example, one arm 47 and between the electrodes 24A, 25A on the opposite arm 48. This can be achieved either sequentially, for example through the use of multiplexing, or simultaneously. Monitoring electrodes 28, 29 on the first arm 47 measure bioelectrical impedance while monitoring electrodes 28A, 29A measure bioelectrical impedance on the opposite arm 48. A measuring meter 30 has two channels for simultaneously monitoring signals provided from the monitoring electrodes 28, 29; 28A; 29A. The signals are passed through an analogue/digital converter 33 and then analysed by processor 35. The results are stored in memory 36 and shown on display 37.

Accordingly the processor 35 operates to analyse the impedance signals and use this to provide an evaluation of the presence, absence or degree of tissue oedema. This is typically performed in accordance with applications software provided in the memory. It will be appreciated from this that the processor 35, the memory 36 and the display 37 may typically be formed from a processing system, such as a computer system, computer server, desktop computer, lap-top, specialised hardware, or the like.

An example of the process for monitoring the impedance signals and evaluating tissue oedema will now be described with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG. 5.

In particular, at step 600, the impedance at first and second body segments are measured using the apparatus shown in FIG. 4. In this example, the body segments are different body segments and may include for example an arm and a leg.

At step 610 the processor 35 determines values of R0 and R∞ for each body segment. This can be achieved using a number of mechanisms. For example, given that there are four unknown parameters R0, R∞, τ, α, the equation (2) can be used to determine four simultaneous equations, which can then be solved using appropriate mathematical techniques. Alternatively, the measured impedance values can be plotted to derive an arc similar to that shown in FIG. 2, which then further allows the values of R0 and R∞ to be determined. Alternative techniques may also be used.

At step 620 the values of R0 and R∞ are used to determine an index I for each body segment. The index is based on the ratio of the extracellular to intracellular fluid and is therefore calculated using equation (3).

At step 630 an index ratio IR based on a ratio of the first body segment index I1 to second body segment index I2 is calculated, with this being used in evaluating the presence, absence or degree of oedema.

This is possible, as, for a healthy subject, there is generally a degree of similarity of intra- and extra-cellular fluid levels, even between different body segments. Thus, for example, if the subject is suffering from a condition other than oedema, which causes a general change in the ratio of extra- to intra-cellular fluid, then this should affect all body segments roughly equally. As a result, assuming that neither body segment has tissue oedema, then the index ratio IR should remain relatively constant for a given individual.

It will be appreciated that in the event that the properties of each body segment are equal, then the index ratio should have a value in the region of 1. Typically however, minor variations in tissue will occur between different body segments, and this can be accounted for in one of two ways.

Firstly, as shown at step 640, the index ratio IR can be compared to a predetermined range. In this case, the range is used to account for variations between body segments that are not attributable to tissue oedema. It will therefore be appreciated that the range is therefore typically set to take into account the difference in index ratio IR between different body portions in a number of different subjects. This range can therefore be set based on data collected from a number of healthy subjects.

In any event, if the index ratio IR falls outside the predetermined range, then this is used by the processor 35 to determine that tissue oedema is present in one of the body segments at step 650.

Furthermore, an assessment of the value of the index ratio IR can be used in assessing the degree of tissue oedema. Thus, for example, a number of value ranges can be defined, with each range corresponding to a different degree of oedema. In this instance, the processor 35 determines within which range the index ratio IR falls, and uses this to generate an indication of the likely degree of tissue oedema.

The value of the index ratio IR will also depend on the body segments that have been selected and accordingly, in general a different range will be selected for the comparison depending on the body segments under consideration.

It will also be appreciated that the index ratio IR can be used to indicate in which body segment the oedema is present, and this can be based on whether the index ratio IR is greater than or less than 1.

The index ratio IR may also depend on a number of factors, such as the subject's age, weight, sex and height, and again a respective range can be selected based on these factors. However, to avoid the need for an assessment of such factors, an alternative process of longitudinal analysis can be performed.

In this case, at step 660 the processor 35 can compare the index ratio IR to previously determined index ratios IRprev measured for the same subject, on the same body segments. In this situation, the previously determined index ratios IRprev are preferably determined prior to the onset of oedema but this is not essential.

In any event, previous measurements of the same body segments on the same subject will automatically account for inherent variations in tissue properties, which in turn cause different values for the ratio of extra- to intra-cellular fluid even if tissue oedema is not present.

In this case, the processor 35 assesses whether the current index ratio IR value is different to the previous index ratio IRprev. If there is change in the value, then the direction in change in value can indicate either increasing or decreasing levels of tissue oedema, with the magnitude of the change being used to indicate a degree of change at step 650.

In general, at step 650, the display 37 is used to display an indication of one or more of:

    • one or more index ratios
    • one or more indexes; and,
    • the presence, absence or degree of tissue oedema.

It will therefore be appreciated from this that the above-described methodology provides two different methods of determining the onset for oedema. This can be achieved either by performing a longitudinal analysis in which the index ratio IR is compared to previously determined index ratios IRprev. Alternatively the index ratio IR can be compared to one or more absolute index ratio ranges.

In practice, a combination for the two approaches will generally be used. Thus, for example, when a patient is first admitted for a procedure to be performed, a comparison to absolute index ratio ranges may be used to confirm that it is unlikely that the patient has oedema.

The measured index ratio IR can then be used to form the reference value of the index ratio IRprev, allowing subsequent measurements to be compared thereto.

By using the index ratio IR described above, this allows variation in tissue properties between different body portions to be taken into account when assessing the presence, absence or degree of tissue oedema, and accordingly, this allows the onset of bilateral oedema to be detected. This is in contrast to previous techniques, in which like body segments are compared. In this case, if impedance measurements of a limb, such as a leg, are compared to measurements from the other corresponding limb, then in the event that oedema is present in both limbs, the impedance measurements will be similar, and will not therefore indicate that oedema is present.

As mentioned above, the values of R0 and R∞ can be determined in any one of a number of ways. However, in general it is preferred to be able to determine the values in real-time to thereby vastly enhance the oedema assessment process. In particular, this allows measurements to be made of the patient, with the processor 35 generating an indication of the degree of tissue oedema in real-time.

The discussion has referred to both oedema and lymphoedema, as it is clear to a skilled addressee that the above method and apparatus may be utilised on any form of tissue oedema. However, it is also likely that the predominant use of the method, and apparatus will be directed mainly to lymphoedema due to its clinical relevance. However, this may change in a specific situation or with time. The method may also be used in comparing a reading from one anatomical region with a separate unpaired region. For example, a reading taken on central localised oedema (eg: ascites) may be referenced against a nonoedematous structure such as a limb.

Throughout the specification, the aim has been to describe the preferred embodiments of the invention without limiting the invention to any one embodiment or specific collection of features. Various changes and modifications may be made to the embodiments described and illustrated without departing from the present invention.

Claims

1. A method of detecting tissue oedema in a subject, the method comprising:

a) determining a measured impedance for a first body segment;
b) determining a measured impedance for a second body segment, the second body segment being different from the first body segment;
c) for each body segment, and using the respective measured impedance, determining, using a processor of a processing system, an index indicative of a ratio of the extra-cellular to intra-cellular fluid;
d) determining, using the processor of the processing system, an index ratio based on the index for the first and second body segments; and
e) determining the presence, absence or degree of tissue oedema based on the index ratio.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the method includes, in the processing system:

a) comparing the index ratio to at least one reference; and
b) determining the presence, absence or degree of tissue oedema based on the results of the comparison.

3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the reference includes at least one of:

a) a predetermined threshold;
b) a tolerance determined from a normal population; and
c) a predetermined range.

4. A method according to claim 2, wherein the reference includes an index ratio previously determined for the subject.

5. A method according to claim 4, wherein the previously determined index ratio is determined prior to the subject undergoing at least one of:

a) surgery; and
b) treatment.

6. A method according to claim 1, wherein the first and second body segments are different types of body segments.

7. A method according to claim 1, wherein the first and second body segments are limbs.

8. A method according to claim 1, wherein the first body segment is a leg and the second body segment is an arm.

9. A method according to claim 1, wherein the method includes, in the processing system:

a) determining a plurality of measured impedances for each body segment, each measured impedance being measured at a corresponding measurement frequency; and,
b) determining the index ratio based on the plurality of measured impedances.

10. A method according to claim 9, wherein the method includes, in the processing system: I = R ∞ R 0 - R ∞

a) determining values for parameters R0 and R∞ from the measured impedance values; and,
b) calculating the index (I) using the equation:
where: R0 is the resistance at zero frequency; and, R∞ is the resistance at infinite frequency.

11. A method according to claim 10, wherein the method includes, in the processing system, determining the parameter values using the equation: Z = R ∞ + R 0 - R ∞ 1 + ( j ⁢ ⁢ ω ⁢ ⁢ τ ) ( 1 - α )

where: Z is the measured impedance at angular frequency ω, τ is a time constant, and α has a value between 0 and 1.

12. A method according to claim 11, wherein the method includes, in the processing system:

a) determining the impedance of each body segment at four discrete frequencies; and,
b) determining values for the parameters by solving the equation using four simultaneous equations.

13. A method according to claim 10, wherein the method includes, in the processing system, determining the parameter values by:

a) determining an impedance locus using the measured impedance values; and
b) using the impedance locus to determine the parameter values.

14. A method according to claim 1, wherein the method includes, in the processing system, displaying an indication of at least one of:

a) the parameter values;
b) the ratio of extra-cellular to intra-cellular fluid; and,
c) an indication of the at least one of the presence, absence or degree of tissue oedema in the subject.

15. A method according to claim 1, wherein the processing system is coupled to an apparatus comprising:

a) a current supply for generating an alternating current at each of a plurality of frequencies;
b) at least two supply electrodes for applying the generated alternating current to a subject;
c) at least two measurement electrodes for detecting a voltage across the subject; and,
d) a sensor coupled to the measurement electrodes for determining the voltage, the sensor being coupled to the processing system to thereby allow the processing system to determine the measured impedances.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3316896 May 1967 Thomasset
3851641 December 1974 Toole et al.
3871359 March 1975 Pacela
4008712 February 22, 1977 Nyboer
4034854 July 12, 1977 Bevilacqua
4144878 March 20, 1979 Wheeler
4184486 January 22, 1980 Papa
4291708 September 29, 1981 Frei et al.
4314563 February 9, 1982 Wheeler
4365634 December 28, 1982 Bare et al.
4407288 October 4, 1983 Langer et al.
4407300 October 4, 1983 Davis
4450527 May 22, 1984 Sramek
4458694 July 10, 1984 Sollish et al.
4468832 September 4, 1984 Batchelor
4486835 December 4, 1984 Bai et al.
4537203 August 27, 1985 Machida
4539640 September 3, 1985 Fry et al.
4557271 December 10, 1985 Stoller et al.
4583549 April 22, 1986 Manoli
4602338 July 22, 1986 Cook
4617939 October 21, 1986 Brown et al.
4646754 March 3, 1987 Seale
4686477 August 11, 1987 Givens et al.
4688580 August 25, 1987 Ko et al.
4763660 August 16, 1988 Kroll et al.
4793362 December 27, 1988 Tedner
4895163 January 23, 1990 Libke et al.
4911175 March 27, 1990 Shizgal
4942880 July 24, 1990 Sloväk
4951682 August 28, 1990 Petre
5025784 June 25, 1991 Shao et al.
5063937 November 12, 1991 Ezenwa et al.
5143079 September 1, 1992 Frei et al.
5197479 March 30, 1993 Hubelbank et al.
5246008 September 21, 1993 Meuller
5280429 January 18, 1994 Withers
5311878 May 17, 1994 Brown et al.
5372141 December 13, 1994 Gallup et al.
5415164 May 16, 1995 Faupel
5449000 September 12, 1995 Libke et al.
5465730 November 14, 1995 Zadehkoochak et al.
5469859 November 28, 1995 Tsoglin et al.
5503157 April 2, 1996 Sramek
5505209 April 9, 1996 Reining
5529072 June 25, 1996 Sramek
5544662 August 13, 1996 Saulnier et al.
5588429 December 31, 1996 Isaacson et al.
5704355 January 6, 1998 Bridges
5732710 March 31, 1998 Rabinovich et al.
5746214 May 5, 1998 Brown et al.
5759159 June 2, 1998 Masreliez
5788643 August 4, 1998 Feldman
5800350 September 1, 1998 Coppleson et al.
5807251 September 15, 1998 Wang et al.
5807270 September 15, 1998 Williams
5807272 September 15, 1998 Kun et al.
5810742 September 22, 1998 Pearlman
5919142 July 6, 1999 Boone et al.
6011992 January 4, 2000 Hubbard et al.
6015389 January 18, 2000 Brown
6018677 January 25, 2000 Vidrine et al.
6122544 September 19, 2000 Organ
6125297 September 26, 2000 Siconolfi
6142949 November 7, 2000 Ubby
6151523 November 21, 2000 Rosell Ferrer et al.
6173003 January 9, 2001 Whikehart et al.
6228022 May 8, 2001 Friesem et al.
6233473 May 15, 2001 Shepherd et al.
6236886 May 22, 2001 Cherepenin et al.
6256532 July 3, 2001 Cha
6292690 September 18, 2001 Petrucelli et al.
6339722 January 15, 2002 Heethaar et al.
6354996 March 12, 2002 Drinan et al.
6496725 December 17, 2002 Kamada et al.
6532384 March 11, 2003 Fukuda
6569160 May 27, 2003 Goldin et al.
6584348 June 24, 2003 Glukhovsky
6618616 September 9, 2003 Iijima et al.
6625487 September 23, 2003 Herleikson
6631292 October 7, 2003 Liedtk
6633777 October 14, 2003 Szopinski
6643543 November 4, 2003 Takehara et al.
6714813 March 30, 2004 Ishigooka et al.
6714814 March 30, 2004 Yamada et al.
6723049 April 20, 2004 Skladnev et al.
6724200 April 20, 2004 Fukuda
6760617 July 6, 2004 Ward et al.
6768921 July 27, 2004 Organ et al.
6845264 January 18, 2005 Skladnev et al.
6870109 March 22, 2005 Villarreal
6906533 June 14, 2005 Yoshida
6922586 July 26, 2005 Davies
7130680 October 31, 2006 Kodama et al.
7148701 December 12, 2006 Park et al.
7212852 May 1, 2007 Smith et al.
7457660 November 25, 2008 Smith et al.
7477937 January 13, 2009 Iijima et al.
7706872 April 27, 2010 Min et al.
20010007056 July 5, 2001 Linder et al.
20010020138 September 6, 2001 Ishigooka et al.
20010025139 September 27, 2001 Pearlman
20020020138 February 21, 2002 Walker et al.
20020072686 June 13, 2002 Hoey et al.
20020079910 June 27, 2002 Fukuda
20020093992 July 18, 2002 Plangger
20020123694 September 5, 2002 Organ et al.
20020161311 October 31, 2002 Ward et al.
20020194419 December 19, 2002 Rajput et al.
20030004403 January 2, 2003 Drinan et al.
20030050570 March 13, 2003 Kodama et al.
20030073916 April 17, 2003 Yonce
20030105411 June 5, 2003 Smallwood et al.
20030120170 June 26, 2003 Zhu et al.
20040015095 January 22, 2004 Li et al.
20040019292 January 29, 2004 Drinan et al.
20040077944 April 22, 2004 Steinberg et al.
20040158167 August 12, 2004 Smith et al.
20040167423 August 26, 2004 Pillon et al.
20040181164 September 16, 2004 Smith et al.
20040186392 September 23, 2004 Ward et al.
20040210150 October 21, 2004 Virtanen
20040210158 October 21, 2004 Organ et al.
20040252870 December 16, 2004 Reeves et al.
20050033281 February 10, 2005 Bowman et al.
20050039763 February 24, 2005 Kraemer et al.
20050098343 May 12, 2005 Fukuda
20050101875 May 12, 2005 Semler et al.
20050137480 June 23, 2005 Alt et al.
20050151545 July 14, 2005 Park et al.
20050177062 August 11, 2005 Skrabal et al.
20050192488 September 1, 2005 Bryenton et al.
20050203435 September 15, 2005 Nakada
20050261743 November 24, 2005 Kroll
20060004300 January 5, 2006 Kennedy
20060085048 April 20, 2006 Cory et al.
20060085049 April 20, 2006 Cory et al.
20060116599 June 1, 2006 Davis
20060122523 June 8, 2006 Bonmassar et al.
20060122540 June 8, 2006 Zhu et al.
20060224079 October 5, 2006 Washchuk
20060264775 November 23, 2006 Mills et al.
20060270942 November 30, 2006 McAdams
20070027402 February 1, 2007 Levin et al.
20080002873 January 3, 2008 Reeves et al.
20080009757 January 10, 2008 Tsoglin et al.
20080039700 February 14, 2008 Drinan et al.
20080205717 August 28, 2008 Reeves et al.
20090043222 February 12, 2009 Chetham
20090177099 July 9, 2009 Smith et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
2231038 November 1999 CA
2912349 October 1980 DE
0249823 December 1987 EP
349043 March 1990 EP
0357309 March 1990 EP
377887 July 1990 EP
865763 September 1998 EP
0869360 October 1998 EP
1146344 October 2001 EP
1114610 November 2001 EP
1177760 February 2002 EP
1219937 July 2002 EP
1338246 August 2003 EP
1452131 September 2004 EP
2486386 January 1982 FR
2131558 June 1984 GB
2260416 April 1993 GB
09051884 February 1997 JP
9220209 August 1997 JP
10000185 January 1998 JP
10014898 January 1998 JP
10014899 February 1998 JP
10-225521 August 1998 JP
11070090 March 1999 JP
2000139867 May 2000 JP
2001321352 November 2001 JP
2002330938 November 2002 JP
WO 88/07392 October 1988 WO
WO 96/12439 May 1996 WO
WO 96/32652 October 1996 WO
WO 97/11638 April 1997 WO
WO 98/23204 June 1998 WO
WO 98/33553 August 1998 WO
WO 00/40955 July 2000 WO
WO 00/79255 December 2000 WO
WO 01/50954 July 2001 WO
WO 01/67098 September 2001 WO
WO 02/062214 August 2002 WO
WO 02/094096 November 2002 WO
WO 04/000115 December 2003 WO
WO 2004/026136 April 2004 WO
WO 2004/047635 June 2004 WO
WO 2004/049936 June 2004 WO
WO 2004/083804 September 2004 WO
WO 2005/010640 February 2005 WO
WO 2005/027717 March 2005 WO
WO 2005018432 March 2005 WO
WO 2005/051194 June 2005 WO
Other references
  • European Search Report dated Jun. 27, 2005 and Written Opinion dated Jul. 6, 2005 for PCT/AU2005/000876 filed Jun. 17, 2005.
  • Abdullah M. Z.; Simulation of an inverse problem in electrical impedance tomography using resistance electrical network analogues; International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education; vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 311-324; Oct. 1999.
  • Al-Hatib, F.; Patient Instrument connection errors in bioelectrical impedance measurement; Physiological Measurement; vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 285-296; May 2, 1998.
  • Boulier, A. et al.; Fat-Free Mass Estimation by Two Electrode Impedance Method; American Journal of Clinical Nutrition; vol. 52, pp. 581-585; 1990.
  • Chaudary, S.S. et al.; Dielectric Properties of Normal & Malignant Human Breast Tissues at Radiowave and Microwave Frequencies; Indian Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics; vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 76-79; 1984.
  • Chiolero, R.L. et al.; Assessment of changes in body water by bioimpedance in acutely ill surgical patients; Intensive Care Medicine; vol. 18, pp. 322-326; 1992.
  • Chumlea et al.; Bioelectrical Impedance and Body Composition: Present Status and Future Directions; Nutrition Reviews; vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 123-131; 1994.
  • Cornish, B.H. et al.; Quantification of Lymphoedema using Multi-frequency Bioimpedance; Applied Radiation and Isotopes; vol. 49, No. 5/6, pp. 651-652; 1998.
  • Cornish, B.H. et al.; Bioelectrical impedance for monitoring the efficacy of lymphoedema treatment programmes; Breast Cancer Research and Treatment; vol. 38, pp. 169-176; 1996.
  • Cornish, B.H. et al.; Data analysis in multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis; Physiological Measurement; vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 275-283; May 1, 1998.
  • Cornish, B.H. et al.; Alteration of the extracellular and total body water volumes measured by multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis; Nutrition Research; vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 717-727; 1994.
  • Cornish, B.H. et al.; Early diagnosis of lymphedema using multiple frequency bioimpedance; Lymphology; vol. 34, pp. 2-11; Mar. 2001.
  • Cornish, B.H. et al.; Early diagnosis of lymphoedema in postsurgery breast cancer patients; Annals New York Academy of Sciences; pp. 571-575; May 2000.
  • Dines K.A. et al.; Analysis of electrical conductivity imaging; Geophysics; vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 1025-1036; Jul. 1981.
  • Ellis, K.J. et al; Human hydrometry: comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance with 2H2O and bromine dilution; Journal of Applied Physiology; vol. 85, No. 3, pp. 1056-1062; 1998.
  • Forslund, A.H. et al.; Evaluation of modified multicompartment models to calculate body composition in healthy males; American Journal of Clinical Nutrition; vol. 63, pp. 856-862; 1996.
  • Gersing, E.; Impedance spectroscopy on living tissue for determination of the state of Organs; Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics; vol. 45, pp. 145-149; 1998.
  • Gerth, W.A. et al.; A computer-based bioelectrical impedance spectroscopic system for noninvasive assessment of compartmental fluid redistribution; Third Annual IEEE Symposium on Computer Based Medical Systems, Jun. 3-6, 1990, University of NC. At Chapel Hill; pp. 446-453; Jun. 1990.
  • Gudivaka R. et al; Single- and multifrequency models for bioelectrical impedance analysis of body water compartments; Applied Physiology; vol. 87, Issue 3, pp. 1087-1096; 1999.
  • Jones, C.H. et al; Extracellular fluid volume determined by bioelectric impedance and serum albumin in CAPD patients; Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation; vol. 13, pp. 393-397; 1998.
  • Jossinet, J. et al.; A Study for Breast Imaging with a Circular Array of Impedance Electrodes; Proc. Vth Int. Conf. Bioelectrical Impedance, 1981, Tokyo, Japan; pp. 83-86; 1981.
  • Jossinet, J. et al.; Technical Implementation and Evaluation of a Bioelectrical Breast Scanner; Proc. 10.sup.th Int. Conf. IEEE Engng. Med. Biol., 1988, New Orleans, USA (Imped. Imaging II); vol. 1. p. 289; 1988.
  • Kanai, H. et al.; Electrcial Measurment of Fluid Distribution in Legs and Arms; Medical Progress through technology; pp. 159-170; 1987.
  • Kim, C.T. et al.; Bioelectrical impedance changes in regional extracellular fluid alterations; Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology; vol. 37, pp. 297-304; 1997.
  • Lozano, A. et al.; Two-frequency impedance plethysmograph: real and imaginary parts; Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing; vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 38-42; Jan. 1990.
  • Liu R. et al; Primary Multi-frequency Data Analyze in Electrical Impedance Scanning; Proceedings of the IEEE-EMBS 2005, 27th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Shanghai, China; pp. 1504-1507; , Sep. 1-4, 2005.
  • Lukaski, H.C. et al.; Estimation of Body Fluid Volumes Using Tetrapolar Bioelectrical Impedance Measurements; Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine; pp. 1163-1169; Dec. 1998.
  • Man, B. et al. Results of Preclinical Tests for Breast Cancer Detection by Dielectric Measurements; XII Int. Conf. Med. Biol. Engng. 1979, Jerusalem, Israel. Springer Int., Berlin; Section 30.4; 1980.
  • McDougal D., et al.; Body Composition Measurements From Whole Body Resistance and Reactance; Surgical Forum; vol. 36, pp. 43-44; 1986.
  • Osterman K.S. et al.; Multifrequency electrical impedance imaging: preliminary in vivo experience in breast; Physiological Measurement; vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 99-109; Feb. 2000.
  • Ott, M. et al.; Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis as a Predictor of Survival in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection; Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology; vol. 9, pp. 20-25; 1995.
  • Pethig, R. et al.; The Passive Electrical Properties of Biological Systems: Their Significance in Physiology, Biophysics and Biotechnology; Physics in Medicine and Biology; vol. 32, pp. 933-970; 1987.
  • Piperno, G. et al.; Breast Cancer Screening by Impedance Measurements; Frontiers of Medical & Biological Engineering; vol. 2, pp. 111-117; 1990.
  • Rigaud, B. et al.; Bioelectrical Impedance Techniques in Medicine; Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering; vol. 24 (4-6), pp. 257-351; 1996.
  • Schneider, I.; Broadband signals for electrical impedance measurements for long bone fractures; Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1996. Bridging Disciplines for Biomedicine. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE; vol. 5, pp. 1934-1935; Oct. 31, 1996.
  • Skidmore, R. et al.; A Data Collection System for Gathering Electrical Impedance Measurements from the Human Breast; Clinical Physics Physiological Measurement; vol. 8, pp. 99-102; 1987.
  • Sollish, B.D. et al.; Micropressor-assisted Screening Techniques; Israel Journal of Medical Sciences; vol. 17, pp. 859-864; 1981.
  • Steijaert, M. et al.; The use of multi-frequency impedance to determine total body water and extracellular water in obese and lean female individuals; International Journal of Obesity; vol. 21, pp. 930-934; 1997.
  • Surowiec, A.J. et al.; Dielectric Properties of Brest Carcinima and the Surrounding Tissues; IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering; vol. 35, pp. 257-263; 1988.
  • Tedner, B.; Equipment Using Impedance Technique for Automatic Recording of Fluid-Volume Changes During Haemodialysis; Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing; pp. 285-290; 1983.
  • Thomas. B.J.; Future Technologies; Asia Pacific Journal Clinical Nutrition; vol. 4, pp. 157-159; 1995.
  • Thomas. B.J. et al.; Bioimpedance Spectrometry in Determination of Body Water Compartments: Accuracy and Clinical Significance; Applied Radiation and Isotopes; vol. 49, No. 5/6, pp. 447-455; 1998.
  • Thomas. B.J. et al.; Bioelectrical impedance analysis for measurement of body fluid volumes—A review; Journal of Clinical Engineering; vol. 17, No. 16, pp. 505-510; 1992.
  • Ulgen, Y. et al.; Electrical parameters of human blood; Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1998. Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE; vol. 6, pp. 2983-2986; Nov. 1, 1998.
  • Ward, L.C. et al.; There is a better way to measure Lymphodema; National Lymphedema Network Newsletter; vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 89-92; Oct. 1995.
  • Woodrow, G. et al; Effects of icodextrin in automated peritoneal dialysis on blood pressure and bioelectrical impedance analysis; Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation; vol. 15, pp. 862-866; 2000.
  • Bracco, D. et al., Bedside determination of fluid accumulation after cardiac surgery using segmental bioelectrical impedance, Critical Care Medicine, vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 1065-1070, 1998.
  • De Luca, F. et al., Use of low-frequency electrical impedance measurements to determine phospoholipid content in amniotic fluid; Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 41, pp. 1863-1869, 1996.
  • Deurenberg, P. et al., Multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance: a comparison between the Cole-Cole modelling and Hanai equations with the classicaly impedance index approach, Annals of Human Biology, vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 31-40, 1996.
  • Mattar, J.A., Application of Total Body Impedance to the Critically Ill Patient, New Horizons, vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 493-503, 1996.
  • Ward, L.C. et al., Multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance augments the diagnosis and management of lymphoedema in post-mastectomy patients, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 22, pp. 751-754, 1992.
Patent History
Patent number: 8615292
Type: Grant
Filed: Jun 17, 2005
Date of Patent: Dec 24, 2013
Patent Publication Number: 20080319336
Assignee: Impedimed Limited (Pinkenba, Queensland)
Inventors: Leigh Ward (Queensland), Bruce Cornish (Queensland)
Primary Examiner: Max Hindenburg
Application Number: 11/629,832
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Measuring Electrical Impedance Or Conductance Of Body Portion (600/547)
International Classification: A61B 5/00 (20060101);