Method and apparatus for tomographic touch imaging and interactive system using same

A touch screen in the form of a panel is capable of conducting signals and a tomograph including signal flow ports is positioned adjacent the panel with the signal flow ports arrayed around the border of the panel at discrete locations. Signals are introduced into the panel to pass from each discrete border location to a plurality of other discrete border locations for being detected and tomographically processed to determine if any change occurred to signals due to the panel being touched during signal passage through the panel, and therefrom determine any local area on the panel where a change occurred. The tomograph computes and outputs a signal indicative of a panel touch and location, which can be shown on a display.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the priority and benefit of previously filed Argentinean Patent Application No. 20070105651 filed on Dec. 17, 2007, in the name of Victor Manuel Suarez Rovere, which is here incorporated by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to a method and apparatus for tomographic touch imaging sensor and interactive system using same. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and apparatus for touch sensitive devices for computing systems or for controlling actions of associated devices or equipment, and still more particularly, to devices that detect and/or process simultaneously multiple touch interactions (by fingers or other objects) at distinct locations on a touch-sensitive surface.

2. Prior Related Art

Many types of input devices are presently available for performing operations in a computing system, such as buttons or keys, mice, trackballs, touch panels, joysticks, touch screens and the like. Touch screens, in particular, are becoming increasingly popular because of the ease and versatility of operation, as well as, their declining price. Touch screens can include a touch panel, which can be a clear panel with a touch-sensitive surface. The touch panel can be positioned in front of a display screen so that the touch-sensitive surface covers the viewable area of the display screen. Touch screens can allow a user to make selections and move a cursor by simply touching the display screen via a finger or stylus. In general, the touch screen can recognize the touch and position of the touch on the display screen, and the computing system can interpret the touch and thereafter perform an action based on the touch event.

One limitation of many conventional touch panel technologies is that they are only capable of reporting a single point or touch event, even when multiple objects simultaneously come into contact with the sensing surface. That is, they lack the ability to track multiple points of contact at the same time. Thus, even when two points are touched, these conventional devices can only identify a single location, which is typically the average between the two contacts (e.g. a conventional touchpad on a notebook computer provides such functionality). This single-point identification is a function of the way these devices provide a value representative of the touch point, which is generally by providing an average resistance or capacitance value.

Another limitation of most touch panels is that, besides being incapable of reporting a plurality of touch points that occurs simultaneously, is that they provide information about just touch coordinates. Most known touch panels cannot provide a complete representation of the details of all shapes contacting the panel, because the methods of detection often include just triangulation of touch points. Thus, a need exists for providing a better and fuller representation of touch interactions. The present invention proposes to provide a method and apparatus for achieving, for example, by providing a pixilated image representative of all the touch areas and their shapes. This ability of providing a full representation of all touch interactions is sometimes called “true-touch”.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, it is a principal object of my invention to provide a method and apparatus for tomographic touch imaging and interactive system using same, especially for computing systems but also usable to control actions of other devices, and still more particularly, to devices that detect and/or process simultaneously multiple touch interactions (by fingers or other objects) at distinct locations on a touch-sensitive surface. The foregoing is accomplished by combining a touch panel with a tomograph in a unique way, and by using this combination as a touch imaging sensor and/or as an interactive system in a computer system.

The present invention applies techniques from tomography field of science, but instead of using it for medical purposes, the tomographic techniques are used for making a computer input device. Specifically, the input device is a touch device capable of multi-touch operations, oriented to control the forthcoming new generation of software applications that propose a new paradigm for Human Computer Interaction.

Since tomography is used to determine inner information from the borders of a panel, and because invisible signals are used, it is possible to make a transparent touch panel with almost perfect light transmission properties. The transparent properties make the touch sensor useful to work with a display, as a touch screen. Other such input devices need to put complex elements on a panel that obstruct vision. As these other such input devices need to have at least some transparency, but not 100%, this requirement makes it difficult to manufacture, affecting costs.

The present invention can be implemented with a very clear and homogeneous material, like a simple sheet of acrylic. Also, because the panel can be very thin, a slim and small system including a flat display can be made, thus enabling the system to be portable.

Several objects and advantages of my invention are listed as follows.

  • a) To provide a device that is sensitive to touch and able to detect objects when they are making a subtle pressure. If the object touching is a finger of an user the invention can provide a tactile feedback. This is in contrast to proximity sensors which can be activated when the user isn't touching anything.
  • b) To provide a touch sensitive device that can provide a digital representation of nearly all areas where there is a touch interaction available. This is in contrast to devices that provide location information of just a few touch interactions simultaneously.
  • c) To provide a touch sensitive device that can be thin, thus having a large relative surface area with respect to volume.
  • d) To provide a touch sensitive device that can have a transparent touch panel so that it can include a display visible through the panel.
  • e) To provide a touch sensitive device that can be interactive by providing output information related to touch interactions.
  • f) To provide a thin touch sensitive device that can be flat, or non-planar (e.g. domed) in 3-dimensional space.
  • g) To provide, in some embodiments, a touch sensitive device that can detect a zero-pressure contact.
  • h) To provide, in some embodiments, a touch sensitive device that can discriminate regarding more than one level of pressure on possible different touch interactions that occurs simultaneously.
  • i) To provide, in some embodiments, a touch sensitive device that can be robust to some external unwanted interfering signals.
  • j) To provide, in some embodiments, a touch sensitive device that can have a transparent touch area of quite low absorption with respect to visible light, useful to make the power requirements of a possibly attached display less demanding.
  • k) To provide, in some embodiments, a touch sensitive device that can be constructed with elements relatively easy to manufacture.

Further object and advantages of my invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention when taken in conjunction with the appended drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A and 1B show, respectively, a top view of the basic tomographic touch device of the present invention, and a cross sectional view taken along line A-A of FIG. 1A.

FIG. 1C shows selected imaginary or notional regions or areas of the touch panel shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrating where touch interactions may occur or be estimated.

FIG. 2 shows an annular shape representing a particular “test” touch interaction made on a rectangular touch panel.

FIG. 3 shows components of a typical tomograph as used in the present invention.

FIG. 4A shows one simple way of defining geometries for the tomography apparatus according to the invention.

FIG. 4B shows a very useful way of defining geometries for the tomograph.

FIGS. 5A and 5B show, respectively, a top plan view and a cross sectional view of a touch device taken along line B-B of FIG. 5A that includes a display and a computer as part of an interactive system according to the present invention.

FIGS. 6A to 6B show, respectively, a top view of a similar touch device combined with an electrical impedance tomograph and a cross sectional view taken along line C-C of FIG. 6A.

FIG. 7 shows an embodiment of the present invention that uses just an air gap to optically couple emitters and detectors to a panel, and the effect of signal reflection on a panel's edge.

FIG. 8 shows two typical emission patterns and its associated detectors, and the signal alteration level measured on each detector after passing through an annular phantom.

FIG. 9 illustrates a flowchart of the operation of an embodiment of the touch device as part of an interactive system.

FIG. 10A illustrates a flow chart of the tomographic touch sensor operation.

FIG. 10B illustrates a flow chart of the tomographic touch screen operation.

FIG. 11 illustrates a flow chart of the interactive system using a tomographic touch sensor, a data processing element, and an output device.

FIG. 12 illustrates a flow chart showing an example embodiment for the acquisition of a tomogram representative of touch interactions.

FIG. 13 illustrates a flow chart showing an example embodiment for the acquisition of an unreconstructed tomogram representative of touch interactions.

FIG. 14 illustrates a flow chart showing an example embodiment for the reconstructed tomogram calculation.

FIG. 15 illustrates a flow chart showing an example embodiment for the definition of parameters for tomogram acquisition.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Referring now to the drawings, and particularly to the embodiment of the present invention, a touch device is illustrated in FIG. 1A (top view) and FIG. 1B (cross sectional view). The touch device, as shown, consists of a thin, flat, circular panel 10 of light conductive material, such as a suitable plastic material known for this purpose. The panel 10, due to its properties is adapted to conduct signals, introduced into the borders of the panel, through the panel. The panel can be opaque or transparent and can be rigid or flexible. The panel can also be resilient and/or compressible. The signals may be any radiation or wave energy that can pass through the panel from border to border or edge to edge including without limitation, light waves in the visible or infra-red or ultraviolet regions of the spectrum, electrical energy, electromagnetic or magnetic energy, or sonic and ultrasonic energy or vibration energy. In the following description, light passing through the panel will be described as a preferred embodiment. The light signals 20 are introduced through the edge or border 22 of the panel 10, as shown in FIG. 1B. The shape of the panel 10 is not limited to any particular shape and may be irregular or regular, such as, circular, elliptical, square, rectangular or polygonal. The panel has a refraction index greater than air so it can act as a waveguide by the effect of TIR (Total Internal Reflection). Touch interactions at discrete locations on the panel surface 12 can interfere with, disrupt or frustrate the TIR effect so that a portion of the signal (light) is lost by escaping the waveguide of the panel. This is indicated in FIG. 1B by the reference numeral 14 showing the light exiting form the panel, i.e. light loss. Thus, the light conductive properties of the panel are altered in those places where the touch interactions occurs, as indicated by reference numeral 16 in FIG. 1A.

Surrounding the conductive panel 10, there is an optical tomograph 30. In the context of the present invention, “tomograph” means, as usually defined, a device that can image from the borders. The tomograph is controlled to emit light signals 20 by light emitters 34, through signal flow ports, which also detects light signals by detectors 32.

The term “signal flow port” refers to both emitters and receivers (detectors), and the signal flow port physically acts either as emitter or receiver. For example, an electrode in the electrical part of the embodiment can be a unique device that could serve both purposes emitter and/or receiver. Also an optoelectronic device like a LED can be used as a detector, although with less performance. So a signal flow port here isn't anything material and thus, isn't either an element that can house an emitter or detector. In the context of this invention, a signal flow port is a term used to refer interchangeably to an emitter, or to a detector, or to a device that may accomplish both roles. Thus, the port houses an emitter and/or detector and may be virtual or real.

The signal flow ports (emitters and detectors) are positioned at the edge 22 of the panel 10. The light signals 20 introduced into the panel 10 by emitters 34 at their associated signal flow ports penetrate or pass through the panel 10, in the manner described, and are detected by detectors 32 at their associated signal flow ports after circulating or passing through the panel 10. The tomograph 30 generates a tomogram representative of the panel conductivity, which is a two dimensional representation of the calculated or estimated conductivity on many imaginary or notional regions 40 defined on the panel surface 12, as shown by the array on FIG. 1C (top view). The resulting tomogram is thus a calculation or an estimative representation of the touch interactions, including its shapes and details. The tomogram may be calculated to represent the conductivity change produced by touch interactions, by comparing it with the conductive properties of the panel when no touch interactions occur. The resulting tomogram can be provided as digital information aimed to control or operate a digital device. The digital device may include an output device, such as a display, and a processing element to transform the tomogram and provide output to a user as feedback of touch interactions, thus forming an interactive device.

An exemplary shape 50 of an interesting and quite challenging touch interaction is shown on FIG. 2 (top view). Shown is an annular shape that could be an approximation of the contact area produced by the palm of a hand touching a rectangular touch panel. As will be appreciated, the resulting tomograph can represent any complex figure or shape depending on the touching interactions. As a parallelism with medical X-ray tomography, the annular shape shown could be an approximation of the cross section of a hollow bone. It will be appreciated that CT or computerized tomography is a well known technology and is understood by those of ordinary skill in the art.

The tomograph 30 of the touch device as illustrated on FIG. 3 may typically comprise a set of signal flow ports 18. Each signal port may be an emitter and/or a detector for the signals, where the signal flows through the port. An emitter 34 is typically an electronic device, for example an IR LED (Infrared Light Emitting Diode) or other light emitting device. A detector 32 is typically an electronic device, such as a phototransistor, photodiode, Charge Coupled Device (CCD) and other like devices. The signal flow ports are typically located around the periphery or perimeter (edges 22) of the conductive panel 10 and spaced apart, usually at regular intervals. The emitters 34 are optically coupled to the panel, in a way that at least a portion of the emitted signal penetrates the conductive panel 10 and circulates or passes through by effect of TIR. The detectors 32 are optically coupled to the panel 10 in a way that each detector 32 receives the emission signals 20 emanating from one or more of the emitters 34 via signal flow ports 18. The ports may be coupled to the conductive panel by via a coupling object that may be optical glue, or just direct contact, or a waveguide like an optical fiber, a diffuser or just an air gap, or by any other known means provided the light from the emitters 34 is introduced properly into the panel 10 and the light is detected by the detectors 32. Although by using an air gap 92, see FIG. 7, total reflections could occur on the border of a polished panel, before reaching a detector close to the point of reflection, as shown in FIG. 7, anyways the reflected signal may approach another detector, thus tomographic reconstruction still could be accomplished.

The tomograph 30 also includes an emission pattern controller 60 operatively coupled to each emitter 34, for example, using any conventional set of communication channels 62, shown in FIG. 3 as wires. The tomograph 30 further includes a signal sampler 64 operatively coupled to each detector 34. Also the tomograph 30 includes a data processor 66 operatively coupled to the pattern controller 60, and to the signal sampler 64.

The emission pattern controller 60 can energize, upon requirement or according to any predetermined program, any desired combination or set of said emitters 34. Each emitter 34 can be energized at any desired emission level of at least two possible values. The configuration of a set of emitters and its levels defines an emission pattern. A representative emission pattern, according to the invention, can be to have one determinate or preselected emitter 34 active while leaving the rest inactive, and then serially process through the emitters 34, one at a time.

The signal sampler 64 can measure, upon requirement or according to any predetermined program, the signal level received on each detector 32. A representative signal sampler 64, according to the invention, can have one or more Analog to Digital Converters (ADC) and also may have one or more analog and/or digital multiplexers.

The data processor 66 can be incorporated in any known computer system, and is adapted to command the emission pattern controller 60 to energize the emitters 34 using a desired sequence of patterns. Also the emission pattern controller 60 and/or signal sampler 64 may function based on a determinate or preselected program, without being commanded by the data processor, for example a digital logic circuit.

By operating the emission pattern controller 60 and the signal sampler 64, an unreconstructed tomograph can be acquired.

To operate emission controller 60, a set of emission patterns has to be defined, for example, a sequence of patterns may be to activate, in turn or serially, different emitters 34. Each emission pattern is active at different times, forming a sequence. While each emission pattern is in effect, an associated set of detectors 32 have to be defined to measure the effects of the active emissions. Then, the data processor 66 acquires from the signal sampler 64, the measured values from the associated set of detectors 32, the set being typically all or a substantial subset of the detector 32. The measured values form part of the unreconstructed tomogram. Thus after applying all emission patterns and obtaining measurements from the detectors, the unreconstructed tomogram is obtained. An example of two emission patterns, its associated detectors, and a representation of the signal alterations, shown in graph of FIG. 8, received for the annular phantom, is shown also in FIG. 4B.

The data processor 66 may be a microcontroller, microprocessor, FPGA, ASIC or special purpose electronic circuit or even part of a complete computer system. Although it may be desirable for the data processor 66 to include a data memory containing a computer program, it is possible to practice the invention performing most computations with just a digital logic circuit. For example, a tomographic reconstruction calculation, as known in the art, can be executed just with an integrated circuit. That integrated circuit can lack a specific “memory”, because computation can be hardwired. The invention contemplates a model using a programmable logic circuit (FPGA) that has a memory, but without any “computer program” as such stored in the memory.

In a typical embodiment, the data processor 66 commands the emission pattern controller 60 to activate one determinate emitter 34, then, acquires measurements from all detectors 32, then, repeating these steps serially for the rest of the emitters 34, one by one. Thus, if the number of emitters 34 is Ne and the number of detector ports is Nd, a vector of Ne by Nd elements is acquired. One can call this vector the projection vector, or one can call it a measurements vector, or just “b”. This acquired vector, not to be confused with a matrix, is sometimes called in the context of Computer Tomography (CT) the “unreconstructed tomogram” or sometimes “sinogram”.

Having the unreconstructed tomogram with Ne by Nd potentially independent values, the amount of available information to make reconstruction can be thus in quadratic relation with respect to number of signal flow ports. So the number of potentially independently recognized touch interactions regions can be in accordance to that quadratic relation, and not in linear relation with respect to number of emitters 34 or detectors 32. Thus, that number of potentially discriminated regions can be quite large or big. Hence, the foregoing is a sample of the potential of the present invention of being able to discriminate not just a few simultaneous touch coordinates, but many.

Having the unreconstructed tomogram, a reconstructed tomogram can be calculated by the use of a Tomographic Reconstruction algorithm. The reconstructed tomogram, or just tomogram, is the representation of the features of the tomographed “phantoms”, a phantom being a particular “test” or “active” touch interaction.

In a tomographic reconstruction algorithm, a linear or nonlinear model of the tomographic system may be used to transform the unreconstructed tomogram. If a linear model is chosen, the system may be modeled by matrix equations and solved by linear matrix operations in a known manner.

A typical equation used to model tomographic systems is Ax=b, where A corresponds to the “system matrix”, as is sometimes called, x corresponds to the reconstructed tomogram and is a vector that represents the regions conductivity values, not to be confused with a matrix just because regions are usually a grid. The variable b is the unreconstructed tomogram, a vector containing the measured projection values reaching the detectors 32 for each emission pattern. The system matrix, in the context of CT, represents the transformation that the typical linear tomograph system accomplishes to generate the projection data. A typical linear tomograph thus works by transforming b into x taking into account matrix A as a transformation operator.

To be able to calculate a two-dimensional tomogram adequately, one needs to have defined appropriate locations to each emitter 34 and detector 32, which are typically surrounding the panel 10 on its edge(s). Also, one needs to define imaginary or notional locations and shapes of a set or array of regions 40 on the surface 22 of the panel 10, where an estimation of conductivity is going to be calculated. The regions 40 are sometimes called “reconstruction regions”. In a typical embodiment, the regions 40 are rectangular and are disposed next to each other in an appropriate imaginary or notional grid of pixels.

Also, to be able to calculate an adequate tomogram, the regions have to be geometrically defined in a way that each region is affected by more than two non-parallel line integrals; each line integral being defined as the path of an actually measured signal between a determined pair of emitter 34 and detector 32. This is to accomplish, for each region, adequate “angle density” as is usually called. In a diffusion tomograph the concept of line integrals may be geometrically not similar to a line, but to a sort of “field” as shown on FIG. 6A.

A determinate signal corresponding to a line integral may be altered in more than one point of its path without being substantially obstructed by a single touch, as depicted in FIG. 1B. That physical property of the panel with respect to conduction of signals is an important factor determining ability of permitting adequate tomographic reconstruction. For example if the touch interaction substantially would obstruct the signal, and another touch in other part of the signal path wouldn't further alter the signal, the annular phantom as shown on FIG. 2 would be easily confused, by that hypothetic system, with a filled circle, because that system would be unable to adequately estimate the interior properties of the phantom. That property of possible successive alterations of the signal along a line integral, configures an “integral function” as sometimes is called. Also, to be able to adequately measure the possible effects of touches over an emitted signal, measurements by the use of analog to digital conversion techniques are important.

Those skilled in the art will understand that the requirements of high angle density for each region and existence of an integral function to do tomographic reconstruction has support in the Projection Slice Theorem, which is related to the Radon Transform. Basically, the projection-slice theorem tells us that if one had an infinite number of one-dimensional projections of an object taken at an infinite number of angles, one could perfectly reconstruct the original object, f(x,y). Note the need of multiple angles (as much as possible in a non-theoretical device) and the need of “projection” (ie. integration data) along the line. However, the present invention is not limited by this theorem.

It's well known that a finger interacting with a waveguide like in the presented embodiments makes better and broader optical contact as more pressure is applied. This effect is because, together with other causes, the skin on the fingerprints gets more deformed, so the average contact area per unit area and thus, average conductivity gets altered in a higher level. This higher change of conductivity could be interpreted as more pressure and used to take distinctive actions. For example an icon of a user interface can be selected with a light pressure but activated with more pressure.

Also, as in any measurement instrument, repeated measurements over time can be done to have a time-varying measurement, so taking a series of tomographs over time is useful to determine how touch interactions changes over time, and that information may be used to detect touch events or gestures, with algorithms well known in the art.

Another embodiment of the touch device, as illustrated in FIGS. 5A and 5B (top plan and cross sectional view, respectively) may include a display 70 beneath the touch panel 10 preferably transparent, to form a touch screen. The touch panel 10 is bent at its edges and the signal flow ports incorporating the emitters 34 and the detectors 32 are arrayed around the bent down perimeter of the device. Light rays 20 pass through the touch screen as described. The touch screen may make available the information related to touch interactions generated by the tomograph, to be interpreted by a digital system, and then the digital system may control the display to show information related to the touch interactions, to be seen through the clear panel. The panel 10 could be convexly curved, and that curved panel could serve to house the display 70 and also to permit the ports to be easily put or mounted on a substrate like a printed circuit board (PCB).

Another embodiment of the touch device, as illustrated on FIG. 5B, may include the output device 70 operatively coupled to the data processor 66 or to an alternative data processor to form an interactive system. The interactive system transforms the tomogram information representative of touch interactions produced by a user, into information to be represented in the output device 70 as feedback to touch interactions. Touch user interactions in the interactive system may be used to modify the state of the software running in the processor, and when the software reflects its modified state in an output device, such as a display, the user receives feedback related to the touch interactions. The typical embodiment of the interactive system may be a cell phone including the touch sensitive area and displaying the images on its user interface.

The transformation of the information representative of touch interactions into information for the output device may be of the type commonly used in Graphical User Interfaces (GUI). For example, the transformation could be to show an icon on the display with an alternative color when a touch interaction event is detected on an area inside the icon, so a user can have the sensation of touching the icon.

The output device 70 may typically be a display such as a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD). A device with a display behind a transparent panel to form an interactive system is one of the main objectives of the invention. However, the touch sensor could be used without a display, for example, just to generate sounds.

The tomograph representative of regions where touch interactions occur may be like a pixilated image representing the conductivity on each region, but an event based GUI may be designed to just accept coordinates of touch interactions or more complex gestures instead of level of activity on determinate regions. So an algorithm to translate activity on each region to coordinates of touch interactions or gestures is useful and contemplated by the invention. The algorithm for determination of touch events often called “Blob Detection and Tracking” and is well known in the art. It is used by some systems that calculate and track touch locations by first using computer vision over an image of the touch regions, and using the image captured with a video camera.

In another embodiment of the touch device according to FIG. 6A (top view) a conductive panel 80 may be rendered electrically conductive using the signal flow ports, which can be simple electrodes 82, and the signals 84 may be electric currents. The electrically conductive panel 80 may be of a material as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,448,837, which is conductive and transparent. Another way to implement the electrically conductive panel 80 is by depositing a thin film of transparent conductive material over a non-conductive transparent substrate, so the touch of a finger makes some part of the currents normally circulating on the panel, to circulate through the skin thus lowering the resistance on the contact points. A display is mounted beneath the touch screen as previously described.

In another embodiment of the touch device the panel may be of a material acting as a dielectric, and the tomograph may be a Capacitance Tomograph, where the touch of a finger or other object can alter the dielectric properties of the panel.

In another embodiment of the touch device the panel may be of a material acting as a vibration conducting medium, and the tomograph may have acoustic or piezoelectric transducers as ports, in a similar way as an ultrasonic tomograph for pregnancy is implemented. The acoustic impedance of the panel can be altered by the touch of a finger or other object.

Operation

The operation of the touch screen device included in an embodiment of an interactive device (the method of the invention) is shown in the flow chart of FIG. 9 and is described as follows.

Steps S1 to S7 carried out as described in the blocks of FIG. 9 define and calculate parameters for posterior tomograph acquisition and reconstruction. These parameters can be calculated during the interactive operation of the system or device, or optionally the information can be calculated and stored in memory for later recall.

Steps S8 to S22 carried out as described in the blocks of FIG. 9 are a group of steps that repeats indefinitely while a user is interacting with the interactive device. Steps S9 to S14 obtain an unreconstructed tomogram; steps S15 to S17 calculate a reconstructed tomogram representative of detected or sensed touch interactions. This is carried out by a suitable algorithm as detailed in the blocks of FIG. 9 for achieving tomographic reconstruction, but other well-known algorithms for tomographic reconstruction can be used. Some of these algorithms are well explained in the book “Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging” by Kak and Slaney, available on the web.

Step S18 to S22 are carried out as described in the blocks in FIG. 9 for processing touch information to control an application and provide feedback to the user.

Step S1 is for defining positions and shapes of the imaginary or notional reconstruction regions over the sensitive surface. The regions forms typically a pixilated grid but each region can have its own shape, that can be polygonal, or inclusive defining a surface of more than one disjoint shape.

Step S2 is for defining the set of emission and detector ports to be involved in unreconstructed tomogram acquisition, and also for selecting its positions. The port positions may be typically the surroundings of the sensitive panel, for example alternating an emitter with a detector at regular intervals. Also, the positions may be near just some portions of the panel's surroundings, for example on just a subset of edges of a polygonal panel. Where there are not ports, the panel may have reflective materials so signals can bounce there (be reflected) and reach other ports.

FIG. 4A (top view) is a quite unuseful way of define regions 40 and port 18 locations. If all emitter 34 ports 18 are disposed just on the left of a square panel 10, all detector 32 ports 16 disposed just on the right, measurements done along just horizontal paths, and reconstruction regions 40 are all vertical rectangles that span from top to bottom, the two dimensional reconstruction that could be done would not produce very interesting results. This example shows that some awkward ways of defining geometries lead to difficulties on tomographic reconstruction. Anyways, the most intuitive and easily defined geometries lead to good results. For example, as shown in FIG. 4B simply disposing alternating emitter and detector ports around the panel, measuring from a substantial subset of the possible emitter-detector pairs, and selecting a pixilated grid for the reconstruction regions in an amount in quadratic relation with number of emitters and detectors, good results can be achieved.

Step S3 is for defining a sequence of emission patterns, where the sequence typically contains a linear independent set of emission patterns, for example, the activation in sequence of just one emitter. Another set of patterns may include patterns interpreted as a matrix that has a substantially high rank so different emission patterns can be discriminated. Matrix rank is well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Another example of patterns can be Code Sequences as normally used for CDMA, a well known technique for multiplexing. The objective is to permit multiplexing and adequate discrimination of the different patterns.

Step S4 is for defining for each emission pattern a set of associated detector ports. Once an emission pattern is active, the signal reaches a set of detector ports and some of them are selected for measurement. The set of ports associated with an emission pattern may be selected taking into account the level of the signal normally received.

Step S5 is for taking a reference unreconstructed tomogram that will be used as reference to calculate the differences on conductivity when any touch is occurring. The panel has default conductivity when no touch is affecting its conductivity, and the measurements are for determining the changes produced by touch interactions.

Step S6 is for calculating the system matrix A, assuming a linear model of the tomographic system. A possible way of calculating the system matrix to be further used to calculate the tomogram may be by making X an identity matrix, on equation AX=B, being B a matrix of measurements, a set of unreconstructed tomogram acquisition. So if X is the identity, thus A=B, thus the way of calculating A may be to touch in sequence each reconstruction region with corresponding shape and “unit pressure”, and measuring in each touch step the projection, so to construct B, and thus this set of measurement results in the system matrix A. This procedure, as explained above, will be readily evident to a person of ordinary skill in the art.

Step S7 is for calculating its pseudoinverse A′ by using a Truncated Singular Value Decomposition (TSVD) algorithm. A typical algorithm for pseudoinverse calculation is provided by the function pinv of the MATLAB software from MathWorks. The parameter that controls the truncation may be used to adjust the results provided by the reconstruction algorithm, for example to make a better estimation of the conductivity values by reducing resulting reconstruction noise by the use of that truncation parameter. A way of estimating the truncation parameter may be to simulate the system with respect to its noise performance, and optimizing the parameter trying to minimize the noise figure.

The definition of parameters for tomographic reconstruction, that includes the definition of regions, position of ports, and sequence of emission patterns with its associated detectors, needs to be selected in a way to permit adequate reconstruction. A way of evaluating suitability of parameters, is by calculating the associated system matrix A, assuming a linear model of the tomographic problem, and then evaluating characteristics of the matrix A. For example, a criterion could be to evaluate if the matrix rank is close to number of defined regions, and with a condition number that characterizes a “well-conditioned” problem. If after evaluating suitability of tomographic parameters, they don't meet the defined criteria, the parameters can be redefined until the criteria are met. For example, less and bigger regions may be defined. Conditions number, rank, and matrix conditioning are concepts well understood to those skilled in the art.

Step S8 represents the actions of a user that perform control operations through one or more touch interactions that can occur simultaneously over the sensitive surface.

Step S9 is for initializing a vector b for holding the posterior acquired unreconstructed tomograph.

Step S10 is for energizing emitter ports by configuring the pattern controller with an emission pattern. In each step of the loop, each emission pattern is selected, in sequence, from the set of defined emission patterns and applied.

Step S11 is for measuring the signal levels reaching the set of detector ports associated with the active emission pattern. To measure signal levels having some rejection to possible interfering signals, for example external light on the optical embodiment, a double reading can be done. For example, the signal levels reaching detectors with all emitters off can be subtracted from the value measured when emission pattern is active.

An embodiment can discard some of the acquired values with a criterion, or just not measure the value. For example, emitting from a determinate emitter and measuring from a detector in close proximity, may be of little use. Other criteria to discard measurements may include discarding emitter-detector combinations that involves a weak signal between them, because, for example, their relative angle of incidence. Most emitters and receivers respond weakly to signals at high angles with respect to the perpendicular. Also, the measured values can be weighted by associating weighting factors with each measured value, being that operation useful to reduce overall reconstruction noise.

Step S12 is for subtracting to this value, the corresponding reference values taken from vector b0. So when no touch is active, the resulting value will be zero plus the possible measurement noise. And in Step 13, the obtained values are appended to the vector b. As shown on Step S14, the steps from S10 to S13 are repeated until unreconstructed tomograph is completely acquired.

Step S15 is for preprocessing the unreconstructed tomogram, for example to linearize it by applying for example a nonlinear operation, in a similar way that most X-ray tomography devices first apply a logarithm to linearize the cumulative effect of successive attenuations that tissue imposes to X-rays. Step S16 is for calculating the reconstructed tomograph x by solving the equation x=A′b, where A′ is the pseudoinverse of system matrix and b is the unreconstructed tomograph. Step S17 is for post processing the reconstructed tomogram, for example with a noise gate that assign zero to values that are below some threshold. The threshold can be set just above normal peak noise values.

Step S18 is for recognizing touch interactions taking into account the reconstructed tomogram and generate touch events. To recognize events, a set of previously acquired tomograms may be also used. Algorithms of recognition of touch events and gestures are well known in the art and are sometimes called “blob tracking and detection”, and may be based on algorithms such as the Watershed algorithm. The kind of events recognized can be a new touch appearing, a touch disappearing, an existing touch moving, or other gestures. A gesture can be a “pinch” gesture that is produced by touching the panel in two locations, and separating apart the fingers. That pinch gesture can be used for example to control the zoom factor in a map application. A touch event can be associated with a coordinate that can have more resolution than the provided by the reconstructed tomogram. A set of values around an area where the touch is occurring, can be processed to obtain a sub-pixel coordinate. For example, having a 3×3 pixels area, the coordinate of each pixel center on that area can be averaged by weighting its coordinate with the value associated with each pixel, obtaining a coordinate similar to each pixel but with sub-pixel resolution.

Alternatively, another embodiment of the touch device operations may skip touch the events detection and generation, transforming the reconstructed tomogram by DSP algorithms or other methods to control the output device. For example the output device may be a sound generation device. The application to be controller may be a synthesizer, using touch interactions to alter synthesizer parameters. As an example, interactions on the horizontal axis may be mapped to pitch and interactions on the vertical axis, to harmonics levels, thus forming a multi spectral instrument.

Step S19 is for modifying the state of a user interface program in response to the touch events. For example if the user interface has a model of a virtual button, that button state becomes active if a touch interaction is detected on the area within the virtual button perimeter.

Step S20 is for generating the output information representative of the altered state of the UI program. For example, in the virtual button case, the output information is one that maps to different colors according to the button activation state.

Step S21 is for showing output information on the display adapted to that information through a transparent implementation of the touch sensitive panel.

Finally, the output of Step 21 is passed to Step 22, which is the user interface receiving feedback of the touch control operations. The user sees the results on the display. Further interactions from the user can be processed by repeating steps from S8 to S22.

FIG. 10A illustrates a flowchart of tomographic touch sensor operation. In step 100A a tomogram representative of touch interactions over the sensitive surface of the panel is acquired from a tomograph, using as an example the embodiment in FIG. 12. In step 100B the tomogram output of step 100A is made accessible as digital information used to control a digital device as a result of the touch interactions.

FIG. 10B illustrates a flow chart of tomographic touch screen operation in which step 105A acquires, when needed, a tomogram representative of touch interactions over the sensitive surface from a tomograph and provide it to a computer using possible embodiment in FIG. 12, and in step 105B access, when needed, image information generated by the computer, and display result, to be seen through the sensitive surface as feedback of touch interactions.

FIG. 11 is a flow chart of an Interactive system using a tomographic touch sensor, a data processing element, and an output device. In step 110A a data processor accesses the tomogram representative of touch interactions produced by a user over the sensitive surface. In step 110B the tomogram is processed with DSP algorithms. In step 110C a decision is taken whether it is an events-based interactive system? If YES, the program advances to step 110D where touch interactions from the tomogram are recognized and touch events are generated. In step 110F, the touch events in step 100D are received and a user-interface software program running in the data processor modifies is state in response to the touch events. If NO, the program advances to step 110E where a user-interface software program running in the data processor transforms the tomogram and modifies its state. The output of steps 110E and 100F feed to step 110G where the user interface software provides information representative of its modified state to the output device as feedback of the touch interactions.

FIG. 12 is a flow chart showing an example embodiment for the acquisition of a tomogram representative of touch interactions. In step 120A, parameters are defined for tomogram acquisition, including emission pattern sequence, set of detector ports associated with each emission pattern, and amount, position and shape of each reconstruction region, using possible embodiment in FIG. 15. In step 120B an unreconstructed tomogram representative of the touch interactions over the sensitive surface is acquired by estimating and measuring the ports around the sensitive surface, using possible embodiment in FIG. 13. In step 120C the reconstructed tomogram is calculated by transforming the unreconstructed tomogram with a tomographic reconstruction algorithm, using possible embodiment in FIG. 14.

FIG. 13 is a flow chart illustrating an example embodiment for the acquisition of an unreconstructed tomogram representative of touch interactions. In step 130A configure a pattern controller with an emission pattern selected in turns from the set of defined emission patterns to energize emitter ports. In step 130B access through a signal sampler, to the measurement values from the set of detector ports associated with the selected emission pattern. In step 130C append the measurement values to the partially acquired unreconstructed tomogram. The output is put to a decision in step 130D regarding is any pattern of the set of defined emission patterns not yet applied to have complete the unreconstructed tomogram acquisition? If YES, then the program jumps or loops back to step 130A; if NO, the program outputs.

FIG. 14 illustrates a flowchart for an example embodiment for the reconstructed tomogram calculation. In step 140A the system provides matrix A, obtains its pseudoinverse A′ by truncated SVD. In step 140B the unreconstructed tomogram is optionally preprocessed. In step 140C x=A′b is calculated, where x is the reconstructed tomogram and b is the unreconstructed tomogram. In step 140D the unreconstructed tomogram is optionally post-processed.

FIG. 15 illustrates a flowchart of an example embodiment for the definition of parameters for tomogram acquisition. In step 150A the amount, positions, and shapes of imaginary or notional reconstruction regions on the sensitive surface are defined. In step 150B amount of emission ports to be involved in unreconstructed tomogram acquisition is defined, and positions selected. In step 150C a linearly independent set of emission patterns is defined. In step 150D amount of detector ports to be involved in unreconstructed tomogram acquisition is defined, and positions selected. In step 150E for each emission pattern a set of associated detector ports is defined. In step 150F the system matrix A is calculated assuming a linear model of the tomographic system. The output of step 150F is passed to a decision in step 150G, namely, is the rank and condition number of the system matrix A enough to allow an adequate posterior reconstruction? If the answer is YES, the signal is output; if the answer is NO, the signal is looped back to step 150A.

The best mode contemplated for practicing the present invention, as of the filing of this application, is an interactive system with the optical FTIR-based embodiment. This embodiment permits the use of a panel with almost perfect light transmission properties, the detection of touch interactions with zero-pressure and also with above-zero pressure, and the use of a very low-cost panel, and other manufacturing advantages, like ease of mounting. This embodiment is detailed as follows.

A conventional LCD display is used as an output device. On top of the display, there's a clear panel made of a sheet of acrylic of less than a few millimeters thick, where infrared light passes from the borders. The objective is to make the screen visible through the panel. The panel is in mechanic contact with the screen by using two-sided tape put on the borders of the screen top, out of its active visible area. To prevent the display making unwanted TIR effect frustration on the panel's bottom surface, the tape is reflective or mirror-like. The tape is thick so if mechanic deformation occurs when pressure is applied with the fingers, the panel doesn't touch the screen. The panel shape is similar to a rectangle, but octagonal with short diagonal corners similar to the panel shown on FIG. 5A. The panel borders are unpolished so to prevent total reflections on the borders and also to provide some diffusion when light enters or exits the panel's border.

Surrounding all panel perimeter, there are infrared LEDs used as emitters and photo transistors used as detectors, touching the panel' borders, so infrared light can enter and exit from the panel. The LED and photo transistors are alternating, each emitter between two detectors and vice versa. The emitters and detectors are spaced apart at regular intervals on each panel edge, separated by about one millimeter. The emitters and detectors are soldered on different Printed Circuit Boards, one for each panel edge.

The emitters are connected to a circuit that works similar to a LED Matrix controller that permits to activate any LED. The possible activation levels for each LED are two: no current or the maximum current allowed for the emitters. Taking into account each LED is active just a short period of time, more than the nominal continuum rate of emission is possible, like in conventional LED Matrices.

The photo transistor detectors have infrared filters matching the emission spectrum of emitters. Each phototransistor makes its current flow through a resistance to convert the current in voltage. The detectors are grouped in groups of eight elements, and each group connected to an 8-to-1 analog multiplexer.

Each analog multiplexer is associated with a 14-bit Analog to Digital Converter, and each digital output of the ADCs are connected to a digital multiplexer, so each ADC conversion value can be addressed. The digital multiplexer is a bus-based one, so each non-selected ADC is in high impedance state while the addressed one ADC is in low impedance with respect to the bus.

The LED matrix controller and the digital multiplexer are connected to a FPGA that controls them and is able to execute a Tomographic Reconstruction Algorithm.

The FPGA is connected to a CPU adapted to be able to run an application with a User Interface. The CPU is also connected to the display.

On the panel's top surface a pixilated matrix is defined. The total area matches the screen's visible area. The pixels are square with a side size matching emitter and detectors separations. A vector representing an unreconstructed tomogram is acquired by energizing in turn each emitter, and while each emitter is active, taking a measurement from all detectors. To optimize acquisition time, all ADC are commanded in parallel to take the measurement using a selected multiplexer channel, repeating this for the eight acquisition channels. The measurements are sent to the FPGA through the bus.

Each time an emitter is energized and measurements are taken, another set of measurements is taken but with all emitters deactivated. This measurement is to read ambient light interference level to be subtracted from the measurement with the emission pattern active. That measurement is taken many times because ambient light can be varying, for example most light bulbs oscillates at 120 Hz. To estimate the interference level at the time of measurement with the emitter active, an average with previous and past interference measurement is calculated. This takes into account the fact that photo transistors are not as fast as other optoelectronic devices like PIN photo diodes, so before measurement a delay is inserted to account for phototransistor time response.

With the tomogram acquisition as described, a base measurement representative of the tomogram acquired when no touch interactions occurs, is taken at factory and stored with the device on a provided memory. That base measurement is called b0. This measurement is taken in every touch device produced, to account possible variations on each specific device properties. For example, not all LED in a batch produces the same level of light emission for same conditions. So this measurement accounts for that possible variation.

A linear model of the tomographic system is assumed. The system matrix A is also calculated at factory by methods used to achieve Algebraic Reconstruction Methods. Each column of matrix A is the unreconstructed tomogram taken when a determinate “unity” touch interaction is in effect. This unreconstructed tomogram is the change with respect to the base tomogram b0. The “unity” touch interaction is an interaction in a determinate region with a shape and position in accordance with that region. Columns of matrix A are representing each reconstruction region. Each “unity” touch interaction can be made by actually touching the panel with a mechanic arm, or by simulating the effect. Those skilled in the art will know to simulate the effect but a method is proposed anyways. Since the rows of system matrix A represents a determinate pair of emitter-detector, for each emitter-detector pair, the row represents all regions associated with that pair. The regions correspond to a pixilated grid and each region has an associated coefficient, so it can be viewed like a 2D grayscale image canvas. To calculate each coefficient, an anti aliased “white” line is drawn between the emitter and detector on a “black” background, taking into account emitter and detector coordinates. White corresponds to value 1 and black to 0. The “gray” level of each canvas pixel is then associated with the row coefficient. Then each row coefficient is multiplied with the value of the corresponding pair from base tomogram b0, to account for actual signal levels involved on the specific device implementation. A rectangular system matrix A is used with more columns that rows, so more measurements are taken than the amount of regions. More measurements than regions are useful to have more precision on tomographic reconstruction. It should be noted that on all steps for tomographic reconstruction, information associated with some pairs of emitter-detector are not taken into account. Some are discarded according to the following criteria: if the dot product of corresponding row on A matrix is below a threshold. The threshold is selected in a way that the rank of A matrix isn't much below region count.

Having the system matrix A, a pseudoinverse A′ is calculated by the Truncated SVD method, by using MATLAB's pinv function. The tolerance parameter is calculated as follows. A value, say 1, is selected. Then by computer simulation, the reconstruction noise for a set of simulated touch interactions is calculated. Based on the noise properties of simulation results for each region, the value is lowered or incremented, so an optimization algorithm is run. The objective is to have noise lowered and if possible equally distributed for all the regions. A practical value is sometimes around 0.4. The pseudoinverse A′ is also stored on device for later recall.

Once all parameters for tomographic reconstruction are calculated, the device enters an interactive loop that runs continuously.

A tomogram b is acquired as described, with the base tomogram b0 subtracted, so if no touch interactions are occurring, the b vector contains zeros or just normal noise values. A reconstructed tomogram x is calculated by solving the equation x=A′b on the FPGA, by techniques well know to those skilled in the art. The reconstructed tomogram, as represented by vector x, is interpreted as an image representing touch interactions, with each pixel corresponding to each reconstruction region.

The tomogram x is transmitted to the CPU, where it is post processed by a noise gate, thus making zero the values below some threshold. The threshold is by default fixed just above normal reconstruction noise. The default threshold value is also calculated at factory but a noise control knob is provided to the user that can run configuration software.

On the CPU, a set of current and previous tomograms are analyzed to find touch events and gestures. The software used analyzes the events by executing a Blob Detection and Tracking algorithm. The algorithm can be selected by the user with a configuration application, where adapted versions of the software TOUCHLIB, http://www.nuigroup.com/touchlib/ and OPENTOUCH, http://code.google.com/p/opentouch/ are offered as options.

After events or gestures are recognized, they are sent by TUIO protocol to applications adapted to work with that protocol. An example application is a GPS mapping application.

The application running on the CPU generates visual information as feedback that is sent to the display to be seen through the panel by the user, thus being that visual response feedback of the control operations introduced by touching the touch device of the present invention.

Although the present invention has been described regarding several illustrative embodiments, numerous variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art that do not depart from the teachings herein. Such variations and modifications are deemed to fall within the purview of the appended claims.

Claims

1. A touch sensitive human-computer interaction device comprising:

a waveguide having a touch surface;
a plurality of light emitters optically coupled at input locations around the periphery of the waveguide touch surface to emit light signals for transmission through the waveguide by the internal reflection effect, wherein one or more touch interactions on the touch surface of the waveguide alters the light conductivity of the waveguide in the location(s) of the one or more touch interactions causing frustration of the internal reflection effect;
a plurality of detectors optically coupled at output locations around the periphery of the waveguide touch surface to receive the light signals along respective sensing signal paths defined between each respective pair of light emitter and detector, and arranged with a device comprising an analog to digital converter to output respective signals on the basis of the light signals received;
wherein each output signal is representative of the level of frustration of the internal reflection caused by one or more touch interactions along the respective sensing signal paths, and wherein each output signal is alterable by each of a plurality of simultaneous touch interactions along a single sensing signal path of the respective signal paths; and
a data processor operatively coupled to the device comprising the analog to digital converter and arranged to process said output signals according to a reconstruction algorithm to obtain a digital representation of said light conductivity and, based on the reconstruction, to output a signal for controlling a visualization device,
wherein the reconstruction algorithm is a Computerized Tomography reconstruction algorithm.

2. The touch sensitive human-computer interaction device according to claim 1, wherein the level of each said output signals is further alterable according to the level of pressure of each touch interaction and said reconstruction accordingly represents said respective pressure levels.

3. The touch sensitive human-computer interaction device according to claim 1, wherein said processing further discriminates interior properties of the one or more touch interactions.

4. The touch sensitive human-computer interaction device according to claim 1, wherein said processing further discriminates the light conductivity at a plurality of contact areas defined on the touch surface.

5. The touch sensitive human-computer interaction device according to claim 1, wherein said Computerized Tomography reconstruction algorithm is implemented according to the Projection-Slice theorem.

6. The touch sensitive human-computer interaction device according to claim 1, wherein said processing further provides location information of the one or more touch interactions relative to the touch surface.

7. The touch sensitive human-computer interaction device according to claim 1, further including the visualization device, wherein the waveguide is transparent and the visualization device is located on the opposite side of the waveguide to the touch surface.

8. The touch sensitive human-computer interaction device according to claim 1, wherein the waveguide is curved.

9. The touch sensitive human-computer interaction device according to claim 1, wherein the waveguide is flexible.

10. The touch sensitive human-computer interaction device according to claim 1, wherein said signal paths collectively define more than two angles.

11. The touch sensitive human-computer interaction device according to claim 1, further comprising a plurality of analog to digital converters.

12. The touch sensitive human-computer interaction device according to claim 11, wherein the plurality of analog to digital converters operate in parallel.

13. A method of controlling a visualization device using a touch sensitive human-computer interaction device comprising:

a waveguide having a touch surface;
a plurality of light emitters optically coupled at input locations around the periphery of the waveguide touch surface to emit light signals for transmission through the waveguide by the internal reflection effect, wherein one or more touch interactions on the touch surface of the waveguide alters the light conductivity of the waveguide in the location(s) of the one or more touch interactions causing frustration of the internal reflection effect;
a plurality of detectors optically coupled at output locations around the periphery of the waveguide touch surface to receive the light signals along respective sensing signal paths defined between each respective pair of light emitter and detector, and arranged with a device comprising an analog to digital converter to output respective signals on the basis of the light signals received;
wherein each output signal is representative of the level of frustration of the internal reflection caused by one or more touch interactions along the respective sensing signal paths, and wherein each output signal is alterable by each of a plurality of simultaneous touch interactions along a single sensing signal path of the respective signal paths;
and a data processor operatively coupled to the device comprising the analog to digital converter;
wherein the method includes the steps of the data processor:
processing said output signals according to a reconstruction algorithm to obtain a digital representation of said light conductivity and,
outputting, based on the reconstruction, a signal for controlling the visualization device,
wherein the reconstruction algorithm is a Computerized Tomography reconstruction algorithm.

14. The method according to claim 13, wherein the level of each said output signals is further alterable according to the level of pressure of each touch interaction and said reconstruction accordingly represents said respective pressure levels.

15. The method according to claim 13, wherein said processing further discriminates the light conductivity at a plurality of contact areas defined on the touch surface.

16. The method according to claim 13, wherein said processing further provides location information of the one or more touch interactions relative to the touch surface.

17. The method according to claim 13, wherein the touch sensitive human-computer interaction device includes the visualization device, and the waveguide is transparent and the visualization device is located on the opposite side of the waveguide to the touch surface.

18. The method according to claim 13, wherein said signal paths collectively define more than two angles.

19. The method according to claim 13, further comprising a plurality of analog to digital converters.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3681110 April 1975 Hounsfield et al.
4448837 May 15, 1984 Ikeda
4484179 November 20, 1984 Kasday
4644100 February 17, 1987 Brenner et al.
4700176 October 13, 1987 Adler
4746770 May 24, 1988 McAvinney
4746914 May 24, 1988 Adler
4749853 June 7, 1988 Salim
4791416 December 13, 1988 Adler
4980646 December 25, 1990 Zemel
5565682 October 15, 1996 Frank et al.
5623158 April 22, 1997 Frank et al.
5768386 June 16, 1998 Yokomoto et al.
5847405 December 8, 1998 Acquaviva et al.
6164135 December 26, 2000 Bicz
6323846 November 27, 2001 Westerman et al.
6570557 May 27, 2003 Westerman et al.
6690363 February 10, 2004 Newton
6747636 June 8, 2004 Martin
6864882 March 8, 2005 Newton
6965836 November 15, 2005 Richardson
7157649 January 2, 2007 Hill
7265748 September 4, 2007 Ryynanen
7334485 February 26, 2008 Weseman
7432893 October 7, 2008 Ma
7435940 October 14, 2008 Eliasson et al.
7629967 December 8, 2009 Newton
7653883 January 26, 2010 Hotelling et al.
7705835 April 27, 2010 Eikman
7880732 February 1, 2011 Goertz
8068101 November 29, 2011 Goertz
8094137 January 10, 2012 Morrison
8125649 February 28, 2012 Godbillon et al.
8144336 March 27, 2012 Quadling et al.
8174701 May 8, 2012 Masuda
8227742 July 24, 2012 Drumm
20040145575 July 29, 2004 Weindorf et al.
20040252091 December 16, 2004 Ma et al.
20050248540 November 10, 2005 Newton
20060086896 April 27, 2006 Han
20060097991 May 11, 2006 Hotelling
20060114237 June 1, 2006 Crockett et al.
20060114244 June 1, 2006 Saxena et al.
20060161870 July 20, 2006 Hotelling et al.
20060161871 July 20, 2006 Hotelling et al.
20060227120 October 12, 2006 Eikman
20070118305 May 24, 2007 Sullivan et al.
20070125937 June 7, 2007 Eliasson et al.
20070198926 August 23, 2007 Joguet
20070201042 August 30, 2007 Eliasson et al.
20070268274 November 22, 2007 Westerman
20080005703 January 3, 2008 Radivojevic et al.
20080029691 February 7, 2008 Han
20080074401 March 27, 2008 Chung
20080088593 April 17, 2008 Smoot
20080143683 June 19, 2008 Hotelling
20080158172 July 3, 2008 Hotelling
20080158176 July 3, 2008 Land et al.
20080179507 July 31, 2008 Han
20090122028 May 14, 2009 Ing
20090127005 May 21, 2009 Zachut et al.
20090135162 May 28, 2009 Van De Wijdeven et al.
20090267919 October 29, 2009 Chao et al.
20090273794 November 5, 2009 Ostergaard et al.
20100127992 May 27, 2010 Schmid
20110227874 September 22, 2011 Fahraeus et al.
20110310064 December 22, 2011 Keski-Jaskari et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
241973 January 1993 AR
006106 August 1999 AR
029424 June 2003 AR
042333 June 2005 AR
064377 April 2009 AR
949233 June 1974 CA
WO2006095320 September 2006 NL
0802531-4 July 2010 SE
2005026930 March 2005 WO
2005026938 March 2005 WO
2005114369 December 2005 WO
2004053781 June 2006 WO
WO2006/095320 September 2006 WO
2006108443 October 2006 WO
2007112742 October 2007 WO
2008000964 January 2008 WO
2008017077 February 2008 WO
2008038066 April 2008 WO
2008066004 June 2008 WO
2008146098 December 2008 WO
2008148307 December 2008 WO
2008154792 December 2008 WO
2009077962 June 2009 WO
2009092599 July 2009 WO
2010064983 June 2010 WO
Other references
  • Gaudette et al.,“A comparison study of linear reconstruction techniques for diffuse optical tomographic imaging of absorption coefficient”, Jan. 20, 2000, Phys. Med. Biol. 45, p. 1051-1070.
  • NextWindow's Multi-Touch Overview, http://touch-base.com/documentation/Documents/nextwindow—multitouch.pdf, copyrighted 2007.
  • NextWindow's Optical Touch Screen Technology, http://www.nextwindow.com/benefits/touchscreen—technology.html, 2008.
  • Meg Davis et al. (Oct. 2006) “Final Project Proposal: Multi-touch Screen” CPSC 452 Team 1 Selected portions: source code, pictures, schematics, descriptions, (available online http://sites.googl.com/site/cpsc462team1/project-proposal).
  • Wayne Westerman (Mar. 1999) “Hand tracking, finger identification, and chordic manipulation on a multi-touch surface” PhD thesis, University of Delaware Selected portions: Abstract, pp. 34-38, all the rest. (available online: http://www.ece.udel.edu/˜westerma/main.pdf).
  • U.S. Appl. No. 61/193,526, filed Dec. 5, 2008: pp. 5-15, p. 24, abstract, claims, figures, all the rest.
  • PCT/SE2009/051364: International Preliminary Report (a) and Written Opinion (b), Apr. 5, 2010.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/998,771: First non-final action, Sep. 20, 2012.
  • PCT/IB2007/052720: Written Opinion, Nov. 28, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/908,032: Office Action Selected passages: pp. 2-14, all the rest, Sep. 29, 2010.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/320,742, filed Dec. 30, 2005.
  • F.M. Dickey, A. W. Doerry (May 2008) “Recovering shape from shadows in synthetic aperture radar imagery” Radar Sensor Technology XII, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 6947.694707 Selected passages: Section 2.2 first paragraph, pp. 4-5, all the rest. (available online: http://144.206.159.178/FT/CONF/16414556/16414560.pdf).
  • Caspar Von Wrede and Pavel Laskov (Apr. 2004) “Using classification to determine the number of finger strokes on a multi-touch tactile device” 10 ESANN'2004 proceedings 28-30 ISBN: 2-930307-04-8; pp. 549-554 (available online: http://www.dice.ucl.ac.be/Proceedings/esann/esannpdf/es2004-127.pdf).
  • Rubine (1991) “The Automatic Recognition of Gestures” Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, CMU-CS-91-202 pp. 25-28 and pp. 221-222 (available online: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/Web/People/music/papers/dean—rubine—thesis.pdf).
  • Bill Buxton (Sep. 2007) “Multi-Touch Systems that I Have Known and Loved”, online article. (available online: http://web.archive.org/web/20071011015629/http://www.billbuxton.com/multitouchOverview.html).
  • “The sensor frame graphic manipulator” (May 1990) NASA-CR-19424 document id 1994000326 (available online: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa gov/19940003261—1994003261.pdf).
  • SK. Lee, W. Buxton and K.C. Smith (Apr. 1985) “A multi-touch three dimensional touch-sensitive tablet” CHI '85 Conference proceedings, San Francisco, ISBN: 0-89791-149-0 (available online: http://www.billbuxton.com/leebuxtonsmith.pdf).
  • Ian Maxwell (Dec. 2007) “An Overview of Optical-Touch Technologies” Information Display vol. 23, No. 12 (available online: http://www.walkermobile.com/December—2007—ID—Overview—of—Optical—Touch—Technologies.pdf).
  • Fink (Apr. 1998) “Ultrasound puts materials to the test” NDTnet vol. 3 No. 4 (available online http://www.ndt.net/article/0498/fink/fink.htm).
  • Hodges et al. (Oct. 2007) “ThinSight: Versatile Multi-touch Sensing for Thin Form-factor Displays” In UIST '07: Prooeedtngs of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User intetface software and technology, pp. 259-268 (available online: http://www.billbuxton.com/UISTthinSight.pdf).
  • Kak and Slaney (1999) Online book: “Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging” Selected portion: Chapter 1 (available online: http://www.slaney.org/pct/pct-toc.html).
  • Natterer (2001) Book: “The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography” (Classics in Applied Mathematics) Selected portion: Preface (p. xi) ISBN-13: 978-0898714937.
  • Kuba (1999) Paper book: “Discrete Tomography: Foundations, Algorithms, and Applications (Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis)” 1 Selected portion: Chapter 1, section 1.1 (Introduction, pp. 3-6) ISBN-13: 978-0817641016.
  • Herman (1980) Paper book: “Fundamentals of Computerized Tomography: Image Reconstruction from Projections (Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)” Selected portion: pp. 4-11 ISBN-13: 978-0123420503.
  • Gardner (2006) Paper book: “Geometric Tomography (Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications)” Selected portion: Preface (pp. xvii-xxii) ISBN-13: 978-052168493.
  • Deans (2007) Paper book: “The Radon Transform and Some of Its Applications” Selected portion: Chapter 1, section 1.1 (Introduction) ISBN-13: 978-0486482417.
Patent History
Patent number: 8773400
Type: Grant
Filed: Dec 15, 2008
Date of Patent: Jul 8, 2014
Patent Publication Number: 20090153519
Inventor: Victor Manuel Suarez Rovere (San Miguel)
Primary Examiner: Sumati Lefkowitz
Assistant Examiner: David Tung
Application Number: 12/334,670
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Transparent Substrate Having Light Entrapment Capability (i.e., Waveguides) (345/176)
International Classification: G06F 3/042 (20060101);