Solid compositions

- AbbVie Inc.

The present invention features solid compositions comprising a selected HCV inhibitor in an amorphous form. In one embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor is formulated in an amorphous solid dispersion which comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer and preferably a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/717,993, filed Dec. 18, 2012, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/581,146, filed Dec. 29, 2011, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/645,696, filed May 11, 2012. This application incorporates by reference the entire content of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0172239.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to solid compositions comprising anti-HCV compounds and methods of using the same to treat HCV infection.

BACKGROUND

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an RNA virus belonging to the Hepacivirus genus in the Flaviviridae family. The enveloped HCV virion contains a positive stranded RNA genome encoding all known virus-specific proteins in a single, uninterrupted, open reading frame. The open reading frame comprises approximately 9500 nucleotides and encodes a single large polyprotein of about 3000 amino acids. The polyprotein comprises a core protein, envelope proteins E1 and E2, a membrane bound protein p7, and the non-structural proteins NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A and NS5B.

HCV infection is associated with progressive liver pathology, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Chronic hepatitis C may be treated with peginterferon-alpha in combination with ribavirin. Substantial limitations to efficacy and tolerability remain as many users suffer from side effects, and viral elimination from the body is often inadequate. Therefore, there is a need for new drugs to treat HCV infection.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention features solid compositions comprising (1) an HCV inhibitor selected from telaprevir (VX-950), BI-201335, TMC-435 (TMC-435350), vaniprevir (MK-7009), MK-5172, asunaprevir (BMS-650032), daclatasvir (BMS-790052), danoprevir, setrobuvir (ANA-598), tegobuvir (GS-333126 or GS-9190), GS-9451, mericitabine (R-4048), IDX-184, filibuvir (PF-00868554), PSI-7977, PSI-352938, BIT-225, boceprevir, GS-5885 or GS-9256 (hereinafter a “selected HCV inhibitor”); (2) a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer; and optionally (3) a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant.

In one aspect, the present invention features a solid composition comprising a solid dispersion, wherein the solid dispersion comprises (1) a selected HCV inhibitor in an amorphous form, (2) a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer, and (3) a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant, wherein the selected HCV inhibitor is telaprevir (VX-950), BI-201335, TMC-435 (TMC-435350), vaniprevir (MK-7009), MK-5172, asunaprevir (BMS-650032), daclatasvir (BMS-790052), danoprevir, setrobuvir (ANA-598), tegobuvir (GS-333126 or GS-9190), GS-9451, mericitabine (RG-7128 or R-4048), IDX-184, filibuvir (PF-00868554), PSI-7977, PSI-352938, BIT-225, boceprevir, GS-5885 or GS-9256. The surfactant can be, without limitation, either formulated in the solid dispersion or separately combined or mixed with the solid dispersion. Preferably, the hydrophilic polymer has a Tg of at least 50° C. More preferably, the hydrophilic polymer has a Tg of at least 80° C. Highly preferably, the hydrophilic polymer has a Tg of at least 100° C. Hydrophilic polymers with Tgs of below 50° C., such as a polymer having a Tg of at least 25° C., and/or surfactants having HLB values of below 10, can also be used.

In one embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the hydrophilic polymer is selected from homopolymer of N-vinyl lactam, copolymer of N-vinyl lactam, cellulose ester, cellulose ether, polyalkylene oxide, polyacrylate, polymethacrylate, polyacrylamide, polyvinyl alcohol, vinyl acetate polymer, oligosaccharide, or polysaccharide. Non-limiting examples of suitable hydrophilic polymers include homopolymer of N-vinyl pyrrolidone, copolymer of N-vinyl pyrrolidone, copolymer of N-vinyl pyrrolidone and vinyl acetate, copolymer of N-vinyl pyrrolidone and vinyl propionate, graft copolymer of polyethylene glycol/polyvinyl caprolactam/polyvinyl acetate (e.g., Soluplus), polyvinylpyrrolidone, methylcellulose, ethylcellulose, hydroxyalkylcelluloses, hydroxypropylcellulose, hydroxyalkylalkylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, cellulose phthalate, cellulose succinate, cellulose acetate phthalate, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose phthalate, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose succinate, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose acetate succinate, polyethylene oxide, polypropylene oxide, copolymer of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, methacrylic acid/ethyl acrylate copolymer, methacrylic acid/methyl methacrylate copolymer, butyl methacrylate/2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate copolymer, poly(hydroxyalkyl acrylate), poly(hydroxyalkyl methacrylate), copolymer of vinyl acetate and crotonic acid, partially hydrolyzed polyvinyl acetate, carrageenan, galactomannan, or xanthan gum, or a combination thereof. In some cases, sugar alcohols can be used in addition to, or in lieu of, hydrophilic polymers.

In another embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the surfactant is selected from polyoxyethylene castor oil derivates, mono fatty acid ester of polyoxyethylene sorbitan, polyoxyethylene alkyl ether, polyoxyethylene alkylaryl ether, polyethylene glycol fatty acid ester, alkylene glycol fatty acid mono ester, sucrose fatty acid ester, or sorbitan fatty acid mono ester. Non-limiting examples of suitable surfactants include polyoxyethyleneglycerol triricinoleate or polyoxyl 35 castor oil (Cremophor EL; BASF Corp.) or polyoxyethyleneglycerol oxystearate such as polyethylenglycol 40 hydrogenated castor oil (Cremophor RH 40, also known as polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil or macrogolglycerol hydroxystearate) or polyethylenglycol 60 hydrogenated castor oil (Cremophor RH 60), mono fatty acid ester of polyoxyethylene sorbitan, such as mono fatty acid ester of polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan, e.g. polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80), polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monostearate (Tween 60), polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monopalmitate (Tween 40) or polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate (Tween 20), polyoxyethylene (3) lauryl ether, polyoxyethylene (5) cetyl ether, polyoxyethylene (2) stearyl ether, polyoxyethylene (5) stearyl ether, polyoxyethylene (2) nonylphenyl ether, polyoxyethylene (3) nonylphenyl ether, polyoxyethylene (4) nonylphenyl ether, polyoxyethylene (3) octylphenyl ether, PEG-200 monolaurate, PEG-200 dilaurate, PEG-300 dilaurate, PEG-400 dilaurate, PEG-300 distearate, PEG-300 dioleate, propylene glycol monolaurate (e.g., lauroglycol FCC), D-alpha-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate, sucrose monostearate, sucrose distearate, sucrose monolaurate, sucrose dilaurate, sorbitan mono laurate, sorbitan monooleate, sorbitan monopaInitate, or sorbitan stearate, or a combination thereof. Other suitable ionic or non-ionic surfactants may also be used.

In yet another embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the solid dispersion is an amorphous solid dispersion. In still another embodiment, the solid dispersion is an amorphous solid dispersion which comprises (1) the selected HCV inhibitor, (2) the hydrophilic polymer, and (3) the surfactant. In a further embodiment, the solid dispersion is a solid solution comprising (1) the selected HCV inhibitor, and (2) the hydrophilic polymer. In yet another embodiment, the solid dispersion is a solid solution comprising (1) the selected HCV inhibitor, (2) the hydrophilic polymer, and (3) the surfactant.

In yet another embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the hydrophilic polymer is a homopolymer or copolymer of N-vinyl pyrrolidone. Preferably, the hydrophilic polymer is copovidone.

In still another embodiment, the surfactant is D-alpha-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (vitamin E TPGS). In a further embodiment, the surfactant is lauroglycol FCC. In yet another embodiment, the surfactant is a combination of vitamin E TPGS and lauroglycol FCC. In still another embodiment, the surfactant is a sorbitan fatty acid ester, such as sorbitan mono laurate (Span 20). In another embodiment, the surfactant is selected from Tween 20, Tween 80, vitamin E TPGS, lauroglycol FCC, or a combination thereof.

In yet another embodiment, a solid composition of the invention comprises an amorphous solid dispersion or a solid solution which comprises (1) the selected HCV inhibitor, (2) copovidone, and (3) a surfactant selected from vitamin E TPGS, Span 20, or a combination thereof.

In another embodiment, a solid composition of the invention comprises an amorphous solid dispersion or a solid solution which comprises (1) the selected HCV inhibitor, (2) copovidone, and (3) a combination of vitamin E TPGS and lauroglycol FCC.

In still another embodiment, a solid composition of the invention comprises an amorphous solid dispersion or a solid solution which comprises (1) the selected HCV inhibitor, (2) copovidone, and (3) a surfactant selected from Tween 20 or Tween 80.

In another aspect, the present invention features processes of making a solid composition of the present invention. In one embodiment, the process comprises drying a volatile solvent in a liquid solution, wherein said solution comprises: (1) the selected HCV inhibitor; (2) a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer; and optionally (3) a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant. The drying process can be carried out using any suitable solvent evaporation techniques including but not limited to spray-drying techniques.

In another embodiment, the process comprises solidifying a melt which comprises: (1) the selected HCV inhibitor; (2) a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer; and optionally (3) a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant.

A solid composition of the invention may also contain other additives or ingredients, such as coloring agents, flavoring agents, lubricants or preservatives. A solid composition of the invention can be prepared into any suitable dosage forms, such as capsule, dragee, granule, powder, or tablet.

A solid composition of the invention may further comprise another anti-HCV agent, for example, an agent selected from HCV helicase inhibitors, HCV polymerase inhibitors, HCV protease inhibitors, HCV NS5A inhibitors, CD81 inhibitors, cyclophilin inhibitors, or internal ribosome entry site (IRES) inhibitors.

The present invention further features methods of using a solid composition of the present invention to treat HCV infection. The methods comprise administering a solid composition of the present invention to a patient in need thereof, thereby reducing the blood or tissue level of HCV virus in the patient.

Other features, objects, and advantages of the present invention are apparent in the detailed description that follows. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, not limitation. Various changes and modifications within the scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the detailed description.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention features solid compositions comprising (1) a selected HCV inhibitor, (2) a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer, and optionally (3) a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant, wherein the selected inhibitor is telaprevir (VX-950), BI-201335, TMC-435 (TMC-435350), vaniprevir (MK-7009), MK-5172, asunaprevir (BMS-650032), daclatasvir (BMS-790052), danoprevir, setrobuvir (ANA-598), tegobuvir (GS-333126 or GS-9190), GS-9451, mericitabine (R-4048), IDX-184, filibuvir (PF-00868554), PSI-7977, PSI-352938, BIT-225, boceprevir, GS-5885 or GS-9256. Formulating the selected HCV inhibitor in an amorphous form can increase the inherent drug solubility and dissolution rate, thereby enhancing the bioavailability of the compound.

Telaprevir (VX-950), BI-201335, TMC-435 (TMC-435350), vaniprevir (MK-7009), MK-5172, asunaprevir (BMS-650032), danoprevir, GS-9451, boceprevir and GS-9256 are HCV protease inhibitors; daclatasvir (BMS-790052) and GS-5885 are HCV NS5A inhibitors; and setrobuvir (ANA-598), tegobuvir (GS-333126 or GS-9190), mericitabine (R-4048), IDX-184, filibuvir (PF-00868554), PSI-7977, PSI-352938 (PSI-938), and BIT-225 are polymerase inhibitors. The chemical structures of these selected HCV inhibitors are provided below:

A non-limiting way to form an amorphous form of a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove is through the formation of solid dispersions with a polymeric carrier. The presence of hydrophilic polymer(s) and optional surfactant(s), as well as the dispersion of the selected HCV inhibitor in an amorphous form in a matrix containing the polymer(s), can significantly enhance the dissolution rate of the selected compound. In some cases, a solid dispersion formulation can also effectively maintain the selected HCV inhibitor in its supersaturation state to allow for better absorption.

As used herein, the term “solid dispersion” defines a system in a solid state (as opposed to a liquid or gaseous state) comprising at least two components, wherein one component is dispersed throughout the other component or components. For example, a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove can be dispersed in a matrix comprised of a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer(s) and a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant(s). The term “solid dispersion” encompasses systems having small particles of one phase dispersed in another phase. These particles are often of less than 400 μm in size, such as less than 100, 10, or 1 μm in size. When a solid dispersion of the components is such that the system is chemically and physically uniform or homogenous throughout or consists of one phase (as defined in thermodynamics), such a solid dispersion is called a “solid solution.” A glassy solution is a solid solution in which a solute is dissolved in a glassy solvent.

The terms “weight percent” or “percent by weight” or “% by weight” or “wt %” denote the weight of an individual component in a composition or mixture as a percentage of the weight of the composition or mixture.

Modern new chemical entities tend to have higher molecular weight, greater lipophilicity and lower aqueous solubility, all of which negatively affect oral bioavailability. Despite formulation advances leading to the commercialization of enabling technologies such as lipid-based drug delivery systems (e.g. SEDDS) and nano-particles, the delivery of poorly water-soluble compounds remains challenging because of the limitations associated with each approach. Utilizing an amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) is attractive not only because it can increase the pharmacokinetic exposure of otherwise poorly absorbed drugs, but also because the final product may be delivered to the patient as a tablet or capsule, which may provide greater chemical stability and improved patient convenience compared to liquid dosage forms.

For all formulation approaches it is imperative to understand the intrinsic physicochemical and biopharmaceutical properties of the active drug substance prior to or at the onset of development. To that end, the biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS) has been routinely utilized to assess oral absorption and guide formulation development. For ASD formulations, the solubility/permeability of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) as well as the long term physical stability of the amorphous drug products are often considered. Conceptually, there are three major factors that influence the physical stability of an ASD: thermodynamic driving force (difference in drug loading and the solubility of drug in matrix), molecular mobility, and activation barrier for crystallization. The present invention relies on the use of an innovative assessment tool to rank the intrinsic physical stability of amorphous drug substances, e.g., crystallization tendency of amorphous API.

The molecular mobility of an amorphous material, which is often characterized by the relaxation time constant or its reciprocal, molecular mobility, is considered by many as a principal factor in determining its physical stability. Kinetic characterization of amorphous materials has been a subject of growing research in pharmaceutical field. The fact that crystallization of amorphous phases proceeds much faster in the supercooled liquid states compared to the glassy states demonstrates the importance of molecular mobility. However significant differences in crystallization tendency have been observed across compounds that cannot be explained by mobility alone. For example, some amorphous phases crystallize almost immediately at the glass temperature, Tg (e.g., progesterone, parabens, acetaminophen), some crystallize below Tg in a relatively short time (e.g., griseofulvin, nifedipine), while others are quite stable. For some of the more stable amorphous phases, crystallization in the glassy state is often not observed and it does not proceed at a significant rate above Tg without seeding. Theoretically, Tg corresponds to the temperature of which the molecular relaxation time constant of the amorphous phase is equivalent to the experimental time scale. In light of these differences it has been postulated that, in addition to mobility, the thermodynamic driving force and activation barrier to crystallization contribute to the observed physical stability differences among these compounds.

Shamblin et al., J. PHYS. CHEM. B 103: 4113-4121 (1999), assessed molecular mobility of amorphous materials based on heat capacity measurements and the Adam-Gibbs model. This method allows calculation of molecular mobility using temperature-modulated differential scanning calorimetry (TMDSC) that is widely available in pharmaceutical laboratories together with the Adam-Gibbs model which has been used to characterize other materials, such as polymers and ceramics.

Using this method, the physical stability of pharmaceutically relevant compounds can be explored in an attempt to identify thermodynamic quantities critical to crystallization. Through this analysis, the calorimetric configurational entropy has been shown to be an important factor in determining crystallization tendency above the Tg.

The configurational entropy typically is a measure of the difference in the number of configurations between the amorphous and the crystalline phases. For molecules in the amorphous state to crystallize, they have to pack into a specific crystal lattice with defined configuration or orientation. Therefore, higher configurational entropy values suggest a lower probability that molecules are in the desirable orientation for packing into the crystal lattice. Hence, a meta-stable amorphous compound with larger configurational entropy tends to show greater physical stability. This is consistent with the observation that large molecules with numerous rotatable bonds are often more difficult to crystallize.

It has been hypothesized that the configurational entropy serves as a thermodynamic measurement of the probability of nucleation while the molecular mobility dictates the rate at which a molecule can change its configurations and serves as a kinetic measurement of nucleation. Similar arguments may be applied to the rate of crystal growth as well. Therefore, these two quantities can be used to assess the intrinsic physical stability risk for the amorphous APIs.

Based on experimental crystallization observations of different compounds, Baird et al., J. PHARM. SCI. 99: 3787-3806 (2010); and Eerdenbrugh et al., J. PHARM. SCI. 99: 3826-3838 (2010) proposed a classification system for assessing the crystallization tendency of amorphous systems. However, crystallization experiments take relatively long time and the results are influenced by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. The present invention utilizes the two above intrinsic properties and a different amorphous classification system (ACS) to assess the physical stability of amorphous drug candidates. The two intrinsic molecular properties can be calculated from a single convenient calorimetry measurement.

The structural flexibility and mobility of a molecule can be used to predict whether a compound will be kinetically stable as an amorphous phase. A physically stable amorphous API may play a role in the physical stability of a formulated ASD.

In the ACS used in the present invention, molecules can be categorized into four categories, as follows:

    • Class I: Stable amorphous solid/poor crystallizer, and High configurational entropy and low molecular mobility (excellent candidates for developing ASD formulations)
    • Class II: Intermediate amorphous stability/crystallizer, and High configurational entropy but high molecular mobility
    • Class III: Intermediate amorphous stability/crystallizer, and Low molecular mobility but low configurational entropy
    • Class IV: Unstable amorphous solid/good crystallizer, and Low configurational entropy and high molecular mobility (poor candidates for developing ASD formulations)

Mobility is highly dependent on the temperature but identical at the Tg for all glasses. Molecular mobility is usually represented by the VTF equation in the supercooled liquid state and by the AGV equation in the glassy state as follows:

τ ( T ) = τ 0 exp ( D T 0 T - T 0 ) ( VTF equation ) τ ( T , T f ) = τ 0 exp ( D T 0 T - ( T / T f ) T 0 ) ( AGV equation )
where τ is the relaxation time constant, τ0 is a constant assumed to equal to 10−14 second, D is the strength parameter, and T0 is the temperature with zero molecular mobility (τ=∞), which is called the Kauzmann temperature and is the temperature where the equilibrium supercooled liquid (i.e. ideal glass) has the same entropy as the crystalline state. Tf is the fictive temperature, which is the temperature where the ideal glass has the same configurational entropy as a real glass at a given temperature (T). It is worth noting that, by definition, at Tg the relaxation time constants are the same for all amorphous systems (i.e. τg=100 sec). The strength parameter D can be used as a convenient representation of molecular mobility at T<Tg.

At the glass transition temperature, Tg, the following relationship holds, which can be obtained via the VTF equation:

T g T 0 = D ln ( τ g / τ 0 ) + 1
where τg is the relaxation time constant at Tg. D and To are not independent and that Tg/T0 is a parameter associated with the strength parameter D. In many theoretical treatments, τ0 is assumed to be 10−14 sec, therefore ln(τg0)=ln(1016)=36.84 is a constant.

Given that Tg is the temperature associated with a constant mobility (i.e. τ=100 sec) while T0 is a temperature associated with zero mobility for ideal glasses, the ratio of Tg/T0, and therefore the value D, represent how fast the molecular mobility of an ideal glass decreases with lowering temperature. The higher the D value, the slower the rate of decrease of molecular mobility with lowering temperature, thus favors crystallization.

It can be further shown for ideal glasses, that:

ln [ τ T / τ 0 ] = D C ( T g / T ) D + C ( 1 - T g / T )
Where C=ln(τg0)=36.84. Given C>0, Tg/T>1, hence at a common temperature represented on the scale of Tg/T, the molecular mobility of the ideal glass is expected to be higher for a glass with larger D value. Opposite trend is true in the supercooled liquid state above Tg. Therefore the strength parameter serves a convenient indicator for molecular mobility in ideal glasses: the larger the D value, the higher the mobility (at identical Tg/T).

“Ideal freshly prepared glass” is one that is melt-quenched with sufficiently high cooling rates, such that no structural relaxation has occurred at temperatures below the glass transition temperature. In such “ideal freshly prepared glasses”, the fictive temperature Tf equals its glass transition temperature, Tg. Therefore molecular relaxation time constant for an “ideal freshly prepared glass” may be derived based on the AGV equation:

τ ( T < T g ) = τ 0 exp ( T g T · D T 0 T g - T 0 ) = τ 0 exp ( T g T · ln ( τ g / τ 0 ) )

The above equation demonstrates the Arrhenius behavior with regard to the temperature dependence of molecular relaxation time constants in these systems. It is further noted that, at the same value of Tg/T, the molecular relaxation time constant or mobility is the same for all “ideal freshly prepared glasses”, regardless of other characteristics of the system. At the first glance, the strength parameter does not appear to be relevant to the magnitude of molecular mobility.

However, configurations in real glasses are not fully arrested. Molecular motions do occur on a longer time scale which leads to structural relaxation or aging. As a result, molecular mobility of real glasses becomes a function of aging time. In reality, when a liquid is quench-cooled, structural relaxation has already occurred in any freshly prepared glass. During the process of aging, the strength parameter D plays a role in the evolution of molecular mobility, from the “ideal freshly prepared glass” where D is of no relevance, to the ideal glass where a higher D value is associated with a higher mobility. The evolution of the molecular mobility reveals a similar relationship between mobility and strength parameter, i.e. higher molecular mobility is dictated by a higher D value during this evolution process.

The configurational entropy at Tg would serve as a good indicator for this parameter for two reasons: (1) Amorphous pharmaceuticals are often practically stored below the glass transition temperature; (2) Configurational entropy for “ideal freshly prepared glass” is temperature independent at T<Tg.

During storage, the configurational entropy continuously decreases as structural relaxation occurs. However the decrease in entropy slows down with time and is far from the values in the ideal glass, even when considering the physical aging over the entire two year's of shelf-life.

To determine configurational entropy, instrument such as TMDSC can be calibrated to obtain accurate measurements of heat capacity. In addition, a conventional DSC scan may provide significant insight on this thermodynamic quantity. It has been observed that the change in configurational heat capacity at Tg or simply heat capacity change at Tg, ΔCp(Tg), shows a relatively good correlation with the configurational entropy and physical stability. Hence ΔCp(Tg) which can be obtained from a conventional DSC measurement, may serve as an approximate indicator or surrogate for configurational entropy. Heat capacity is a direct measurement on the modes by which a molecule can dissipate heat energies therefore is a physically meaningful measure of configurations. The heat capacity change at the glass transition temperature directly reflects the number of configurations that become available as a result of the glass-supercooled liquid transition. Because the temperature range of typical glass transition is relatively small, the contribution of anharmonic vibrations may be minimal. Therefore, such practices minimize the concerns on the true configurational origin of the excess entropy obtained via thermal analysis.

In addition, ΔCp(Tg) can be used to estimate the strength parameter D for a glass based on the Adam-Gibbs model and the assumption of hyperbolic temperature relationship of the configurational heat capacity, Cp conf, at temperatures above Tg:
K=T·Cp conf≈Tg·ΔCp(Tg)

The entropy-based Kauzmann temperature is calculated as:

T 0 = T m 1 + Δ H m / K
where Tm and ΔHm are the temperature and enthalpy of melting, respectively. Hence the strength parameter may be derived as:

D = T g - T 0 T 0 · ln ( τ g / τ 0 )

The advantage of using ΔCp(Tg) as an estimate of configurational entropy is that this quantity can be readily measured without laborious procedures such as those required for the determination of configuration entropy. In addition, the configurational entropy at Tg may be estimated based on ΔCp(Tg) and other relevant parameters:

S conf ( T g ) = Δ S m - T g T m C p conf T T Δ S m - K ( 1 T g - 1 T m )
where ΔSm is the entropy of melting.

The strength parameter D can therefore be used to represent the molecular mobility of an amorphous material, and the configurational entropy can be represented by its quantity at the glass transition temperature, or more conveniently, it can be represented by the change in heat capacity at Tg, ΔCp(Tg). The high-low criterion for each quantity can then be defined to be used in the ACS assignment.

The criterion for stability is different across different fields of applications. Pharmaceutical products often concern the stability during the typical shelf lives, e.g., 2-3 years. A benchmarking approach may be adopted by surveying a number of pharmaceutical compounds with known physical stability, including those whose ASD formulations have been successfully commercialized. These compounds encompass a wide variety of structural features and a broad spectrum ranging from rapid crystallizers (such as acetaminophen, griseofulvin, phenobarbital, and sulfathiazole) to some that form kinetically stable amorphous phases (such as itraconazole, ketoconazole, saquinavir, ritonavir and lopinavir). These compounds include ritonavir, acetaminophen, fenofibrate, sucrose, nifedipine, griseofulvin, lopinavir, lovastatin, felodipine, indomethacin, itraconazole, ketoconazole, phenobarbital, flopropione, celecoxib, etoricoxib, rofecoxib, Valdecoxib, tolbutamide, quinidine, phenylbutazone, sulfathiazole, hydrochlorthiazide, glibenclamide, cimetidine, atropine, rac-Ibuprofen, salicin, santonin, simvastatin, and saquinavir.

Based on the assessments of mobility and configurational entropy, and the known physical stability for the above selected compounds in their amorphous states, the following criteria was developed:

(1) D≧9 as the high molecular mobility criterion;

(2) Sconf(Tg)R≧6 as the criterion for high configurational entropy. Alternatively high configurational entropy may be considered when ΔCp(Tg)/R≧23.

Choices of these criteria allow for categorization of the compounds into four categories in the context of physical stability or crystallization tendency. In many times, the configurational features of each molecule are reflected consistently by the simple measurement of ΔCp(Tg) and information can be conveniently extracted to allow the ACS determination. The use of ΔCp(Tg) allows the ACS assignment of a molecule even when no crystal form is identified, provided that the molecular mobility can be evaluated independently by other means such as viscosity measurement and the scanning rate dependence of the glass transition temperature.

Based on the above-described ACS model, it is believed that a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove is a good candidate for developing ASD formulations.

In one aspect, the present invention features a solid composition comprising (1) a selected HCV inhibitor, (2) a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer, and optionally (3) a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant, wherein the selected HCV inhibitor is telaprevir (VX-950), BI-201335, TMC-435 (TMC-435350), vaniprevir (MK-7009), MK-5172, asunaprevir (BMS-650032), daclatasvir (BMS-790052), danoprevir, setrobuvir (ANA-598), tegobuvir (GS-333126 or GS-9190), GS-9451, mericitabine (R-4048), IDX-184, filibuvir (PF-00868554), PSI-7977, PSI-352938, BIT-225, boceprevir, GS-5885 or GS-9256. The selected HCV inhibitor and the polymer can be formulated in a solid dispersion. The surfactant may be formulated in the same solid dispersion; or the surfactant can be separately combined or mixed with the solid dispersion.

In one embodiment, a solid composition of the invention comprises an amorphous solid dispersion which comprises (1) the selected HCV inhibitor, (2) a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer, and (3) a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant. In another embodiment, a solid composition of the invention comprises a solid solution which comprises (1) the selected HCV inhibitor, and (2) a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer. In still another embodiment, a solid composition of the invention comprises a solid solution which comprises (1) the selected HCV inhibitor, (2) a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer, and (3) a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant. In yet another embodiment, a solid composition of the invention comprises a glassy solution which includes (1) the selected HCV inhibitor, and (2) a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer. In a further embodiment, a solid composition of the invention comprises a glassy solution which includes (1) the selected HCV inhibitor, (2) a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer, and (3) a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant.

A solid composition (or a solid dispersion) of the invention can contain, for example, at least 1% by weight of the selected HCV inhibitor, preferably at least 5%, including, e.g., at least 10%. For instance, a solid composition (or a solid dispersion) of the invention can contain from 1 to 50% by weight of the selected HCV inhibitor. For another instance, a solid composition (or a solid dispersion) of the invention can contain from 5 to 30% by weight of the selected HCV inhibitor. Preferably, a solid composition (or a solid dispersion) of the invention contains from 5 to 15% by weight of the selected HCV inhibitor.

A solid dispersion of the invention may contain at least 30% by weight of a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer or a combination of such hydrophilic polymers. Preferably, the solid dispersion contains at least 40% by weight of a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer or a combination of such hydrophilic polymers. More preferably, the solid dispersion contains at least 50% (including, e.g., at least 60%, 70%, 80% or 90%) by weight of a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer or a combination of such polymers. A solid dispersion (or a solid composition) of the invention may also contain at least 1% by weight of a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant or a combination of such surfactants. Preferably, the solid dispersion (or solid composition) contains at least 2% by weight of a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant or a combination of such surfactants. More preferably, the solid dispersion (or solid composition) contains from 4% to 20% by weight of the surfactant(s), such as from 5% to 10% by weight of the surfactant(s).

In one embodiment, a solid dispersion (or a solid composition) of the invention comprises at least 30% by weight of a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer or a combination of such polymers, and at least 1% by weight of a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant or a combination of such surfactants. In another embodiment, a solid dispersion (or a solid composition) of the invention comprises at least 50% by weight of a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer or a combination of such polymers, and from 2% to 20% by weight of a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant or a combination of such surfactants. In yet another embodiment, a solid dispersion (or a solid composition) of the invention comprises from 50% to 90% by weight of a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer or a combination of such polymers, and from 3% to 15% by weight of a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant or a combination of such surfactants. In yet another embodiment, a solid dispersion (or a solid composition) of the invention comprises from 70% to 90% by weight of a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer or a combination of such polymers, and from 5% to 10% by weight of a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant or a combination of such surfactants.

Preferably, a hydrophilic polymer employed in the present invention has a Tg of at least 50° C., more preferably at least 60° C., and highly preferably at least 80° C. including, but not limited to from, 80° C. to 180° C., or from 100° C. to 150° C. Methods for determining Tg values of organic polymers are described in INTRODUCTION TO PHYSICAL POLYMER SCIENCE (2nd Edition by L. H. Sperling, published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1992). The Tg value can be calculated as the weighted sum of the Tg values for homopolymers derived from each of the individual monomers, i.e., the polymer Tg=ΣWi·Xi where Wi is the weight percent of monomer in the organic polymer, and Xi is the Tg value for the homopolymer derived from monomer i. Tg values for the homopolymers may be taken from POLYMER HANDBOOK (2nd Edition by J. Brandrup and E. H. Immergut, Editors, published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1975). Hydrophilic polymers with a Tg as described above may allow for the preparation of solid dispersions that are mechanically stable and, within ordinary temperature ranges, sufficiently temperature stable so that the solid dispersions may be used as dosage forms without further processing or be compacted to tablets with only a small amount of tabletting aids. Hydrophilic polymers having a Tg of below 50° C. may also be used.

Preferably, a hydrophilic polymer employed in the present invention is water-soluble. A solid composition of the present invention can also comprise poorly water-soluble or water-insoluble polymer or polymers, such as cross-linked polymers. A hydrophilic polymer comprised in a solid composition of the present invention preferably has an apparent viscosity, when dissolved at 20° C. in an aqueous solution at 2% (w/v), of 1 to 5000 mPa·s., and more preferably of 1 to 700 mPa·s, and most preferably of 5 to 100 mPa·s.

Hydrophilic polymers suitable for use in a solid composition of the invention include, but are not limited to, homopolymers or copolymers of N-vinyl lactams, such as homopolymers or copolymers of N-vinyl pyrrolidone (e.g., polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), or copolymers of N-vinyl pyrrolidone and vinyl acetate or vinyl propionate); cellulose esters or cellulose ethers, such as alkylcelluloses (e.g., methylcellulose or ethylcellulose), hydroxyalkylcelluloses (e.g., hydroxypropylcellulose), hydroxyalkylalkylcelluloses (e.g., hydroxypropylmethylcellulose), and cellulose phthalates or succinates (e.g., cellulose acetate phthalate and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose phthalate, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose succinate, or hydroxypropylmethylcellulose acetate succinate); high molecular polyalkylene oxides, such as polyethylene oxide, polypropylene oxide, and copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide; polyacrylates or polymethacrylates, such as methacrylic acid/ethyl acrylate copolymers, methacrylic acid/methyl methacrylate copolymers, butyl methacrylate/2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate copolymers, poly(hydroxyalkyl acrylates), and poly(hydroxyalkyl methacrylates); polyacrylamides; vinyl acetate polymers, such as copolymers of vinyl acetate and crotonic acid, and partially hydrolyzed polyvinyl acetate (also referred to as partially saponified “polyvinyl alcohol”); polyvinyl alcohol; oligo- or polysaccharides, such as carrageenans, galactomannans, and xanthan gum; polyhydroxyalkylacrylates; polyhydroxyalkyl-methacrylates; copolymers of methyl methacrylate and acrylic acid; polyethylene glycols (PEGs); graft copolymers of polyethylene glycol/polyvinyl caprolactam/polyvinyl acetate, or any mixture or combination thereof. In some cases, sugar alcohols can be used in addition to, or in lieu of, hydrophilic polymers.

Non-limiting examples of preferred hydrophilic polymers for the invention include polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) K17, PVP K25, PVP K30, PVP K90, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) E3, HPMC E5, HPMC E6, HPMC E15, HPMC K3, HPMC A4, HPMC A15, HPMC acetate succinate (AS) LF, HPMC AS MF, HPMC AS HF, HPMC AS LG, HPMC AS MG, HPMC AS HG, HPMC phthalate (P) 50, HPMC P 55, Ethocel 4, Ethocel 7, Ethocel 10, Ethocel 14, Ethocel 20, copovidone (vinylpyrrolidone-vinyl acetate copolymer 60/40), polyvinyl acetate, methacrylate/methacrylic acid copolymer (Eudragit) L100-55, Eudragit L100, Eudragit S100, polyethylene glycol (PEG) 400, PEG 600, PEG 1450, PEG 3350, PEG 4000, PEG 6000, PEG 8000, Soluplus, poloxamer 124, poloxamer 188, poloxamer 237, poloxamer 338, and poloxamer 407.

Of these, homopolymers or copolymers of N-vinyl pyrrolidone, such as copolymers of N-vinyl pyrrolidone and vinyl acetate, are preferred. A non-limiting example of a preferred polymer is a copolymer of 60% by weight of N-vinyl pyrrolidone and 40% by weight of vinyl acetate. Other preferred polymers include, without limitation, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC, also known as hypromellose in USP), such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose grade E5 (HPMC-E5); and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate (HPMC-AS).

A pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant employed in the present invention is preferably a non-ionic surfactant. Ionic surfactants may also be used. More preferably, a solid composition of the present invention comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant having an HLB value of from 2-20. In one example, a solid composition of the present invention includes a mixture of pharmaceutically acceptable surfactants, with at least one surfactant having an HLB value of no less than 10 and at least another surfactant having an HLB value of below 10. The HLB system (Fiedler, H. B., ENCYLOPEDIA OF EXCIPIENTS, 5th ed., Aulendorf: ECV-Editio-Cantor-Verlag (2002)) attributes numeric values to surfactants, with lipophilic substances receiving lower HLB values and hydrophilic substances receiving higher HLB values.

Non-limiting examples of pharmaceutically acceptable surfactants that are suitable for the present invention include polyoxyethylene castor oil derivates, e.g. polyoxyethyleneglycerol triricinoleate or polyoxyl 35 castor oil (Cremophor EL; BASF Corp.) or polyoxyethyleneglycerol oxystearate such as polyethylenglycol 40 hydrogenated castor oil (Cremophor RH 40, also known as polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil or macrogolglycerol hydroxystearate) or polyethylenglycol 60 hydrogenated castor oil (Cremophor RH 60); or a mono fatty acid ester of polyoxyethylene sorbitan, such as a mono fatty acid ester of polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan, e.g. polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80), polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monostearate (Tween 60), polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monopalmitate (Tween 40), or polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate (Tween 20). Other non-limiting examples of suitable surfactants include polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers, e.g. polyoxyethylene (3) lauryl ether, polyoxyethylene (5) cetyl ether, polyoxyethylene (2) stearyl ether, polyoxyethylene (5) stearyl ether; polyoxyethylene alkylaryl ethers, e.g. polyoxyethylene (2) nonylphenyl ether, polyoxyethylene (3) nonylphenyl ether, polyoxyethylene (4) nonylphenyl ether, polyoxyethylene (3) octylphenyl ether; polyethylene glycol fatty acid esters, e.g. PEG-200 monolaurate, PEG-200 dilaurate, PEG-300 dilaurate, PEG-400 dilaurate, PEG-300 distearate, PEG-300 dioleate; alkylene glycol fatty acid mono esters, e.g. propylene glycol monolaurate (lauroglycol, such as lauroglycol FCC); sucrose fatty acid esters, e.g. sucrose monostearate, sucrose distearate, sucrose monolaurate, sucrose dilaurate; sorbitan fatty acid mono esters such as sorbitan mono laurate (Span 20), sorbitan monooleate, sorbitan monopaInitate (Span 40), or sorbitan stearate; D-alpha-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate; or a combination or mixture thereof. Other suitable surfactants include, but are not limited to, block copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, also known as polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene block copolymers or polyoxyethylene polypropyleneglycol, such as Poloxamer 124, Poloxamer 188, Poloxamer 237, Poloxamer 388, or Poloxamer 407 (BASF Wyandotte Corp.). As described above, a mixture of surfactants can be used in a solid composition of the present invention.

Non-limiting examples of preferred surfactants for the invention include to polysorbate 20, polysorbate 40, polysorbate 60, polysorbate 80, Cremophor RH 40, Cremophor EL, Gelucire 44/14, Gelucire 50/13, D-alpha-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (vitamin E TPGS), propylene glycol laurate, sodium lauryl sulfate, and sorbitan monolaurate.

In one embodiment, a solid composition of the present invention comprises an amorphous solid dispersion or solid solution which includes (1) a selected HCV inhibitor selected from telaprevir (VX-950), BI-201335, TMC-435 (TMC-435350), vaniprevir (MK-7009), MK-5172, asunaprevir (BMS-650032), daclatasvir (BMS-790052), danoprevir, setrobuvir (ANA-598), tegobuvir (GS-333126 or GS-9190), GS-9451, mericitabine (R-4048), IDX-184, filibuvir (PF-00868554), PSI-7977, PSI-352938, BIT-225, boceprevir, GS-5885 or GS-9256, and (2) a pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer. The solid composition can also include a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant which preferably is formulated in the amorphous solid dispersion or solid solution. The hydrophilic polymer can be selected, for example, from the group consisting of homopolymer of N-vinyl lactam, copolymer of N-vinyl lactam, cellulose ester, cellulose ether, polyalkylene oxide, polyacrylate, polymethacrylate, polyacrylamide, polyvinyl alcohol, vinyl acetate polymer, oligosaccharide, and polysaccharide. As a non-limiting example, the hydrophilic polymer is selected from the group consisting of homopolymer of N-vinyl pyrrolidone, copolymer of N-vinyl pyrrolidone, copolymer of N-vinyl pyrrolidone and vinyl acetate, copolymer of N-vinyl pyrrolidone and vinyl propionate, polyvinylpyrrolidone, methylcellulose, ethylcellulose, hydroxyalkylcelluloses, hydroxypropylcellulose, hydroxyalkylalkylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, cellulose phthalate, cellulose succinate, cellulose acetate phthalate, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose phthalate, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose succinate, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose acetate succinate, polyethylene oxide, polypropylene oxide, copolymer of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, graft copolymer of polyethylene glycol/polyvinyl caprolactam/polyvinyl acetate, methacrylic acid/ethyl acrylate copolymer, methacrylic acid/methyl methacrylate copolymer, butyl methacrylate/2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate copolymer, poly(hydroxyalkyl acrylate), poly(hydroxyalkyl methacrylate), copolymer of vinyl acetate and crotonic acid, partially hydrolyzed polyvinyl acetate, carrageenan, galactomannan, and xanthan gum. Preferably, the hydrophilic polymer is selected from polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) K17, PVP K25, PVP K30, PVP K90, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) E3, HPMC E5, HPMC E6, HPMC E15, HPMC K3, HPMC A4, HPMC A15, HPMC acetate succinate (AS) LF, HPMC AS MF, HPMC AS HF, HPMC AS LG, HPMC AS MG, HPMC AS HG, HPMC phthalate (P) 50, HPMC P 55, Ethocel 4, Ethocel 7, Ethocel 10, Ethocel 14, Ethocel 20, copovidone (vinylpyrrolidone-vinyl acetate copolymer 60/40), polyvinyl acetate, methacrylate/methacrylic acid copolymer (Eudragit) L100-55, Eudragit L100, Eudragit S100, polyethylene glycol (PEG) 400, PEG 600, PEG 1450, PEG 3350, PEG 4000, PEG 6000, PEG 8000, Soluplus, poloxamer 124, poloxamer 188, poloxamer 237, poloxamer 338, or poloxamer 407. More preferably, the hydrophilic polymer is selected from homopolymers of vinylpyrrolidone (e.g., PVP with Fikentscher K values of from 12 to 100, or PVP with Fikentscher K values of from 17 to 30), or copolymers of 30 to 70% by weight of N-vinylpyrrolidone (VP) and 70 to 30% by weight of vinyl acetate (VA) (e.g., a copolymer of 60% by weight VP and 40% by weight VA). The surfactant can be selected, for example, from the group consisting of polyoxyethyleneglycerol triricinoleate or polyoxyl 35 castor oil (Cremophor EL; BASF Corp.) or polyoxyethyleneglycerol oxystearate, mono fatty acid ester of polyoxyethylene sorbitan, polyoxyethylene alkyl ether, polyoxyethylene alkylaryl ether, polyethylene glycol fatty acid ester, alkylene glycol fatty acid mono ester, sucrose fatty acid ester, and sorbitan fatty acid mono ester. As a non-limited example, the surfactant is selected from the group consisting of polyethylenglycol 40 hydrogenated castor oil (Cremophor RH 40, also known as polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil or macrogolglycerol hydroxystearate), polyethylenglycol 60 hydrogenated castor oil (Cremophor RH 60), a mono fatty acid ester of polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan (e.g. polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80), polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monostearate (Tween 60), polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monopalmitate (Tween 40), or polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate (Tween 20)), polyoxyethylene (3) lauryl ether, polyoxyethylene (5) cetyl ether, polyoxyethylene (2) stearyl ether, polyoxyethylene (5) stearyl ether, polyoxyethylene (2) nonylphenyl ether, polyoxyethylene (3) nonylphenyl ether, polyoxyethylene (4) nonylphenyl ether, polyoxyethylene (3) octylphenyl ether, PEG-200 monolaurate, PEG-200 dilaurate, PEG-300 dilaurate, PEG-400 dilaurate, PEG-300 distearate, PEG-300 dioleate, propylene glycol monolaurate, D-alpha-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate, sucrose monostearate, sucrose distearate, sucrose monolaurate, sucrose dilaurate, sorbitan monolaurate, sorbitan monooleate, sorbitan monopaInitate, and sorbitan stearate. Preferably, the surfactant is selected from polysorbate 20, polysorbate 40, polysorbate 60, polysorbate 80, Cremophor RH 40, Cremophor EL, Gelucire 44/14, Gelucire 50/13, D-alpha-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (vitamin E TPGS), propylene glycol laurate, sodium lauryl sulfate, or sorbitan monolaurate. More preferably, the surfactant is selected from sorbitan monolaurate, D-alpha-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate, propylene glycol monolaurate, or a combination thereof (e.g., a combination of D-alpha-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate and lauroglycol FCC).

In another embodiment, a solid composition of the present invention comprises an amorphous solid dispersion or solid solution which includes (1) a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove, and (2) a homopolymer or copolymer of N-vinyl pyrrolidone (e.g., copovidone). The solid composition also comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant (e.g., vitamin E TPGS, sorbitan monolaurate, or a combination of vitamin E TPGS and lauroglycol FCC), wherein the surfactant preferably is formulated in the amorphous solid dispersion or solid solution.

In yet another embodiment, a solid composition of the present invention comprises an amorphous solid dispersion or solid solution which includes (1) a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove, (2) copovidone, and (3) a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant (e.g., vitamin E TPGS, sorbitan monolaurate, or a combination of vitamin E TPGS and lauroglycol FCC). The amorphous solid dispersion or solid solution may also include another pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant.

In still another embodiment, a solid composition of the present invention comprises an amorphous solid dispersion or solid solution which includes (1) 10% by weight the selected HCV inhibitor, (2) 82% by weight copovidone, and (3) 5% by weight vitamin E TPGS and 2% by weight lauroglycol FCC. The solid composition can also include 1% by weight colloidal silica.

In a further embodiment, a solid composition of the present invention comprises an amorphous solid dispersion or solid solution which includes (1) 10% by weight the selected HCV inhibitor, (2) 82% by weight copovidone, and (3) 7% by weight propylene glycol monocaprylate (Capryol 90). The solid composition can also include 1% by weight colloidal silica.

A solid dispersion employed in the present invention preferably comprises or consists of a single-phase (defined in thermodynamics) in which the therapeutic agent(s) (e.g., a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove with or without another anti-HCV agent) is molecularly dispersed in a matrix containing the pharmaceutically acceptable hydrophilic polymer(s). In such cases, thermal analysis of the solid dispersion using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) typically shows only one single Tg, and the solid dispersion does not contain any detectable crystalline HCV inhibitor as measured by X-ray powder diffraction spectroscopy.

A solid composition of the present invention can further include one or more other anti-HCV agents. These other anti-HCV agents can be, for example, HCV polymerase inhibitors (including nucleoside or non-nucleoside type of polymerase inhibitors), HCV protease inhibitors, HCV helicase inhibitors, CD81 inhibitors, cyclophilin inhibitors, internal ribosome entry site inhibitors, or HCV NS5A inhibitors.

In one embodiment, a solid composition of the invention comprises (1) a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove and (2) another HCV protease inhibitor. In another embodiment, a solid composition of the invention comprises (1) a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove, and (2) another HCV polymerase inhibitor (e.g., a non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor, or preferably a nucleoside polymerase inhibitor). In yet another embodiment, a solid composition of the invention comprises (1) a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove, (2) another HCV protease inhibitor, and (3) another HCV polymerase inhibitor (e.g., a non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor, or preferably a nucleoside polymerase inhibitor). In another embodiment, a solid composition of the invention comprises (1) a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove, and (2) another HCV NS5A inhibitor. In another embodiment, a solid composition of the invention comprises (1) a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove, (2) another HCV polymerase inhibitor (e.g., a non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor, or preferably a nucleoside polymerase inhibitor), and (3) another HCV NS5A inhibitor. In another embodiment, a solid composition of the invention comprises (1) a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove, (2) another HCV protease inhibitor, and (3) another HCV NS5A inhibitor.

Non-limiting examples of other protease inhibitors can be selected from ACH-1095 (Achillion), ACH-1625 (Achillion), ACH-2684 (Achillion), AVL-181 (Avila), AVL-192 (Avila), BI-201335 (Boehringer Ingelheim), BMS-650032 (BMS), boceprevir, danoprevir, GS-9132 (Gilead), GS-9256 (Gilead), GS-9451 (Gilead), IDX-136 (Idenix), IDX-316 (Idenix), IDX-320 (Idenix), MK-5172 (Merck), narlaprevir, PHX-1766 (Phenomix), telaprevir, TMC-435 (Tibotec), vaniprevir, VBY708 (Virobay), VX-500 (Vertex), VX-813 (Vertex), VX-985 (Vertex), or a combination thereof. And non-limiting examples of other HCV polymerase inhibitors can be selected from ABT-072 (Abbott), ABT-333 (Abbott), ANA-598 (Anadys), BI-207127 (Boehringer Ingelheim), BILB-1941 (Boehringer Ingelheim), BMS-791325 (BMS), filibuvir, GL59728 (Glaxo), GL60667 (Glaxo), GS-9669 (Gilead), IDX-375 (Idenix), MK-3281 (Merck), tegobuvir, TMC-647055 (Tibotec), VCH-759 (Vertex & ViraChem), VCH-916 (ViraChem), VX-222 (VCH-222) (Vertex & ViraChem), VX-759 (Vertex), GS-6620 (Gilead), IDX-102 (Idenix), IDX-184 (Idenix), INX-189 (Inhibitex), MK-0608 (Merck), PSI-7977 (Pharmasset), PSI-938 (Pharmasset), RG7128 (Roche), TMC64912 (Medivir), GSK625433 (GlaxoSmithKline), BCX-4678 (BioCryst), or a combination thereof. The polymerase inhibitor may be a nucleotide polymerase inhibitor, such as GS-6620 (Gilead), IDX-102 (Idenix), IDX-184 (Idenix), INX-189 (Inhibitex), MK-0608 (Merck), PSI-7977 (Pharmasset), PSI-938 (Pharmasset), RG7128 (Roche), TMC64912 (Medivir), or a combination thereof. The polymerase inhibitor may also be a non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor, such as ABT-072 (Abbott), ABT-333 (Abbott), ANA-598 (Anadys), BI-207127 (Boehringer Ingelheim), BILB-1941 (Boehringer Ingelheim), BMS-791325 (BMS), filibuvir, GL59728 (Glaxo), GL60667 (Glaxo), GS-9669 (Gilead), IDX-375 (Idenix), MK-3281 (Merck), tegobuvir, TMC-647055 (Tibotec), VCH-759 (Vertex & ViraChem), VCH-916 (ViraChem), VX-222 (VCH-222) (Vertex & ViraChem), VX-759 (Vertex), or a combination thereof. The present invention also contemplates the inclusion of both a nucleotide polymerase inhibitor and a non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor in a solid composition of the invention. Non-limiting examples of other HCV NS5A inhibitors include ACH-2928 (Achillion), AZD2836 (Astra-Zeneca), AZD7295 (Astra-Zeneca), BMS-790052 (BMS), BMS-824393 (BMS), EDP-239 (Enanta), GS-5885 (Gilead), PPI-1301 (Presidio), PPI-461 (Presidio), GSK62336805, or a combination thereof.

A solid composition of the present invention preferably is a solid oral dosage form. Common solid oral dosage forms suitable for the present invention include, but are not limited to, capsules, dragees, granules, pills, powders and tablets, with capsules and tablets being preferred. A solid oral dosage form of the present invention can also include other excipients or inset diluents, such as sucrose, lactose or starch. Lubricants, coloring agents, releasing agents, coating agents, sweetening or flavoring agents, buffering agents, preservatives, or antioxidants can also be included in a solid oral dosage form of the present invention.

A solid composition of the present invention can be prepared by a variety of techniques such as, without limitation, melt-extrusion, spray-drying, co-precipitation, freeze drying, or other solvent evaporation techniques, with melt-extrusion and spray-drying being preferred. The melt-extrusion process typically comprises the steps of preparing a melt which includes the active ingredient(s), the hydrophilic polymer(s) and preferably the surfactant(s), and then cooling the melt until it solidifies. Melting often involves a transition into a liquid state in which it is possible for one component to get dissolved or embedded, preferably homogeneously dissolved or embedded, in the other component or components. In many cases, the polymer component(s) will melt and the other components including the active ingredient(s) and surfactant(s) will dissolve in the melt thereby forming a solution. In such a case, the polymer functions as a solvent. Melting usually involves heating above the softening point of the polymer(s). The preparation of the melt can take place in a variety of ways. The mixing of the components can take place before, during or after the formation of the melt. For example, the components can be mixed first and then melted or be simultaneously mixed and melted. The melt can also be homogenized in order to disperse the active ingredient(s) efficiently. In addition, it may be convenient first to melt the polymer(s) and then to mix in and homogenize the active ingredient(s). In one example, all materials except surfactant(s) are blended and fed into an extruder, while the surfactant(s) is molten externally and pumped in during extrusion.

In another example, the melt comprises a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove, and one or more hydrophilic polymers described above; and the melt temperature is in the range of from 100 to 170° C., preferably from 120 to 150° C., and highly preferably from 135 to 140° C. The melt can also include a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant described above.

In still another example, the melt comprises a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove, at least another anti-HCV agent described above, and one or more hydrophilic polymers described above. The melt can also include a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant described above.

To start a melt-extrusion process, the active ingredient(s) (e.g., a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove) can be employed in their solid forms, such as their respective crystalline forms. The active ingredient(s) can also be employed as a solution or dispersion in a suitable liquid solvent such as alcohols, aliphatic hydrocarbons, esters or, in some cases, liquid carbon dioxide. The solvent can be removed, e.g. evaporated, upon preparation of the melt.

Various additives can also be included in the melt, for example, flow regulators (e.g., colloidal silica), binders, lubricants, fillers, disintegrants, plasticizers, colorants, or stabilizers (e.g., antioxidants, light stabilizers, radical scavengers, and stabilizers against microbial attack).

The melting and/or mixing can take place in an apparatus customary for this purpose. Particularly suitable ones are extruders or kneaders. Suitable extruders include single screw extruders, intermeshing screw extruders or multiscrew extruders, preferably twin screw extruders, which can be corotating or counterrotating and, optionally, be equipped with kneading disks. It will be appreciated that the working temperatures will be determined by the kind of extruder or the kind of configuration within the extruder that is used. Part of the energy needed to melt, mix and dissolve the components in the extruder can be provided by heating elements. However, the friction and shearing of the material in the extruder may also provide a substantial amount of energy to the mixture and aid in the formation of a homogeneous melt of the components.

The melt can range from thin to pasty to viscous. Shaping of the extrudate can be conveniently carried out by a calender with two counter-rotating rollers with mutually matching depressions on their surface. The extrudate can be cooled and allow to solidify. The extrudate can also be cut into pieces, either before (hot-cut) or after solidification (cold-cut).

The solidified extrusion product can be further milled, ground or otherwise reduced to granules. The solidified extrudate, as well as each granule produced, comprises a solid dispersion, preferably a solid solution, of the active ingredient(s) in a matrix comprised of the hydrophilic polymer(s) and optionally the pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant(s). Where the granules do not contain any surfactant, a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant described above can be added to and blended with the granules. The extrusion product can also be blended with other active ingredient(s) and/or additive(s) before being milled or ground to granules. The granules can be further processed into suitable solid oral dosage forms.

In some cases, direct-shaping techniques such as injection moulding can be used in combination with melt extrusion to prepare suitable solid dosage forms.

In one example, copovidone and one or more surfactants are mixed and granulated, followed by the addition of aerosil and a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove. The mixture, which may contain for example at least 5% by weight of the selected HCV inhibitor is then milled. The mixture is then subject to extrusion, and the extrudate thus produced can be milled and sieved for further processing to make capsules or tablets. Surfactant(s) employed in this example can also be added through liquid dosing during extrusion.

The approach of solvent evaporation, via spray-drying, provides the advantage of allowing for processability at lower temperatures, if needed, and allows for other modifications to the process in order to further improve powder properties. The spray-dried powder can then be formulated further, if needed, and final drug product is flexible with regards to whether capsule, tablet or any other solid dosage form is desired.

Exemplary spray-drying processes and spray-drying equipment are described in K. Masters, SPRAY DRYING HANDBOOK (Halstead Press, New York, 4th ed., 1985). Non-limiting examples of spray-drying devices that are suitable for the present invention include spray dryers manufactured by Niro Inc. or GEA Process Engineering Inc., Buchi Labortechnik AG, and Spray Drying Systems, Inc. A spray-drying process generally involves breaking up a liquid mixture into small droplets and rapidly removing solvent from the droplets in a container (spray drying apparatus) where there is a strong driving force for evaporation of solvent from the droplets. Atomization techniques include, for example, two-fluid or pressure nozzles, or rotary atomizers. The strong driving force for solvent evaporation can be provided, for example, by maintaining the partial pressure of solvent in the spray drying apparatus well below the vapor pressure of the solvent at the temperatures of the drying droplets. This may be accomplished by either (1) maintaining the pressure in the spray drying apparatus at a partial vacuum; (2) mixing the liquid droplets with a warm drying gas (e.g., heated nitrogen); or (3) both.

The temperature and flow rate of the drying gas, as well as the spray dryer design, can be selected so that the droplets are dry enough by the time they reach the wall of the apparatus. This help to ensure that the dried droplets are essentially solid and can form a fine powder and do not stick to the apparatus wall. The spray-dried product can be collected by removing the material manually, pneumatically, mechanically or by other suitable means. The actual length of time to achieve the preferred level of dryness depends on the size of the droplets, the formulation, and spray dryer operation. Following the solidification, the solid powder may stay in the spray drying chamber for additional time (e.g., 5-60 seconds) to further evaporate solvent from the solid powder. The final solvent content in the solid dispersion as it exits the dryer is preferably at a sufficiently low level so as to improve the stability of the final product. For instance, the residual solvent content of the spray-dried powder can be less than 2% by weight. Highly preferably, the residual solvent content is within the limits set forth in the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Guidelines. In addition, it may be useful to subject the spray-dried composition to further drying to lower the residual solvent to even lower levels. Methods to further lower solvent levels include, but are not limited to, fluid bed drying, infra-red drying, tumble drying, vacuum drying, and combinations of these and other processes.

Like the solid extrudate described above, the spray dried product contains a solid dispersion, preferably a solid solution, of the active ingredient(s) in a matrix comprised of the hydrophilic polymer(s) and optionally the pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant(s). Where the spray dried product does not contain any surfactant, a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant described above can be added to and blended with the spray-dried product before further processing.

Before feeding into a spray dryer, the active ingredient(s) (e.g., a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove), the hydrophilic polymer(s), as well as other optional active ingredients or excipients such as the pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant(s), can be dissolved in a solvent. Suitable solvents include, but are not limited to, water, alkanols (e.g., methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol or mixtures thereof), acetone, acetone/water, alkanol/water mixtures (e.g., ethanol/water mixtures), or combinations thereof. The solution can also be preheated before being fed into the spray dryer.

The solid dispersion produced by melt-extrusion, spray-drying or other techniques can be prepared into any suitable solid oral dosage forms. In one embodiment, the solid dispersion prepared by melt-extrusion, spray-drying or other techniques (e.g., the extrudate or the spray-dried powder) can be compressed into tablets. The solid dispersion can be either directly compressed, or milled or ground to granules or powders before compression. Compression can be done in a tablet press, such as in a steel die between two moving punches. When a solid composition of the present invention comprises a selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove and another anti-HCV agent, it is possible to separately prepare solid dispersions of each individual active ingredient and then blend the optionally milled or ground solid dispersions before compacting. A selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove and other active ingredient(s) can also be prepared in the same solid dispersion, optionally milled and/or blended with other additives, and then compressed into tablets.

At least one additive selected from flow regulators, binders, lubricants, fillers, disintegrants, or plasticizers may be used in compressing the solid dispersion. These additives can be mixed with ground or milled solid dispersion before compacting. Disintegrants promote a rapid disintegration of the compact in the stomach and keeps the liberated granules separate from one another. Non-limiting examples of suitable disintegrants are cross-linked polymers such as cross-linked polyvinyl pyrrolidone, cross-linked sodium carboxymethylcellulose or sodium croscarmellose. Non-limiting examples of suitable fillers (also referred to as bulking agents) are lactose monohydrate, calcium hydrogenphosphate, microcrystalline cellulose (e.g., Avicell), silicates, in particular silicium dioxide, magnesium oxide, talc, potato or corn starch, isomalt, or polyvinyl alcohol. Non-limiting examples of suitable flow regulators include highly dispersed silica (e.g., colloidal silica such as Aerosil), and animal or vegetable fats or waxes. Non-limiting examples of suitable lubricants include polyethylene glycol (e.g., having a molecular weight of from 1000 to 6000), magnesium and calcium stearates, sodium stearyl fumarate, and the like.

Various other additives may also be used in preparing a solid composition of the present invention, for example dyes such as azo dyes, organic or inorganic pigments such as aluminium oxide or titanium dioxide, or dyes of natural origin; stabilizers such as antioxidants, light stabilizers, radical scavengers, stabilizers against microbial attack.

Solid compositions according to certain embodiments of the present invention may contain several layers, for example laminated or multilayer tablets. They can be in open or closed form. “Closed dosage forms” are those in which one layer is completely surrounded by at least one other layer.

In order to facilitate the intake of a solid dosage form, it is advantageous to give the dosage form an appropriate shape. Large tablets that can be swallowed comfortably are therefore preferably elongated rather than round in shape.

A film coat on the tablet further contributes to the ease with which it can be swallowed. A film coat also improves taste and provides an elegant appearance. The film-coat usually includes a polymeric film-forming material such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, hydroxypropylcellulose, and acrylate or methacrylate copolymers. Besides a film-forming polymer, the film-coat may further comprise a plasticizer, e.g. polyethylene glycol, a surfactant, e.g. polysorbates, and optionally a pigment, e.g. titanium dioxide or iron oxides. The film-coating may also comprise talc as anti-adhesive. Preferably, the film coat accounts for less than 5% by weight of a pharmaceutical composition of the present invention.

In another aspect, the present invention feature methods of using solid compositions of the present invention to treat HIV infection. The methods comprise administering a solid composition of the present invention to a patient in need thereof. A solid composition of the present invention can be administered either alone, or in combination with one or more other anti-HCV agents, such as those described hereinabove. The specific inhibitory dose for any particular patient will depend upon a variety of factors including the severity of the HCV infection; the activity of the active ingredient(s) in the particular patient; the specific solid composition employed; the age, body weight, general health, sex and diet of the patient; the time of administration and rate of excretion; the duration of the treatment; drugs used in combination or coincidental with the selected HCV inhibitor described hereinabove; and like factors well known in the medical arts.

In one embodiment, a method of the present invention comprises administering to a patient in need thereof a solid composition of the present invention and at least another anti-HCV agent, wherein said another anti-HCV agent is selected from HCV polymerase inhibitors (e.g., nucleoside or non-nucleoside HCV polymerase inhibitors), HCV protease inhibitors, HCV helicase inhibitors, CD81 inhibitors, cyclophilin inhibitors, internal ribosome entry site inhibitors, or HCV NS5A inhibitors. Preferably, said another anti-HCV agent is an HCV polymerase inhibitor (e.g., nucleoside or non-nucleoside HCV polymerase inhibitor) or an HCV protease inhibitor. Also preferably, said another anti-HCV agent is interferon or ribavirin, or preferably a combination thereof. The interferon preferably is α-interferon, and more preferably, pegylated interferon-α such as PEGASYS (peginterferon alfa-2a). The administration of a solid composition of the present invention and another anti-HCV agent(s) can be concurrent or sequential.

The present invention also features use of a solid composition of the present invention for the manufacture of medicaments for the treatment of HCV infection.

In one embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is telaprevir (VX-950).

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is BI-201335.

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is TMC-435 (TMC-435350).

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is vaniprevir (MK-7009).

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is MK-5172.

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is asunaprevir (BMS-650032).

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is daclatasvir (BMS-790052).

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is danoprevir. Preferably, danoprevir is used together with ritonavir to improve the pharmacokinetics of danoprevir. More preferably, danoprevir is co-formulated with ritonavir in a solid composition of the invention. For instance, danoprevir and ritonavir in a solid composition of the invention can be formulated in the same solid dispersion or different solid dispersions.

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is setrobuvir (ANA-598).

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is tegobuvir (GS-333126 or GS-9190).

Preferably, a solid composition of this embodiment further comprises GS-9256, GS-9451 or GS-5885. Also preferably, a solid composition of this embodiment further comprises GS-9451 and GS-5885.

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is GS-9451. Preferably, a solid composition of this embodiment further comprises tegobuvir or GS-5885. Also preferably, a solid composition of this embodiment further comprises tegobuvir and GS-5885.

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is mericitabine (R-4048).

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is IDX-184.

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is filibuvir (PF-00868554).

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is PSI-7977. Preferably, a solid composition of this embodiment further comprises GS-5885 or daclatasvir.

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is PSI-352938.

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is BIT-225.

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is boceprevir.

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is GS-5885. Preferably, a solid composition of this embodiment further comprises PSI-7977, GS-9451 or tegobuvir. Also preferably, a solid composition of this embodiment further comprises GS-9451 and tegobuvir. In one example, a solid oral dosage form of the invention comprises an amorphous solid dispersion, wherein said solid dispersion comprises GS-5885, copovidone and optionally a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant. In another example, a solid oral dosage form of the invention comprises an amorphous solid dispersion, wherein said solid dispersion comprises GS-5885, copovidone and optionally a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant, and wherein said solid oral dosage form further comprises

In another embodiment, the selected HCV inhibitor used in any aspect, embodiment, example or feature described hereinabove is GS-9256. Preferably, a solid composition of this embodiment further comprises tegobuvir.

Other formulation approaches, such as liquid-based formulations, simple solutions, nanoparticles, crystalline solids, salts or co-crystals, and conventional immediate release formulations, can also be employed to formulate the selected HCV inhibitors, either alone or in combination with other anti-HCV agents.

The foregoing description of the present invention provides illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise one disclosed. Modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of the invention. Thus, it is noted that the scope of the invention is defined by the claims and their equivalents.

Claims

1. A solid oral dosage form comprising a solid solution which includes:

copovidone, and
optionally a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
5830867 November 3, 1998 Bhatnagar et al.
5935982 August 10, 1999 Dykstra et al.
6042847 March 28, 2000 Kerc et al.
6235493 May 22, 2001 Bissell et al.
6369091 April 9, 2002 Sircar et al.
6388093 May 14, 2002 Chamberlain et al.
6599528 July 29, 2003 Rosenberg et al.
6703403 March 9, 2004 Norbeck et al.
6846802 January 25, 2005 Chen et al.
6881741 April 19, 2005 Chan Chun Kong et al.
6919366 July 19, 2005 Sircar et al.
6923988 August 2, 2005 Patel et al.
7065453 June 20, 2006 Diller et al.
7141574 November 28, 2006 Beaulieu et al.
7183270 February 27, 2007 Cherney et al.
7488832 February 10, 2009 Cole et al.
7659270 February 9, 2010 Bachand et al.
7704992 April 27, 2010 Bachand et al.
7728027 June 1, 2010 Pack et al.
7732457 June 8, 2010 Malamas et al.
7741347 June 22, 2010 Bachand et al.
7745636 June 29, 2010 Bachand et al.
7759495 July 20, 2010 Bachand et al.
7763731 July 27, 2010 Rockway et al.
7906655 March 15, 2011 Belema et al.
8025899 September 27, 2011 Berndl et al.
8088368 January 3, 2012 Guo et al.
8101643 January 24, 2012 Qiu et al.
20020183319 December 5, 2002 Liang et al.
20030004203 January 2, 2003 Sircar et al.
20030100582 May 29, 2003 Sircar et al.
20030195228 October 16, 2003 Chen et al.
20040013697 January 22, 2004 Berndl et al.
20040229776 November 18, 2004 Chen et al.
20050075343 April 7, 2005 Sircar et al.
20050084529 April 21, 2005 Rosenberg et al.
20050197375 September 8, 2005 Sircar et al.
20060003942 January 5, 2006 Tung et al.
20060052602 March 9, 2006 Kim et al.
20060058317 March 16, 2006 Gravestock et al.
20060105997 May 18, 2006 Arrington et al.
20070004741 January 4, 2007 Apodaca et al.
20070142434 June 21, 2007 Sandanayaka et al.
20070197558 August 23, 2007 Betebenner et al.
20070218138 September 20, 2007 Bittorf et al.
20070232627 October 4, 2007 Betebenner et al.
20070232645 October 4, 2007 Rockway et al.
20070299068 December 27, 2007 Karp et al.
20080044379 February 21, 2008 Bachand et al.
20080044380 February 21, 2008 Bachand et al.
20080050336 February 28, 2008 Bachand et al.
20080075696 March 27, 2008 Parsons et al.
20080221107 September 11, 2008 Giordanetto et al.
20080299075 December 4, 2008 Bachand et al.
20080311075 December 18, 2008 Bachand et al.
20090004111 January 1, 2009 Rice et al.
20090041716 February 12, 2009 Kim et al.
20090043107 February 12, 2009 Pack et al.
20090068140 March 12, 2009 Bachand et al.
20090093456 April 9, 2009 Arnold et al.
20090104151 April 23, 2009 Hanson et al.
20090181902 July 16, 2009 Desai et al.
20090202478 August 13, 2009 Bachand et al.
20090202483 August 13, 2009 Bachand et al.
20090269305 October 29, 2009 Seiwert et al.
20100021540 January 28, 2010 Gopinathan et al.
20100029666 February 4, 2010 Harper et al.
20100055071 March 4, 2010 Leivers et al.
20100068176 March 18, 2010 Belema et al.
20100080772 April 1, 2010 Belema et al.
20100143499 June 10, 2010 Condon
20100144608 June 10, 2010 Yigin et al.
20100158862 June 24, 2010 Kim et al.
20100160355 June 24, 2010 Degoey et al.
20100168138 July 1, 2010 Degoey et al.
20100168384 July 1, 2010 McDaniel et al.
20100215616 August 26, 2010 Romine et al.
20100215618 August 26, 2010 Carter et al.
20100221214 September 2, 2010 Or et al.
20100221215 September 2, 2010 Qiu et al.
20100221216 September 2, 2010 Or et al.
20100226882 September 9, 2010 Or et al.
20100226883 September 9, 2010 Qiu et al.
20100233120 September 16, 2010 Bachand et al.
20100233122 September 16, 2010 Qiu et al.
20100249190 September 30, 2010 Lopez et al.
20100260708 October 14, 2010 Belema et al.
20100260715 October 14, 2010 Or et al.
20100266543 October 21, 2010 Qiu et al.
20100267634 October 21, 2010 Donner et al.
20100303755 December 2, 2010 Lopez et al.
20100310512 December 9, 2010 Guo et al.
20100316607 December 16, 2010 Or et al.
20100317568 December 16, 2010 Degoey et al.
20110008288 January 13, 2011 Or et al.
20110064695 March 17, 2011 Qiu et al.
20110064696 March 17, 2011 Or et al.
20110064697 March 17, 2011 Qiu et al.
20110064698 March 17, 2011 Or et al.
20110070196 March 24, 2011 Qiu et al.
20110070197 March 24, 2011 Or et al.
20110077280 March 31, 2011 Bender et al.
20110092415 April 21, 2011 Degoey et al.
20110112100 May 12, 2011 Milbank et al.
20110136799 June 9, 2011 Chern et al.
20110142798 June 16, 2011 Qiu et al.
20110150827 June 23, 2011 Dousson et al.
20110152246 June 23, 2011 Buckman et al.
20110189129 August 4, 2011 Qiu et al.
20110195044 August 11, 2011 Romine
20110207660 August 25, 2011 Sheth et al.
20110207699 August 25, 2011 Degoey et al.
20110217261 September 8, 2011 Or et al.
20110218175 September 8, 2011 Or et al.
20110223134 September 15, 2011 Nair et al.
20110237579 September 29, 2011 Li et al.
20110237636 September 29, 2011 Belema et al.
20110250176 October 13, 2011 Lemm et al.
20110274648 November 10, 2011 Lavoie et al.
20110281910 November 17, 2011 Lavoie et al.
20110286961 November 24, 2011 Belema et al.
20110294819 December 1, 2011 Lopez et al.
20110300104 December 8, 2011 Qiu et al.
20110306541 December 15, 2011 Delaney, IV et al.
20110312973 December 22, 2011 Liepold et al.
20120004196 January 5, 2012 Degoey et al.
20120028978 February 2, 2012 Zhong et al.
20120039848 February 16, 2012 Qiu et al.
20120040977 February 16, 2012 Li et al.
20120076756 March 29, 2012 Qiu et al.
20120114600 May 10, 2012 McKinnell et al.
20120122864 May 17, 2012 Zhong et al.
20120172290 July 5, 2012 Krueger et al.
20120258909 October 11, 2012 Liepold et al.
20120264780 October 18, 2012 Kullmann et al.
20140212487 July 31, 2014 Mogalian et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
PI0401908 January 2006 BR
75755 June 1894 DE
1880715 January 2008 EP
2242751 October 2010 EP
2003282270 October 2003 JP
2007320925 December 2007 JP
2010126571 June 2010 JP
2286343 October 2006 RU
WO-9427627 December 1994 WO
WO-9961020 December 1999 WO
WO-0000179 January 2000 WO
WO-0012521 March 2000 WO
WO-0214314 February 2002 WO
WO-03082186 October 2003 WO
WO-2004005283 January 2004 WO
WO-2004014313 February 2004 WO
WO-2004014852 February 2004 WO
WO-2004014852 April 2004 WO
WO-2004014313 December 2005 WO
WO-2005123076 December 2005 WO
WO-2006020951 February 2006 WO
WO-2006033703 March 2006 WO
WO-2006093867 September 2006 WO
WO-2006133326 December 2006 WO
WO-2007070556 June 2007 WO
WO-2007070600 June 2007 WO
WO-2007076034 July 2007 WO
WO-2007076035 July 2007 WO
WO-2007081517 July 2007 WO
WO-2007082554 July 2007 WO
WO-2007070556 August 2007 WO
WO-2007081517 September 2007 WO
WO-2007070600 November 2007 WO
WO-2007131366 November 2007 WO
WO-2007144174 December 2007 WO
WO-2008014236 January 2008 WO
WO-2008014238 January 2008 WO
WO-2008021927 February 2008 WO
WO-2008021928 February 2008 WO
WO-2008021936 February 2008 WO
WO-2008021928 March 2008 WO
WO-2008021936 April 2008 WO
WO-2008021927 May 2008 WO
WO-2008064218 May 2008 WO
WO-2008070447 June 2008 WO
WO-2008074450 June 2008 WO
WO-2008064218 October 2008 WO
WO-2008128121 October 2008 WO
WO-2008133753 November 2008 WO
WO-2008144380 November 2008 WO
WO-2009003009 December 2008 WO
WO-2009020534 February 2009 WO
WO-2009020825 February 2009 WO
WO-2009020828 February 2009 WO
WO-2008070447 March 2009 WO
WO-2009050289 April 2009 WO
WO-2009093082 July 2009 WO
WO-2009094224 July 2009 WO
WO-2009102318 August 2009 WO
WO-2009102325 August 2009 WO
WO-2009102568 August 2009 WO
WO-2009102633 August 2009 WO
WO-2009102694 August 2009 WO
WO-2009136290 November 2009 WO
WO-2009143361 November 2009 WO
WO-2009155709 December 2009 WO
WO-2010015090 February 2010 WO
WO-2010017035 February 2010 WO
WO-2010017401 February 2010 WO
WO 2010017432 February 2010 WO
WO-2010030359 March 2010 WO
WO-2010039793 April 2010 WO
WO-2010059858 May 2010 WO
WO-2010062821 June 2010 WO
WO-2010065668 June 2010 WO
WO-2010065674 June 2010 WO
WO-2010065681 June 2010 WO
WO-2010075376 July 2010 WO
WO-2010091413 August 2010 WO
WO-2010096302 August 2010 WO
WO-2010096462 August 2010 WO
WO-2010096777 August 2010 WO
WO 2010097229 September 2010 WO
WO-2010099527 September 2010 WO
WO-2010111483 September 2010 WO
WO-2010111534 September 2010 WO
WO-2010111673 September 2010 WO
WO-2010115767 October 2010 WO
WO-2010117635 October 2010 WO
WO-2010117704 October 2010 WO
WO-2010117977 October 2010 WO
WO-2010120621 October 2010 WO
WO-2010120935 October 2010 WO
WO-2010122162 October 2010 WO
WO 2010017432 November 2010 WO
WO-2010132538 November 2010 WO
WO-2010132601 November 2010 WO
WO-2010138368 December 2010 WO
WO-2010138488 December 2010 WO
WO-2010138790 December 2010 WO
WO-2010138791 December 2010 WO
WO-2010144646 December 2010 WO
WO-2010148006 December 2010 WO
WO-2011004276 January 2011 WO
WO-2011009084 January 2011 WO
WO-2011015658 February 2011 WO
WO-2011026920 March 2011 WO
WO-2011028596 March 2011 WO
WO-2011031904 March 2011 WO
WO-2011031934 March 2011 WO
WO-2011050146 April 2011 WO
WO-2011054834 May 2011 WO
WO-2011059850 May 2011 WO
WO-2011059887 May 2011 WO
WO-2011060000 May 2011 WO
WO-2011066241 June 2011 WO
WO-2011068941 June 2011 WO
WO-2011075439 June 2011 WO
WO-2011075607 June 2011 WO
WO-2011075615 June 2011 WO
WO-2011079327 June 2011 WO
WO-2011081918 July 2011 WO
WO-2011082077 July 2011 WO
WO-2011087740 July 2011 WO
WO-2011091417 July 2011 WO
WO-2011091446 July 2011 WO
WO-2011091532 August 2011 WO
WO-2011112429 September 2011 WO
WO-2011119853 September 2011 WO
WO-2011119858 September 2011 WO
WO-2011119860 September 2011 WO
WO-2011119870 September 2011 WO
WO-2011127350 October 2011 WO
WO-2011146401 November 2011 WO
WO-2011150243 December 2011 WO
WO-2011156543 December 2011 WO
WO-2011156578 December 2011 WO
WO-2012039717 March 2012 WO
WO-2012040389 March 2012 WO
WO-2012040923 April 2012 WO
WO-2012040924 April 2012 WO
WO-2012041014 April 2012 WO
WO-2012041227 April 2012 WO
WO-2012050848 April 2012 WO
WO-2012050850 April 2012 WO
WO-2012068234 May 2012 WO
WO-2012074437 June 2012 WO
WO-2012087976 June 2012 WO
Other references
  • Liu, R. Water-Insoluble Drug Formulation, Second Edition; CRC Press, 2008, pp. 499-503; 8 pages.
  • Abagyan R., et al., “ICM—A New Method for Protein Modeling and Design: Applications to Docking and Structure Prediction from the Distorted Native Conformation,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, 1994, vol. 15 (5), pp. 488-506.
  • Adjabeng G., et al., “Novel Class of Tertiary Phosphine Ligands Based on a Phospha-adamantane Framework and use in the Suzuki cross-Coupling Reactions of Aryl Halides Under Mild Conditions,” Organic Letters, 2003, vol. 5 (6), pp. 953-955.
  • Adjabeng G., et al., “Palladium Complexes of 1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-2,4,8-trioxa-6-phenyl-6-phosphaadamantane: Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Use in the Suzuki and Sonogashira Reactions and the a-Arylation of Ketones,” The Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2004, vol. 69 (15), pp. 5082-5086.
  • Aldous D.J., et al. , “A Simple Enantioselective Preparation of (2S,5S)-2,5-diphenylpyrrolidine and Related Diaryl Amines,” Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 2000, vol. 11, pp. 2455-2462.
  • Alesso E.N., et al., “Synthesis of Diastereoisomeric 1,2,3-Triphenylindans,” Australian Journal of Chemistry, 1997, vol. 50, pp. 149-152.
  • Altschuel S.F., et al., “Basic Local Alignment Search Tool,” Journal of Molecular Biology, 1990, 215, 403-410.
  • Altschul S.F., et al., “Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A New Generation of Protein Database Search Programs,” Nucleic Acids Research, 1997, 25 (17), 3389-3402.
  • Angiolini M., et al., “Synthesis of Azabicycloalkane Amino Acid Scaffolds as Reverse-Turn Inducer Dipeptide Mimics ,” European Journal Organic Chemistry, 2000, pp. 2571-2581.
  • Baker D., et al., “Protein Structure Prediction and Structural Genomics,” Science, 2001, vol. 294, pp. 93-96.
  • Bartenschlager R., “Hepatitis C Virus Molecular Clones: From cDNA to Infectious Virus Particles in Cell Culture,” Current Opinion in Microbiology, 2006, vol. 9 (4), pp. 416-422.
  • Bartenschlager R., “Hepatitis C Virus Replicons: Potential Role for Drug Development,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2002, vol. 1 (11), pp. 911-916.
  • Boehm T., et al., “Uber Die Bildung Von Gamma-Piperidonderivaten Aus Azetessigester, Aromatischen Aldehyden und Aminen, Eine Modifikation Der Hantzschschen Pyridinsynthese,” Pharmaceutical,1943, vol. 281, pp. 62-77.
  • Bohm H.J., “The Computer Program LUDI: A New Method for the De Novo Design of Enzyme Inhibitors,” Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 1992, vol. 6, pp. 61-78.
  • Breitenbach J., et al., “Confocal Raman-Spectroscopy: Analytical Approach to Solid Dispersions and Mapping of Drugs,” Pharmaceutical Research 1999, vol. 16 (7), pp. 1109-1113.
  • Brettle R., et al., “A Highly Efficient Enzymic Route to Novel Chiral Liquid Crystals based on 3-Aryl-2-cycloalken-1-ones,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, 1994, pp. 2305-2306.
  • Brunger A.T., et al., “Recent Developments for the Efficient Crystallographic Refinement of Macromolecular Structures,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 1998, vol. 8, pp. 606-611.
  • Bundgaard H., “Design of Prodrugs”, Elsevier Science Publishers, 1985, pp. 7-9 & 1-6 & 21-24.
  • Bundgaard H., ed., in: Design of Prodrugs, Elsevier Science, 1985, Table of Contents.
  • Charifson P.S., et al., “Novel Dual-Targeting Benzimidazole Urea Inhibitors of DNA Gyrase and Topoisomerase IV Possessing Potent Antibacterial Activity: Intelligent Design and Evolution through the Judicious Use of Structure-Guided Design and Stucture-Activity Relationships,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2008, vol. 51, pp. 5243-5263.
  • Chiou W.L., et al., “Pharmaceutical Applications of Solid Dispersion Systems,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1971, vol. 60 (9), pp. 1281-1302.
  • Chong J.M., et al. , “Asymmetric Synthesis of trans.2,5-Diphenylpyrrolidine: A C2-Symmetric Chirai Amine,” Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 1995, vol. 6 (2), pp. 409-418.
  • Clark W.M., et al., “A Highly Enantioselective Conjugate Reduction of 3-Arylinden-1-ones Using Bakers' Yeast for the Preparation of (S)-3-Arylindan-1-ones,” Organic Letters, 1999, vol. 1 (11), pp. 1839-1842.
  • Clarke P.A., et al., “Pot, Atom and Step Economic (PASE) Synthesis of Highly Functionalized Piperidines: A Five-Component Condensation,” Tetrahedron Letters , 2007, vol. 48 , pp. 5209-5212.
  • Clarke P.A., et al., “Pot, Atom and Step Economic (PASE) Synthesis of Highly Substituted Piperidines:A Five-Component Condensation,” Synthesis, 2008, No. 28, pp. 3530-3532.
  • Collado I., et al , “Stereoselective Addition of Grignard-Derived Organocopper Reagents to N-Acyliminium Ions: Synthesis of Enantiopure 5- and 4,5-Substituted Prolinates ,” Journal of Organic Chemistry , 1995, vol. 60, pp. 5011-5015.
  • Conte I., et al., “Synthesis and SAR of Piperazinyl-N-Phenylbenzamides as Inhibitors of Hepatitis C Virus RNA Replication in Cell Culture,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2009, vol. 19, pp. 1779-1783.
  • Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/404,429, filed Feb. 24, 2012.
  • Cornell, W.D., et al., “A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1995, vol. 117, pp. 5179-5197.
  • De Francesco R., et al., “Challenges and Successes in Developing New Therapies for Hepatitis C,” Nature, 2005, vol. 436, pp. 953-960.
  • Dell'Erba C., et al., “Synthetic Exploitation of the Ring-Opening of 3,4-Dinitrothiophene, IX Pyrrolidines, Pyrrolines and Pyrroles from 1,4-Diaryl-2,3-Dinitro-1,3-Butadienes Via a 5-endo-Trig Cyclization,” European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2000, pp. 903-912.
  • Effenberger F., et al., “Synthesis, Structure, and Spectral Behavior of Donor-Acceptor Substituted Biphenyls,” The Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1983, vol. 48, pp. 4649-4658.
  • Eldridge M.D., et al., “Empirical Scoring Functions: I. The Development of a Fast Empirical Scoring Function to Estimate the Binding Affinity of Ligands in Receptor Complexes,” Journal of Computer Aided Molecular Design, 1997, vol. 11, pp. 425-445.
  • Eswar N., et al., “Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using Modeller,” Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 2006, Suppl. 15, 5.6.1-5.6.30.
  • European Search Report for Application No. EP12155991, mailed on Mar. 29, 2012, 2 pages.
  • Excipients & Activities for Pharma, ExAct, No. 20, May 2008.
  • Fan X., et al., “An Efficient and Practical Synthesis of the HIV Protease Inhibitor Atazanavir via a Highly Diastereoselective Reduction Approach,” Organic Process Research and Development, 2008, vol. 12 (1), pp. 69-75.
  • Feig M., et al., “Performance Comparison of Generalized Born and Poisson Methods in the Calculation of Electrostatic Solvation Energies for Protein Structures,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, 2004, vol. 25 (2), pp. 265-284.
  • Fiedler., “Encyclopedia of Excipients for Pharmaceuticals, Cosmetics and Related Areas,” 5th Edition, Hoepfner E.M., et al., eds., Editio Cantor Verlag Aulendorf, 2002, Table of Contents.
  • Fiser A., et al., “Modeling of Loops in Protein Structures,” Protein Science, 2000, vol. 9 (9), pp. 1753-1773.
  • Forster A., et al., “Selection of Excipients for Melt Extrusion with Two Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs by Solubility Parameter Calculation and Thermal Analysis,” 2001, vol. 226, pp. 147-161.
  • Galun E., et al., “Hepatitis C Virus Viremia in SCID-BNX Mouse Chimera,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1995, vol. 172 (1), pp. 25-30.
  • Gastreich M., et al., “Ultrafast De Novo Docking Combining Pharmacophores and Combinatorics,” Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2006, vol. 20, pp. 717-734.
  • Gillet V., et al., “SPROUT: A Program for Structure Generation,” Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 1993, vol. 7, pp. 127-153.
  • Gohlke H., et al., “Approaches to the Description and Prediction of the Binding Affinity of Small-Molecule Ligands to Macromolecular Receptors,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2002, vol. 41 (15), pp. 2644-2676.
  • Goodford P.J., “A Computational Procedure for Determining Energetically Favorable Binding Sites on Biologically Important Macromolecules,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1985, vol. 28, pp. 849-857.
  • Goodsell D.S., et al., “Automated Docking of Substrates to Proteins by Simulated Annealing,” Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetic, 1990, vol. 8, pp. 195-202.
  • Gordon T.D., et al , “Synthetic Approaches to the Azole Peptide Mimetics,” Tetrahedron Letters, 1993, vol. 34 (12), pp. 1901-1904.
  • Greene T.W., et al., in: Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 3rd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1999, Preface, Table of Contents, Abbreviations.
  • Greene T.W., et al., “Protection for the Amino Group,” Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 1999, Third Edition, pp. 494-653.
  • Halperin I., et al., “Principles of Docking: An Overview of Search Algorithms and a Guide to Scoring Functions,” Proteins: Structure, Function, and Generic, 2002, vol. 47, pp. 409-443.
  • Hartwig J.F., et al., “III.3.2 Palladium-Catalyzed Amination of Aryl Halides and Related Reactions,” Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis, 2002, pp. 1051-1096.
  • Hoover J.E., Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 15th Edition, 1975, Mack Publishing Co., Table of Contents.
  • Hubbard S.R., et al., “Src Autoinhibition: Let us Count the Ways,” Nature Structural Biology, 1999, vol. 6 (8), pp. 711-714.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/069188, mailed on Jun. 29, 2011, 10 pages.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for the Application No. PCT/US2010/031102, mailed on Oct. 18, 2011, 7 pages.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2009/069177, mailed on Jun. 29, 2011, 1 page.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/038077, mailed on Jan. 21, 2011, 16 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/069177, mailed on Aug. 10, 2010, 17 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2009/069188, mailed on Jun. 8, 2010, 4 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/039769, mailed on Oct. 6, 2011, 4 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/056045, mailed on Apr. 2, 2012, 4 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/065206, mailed on May 22, 2012, 3 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/065215, mailed on Jun. 12, 2012, 3 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/065224, mailed on Jun. 12, 2012, 3 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/065239, mailed on Jul. 30, 2012, 3 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/065242, mailed on May 22, 2012, 3 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/065247, mailed on Jun. 12, 2012, 3 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/065486, mailed on Mar. 26, 2012, 3 pages.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2012/070349, mailed on May 14, 2013, 8 pages.
  • International Search Report for the Application No. PCT/US2010/031102, mailed on Sep. 1, 2010, 4 pages.
  • Jacques et al., “Enantiomers, Racemates, and Resolutions,” J. Wiley & Sons, Chapter 3, pp. 197-213, 1981.
  • Jeffrey J.L., et al., “Concise Synthesis of Pauciflorol F Using a Larock Annulation,” Organic Letters, 2009, vol. 11 (23), pp. 5450-5453.
  • Jing Q., et al., “Bulky Achiral Triarylphosphines Mimic BINAP in Ru(II)—Catalyzed Asymmetric Hydrogenation of Ketones,” Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis, 2005, vol. 347, pp. 1193-1197.
  • Jones G., et al., “Development and Validation of a Genetic Algorithm for Flexible Docking,” Journal of Molecular Biology, 1997, vol. 267 (3), pp. 727-748.
  • Jones G., et al., “Docking Small-Molecule Ligands into Active Sites,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 1995, vol. 6 (6), pp. 652-656.
  • Jones G., et al., “Molecular Recognition of Receptor Sites using a Genetic Algorithm with a Description of Desolvation,” Journal of Molecular Biology, 1995, vol. 245 (1), pp. 43-53.
  • Khan A.T., et al., “Effects of Substituents in the B-Position of 1,3-Dicarbonyl Compounds in Bromodimethylsulfonium Bromide-Catalyzed Multicomponent Reactions: A Facile Access to Functionalized Piperidines,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2008, vol. 73 , pp. 8398-8402.
  • Kolykhalov A.A., et al., “Transmission of Hepatitis C by Intrahepatic Inoculation with Transcribed RNA,” Science, 1997, vol. 277 (5325), pp. 570-574.
  • Kuethe J.T., et al., “Asymmetric Synthesis of 1,2,3-Trisubstituted Cyclopentanes and Cyclohexanes as Key Components of Substance P Antagonists,” The Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2002, vol. 67 (17), pp. 5993-6000.
  • Kuntz I.D., et al., “A Geometric Approach to Macromolecule-Ligand Interactions,” Journal of Molecular Biology, 1982, vol. 161 (2), pp. 269-288.
  • Lattman, E., “Use of the Rotation and Translation Functions,” Meth. In Enzymol., 1985, 115, 55-77.
  • Li, Chuan-Ying., et al., “Olefination of Ketenes for the Enantioselective Synthesis of Allenes via an Ylide Route,” Tetrahedron, 2007, vol. 63, pp. 8046-8053.
  • Lieberman L., et al., eds., Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, vol. 1, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1980, Table of Contents.
  • Louie J., et al., “Palladium-Catalyzed Amination of Aryl Triflates and Importance of Triflate Addition Rate,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1997, vol. 62 (5), pp. 1268-1273.
  • L-selectride, Retrieved from the Intenet:<URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php″oldid=488453454>.
  • Lucas S., et al.,“In Vivo Active Aldosterone Synthase Inhibitors with Improved Aelectivity: Lead Optimization Providing a Series of Pyridine Substituted 3,4-Dihydro-1H-Quinolin-2-one Derivatives,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2008, vol. 51 (24), pp. 8077-8087.
  • Marti-Renom M.A., et al., “Comparative Protein Structure Modeling of Genes and Genomes,” Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure, 2000, vol. 29, pp. 291-325.
  • Masters K., “Spray Drying Handbook” 4th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1985, Table of Contents.
  • Masui M., et al., “A Practical Method for Asymmetric Borane Reduction of Prochiral Ketones Using Chiral Amino Alcohols and Trimethyl Borate,” Synlett, 1997, pp. 273-274.
  • Matzeit A., et al., “Radical Tandem Cyclizations by Anodic Decarboxylation of Carboxylic Acids,” Synthesis, 1995, pp. 1432-1444.
  • Mercer D.F., et al., “Hepatitis C Virus Replication in Mice with Chimeric Human Livers,” Nature Medicine, 2001, vol. 7 (8), pp. 927-933.
  • Miranker A., et al., “Functionality Maps of Binding Sites: A Multiple Copy Simultaneous Search Method,” Proteins, 1991, vol. 11 (1), pp. 29-34.
  • Misra M., et al., “Organocatalyzed Highly Atom Economic One Pot Synthesis of Tetrahydropyridines as Antimalarials,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 2009, vol. 17 , pp. 625-633.
  • Moinet C., et al., “Novel Non-Peptide Ligands for the Somatostatin sst3 Receptor,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2001, vol. 11 (8), pp. 991-995.
  • Muci A.R., et al., “Practical Palladium Catalysts for C—N and C—O Bond Formation,” Topics in Current Chemistry, 2002, vol. 219, pp. 131-209.
  • Muri E.M.F., et al., “Pseudo-Peptides Derived From Isomannide As Potential Inhibitors Of Serine Proteases,” Amino Acids, 2005, vol. 28 (4), pp. 413-419.
  • Navaza J., “AMoRe: An Automated Package for Molecular Replacement,” Acta Crystallographica, 1994, vol. A50 (2), pp. 157-163.
  • Naylor E.M., et al. , “3-Pyridylethanolamines: Potent And Selective Human B3 Adrenergic Receptor Agonists,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 1998, vol. 8 (21), pp. 3087-3092.
  • Nevar N.M., et al., “One Step Preparation of 1,4-Diketones from Methyl Ketones and a-Bromomethyl Ketones in the Presence of ZnCl2•t-BuOH•Et2NR as a Condensation Agent,” Synthesis, 2000, vol. 9, pp. 1259-1262.
  • Nishibata Y., et al., “Confirmation of Usefulness of a Structure Construction Program Based on Three-Dimensional Receptor Structure for Rational Lead Generation,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1993, vol. 36 (20), pp. 2921-2928.
  • Pak V.D., et al., “Catalytic Condensation of Schiff's Base With P-Methoxybenzal Acetone,” Catalytic Synthesis of Organic Nitrate Compounds, 1970, vol. 68 (Part 4), pp. 66-71.
  • Peng T., et al., “Construction of a Library of Rhodol Fluorophores for Developing New Fluorescent Probes,” Organic Letters, 2010, vol. 12 (3), pp. 496-499.
  • Penning T.D., et al, “Discovery and SAR of 2-(1-Propylpiperidin-4-yl)-1H-Benzimidazole-4-Carboxamide: A Potent Inhibitor of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) for the Treatment of Cancer,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 2008, vol. 16(14), pp. 6965-6975.
  • Polymer Handbook, Brandrup J., et al., Eds., Interscience Publishers, 1975, Table of Contents, III-139-III-192.
  • Rao S.N., et al., “Validation Studies of the Site-Directed Docking Program LibDock,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2007, vol. 47 (6), pp. 2159-2171.
  • Rarey M., et al., “A Fast Flexible Docking Method using an Incremental Construction Algorithm,” Journal of Molecular Biology, 1996, vol. 261 (3), pp. 470-489.
  • Rosen M.H., et al., “Contraceptive Agents from Cycloaddition Reactions of Diarylcyclopropenones and Diarylthiirene 1, 1-Dioxides,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1976, vol. 19 (3), pp. 414-419.
  • Rosenberg J., et al., “Novel Therapeutic Delivery System,” Journal of Controlled Release, 2003, vol. 87, pp. 198-308.
  • Rossmann M.G., “The Molecular Replacement Method: A Collection of Papers on the Use of Non-Crystallographic Symmetry” Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1972, Table of Contents.
  • Sali A., et al., “Comparative Protein Modelling by Satisfaction of Spatial Restraints,” Journal of Molecular Biology, 1993, vol. 234 (3), pp. 779-815.
  • Sato H., et al., “Prediction of Multiple Binding Modes of the CDK2 Inhibitors, Anilinopyrazoles, Using the Automated Docking Programs GOLD, FlexX, and LigandFit: An Evaluation of Performance,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2006, vol. 46 (6), pp. 2552-2562.
  • Sato M., et al., “Efficient Preparation of Optically Pure C2-Symmetrical Cyclic Amines for Chiral Auxiliary,” Synthesis, 2004, vol. 9, pp. 1434-1438.
  • Sawyer J.S., et al., “Synthetic and Structure/Activity Studies on Acid-Substituted 2-Arylphenols:Discovery of 2-[2-Propyl-3-[3-[2-ethyl-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-hydroxyphenoxy]-propoxy]phenoxy] benzoic Acid, a High-Affinity Leukotriene B4 Receptor Antagonist,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1995, vol. 38 (22), pp. 4411-4432.
  • Serajuddin A.T., “Solid Dispersion of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs: Early Promises, Subsequent Problems, and Recent Breakthroughs,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1999, vol. 88 (10), pp. 1058-1066.
  • Smith A.B., et al., “Indole Diterpene Synthetic Studies: Development of a Second-Generation Synthetic Strategy for (+)-Nodulisporic Acids A and B,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2007, vol. 72 (13), pp. 4611-4620.
  • Smith D.C., et al., “Reissert Compound Chemistry. XXVI. The Syntheses of Bis-Benzylisoquinolines,” Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, 1976, vol. 13, pp. 573-576.
  • Sousa S.F., et al., “Protein-Ligand Docking: Current Status and Future Challenges,” Proteins, 2006, vol. 65 (1), pp. 15-26.
  • Sperling L. H., “Introduction to Physical Polymer Science,” 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1992, Table of Contents.
  • Sugawara M., et al., “Remarkable gamma-Effect of Tin: Acid-Promoted Cyclopropanation Reactions of alpha-((alkoxycarbonyl)oxy)stannanes with Alkenes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1997, vol. 119 (49), pp. 11986-11987.
  • Takagi S., et al., “Antimicrobial Agents From Bletilla striata,” Phyrochemistry, 1983, vol. 22 (4), pp. 1011-1015.
  • Tatsumi K., et al., “Enzyme-Mediated Coupling of 3,4-Dichloroaniline and Ferulic Acid: A Model for Pollutant Binding to Humic Materials,” Environmental Science & Technology, 1994, vol. 28 , pp. 210-215.
  • Tellinghuisen T.L., et al., “Structure of the Zinc-Binding Domain of an Essential Component of the Hepatitis C Virus Replicase,” Nature, 2005, vol. 435 (7040), pp. 374-379.
  • Thayer A. M., “Finding Solutions, Custom manufacturers take on drug solubility issues to help pharmaceutical firms move products through development,” Chemical & Engineering News, 2010, vol. 88 (22), pp. 13-18.
  • Vagin A., et al., “MOLREP: An Automated Program for Molecular Replacement,” Journal of Applied Crystallography, 1997, vol. 30, pp. 1022-1025.
  • Vallee R.J., et al., “Photoannelation Reactions of 3-(Alk-1-ynyl)cyclohept-2-en-1-ones,” Helvetica Chimica Acta, 2010, vol. 93 (1), pp. 17-24.
  • Verboom W., et al., ““tert-Amino effect” in Heterocyclic Synthesis. Formation of N-Heterocycles by Ring Closure Reactions of Substituted 2-vinyl-N,N-dialkylanilines,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1984, vol. 49 (2), pp. 269-276.
  • Voigt R., “Pharmaceutical Technology” for Students and Professionals, 7th revised Edition, 2000, pp. 80-85.
  • Warren G.L., et al., “A Critical Assessment of Docking Programs and Scoring Functions,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2006, vol. 49 (20), pp. 5912-5931.
  • Web Page for Antares Health Products, www.tpgs.com. Downloaded Jan. 31, 2013.
  • Willis M.C., et al., “Palladium-Catalyzed Tandem Alkenyl and Aryl C—N Bond Formation: A Cascade N-Annulation Route to 1-Functionalized Indoles,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2005, vol. 44 (3), pp. 403-406.
  • Wolfe J.P., et al., “Palladium-Catalyzed Amination of Aryl Triflates,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, 1997, vol. 62 (5), pp. 1264-1267.
  • Wu G.Y., et al., “A Novel Immunocompetent Rat Model of HCV Infection and Hepatitis,” Gastroenterology, 2005, vol. 128 (5), pp. 1416-1423.
  • Xiao D., et al., “A Practical Synthetic Pathway to Polysubstituted Tetrahydropyridines via Multicomponent Reactions Catalyzed by BF3•OEt2,” Synlett, 2005, vol. 10, pp. 1531-1534.
  • Xie Z.C., et al., “Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus Infection to Tree Shrews,” Virology, 1998, vol. 244 (2), pp. 513-520.
  • Yanagi M., et al., “Transcripts from a Single Full-Length cDNA Clone of Hepatitis C Virus are Infectious when Directly Transfected into the Liver of a Chimpanzee,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1997, vol. 94 (16), pp. 8738-8743.
  • Yu H., et al., “The Discovery of Novel Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinases Inhibitors: Pharmacophore Modeling, Virtual Screening and Docking Studies,” Chemical Biology and Drug Design, 2007, vol. 69 (3), pp. 204-211.
  • Zhang J., et al., “Stereoselective Bromination-Suzuki Cross-Coupling of Dehydroamino Acids To Form Novel Reverse-Turn Peptidomimetics: Substituted Unsaturated and Saturated Indolizidinone Amino Acids,” Journal of the American Chemical Society , 2002, vol. 4 (23), pp. 4029-4032.
  • Zhu Q., et al., “Novel Robust Hepatitis C Virus Mouse Efficacy Model,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2006, vol. 50 (10), pp. 3260-3268.
  • International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2012/026456, mailed on Jun. 22, 2012, 3 pages.
  • Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/027511, mailed on Nov. 10, 2011, 6 pages.
  • Baird J.A., et al., “A Classification System to Assess the Crystallization Tendency of Organic Molecules from Undercooled Melts,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2010, vol. 99 (9), pp. 3787-3806.
  • Gao M., et al., “Chemical Genetics Strategy Identifies an HCV NS5A Inhibitor with a Potent Clinical Effect,” Nature, 2010, vol. 465 (7294), pp. 96-100.
  • Shamblin S.L., et al., “Characterization of the Time Scales of Molecular Motion in Pharmaceutically Important Glasses,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1999, vol. 103, pp. 4113-4121.
  • Van Eerdenbrugh B., et al., “Crystallization Tendency of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients following Rapid Solvent Evaporation-Classification and Comparison with Crystallization Tendency from Undercooled Melts,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2010, vol. 99 (9), pp. 3826-3838.
  • Buhler (Polyvinylpyrrolidone Excipients for Pharmaceuticals 2005, Spring pp. 66, 67, 85 and 100 in part). 6 pages.
  • Spray drying for Amorphous Dispersions ([online]); retrieved from: http://www.formexlic.com/pages/spray-drying-amorphous-dispersions on Feb. 13, 2014; 2 pages).
Patent History
Patent number: 8987214
Type: Grant
Filed: Oct 6, 2014
Date of Patent: Mar 24, 2015
Patent Publication Number: 20150025024
Assignee: AbbVie Inc. (North Chicago, IL)
Inventors: Yi Gao (Vernon Hills, IL), Geoff Zhang (Vernon Hills, IL)
Primary Examiner: Ernst V Arnold
Application Number: 14/507,267
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: 3 Or 4 Amino Acid Residues In The Peptide Chain (514/21.9); Benzo Fused At 4,5-positions Of The Diazole Ring (514/394)
International Classification: A61K 31/4184 (20060101); A61K 38/06 (20060101); A61K 47/32 (20060101); A61K 9/10 (20060101); A61K 38/05 (20060101); A61K 38/07 (20060101); A61K 45/06 (20060101); A61K 9/14 (20060101); A61K 9/16 (20060101); A61K 31/403 (20060101); A61K 31/4178 (20060101); A61K 31/439 (20060101); A61K 31/4709 (20060101); A61K 31/497 (20060101); A61K 31/501 (20060101); A61K 31/519 (20060101); A61K 31/549 (20060101); A61K 31/55 (20060101); A61K 31/7068 (20060101); A61K 31/708 (20060101);