Under-eye strip
An improved under-eye strip that reduces low-angle reflected light compared to the prior art through the use of a fuzzy material on the exposed surface of the strip.
Latest Mueller Sports Medicine, Inc. Patents:
This application claims priority to provisional application No. 61/087,655 filed Aug. 9, 2008, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. This application claims priority to provisional application No. 61/087,525 filed Aug. 8, 2008, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTIONThis invention relates generally to the field of sporting goods and athletic competition. More particularly, the present invention relates to an improved under-eye strip that reduces low-angle reflected light compared to the prior art.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONAthletes have applied various forms of eye black under their eyes for many years. According to the Dec. 3, 2006 New York Times, eye black was used in professional football at least as early as 1942. Athletes use eye black for various reasons, for example because they believe it reduces glare off their cheeks and will thereby improve their ability to catch or hit a ball, or because they believe it creates an intimidating appearance. No matter what the reason, it is clear that athletes from grade school up to professional levels like to wear eye black in its various forms.
The first eye black products were most likely grease paint or burnt cork. Grease paint products are still used for this purpose, including stick products for convenient application. U.S. Pat. No. 4,719,909 teaches an under eye light absorbing device in the form of adhesive patches that avoids some of the problems with grease paint, for example ease of application and removal.
What is needed is an improved glare reducing strip that reduces the light that is likely to enter the eye due to reflection from the strip when worn.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONA first embodiment of the invention is an under-eye strip having a fuzzy surface.
A second embodiment of the invention is a method of using an under-eye strip having a fuzzy surface.
A third embodiment of the invention is a method of manufacturing an under-eye strip having a fuzzy surface.
Further objects, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In the drawings:
The under-eye strip 30 can be made by rolling a suitable sheet material together with a release paper coated with one or more suitable pressure sensitive adhesives. The under-eye strip 30 of
After rolling the suitable sheet material together onto the release paper coated with adhesive, the exposed surface of the sheet material can be coated or imprinted with a suitable ink or dye. The under-eye strip 30 of
After printing onto the exposed surface of the sheet material, the sheet material can be die-cut (without cutting the release paper) into multiple strips 30 having the desired shape. Although the under-eye strip 30 is preferably cut into the kidney shape shown in
This apparatus allows the measurement of light reflected from samples mounted on the sample holder, with the light source and photoreceptor able to be positioned at various (and equal) angles relative to the surface of the sample and sample holder. For example, the apparatus allows measurement of light reflected from the sample at low angles (approximately 30 degrees) of incidence and reflection. The apparatus also allows rotation of the sample in the sample holder, so that reflectance can be measured at different rotational positions of the sample relative to the plane of the light source and photoreceptor arms.
The apparatus of
After mounting the samples to mounting boards, the light source and photoreceptor arms were positioned at approximately 60 degrees from the plane of the sample holder. The sample holder was set to a first rotational position, and a white “control” sample was inserted into the sample holder. The intensity of the light source was adjusted to obtain a standardized reading of about 6500 LUX. The sample holder was set to additional rotational orientations, and light intensity was measured at each of these rotational positions. The procedure was repeated with all three white “control” samples to verify the repeatability and consistency of the measurements.
After setting up the test apparatus using the white “control samples”, the low angle light reflected from a sample of each of the under-eye strips 20, 22, 24, and 30 was measured at two rotational positions in the sample holder, with the light source and photoreceptor arms fixed at approximately 30 degrees from the plane of the sample holder. Besides the under-eye strips 20, 22, 24, 30, and the white paper control, an additional blank under-eye strip according to the invention (the “blank strip”) was tested, where the blank strip has identical construction to strip 30 except that the entire surface of the blank strip is printed black so that it does not contain any manufacturer's logo. The averaged results are presented in Table 1 and shown in
As can be seen from Table 1 and
Generally, it is believed that incoming light penetrates the fuzzy material to a point of reflection that lies between the top of the fuzz and the bottom of the fuzz. At the point of reflection, the incoming light is partially absorbed and partially reflected as attenuated reflected light. The degree of absorption depends on the material, which can be chosen to absorb as much light as possible (e.g dull black materials instead of white or reflective materials).
The attenuated reflected light will also be scattered to a degree that depends on the material. The material can be chosen to scatter the light as much as possible (e.g. rough and irregular materials instead of smooth planar materials).
Because the point of reflection is within the fuzz in materials such as those shown in
It is believed that this “trapping” of the reflected light does not occur in the prior art strips because the surfaces of those prior art strips are relatively planar. Once the light reflects the first time off the surface of prior art strips, there is no opportunity for the reflected light to be absorbed or scattered again through subsequent reflections/absorptions as can occur with the fuzzy materials.
While the preceding discussion of the exemplary glare reducing strip 30 identifies a particular artificial suede material as a suitable sheet material, this is not required and other textured or fuzzy materials could be used. A flocked material having a dull irregular surface could also be used, for example of the types available from Fiberlok, Inc. of Fort Collins, Colo. or from Microfibres, Inc. of Pawtucket, R.I. A felt product having a dull irregular surface could also be used, for example of the types available from Aetna Felt Corporation of Allentown, Pa. or 3M Corporation of St. Paul, Minn.
While the preceding discussion of the exemplary glare reducing strip 30 refers to the particular kidney shape shown in
It is understood that the invention is not confined to the embodiments set forth herein as illustrative, but embraces all such forms thereof that come within the scope of the following claims.
Claims
1. An anti-glare under-eye strip comprising a material sheet shaped and sized for placement on a skin area located under a wearer's eye on the upper edge of said wearer's cheek;
- said material sheet having an outwardly facing surface and an inwardly facing surface with adhesive thereon to thereby attach said inwardly facing surface of said material sheet to said skin area;
- said outwardly facing exposed surface including longitudinally outwardly extending fibers extending outwardly from said exposed surface in multiple directions, said fibers are too short to be plainly visible as individual fibers to a viewer's naked eye and are only visible when viewed with a microscope
- whereby said longitudinally extending fibers on said outwardly facing surface forms a fuzzy appearance on said surface when viewed through said microscope; and wherein said fuzzy surface interferes with the glare-causing light that hits the anti-glare under-eye strip on said wearer's cheek when worn so that said wearer's vision is not interfered with by said glare causing light and reflection froim said cheek skin surface.
2. The under-eye strip of claim 1 wherein the exposed surface includes an artificial suede material.
3. An anti-glare under-eye strip comprising a material sheet shaped with a horizontal dimension and a vertical dimension of a size for placement on a skin area located under a wearer's eye on the upper edge of said wearer's cheek;
- said material sheet having an outwardly facing surface and an inwardly facing surface with adhesive thereon to thereby attach said inwardly facing surface of said material sheet to said skin area;
- said outwardly facing exposed surface including longitudinally outwardly extending fibers extending outwardly from said exposed surface in multiple directions, said fibers are too short to be plainly visible as individual fibers to a viewer's naked eye and are only visible when viewed with a microscope
- whereby said longitudinally extending fibers on said outwardly facing surface forms a fuzzy appearance on said surface when viewed through said microscope; and wherein said fuzzy surface interferes with the glare-causing light that hits the anti-glare under-eye strip on said wearer's cheek when worn so that said wearer's vision is not interfered with by said glare causing light and reflection from said cheek skin surface.
4. The under-eye strip of claim 3 wherein the exposed surface includes an artificial suede material.
5. The under-eye strip of claim 1 wherein the exposed surface includes markings that communicate information.
6. The under-eye strip of claim 5 wherein the markings comprise portions of the exposed surface imprinted with ink or dye.
7. The under-eye strip of claim 1 wherein at least half of the fibers have a random orientation.
8. The under-eye strip of claim 1 wherein at least half of the fibers are formed as loops.
9. The under-eye strip of claim 1 wherein at least half of the fibers are formed as cut loops.
10. The under-eye strip of claim 3 wherein the exposed surface includes markings that communicate information.
11. The under-eye strip of claim 10 wherein the markings comprise portions of the exposed surface imprinted with ink or dye.
12. The under-eye strip of claim 3 wherein at least half of the fibers have a random orientation.
13. The under-eye strip of claim 3 wherein at least half of the fibers are formed as loops.
14. The under-eye strip of claim 3 wherein at least half of the fibers are formed as cut loops.
2238098 | April 1941 | Bradshaw |
2842142 | July 1958 | Peck |
3024518 | March 1962 | Newton |
3823723 | July 1974 | Miller |
4203435 | May 20, 1980 | Krull et al. |
4285338 | August 25, 1981 | Lemelson |
4500571 | February 19, 1985 | Jones |
4719909 | January 19, 1988 | Micchia et al. |
4745916 | May 24, 1988 | Seber |
4964428 | October 23, 1990 | Lamatrice |
5765231 | June 16, 1998 | Leonard et al. |
5939142 | August 17, 1999 | Comiskey et al. |
6096154 | August 1, 2000 | Comiskey et al. |
6350338 | February 26, 2002 | Comiskey et al. |
6537660 | March 25, 2003 | Katayama et al. |
RE38246 | September 16, 2003 | Leonard et al. |
6632499 | October 14, 2003 | Marks et al. |
20010047847 | December 6, 2001 | Kukoff |
20040031085 | February 19, 2004 | Widdemer |
20060231188 | October 19, 2006 | Wen |
20090229742 | September 17, 2009 | Livacich et al. |
354884 | February 1990 | EP |
Type: Grant
Filed: Aug 7, 2009
Date of Patent: Jul 28, 2015
Assignee: Mueller Sports Medicine, Inc. (Prairie du Sac, WI)
Inventor: Brett Mueller (Middleton, WI)
Primary Examiner: Gloria Hale
Application Number: 12/537,864
International Classification: A61F 9/04 (20060101); A41D 13/11 (20060101);