Surface modified unit cell lattice structures for optimized secure freeform fabrication

Aspects of the present disclosure relate generally to preparing models of three-dimensional structures. In particular, a model of a three-dimensional structure constructed of porous geometries is prepared. A component file including a porous CAD volume having a predefined portion of a boundary. A space including the porous CAD volume is populated with unit cells overlapping the predefined portion of the boundary. The unit cells are populated with porous geometries having a plurality of struts having nodes on each end. At least a first strut overlaps the predefined portion of the boundary and has a length, a first node outside the porous CAD volume, and a second node inside the porous CAD volume. All struts entirely outside the porous CAD volume are removed. After removal of the struts entirely outside the porous CAD volume, each of the remaining struts is connected to a node at each end thereof.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to preparing computer-generated models of porous structures. In particular, the surfaces of computer-generated models of structures may be modified through movement and removal of struts and nodes of porous geometries near the surface to produce surfaces conforming to the surfaces of intended physical structures being modelled.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The field of free-form fabrication has seen many important recent advances in the fabrication of articles directly from computer controlled databases. These advances, many of which are in the field of rapid prototyping of articles such as prototype parts and mold dies, have greatly reduced the time and expense required to fabricate articles, particularly in contrast to conventional machining processes in which a block of material, such as a metal, is machined according to engineering drawings.

One example of a modern rapid prototyping technology is a selective laser sintering process. According to this technology, articles are produced in layer-wise fashion from a laser-fusible powder that is dispensed one layer at a time. The powder is sintered, by the application of laser energy that is directed in raster-scan fashion to portions of the powder layer corresponding to a cross section of the article. After the sintering of the powder on one particular layer, an additional layer of powder is dispensed, and the process repeated, with sintering taking place between the current layer and the previously laid layers until the article is complete. Detailed descriptions of the selective laser sintering technology may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,863,538, U.S. Pat. No. 5,017,753, U.S. Pat. No. 5,076,869 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,944,817, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein. Similarly, a detailed description of the use of selective laser melting technology may be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/704,270, filed on Nov. 7, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,537,664 (“the '664 patent”), the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. The selective laser melting and sintering technologies have enabled the direct manufacture of solid or porous three-dimensional articles of high resolution and dimensional accuracy from a variety of materials including wax, metal powders with binders, polycarbonate, nylon, other plastics and composite materials, such as polymer-coated metals and ceramics.

The invention claimed in the '664 patent was the first of many inventions assigned to Howmedica Osteonics Corporation, who has been a pioneer in porous surface and porous structure formation, specifically for use in orthopedics. For instance, other applications in this area, such as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/027,421 filed on Dec. 30, 2004 (“the '421 Application”), and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/846,327 filed on Jul. 29, 2010 (“the '327 Application”), the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein, have taught the generation of a population of porous geometry, a mathematical representation of the portion of geometry of the porous structure to be built within a region defined by predetermined unit cells or imaginary volumes that are organized to fill and form a predetermined build geometry, which may be used to produce a near net-shape of an intended porous tissue in-growth structure. The predetermined build geometry, or overall computer-aided design (CAD) geometry, may refer to the mathematical or pictorial representation (such as that on a computer display) of the extent or outer boundary of an intended physical structure to be manufactured. In the case of physical components that include both porous material and solid material, the build geometry may be an assembly of solid and porous CAD volumes that model the outer boundaries of the respective solid and porous materials intended to be manufactured. Furthermore, these applications teach the randomization of the position of interconnected nodes, or points of intersection between two struts or between a strut and a substrate, that define each of the porous geometries while maintaining the interconnectivity between the nodes. As previously taught, such randomization may accomplished by changing the coordinate positions of the nodes in the x, y, and z directions of a Cartesian coordinate system, to new positions based on a defined mathematical function. To achieve a required external shape for a device being created, these references have taught the truncation or removal of struts forming the unit cells at the outer surface. Such truncation helps to achieve the near-net shape of the intended structure, but truncated or clipped struts may, in some instances, create a situation where the porous geometries are un-supported by the underlying structures. These truncated struts may present a potential site for the generation of debris as protruding struts may fracture. Thus, a new method is needed to create build geometries having surfaces that are more robust and less likely to form debris.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a process of preparing a computer generated model of a three dimensional structure constructed of porous geometries may include a step of preparing a computer-generated component file including a porous CAD volume having a boundary having a predefined portion. The process for preparing the model may include a step of populating, by a processor, a space. The space may include the porous CAD volume which may be populated by unit cells that overlap the predefined portion of the boundary. The process for preparing the model may include a step of populating, by a processor, the unit cells with porous geometries. The porous geometries may have a plurality of struts with nodes at each of the ends of the struts including a first strut overlapping the predefined portion of the boundary. The first strut may have a length, a first node outside the porous CAD volume, and a second node inside the porous CAD volume. The process for preparing the model may include a step of removing all struts entirely outside the porous CAD volume in which after the removal of the struts entirely outside the porous CAD volume, each of the remaining struts is connected to a node at each end of the remaining struts.

In accordance with a further embodiment of the invention, a process of preparing a computer generated model of a three dimensional structure constructed of porous geometries may include a step of preparing a computer-generated component file including a porous CAD volume having a boundary with a predefined portion. The process may include a step of populating, by a processor, a space. The space may include the porous CAD volume which may be populated by unit cells that overlap the predefined portion of the boundary. The process for preparing the model may include a step of populating, by a processor, the unit cells with porous geometries in which the porous geometries have a plurality of struts with nodes at each of the ends of the struts including a first strut that intersects the predefined portion of the boundary. The first strut may have a length and a first node at a first location that may be on the predefined outer boundary or outside the porous CAD volume. The process for preparing the model may include a step of removing all struts entirely outside the porous CAD volume. The process for preparing the model may include a step of moving the first node from the first location to a second location.

In accordance with a further embodiment of the invention a tangible computer-readable storage medium may have computer readable instructions of a program stored on the medium. The instructions, when executed by a processor, may cause the processor to perform a process of preparing a computer generated model of a three dimensional structure constructed of unit cells. The process of preparing the model may a step of preparing a computer-generated component file including a porous CAD volume having a boundary having a predefined portion. The process for preparing the model may include a step of populating, by a processor, a space. The space may include the porous CAD volume which may be populated by unit cells that overlap the predefined portion of the boundary. The process for preparing the model may include a step of populating, by a processor, the unit cells with porous geometries. The porous geometries may have a plurality of struts with nodes at each of the ends of the struts including a first strut overlapping the predefined portion of the boundary. The first strut may have a length, a first node outside the porous CAD volume, and a second node inside the porous CAD volume. The process for preparing the model may include a step of removing all struts entirely outside the porous CAD volume in which after the removal of the struts entirely outside the porous CAD volume, each of the remaining struts is connected to a node at each end of the remaining struts.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a functional diagram of a system in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2(a) is a three-dimensional schematic representation of two unit cells and two porous geometries located therein;

FIG. 2(b) is a three-dimensional schematic representation of a spatial arrangement of melt spots that may be used to create the porous geometries of FIG. 2a;

FIG. 3 illustrates a two-dimensional representation of a bounding box containing unit cells in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates the unit cells of FIG. 3separated into those that intersect a boundary of a porous CAD volume and those that do not intersect the porous CAD volume;

FIG. 5 shows the complete unit cells lying within the boundary of the porous CAD volume that are retained as shown in FIG. 4;

FIG. 6 illustrates a wireframe of porous geometries created within the retained unit cells shown in FIG. 5;

FIG. 7(a) illustrates a wireframe of porous geometries created within the unit cells that intersect the boundary of the porous CAD volume shown in FIG. 4;

FIG. 7(b) illustrates the nodes of the porous geometries within the unit cells of FIG. 7(a).

FIGS. 8(a) and (b) illustrate the wireframe of the porous geometries of FIG. 7 after clipping struts of the porous geometries at their intersections with the boundary of the porous CAD volume;

FIGS. 9(a) and (b) illustrate the wireframe of the porous geometries of FIG. 7 after clipping the full lengths of struts that overlap the boundary of the porous CAD volume;

FIGS. 10(a) and (b) illustrate the wireframe of the porous geometries of FIG. 7 after clipping the full lengths of struts that lie entirely outside the boundary of the porous CAD volume;

FIGS. 11(a) and (b) illustrate the wireframe of the porous geometries of FIG. 7 after clipping the full length of struts overlapping the boundary and having an inner node closest to the boundary to their respective inner nodes and the full length of struts lying entirely outside the boundary, while retaining the struts having the full length of struts overlapping the boundary and having an outer node closest to the boundary of the porous CAD volume;

FIGS. 12(a) and (b) illustrate the wireframe of the porous geometries of FIG. 11 after repositioning of the nodes closest to the boundary to positions along the boundary of the porous CAD volume through conformal manipulation;

FIGS. 13(a) and (b) show plan and side cross-sectional views, respectively, of a solid CAD volume surrounded by a boundary of a porous CAD volume of a tapered cylindrical geometry for use in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;

FIGS. 14(a) and (b) show plan and side cross-sectional views, respectively, of the tapered cylindrical geometry of FIG. 13, wherein nodes are populated at corners of unit cells within slices of the porous CAD volume through the use of polar coordinates;

FIGS. 15(a)-(c) show a plan view including unit cells, a plan view without unit cells, and a side cross-sectional view, respectively, of the tapered cylindrical geometry of FIG. 14, wherein struts connecting the nodes have been generated in a conformal manner;

FIGS. 16(a) and (b) illustrate plan cross-sectional views of the tapered cylindrical geometry of FIG. 15, before and after, respectively, repositioning of the nodes circumferentially about the cylindrical geometry at a boundary thereof in the same direction to create a structure with torque resistant properties.

FIG. 17 illustrates a plan cross-sectional view of the tapered cylindrical geometry of FIG. 16(a) after repositioning of the nodes circumferentially about the cylindrical geometry at the boundary thereof in opposite directions on opposite portions to create a structure with torque resistant properties;

FIGS. 18(a) and (b) illustrate side cross-sectional views of the tapered cylindrical geometry of FIG. 15, before and after, respectively, repositioning of the nodes longitudinally along the cylindrical geometry at the boundary thereof to create structures with anti back-out properties;

FIGS. 19(a)-(c) illustrate computer-generated models of cylindrical structures created by (a) clipping struts, positioned using Cartesian coordinates, at a boundary of a porous CAD volume, (b) positioning nodes based on polar coordinates, and (c) positioning nodes using Cartesian coordinates including repositioning of the nodes closest to the boundary to positions along the boundary of the porous CAD volume through conformal manipulation;

FIGS. 20(a)-(c) illustrate computer-generated models of structures created by positioning struts based on polar coordinates and then displacing nodes by varying amounts to create anti-back out functions;

FIG. 21 is a schematic of a surface produced by manipulating nodes in accordance with an embodiment of the invention to create a desired surface roughness;

FIGS. 22(a)-(c) illustrate a process of roughening a predetermined surface by moving nodes within a defined region along the surface in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;

FIGS. 23(a) and (b) show coupons having surfaces prepared by (a) applying and (b) not applying a predetermined surface roughness thereto in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 24 shows a curved surface prepared by applying a predetermined surface roughness thereto in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

FIGS. 25(a) and (b) show examples of flat surfaces prepared by applying a predetermined surface roughness thereto to create surface labelling in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;

FIGS. 26(a) and (b) illustrate side elevation and plan views, respectively, of a model of a flat surface having surface node deformation to create irregularity in a specific area of a regular structure in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 27 shows an example of a curved surface having surface node deformation to create irregularity in a specific area of a regular structure in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;

FIGS. 28(a) and (b) illustrate the wireframes of the porous geometries of FIGS. 12 and 15, respectively, having portions of struts added to the surface nodes of the respective porous CAD volumes;

FIG. 29 is a process flow diagram in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 30 is another process flow diagram in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 31 is another process flow diagram in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 32 is another process flow diagram in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to generating computer models of three-dimensional structures. These models may be used to prepare porous tissue in-growth structures in medical implants and prostheses. The models may include features corresponding to tangible structures having nodes along a predefined outer boundary.

FIG. 1 depicts a system 105 that may be used, among other functions, to generate, store and share three-dimensional models of structures. The system 105 may include at least one server computer 110, a first client computer 120, and in some instances, at least a second client computer 130. These computers may send and receive information via a network 140. For example, a first user may generate a model at the first client device 120. The model may then be uploaded to the server 110 and distributed via the network 140 to the second client computer 130 for viewing and modification by at least a second user.

The network 140, and intervening communication points, may comprise various configurations and protocols including the Internet, World Wide Web, intranets, virtual private networks, wide area networks, local networks, private networks using communication protocols proprietary to one or more companies, Ethernet, WiFi and HTTP, and various combinations of the foregoing. Such communication may be facilitated by any device capable of transmitting data to and from other computers, such as modems (e.g., dial-up, cable or fiber optic) and wireless interfaces. Although only a few devices are depicted in FIG. 1, a typical system may include a large number of connected computers, with each different computer being at a different communication point of the network.

Each of computers 110, 120, and 130 may include a processor and memory. For example, server 110 may include memory 114 which stores information accessible by a processor 112, computer 120 may include memory 124 which stores information accessible by a processor 122, and computer 130 may include memory 134 which stores information accessible by a processor 132.

The processors 112, 122, 132 may be any conventional processor, such as commercially available CPUs. Alternatively, the processors may be dedicated controllers such as an ASIC, FPGA, or other hardware-based processor. Although shown in FIG. 1 as being within the same block, the processor and memory may actually comprise multiple processors and memories that may or may not be stored within the same physical housing. For example, memories may be a hard drive or other storage media located in a server farm of a network data center. Accordingly, references to a processor, memory, or computer will be understood to include references to a collection of processors, memories, or computers that may or may not operate in parallel.

The memories may include a first part storing applications or instructions 116, 126, 136 that may be executed by the respective processor. The instructions 116, 126, 136 may be any set of instructions to be executed directly (such as machine code) or indirectly (such as scripts) by the processor. In that regard, the terms “applications,” “instructions,” “steps” and “programs” may be used interchangeably herein.

The memories may also include a second part storing data 118, 128, 138 that may be retrieved, stored or modified in accordance with the respective instructions. The memory may include any type capable of storing information accessible by the processor, such as a hard-drive, memory card, ROM, RAM, DVD, CD-ROM, write-capable, and read-only memories or various combinations of the foregoing, where the applications 116 and data 118 are stored on the same or different types of media.

In addition to a processor, memory and instructions, client computers 120, 130, 131, 133 may have all of the components used in connection with a personal computer. For example, the client computers may include an electronic display 150, 151 (e.g., a monitor having a screen, a touch-screen, a projector, a television, a computer printer or any other electrical device that is operable to display information), one or more user inputs 152, 153 (e.g., a mouse, keyboard, touch screen and/or microphone), speakers 154, 155, and all of the components used for connecting these elements to one another.

Instructions 126, 136 of the first and second client devices 120, 130 may include building applications 125, 135. For example, the building applications may be used by a user to create three-dimensional structures, such as those described further herein. The building applications may be associated with a graphical user interface for displaying on a client device in order to allow the user to utilize the functions of the building applications.

A building application may be a computer-aided design (CAD) three-dimensional (3-D) modeling program or equivalent as known in the art. Available CAD programs capable of generating such a structure include Autodesk® AutoCAD®, Creo® by Parametric Technology Corporation (formerly Pro/Engineer), Siemens PLM Software NX™ (formerly Unigraphics), and CATIA® by Dassault Systèmes. Such structures may be those described in the '421 Application.

The data 118, 128, 138 need not be limited by any particular data structure. For example, the data may be stored in computer registers, in a relational database as a table having a plurality of different fields and records, or XML documents. The data may also be formatted into any computer-readable format such as, but not limited to, binary values, ASCII or Unicode. Moreover, the data may comprise any information sufficient to identify the relevant information, such as numbers, descriptive text, proprietary codes, pointers, references to data stored in other memories (including other network locations) or information that is used by a function to calculate the relevant data. For example, the data 128 of the first client device 120 may include information used by the building application 125 to create three-dimensional models.

In addition to the operations described above and illustrated in the FIGs., various other operations will now be described. It should be understood that the following operations do not have to be performed in the precise order described below. Rather, various steps may be handled in a different order or simultaneously. Steps may also be omitted or added unless otherwise stated herein.

An overall three-dimensional representation of a component may first be generated by preparing a CAD model. This overall CAD model may comprise of one or more distinct CAD volumes that are intended to be manufactured as either solid or porous geometries.

Solid CAD volumes can be sliced into layers of a predetermined thickness ready for hatching, re-merging with the porous volume (post-lattice generation) and subsequent manufacture.

Porous CAD volumes (the basic principles of which are detailed in FIGS. 2(a) and (b) can be processed using bespoke software. In this case the porous geometry is made up of a plurality of struts organized within tessellating unit cells 60. Many designs of porous geometry are possible to impart various strength, surface, and/or other characteristics into the porous CAD volume. For example, these porous geometries can be used to control the shape, type, degree, density, and size of porosity within the structure. Such porous geometry designs can be dodecahedral, octahedral, tetrahedral (diamond), as well as many other various shapes. In comparison, dodecahedral porous geometries have a different mechanical performance than a tetrahedral structure. Besides these regular geometric shapes, the porous geometries of the present invention may be configured to have irregular shapes where various sides and dimensions have little if any repeating sequences. Porous geometries can even be configured into constructs that closely mimic the structure of trabecular bone. Porous geometries can be space filling, in which all the space within a three-dimensional object is filled with porous geometries but do not always fill the space of an object they are used to produce.

FIG. 3 shows in greater detail a portion of a model build structure 50, generated through the use of an engineering design package such as that described previously herein.

The first step in creating a porous CAD volume is calculate a bounding box, i.e., a box whose x, y, and z dimensions correspond to, or are slightly larger than, a defined boundary of the porous CAD volume, which may be the entire boundary or a portion of a boundary as shown in FIG. 3. This bounding box is then divided into a number of unit cells defined by x, y, and z dimensions. Calculations are then performed during an interrogation on each individual unit cell to ascertain if each cell is within, or intersects the boundary of the porous CAD volume, as illustrated by FIGS. 4 and 5. If these conditions are satisfied for an individual cell, the cell is retained, whereas if they are not, the cell is discarded. Once all cells have been interrogated, porous geometry is populated within the cells that have been retained, as shown in FIGS. 6 and 7).

Various building blocks make up a porous geometry. Referring again to FIGS. 2 and 3 each of the porous geometries are made up of struts 65, or segments having a length. Nearly all of the struts 65 of the model build structure 50 meet at a node or intersection 70. The position of the nodes may be identified within an array of the data of the processor according to Cartesian, polar coordinates, or other user-defined coordinates.

The porous CAD volume has a predefined boundary 100 that corresponds to the intended outer surface of the part being designed. A portion of the boundary 100 is illustrated in FIG. 7. As shown, some of the unit cells 60 along the predefined boundary 100 have overlapping struts 8-21 that cross over the boundary 100. The struts 8-21 have inner nodes 26-29, 31, and 33 within the boundary 100 of the porous CAD volume and outer nodes 25, 30, 32, 34, and 35 outside of the boundary 100.

To produce a porous structure having struts that terminate along the boundary, the overlapping struts may be clipped such that any portion of the overlapping struts beyond the predefined boundary is removed. FIG. 8 depicts a model build structure 50 generated according to this clipping approach, in other words, after the overlapping struts 8-21 have been clipped. The overlapping struts 8-21 are now shorter. The ends of each of the overlapping struts 8-21 now lie along the predefined outer boundary 100 and none of the overlapping struts 8-21 extend past the boundary 100.

In some cases this clipping approach may be appropriate. However, the struts that have been shortened may not be supported at their outer points as can be seen in the model of FIG. 19(a), and as such they can act as cantilevers and may result in an increased risk of debris formation. In some instances (assuming a flat edge is present), the porous CAD volume may be modified so that the boundary lies along a whole number of unit cells. In this instance there is no need for the clipping operation. This mitigates the possibility of debris generation as the end of each strut is supported by at least one other strut, and is correspondingly less prone to failure.

FIG. 9 shows the model build structure 50 prepared by another approach where the full length of struts that overlap the surface of the porous CAD volume are removed to the inner node. Thus the overlapping struts 8-21 are removed. Preferably, removal of these struts leaves only the complete porous geometries 60. However, this approach may leave the surface rough, uneven and nonconforming to the original porous CAD volume as some of the unit cells 60 do not reach the outer boundary 100.

FIG. 10 shows the model build structure 50 prepared by another approach where the full length of struts that overlap the surface of the porous CAD volume are retained to their respective outer nodes. In this manner, the overlapping struts 8-21 remain beyond the boundary 100 of the porous CAD volume.

FIG. 11 shows the model build structure 50 prepared by yet a further approach where each of these struts 8-21 are either fully retained or fully removed, depending on the distance of their nodes from the boundary 100 of the porous CAD volume. In the example shown, each of the unit cells 60 outside the outer boundary 100 as well as the struts 9-12, 16 and 19 are removed (or marked for removal). The struts selected for removal are those overlapping struts in which the node outside the boundary, i.e., the outer node, is further from the boundary than the corresponding node of the overlapping strut inside the boundary, i.e., the inner node. In contrast, the overlapping struts 8, 13-15, 17-18, and 20-21 are not removed because their corresponding nodes 25, 30, 32, 34, and 35, although outside the outer boundary 100 are closer to the boundary 100 than their corresponding inner nodes.

FIG. 12 shows the model build structure 50 prepared after clipping, followed by the repositioning of the remaining nodes 25-35, closest to the boundary 100 of the porous CAD volume to coincide with the boundary 100. In some embodiments, each of the nodes 25-35 closest to the boundary 100 may be repositioned to a location determined by a mathematical calculation based on the original position of each of these nodes, e.g., the distance from the boundary of each of these nodes, or the original length of the struts attached to these nodes that overlap the boundary or both of these values. In this manner, the shape of the structure may be maintained when having nodes along the boundary.

As further shown in FIG. 12, when the nodes 25-35 are repositioned, the remaining struts connected to the nodes 25-35 may then be lengthened or shortened as required to maintain connectivity between the nodes. In this manner, the outermost nodes and struts may be positioned such that they do not coincide with the boundary by any function of the cell size or geometry. This effect can be seen clearly in FIG. 19(c).

In a variant of this embodiment, the nodes 25-35 may not be moved but instead discarded and replaced by new nodes. Additionally, the struts connected to the nodes 25-35 may be replaced by new struts that are longer or shorter than the original struts to maintain the connectivity between the nodes.

The use of polar or spherical coordinates to define nodes may be preferred to the use of Cartesian coordinates when a surface of a model build structure to be formed is curvate or cylindrical. In this manner, nodes repositioned on a boundary may be positioned at the same angle defining a replaced node but at a different radius from the origin of a polar coordinate system being used to create a model build structure. However, other user-defined coordinates may be used to create conformal structures. In other words, a user-defined node positioning system may be used to form a model build structure having nodes along an outer boundary that fit the contours of the outer boundary of the component being modelled.

FIG. 13 shows various cross sections of a tapered, cylindrical geometry. The gray color represents the solid CAD volume which is bounded by a clear, porous CAD volume.

FIG. 14 further shows the geometry of FIG. 13 subsequent to the generation of a plurality of outer nodes 410 and a plurality of inner nodes 430 along inner and outer boundaries 435, 445 of the porous CAD volume. Such nodes define the vertices of unit cells 450 which are created by virtually slicing the porous CAD volume according to the unit cell height. This operation produces polar rings that are then populated with volumes that pattern radially around the ring of the part. These volumes define the unit cells for the part.

FIG. 15 shows the population of the unit cells 450 created in the previous stage. The depicted geometry is based on the preferred octahedral cell as described previously herein but could be based on any porous geometry. These porous geometries are then defined by nodes with connecting struts or segments 480, all of which meet at the defined surface of the porous CAD volume 500. This effect can be seen clearly in FIG. 19(b).

Creation of beneficial surface properties can be achieved through the movement of the nodes 410 at the outer surface 500 of the porous CAD volume. FIGS. 16 and 17 detail the creation of torque or movement resisting features on the surface of cylindrical components. The nodes 410-427 that lie on the outermost boundary of the porous CAD volume 500 can be manipulated to be repositioned along the surface of the porous CAD volume 500 in either direction to create a deformed unit cell with a preferential direction of movement. Such manipulation involves the changing of the coordinate positions of the nodes. For example, the angular component of at least some of the polar coordinates of the nodes along the boundary may be modified in the same or opposite directions to produce an anti-torque effect. In another example, the height component and in some instances the radius component as well of the nodes along the boundary may be modified in the same or opposite directions to produce an anti-backout effect. In producing either of these effects, the struts may correspondingly be lengthened or shortened as necessary to maintain connectivity with the nodes along the boundary. The amount that any coordinate is changed can be based on any empirical or mathematical function.

A similar modification in the vertical direction is shown in FIG. 18. In this case the nodes on the outermost boundary of the porous CAD volume 500 are manipulated to be repositioned in the vertical direction to create features that are resistant to the part being extracted after insertion.

In another example, as illustrated in FIG. 21, surface features can be generated on any part where the surface is made up of connected nodes. Intrinsic surface properties can be created through the movement of nodes away from the surface to positions both inside and outside of the porous CAD volume. The location of the new position of a node 151-160 and corresponding struts 161-170 may be a parameter of the building application such that the repositioned node 151-160 will be at a position selected to satisfy a predetermined theoretical surface roughness along the predefined portion of the outer boundary 200. The theoretical surface roughness may be defined by a formula for surface roughness, such as any of the ANSI/ASME B46.1-2009 standards for surface roughness Ra, Rs, Rz, or Rq. In addition, the new positions of a group of nodes 151-160 and corresponding struts 161-170 along a predefined portion of the outer boundary 200 may be selected such that the surface roughness of the predefined portion of the outer boundary 200 is a predetermined value. Thus, the positions chosen may be selected at random so long as the aggregate of the positions of the nodes 151-160 and corresponding struts 161-170 satisfy the theoretical surface roughness chosen. For example, if R, is the parameter, then each of the struts 161-170 and nodes 151-160 along the outer boundary 200 must fall within a set distribution between minimum and maximum heights 275 and 285, respectively, as shown in FIG. 21.

FIGS. 23(a) and (b) depict the surfaces of flat structures formed using a conventional modeling method and some of the approaches described herein. FIG. 23(a) is a photograph of a coupon formed by selective laser melting of powdered metal prepared in accordance with a method known in the prior art. To produce the coupon, a model build structure was prepared with the upper nodes of the regular, octahedral, porous geometry deliberately intersecting the upper surface boundary of the cuboid porous CAD volume.

FIG. 23(b) is a photograph of another coupon formed using the same selective laser melting process as the coupon in FIG. 23(a). The model build structure used to produce the coupon in FIG. 23(b) used the same lattice structure as the coupon in FIG. 23(a). However, an approach in accordance with those described herein was employed to produce the top surface of the model build structure corresponding to the roughened top surface 200 shown in FIG. 23B. An algorithm was applied to the nodes at the upper surface of the porous CAD volume. This algorithm required a predetermined surface roughness (to a corresponding Ra, Sa or other standard roughness measure) as described previously. FIG. 23(b) shows the resultant built geometry illustrating the surface roughness obtained.

The features previously described herein can be used on any surface. An example of their use on curved surfaces is shown in FIG. 22. A porous CAD volume that conforms to a surface 100 is used as the base. An upper bound 300 and lower bound 301 define a region 302 in which the surface nodes 25-35 can be repositioned. As in the example shown in FIGS. 8(a) and 8(b), the amplitude and direction of each movement can be controlled to create any predetermined theoretical surface quality eg roughness or surface marking. This same algorithm has been applied to a curved surface detailed in FIG. 24 where the nodes have been moved by a set amplitude to get a desired roughness value on a curved surface.

Specific use can be made of these different roughening algorithms to produce desired effects, for example surface marking for use in product identification. This can be seen in FIG. 25 which illustrates that it is possible to produce markings that are invisible under normal light, and visible under angular directed light, for example by creating areas of different roughness, which may be sub-flush or proud of the surface. This could also be applied in the form of a 2-D barcode or QR code that may contain proprietary information relating to the specific implant to which the coding has been applied. In this manner, the marking may be readable by hand-held laser scanners or other well-known devices.

Another application of the movement of the nodes along and through the surface is demonstrated in FIG. 26. These relate to the creation of an irregular appearance at the surface of a regular structure. The nodes that are at the surface can be moved along, out of, into or in any combination of these movements to create a modified surface that has irregular qualities but which is based on a regular structure.

Yet a further method of creating surface roughness is shown in FIG. 28. Additional struts may be added onto the outer nodes 25-35 as defined in the arrangement shown in FIGS. 12 and 410-427 as defined in the arrangement of FIG. 16. These additional struts do not connect to another strut. In this manner, these struts may give rise to a resistance to movement in a direction at an angle sufficiently perpendicular to the surface.

As contemplated by an embodiment of this invention, self-retaining features, such as the additional struts 520, may be used to produce a “VELCRO” type effect in tangible structures formed from a corresponding model build structure. In this manner, the outside surface of one tangible structure having a self-retaining feature may be an inverse representation of the outside surface of a mating tangible structure having a corresponding self-retaining feature. For example, the mating structures may each have additional struts that interlock or engage with one another. In another embodiment, additional struts of one structure may fit into pores or holes on the surface of another structure in a “hook and eye” formation to attach the two structures. Other formations include a barbed geometry with corresponding ends, a hooked geometry with corresponding ends, deformable loops, or variations in the depth of the roughening applied to mating surfaces as described previously herein, to create an interlock between the mating surfaces. In some instances, these types of positive engagement may remove or minimize the need for mechanical fixation devices such as bone screws or other assembly devices.

A flow diagram shown in FIG. 29 details an embodiment of the creation of porous geometries within a Cartesian coordinate defined unit cell. At block 610, a computer-generated model of a three-dimensional structure is prepared. A bounding box is created by a processor. This bounding box is populated with unit cells 620.

The spatial interaction of the unit cells with the surface of the porous CAD volume is determined, by a processor, and two pathways are created at a step 630. The unit cells that do not make contact with the surface are then interrogated to determine their position at a step 640. Unit cells that lie outside the structure are discarded. Unit cells that are within the porous CAD volume are populated with porous geometries 650.

The unit cells that cross the surface of the porous CAD volume are populated with porous geometries. The struts of porous geometries can then either be clipped to the surface at a step 670 or clipped to a node at a step 680 as described previously herein. In other words, the struts may be clipped to an inner node, an outer node, or at the boundary of the porous CAD volume. However, this approach may leave the surface rough, uneven, and nonconforming to the original porous CAD volume.

Through steps 690-692, the nodes at the surface can also be manipulated so that all the surface nodes lie on the outer boundary of the porous CAD volume to create a conformal surface.

A process flow diagram shown in FIG. 30 details an embodiment of the creation of porous geometries within polar or cylindrical coordinate defined unit cells. At a step 710, a computer-generated model of a three-dimensional structure is prepared or a part is defined using geometric parameters.

This model may then be sliced virtually at a step 720 to produce polar rings that can then be populated with unit cells and nodes in a radial pattern at a step 730. These unit cells may be populated with porous geometries at a step 740.

A process flow diagram shown in FIG. 31 details an embodiment the creation of surface features through repositioning of nodes that lie on the boundary of the porous CAD volume. This operation can be performed on any porous geometry that consists of struts which interconnect at nodes along the boundary of the porous CAD volume.

At least one node is selected at a step 810 which can then be perturbed in a variety of ways to generate the desired surface properties. In one embodiment, a node along the boundary can be repositioned along a position vector which is at an angle to the surface direction as shown at steps 830-831. This process may be used to create surface properties such as surface roughness.

In another embodiment, a node can be moved along a position vector parallel to the surface direction across the surface which can be used to create torque or movement resisting, pullout resisting and surface irregularity properties at steps 840 and 841.

In yet another embodiment, any combination of the steps 830 and 840 may be used to create surface properties. Nodes can be moved both along and away from the surface to create areas of irregularity, roughness and marking at steps 850 and 851.

In another example as shown in FIG. 32, a computer-generated component file is prepared at a block 910. The component file includes a porous CAD volume with a boundary having at least one predefined portion. At a block 920, a space that includes the porous CAD volume is populated, by a processor, with unit cells that overlap the predefined portion of the boundary. Such a space may be defined by sets of coordinates, such as Cartesian, polar, or spherical coordinates. At a block 930, the unit cells are populated with porous geometries. Within the porous geometries may be a plurality of struts. At least one end of the struts may have a node. As further shown at block 930, at one of the struts overlaps the predefined portion of the boundary. Such a strut has a length, one node outside the porous CAD volume, and one node inside the porous CAD volume. At block 940, any struts entirely outside the predefined portion of the boundary are removed. In some embodiments, any struts outside the entire boundary are removed. In this manner, a computer-generated model of a three-dimensional structure constructed of porous geometries is prepared. At an optional block 950, a tangible three-dimensional structure having a shape corresponding to the computer-generated model may be produced. The shape of the three-dimensional structure may be in the form of a geometric lattice structure.

Visualization of all of the above effects under consideration can be achieved by voxelating the sliced output files from bespoke software that is being applied in an additive layer manufacturing machine. Utilizing developed algorithms and the output files, the data may be fed into a commercial software package, e.g., Matlab, and the images produced can be interpreted. FIGS. 2(a) and 2(b) illustrate an initial process operation in contrast to FIGS. 19, 20 and 26 representing common output images.

The approaches for generating three-dimensional models described herein may be used for building various tangible structures and surfaces, specifically structures and surfaces for medical implants. Although a brief summary follows, many details of the process of melting powdered metal are given in the '421 and '327 Applications. In constructing a tangible structure from a model build structure, a layer of metal powder, in some instances, may be deposited on a substrate. The substrate may be a work platform, a solid base, or a core, with the base or core being provided to possibly be an integral part of the finished product.

The metal powder may be Ti alloys, stainless steel, cobalt chrome alloys, Ta or Nb. In some embodiments, individual layers of metal may be scanned using a directed high energy beam, such as a laser or e-beam system to selectively melt the powder, i.e., melt the powder in predetermined locations. Each layer, or portion of a layer, is scanned to create a plurality of predetermined porous geometries by point exposure to the energised beam. This leads to the production of struts that correspond to the struts described previously herein, as will be described below. Successive layers are deposited onto previous layers and also are scanned. The scanning and depositing of successive layers continues the building process of the predetermined porous geometries and oblique struts are directed to nodes. As disclosed herein, continuing the building process refers not only to a continuation of a porous geometry from a previous layer but also a beginning of a new porous geometry as well as the completion of the current porous geometry.

In a preferred aspect of the present invention, the high energy beam may be adjusted to modify the cross-sectional diameter of various struts. Some of the struts of the porous geometries may overlap struts of other porous geometries as a result of randomization within unit cells, but such struts never lose their identity with respect to their origin. Dimensions of strut diameter and unit cell size may enable the adjusting of the porosity throughout the completed structure. The strut diameter preferably should be nominally two times the diameter of the high energy beam, and each unit cell should have sides with lengths preferably no greater than 2 mm and have an aspect ratio that is limited to a maximum of 1:2 with respect to a maximum height of the unit cell.

In some embodiments, a component structure or sub-structure thereof produced by the approaches herein may be porous and if desired, the pores can be interconnecting to provide an interconnected porosity. In some embodiments, the amount and location of porosity may be predetermined, and preferably lie in the range 50% to 90% as being suitable when used as a bone ingrowth surface, and 20% to 90% as being suitable for polymer interlock surfaces. This also applies to cases where the outer porous section of a medical device is connected to host bone with bone cement or bone type adhesives for example. A base or core of cobalt chrome alloy, titanium or alloy thereof, stainless steel, niobium and tantalum, may be used to build a porous layer of any one of these metals and/or alloys by melting using high energy beam, such as a continuous or pulsed laser beam or an electron beam. Thus, a mixture of desired mixed materials can be employed. The porous layers can be applied to an existing article made from cobalt chrome, titanium or alloy, stainless steel, tantalum or niobium, such as an orthopaedic implant. It is thus intended that the approaches described herein may be exploited to produce commercially saleable implants with bone in-growth structures having porous surfaces with a controllable texture or surface profile. Such an implant may be an acetabular component, a knee tibial or patella implant, a femoral knee or hip implant, or the like. The constructed medical implant may have a porosity and architecture optimised, to create very favourable conditions so that bone in-growth takes place in a physiological environment and the overall outcome favours long-term stability.

The medical implants, as well as other constructed structures, may be provided with an attaching mechanism for anchoring or at least more firmly attaching the medical implant to another element. One such example is an acetabular component being provided with a surface structure which mates with the surface of an augment component.

Because a laser melting process may not require subsequent heat treatment or the temperature at which this heat treatment occurs is lower than any critical phase change in the material, the initial mechanical properties of any base metal to which a porous structure is applied may be preserved.

The equipment used for the manufacture of such a device could be one of many currently available including but not limited to those manufactured by Renishaw, SLM Solutions, Realizer, EOS, Concept Laser, Arcam and the like. The laser or electron beam may also be a custom produced laboratory device.

Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method of preparing a computer-generated model of a three-dimensional structure constructed of porous geometries, the method comprising: preparing a computer-generated component file including a porous computer-aided design volume having a boundary having at least one predefined portion; populating, by a processor, a space including the porous computer-aided design volume with unit cells overlapping the at least one predefined portion of the boundary; populating, by a processor, the unit cells with porous geometries, the porous geometries having a plurality of struts having opposing ends, each end being connected at a node, the plurality of struts including at least a first strut overlapping the predefined portion of the boundary, the first strut further having a length, a first node outside the porous computer-aided design volume, and a second node inside the porous computer-aided design volume; and removing all struts entirely outside the porous computer-aided design volume, such that each end of the remaining struts remains connected at the node.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein a plurality of struts overlap the predefined portion of the boundary, each of the plurality of struts having a length, a first node outside the predefined portion of the boundary, and a second node inside the predefined portion of the boundary, the method further comprising retaining the full length of the plurality of struts overlapping the predefined portion of the boundary to the first node of each of the plurality of struts.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the first strut is removed when the first node is further from the boundary than the second node.

4. The method of claim 3, the second node being further attached to at least one adjacent strut inside the porous computer-aided design volume further comprising: moving a closer of the first and the second nodes to the predefined portion of the boundary at a position along the predefined portion of the boundary; and when the first node is the closer node, changing the length of at least the first strut such that the first strut remains connected to the first node, and when the second node is the closer node, changing the length of the at least one adjacent strut such that the at least one adjacent strut remains connected to the second node.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the closer of the first and the second nodes to the predefined portion of the boundary is moved to a location on the predefined portion of the boundary nearest to the previous location of the moved node.

6. The method of claim 3, further comprising: replacing a closer of the first and the second nodes to the predefined portion of the boundary with a replacement node at a position along the predefined portion of the boundary; and replacing the first strut with a replacement strut having the replacement node at one end and the remaining node of the first and second nodes at the other end thereof.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein a plurality of struts overlap the predefined portion of the boundary, each of the plurality of struts having a length, a first node outside the predefined portion of the boundary, and a second node inside the predefined portion of the boundary, the method further comprising moving at least one of the first and the second nodes of at least one of the plurality of struts overlapping the predefined portion of the boundary- to a position to satisfy a predetermined surface roughness along the predefined portion of the boundary.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein at least one of the first and the second nodes of at least two of the plurality of struts overlapping the predefined portion of the boundary are moved to positions selected at random along the predefined portion of the boundary.

9. A method of preparing a computer-generated model of a three-dimensional structure constructed of porous geometries, the method comprising: preparing a computer-generated component file including a porous computer-aided design volume having a boundary having at least one predefined portion; populating, by a processor, a space including the porous computer-aided design volume with unit cells on or overlapping the at least one predefined portion of the boundary; populating, by a processor, the unit cells with porous geometries, the porous geometries having a plurality of struts having opposing ends, each end being connected at a node at the plurality of struts including at least a first strut intersecting the predefined portion of the boundary, the first strut further having a length and a first node at a first location either (i) on the predefined outer boundary or (ii) outside the porous computer-aided design volume; removing only all struts entirely outside the porous computer-aided design volume such that each end of the remaining struts remains connected at the node; and moving the first node from the first location to a second location.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the three-dimensional structure is adapted to be placed into a separate structure, the method further comprising moving the first node in a direction not parallel to the first strut to create a resistance to movement of the three-dimensional structure when the three-dimensional structure is placed into the separate structure.

11. The method of claim 9, wherein the three-dimensional structure is adapted to be placed into a separate structure, and wherein a plurality of struts intersect the predefined portion of the boundary, each of the plurality of struts having a length and a first node at a first location either (i) on the predefined outer boundary or (ii) outside the porous computer-aided design volume, the method further comprising: moving the first node of the first strut in a first direction not parallel to the first strut; and moving the first node of at least a second strut of the plurality of struts in a second direction not parallel to the second strut and not in the same direction as the movement of the first node of the first strut to create a resistance to movement of the three-dimensional structure when the three-dimensional structure is placed into the separate structure.

12. The method of claim 9, further comprising forming a strut extending from the first node to: at least one of (i) produce a rougher surface of the three-dimensional structure and (ii) produce interlocking features to enable assembly or engagement with at least one additional three-dimensional porous structure.

13. The method of claim 9, wherein a plurality of struts intersect the predefined portion of the boundary, each of the plurality of struts having a length and a node at a first location either (i) on the predefined outer boundary or (ii) outside the porous computer-aided design volume, the method further comprising: moving the first node of the first strut and at least a second node of the-a second strut in a direction away from the predefined portion of the boundary and either (i) outside the porous computer-aided design volume or (ii) inside the porous computer-aided design volume.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the first node and the second node form at least portions of an identifying marker visible to the unaided eye.

15. The method of claim 13, wherein the first node and the second node form at least portions of an identifying marker invisible to the unaided eye.

16. A method of producing a three-dimensional structure comprising: preparing a computer-generated model of a three-dimensional structure according to claim 1; depositing a metal powder onto a substrate; scanning a beam to form a first layer of the three-dimensional structure, the three-dimensional structure having a geometric lattice structure constructed of formed porous geometries, the formed porous geometries formed by a plurality of formed struts, each of the plurality of formed struts having a formed node on each end thereof, and an outer surface with at least a predefined portion, wherein a portion of the formed nodes lies on the predefined portion of the outer surface.

17. The method of producing a three-dimensional structure according to claim 16, wherein the beam is either (i) an electron beam or (ii) a laser beam.

18. A tangible computer-readable storage medium on which computer readable instructions of a program are stored, the instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform a method of preparing a computer-generated model of a three-dimensional structure constructed of porous geometries, the method comprising: preparing a computer-generated component file including a porous computer-aided design volume having a boundary having at least one predefined portion; populating a space including the porous computer-aided design n volume with unit cells overlapping the at least one predefined portion of the boundary; populating the unit cells with porous geometries, the porous geometries having a plurality of struts having opposing ends, each end being connected at a node, each of the plurality of struts including at least a first strut overlapping the predefined portion of the boundary, the first strut further having a length, a first node outside the porous computer-aided design volume, and a second node inside the porous computer-aided design volume; and removing all struts entirely outside the porous computer-aided design volume such that each end of the remaining struts remains connected at the node.

19. The method of claim 1, wherein during the removal of all struts entirely outside the porous computer-aided design volume, only struts entirely outside the porous computer-aided design volume are removed.

20. The method of claim 9, wherein the second location is on the predefined outer boundary.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
14403 March 1856 Brown et al.
222687 December 1879 Fresco
2373769 April 1945 Macy
3520099 July 1970 Mattes
3556918 January 1971 Lemelson
3605123 September 1971 Pratt et al.
3806961 April 1974 Muller
3816855 June 1974 Saleh
3826054 July 1974 Culpepper, Jr.
4047349 September 13, 1977 Aguilar, Jr.
4085466 April 25, 1978 Goodfellow et al.
4154040 May 15, 1979 Pace
4164794 August 21, 1979 Spector et al.
4202055 May 13, 1980 Reiner et al.
4218494 August 19, 1980 Belmondo et al.
4247508 January 27, 1981 Housholder
4305340 December 15, 1981 Iwaki et al.
4344193 August 17, 1982 Kenny
4385404 May 31, 1983 Sully et al.
4444818 April 24, 1984 Tominaga et al.
4479271 October 30, 1984 Bolesky et al.
4502161 March 5, 1985 Wall
4513045 April 23, 1985 Bondoc et al.
4542539 September 24, 1985 Rowe, Jr. et al.
4543158 September 24, 1985 Bondoc et al.
4636219 January 13, 1987 Pratt et al.
4644942 February 24, 1987 Sump
4659331 April 21, 1987 Matthews et al.
4673408 June 16, 1987 Grobbelaar
4714473 December 22, 1987 Bloebaum
4714474 December 22, 1987 Brooks, Jr. et al.
4719908 January 19, 1988 Averill et al.
4766029 August 23, 1988 Brock et al.
4863538 September 5, 1989 Deckard
4944817 July 31, 1990 Bourell et al.
4961154 October 2, 1990 Pomerantz et al.
4969302 November 13, 1990 Coggan et al.
4969907 November 13, 1990 Koch et al.
4978355 December 18, 1990 Frey et al.
4990163 February 5, 1991 Ducheyne et al.
4997445 March 5, 1991 Hodorek
5004476 April 2, 1991 Cook
5017753 May 21, 1991 Deckard
5024670 June 18, 1991 Smith et al.
5031120 July 9, 1991 Pomerantz et al.
5034186 July 23, 1991 Shimamune et al.
5053090 October 1, 1991 Beaman et al.
5067964 November 26, 1991 Richmond et al.
5076869 December 31, 1991 Bourell et al.
5080674 January 14, 1992 Jacobs et al.
5090174 February 25, 1992 Fragale
5108432 April 28, 1992 Gustavson
5108441 April 28, 1992 McDowell
5147402 September 15, 1992 Bohler et al.
5155324 October 13, 1992 Deckard et al.
5158574 October 27, 1992 Stone
5171282 December 15, 1992 Pequignot
5176710 January 5, 1993 Hahn et al.
5192328 March 9, 1993 Winters
5219362 June 15, 1993 Tuke et al.
5282861 February 1, 1994 Kaplan
5282870 February 1, 1994 Moser et al.
5287435 February 15, 1994 Cohen et al.
5314478 May 24, 1994 Oka et al.
5323954 June 28, 1994 Shetty et al.
5336518 August 9, 1994 Narayanan et al.
5352405 October 4, 1994 Beaman et al.
5356433 October 18, 1994 Rowland et al.
5358529 October 25, 1994 Davidson
5368602 November 29, 1994 de la Torre
5386500 January 31, 1995 Pomerantz et al.
5398193 March 14, 1995 deAngelis
5425210 June 20, 1995 Zafir
5443510 August 22, 1995 Shetty et al.
5443518 August 22, 1995 Insall
5461839 October 31, 1995 Beck
5486599 January 23, 1996 Saunders et al.
5490962 February 13, 1996 Cima et al.
5496372 March 5, 1996 Hamamoto et al.
5504300 April 2, 1996 Devanathan et al.
5507815 April 16, 1996 Wagner et al.
5514183 May 7, 1996 Epstein et al.
5526627 June 18, 1996 Beck
5549700 August 27, 1996 Graham et al.
5571185 November 5, 1996 Schug
5571196 November 5, 1996 Stein
5580353 December 3, 1996 Mendes et al.
5609646 March 11, 1997 Field et al.
5616294 April 1, 1997 Deckard
5624463 April 29, 1997 Stone et al.
5632745 May 27, 1997 Schwartz
5640667 June 17, 1997 Freitag et al.
5648450 July 15, 1997 Dickens, Jr. et al.
5665118 September 9, 1997 LaSalle et al.
5681354 October 28, 1997 Eckhoff
5702448 December 30, 1997 Buechel et al.
5728162 March 17, 1998 Eckhoff
5729946 March 24, 1998 Beck
5735903 April 7, 1998 Li et al.
5749874 May 12, 1998 Schwartz
5769899 June 23, 1998 Schwartz et al.
5773789 June 30, 1998 Devanathan et al.
5776201 July 7, 1998 Colleran et al.
5782908 July 21, 1998 Cahalan et al.
5795353 August 18, 1998 Felt
5824098 October 20, 1998 Stein
5824102 October 20, 1998 Buscayret
5839247 November 24, 1998 Beck
5857303 January 12, 1999 Beck et al.
5866113 February 2, 1999 Hendriks et al.
5879387 March 9, 1999 Jones et al.
5879398 March 9, 1999 Swarts et al.
5928285 July 27, 1999 Bigliani et al.
5973222 October 26, 1999 Devanathan et al.
5987838 November 23, 1999 Beck
5989472 November 23, 1999 Ashby et al.
6013855 January 11, 2000 McPherson et al.
6046426 April 4, 2000 Jeantette et al.
6049054 April 11, 2000 Panchison et al.
6087553 July 11, 2000 Cohen et al.
6096043 August 1, 2000 Techiera et al.
6128866 October 10, 2000 Wearne
6132468 October 17, 2000 Mansmann
6139585 October 31, 2000 Li
6164032 December 26, 2000 Beck
6171340 January 9, 2001 McDowell
6190407 February 20, 2001 Ogle et al.
6206924 March 27, 2001 Timm
6206927 March 27, 2001 Fell et al.
6215093 April 10, 2001 Meiners et al.
6248131 June 19, 2001 Felt et al.
6251143 June 26, 2001 Schwartz et al.
6261322 July 17, 2001 Despres, III et al.
6261493 July 17, 2001 Gaylo et al.
6280478 August 28, 2001 Richter et al.
6283997 September 4, 2001 Garg et al.
6290726 September 18, 2001 Pope et al.
6299645 October 9, 2001 Ogden
6344061 February 5, 2002 Leitao et al.
6355086 March 12, 2002 Brown et al.
6370382 April 9, 2002 Kang et al.
6371958 April 16, 2002 Overaker
6385585 May 7, 2002 Jonsson et al.
6395327 May 28, 2002 Shetty
6406497 June 18, 2002 Takei
6415574 July 9, 2002 Beck
6454811 September 24, 2002 Sherwood et al.
6476343 November 5, 2002 Keicher et al.
6482209 November 19, 2002 Engh et al.
6494914 December 17, 2002 Brown et al.
6520996 February 18, 2003 Manasas et al.
6530951 March 11, 2003 Bates et al.
6551608 April 22, 2003 Yao
6558421 May 6, 2003 Fell et al.
6582715 June 24, 2003 Barry et al.
6589283 July 8, 2003 Metzger et al.
6592598 July 15, 2003 Vibe-Hansen et al.
6599301 July 29, 2003 Vibe-Hansen et al.
6610067 August 26, 2003 Tallarida et al.
6626945 September 30, 2003 Simon et al.
6632246 October 14, 2003 Simon et al.
6652246 November 25, 2003 Lin et al.
6652587 November 25, 2003 Felt et al.
6679917 January 20, 2004 Ek
6682567 January 27, 2004 Schroeder
6686437 February 3, 2004 Buchman et al.
6699252 March 2, 2004 Farr, II et al.
6709462 March 23, 2004 Hanssen
6712822 March 30, 2004 Re et al.
6712856 March 30, 2004 Carignan et al.
6716957 April 6, 2004 Tunc
6743232 June 1, 2004 Overaker et al.
6770099 August 3, 2004 Andriacchi et al.
6846329 January 25, 2005 McMinn
6850125 February 1, 2005 Norman et al.
6852125 February 8, 2005 Simon et al.
6855165 February 15, 2005 Fell et al.
6863689 March 8, 2005 Ralph et al.
6866684 March 15, 2005 Fell et al.
6893463 May 17, 2005 Fell et al.
6911044 June 28, 2005 Fell et al.
6916341 July 12, 2005 Rolston
6921264 July 26, 2005 Mayer et al.
6923831 August 2, 2005 Fell et al.
6932610 August 23, 2005 Ono et al.
7168283 January 30, 2007 Van Note et al.
7294149 November 13, 2007 Hozack et al.
7494507 February 24, 2009 Dixon et al.
7497876 March 3, 2009 Tuke et al.
7563284 July 21, 2009 Coppes et al.
7632575 December 15, 2009 Justin et al.
7655047 February 2, 2010 Swords
7674517 March 9, 2010 Ramsey et al.
7879275 February 1, 2011 Smith et al.
8430930 April 30, 2013 Hunt
8454705 June 4, 2013 Pressacco et al.
8551173 October 8, 2013 Lechmann et al.
20010014403 August 16, 2001 Brown et al.
20020010512 January 24, 2002 Takei
20020015654 February 7, 2002 Das et al.
20020016635 February 7, 2002 Despres et al.
20020127328 September 12, 2002 Shetty
20020130112 September 19, 2002 Manasas et al.
20020151983 October 17, 2002 Shetty
20020173855 November 21, 2002 Mansmann
20020198528 December 26, 2002 Engh et al.
20030032351 February 13, 2003 Horner et al.
20030033018 February 13, 2003 Merchant
20030045941 March 6, 2003 Lewallen
20030055500 March 20, 2003 Fell et al.
20030055501 March 20, 2003 Fell et al.
20030060882 March 27, 2003 Fell et al.
20030060883 March 27, 2003 Fell et al.
20030060884 March 27, 2003 Fell et al.
20030060885 March 27, 2003 Fell et al.
20030060888 March 27, 2003 Fell et al.
20030069638 April 10, 2003 Barlow et al.
20030069718 April 10, 2003 Hollister et al.
20030153977 August 14, 2003 Suguro et al.
20030153981 August 14, 2003 Wang et al.
20030155686 August 21, 2003 Hawkins et al.
20030158606 August 21, 2003 Coon et al.
20030209305 November 13, 2003 Smith et al.
20030220696 November 27, 2003 Levine et al.
20040006393 January 8, 2004 Burkinshaw
20040009228 January 15, 2004 Tormala et al.
20040015170 January 22, 2004 Tallarida et al.
20040023586 February 5, 2004 Tilton
20040044414 March 4, 2004 Nowakowski
20040054416 March 18, 2004 Wyss et al.
20040059356 March 25, 2004 Gingras
20040098132 May 20, 2004 Andriacchi et al.
20040121110 June 24, 2004 Schmidt et al.
20040143339 July 22, 2004 Axelson et al.
20040148030 July 29, 2004 Ek
20040153163 August 5, 2004 Posner
20040162622 August 19, 2004 Simon et al.
20040167633 August 26, 2004 Wen et al.
20040191106 September 30, 2004 O'Neill et al.
20040199249 October 7, 2004 Fell
20040199250 October 7, 2004 Fell
20040204766 October 14, 2004 Siebel
20040230315 November 18, 2004 Ek
20040243237 December 2, 2004 Unwin et al.
20040267363 December 30, 2004 Fell et al.
20050033424 February 10, 2005 Fell
20050043816 February 24, 2005 Datta et al.
20050079200 April 14, 2005 Rathenow et al.
20050085918 April 21, 2005 Soffiati et al.
20050100578 May 12, 2005 Schmid et al.
20050123672 June 9, 2005 Justin et al.
20050154471 July 14, 2005 Aram et al.
20050170159 August 4, 2005 Ramsey et al.
20050171604 August 4, 2005 Michalow
20050177169 August 11, 2005 Fisher et al.
20050192672 September 1, 2005 Wyss et al.
20060045903 March 2, 2006 Kadiyala et al.
20060147332 July 6, 2006 Jones et al.
20060241776 October 26, 2006 Brown et al.
20060254200 November 16, 2006 Clarke et al.
20070142914 June 21, 2007 Jones et al.
20070156249 July 5, 2007 Lawrynowicz et al.
20070225390 September 27, 2007 Wang et al.
20080004709 January 3, 2008 O'Neill et al.
20080050412 February 28, 2008 Jones et al.
20080161927 July 3, 2008 Savage et al.
20090068245 March 12, 2009 Noble et al.
20090087605 April 2, 2009 Ramsey et al.
20090105772 April 23, 2009 Seebeck et al.
20090112315 April 30, 2009 Fang et al.
20100298950 November 25, 2010 McDonnell et al.
20120067853 March 22, 2012 Wang et al.
20130030529 January 31, 2013 Hunt
20130123935 May 16, 2013 Hunt et al.
20130158672 June 20, 2013 Hunt
20130218282 August 22, 2013 Hunt
20140121776 May 1, 2014 Hunt
20140288649 September 25, 2014 Hunt
20140288650 September 25, 2014 Hunt
Foreign Patent Documents
2295896 July 2000 CA
101301230 November 2008 CN
102087676 June 2011 CN
19502733 March 1996 DE
0 178 650 April 1986 EP
0295038 December 1988 EP
0 528 800 March 1993 EP
0761242 March 1997 EP
1 300 511 April 2003 EP
1418013 May 2004 EP
1426013 June 2004 EP
1455666 September 2004 EP
1493455 January 2005 EP
1683593 July 2006 EP
1800700 June 2007 EP
1806154 July 2007 EP
1949989 July 2008 EP
2255329 October 1990 JP
4041794 February 1992 JP
11287020 October 1999 JP
2001303751 October 2001 JP
2003293012 October 2003 JP
2218242 December 2003 RU
9606881 March 1996 WO
02085246 October 2002 WO
2005/084216 September 2005 WO
2005080029 September 2005 WO
2005087982 September 2005 WO
2007058160 May 2007 WO
2009116950 September 2009 WO
2011002765 January 2011 WO
2013006778 January 2013 WO
Other references
  • Engelbrecht et al., Cellular Structures for Optimal Performance, Georgia Institute of Technology & Paramount Industries, Inc., 2009.
  • Wang, Computer-Aided Design Methods for Additive Fabrication of Truss Structures, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2002.
  • Chen, 3D Texture Mapping for Rapid Manufacturing, University of Southern California, 2007.
  • Created and Designed by Shaman Gaspar, Maintained by Peter Fox, “Direct Laser Remelting” , “Project Web Site”, Using Lasers to Grow 3D object on Stainless Steel; The University of Liverpool 2002; http://mserc.liv.ac.uk/research/dlr/dlr—html.
  • Hollander et al., Structural mechanical and in vitro characterization of individually structured Ti-A1-4V produces by direct layer forming, Biomaterials, pp. 1-9, 2005.
  • Vureal et al., Plasma-sprayed oxide ceramics on steel substrates, Surface Coatings and Technology, 97 (1997) 347-354.
  • The Metals Handbook, Desk Edition, 2nd Edition, ASM International, 1998, p. 29.
  • Meiners et al., “Direct Generation of Metal Parts and Tools by Selective Laser Powder Remelting (SLPR)”, W. Meiners, C. Over, K. Wissenbach, R. Poprawe, pp. 655-661 Austin, Texas, Aug. 9-11, 1999.
  • Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 14th edition. John Wiley & Sons, 2002. Definition: sintering.
  • Dr. Kerron Harvey, producer, Research Intelligence, the University of Liverpool, Issue 13, Jun. 2002.
  • H.J. Niu and I.T.H. Chang, “Selective Laser Sintering of Gas and Water Atomized High Speed Steel Powders, ” Scripta Materialia vol. 41, No. 1, (1999), pp. 25-30.
  • European Search Report and Written Opinion, EP05028133, dated May 11, 2010.
  • European Search Report and Written Opinion, EP10162970, dated Jun. 17, 2010.
  • R. Morgan, C.J. Sutcliffe, W. O'Neill, “Experimental investigatoin of nanosecond pulsed Nd:YAG laser re-melted pre-placed powder beds,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 7, No. 3, 2001, pp. 159-172.
  • N.K. Vail, L.D. Swain, W.C. fox, T.B. Aufdlemorte, G. Lee, J.W. Barlow, “Materials for biomedical applications,” Materials and Design, 20, 1999, pp. 123-132.
  • R.H. Morgan, A.J. Papworth, C. Sutcliffe, P. Fox, W. O'Neill, “High density net shape components by direct laser remelting of single phase powders,” Journal of Materials Science, 37, 2002, pp. 3093-3100.
  • European Search Report and Written Opinion, EP06127218, dated May 6, 2010.
  • PCT/US2008/008955 International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Dec. 2, 2008.
  • PCT/US2008/008955 International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Feb. 4, 2010.
  • C. K- Chua et al. Development of a Tissue Engineering Scaffold Structure Library for Rapid Prototyping. Parts 1 and 2, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, (2003) vol. 21, pp. 291-312.
  • Filiz et al., Int. Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 48, 459-472, 2008.
  • Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2013202075 dated Feb. 13, 2015.
  • Australian Examination Report for Application No. 2013202686 date Aug. 7, 2014.
  • Patello-femoral Arthroplasty X-ray Results, Stryker Howmedica Osteonics, published on or before Apr. 5, 2011.
  • Protek Cementless Replacement of the Acetabulum by E. Morscher, published on or before Apr. 5, 2011.
Patent History
Patent number: 9135374
Type: Grant
Filed: Apr 6, 2012
Date of Patent: Sep 15, 2015
Patent Publication Number: 20130264749
Assignees: Howmedica Osteonics Corp. (Mahwah, NJ), The University Of Liverpool
Inventors: Eric Jones (Limerick), Christopher J. Sutcliffe (Liverpool), Joe Robinson (Lancashire), Dan Jones (Limerick), Lewis Mullen (Merseyside)
Primary Examiner: Mohammad Ali
Assistant Examiner: John Park
Application Number: 13/441,154
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Barrier Construction (52/745.05)
International Classification: G06F 17/30 (20060101); B29C 35/08 (20060101); G06F 17/50 (20060101);