Delivery system for ocular implant

- Transcend Medical, Inc.

A delivery system is disclosed which can be used to deliver an ocular implant into a target location within the eye via an ab interno procedure. In some embodiments, the implant can provide fluid communication between the anterior chamber and the suprachoroidal or supraciliary space while in an implanted state. The delivery system can include a proximal handle component and a distal delivery component. In addition, the proximal handle component can include an actuator to control the release of the implant from the delivery component into the target location in the eye.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
REFERENCE TO PRIORITY DOCUMENT

This application claims priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/637,789, filed Apr. 24, 2012, and entitled “Delivery System for Ocular Implant.” The priority of the filing date is hereby claimed, and the disclosure of the provisional patent application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

This disclosure relates generally to methods and devices for use in delivering devices for treating glaucoma.

The mechanisms that cause glaucoma are not completely known. It is known that glaucoma results in abnormally high pressure in the eye, which leads to optic nerve damage. Over time, the increased pressure can cause damage to the optic nerve, which can lead to blindness. Treatment strategies have focused on keeping the intraocular pressure down in order to preserve as much vision as possible over the remainder of the patient's life.

Pursuant to such strategies, one or more implants can be delivered into the eye for shunting fluid out of the anterior chamber in order to regulate pressure in the eye. Accurate placement of an implant in the angle of the eye is critical for the targeted effect of reducing intraocular pressure (IOP). Placing an implant too distally into the eye, such as too distally into the supraciliary space, may leave no portion of the implant remaining in the anterior chamber. This may inhibit aqueous outflow, as the fluid will not have a direct communication with the flow target location if there is no opening to the anterior chamber.

Conversely if the implant is placed too proximally in the supraciliary space such that a significant portion of the implant remains in the anterior chamber, damage to the corneal endothelium may result from implants that protrude upwards and touch the cornea. Implants placed too proximally may also touch the iris resulting in increased amounts of pigment dispersion in the eye, which can increase outflow resistance and intraocular pressure by clogging the trabecular meshwork. Correct placement of the implant is desired for a safe and successful surgical outcome.

In view of the foregoing, there is a need for improved delivery systems for delivering implants into the eye such as by way of an ab interno procedure.

SUMMARY

There is a need for improved delivery systems, devices and methods for the treatment of eye diseases such as glaucoma.

In a first embodiment, disclosed herein is a delivery device for delivering an ocular implant into an eye. The delivery device can include a proximal handle portion and a distal delivery portion coupled to a distal end of the handle portion and configured to releasably hold an ocular implant. In addition, the delivery portion can include a sheath positioned axially over a guidewire. The delivery device can further include an actuator coupled to a mechanism that releases the ocular implant from the delivery portion upon actuation of the actuator.

Also described herein are methods of delivering an ocular implant to a target location within an eye. In an embodiment, disclosed is a method including loading the ocular implant onto a distal delivery portion of a delivery system. The delivery system can include a proximal handle portion with the delivery portion coupled to a distal end of the handle portion. In addition, the delivery portion can be configured to releasably hold the ocular implant. The delivery portion can further include a sheath positioned axially over a guidewire. Additionally, the delivery device can include an actuator coupled to a mechanism that releases the ocular implant from the delivery portion upon actuation of the actuator. The method can further include inserting the distal delivery portion and the ocular implant into the eye through a corneal incision and positioning the ocular implant into the target location within the eye by way of an ab-interno procedure. Furthermore, the method can include actuating the actuator and releasing the ocular implant into the target location.

Other features and advantages should be apparent from the following description of various embodiments, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the described subject matter.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other aspects will now be described in detail with reference to the following drawings.

FIG. 1 shows an example cross-sectional view of a portion of the human eye.

FIG. 2 shows and an example partial cross-sectional view of the eye showing a part of the anterior and posterior chambers of the eye and an ocular implant implanted in the eye.

FIG. 3 shows a perspective view of an embodiment of a delivery device having a proximal handle component and a distal delivery component with an ocular implant loaded onto the distal delivery component.

FIG. 4 shows a close up view of the distal end of the delivery component of FIG. 3 which illustrates the implant loaded onto a guidewire of the delivery system.

FIG. 5 shows a partial cross section view of the delivery system of FIG. 3 showing a distal portion of the handle component, including the spring-loaded actuator in a compressed configuration, and the distal delivery component.

FIG. 6 shows the partial cross section view of the delivery system of FIG. 5 with the spring-loaded actuator shown in a decompressed configuration which releases the implant from the distal delivery component.

FIG. 7 shows an embodiment of the guidewire of the delivery system having a curved configuration.

FIG. 8 shows an embodiment of the guidewire of the delivery system having a sinusoidal configuration.

FIG. 9 shows an embodiment of the guidewire of the delivery system having a length sufficient to extend from the supraciliary space down to the sub-retinal space.

FIG. 10 shows an enlarged view of the anterior region of the eye with the implant approaching the supraciliary space or suprachoroidal space from the anterior chamber.

Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional, perspective view of a portion of the eye showing the anterior and posterior chambers of the eye. A schematic representation of an implant 105 is positioned inside the eye such that a proximal end 110 is located in the anterior chamber 115 and a distal end 120 communicates with and/or is located in or near the supraciliary space or suprachoroidal space (sometimes referred to as the perichoroidal space). It should be appreciated that FIG. 1 and other figures herein are schematic and are not necessarily to scale with respect to size and relative positions of actual eye tissue.

The implant 105 provides a fluid pathway between the anterior chamber 115 into the supraciliary space and toward the suprachoroidal space. The implant 105 has a distal end 120 that may be positioned in the supraciliary space or the suprachoroidal space. The implant 105 may be positioned at least partially between the ciliary body and the sclera or it may be at least partially positioned between the sclera and the choroid. The distal end 120 of the implant 105 is not necessarily positioned between the choroid and the sclera.

In an embodiment, the implant 105 is an elongate element having one or more internal lumens through which aqueous humor can flow from the anterior chamber 115 into the supraciliary space. The implant 105 can have a substantially uniform internal diameter along its entire length, although the shape of the implant 105 can vary along its length (either before or after insertion of the implant), as described below. Moreover, the implant 105 can have various cross-sectional shapes (such as a circular, oval or rectangular shape) and can vary in cross-sectional shape moving along its length. The cross-sectional shape can be selected to facilitate easy insertion into the eye. The following applications describe exemplary implants: U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2007-0191863 and 2009-0182421. These applications are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of the human eye. The eye is generally spherical and is covered on the outside by the sclera S. The retina (not shown) lines the inside posterior half of the eye. The retina registers the light and sends signals to the brain via the optic nerve. The bulk of the eye is filled and supported by the vitreous body, a clear, jelly-like substance. The elastic lens L is located near the front of the eye. The lens L provides adjustment of focus and is suspended within a capsular bag from the ciliary body CB, which contains the muscles that change the focal length of the lens. A volume in front of the lens L is divided into two by the iris I, which controls the aperture of the lens and the amount of light striking the retina. The pupil is a hole in the center of the iris I through which light passes. The volume between the iris I and the lens L is the posterior chamber PC. The volume between the iris I and the cornea is the anterior chamber AC. Both chambers are filled with a clear liquid known as aqueous humor.

The ciliary body CB continuously forms aqueous humor in the posterior chamber PC by secretion from the blood vessels. The aqueous humor flows around the lens L and iris I into the anterior chamber and exits the eye through the trabecular meshwork, a sieve-like structure situated at the corner of the iris I and the wall of the eye (the corner is known as the iridocorneal angle). Some of the aqueous humor filters through the trabecular meshwork near the iris root into Schlemm's canal, a small channel that drains into the ocular veins. A smaller portion rejoins the venous circulation after passing through the ciliary body and eventually through the sclera (the uveoscleral route).

The internal lumen of the implant 105 serves as a passageway for the flow of aqueous humor through the implant 105 directly from the anterior chamber toward or into the supraciliary or suprachoroidal space. In addition, the internal lumen of the implant 105 can be used as an access location to mount the implant 105 onto a delivery device, as described in more detail below. The internal lumen can also be used as a pathway for flowing fluid, such as an irrigation fluid or a visco-elastic substance(s), into the eye for flushing or to maintain pressure in the anterior chamber, or using the fluid to assist in dissection, visualization or hydraulic creation of a dissection plane into or within the suprachoroidal space.

Fluid can be flowed toward or into the supraciliary or suprachoroidal space, for example via a delivery cannula or through the internal lumen of the shunt. The fluid can be flowed into the eye with a pressure sufficient to form a dissection plane into or within the supraciliary suprachoroidal space. The fluid can accumulate within the eye so as to form a lake. In general, hydro-dissection or the injection of fluids such as a visco-elastic substance(s) can be used to separate the ciliary body from the sclera to enlarge an area of detachment of the ciliary body from the sclera with or without insertion of a device.

FIG. 3 shows an embodiment of a delivery system 305 that can be used to deliver the implant 105 into the eye. In some embodiments, the implant 105 can provide fluid communication between the anterior chamber toward the suprachoroidal or supraciliary space while in an implanted state. It should be appreciated that these delivery systems 305 are exemplary and that variations in the structure, shape and actuation of the delivery system 305 are possible. The delivery system 305 can include a proximal handle component 310 and a distal delivery component 312. The proximal handle component 310 can include an actuator 420, such as a button, to control the release of an implant from the delivery component 312 into a target location in the eye. The actuator 420 can vary in structure and is not limited to a button.

An embodiment of the delivery component 312 includes an elongate applier in the form of a guidewire 515 and a “stopper” or sheath 510 positioned axially over the guidewire 515. The guidewire 515 can insert longitudinally through the internal lumen of the implant 105 and can assist in inserting and positioning the implant 105 into the target location. The sheath 510 can aid in the release of the implant 105 from the delivery component 312 into the target location in the eye. In addition, the actuator 420 can be used to control movement or relative movement of the guidewire 515 and/or the sheath 510. For example, the sheath 510 can be fixed relative to the handle component 310 and act as a stopper which can impede the implant 105 from moving in a proximal direction as the guidewire 515 is withdrawn proximally from the implant 105 upon actuation of the actuator 420.

For example, in a first state, the guidewire 515 can be extended distally relative to a distal end of the sheath 510. Actuation of the actuator 420, such as by pressing the actuator 420, can cause the guidewire 515 to slide proximally or retract into the sheath 510. This can effectively disengage the implant 105 off the distal end of the guidewire 515 and releases the implant 105 in a controlled fashion into the target location. Controlled disengagement of the implant 105 off the distal end of the guidewire 515 can assist in ensuring that positioning of the implant 105 within the target location is maintained.

FIG. 4 shows an embodiment of the implant 105 mounted on the delivery component 312 of the delivery system 305. More specifically, the implant 105 can be mounted on the distal region of the guidewire 515, as shown in FIG. 4. In addition, the sheath 510 can be sized and shaped to receive or abut a portion of the proximal end of the implant 105. In this embodiment, upon actuation of the actuator 420, the guidewire 515 can slide in a proximal direction (arrow P) into the sheath 510 which can allow the proximal end of the implant 105 to abut the distal end of the sheath 510 and prevent the implant 105 from sliding in the proximal direction. This can effectively disengage the implant 105 off the distal end of the guidewire 515 and controllably releases the implant 105 into the target location within the eye.

In some embodiments, the actuator 420 can be a push-button that is coupled to a spring-activated mechanism. Upon applying a force onto the actuator 420, the spring mechanism can retract the guidewire 515 toward and/or into the sheath 510 which can release the implant 105 from the guidewire 515. The mechanism by which the guidewire 515 can be withdrawn into the sheath 510 can be a spring activated assembly or any of a variety of mechanisms that allow the guidewire to retract upon activation of an actuator.

FIG. 5 shows an embodiment of a portion of the delivery system 305 in cross-section with the implant 105 loaded onto the guidewire 515. The delivery system 305 can include a front spring 550 which can assist in positioning the guidewire 515. For example, the front spring 550 can be compressed or charged which can allow the guidewire 515 to be positioned in an extended state relative to the handle 310. When the guidewire 515 is in an extended state, the guidewire 515 can be loaded with the implant 105, as shown in FIG. 5.

The delivery system 305 can include a variety of mechanisms for assisting in the positioning of the guidewire 515. For example, the delivery system 305 can include a feature which can interact with the actuator 420 in order to allow the actuator to assist in positioning the guidewire 515. For example, the guidewire 515 can be attached at a proximal end to a piston 560 having a de-tent latch 555. The de-tent latch 555 can interact with the actuator 420 such that upon actuation of the actuator 420, the 555 latch can release the piston 560 from a locked position and allow the piston 560 to move. For example, once the piston 560 is allowed to move, the front spring 550 can force the piston to move in a direction, such as in a proximal direction, thus causing the guidewire 515 to move in a proximal direction. Movement of the guidewire 515 in a proximal direction can allow the implant 105 loaded on the distal end of the guidewire 515 to be released from the guidewire 515.

In some embodiments, the actuator 420 can be configured such that when actuated or depressed by the user, the detent latch 555 of the piston 560 is flexed downward thereby allowing the front spring 550 to release. As the piston 560 moves proximally with the guidewire 515, the implant 105 can abut the distal end of the stopper tube 510 and release from the guidewire 515. FIG. 6 shows an embodiment of the delivery system 305 in a retracted state where the front spring 550 is in a decompressed state with the implant 105 fully released from the guidewire 515.

The travel of the piston 560 can be defined such that the guidewire 515 reaches a complete stop in the proximal direction only after the implant 105 is fully released. In addition, the force of the front spring 550 can allow withdrawal of the guidewire 515 from the implant 105 when the implant 105 is positioned in a variety of angles relative to the stopper tube 510. For example, the force of the front spring 550 can allow the withdrawal of the guidewire 515 from the implant 105 when the implant 105 is at a 45 degree angle relative to the stopper tube 510, such as what may be encountered when the implant 105 is being deployed to the supraciliary space.

In some embodiments, for example, the front spring 550 can provide approximately 1.0 to 2.0 lbf at the compressed or charged configuration which can allow the guidewire 515 to withdraw from the implant 105, including when the implant 105 is positioned at an approximate 45 degree angle relative to the stopper tube 510. However, the front spring 550 can provide any of a variety of spring force which allows the guidewire 515 to release the implant 105 positioned at a variety of angles relative to at least the stopper tube 510.

In some embodiments, the front spring 550 can create approximately 2.0 to 10.0 lbf. For example, a greater spring force of the front spring 550 can allow the guidewire 515 to retract in a variety of conditions. In addition, a lower force of the front spring, such as 0.10 to 1.0 lbf, may reduce the speed of the retraction and reduce the force required to reload the system. Any of a variety of front springs 550 can be implemented in the delivery system 350.

A dampening element, such as grease 565, may be placed between the piston 560 and inside wall of the handle 310 which can assist in providing a slower retraction of the guidewire 515. A slower retraction of the guidewire 515 can prevent or lessen any jerking motion of the delivery system 350 in the user's hands, including at the end of the piston 560 travel. This dampening grease 565 can be a silicone grease such that grease is unaffected by production level e-beam sterilization dose of 25-50 kGy. In addition, other dampening elements aside from grease 565 may be used. Alternate dampening grease such as low, medium, or high viscosity fluorocarbons may be used to alter the dampening and speed of deployment. These materials may have a larger acceptable e-beam sterilization range.

In some embodiments, the spring-activated retraction of the guidewire 515 can improve the delivery of supraciliary and suprachoroidal implants. For example, some current tools for implanting ocular implants require a sliding motion of the user's finger, such as in the range of approximately 0.280″ inches of travel, in order to release the implant. The sliding motion can be difficult for surgeons to achieve while simultaneously holding the distal end of the delivery tool steady. In contrast, the spring-activated mechanism of the present disclosure, including the spring activated push-button mechanism, allows for smaller and more ergonomic motion of the users finger to activate guidewire 515 retraction which also allows the user to maintain the distal end of the delivery device 312 in a steady position. In addition, the spring-activated mechanism of the present disclosure can allow implantation to occur more quickly and with less unwanted distal movement of the implant 105 during the guidewire retention.

The outer diameter of the guidewire 515 can be smaller than the inner diameter of the implant 105 (i.e. the fluid channel) such that the implant 105 can be loaded onto the guidewire 515 by sliding the guidewire 515 into and through an internal lumen of the implant 105. In some embodiments, the guidewire 515 can include a retention feature that can act to retain the implant 105 on the guidewire 515. For example, the guidewire 515 can include a retention feature which can assist in retaining the implant 105 on the guidewire 515 during blunt dissection and implantation in order to prevent the implant 105 from inadvertently sliding off the guidewire 515.

Before the implant 105 has been released from the guidewire 515 and implanted into the target location within the eye, the implant 105 can be moved either distally or proximally in order to adjust its placement. This can exert axial forces on the implant 105 which may cause it to slip off the guidewire 515 if it is not well retained on the guidewire 515. Therefore, in some embodiments, the guidewire 515 can include features which can assist in retaining the implant 105 onto the guidewire 515 during positioning of the implant 105, including positioning the implant 105 within the target location.

FIG. 7 shows an embodiment of a guidewire 515 which has at least one retention feature including a curved configuration 520 along a length of the guidewire 515. In some embodiments, the curved configuration 520 of the guidewire 515 can assist in facilitating entry of the implant 105 into the supracilliary space. In addition, the curvature of the guidewire 515 can change the shape of the implant 105 due to the implant 105 conforming to the curved shape of the guidewire 515 which can facilitate placement of the implant 105 into the supraciliary space as it curves along the scleral wall. The curvature radius or arc, including the curved configuration 520 of the guidewire 515, can vary and can be in the range of approximately 0.425″ to about 0.525″ with a central angle of approximately 20 degrees to approximately 40 degrees.

Additionally, any part of the guidewire 515 can have the curved configuration 520, including either the distal end or the entire length of the guidewire 515. Furthermore, the guidewire 515 can alternate between having a variety of configurations, including both straight and curved configurations. For example, the guidewire 515 can have a curved configuration in its natural state but can conform to a straight passageway, such as through the handle 310 of the delivery system 305. Therefore, the guidewire 515 can conform to a straight passageway and return to a curved configuration after having passed through the straight passageway.

In some embodiments, the guidewire 515 can have one or more cut patters along a length of the guidewire 515 which can allow the guidewire 515 to be more flexible than the material comprising the guidewire 515 can allow. For example, the distal end or tip of the guidewire 515 can include a spiral cut pattern which allows the tip of the guidewire 515 to deflect or bend in one or more of a variety of directions relative to a longitudinal axis of the guidewire 515. Furthermore, the spiral cut pattern can allow the distal end or tip of the guidewire 515 to deflect or bend to a greater degree than what the guidewire could achieve without the spiral cut pattern. These cut patterns may additionally serve as fluid conduits which can provide a passageway for substances injected into the guidewire 515 to be released to an area surrounding the guidewire, including either the implant or the eye.

FIG. 8 shows an embodiment of the guidewire 515 having at least one retention feature including a sinusoidal or S-curve configuration along a length of the guidewire 515. The sinusoidal or S-curve configuration can assist in retaining the implant 105 onto the guidewire 515, such as by at least one curved region 524 along a length of the guidewire 515. The at least one curved feature can include a protrusion, bump, etc. For example, the curved feature 524 can be configured to provide an interference fit between the guidewire 515 and the inner lumen of the implant 105.

In some embodiments, the retention feature can include an S-shaped curve along a length of the guidewire 515 which can have one or more rounded curved features 524, including bends or peaks, as shown in FIG. 8. Furthermore, each retention feature, such as curved feature 524, can form a point of contact between the inner lumen of the implant 105 and the guidewire 515. The curved features 524 of the guidewire S-curve can also reduce the risk of damaging the inner lumen of the implant 105 as the guidewire 515 is released from the implant 105. In addition, the retention features can provide a gentle interaction and retention between the guidewire 515 and the implant 105, including during removal of the guidewire 515 from the implant 105. Alternatively, the guidewire 515 retention features can be stamped, bent or shape-set, including in the shape of swells or other formations along at least a part of the length of the guidewire 515.

In an embodiment, an amount of retention force can be defined by the peak-to-peak distance between two or more retention features or curved features 524 of the implant 105. For example, larger peak-to-peak distances between the two or more curved features 524 can produce higher retention forces and smaller peak-to-peak distances can produce lower retention forces. In some embodiments, a peak-to-peak distance that is too large can cause damage to the implant 105, such as due to the guidewire 515 scraping away material along the inner lumen during removal. For example, the peak-to-peak distance may be in the range of approximately 0.0100″ to approximately 0.0200″, or in the range of approximately 0.0120″ to approximately 0.0150″. In addition, at least one retention force acting upon the implant 105, such as a polyimide implant, by the guidewire 515 of approximately 0.050-0.200 lbf can be sufficient to retain the implant 105 along the guidewire 515 during manipulation of the implant 105 prior to implantation into the target location.

In alternate embodiments, the material of the guidewire 515 can be made out of one or more flexible materials, such as metals including stainless steel or elgiloy, and polymers such as Pebax, silicones, urethanes, including a variety of combinations of materials. In some embodiments, the guidewire 515 can have a radius of curvature or arc which is less than 0.425″, such as in order to provide a small curvature of the implant 105 during insertion. This configuration can be advantageous when access between the incision and the target location requires the implant 105 to be introduced into the target location by way of a small radius, such as less than 0.425″.

Alternatively, the radius of curvature or arc of the guidewire 515 can be larger than 0.525″. Any of a variety of radius of curvature or arcs of the guidewire 515 can be implemented into any of the delivery systems 305 in order to best accommodate insertion of the implant 105 into the designated target location. For example, the radius of curvature or arc of the guidewire 515 may be such that it can allow the implant 105 to bend against the scleral wall during insertion into the supraciliary space. In addition, the retention features of the guidewire 515 can vary and can include one or more of a variety of shapes and sizes along a length of the guidewire 515. For example, the retention features can be configured to include spiral shapes, triangle peaks or the like. Additionally, the retention features can extend along one or more of a variety of planes, including more than one retention feature extending in planes positioned perpendicular relative to each other.

In addition, any number of retention features can be positioned along a length of the guidewire 515. For example, at least two, including more than five or more than ten retention features can be positioned along a length of the guidewire 515. In addition, each retention feature can provide the same or a variety of different amounts of retention forces for securing the implant 105 in a position along the guidewire 515. In some embodiments, the peak-to-peak distance between the retention features can be larger than the inner diameter of the implant 105 and can be a dimensioned larger than 0.0150″ such that it does not damage the implant 105.

In some embodiments of the delivery system 305, instead of using the guidewire 515 to provide retention of the implant 105, an additional feature of the delivery system 305 or device can be used in order to provide the necessary retention of the implant 105 onto the guidewire 515. This may include, for example, a Pebax material which can be coupled onto a part of the guidewire 515 in order to create at least a width along the guidewire 515 that is larger than the inner diameter of the implant 105. For example, the Pebax material can be crimped to the guidewire and can retain the implant 105 relative to the guidewire 515 until the implant 150 is released from the delivery system 305, such as after actuation of the actuator 420.

As shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, the delivery system 305 can include at least one fluid delivery feature which can be configured to deliver fluid into at least one of the implant or the eye, including during or after implantation of the implant 105. The delivered fluid can vary and may include a viscoelastic, drugs, stem cells, or a combination thereof. In addition, the delivery may be in combination with retinal or macula therapy.

The at least one fluid delivery feature can include an elongated tube 370 having at least one inner lumen. The elongated tube 370 can extend outward from the handle 310. In addition, the elongated tube 370 can extend through the handle 310. Additionally, the elongated tube 370 can have an internal lumen which communicates with an internal lumen of the guidewire 515.

In some embodiments, the guidewire 515 can include one or more outlet openings, such as slots 541 (FIG. 4), which can be located along a length of the guidewire 515, including along a distal region of the guidewire 515. The slots 541 can allow fluid communication between the internal lumen of the guidewire 515 and an area surrounding the guidewire 515. In addition, the outlet openings or slots 541 can also be in fluid communication with at least one inner lumen of the elongated tube 370.

In some embodiments, the elongated tube 370 can be connected at a proximal end to a source of fluid (such as via a Luer connection). The source of fluid can provide fluid into at least one inner lumen of the elongated tube 370 which can be delivered to a variety of places either within at least one of the delivery system 305, the implant 105 or the eye. For example, some of the fluid provided by the fluid source can be passed through the elongated tube 370 and exit the guidewire 515 via the slots 541 for delivery into the eye.

The size of the at least one inner lumens of the elongated tube 370 and guidewire 515 may vary. In an embodiment, the inner lumen of either the elongated tube 370 or guidewire 515 can be within a range of approximately 0.001″ to approximately 0.010″ in diameter, or approximately 0.005″ to approximately 0.009″ in diameter. In addition, the size of the inner lumen can depend on the size constraints of the outer diameter of either the elongated tube 370 or the guidewire 515.

In some embodiments, the distal slots 541 of the guidewire 515 can allow fluid from at least the fluid source to be delivered to a distal end of the implant 105, including during or after implantation of the implant 105. In addition, fluid from the fluid source can be delivered to an area adjacent the distal end of the implant in order to create an aqueous lake or create a tenting effect around at least a part of or adjacent the implant 105. The size and location of the slots 541 can be sized, shaped and positioned along the guidewire 515 in order to create a variety of fluid delivery effects. For example, at least two slots 541 can be configured symmetrically relative to the distal end of the guidewire 515 which can allow the fluid to be delivered symmetrically around or near the distal end of the implant.

In an embodiment, the flow rate of the fluid from the fluid source can be within a range of approximately 1 mg/sec to 10 mg/sec, or approximately 2 mg/sec to 5 mg/sec. In addition, the burst pressure of the delivery system 305, including the fluid delivery features, can be large enough to withstand the pressure of injecting a fluid through the lumens of the delivery system 305 and implants 105.

In some embodiments, the burst pressure of the delivery system 305 can be larger than the pressure required for the fluid to flow from the fluid source through at least the delivery system 305. For example, the burst pressure can be approximately 400 psi to approximately 1500 psi, or approximately 600 psi to approximately 1200 psi. In addition, the burst pressure required for viscoelastic flow of Healon 5 can be approximately 100 psi to approximately 500 psi, or approximately 200 psi to approximately 300 psi.

In some embodiments, fluid from the fluid source can be delivered to one or more sections along the axial length of the implant 105. For example, one or more holes along the length of the implant 105 (as shown in FIG. 4) can be configured to be sufficiently large such that a fluid may be delivered from the guidewire 515. For example, one or more slits 514 positioned along the length of the guidewire 515, such as below a loaded implant 105, can allow fluid to travel through the at least one hole along the length of the implant 105 and into the eye. For example, the fluid can flow out from the one or more holes along the length of the implant and into the supraciliary or suprachoroidal space surrounding the body of the implant 105 (depending on where the implant is positioned and the length of the implant). The release of fluid through the at least one hole along the length of the implant 105 can assist in creating additional space surrounding the implant 105 which can improve tenting.

One or more drugs can be delivered to the inner lumen of the implant 105 through the one or more holes or slits 514 along the axial length of the guidewire 515. Alternatively or in addition, drugs can be delivered through the guidewire 515 slots 541 positioned at or near the distal end of the guidewire 515 which can dispense fluid either before or during retraction of the guidewire 515. In some instances, this can reduce the fibrotic response of the surrounding tissue to the implant 105. Additionally, the delivery of fluids may be administered through separate components that do not retain the implant 105. For example, separate tubes may be inserted into the eye alongside of the implant 105 which can deliver drugs or viscoelastic to, for example, the distal end of the implant 105.

The system may also be used for the ab-interno delivery of fluids to other locations in the eye. FIG. 9, for example, shows the guidewire 515 having a length sufficient to extend from the supraciliary space down to the sub-retinal space. Fluid delivery in the subretinal portion of the eye may be advantageous because it can allow for direct delivery of drugs to the macula for diseases such as age related macular degeneration (AMD) or diabetic retinopathy, or the like. A variety of drugs can be delivered to the sub-retinal space, including anti-VEGF treatments or the like. Alternatively other fluids containing a stem cell therapeutic may be delivered through the guidewire 515 and into the sub-retinal or sub-macula space. These could be used to treat disease such as glaucoma, AMD, and diabetic retinopathy.

Additionally, fluid may be delivered to various anatomical structures comprising the eye. For example, fluid can be delivered to anatomical structures such as the Schlemm's Canal. By way of further example, the guidewire 515 can be passed through the Trabecular Meshwork, such as via an ab interno procedure, and into the Schlemm's Canal where viscoelastic substances can then be injected. The viscoelastic substances can then travel circumferentially around the eye for a number of hours which can dilate the Schlemm's Canal. In another embodiment, the guidewire 515 may be inserted through the sclera with the tip of the guidewire 515 just below the conjunctiva. Fluids such as viscoelastic may then be injected to create a sub-conjunctiva space which can form a filtration bleb.

A guidewire 515 assembly having an increased stiffness, such as one made from Nitinol, can be appropriately sized and delivered through an ab-interno approach. Alternate materials such as flexible polymers including Pebax, silicone, and urethane, can also be used. The ab-interno procedure can offer a patient significant reductions in complications and risks that are associated with the current ab-externo procedures, including conjunctivitis.

An example method of delivering and implanting the ocular implant 105 in the eye can include loading one or more implants 105 on a delivery system 305 and implanting the implants 105 by way of an ab interno procedure. The implant 105 can be implanted such that it can provide fluid communication between the anterior chamber and the supraciliary or suprachoroidal space. The implant 105 can then be secured in the eye so that it provides permanent fluid communication between the anterior chamber and the supraciliary space or suprachoroidal space.

The guidewire 515 can be positioned on the delivery system 305 such that the distal tip of the guidewire 515, the implant 105 and sheath 510 can penetrate through a small corneal incision in order to access the anterior chamber, such as along the limbus of the cornea. In an embodiment, the incision can be very close to the limbus, such as either at the level of the limbus or within 2 mm of the limbus in the clear cornea. The guidewire 515 can be used to make the incision or a separate cutting device can be used. For example, a knife-tipped device or diamond knife can be used to initially enter the cornea.

The corneal incision can have a size that is sufficient to permit passage of at least the implant 105. In an embodiment, the incision can be approximately 1 mm in size. In another embodiment, the incision can be no greater than approximately 2.85 mm in size. In another embodiment, the incision is no greater than approximately 2.85 mm and can be greater than approximately 1.5 mm.

After insertion through the incision, the guidewire 515 can be advanced into the anterior chamber along a pathway that enables the implant 105 to be delivered to a position such that the implant 105 provides a flow passageway from the anterior chamber toward the suprachoroidal space. The guidewire 515 can be advanced further into the eye such that the blunt distal tip of the guidewire 515 and/or the implant 105 seats with and can penetrate the iris root IR or a region of the ciliary body CB or the iris root part of the ciliary body near its tissue border with the scleral spur.

The guidewire 515 can approach the iris root from the same side of the anterior chamber as the deployment location such that the guidewire 515 does not have to be advanced across the iris. Alternately, the guidewire 515 can approach the location from across the anterior chamber such that the guidewire 515 is advanced across the iris and/or the anterior chamber toward the opposite iris root. The guidewire 515 can approach the eye and the iris root along a variety of pathways. For example, the guidewire 515 can be advanced through the anterior chamber such that it does not intersect the optical axis of the eye. In other words, the corneal incision and the location where the implant 105 is implanted at the iris root can be in the same quadrant (if the eye is viewed from the front and divided into four quadrants).

FIG. 10 shows an enlarged view of the anterior region of the eye showing the anterior chamber AC, the cornea C, the iris I, and the sclera S. In addition, FIG. 10 shows the implant 105 loaded onto a guidewire 515 and approaching the supraciliary space or suprachoroidal space from the anterior chamber AC. The implant 105 mounted on the guidewire 515 can move along a pathway such that the dissection entry point of the distal tip of the guidewire 515 can penetrate the iris root IR near its junction with the scleral spur SSp or the iris root portion of the ciliary body CB or other desired location. The surgeon can rotate or reposition the handle 310 of the delivery system 305 in order to obtain a proper approach trajectory for the distal tip of the guidewire 515, as described in further detail below.

The guidewire 515 with the implant 105 positioned thereupon can be advanced from a region of the anterior chamber which can be viewed through a transparent zone of the cornea to a region of the anterior chamber that may be obscured by an opaque zone of the cornea. The guidewire 515 and implant 105 can be advanced through the cornea C until resistance is felt and the delivery device can be seated at a location near the iris root IR, the ciliary body or the iris root portion of the ciliary body. The guidewire 515 can then be advanced further such that the guidewire 515 and implant 105 loaded thereon can penetrate an area of fibrous attachment between the scleral spur SSP and the ciliary body CB. This area of fibrous attachment can be approximately 1 mm in length. Once the distal tip of the guidewire 515 penetrates and is urged past this fibrous attachment region, the guidewire 515 can then more easily cause the sclera S to peel away or otherwise separate from the ciliary body CB and possibly the choroid as the guidewire 515 follows the inner curve of the sclera S and enters the supraciliary space. A combination of the guidewire's tip shape, material, material properties, diameter, flexibility, compliance, coatings, pre-curvature etc. can make it more inclined to follow an implantation pathway which mirrors the curvature of the inner wall of the sclera and between tissue layers such as between the sclera and the ciliary body, and between the sclera and the choroid.

The dissection plane of the guidewire 515 and implant 105 can follow the curve of the inner scleral wall such that the implant 105 mounted on the guidewire 515 can bluntly dissect the boundary between the scleral spur SSp and the ciliary body CB such that a distal region of the implant extends into the supraciliary space. For example, the dissection plane can be formed by the guidewire 515 and implant 105 after either the guidewire 515 or implant 105 penetrates the iris root or the iris root portion of the ciliary body. In an embodiment, the implant 105 can be positioned such that it does not extend anteriorly past the scleral spur SSP far enough to reach or otherwise contact the choroid. In addition, in some embodiments, the distal end of the implant 105 does not reach and cannot contact the choroid. In another embodiment, the implant 105 can extend sufficiently past the scleral spur SSP such that it can be positioned between the tissue boundaries of the sclera and the choroid (the suprachoroidal space).

In some embodiments, at least approximately 1 mm to approximately 2 mm of the implant (along the length) remains in the anterior chamber AC. The implant 105 can be positioned so that a portion of the implant 105 is sitting on top of the ciliary body CB. The ciliary body CB may act as a platform off of which the implant 105 can cantilever towards or into the suprachoroidal space SChS although the implant may not actually enter the suprachoroidal space. The implant 105 can lift or “tent” the sclera S outward such that a tented chamber is formed around the distal end of the implant 105. It should be appreciated that the actual contour of the tented region of tissue may differ in the actual anatomy. In some embodiments, the distal end of the implant 105 does not extend far enough to reach the choroid. In another embodiment, the distal end of the implant 105 reaches the choroid and can contact the choroid.

Once properly positioned, the implant 105 can then be released from the guidewire 515. The implant 105 can be released for example by withdrawing the guidewire 515 such that the implant 105 is effectively disengaged in a controlled manner from the tip of the guidewire 515 with the assistance of the sheath 510, as described above.

The implant 105 can include one or more structural features near its proximal region that aid to anchor or retain the implant 105 in the target location in the eye. The structural features can include flanges, protrusions, wings, tines, or prongs, and the like which can lodge into surrounding eye anatomy in order retain the implant 105 in place and prevent the implant 105 from moving further into the suprachoroidal space SchS.

While this specification contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of an invention that is claimed or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular embodiments. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or a variation of a sub-combination. Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. Only a few examples and implementations are disclosed. Variations, modifications and enhancements to the described examples and implementations and other implementations may be made based on what is disclosed.

Claims

1. A delivery device for delivering an ocular implant into an eye, the delivery device comprising:

a proximal handle portion;
a distal delivery portion coupled to a distal end of the handle portion and configured to releasably hold an ocular implant, the delivery portion comprising a sheath positioned axially over a guidewire that inserts through the ocular implant when the ocular implant is mounted on the guidewire such that only the guidewire is inserted into the ocular implant; and
an actuator coupled to a mechanism that releases the ocular implant from the delivery portion upon actuation of the actuator, wherein the guidewire is coupled to a part of the mechanism which includes a spring, wherein actuation of the actuator causes the spring to retract the guidewire; and
a dampener coupled to the handle portion, the dampener adapted to dampen retraction of the guidewire upon actuation of the actuator
wherein the guidewire includes at least one non-spiraled curved section that at least partially retains the implant on the guidewire during delivery into the eye, wherein the curved section forms a radius of curvature that is tighter than a radius of curvature of the entire guidewire.

2. The delivery device of claim 1, wherein a distal end of the guidewire extends distally from a distal end of the sheath when the spring is in a first formation.

3. The delivery device of claim 2, wherein the distal end of the guidewire proximally retracts from the distal end of the sheath when the spring is in a second formation.

4. The delivery device of claim 3, wherein actuation of the actuator causes the spring to transition between the first formation and the second formation.

5. The delivery device of claim 1, wherein a distal end of the sheath at least one of receives or abuts a proximal end of the ocular implant and prevents the ocular implant from sliding in a proximal direction as the guidewire proximally retracts.

6. The delivery device of claim 1, wherein the curved section includes a radius of curvature in the range of 0.425 inches to 0.525 inches with a central angle in the range of 20 degrees to 40 degrees.

7. The delivery device of claim 1, wherein the guidewire includes at least one inner lumen.

8. The delivery device of claim 7, wherein the guidewire includes at least one opening along a length of the guidewire which provides fluid communication between the inner lumen of the guidewire and an area surrounding the guidewire.

9. The delivery device of claim 8, wherein the implant includes at least one hole along a length of the ocular implant which provides fluid communication between the inner lumen of the implant and an area surrounding the ocular implant.

10. The delivery device of claim 1, wherein the delivery device includes at least one fluid delivery feature which delivers fluid from a fluid source to at least one of the ocular implant or the eye.

11. The delivery device of claim 10, wherein the fluid from the fluid source includes one or more of a viscoelastic, a drug and a stem cell.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
2990670 July 1961 Kingsbury
3439675 April 1969 Cohen
3767759 October 1973 Wichterle
3788327 January 1974 Donowitz et al.
3915172 October 1975 Wichterle et al.
4037604 July 26, 1977 Newkirk
4402681 September 6, 1983 Haas et al.
4457757 July 3, 1984 Molteno
4521210 June 4, 1985 Wong
4554918 November 26, 1985 White
4604087 August 5, 1986 Joseph
4617715 October 21, 1986 Koistinen et al.
4634418 January 6, 1987 Binder
4722724 February 2, 1988 Schocket
4750901 June 14, 1988 Molteno
4787885 November 29, 1988 Binder
4826478 May 2, 1989 Schocket
4846172 July 11, 1989 Berlin
4863457 September 5, 1989 Lee
4886488 December 12, 1989 White
4900300 February 13, 1990 Lee
4946436 August 7, 1990 Smith
4968296 November 6, 1990 Ritch et al.
5041081 August 20, 1991 Odrich
5071408 December 10, 1991 Ahmed
5073163 December 17, 1991 Lippman
5092837 March 3, 1992 Ritch et al.
5127901 July 7, 1992 Odrich
5171213 December 15, 1992 Price, Jr.
5178604 January 12, 1993 Baerveldt et al.
5180362 January 19, 1993 Worst
5284476 February 8, 1994 Koch
5300020 April 5, 1994 L'Esperance, Jr.
5338291 August 16, 1994 Speckman et al.
5342370 August 30, 1994 Simon et al.
5346464 September 13, 1994 Camras
5370607 December 6, 1994 Memmen
5372577 December 13, 1994 Ungerleider
5397300 March 14, 1995 Baerveldt et al.
5433701 July 18, 1995 Rubinstein
5443505 August 22, 1995 Wong et al.
5454746 October 3, 1995 Guegan et al.
5476445 December 19, 1995 Baerveldt et al.
5558629 September 24, 1996 Baerveldt et al.
5558630 September 24, 1996 Fisher
RE35390 December 3, 1996 Smith
5601094 February 11, 1997 Reiss
5626558 May 6, 1997 Suson
5626559 May 6, 1997 Solomon
5651782 July 29, 1997 Simon et al.
5676944 October 14, 1997 Alvarado et al.
5702414 December 30, 1997 Richter et al.
5704907 January 6, 1998 Nordquist et al.
5713844 February 3, 1998 Peyman
5741292 April 21, 1998 Mendius
5743868 April 28, 1998 Brown et al.
5752928 May 19, 1998 de Roulhac et al.
5792075 August 11, 1998 Schwager
5807244 September 15, 1998 Barot
5807302 September 15, 1998 Wandel
5868697 February 9, 1999 Richter et al.
5882327 March 16, 1999 Jacob
5893837 April 13, 1999 Eagles et al.
5941250 August 24, 1999 Aramant et al.
5968058 October 19, 1999 Richter et al.
6007510 December 28, 1999 Nigam
6007511 December 28, 1999 Prywes
6036678 March 14, 2000 Giungo
6050970 April 18, 2000 Baerveldt
6050999 April 18, 2000 Paraschac et al.
6077299 June 20, 2000 Adelberg et al.
6102045 August 15, 2000 Nordquist et al.
6142969 November 7, 2000 Nigam
6152918 November 28, 2000 Padilla et al.
6174307 January 16, 2001 Daniel et al.
6186974 February 13, 2001 Allan et al.
6203513 March 20, 2001 Yaron et al.
6221078 April 24, 2001 Bylsma
6251090 June 26, 2001 Avery et al.
6261256 July 17, 2001 Ahmed
6264668 July 24, 2001 Prywes
6270472 August 7, 2001 Antaki et al.
6331313 December 18, 2001 Wong et al.
6375642 April 23, 2002 Grieshaber et al.
6383219 May 7, 2002 Telandro et al.
6450984 September 17, 2002 Lynch et al.
6464724 October 15, 2002 Lynch et al.
6468283 October 22, 2002 Richter et al.
6471666 October 29, 2002 Odrich
6471777 October 29, 2002 Kobayashi et al.
6494857 December 17, 2002 Neuhann
6508779 January 21, 2003 Suson
6510600 January 28, 2003 Yaron et al.
6524275 February 25, 2003 Lynch et al.
6533768 March 18, 2003 Hill
6537568 March 25, 2003 Olejnik et al.
6544208 April 8, 2003 Ethier et al.
6544249 April 8, 2003 Yu et al.
6558342 May 6, 2003 Yaron et al.
6561974 May 13, 2003 Grieshaber et al.
6579256 June 17, 2003 Hughes
6589203 July 8, 2003 Mitrev
6595945 July 22, 2003 Brown
6626858 September 30, 2003 Lynch et al.
6638239 October 28, 2003 Bergheim et al.
6648283 November 18, 2003 Chase et al.
6666841 December 23, 2003 Gharib et al.
6676607 January 13, 2004 de Juan, Jr. et al.
6699210 March 2, 2004 Williams et al.
6699211 March 2, 2004 Savage
6719750 April 13, 2004 Varner et al.
6726664 April 27, 2004 Yaron et al.
6726676 April 27, 2004 Stegmann et al.
6730056 May 4, 2004 Ghaem et al.
6736791 May 18, 2004 Tu et al.
6741666 May 25, 2004 Henry et al.
6752753 June 22, 2004 Hoskins et al.
6780164 August 24, 2004 Bergheim et al.
6783544 August 31, 2004 Lynch et al.
6786888 September 7, 2004 Zadno-Azizi et al.
6827699 December 7, 2004 Lynch et al.
6827700 December 7, 2004 Lynch et al.
6881197 April 19, 2005 Nigam
6881198 April 19, 2005 Brown
6939298 September 6, 2005 Brown et al.
6955656 October 18, 2005 Bergheim et al.
6962573 November 8, 2005 Wilcox
6966888 November 22, 2005 Cullen et al.
6969384 November 29, 2005 de Juan, Jr. et al.
6981958 January 3, 2006 Gharib et al.
6989007 January 24, 2006 Shadduck
7041077 May 9, 2006 Shields
7090681 August 15, 2006 Weber et al.
7094225 August 22, 2006 Tu et al.
7135009 November 14, 2006 Tu et al.
7160264 January 9, 2007 Lisk, Jr. et al.
7163543 January 16, 2007 Smedley et al.
7186232 March 6, 2007 Smedley et al.
7192412 March 20, 2007 Zhou et al.
7195774 March 27, 2007 Carvalho et al.
7207965 April 24, 2007 Simon
7220238 May 22, 2007 Lynch et al.
7273475 September 25, 2007 Tu et al.
7291125 November 6, 2007 Coroneo
7297130 November 20, 2007 Bergheim et al.
7331984 February 19, 2008 Tu et al.
7431710 October 7, 2008 Tu et al.
7488303 February 10, 2009 Haffner et al.
7563241 July 21, 2009 Tu et al.
7708711 May 4, 2010 Tu et al.
7850637 December 14, 2010 Lynch et al.
7857782 December 28, 2010 Tu et al.
7867186 January 11, 2011 Haffner et al.
7867205 January 11, 2011 Bergheim et al.
8075511 December 13, 2011 Tu et al.
8128588 March 6, 2012 Coroneo
8172899 May 8, 2012 Silvestrini et al.
8337393 December 25, 2012 Silverstrini et al.
8702727 April 22, 2014 Harrington et al.
20020013546 January 31, 2002 Grieshaber et al.
20020013572 January 31, 2002 Berlin
20020072673 June 13, 2002 Yamamoto et al.
20020087111 July 4, 2002 Ethier et al.
20020111608 August 15, 2002 Baerveldt et al.
20020128613 September 12, 2002 Nakayama
20020133168 September 19, 2002 Smedley et al.
20020143284 October 3, 2002 Tu et al.
20020177856 November 28, 2002 Richter et al.
20020188308 December 12, 2002 Tu et al.
20020193725 December 19, 2002 Odrich
20020193804 December 19, 2002 Tickle
20030028127 February 6, 2003 Balzum et al.
20030028228 February 6, 2003 Sand
20030055372 March 20, 2003 Lynch et al.
20030060752 March 27, 2003 Bergheim et al.
20030097151 May 22, 2003 Smedley et al.
20030097171 May 22, 2003 Elliott
20030135149 July 17, 2003 Cullen et al.
20030181848 September 25, 2003 Bergheim et al.
20030187384 October 2, 2003 Bergheim et al.
20030208163 November 6, 2003 Yaron et al.
20030229303 December 11, 2003 Haffner et al.
20030236483 December 25, 2003 Ren
20030236484 December 25, 2003 Lynch et al.
20040015140 January 22, 2004 Shields
20040024345 February 5, 2004 Gharib et al.
20040088048 May 6, 2004 Richter et al.
20040092856 May 13, 2004 Dahan
20040097984 May 20, 2004 Zapata
20040102729 May 27, 2004 Haffner et al.
20040111050 June 10, 2004 Smedley et al.
20040127843 July 1, 2004 Tu et al.
20040147870 July 29, 2004 Burns et al.
20040148022 July 29, 2004 Eggleston
20040193095 September 30, 2004 Shadduck
20040193262 September 30, 2004 Shadduck
20040210181 October 21, 2004 Vass et al.
20040210185 October 21, 2004 Tu et al.
20040216749 November 4, 2004 Tu
20040225250 November 11, 2004 Yablonski
20040236343 November 25, 2004 Taylor et al.
20040249333 December 9, 2004 Bergheim et al.
20040254517 December 16, 2004 Quiroz-Mercado et al.
20040254519 December 16, 2004 Tu et al.
20040254520 December 16, 2004 Porteous et al.
20040254521 December 16, 2004 Simon
20040260228 December 23, 2004 Lynch et al.
20050008673 January 13, 2005 Snyder et al.
20050049578 March 3, 2005 Tu et al.
20050085892 April 21, 2005 Goto
20050090806 April 28, 2005 Lynch et al.
20050090807 April 28, 2005 Lynch et al.
20050107734 May 19, 2005 Coroneo
20050119601 June 2, 2005 Lynch et al.
20050119636 June 2, 2005 Haffner et al.
20050119737 June 2, 2005 Bene et al.
20050125003 June 9, 2005 Pinchuk et al.
20050143817 June 30, 2005 Hunter et al.
20050149080 July 7, 2005 Hunter et al.
20050171507 August 4, 2005 Christian et al.
20050175663 August 11, 2005 Hunter et al.
20050181011 August 18, 2005 Hunter et al.
20050181977 August 18, 2005 Hunter et al.
20050182350 August 18, 2005 Nigam
20050191331 September 1, 2005 Hunter et al.
20050192527 September 1, 2005 Gharib et al.
20050197613 September 8, 2005 Sniegowski et al.
20050209549 September 22, 2005 Bergheim et al.
20050209550 September 22, 2005 Bergheim et al.
20050232972 October 20, 2005 Odrich
20050244462 November 3, 2005 Farooq
20050250788 November 10, 2005 Tu et al.
20050266047 December 1, 2005 Tu et al.
20050267397 December 1, 2005 Bhalla
20050267398 December 1, 2005 Protopsaltis et al.
20050271704 December 8, 2005 Tu et al.
20050273033 December 8, 2005 Grahn et al.
20050277864 December 15, 2005 Haffner et al.
20050283108 December 22, 2005 Savage
20050287188 December 29, 2005 Anderson et al.
20050288617 December 29, 2005 Yaron et al.
20050288619 December 29, 2005 Gharib et al.
20060020248 January 26, 2006 Prescott
20060032507 February 16, 2006 Tu
20060036207 February 16, 2006 Koonmen et al.
20060069340 March 30, 2006 Simon
20060074375 April 6, 2006 Bergheim et al.
20060084907 April 20, 2006 Bergheim et al.
20060116626 June 1, 2006 Smedley et al.
20060149194 July 6, 2006 Conston et al.
20060155238 July 13, 2006 Shields
20060173397 August 3, 2006 Tu et al.
20060195055 August 31, 2006 Bergheim et al.
20060195056 August 31, 2006 Bergheim et al.
20060200113 September 7, 2006 Haffner et al.
20060235367 October 19, 2006 Takashima et al.
20060241580 October 26, 2006 Mittelstein et al.
20060241749 October 26, 2006 Tu et al.
20060276739 December 7, 2006 Brown
20070010827 January 11, 2007 Tu et al.
20070088242 April 19, 2007 Coroneo
20070088424 April 19, 2007 Greenberg et al.
20070088432 April 19, 2007 Solovay et al.
20070106235 May 10, 2007 Coroneo
20070106236 May 10, 2007 Coroneo
20070112292 May 17, 2007 Tu et al.
20070118147 May 24, 2007 Smedley et al.
20070141106 June 21, 2007 Bonutti et al.
20070149915 June 28, 2007 Yablonski
20070191863 August 16, 2007 De Juan et al.
20070207186 September 6, 2007 Scanlon et al.
20070233037 October 4, 2007 Gifford et al.
20070276315 November 29, 2007 Haffner et al.
20070276316 November 29, 2007 Haffner et al.
20070282244 December 6, 2007 Tu et al.
20070282245 December 6, 2007 Tu et al.
20070293807 December 20, 2007 Lynch et al.
20080015488 January 17, 2008 Tu et al.
20080045878 February 21, 2008 Bergheim et al.
20080058704 March 6, 2008 Hee et al.
20080108933 May 8, 2008 Yu et al.
20080147021 June 19, 2008 Jani
20080195027 August 14, 2008 Coroneo
20080200860 August 21, 2008 Tu et al.
20080228127 September 18, 2008 Burns
20080234624 September 25, 2008 Bergheim et al.
20090036819 February 5, 2009 Tu et al.
20090036840 February 5, 2009 Viray et al.
20090043321 February 12, 2009 Conston et al.
20090118702 May 7, 2009 Lazar
20090182421 July 16, 2009 Silvestrini et al.
20100010416 January 14, 2010 Juan, Jr. et al.
20100134759 June 3, 2010 Silvestrini et al.
20100137981 June 3, 2010 Silvestrini et al.
20100152641 June 17, 2010 Yablonski
20100211079 August 19, 2010 Aramant
20100234790 September 16, 2010 Tu et al.
20100274259 October 28, 2010 Yaron et al.
20100280317 November 4, 2010 Silvestrini et al.
20110028883 February 3, 2011 Juan, Jr. et al.
20110028884 February 3, 2011 Theodore Coroneo
20110087148 April 14, 2011 Silvestrini et al.
20110087149 April 14, 2011 Theodore Coroneo
20110087150 April 14, 2011 Theodore Coroneo
20110087151 April 14, 2011 Theodore Coroneo
20110098629 April 28, 2011 Juan, Jr. et al.
20110098809 April 28, 2011 Wardle et al.
20110112546 May 12, 2011 Juan, Jr. et al.
20110238075 September 29, 2011 Clauson et al.
20110276054 November 10, 2011 Helmy
20110306915 December 15, 2011 De Juan, Jr. et al.
20120035525 February 9, 2012 Silvestrini
20120089071 April 12, 2012 Oliver et al.
20120116504 May 10, 2012 Lyons
20120123316 May 17, 2012 Horvath et al.
20120123434 May 17, 2012 Grabner et al.
20120271272 October 25, 2012 Hammack et al.
20140155805 June 5, 2014 Schaller et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
0228185 November 1986 EP
1184010 March 2002 EP
1310222 May 2003 EP
1473004 November 2004 EP
1477146 November 2004 EP
1418868 March 2008 EP
1977724 October 2008 EP
2027837 February 2009 EP
2101891 January 1983 GB
2007-535386 December 2007 JP
2010-533565 October 2010 JP
2018289 August 1994 RU
2056818 March 1996 RU
2074686 March 1997 RU
2074687 March 1997 RU
2157678 October 2000 RU
WO-89/00869 February 1989 WO
WO-91/12046 August 1991 WO
WO-92/19294 November 1992 WO
WO-94/02081 February 1994 WO
WO-94/09721 May 1994 WO
WO-94/09837 May 1994 WO
WO-94/13234 June 1994 WO
WO-95/08310 March 1995 WO
WO-96/20742 July 1996 WO
WO-96/36377 November 1996 WO
WO-98/23237 June 1998 WO
WO-98/30181 July 1998 WO
WO-99/26567 June 1999 WO
WO-00/06223 February 2000 WO
WO-00/64389 November 2000 WO
WO-00/64390 November 2000 WO
WO-00/64391 November 2000 WO
WO-00/64393 November 2000 WO
WO-00/64511 November 2000 WO
WO-01/78631 October 2001 WO
WO-01/78656 October 2001 WO
WO-01/97727 December 2001 WO
WO-02/36052 May 2002 WO
WO-02/070045 September 2002 WO
WO-02/074052 September 2002 WO
WO-02/080811 October 2002 WO
WO-02/080829 October 2002 WO
WO-02/087418 November 2002 WO
WO-02/087479 November 2002 WO
WO-02/089699 November 2002 WO
WO-02/102274 December 2002 WO
WO-03/015659 February 2003 WO
WO-03/015667 February 2003 WO
WO-03/041622 May 2003 WO
WO-03/073968 September 2003 WO
WO-03/099175 December 2003 WO
WO-2004/014218 February 2004 WO
WO-2004/026106 April 2004 WO
WO-2004/026347 April 2004 WO
WO-2004/043231 May 2004 WO
WO-2004/056294 July 2004 WO
WO-2004/060219 July 2004 WO
WO-2004/062469 July 2004 WO
WO-2004/073552 September 2004 WO
WO-2004/110391 December 2004 WO
WO-2005/016418 February 2005 WO
WO-2005/046782 May 2005 WO
WO-2005/055873 June 2005 WO
WO-2005/105197 November 2005 WO
WO-2005/107664 November 2005 WO
WO-2005/107845 November 2005 WO
WO-2006/012421 February 2006 WO
WO-2006/036715 April 2006 WO
WO-2007/087061 August 2007 WO
WO-2007/115259 October 2007 WO
WO-2007/130393 November 2007 WO
WO-2008/061043 May 2008 WO
WO-2009/012406 January 2009 WO
WO-2009/158524 December 2009 WO
WO-2010/115101 October 2010 WO
Other references
  • Barsky et al. “Evaluation of absorbable gelatin film (Gelfilm) in cyclodialysis clefts” Arch. Ophth. 60(6): 1044-1052, 1958.
  • Bick MW “Use of tantalum for ocular drainage” Arch Ophthal. 42(4): 373-88 (1949).
  • Bietti “The present state of the use of plastics in eye surgery” Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 33(4):337-70 (1955).
  • Brown et al., “Internal Sclerectomy for Glaucoma Filtering Surgery with an Automated Trephine,” Archives of Ophthalmology, 105:133-136 (1987).
  • Burchfield JC, Kass MA, Wax MB. Primary valve malfunction of the Krupin eye valve with disk. J Glaucoma. Jun. 1997;6(3):152-6.
  • Chiou et al. “Ultrasound biomicroscopy of eyes undergoing deep sclerectomy with collagen implant” Br J Ophthalmol 80 (1996), pp. 541-544.
  • Chylack LT, Bellows AR. Molecular sieving in suprachoroidal fluid formation in man. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17: 420, 1978.
  • Classen et al. “A histopathologic and immunohistorchemical analysis of the filtration bleb after unsuccessful glaucoma seton implantation” Am. J. Ophthalmol. 122:205-12 (1996).
  • Cohen et al. “First day post-operative review following uncomplicated phacoemulsification” Eye 12(4):634-6 (1998).
  • Collaborative Normal-Tension Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126:487-97.
  • Congdon N, O'Colmain B, Klaver CC, et al. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:477-85.
  • Coote. “Glaucoma Hollow Fiber Filters—A New Glaucoma Seton. Preliminary Results.” J. Glaucoma. vol. 8 No. 1 Supplement (1999):p. S4.
  • Cullen, et al. “Anterior Chamber of Frontal Sinus Shunt for the Diversion of Aqueous Humor: A Pilot Study in Four Normal Dogs”. Veterinary Ophthalmology. vol. 1. No. 1. (1998):31-39.
  • Demailly et al. “Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) with or without collagen device (CD) in primary open-angle glaucoma: middle-term retrospective study” International Ophthalmology 20: 131-140, 1997.
  • Derwent English abstract for EP 1184010, published Mar. 6, 2002 entitled: “Drainage unit for an eye, consists of a hollow line, a distribution member, and a pressure relief valve which only allows water to leave the eye chamber above a certain pressure,” Accession Nbr. 12409716 [351].
  • Dinakaran et al. “Is the first post-operative day review necessary following uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery?” Eye, 14(3A):364-6 (2000).
  • Draeger “Chirurgische Maβnahmen bei kongenitalem Glaukom” (Surgical Interventions in Congenital Glaucoma) Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1993; 202(5): 425-427 [Article in German with English summary included].
  • Einmahl et al. “Evaluation of a novel biomaterial in the suprachoroidal space of the rabbit eye” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 43:1533-1539 (2002).
  • Ellis, RA “A Reduction of Intraocular Pressure Using Plastics in Surgery” Am J Ophth. 50; 1960, 733-742.
  • Emi et al. “Hydrostatic pressure of the suprachoroidal space” Invest. Ophthal. Visual Sci. 30(2):233-238 (1989).
  • Fanous MM, Cohn RA. Propionibacterium endophthalmitis following Molteno tube repositioning. J Glaucoma. Aug. 1997;6(4):201-2.
  • Friedman DS, Wolfs RC, O'Colmain BJ, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:532-8.
  • Fuchs E. “Detachment of the choroid inadvertently during cataract surgery” [German] von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol, 51:199-224 (1900) [Article in German with English summary].
  • Gills et al. “Action of cyclodialysis utilizing an implant studied by manometry in a human eye” Exp Eye Res 1967; 6:75-78.
  • Gills JP “Cyclodialysis implants” South Med J. 1967 60(7):692-5.
  • Gills, “Cyclodialysis Implants in Human Eyes” Am J Ophth 61:1966,841-846.
  • Goldberg “Management of Uncontrolled Glaucoma With the Molteno System” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 1987; 15: 97-107.
  • Gordon MO, Kass. MA, for the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Design and baseline description of the participants. Arch Ophthalmol 1999:573-83.
  • Grant, W.M. , MD, Further Studies on Facility of Flow Through the Trabecular Meshwork, A.M.A. Archives of Ophthalmololgy, Oct. 1958, vol. 60, pp. 523-533.
  • Gross et al. “Surgical therapy of chronic glaucoma in aphakia and pseudophakia” Ophthalmology, 95:1195-201 (1988).
  • Harper SL, Foster CS. Intraocular lens explantation in uveitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2000 Winter; 40(1):107-16.
  • Harrington “Cataract and Glaucoma. Management of the coexistent conditions and a description of a new operation combining lens extraction with reverse cyclodialysis.” Am J Ophthalmol. May 1966;61(5 Pt 2):1134-40.
  • Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al for the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression. Results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1268-79.
  • Heine I. “Cyclodialysis, a new glaucoma operation” [German] Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 31:824-826 (1905).
  • Hildebrand et al. “Efficacy of anterior chamber decompression in controlling early intraocular pressure spikes after uneventful phacoemulsification” J. Catact Refract Surg., 29:1087-92 (2003).
  • Hoskins, et al., “Aqueous Humor Outflow”, Becker-Shaffer's Diagnosis and Therapy of the Glaucomas, 6th Edition, Chapter 4, pp. 41-66, 1989.
  • Howorth D J “Feasibility study for a micromachined glaucoma drainage device” Cranfield University School of industrial and manufacturing science MSc Thesis Academic Year 2001-2002 Sep. 13, 2002.
  • Hylton et al. “Update on prostaglandin analogs” Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 14:65-9 (2003).
  • Javitt JC, Chiang YP. Preparing for managed competition. Utilization of ambulatory eye care visits to ophthalmologists. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:1034-5.
  • Jay JL, Allan D. The benefit of early trabeculectomy versus conventional management in primary open-angle glaucoma relative to severity of disease. Eye 1989; 3:528-35.
  • Jordan J. “A Novel Approach to Suprachoroidal Drainage for the Surgical Treatment of Intractable Glaucoma” J. Glaucoma 15:200-205 (2006).
  • Jordan JF, Dietlein TS, Dinslage S, Luke C, Konen W, Krieglstein GK. Cyclodialysis ab inferno as a surgical approach to intractable glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. Aug. 2007;245(8):1071-6.
  • Karlen et al. “Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant: medium term results” Br. J. Ophthalmol, Jan. 1999, 83(1):6-11.
  • Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al for the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. The Ocular HypertensionTreatment Study. A randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:701-13.
  • Klemm et al. “Die Ultraschallbiomikroskopie als Kriterium der Funktionsprüfung des suprachorioidalen Spaltes nach kammerwinkelchirurgischen Eingriffen” (Ultrasound Biomicroscopic Imaging for Assessment of the Suprachoroidal Cleft after Angle Surgery) “Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde 1997; 210: 74-77 [Article in German with English summary included]”.
  • Klemm et al. “Experimental use of space-retaining substances with extended duration: functional and morphological results” Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Sep. 1995; 233(9):592-7.
  • Kozlov et al. “Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy with collagen” Eye microsurgery 3:44-46 (1990) [Russian with English translation].
  • Krejci “Cyclodialysis with hydroxymethyl methacrylate capillary strip (HCS). Animal experiments with a new approach in glaucoma drainage surgery” Ophthalmologica 1972; 164(2):113-21.
  • Krejci L. “Microdrainage of anterior chamber of eye glaucoma operation using hydron capillary drain. ” Acta Univ Carol Med Monogr. 1974;(61):1-90.
  • Kupfer “Studies on intraocular pressure. I. A technique for polyethylene tube implantation into the anterior chamber of the rabbit.” Arch Ophthalmol. Apr. 1961;65:565-70.
  • La Rocca “Gonioplasty in Glaucoma*A Preliminary Report” Br J Ophth 46:1962, 404-415.
  • Law et al., “Retinal Complications After Aqueous Shunt Surgical Procedures for Glaucoma” Arch Ophthal.; Dec. 1996; vol. 114:1473-1480.
  • Lee et al. “Aqueous-venous shunt and intraocular pressure. Preliminary report of animal studies.” Investigative Ophthalmology. vol. 5 No. 1: 59-64. Feb. 1966.
  • Lee et al. “Magnetic resonance imaging of the aqueous flow in eyes implanted with the trabeculo-suprachoroidal glaucoma seton” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 33:948 (1992).
  • Lee KY. Trabeculo-suprachoroidal shunt for treating recalcitrant and secondary glaucoma. Presented at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA, 1991.
  • Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, et al for the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment. The Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol Jan. 2003;121:48-56.
  • Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al and the CIGTS Study Group. Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1943-53.
  • Losche W. “Proposals for improvement of cyclodialysis” Klin Monatsblatter Augenheilkd Augenarztl Fortbild 121(6):715-6 (1952) [German].
  • Marx et al., “Use of the Ganciclovir Implant in the Treatment of Recurrent Cytomegalovirus Retinitis” Arch Ophthal.; Jul. 1996; vol. 114:815-820.
  • McPherson “Combined Trabeculotomy and Cataract Extraction as a Single Operation” Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc., vol. LXXIV, 1976; 251-260.
  • Migdal C, Gregory W, Hitchings R. Long term functional outcome after early surgery compared with laser and medicine in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1651-7.
  • Miglior S, Pfeiffer N, Zeyen T et al for the European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group. Results of the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. Ophthalmology 2005;112:366-75.
  • Miglior S, Zeyen T, Pfeiffer N, et al for the European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group. The European Glaucoma Prevention Study design and baseline description of the participants. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1612-21.
  • Miki, MD et al., “Intraocular Cannula for Continuous, Chronic Drug Delivery-Histopathic Observations and Function” Arch Ophthal.; May 1985; vol. 103:712-717.
  • Molteno et al. “Long tube implants in the management of glaucoma.” South African Medical Journal, Jun. 26, 1976;50(27):1062-6.
  • Molteno et al. “The Vicryl tie technique for inserting a draining implant in the treatment of secondary glaucoma. ” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 1986; 14: 343-354.
  • Moses RA “Detachment of ciliary body-anatomical and physical considerations” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Assoc. for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, US, vol. 4, No. 5, Oct. 1, 1965.
  • Nesterov AP et al. “Surgical stimulation of the uveoscleral outflow. Experimental studies on enucleated human eyes” Acta Opthalmol (Copenh) June; 57(3):409-17 (1979).
  • Nguyen et al., “Complications of Baerveldt Glaucoma Drainage Implants” Arch Ophthal.; May 1998; vol. 116:571-575.
  • Noecker RJ. Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Gold Micro-Shunt for Reduction of 10 P in Refractory Glaucomas. American Glaucoma Society Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2007.http://www.glaucomaweb.org/associations/5224/files/AGS%20AM07%20Prgrm%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed Nov. 1, 2008).
  • O'Brien et al. “Cyclodialysis” Arch Ophthal. 1949;42(5):606-619.
  • Odrich. “The New Technique During Complex Tube-Shunt Implantation”. J. Glaucoma. vol. 9 No. 3 (2000):278-279.
  • Olsen, Timothy W., et al., Cannulation of the Suprachoroidal Space: A Novel Drug Delivery Methodology to the Posterior Segment, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 142, No. 5, Nov. 2006, pp. 777-787.e2.
  • Ozdamar et al. “Suprachoroidal seton implantation in refractory glaucoma: a novel surgical technique” J. Glaucoma Aug. 2003; 12(4):354-9.
  • Pinnas G. et al. “Cyclodialysis with teflon tube implants” Am J. Ophthalmol Nov. 1969; 68(5):879-883.
  • Portney GL, “Silicone elastomer implantation cyclodialysis.” Arch Ophthalmol 1973; 89: 10-12.
  • Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. Preferred Practice Patterns, American Academy of Ophthalmology.http://one.aao.org/CE/PracticeGuidelines/PPP—Content.aspx?cid=a5a59e02-450b-4d50-8091-b2dd2lefl ff2#references (Accessed Nov. 1, 2008).
  • Pruett et al., “The Fishmouth Phenomenon-II. Wedge Scleral Buckling” Arch Ophthal.; Oct. 1977; vol. 95:1782-1787.
  • Qadeer “Acrylic Gonio-Subconjunctival Plates in Glaucoma Surgery” Br J Ophthalmol. Jun. 1954; 38(6): 353-356.
  • Quigley HA, Vitale S. Models of open-angle glaucoma prevalence and incidence in the United States. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38:83-91.
  • Richards et al. “Artificial Drainage Tubes for Glaucoma” Am J Ophth 60:1965,405-408.
  • Ritch, et al., “Uveoscleral Outflow”, The Glaucomas. St. Louis: Mosby, 1996; pp. 337-343.
  • Rohen, Johannes W., Anatomy of the Aqueous Outflow Channels, Glaucoma, vol. 1, Chapter 14, pp. 277-296, Edited by J.E. Cairns, Grune & Stratton, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, 1986.
  • Rosenberg, et al. “Implants in glaucoma surgery” Chapter 88, The Glaucomas, Ritch et al. Eds. 2nd Ed. Mosby St. Louis 1996; p. 1783-1807.
  • Row H. “Operation to control glaucoma: preliminary report” Arch. Ophthal 12:325 (1934).
  • Rowan, Patrick J., MD, Combined Cyclodialysis and Cataract Surgery, Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, Dec. 1998, vol. 29, No. 12, pp. 962-968 (9 pages).
  • Sampimon “A New Approach to Filtering Glaucoma Surgery” Ophthalmologica (Basel) 151: 1966, 637-644.
  • Schappert S. Office visits for glaucoma: United States, 1991-92. Advance data from vital and health statistics. vol. 262. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1995.
  • Shaffer RN, Weiss DI. Concerning cyclodialysis and hypotony. Arch Ophthalmol 68: 25, 1962.
  • SOLX Clinical Literature Handout; Industry Show Feb. 2006; “The SOLX Gold Micro-shunt (GMS) treatment”.
  • Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1412-7.
  • Sourdille et al. “Reticulated hyaluronic acid implant in non-perforating trabecular surgery.” J Cataract Refract Surg 25: 332-339. (1999).
  • Spiegel et al. “Schlemm's Canal Implant: A New Method to Lower Intraocular Pressure in Patients With POAG?” Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers. vol. 30, No. 6: 492-494. Jun. 1999.
  • Srinivasan et al. “Microbial contamination of the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification” J. Cataract Refract Surg. 28:2173-6 (2002).
  • Suguro K, Toris CB, Pederson JE. Uveoscleral outflow following cyclodialysis in the monkey eye using a fluorescent tracer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985: 26, 810.
  • The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field detorioration. The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:429-40.
  • The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS); 13. Comparison of treatment outcomes within race: 10-year results. Ophthalmology 2004;111:651-64.
  • The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT) and Glaucoma Laser Trial Follow-up Study: 7. Results. Am J Ophthahnol 1995;120:718-31.
  • The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT). 2. Results of argon laser trabeculoplasty versus topical medicines. The Glaucoma Laser Trial Research Group. Ophthalmology 1990;97:1403-13.
  • Thiagalingam S, Tarongoy P, Hamrah P, Lobo AM, Nagao K, Barsam C, Bellows R, Pineda R. Complications of cosmetic iris implants. J Cataract Refract Surg. Jul. 2008;34(7):1222-4.
  • Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, et al. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 1991;266:369-74.
  • Toris CB. Extravascular albumin concentration of the uvea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990; 31:43.
  • Toris et al. “Aqueous humor dynamics in the aging human eye” Am J. Ophthalmol., 127:407-12 (1999).
  • Toris et al. “Effect of intraocular pressure on uveoscleral outflow following cyclodialysis in the monkey eye.” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 26 (1985) 1745-1749.
  • Transcend Medical Inc. v. Glaukos Corporation, Transcend Medical, Inc.'s Disclosures Pursuant to Default Discovery Rule 4 (d) (United States District Court for the District of Delaware, dated Dec. 6, 2013; case No. C.A. No. 13-830 (MSG) and Certificate of Service, dated Dec. 9, 2013.
  • Trigler L, Proia AD, Freedman SF. Fibrovascular ingrowth as a cause of Ahmed glaucoma valve failure in children. Am J Ophthalmol. Feb. 2006;141(2):388-9.
  • Troncoso Manuel U., “Cyclodialysis with insertion of metal implant in treatment of glaucoma, a Preliminary Report” Arch. Ophthal. 23:270 (1940).
  • Troncoso, Manuel U., Tantalum implants for inducing hypotny, Am Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 32(4):499-508 (1949).
  • Van der Veen et al. “The gonioseton, a surgical treatment for chronic glaucoma”. Documenta Ophthalmologica; vol. 75, Nos. 3-4, 365-375. (1990).
  • Vossmerbaeumer U, Ditzen K, Jonas JB. Removal of an intracorneal hydrogel implant for hyperopia after Lasik. J Refract Surg. Jan. 2007;23(1):102-4.
  • Wagner, Justin A., et al., Characterization of Uveoscleral Outflow in Enucleated Porcine Eyes Perfused under Constant Pressure, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci., Published in edited form in Sep. 2004, vol. 45, Issue 9, pp. 3203-3206.
  • Wamsley S, Moster MR, Rai S, Alvim HS, Fontanarosa J. Results of the use of the Ex-Press miniature glaucoma implant in technically challenging, advanced glaucoma cases: a clinical pilot study. Am J Ophthalmol. Dec. 2004; 138(6): 1049-51.
  • Yablonski, “Some thoughts on the pressure dependence of uveoscleral flow” Journal of Glaucoma, 12(1):90-92 (2003).
  • Yablonski, “Trabeculectomy with Internal Tube Shunt: a novel glaucoma surgery” J. Glaucoma 14:91-97 (2005).
  • Yoo C, Kwon SW, Kim YY. Pericardium plug in the repair of the corneoscleral fistula after ahmed glaucoma valve explantation. Korean J Ophthalmol. Dec. 2008;22(4):268-71.
  • Zhou et al. “A trabecular bypass flow hypothesis” J Glaucoma. 14(1):74-83 (2005).
  • In the Commonwealth of Australia—In the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Colin Clement in support of Opponent's opposition. (Sep. 9, 2014).
  • In the Commonwealth of Australia—in the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Dr. Ilesh Patel in support of Opponent's opposition. (Sep. 9, 2014).
  • In the Commonwealth of Australia—in the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Declaration of Mr. Craig Andrews in support of Opponent's opposition. (Sep. 9, 2014).
  • In the Commonwealth of Australia—in the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”)—Opponent's amended Statement of Grounds and Particulars of Opposition. (Sep. 10, 2014).
  • In the Commonwealth of Australia—in the Matter of Australian Patent Application No. 2006336598 in the name of Transcend Medical, Inc. (“Applicant”) and Opposition thereto by Glaukos Corporation (“Opponent”), Commonwealth of Australia—Opponent's Statement of Grounds and Particulars of Opposition. (Apr. 10, 2014).
  • Schocket, Stanley S. “Investigations of the Reasons for Success and Failure in the Anterior Shunt-To-The-Encircling-Band Procedure in the Treatment of Refractory Glaucoma.” Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc.vol. LXXXIX. (1986):743-798.
Patent History
Patent number: 9241832
Type: Grant
Filed: Apr 18, 2013
Date of Patent: Jan 26, 2016
Patent Publication Number: 20130281908
Assignee: Transcend Medical, Inc. (Menlo Park, CA)
Inventors: Michael Schaller (Menlo Park, CA), David Lari (Menlo Park, CA), Luke Clauson (Menlo Park, CA), Nathan White (Menlo Park, CA), Richard S. Lilly (Menlo Park, CA), Matthew Newell (Menlo Park, CA), Iqbal Ike K. Ahmed (Menlo Park, CA)
Primary Examiner: Adam Marcetich
Application Number: 13/865,947
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Catheter Guide Means (600/434)
International Classification: A61F 9/007 (20060101); A61F 9/00 (20060101); A61M 25/09 (20060101); A61F 2/95 (20130101); A61F 9/008 (20060101); A61M 5/32 (20060101); A61M 5/20 (20060101); A61F 2/16 (20060101);