Indoor localization using commercial frequency-modulated signals
A commercial frequency-modulated (FM) radio signal indoor localization system and method for finding a location of a mobile embedded device (such as a smartphone) within a building. Indoor localization is performed by receiving commercial FM radio signals on the device, analyzing the signals using signal quality metrics, and generating signal quality vectors for each signal and signal quality metric used for the signal. The signal quality metric can be any physical signal quality indicator. The signal quality vectors are added to obtain a current location fingerprint. The current location fingerprint is compared to fingerprints stored in a fingerprint database. The location associated with the stored fingerprint that is the closest match to the current fingerprint location is designated as the current location in the building of the mobile embedded device. Locally generated radio signals can be used in conjunction with the commercial FM radio signals to improve localization accuracy.
Latest Microsoft Patents:
This patent application is a continuation of, and claims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/328,613, filed on Dec. 16, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUNDAccurately determining the location of mobile embedded devices (such as smartphones) in indoor environments can be difficult. A global positioning systems (GPS) cannot be used because the needed satellite signals are hard to receive indoors because they are blocked by the walls of the building.
There are a number of existing approaches to indoor localization. One approach is a WiFi®-based indoor localization (WiFi® is a registered trademark of the WiFi Alliance in Austin, Tex.). In general, this type of approach records the signal strength from WiFi® access points in the immediate vicinity. Given the location of the WiFi® access points, the location of the mobile device can be calculated. Similar approaches have also been used where FM radio transmitters deployed in the building are used instead of WiFi® signals.
Another approach is proximity-based indoor localization. This type of approach uses a large number of low-power radios (such as RFIDs, low-power Bluetooth® devices (Bluetooth® is a registered trademark of the Bluetooth® Special Interest Group in Kirkland, Wash.), FM radio transmitters) that are deployed in every room or location that needs to be localized. The mobile embedded device detects proximity to and obtains its location from the nearest low-power radio source or sources.
Each of these approaches measure a signal strength between the mobile embedded device and the transmitter. The indoor space of the building then is profiled by creating a map of the signal strength. For example, this profiling may occur by measuring the signal strength along every meter of the indoor space and recording each of the record wireless access points that can be connected to at each location. This collection (or vector) of signal strengths becomes the “fingerprint” of that indoor location. This is performed for a large numbers of locations within the building to create a fingerprint database that consists of pairs of ground truth locations and signal strength vectors.
Once the fingerprint database is obtained, any user can enter the building with his mobile embedded device and localize the device. The mobile embedded device will determine which local radio transmitters are within the range of the device, and will record the signal strength from these individual transmitters at the user's current location in the building. The fingerprint of the mobile embedded device at the location in the building is compared to the fingerprint database to find the closest match. The position that is associated to the closest fingerprint match in the database is assumed to be the location of the mobile embedded device in the building.
One problem, however, with using local radio transmitters (such as WiFi®) is that it operates at the 2.4 GHz range, which means that its signal strength is susceptible to human presence, device orientation, and presence of small objects in a room. Additionally, these parameters change over time, further impacting the signal strength of WiFi® signals, and leading to additional errors in the indoor localization.
SUMMARYThis Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system and method enable indoor localization of mobile embedded devices (such as smartphones) using commercial frequency-modulated (FM) radio signals. In other words, embodiments of the system and method use commercial FM radio signal broadcasts to find which room in a building the device is located. Embodiments of the system and method use the commercial FM radio signals either alone or in combination with one or more other types of locally-generated radio signals. These are radio signals that are generated locally in the close vicinity or within the building. These other types of locally-generated radio signals include WiFi®, Bluetooth®, and local FM signals.
Commercial FM radio signals are used by embodiments of the system and method because there is an existing and large infrastructure of commercial FM radio stations throughout the country. This is especially true in urban areas. Moreover, because of the low frequency at which these signals operate, they achieve improved penetration through structures, walls and furniture over WiFi®, Bluetooth®, or most other radio signals. In addition, because of the wavelength, FM radio signals have improved resilience to small objects, human presence, and to multipath and fading effects. Further, a WiFi® receiver generally uses more power on a mobile embedded device that an FM radio receiver.
Embodiments of the system and method first build a database of commercial FM radio signal quality vectors that are used for the indoor localization. These signal quality vectors are used to generate a fingerprint at a specific location within the building. The building is profiled by measuring the radio signals at set locations in the building and obtaining fingerprints for the locations. These fingerprints then are stored in a fingerprint database along with the location at which they were recorded.
Later, when a user carries his mobile embedded device into a mapped building, embodiments of the system and method use the receiver in the device to automatically synchronize to the different available commercial FM radio stations. In some embodiments, other types of radio signals are also used. Next, one or more signal quality metrics are applied to each of the radio signals in order to construct a signal quality vector. There is a signal quality vector for each signal quality metric associated with a particular radio signal. Several different types of signal quality metrics of each type of radio signal may be used, including received signals strength indication (RSSI), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), multipath indicators, and frequency offset indicators. The same process can be repeated for other available wireless signals, such as WiFi® signals, and the resulting signal vectors from each type of wireless signal can be combined to form a single signature.
Embodiments of the system and method then construct a fingerprint for the current location in the building using the signal quality vectors. This current location fingerprint is compared to the fingerprints in the fingerprint database. The closest match is found between the current location fingerprint and a fingerprints in the fingerprint database. The stored fingerprint in the database that is the closest match to the current location fingerprint is designated as the current location in the building of the mobile embedded device.
It should be noted that alternative embodiments are possible, and steps and elements discussed herein may be changed, added, or eliminated, depending on the particular embodiment. These alternative embodiments include alternative steps and alternative elements that may be used, and structural changes that may be made, without departing from the scope of the invention.
Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represent corresponding parts throughout:
In the following description of embodiments of a commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system and method reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part thereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration a specific example whereby embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system and method may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the claimed subject matter.
I. Commercial Frequency-Modulated (FM) Radio Signals
Embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system and method make use of commercial FM radio signals, such as those used by commercial FM radio stations. Currently, the FM band occupies 87.8-108 MHz, a total of 20.2 MHz and 101 channels. There are usually multiple FM radio stations available at a given location. In addition, some transmission towers are shared by several FM stations.
Commercial FM broadcasting is usually strong enough for outdoor reception. In addition, the indoor penetration of commercial FM radio signal is also high. The wavelength of the FM radio signals is about 3 meters. Thus indoor propagation is less sensitive to the smaller objects, but is more determined by large obstacles such as walls. For the same reason, FM signals are less susceptible to human presence and orientation. This means that FM radio signals are typically more stable in an indoor environment than radio signals of shorter wavelength, such as WiFi® and Bluetooth®.
Moreover, FM receivers are widely available in mobile embedded devices (such as smartphones) due to their small footprint and low cost. As compared to Wi-Fi®, FM receivers also consume much less energy (about 15 mW versus 300 mW). Thus, compared to other types of radio signals (such as Wi-Fi®), commercial FM radio signals require less power, are less susceptible to human presence and small objects, and have improved penetration.
II. System Overview
Embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system and method leverage commercial FM radio signals transmitted by already deployed FM radio towers to profile indoor locations and perform signature-based indoor localization of a mobile embedded device.
Embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system 100 and method include a receiver 110 that is capable of receiving radio signals. These radio signals may be a variety of types of radio signals. However, in each embodiment of the system 100 and method the receiver 110 is capable of receiving commercial FM radio signals broadcasted by FM radio transmitters. These FM radio transmitters include N number of commercial FM radio transmitters. As shown in
It should be noted that the term “commercial” is used to denote that the commercial FM radio transmitters (1) to (N) broadcast their FM radio signals over a wide area. These FM radio signals are broadcast wirelessly over the airwaves, as denoted by the first communication link 115 from commercial FM radio transmitter (1) to the mobile embedded device 105 and the second communication link 120 from commercial FM radio transmitter (N) to the mobile embedded device 105. Typically, the commercial FM radio transmitters (1) to (N) will be associated with one or more commercial FM radio stations. Moreover, these transmitters typically will broadcast their FM radio signals over a wide area involving several square miles, such as tens or hundreds of square miles.
Moreover, a commercial FM radio signal is not dedicated only to the indoor localization process, unlike most existing techniques. In fact, the commercial FM radio signal's primary intent is not for indoor localization but for carrying radio broadcasts. Using commercial FM radio signals does not require the deployment of any device in any building. This also limits the cost associated with large-scale deployment of transmitters throughout a building.
Some embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system 100 and method also include using local radio transmitters. It should be noted the term “local” is used to indicate that the radio signals are broadcast over a short geographic range, such as less than a half mile or so. Typically, these local radio transmitters are designed to transmit within a building, such as with a WiFi® network.
As shown in
These local radio transmitters (1) to (M) typically have a short geographic range, such as within an enclosed building or structure.
Embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system 100 and method include an optional fingerprint profiling module 140. The optionality of the module 140 is shown by the dotted lines around the module 140. The module 140 is used during a profiling stage of the method to profile the radio signal fingerprints at various location in the building 135. These fingerprints are stored in a fingerprint database 145. In some embodiments, the fingerprint database resides on a web server 150 in a cloud computing environment 155. The cloud computing environment is in communication with the mobile embedded device 105 over a fifth communications link 160.
The two-way communication between the fingerprint profiling module 140 and the fifth communications link 160 is shown as a dotted two-way arrow to indicate that this the profiling is an optional process. In reality, the profiling is done at least once in order to populate the fingerprint database 145. However, the fingerprint profiling module 140 does not have to be performed on the mobile embedded device 105 and may be performed with any other type of devices capable of receiving the radio signals and generating the associated fingerprints. Fingerprints can also be automatically crowdsourced by real users as they check-in to different business from their mobile devices. Every time a check-in is taking place, the signal vectors are recorded on the mobile device, annotated with the location of the business the user checked in and uploaded to the fingerprint database.
Once the fingerprint database 145 is populated and the building 135 is profiled, any mobile embedded device containing embodiments of the system 100 and method can be determine a location of the device 105 within the building 135, even without the optional fingerprint profiling module 140. In
Embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system 100 and method include a radio signal quality metric module 165 and a fingerprint matching module 170. In order to find a location of the mobile embedded device 105 once the fingerprint database 145 has been populated, embodiments of the system 100 and method receive radio signals on the receiver 110 and process these radio signals using the radio signal quality metric module 165. Embodiments of the module 165 use one or more signal quality metrics to measure a signal quality of the incoming radio signals.
The signal quality of the incoming signals is used to generate a location fingerprint 175 based on the signal quality metrics. This location fingerprint 175 is used to update the fingerprint database 145. In addition, the location fingerprint 175 is process by the fingerprint matching module 170 in order to determine a current location 180 of the mobile embedded device 105 at the indoor location. This process is explained in more detail below.
II.A. Fingerprint Profiling ModuleSome embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system 100 and method include the fingerprint profiling module 140. The module 140 is used during a profiling stage of the method to profile the radio signal fingerprints in the building 135. Specifically, at a given location inside the building 135, the desired signal quality metrics are recorded using the receiver 110 and the radio signal quality metric module 165. This is performed at the given location for every radio signal frequency (or radio station) that the mobile embedded device 105 can receive.
This collection of radio signal quality metric information across each of the plurality of radio signals becomes a “signature” or fingerprint for the given location in the building 135. Whenever a user is in an unknown location in the building 135, the mobile embedded device 105 uses a current location fingerprint generated from the plurality of radio signals to and compares it against the fingerprint database 145 of already collected fingerprints. As explained in detail below, the closest fingerprint from the fingerprint database 145 is selected and its corresponding location is assumed to be the current location of the user.
In some embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system 100 and method the fingerprint profiling module 140 is not used. Instead, the GPS location of the mobile embedded device 105 can be associated with signal quality vectors (described below). This avoids the need to profile the entire building 135. As the user checks into a business in the building 135 the map of the business will be known to the mobile embedded device 105. This means that the GPS location of the mobile embedded device 105 can be associated with the signal quality vectors and the fingerprint database for the business in the building. In this case, there is longer a need to manually fingerprint the entire building. In many cases the user's consent will be obtained prior to releasing any user data (such as the user's location).
III. Operational Details
In some embodiments, only commercial FM radio signals are used for the indoor localization of the mobile embedded device 105. In other embodiments, the commercial FM radio signal and other types of local radio signals are used. These two general embodiments will now be discussed in further detail.
III.A. Commercial FM Radio Signals for Indoor LocalizationSome embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system 100 and method use only commercial FM radio signals for the plurality of radio signals to perform indoor localization. In these embodiments no other types of radio signals are used. Although a single commercial FM radio signal may be used for the indoor localization, improved results are obtained when using a plurality of commercial FM radio signals.
One advantage to commercial FM radio signals is that they are more robust than WiFi® radio signals. The receiver 110 on the mobile embedded device 105 is used to collect individual commercial FM radio signals. As explained below, the each commercial FM radio signal received is analyzed using a signal quality metric to obtain a signal quality vector. These vectors together constitute a fingerprint that defines the indoor location of the mobile embedded device 105.
The strength of the commercial FM radio signals does vary over the course of the day. Moreover, there is some variation of signal quality metrics over different receivers. However, it has been shown that the variation is not that high to prevent embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system 100 and method from performing the indoor localization.
III.B. Combined Commercial FM Radio Signals and Local Radio SignalsSome embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system 100 and method pair the commercial FM radio signals with additional local (or locally-generated) radio signals. This allows these embodiments of the system 100 and method to exhibit a marked improvement in indoor localization over techniques that use the local radio signals alone.
In these combined embodiments, the plurality of radio signals includes the commercial FM radio signals along with the local radio signals. These local radio signals can include WiFi® radio signals, Bluetooth® radio signals, or even local FM radio signals from local FM radio transmitters. These embodiments can include virtually any combination or type of radio signals, as long as the commercial FM radio signals are included.
In addition, signal quality metrics are used to analyze each type of radio signal in the plurality of radio signals. Because these embodiments have a plurality of different types of radio signals, the fingerprints in the fingerprint database 145 have a longer fingerprint that includes both the commercial FM radio signal fingerprint and fingerprint from the other types of radio signals.
These combined embodiments typically provide a higher indoor localization accuracy that using just the local radio signals or commercial FM radio signals alone. This means that the error is complementary of the error that is obtained using just the local radio signals along. Combined, the indoor localization becomes more accurate.
Referring again to
The received signal strength indication (RSSI) is a signal quality metric that existing receivers report. However, one problem with the RSSI is that it is a high-level indication signal that because it is high level it contains more noise that low-level signals. More noise means more localization error.
It is desirable to use more low-level signal indicators in place of or to augment a signal quality vector. By using more indicators at the physical layer, we can generate more discriminative signatures can be generated, which improves indoor localization accuracy. Thus, instead of using only RSSI as the signal quality metric for a selected radio signal, embodiments of the system 100 and method can use other signal quality metrics in place of or in addition to the RSSI signal quality metric. These additional signal quality metrics include signal-to-noise ratio, multipath indicators, and frequency offset of signal indicators.
III.D. Signal-to-Noise RatioAnother type of signal quality metric that can be used by embodiments of the system 100 and method is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The SNR uses the fact that no wireless radio signal has a perfect incoming signal. There is some noise because it is a wireless transmission. The SNR measures the perturbation of the incoming radio signal by indicating how strong the actual signal is compared to the noise of the input signal. The higher the noise as denoted by the SNR, then the lower the confidence in the quality of the signal.
III.E. Multipath IndicatorsYet another type of signal quality metric that can be used by embodiments of the system 100 and method is multipath indicators. Whenever a wireless signal is transmitted, it is reflected when it meets metallic or other types of objects. This causes the receiver 110 to receive the original signal and a plurality of reflected signals. The receiver 110 rarely receives a single signal. It is usually receiving the original signal and its reflected signals.
The multipath indicators indicate how many of these reflected signals have been received. This is a valuable signal quality metric because it can characterize the physical space in which the person is occupying. This is because depending on the space in which the person is occupying (including the walls and furniture setup), the multipath indicators can be used to characterize the room and therefore find the indoor location.
III.F. Frequency Offset of SignalStill another type of signal quality metric that can be used by embodiments of the system 100 and method is indicators of the frequency offset of the signal. The receiver 110 receives multiple signals at virtually the same time. These multiple signals, because they travel different distances, usually have some delay that is translated into frequency offset. This can be used as a signal quality metric of the incoming signal.
Referring again to
A determination then is made as to whether there are additional signal quality metrics that will be used on the selected radio signal (box 230). If so, then embodiments of the method select another signal quality metric (box 235). This newly selected signal quality metric then is used to analyze the selected radio signal (box 215) and generate a signal quality vector (box 220). This signal quality vector for the newly selected signal quality metric is added to the current location fingerprint (box 225).
If there are no additional signal quality metrics to be processed for the selected radio signal, then a determination is made as to whether there are additional radio signals to process (box 240). If so, then embodiments of the method select another one of the plurality of radio signal (box 245). Embodiments of the method then process this selected radio signal as described above in connection with boxes 210, 215, 220, 225, 230, and 235.
If there are no more radio signals to process, then embodiments of the method compare the current location fingerprint to fingerprints in the fingerprint database 145 (box 250). The fingerprint in the fingerprint database 145 that most closely matches the current location fingerprint is found. This “closest match” means that the signal quality vectors of the current location fingerprint and the fingerprint in the fingerprint database 145 that is the closest match have values that are nearest each other, as compared to the other fingerprints in the fingerprint database 145.
Embodiments of the system 100 and method can use any one of a variety of techniques to find the closest match between fingerprints. In general, these techniques basically are given a fingerprint to be localized and the fingerprint database 145, and then find which entry in the fingerprint database 145 is the closest to the given fingerprint. These techniques include distance metric techniques that match the given fingerprints with the fingerprint database 145. In addition, any type of metric, and any type of smoothing on top of the metric can be used to compare the signal quality vectors obtained from the mobile embedded device 105 to the fingerprint database 145.
Referring again to
The fingerprint database 145 then is updated with the current location fingerprint (box 260). This ensures that the fingerprint database 145 contains current fingerprint information about locations within the building 135. A determination then is made as to whether the mobile embedded device 105 has moved within the building 135 (box 265). If so, then the process described above is repeated for the plurality of radio signals to obtain an updated indoor location of the mobile embedded device 105. Otherwise, the process is completed 270 until the mobile embedded device 105 is moved again.
IV. Exemplary Operating Environment
Embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system 100 and method described herein are operational within numerous types of general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations.
For example,
To allow a device to implement embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system 100 and method described herein, the device should have a sufficient computational capability and system memory to enable basic computational operations. In particular, as illustrated by
In addition, the simplified computing device of
The simplified computing device of
Retention of information such as computer-readable or computer-executable instructions, data structures, program modules, etc., can also be accomplished by using any of a variety of the aforementioned communication media to encode one or more modulated data signals or carrier waves, or other transport mechanisms or communications protocols, and includes any wired or wireless information delivery mechanism. Note that the terms “modulated data signal” or “carrier wave” generally refer to a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. For example, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection carrying one or more modulated data signals, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared, laser, and other wireless media for transmitting and/or receiving one or more modulated data signals or carrier waves. Combinations of the any of the above should also be included within the scope of communication media.
Further, software, programs, and/or computer program products embodying the some or all of the various embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system 100 and method described herein, or portions thereof, may be stored, received, transmitted, or read from any desired combination of computer or machine readable media or storage devices and communication media in the form of computer executable instructions or other data structures.
Finally, embodiments of the commercial FM radio signal indoor localization system 100 and method described herein may be further described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computing device. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc., that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The embodiments described herein may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by one or more remote processing devices, or within a cloud of one or more devices, that are linked through one or more communications networks. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including media storage devices. Still further, the aforementioned instructions may be implemented, in part or in whole, as hardware logic circuits, which may or may not include a processor.
Moreover, although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
Claims
1. A computer system comprising:
- one or more processing units; and
- one or more computer storage media storing computer-executable instructions which, when executed by the one or more processing units, cause the one or more processing units to: obtain multiple different signal indicators for a frequency-modulated signal, the multiple different signal indicators characterizing the frequency-modulated signal as received by a mobile device and comprising at least: a detected frequency offset signal indicator that indicates a frequency offset characteristic of the frequency-modulated signal as detected by the mobile device, and another detected signal indicator that indicates another characteristic of the frequency-modulated signal as detected by the mobile device; and compare the detected frequency offset signal indicator and the another detected signal indicator to a database to obtain a current location of the mobile device, the database having prerecorded frequency offset signal indicators that indicate the frequency offset characteristic of the frequency-modulated signal as detected by other mobile devices at various locations and prerecorded other signal indicators that indicate the another characteristic of the frequency-modulated signal as detected by the other mobile devices at the various locations.
2. The computer system of claim 1, embodied as the mobile device.
3. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the frequency-modulated signal is a commercial frequency-modulated signal.
4. The computer system of claim 3, wherein the another detected signal indicator is a received signal strength indicator of the commercial frequency-modulated signal.
5. The computer system of claim 3, wherein the commercial frequency-modulated signal is transmitted by a radio station at a frequency between 87.8 megahertz and 108 megahertz.
6. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the frequency-modulated signal is a locally-generated frequency-modulated signal.
7. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the another detected signal indicator is a multipath indicator of the frequency-modulated signal.
8. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the computer-executable instructions, when executed by the one or more processing units, cause the one or more processing units to:
- obtain the multiple different signal indicators for another frequency-modulated signal;
- include the multiple different signal indicators for the frequency-modulated signal and the another frequency-modulated signal into a location fingerprint of the mobile device; and
- obtain the current location of the mobile device by comparing the location fingerprint to other fingerprints stored in the database.
9. The computer system of claim 8, wherein both the frequency-modulated signal and the another frequency-modulated signal are both commercial radio signals.
10. A method for determining a location of a mobile device, the method comprising:
- obtaining multiple different signal indicators for a frequency-modulated signal, the multiple different signal indicators characterizing the frequency-modulated signal as received by the mobile device and comprising at least: a detected frequency offset signal indicator that indicates a frequency offset characteristic of the frequency-modulated signal as detected by the mobile device, and another detected signal indicator that indicates another characteristic of the frequency-modulated signal as detected by the mobile device; and
- comparing the detected frequency offset signal indicator and the another detected signal indicator to a database to obtain the location of the mobile device, the database having prerecorded frequency offset signal indicators that indicate the frequency offset characteristic of the frequency-modulated signal as detected by other mobile devices at various locations and prerecorded other signal indicators that indicate the another characteristic of the frequency-modulated signal as detected by the other mobile devices at the various locations.
11. The method of claim 10 performed by the mobile device.
12. The method of claim 10, wherein the frequency-modulated signal is a commercial frequency-modulated radio signal.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the comparing comprises matching a location fingerprint comprising the detected frequency offset signal indicator and the another detected signal indicator to a matching fingerprint stored in the database, wherein the database is located remotely from the mobile device.
14. The method of claim 13, further comprising:
- obtaining the prerecorded frequency offset indicators and the prerecorded other signal indicators from the other mobile devices.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein:
- the location fingerprint includes a received signal strength indicator that indicates a signal strength characteristic of the frequency-modulated signal that is received by the mobile device,
- the location fingerprint includes a detected multipath indicator that indicates a multipath characteristic of the frequency-modulated signal that is received by the mobile device, and
- the comparing comprises comparing the location fingerprint to prerecorded signal strength indicators and prerecorded multipath indicators detected by the other mobile devices at the various locations.
16. The method of claim 14, wherein:
- the location fingerprint includes a received signal strength indicator that indicates a signal strength of the frequency-modulated signal that is received by the mobile device, and
- the comparing comprises comparing the location fingerprint to prerecorded received signal strength indicators detected by the other mobile devices at the various locations.
17. The method of claim 14, wherein:
- the location fingerprint includes a detected multipath indicator that indicates a multipath characteristic of the frequency-modulated signal that is received by the mobile device, and
- the comparing comprises comparing the location fingerprint to prerecorded multipath indicators detected by the other mobile devices at the various locations.
18. A system comprising:
- a radio signal quality metric module;
- a fingerprint matching module; and
- one or more processing units configured to execute the radio signal quality metric module and the fingerprint matching module,
- wherein the radio signal quality metric module is configured to obtain multiple different signal indicators for a frequency-modulated signal, the multiple different signal indicators characterizing the frequency-modulated signal as received by a mobile device and comprising at least: a detected frequency offset signal indicator that indicates a frequency offset characteristic of the frequency-modulated signal as detected by the mobile device, and another detected signal indicator that indicates another characteristic of the frequency-modulated signal as detected by the mobile device; and
- wherein the fingerprint matching module is configured to compare the detected frequency offset signal indicator and the another detected signal indicator to a database to obtain a location of the mobile device, the database having prerecorded frequency offset signal indicators that indicate the frequency offset characteristic of the frequency-modulated signal as detected by other mobile devices at various locations and prerecorded other signal indicators that indicate the another characteristic of the frequency-modulated signal as detected by the other mobile devices at the various locations.
19. The system of claim 18, embodied as the mobile device.
20. The system of claim 19, further comprising a receiver of the mobile device, wherein the receiver is configured to receive the frequency-modulated signal.
6944465 | September 13, 2005 | Spain et al. |
8077090 | December 13, 2011 | Chintalapudi et al. |
8130141 | March 6, 2012 | Pattabiraman et al. |
8170583 | May 1, 2012 | Shkedi |
8174931 | May 8, 2012 | Vartanian et al. |
8294617 | October 23, 2012 | Rieger, III |
8339316 | December 25, 2012 | Mendis |
8399316 | March 19, 2013 | Vinet et al. |
8503989 | August 6, 2013 | Kasturi et al. |
8548497 | October 1, 2013 | Lymberopoulos et al. |
20010022558 | September 20, 2001 | Karr, Jr. |
20010050926 | December 13, 2001 | Kumar |
20020184653 | December 5, 2002 | Pierce et al. |
20030008668 | January 9, 2003 | Perez-Breva et al. |
20040022214 | February 5, 2004 | Goren et al. |
20040072577 | April 15, 2004 | Myllymaki et al. |
20040252868 | December 16, 2004 | Nilsson |
20050020210 | January 27, 2005 | Krumm et al. |
20050020277 | January 27, 2005 | Krumm et al. |
20050094610 | May 5, 2005 | de Clerq et al. |
20060125692 | June 15, 2006 | Wang et al. |
20070026870 | February 1, 2007 | Spain et al. |
20070129084 | June 7, 2007 | Sylvain |
20080225995 | September 18, 2008 | Auranen |
20080225996 | September 18, 2008 | Vare et al. |
20080240070 | October 2, 2008 | Feher |
20080248815 | October 9, 2008 | Busch |
20080299925 | December 4, 2008 | Walley et al. |
20080311870 | December 18, 2008 | Walley et al. |
20090103651 | April 23, 2009 | Lahtonen |
20090191897 | July 30, 2009 | Johnson et al. |
20090322603 | December 31, 2009 | Liao |
20100029274 | February 4, 2010 | Deshpande et al. |
20100075695 | March 25, 2010 | Haughay et al. |
20100109842 | May 6, 2010 | Patel et al. |
20100120447 | May 13, 2010 | Anderson et al. |
20100127836 | May 27, 2010 | Huang et al. |
20100178938 | July 15, 2010 | Ingrassia et al. |
20100227626 | September 9, 2010 | Dressler et al. |
20100271263 | October 28, 2010 | Moshfeghi |
20100285763 | November 11, 2010 | Ingrassia et al. |
20100309051 | December 9, 2010 | Moshfeghi |
20100309790 | December 9, 2010 | Polakos |
20110034180 | February 10, 2011 | Walley et al. |
20110039517 | February 17, 2011 | Wigren et al. |
20110065450 | March 17, 2011 | Kazmi |
20110183688 | July 28, 2011 | Dietrich et al. |
20110256890 | October 20, 2011 | Polakos |
20110269479 | November 3, 2011 | Ledlie |
20110306354 | December 15, 2011 | Ledlie et al. |
20110319097 | December 29, 2011 | Wirola et al. |
20120056785 | March 8, 2012 | Jovicic et al. |
20120072106 | March 22, 2012 | Han et al. |
20120078894 | March 29, 2012 | Jiang et al. |
20120083286 | April 5, 2012 | Kim et al. |
20120191512 | July 26, 2012 | Wuoti et al. |
20120208500 | August 16, 2012 | Ledlie et al. |
20120214515 | August 23, 2012 | Davis et al. |
20120226554 | September 6, 2012 | Schmidt et al. |
20120290636 | November 15, 2012 | Kadous et al. |
20120302263 | November 29, 2012 | Tinnakornsrisuphap et al. |
20130072216 | March 21, 2013 | Ledlie |
- Matic, et al., “Tuning to Your Position: FM-radio based Indoor Localization with Spontaneous Recalibration”, IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), Mar. 29-Apr. 2, 2010, pp. 153-161.
- Haeberlen et al., “Practical Robust Localization over Large-Scale 802.11 Wireless Networks,” Proc. International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom '04), Sep. 26-Oct. 1, 2004, pp. 70-84, 15 pages.
- Krumm et al., “RightSPOT: A Novel Sense of Location for a Smart Personal Object,” Fifth International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2003), Oct. 2003, pp. 36-43, 8 pages.
- Miura et al., “Indoor Localization for Mobile Node Based on RSSI,” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference, KES 2007 and XVII Italian workshop on neural networks conference on Knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems: Part III, Sep. 2007, pp. 1065-1072, 8 pages.
- Moghtadaiee et al., “Indoor Localization Using FM Radio Signals: A Fingerprinting Approach,” 2011 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), Sep. 21-23, 2011, pp. 21-23, 4 pages.
- Papliatseyeu et al., “FINDR: Low-Cost Indoor Positioning Using FM Radio,” Proceedings of MobilWare, vol. 07, Apr. 2009, pp. 1-13, 13 pages.
- Sayrafian-Pour et al., “A Robust Model-based Approach to Indoor Positioning Using Signal Strength,” IEEE 19th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Sep. 15-18, 2008, 5 pages.
- Tarzia et al., “Demo: Indoor Localization Without Infrastructure Using the Acoustic Background Spectrum,” Proc. 9th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys'11), Jun. 2011, 1 page.
- Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 13, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 13/328,613, 12 pages.
- Response filed Apr. 11, 2013 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 13, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 13/328,613, 12 pages.
- Notice of Allowance and Examiner Initiated Interview Summary mailed May 30, 2013 from U.S. Appl. No. 13/328,613, 18 pages.
- Notice of Allowance and Applicant Initiated Interview Summary mailed Jun. 12, 2013 from U.S. Appl. No. 13/328,613, 6 pages.
- Matic et al., “Tuning to Your Position: FM-Radio Based Indoor Localization with Spontaneous Recalibration”, IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), Mar. 29-Apr. 2, 2010, 9 pages.
Type: Grant
Filed: Aug 27, 2013
Date of Patent: Feb 23, 2016
Patent Publication Number: 20130344892
Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC (Redmond, WA)
Inventors: Dimitrios Lymberopoulos (Bellevue, WA), Jie Liu (Medina, WA), Nissanka Arachchige Bodhi Priyantha (Redmond, WA), Yin Chen (Baltimore, MD)
Primary Examiner: Mong-Thuy Tran
Application Number: 14/011,648
International Classification: H04W 24/00 (20090101); H04W 4/04 (20090101); H04W 4/00 (20090101); G01S 5/02 (20100101); H04W 64/00 (20090101);