Flower pot cover

Skip to: Description  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of our new flower pot cover design;

FIG. 2 is a side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a bottom plan view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 1, the only difference being in the horizontal angle of the skirt;

FIG. 6 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 1, the only difference being in the near vertical angle of the skirt;

FIG. 7 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 1, the only difference being in the downward angle of the skirt;

FIG. 8 is a side elevational view of a second embodiment of the design of FIG. 1, the only difference being in the height of the base;

FIG. 9 is a side elevational view of a third embodiment of the design of FIG. 1, the only difference being in the height of the base;

FIG. 10 is a side elevational view of a fourth embodiment of the design of FIG. 1, the only difference being in the size of the skirt;

FIG. 11 is a side elevational view of a fifth embodiment of the design of FIG. 1, the only difference being in the size of the skirt;

FIG. 12 is a perspective view of a sixth embodiment of our new flower pot cover design;

FIG. 13 is a side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 14 is a top plan view thereof;

FIG. 15 is a bottom plan view thereof;

FIG. 16 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 12, the only difference being in the horizontal angle of the skirt;

FIG. 17 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 12, the only difference being in the near vertical angle of the skirt;

FIG. 18 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 12, the only difference being in the downward angle of the skirt;

FIG. 19 is a side elevational view of a seventh embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the height of the base;

FIG. 20 is a side elevational view of an eighth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the height of the base;

FIG. 21 is a side elevational view of a ninth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the size of the skirt;

FIG. 22 is a side elevational view of a tenth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the size of the skirt;

FIG. 23 is a perspective view of an eleventh embodiment of our new flower pot cover design;

FIG. 24 is a side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 25 is a top plan view thereof;

FIG. 26 is a bottom plan view thereof;

FIG. 27 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 23, the only difference being in the horizontal angle of the skirt;

FIG. 28 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 23, the only difference being in the near vertical angle of the skirt;

FIG. 29 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 23, the only difference being in the downward angle of the skirt;

FIG. 30 is a side elevational view of a twelfth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the height of the base;

FIG. 31 is a side elevational view of an thirteenth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the height of the base;

FIG. 32 is a side elevational view of a fourteenth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the size of the skirt;

FIG. 33 is a side elevational view of a fifteenth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the size of the skirt;

FIG. 34 is a perspective view of an sixteenth embodiment of our new flower pot cover design;

FIG. 35 is a side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 36 is a top plan view thereof;

FIG. 37 is a bottom plan view thereof;

FIG. 38 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 34, the only difference being in the horizontal angle of the skirt;

FIG. 39 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 34, the only difference being in the near vertical angle of the skirt;

FIG. 40 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 34, the only difference being in the downward angle of the skirt;

FIG. 41 is a side elevational view of a seventeenth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the height of the base;

FIG. 42 is a side elevational view of an eighteenth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the height of the base;

FIG. 43 is a side elevational view of a nineteenth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the size of the skirt;

FIG. 44 is a side elevational view of a twentieth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the size of the skirt;

FIG. 45 is a perspective view of an twenty-first embodiment of our new flower pot cover design;

FIG. 46 is a side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 47 is a top plan view thereof;

FIG. 48 is a bottom plan view thereof;

FIG. 49 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 45, the only difference being in the horizontal angle of the skirt;

FIG. 50 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 45, the only difference being in the near vertical angle of the skirt;

FIG. 51 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 45, the only difference being in the downward angle of the skirt;

FIG. 52 is a side elevational view of a twenty-second embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the height of the base;

FIG. 53 is a side elevational view of an twenty-third embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the height of the base;

FIG. 54 is a side elevational view of a twenty-fourth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the size of the skirt;

FIG. 55 is a side elevational view of a twenty-fifth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the size of the skirt;

FIG. 56 is a perspective view of an twenty-sixth embodiment of our new flower pot cover design;

FIG. 57 is a side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 58 is a top plan view thereof;

FIG. 59 is a bottom plan view thereof;

FIG. 60 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 56, the only difference being in the horizontal angle of the skirt;

FIG. 61 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 56, the only difference being in the near vertical angle of the skirt;

FIG. 62 is a side elevational view of the design of FIG. 56, the only difference being in the downward angle of the skirt;

FIG. 63 is a side elevational view of a twenty-seventh embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the height of the base;

FIG. 64 is a side elevational view of an twenty-eighth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the height of the base;

FIG. 65 is a side elevational view of a twenty-ninth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the size of the skirt; and,

FIG. 66 is a side elevational view of a thirtieth embodiment of the flower pot cover design, the only difference being in the size of the skirt.

The flower pot cover has no substantial thickness.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
D239192 March 1976 Wiles et al.
D254659 April 8, 1980 Karotseris
D292182 October 6, 1987 Weder et al.
D292562 November 3, 1987 Weder et al.
D293224 December 15, 1987 Weder et al.
D293775 January 19, 1988 Weder et al.
D317583 June 18, 1991 Weder et al.
D322403 December 17, 1991 Eaton
D324659 March 17, 1992 Stehouwer
D336041 June 1, 1993 Zama
D348634 July 12, 1994 Weder et al.
1951642 March 1934 Augustin et al.
2355559 August 1944 Renner
3253768 March 1958 Gjesdal
3443741 May 1969 Stockdale
4043077 August 23, 1977 Stonehocker
4712725 December 15, 1987 Moore
5076011 December 31, 1991 Stehouwer
Foreign Patent Documents
2489126 March 1982 FRX
2603159 March 1988 FRX
Other references
  • Exhibit A--Speed Cover.RTM. Brochure--The Simple Solution . . . , .COPYRGT.1989.
Patent History
Patent number: D364587
Type: Grant
Filed: Jun 11, 1993
Date of Patent: Nov 28, 1995
Assignee: Highland Supply Corporation (Highland, IL)
Inventors: Donald E. Weder (Highland, IL), Jon S. Shryock (Bethany, OK)
Primary Examiner: Jeffrey Asch
Law Firm: Dunlap & Codding
Application Number: 0/9,447