Child proximity monitor
Description
FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a child proximity monitor shown in a cover-open position;
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a child proximity monitor shown in a cover-closed position;
FIG. 3 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a first side view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a first end view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a second side view thereof opposite the view of FIG. 4;
FIG. 7 is a bottom plan view thereof opposite the view of FIG. 3; and,
FIG. 8 is a second end view thereof opposite the view of FIG. 5.
Claims
The ornamental design for a child proximity monitor, as shown and described.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
D381922 | August 5, 1997 | Casperson |
5900817 | May 4, 1999 | Olmassakian |
D427099 | June 27, 2000 | Hunter |
6127931 | October 3, 2000 | Mohr |
D436878 | January 30, 2001 | Vassell |
D445051 | July 17, 2001 | Oakes et al. |
D453698 | February 19, 2002 | Marks |
6369713 | April 9, 2002 | Halleck et al. |
D461425 | August 13, 2002 | Heskett et al. |
6529131 | March 4, 2003 | Wentworth |
Patent History
Patent number: D501419
Type: Grant
Filed: Sep 18, 2003
Date of Patent: Feb 1, 2005
Assignee: VitalTrak Technology, Inc. (Manhattan Beach, CA)
Inventors: Raymond G. Oja (Manhattan Beach, CA), Ivanhoe E. Chaput (Torrance, CA), Ivanhoe P. Chaput (Torrance, CA)
Primary Examiner: Lucy Lieberman
Attorney: Donn K. Harms
Application Number: 29/190,445
Type: Grant
Filed: Sep 18, 2003
Date of Patent: Feb 1, 2005
Assignee: VitalTrak Technology, Inc. (Manhattan Beach, CA)
Inventors: Raymond G. Oja (Manhattan Beach, CA), Ivanhoe E. Chaput (Torrance, CA), Ivanhoe P. Chaput (Torrance, CA)
Primary Examiner: Lucy Lieberman
Attorney: Donn K. Harms
Application Number: 29/190,445
Classifications
Current U.S. Class:
D10/104;
Linear Or Distance (9) (D10/70)