Arthroplasty jig blank

- OtisMed Corporation
Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

This application is related to U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 11/924,425 entitled “Arthroplasty Systems and Devices, and Related Methods”, filed concurrently herewith, and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a left femoral jig blank of an arthroplasty jig blank according to a first variant of the present design;

FIG. 2 is a rear perspective view of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a front view elevational of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 1

FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is a top plan view of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 1;

FIG. 6 is a bottom plan view of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 1;

FIG. 7 is a right side elevational view of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 1;

FIG. 8 is a rear left side elevational view of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 1;

FIG. 9 is bottom perspective view of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 1;

FIG. 10 is a right side, front perspective view of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 1;

FIG. 11 is a front elevational view of a right femoral jig blank according to a second variant of an arthroplasty jig blank, which is a mirror image of the of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 1;

FIG. 12 is a front perspective view of the left femoral jig blank according to a third variant of an arthroplasty jig blank;

FIG. 13 is a rear perspective view of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 12;

FIG. 14 is a front elevational view of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 12;

FIG. 15 is a rear elevational view of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 12;

FIG. 16 is a top plan view of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 12;

FIG. 17 is a bottom plan view of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 12;

FIG. 18 is a right side elevational view of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 12;

FIG. 19 is a left side elevational view of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 12; and,

FIG. 20 is a top plan view of a right femoral jig blank according to the fourth variant of an arthroplasty jig blank, which is a mirror image of the left femoral jig blank of FIG. 12.

Claims

I claim the ornamental design for an arthroplasty jig blank, as shown and described.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3195411 July 1965 MacDonald et al.
3825151 July 1974 Arnaud
D245920 September 27, 1977 Shen
4298992 November 10, 1981 Burstein
4436684 March 13, 1984 White
D274093 May 29, 1984 Kenna
D274161 June 5, 1984 Kenna
4575330 March 11, 1986 Hull
4821213 April 11, 1989 Cline et al.
4822365 April 18, 1989 Walker et al.
4931056 June 5, 1990 Ghajar et al.
4936862 June 26, 1990 Walker et al.
5027281 June 25, 1991 Rekow et al.
5075866 December 24, 1991 Goto et al.
5078719 January 7, 1992 Schreiber
5098383 March 24, 1992 Hemmy et al.
5122144 June 16, 1992 Bert et al.
5123927 June 23, 1992 Duncan et al.
5140646 August 18, 1992 Ueda
5156777 October 20, 1992 Kaye
5171276 December 15, 1992 Caspari et al.
D336518 June 15, 1993 Taylor
5218427 June 8, 1993 Koch
5234433 August 10, 1993 Bert et al.
5274565 December 28, 1993 Reuben
5298115 March 29, 1994 Leonard
D346979 May 17, 1994 Stalcup et al.
5320529 June 14, 1994 Pompa
5360446 November 1, 1994 Kennedy
5364402 November 15, 1994 Mumme et al.
5365996 November 22, 1994 Crook
D355254 February 7, 1995 Krafft et al.
5408409 April 18, 1995 Glassman et al.
5448489 September 5, 1995 Reuben
5452407 September 19, 1995 Crook
5462550 October 31, 1995 Dietz et al.
5484446 January 16, 1996 Burke et al.
D372309 July 30, 1996 Heldreth
D374078 September 24, 1996 Johnson et al.
5556278 September 17, 1996 Meitner
5569261 October 29, 1996 Marik et al.
5601563 February 11, 1997 Burke et al.
5662656 September 2, 1997 White
5682886 November 4, 1997 Delp et al.
5683398 November 4, 1997 Caris et al.
5716361 February 10, 1998 Masini
5725376 March 10, 1998 Poirier
5749876 May 12, 1998 Duvillier et al.
5768134 June 16, 1998 Swaelens et al.
5769859 June 23, 1998 Dorsey
D398058 September 8, 1998 Collier
5810830 September 22, 1998 Noble et al.
5824100 October 20, 1998 Kester et al.
5824111 October 20, 1998 Schall et al.
5860980 January 19, 1999 Axelson, Jr. et al.
5860981 January 19, 1999 Bertin et al.
5871018 February 16, 1999 Delp et al.
5880976 March 9, 1999 DiGioia III et al.
5908424 June 1, 1999 Bertin et al.
5964808 October 12, 1999 Blaha et al.
5967777 October 19, 1999 Klein et al.
5993448 November 30, 1999 Remmler
6002859 December 14, 1999 DiGioia, III et al.
6068658 May 30, 2000 Insall et al.
6090114 July 18, 2000 Matsuno et al.
6096043 August 1, 2000 Techiera et al.
6106529 August 22, 2000 Techiera
6112109 August 29, 2000 D'Urso
6132447 October 17, 2000 Dorsey
6171340 January 9, 2001 McDowell
6205411 March 20, 2001 DiGioia, III et al.
6228121 May 8, 2001 Khalili
6254639 July 3, 2001 Peckitt
6343987 February 5, 2002 Hayama et al.
6382975 May 7, 2002 Poirier
6383228 May 7, 2002 Schmotzer
6415171 July 2, 2002 Gueziec et al.
6458135 October 1, 2002 Harwin et al.
6463351 October 8, 2002 Clynch
6503254 January 7, 2003 Masini
6520964 February 18, 2003 Tallarida et al.
6575980 June 10, 2003 Robie
6602259 August 5, 2003 Masini
6672870 January 6, 2004 Knapp
6692448 February 17, 2004 Tanaka et al.
6701174 March 2, 2004 Krause et al.
6711432 March 23, 2004 Krause et al.
6712856 March 30, 2004 Carignan et al.
6716249 April 6, 2004 Hyde
6738657 May 18, 2004 Franklin et al.
6747646 June 8, 2004 Gueziec et al.
6770099 August 3, 2004 Andriacchi et al.
6772026 August 3, 2004 Bradbury et al.
6814575 November 9, 2004 Poirier
6905510 June 14, 2005 Saab
6905514 June 14, 2005 Carignan et al.
6923817 August 2, 2005 Carson et al.
6932842 August 23, 2005 Litschko et al.
6944518 September 13, 2005 Roose
6969393 November 29, 2005 Pinczewski et al.
6975894 December 13, 2005 Wehrli et al.
6978188 December 20, 2005 Christensen
7029479 April 18, 2006 Tallarida et al.
7039225 May 2, 2006 Tanaka et al.
7060074 June 13, 2006 Rosa et al.
7074241 July 11, 2006 McKinnon
7090677 August 15, 2006 Fallin et al.
RE39301 September 19, 2006 Bertin
7104997 September 12, 2006 Lionberger et al.
7128745 October 31, 2006 Masini
D532515 November 21, 2006 Buttler et al.
7141053 November 28, 2006 Rosa et al.
7153309 December 26, 2006 Huebner et al.
7235080 June 26, 2007 Hodorek
7238190 July 3, 2007 Schon et al.
7239908 July 3, 2007 Alexander et al.
7309339 December 18, 2007 Cusick et al.
7340316 March 4, 2008 Spaeth et al.
7359746 April 15, 2008 Arata
7393012 July 1, 2008 Funakura et al.
7394946 July 1, 2008 Dewaele
7468075 December 23, 2008 Lang et al.
7547307 June 16, 2009 Carson et al.
7611519 November 3, 2009 Lefevre et al.
7618421 November 17, 2009 Axelson, Jr. et al.
7618451 November 17, 2009 Berez et al.
7634306 December 15, 2009 Sarin et al.
7641660 January 5, 2010 Lakin et al.
7643862 January 5, 2010 Schoenefeld
D618796 June 29, 2010 Cantu et al.
D619718 July 13, 2010 Gannoe et al.
D622854 August 31, 2010 Otto et al.
D626234 October 26, 2010 Otto et al.
20020055783 May 9, 2002 Tallarida et al.
20020087274 July 4, 2002 Alexander et al.
20020160337 October 31, 2002 Klein et al.
20030009167 January 9, 2003 Wozencroft
20030055502 March 20, 2003 Lang et al.
20030176783 September 18, 2003 Hu
20030216669 November 20, 2003 Lang et al.
20040097952 May 20, 2004 Sarin et al.
20040102792 May 27, 2004 Sarin et al.
20040102866 May 27, 2004 Harris et al.
20040133276 July 8, 2004 Lang et al.
20040138754 July 15, 2004 Lang et al.
20040147927 July 29, 2004 Tsougarakis et al.
20040153066 August 5, 2004 Coon et al.
20040153079 August 5, 2004 Tsougarakis et al.
20040171924 September 2, 2004 Mire et al.
20040204760 October 14, 2004 Fitz et al.
20040220583 November 4, 2004 Pieczynski, II et al.
20040236424 November 25, 2004 Berez et al.
20040243148 December 2, 2004 Wasielewski
20040254584 December 16, 2004 Sarin et al.
20050059978 March 17, 2005 Sherry et al.
20050065617 March 24, 2005 Moctezuma de la Barrera
20050096535 May 5, 2005 de la Barrera
20050113841 May 26, 2005 Sheldon et al.
20050119664 June 2, 2005 Carignan et al.
20050148843 July 7, 2005 Roose
20050148860 July 7, 2005 Liew et al.
20050192588 September 1, 2005 Garcia
20050216024 September 29, 2005 Massoud
20050234461 October 20, 2005 Burdulis, Jr. et al.
20050245934 November 3, 2005 Tuke et al.
20050245936 November 3, 2005 Tuke et al.
20050256389 November 17, 2005 Koga et al.
20050267584 December 1, 2005 Burdulis, Jr. et al.
20060015018 January 19, 2006 Jutras et al.
20060015188 January 19, 2006 Grimes
20060030853 February 9, 2006 Haines
20060036257 February 16, 2006 Steffensmeier
20060110017 May 25, 2006 Tsai et al.
20060111628 May 25, 2006 Tsai et al.
20060122491 June 8, 2006 Murray et al.
20060155293 July 13, 2006 McGinley et al.
20060155294 July 13, 2006 Steffensmeier et al.
20060195113 August 31, 2006 Masini
20060271058 November 30, 2006 Ashton et al.
20060293681 December 28, 2006 Claypool et al.
20070005073 January 4, 2007 Claypool et al.
20070021838 January 25, 2007 Dugas et al.
20070038059 February 15, 2007 Sheffer et al.
20070055268 March 8, 2007 Utz et al.
20070073305 March 29, 2007 Lionberger et al.
20070100462 May 3, 2007 Lang et al.
20070106389 May 10, 2007 Croxton et al.
20070118055 May 24, 2007 McCombs
20070118243 May 24, 2007 Schroeder et al.
20070123912 May 31, 2007 Carson
20070173858 July 26, 2007 Engh et al.
20070191741 August 16, 2007 Tsai et al.
20070198022 August 23, 2007 Lang et al.
20070213738 September 13, 2007 Martin et al.
20070219560 September 20, 2007 Hodorek
20070226986 October 4, 2007 Chi et al.
20070232959 October 4, 2007 Couture et al.
20070233136 October 4, 2007 Wozencroft
20070233140 October 4, 2007 Metzger et al.
20070233141 October 4, 2007 Park et al.
20070233269 October 4, 2007 Steines et al.
20070239167 October 11, 2007 Pinczewski et al.
20070249967 October 25, 2007 Buly et al.
20070276224 November 29, 2007 Lang et al.
20070276400 November 29, 2007 Moore et al.
20070282451 December 6, 2007 Metzger et al.
20070288030 December 13, 2007 Metzger et al.
20080004701 January 3, 2008 Axelson et al.
20080015433 January 17, 2008 Alexander et al.
20080015599 January 17, 2008 D'Alessio et al.
20080015600 January 17, 2008 D'Alessio et al.
20080015602 January 17, 2008 Axelson et al.
20080015606 January 17, 2008 Axelson et al.
20080015607 January 17, 2008 Axelson et al.
20080031412 February 7, 2008 Lang et al.
20080033442 February 7, 2008 Amiot et al.
20080088761 April 17, 2008 Lin et al.
20080114370 May 15, 2008 Schoenefeld
20080147072 June 19, 2008 Park et al.
20080153067 June 26, 2008 Berckmans et al.
20080161815 July 3, 2008 Schoenefeld et al.
20080195108 August 14, 2008 Bhatnagar et al.
20080215059 September 4, 2008 Carignan et al.
20080234685 September 25, 2008 Gjerde
20080243127 October 2, 2008 Lang et al.
20080257363 October 23, 2008 Schoenefeld et al.
20080262624 October 23, 2008 White et al.
20080275452 November 6, 2008 Lang et al.
20080281328 November 13, 2008 Lang et al.
20080281329 November 13, 2008 Fitz et al.
20080281426 November 13, 2008 Fitz et al.
20080286722 November 20, 2008 Berckmans, III et al.
20080287953 November 20, 2008 Sers
20080287954 November 20, 2008 Kunz et al.
20080312659 December 18, 2008 Metzger et al.
20080319491 December 25, 2008 Schoenefeld
20090024131 January 22, 2009 Metzger et al.
20090088763 April 2, 2009 Aram et al.
20090093816 April 9, 2009 Roose et al.
20090110498 April 30, 2009 Park
20090112213 April 30, 2009 Heavener et al.
20090131941 May 21, 2009 Park et al.
20090138020 May 28, 2009 Park et al.
20090151736 June 18, 2009 Belcher et al.
20090157083 June 18, 2009 Park et al.
20090222014 September 3, 2009 Bojarski et al.
20090222015 September 3, 2009 Park et al.
20090222016 September 3, 2009 Park et al.
20090248044 October 1, 2009 Amiot et al.
20090254093 October 8, 2009 White et al.
20090254367 October 8, 2009 Belcher et al.
20090270868 October 29, 2009 Park et al.
20090274350 November 5, 2009 Pavlovskaia et al.
20090306676 December 10, 2009 Lang et al.
20090307893 December 17, 2009 Burdulis, Jr. et al.
20090312805 December 17, 2009 Lang et al.
20100023015 January 28, 2010 Park
20100042105 February 18, 2010 Park et al.
20100049195 February 25, 2010 Park et al.
20100152741 June 17, 2010 Park et al.
20100298894 November 25, 2010 Bojarski et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
3305237 February 1983 DE
4341367 June 1995 DE
10 2005 023 November 2006 DE
0097001 December 1983 EP
0574098 December 1993 EP
0622052 November 1994 EP
0908836 April 1999 EP
0908836 December 1999 EP
1486900 December 2004 EP
1 532 939 May 2005 EP
2215610 September 1989 GB
2420717 June 2006 GB
WO 93/25157 December 1993 WO
WO 95/07509 March 1995 WO
WO 97/23172 July 1997 WO
WO 98/12995 April 1998 WO
WO 01/00096 January 2001 WO
WO 01/70142 September 2001 WO
WO 02/096268 December 2002 WO
WO 2004/032806 April 2004 WO
WO 2004/049981 June 2004 WO
WO 2005/051240 June 2005 WO
2005/087125 September 2005 WO
WO 2005/087125 September 2005 WO
WO 2006/058057 June 2006 WO
WO 2006/060795 June 2006 WO
WO 2006/092600 September 2006 WO
WO 2006/134345 December 2006 WO
WO 2007/014164 February 2007 WO
WO 2007/058632 May 2007 WO
2007/092841 August 2007 WO
WO 2007/092841 August 2007 WO
Other references
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/083125, dated Mar. 9, 2009, 13 pages.
  • Akenine-Möller et al., Real-Time Rendering, Second Edition, AK Peters, Natick, MA, 6 pages (Table of Contents), 2002.
  • Author Unknown, “MRI Protocol Reference,” ConforMIS, Inc., copyright 2007, http://www.conformis.com/Imaging-Professionals/MRI-Protocol-Guides, last visited on Mar. 28, 2008, 18 pages.
  • Author Unknown, “MRI Protocol Reference Guide for GE Systems,” ConforMIS, Inc., copyright 2007, http://www.conformis.com/Imaging-Professionals/MRI-Protocol-Guides, last visited on Mar. 28, 2008, 18 pages.
  • Author Unknown, “MRI Protocol Reference Guide for Phillips Systems,” ConforMIS, Inc., copyright 2007, http://www.conformis.com/Imaging-Professionals/MRI-Protocol-Guides, last visited on Mar. 28, 2008, 19 pages.
  • Author Unknown, “MRI Protocol Reference Guide for Siemens Systems,” ConforMIS, Inc., copyright 2007, http://www.conformis.com/Imaging-Professionals/MRI-Protocol-Guides, last visited on Mar. 28, 2008, 18 pages.
  • Barequet et al., “Filling Gaps in the Boundary of a Polyhedron,” Computer Aided Geometric Design, vol. 12, pp. 207-229, 1995.
  • Barequet et al., “Repairing CAD Models,” Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Visualization '97 Conference, pp. 363-370, Oct. 1997.
  • Berry et al., “Personalised image-based templates for intra-operative guidance,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, vol. 219, pp. 111-118, Oct. 7, 2004.
  • Bi{hacek over (sc)}evic et al., “Variations of Femoral Condyle Shape,” Coll. Antropol., vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 409-414, 2005.
  • Blinn, Jim Blinn's Corner—A Trip Down the Graphics Pipeline, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, CA, 5 pages (Table of Contents), 1996.
  • Bøhn et al., “A Topology-Based Approach for Shell-Closure,” Geometric Modeling for Product Realization (P.R. Wilson et al. editors), pp. 297-319, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North- Holland, 1993.
  • Chauhan et al., “Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique—a randomised, prospective trial,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 86-B, No. 3, pp. 372-377, Apr. 2004.
  • Cohen et al., Radiosity and Realistic Image Synthesis, Academic Press Professional, Cambridge, MA, 8 pages (Table of Contents), 1993.
  • Couglin et al., “Tibial Axis and Patellar Position Relative to the Femoral Epicondylar Axis During Squatting,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 18, No. 8, Elsevier, 2003.
  • Delp et al., “Computer Assisted Knee Replacement,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 354, pp. 49-56, Sep. 1998.
  • Dutré et al., Advanced Global Illumination, AK Peters, Natick, MA, 5 pages (Table of Contents), 2003.
  • Eckhoff et al., “Three-Dimensional Mechanics, Kinematics, and Morphology of the Knee Viewed in Virtual Realty,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 87-A, Supplement 2, pp. 71-80, 2005.
  • Erikson, “Error Correction of a Large Architectural Model: The Henderson County Courthouse,” Technical Report TR95-013, Dept. of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, pp. 1-11, 1995.
  • Ervin et al., Landscape Modeling, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 8 pages (Table of Contents), 2001.
  • Farin, NURB Curves and Surfaces: From Projective Geometry to Practical Use, AK Peters, Wellesley, MA, 7 pages (Table of Contents), 1995.
  • Fleischer et al., “Accurate Polygon Scan Conversion Using Half-Open Intervals,” Graphics Gems III, pp. 362-365, code: pp. 599-605, 1992.
  • Foley et al., Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, 9 pages (Table of Contents), 1990.
  • Glassner (editor), An Introduction to Ray Tracing, Academic Press Limited, San Diego, CA, 4 pages (Table of Contents), 1989.
  • Glassner, Principles of Digital Image Synthesis, Volumes One and Two, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, CA, 32 pages (Table of Contents), 1995.
  • Gooch et al., Non-Photorealistic Rendering, AK Peters, Natick, MA, 4 pages (Table of Contents), 2001.
  • Grüne et al., “On numerical algorithm and interactive visualization for optimal control problems,” Journal of Computation and Visualization in Science, vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 221-229, Jul. 1999.
  • Guéziec et al., “Converting Sets of Polygons to Manifold Surfaces by Cutting and Stitching,” Proc. IEEE Visualization 1998, pp. 383-390, Oct. 1998.
  • Hafez et al., “Patient Specific Instrumentation for TKA: Testing the Reliability Using a Navigational System,” MIS Meets CAOS Symposium & Instructional Academy, Less and Minimally Invasive Surgery for Joint Arthroplasty: Fact and Fiction Syllabus, San Diego, CA, 8 pages, Oct. 20-22, 2005.
  • Hafez et al., “Computer Assisted Total Knee Replacement: Could a Two-Piece Custom Template Replace the Complex Conventional Instrumentations?”, Computer Aided Surgery, vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 93-94, 2004.
  • Hafez et al., “Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Patient-Specific Templating,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 0, pp. 1-9, 2006.
  • Jensen, Realistic Image Synthesis Using Photon Mapping, AK Peters, Natick, MA, 7 pages (Table of Contents), 2001.
  • Jones et al., “A new approach to the construction of surfaces from contour data,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 75-84, 1994 [ISSN 0167-7055].
  • Khorramabadi, “A Walk Through the Planned CS Building,” Technical Report UCB/CSD 91/652, Computer Science Department, University of California at Berkeley, 74 pages, 1991.
  • Kidder et al., “3-D Model Acquisition, Design, Planning and Manufacturing of Orthopaedic Devices: A Framework,” Advanced Sensor and Control-System Interface (B.O. Nnaji editor), Proceedings SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham, WA, vol. 2911, pp. 9-22, Nov. 21-22, 1996.
  • Kumar, Robust Incremental Polygon Triangulation for Surface Rendering, Center for Geometric Computing, Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, WSCG, The International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision, pp. 381-388, 2000.
  • Lorensen et al., “Marching Cubes: A High Resolution 3d Surface Construction Algorithm,” Computer Graphics, vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 163-169, 1987.
  • Morvan et al., IVECS, Interactively Correcting .STL Files in a Virtual Environment, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, Proc. Conf. Virtual Design, Aug. 1996.
  • Nooruddin et al., Simplification and Repair of Polygonal Models Using Volumetric Techniques, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 191-205, Apr.-Jun. 2003.
  • Pharr et al., Physically Based Rendering, from Theory to Implementation, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 13 pages (Table of Contents), 2004.
  • Platt et al., “Mould Arthroplasty of the Knee, A Ten-Year Follow-up Study,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British Volume), vol. 51-B, No. 1, pp. 76-87, Feb. 1969.
  • Potter, “Arthroplasty of the Knee with Tibial Metallic Implants of the McKeever and MacIntosh Design,” The Surgical Clinics of North America, vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 903-915, Aug. 1969.
  • Radermacher et al., “Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery with Image Based Individual Templates,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 354, pp. 28-38, Sep. 1998.
  • Rohlfing et al., “Quo Vadis, Atlas-Based Segmentation?”, The Handbook of Medical Image Analysis: Segmentation and Registration Models (Kluwer), pp. 1-55, (http://www.stanford.edu/˜rohlfing/publications/2005-rohlfing-chapter-quo—vadis—atlas—based—segmentation.pdf).
  • Shirley et al., Realistic Ray Tracing, Second Edition, AK Peters, Natick, MA, 7 pages (Table of Contents), 2003.
  • Strothotte et al., Non-Photorealistic Computer Graphics—Modeling, Rendering, and Animation, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 9 pages (Table of Contents), 2002.
  • Vande Berg et al., “Assessment of Knee Cartilage in Cadavers with Dual-Detector Spiral CT Arthrography and MR Imaging,” Radiology, vol. 222, No. 2, pp. 430-436, Feb. 2002.
  • Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, “CNC,” (date unknown) located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNC>, 6 pages, last visited on Apr. 12, 2007.
  • Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/146,862, mailed Jan. 13, 2005, 10 pages.
  • Amendment and Response to Office Action and Petition to Revive, U.S. Appl. No. 10/146,862, filed Jan. 18, 2006, 29 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2007/001624, dated Dec. 12, 2007, 14 pages.
  • Invitation to Pay Additional Fees mailed on Jul. 31, 2007, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/001624 filed on Jan. 19, 2007, 5 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2007/001622, dated Jun. 11, 2007, 14 pages.
  • Restriction Requirement, U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,569, mailed Apr. 27, 2009, 7 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2009/34983, mailed May 22, 2009, 15 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2009/034967, mailed Jun. 16, 2009, 15 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2009/041519, mailed Jun. 17, 2009, 10 pages.
  • Kunz et al., “Computer Assisted Hip Resurfacing Using Individualized Drill Templates,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 00, No. 0, pp. 1-7, 2009.
  • Amendment and Response to Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,382, dated Apr. 20, 2010, 23 pages.
  • Amendment and Response to Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,323, filed Jun. 25, 2010, 7 pages.
  • Amendment and Response to Restriction Requirement, U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,382, dated Oct. 5, 2009, 10 pages.
  • Amendment and Response to Restriction Requirement, U.S. Appl. No. 11/642,385, filed Nov. 24, 2009, 10 pages.
  • Amendment and Response to Restriction/Election Requirement, U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,323, filed Dec. 8, 2009, 6 pages.
  • Amendment and Response, U.S. Appl. No. 11/642,385, filed May 28, 2010, 11 pages.
  • Amendment and Response to Restriction Requirement, U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,569, dated May 27, 2009, 12 pages.
  • Amendment and Response to Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,569, dated Feb. 5, 2010, 20 pages.
  • Amendment and Response to Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/642,385, filed Oct. 4, 2010, 16 pages.
  • Final Office Action and PTO-892, U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,382, mailed Aug. 5, 2010, 13 pages.
  • Final Office Action and PTO-892, U.S. Appl. No. 11/642,385, mailed Aug. 5, 2010, 10 pages.
  • Final Office Action and PTO-892, U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,323, mailed Sep. 3, 2010, 11 pages.
  • Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,569, mailed May 10, 2010, 9 pages.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2009/034983, dated Sep. 10, 2010, 13 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2009/058946, mailed Jan. 28, 2010, 14 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2009/068055, mailed Mar. 11, 2010, 10 pages.
  • Non-Final Office Action and PTO-892, U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,382, mailed Jan. 20, 2010, 12 pages.
  • NonFinal Office Action and PTO-892, U.S. Appl. No. 11/642,385, mailed Mar. 2, 2010, 11 pages.
  • Non-Final Office Action and PTO-892, U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,323, mailed Mar. 30, 2010 10 pages.
  • Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,569, mailed Aug. 7, 2009, 3 pages.
  • Preliminary Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,569, dated Aug. 14, 2008, 13 pages.
  • Preliminary Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 11/642,385, filed Aug. 22, 2008, 42 pages.
  • RCE/Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,569, filed Aug. 9, 2010.
  • Response to Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,569, dated Aug. 19, 2009, 11 pages.
  • AKCA, “Matching of 3D Surfaces and Their Intensities,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 62(2007), 112-121.
  • Arima et al., “Femoral Rotational Alignment, Based on the Anteroposterior Axis, in Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Valgus Knee. A Technical Note,” Journal Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(9):1331-4.
  • Bargar et al., “Robotic Systems in Surgery,” Orthopedic and Spine Surgery, Surgical Technology International II, 1993, 419-423.
  • Besl et al., “A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI), 14(2):239-256, Feb. 1992.
  • Blaha et al., “Using the Transepicondylar Axis to Define the Sagittal Morphology of the Distal Part of the Femur,” J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A Suppl 2:48-55.
  • Bullough et al., “The Geometry of Diarthrodial Joints, Its Physiologic Maintenance and the Possible significance of Age-Related Changes in Geometry-to-Load distribution and the Development of Osteoarthritis,” Clin Orthop Rel Res 1981, 156:61-6.
  • Burgkart et al., “Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Assessment of Cartilage Loss in Severe Osteoarthritis: Accuracy, Precision, and Diagnostic Value,” Arthritis Rheum 2001, 44:2072-7.
  • Canny, “A computational Approach to Edge Detection,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI 8(6), pp. 679-698 (1986).
  • Churchill et al., “The Transepicondylar Axis Approximates the Optimal Flexion Axis of the Knee,” Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998(356):111-8.
  • Cicuttini et al., “Gender Differences in Knee Cartilage Volume as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999, 7:265-71.
  • Cicuttini et al., “Longitudinal Study of the Relationship Between Knee angle and Tibiofemoral cartilage Volume In Subjects with Knee Osteoarthritis,” Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004, 43:321-4.
  • Eckhoff et al., “Difference Between the Epicondylar and Cylindrical Axis of the Knee,” Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;461:238-44.
  • Eisenhart-Rothe et al., “Femorotibial and Patellar Cartilage Loss in Patients Prior to Total Knee arthroplasty, Heterogeneity, and Correlation with alignment of the Knee,” Ann Rheum Dis., Jun. 2005 (BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism).
  • Eisenhart-Rothe et al., “The Role of Knee alignment in Disease Progression and Functional Decline in Knee Osteoarthritis,” JAMA 2001, 286:188-95.
  • Elias et al., “A Correlative Study of the Geometry and anatomy of the Distal Femur,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1990(260):98-103.
  • Favorito et al., “total Knee Arthroplasty in the Valgus Knee,” Journal Am Acad Orthop surg. 2002;10(1):16-24.
  • Freeman et al., “The Movement of the Knee Studied by Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2003(410):35-43.
  • Freeman et al., “The Movement of the Normal Tibio-Femoral Joint,” Journal Biomech. 2005;38(2):197-208.
  • Graichen et al., “Quantitative Assessment of Cartilage Status in Osteoarthritis by Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Technical Validation for Use in analysis of Cartilage Volume And Further Morphologic Parameters,” Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:811-16.
  • Gruen et al., “Least Squares 3D Surface and Curve Matching,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 59(2005), 151-174.
  • Hollister et al., “The Axes of Rotation of the Knee,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1993(290):259-68.
  • Howell et al., “Longitudinal Shapes of the Tibia and Femur are Unrelated and Variable,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2010) 468: 1142-1148.
  • Howell et al., “Results of an Initial Experience with Custom-Fit Positioning Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Series of 48 Patients,” Orthopedics, 2008;31(9):857-63.
  • Howell et al., “In Vivo Adduction and Reverse Axial Rotation (External) of the Tibial Component can be Minimized During Standing and Kneeling,” Orthopedics, In Press.
  • Iwaki et al., “Tibiofemoral Movement 1: The Shapes and Relative Movements of the Femur and Tibia in the Unloaded Cadaver Knee,” Journal Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(8):1189-95.
  • Jacobs et al., “Hip Resurfacing Through an Anterolateral Approach,” J. Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008:90 Suppl 3:38-44.
  • Johnson, “Joint Remodeling as the Basis for Osteoarthritis,” Journal Am Vet Med Assoc. 1962, 141:1233-41.
  • Kass et al., “Active Contour Models, International Journal of Computer Vision,” pp. 321-331 (1988).
  • Kellgren et al., “Radiological Assessment of Osteoarthrosis,” Ann Rheum Dis 1957, 10:494-501.
  • Kessler et al, “Sagittal Curvature of Total Knee Replacements Predicts in vivo Kinematics,” Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007; 22(1):52-8.
  • Kienzel III et al., “Total Knee Replacement,” IEEE May/Jun. 1995.
  • Kienzel III et al., “An Integrated CAD-Robotics System for Total Knee Replacement Surgery”, IEEE International Conference, pp. 889-894, vol. 1, May 1993.
  • Krackow et al., “Flexion-Extension Joint Gap Changes After Lateral Structure Release for Valgus Deformity Correction in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Cadaveric Study,” Journal Arthroplasty, 1999;14(8):994-1004.
  • Krackow et al., “Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Fixed Valgus Deformity,” Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991(273):9-18.
  • Krackow, “Approaches to Planning lower Extremity alignment for Total Knee arthroplasty and Osteotomy About the Knee,” adv Orthop surg 7:69, 1983.
  • Lea et al., “Registration and immobilization in robot-assisted surgery”, Journal of Image Guided Surgery, pp. 1-10, 1995.
  • Manner et al., “Knee Deformity in Congenital Longitudinal Deficiencies of the Lower Extremity,” Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;448:185-92.
  • Matsuda et al., “Anatomical Analysis of the Femoral Condyle in Normal and Osteoarthritic Knees,” Journal Orthopaedic Res. 2004;22(1):104-9.
  • Matsuda et al., “Femoral Condyle Geometry in the Normal and Varus Knee,” Clinical Orthop Relat Res. 1998(349):183-8.
  • Messmer et al., “Volumetric Model Determination of the Tibia Based on 2d Radiographs Using A 2d/3d Database”, Dept. Of Surgery, Trauma Unit, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, Computer Aided Surgery 6:183-194 (2001).
  • Mihalko et al., The Variability of Intramedullary Alignment of the Femoral Component During Total Knee Arthroplasty, Journal Arthroplasty. 2005;20(1):25-8.
  • Morvan et al., IVECS, Interactively Correcting .STL Files in a Virtual Environment, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, Proc. Conf. Virtual Design, Aug. 1996.
  • Kusumoto, Taiji et al., “Application of Virtual Reality Force Feedback Haptic Device for Oral Implant Surgery”, Graduate School of Dentistry Course for Integrated Oral Science and Stomatology, Jun. 16, 2005.
  • Panjabi et al., “Errors in Kinematic Parameters of a Planar Joint: Guidelines for Optimal Experimental Design,” Journal Biomech. 1982;15(7):537-44.
  • Perillo-Marcone et al., “Effect of Varus/Valgus Malalignment on Bone Strains in the Proximal Tibia After TKR: An Explicit Finite element Study,” Journal Biomechanical Engineering 2007, vol. 129, 1:1-11.
  • Peterfy et al., “Quantification of articular Cartilage in the Knee with Pulsed Saturation Transfer Subtraction and Fact-Suppressed MR Imaging: Optimization and Validation,” Radiology 1994, 192:485-91.
  • Pinskerova et al., “The Shapes and Relative Movements of the Femur and Tibia at the Knee,” Orthopaedics 2000;29 Suppl 1:S3-5.
  • Rosset et al., “General Consumer Communication Tools for Improved Image Management and Communication in Medicine,” Journal Digital Imaging, 2005;18(4):270-9.
  • Shakespeare D., “Conventional Instruments in Total Knee Replacement: What Should We Do With Them?” Knee. 2006;13(1):1-6.
  • Shepstone et al., “The shape of the Distal Femur: a Palaeopathological Comparison of Eburnated and Non-Eburnated Femora,” Ann. Rheum Dis. 1999, 58:72-8.
  • Siston et al., “The Variability of Femoral Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty,” Journal Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(10):2276-80.
  • Siston et al., “Averaging Different Alignment Axes Improves Femoral Rotational Alignment in Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty,” Journal Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(10):2098-104.
  • Soudan et al., “Methods, Difficulties and Inaccuracies in the Study of Human Joint Kinematics and Pathokinematics by the Instant axis Concept. Example: The Knee Joint,” Journal Biomech. 1979;12(1):27-33.
  • Spencer et al., “Initial Experience with Custom-Fit Total Knee Replacement: Intra-operative Events and Long-Leg Coronal alignment,” International Orthopaedics (SICOT), 2009:In Press.
  • Stulberg et al., “Computer- and Robot-Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery”, Computer-Integrated Surgery Technology and Clinical Applications, edited by Taylor et al., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Chapter 27, pp. 373-378, 1996.
  • Teeny et al., “Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Severe Varus Deformity. A Comparative Study,” Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991(273):19-31.
  • Wright Medical Technology, Inc., “Prophecy Pre-Operative Naviation Guides Surgical Technique,” 2009.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2009/040629, mailed Aug. 6, 2009, 9 pages.
  • Restriction Requirement, U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,382, mailed Sep. 3, 2009, 6 pages.
  • Restriction Requirement, U.S. Appl. No. 11/642,385, mailed Oct. 27, 2009, 7 pages.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2009/051109, mailed Nov. 6, 2009, 13 pages.
  • NonFinal Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/641,569, mailed Nov. 12, 2009, 9 pages.
  • Restriction Requirement, U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,323, mailed Nov. 13, 2009, 10 pages.
  • Advisory Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/642,385, filed Oct. 29, 2010.
  • Request for Continued Examination/Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 11/642,385, filed Dec. 6, 2010.
  • Request for Continued Examination/Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,323, filed Nov. 19, 2010.
  • Response to Restriction Requirement, U.S. Appl. No, 11/959,344, filed Nov. 24, 2010.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2009/040629, dated Nov. 11, 2010.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2009/041519, dated Nov. 11, 2010.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2008/083125, dated Jul. 1, 2010.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2007/001624, dated Aug. 19, 2008.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability/PCT/US2007/001622, dated Dec. 28, 2009.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2009/034967, dated Nov. 11, 2010.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2009/034983, dated Sep. 10, 2010.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2009/051109, dated Jan. 25, 2011.
  • Restriction Requirement, U.S. Appl. No. 11/959,344, dated Oct. 29, 2010.
  • European Search Report, Application No. 10192631.9-2310, dated Mar. 17, 2011, 5 pages.
Patent History
Patent number: D642263
Type: Grant
Filed: Oct 25, 2007
Date of Patent: Jul 26, 2011
Assignee: OtisMed Corporation (Alameda, CA)
Inventor: Ilwhan Park (Walnut Creek, CA)
Primary Examiner: Ian Simmons
Assistant Examiner: Carissa C Fitts
Attorney: Polsinelli Shughart PC
Application Number: 29/296,687
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Guide Or Gauge (D24/140)