Apparatus for patterning cells

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

FIG. 1 shows a top view of an apparatus for patterning cells showing our new design, according to a first tricuspid embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 shows a top perspective view thereof.

FIG. 3 shows a bottom view thereof.

FIG. 4 shows a bottom perspective view thereof.

FIG. 5 shows a top view of an apparatus for patterning cells showing our new design, according to a second tricuspid embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 shows a top perspective view of a tricuspid embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7 shows a bottom view thereof.

FIG. 8 shows a bottom perspective view thereof.

FIG. 9 shows a top view of an apparatus for patterning cells showing our new design, according to a third tricuspid embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 10 shows a top perspective view thereof.

FIG. 11 shows a bottom view thereof.

FIG. 12 shows a bottom perspective view thereof.

FIG. 13 shows a top view of an apparatus for patterning cells showing our new design, according to a fourth tricuspid embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 14 shows a top perspective view thereof.

FIG. 15 shows a bottom view thereof.

FIG. 16 shows a bottom perspective view thereof.

FIG. 17 shows a top view of an apparatus for patterning cells showing our new design, according to a fifth tricuspid embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 18 shows a top perspective view thereof.

FIG. 19 shows a bottom view thereof.

FIG. 20 shows a bottom perspective view thereof.

FIG. 21 shows a top view of a tricuspid embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 22 shows a top perspective view of an apparatus for patterning cells showing our new design, according to a sixth tricuspid embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 23 shows a bottom view thereof; and,

FIG. 24 shows a bottom perspective view thereof.

The broken lines in FIGS. 1-24 show portions of the invention which form no part of the claimed design. The broken lines in FIGS. 1-24 are environmental only and are not part of the claimed design.

Claims

The ornamental design for an apparatus for patterning cells, as shown and described.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
2521475 September 1950 Nickolas
4087327 May 2, 1978 Feder et al.
4228243 October 14, 1980 Iizuka
4623355 November 18, 1986 Sawruk
4642220 February 10, 1987 Bjorkman
4695547 September 22, 1987 Hilliard et al.
4831869 May 23, 1989 Fowler et al.
4839280 June 13, 1989 Banes
4839292 June 13, 1989 Cremonese
4851354 July 25, 1989 Winston et al.
4908319 March 13, 1990 Smyczek et al.
4940853 July 10, 1990 Vandenburgh
4974952 December 4, 1990 Focht
5153136 October 6, 1992 Vandenburgh
5240854 August 31, 1993 Berry et al.
5273905 December 28, 1993 Muller et al.
5348879 September 20, 1994 Shapiro et al.
5414556 May 9, 1995 Focht
5460945 October 24, 1995 Springer et al.
5496697 March 5, 1996 Parce et al.
5518909 May 21, 1996 Banes
5686303 November 11, 1997 Korman
5843766 December 1, 1998 Applegate et al.
D411308 June 22, 1999 Pandey
5958760 September 28, 1999 Freeman
6015590 January 18, 2000 Suntola et al.
6037141 March 14, 2000 Banes
6048723 April 11, 2000 Banes
6207451 March 27, 2001 Dennis et al.
6218178 April 17, 2001 Banes
6472202 October 29, 2002 Banes
6586235 July 1, 2003 Banes
6645759 November 11, 2003 Banes
6998265 February 14, 2006 Banes
D522145 May 30, 2006 Best
7186548 March 6, 2007 Li
7738682 June 15, 2010 Banes et al.
D632386 February 8, 2011 Chang
D697073 January 7, 2014 Andersson
D708760 July 8, 2014 Smeja
D720844 January 6, 2015 Wells
D736403 August 11, 2015 Hudson
D754840 April 26, 2016 Waldman
D767163 September 20, 2016 Schimmel
D793258 August 1, 2017 Buber
D828122 September 11, 2018 Levine
20040142411 July 22, 2004 Kirk et al.
20050153273 July 14, 2005 Wikswo et al.
20060270023 November 30, 2006 LeDuc et al.
20070077653 April 5, 2007 Banes
20130337565 December 19, 2013 Banes
Foreign Patent Documents
2155948 October 1985 GB
Other references
  • Andarawis-Puri et al. “Rotator cuff tendon strain correlates with tear propagation,” J. Biomech, Jan. 9, 2009, pp. 158-163, vol. 42, No. 2.
  • Banes et al., “Mechanical forces and signaling in connective tissue cells: cellular mechanisms of detection, transduction, and responses to mechanical deformation,” Current Opinion in Orthopaedics, 2001, pp. 389-396, vol. 12.
  • Clark et al., “Integrins and signal transduction pathways: the road taken,” Science, 1995, 6 pages, vol. 268.
  • Di Carlo et al. “Single-Cell Enzyme Concentrations, Kinetics, and Inhibition Analysis Using High-Density Hydrodynamic Cell Isolation Arrays,” Anal. Chem. Jul. 15 2006, pp. 4925-4930, vol. 78, No. 14.
  • Discher et al., “Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate,” Science, Nov. 18 2005, pp. 1139-1143, vol. 310, No. 5751.
  • Duncan et al., “Mechanotransduction and the Functional Response of Bone to Mechanical Strain,” Calcif Tissue Int, 1995, pp. 344-358, vol. 57.
  • Howard et al., “Mechanoelectrical Transduction by Hair Cells,” Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem., 1988, pp. 99-124, vol. 17.
  • Hellmich et al., “Single cell manipulation, analytics and label-free protein detection in microfluidic devices for systems nanobiology,” Electrophoresis, 2005, pp. 3689-3696, vol. 26.
  • Irimia et al. “Cell Handling using microstructured membranes,” Lab Chip, 2006, pp. 345-352, vol. 6.
  • Irimia et al., “Single-Cell Chemical Lysis in Picoliter-Scale Closed Volumes Using a Microfabricated Device,” Anal. Chem., Oct. 1, 2004, pp. 6137-6143, vol. 76, No. 20.
  • Li et al., “Biology on a chip: Microfabrication for Studying the Behavior of Cultured Cells,” Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 2003, pp. 423-488, vol. 31, Nos. 5&6.
  • Long et al., “Low magnitude of tensile strain inhibits IL-1beta-dependent induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and induces synthesis of IL-10 in human periodontal ligament cells in vitro,” J Dent Res. 2001, pp. 1416-1420, vol. 80, No. 5.
  • Long et al., “Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha-dependent Proinflammatory Gene Induction Is Inhibited by Cyclic Tensile Strain in Articular Chondrocytes in Vitro.” Arthritis & Rheumatism, Oct. 2001, pp. 2311-2319, vol. 44, No. 10.
  • Martini et al., “Systems Nanobiology: From Quantitative Single Molecule Biophysics to Microfluidic-based Single Cell Analysis,” Subcellular Proteomics, 2007, Chapter 14, pp. 301-321.
  • McClain et al., “Microfluidic Devices for the High-Throughput Chemical Analysis of Cells,” Anal. Chem., Nov. 1, 2003, pp. 5646-5655, vol. 75, No. 21.
  • Mijatovic et al., “Technologies for nanofluidic systems: top-down vs. bottom-up—a review,” Lab Chip, 2005, 5, pp. 492-500.
  • Munce et al., “Microfabricated System for Parallel Single-Cell Capillary Electrophoresis,” Anal Chem., Sep. 1, 2004, pp. 4983-4989, vol. 76, No. 17.
  • Munoz-Pinedo et al., “Confocal restricted-height imaging of suspension cells (CRISC) in a PDMS microdevice during apoptosis,” Lab Chip, 2005, pp. 628-633, vol. 5.
  • Nevill et al. “Integrated microfluidic cell culture and lysis on a chip,” Lab Chip, 2007, pp. 1689-1695, vol. 7, No. 12.
  • Ostuni et al., “Patterning Mammalian Cells Using Elastomeric Membranes,” Langmuir, 2000, pp. 7811-7819, vol. 16.
  • Reyes et al., “Micro Total Analysis Systems. 1. Introduction, Theory, and Technology,” Anal. Chem., Jun. 15, 2002, pp. 2623-2636, vol. 74, No. 12.
  • Riveline et al., “Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors: Externally applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an mDia1-dependent and Rock-independent Mechanism,” Journal of Cell Biology, Jun. 11, 2001, pp. 1175-1185, vol. 153, No. 6.
  • Ros et al., “Bioanalysis in structured microfluidic systems,” Electrophoresis, 2006, pp. 2651-2658, vol. 27.
  • Sims et al., “Analysis of single mammalian cells on-chip,” Lab Chip, 2007, pp. 423-440, vol. 7.
  • Svahn et al., “Single cells or large populations?,” Lab Chip, 2007, 544-546, vol. 7.
  • Tourovskaia et al., “Differentiation-on-a-chip: A microfluidic platform for long-term cell culture studies,” Lab Chip, 2005, pp. 14-19, vol. 5.
  • Unger et al., “Monolithic Microfabricated Valves and Pumps by Multilayer Soft Lithography,” Science, Apr. 7, 2000, pp. 113-116, vol. 288.
  • Voleti et al., “Tendon healing: repair and regeneration.” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 2012, pp. 47-71, vol. 14.
  • Wall et al., “Comparison of cellular strain with applied substrate strain in vitro,” Journal of Biomechanics, 2007, pp. 173-181, vol. 40.
  • Whitesides et al., “Soft Lithography in Biology and Biochemistry,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 2001, pp. 335-373, vol. 3.
  • Yang et al., “Hydrodynamic simulation of cell docking in microfluidic channels with different dam structures,” Lab Chip, 2004, pp. 53-59, vol. 4.
  • Yang et al. “Cell Docking and On-Chip Monitoring of Cellular Reactions with a Controlled Concentration Gradient on a Microfluidic Device,” Anal. Chem., Aug. 15, 2002, pp. 3991-4001, vol. 74 No. 16.
Patent History
Patent number: D880721
Type: Grant
Filed: Jun 16, 2017
Date of Patent: Apr 7, 2020
Assignee: MedTrain Technologies, LLC (Burlington, NC)
Inventors: Albert J. Banes (Hillsborough, NC), Colin Patrick Frazier (Raleigh, NC), Christopher James Wimmer (Raleigh, NC)
Primary Examiner: Vy N Koenig
Application Number: 29/607,853