Gastro-laryngeal mask

A gastro-laryngeal mask features softly compliant construction of the distal half of the mask, wherein the mask is of generally elliptical configuration, with an inflatable peripheral cuff to seal and support the mask around the laryngeal inlet. A back cushion is inflatable to engage the back wall of the pharynx and thus to forwardly load the peripheral-cuff seal to the laryngeal inlet. An evacuation tube for external removal of a possible gastric discharge completes an evacuation or discharge passage contained within the mask and opening through the distal end of the peripheral cuff. Special provision is made for assuring integrity of the discharge passage within the flexible distal half of the mask, i.e., assuring against collapse of the distal-end half of the softly compliant evacuation tube in the distal region of the mask, such that inflation of the mask does not compromise viability of the evacuation tube by compressing softly compliant material of the evacuation tube during periods of mask inflation. The special provision also favors such collapse of the mask when deflated as to provide a leading flexible edge for piloting a safe and correct advancing insertional advance of the deflated mask in the patient's throat, in avoidance of epiglottis interference and to the point of locating engagement in the upper sphincter of the oesophagus.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
RELATED CASE

This application is a continuation of original application, Ser. No. 08/609,521, filed Mar. 1, 1996, now abandoned.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a laryngeal-mask airway (LMA) device, which is an artificial airway device designed to facilitate lung ventilation in an unconscious patient by forming a low-pressure seal around the laryngeal inlet. An inflatable-ring seal surrounds an appropriately shaped mask which fits into the lower pharynx and is attached to a tube which emerges from the mouth, as for connection to medical gas-supply tubing.

More particularly, the invention relates to a variety of laryngeal masks, known as gastro-laryngeal masks (GLM), wherein. provision is made for airway assurance to the patient who is at. risk from vomiting or regurgitation of stomach contents while unconscious. U.S. Pat. No. 5,241,956 deals with this problem by providing an evacuation tube which is open through the center of the inflatable seal of the laryngeal mask, thus utilizing the distal end of the inflatable ring as an inflatable-cuff formation which establishes peripherally sealed engagement to the upper sphinctral region of the oesophagus and centrally supports the distal end of the evacuation tube. In addition, said U.S. Pat. No. 5,241,956 discloses a further inflatable cuff carried by the laryngeal mask and by the evacuation tube, for referencing inflation against the back wall of the pharynx, thus making it possible to establish the laryngeal-inlet seal with reduced inflation pressure, as compared with prior structures not having such an additional inflatable cuff.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,305,743 discloses moulding techniques for manufacture of a variety of laryngeal masks, including a gastro-laryngeal mask, wherein an inflatable back cushion provides such referencing inflation against the back wall of the pharynx as to widely distribute the back-wall reference, over substantially the full area of the laryngeal mask. Such a back-cushion construction has been found to be mechanically simple and highly effective, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,355,879 discloses such a back cushion for each of several representative laryngeal-mask constructions.

In practice, although a gastro-laryngeal-mask as described in said U.S. Pat. No. 5,355,879 works well, it has the disadvantage that the gastric evacuation channel needs to be sufficiently stiff to prevent its collapse under the influence of the increased pressure within the back-cushion cuff, when it is inflated in the pharynx. A suitably stiff tube is readily provided, but the whole device is then more difficult to insert into the patient's throat, since insertion involves flexing the device around the angle at the back of the tongue. Provision of a pre-curved airway tube facilitates passage around the back of the tongue, but the advancing distal tip end of the device is then more likely to collide with the glottis (or entrance to the larynx), and indeed it may block the larynx by so doing, with consequent danger to the patient.

BRIEF STATEMENT OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the invention to provide an improved gastro-laryngeal mask.

A specific object is to meet the above object with a construction that specifically avoids problems or difficulties with constructions of said U.S. patents.

Another specific object is to provide for ready compression and flexure of a gastric passage within a back-cushioned or cuffed gastro-laryngeal mask, when the mask is in deflated condition for insertion into the patient's throat.

Furthermore, for the deflated condition of the mask, i.e., in readiness for insertion into the patient's throat, it is an object to enable formation of a flattened flexible leading distal-end edge to self-adapt to and resiliently ride the outer limit of curvature of the patient's airway, throughout the insertional course of the deflated mask and into its locating engagement with the hypopharynx.

It is a further specific object, in conjunction with the foregoing specific objects, to provide for assurance of full patency of the gastric passage within the mask, when the mask has been inflated.

These objects are realized in the present invention by utilizing two structural mechanisms, both of which are operative when the device is inflated; one of these mechanisms prevents lateral compression of the wall of the gastric tube, while the other of these mechanisms prevents antero-posterior compression of the wall of the gastric tube; the result is to assure a substantially circular section within relatively soft portions of the evacuation passage, as long as the device is inflated and in installed position.

In a preferred embodiment of the invention, an artificial airway device to facilitate a patient's lung ventilation comprises an airway tube, an evacuation tube, and a laryngeal mask at one end of both tubes. The mask is of generally elliptical configuration and comprises a body or backplate of relatively stiffly compliant nature, and an inflatable annular cuff or ring of relatively softly compliant nature is connected to and surrounds the body or backplate. When inflated, the annular cuff adapts to and seals around the laryngeal inlet, and an inflatable cushion on the exterior of the inflated annulus bears against the back wall of the pharynx, to thereby forwardly load the inflated annulus into sealed relation with the laryngeal inlet, with the backplate dividing the mask between a laryngeal-chamber side and a pharyngeal-chamber side. The relatively stiff backplate is formed for connection to the airway tube for exclusive communication to the larynx through an opening in the backplate; and the backplate is also configured to guide and support a relatively soft flexible evacuation tube within the pharyngeal-chamber side, from a distally open end for reception of gastric products, to a proximal end for connection to an externally discharging evacuation tube.

It is a feature of the invention that along an aligning path for the flexible evacuation tube within the pharyngeal-chamber side of the mask, a first significant angular fraction of the periphery of the flexible tube is bonded to a stabilizing portion of the backplate, and that a second angular fraction of the periphery of the flexible tube is continuously bonded to the inner surface of the flexible back cushion, such that generally opposite unbonded further angular regions exist between the bonded regions. These unbonded further regions are provided with external stiffening ribs at a succession of axial intervals, to reinforce the unbonded regions against lateral compression when the back cushion and the inflatable ring are under inflation pressure. In this way, inflation of the annular laryngeal-inlet sealing ring and of the flexible back cushion will assure a maximally open evacuation passage within the mask in inflated condition, essentially without antero-posterior or lateral compression of the passage. And it is further assured that upon deflation of the mask, evacuation-passage compression will be essentially in the sense of achieving a squeezing and somewhat flattening deformation of the discharge passage against the formed back-plate area of evacuation-passage support; such flattening is maximal at the oesophageal end of the discharge passage, so that, when correctly deflated, the device forms a wedge shape for correct insertion.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention will be illustratively described in detail for a presently preferred embodiment, and for certain other embodiments, all in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a simplified view, generally in side elevation, for the presently preferred embodiment of an artificial airway device, having at its distal end a laryngeal mask with a gastric-drainage feature of the invention, the same being shown in position for use in a patient;

FIG. 2 is a fragmentary plan view, to an enlarged scale showing the back or pharynx-facing side of the mask of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a plan view to the scale of FIG. 2, showing a softly compliant moulded inflatable component of the mask, as seen from the aspect of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a plan view to the scale of FIG. 2, showing a relatively stiffly compliant rigidising or reinforcing back-plate component of the mask, as seen from the aspect of FIG. 2;

FIG. 5 is a longitudinal section of the softly compliant component of FIG. 3, to the scale of FIGS. 2 to 4 and taken generally in the vertical plane 5—5 of substantial symmetry, but prior to an inside-out deformation step, to create the appearance of FIG. 3;

FIG. 5A is a section, taken at 5A-5A in FIG. 5;

FIG. 6 is another view in longitudinal section, to the scale of FIGS. 2 to 5 and in the vertical plane 5—5 of FIG. 3, showing the relatively stiff component of FIG. 4 in assembled relation to the softly compliant component of FIG. 3;

FIG. 7 is an end view, being a proximally directed view, of the distal end of the rigidising component of FIG. 4;

FIG. 8 is a simplified cross-sectional view of the inflated mask of FIG. 2, taken at 8—8 in FIG. 2;

FIG. 9 is a simplified cross-sectional view of the deflated mask of FIG. 2, taken at 8—8 in FIG. 2;

FIG. 10 is a view similar to FIG. 2, to show a first modification;

FIG. 11 is a view similar to FIG. 4, to show the back-plate component in the modification of FIG. 10;

FIG. 12 is a sectional view, taken at 12—12 in FIG. 11; and

FIG. 13 is a plan view to the scale of FIG. 2 to illustrate an intermediate product which is a modification of that shown in FIGS. 5 and 6.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring first to the preferred embodiments of FIGS. 1 to 9, the invention is shown in application to an airway system comprising a laryngeal-mask unit 10 and its airway tube 11, installed through the mouth 12 of a patient. The mask unit 10 may be generally as described in any of the above-identified U.S. patents and therefore need not now be described in detail. It suffices to say that mask unit 10 comprises a relatively stiff body or backing-plate member, generally indicated at 13, and an apertured relatively thin body-membrane portion or panel 13′ having an aperture or lumen 14 through which the airway tube 11 can establish a free externally accessible ventilation passage, via the patient's mouth 12 and throat 15, and past the epiglottis 16 to the larynx 17. The body member 13 of mask 10 may be described as generally dome-shaped, with its concave side terminating in a generally elliptical footing, and facing the laryngeal inlet; and its convex side faces the backwall of the pharynx. Body 13 is suitably of an elastomer such as silicone rubber and relatively stiff; and body member 13 is surrounded by an inflatable ring 18 which is generally elliptical and which is circumferentially united to body member 13 in essentially a single plane. The inflatable ring 18 may also be of silicone rubber, although preferably relatively soft and flexible compared to body member 13. An externally accessible tube 19 is the means of supplying air to the inflatable ring 18 and of extracting air from (and therefore collapsing) ring 18 for purposes of insertion in or removal from the patient; check-valve means 21 in tube 19 will be understood to hold a given inflation or to hold a given deflation of ring 18.

In the installed position of FIG. 1, the projecting but blunted distal end 27 of ring 18 is shaped to conform with the base of the hypopharynx where it has established limited entry into the upper sphinctral region of the oesophagus 24. The back side of body member 13 is covered by a thin flexible panel 25 (FIG. 2) which is peripherally bonded to the inflatable ring 18 (FIG. 1) and in sealed engagement at peripheral line 25′ around the entrance of tubes 11 and 23 to the mask structure to define an inflatable back cushion which assures referencing to the back wall of the pharynx and thus is able to load the mask unit forward for enhanced effectiveness of inflated-ring sealing engagement to the laryngeal inlet. The inflated ring, thus-engaged to the laryngeal inlet, orients the distal-end of the airway tube 11 at an acute angle to the general plane of ring 18 and in substantial alignment with the axis of the laryngeal inlet, for direct airway communication only with the larynx 17.

The laryngeal-mask unit 10 is of the GLM variety in which an evacuation tube 23 (FIG. 2) serves for extraction and external removal of gastric-discharge products from the oesophagus. Tube 23 follows the general course of the airway tube 11, with sealed entry alongside airway tube 11, beneath the back-cushion panel 25, and with passage through the interior of ring 18, near the distal end of the mask; in FIG. 3, the distally open end of the evacuation tube 23 is defined by a re-entrant tubular conduit formation 26 integrally formed with the relatively soft material of ring 18. As explained in U.S. Pat. No. 5,241,956, inflation-air supply to the back cushion may be the same (19) as for ring 18, or separate inflating means (not shown) may be provided for these separate inflatable means.

More specifically, for the particular construction shown, the relatively softly compliant flexible components may be integrally formed in a single moulding operation, in which the moulded intermediate product is an inside-out version of what will become the finished more flexible part of the finished mask unit 10. The moulded intermediate product may thus have the appearance shown in FIG. 5, following the technique described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,305,743, to which reference is made for detailed description. It suffices here to identify the inflation-air inlet formation 28, directed inwardly on a central axis 29 which also includes the outwardly directed distal-end formation of the evacuation tube 26; the central axis 29 may also be understood as identifying the equator plane (perpendicular to the drawing of FIG. 5) which applies to the inflatable annular ring 18, after evacuation tube 26 has been swung upward (counterclockwise), in the sense suggested by arrow 30, and generally for 180° of rotation about an axis 31, which (axis 31) is normal to the plane of the drawing of FIG. 5. This 180° rotation tucks tube 26 into the flange relatively large edge 32 of the open skirt of the moulded intermediate product of FIG. 5 and makes it a simple matter to turn the remainder of the skirt inside-out, thus defining ring 18, with the edge flange 32 seated on a ledge 33 of the upper dome-shaped feature (body-membrane portion or liner 13′) of the moulded intermediate product.

In the preferred form shown, the mask body member 13 (FIGS. 4 and 7) is a separately moulded component of relatively stiff nature as compared to the moulded intermediate product of FIG. 5. Stiffness vs. softness will be understood to be relative terms and not necessarily to imply that these components are formed from different materials.

In FIG. 4, the body component 13 is seen to comprise an apertured panel which is essentially a moulded dome or bowl 34 having a concave inner surface which conforms to the convex moulded contour of the dome shape 35 of the relatively soft (i.e., thin-walled) component of FIG. 5, these components being shown in FIG. 6 in assembled relation. Relative stiffness (thickness) in the bowl or dome 34 of FIG. 4 is generally in the range 2 to 5 mm, with gradually reducing thickness for greater flexibility in approach to the lower or distal end. The bowl or dome 34 has a peripheral edge which terminates in a single plane, for adhesively bonded seating to the ledge 33 of the relatively soft component of FIG. 5, after making the inside-out inversion.

The stiffness of body member 13 is greatest in the region of proximal-end seating to ledge 33, above which an inlet-air formation 36 is oriented on an axis 37 which is not only inclined at an acute angle α to the plane of seating to ledge 33., but is also laterally offset from the central longitudinal plane of symmetry of the mask, denoted 5—5 in FIG. 3. Relative stiffness of body member 13 is also enhanced (i) by the fact that its distal half features a slot 38 of width less than the diameter of the re-entrant distal-end tube 26, (ii) by the fact that the re-entrant tube 26 is adhesively retained in cradled support by and between confronting edges of slot 38, and (iii) by the fact that the distal end of evacuation tube 23 is preferably preformed (as seen in FIG. 2) with a quarter-turn helical advance to track the course of slot 38 in the upper or proximal half of body member 13. The evacuation tube 23 is preferably relatively stiff, e.g., stiffness (thickness) in the order of magnitude of the material at the upper (proximal) half of body member 13, and is seen in FIG. 2 to have telescoping fit to the proximally directed upper end of re-entrant tube 26; this is an adhesively sealed fit.

Stated in other words and in explanation of the distal and proximal halves of the body member 13 and the relation of these halves to the relatively thin material and distal-half extent of re-entrant tubular conduit 26, said tubular conduit may be said to extend proximally to approximately 50 percent of the longitudinal extent of the inflatable ring 18; alternatively, said tubular conduit 26 may be said to extend proximally to at least substantially 50 percent of the longitudinal extent of the inflatable ring 18, consistent with the drawings of FIGS. 2, 3, and 6. Furthermore, as seen in FIG. 4, the distal half of backing-plate member 13 is essentially straight, thus determining a straight proximal direction of tubular conduit 26 for substantially the distal half of the longitudinal extent of the mask.

As also seen in FIG. 2, the back-cushion panel 25 covers a substantial part of the posterior surface of the mask, being peripherally sealed around the generally elliptical course of inflatable ring 18, and also being centrally adhered to the re-entrant tube 26 for substantially the entire length of tube 26, as suggested by cross-hatching 39. Finally, to assure integrity of the inflatable ring 18, the re-entrant tube 26 is adhesively sealed to the adjacent edges of tube-26 local passage through ring 18 at the distal location designated 40 in FIG. 3; for purposes of avoiding undue complexity in the drawings, this adhesively sealed region is not shown but will be understood to be along the line of tube-26 intercept with locally adjacent walls of inflatable ring 18. In FIG. 5, this intercept line is accounted for by a local cut-out 40′ at the distal end of the skirt of the intermediate product of FIG. 5.

The simplified sectional diagram of FIG. 8 illustrates the functional cooperation of described component parts and features of the described gastro-laryngeal mask construction, in inflated condition, to account for diametrically opposite section cuts through right and left halves of the inflatable ring 18, spaced by sealed fit of body member 13 to the inner profile of ring 18. The back-cushion panel 25, being centrally adhered at 39 to the upper central region of re-entrant tube 26, provides a lifting force which is in the direction to hold open the evacuation tube and, therefore, not to collapse tube 26 when the back cushion is inflated; without this force, in opposition to a retaining force attributable to adhesive connection to body member 13 (along edges of slot 38), there would be no tendency to hold a softly compliant tube 26 against collapse, in that the cushion panel would outwardly expand itself to a bowed shape 25′ suggested by phantom outline in FIGS. 6 and 8.

Preferably, the effective arcuate extent of adhesive connection 39 is in the range 45° to 90° about the central axis of tube 26, as seen in FIG. 8. Preferably also, the adhesive connection of tube 26 along the straight edges of the distal half of slot 38 accounts for a corresponding range of support of tube 26 against collapse in the circumstance of back-cushion inflation. In other words, inflation of the ring 18 and back cushion 25 will assure developed vertical forces to hold the evacuation passage of re-entrant tube 26 in substantially open condition, but the transversely opposed arcuate regions (each of approximately 90° arcuate extent) between these adhesively connected regions are vulnerable to compressionally inward bowing, thus reducing the sectional area of tube 26 while the mask is inflated. The invention resolves this vulnerability by providing axially spaced stiffening ribs or ridges 42 as integral formations of the re-entrant tube 26, in the initially moulded intermediate product of FIG. 5. As shown, there are three mutually opposed pairs of ridges 42, at axial spacings which are in the order of the unstressed bore diameter of tube 26. For the indicated silicone-rubber material of the product of FIG. 5, the incremental local thickness at ridges 42 is suitably twice or three times the otherwise uniformly thin moulded product of FIG. 5, as seen in FIG. 5A.

In FIG. 8, a section taken near the location of tube 26 connection to the more stiffly compliant evacuation tube 23, the inflated condition of the GLM mask of the invention is seen to have an overall “height” dimensions H1, meaning front-to-back (i.e., laryngeal inlet-to-pharynx back wall). When the mask is deflated, this dimension H1 is seen to be reduced by approximately 50 percent, as shown at H2 in FIG. 9 for the deflated condition of the same mask. When deflated, as has been pointed out in U.S. Pat. No. 5,297,547, the ring 18 collapses into flattened double walls (marked 18′) which are upwardly dished; and although deflation does little to compress tube 26 other than at the region 39′ of adhesion to the back-cushion panel 25, the overall deflated extent H2 is essentially unchanged from the dimension H2 which applies for collapse of ring 18. On the other hand, at the distal end of the mask, the collapse of ring 18 is operative upon the formed distal-end opening 43 of tube 26 to somewhat flatten the opening 43, into a generally shovel-shaped distal lip feature which merges smoothly into the adjacent upwardly dished double-wall. shape 18′ shown in the longitudinal mid-section of FIG. 9.

It will be appreciated that the GLM device described thus far has an airway tube 11 that is of larger diameter than the evacuation tube 23; in this circumstance, the airway tube 11 is large enough to accommodate guided insertion of an endotracheal tube. The tubes 11, 23 enter the described laryngeal mask 10 in side-by-side relation and are preferably adhesively secured to each other in this side-by-side relation, and along their full longitudinal extent, in order to provide a measure of torsional resistance against twisting, thereby aiding a medically qualified person in quickly and correctly installing a fully deflated GLM in a patient, with assurance that, upon inflation of ring 18 and the back-cushion panel 25, an exclusive and sealed airway connection will be established to the laryngeal inlet, via lumen 14 and from the airway tube 11; concurrently, a similarly exclusive evacuation connection is established to the upper sphinctral region of the oesophagus, via the distal-end opening 43 of tube 26, through the evacuation tube 23, and to suitable waste-collection means (not shown) external to the patient.

More specifically as to insertion of the fully deflated GLM device in a patient, it will be understood that a range of GLM sizes is available from which to select a sufficiently correct size for the patient. Deflation is accomplished via external means (not shown) and via check-valve means 21 to hold the deflated condition wherein the dome shape of body member 13 rises from within the dished peripheral lip 18′ of the collapsed ring 18. A skilled operator is quickly able to develop the desired appearance of the GLM in its deflated state; but for a uniformly correct deflated shaping, it is recommended to use a forming tool as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,711,293.

When correctly shaped and in its deflated condition, and at the distal end of the GLM, the opening 43 will have been flattened, and this distal end merges with the peripheral lip 18′ of the collapsed ring 18. Noting that the entire distal half of the mask is of relatively soft material, stiffened only by indicated adhesive connection, the distal end projects distally and at its upwardly flared merge with lip 18′, for low acute-angle incidence to the posterior arcuate profile of the patient's throat passage. That being the case, a medical technician need only make sure that upon inserting the mask via the patient's mouth and throat, the flattened distal end rides the outer (posterior) arcuate contour of the patient's airway, in that the softly flexible nature of the distally projecting and somewhat flattened distal end will be flexibly self-adapting to local irregularities (if any) in the course of passage into the pharynx; final insertional location is noted by an increase in encountered resistance, upon distal-end engagement of the GLM with the upper sphinctral region of the oesophagus. At this juncture, inflation air supplied via line 19 and retained by check-valve means 21 establishes (i) the described seal of ring 18 to the laryngeal inlet, (ii) back cushion (panel 25) contact with the back wall of the pharynx, and (iii) full opening of the evacuation tube 26 for maximum accommodation of a possible gastric discharge from the oesophagus.

Beyond what has been described, FIG. 10 illustrates at phantom outline 26′ that the flexible length of the re-entrant tube 26 may be of even greater length than the approximately half-mask length shown by the solid lines of FIG. 5. In that event, arcuate stiffener ridges as described at 42 will be preferred, as long as lateral support is needed to prevent side-wall collapse of the extended tube 26′, in the inflated condition of the mask, i.e., including inflation of back-cushion panel 25.

FIGS. 10 to 12 illustrate another GLM embodiment wherein an airway tube 50 and an evacuation tube 51 are of equal size, adhered (as suggested at 52) to each other in side-by-side relation for torsionally resistant and symmetrically positioned entry into corresponding side-by-side ports 53, 54 of the dome like moulded backing plate or body member 55 of FIGS. 11 and 12. The backing plate 55 may be similar to plate 13 of FIG. 4, except that in FIG. 11 the somewhat helically arcuate conduit path from the inserted distal end of evacuation tube 51 to the point 56 of softly compliant re-entrant tube (26) connection is provided by an integral passage formation 57 of the backing plate 55. At point 56 in FIG. 11, the formation 57 is seen to be in the central vertical plane 58 of symmetry of the bowl or dome-shape of backing plate 55 and in alignment for accepted proximal-end insertional accommodation of a re-entrant tube 26 of thin-walled material to which backing plate 55 is to be assembled, with edges of the straight slot 38′ supporting tube 26 in the manner already described. Also integrally formed with backing plate 55 is an inlet-connection counterbore for coupled connection of airway tube 50 to the laryngeally exposed side of the mask. Features in FIG. 10, such as the back-cushion panel 25, the inflatable ring 18, and the adhesively bonded connection 39 of panel 25 to tube 26 are all as previously described.

It will be understood that the inside-out technique described in connection with FIGS. 5 and 6 for initially moulding and then inverting the skirt of the moulded product, is but one illustration of a way to create the mask and its inflatable ring, in which case the flexible drainage conduit does not get inverted. That being the case, the reinforcement ribs 42 are initially formed portions of the outer surface of the moulded product. On the other hand, another technique for forming the mask with its inflatable ring, involves moulding the mask bowl integrally with an elliptically configured product as shown in FIG. 13, wherein completion of inflatable-ring (18) integrity requires only an adhesively bonded completion of the ring peripherally around the inner substantially elliptical profile, where backing-plate (13) connection is also adhesively secured. In that case, the drainage tube 26 is integrally-moulded with the non-invertible ring (18), so that an inversion of tube 26 is necessary, to have it project re-entrantly, in the proximal direction, and the moulded product which is to become inflatable ring 18 must be cut away as at 40, to permit inverted tube 26 to “pass through” the inflatable ring, in order to develop a relationship which is suggested by FIG. 5. Of course, if tube 26 is to be inverted, the reinforcement ribs 42 are preferably integrally formed as radially inward rib reinforcements or discontinuities in the moulded bore of tube 26. Inversion of tube 26 places these rib reinforcements on the outer surface of tube 26, so that the bore of tube 26 is inherently smooth.

Claims

1. A laryngeal mask construction for concurrent airway service to a patient's laryngeal inlet and for removal of gastric-discharge products from the oesophagus, said construction comprising:

an inflatable ring in the form of a generally elliptical annulus having an outer periphery configured for continuously sealed adaptation to the laryngeal inlet, said ring extending longitudinally between proximal and distal ends and having an inflation port connection at its proximal end, said ring being a moulded product of relatively thin and softly pliant elastomeric material, said ring including within the inner periphery of said annulus an apertured panel or membrane establishing separation between a pharyngeal-chamber side and a laryngeal-chamber side, said ring further integrally including at its distal end a distally open tubular conduit for operative engagement and communication with the oesophageal inlet, said tubular conduit extending from its distally open end and in the proximal direction adjacent said panel and on the pharyngeal side of said panel;
a domed backing-plate member of relatively stiff elastomeric material and having a concave side which terminates in a generally elliptical footing in a geometric plane and is sealed engagement with said panel at the inner periphery of said annulus, said backing-plate member having an airway-tube connecting formation on a proximally directional axis that is at an acute angle with said geometric plane, said backing-plate member providing stability to the inner periphery of said annulus and directional stability for said tubular conduit;
an airway tube connected to said connecting formation; and
a gastric-discharge tube connected to said tubular conduit.

2. The mask construction of claim 1, in which said airway tube and said gastric-discharge tube are bonded to each other in side-by-side relation.

3. The mask construction of claim 1, in which said tubular conduit extends proximally to approximately 50 percent of the longitudinal extent of said inflatable ring.

4. The mask construction of claim 1, in which said tubular conduit extends proximally to at least 50 percent of the longitudinal extent of said inflatable ring.

5. The mask construction of claim 1, in which said backing-plate member is formed for directionally guiding relation to said tubular conduit, to determine a straight proximal direction of said tubular conduit for substantially the distal half of the longitudinal extent of said mask.

6. The mask construction of claim 5, in which said backing-plate member is further formed for tubular-conduit guidance on generally a helical arc to a location of gastric-discharge tube entry to said mask alongside said airway tube.

7. The mask construction of claim 1, further including an inflatable back cushion comprising a panel of softly compliant elastomeric material bonded peripherally to the pharyngeal-chamber side of said annulus and extending over said tubular conduit.

8. The mask construction of claim 7, in which said back-cushion panel is peripherally bonded to said tubular conduit.

9. The mask construction of claim 8, in which said back-cushion bond to said tubular conduit extends for substantially the distal half of the longitudinal extent of said inflatable ring.

10. The mask construction of claim 8, in which (a) a first arcuate circumferential fraction of said tubular conduit is connected to said backing-plate member, (b) the bond of said back cushion to said tubular conduit is angularly spaced from and generally opposite the connection of said tubular conduit to said backing-plate member, the bond to said back cushion being over a second arcuate circumferential fraction of said tubular conduit, (c) the arcuate circumferential extent by which said angular tubular-member connections are made to said backing-plate member and to said back cushion being reinforced with circumferentially arcuate stiffener formations.

11. The mask construction of claim 10, in which said stiffener formations are arcuate ribs in axially spaced array.

12. The mask construction of claim 11, in which said ribs project radially outward of said tubular conduit.

13. A laryngeal mask construction for concurrent airway service to a patient's laryngeal inlet and for removal of gastric-discharge products from the oesophagus, said construction comprising:

an inflatable/deflatable ring in the form of a generally elliptical annulus having an outer periphery configured for continuously sealed adaptation to the laryngeal inlet, said ring being a moulded product of relatively thin and softly pliant elastomeric material, said ring integrally including at its distal end a distally open tubular conduit through a distal opening in said ring, said distally open tubular conduit being for operative engagement and communication with the oesophageal inlet;
a backing-plate member of relatively stiff elastomeric material having a concave front side which is adapted to face the laryngeal inlet and which terminates in an elliptical footing in a geometric plane and in peripherally sealed engagement with the inner periphery of said inflatable/deflatable ring, said backing-plate member having an airway-tube connecting formation on a proximally directional axis that is at an acute angle with said geometric plane, said backing-plate member having a lumen for airway-tube communication with the laryngeal inlet, and said backing-plate member providing stability to the inner periphery of said annulus and proximally directed directional stability for said tubular conduit;
an airway tube connected to said connecting formation; and
a gastric-discharge tube connected to said tubular conduit.

14. A Laryngeal mask construction, including:

(A) a generally elliptical inflatable ring defining a distal end, the ring being adapted for sealed engagement to a laryngeal inlet of a patient;
(B) a backing plate defining an air inlet, the backing plate being sealed to the ring, the backing plate establishing a laryngeal-chamber side and a pharyngeal-chamber side of the construction;
(C) an inflatable back cushion disposed on the pharyngeal-chamber side, the back cushion when inflated contacting a pharyngeal wall of the patient and biasing the ring away from the pharyngeal wall;
(D) a tubular conduit defining a distal end, the distal end of the tubular conduit being disposed near the distal end of the ring for communication with an esophageal inlet of the patient, a first portion of the conduit being adhered to a portion of the back cushion, a second portion of the conduit being adhered to a portion of the backing plate; and
(E) one or more stiffening ribs, the ribs being disposed on a third portion of the tubular conduit, the third portion of the tubular conduit being disposed between the first and second portions of the tubular conduit.

15. The laryngeal mask construction according to claim 14, further including an airway tube, a distal end of the airway tube being sealed to the air inlet.

16. The laryngeal mask construction according to claim 14, further including a gastric discharge tube, a distal end of the gastric discharge tube being sealed to a proximal end of the tubular conduit.

17. The laryngeal mask construction according to claim 14, wherein the ribs and the tubular conduit are of a monolithic construction.

18. The laryngeal mask construction according to claim 14, wherein the tubular conduit and the ring are of a monolithic construction.

19. The laryngeal mask construction according to claim 14, wherein the backing plate is domed.

20. The laryngeal mask construction according to claim 14, wherein the backing plate defines a groove.

21. The laryngeal mask construction according to claim 14, wherein the ring is of relatively thin and softly pliant elastomeric material.

22. The laryngeal mask construction according to claim 14, wherein the ring is a molded product.

23. A laryngeal mask construction, including:

(A) a generally elliptical inflatable ring defining a distal end, the ring being adapted for sealed engagement to a laryngeal inlet of a patient;
(B) a backing plate defining an air inlet, the backing plate being sealed to the ring, the backing plate establishing a laryngeal-chamber side and a pharyngeal-chamber side of the construction;
(C) an inflatable back cushion disposed on the pharyngeal-chamber side, the back cushion when inflated contacting a pharyngeal wall of the patient and biasing the ring away from the pharyngeal wall;
(D) a tubular conduit defining a distal end, the distal end of the tubular conduit being disposed near the distal end of the ring for communication with an esophageal inlet of the patient, a first portion of the conduit being adhered to a portion of the back cushion; and
(E) one or more stiffening ribs, the ribs being disposed on a second portion of the tubular conduit.

24. A laryngeal mask construction, including:

(A) a generally elliptical inflatable ring defining a distal end, the ring being adapted for sealed engagement to a laryngeal inlet of a patient;
(B) a backing plate defining an air inlet, the backing plate being sealed to the ring, the backing plate establishing a laryngeal-chamber side and a pharyngeal-chamber side of the construction;
(C) an inflatable back cushion disposed on the pharyngeal-chamber side, the back cushion when inflated contacting a pharyngeal wall of the patient and biasing the ring away from the pharyngeal wall;
(D) a tubular conduit defining a distal end, the distal end of the tubular conduit being disposed near the distal end of the ring for communication with an esophageal inlet of the patient, a first portion of the conduit being adhered to a portion of the back plate; and
(E) one or more stiffening ribs, the ribs being disposed on a second portion of the tubular conduit.

25. A laryngeal mask construction, including:

(A) a generally elliptical inflatable ring defining a distal end, the ring being adapted for sealed engagement to a laryngeal inlet of a patient;
(B) a backing plate defining an air inlet, the backing plate being sealed to the ring, the backing plate establishing a laryngeal-chamber side and a pharyngeal-chamber side of the construction;
(C) an inflatable back cushion disposed on the pharyngeal-chamber side, the back cushion when inflated contacting a pharyngeal wall of the patient and biasing the ring away from the pharyngeal wall; and
(D) a tubular conduit defining a distal end, the distal end of the tubular conduit being disposed near the distal end of the ring for communication with an esophageal inlet of the patient, a first portion of the conduit being adhered to a portion of the back cushion, a second portion of the conduit being adhered to a portion of the backing plate, the first portion extending from a first location to a second location, the first location being near the distal end of the tubular conduit, the second location being spaced apart from the first location in a direction towards a center of the generally elliptical inflatable ring.

26. A laryngeal mask construction, including:

(A) an airway tube;
(B) a gastric discharge tube;
(C) a generally elliptical inflatable ring defining a distal end, the ring being adapted for sealed engagement to a laryngeal inlet of a patient;
(D) a backing plate defining an air inlet, the air inlet being sealed to the airway tube, the backing plate being sealed to the ring, the backing plate establishing a laryngeal-chamber side and a pharyngeal-chamber side of the construction;
(E) an inflatable back cushion disposed on the pharyngeal-chamber side, the back cushion when inflated contacting a pharyngeal wall of the patient and biasing the ring away from the pharyngeal wall;
(F) a tubular conduit defining a proximal end and a distal end, the proximal end of the tubular conduit being sealed to the gastric-discharge tube, the distal end of the tubular conduit being disposed near the distal end of the ring for communication with an esophageal inlet of the patient, a first portion of the conduit being adhered to a portion of the back cushion, a second portion of the conduit being adhered to a portion of the backing plate; and
(G) one or more stiffening ribs, the ribs being disposed on a third portion of the tubular conduit, the third portion of the tubular conduit being disposed between the first and second portions of the tubular conduit.

27. A laryngeal mask construction including:

(A) a mask adapted for positioning inside of a patient near the patient's larynx, a central plane dividing the construction into a left portion and a right portion;
(B) an airway tube coupled to the mask, at least a portion of the airway tube extending away from the mask and defining a central axis, the central axis portion of the airway tube being disposed on one side of the central plane; and
(C) a gastric discharge tube coupled to the mask, at least a portion of the discharge tube extending away from the mask and defining a central axis, the central axis of the portion of the discharge tube being disposed on the other side of the central plane.

28. The laryngeal mask construction according to claim 27, wherein an outer diameter of the airway tube is substantially equal to an outer diameter of the discharge tube.

29. The laryngeal mask construction according to claim 27, wherein an outer diameter of the airway tube is not equal to an outer diameter of the discharge tube.

30. A device, including:

(A) an airway tube for supplying air to a patient;
(B) an evacuation tube for communication with an esophageal inlet of the patient;
(C) a mask adapted for sealed engagement with a laryngeal inlet of the patient, the mask including a back cushion for contacting a pharyngeal wall of the patient and biasing at least part of the mask away from the pharyngeal wall, a first portion of the back cushion being sealed to a first portion of the evacuation tube, the first portion of the back cushion extending from a first location to a second location, the first location being near the distal end of the evacuation tube, the second location being spaced apart from the first location in a direction towards a center of the mask.

31. A device according to claim 30, a second portion of the evacuation tube being sealed to the mask, the second portion being disposed opposite to the first portion.

32. A device according to claim 30, the mask including a generally elliptical inflatable ring.

33. A device according to claim 32, the mask further including a body, a second portion of the evacuation tube being sealed to the body.

34. A device according to claim 33, the body defining a slot, the evacuation tube extending along the slot.

35. A device including:

(A) an inflatable mask adapted for sealed engagement with a laryngeal inlet of the patient;
(B) a single airway tube for supplying air to a patient, the airway tube being coupled to the mask, a portion of the airway tube extending away from the mask;
(C) a single evacuation tube for communication with an esophageal inlet of the patient, the evacuation tube being coupled to the mask, a portion of the evacuation tube extending away from the mask, the portions of the airway and evacuation tubes being coupled to one another in side-by-side relation such that a center of one of the airway and evacuation tubes is dosposed on a left side of the device and a center of the other one of the airway and evacuation tubes is disposed on a right side of the device.

36. A device according to claim 35, the evacuation tube including a conduit extending through a portion of the mask.

37. A device according to claim 36, further including an inflation line coupled to the mask for inflating and deflating the mask.

38. A device, including:

(A) an airway tube for supplying air to a patient;
(B) an evacuation tube extending from a proximal end to a distal end, the distal end being adapted for communication with an esophageal inlet of the patient;
(C) a mask adapted for sealed engagement with a laryngeal inlet of the patient, the mask including a back cushion for contacting a pharyngeal wall of the patient and biasing at least part of the mask away from the pharyngeal wall, a first portion of the evacuation tube being sealed to a portion of the back cushion, the first portion of the evacuation tube extending from near the distal end of the evacuation tube towards the proximal end of the evacuation tube.

39. A device including:

(A) an inflatable mask, the mask being insertable, at least when deflated, through a mouth of the patient to an inserted location within a patient, the inserted location being near a laryngeal inlet of the patient;
(B) an airway tube coupled to the mask, the airway tube extending from a proximal end located outside of the patient's mouth through an interdental gap to the mask when the mask is at the inserted location, the interdental gap being a space between the patient's lower teeth and the patient's upper teeth;
(C) an evacuation tube for communication with an esophageal inlet of the patient, the evacuation tube being coupled to the mask, the evacuation tube extending from a proximal end located outside of the patient's mouth through the interdental gap to the mask when the mask is at the inserted location, one of the airway and evacuation tubes being greater than or equal to the other of the airway and evacuation tubes where the tubes pass through the interdental gap, the airway and evacuation tubes being coupled together in side-by-side relation such that the interdental gap need not be greater than the one tube when the mask is at the inserted location.

40. A device according to claim 39, a diameter of the airway tube being equal to a diameter of the evacuation tube.

41. A device according to claim 39, the mask including a generally elliptical inflatable ring.

42. A device according to claim 41, the mask further including an inflatable back cushion, the back cushion contacting a pharyngeal wall of the patient and biasing at least part of the mask away from the pharyngeal wall when inflated and when the mask is at the inserted location.

43. A device according to claim 41, the mask further including a body, a portion of the evacuation tube being sealed to the body.

44. A device according to claim 43, the body defining a slot, the evacuation tube extending along the slot.

45. A device including an airway tube, an evacuation tube, and an inflatable mask, the mask being insertable, at least when deflated, through a mouth of the patient to an inserted location within a patient, the inserted location being near a laryngeal inlet of the patient, the airway tube extending from a proximal end located outside of the patient's mouth through an interdental gap to the mask when the mask is at the inserted location, the interdental gap being a space between the patient's lower teeth and the patient's upper teeth, the evacuation tube being coupled to the mask, the evacuation tube extending from a proximal end located outside of the patient's mouth through the interdental gap to the mask when the mask is at the inserted location, one of the airway and evacuation tubes being greater than or equal to the other of the airway and evacuation tubes where the tubes pass through the interdental gap, the airway and evacuation tubes being coupled together in side-by-side relation such that the interdental gap need not be greater than the one tube when the mask is at the inserted location.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
2839788 June 1958 Dembiak
2862498 December 1958 Weekes
3529596 September 1970 Garner
3554673 January 1971 Schwartz et al.
3683908 August 1972 Tantrimudalige et al.
3794036 February 1974 Carroll
3931822 January 13, 1976 Marici
4067329 January 10, 1978 Winicki et al.
4104357 August 1, 1978 Blair
4116201 September 26, 1978 Shah
4134407 January 16, 1979 Elam
4159722 July 3, 1979 Walker
4178938 December 18, 1979 Au et al.
4178940 December 18, 1979 Au et al.
4231365 November 4, 1980 Scarberry
4256099 March 17, 1981 Dryden
4285340 August 25, 1981 Gezari et al.
4351330 September 28, 1982 Scarberry
4446864 May 8, 1984 Watson et al.
4471775 September 18, 1984 Clair et al.
4501273 February 26, 1985 McGinnis
4509514 April 9, 1985 Brain
4510273 April 9, 1985 Miura et al.
4526196 July 2, 1985 Pistillo
4553540 November 19, 1985 Straith
4583917 April 22, 1986 Shah
4630606 December 23, 1986 Weerda et al.
4689041 August 25, 1987 Corday et al.
4700700 October 20, 1987 Eliachar
4770170 September 13, 1988 Sato et al.
4793327 December 27, 1988 Frankel
4798597 January 17, 1989 Vaillancourt
4825862 May 2, 1989 Sato et al.
4832020 May 23, 1989 Augustine
4850349 July 25, 1989 Farahany
4856510 August 15, 1989 Kowalewski et al.
4872483 October 10, 1989 Shah
4924862 May 15, 1990 Levinson
4953547 September 4, 1990 Poole, Jr.
4981470 January 1, 1991 Bombeck, IV
4995388 February 26, 1991 Brain
5038766 August 13, 1991 Parker
5042469 August 27, 1991 Augustine
5042476 August 27, 1991 Smith
5203320 April 20, 1993 Augustine
5218970 June 15, 1993 Turnbull et al.
5235973 August 17, 1993 Levinson
5241325 August 31, 1993 Nguyen et al.
5241956 September 7, 1993 Brain
5249571 October 5, 1993 Brain
5273537 December 28, 1993 Haskvitz et al.
5277178 January 11, 1994 Dingley
5282464 February 1, 1994 Brain
5297547 March 29, 1994 Brain
5303697 April 19, 1994 Brain
5305743 April 26, 1994 Brain
5311861 May 17, 1994 Miller et al.
5331967 July 26, 1994 Akerson et al.
5339805 August 23, 1994 Parker
5339808 August 23, 1994 Don Michael
5355879 October 18, 1994 Brain
5361753 November 8, 1994 Pothmann et al.
5391248 February 21, 1995 Brain
5400771 March 28, 1995 Pirak et al.
5421325 June 6, 1995 Cinberg et al.
5452715 September 26, 1995 Boussignac et al.
5459700 October 17, 1995 Jacobs
5487383 January 30, 1996 Levinson
5529582 June 25, 1996 Fukuhara
5546935 August 20, 1996 Champeau
5546936 August 20, 1996 Virag et al.
5551420 September 3, 1996 Lurie et al.
5554673 September 10, 1996 Shah
5569219 October 29, 1996 Hakki et al.
5577693 November 26, 1996 Corn
5582167 December 10, 1996 Joseph
5584290 December 17, 1996 Brain
5599301 February 4, 1997 Jacobs et al.
5623921 April 29, 1997 Kinsinger et al.
5626151 May 6, 1997 Linden
5632271 May 27, 1997 Brain
RE35531 June 17, 1997 Callaghan et al.
5653229 August 5, 1997 Greenberg
5655528 August 12, 1997 Pagan
5682880 November 4, 1997 Brain
5692498 December 2, 1997 Lurie et al.
5694929 December 9, 1997 Christopher
5711293 January 27, 1998 Brain
5738094 April 14, 1998 Hoftman
5743254 April 28, 1998 Parker
5746202 May 5, 1998 Pagan
5771889 June 30, 1998 Pagan
5778872 July 14, 1998 Fukunaga et al.
5791341 August 11, 1998 Bullard
5816240 October 6, 1998 Komesaroff
5819723 October 13, 1998 Joseph
5832916 November 10, 1998 Lundberg et al.
5850832 December 22, 1998 Chu
5855203 January 5, 1999 Matter
5856510 January 5, 1999 Meng et al.
5860418 January 19, 1999 Lundberg et al.
5865176 February 2, 1999 O'Neil
5878745 March 9, 1999 Brain
5881726 March 16, 1999 Neame
5893891 April 13, 1999 Zahedi et al.
5896858 April 27, 1999 Brain
5915383 June 29, 1999 Pagan
5924862 July 20, 1999 White
5937860 August 17, 1999 Cook
5957133 September 28, 1999 Hart
5979445 November 9, 1999 Neame et al.
5983891 November 16, 1999 Fukunaga
5983896 November 16, 1999 Fukunaga et al.
5983897 November 16, 1999 Pagan
5988167 November 23, 1999 Kamen
5996582 December 7, 1999 Turnbull
6003510 December 21, 1999 Anunta
6003511 December 21, 1999 Fukunaga et al.
6003514 December 21, 1999 Pagan
6012452 January 11, 2000 Pagan
6021779 February 8, 2000 Pagan
6050264 April 18, 2000 Greenfield
6062219 May 16, 2000 Lurie et al.
6070581 June 6, 2000 Augustine et al.
6079409 June 27, 2000 Brain
D429811 August 22, 2000 Bermudez et al.
6095144 August 1, 2000 Pagan
6098621 August 8, 2000 Esnouf et al.
6110143 August 29, 2000 Kamen
6116243 September 12, 2000 Pagan
6119695 September 19, 2000 Augustine et al.
6131571 October 17, 2000 Lampotang et al.
6149603 November 21, 2000 Parker
6155257 December 5, 2000 Lurie et al.
6213120 April 10, 2001 Block et al.
6224562 May 1, 2001 Lurie et al.
6234985 May 22, 2001 Lurie et al.
6240922 June 5, 2001 Pagan
6251093 June 26, 2001 Valley et al.
6269813 August 7, 2001 Fitzgerald et al.
6315739 November 13, 2001 Merilainen et al.
6390093 May 21, 2002 Mongeon
6427686 August 6, 2002 Augustine et al.
6439232 August 27, 2002 Brain
6450164 September 17, 2002 Banner et al.
6631720 October 14, 2003 Brain et al.
6647984 November 18, 2003 O'Dea et al.
6651666 November 25, 2003 Owens
6705318 March 16, 2004 Brain
7004169 February 28, 2006 Brain et al.
7040322 May 9, 2006 Fortuna et al.
7051096 May 23, 2006 Krawiec et al.
7097802 August 29, 2006 Brain et al.
7128071 October 31, 2006 Brain et al.
7134431 November 14, 2006 Brain et al.
7156100 January 2, 2007 Brain et al.
7159589 January 9, 2007 Brain
20030051734 March 20, 2003 Brain
20030101998 June 5, 2003 Zocca et al.
20030131845 July 17, 2003 Lin
20030172925 September 18, 2003 Zocca et al.
20050274383 December 15, 2005 Brain
20060124132 June 15, 2006 Brain
20060254596 November 16, 2006 Brain
Foreign Patent Documents
2141167 July 1995 CA
2067782 June 1999 CA
2012750 August 1999 CA
10042172 April 2001 DE
0389272 September 1990 EP
0402872 December 1990 EP
0294200 April 1992 EP
0580385 May 1996 EP
0712638 May 1996 EP
0 732 116 September 1996 EP
0796631 September 1997 EP
0845276 June 1998 EP
0865798 September 1998 EP
0922465 June 1999 EP
1125595 August 2001 EP
1119386 September 2005 EP
2111394 July 1983 GB
2205499 January 1991 GB
2298797 September 1996 GB
2317342 March 1998 GB
2317830 April 1998 GB
2318735 May 1998 GB
2319478 May 1998 GB
2321854 August 1998 GB
2323289 September 1998 GB
2323290 September 1998 GB
2323291 September 1998 GB
2323292 September 1998 GB
2359996 September 2001 GB
10118182 May 1998 JP
10216233 August 1998 JP
10263086 October 1998 JP
10277156 October 1998 JP
10314308 December 1998 JP
10323391 December 1998 JP
10328303 December 1998 JP
11128349 May 1999 JP
11192304 July 1999 JP
11206885 August 1999 JP
WO-91/03207 March 1991 WO
WO-91/07201 May 1991 WO
WO-91/12845 September 1991 WO
WO-92/13587 August 1992 WO
WO-95/33506 December 1995 WO
WO-97/12640 April 1997 WO
WO-97/12641 April 1997 WO
WO-98/16273 April 1998 WO
WO-99/06093 February 1999 WO
WO 00/09189 February 2000 WO
WO-00/22985 April 2000 WO
WO-00/23135 April 2000 WO
WO-00/61212 October 2000 WO
Other references
  • Oxford University Press, “Concise Medical Dictionary, Fourth Edition”, 1994, pp. 582-585 and 641-642.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 07/919,289, filed Jul. 24, 1992, Brain.
  • Abdelatti, “A Cuff Pressure Controller for Tracheal Tubes and Laryngeal Mask Airway,” Anaesthesia, 1999, vol. 54, pp. 981-986.
  • Benumof, “Laryngeal Mask Airway and teh ASA Difficult Airway Algorithm,” Anesthesiology, 1996, vol. 84(3), pp. 686-699.
  • Bernhard et al., “Adjustment of Intracuff Pressure to Prevent Aspiration,” Anesthesiology, 1979, vol. 50(4), pp. 363-366.
  • Bernhard et al., “Physical Characteristics of and Rates of Nitrous Oxide Diffusion into Tracheal Tube Currs,” Anesthesiology, 1978, vol. 48, pp. 413-414.
  • Brain, “The Laryngeal Mask—A New Concept in Airway Management,” Br. J. Anaesth., 1983, vol. 55, pp. 801-805.
  • Brain, “The Laryngeal Mask Airway—A Possible New Solution to Airway Problems in the Emergency Situation,” Archives of Emergency Medicine, 1984, vol. 1, pp. 229-232.
  • Brain, “The Laryngeal Mask Airway,” Anaesthesia, 1985, vol. 40, pp. 356-361.
  • Brain, “Three Cases of Difficult Intuition Overcome by the Laryngeal Mask Airway,” Anaesthesia, 1985, vol. 40, pp. 353-355.
  • Brain, et al., “A New Laryngeal Mask Prototype,” Anaesthesia, 1995, vol. 50, pp. 42-48.
  • Brimacombe, “The Split Laryngeal Mask Airway,” p. 639.
  • Broderick et al., “The Laryngeal Mask Airway,” Anaesthesia, 1989, vol. 44, pp. 238-241.
  • Burgard, et al., “The Effect of Laryngeal Mask Cuff Pressure on Postoperative Sore Throat Incidence,” J. Clinical Anesthesia, 1996, vol. 8, p. 198-201.
  • Caplan, et al., “Adverse Respiratory Events in Anesthesia: A Clsoed Claims Analysis”, Anesthesiology 72: 828-833, 1990.
  • Communication of a notice of opposition, European Patent Office, Feb. 15, 2006 (cover page and pp. 1-4).
  • Craven, “Prevention of Hospital-Acquried Pneumonia: Measuring Effect in Ounces, Pounds, and Tonds,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 1995, vol. 122(3), pp. 229-231.
  • Cuff-Pressure-Control DCR, 2000, LogoMed.
  • Davies, et al., “Laryngeal Mask Airway and Tracheal Tube Insertion by Unskilled Personnel,” The Lancet, vol. 336, pp. 977-979.
  • DeMello, et al., “The Use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway in Primary Anaesthesia,” Anaesth. Corresp., 1990, vol. 45, pp. 793.
  • Doyle et al., “Intraoperative Awareness: A Continuing Clinical Problem,” http://doyle.ibme.utoronoto.ca/anesthesia/aware.htm.
  • Engbers, “Practical Use of ‘Diprifusor’ Systems,” Anaesthesia, 1998, vol. 53(1), pp. 28-34.
  • Eriksson et al., “Functional Assessment of the Pharynx at Rest and During Swallowing in Partially Paralyzed Humans,” Anesthesiology, 1997, vol. 87(5), pp. 1035-1042.
  • Glen, “The Development of ‘Diprifusor’: A TCI System for Propofol,” Anaesthesia, 1998, vol. 53(1), pp. 13-21.
  • Gray et al., “Development of the Technology for ‘Diprifusor’ TCI Systems,” Anaesthesia, 1998, vol. 53(1), pp. 22-27.
  • Heath, “Endotracheal Intubation Through the Laryngeal Mask—Helpful When Laryngoscopy is Difficult or Dangerous,” European J. of Anaesthesiology, 1991, vol. 4, pp. 41-45.
  • Hickey, et al., “Cardiovascular Response to Insertion of Brain's Laryngeal Mask,” Anesthesia, 1990, vol. 45, pp. 629-633.
  • Inomata et al., “Transient Bilateral Vocal Cord Paralysis After Insertion of a Laryngeal Mask Airway,” Anesthesiology, 1995, vol. 82, pp. 787-788.
  • Jacobson et al., “A Study of Intracuff Pressure Measurements, Trends and Behaviours in Patients During Prolonged Period of Tracheal Intubation,” Br. J. Anaesth., 1981, vol. 53, pp. 97.
  • Kambic et al., “Intubation Lesions of the Larynx,” Br. J. Anasth. 1978, vol. 50, pp. 587-590.
  • Lindholm, “Prolonged Endotracheal Intubation,” ACTA Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1969, vol. 33, pp. 32-46.
  • Majumder et al., “Bilateral Lingual Nerve Injury Following the Use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway,” Anaesthesia, 1998, vol. 53, pp. 184-186.
  • Miller, “A Pressure Regulator for the Cuff of a Tracheal Tube,” Anaesthesia, 1992, vol. 47, pp. 594-596.
  • Muthuswamy et al., “The Use of Fuzzy Integrals and Bispectral Analysis of the Electroencephalogram to Predict Movement under Anesthesia,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1999, vol. 46(3), pp. 290-299.
  • Nagai, “Unilateral Hypoglossal Nerve Paralysis Following the Use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway,” Anaesthesia, 1994, vol. 49, pp. 603-604.
  • Observations by Third Party Concerning European Patent Application No. 99 947 765.6-2318, European Patent Office, Munich, Germany, Jan. 18, 2005 (3 pgs.).
  • Patel et al., “Tracheal Tube Cuff Pressure,” Anaesthesia, 1984, vol. 39, pp. 862-864.
  • Pennant, “Comparison of the Endotracheal Tube and Laryngeal Mask in Airway Management by Paramedical Personnel,” Anesth. Analg. , 1992, vol. 74, pp. 531-534.
  • Pippin et al., “Long-Term Tracheal Intubation Practice in the United Kingdom,” Anaesthesia, 1983, vol. 38, pp. 791-795.
  • Raeder et al. “Tracheal Tube Cuff Pressures,” Anaesthesia, 1985, vol. 40, pp. 444-447.
  • Response to Complaint Matter No.: 4b 0 440-05, In the Matter of: LMA Deutschland GmbH versus Ambu (Deutschland) GmbH, Feb. 10, 2006, pp. 1-47.
  • Seegobin et al., “Endotracheal Cuff Pressure and Tracheal Mucosal Blood Flow: Endoscopic Study of Effects of Four Large Volume Cuffs,” British Medical Journal, 1984, vol. 288.
  • Willis et al., “Tracheal Tube Cuff Pressure,” Anaesthesia, 1988, vol. 43, pp. 312-314.
  • Worthington, et al., “Proceedings of the Anaesthetic Research Society,” Br. J. Anaesthesia, 1995, vol. 75, pp. 228P-229P.
  • Wynn et al., “Tongue Cyanosis After Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion,” Anesthesiology, 1994, vol. 80(6), pp. 1403.
  • Benumof, JL, “Management of the Difficult Adult Airway with Special Emphasis on Awake Tracheal Intubation”, Anesthesiol., vol. 75, No. 6, pp. 1087-1110, 1991.
  • “Improving Anaesthesia”, Med Pro Monthly, Nov.-Dec., 1998, pp. 311-312.
  • Kapila, A. et al., “Intubating LMA; A Preliminary Assessment of Performance”, British Journal of Anaethsia, vol. 75, pp. 228-229, 1995 (abstract).
  • Laryngeal Mask Publications, 74 pages, Dec. 1998, www.saga.nl/lma/lmapub.htm.
  • Martin, T., “Patentability of Methods of Medical Treatment: A Comparative Study”, Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, pp. 381-423, Jun. 2000.
  • Neurometric Assessment of Adequacy of Intraoperative Anesthetic. Mar. 1999, 3 pages, www.pnl.gov/medical/info/neuro.htm.
  • Rieger et al., Anesthesiology, vol. 87, No. 1, Jul. 1997.
Patent History
Patent number: RE39938
Type: Grant
Filed: Mar 8, 2001
Date of Patent: Dec 18, 2007
Assignee: Indian Ocean Medical, Inc. (Mahe)
Inventor: Archibald Ian Jeremy Brain (Chertsey)
Primary Examiner: Justine R. Yu
Assistant Examiner: Annette Dixon
Attorney: Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr LLP
Application Number: 09/803,452
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Breathing Passage Occluder (128/207.15); Respiratory Gas Supply Means Enters Mouth Or Tracheotomy Incision (128/207.14); Means Placed In Body Opening To Facilitate Insertion Of Breathing Tube (128/200.26); 604/96; Means For Securing Conduit To Body (604/174)
International Classification: A61M 16/00 (20060101); A61M 29/00 (20060101); A61M 5/32 (20060101); A62B 9/06 (20060101);