Implicit population of access control lists
Communication applications may include lists of users with which a user of the application communicates. If two users of a communications application each include the other user on their user lists, an implicit trust may be established between the users. For example, if user A includes user B in her list and user B includes user A in his list, then it may be determined that each user knows and/or trusts the other user. As a result, a connection or communications pathway may be automatically created between the client devices of the users to facilitate communications between the users based on the implicit trust.
Latest Facebook Patents:
- Identifying content to present to a group of online system users based on user actions and specified by a third-party system
- SURFACE RELIEF GRATING AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME
- VOLUME BRAGG GRATING, FABRICATION METHOD AND SYSTEM
- INTRALINK BASED SESSION NEGOTIATION AND MEDIA BIT RATE ADAPTATION
- GENERATING AND PROVIDING ORGANIZATION-BASED SPACES FOR A VIRTUAL COMMUNITY OF USERS
This application is a continuation application of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/782,461, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,490,238, filed Jul. 24, 2007, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/334,142, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,263,614, filed on Dec. 31, 2002, the entire contents all of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
TECHNICAL FIELDThe following description relates to network communications.
BACKGROUNDWith the rapid proliferation and affordability of computers, the Internet has become the communications medium of choice for many users. Although the Internet is a public medium, techniques have been developed for using the Internet to enable private communications between networks. One such private communications technique is used to enable instant messaging.
Instant messaging allows users to rapidly communicate with other users of a communications network. Generally, client messaging software runs on a client A device 102 and provides a communications interface for entry of a message. The intended message recipient may be entered manually or may be selected from a user list, such as a Buddy List™ from America Online, Inc. Instant messaging may be used to communicate text messages, images, and sounds or voice.
SUMMARYIn one general aspect, messaging applications, systems, and methods may be used to automatically configure a communications pathway based on an implicit trust between users. Each user of a communications application may have a user list that identifies other users to which a message may be sent. If two users of the communications application each include the other user on their user lists, an implicit trust may be inferred between the users. For example, if user A includes user B in her user list and user B includes user A in his. user list, then it may be inferred or determined that each user knows and/or implicitly trusts the other user. As a result, a connection or communications pathway may be automatically created and/or configured between the client devices of the users to facilitate communications between the users based on the implicit trust.
The communications application may be an instant messaging application. The communications pathway may be implemented as a virtual private network.
In another general aspect, a communications pathway between a first client A device 102 associated with the first user and a second client A device 102 associated with the second user may be established upon determining that the first user is included on a user list associated with a communications application of the second user and that the second user is included on the user list associated with a communications application of the first user. The communications pathway may be a virtual private network.
To establish the communications pathway, an Internet protocol address of the first user may be provided to the second client device, and an Internet protocol address of the second user may be provided to the first client device. A shared secret also may be provided to the first and second client devices. The first client device may contact the Internet protocol address of the second client A device 102 and present the shared secret. The second client device may validate the identity of the first client B device 104 based on the presented shared secret.
In another general aspect, upon determining that an Internet protocol address (e.g., a global Internet protocol address of a firewall associated with the first client device) of a communication received from a first client device is different from the Internet protocol address (e.g., a local source Internet protocol address) of the first client device, a determination may be made that a direct communications pathway between the first client A device 102 and the second client device may not be established. In this case, to establish the communications pathway a hole may be opened in the firewall associated with the first client device for an Internet protocol address associated with the second client device.
To open the hole, a request for a proxy forward may be sent to the firewall. The firewall selects a target Internet protocol address and a port number. The target Internet protocol address is provided to a host (e.g., an instant messaging host) associated with the communications application. The host sends the target Internet protocol address to the second client device. The second client device responds to the host with an Internet protocol address associated with the second client device. The host provides the Internet protocol address associated with the second client device to the firewall associated with the first client device to enable the proxy forward for the Internet protocol address associated with the second client device.
The Internet protocol address associated with the second client device may be the Internet protocol address of a firewall associated with the second client device.
Other features will be apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
DETAILED DESCRIPTIONSome communications techniques include the use of a contact list or user list. Communications applications employing these techniques facilitate communications by allowing a user to select an intended recipient of a message from the user list. Although such applications provide a useful interface for transmitting messages, the user lists also may be helpful to facilitate other types of communications. For example, if two users include each other on their user lists, an implicit trust between the users may be inferred. Based on the implicit trust, a communications pathway may be established between the users to facilitate communications, as described in detail below.
Referring to
If user A sends a message to user B, the IM host 125 may determine that the user list of user B or a particular portion of the user list (e.g., a group, such as buddies, family, or garners) includes user A, and that the user list (or particular portion of the user list) of user A includes user B. Based on this determination, the IM host 125 may infer that there is an implicit trust between user A and user B or that user A and user B have granted access of their client devices to each other. The IM host 125 automatically creates a communications pathway between the client devices 102 and 104 by sending a message to each of client devices 102 and 104. Each message includes the IP address and port of the other client A device 102 and a shared secret.
Each client device may contact the other client device using the specified IP address and port. In addition, each client device may present the shared secret to the other client device to validate. The client devices 102 and 104 then enter negotiations to establish the details (e.g., a communications protocol and encryption) of the communications pathway 130.
The external network 110 may be implemented using one or more local area networks (LANs), wide area networks (WANs), global networks, or any combination of these networks (e.g., the World Wide Web or the Internet). These networks may include any number of components and/or devices (e.g., hubs, routers, switches, servers, repeaters, storage devices, communications interfaces, and various communications media) and various other supporting components (e.g., software, operators/administrators/technicians, and other infrastructure).
The client devices 102 and 104 may be operated by one or more users to access the external network 110 and any associated devices and/or components. An example of a client device is a general-purpose computer capable of responding to and executing instructions in a defined manner. Client devices also may include a special-purpose computer, a personal computer (“PC”), a workstation, a server, a laptop, a Web-enabled phone, a Web-enabled personal digital assistant (“PDA”), an interactive television set, a set top box, an on-board (i.e., vehicle-mounted) computer, or a combination of one or more these devices capable of responding to and executing instructions. The client device may include any number of other devices, components, and/or peripherals, such as memory/storage devices, input devices, output devices, user interfaces, and/or communications interfaces.
The client A device 102 also may include one or more software applications (e.g., an operating system, a browser application, a microbrowser application, a server application, a proxy application, a gateway application, a tunneling application, an e-mail application, an IM client application, an online service provider client application, and/or an interactive television client application) loaded on the client device to command and direct the client device. Applications include a computer program, a piece of code, an instruction, or some combination thereof, for independently or collectively instructing the client device to interact and operate as desired.
The applications may be embodied permanently or temporarily in any type of machine, device, component, physical or virtual equipment, storage medium, or propagated signal capable of providing instructions to the client device. In particular, the applications may be stored on a storage media or device (e.g., read only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a volatile/non-volatile memory, a magnetic disk, or a propagated signal or wave) readable by the client device, such that if the storage medium or device is read by the client device, the steps or instructions specified are performed.
Each of the client devices 102 and 104 also includes one or more a corresponding communications interface 117 or 118 that allow the client device to send information to and receive information from the corresponding communications links 112 or 113.
The communications links 112 and 113 may be configured to send and receive signals (e.g., electrical, electromagnetic, or optical) that convey or carry data streams representing various types of analog and/or digital content. For example, the communications links 112 and 113 may be implemented using various communications media and one or more networks comprising one or more network devices (e.g., servers, routers, switches, hubs, repeaters, and storage devices). The one or more networks may include WANs, LANs, a plain old telephone service (POTS) network, a digital subscriber line (DSL) network, an integrated services digital network (ISDN), and a synchronous optical network (SONNET), or a combination of one or more of these networks. In addition, the communications links 112 and 113 may include one or more wireless links that transmit and receive electromagnetic signals, such as, for example, radio, infrared, and microwave signals, to convey information.
Communications applications, such as communications applications 115 and 116, loaded and/or running on a client device may command and direct communications by the client device. The communications applications may work in conjunction with or enable the corresponding communications interface 117 or 118 to exchange data with other devices, networks, and communications media. Examples of communications applications include a browser application, a microbrowser application, a server application, a proxy application, a gateway application, a tunneling application, an e-mail application, an instant messaging (IM) application, an interactive television application, and/or an Internet service provider (ISP) application.
As described above, one example of a communications application is the IM application. The IM application may provide an IM user interface that allows a user to send and receive messages. The IM user interface may include an IM message display area including one or more windows/frames to enter and present messages. The IM user interface also may include icons, menus, and/or other inputs to control the interface, configure interface settings, and activate features of the interface.
One feature of an IM application is a list of users or contacts, such as, for example, the Buddy List for AOL's Instant Messenger. The user list may be populated with identifiers (e.g., screen names) of one or more users. The user identifiers that populate the user list may be divided into one or more categories of users (e.g., friends, family, coworkers, buddies, and garners).
The user list also provides an indication of whether a user associated with an identifier is currently able to receive messages (e.g., is currently connected to the external network 110 and able to engage in a one-to-one and/or peer-to-peer communication with another client device). A user may send a message to another user by manually entering a user identifier or selecting a user identifier from the list.
When the IM application is activated and the client device is connected to the external network 110, the IM application causes the client device to contact the host network 120, which is connected to the external network 110. The host network 120 may include one or more login servers (not shown) to enable communications with and to authorize access by a client A device 102 and other networks to various elements of the host network 120 and/or the IM host 125. The IM host 125 may include one or more IM servers and storage devices that manage and enable IM communications provided by the host network 120.
To access the IM host 125 and begin an IM session, the client device 102 or 104 establishes a connection to the login server. The login server determines whether a particular user is authorized to access the IM host 125 by verifying a user identifier and/or a password. If the user is authorized to access the IM host 125, the login server identifies a particular IM server (not shown) for use during the user's session. The client device establishes a connection to the IM host 125 and the designated server through the corresponding communications link 112 or 113.
Once a connection to the IM server has been established, the client device may directly or indirectly transmit data to and access content from the IM server. By accessing the IM server, a user may use the IM application to view whether or not particular users are online, exchange instant messages with users, participate in group chat rooms, trade files, such as pictures, invitations, or documents, find other users with similar interests, get customized news and stock quotes, and search the World Wide Web.
The IM host 125 also may include a user profile server (not shown) connected to a database that may store user profile data. The user profile server may be used to enter, retrieve, edit, manipulate, or otherwise process user profile data. In one implementation, a user's profile data includes, for example, a user list, identified interests, a geographic location, an Internet protocol address associated with the client device, a general account, and demographic information. The user may enter, edit and/or delete profile data using an installed IM application on the client device.
Because the user data profile may be accessed by the IM host 125, the user does not have to reenter or update such information in the event that the user accesses the IM host 125 using a new or different client device. Accordingly, when a user accesses the IM host 125, the IM server can instruct the user profile server to retrieve the user's profile data from the database and to provide, for example, the user list to the IM server. The user profile server also may communicate with other servers in the host network 120 to share user profile data. The user profile data also may be saved locally on a client device. In this implementation, the client device may provide the user profile or user profile data to the host network 120 at specified times or when requested. In another implementation, the user profile may be stored locally at the client A device 102 and at the host network 120 and may be periodically synchronized (e.g., at login).
One communications pathway 130 that may be established between the client devices is a virtual private network (VPN). A VPN, also known as an encrypted tunnel, allows two physically separated networks or client devices to be connected over a WAN, such as the Internet, without exposing transmitted data to viewing by unauthorized parties. VPNs require at least two cooperating devices. The communication path between these devices may be viewed as a secure tunnel through the insecure external network 110. Wrapped around the tunnel is a series of functions, which may include authentication, access control, and data encryption, that protect the transmitted data from being viewed or used by others. The VPN may be established by the IM application or other communication application working in conjunction with the communications interface 117 or 118 and/or other devices (e.g., a firewall).
In one implementation, a communications pathway 130 maybe established as follows. When a first user sends an instant message to second user, the IM host 125 receives the message, and, if the second user is connected to the host network 120, sends the message to the second user. In addition, the IM host may determine whether each user is listed in the user list of the other user (e.g., by contacting the profile server or by querying the client devices). If each user is listed in the user list of the other user, the IM host 125 may determine that permission has been granted implicitly by each user to give the other user access to their client device.
The IM host 125 may then send a message to each client device including the IP address and port of the other client A device 102 and a shared secret. The shared secret may include information (e.g., an identification, a key, or a certificate) that enables a client device to prove and/or authenticate the identity of a user. In another implementation, the shared secret may be provided to each client B device 104y a third party host (e.g., an Internet certificate site, such as Verisign) that facilitates communications.
Using the information in the message from the IM host 125, each client device may attempt to establish a communications pathway 130. For example, each device may contact the other client A device 102 the IP address and port specified in the message. After establishing contact with the other client device, the shared secret is presented to prove the identity of the contacting client device. Once the shared secret is verified by the other client device, the client devices may enter negotiations to establish the details of the communications pathway 130 (e.g., a communications protocol and encryption). If two communications pathways are established, one may be dropped during the negotiations.
Once the communications pathway 130 is established, the client devices may exchange data using the communications pathway 130. Both client devices are provided with, in effect, a virtual network communication card that is able to exchange information directly with the other client device. This process is transparent to the users of the client devices.
In another implementation, a client device may send a request to the IM host 125 to establish a connection with another client device. In this case, the IM host 125 responds to the request by determining whether the implicit access has been granted between the requesting client A device 102 and the target client device. If so, the requesting client device is provided with the IP address and port of the target device and a shared secret. The target device also is provided with the shared secret. Establishing of the communications pathway 130 may then proceed as described above.
Either or both client devices may attempt to establish a communications pathway 130. If both client devices attempt to establish the communications pathway 130, only one of the attempts needs to be successful. However, if more than one communications pathway 130 is established, one of the two pathways may be dropped as part of the negotiations. Once the communications pathway 130 is established, client devices 102 and 104 may exchange data using the pathway 130.
As shown in
If either client device 102 or 104 sends a message to the IM host 125, the IM host 125 determines whether the user associated with each client device is included in the user list of the other user. If each user is included in the list of the other user, the IM host 125 may provide the IP address/port of each client A device 102 and a shared secret to the other device. Each client device 102 and 104 may attempt to establish contact with the other client device.
However, as shown in
Notwithstanding the difficulties that may be encountered establishing a connection due to the firewall associated with client A device 102, the communications pathway 130 from client A device 102 to client B device 104 may established. For instance, client A device 102 may contact client B device 104 at the specified IP address/port and present the shared secret to client B device 104 to prove the identity of client A device 102, which client B device 104 verifies. Then, the client devices 102 and 104 may enter negotiations to establish the details of the communications pathway 130.
In another implementation of the communications system 200, when an instant message is sent to either client device, the IM host 125 may determine that the IP address and port associated with client A device 102 does not match the actual IP address being used to establish communications (e.g., because firewall 250 substitutes the local IP address with a global IP address of the firewall 250). From this information, the IM host 125 may be configured to deduce that the client A device 102 is behind a firewall (or similar device). Through a similar process, the IM host 125 may determine that the client B device 104 is not behind a firewall. In this case, if an attempt is made to establish a communications pathway 130 by either client device, the IM host 125 may send a message to the client A device 102 that provides the IP address and port of the client B device 104 and a shared secret, and also may send the shared secret to client B device 104 to facilitate communications. Client A device 102 then proceeds to contact client B device 104 and establish a communications pathway 130 as described above.
As shown in
If a message is sent by user A to user B, the IM host 125 may determine that user A is listed on the user list of user B (or a group of the list of user B), and that user B is listed on the user list of user A (or a group of the list user A). Based on this determination, the IM host 125 may infer that user A and user B have implicitly granted access to each other. If the IM host 125 attempts to give the local IP address or the global IP address of the associated firewall of either client A device 102 or 104 to the other, a communications pathway 130 may not result for the reasons explained above with regard to
First, the IM host 125 may determine that a direct connection cannot be made by the client devices. For example, the IM host 125 may determine that the global IP addresses used to establish communications with the IM host 125 do not match the local IP addresses purported to be used by the IM applications of the client devices. The IM host 125 also may determine that direct connection may not be made as a default because all other attempts to establish a communications pathway fail. In either case, the IM host 125 may inform one client device (e.g., client A device 102) that a direct connection may not be established, whether or not it is physically impossible to achieve such a connection.
In this instance, the communications application 115 of client A device 102 may contact the firewall 350 and request that the firewall 350 open a hole. For example, the communications application 115 may request that the firewall 350 create a proxy forward to pass traffic from client B device 104 to client A device 102. The firewall 350 randomly selects a port number and replies to the communication application 115 of client A device 102 with the selected port number and the public IP address of the firewall 350. The selected IP address/port data effectively designate a hole in firewall 350 that may be opened to allow direct communications with client A device 102.
The communications application 115 may provide the selected IP address/port data to the IM host 125. The IM host 125 sends the selected IP address/port data to the communications application 116 of client B device 104 along with a shared secret. The IM host 125 also provides the IP address of firewall 360 to the communications application 115 of client A device 102 along with the shared secret. The communications application 115 passes the IP address of firewall 360 to firewall 350. Firewall 350 opens the hole only for firewall 360 using the IP address of firewall 360.
The communications application 116 of client B device 104 connects to the specified IP address and port of firewall 350 (through firewall 360). As a result, the traffic from the communications application 116 arriving at the firewall 350 appears to originate from firewall 360, and the traffic is proxied forward to the communications application 115 of client A device 102. The communications application 115 may verify the identity of client B device 104 using the shared secret. Communications applications 115 and 116 may negotiate the details of the communications pathway 130 (e.g., a VPN) and establish the communications pathway 130.
The IM user interface may include a feature or setting to allow a user to block one or more users, a group of users, or all users on the user list from establishing a communications pathway. In addition, the IM user interface may include a setting to disable or prohibit the IM application from establishing any communications pathway regardless of whether each of two users includes the other user on their user lists. The IM user interface also may be configured to allow the communication pathway to be established for a specified group of users on the list (e.g., a user category, such as buddies, family, coworkers, and/or gamers).
If user A is in the list of user B, a determination is made as to whether user B is in the list of user A (520). If not, a VPN is not established (517).
Optionally, a determination may be made whether automatic VPN connections are enabled (525). If not, a VPN is not established (517).
If user B is in the list of user A and the automatic VPN connections are enabled, then an attempt to establish a VPN (530) is made as described below with respect to
Upon determining that a VPN was established (620), a determination is made as to whether more than one VPN was established (e.g., both clients were able to contact each other with the information provided and therefore established two VPNs) (630). If more than one VPN was established between the clients, one of the two VPNs is dropped during the negotiations (635).
Upon determining that a VPN was not established (620), one of the client devices (e.g., client A device 102) may contact its firewall to request a proxy forward be created for the other client device (e.g., client B device 104) (640). The client A device 102 receives a target public IP address and random port number selected by its associated firewall. Client device A sends the target IP/Port information to a host (645). The host returns the public IP address of the firewall of client B device 104 (650). Client device A provides the IP address to its firewall, which opens a hole in the firewall for the firewall of client B (655). The host sends the target IP/port information to the firewall of client B (660). The firewall of client B contacts firewall of client A to establish a VPN (665). If a VPN is not established (670), an error message is generated (675) (e.g., automatic VPN could not be configured).
As shown in
In the implementation shown in
A number of exemplary implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it is understood that various modifications may be made. For example, suitable results may be achieved if the steps of the disclosed techniques are performed in a different order and/or if components in a disclosed architecture, device, or circuit are combined in a different manner and/or replaced or supplemented by other components. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
Claims
1. A method comprising:
- logging, by a server, a first client device into a the server;
- logging, by the server, a second client device into the server;
- accessing, using by the server, a first user list associated with a first user of the first client device;
- accessing, using by the server, a second user list associated with a second user of the second client device, wherein the first user list and the second user list are maintained separately from one another;
- analyzing, using by the server, the accessed first user list to determine whether an identifier of the second user is included in the first user list;
- analyzing, using by the server, the accessed second user list to determine whether an identifier of the first user is included in the second user list; and
- regulating, using by the server, a communications pathway communications between the first client device and the second client device based on both the determination of whether the identifier of the first user is included on the second user list and the determination of whether the identifier of the second user is included on the first user list.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein regulating the communications pathway communications includes establishing a virtual private network.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein regulating the communications pathway communications includes establishing a peer-to-peer connection between the first client device and the second client device.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the first user list and the second user list comprise lists of identities for whom online presence is monitored.
5. The method of claim 1 further comprising receiving, at the server, a request from a first communications program executing on the first client device to establish a communications pathway communication with a second communications program executing on the second client device, wherein:
- analyzing, using by the server, the accessed first user list to determine whether the identifier of the second user is included in the first user list comprises analyzing, using the server, the accessed first user list to determine whether the identifier of the second user is included in the first user list in response to receiving the request;
- analyzing, using by the server, the accessed second user list to determine whether the identifier of the first user is included in the second user list comprises analyzing, using the server, the accessed second user list to determine whether the identifier of the first user is included in the second user list in response to receiving the request; and
- regulating the communications pathway communications between the first client device and the second client device comprises establishing the communications pathway one or more communication types or pathways between the first communications program and the second communications program.
6. The method of claim 1 further comprising receiving a message from a first communications application executing on the first client device directed to a second communications application executing on the second client device, wherein:
- analyzing, using by the server, the accessed first user list to determine whether the identifier of the second user is included in the first user list comprises analyzing, using by the server, the accessed first user list to determine whether the identifier of the second user is included in the first user list in response to receiving the message;
- analyzing, using by the server, the accessed second user list to determine whether the identifier of the first user is included in the second user list comprises analyzing, using by the server, the accessed second user list to determine whether the identifier of the first user is included in the second user list in response to receiving the message; and
- regulating the communications pathway communications between the first client device and the second client device comprises establishing the communications pathway one or more communication types or pathways between the first communications program and the second communications program.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein regulating, using by the server, a communications pathway communications between the first client device and the second client device, comprises automatically establishing a communications pathway one or more communication types or pathways between the first client device and the second client device.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein regulating, using by the server, a communications pathway communications between the first client device and the second client device, comprises sending a shared secret to the first client device and the second device, which enables the first client device and the second client device to authenticate themselves.
9. A system comprising:
- a first client device;
- a second client device; and
- a server configured to that: access accesses a first user list associated with a first user of the a first client device; access accesses a second user list associated with a second user of the a second client device, wherein the first user list and the second user list are maintained separately from one another; analyze analyzes the accessed first user list to determine whether an identifier of the second user is included in the first user list; analyze analyzes the accessed second user list to determine whether an identifier of the first user is included in the second user list; and regulate a communications pathway regulates communications between the first client device and the second client device based on both the determination of whether the identifier of the first user is included on the second user list and the determination of whether the identifier of the second user is included on the first user list.
10. The system of claim 9 wherein, to regulate the communications pathway communications between the first client device and the second client device, the server is configured to establish establishes a virtual private network.
11. The system of claim 9 wherein, to regulate the communications pathway communications between the first client device and the second client device, the server is configured to establish establishes a peer-to-peer connection between the first client device and the second client device.
12. The system of claim 9 wherein the first user list and the second user list comprise lists of identities for whom online presence is monitored.
13. The system of claim 9 wherein:
- the server is configured to receive receives a request from a first communications program executing on the first client device to establish a communications pathway communications with a second communications program executing on the second client device;
- to analyze the accessed first user list to determine whether the identifier of the second user is included in the first user list, the server is configured to analyze analyzes the accessed first user list to determine whether the identifier of the second user is included in the first user list in response to receiving the request;
- to analyze the accessed second user list to determine whether the identifier of the first user is included in the second user list the server is configured to analyze analyzes the accessed second user list to determine whether the identifier of the first user is included in the second user list in response to receiving the request; and
- to regulate the communications pathway communications between the first client device and the second client device, the server is configured to establish the communications pathway establishes one or more communication types or pathways between the first communications program and the second communications program.
14. The system of claim 9 wherein:
- the server is configured to receive receives a message from a first communications application executing on the first client device directed to a second communications application executing on the second client device;
- to analyze the accessed first user list to determine whether the identifier of the second user is included in the first user list, the server is configured to analyze analyzes the accessed first user list to determine whether the identifier of the second user is included in the first user list in response to receiving the message;
- to analyze the accessed second user list to determine whether the identifier of the first user is included in the second user list, the server is configured to analyze analyzes the accessed second user list to determine whether the identifier of the first user is included in the second user list in response to receiving the message; and
- to regulate the communications pathway communications between the first client device and the second client device, the server is configured to establish the communications pathway establishes one or more communication types or pathways between the first communications program and the second communications program.
15. The system of claim 9, wherein the server is further configured to automatically establish a communications pathway establishes one or more communications types or pathways between the first client device and the second client device.
16. The system of claim 9, wherein the server is further configured to send sends a shared secret to the first client device and the second device, which enables the first client device and the second client device to authenticate themselves.
17. A host system comprising:
- an interface to receive a communication from a first client device associated with a first user and to transmit a communication to a second client device associated with a second user;
- storage to store a first user list associated with the first user and to store a second user list associated with the second user; and
- a host configured to server that:
- determine determines an identifier of the first user and an identifier of the second user;
- access accesses the first user list associated with the first user of the first client device;
- access accesses the second user list associated with the second user of the second client device, wherein the first user list and the second user list are maintained separately from one another;
- analyze analyzes the accessed first user list to determine whether an identifier of the second user is included in the first user list;
- analyze analyzes the accessed second user list to determine whether an identifier of the first user is included in the second user list; and
- regulate a communications pathway regulates communications between the first client device and the second client device based on both the determination of whether the identifier of the first user is included on the second user list and the determination of whether the identifier of the second user is included on the first user list.
18. The system of claim 17 wherein, to regulate the communications pathway communications between the first client device and the second client device, the host is configured to establish server establishes a virtual private network.
19. The system of claim 17 wherein, to regulate the communications pathway communications between the first client device and the second client device, the host is configured to establish server establishes a peer-to-peer connection between the first client device and the second client device.
20. The system of claim 17 wherein the first user list and the second user list comprise lists of identities for whom online presence is monitored.
21. The system of claim 17 wherein:
- the communication from the first client device is a request received from a first communications program executing on the first client device to establish a communications pathway communications with a second communications program executing on the second client device;
- to analyze the accessed first user list to determine whether the identifier of the second user is included in the first user list, the host is configured to analyze server analyzes the accessed first user list to determine whether the identifier of the second user is included in the first user list in response to receiving the request;
- to analyze the accessed second user list to determine whether the identifier of the first user is included in the second user list, the host is configured to analyze server analyzes the accessed second user list to determine whether the identifier of the first user is included in the second user list in response to receiving the request; and
- to regulate the communications pathway communications between the first client device and the second client device, the host is configured to establish the communications pathway server establishes one or more communication types or pathways between the first communications program and the second communications program.
22. The system of claim 17 wherein:
- the communication from the first client device is a message from a first communications application executing on the first client device directed to a second communications application executing on the second client device;
- to analyze the accessed first user list to determine whether the identifier of the second user is included in the first user list, the host is configured to analyze server analyzes the accessed first user list to determine whether the identifier of the second user is included in the first user list in response to receiving the message;
- to analyze the accessed second user list to determine whether the identifier of the first user is included in the second user list the host is configured to analyze server analyzes the accessed second user list to determine whether the identifier of the first user is included in the second user list in response to receiving the message; and
- to regulate the communications pathway communications between the first client device and the second client device, the host is configured to establish the communications pathway server establishes one or more communication types or pathways between the first communications program and the second communications program.
23. The system of claim 17, wherein the host is further configured to server automatically establish a communications pathway establishes one or more communications types or pathways between the first client device and the second client device.
24. The system of claim 17, wherein the host is further configured to send server sends a shared secret to the first client device and the second device, which enables the first client device and the second client device to authenticate themselves.
25. The method of claim 1, wherein regulating communications between the first client device and the second client device comprises establishing one or more communication pathways.
26. The method of claim 25, wherein establishing one or more communication pathways comprises simultaneously establishing a first communications type or pathway and a second communications type or pathway between the first client device and the second client device based on the determination of whether the identifier of the first user is included on the second user list and the determination of whether the identifier of the second user is included on the first user list.
27. The method of claim 1, wherein regulating communications between the first client device and the second client device comprises allowing the first client and the second client to view whether or not other users are online, exchange instant messages, participate in group chat rooms, trade files, find other users with similar interests, get customized news and stock quotes, or search the World Wide Web.
28. The system of claim 9, wherein regulating communications between the first client device and the second client device comprises establishing one or more communication pathways.
29. The system of claim 28, wherein establishing one or more communication pathways comprises simultaneously establishing a first communications type or pathway and a second communications type or pathway between the first client device and the second client device based on the determination of whether the identifier of the first user is included on the second user list and the determination of whether the identifier of the second user is included on the first user list.
30. The system of claim 9, wherein regulating communications between the first client device and the second client device comprises allowing the first client and the second client to view whether or not other users are online, exchange instant messages, participate in group chat rooms, trade files, find other users with similar interests, get customized news and stock quotes, or search the World Wide Web.
31. The system of claim 17, wherein regulating communications between the first client device and the second client device comprises establishing one or more communication pathways.
32. The system of claim 31, wherein establishing one or more communication pathways comprises simultaneously establishing a first communications type or pathway and a second communications type or pathway between the first client device and the second client device based on the determination of whether the identifier of the first user is included on the second user list and the determination of whether the identifier of the second user is included on the first user list.
33. The system of claim 17, wherein regulating communications between the first client device and the second client device comprises allowing the first client and the second client to view whether or not other users are online, exchange instant messages, participate in group chat rooms, trade files, find other users with similar interests, get customized news and stock quotes, or search the World Wide Web.
4837798 | June 6, 1989 | Cohen et al. |
5086394 | February 4, 1992 | Shapira |
5276905 | January 4, 1994 | Hurst et al. |
5327486 | July 5, 1994 | Wolff et al. |
5548637 | August 20, 1996 | Heller et al. |
5553110 | September 3, 1996 | Sentoku et al. |
5557659 | September 17, 1996 | Hyde-Thomson |
5583920 | December 10, 1996 | Wheeler, Jr. |
5608786 | March 4, 1997 | Gordon |
5610910 | March 11, 1997 | Focsaneanu et al. |
5650994 | July 22, 1997 | Daley |
5694616 | December 2, 1997 | Johnson et al. |
5721906 | February 24, 1998 | Siefert |
5742905 | April 21, 1998 | Pepe et al. |
5764916 | June 9, 1998 | Busey et al. |
5774670 | June 30, 1998 | Montulli |
5790800 | August 4, 1998 | Gauvin et al. |
5793365 | August 11, 1998 | Tang et al. |
5802470 | September 1, 1998 | Gaulke et al. |
5835724 | November 10, 1998 | Smith |
5848134 | December 8, 1998 | Sekiguchi et al. |
5850594 | December 15, 1998 | Cannon et al. |
5859979 | January 12, 1999 | Tung et al. |
5867162 | February 2, 1999 | O'Leary et al. |
5870744 | February 9, 1999 | Sprague |
5872521 | February 16, 1999 | Lopatukin et al. |
5878219 | March 2, 1999 | Vance, Jr. et al. |
5893091 | April 6, 1999 | Hunt et al. |
5893099 | April 6, 1999 | Schreiber et al. |
5919247 | July 6, 1999 | Van Hoff et al. |
5920692 | July 6, 1999 | Nguyen et al. |
5940488 | August 17, 1999 | DeGrazia et al. |
5946617 | August 31, 1999 | Portaro et al. |
5948058 | September 7, 1999 | Kudoh et al. |
5951643 | September 14, 1999 | Shelton et al. |
5951646 | September 14, 1999 | Brandon |
5951652 | September 14, 1999 | Ingrassia, Jr. et al. |
5954798 | September 21, 1999 | Shelton et al. |
5956716 | September 21, 1999 | Kenner et al. |
5960173 | September 28, 1999 | Tang et al. |
5983369 | November 9, 1999 | Bakoglu et al. |
5987113 | November 16, 1999 | James |
5987407 | November 16, 1999 | Wu et al. |
5991791 | November 23, 1999 | Siefert |
5995023 | November 30, 1999 | Kreft |
6002402 | December 14, 1999 | Schacher |
6006179 | December 21, 1999 | Wu et al. |
6009413 | December 28, 1999 | Webber et al. |
6012051 | January 4, 2000 | Sammon, Jr. et al. |
6014135 | January 11, 2000 | Fernandes |
6014638 | January 11, 2000 | Burge et al. |
6026403 | February 15, 2000 | Siefert |
6026429 | February 15, 2000 | Jones et al. |
6049533 | April 11, 2000 | Norman et al. |
6065047 | May 16, 2000 | Carpenter et al. |
6070171 | May 30, 2000 | Snyder et al. |
6073138 | June 6, 2000 | De I'Etraz et al. |
6081830 | June 27, 2000 | Schindler |
6085223 | July 4, 2000 | Carino, Jr. et al. |
6088435 | July 11, 2000 | Barber et al. |
6112181 | August 29, 2000 | Shear et al. |
6134432 | October 17, 2000 | Holmes et al. |
6144991 | November 7, 2000 | England |
6151584 | November 21, 2000 | Papierniak et al. |
6161130 | December 12, 2000 | Horvitz et al. |
6166730 | December 26, 2000 | Goode et al. |
6175831 | January 16, 2001 | Weinreich et al. |
6192395 | February 20, 2001 | Lemer et al. |
6195354 | February 27, 2001 | Skalecki et al. |
6199103 | March 6, 2001 | Sakaguchi et al. |
6212548 | April 3, 2001 | DeSimone et al. |
6212550 | April 3, 2001 | Segur |
6223213 | April 24, 2001 | Cleron et al. |
6233577 | May 15, 2001 | Rasasubramani et al. |
6247043 | June 12, 2001 | Bates et al. |
6249740 | June 19, 2001 | Ito et al. |
6260148 | July 10, 2001 | Aggarwal et al. |
6269369 | July 31, 2001 | Robertson |
6301609 | October 9, 2001 | Aravamudan et al. |
6311211 | October 30, 2001 | Shaw et al. |
6314450 | November 6, 2001 | Hachiya et al. |
6317776 | November 13, 2001 | Broussard et al. |
6324541 | November 27, 2001 | De I'Etraz et al. |
6330590 | December 11, 2001 | Cotten |
6347332 | February 12, 2002 | Malet et al. |
6349327 | February 19, 2002 | Tang et al. |
6351698 | February 26, 2002 | Kubota et al. |
6363392 | March 26, 2002 | Halstead et al. |
6366962 | April 2, 2002 | Teibel |
6374246 | April 16, 2002 | Matsuo |
6374290 | April 16, 2002 | Scharber et al. |
6389127 | May 14, 2002 | Vardi et al. |
6389372 | May 14, 2002 | Glance et al. |
6393464 | May 21, 2002 | Dieterman |
6400381 | June 4, 2002 | Barrett et al. |
6405035 | June 11, 2002 | Singh |
6405249 | June 11, 2002 | Matsuda et al. |
6415318 | July 2, 2002 | Aggarwal et al. |
6421439 | July 16, 2002 | Liffick |
6421675 | July 16, 2002 | Ryan |
6421709 | July 16, 2002 | McCormick et al. |
6425012 | July 23, 2002 | Trovato et al. |
6430344 | August 6, 2002 | Dixon et al. |
6430604 | August 6, 2002 | Ogle et al. |
6446112 | September 3, 2002 | Bunney et al. |
6449344 | September 10, 2002 | Goldfinger et al. |
6449634 | September 10, 2002 | Capiel |
6480885 | November 12, 2002 | Olivier |
6484196 | November 19, 2002 | Maurille |
6501834 | December 31, 2002 | Milewski et al. |
6507866 | January 14, 2003 | Barchi |
6525747 | February 25, 2003 | Bezos |
6529475 | March 4, 2003 | Wan et al. |
6535586 | March 18, 2003 | Cloutier et al. |
6539421 | March 25, 2003 | Appelman et al. |
6542750 | April 1, 2003 | Hendrey et al. |
6549937 | April 15, 2003 | Auerbach et al. |
6557027 | April 29, 2003 | Cragun |
6559863 | May 6, 2003 | Megiddo |
6564248 | May 13, 2003 | Budge et al. |
6564261 | May 13, 2003 | Gudjonsson et al. |
6571234 | May 27, 2003 | Knight et al. |
6574599 | June 3, 2003 | Lim et al. |
6580790 | June 17, 2003 | Henry et al. |
6606647 | August 12, 2003 | Shah et al. |
6615241 | September 2, 2003 | Miller et al. |
6636733 | October 21, 2003 | Helferich |
6640218 | October 28, 2003 | Golding |
6640230 | October 28, 2003 | Alexander et al. |
6647383 | November 11, 2003 | August |
6654683 | November 25, 2003 | Jin et al. |
6677968 | January 13, 2004 | Appelman |
6677976 | January 13, 2004 | Parker et al. |
6678719 | January 13, 2004 | Stimmel |
6691162 | February 10, 2004 | Wick |
6697807 | February 24, 2004 | McGeachie |
6701348 | March 2, 2004 | Sommerer |
6714791 | March 30, 2004 | Friedman |
6714793 | March 30, 2004 | Carey et al. |
6714916 | March 30, 2004 | Robertson et al. |
6731308 | May 4, 2004 | Tang et al. |
6732155 | May 4, 2004 | Meek |
6738822 | May 18, 2004 | Fukasawa et al. |
6747970 | June 8, 2004 | Lamb et al. |
6748421 | June 8, 2004 | Ozkan et al. |
6750881 | June 15, 2004 | Appelman |
6757365 | June 29, 2004 | Bogard |
6757732 | June 29, 2004 | Sollee et al. |
6772188 | August 3, 2004 | Cloutier |
6781608 | August 24, 2004 | Crawford |
6785554 | August 31, 2004 | Amerga |
6785681 | August 31, 2004 | Keskar et al. |
6788769 | September 7, 2004 | Waites |
6795863 | September 21, 2004 | Doty |
6799039 | September 28, 2004 | Wu et al. |
6800031 | October 5, 2004 | Di Cesare |
6807574 | October 19, 2004 | Partovi et al. |
6816578 | November 9, 2004 | Kredo et al. |
6832245 | December 14, 2004 | Isaacs |
6839737 | January 4, 2005 | Friskel |
6857006 | February 15, 2005 | Nishizawa |
6879665 | April 12, 2005 | Cook et al. |
6901559 | May 31, 2005 | Blum |
6904026 | June 7, 2005 | Tarnanen et al. |
6907243 | June 14, 2005 | Patel |
6912563 | June 28, 2005 | Parker et al. |
6912564 | June 28, 2005 | Appelman et al. |
6917965 | July 12, 2005 | Gupta et al. |
6920478 | July 19, 2005 | Mendiola et al. |
6941345 | September 6, 2005 | Kapil |
6968179 | November 22, 2005 | De Vries |
6990513 | January 24, 2006 | Belfiore et al. |
6993327 | January 31, 2006 | Mathis |
6993564 | January 31, 2006 | Whitten, II |
6996520 | February 7, 2006 | Levin |
7035865 | April 25, 2006 | Doss et al. |
7039639 | May 2, 2006 | Brezin |
7039676 | May 2, 2006 | Day et al. |
7043530 | May 9, 2006 | Isaacs et al. |
7058036 | June 6, 2006 | Yu et al. |
7058690 | June 6, 2006 | Maehiro |
7065186 | June 20, 2006 | Myers et al. |
7082047 | July 25, 2006 | Chow |
7082407 | July 25, 2006 | Bezos et al. |
7085834 | August 1, 2006 | Delany et al. |
7117254 | October 3, 2006 | Lunt et al. |
7120687 | October 10, 2006 | Tessman, Jr. et al. |
7124123 | October 17, 2006 | Roskind et al. |
7127232 | October 24, 2006 | O'Neil et al. |
7162202 | January 9, 2007 | Westman |
7171473 | January 30, 2007 | Eftis et al. |
7177880 | February 13, 2007 | Ruvolo et al. |
7181498 | February 20, 2007 | Zhu et al. |
7185059 | February 27, 2007 | Daniell et al. |
7188153 | March 6, 2007 | Lunt et al. |
7190956 | March 13, 2007 | Dorenbosch et al. |
7200634 | April 3, 2007 | Mendiola et al. |
7202814 | April 10, 2007 | Caspi et al. |
7222156 | May 22, 2007 | Gupta et al. |
7233992 | June 19, 2007 | Muldoon et al. |
7263614 | August 28, 2007 | Roskind |
7269590 | September 11, 2007 | Hull et al. |
7275215 | September 25, 2007 | Werndorfer |
7283805 | October 16, 2007 | Agrawal |
7313760 | December 25, 2007 | Grossman et al. |
7316028 | January 1, 2008 | Donatelli et al. |
7436780 | October 14, 2008 | Stephens et al. |
7437413 | October 14, 2008 | Okuyama et al. |
7454470 | November 18, 2008 | Isaacs et al. |
7490238 | February 10, 2009 | Roskind |
7711106 | May 4, 2010 | Likwornik |
7716287 | May 11, 2010 | Appelman |
7774711 | August 10, 2010 | Valeski |
7945674 | May 17, 2011 | Appelman |
7949759 | May 24, 2011 | Appelman |
7954146 | May 31, 2011 | Roskind |
8060566 | November 15, 2011 | Appleman |
8185638 | May 22, 2012 | Appelman |
8560706 | October 15, 2013 | Appelman |
20010002469 | May 31, 2001 | Bates et al. |
20010005861 | June 28, 2001 | Mousseau et al. |
20010013050 | August 9, 2001 | Shah |
20010032246 | October 18, 2001 | Fardella et al. |
20010052019 | December 13, 2001 | Walters et al. |
20020015061 | February 7, 2002 | Maguire |
20020021307 | February 21, 2002 | Glenn et al. |
20020023132 | February 21, 2002 | Tornabene et al. |
20020023134 | February 21, 2002 | Roskowski et al. |
20020028595 | March 7, 2002 | Higashi et al. |
20020042816 | April 11, 2002 | Bae |
20020049717 | April 25, 2002 | Routtenberg et al. |
20020055975 | May 9, 2002 | Petrovykh |
20020056123 | May 9, 2002 | Liwerant et al. |
20020059201 | May 16, 2002 | Work |
20020065856 | May 30, 2002 | Kisiel |
20020065894 | May 30, 2002 | Dalal et al. |
20020077080 | June 20, 2002 | Greene |
20020083136 | June 27, 2002 | Whitten, II |
20020086732 | July 4, 2002 | Kirmse et al. |
20020091667 | July 11, 2002 | Jaipuria et al. |
20020103801 | August 1, 2002 | Lyons |
20020112181 | August 15, 2002 | Smith |
20020116463 | August 22, 2002 | Hart |
20020116641 | August 22, 2002 | Mastrianni |
20020133292 | September 19, 2002 | Miyaki |
20020133369 | September 19, 2002 | Johnson |
20020147777 | October 10, 2002 | Hackbarth et al. |
20020174010 | November 21, 2002 | Rice, III |
20020175953 | November 28, 2002 | Lin |
20020178161 | November 28, 2002 | Brezin |
20020181703 | December 5, 2002 | Logan et al. |
20020184089 | December 5, 2002 | Tsou et al. |
20020193942 | December 19, 2002 | Odakura et al. |
20020199095 | December 26, 2002 | Bandini et al. |
20030004855 | January 2, 2003 | Dutta et al. |
20030004872 | January 2, 2003 | Gardi et al. |
20030009385 | January 9, 2003 | Tucciarone et al. |
20030009523 | January 9, 2003 | Lindskog et al. |
20030018726 | January 23, 2003 | Low et al. |
20030023875 | January 30, 2003 | Hursey et al. |
20030028524 | February 6, 2003 | Keskar et al. |
20030028595 | February 6, 2003 | Vogt et al. |
20030037112 | February 20, 2003 | Fitzpatrick et al. |
20030043201 | March 6, 2003 | Abdelhadi et al. |
20030046198 | March 6, 2003 | Knapp et al. |
20030050916 | March 13, 2003 | Ortega et al. |
20030055831 | March 20, 2003 | Ryan |
20030065721 | April 3, 2003 | Roskind |
20030084103 | May 1, 2003 | Weiner et al. |
20030088554 | May 8, 2003 | Ryan |
20030093483 | May 15, 2003 | Allen et al. |
20030093580 | May 15, 2003 | Thomas et al. |
20030101226 | May 29, 2003 | Quine |
20030105822 | June 5, 2003 | Gusler et al. |
20030131061 | July 10, 2003 | Newton et al. |
20030140103 | July 24, 2003 | Szeto et al. |
20030167324 | September 4, 2003 | Farnham et al. |
20030172349 | September 11, 2003 | Katayama |
20030182394 | September 25, 2003 | Ryngler et al. |
20030187813 | October 2, 2003 | Goldman et al. |
20030212804 | November 13, 2003 | Hashemi |
20030225847 | December 4, 2003 | Heikes et al. |
20030233416 | December 18, 2003 | Beyda |
20030236835 | December 25, 2003 | Levi et al. |
20040015548 | January 22, 2004 | Lee |
20040015553 | January 22, 2004 | Griffin et al. |
20040054729 | March 18, 2004 | Fukuizumi et al. |
20040054736 | March 18, 2004 | Daniell |
20040056901 | March 25, 2004 | March et al. |
20040117443 | June 17, 2004 | Barsness |
20040122681 | June 24, 2004 | Ruvolo |
20040122810 | June 24, 2004 | Mayer |
20040122855 | June 24, 2004 | Ruvolo |
20040128322 | July 1, 2004 | Nagy |
20040128356 | July 1, 2004 | Bernstein et al. |
20040179039 | September 16, 2004 | Blattner et al. |
20040186738 | September 23, 2004 | Reisman |
20040201624 | October 14, 2004 | Crawford |
20040210844 | October 21, 2004 | Pettinati et al. |
20040215648 | October 28, 2004 | Marshall |
20040215721 | October 28, 2004 | Szeto et al. |
20040215793 | October 28, 2004 | Ryan et al. |
20040221309 | November 4, 2004 | Zaner |
20040260762 | December 23, 2004 | Fish |
20050004989 | January 6, 2005 | Satterfield et al. |
20050015432 | January 20, 2005 | Cohen |
20050021750 | January 27, 2005 | Abrams |
20050027382 | February 3, 2005 | Kirmse et al. |
20050038688 | February 17, 2005 | Collins et al. |
20050038856 | February 17, 2005 | Krishnasamy |
20050043989 | February 24, 2005 | Shifrin |
20050044152 | February 24, 2005 | Hardy et al. |
20050050143 | March 3, 2005 | Guster et al. |
20050055416 | March 10, 2005 | Heikes et al. |
20050055450 | March 10, 2005 | Gang |
20050060377 | March 17, 2005 | Lo et al. |
20050076240 | April 7, 2005 | Appleman |
20050076241 | April 7, 2005 | Appelman |
20050080859 | April 14, 2005 | Lake |
20050080863 | April 14, 2005 | Daniell |
20050086211 | April 21, 2005 | Mayer |
20050091311 | April 28, 2005 | Lund et al. |
20050102202 | May 12, 2005 | Linden et al. |
20050102257 | May 12, 2005 | Onyon et al. |
20050114229 | May 26, 2005 | Ackley et al. |
20050153681 | July 14, 2005 | Hanson |
20050154913 | July 14, 2005 | Barriga et al. |
20050171799 | August 4, 2005 | Hull et al. |
20050177486 | August 11, 2005 | Yeager |
20050197846 | September 8, 2005 | Pezaris |
20050198131 | September 8, 2005 | Appelman |
20050198172 | September 8, 2005 | Appelman |
20050198173 | September 8, 2005 | Evans |
20050198268 | September 8, 2005 | Chandra |
20050216300 | September 29, 2005 | Appelman et al. |
20050246420 | November 3, 2005 | Little, II |
20060031366 | February 9, 2006 | Dolph |
20060031772 | February 9, 2006 | Valeski |
20060075044 | April 6, 2006 | Fox et al. |
20060129678 | June 15, 2006 | Morita |
20060167991 | July 27, 2006 | Heikes et al. |
20060168054 | July 27, 2006 | Burkhart et al. |
20060173824 | August 3, 2006 | Bensky et al. |
20060173963 | August 3, 2006 | Roseway et al. |
20060182248 | August 17, 2006 | Smith et al. |
20060190536 | August 24, 2006 | Strong et al. |
20060212561 | September 21, 2006 | Feng |
20060248573 | November 2, 2006 | Pannu et al. |
20060277187 | December 7, 2006 | Roese et al. |
20070156664 | July 5, 2007 | Norton et al. |
20070250566 | October 25, 2007 | Appelman |
20070271607 | November 22, 2007 | Roskind |
20080082620 | April 3, 2008 | Barsness |
20080115087 | May 15, 2008 | Rollin et al. |
20080186164 | August 7, 2008 | Emigh et al. |
20080228598 | September 18, 2008 | Leff et al. |
20080255989 | October 16, 2008 | Altberg et al. |
20090043844 | February 12, 2009 | Zimmet et al. |
20090070306 | March 12, 2009 | Stroe |
20090089316 | April 2, 2009 | Kogan et al. |
20100205546 | August 12, 2010 | Appelman |
20100325113 | December 23, 2010 | Valeski |
20120005078 | January 5, 2012 | Pitroda et al. |
20130073556 | March 21, 2013 | Valeski |
20130080529 | March 28, 2013 | Appelman |
20140108571 | April 17, 2014 | Appelman |
0862304 | September 1998 | EP |
1176840 | January 2002 | EP |
2319137 | May 1998 | GB |
2357932 | April 2001 | GB |
2368747 | August 2002 | GB |
2008-314826 | November 1996 | JP |
2000-499001 | February 2000 | JP |
2000-259514 | September 2000 | JP |
2000-284999 | October 2000 | JP |
2001-084320 | March 2001 | JP |
WO 97/10558 | March 1997 | WO |
WO 97/14234 | April 1997 | WO |
WO 97/46955 | December 1997 | WO |
WO 98/16045 | April 1998 | WO |
WO 98/47270 | October 1998 | WO |
WO 99/08434 | February 1999 | WO |
WO 99/34628 | July 1999 | WO |
WO 99/48011 | September 1999 | WO |
WO 00/16201 | March 2000 | WO |
WO 00/24154 | April 2000 | WO |
WO 00/60809 | October 2000 | WO |
WO 00/79396 | December 2000 | WO |
WO 01/06748 | January 2001 | WO |
WO 01/22258 | March 2001 | WO |
WO 01/24036 | April 2001 | WO |
WO 01/43357 | June 2001 | WO |
WO 01/67787 | September 2001 | WO |
WO 01/72020 | September 2001 | WO |
WO 01/80079 | October 2001 | WO |
WO 02/03216 | January 2002 | WO |
WO 02/09437 | January 2002 | WO |
WO 02/35781 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 02/062039 | August 2002 | WO |
WO 02/073886 | September 2002 | WO |
WO 2004/28178 | April 2004 | WO |
WO 2005/086723 | September 2005 | WO |
WO 2005/089286 | September 2005 | WO |
WO 2006/068955 | June 2006 | WO |
- U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,312, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Appleman.
- U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,364, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Appleman.
- U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,397, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Appleman.
- “A Reputation System for Peer-to-Peer Networks,” Gupta et al., Jun. 1-3, 2003, NOSSDAV'03, Monterey, California, pp. 144-152.
- “About File Transfers”, AOL Instant Messenger, version 4.3, Help Documentation, available on Jul. 21, 2001, 5 pages.
- “About Internet directory services,” Outlook 2000 SR-I (9.0.0.4527) Help File, on or before Aug. 10, 2001, p. 1.
- “Active Directory Features,” [online], Jun. 15, 1999 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet http://www.microsoft.corn/windows2000/server/evaluation/features/adlist.asp, pp. 1-4.
- “Active Directory Service Overview,” [online], Nov. 30, 2001 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet <http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/evaluation/business/addatasheet.asp>, pp. 1-5.
- “Active Directory,” [online], [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/technologies/directory/AD/default.asp, pp. 1-13.
- “AOL Instant Messenger Windows Beta Features”, Jun. 24, 1999, 2 pages, AOL Instant Messenger All New Version 2.0, 2 pages, Jun. 24, 1999, What is AOL Instant Messenger, 3 pages, Jun. 24, 1999, Quick Tips for Getting Started, 5 pages, Jun. 24, 1999, Frequently Asked Questions About AOL Instant Messenger, 6 pages, Jun. 24, 1999.
- “AOL Instant Messenger”, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20010721193059/http://aim.com/ (Way Back Machine—Available on Jul. 21, 2001) on Aug. 26, 2005, 7 pages.
- “AOL Instant Messenger All New Version 2.0 Quick Tips for Getting Started,” Jun. 24, 1999, 5 pages.
- “AOL technology: turning complicated things into engaging services,” 1996 Annual Report, 22 pages.
- “Benefits of Active Directory in a Windows 2000 Environment,” [online], Sep. 20, 2001 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet <http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/evaluation/business/adwin2k.asp>, pp. 1-9.
- “BestCalls.com Announces the BestCalls Technology Index,” Business Wire, Jun. 30, 1999, Business Wire, (2 pages).
- “Business at Cyberspeed; Brainstorm Becomes Quick Internet Hit,” Walker, Jan. 24, 1999, The Washington Post, p. A.OI, (4 pages).
- “CrushParty.com: Help,” retrieved Jun. 12, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.crushparty.comlhelp.jsp. (3 pages).
- “Degrees of Separation Email Spam Protection”, http://www.halfbakery.com, pp. 1-3, Dec. 2001.
- “Digital Artifacts for Remembering and Storytelling: Post History and Social Network Fragments,” Viegas et al., retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://we.media.mit.edul-fviegas/papers/posthistory—snf.pdf, (10 pages) 2004.
- “Directory Integration Can Lower Total Cost of Ownership and Increase Application Functionality,” [online], Jul. 27, 1998, [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet http://www.microsoft.com/presspas/press/1998/July98/ActivDPR.asp, pp. 1-4.
- “Enterprise Identity Management with Windows 2000 and Active Directory,” [online], 1999 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/ad/windows2000/evaluate/w2keims.asp?fra . . . ,pp. 1-16.
- “File Transfer Preferences”, AOL Instant Messenger, version 5.1, Help Documentation, apparently available as of Nov. 21, 2002, 2 pages.
- “Finding Others Online: Reputation Systems for Social Online Spaces,” Jensen et al., Apr. 20-25, 2002, CHI, Minneapolis, Minnesota, vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 447-454.
- “GLWebMail 2.0 is released!” http://www.gordano.com; available on Apr. 18, 2001, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20010418153714//http://www.gordano.com, 2 pages.
- “Frequently Asked Questions About AOL Instant Messenger,” Jun. 24, 1999, 6 pages.
- “Hottie or Nottie? Web Site Voters Let You Know Whether You Sizzle or Fizzle,” Marino, Jul. 11, 2001, Florida Times Union, p. c.i., (2 pages).
- “Icq.anywhere, Email Features-Email Center-ICQ.com,” retrieved Apr. 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.icq.cornlemail/popular-features.htrnl, pp. 1-5.
- “Idea for Online Networking Brings Two Entrepreneurs Together,” Patents: Idea for Online Networking Brings Two EntrepreneursTogether, reprinted from http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12101/technology/Olpatt.htrnl?adxnnl+0&adxnnlx=107029 . . . , printed on Nov. 5, 2004, (2 pages).
- “Instant Messaging for Gamers,” PC Gamer, May 2004, vol. 11, No. 5, (2 pages).
- “Integrating Applications with Windows 2000 and Active Directory,”[online], Oct. 2000 [retrieved on May 8, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet <http:/www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/ad/windows2000/evaluate/adappstr.asp?fra . . . >, pp. 1-12.
- “Integrating Microsoft Metadirectory Services and Active Directory,” [online], Aug. 31, 2000 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet <http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/evaluation/news/bulletins/mmsma.asp>, p. 1.
- “Look up contact information from an item,” Outlook 2000 SR-I (9.0.04527) Help File, on or before Aug. 10, 2001, p. 1.
- “Lotus Instant Messaging Everyplace FAQ” retrieved Apr. 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.lotus.comlproducts/product4.nsf/wdocs/249c6f083166cd3e85256d7300714407, pp. 1-3.
- “New Features in AOL Instant Messenger for Windows v. 2.01 Beta,” Apr. 28, 1999, 2 pages.
- “Part II: Tasks and Procedures,” Active Directory Operations Guide, Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Windows 2000, Version 1.5, Published Dec. 5, 2002, pp. 1-131.
- “PieSpy—Inferring and Visualizing Social Network on IRC,” PieSpy Social Network Bot, reprinted from http://lister.linux-srv.anlx.net/piespy printed on Mar. 11, 2004 (18 pages).
- “Plaxo,” Plaxo, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20041105072256/http://www.plaxo.comlprinted on Nov. 5, 2004 (available on Feb. 14, 2004), (2 pages).
- “Plaxo-Update Your Address Book,” Plaxo Contact Networks, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/2003021823363 8/http://www.plaxo.comlprinted on Nov. 5, 2004 (available on Feb. 18, 2003), ( 1 page).
- “Reflections on Friendster, Trust and Intimacy.” Danah Boyd. Ubicomp 2003, Workshop Application for the Intimate Ubiquitous Computing Workshop. Seattle, WA, Oct. 12-15, 2003.
- “Reputation Systems,” Resnicket al., Dec. 2000, Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, No. 12, pp. 45-48.
- “RIM Road: Software: Internet & Network: Webmessenger RIMJ2ME/Instant Messaging,” retrieved Apr. 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.rinnod.comisoftware/rimllWebmessenger-RIM-J2ME Instant—-Messaging-20 . . . , (4 pages).
- “Set up LDAP directory services,” Outlook 2000 SR-I (9.0.04527) Help File, on or before Aug. 10, 2001, p. 1.
- “Six Degrees-New Programs Help Companies ‘Mine Workers’ Relationships for Key Business.Prospects,” William M. Bulkeley et al., Marketplace, The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 4, 2003, (3 pages).
- “Social Network Fragments: An Interactive Tool for Exploring Digital Social Connections.” Danah Boyd, Jeff Potter. Sketch as SIGGRAPH 2003. San Diego, California: ACM, Jul. 27-31, 2003.
- “Social Networking for Business: Release 0.5,” Esther Dyson. Esther Dyson's Monthly Report, Release 1.0, vol. 21, No. 10, Nov. 25, 2003, www.edventure.com (36 pages).
- “Social Sites Clicking With Investors,” Washingtonpost.com: Social Sites Clicking With Investors, reprinted from http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A32066-2003NovI2?language=printer printed on Nov. 5, 2004, (2 pages).
- “Social Social Networks: Deodorant for the Soul?” Esther Dyson. Esther Dyson's Monthly Report, Release 1.0, vol. 21, No. 11, Dec. 12, 2003, www.edventure.com (36 pages).
- “Socialware: Multiagent Systems for Supporting Network Communities,” Hattori et al., Mar. 1999, Association for Computing Machinery, Communications of the ACM, vol. 42, Issue 3, pp. 55ff., (6 pages).
- “Spoke Builds on Social Networking Patent Portfolio,” reprinted from http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/print.php/3073621 printed on Nov. 5, 2004 (3 pages).
- “SWF Seeks Attractive Head Shot; To Stand Out, Online Daters Pay for Professional Photos; Cropping out the Ex-Wife,” Leiber, Nov. 19, 2003, The Wall Street Journal, p. D.1.
- “Technology Journal: Changing Chat-Instant Messaging is Taking Off, and For Some Users Its Nuzzling Out the Phone,” Nick Wingfield, Asian WSJ, Sep. 2000, (5 pages).
- “Technology Journal-Are You Satisfied? EBay's Battle Against Fraud Rests Primarily on a Simple Concept: Customer Feedback,” Wingfield, Sep. 23, 2002, Asian Wall Street Journal, p. T.8, (4 pages).
- “The first Social Software . . . a true Social Adventure,” Huminity Social Networking, Chat Software, Create Personal Free Blogs and My Group . . . , reprinted from http://www.huminity.com/ printed on Nov. 5, 2004 (2 pages).
- “The Gordano Messaging Server,” http://www.gordano.com, Copyright 1994-2003, Gordano, 3 pages.
- “Introducing the Gordano Messaging Suite”; http://www.gordano.com; copyright 1994-2003, 2 pages.
- “The LP Wireless Messenger,” Messenger Documentation, [online] LP Wireless, Inc., 2002, retrieved on Nov. 2, 2002 from http://www.lpwireless.com/messengerhelp.htm, pp. 1-7.
- “Trillian Discussion Forums-HOWTO: Import ICQ 2003a Contact List,” retrieved Apr. 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://trillian.cc/forums/showthread.php?s+&threadid=36475, (2 pages).
- “Using Active Directory Service,” from Chapter 5, Microsoft Windows 2000 Administrator's Pocket Consultant, by William R. Stank (1999). pp. 1-6.
- “Welcome to Huminity World of Connections,” Huminity-Home, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/2003022S131435/www.huminity.comldefault.php?internationa . . . printed on Nov. 5, 2004 (available on Feb. 2, 2003), (1 page).
- “What is AOL Instant Messenger,” Jun. 24, 1999, 3 pages.
- “What's new about exchanging information over the Internet,” Outlook 2000 SR-I (9.0.0.4527), 1 page,on or before Aug. 10, 2001.
- “Windows 2000 Directory Services,” [online] http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/technologies/directory/default.asp, Nov. 25, 2001, 1 page.
- “Windows NetMeeting—Features”, [Online], Jun. 17, 1999, X002245623, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.microsoft.com/windows/NetMeeting/Features/default.ASP>, 8 pages.
- “YAHOO! Messenger Makes the World a Little Smaller, More Informed,” Jun. 21, 1999, pp. 1-2.
- A. Kolcz and J. Alspector, “SVM-based Filtering of E-mail Spam with Content-specific Misclassification Costs,” TextDM'2001 (IEEE ICDM-2001 Workshop on Text Mining), San Jose, CA, 2001, pp. 1-14.
- Alan Cohen, “Instant Messaging,” PC Magazine, PC Labs, Apr. 13, 1999, 2 pages.
- America Online Inc., “AOL Instant Messenger”, Aug. 29, 2000, Internet: www.aol.com/aim/, (18 pages).
- America Online Inc., New AIM 4.7, Sep. 27, 2001, Internet: http://aim.aol.com, (7 pages).
- Anand Ranganathan et al., “ConChat: A Context-Aware Chat Program”, Jul.- Sep. 2002, Pervasive Computing, pp. 51-57.
- Anonymous: “Push To Talk Services”, Internet Document, [Online], p. 1, Retrieved from the internet: URL:http://www.nextel.com/services/directconnect/ptt—overview.shtml, 1 page.
- Anonymous: “The Internet—the Advent of New Forms of Communication”, Internet Document, [Online], pp. 1-4, Retrieved from the internet URL:http://www.journal.fujitsu.com/248e/e48now.htm, 3 pages.
- Archive.org Archived copy of the Morpheus 1.9.1 download page on c-net Download.com [online] Jun. 20, 2002, Retrieved from the internet, URL:http://web.archive.org/web/20020803071751/download.com.com/3000-2166-10057840.html>, 2 pages.
- Australian Office Action of Apr. 7, 2006, App. No. 2002340039 (2 pages).
- BuddyGopher We Love Away Messages!, “BuddyGopher simultaneously checks the away messages of your favorite AIM® buddies.”, available on Sep. 24, 2004, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/200400924104001/http://www.buddygopher.com/ on Sep. 28, 2005 (2 pgs).
- BuddyGopher˜About, available on Jul. 13, 2004, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20040713002836/www.buddygopher.com/about.html on Sep. 28, 2005 (3 pgs).
- Canadian Office Action from Application Serial No. 2403520 dated Feb. 21, 2005, 2 pages.
- Chinese Office Action of Jul. 7, 2006, App. No. 02821420X (5 pages).
- AOL Instant Messenger, available on Nov. 21, 2002, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20021121031257/http:// aim.com on Aug. 31, 2005 (2 pages).
- Bart Massey et al.; “Learning Spam: Simple Techniques for Freely Available Software”, Computer Science Dept., Portland, OR USA, 2003, pp. 1-14.
- CNET Networks Inc., “PopUp Killer”, Sep. 13, 2001, Internet: download.cnet.comidownloads/0-10059-100-6932612.html, (3 pages).
- Courter et al., “Mastering Microsoft Outlook 2000 Premium Edition”, Sybex Inc., Alameda, California, Feb. 2000, pp. 167-169, ISBN 0-7821-2676-6.
- Dodgeball.com:: mobile social software, “help: text messaging”, available on Oct. 13, 2004, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20041013034241/www.dodgeball.com/social/help-text.php on Sep. 28, 2005 (3 pgs).
- Dodgeball.com:: mobile social software, “help: the basics”, available on Oct. 9, 2004, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20041009200739/www.dodgeball.com/social/help—basics.php on Sep. 28, 2005 (2 pgs).
- Dodgeball.com:: mobile social software, “help: use it”, available on Oct. 9, 2004, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20041009201853/www.dodgeball.com/social/help—useit.php on.Sep. 28, 2005 (2 pgs).
- Dodgeball.com:: mobile social software, “Hook up with friends. Discover what's around you”, available on Nov. 30, 2003, reprinted from http://web.archive.org/web/20041130034344/www.dodgeball.com/social/index.php on Sep. 28, 2005 (2 pgs).
- Dutta-Roy Amitava, “Virtual Meetings with Desktop Conferencing”, IEEE Spectrum, vol. 35, No. 7, Jul. 1, 1998, pp. 47-56 and p. 66.
- Ed Bott and Ron Person, Using Windows 95 with Internet Explorer 4.0, Feb. 17, 1995, Que, Special Edition, (21 pages).
- Eschenburg, WO laufen sie denn?, Oct. 26, 1998, pp. 92-95.
- H. Drucker et al., “Support Vector Machines for Spam Categorization”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 10, No. 5, Sep. 1999, pp. 1048-1054.
- Home-tribe.net, http://washingtondc.tribe.net/message/24434d1b817b-4580-aa42-3bffal5f26a?page=1, (4 pages) available at least as early as Dec 13, 2004.
- http://www.friendster.com, Dec. 2004, ( 17 pages).
- Hudson, Greg; Security in the Internet Message and Presence Protocols, http://mirrors.isc.org/pub/www.watersprings.org/pub/id/ draft-hudson-impp-security-00.txt; p. 6, section 7.2.2, first paragraph, p. 6 section 7.2.1, lines 1-2, Nov. 21, 2000.
- IBM “Configuring Sametime servers in your Domino environment” May 1, 2000 (14 pages).
- Ion Adroutsopoulos et al., “Learning to Filter Spam E-Mail: A Comparison of a Naive Bayesian and a Memory-Based Approach”, University of Athens, Sep. 2000, pp. 1-12.
- Isaacs, Ellen: “Example UI Spec: Sound Internet Messages”, Internet Document, [online], pp. 1-2. Retrieved from the internet: URL:http://www.uidesigns.com/spec/d-sims.html [retrieved on Jun. 26, 2003].
- J. Dudley, “Telstra targets Net spammers”, news.com.au, Dec. 2, 2003, 2 pages.
- J.C. Cannon, “Design Guide for Directory-Enabled Applications,”[online], Apr. 2001 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnactdir/html/ deal.asp?frame=true>, pp. 1-18.
- Japanese Office Action of May 12, 2008, App. No. 2003-533140 (7 pages).
- Joanna Glasner, “Social Nets Find Friends in VCs”, http://www.wired.com/news, Nov. 17, 2003, pp. 1-3.
- Klaus Hartenstein et al., “xhtalk 2.9”, Nov. 1992, 6 pages.
- Kohda et al., “IMPP: A New Instant Messaging Standard and Its Impact on Internet Business,” Dec. 2000, Fujitsu Sci. Tech. J., 36, 2, pp. 147-153.
- Leander Kahney, “Will You Buy a Car From This Man?”, Oct. 6, 2003, pp. 1-3.
- Lotus Sametime 1.5 Jul. 27, 1999 (4 pages).
- Mariano, Gwendolyn. ZDNetNews, “Morpheus 1.9 to be unleashed”, [online] Jun. 10, 2002. Retrieved from internet URL: http;//news.zdnetcom/2100-3513—22-934615.htm, 6 pages.
- Mary Beth Marklein, “Student have ‘away’ with words”, Mar. 28, 2004, USA RODAY, http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2004-03-28-aways-messages-usat-x.htm, all pages.
- Matsumoto, Tatsuro et al.: “Chocoa Communicator—A New Communication System based on Awareness and Text Communications—”, FUJITSU Sci. Tech. J., 36, 2, pp. 154-161, Dec. 2000.
- M. Hearst et al., “Support Vector Machines”, IEEE Intelligent Systems, Jul./ Aug. 1998, pp. 18-28.
- M. Marvin, “Announce: Implementation of E-mail Spam Proposal”, news.admin.net-abuse.misc, Aug. 3, 1996, 2 pages.
- McKendrick, Joseph, “Internet Call Centers: New Era in Customer Service,” Feb. 2002, vol. 10, n2, 5 pages.
- Microsoft Corporation, “Active Directory Services Interface in the Microsoft Exchange 5.5 Environment,” [online], Nov. 1997 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnactdir/html/msdn—adsiexch.asp?frame=-true>, pp. 1-12.
- Microsoft Corporation, “Comparing Microsoft Active Directory to Novell's NDS,” [online], Sep. 1998 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet.<http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/enus/dnactdir/html/msdn—activedirvsnds.asp?frame=true>, pp. 1-17.
- Microsoft Corporation, “Introduction to Active Directory Application Mode,” Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Aug. 2002, pp. 1-13.
- Microsoft Corporation, “Using ADSI, LDAP, and Network Management Functions With Active Directory,” [online], Feb. 2002 [retrieved on May 13, 2003]. Retrieved from the Internet <http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnactdir/html/BuildingADApps.asp?framc-truc>, pp. 1-9.
- Mike Snider, “America goes online for New Year's bash”, USA Today, Jan. 3, 2000, 1 page.
- Muller, Nathan, “Dial 1-800-Internet”: Feb. 1996, pp. 83-84, 86, 88.
- Neo Mai, Ken Neo. “Buying and selling on the internet; [Computimes, 2* Edition].” New Straits Times. Kuala Lumpur: Jun. 28, 2001. p. 53.
- Part I: Active Directory Operations, Active Directory Operations Guide, Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Windows 2000, Version 1.5, Published Dec. 5, 2002, pp. 1-187.
- Paul Graham, “Better Bayesian Filtering”, Jan. 2003, pp. 1-11, http://www.paulgraham.com/better.html.
- Paul Mutton, “PieSpy Social Network Bot-Inferring and Visualizing Social Networks on IRC”, jibble.org, http://lister.linux-srv.anlx.net/piespy, © 2001-2004, pp. 1-18.
- PowWow (Mar. 1, 2000), Introduction, Retrieved Apr. 3, 2006 from website http://Web.archive.org/web/20000301125635/ww2.tribal.com/help/online—docs/h205voic.html.
- Pruitt, Scarlet. IDG News Service. “Morpheus Updates Peer-to-Peer Client” [online] Jun. 10, 2002, Retrieved from the internet URL:http://www.pcworld.com/article/id.101736/article.html, 3 pages.
- R. Hall, “A Countermeasure to Duplicate-detecting Anti-spam Techniques”, AT&T Labs Technical Report 99.9.1, 1999, Abst. and pp. 1-26.
- R. Movva & W. Lai, “MSN Messenger Service 1.0 Protocol,” Aug. 1999, Internet Draft, http://tools.ietf.org/id!draft-movva-msn-messenger-protocol-oo.txt, 28 pages.
- Reichard, K., “AOL, ICQ to Interoperate-But in a Limited Fashion,” Oct. 30, 2002, InstantMessagingPlanet, available at www.instantmessagingplanet.com/public/articie.php/1490771.
- Ryze home page, www.ryze.com, Dec. 21, 2003, available at http://web.archive.org/web/20031221010006/http://ryze.com, printed Mar. 16, 2005, (13 pages).
- S. Hird, “Technical Solutions for Controlling Spam”, Proceedings of AUUG2002, Melbourne, Sep. 4-6, 2002, 17 pages.
- Satter, Michael, excerpts from the Internet TV with CU-SeeMe, First Edition, including inside Title Page and Copyright Page; “Overview”; “Contents,”through pages xii; Chapter 1, “Introduction to the Internet Videoconferencing and CU-SeeMe,” pp. 1-12; Chapter 4, “Hardware,”pp. 47-64; Chapter 5, “Software,” pp. 65-92: Chapter 6, “CU-SeeMe User's Guide,” pp. 93-121; Chapter 9, “Other Videoconferencing Technologies,” pp. 201-226; Chapter 10, “What the Future Holds,” pp. 227-233; Appendix A, “Troubleshooting Q&A,” pp. 235-249; published by Sams.net Publishing, 201 W. 103rd St., Indianapolis, In 46290, International Standard Book Number: 1-57521-006-1, Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 95-70178, copyright 1995.
- Stanek, William R., “Working with Active Directory Domains,” from Chapter 5, Microsoft Windows 2000 Administrator's Pocket Consultant, (1999). pp. 1-10.
- T. Joachims, “Text Categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with Many Relevant Features”, University of Dortmund, Computer Science Dept., LS-8 Report 23, 1998, 18 pages.
- Takashi Yoshino et al., “Namba: Location-Aware Collaboration System for Shopping and Meeting”, Aug. 2002, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, pp. 470-477.
- Tribal Voice, PowWow Guided Tour—Step 6, PowWow personal communication. Http://web.archive.org/web/2000817094516/www.tribal.com/powwow/tour/step6.cfm (Oct. 22, 1999), 2 pages.
- VisiblePath webpages, www.visiblepath.org, Dec. 3, 2003, available at http://web.archive.org/web/200312031322111http://www.visiblepath.com, printed Mar. 16, 2005, (5 pages).
- Wayner, Peter, “Hey Baby, Call Me at My IP Address”, Apr. 1996, 3 pages.
- WBWE (1998), PowWow 3.6 Brings the Power of Internet Community to the People, Business.Wire, 2 pages.
- WebmasterWorld.com Inc., “HTML and Browsers”, Mar. 5, 2001, Internet: www.webmaster.com/forum21/367.htm, (2 pages).
- Yubing Wang, Mark Claypool, Zheng Zuo. Video: An empirical study of realvideo performance across the internet. Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on the internet measurement IMW'01. Nov. 2001. ACM Press. 15 pages.
- ZeroDegrees home page, www.zerodegrees.com, Jan. 24, 2004, available at http://web.archive.org/web/20040204153037/www.zerodegrees.com/home.htm, printed Mar. 16, 2005, (2 page).
- International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US03/15715, mailed Aug. 14, 2003, 6 pages.
- International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US03/41499, dated Oct. 27, 2004.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 15, 2006 for International Application No. PCT/US05/07204, (10 pages).
- International Search Report and Written Opinion issued for PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/042992, Mar. 6, 2007 914 pages).
- International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US05/45663, dated Apr. 11, 2008.
- International Search Report issued in Application Serial No. PCT/US05/08476, dated Oct. 16, 2006, (9 pages).
- International Search Report issued in International Application No. EP03731244, dated Aug. 30, 2005, (4 pages).
- International Search Report of Apr. 11, 2003, App. No. PCT/US00/35160 (3 pages).
- International Search Report of Jan. 9, 2003, App. No. PCT/US02/30730 (4 pages).
- International Search Report, Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/018286, dated Oct. 19, 2006, 12 pages.
- Supplementary European Search Report issued in European Application No. 05857099.5-1238/1836596 PCT/US2005045663, dated Nov. 7, 2008, (5 pages).
- Supplementary European Search Report issued in European Application No. EP 05728303, dated Jan. 9, 2009, (4 pages).
- European Office Action in Application No. 01954931.0-2414, mailed Jul. 14, 2008, 3 pages.
- European Patent Office, Communication of Aug. 30, 2005, App. No. 03731244.1-2416 (PCT/US0315715) 4 pages.
- European Patent Office, Communication of Aug. 31, 2009, App. No. 02778374.5-1238, 8 pages.
- European Patent Office, Communication of Sep. 5, 2006, App. No. 02778374.5-1238, 4 pages.
- Office Action mailed approximately Feb. 29, 2006 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2002-515026 (6 pages).
- Office Action of Canadian Application No. 2,462,037, dated Feb. 12, 2009, 8 pages.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/810,159, filed Jul. 6, 2004, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/810,159, filed Feb. 11, 2005, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/810,159, filed Jun. 15, 2005, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/810,159, filed Dec. 2, 2005, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/810,159, filed Apr. 19, 2006, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/810,159, filed Jan. 10, 2008, Examiner's Answer.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/810,159, filed Jan. 11, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/810,159, filed Jan. 29, 2010, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/843,788, filed Mar. 30, 2004, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/843,788, filed Dec. 2, 2004, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/843,788, filed Jul. 27, 2005, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/843,788, filed Mar. 28, 2006, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/843,788, filed Jun. 12, 2006, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/843,788, filed Apr. 19, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/843,788, filed Oct. 31, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/843,788, filed Sep. 15, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/843,788, filed May 5, 2010, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/911,799, filed Oct. 5, 2004, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/911,799, filed Apr. 29, 2005, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/911,799, filed Nov. 17, 2005, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/911,799, filed Aug. 11, 2006, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/911,799, filed Jul. 3, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/911,799, filed Dec. 1, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/911,799, filed Mar. 18, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 09/911,799, filed Mar. 18, 2010, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/134,437, filed Nov. 1, 2005, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/134,437, filed May 18, 2006, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/134,437, filed Aug. 21, 2006, Advisory Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/134,437, filed Sep. 6, 2007, Miscellaneous Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/134,437, filed Feb. 11, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/134,437, filed Sep. 18, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/134,437, filed Mar. 10, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/134,437, filed Oct. 2, 2009, Notice of Allowance.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/134,437, filed Nov. 17, 2009, Supplemental Notice of Allowability.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/146,814, filed May 17, 2002, Examiner's Answer.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/146,814, filed Sep. 20, 2005, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/146,814, filed May 22, 2006, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/146,814, filed Dec. 11, 2006, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/146,814, filed Jul. 2, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/146,814, filed Apr. 15, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/146,814, filed Jan. 12, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/146,814, filed Mar. 22, 2010, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,002, filed Aug. 25, 2005, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,002, filed Apr. 20, 2006, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,002, filed Jan. 9, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,002, filed Jan. 8, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,002, filed Jul. 24, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,056, filed Nov. 29, 2004, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,056, filed Jul. 6, 2005, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,056, filed Oct. 31, 2005, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,056, filed May 10, 2006, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,056, filed May 21, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,056, filed Nov. 5, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,056, filed May 12, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,056, filed Oct. 30, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/633,636, filed Oct. 11, 2006, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/746,230, filed Mar. 17, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/746,230, filed Oct. 5, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/746,230, filed Apr. 9, 2010, Notice of Allowance.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/746,230, filed Jan. 6, 2011, Notice of Allowance.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/746,232, filed Mar. 18, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/746,232, filed Oct. 30, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/746,232, filed Jun. 10, 2010, Notice of Allowance.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/746,232, filed Jan. 18, 2011, Notice of Allowance.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/747,623, filed Mar. 13, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/747,623, filed Aug. 21, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/747,623, filed Nov. 14, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/747,623, filed Aug. 23, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/747,624, filed Feb. 26, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/747,624, filed Jul. 16, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/747,624, filed Nov. 1, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/747,679, filed Oct. 2, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/747,679, filed Apr. 29, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/981,460, filed Aug. 20, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,423, filed Mar. 2, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,424, filed Mar. 19, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,424, filed Nov. 3, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,424, filed May 1, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,424, filed Oct. 19, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,424, filed Feb. 17, 2010, Notice of Allowance.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,476, filed Mar. 2, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/017,204, filed Dec. 12, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/017,204, filed Jun. 23, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/079,522, filed Apr. 3, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/079,522, filed Oct. 16, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/150,180, filed Oct. 2, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/150,180, filed Apr. 7, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/150,180, filed Aug. 19, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/237,718, filed Apr. 2, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/237,718, filed Oct. 30, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/237,718, filed Apr. 2, 2010, Notice of Allowance.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,110, filed Nov. 19, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,110, filed Jul. 9, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,110, filed Oct. 9, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,129, filed Nov. 14, 2007, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,129, filed May 28, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,130, filed Apr. 14, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,130, filed Nov. 13, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,130, filed Jul. 3, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/238,130, filed Nov. 24, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/464,816, filed Apr. 21, 2009, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,461, filed Jan. 22, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,461, filed Jul. 17, 2008, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,461, filed Oct. 7, 2008, Notice of Allowance.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,880, filed Aug. 4, 2010, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/349,161, filed Jun. 4, 2010, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/349,161, filed Oct. 1, 2010, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/349,161, filed Jan. 24, 2011, Notice of Allowance.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,045, filed Dec. 12, 2011, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,045, filed Jul. 19, 2012, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,045, filed Dec. 31, 2012, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,045, filed Apr. 15, 2013, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,045, filed Mar. 7, 2014, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/852,769, filed Nov. 14, 2012, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/852,769, filed Jul. 13, 2013, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 12/852,769, filed Sep. 20, 2013, Notice of Allowance.
- U.S. Appl. No. 13/093,147, filed Jul. 19, 2011, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 13/093,147, filed Jan. 27, 2012, Notice of Allowance.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,142, filed Sep. 7, 2004, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,142, filed May 4, 2005, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,142, filed Dec. 6, 2005, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,142, filed Jul. 14, 2006, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,142, filed Dec. 29, 2006, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 10/334,142, filed Apr. 18, 2007, Notice of Allowance.
- U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,583, filed Dec. 6, 2012, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 13/472,583, filed Jul. 1, 2013, Notice of Allowance.
- U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,921, filed Feb. 15, 2013, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,921, filed Aug. 7, 2013, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,921, filed Dec. 20, 2013, Office Action.
- U.S. Appl. No. 13/620,921, filed Apr. 25, 2014, Notice of Allowance.
- U.S. Appl. No. 14/049,069, filed May 23, 2014, Office Action.
Type: Grant
Filed: May 31, 2013
Date of Patent: Nov 18, 2014
Assignee: Facebook, Inc. (Menlo Park, CA)
Inventor: James A. Roskind (Redwood City, CA)
Primary Examiner: William Powers
Application Number: 13/907,761
International Classification: G06F 17/00 (20060101); H04L 9/32 (20060101); H04L 12/28 (20060101);