Image guided awl/tap/screwdriver

A trackable medical instrument for use in a computer assisted image guided medical and surgical navigation systems that generate images during medical and surgical procedures, includes a guide member having an emitter array for being tracked by the system and a drive shaft contained within the guide member having a proximal and a distal end, the drive shaft being rotatable within the guide member while being fixable axially inside the guide member, the proximal end of the drive shaft having a first connector for interchangeably receiving at least one drive source, and the distal end having a second connector for interchangeably receiving at least one instrument tip.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

This application is a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,021,343 issued on Feb. 1, 2000 and also claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 as a continuation of currently U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/453,709, filed on Apr. 23, 2012; which is also a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,021,343 issued on Feb. 1, 2000; which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 as a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. Re. 43,328, which is also a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,021,343 issued on Feb. 1, 2000. The disclosures of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to computer assisted image guided medical and surgical navigation systems that generate images during medical and surgical procedures indicating the relative position of various body parts, surgical implants, and instruments. In particular, the present invention relates to an instrument for use in an image guided surgery navigation system that enables the system to track both the depth and the trajectory of the instrument during surgery.

2. Background of Related Art

Computer assisted image guided medical and surgical navigation systems are known and used to generate images in order to guide a doctor during a surgical procedure. Such systems are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,383,454 to Bucholz; PCT application Ser. No. PCT/US94/04530 (Publication No. WO 94/24933) to Bucholz; and PCT application Ser. No. PCT/US95/12984 (Publication No. WO 96/11624) to Bucholz et al., incorporated herein by reference.

In general, these image guided systems use images of a body part, such as CT scans, taken before surgery to generate images on a display, such as a CRT monitor screen, during surgery for representing the position of a surgical instrument with respect to the body part. The systems typically include tracking devices such as, for example, an LED array mounted on a surgical instrument as well as a body part, a digitizer to track in real time the position of the body part and the instrument used during surgery, and a monitor screen to display images representing the body and the position of the instrument relative to the body part as the surgical procedure is performed.

There is a need in the art for a surgically navigable tool for use with these image guided systems that is simple to use and manipulate, that enables the computer tracking system to track both the trajectory of the instrument and the depth that the instrument is inserted into the body, and that is easily interchangeable with alternative drive sources such as a ratcheting handle or other instruments such as awls, taps, and screwdrivers.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is therefore an object of the invention to provide an image guided medical instrument whose tip and trajectory can be simultaneously tracked.

It is a further object of the invention to provide an image guided medical instrument capable of generating a signal representing the trajectory and the depth of the tip of the instrument.

It is a still further object of the invention to provide an image guided medical instrument that may easily be used with any number of different tips and handles.

It is another object of the invention to provide an image guided medical instrument that is of relatively simple construction and relatively easy to use.

Additional objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows and, in part, will be obvious from the description or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.

To achieve the objects and in accordance with the purpose of the invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, the invention comprises a trackable medical instrument for use in a computer assisted image guided surgery system having a digitizer for tracking the position of the instrument in three dimensional space and a display providing an indication of the position of the instrument with respect to images of a body part taken preoperatively. The instrument includes a guide member having an emitter array mounted thereon for being tracked by the digitizer, and a drive shaft contained within the guide member, the drive shaft having a proximal and a distal end, the drive shaft being rotatable within the guide member while being fixable axially within the guide member, the proximal end of the drive shaft having a first connector for interchangeably receiving at least one drive source, and the distal end having a second connector for interchangeably receiving at least one instrument tip. The instrument may further include at least one instrument tip for connection to the distal end of the drive shaft and a drive handle for connection to the proximal end of the drive shaft for transmitting torque to the instrument tip to cause rotation of the instrument tip.

In another aspect of this invention, the instrument may further include a sensor which senses the removal and the connection of an instrument tip to the instrument. The sensor may be an electromechanical switch on the guide member.

It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are not restrictive of the invention as claimed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.

FIG. 1 is a schematic front view of a computer assisted image guided surgery system used with an instrument according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an instrument according to the present invention.

FIG. 3 is an exploded view of the instrument shown in FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 is a view of a portion of the instrument shown in FIG. 2.

FIG. 5 is an exploded view of the portion of the instrument shown in FIG. 4.

 DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers are used in the drawings and the description to refer to the same or like parts.

The medical instrument of the present invention is shown generally at 10 in FIG. 1. Instrument 100 can be used in many known computer assisted image guided surgical navigation systems such the system shown in FIG. 1 and disclosed in PCT application Ser. No. PCT/US95/12984 (Publication No. WO 96/11624) to Bucholz et al., incorporated herein by reference. A computer assisted image guided surgery system, shown at 10, generates an image for display on a monitor 106 representing the real time position of a body part and the position of instrument 100 relative to the body part.

An image may be generated on monitor 106 from an image data set stored in a controller, such as computer 108, usually generated preoperativcly by some scanning technique such as by a CAT scanner or by magnetic resonance imaging. The image data set and the image generated have reference points for at least one body part. The reference points for the particularly body part have a fixed spatial relation to the particular body part.

System 10 also generally includes a processor for processing image data, shown as digitizer control unit 114. Digitizer control unit 114 is connected to monitor 106, under control of computer 108, and to instrument 100. Digitizer 114, in conjunction with a reference frame arc 120 and a sensor array 110 or other known position sensing unit, tracks the real time position of a body part, such as a cranium shown at 119 clamped in reference frame 120, and an instrument 100. Reference frame 120 has emitters 122 or other tracking means that generate signals representing the position of the various body reference points. Reference frame 120 is fixed spatially in relation to a body part by a clamp assembly indicated generally at 124,125, and 126. Instrument 100 also has a tracking device shown as an emitter array 40 which generates signals representing the position of the instrument during the procedure.

Sensor array 110, mounted on support 112, receives and triangulates the signals generated by emitters 122 and emitter array 40 in order to identify during the procedure the relative position of each of the reference points and the instrument. Digitizer 114 and computer 108 may then modify the image date set according to the identified relative position of each of the reference points during the procedure. Computer 108 may then generate an image data set representing the position of the body elements and the instrument during the procedure. System 10 may also include a foot switch 116 connected to instrument 100 and digitizer 114 for controlling operation of the system. The structure and operation of an image guided surgery system is well known in the art and need not be discussed further here.

Referring to FIGS. 2 and 3, an instrument according to the present invention is shown at 100. Instrument 100 includes a guide member 30, an interchangeable instrument tip 15, and an interchangeable driving handle 20.

A drive shaft 35 is housed within guide member 30 and is removably connected to an end, here the proximal end 37, to surgical instrument tip 15 and at the other end, here the distal end 38, to driving handle 20 such that torque applied manually or by motorized means to drive handle 20 is transmitted to drive shaft 35 which in turn is transmitted to tip 15. Drive shaft 35, while it could be extractable such as for service, is fixable axially in relation to guide member 30, but is rotatable within guide member 30. As shown in FIG. 5, bushings 33 may be provided at each end of guide member 30 to ensure smooth motion between drive shaft 35 and guide member 30. Guide member 30 is preferably made of stainless steel, but can also be made of titanium, aluminum or plastic. Shaft 35 is preferably made from stainless steel, titanium, or aluminum.

Instrument 100 further includes a tracking device such as emitter array 40 attached to guide member 30 for tracking the location and trajectory of instrument 100. As shown in FIG. 4, array 40 is equipped with a plurality of emitters or tracking means 45, preferably four emitters, for generating a signal representing the trajectory of instrument 100 and the depth of instrument tip 15. Preferably emitters 45 are light emitting diodes; however, other tracking devices known in the art capable of being tracked by a corresponding sensor array are within the scope of the invention. For purposes of illustration, not limitation, the tracking device may generate signals actively such as with acoustic, magnetic, electromagnetic, radiologic, and micropulsed radar systems, or passively such as with reflective surfaces.

Drive handle 20 and instrument tip 15 are shown as modular units that can be attached to drive shaft 35 with corresponding and interlocking male and female socket joints. As shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, drive shaft 35 has a female socket joint 34 for connection with a male socket 14 on tip 15, and drive shaft 35 has a male socket joint 36 for connection with a female socket joint 26 on drive handle 20. With the use of male and female socket joints, various instrument tips and various type and sized drive handles can be easily interchangeable. Instrument tip 15 could be any of a variety of instruments used in surgery such as taps, awls, and shaped tools for interacting with a work piece, such as a screwdriver for driving screws. Drive handle 20 could be any number of existing or specially designed handles and could be ratcheting, nonratcheting or motorized. Instrument tip 15 and drive handle 20 could also be permanently attached to drive shaft 35. Other suitable connection means are within the scope of the invention as well.

In operation, torque applied to drive handle 20 is transmitted through drive shaft 35 to instrument tip 15. Because drive shaft 35 is fixed axially in relation to guide member 30, guide member 30 can remain stationary while drive shaft 35 rotates without translating along the axis of drive shaft 35. The relationship between array 40 and the axis of drive shaft 35, therefore, remains constant. Instrument tip 15 is also fixed axially in relation guide member 30. As a result, the relationship between array 40 and instrument tip 15 also remains constant. Because the relationship between array 40 and tip 15 is constant, the signals emitted by emitters 45 can be used by the computer assisted image guided surgical navigation system to inform the surgeon of the position of instrument 100, indicating both the trajectory or orientation in three dimensional space of instrument 100 and the length of travel along the trajectory, i.e., the depth instrument tip 15 has been inserted into a body part.

It should be recognized that other variations or modifications may be made to provide an instrument that has an emitter array fixed axially relative to the instrument tip while allowing the instrument tip to rotate relative to the emitter array. For example, guide member 30 may also be integral with instrument tip 15 and/or drive handle 20. The array could then be fixed axially relative to the instrument and means could be provided to allow rotation of the instrument relative to the array.

As discussed above, a variety of different instrument tips may be easily interchanged on instrument 100. To use these different instrument tips, information concerning the dimensions of the different tips may be entered into computer 108. As a result, computer 108 can process the various image data for the specific instrument tip being used so that system 10 tracks the depth of the tip being used or, in the case of a screwdriver, so that system 10 tracks the depth of the screw being inserted.

System 10 may also be provided with a mechanism to prevent the system from operating after a new tip has been connected until computer 108 has been recalibrated. For example, an electromechanical switch, or other suitable sensors, could be provided on instrument 100 to provide a signal to computer 108 indicating that instrument tip 15 has been removed from instrument 100 or that a new instrument tip 15 has been coupled to instrument 100. The switch is preferably a micro switch but can be embodied by any suitable electrical or electromechanical device or sensing device capable of providing a signal in response to attachment or detachment at a particular point on guide member 30 or tip 15.

The switch may be automatically actuated when tip 15 is removed or coupled to instrument 100. Computer 108 may be operably connected to the switch, such as through cable 161, and is responsive to the operation of the switch. Alternatively, if a wireless instrument is used such as one with passive reflective surfaces in place of LED emitters, any suitable form of communication known in the art can be used. An alarm or other indication of some type, such as a message or display on monitor 106, may be generated by computer 108 indicating to the user that tip 15 has been changed. The computer 108 may further prevent the system from operating until the system has been recalibrated for the new instrument tip. Recalibration may be accomplished by touching the instrument tip to a known reference point. Recalibration of the instrument tip can be positively confirmed by means of a light emission from the emitter array 40 detected by sensor array 110 and triangulated to determine the position of the instrument tip. Alternatively, the dimensions of the instrument or tool type may be entered into computer 108 or selected from a pre-programmed list of tool dimensions or tool types. Further, recalibration could be accomplished by a fiber optic device for reading a bar code on the instrument tip, or by any other suitable recalibration technique.

It will also be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the structure and methodology of the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. In view of the foregoing, it is intended that the present invention cover modifications and variations of this invention provided they fall within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.

Claims

1. A trackable medical instrument for use in a computer assisted image guided surgery system having a digitizer for tracking the position of the instrument in three dimensional space and a display providing an indication of the position of the instrument with respect to images of a body part take preoperatively, the instrument comprising:

a guide member having an emitter array mounted thereon for being tracked by a digitizer; and
a drive shaft contained within the guide member, the drive shaft having a longitudinal axis and a proximal and a distal end, the drive shaft being rotatable within the guide member while being fixable within the guide member in a direction of the longitudinal axis, the proximal end of the drive shaft having a first connector for interchangeably receiving at least one drive source for transmitting torque to the drive shaft causing rotation of the drive shaft relative to the guide member, and the distal end having a second connector for interchangeably receiving at least one instrument tip.

2. The instrument according to claim 1, further comprising at least one instrument tip for removable connection to the distal end of the drive shaft.

3. The instrument according to claim 2, wherein the at least on drive source comprises a drive handle for removable connection to the proximal end of the drive shaft for transmitting torque to the drive shaft and the instrument tip to cause rotation of the instrument tip.

4. The instrument according to claim 3, wherein the drive handle and the drive shaft include a male-female socket joint to removably connect the drive shaft to the drive handle.

5. The instrument according to claim 3, wherein the drive handle includes a ratchet.

6. The instrument according to claim 3, wherein the drive handle includes a motor for imparting torque to the drive shaft.

7. The instrument according to claim 2, wherein the instrument tip and the drive shaft include a male-female socket joint to removably connect the drive shaft to the instrument tip.

8. The instrument according to claim 2, wherein the instrument tip is an awl.

9. The instrument according to claim 2, wherein the instrument tip is a tap.

10. The instrument according to claim 2, wherein the instrument tip has a shaped end for mating with a workpiece to be rotated by said drive shaft.

11. The instrument according to claim 2, wherein the instrument tip is a drill bit.

12. The instrument according to claim 1, wherein the emitter array includes at least one LED array for emitting light signals.

13. The instrument according to claim 12, wherein the LED array includes a base and a plurality of LED emitters disposed on the base.

14. The instrument according to claim 1, wherein at least one bushing is provided in the guide member to reduce friction between the guide member and drive shaft.

15. The instrument according to claim 1, wherein the instrument includes a sensor which senses the removal and connection of an instrument tip to the instrument.

16. The instrument according to 15, wherein the sensor includes an electromechanical switch on the guide member electrically connected to the system.

17. A trackable medical instrument for use in a computer assisted image guided surgery system having a digitizer for receiving signals representing a position of the instrument during surgery, a computer for processing the signals received, and a display for providing an image representing the position of the instrument in three dimensional space during surgery, the instrument comprising:

guiding means for guiding the instrument in three dimensional space, the guiding means including signaling means for providing a signal representing the trajectory of the instrument and the location of the instrument; and
driving means for driving the instrument contained within the guiding means, the driving means having a longitudinal axis and being fixable in relation to the guiding means in a direction of the longitudinal axis while being rotatable in relation to the guiding means, the driving means having a first end adapted to interchangeably receive at least one medical instrument tip and an opposite end adapted to interchangeably receive at least one drive source.

18. The instrument according to claim 17, wherein the instrument includes a sensing means for sensing the removal and the connection of an instrument tip to the instrument.

19. The instrument according to 18, wherein the sensing means includes an electromechanical switch on the guiding means connected to the means for processing.

20. The instrument according to claim 17, wherein the guiding means comprises a housing for receiving the driving means, the driving means being rotatable within the housing while being retained axially within the housing.

21. The instrument according to claim 20 wherein the signaling means comprises an LED array.

22. The instrument according to claim 21, further comprising an instrument tip for connection to the first end of the driving means.

23. The instrument according to claim 22, further comprising a drive handle for connection to the opposite end of the driving means for transmitting torque to the instrument tip to cause rotation of the instrument tip.

24. The instrument according to claim 20, wherein the driving means comprises a drive shaft having mating connectors on both ends for connection to corresponding connectors disposed on an instrument tip and a drive source.

25. The instrument according to claim 24, wherein at least one bushing is provided between the housing and the drive shaft to reduce friction between the guide handle and drive shaft.

26. The instrument according to claim 22, wherein the instrument tip is an awl.

27. The instrument according to claim 22, wherein the instrument tip is a tap.

28. The instrument according to claim 22, wherein the instrument tip has a shaped end for mating with a workpiece.

29. A trackable medical instrument for use in a computer assisted image guided surgery system having a digitizer for tracking the position of the instrument in three dimensional space and a display providing an indication of the position of the instrument with respect to images of a body part take preoperatively, the instrument comprising:

a guide member having an emitter array mounted thereon for being tracked by a digitizer;
a drive shaft contained within the guide member, the drive shaft having a longitudinal axis and a proximal and a distal end, the drive shaft being rotatable within the guide member while being fixable within the guide member in a direction of the longitudinal axis;
an instrument tip extending from the proximal end of the drive shaft; wherein the instrument tip rotates freely relative to the guide member while being fixable axially relative to the guide member; and
a drive handle extending from the distal end of the drive shaft for guiding the instrument, including the guide member, and for imparting rotary motion to the drive shaft and the instrument tip independent of the guide member.

30. The instrument according to claim 29, further comprising a proximal coupler for interchangeably coupling the drive source to the drive shaft.

31. The instrument according to claim 30, wherein the proximal coupler comprises a male-female socket joint disposed on the drive shaft and the drive source to removably connect the drive source to the drive shaft.

32. The instrument according to claim 29, wherein the drive handle includes a ratchet.

33. The instrument according to claim 29, wherein the drive handle includes a motor for imparting rotary motion to the drive shaft.

34. The instrument according to claim 29, further comprising a distal coupler for interchangeably coupling the instrument tip to the drive shaft.

35. The instrument according to claim 34, wherein the distal coupler includes a male-female socket joint disposed on the drive shaft and the instrument tip to removably connect the instrument tip to the drive shaft.

36. The instrument according to claim 29, wherein the instrument tip is an awl.

37. The instrument according to claim 29, wherein the instrument tip is a tap.

38. The instrument according to claim 29, wherein the instrument tip has a shaped end for mating with a workpiece to be rotated by said drive shaft.

39. The instrument according to claim 29, wherein the instrument tip is a drill bit.

40. The instrument according to claim 29, wherein the emitter array includes at least one LED array for emitting light signals.

41. The instrument according to claim 29, wherein the at least one LED array includes a base and a plurality of LED emitters disposed on the base.

42. The instrument according to claim 29, wherein at least one bushing is provided in the guide member to reduce friction between the guide member and drive shaft.

43. A trackable medical instrument for use in a computer assisted image guided surgery system having a digitizer for tracking the position of the instrument in three dimensional space and a display providing an indication of the position of the instrument with respect to images of a body part taken preoperatively, the instrument comprising:

a guide member having a tracking device mounted thereon for being tracked by a digitizer;
a drive shaft contained within the guide member, the drive shaft having a longitudinal axis and a proximal and a distal end, the drive shaft being rotatable within the guide member while being fixable within the guide member in a direction of the longitudinal axis;
an instrument tip extending from the proximal end of the drive shaft; wherein the instrument tip rotates freely relative to the guide member while being fixable axially relative to the guide member; and
a drive handle extending from the distal end of the drive shaft for guiding the instrument, including the guide member, and for imparting rotary motion to the drive shaft and the instrument tip independent of the guide member.

44. The instrument according to claim 43, wherein the tracking device includes a passive signal generator.

45. The instrument according to claim 44, wherein the instrument comprises at least one reflective surface for reflecting signals to be tracked by the digitizer.

46. The instrument according to claim 44, wherein the instrument comprises at least three reflective surfaces for reflecting signals to be tracked by the digitizer.

47. The instrument according to claim 43, further comprising a proximal coupler for interchangeably coupling the drive source to the drive shaft.

48. The instrument according to claim 47, wherein the proximal coupler comprises a male-female socket joint disposed on the drive shaft and the drive source to removably connect the drive source to the drive shaft.

49. The instrument according to claim 43, further comprising a distal coupler for interchangeably coupling the instrument tip to the drive shaft.

50. The instrument according to claim 49, wherein the distal coupler includes a male-female socket joint disposed on the drive shaft and the instrument tip to removably connect the instrument tip to the drive shaft.

51. A trackable instrument, a guide member having a tracking device mounted thereon for being tracked by a system including a digitizer and a drive shaft contained within the guide member, the drive shaft having a longitudinal axis and a proximal end and a distal end, the distal end having a tip connector, the instrument comprising:

at least one instrument tip extending a distance between a tip proximal end and a tip distal end;
wherein the tip proximal end includes a shaped exterior;
wherein the tip distal end is configured for performing a procedure;
wherein the tip proximal end is configured to be interchangeably received with the tip connector;
wherein the system is configured to be recalibrated to determine a position of the instrument tip for tracking after the instrument is connected to the drive shaft.

52. The instrument of claim 51, further comprising:

the drive shaft;
wherein the drive shaft is configured to be rotatable within the guide member while being fixable within the guide member in a direction of the longitudinal axis, the proximal end of the drive shaft having a drive connector for interchangeably receiving at least one drive source for transmitting torque to the drive shaft causing rotation of the drive shaft relative to the guide member.

53. The instrument of claim 52, wherein the tip proximal end of the instrument tip is shaped for mating with and to be rotated by the drive shaft.

54. The instrument of claim 52, further comprising:

at least one drive source including a drive handle for removable connection to the proximal end of the drive shaft or a motor for removable connection to the proximal end of the drive shaft for transmitting torque to the drive shaft and the instrument tip to cause rotation of the instrument tip.

55. The instrument of claim 52, wherein the instrument tip and the drive shaft include a male-female socket joint to removably connect the drive shaft to the instrument tip.

56. The instrument of claim 52, wherein the instrument tip is an awl.

57. The instrument of claim 52, wherein the instrument tip is a tap.

58. The instrument of claim 52, wherein the instrument tip is a drill bit.

59. The instrument of claim 51, wherein the instrument includes a sensor which senses the removal and connection of the instrument tip relative to the drive shaft.

60. The instrument of claim 59, wherein the instrument tip is configured to operate the sensor to send a signal to the digitizer that at least one of the instrument tip is removed or that the instrument tip is inserted.

61. The instrument of claim 59, wherein the sensor is at least one of an electrical device, an electromechanical device, or sensing device configured to be operated by the instrument tip.

62. The instrument of claim 51, instrument tip is configured to be rotatable relative to the guide member while being fixable relative to the guide member in a direction of a longitudinal axis of the instrument tip.

63. A trackable instrument, a guide member having a tracking device mounted thereon for being tracked by a digitizer of a system and a drive shaft contained within the guide member, the drive shaft having a longitudinal axis and a proximal end and a distal end, the distal end having a tip connector, wherein the drive shaft is configured to be rotatable within the guide member while being fixable within the guide member in a direction of the longitudinal axis, the instrument comprising:

at least one instrument tip extending a distance between a tip proximal end and a tip distal end;
wherein the tip proximal end includes a shaped exterior;
wherein the tip distal end is configured for performing a procedure;
wherein the tip proximal end is configured to be interchangeably received with the tip connector;
wherein the system is configured to be recalibrated to determine a position of the instrument tip for tracking after the instrument is connected to the drive shaft and the instrument tip to rotate relative to the tracking device with the drive shaft contained within the guide member.

64. The instrument of claim 63, further comprising:

the drive shaft;
wherein the proximal end of the drive shaft has a drive connector for interchangeably receiving at least one drive source for transmitting torque to the drive shaft causing rotation of the drive shaft relative to the guide member.

65. The instrument of claim 63, wherein the instrument further comprises a sensor configured to be actuated by the instrument tip;

wherein the sensor is configured to transmit a signal to the digitizer.

66. The instrument of claim 65, wherein the sensor includes at least one of an electrical device, an electromechanical device, or sensing device.

67. The instrument of claim 63, wherein the system is configured to make an indication that the instrument tip has changed.

68. The instrument of claim 67, wherein the tracking device is an emitter array.

69. A method for operation of a trackable instrument, comprising:

engaging an instrument tip to a tip connector of a drive shaft, wherein the drive shaft is contained within a guide member, wherein a tracking device is mounted on the guide member for being tracked by a digitizer, the drive shaft having a longitudinal axis and a proximal end and a distal end, the distal end having the tip connector, wherein the drive shaft is configured to be rotatable within the guide member while being fixable within the guide member in a direction of the longitudinal axis, the instrument tip having a tip proximal end and a tip distal end, wherein the tip proximal end is configured to be interchangeably received with the tip connector; and
calibrating the engaged instrument tip when engaged to the drive shaft.

70. The method of claim 69, further comprising:

receiving an indication that calibration of the instrument tip should occur.

71. The method of claim 69, further comprising:

actuating a sensor with the instrument tip during the engaging the instrument tip with the tip connector.

72. The method of claim 71, wherein actuating the sensor includes at least one of actuating at least one of an electrical device, an electromechanical device, or sensing device.

73. The method of claim 69, wherein calibrating the engaged instrument tip includes entering information regarding a dimension of the instrument tip.

74. The method of claim 69, further comprising:

selecting the instrument tip for engaging to the tip connector of the drive shaft.

75. The method of claim 74, wherein selecting the instrument tip includes selecting the instrument tip from a plurality of instruments tips including at least one of an awl, a tap, a screwdriver, or a shaped tool.

76. The method of claim 69, further comprising:

tracking a location of the engaged instrument tip based at least on the calibrating the engaged instrument tip.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
1576781 March 1926 Phillips
1735726 November 1929 Bornhardt
2407845 September 1946 Nemeyer
2650588 September 1953 Drew
2697433 December 1954 Zehnder
3016899 January 1962 Stenvall
3017887 January 1962 Heyer
3061936 November 1962 Dobbeleer
3073310 January 1963 Mocarski
3109588 November 1963 Polhemus et al.
3294083 December 1966 Alderson
3367326 February 1968 Frazier
3439256 April 1969 Kahne
3577160 May 1971 White
3614950 October 1971 Rabey
3644825 February 1972 Davis, Jr. et al.
3674014 July 1972 Tillander
3702935 November 1972 Carey et al.
3704707 December 1972 Halloran
3821469 June 1974 Whetstone et al.
3867943 February 1975 Nordin
3868565 February 1975 Kuipers
3941127 March 2, 1976 Froning
3963028 June 15, 1976 Cooley et al.
3983474 September 28, 1976 Kuipers
4017858 April 12, 1977 Kuipers
4037592 July 26, 1977 Kronner
4052620 October 4, 1977 Brunnett
4054881 October 18, 1977 Raab
4117337 September 26, 1978 Staats
4173228 November 6, 1979 Van Steenwyk et al.
4182312 January 8, 1980 Mushabac
4202349 May 13, 1980 Jones
4228799 October 21, 1980 Anichkov et al.
4256112 March 17, 1981 Kopf et al.
4262306 April 14, 1981 Renner
4287809 September 8, 1981 Egli et al.
4298874 November 3, 1981 Kuipers
4314251 February 2, 1982 Raab
4317078 February 23, 1982 Weed et al.
4319136 March 9, 1982 Jinkins
4328548 May 4, 1982 Crow et al.
4328813 May 11, 1982 Ray
4339953 July 20, 1982 Iwasaki
4341220 July 27, 1982 Perry
4346384 August 24, 1982 Raab
4358856 November 9, 1982 Stivender et al.
4368536 January 11, 1983 Pfeiler
4396885 August 2, 1983 Constant
4396945 August 2, 1983 DiMatteo et al.
4403321 September 6, 1983 Kruger
4418422 November 29, 1983 Richter et al.
4419012 December 6, 1983 Stephenson et al.
4422041 December 20, 1983 Lienau
4431005 February 14, 1984 McCormick
4485815 December 4, 1984 Amplatz et al.
4506676 March 26, 1985 Duska
4543959 October 1, 1985 Sepponen
4548208 October 22, 1985 Niemi
4571834 February 25, 1986 Fraser et al.
4572198 February 25, 1986 Codrington
4583538 April 22, 1986 Onik et al.
4584577 April 22, 1986 Temple
4608977 September 2, 1986 Brown
4613866 September 23, 1986 Blood
4617925 October 21, 1986 Laitinen
4618978 October 21, 1986 Cosman
4621628 November 11, 1986 Brudermann
4625718 December 2, 1986 Olerud et al.
4638798 January 27, 1987 Shelden et al.
4642786 February 10, 1987 Hansen
4645343 February 24, 1987 Stockdale et al.
4649504 March 10, 1987 Krouglicof et al.
4651732 March 24, 1987 Frederick
4653509 March 31, 1987 Oloff et al.
4659971 April 21, 1987 Suzuki et al.
4660970 April 28, 1987 Ferrano
4672306 June 9, 1987 Thong
4673352 June 16, 1987 Hansen
4688037 August 18, 1987 Krieg
4701049 October 20, 1987 Beckman et al.
4705395 November 10, 1987 Hageniers
4705401 November 10, 1987 Addleman et al.
4706665 November 17, 1987 Gouda
4709156 November 24, 1987 Murphy et al.
4710708 December 1, 1987 Rorden et al.
4719419 January 12, 1988 Dawley
4722056 January 26, 1988 Roberts et al.
4722336 February 2, 1988 Kim et al.
4723544 February 9, 1988 Moore et al.
4727565 February 23, 1988 Ericson
RE32619 March 8, 1988 Damadian
4733969 March 29, 1988 Case et al.
4737032 April 12, 1988 Addleman et al.
4737794 April 12, 1988 Jones
4737921 April 12, 1988 Goldwasser et al.
4742356 May 3, 1988 Kuipers
4742815 May 10, 1988 Ninan et al.
4743770 May 10, 1988 Lee
4743771 May 10, 1988 Sacks et al.
4745290 May 17, 1988 Frankel et al.
4750487 June 14, 1988 Zanetti
4753528 June 28, 1988 Hines et al.
4761072 August 2, 1988 Pryor
4764016 August 16, 1988 Johansson
4771787 September 20, 1988 Wurster et al.
4779212 October 18, 1988 Levy
4782239 November 1, 1988 Hirose et al.
4788481 November 29, 1988 Niwa
4791934 December 20, 1988 Brunnett
4793355 December 27, 1988 Crum et al.
4794262 December 27, 1988 Sato et al.
4797907 January 10, 1989 Anderton
4803976 February 14, 1989 Frigg et al.
4804261 February 14, 1989 Kirschen
4805615 February 21, 1989 Carol
4809694 March 7, 1989 Ferrara
4821200 April 11, 1989 Oberg
4821206 April 11, 1989 Arora
4821731 April 18, 1989 Martinelli et al.
4822163 April 18, 1989 Schmidt
4825091 April 25, 1989 Breyer et al.
4829373 May 9, 1989 Leberl et al.
4836778 June 6, 1989 Baumrind et al.
4838265 June 13, 1989 Cosman et al.
4841967 June 27, 1989 Chang et al.
4845771 July 4, 1989 Wislocki et al.
4849692 July 18, 1989 Blood
4860331 August 22, 1989 Williams et al.
4862893 September 5, 1989 Martinelli
4869247 September 26, 1989 Howard, III et al.
4875165 October 17, 1989 Fencil et al.
4875478 October 24, 1989 Chen
4884566 December 5, 1989 Mountz et al.
4889526 December 26, 1989 Rauscher et al.
4896673 January 30, 1990 Rose et al.
4905698 March 6, 1990 Strohl, Jr. et al.
4923459 May 8, 1990 Nambu
4931056 June 5, 1990 Ghajar et al.
4945305 July 31, 1990 Blood
4945914 August 7, 1990 Allen
4951653 August 28, 1990 Fry et al.
4955891 September 11, 1990 Carol
4961422 October 9, 1990 Marchosky et al.
4977655 December 18, 1990 Martinelli
4989608 February 5, 1991 Ratner
4991579 February 12, 1991 Allen
5002058 March 26, 1991 Martinelli
5005592 April 9, 1991 Cartmell
5013317 May 7, 1991 Cole et al.
5016639 May 21, 1991 Allen
5017139 May 21, 1991 Mushabac
5027818 July 2, 1991 Bova et al.
5030196 July 9, 1991 Inoue
5030222 July 9, 1991 Calandruccio et al.
5031203 July 9, 1991 Trecha
5042486 August 27, 1991 Pfeiler et al.
5047036 September 10, 1991 Koutrouvelis
5050608 September 24, 1991 Watanabe et al.
5054492 October 8, 1991 Scribner et al.
5057095 October 15, 1991 Fabian
5059789 October 22, 1991 Salcudean
5078140 January 7, 1992 Kwoh
5079699 January 7, 1992 Tuy et al.
5086401 February 4, 1992 Glassman et al.
5094241 March 10, 1992 Allen
5097839 March 24, 1992 Allen
5098426 March 24, 1992 Sklar et al.
5099845 March 31, 1992 Besz et al.
5099846 March 31, 1992 Hardy
5105829 April 21, 1992 Fabian et al.
5107839 April 28, 1992 Houdek et al.
5107843 April 28, 1992 Aarnio et al.
5107862 April 28, 1992 Fabian et al.
5109194 April 28, 1992 Cantaloube
5119817 June 9, 1992 Allen
5142930 September 1, 1992 Allen et al.
5143076 September 1, 1992 Hardy et al.
5152288 October 6, 1992 Hoenig et al.
5160337 November 3, 1992 Cosman
5161536 November 10, 1992 Vilkomerson et al.
5178164 January 12, 1993 Allen
5178621 January 12, 1993 Cook et al.
5186174 February 16, 1993 Schlöndorff et al.
5187475 February 16, 1993 Wagener et al.
5188126 February 23, 1993 Fabian et al.
5190059 March 2, 1993 Fabian et al.
5193106 March 9, 1993 DeSena
5197476 March 30, 1993 Nowacki et al.
5197965 March 30, 1993 Cherry et al.
5198768 March 30, 1993 Keren
5198877 March 30, 1993 Schulz
5207681 May 4, 1993 Ghadjar et al.
5207688 May 4, 1993 Carol
5211164 May 18, 1993 Allen
5211165 May 18, 1993 Dumoulin et al.
5211176 May 18, 1993 Ishiguro et al.
5212720 May 18, 1993 Landi et al.
5214615 May 25, 1993 Bauer
5219351 June 15, 1993 Teubner et al.
5222499 June 29, 1993 Allen et al.
5224049 June 29, 1993 Mushabac
5228442 July 20, 1993 Imran
5230338 July 27, 1993 Allen et al.
5230623 July 27, 1993 Guthrie et al.
5233990 August 10, 1993 Barnea
5237996 August 24, 1993 Waldman et al.
5249581 October 5, 1993 Horbal et al.
5251127 October 5, 1993 Raab
5251635 October 12, 1993 Dumoulin et al.
5253647 October 19, 1993 Takahashi et al.
5255680 October 26, 1993 Darrow et al.
5257636 November 2, 1993 White
5257998 November 2, 1993 Ota et al.
5261404 November 16, 1993 Mick et al.
5265610 November 30, 1993 Darrow et al.
5265611 November 30, 1993 Hoenig et al.
5269759 December 14, 1993 Hernandez et al.
5271400 December 21, 1993 Dumoulin et al.
5273025 December 28, 1993 Sakiyama et al.
5274551 December 28, 1993 Corby, Jr.
5279309 January 18, 1994 Taylor et al.
5285787 February 15, 1994 Machida
5291199 March 1, 1994 Overman et al.
5291889 March 8, 1994 Kenet et al.
5295483 March 22, 1994 Nowacki et al.
5297549 March 29, 1994 Beatty et al.
5299253 March 29, 1994 Wessels
5299254 March 29, 1994 Dancer et al.
5299288 March 29, 1994 Glassman et al.
5300080 April 5, 1994 Clayman et al.
5305091 April 19, 1994 Gelbart et al.
5305203 April 19, 1994 Raab
5306271 April 26, 1994 Zinreich et al.
5307072 April 26, 1994 Jones, Jr.
5309913 May 10, 1994 Kormos et al.
5315630 May 24, 1994 Sturm et al.
5316024 May 31, 1994 Hirschi et al.
5318025 June 7, 1994 Dumoulin et al.
5320111 June 14, 1994 Livingston
5325728 July 5, 1994 Zimmerman et al.
5325873 July 5, 1994 Hirschi et al.
5329944 July 19, 1994 Fabian et al.
5330485 July 19, 1994 Clayman et al.
5333168 July 26, 1994 Fernandes et al.
5353795 October 11, 1994 Souza et al.
5353800 October 11, 1994 Pohndorf et al.
5353807 October 11, 1994 DeMarco
5359417 October 25, 1994 Muller et al.
5368030 November 29, 1994 Zinreich et al.
5371778 December 6, 1994 Yanof et al.
5375596 December 27, 1994 Twiss et al.
5377678 January 3, 1995 Dumoulin et al.
5383454 January 24, 1995 Bucholz
5385146 January 31, 1995 Goldreyer
5385148 January 31, 1995 Lesh et al.
5386828 February 7, 1995 Owens et al.
5389101 February 14, 1995 Heilbrun et al.
5391199 February 21, 1995 Ben-Haim
5394457 February 28, 1995 Leibinger et al.
5394875 March 7, 1995 Lewis et al.
5397329 March 14, 1995 Allen
5398684 March 21, 1995 Hardy
5399146 March 21, 1995 Nowacki et al.
5400384 March 21, 1995 Fernandes et al.
5402801 April 4, 1995 Taylor
5408409 April 18, 1995 Glassman et al.
5413573 May 9, 1995 Koivukangas
5417210 May 23, 1995 Funda et al.
5419325 May 30, 1995 Dumoulin et al.
5423334 June 13, 1995 Jordan
5425367 June 20, 1995 Shapiro et al.
5425382 June 20, 1995 Golden et al.
5426683 June 20, 1995 O'Farrell, Jr. et al.
5426687 June 20, 1995 Goodall et al.
5427097 June 27, 1995 Depp
5429132 July 4, 1995 Guy et al.
5433198 July 18, 1995 Desai
RE35025 August 22, 1995 Anderton
5437212 August 1, 1995 Thompson et al.
5437277 August 1, 1995 Dumoulin et al.
5443066 August 22, 1995 Dumoulin et al.
5443489 August 22, 1995 Ben-Haim
5444756 August 22, 1995 Pai et al.
5445144 August 29, 1995 Wodicka et al.
5445150 August 29, 1995 Dumoulin et al.
5445166 August 29, 1995 Taylor
5446548 August 29, 1995 Gerig et al.
5447154 September 5, 1995 Cinquin et al.
5448610 September 5, 1995 Yamamoto et al.
5453686 September 26, 1995 Anderson
5456718 October 10, 1995 Szymaitis
5457641 October 10, 1995 Zimmer et al.
5464446 November 7, 1995 Dreessen et al.
5469847 November 28, 1995 Zinreich et al.
5474558 December 12, 1995 Neubardt
5478341 December 26, 1995 Cook et al.
5478343 December 26, 1995 Ritter
5480422 January 2, 1996 Ben-Haim
5480439 January 2, 1996 Bisek et al.
5483961 January 16, 1996 Kelly et al.
5485849 January 23, 1996 Panescu et al.
5487391 January 30, 1996 Panescu
5487729 January 30, 1996 Avellanet et al.
5487757 January 30, 1996 Truckai et al.
5490196 February 6, 1996 Rudich et al.
5494034 February 27, 1996 Schlondorff et al.
5503416 April 2, 1996 Aoki et al.
5513637 May 7, 1996 Twiss et al.
5514146 May 7, 1996 Lam et al.
5515160 May 7, 1996 Schulz et al.
5517990 May 21, 1996 Kalfas et al.
5531227 July 2, 1996 Schneider
5531520 July 2, 1996 Grimson et al.
5542938 August 6, 1996 Avellanet et al.
5543951 August 6, 1996 Moehrmann
5546940 August 20, 1996 Panescu et al.
5546949 August 20, 1996 Frazin et al.
5546951 August 20, 1996 Ben-Haim
5551429 September 3, 1996 Fitzpatrick et al.
5558091 September 24, 1996 Acker et al.
5564437 October 15, 1996 Bainville et al.
5566681 October 22, 1996 Manwaring et al.
5568384 October 22, 1996 Robb et al.
5568809 October 29, 1996 Ben-haim
5572999 November 12, 1996 Funda et al.
5573533 November 12, 1996 Strul
5575192 November 19, 1996 Eggert
5575794 November 19, 1996 Walus et al.
5575798 November 19, 1996 Koutrouvelis
5383454 January 24, 1995 Bucholz
5583909 December 10, 1996 Hanover
5588430 December 31, 1996 Bova et al.
5590215 December 31, 1996 Allen
5591207 January 7, 1997 Coleman
5592939 January 14, 1997 Martinelli
5595193 January 21, 1997 Walus et al.
5596228 January 21, 1997 Anderton et al.
5600330 February 4, 1997 Blood
5603318 February 18, 1997 Heilbrun et al.
5611025 March 11, 1997 Lorensen et al.
5617462 April 1, 1997 Spratt
5617857 April 8, 1997 Chader et al.
5619261 April 8, 1997 Anderton
5622169 April 22, 1997 Golden et al.
5622170 April 22, 1997 Schulz
5627873 May 6, 1997 Hanover et al.
5628315 May 13, 1997 Vilsmeier et al.
5630431 May 20, 1997 Taylor
5636644 June 10, 1997 Hart et al.
5638819 June 17, 1997 Manwaring et al.
5640170 June 17, 1997 Anderson
5642395 June 24, 1997 Anderton et al.
5643268 July 1, 1997 Vilsmeier et al.
5645065 July 8, 1997 Shapiro et al.
5645545 July 8, 1997 Bryant
5646524 July 8, 1997 Gilboa
5647361 July 15, 1997 Damadian
5662111 September 2, 1997 Cosman
5664001 September 2, 1997 Tachibana et al.
5674296 October 7, 1997 Bryan et al.
5676673 October 14, 1997 Ferre et al.
5681260 October 28, 1997 Ueda et al.
5682886 November 4, 1997 Delp et al.
5682890 November 4, 1997 Kormos et al.
5690108 November 25, 1997 Chakeres
D387427 December 9, 1997 Bucholz et al.
5694945 December 9, 1997 Ben-Haim
5695500 December 9, 1997 Taylor et al.
5695501 December 9, 1997 Carol et al.
5697377 December 16, 1997 Wittkampf
5702406 December 30, 1997 Vilsmeier et al.
5711299 January 27, 1998 Manwaring et al.
5713946 February 3, 1998 Ben-Haim
5715822 February 10, 1998 Watkins et al.
5715836 February 10, 1998 Kliegis et al.
5718241 February 17, 1998 Ben-Haim et al.
5727552 March 17, 1998 Ryan
5727553 March 17, 1998 Saad
5729129 March 17, 1998 Acker
5730129 March 24, 1998 Darrow et al.
5730130 March 24, 1998 Fitzpatrick et al.
5732703 March 31, 1998 Kalfas et al.
5735278 April 7, 1998 Hoult et al.
5738096 April 14, 1998 Ben-Haim
5740802 April 21, 1998 Nafis et al.
5741214 April 21, 1998 Ouchi et al.
5742394 April 21, 1998 Hansen
5744953 April 28, 1998 Hansen
5748767 May 5, 1998 Raab
5749362 May 12, 1998 Funda et al.
5749835 May 12, 1998 Glantz
5752513 May 19, 1998 Acker et al.
5755725 May 26, 1998 Druais
RE35816 June 2, 1998 Schulz
5758667 June 2, 1998 Slettenmark
5762064 June 9, 1998 Polvani
5767669 June 16, 1998 Hansen et al.
5767960 June 16, 1998 Orman
5769789 June 23, 1998 Wang et al.
5769843 June 23, 1998 Abela et al.
5769861 June 23, 1998 Vilsmeier
5772594 June 30, 1998 Barrick
5775322 July 7, 1998 Silverstein et al.
5776064 July 7, 1998 Kalfas et al.
5782765 July 21, 1998 Jonkman
5787886 August 4, 1998 Kelly et al.
5792055 August 11, 1998 McKinnon
5795294 August 18, 1998 Luber et al.
5797849 August 25, 1998 Vesely et al.
5799055 August 25, 1998 Peshkin et al.
5799099 August 25, 1998 Wang et al.
5800352 September 1, 1998 Ferre et al.
5800535 September 1, 1998 Howard, III
5802719 September 8, 1998 O'Farrell, Jr. et al.
5803089 September 8, 1998 Ferre et al.
5807252 September 15, 1998 Hassfeld et al.
5810008 September 22, 1998 Dekel et al.
5810728 September 22, 1998 Kuhn
5810735 September 22, 1998 Halperin et al.
5810828 September 22, 1998 Lightman et al.
5820553 October 13, 1998 Hughes
5823192 October 20, 1998 Kalend et al.
5823958 October 20, 1998 Truppe
5828725 October 27, 1998 Levinson
5828770 October 27, 1998 Leis et al.
5829444 November 3, 1998 Ferre et al.
5831260 November 3, 1998 Hansen
5833608 November 10, 1998 Acker
5834759 November 10, 1998 Glossop
5836954 November 17, 1998 Heilbrun et al.
5840024 November 24, 1998 Taniguchi et al.
5840025 November 24, 1998 Ben-Haim
5843076 December 1, 1998 Webster, Jr. et al.
5848967 December 15, 1998 Cosman
5851183 December 22, 1998 Bucholz
5865846 February 2, 1999 Bryan et al.
5868674 February 9, 1999 Glowinski et al.
5868675 February 9, 1999 Henrion et al.
5871445 February 16, 1999 Bucholz
5871455 February 16, 1999 Ueno
5871487 February 16, 1999 Warner et al.
5873822 February 23, 1999 Ferre et al.
5882304 March 16, 1999 Ehnholm et al.
5884410 March 23, 1999 Prinz
5889834 March 30, 1999 Vilsmeier et al.
5891034 April 6, 1999 Bucholz
5891157 April 6, 1999 Day et al.
5904691 May 18, 1999 Barnett et al.
5907395 May 25, 1999 Schulz et al.
5913820 June 22, 1999 Bladen et al.
5920395 July 6, 1999 Schulz
5921992 July 13, 1999 Costales et al.
5923727 July 13, 1999 Navab
5928248 July 27, 1999 Acker
5938603 August 17, 1999 Ponzi
5938694 August 17, 1999 Jaraczewski et al.
5947980 September 7, 1999 Jensen et al.
5947981 September 7, 1999 Cosman
5950629 September 14, 1999 Taylor et al.
5951475 September 14, 1999 Gueziec et al.
5951571 September 14, 1999 Audette
5954647 September 21, 1999 Bova et al.
5957844 September 28, 1999 Dekel et al.
5964796 October 12, 1999 Imran
5967980 October 19, 1999 Ferre et al.
5967982 October 19, 1999 Barnett
5968047 October 19, 1999 Reed
5971997 October 26, 1999 Guthrie et al.
5976156 November 2, 1999 Taylor et al.
5980535 November 9, 1999 Barnett et al.
5983126 November 9, 1999 Wittkampf
5987349 November 16, 1999 Schulz
5987960 November 23, 1999 Messner et al.
5999837 December 7, 1999 Messner et al.
5999840 December 7, 1999 Grimson et al.
6001130 December 14, 1999 Bryan et al.
6006126 December 21, 1999 Cosman
6006127 December 21, 1999 Van Der Brug et al.
6013087 January 11, 2000 Adams et al.
6014580 January 11, 2000 Blume et al.
6016439 January 18, 2000 Acker
6019725 February 1, 2000 Vesely et al.
6021343 February 1, 2000 Foley et al.
6024408 February 15, 2000 Bello et al.
6050724 April 18, 2000 Schmitz et al.
6059718 May 9, 2000 Taniguchi et al.
6063022 May 16, 2000 Ben-Haim
6071288 June 6, 2000 Carol et al.
6073043 June 6, 2000 Schneider
6076008 June 13, 2000 Bucholz
6096050 August 1, 2000 Audette
6104944 August 15, 2000 Martinelli
6118845 September 12, 2000 Simon et al.
6122538 September 19, 2000 Sliwa, Jr. et al.
6122541 September 19, 2000 Cosman et al.
6131396 October 17, 2000 Duerr et al.
6139183 October 31, 2000 Graumann
6147480 November 14, 2000 Osadchy et al.
6149592 November 21, 2000 Yanof et al.
6156067 December 5, 2000 Bryan et al.
6161032 December 12, 2000 Acker
6165181 December 26, 2000 Heilbrun et al.
6167296 December 26, 2000 Shahidi
6172499 January 9, 2001 Ashe
6175756 January 16, 2001 Ferre et al.
6178345 January 23, 2001 Vilsmeier et al.
6194639 February 27, 2001 Botella et al.
6201387 March 13, 2001 Govari
6203497 March 20, 2001 Dekel et al.
6211666 April 3, 2001 Acker
6223067 April 24, 2001 Vilsmeier et al.
6233476 May 15, 2001 Strommer et al.
6236875 May 22, 2001 Bucholz et al.
6246231 June 12, 2001 Ashe
6259942 July 10, 2001 Westermann et al.
6273896 August 14, 2001 Franck et al.
6285902 September 4, 2001 Kienzle, III et al.
6298262 October 2, 2001 Franck et al.
6314310 November 6, 2001 Ben-Haim et al.
6332089 December 18, 2001 Acker et al.
6341231 January 22, 2002 Ferre et al.
6351659 February 26, 2002 Vilsmeier
6381485 April 30, 2002 Hunter et al.
6424856 July 23, 2002 Vilsmeier et al.
6427314 August 6, 2002 Acker
6428547 August 6, 2002 Vilsmeier et al.
6434415 August 13, 2002 Foley et al.
6434507 August 13, 2002 Clayton
6437567 August 20, 2002 Schenck et al.
6445943 September 3, 2002 Ferre et al.
6470207 October 22, 2002 Simon et al.
6474341 November 5, 2002 Hunter et al.
6478802 November 12, 2002 Kienzle, III et al.
6484049 November 19, 2002 Seeley et al.
6490475 December 3, 2002 Seeley et al.
6493573 December 10, 2002 Martinelli et al.
6498944 December 24, 2002 Ben-Haim et al.
6516046 February 4, 2003 Frohlich et al.
6527443 March 4, 2003 Vilsmeier et al.
6551325 April 22, 2003 Neubauer et al.
6584174 June 24, 2003 Schubert et al.
6609022 August 19, 2003 Vilsmeier et al.
6611700 August 26, 2003 Vilsmeier et al.
6640128 October 28, 2003 Vilsmeier et al.
6694162 February 17, 2004 Hartlep
6701179 March 2, 2004 Martinelli et al.
RE43328 April 24, 2012 Foley et al.
RE45484 April 21, 2015 Foley et al.
20010007918 July 12, 2001 Vilsmeier et al.
20020095081 July 18, 2002 Vilsmeier
20040024309 February 5, 2004 Ferre et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
964149 March 1975 CA
1336451 January 1988 CA
1336451 July 1995 CA
3042343 June 1982 DE
3508730 September 1986 DE
3717871 December 1988 DE
3831278 March 1989 DE
3838011 July 1989 DE
4213426 October 1992 DE
4225112 December 1993 DE
4233978 April 1994 DE
19715202 October 1998 DE
19751761 October 1998 DE
19832296 February 1999 DE
19747427 May 1999 DE
10085137 November 2002 DE
0062941 October 1982 EP
0119660 September 1984 EP
0155857 September 1985 EP
0 326 768 December 1988 EP
0319844 June 1989 EP
0326768 August 1989 EP
0350996 January 1990 EP
0 501 993 November 1990 EP
0419729 April 1991 EP
0427358 May 1991 EP
0 469 966 July 1991 EP
0456103 November 1991 EP
0469966 February 1992 EP
0501993 September 1992 EP
0581704 February 1994 EP
0651968 May 1995 EP
0655138 May 1995 EP
0894473 February 1999 EP
0908146 April 1999 EP
0930046 July 1999 EP
2417970 September 1979 FR
2618211 November 1991 FR
2094590 September 1982 GB
2164856 April 1986 GB
62327 June 1983 JP
61-94639 October 1984 JP
63240851 October 1988 JP
2765738 April 1991 JP
3267054 November 1991 JP
WO-8809151 December 1988 WO
WO-8905123 June 1989 WO
WO 90/05494 May 1990 WO
WO-9005494 May 1990 WO
WO 91/04711 April 1991 WO
WO-9103982 April 1991 WO
WO-9104711 April 1991 WO
WO 91/07726 May 1991 WO
WO-9107726 May 1991 WO
WO-9203090 March 1992 WO
WO 92/06645 April 1992 WO
WO-9206645 April 1992 WO
WO-9404938 March 1994 WO
WO-9423647 October 1994 WO
WO-9424933 November 1994 WO
WO-9507055 March 1995 WO
WO 96/11624 April 1996 WO
WO-9611624 April 1996 WO
WO-9632059 October 1996 WO
WO97/15234 May 1997 WO
WO-9715234 May 1997 WO
WO-9736192 October 1997 WO
WO-9749453 December 1997 WO
WO-9808554 March 1998 WO
WO-9838908 September 1998 WO
WO-9915097 April 1999 WO
WO-9921498 May 1999 WO
WO-9923956 May 1999 WO
WO-9926549 June 1999 WO
WO-9929253 June 1999 WO
WO-9933406 July 1999 WO
WO-9937208 July 1999 WO
WO-9938449 August 1999 WO
WO-99/27839 October 1999 WO
WO-9952094 October 1999 WO
WO-9960939 December 1999 WO
WO-0130437 May 2001 WO
Other references
  • Germano, Isabelle M., “The NeuroStation System for Image-Guided, Frameless Stereotaxy,” Neurosurgery, vol. 37, No. 2 Aug. 1995, pp. 348-350.
  • Alignment Procedure for the PixSys Two-Emitter Offset Probe for the SAC GP-8-3d Sonic Digitizer, PixSys, Jul. 2, 1992, pp. 1-4.
  • Bucholz et al., Richard D. Intraoperative localization using a three dimensional optical digitizer Proceeding of Clinical Applications of Modern Imaging Technology, SPIE vol. 1894 (Jan. 19, 1993), pp. 312-322.
  • Adams et al., Computer-Assisted Surgery, IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, pp. 43-51, (May 1990).
  • Adams, L., et al., “Aide Au Reperage Tridimensionnel Pour La Chirurgie de la Base du Crane,” Innov. Tech. Biol. Med., vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 409-424, 1992.
  • Barrick et al., “Prophylactic Intramedullary Fixation of the Tibia for Stress Fracture in a Professional Athlete,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 241-244 (1992).
  • Barrick et al., “Technical Difficulties with the Brooker-Wills Nail in Acute Fractures of the Femur,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 144-150 (1990).
  • Barrick, “Distal Locking Screw Insertion Using a Cannulated Drill Bit: Technical Note,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 7, No. 3, 1993, pp. 248-251.
  • Batnitzky et al., “Three-Dimensinal Computer Reconstructions of Brain Lesions from Surface Contours Provided by Computed Tomography: A Prospectus,” Neurosurgery, vol. 11, No. 1, Part 1, 1982, pp. 73-84.
  • Benzel et al., “Magnetic Source Imaging: a Review of the Magnes System of Biomagnetic Technologies Incorporated,” Neurosurgery, vol. 33, No. 2 (Aug. 1993), pp. 252-259.
  • Bergstrom et al. Stereotaxic Computed Tomography, Am. J. Roentgenol, vol. 127 pp. 167-170 (1976).
  • Bouazza-Marouf et al.; “Robotic-Assisted Internal Fixation of Femoral Fractures”, IMECHE., pp. 51-58 (1995).
  • Brack et al., “Accurate X-ray Based Navigation in Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery,” CAR '98, pp. 716-722.
  • Brown, R., M.D., A Stereotactic Head Frame for Use with CT Body Scanners, Investigative Radiology .Copyrgt. J.B. Lippincott Company, pp. 300-304 (Jul.-Aug. 1979).
  • Bryan, “Bryan Cervical Disc System Single Level Surgical Technique”, Spinal Dynamics, 2002, pp. 1-33.
  • Bucholz et al., “Variables affecting the accuracy of stereotactic localizationusing computerized tomography,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 79, Nov. 1993, pp. 667-673.
  • Bucholz et al., Richard D.; “Clinical Applications of Modern Imaging Technology,” SPIE vol. 1894; pp. 312-322; Jan. 19, 1993.
  • Bucholz, R.D., et al. Image-guided surgical techniques for infections and trauma of the central nervous system, Neurosurg. Clinics of N.A., vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 187-200 (1996).
  • Bucholz, R.D., et al., A Comparison of Sonic Digitizers Versus Light Emitting Diode-Based Localization, Interactive Image-Guided Neurosurgery, Chaster 16, pp. 179-200 (1993).
  • Bucholz, R.D., et al., Intraoperative localization using a three dimensional optical digitizer, SPIE—The Intl. Soc. for Opt. Eng., vol. 1894, pp. 312-322 (Jan. 17-19, 1993).
  • Bucholz, R.D., et al., Intraoperative Ultrasonic Brain Shift Monitor and Analysis, Stealth Station Marketing Brochure (2 pages) (undated).
  • Bucholz, R.D., et al., The Correction of Stereotactic Inaccuracy Caused by Brain Shift Using an Intraoperative Ultrasound Device, First Joint Conference, Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medical Robotics andComputer-Assisted Surgery, Grenoble, France, pp. 459-466 (Mar. 19-22, 1997).
  • Champleboux et al., “Accurate Calibration of Cameras and Range Imaging Sensors: the NPBS Method,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nice, France, May 1992.
  • Champleboux, “Utilisation de Fonctions Splines pour la Mise au Point D'un Capteur Tridimensionnel sans Contact,” Quelsues Applications Medicales, Jul. 1991.
  • Cinquin et al., “Computer Assisted Medical Interventions,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, May/Jun. 1995, pp. 254-263.
  • Cinquin et al., “Computer Assisted Medical Interventions,” International Advanced Robotics Programme, Sep. 1989, pp. 63-65.
  • Clarysse et al., “A Computer-Assisted System for 3-D Frameless Localization in Stereotaxic MRI,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 10, No. 4, Dec. 1991, pp. 523-529.
  • Cutting M.D. et al., Optical Tracking of Bone Fragments During Craniofacial Surgery, Second Annual International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, pp. 221-225, (Nov. 1995).
  • Feldmar et al., “3D-2D Projective Registration of Free-Form Curves and Surfaces,” Rapport de recherche recherche (Inria Sophia Antipolis), 1994, pp. 1-44.
  • Foley et al., “Fundamentals of Interactive Computer Graphics,” The Systems Programming Series, Chapter 7, Jul. 1984, pp. 245-266.
  • Foley et al., “Image-guided Intraoperative Spinal Localization,” Intraoperative Neuroprotection, Chapter 19, 1996, pp. 325-340.
  • Foley, “The StealthStation: Three-Dimensional Image-Interactive Guidance for the Spine Surgeon,” Spinal Frontiers, Apr. 1996, pp. 7-9.
  • Friets, E.M., et al. A Frameless Stereotaxic Operating Microscope for Neurosurgery, IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng., vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 608-617 (Jul. 1989).
  • Gallen, C.C., et al., Intracranial Neurosurgery Guided by Functional Imaging, Surg. Neurol., vol. 42, pp. 523-530 (1994).
  • Galloway, R.L., et al., Interactive Image-Guided Neurosurgery, IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng., vol. 89, No. 12, pp. 1226-1231 (1992).
  • Galloway, R.L., Jr. et al, Optical localization for interactive, image-guided neurosurgery, SPIE, vol. 2164, pp. 137-145 (undated.
  • Gildenberg et al., “Calculation of Stereotactic Coordinates from the Computed Tomographic Scan,” Neurosurgery, vol. 10, No. 5, May 1982, pp. 580-586.
  • Gomez, C.R., et al., Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound Following Closed Head Injury: Vasospasm or Vasoparalysis?, Surg. Neurol., vol. 35, pp. 30-35 (1991).
  • Gonzalez, “Digital Image Fundamentals,” Digital Image Processing, Second Edition, 1987, pp. 52-54.
  • Gottesfeld Brown et al., “Registration of Planar Film Radiographs with Computer Tomography,” Proceedings of MMBIA, Jun. 1996, pp. 42-51.
  • Grimson, W.E.L., An Automatic Registration Method for Frameless Stereotaxy, Image Guided Surgery, and enhanced Reality Visualization, IEEE, pp. 430-436 (1994).
  • Grimson, W.E.L., et al., Virtual-reality technology is giving surgeons the equivalent of x-ray vision helping them to remove tumors more effectively, to minimize surgical wounds and to avoid damaging critical tissues, Sci. Amer., vol. 280, No. 6,pp. 62-69 (Jun. 1999).
  • Gueziec et al., “Registration of Computed Tomography Data to a Surgical Robot Using Fluoroscopy: A Feasibility Study,” Computer Science/Mathematics, Sep. 27, 1996, 6 pages.
  • Guthrie, B.L., Graphic-Interactive Cranial Surgery: The Operating Arm System, Handbook of Stereotaxy Using the CRW Apparatus, Chapter 13, pp. 193-211 (undated.
  • Hamadeh et al, “Kinematic Study of Lumbar Spine Using Functional Radiographies and 3D/2D Registration,” TIMC UMR 5525—IMAG.
  • Hamadeh et al., “Automated 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic and Fluorscopic Image Registration,” Computer Aided Surgery (1998), 3:11-19.
  • Hamadeh et al., “Towards Automatic Registration Between CT and X-ray Images: Cooperation Between 3D/2D Registration and 2D Edge Detection,” MRCAS '95, pp. 39-46.
  • Hardy, T., M.D., et al., CASS: A Program for Computer Assisted Stereotaxic Surgery, The Fifth Annual Symposium on Comptuer Applications in Medical Care, Proceedings, Nov. 1-4, 1981, IEEE, pp. 1116-1126, (1981).
  • Hatch, “Reference-Display System for the Integration of CT Scanning and the Operating Microscope,” Thesis, Thayer School of Engineering, Oct. 1984, pp. 1-189.
  • Hatch, et al., “Reference-Display System for the Integration of CT Scanning and the Operating Microscope”, Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference, Mar. 14-15, 1985, pp. 252-254.
  • Heilbrun et al., “Preliminary experience with Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) computerized tomography stereotaxic guidance system,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 59, Aug. 1983, pp. 217-222.
  • Heilbrun, M.D., Progressive Technology Applications, Neurosurgery for the Third Millenium, Chapter 15, J. Whitaker & Sons, Ltd., Amer. Assoc. of Neurol. Surgeons, pp. 191-198 (1992).
  • Heilbrun, M.P., et al., Stereotactic Localization and Guidance Using a Machine Vision Technique, Sterotact & Funct. Neurosurg., Proceed. of the Mtg. of the Amer. Soc. for Sterot. and Funct. Neurosurg. (Pittsburgh, PA) vol. 58, pp. 94-98 (1992).
  • Henderson et al., “An Accurate and Ergonomic Method of Registration for Image-guided Neurosurgery,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 18, No. 4, Jul.-Aug. 1994, pp. 273-277.
  • Hoerenz, “The Operating Microscope I. Optical Principles, Illumination Systems, and Support Systems,” Journal of Microsurgery, vol. 1, 1980, pp. 364-369.
  • Hofstetter et al., “Fluoroscopy Based Surgical Navigation—Concept and Clinical Applications,” Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 1997, pp. 956-960.
  • Horner et al., “A Comparison of CT-Stereotaxic Brain Biopsy Techniques,” Investigative Radiology, Sep.-Oct. 1984, pp. 367-373.
  • Hounsfield, “Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part 1. Description of system,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 46, No. 552, Dec. 1973, pp. 1016-1022.
  • Jacques et al., “A Computerized Microstereotactic Method to Approach, 3-Dimensionally Reconstruct, Remove and Adjuvantly Treat Small CNS Lesions,” Applied Neurophysiology, vol. 43, 1980, pp. 176-182.
  • Jacques et al., “Computerized three-dimensional stereotaxic removal of small central nervous system lesion in patients,” J. Neurosurg., vol. 53, Dec. 1980, pp. 816-820.
  • Joskowicz et al., “Computer-Aided Image-Guided Bone Fracture Surgery: Concept and Implementation,” CAR '98, pp. 710-715.
  • Kall, B., The Impact of Computer and lmgaging Technology on Stereotactic Surgery, Proceedings of the Meeting of the American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, pp. 10-22 (1987).
  • Kato, A., et al., A frameless, armless navigational system for computer-assisted neurosurgery, J. Neurosurg., vol. 74, pp. 845-849 (May 1991).
  • Kelly et al., “Computer-assisted stereotaxic laser resection of intra-axial brain neoplasms,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 64, Mar. 1986, pp. 427-439.
  • Kelly et al., “Precision Resection of Intra-Axial CNS Lesions by CT-Based Stereotactic Craniotomy and Computer Monitored CO2 Laser,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 68, 1983, pp. 1-9.
  • Kelly, P.J., Computer Assisted Stereotactic Biopsy and Volumetric Resection of Pediatric Brain Tumors, Brain Tumors in Children, Neurologic Clinics, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 317-336 (May 1991).
  • Kelly, P.J., Computer-Directed Stereotactic Resection of Brain Tumors, Neurologica Operative Atlas, vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 299-313 (1991).
  • Kelly, P.J., et al., Results of Computed Tomography-based Computer-assisted Stereotactic Resection of Metastatic Intracranial Tumors, Neurosurgery, vol. 22, No. 1, Part 1, 1988, pp. 7-17 (Jan. 1988).
  • Kelly, P.J., Stereotactic Imaging, Surgical Planning and Computer-Assisted Resection of Intracranial Lesions: Methods and Results, Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery, vol. 17, pp. 78-118, (1990).
  • Kim, W.S. et al., A Helmet Mounted Display for Telerobotics, IEEE, pp. 543-547 (1988).
  • Klimek, L., et al., Long-Term Experience with Different Types of Localization Systems in Skull-Base Surgery, Ear, Nose & Throat Surgery, Chapter 51, pp. 635-638 (undated).
  • Kosugi, Y., et al., An Articulated Neurosurgical Navigation System Using MRI and CT Images, IEEE Trans. on Biomed, Eng. vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 147-152 (Feb. 1988).
  • Kwoh, Y.S., Ph.D., et al., A New Computerized Tomographic-Aided Robotic Stereotaxis System, Robotics Age, vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 17-22 (Jun. 1985).
  • Laitinen et al., “An Adapter for Computed Tomography-Guided, Stereotaxis,” Surg. Neurol., 1985, pp. 559-566.
  • Laitinen, “Noninvasive multipurpose stereoadapter,” Neurological Research, Jun. 1987, pp. 137-141.
  • Lavallee et al, “Matching 3-D Smooth Surfaces with their 2-D Projections using 3-D Distance Maps,” SPIE, vol. 1570, Geometric Methods in Computer Vision, 1991, pp. 322-336.
  • Lavallee et al., “Computer Assisted Driving of a Needle into the Brain,” Proceedings of the International Symposium CAR '89, Computer Assisted Radiology, 1989, pp. 416-420.
  • Lavallee et al., “Computer Assisted Interventionist Imaging: The Instance of Stereotactic Brain Surgery,” North-Holland MEDINFO 89, Part 1, 1989, pp. 613-617.
  • Lavallee et al., “Computer Assisted Spine Surgery: A Technique for Accurate Transpedicular Screw Fixation Using CT Data and a 3-D Optical Localizer,” TIMC, Faculte de Medecine de Grenoble.
  • Lavallee et al., “Image guided operating robot: a clinical application in stereotactic neurosurgery,” Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE Internation Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 1992, pp. 618-624.
  • Lavallee et al., “Matching of Medical Images for Computed and Robot Assisted Surgery,” IEEE EMBS, Orlando, 1991.
  • Lavallee, “A New System for Computer Assisted Neurosurgery,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society 11th Annual International Conference, 1989, pp. 0926-0927.
  • Lavallee, “VI Adaption de la Methodologie a Quelques Applications Cliniques,” Chapitre VI, pp. 133-148.
  • Lavallee, S., et al., Computer Assisted Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction First Clinical Tests, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, pp. 11-16 (Sep. 1994).
  • Lavallee, S., et al., Computer Assisted Medical Interventions, NATO ASI Series, vol. F 60, 3d Imaging in Medic., pp. 301-312 (1990).
  • Leavitt, D.D., et al., Dynamic Field Shaping to Optimize Stereotactic Radiosurgery, I.J. Rad. Onc. Biol. Physc., vol. 21, pp. 1247-1255 (1991).
  • Leksell et al., “Stereotaxis and Tomography—A Technical Note,” ACTA Neurochirurgica, vol. 52, 1980, pp. 1-7.
  • Lemieux et al., “A Patient-to-Computed-Tomography Image Registration Method Based on Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs,” Med. Phys. 21 (11), Nov. 1994, pp. 1749-1760.
  • Levin et al., “The Brain: Integrated Three-dimensional Display of MR and PET Images,” Radiology, vol. 172, No. 3, Sep. 1989, pp. 783-789.
  • Maurer, Jr., et al., Registration of Head CT Images to Physical Space Using a Weighted Combination of Points and Surfaces, IEEE Trans. on Med. Imaging, vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 753-761 (Oct. 1998).
  • Mazier et al., “Computer-Assisted Interventionist Imaging: Application to the Vertebral Column Surgery,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 12, No. 1, 1990, pp. 0430-0431.
  • Mazier et al., Chirurgie de la Colonne Vertebrale Assistee par Ordinateur: Appication au Vissage Pediculaire, Innov. Tech. Biol. Med., vol. 11, No. 5, 1990, pp. 559-566.
  • McGirr, S., M.D., et al., Stereotactic Resection of Juvenile Pilocytic Astrocytomas of the Thalamus and Basal Ganglia, Neurosurgery, vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 447-452, (1987).
  • Merloz, et al., “Computer Assisted Spine Surgery”, Clinical Assisted Spine Surgery, No. 337, pp. 86-96.
  • Ng, W.S. et al., Robotic Surgery—A First-Hand Experience in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Surgery, IEEE Eng. in Med. and Biology, pp. 120-125 (Mar. 1993).
  • Pelizzari et al., “Accurate Three-Dimensional Registration of CT, PET, and/or MR Images of the Brain,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, Jan./Feb. 1989, pp. 20-26.
  • Pelizzari et al., “Interactive 3D Patient-Image Registration,” Information Processing in Medical Imaging, 12th International Conference, IPMI '91, Jul. 7-12, 136-141 (A.C.F. Colchester et al. eds. 1991).
  • Pelizzari et al., No. 528—“Three Dimensional Correlation of PET, CT and MRI Images,” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 28, No. 4, Apr. 1987, p. 682.
  • Penn, R.D., et al., Stereotactic Surgery with Image Processing of Computerized Tomographic Scans, Neurosurgery, vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 157-163 (Sep.-Oct. 1978).
  • Phillips et al., “Image Guided Orthopaedic Surgery Design and Analysis,” Trans Inst. MC, vol. 17, No. 5, 1995, pp. 251-264.
  • Potamianos et al., “Intra-Operative Imaging Guidance for Keyhole Surgery Methodology and Calibration,” First International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Sep. 22-24, 1994, pp. 98-104.
  • Reinhardt et al., “CT-Guided ‘Real Time’ Stereotaxy,” ACTA Neurochirurgica, 1989.
  • Reinhardt, H., et al., A Computer Assisted Device for Intraoperative CT-Correlated Localization of Brain Tumors, pp. 51-58 (1988).
  • Reinhardt, H.F. et al., Sonic Stereometry in Microsurgical Procedures for Deep Seated Brain Tumors and Vascular Malformations, Neurosurgery, vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 51-57 (Jan. 1993).
  • Reinhardt H.F., et al., Mikrochirugische Entfernung tiefliegender Gefa.beta.mi.beta.bildungen mit Hilfe der Sonar-Stereometrie (Microsurgical Removal of Deep-Seated Vascular Malformations Using Sonar Stereometry). Ultraschall in Med. 12, pp. 80-83(1991).
  • Reinhardt, Hans. F., Neuronavigation: A Ten Year Review, Neurosurgery, pp. 329 341 (undated).
  • Roberts et al., “A frameless stereotaxic integration of computerized tomographic imaging and the operating microscope,” J. Neurosurg., vol. 65, Oct. 1986, pp. 545-549.
  • Rosenbaum et al., “Computerized Tomography Guided Stereotaxis: A New Approach,” Applied Neurophysiology, vol. 43, No. 3-5, 1980, pp. 172-173.
  • Sautot, “Vissage Pediculaire Assiste Par Ordinateur,” Sep. 20, 1994.
  • Schueler et al., “Correction of Image Intensifier Distortion for Three-Dimensional X-Ray Angiography,” SPIE Medical Imaging 1995, vol. 2432, pp. 272-279.
  • Selvik et al., “A Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric System,” Acta Radiologica Diagnosis, 1983, pp. 343-352.
  • Simon, D.A., Accuracy Validation in Image-Guided Orthopaedic Surgery, Second Annual Intl. Symp. on Med. Rob. an Comp-Assisted surgery, MRCAS '95, pp. 185-192 (undated).
  • Skip Jacques, et al., “A Computerized Microstereotactic Method to Approach, 3-Dimensionally Reconstruct, Remove and Adjuvantly Treat Small CNS Lesions,” Meeting of the Amer. Soc. Stereotactic & Functional Neurosurgery, Houston 1980, Appl.Neurophysiol. 43: 176-182 (1980).
  • Smith et al., “Computer Methods for Improved Diagnostic Image Display Applied to Stereotactic Neurosurgery,” Automedical, vol. 14, 1992, pp. 371-382 (4 unnumbered pages).
  • Smith, K.R., et al. Multimodality Image Analysis and Display Methods for Improved Tumor Localization in Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Annul Intl. Conf. of the IEEE Eng. in Med. and Biol. Soc., vol. 13, No. 1, p. 210 (1991).
  • Tan, K., Ph.D., et al., A frameless stereotactic approach to neurosurgical planning based on retrospective patient-image registration, J Neurosurgy, vol. 79, pp. 296-303 (Aug. 1993).
  • Thompson, et al., A System for Anatomical and Functional Mapping of the Human Thalamus, Computers and Biomedical Research, vol. 10, pp. 9-24 (1977).
  • Trobraugh, J.W., et al., Frameless Stereotactic Ultrasonography: Method and Applications, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 235-246 (1994).
  • Viant et al., “A Computer Assisted Orthopaedic System for Distal Locking of Intramedullary Nails,” Proc. of MediMEC '95, Bristol, 1995, pp. 86-91.
  • Von Hanwhr et al., Foreword, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 225-228, (Jul.-Aug. 1994).
  • Wang, M.Y., et al., An Automatic Technique for Finding and Localizing Externally Attached Markers in CT and MR Volume Images of the Head, IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng., vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 627-637 (Jun. 1996).
  • Watanabe et al., “Three-Dimensional Digitizer (Neuronavigator): New Equipment for Computed Tomography-Guided Stereotaxic Surgery,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 27, No. 6, Jun. 1987, pp. 543-547.
  • Watanabe, “Neuronavigator,” Igaku-no-Ayumi, vol. 137, No. 6, May 10, 1986, pp. 1-4.
  • Watanabe, E., M.D., et al., Open Surgery Assisted by the Neuronavigator, a Stereotactic, Articulated, Sensitive Arm, Neurosurgery, vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 792-800 (1991).
  • Weese et al., “An Approach to 2D/3D Registration of a Vertebra in 2D X-ray Fluoroscopies with 3D CT Images,” pp. 119-128.
  • “Prestige Cervical Disc System Surgical Technique”, 12 pgs.
  • Adams et al., “Orientation Aid for Head and Neck Surgeons,” Innov. Tech. Biol. Med., vol. 13, No. 4, 1992, pp. 409-424.
  • Adams, L., et al., “Aide Au Reperage Tridimensionnel Pour La Chirurgie de la Base du Crane,” Innov. Tech. Biol. Med., vol. 13, No. 4 pp. 409-424, 1992.
  • Bucholz, Richard D., “Halo vest versus spinal fusion for cervical injury: evidence from an outcome study,” J. Neurosurg 70:884-892, Jun. 1989.
  • Germano, “Instrumentation, Technique and Technology”, Neurosurgery, vol. 37, No. 2, Aug. 1995, pp. 348-350.
  • Heilbrun, M.P., Computed Tomography—Guided Stereotactic Systems, Clinical Neurosurgery, Chapter 31, pp. 564-581 (1983).
  • Krybus, W., et al., Navigation Support for Surgery by Means of Optical Position Detection, Computer Assisted Radiology Proceed. of the Intl. Symp. CAR '91 Computed Assisted Radiology, pp. 362-366 (Jul. 3-6, 1991).
  • Laitenen: The Laitenen Stereotactic System; STT, 5 pages, 1980.
  • Pixsys, 3-D Digitizing Accessories, by Pixsys (marketing brochure)(undated) (2 pages).
  • Reinhardt, H.F. et al., Sonic Stereometry in Microsurgical Procedures for Deep-Seated Brain Tumors and Vascular Malformations, Neurosurgery, vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 51-57 (Jan. 1993).
  • Shelden et al., “Development of a computerized microsteroetaxic method for localization and removal of minute CNS lesions under direct 3-D vision,” J. Neurosurg., vol. 52, 1980, pp. 21-27.
  • Smith et al., “The Neurostation.TM.—A Highly Accurate, Minimally Invasive Solution to Frameless Stereotactic Neurosurgery,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 18, Jul.-Aug. 1994, pp. 247-256.
  • M. Peter Heilbrun, M.D., “Computer Tomography-Guided Stereotactic Systems,” Computed Tomographic Stereotaxy, Ch.31 pp. 564-581, 1983.
  • W. Krybus, et al., “Navigation Support for Surgery by Means of Optical Position Detection,” p. 362-366, 1990.
  • Offset Probe for SAC GP8-3d Digitizer, 2 pages, not dated.
  • “3-D Digitizing Accessories,” PixSys, Jul. 2, 1992, 6 pages.
  • Richard D. Bucholz, M.D., et al., “Poster #1120, Use of an Intraoperative Optical Digitizer in a System for Free-Hand Stereotactic Surgery,” Scientific Program, Am. Assoc. of Neurological Surgeons 1992 Annual Meeting, pp. 284-285, Apr. 16, 1992.
Patent History
Patent number: RE46409
Type: Grant
Filed: Apr 20, 2015
Date of Patent: May 23, 2017
Assignee: Medtronic Navigation, Inc. (Louisville, CO)
Inventors: Kevin T. Foley (Germantown, TN), Anthony J. Melkent (Germantown, TN), Catalina J. Carroll (Memphis, TN)
Primary Examiner: Sara Clarke
Application Number: 14/691,159
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Fluid Motor (173/218)
International Classification: A61B 17/16 (20060101); A61B 17/88 (20060101); A61B 19/00 (20060101); A61B 17/00 (20060101); A61B 90/96 (20160101); A61B 34/20 (20160101); A61B 34/10 (20160101); A61B 90/00 (20160101);