Wedge clamp type termination for elevator tension member

- OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY

A tension member termination device optimized for terminating flat tension members having compressible outer coatings, the device including a wedge and a socket each having cooperating surfaces positioned at a predetermined angle for clamping the tension member therebetween. The angle reliably secures the tension member while avoiding deleterious pressure and stress upon the tension member. The invention also provides a safety clamp for optional use with the tension member termination device.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/224,045, filed Dec. 31, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,256,841.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to elevator systems, and more particularly to tension members for such elevator systems.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A conventional traction elevator system includes a car, a counterweight, two or more ropes interconnecting the car and counterweight, a traction sheave to move the ropes, and a machine to rotate the traction sheave. The ropes are formed from laid or twisted steel wire and the sheave is formed from cast iron.

Although conventional steel ropes and cast iron sheaves have proven very reliable and cost effective, there are limitations on their use. One such limitation is the traction forces between the ropes and the sheave. Typical techniques to increase the traction forces between the ropes and sheave result in reducing the durability of the ropes, increasing wear or the increasing rope pressure.

Another limitation on the use of steel ropes is the flexibility and fatigue characteristics of steel wire ropes. The minimum diameter of a steel rope is dictated mostly by fatigue requirements and results in a relatively thick rope. The relatively thick cross section of a steel rope reduces its inherent flexibility necessitating a sheave having a relatively large diameter. The larger the sheave diameter, the greater torque required from the machine to drive the elevator system thereby increasing the size and cost of the elevator system.

Another drawback of conventional round ropes is that smaller sheave diameters increase rope pressure shortening the life of the rope. Rope pressure is generated as the rope travels over the sheave and is directly proportional to the tension in the rope and inversely proportional to the sheave diameter D and the rope diameter. In addition, the shape of the sheave grooves, including such traction enhancing techniques as undercutting the sheave grooves, further increases the maximum rope pressure to which the rope is subjected.

In a typical rope driven elevator installation rope wedge clamps are used for termination purposes. Wedge clamps operate by securing the elevator rope between opposed angled walls of the wedge clamps and a tear drop shaped wedge around which the cable is wound. The wedge acts to cam the rope against the walls of the wedge clamp during tensioning of the ropes. A benefit of this design is that the wedge may have a relatively sharp angle producing a large clamping force. Because the steel ropes have a high compressive strength the large clamping force has no deleterious effects on the rope such as crush or creep.

In attempts to overcome the deficiencies and drawbacks of conventional round steel ropes for use in elevator systems coated tension members, including a relatively flat tension member, has been developed. The flat tension member includes a plurality of individual load carrying cords encased within a common layer of coating. An exemplary tension member of the type contemplated in this application is discussed in further detail in U.S. Ser. No. 09/031,108 filed Feb. 26, 1998 Entitled Tension Member For An Elevator and Continuation-In-Part Application Entitled Tension Member For An Elevator filed Dec. 22, 1998, both of which are entirely incorporated herein by reference.

The coating layer surrounds and/or separates the individual cords and defines an engagement surface for engaging a traction sheave. As a result of the configuration of the tension member, the rope pressure may be distributed more uniformly throughout the tension member, traction is increased and smaller sheave diameters are possible.

A method of terminating and securing flat tension members involves looping the members over a bar and clamping the end with a pair of plates. The plates are secured by a plurality of fasteners that pass through holes provided in the plates. Another method of terminating flat tension members includes a wedged end fastener wherein a wedge of material is positioned at the end of the tension member and clamped by a pair of plates. In such a configuration one of the plates comprises a wedge shaped cross section cooperating with the wedge of material and the second plate comprises a cross section of uniform thickness. The plates are similarly secured by a plurality of fasteners that pass through holes provided in the plates. A drawback to these types of termination methods is that the tension carrying capability of the termination relies solely on the clamping forces provided by the fasteners. In addition, the wedge type fastener limits the termination point of the member and hampers adjustability.

The above art notwithstanding, scientists and engineers under the direction of Applicants' Assignee are working to develop more efficient and durable methods and apparatus to drive elevator systems.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

According to the present invention, a termination device for a tension member having a compressible outer coating has a wedge disposed in a socket having cooperating jaw surfaces. The rope is wrapped around the wedge and inserted with the socket and clamped therein by forces generated by the tension in the member and the cooperation of the wedge and jaw surfaces.

A principal feature of the present invention is the geometry of the wedge, particularly the angle of the wedge, including its length and width. The wedge is sized and the angle is selected to provide sufficient clamping force to resist slippage of the rope without exceeding the compressive stress capability of the tension member. In addition, the wedge comprises a domed top portion to efficiently distribute the tension of the rope across the wedge.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is perspective view of an elevator system having a tension member termination device according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an embodiment of a termination clamp, showing an optional tension clamp device;

FIG. 3 is a cross sectional view of the embodiment shown in FIG. 2 taken substantially along lines 3-3;

FIG. 4 is perspective view of an alternate embodiment showing a pivot block;

FIG. 5 is a cross sectional view of the embodiment shown in FIG. 4 taken substantially along lines 5-5;

FIG. 6 is diagrammatic cross sectional view of a wedge, tension member and jaw surface showing the relevant geometries and forces;

FIG. 7 is a perspective view of an embodiment of a wedge showing ridges and locking features;

FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a plate of the tension clamp of FIG. 2; and

FIG. 9 is a front plan view of a plate of the tension clamp of FIG. 8.

 BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Illustrated in FIG. 1 is a traction elevator system 12. The elevator system 12 includes a car 14, a counterweight 16, a traction drive 18, and a machine 20. The traction drive 18 includes a tension member 22, interconnecting the car 14 and counterweight 16, and a traction sheave 24. The tension member 22 is engaged with the sheave 24 such that rotation of the sheave 24 moves the tension member 22, and thereby the car 14 and counterweight 16. Tension member 22 is coupled to counterweight 16 and car 14 by terminal clamp 30. Although shown as a geared machine 20, it should be noted that this configuration is for illustrative purposes only, and the present invention may be used with geared or gearless machines. In addition, although shown as a relatively flat tension member 22, it should be noted that this too is by way of example and the present invention may be used with other types of tension members including round coated tension members.

An embodiment of terminal clamp 30 is illustrated in more detail in FIG. 2. Tension member 22 is wrapped around wedge 32 and disposed within socket 34. Terminal clamp 30 is attached to car 14 and counterweight 16 via attachment rod 36 attached to socket 34 by pin 38. Attachment rod 36 is coupled to counterweight 16 and car 14 by threaded nuts 40 secured in place by cotter pin 42. Also shown in FIG. 2 is an optional gripping jaw clamp 50 wherein tension member 22 is clamped within grooves 52, 54 of plates 56, 58 in a double overlap arrangement.

Referring to FIG. 3 clamp 30 operates to provide a secure termination of tension member 22. In use, lead portion 44 of tension member 22 is inserted within aperture 46 in the bottom portion of socket 34, as viewed in the figure, wrap portion 47 of the tension member is then wrapped around wedge 32 and then tail portion 48 passed back out through aperture 46. Wedge 32 is then inserted within opening 60 of socket 34 to the clamp position shown in FIG. 2 wherein lead portion 44 and tail portion 48 are clamped between jaw surfaces 62, 64 respectively, of socket 34. Termination clamp 30 is designed such that tension member 22 and attachment rod 36 are substantially axially aligned to allow for efficient load transfer and prevents undesirable rotation of termination clamp.

Still referring to FIG. 3, in normal operation of the elevator system 12 (FIG. 1), the tension (T) in lead portion 44 of tension member 22 is in the direction indicated by arrow 66 which reacts in wrap portion 47 to force wedge 32 farther into socket 34 in the direction of aperture 46. With the load in tension member 22 forcing wedge 32 into socket 34, a clamping force represented by arrow 68 clamps lead portion 44 against jaw surface 62 and a clamping force represented by arrow 70 clamps tail portion 48 against jaw surface 64. Clamping forces 68, 70 are normal to jaws 62, 64 respectively, and to the respective portions of wedge 32 and are expressed as normal forces (Fn). The clamping forces generated by jaws 62, 64, together with the friction forces acting on wrap portion 47, react out the total tension (T) in tension member 22 thereby retaining the member in clamp 30.

An alternative embodiment of termination clamp 30 is shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 wherein attachment rod 36 is attached to pivot block 72 by pin 38 an in turn pivotally attached to socket 34 by pivot pin 74 and secured by cotter pin 76. In this particular embodiment, lead portion 44 of tension member 22 is inserted within aperture 46 in the bottom portion of socket 34, as viewed in the figure, wrap portion 47 of the tension member is then wrapped around wedge 32 and then tail portion 48 passed back out through aperture 44. Wedge 32 is then inserted within opening 60 of socket 34 to the clamp position shown in FIG. 5 wherein lead portion 44 and tail portion 48 are clamped between jaw surfaces 62, 64 respectively, of socket 34. It is an important feature of this embodiment that once wedge 32 and tension member 22 are installed within socket 34 pivot block 72 is then installed to prevent the wedge from being inadvertently dislodged from the socket if tension is lost in the member, as will be more fully described hereinbelow. In addition, this particular embodiment maintains tension member 22 and attachment rod 36 substantially axially aligned to allow for efficient load transfer. Pivot block 72 also permits angular displacement of tension member 22 relative to the car 14 or counterweight 16 without imparting large stresses within attachment rod 36 or socket 34. Another advantage of this particular embodiment over that shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 is that the overall height the socket is reduced because the wedge 32 is inserted through the top of socket 34. Pivot block 72 is then inserted within close proximity of the wedge thus reducing the overall height of termination clamp 30.

The geometry of wedge 32 is an important factor in producing normal forces 68, 70 and properly retaining tension member 22. The relevant parameters of wedge 32 controlling the normal force Fn are shown with reference to FIG. 6 and include the length (L) designated by 78, depth (d) represented by 80, angle ϕ represented by 82 and measured from centerline 83 to clamping surface 33, 35 and the width (W) of tension member 22 (FIG. 2). The other factor relevant to controlling the normal forces 68, 70 is the tension (T) in tension member 22 represented by 66. The parameters L and d are somewhat dependant on ϕ and are typically limited by available space in the hoistway (not shown). Given a nominal tension T, normal forces Fn 68, 70 (FIGS. 3 and 5) are inversely related to ϕ. That is to say, if ϕ is too small, Fn will be too great and tension member 22 will experience compressive creep. This is particularly important in an embodiment where tension member 22 is comprised of a urethane outer coating, or where the coating is another flexible elastomer, as they have a maximum compressive stress (σc) capability of about 5 MPa before non-recoverable deformation, or creep, occurs. On the other hand if ϕ is too large the normal forces will be too small the tension member will slip within termination clamp 30. It is particularly advantageous to reduce the compressive stress on tension member 22. One way to reduce the compressive stress is to increase the length L over which the clamping forces are applied, however hoistway consideration are generally limiting in this regard. Taking the above referenced physical parameters in to consideration, in order to preclude exceeding σc the minimum ϕ can be predetermined in accordance with the formula:
ϕ=tan−1[T/(σc*L*W)]

In a typical application of the present invention for a tension member having a T of about 2500 N, d ranges from about 60 mm to about 70 mm, L is about 140 mm, ϕ ranges from about 9 degrees to about 10 degrees.

The present invention will now be described with respect to a specific example of the termination clamp 30 shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 by referring to FIG. 6. A typical tension member 22, as described in the above related applications, is comprised of a 30 mm wide flat flexible rope having a urethane outer coating and has a maximum tension capability of 30,000 N. As is known in the art, a safety factor of about 12 is applied to elevator ropes and provides a maximum tension in member 22 of about 2500 N. Wedge 32 has length L of 140 mm and angle ϕ of 10 degrees geometrically yielding diameter d as follows:
d=2(L tan ϕ)=2(140 tan 20/2))=49.37 mm
The determination of Fn with T equal to 2500 N is as follows:
Fn=T/sin ϕ=2500/sin (20/2)=14,397 N
Since Fn is distributed over the entire area of lead portion 44 the compressive stress σ on the tension member 22 is a function of the area of lead portion, A, clamped between wedge 32 and jaw surface 62, and is calculated as follows:
A=L*W=140*30=4,200 mm2
The compressive stress in tension member 22 is then determined as follows:
σ=Fn/A=14,397/4,200=3.43 MPa
In this particular example, the compressive stress limit of the material is not exceeded and therefore no creep will occur.

The ability of termination clamp 30 to react out T in lead section 44 is important and is a function of Fn and the coefficient of friction (μ) between the tension member 22 and jaw surface 62 and the surface of wedge 32. In the example given, tension member 22 is comprised of a urethane coating and jaw surface 62, as well as wedge 32, is smooth steel and a conservative number for the coefficient friction between the surfaces is about μ=0.25. To properly maintain wedge 32 within socket 34 T must be preferably substantially reacted out within lead section 44 although a remainder may be transferred into wrap section 47. The following relation, from clamping theory, provides the maximum reaction force Fr, or the amount of tension that can be reacted, in the example given for μ=0.25:
Fr=μ*Fn=0.25*14,397=3,599 N
Therefore, recalling that the maximum T in the example given is 2500 N, all of the tension T will be reacted out of tension member 22 in the lead portion 44 and the member will not slip within termination clamp 30.

An alternative embodiment of the present invention aimed at increasing the coefficient of friction between the tension member 22 and the jaw surface 62, 64 and wedge 32 comprises a roughened surface on the jaws and the wedge. In one particular embodiment the surface is roughened by a sandblasting procedure. Sandblasting of the surfaces raises the coefficient of friction to 0.35 or greater. Other methods of increasing the surface friction include etching, machining, knurling and other suitable equivalents. In addition to raising the coefficient of friction the roughened surfaces would form small ridges and valleys. A characteristic of the urethane coating is its tendency to exhibit cold flow under high loading conditions. Under the loading conditions described above the urethane coating cold flows into and around the ridges and valleys, also referred to as locking features, in the wedge and socket and provides for a small but effective mechanical lock. The locking features increase the ability of the termination clamp to resist slippage of tension member 22. It is within the scope of the present invention that the locking features may comprise grooves, striations 83 (FIG. 7), cuts, diamond pattern, or other suitable equivalents. It is important to note that the locking features reduce the required normal force as described hereinabove. The use of locking features as describes allows a reduction in the length L, or an increase in angle ϕ to further minimize the risk of creep.

An alternative embodiment for wedge 32 is shown in FIG. 7 and includes ridges 84, 86 forming a channel 88 therebetween. Ridges 84, 86 are approximately the height of a cord within the coating of tension member 22. For example, a particular embodiment of tension member 22 is 3 mm thick having a cord with a 1.4 mm cord disposed therein. Ridges 84, 86 for this particular embodiment would define a channel 88 having a depth of approximately 1 mm. Tension member 22 is disposed within channel 88 and wedge 32 is installed within socket 34 as described herein above. The benefit of ridges 84, 86 are that they contain tension member 22 within channel 88 given the anticipated cold flow characteristics of the coating material. In addition, ridges 84, 86 are sized to prevent compressive stress failure of tension member 22 by limiting the displacement of wedge 32 within socket 34. In the event that a higher than anticipated normal force Fn is transferred to the member ridges 84, 86 will contact jaw surfaces 62, 64 and arrest the travel of wedge 32 within socket 34.

Referring now to FIGS. 2, 8 and 9, the above mentioned optional tension clamp 50 for use with the termination clamp 30 is illustrated. The purpose of tension clamp 50 is to aid in terminating and reacting tension in member 22 and to equalize the tension between lead portion 44 and tail portion 48 as they enter socket 34. Tension clamp 50 also assists termination clamp 30 in the unlikely event of that tension member 22 loses tension, such as for instance, during an abrupt stop of elevator car 14. Tension clamp 50 is clamped onto the tail portion 48 and lead portion 44 prior to entering socket 34. When engaged with the tension member 22, tension clamp 50 cannot move thereon. Plates 56, 58 as shown and described are identical, however it is within the scope of the present invention that the plates are different wherein one plate has a tension member groove and one plate has no groove.

As described hereinabove tension clamp 50 comprises a pair of plates 56, 58 each having a tension member groove 52, 54 approximately the thickness of the tension member 22. Bore holes 51 are provided for through passage of fasteners 53. Plates 56, 58 further include leading edges 55 comprising a generous radius to facilitate a smooth transition of lead portion 44 and tail portion 48 from socket 34 into tension clamp 50.

In use, the lead portion 44 is inserted into groove 52 of plate 56 and tail portion 48 into groove 54 of plate 58 and the plates are assembled together with fasteners 53. When the bolts 53 are tightened tension member 22 is clamped within the grooves 52, 54 and are held resistant to slippage by plates 56, 58. In this way the tension member is prevented from moving relative to tension clamp 50.

When optional tension clamp 50 is used in conjunction with termination clamp 30, leading portion 44 and tail portion 48 load share the full tension created by car 14. In this regard, the analysis for determining the clamping performance established herein above is modified to reflect a load sharing in the tension in each of the cables.

While preferred embodiments have been shown and described, various modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustration and not limitation.

Claims

1. A termination device for a tension member, the tension member having a width W and an elastomer coating that has a maximum compressive stress capability σc, the tension member being subjected to a tensile force T, the termination device comprising:

a socket; and
a wedge that fits within the socket with the tension member wrapped around the wedge, the wedge having a clamping surface that includes a length L and is disposed at an angle ϕ, which is measured from a centerline of the wedge to the clamping surface and which relates to the length L in accordance with the formula defining a minimum of the angle ϕ: ϕ≥tan−1 ϕ=tan−1(T/(σc*L*W)).

2. A method for terminating a tension member having a width W and an elastomer coating that has a maximum compressive stress capability σc, comprising:

feeding the tension member into an aperture of a socket;
wrapping the tension member around a wedge having a clamping surface that includes a length L and is disposed at an angle ϕ, which is measured from a centerline of the wedge to the clamping surface;
feeding the tension member back through the aperture; and
applying a tensile force T in the tension member so that the tension member is compressed between the wedge and the socket, wherein the tensile force T is applied in accordance with the formula defining a minimum of the angle ϕ: ϕ≥tan−1 ϕ=tan−1(T/(σc*L*W)).

3. A method according to claim 2 further comprising:

positioning the tension member in a back-to-back arrangement;
placing a pair of plates on either side of the tension member;
inserting a plurality of fasteners through the plates;
tightening the fasteners; and
clamping the tension member between the plates in a double overlap arrangement.

4. A termination device for a tension member, the tension member having a width W and a compressible coating that has a predetermined maximum compressive stress capability σc, the compressible coating being subject to compressive creep, the tension member being subjected to a tensile force T, the termination device comprising:

a socket; and
a wedge that fits within the socket with the tension member wrapped around the wedge, the wedge having a clamping surface that includes a length L and is disposed at an angle ϕ, which is measured from a centerline of the wedge to the clamping surface and which relates to the length L in accordance with the formula defining a minimum of the angle ϕ: ϕ=tan−1(T/(σc*L*W)).

5. A method for terminating a tension member having a width W and a compressible coating that has a predetermined maximum compressive stress capability σc, the compressible coating being subject to compressive creep, the method comprising:

feeding the tension member into an aperture of a socket;
wrapping the tension member around a wedge having a clamping surface that includes a length L and is disposed at an angle ϕ, which is measured between a centerline of the wedge and the clamping surface;
feeding the tension member back through the aperture; and
applying a tensile force T in the tension member so that the tension member is compressed between the wedge and the socket, wherein the tensile force T is applied in accordance with the formula defining a minimum of the angle ϕ: ϕ=tan−1(T/(σc*L*W)).

6. A termination device for a tension member, the tension member having a width W and comprised of a plurality of inner load carrying cords and a compressible coating, wherein the compressible coating defines a traction surface for the tension member and the compressible coating has a predetermined maximum compressive stress capability σc, the compressible coating being subject to compressive creep if the maximum compressive stress capability is exceeded, the tension member being subjected to a tensile force T, the termination device comprising:

a socket; and
a wedge that fits within the socket with the tension member wrapped around the wedge, the wedge having a clamping surface that includes a length L and is disposed at an angle ϕ, which is measured between a centerline of the wedge and the clamping surface and which relates to the length L in accordance with the formula that defines a minimum of the angle ϕ: ϕ=tan−1(T/(σc*L*W)).

7. A method for terminating a tension member having a width W and comprised of a plurality of inner load carrying cords and a compressible coating, wherein the compressible coating defines a traction surface for the tension member and has a predetermined maximum compressive stress capability σc, the compressible coating being subject to compressive creep if the predetermined maximum compressive stress capability is exceeded, the method comprising:

feeding the tension member into an aperture of a socket;
wrapping the tension member around a wedge having a clamping surface that includes a length L and is disposed at an angle ϕ, which is measured between a centerline of the wedge and the clamping surface;
feeding the tension member back through the aperture; and applying a tensile force T in the tension member so that the tension member is compressed between the wedge and the socket, wherein the tensile force T is applied in accordance with the formula that defines a minimum of the angle ϕ: ϕ=tan−1(T/(σc*L*W)).
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
975790 November 1910 Pearson
1011423 December 1911 Gale, Sr.
1035230 August 1912 Pearson
1164115 December 1915 Pearson
1266312 May 1918 Pope
1380800 June 1921 Haworth
2827680 March 1958 Gibson
3148427 September 1964 Hoffstrom
3951504 April 20, 1976 Clark
4313243 February 2, 1982 Childress
4362288 December 7, 1982 Allen
4570753 February 18, 1986 Ohta et al.
4624097 November 25, 1986 Wilcox
4643609 February 17, 1987 Biass
4887422 December 19, 1989 Klees et al.
5112933 May 12, 1992 O'Donnell et al.
5199137 April 6, 1993 Edwards
5336846 August 9, 1994 Sachs
5353893 October 11, 1994 Sun et al.
5526552 June 18, 1996 DeAngelis
5553360 September 10, 1996 Lucas et al.
5566786 October 22, 1996 DeAngelis et al.
5855254 January 5, 1999 Blochle
5881843 March 16, 1999 O'Donnell et al.
6058575 May 9, 2000 Dagan
6061879 May 16, 2000 Ericson et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
570699 February 1933 DE
2105053 August 1971 DE
2136540 February 1973 DE
97631 May 1973 DE
2228887 December 1973 DE
2300361 July 1974 DE
2333120 January 1975 DE
36 23 407 January 1988 DE
3623407 January 1988 DE
0672781 September 1995 EP
0846645 June 1998 EP
0995832 April 2000 EP
0995833 April 2000 EP
1010803 June 2000 EP
1022376 July 2000 EP
1029973 August 2000 EP
1029974 August 2000 EP
2079239 November 1971 FR
2146481 March 1973 FR
2 293 392 July 1976 FR
2293392 August 1976 FR
363458 December 1931 GB
1295718 November 1972 GB
1362514 August 1974 GB
1401197 July 1975 GB
2073300 October 1981 GB
2134209 August 1984 GB
48000287 January 1973 JP
1-242385 September 1989 JP
1-266341 October 1989 JP
1-267286 October 1989 JP
3-3883 January 1991 JP
3-229042 October 1991 JP
5-39180 February 1993 JP
5-70059 March 1993 JP
7-71537 March 1995 JP
08040669 February 1996 JP
9-21084 January 1997 JP
1216120 March 1986 SU
1216120 July 1986 SU
WO 97/31852 September 1997 WO
98/29326 July 1998 WO
98-29327 July 1998 WO
Other references
  • “Hannover Fair '98”, 1998, in parent U.S Appl. No. 09/224,045, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,256,841.
  • L. Janovsky, Elevator Mechanical Design—Principles and Concepts, 1987, pp. 39-41, Ellis Horwood, Ltd., West Sussex, England.
  • Alessandro D'Apice, Erkiarung (Statement), Engineering Graduate, 2005, 1 pg.
  • MZ 739870 (Construction drawing), 1997, 1 pg.
  • MZ 739871 (Construction drawing), 1997, 1 pg.
  • CF14 (Construction drawing), 1997, 1 pg.
  • Z 319787 (Construction drawing), 1997, 1 pg.
  • Z 459116 (Construction drawing), 1997, 1 pg.
  • VZ 200963 (Construction drawing), 1995, 1 pg.
  • Innendienst (Redesign material specification), 1997, 24 pgs.
  • Regie Immobiliere 3000 Lausanne SA (Letter), 1998, 1 pg.
  • Protocole De Reception (Protocol receipt), 1998, 12 pgs.
  • C. De Angelis, Erklarung (Statement), 2005, 1 pg.
  • K.H. Wehking, Institut Fur Fordertechnik Getriebetechnik Und Baumaschinen (Report—Institute of Material Handling and Logistic Systems, 1996, 1-11, Institut fur Fordertechnik.
  • DIN 15315, Aufzuge Seilschlosser (Elevator Rope Anchors), 1999, 4 pgs.
  • Dubbel, Taschenbuch fur den Maschinenbau (Handbook of Mechanical Engineering), 1974, 5 pgs., Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York.
  • Angst & Pfister, Vulkollan, abriebfest (Abrasion resistant), 1975, 12 pgs.
  • Klaus Feyrer, Drahtseile (Wire ropes), 1994, pp. IV to IX, 1-57 and 327-346, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York.
  • Opposition Brief for EP1140689B1.
  • European Patent Office, Decision rejecting the opposition of EP 1140689 (related to the present application), Dec. 4, 2007, 23 pgs.
  • Schindler S.A. Opposition Brief in the opposition of EP 1140689 (related to the present application), Dec. 4, 2007, Mar. 3, 2008, 143 pgs. (English Translation, 12 pgs).
  • Schindler Aufzuge and Fahrtrepen Opposition Brief in the opposition of EP 1140689 (related to the present application), Jan. 24, 2008, 72 pgs. (English Translation, 11 pgs).
  • Inventio AG, Appeal Brief in the opposition of EP 1140689 (related to the present application), Apr. 3, 2008, 16 pgs. (English Translation, 8 pgs).
  • Schindler S.A. Pleadings in French litigation, Jun. 9, 2008, 68 pgs. (English Translation, 60 pgs).
  • Schindler, Media Release, Nov. 16, 2005; 1 pp.
  • Schmid, A., Attestation, PPE Tour d'Ivoire, Feb. 12, 2007, 1 pp (English Translation, 1 pp).
  • EP Patent 1 140 689 (99 966 424.6) (based on PCT/US99/30227) Patentee: Otis Elevator Company; Opponent: Inventio AG (hereinafter Patent '689); Otis Elevator Company Reply to Opposition dated Dec. 15, 2005.
  • Patent '689; Inventio AG Final Reply Brief Translation dated Aug. 24, 2007.
  • Patent '689; Invention AG Final Reply Brief dated Aug. 24, 2007.
  • Patent '689; Otis Elevator Company Final Reply Brief dated Aug. 24, 2007.
  • Patent '689; Inventio AG Notice of Appeal Translation dated Feb. 11, 2008.
  • Patent '689; Inventio AG Notice of Appeal dated Feb. 11, 2008.
  • Patent '689; Co-Opponent Schindler GmbH Additional Brief Translation dated Apr. 8, 2008.
  • Patent '689; Co-Opponent Schindler GmbH Additional Brief dated Apr. 8, 2008.
  • Patent '689; Co-Opponent Schindler GmbH Additional Brief Translation dated Apr. 10, 2008.
  • Patent '689; Co-Opponent Schindler GmbH Additional Brief dated Apr. 10, 2008.
  • Patent '689; Otis Elevator Company Reply Brief dated Oct. 20, 2008.
  • Patent '689; Co-Opponent Schindler GmbH Brief Translation dated Sep. 29, 2009.
  • Patent '689; Co-Opponennt Schindler GmbH Brief dated Sep. 29, 2009.
  • Patent '689; Co-Opponent Schinder SA Brief Attachment Translation—EPO Appeal Decision—dated Oct. 8, 2009.
  • Patent '689; Co-Opponent Schinder SA Brief Translation Oct. 8, 2009.
  • Patent '689; Schinder SA Brief dated Oct. 8, 2009.
  • Patent '689; Invention AG Brief Translation dated Oct. 9, 2009.
  • Patent '689; Invention AG Brief dated Oct. 9, 2009.
  • Patent '689; Otis Elevator Company letter to EPO dated Oct. 30, 2009.
  • Patent '689; Otis Elevator Company Appeal Brief Enclosures dated Dec. 16, 2009.
  • Patent '689; Otis Elevator Company Appeal Brief dated Dec. 6, 2009.
  • Patent '689; Preliminary Opinion of Appeal Board dated Dec. 17, 2009.
  • Patent '689; Schinder GmbH Additional Brief Translation dated Jan. 8, 2010.
  • Patent '689; Schindler GmbH Additional Brief dated Jan. 8, 2010.
  • Patent '689; Schindler SA Additional Brief Translation dated Jan. 15, 2010.
  • Patent '689; Schinder SA Additional Brief dated Jan. 15, 2010.
  • Patent '689; Invention AG Additional Brief Translation dated Jan. 21, 2010.
  • Patent '689; Inventio AG Additional Brief dated Jan. 21, 2010.
  • Patent '689; Otis Brief dated Jan. 28, 2010.
  • Patent '689; Schindler GmbH Additional Brief Translation dated Feb. 5, 2010.
  • Patent '689; Schindler GmbH Additional Brief dated Feb. 5, 2010.
  • Patent '689; Inventio AG Additional Brief Translation dated Feb. 9, 2010.
  • Patent '689; Inventio AG Additional Brief dated Feb. 9, 2010.
  • Patent '689; Schinder SA Additional Brief Translation dated Feb. 9, 2010.
  • Patent '689; Schindler SA Additional Brief dated Feb. 9, 2010.
  • Decision of the Technical Board of Appeal 3.2.06 of Feb. 18, 2010 for Appeal No. T0305/08-3206, mailed Mar. 24, 2010.
  • Minutes of the Oral proceeding of Feb. 18, 2010 for Appeal No. T0305/08-3206.
  • SCP Pascal Robert et Mayeul Robert, Notification of Decision (Pursuant to the Hague Convention) of Jul. 1, 2009 decision in French litigation (related to EP1140689, which is related to this application), Aug. 11, 2009, 27 pgs.
  • “Hanover Fair: Another new idea from ContiTech—Lifting belts for elevators,” 1998.
Patent History
Patent number: RE47035
Type: Grant
Filed: Mar 19, 2004
Date of Patent: Sep 11, 2018
Assignee: OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY (Farmington, CT)
Inventors: Richard J. Ericson (Southington, CT), Dennis J. Rehmer (Bristol, CT), Pedro Baranda (Madrid)
Primary Examiner: Matthew C. Graham
Application Number: 10/805,490
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Including Provision To Attach Tether (439/451)
International Classification: F16G 11/04 (20060101); B66B 7/08 (20060101); B66B 7/06 (20060101);