Raster-based contour swathing for guidance and variable-rate chemical application

- AGJUNCTION LLC

A raster-based system for global navigation satellite system (GNSS) guidance includes a vehicle-mounted GNSS antenna and receiver. A processor provides guidance and/or autosteering commands based on GNSS-defined pixels forming a grid representing an area to be treated, such as a field. Specific guidance and chemical application methods are provided based on the pixel-defined treatment areas and preprogrammed chemical application prescription maps, which can include variable chemical application rates and dynamic control of the individual nozzles of a sprayer.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of and claims priority in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/689,184, filed Jan. 18, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,386,129, issued Feb. 26, 2013, which claims priority in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/145,542, filed Jan. 17, 2009, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. This application is a reissue of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/776,512, filed Feb. 25, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,718,874, issued May 6, 2014, which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/689,184, filed Jan. 18, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,386,129, issued Feb. 26, 2013, which claims priority in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/145,542, filed Jan. 17, 2009, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to automated equipment control using a raster-based database, including vehicle navigation and guidance using global navigation satellite system (GNSS), inertial navigation system (INS) and other positioning inputs, and machine control functions such as variable-rate chemical applications in agricultural spraying.

2. Description of the Related Art

GNSS technology advanced vehicle and machine guidance and control in various technical fields, including the field of agricultural guidance by enabling reliable, accurate systems, which are relatively easy to use. GNSS guidance systems are adapted for displaying directional guidance information to assist operators with manually steering the vehicles. For example, the OUTBACK® steering guidance system, which is available from Hemisphere GPS LLC of Calgary, Alberta, Canada and is covered by U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,539,303 and 6,711,501 (incorporated herein by reference), includes an on-board computer capable of storing various straight-line and curved (“contour”) patterns. An advantage of this system is its ability to retain field-specific cultivating, planting, spraying, fertilizing, harvesting and other patterns in memory. This feature enables operators to accurately retrace such patterns. Another advantage relates to the ability to interrupt operations for subsequent resumption by referring to system-generated logs of previously treated areas. The OUTBACK S steering guidance system, and related product offerings from Hemisphere GPS LLC, utilize “near point search method” technology, which logs GPS-defined positions along swath edges, the nearest of which are located for placing the edge of the next swath against the last.

Another type of GPS guidance utilizes “form line following,” wherein vectors, which can be straight-line (A-B) or curved (contour), are computed based on equipment widths offset from the previously-driven form lines. A disadvantage with this type of system is that initial form lines must be driven and delineated based upon which subsequent form lines must be computed and followed. Significant computer overhead can be occupied with such tasks, whereby trade-offs are required between component costs and system responsiveness.

GNSS vehicle guidance equipment using the above techniques is available as a steering guide with a graphical user interface (GUI) for manually-steered vehicles, and also with an autosteer function for automatically steering the vehicle along all or part of its travel path. Automated systems can also control an agricultural procedure or operation, such as spraying, planting, tilling, harvesting, etc. Examples of such equipment are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,142,956, which is incorporated herein by reference. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0186644 shows satellite-based vehicle guidance control in straight and contour modes, and is also incorporated herein by reference. U.S. Pat. No. 7,162,348 is incorporated herein by reference and discloses an articulated equipment position control system and method whereby a working component, such as an implement, can be guided independently of a motive component, such as a tractor. The implement can optionally be equipped with its own GNSS antenna and/or receiver for interacting with a tractor-mounted GNSS system.

Ideally crops would be planted in perfectly straight, evenly-spaced rows. Guidance through such fields would consist of following relatively simple straight-line patterns. Such guidance modes are commonly referred to as straight line or “A-B” in reference to the equipment traveling in a straight line from point A to point B in a repeating pattern in order to cover an entire field, which is typically flat and rectangular and therefore efficiently divided into multiple, parallel swaths. However, field conditions in many areas are not suitable for A-B guidance. For example, hilly terrain sometimes requires the formation of constant-elevation terraces.

Guidance systems accommodate such irregular conditions by operating in “contour following” modes consisting of curvilinear tracks defined by multiple GNSS points along which the equipment is guided. Initial planting passes made with manual and visually-guided navigation, which may or may not be supplemented with GNSS navigational aids, can cause crop rows to deviate from straight lines. Accommodating such irregular crop rows in subsequent operations (e.g., spraying and harvesting) may require the equipment to deviate from straight-line passes.

“Tramline” (sometimes referred to as “match tracks”) is another operating mode available with some modern GNSS guidance systems. In tramline operating mode the existing crop rows are relatively well protected because the equipment follows or “matches” the previously-driven passes. The equipment wheels or tracks are thus confined between the crop rows. Machine damage from running over crops is thus avoided, or at least minimized.

Preferably a system embodying an aspect of the present invention would avoid the drawbacks inherent in the previous systems described above and be adaptable to various machine control applications, including variably controlling the output of individual nozzles in agricultural sprayers. In particular, raster (e.g., bitmap) data bases can be used with previously-defined world geodetic systems, such as WGS 84, thereby eliminating overhead-intensive tasks such as continuously running extensive searches for points along the edges of previously-driven swaths or computing form lines.

Heretofore there has not been available a raster-based contour swathing system and method with the advantages and features of the present invention.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In the practice of the present invention, a system and method are provided for automatically guiding and controlling vehicles and equipment using GNSS for defining a raster-based database of pixels defining either an entire area to be treated, or a subset through which a vehicle travels. For example, agricultural equipment comprising a tractor and an implement can be equipped with a vector position and heading sensor subsystem including a GNSS receiver and antennas and an optional inertial navigational system (INS) with X, Y and Z axis sensors for sensing equipment attitude changes through six degrees of freedom. Such sensors typically comprise gyroscopes and/or accelerometers. A 2D map array comprises an XY grid of pixels, which is scalable according to the requirements of a particular operation. Guidance operations are accomplished by marking pixels as “applied” when treated on an equipment pass. Subsequent passes can guide off of the applied pixel areas, using “target” aim point pixels and/or swath-width spacing to one side or the other of the applied areas. Moreover, machine control functions can actuate certain operations based on equipment position. For example, spray nozzles on a sprayer implement can be selectively and individually actuated over areas to be sprayed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a plan view of agricultural equipment equipped with GNSS and (optionally) INS guidance and control systems, shown in operation on a field defined by an XY array of pixels.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a GNSS/INS/RTK tractor and implement system for implementing the raster-based guidance system and method.

FIGS. 3a and 3b show a flowchart of a raster-based guidance method.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart of another aspect of the raster-based guidance method using target pixels.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of another aspect of the raster-based guidance method.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart of another aspect of the raster-based guidance method.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart of another aspect of the raster-based guidance method including spray nozzle control.

FIG. 8a is a diagram of material application parameters on exiting a treated area.

FIG. 8b is another diagram of material application parameters on entering an area to be treated.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

I. Introduction and Environment

As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention, which may be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention in virtually any appropriately detailed structure.

Certain terminology will be used in the following description for convenience in reference only and will not be limiting. For example, up, down, front, back, right and left refer to the invention as oriented in the view being referred to. The words “inwardly” and “outwardly” refer to directions toward and away from, respectively, the geometric center of the embodiment being described and designated parts thereof Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) are broadly defined to include GPS (U.S.), Galileo (proposed), GLONASS (Russia), Beidou (China), Compass (proposed), IRNSS (India, proposed), QZSS (Japan, proposed) and other current and future positioning technology using signals from satellites, using single or multiple antennae, with or without augmentation from terrestrial sources. Inertial navigation systems (INS) include gyroscopic (gyro) sensors, accelerometers and similar technologies for providing output corresponding to the inertia of moving components in all axes, i.e. through six degrees of freedom (positive and negative directions along transverse X, longitudinal Y and vertical Z axes). Yaw, pitch and roll refer to moving component rotation about the Z, X and Y axes respectively. Said terminology will include the words specifically mentioned, derivatives thereof and words of similar meaning.

II. Guidance and Control System 4

Referring to the drawings in more detail, the reference numeral 2 generally designates a piece of agricultural equipment, which is equipped with a raster-based guidance and control system 4 embodying an aspect of the present invention. Without limitation on the generality of equipment 2, a motive component 6 is connected to a working component 7 through an optional articulated connection or hitch 34 (collectively comprising the equipment or vehicle 2). Also by way of example, the motive component 6 can comprise a tractor or other vehicle and the working component 7 can comprise a ground-working implement. However, the system 4 can be applied to other equipment configurations for a wide range of other applications. Such applications include equipment and components used in road construction, road maintenance, earthworking, mining, transportation, industry, manufacturing, logistics, etc.

FIG. 1 shows the equipment 2 operating on a portion of a field 10 with an array of XY pixels 50, which are used for providing guidance and controlling the operation of the implement 7, which can comprise a sprayer with individual nozzles 8.

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram showing the components of the GNSS guidance/control system 4. The tractor 6 components include a GNSS receiver 12 including a first vehicle antenna 21, an optional second vehicle antenna 22, an RF (down) converter 14, a tracking device 16 and an optional rover RTK receiver 18. A guidance processor CPU 23 includes a GUI display 24, a microprocessor 26 and a media storage device 28. Vehicle steering 30 and INS components 31 (e.g., gyroscopes and/or accelerometers) are connected to the guidance processor 23. GNSS-derived data is transferred from the GNSS receiver 12 to the guidance processor CPU 23. The implement 7 can include a first implement antenna 41 and an optional second implement antenna 42, which are connected to the vehicle GNSS receiver 12 and provide GNSS data thereto.

An implement steering subsystem 36 receives steering commands from the guidance processor CPU 23 via a CAN bus 32 or some other suitable connection, which can be wireless. The implement 7 is mechanically connected to the vehicle 6 by a hitch 34, which can be power-driven for active implement positioning in response to implement steering commands, or a conventional mechanical linkage. The hitch 34 can be provided with sensors for determining relative attitudes and orientations between the vehicle 6 and the implement 7. Examples of such an articulated connection and an implement steering system are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,865,465, 7,162,348 and 7,460,942, which are incorporated herein by reference. The implement 8 can comprise any of a wide range of suitable implements, such as planting, cultivating, harvesting and spraying equipment. For example, spraying applications are commonly performed with a boom 5, which can be equipped for automatic, selective control of multiple nozzles 8 and other boom operating characteristics, such as height, material dispensed, etc. By way of example and without limitation, the implement 7 can comprise an agricultural sprayer with a spray nozzle control 38 connected to the guidance processor CPU 23 by the CAN bus 32 for individually controlling the spray nozzles 8.

The GNSS/INS guidance and control system 4 can be configured in various combinations of components and thereby accommodate a wide range of guidance and control operations. For example, RTK guidance can be accommodated with a base 44 including an RTK receiver 46 and an RTK transmitter 48, which can be mounted at a fixed-position reference point in the general vicinity of fields being worked by the equipment 2. Moreover, various combinations of receivers and antennas can be used on the vehicle 6 and/or the implement 7, including single frequency (L1 only) and dual frequency (L1 and L2). Various forms of signal correction can also be utilized, including Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS), Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) and private subscription services.

The GNSS receiver 12 disclosed herein can be adapted for various satellite navigational systems, and can utilize a variety of SBAS technologies. Technology is also available for continuing operation through satellite signal interruptions, and can be utilized with the system 4. The antennas 21, 22 can be horizontally aligned transversely with respect to a direction of travel of the tractor 6, i.e. parallel to its transverse X axis. The relative positions of the antennas 21, 22 with respect to each other can thus be processed for determining yaw, i.e. rotation with respect to the vertical Z axis. The INS 31 can include inertial sensors (e.g., gyroscopes and accelerometers) for detecting and measuring inertial movement with respect to the X, Y and Z axes corresponding to yaw, roll and pitch movements in six degrees of freedom. Signals from the receiver 12 and the INS sensors are received and processed by the microprocessor 26 based on how the system 4 is configured and programmed

III. Raster-based Guidance and Control Method

FIGS. 3a and 3b show a method of raster-based guidance and control according to an aspect of the present invention. From a start 40 the system 4 is initialized at 42, including setting a pixel grid resolution at 44. Without limitation, pixel grid resolution in the approximate range of 0.05 meters to 5 meters can be useful for various operations, depending on the desired accuracy.

Setup of a raster-based database (DB) of XY pixel grid pages 48 occurs at 46. An example of a pixel grid page 48 is shown in FIG. 1 and includes multiple pixels 50. Pixel grid pages can cover entire fields, or, alternatively from decision box 51, can be freeform and automatically expandable in any direction through a tiling method at step 52. An exemplary preferred method is to use a rectangular grid based on WGS 84 comprising GPS-based coordinates for generating a grid page at 48. Scale factors for latitude and longitude are set at 56 and an initial reference point is defined at 58. A location in the grid area can be generated at 60 on a GIS system, such as the Map Star™ program available from Hemisphere GPS of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, or in real-time in the field on the guidance system 4. Locations in the grid area are defined by the number of pixels east-west (EW) and north-south (NS) from the reference location at 62. X and Y pixel indicies are computed in 62 where X and Y indicies=(Current Position−Reference position). A linear or multidimensional database is accessed at 64 using the XY pixel indices computed at 62. The database can be accessed and read and/or written to (R/W) at 64.

In an exemplary field spraying operation using the sprayer 7, the equipment 2 is driven in an initial pass at 66 in a “swath” mode with its swath width comprising one of the operating parameters whereby all pixels covered by the spray boom 5 are marked as “applied” (50a in FIG. 1) at step 68. On a subsequent adjacent pass, the database around the spray boom end locations is examined for the closest applied pixel 50a at 70, which is designated 50d (tested and applied) in FIG. 1, and is then used for instantaneous guidance control at 72, either through a visual GUI at 74 and/or an autosteering function at 76.

As shown in FIG. 1, the operator can thereby drive against previously covered (applied) pixels 50a. The database can be programmed for “unapplied” 50e and “applied” 50a pixel status conditions. Other pixel status conditions can include “vehicle track” 50b, “unapplied test” 50c, “applied test” 50d, “unapplied” 50e, “under-applied” 50f and “over-applied” 50g (FIG. 1). The process continues via a loop through the “another pass” decision box 78 until complete or interrupted, whereafter an application map showing database values, pixel status, equipment positions and headings is computed at 80 and output at 82 with the operation ending at 84.

FIG. 4 shows another method of guidance using the vehicle 6 location, swath (e.g., spray boom 5) width and direction of travel. From start 86, initialize 88 and detect guidance 90, vehicle track/target pixels 50b (FIG. 1) ahead of the equipment 2 are “walked up” from the center of the vehicle 6 to a target pixel point ahead using either a Bresenham-type algorithm at 91 or by directly computing a track/target pixel 50b ahead at 92. Then the unapplied test pixels 50c to the side of the track/target pixel 50b are tested for “applied” status at 93. Upon detecting an applied test pixel 50d at 94, its distance away from the track/target pixel 50b relative to the implement swath width (i.e. “offset” generally equal to half of the swath width) is obtained at 95, related to swath width at 96, used to determine guidance at 97 and the method ends at 98.

As shown in FIG. 5, a similar method can be used for computing guidance using two dimensions (2D). From start 102 and initialize 104, multiple scans to the side of the vehicle and different distances ahead of it are tested at 106, 108 respectively to detect previously-applied areas along curves at 110 and to implement curve guidance at 112. The output can be provided visually via a GUI 24 and/or used in an autosteering algorithm at 114. Speed control at 116 and end-of-row turnaround at 118, 120 can be enabled and optimized. The method ends at 122.

FIG. 6 shows a variation comprising a 3D method using the altitudes of the different pixels for adjusting guidance and steering. From a start 124 vehicle dynamics are input as operating parameters at 126, guidance is detected at 128 and pixel altitudes are input at 130. For example, the method can compensate by remaining closer to the applied area to adjust for vehicle downhill slippage and hillside chemical spray patterns at 132. Such 3D information can also correspond to crop heights with the system making suitable adjustments, also at 132. The method ends at 134.

FIG. 7 shows another method of the invention involving sprayer nozzle control. From a start 140 the nozzle and spray dynamics are initialized at 142. A chemical spray prescription map including the positions represented by pixels and target chemical application rates (e.g. gallons per acre) is input at 144. Operation commences as the spray boom crosses an area at 146 and flow rate is computed based on desired coverage (i.e. prescription database value) and vehicle speed at 148. The database is read for the locations of the spray nozzles at 150 whereby their pixel-defined locations are used for determining chemical applications and nozzle control at 152. At 154 the dispensing rate for one or more of the nozzles 8 is reduced to zero if the equipment 2 travels outside the predetermined application area, e.g., field 10. A comparison with the prescription occurs at 156 followed by reapplication as necessary at 158 followed by measure actual applied rate and update prescription database to reflect remaining application at 159 followed by a loop back to 146. The process shown in FIG. 7 is continuous in the sense that the operator can start and stop at any time and the sprayer will only dispense when located over a pixel 50 with a non-zero prescription database value. Thus, the field 50 is completely treated when all of its pixels 50 have zero prescription database values, and the system will no longer dispense.

In conjunction with the methods described above, variable rate control can be accomplished using multiple channels for individual nozzle control of chemical applications. For example, the CAN bus 32 communicates individual nozzle control commands from the processor 23 to the spray nozzles 8, which can be monitored and boom pressure controlled thereby for correct calibration. Individual nozzle flow rate control across the entire spray boom accommodates swath overlaps whereby spray nozzle output would be reduced or shut off. Nozzles 8 can also be shut off upon entry into previously-applied areas and no-spray areas, such as outside the field boundaries.

The pixel status in the method of the present invention includes information on the chemical(s) application rates(s). As the spray boom 5 crosses the treatment area the database is read for each nozzle 8 location and the desired rates per area, e.g. gallons per acre. The nozzle flow rate is then adjusted to the required output, e.g., in gallons per minute (GPM) based on the current nozzle speed. The amount of coverage during turning of the vehicle can also vary according to the nozzle locations in the turn, with the outermost nozzle 8 traveling fastest (requiring the greatest flow rate) and the innermost nozzle traveling slowest (requiring the least flow rate). Such speeds can vary considerably in turns and are accommodated by the system 4.

Alternative algorithms can be utilized for managing chemical application. For example, in a “rate reduction to zero” algorithm the application rates can be progressively reduced on one or more passes as required to “zero out” the applied material quantities across the boom widths whereby on subsequent passes the applied rate will be zero gallons per acre. Alternatively, in an “as applied map” algorithm the application rates can be read back in real time from the processor 23 and subtracted from the desired target rate per pixel and written back as the remaining desired rates with a flag indicating partial application marking the partially-treated (under-applied) pixels 50f. The real time database display reflects the remaining rates required for each pixel, the remaining chemical required for the completion of the field area and the remaining quantities available.

Various output information can be provided to an operator, e.g., indicating pixel status originally and currently, “as applied” mapping and remaining chemical application rates by pixel for job completion. By individually controlling the flow rates at the nozzles 8, the desired prescription map area rate can be achieved, thereby optimizing variable rate coverage for increased crop production. Less-experienced operators can be accommodated because the system 4 reduces the likelihood of over-application or application outside the field perimeter.

FIGS. 8a and 8b show conditions encountered at field perimeters (i.e. area boundaries). FIG. 8a shows a preemptive shut off as the vehicle approaches the area boundary. Programming the system 4 with such “look-ahead” capabilities can prevent chemical application beyond the area boundary. FIG. 8b shows commencing application upon entering a coverage area, which can occur in phases with a first applied material quantity, from which the remaining quantity of material to be applied can be determined in order to achieve the target chemical application.

It is to be understood that the invention can be embodied in various forms, and is not to be limited to the examples discussed above. The different methods described above may be combined together.

Claims

1. A method of using a processor for guiding an agriculture sprayer vehicle including a motive component and a spray working component with a spray boom having opposite ends and multiple spray nozzles mounted in spaced relation between said ends, said components being interconnected by a power hitch adapted for laterally shifting said working component relative to said motive component, which method comprises the steps of, comprising:

providing an XY pixel grid page corresponding to the an area, the grid page including pixels associated with different portions of the area;
providing a raster-based database page comprising said XY pixel grid for said area;
providing a processor on the vehicle;
providing a GNSS guidance system connected to the processor on the vehicle;
receiving GNSS positioning signals with said guidance system;
providing said GNSS positioning signals as input to said processor;
computing GNSS-based positioning for said vehicle with said processor;
defining a GNSS-defined reference point on said area and storing the reference point coordinates with said processor;
computing X and Y pixel indices based on said GNSS-defined vehicle position in relation to said reference point with said processor;
treating portions of said area with said working component;
with said processor marking pixels in said treated area portions as treated;
guiding said vehicle over said area utilizing said treated pixel information;
defining additional raster-based XY pixel grid pages in said area;
expanding said database by tiling said pixel grid pages over said area;
generating X and Y scale factors for said database;
relating said X and Y scale factors to latitude and longitude respectively;
computing X and Y pixel indices based on the difference between current GNSS-defined position coordinates and the reference position coordinates;
creating with said processor a linear or multidimensional database comprising said pixel grid pages;
accessing with said processor said database;
marking pixels in said database as treated;
defining a swath coverage area with said working component ends forming opposite edges of said swath;
with said GNSS system and said processor seeking pixels in proximity to said swath edges;
with said GNSS system and said processor guiding said vehicle along said swath edges;
providing an autosteer system on said vehicle;
with said processor generating steering commands using the marked pixel information and said XY pixel page database;
outputting said steering commands to said autosteer system for automatically steering said vehicle over said area;
with said processor and said GNSS system laterally shifting said working component relative to said motive component for maintaining said working component generally within said swath;
computing an application map for said area corresponding to treatments of pixels therein with said working component;
guiding said vehicle with said application map while treating said pixels; and
guiding the agricultural vehicle in an initial pass over the area corresponding to the grid page;
during the initial pass of the area marking the pixels in the XY pixel grid page associated with the portions of the area treated by the working component as applied pixels;
during another pass of the area, detecting a vehicle direction of travel path with said a GNSS system;
walking up the pixels in the XY pixel grid page along the vehicle direction of travel path to a target pixel in the XY pixel grid page;
testing the pixels in multiple scans in the XY pixel grid page alongside said the vehicle path for treated conditions the applied pixels based on a swath width of said the working component; and
guiding said the vehicle towards said the target pixel using said treated condition pixel information based on the applied pixels identified alongside said the vehicle path;
testing multiple distances ahead for treated pixels;
detecting a curve condition defined by treated pixels;
guiding said vehicle alongside said curve using said treated pixel information;
preprogramming said processor with variables corresponding to vehicle performance dynamics;
determining altitudes of said pixels with said GNSS system; and
adjusting guidance and steering for vehicle slippage, sloping surface chemical spray patterns and crop heights using said vehicle performance dynamics and said pixel altitudes.

2. The method of claim 1, including:

testing, with the processor, multiple distances ahead for the applied pixels;
detecting, with the processor, a curve defined by the applied pixels; and
guiding, with the processor, the vehicle alongside the curve defined by the applied pixels.

3. The method of claim 1, including:

determining altitudes for the portions of the area;
assigning the altitudes to the pixels associated with the portions of the area; and
adjusting guidance and steering of the vehicle based on the altitudes assigned to the pixels associated with the portions of the area covered by the working component.

4. The method of claim 1, including:

defining additional XY pixel grid pages; and
combining the additional XY pixel grid pages with the provided XY pixel grid page.

5. The method of claim 1, including:

identifying a swath coverage area with swath edges corresponding with opposite ends of the working component;
identifying the pixels in proximity to the swath edges; and
steering the vehicle based on the pixels in proximity to the swath edges.

6. The method of claim 1, including:

assigning chemical prescription rate values to the pixels;
compute amounts of a chemical applied to the portions of the area;
compare the amounts of the chemical applied to the portions of the area with the chemical prescription rate values assigned to the pixels associated with the portions of the area; and
adjusting the amounts of additional chemical output from individual spray nozzles of the working component on the portions of the area based on the comparisons of the amounts of the chemical previously applied to the portions of the area and the chemical prescription rate values assigned to the pixels associated with the portions of the areas.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3586537 June 1971 Rennick
3596228 July 1971 Reed, Jr.
3727710 April 1973 Sanders
3815272 June 1974 Marleau
3899028 August 1975 Morris
3987456 October 19, 1976 Gelin
4132272 January 2, 1979 Holloway
4170776 October 9, 1979 MacDoran
4180133 December 25, 1979 Collogan
4398162 August 9, 1983 Nagai
4453614 June 12, 1984 Allen
4529990 July 16, 1985 Brunner
4637474 January 20, 1987 Leonard
4667203 May 19, 1987 Counselman, III
4689556 August 25, 1987 Cedrone
4694264 September 15, 1987 Owens
4710775 December 1, 1987 Coe
4714435 December 22, 1987 Stipanuk
4739448 April 19, 1988 Rowe
4751512 June 14, 1988 Longaker
4769700 September 6, 1988 Pryor
4785463 November 15, 1988 Janc
4802545 February 7, 1989 Nystuen
4812991 March 14, 1989 Hatch
4813991 March 21, 1989 Hale
4858132 August 15, 1989 Holmquist
4864320 September 5, 1989 Munson
4894662 January 16, 1990 Counselman
4916577 April 10, 1990 Dawkins
4918607 April 17, 1990 Wible
4963889 October 16, 1990 Hatch
5031704 July 16, 1991 Fleischer
5100229 March 31, 1992 Lundberg
5134407 July 28, 1992 Lorenz
5148179 September 15, 1992 Allison
5152347 October 6, 1992 Miller
5155490 October 13, 1992 Spradley
5155493 October 13, 1992 Thursby
5156219 October 20, 1992 Schmidt
5165109 November 1992 Han
5173715 December 22, 1992 Rodal
5177489 January 5, 1993 Hatch
5185610 February 9, 1993 Ward
5191351 March 2, 1993 Hofer
5194851 March 16, 1993 Kraning et al.
5202829 April 13, 1993 Geier
5207239 May 4, 1993 Schwitalia
5239669 August 24, 1993 Mason
5255756 October 26, 1993 Follmer
5268695 December 7, 1993 Dentinger
5293170 March 8, 1994 Lorenz
5294970 March 15, 1994 Dornbusch
5296861 March 22, 1994 Knight
5311149 May 10, 1994 Wagner
5323322 June 21, 1994 Mueller
5334987 August 2, 1994 Teach
5343209 August 30, 1994 Sennott
5345245 September 6, 1994 Ishikawa
5359332 October 25, 1994 Allison
5361212 November 1, 1994 Class
5365447 November 15, 1994 Dennis
5369589 November 29, 1994 Steiner
5375059 December 20, 1994 Kyrtsos
5390124 February 14, 1995 Kyrtsos
5390125 February 14, 1995 Sennott et al.
5390207 February 14, 1995 Fenton
5416712 May 16, 1995 Geier
5430654 July 4, 1995 Kyrtsos et al.
5442363 August 15, 1995 Remondi
5444453 August 22, 1995 Lalezari
5451964 September 19, 1995 Babu
5467282 November 14, 1995 Dennis
5471217 November 28, 1995 Hatch
5476147 December 19, 1995 Fixemer
5477228 December 19, 1995 Tiwari
5477458 December 19, 1995 Loomis
5490073 February 6, 1996 Kyrtsos
5491636 February 13, 1996 Robertson
5495257 February 27, 1996 Loomis
5504482 April 2, 1996 Schreder
5511623 April 30, 1996 Frasier
5519620 May 21, 1996 Talbot
5521610 May 28, 1996 Rodal
5523761 June 4, 1996 Gildea
5534875 July 9, 1996 Diefes
5543804 August 6, 1996 Buchler
5546093 August 13, 1996 Gudat
5548293 August 20, 1996 Cohen
5561432 October 1, 1996 Knight
5563786 October 8, 1996 Torii
5568152 October 22, 1996 Janky
5568162 October 22, 1996 Samsel
5583513 December 10, 1996 Cohen
5589835 December 31, 1996 Gildea
5592382 January 7, 1997 Colley
5596328 January 21, 1997 Stangeland
5600670 February 4, 1997 Turney
5604506 February 18, 1997 Rodal
5608393 March 4, 1997 Hartman
5610522 March 11, 1997 Locatelli
5610616 March 11, 1997 Vallot
5610845 March 11, 1997 Slabinski
5612883 March 18, 1997 Shaffer
5615116 March 25, 1997 Gudat
5617100 April 1, 1997 Akiyoshi
5617317 April 1, 1997 Ignagni
5621646 April 15, 1997 Enge
5631658 May 20, 1997 Gudat et al.
5638077 June 10, 1997 Martin
5644138 July 1, 1997 Allen
5646844 July 8, 1997 Gudat et al.
5663879 September 2, 1997 Trovato et al.
5664632 September 9, 1997 Frasier
5673491 October 7, 1997 Brenna
5680140 October 21, 1997 Loomis
5684476 November 4, 1997 Anderson
5684696 November 4, 1997 Rao
5706015 January 6, 1998 Chen
5717593 February 10, 1998 Gvili
5725230 March 10, 1998 Walkup
5731786 March 24, 1998 Abraham
5739785 April 14, 1998 Allison
5757316 May 26, 1998 Buchler
5765123 June 9, 1998 Nimura
5777578 July 7, 1998 Chang
5810095 September 22, 1998 Orbach
5828336 October 27, 1998 Yunck
5838562 November 17, 1998 Gudat
5854987 December 29, 1998 Sekine
5862501 January 19, 1999 Talbot
5864315 January 26, 1999 Welles
5864318 January 26, 1999 Cozenza
5875408 February 23, 1999 Bendett
5877725 March 2, 1999 Kalafus
5890091 March 30, 1999 Talbot
5899957 May 4, 1999 Loomis
5906645 May 25, 1999 Kagawa
5912798 June 15, 1999 Chu
5914685 June 22, 1999 Kozlov
5917448 June 29, 1999 Mickelson
5918558 July 6, 1999 Susag
5919242 July 6, 1999 Greatline
5923270 July 13, 1999 Sampo et al.
5926079 July 20, 1999 Heine
5927603 July 27, 1999 McNabb
5928309 July 27, 1999 Korver
5929721 July 27, 1999 Munn
5933110 August 3, 1999 Tang
5935183 August 10, 1999 Sahm
5936573 August 10, 1999 Smith
5940026 August 17, 1999 Popeck
5941317 August 24, 1999 Mansur
5943008 August 24, 1999 Van Dusseldorp
5944770 August 31, 1999 Enge
5945917 August 31, 1999 Harry
5949371 September 7, 1999 Nichols
5955973 September 21, 1999 Anderson
5956250 September 21, 1999 Gudat
5969670 October 19, 1999 Kalafus
5987383 November 16, 1999 Keller
6014101 January 11, 2000 Loomis
6014608 January 11, 2000 Seo
6018313 January 25, 2000 Engelmayer
6023239 February 8, 2000 Kovach
6052647 April 18, 2000 Parkinson et al.
6055477 April 25, 2000 McBurney
6057800 May 2, 2000 Yang
6061390 May 9, 2000 Meehan
6061632 May 9, 2000 Dreier
6062317 May 16, 2000 Gharsalli
6069583 May 30, 2000 Silvestrin
6070673 June 6, 2000 Wendte
6073070 June 6, 2000 Diekhans
6076612 June 20, 2000 Carr
6081171 June 27, 2000 Ella
6100842 August 8, 2000 Dreier
6122595 September 19, 2000 Varley
6128574 October 3, 2000 Diekhans
6144335 November 7, 2000 Rogers
6191730 February 20, 2001 Nelson, Jr.
6191733 February 20, 2001 Dizchavez
6198430 March 6, 2001 Hwang
6198992 March 6, 2001 Winslow
6199000 March 6, 2001 Keller
6205401 March 20, 2001 Pickhard
6212453 April 3, 2001 Kawagoe et al.
6215828 April 10, 2001 Signell
6229479 May 8, 2001 Kozlov
6230097 May 8, 2001 Dance
6233511 May 15, 2001 Berger
6236916 May 22, 2001 Staub
6236924 May 22, 2001 Motz
6253160 June 26, 2001 Hanseder
6256583 July 3, 2001 Sutton
6259398 July 10, 2001 Riley
6266595 July 24, 2001 Greatline
6285320 September 4, 2001 Olster
6292132 September 18, 2001 Wilson
6307505 October 23, 2001 Green
6313788 November 6, 2001 Wilson
6314348 November 6, 2001 Winslow
6325684 December 4, 2001 Knight
6336051 January 1, 2002 Pangels
6336066 January 1, 2002 Pellenc
6345231 February 5, 2002 Quincke
6356602 March 12, 2002 Rodal
6377889 April 23, 2002 Soest
6380888 April 30, 2002 Kucik
6389345 May 14, 2002 Phelps
6392589 May 21, 2002 Rogers
6397147 May 28, 2002 Whitehead
6415229 July 2, 2002 Diekhans
6418031 July 9, 2002 Archambeault
6421003 July 16, 2002 Riley
6424915 July 23, 2002 Fukuda
6431576 August 13, 2002 Viaud
6434462 August 13, 2002 Bevly
6445983 September 3, 2002 Dickson et al.
6445990 September 3, 2002 Manring
6449558 September 10, 2002 Small
6463091 October 8, 2002 Zhodzicshsky
6463374 October 8, 2002 Keller
6466871 October 15, 2002 Reisman
6469663 October 22, 2002 Whitehead
6484097 November 19, 2002 Fuchs
6501422 December 31, 2002 Nichols
6515619 February 4, 2003 McKay, Jr.
6516271 February 4, 2003 Upadhyaya
6539303 March 25, 2003 McClure et al.
6542077 April 1, 2003 Joao
6549835 April 15, 2003 Deguchi
6553299 April 22, 2003 Keller
6553300 April 22, 2003 Ma
6553311 April 22, 2003 Ahearn
6570534 May 27, 2003 Cohen
6577952 June 10, 2003 Geier
6587761 July 1, 2003 Kumar
6606542 August 12, 2003 Hauwiller
6611228 August 26, 2003 Toda
6611754 August 26, 2003 Klein
6611755 August 26, 2003 Coffee
6622091 September 16, 2003 Perlmutter
6631916 October 14, 2003 Miller
6643576 November 4, 2003 O'Connor
6646603 November 11, 2003 Dooley
6657875 December 2, 2003 Zeng
6671587 December 30, 2003 Hrovat
6688403 February 10, 2004 Bernhardt
6703973 March 9, 2004 Nichols
6711501 March 23, 2004 McClure
6721638 April 13, 2004 Zeitler
6732024 May 4, 2004 Rekow
6744404 June 1, 2004 Whitehead
6754584 June 22, 2004 Pinto
6774843 August 10, 2004 Takahashi
6789014 September 7, 2004 Rekow et al.
6792380 September 14, 2004 Toda
6804587 October 12, 2004 O Connor et al.
6819269 November 16, 2004 Flick
6819780 November 16, 2004 Benson et al.
6822314 November 23, 2004 Beasom
6865465 March 8, 2005 McClure
6865484 March 8, 2005 Miyasaka
6876920 April 5, 2005 Mailer
6900992 May 31, 2005 Kelly
6922635 July 26, 2005 Rorabaugh
6931233 August 16, 2005 Tso
6967538 November 22, 2005 Woo
6990399 January 24, 2006 Hrazdera
7006032 February 28, 2006 King
7026982 April 11, 2006 Toda
7027918 April 11, 2006 Zimmerman
7031725 April 18, 2006 Rorabaugh
7089099 August 8, 2006 Shostak
7142956 November 28, 2006 Heiniger et al.
7162348 January 9, 2007 McClure
7191061 March 13, 2007 McKay
7231290 June 12, 2007 Steichen
7248211 July 24, 2007 Hatch
7271766 September 18, 2007 Zimmerman
7277784 October 2, 2007 Weiss
7277792 October 2, 2007 Overschie
7292186 November 6, 2007 Miller
7324915 January 29, 2008 Altman
7358896 April 15, 2008 Gradincic
7373231 May 13, 2008 McClure
7388539 June 17, 2008 Whitehead
7395769 July 8, 2008 Jensen
7428259 September 23, 2008 Wang
7437230 October 14, 2008 McClure
7451030 November 11, 2008 Eglington
7460942 December 2, 2008 Mailer
7479900 January 20, 2009 Horstemeyer
7505848 March 17, 2009 Flann
7522100 April 21, 2009 Yang
7571029 August 4, 2009 Dai
7623952 November 24, 2009 Unruh et al.
7689354 March 30, 2010 Heiniger
RE41358 May 25, 2010 Heiniger et al.
8140223 March 20, 2012 Whitehead et al.
8190337 May 29, 2012 McClure
8265826 September 11, 2012 Feller et al.
8386129 February 26, 2013 Collins
8437901 May 7, 2013 Anderson
8649930 February 11, 2014 Reeve et al.
8718874 May 6, 2014 McClure
20020072850 June 13, 2002 McClure et al.
20020107609 August 8, 2002 Benneweis
20030014171 January 16, 2003 Ma
20030187560 October 2, 2003 Keller et al.
20030208319 November 6, 2003 Ell
20040039514 February 26, 2004 Steichen
20040186644 September 23, 2004 McClure et al.
20040212533 October 28, 2004 Whitehead
20050080559 April 14, 2005 Ishibashi
20050225955 October 13, 2005 Grebenkemper
20050265494 December 1, 2005 Goodings
20060167600 July 27, 2006 Nelson, Jr. et al.
20060215739 September 28, 2006 Williamson
20070021913 January 25, 2007 Heiniger et al.
20070078570 April 5, 2007 Dai
20070088447 April 19, 2007 Stothert
20070121708 May 31, 2007 Simpson
20070205940 September 6, 2007 Yang
20070285308 December 13, 2007 Bauregger
20080129586 June 5, 2008 Martin
20080195268 August 14, 2008 Sapilewski et al.
20080204312 August 28, 2008 Euler
20090099737 April 16, 2009 Wendte et al.
20090121932 May 14, 2009 Whitehead et al.
20090171583 July 2, 2009 DiEsposti
20090174597 July 9, 2009 DiLellio
20090174622 July 9, 2009 Kanou
20090177395 July 9, 2009 Stelpstra
20090177399 July 9, 2009 Park
20090259397 October 15, 2009 Stanton
20090259707 October 15, 2009 Martin
20090262014 October 22, 2009 DiEsposti
20090262018 October 22, 2009 Vasilyev
20090262974 October 22, 2009 Lithopoulos
20090265054 October 22, 2009 Basnayake
20090265101 October 22, 2009 Jow
20090265104 October 22, 2009 Shroff
20090273372 November 5, 2009 Brenner
20090273513 November 5, 2009 Huang
20090274079 November 5, 2009 Bhatia
20090274113 November 5, 2009 Katz
20090276155 November 5, 2009 Jeergage
20090295633 December 3, 2009 Pinto
20090295634 December 3, 2009 Yu
20090299550 December 3, 2009 Baker
20090322597 December 31, 2009 Medina Herrero
20090322598 December 31, 2009 Fly
20090322600 December 31, 2009 Whitehead
20090322601 December 31, 2009 Ladd
20090322606 December 31, 2009 Gronemeyer
20090326809 December 31, 2009 Colley
20100013703 January 21, 2010 Tekawy
20100026569 February 4, 2010 Amidi
20100030470 February 4, 2010 Wang
20100039316 February 18, 2010 Gronemeyer
20100039318 February 18, 2010 Kmiecik
20100039320 February 18, 2010 Boyer
20100039321 February 18, 2010 Abraham
20100060518 March 11, 2010 Bar-Sever
20100063649 March 11, 2010 Wu
20100084147 April 8, 2010 Aral
20100085249 April 8, 2010 Ferguson
20100085253 April 8, 2010 Ferguson
20100103033 April 29, 2010 Roh
20100103034 April 29, 2010 Tobe
20100103038 April 29, 2010 Yeh
20100103040 April 29, 2010 Broadbent
20100106414 April 29, 2010 Whitehead
20100106445 April 29, 2010 Kondoh
20100109944 May 6, 2010 Whitehead
20100109945 May 6, 2010 Roh
20100109947 May 6, 2010 Rintanen
20100109948 May 6, 2010 Razoumov
20100109950 May 6, 2010 Roh
20100111372 May 6, 2010 Zheng
20100114483 May 6, 2010 Heo
20100117894 May 13, 2010 Velde
20100185364 July 22, 2010 Collins
20100312428 December 9, 2010 Roberge et al.
20110015817 January 20, 2011 Reeve
20110018765 January 27, 2011 Whitehead et al.
20110054729 March 3, 2011 Whitehead et al.
20110270495 November 3, 2011 Knapp
20120174445 July 12, 2012 Jones et al.
20130179026 July 11, 2013 McClure et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
2002244539 October 2002 AU
2002244539 October 2002 AU
2002325645 March 2003 AU
2002325645 September 2007 AU
07244150 September 1995 JP
2000/024239 May 2000 WO
2003/019430 March 2003 WO
2005/119386 December 2005 WO
2008/080193 July 2008 WO
WO-2008080193 July 2008 WO
2009/066183 May 2009 WO
2009/126587 October 2009 WO
2009/148638 December 2009 WO
2010/005945 January 2010 WO
WO-2010005945 January 2010 WO
Other references
  • Noh, Kwang-Mo, Self-tuning controller for farm tractor guidance, Iowa State University Retrospective Theses and Dissertations, Paper 9874, (1990).
  • Van Zuydam,. R.P., Centimeter-Precision Guidance of Agricultural Implements in the Open Field by Means of Real Tim Kinematic DGPS, ASA-CSSA-SSSA, pp. 1023-1034 (1999).
  • “ARINC Engineering Services, Interface Specification IS-GPS-200, Revision D”, Online [retrieved on May 18, 2010]. Retrieved from the Internet: <http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/gps/geninfo/IS-GPS-200D.pdf> Dec. 7, 2004; p. 168, para [0001].
  • “Eurocontrol, PEGASUS Technical Notes on SBAS”, report [online], Dec. 7, 2004 [retrieved on May 18, 2010]. Retrieved from the Internet: <http://www.icao.int/icao/en/ro/nacc/meetings/2004/gnss/documentation/Pegasus/tn.pdf> Dec. 7, 2004; p. 89, paras [0001]-[0004].
  • “ISO”, 11783 Part 7 Draft Amendment 1 Annex, Paragraphs B.6 and B.7 ISO 11783-7 2004 DAM1, ISO; Mar. 8, 2004.
  • “Orthman Manufacturing Co., www.orthman.com/htm;guidance.htm”, 2004, regarding the “Tracer Quick-Hitch.”.
  • Bevly, David M., “Comparison of INS v. Carrier-Phase DGPS for Attitude Determination in the Control of Off-Road Vehicles”; ION 55th Annual Meeting; Jun. 28-30, 1999; Cambridge, Mass; p. 497-504.
  • Han, Shaowel et al., “Single-Epoch Ambiguity Resolution for Real-Time GPS Attitude Determination with the Aid of One-Dimensional Optical Fiber Gyro”. GPS Solutions, vol. 3, No. 1; pp. 5-12 (1999); John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/162008/003796 dated Jul. 15, 2009.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2004/015678 dated Jun. 21, 2005.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2009/063594 dated Jan. 11, 2010.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/021334 dated Mar. 12, 2010.
  • International Search Report for PCT/AU2008/000002 dated Feb. 28, 2008.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US2009/033567 dated Feb. 9, 2009.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US2009/033693 dated Mar. 30, 2009.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US2009/039686 dated May 26, 2009.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US2009/049776 dated Aug. 11, 2009.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US2009/060668 dated Dec. 9, 2009.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US2009/067693 dated Jan. 26, 2010.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US2010/026509 dated Apr. 20, 2010.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US209/034376 dated Nov. 2, 2009.
  • Irsigler, M. et al., “PPL Tracking Performance in the Presence of Oscillator Phase Noise”, GPS Solutions, vol. 5, No. 4; pp. 45-57; 2002.
  • Kaplan, E.D. “Understanding GPS: Principles and Applications”; Artech House, MA; 1996.
  • Keicher, R. et al. “Automatic Guidance for Agricultural Vehicles in Europe”, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 25, Jan. 2000; pp. 169-194.
  • Last, J.D. et al., “Effect of skyware interference on coverage of radio beacon stations”, IEEE Proc.-Radar, Sonar Navig., vol. 14, No. 3; Jun. 1997; pp. 163-168.
  • Lin, Dai et al., “Real-time Attitude Determination for Microsatellite by Lamda Method Combined with Kalman Filtering”, A collection of the 22nd AIAA International Communications Satellite Systems Conference and Exhibit Technical Papers vol. 1, Monterey, CA, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.; May 2004; 136-143.
  • Park, Chansik et al., “Integer Ambiguity Resolution for GPS Based Attitude Determination System”, SICE Jul. 29-31, 1998, Shiba, 1115-1120.
  • Parkinson, Bradford W., et al., “Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, vol. II”; Bradford W. Parkinson and James J. Spiker, Jr., eds., Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, vol. II: 1995, AIAA, Reston, VA, USA; pp. 3-50; (1995), 3-50.
  • Rho, Hyundho et al., “Dual-Frequency GPS Precise Point Positioning with WADGPS Corrrections”, [retrieved on May 18, 2010]. Retrieved from the Internet: <http://gauss.gge.unb.ca/papers.pdf/iongnss2005.rho.wadgps.pdf> Jul. 12, 2006.
  • Schaer, et al., “Determination and Use of GPS Differential Code Bias Values”, Presentation [online]. Retrieved on May 18, 2010. Retrieved from the Internet: <http://nng/esoc.esa.de/ws2006/REPR2.pdf> May 8, 2006.
  • Takac, Frank et al., “SmartRTK: A Novel Method of Processing Standardized RTCM Network RTK information for High Precision Positioning”; Proceedings of ENC GNSS 2008, Toulouse, France; Apr. 22, 2008.
  • Ward, Phillip, W., “Performance Comparisons Between FLL, PLL and a Novel FLL-Assisted-PLL Carrier Tracking Loop Under RF Interference Conditions”, 11th Int. Tech Meeting of the Satellite Division of the US Inst. Of Navigation, Nashville, TN; Sep. 15018, 1998; p. 783-795.
  • Xu, Jiangning et al., “An EHW Architecture for Real-Time GPS Attitude Determination Based on Parallel Genetic Algorithm”, the Computer Society Proceedings of the 2002 NASA/DOD Conference on Evolvable Hardware (EH '02)(2002).
Patent History
Patent number: RE47055
Type: Grant
Filed: May 5, 2016
Date of Patent: Sep 25, 2018
Assignee: AGJUNCTION LLC (Hiawatha, KS)
Inventors: John A. McClure (Scottsdale, AZ), Dennis M. Collins (Overgaard, AZ)
Primary Examiner: Robert Nasser
Application Number: 15/147,689
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Heating (700/207)
International Classification: A01B 69/00 (20060101); B62D 6/00 (20060101); B62D 11/00 (20060101); B62D 12/00 (20060101); B63G 8/20 (20060101); B63H 25/04 (20060101); G05D 1/00 (20060101); G06F 7/00 (20060101); G06F 17/00 (20060101); G06F 19/00 (20180101); G06F 7/70 (20060101); G06G 7/00 (20060101); G06G 7/76 (20060101); A01B 69/04 (20060101); G05D 1/02 (20060101); A01B 79/00 (20060101);