Use of objective quality measures of streamed content to reduce streaming bandwidth

- DIVX, LLC

A method includes encoding video at a first bitrate to produce first encoded sections, and at a second bitrate that is less than the first bitrate to produce second encoded sections. The method further includes measuring levels of objective quality, indicative of perceptual quality, of the first and second encoded sections. The method includes determining, based on the measured objective quality levels, replaceable sections among the first encoded sections, and replacement sections among the second encoded sections, each of the replacement sections to replace a corresponding one of the replaceable sections. the method includes streaming the first encoded sections except for the replaceable sections, and the replacement sections instead of their corresponding replaceable sections.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
BACKGROUND

Distribution of multimedia (also referred to herein as “media” and/or “program(s)”), such as movies and the like, from network services to a client device may be achieved through adaptive bitrate streaming of the media. Typically, the media may be encoded at different bitrates and resolutions into multiple bitrate streams that are stored in the network services. Conventional adaptive bitrate streaming of media includes determining streaming conditions, e.g., an available streaming bandwidth at the client device, and then streaming a selected one of the different bitrate stream from the network services to the client device based on the determined conditions.

From the perspective of the network service, streaming media includes transmitting the media in response to requests from the client device. From the perspective of the client device, streaming media includes continuously requesting and receiving the media from the network services, and storing the received media in a buffer for subsequent presentation or playback, essentially, in near real-time. The buffered media may be presented, i.e., played back, in audio-visual form, for example.

The human visual system perceives a perceptual or subjective quality of streamed, presented media, and is able to detect small changes in the perceptual quality. The perceptual quality generally increases and decreases as the encoded bitrate of the streamed program (i.e., “streaming bitrate”) increases and decreases. Therefore, more or less available streaming bandwidth may translate to more or less perceptual quality, respectively.

Given the ever pressing need to conserve bandwidth at the client device, conventional streaming techniques tend to select a streaming bitrate deemed to be sufficiently high to meet an acceptable level of perceptual quality, based on the streaming bandwidth conditions determined at the client device, as mentioned above. This bandwidth-centric determination and selection at the client device dies not take into consideration changes or variations in the content contained in the media itself over time as the media is streamed and, therefore, often results in unnecessarily high, and therefore, bandwidth-wasteful, streaming bitrates.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS/FIGURES

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example network environment in which adaptive streaming of multimedia (also referred to herein as “media” and “program(s)”) from network services to a client device may be implemented.

FIG. 2 is an illustration of an example encoded video program generated by a media distributor.

FIG. 3 is an illustration of a container file that encodes a single audio stream.

FIG. 4 is an illustration of a container file that encodes multiplexed audio and video streams.

FIG. 5 is an illustration of a container file that encodes multiplexed video, audio, text, and metadata streams.

FIG. 6 is an illustration of an example of swapping-while-streaming from the container files of FIG. 2.

FIG. 7 is an illustration of an example of pre-swapped streaming using the container files of FIG. 2.

FIG. 8 is an illustration of example level-drop (or swap) information that identifies swappable, co-located clusters, as determined in cluster swapping examples of FIGS. 6 and 7.

FIG. 9 is a sequence diagram of example high-level interactions between a distributor and a client device in the network environment of FIG. 1.

FIG. 10 is a flowchart of an example method of streaming a program, which may be performed at a client device of FIG. 1.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart of an example method of adaptive streaming of programs from network services to a client device, which may be performed in a distributor of the network services.

FIG. 12 is a flowchart of a method expanding on the streaming in the method of FIG. 11 corresponding to a swapping-while-streaming embodiment, in which streaming is from multiple files.

FIG. 13 is a flowchart of a method expanding on the streaming of the method of FIG. 11, corresponding to a pre-swapped embodiment, in which streaming is from a single file constructed from multiple different files.

FIG. 14 is a block diagram of an example computer system corresponding to any network services, including a distributor in the network services.

FIG. 15 is a block diagram of an example system representing a client device.

FIG. 16 is a block diagram of a computer system configured to perform processing of media/programs and adaptive streaming.

FIG. 17 is a block diagram of an example computer program hosted in a client-side computer system (e.g., client device) similar to the compute system of FIG. 14.

In the drawings, the leftmost digit(s) of a reference number identifies the drawing in which the reference number first appears.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments described herein are directed to adaptive streaming of a video program from network services to a client device that utilize encoded video section swapping to reduce streaming bandwidth, which minimally impacting a perceptual/presentation quality of the streamed program at the client device. The adaptive streaming with sections swapping embodiments reduce streaming bandwidth at client the device based on characteristics or properties of content in the video program, i.e., measures of objective quality indicative of perceptual quality, that changes over time while the program is being streamed. More specifically, the embodiments determine swappable, corresponding/co-located sections of video encoded at different bitrates based on the measured objective quality levels of the co-located sections and the predetermined criterion of objective quality. The swappable, co-located sections include a section encoded at a first bitrate and a section encoded at a second bitrate that is less than the first bitrate. During streaming of the video program, the section encoded at the first bitrate is replaced with the co-located section encoded at the lesser second bitrate, thereby conserving streaming bandwidth by a substantial amount approximately equally to a difference between the first and second bitrates.

Network Environment

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example network environment 100 in which adaptive streaming of programs from network services to a client device may be implemented. Network environment 100 includes a collection of server-side services 101 that interact and cooperate to originate, manage, and distribute, e.g., stream, programs to a user operated client device 104 over one or more networks 106, such as the Internet. Such program include, but are not limited to, entertainment programs (e.g., television, shows, movies, cartoons, new programs, etc.), educations programs (e.g., classroom video, adult education video, learning programs, etc.), and advertising programs (e.g., commercials, infomercials, or marketing content). Network services 102 communicate with each other and with client device 104 using any suitable communication protocol, such as an Internet protocol, which may include Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP), Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), etc.

Client device 104 may be capable of wireless and/or wired communication with networks 106. Client device 104 includes processing, storage, communication, and user interface capabilities sufficient to provide all of the client device functionality described herein. Such functionality may be provided, at least in part, by one or more applications, such as computer programs, that execute on client device 104. Applications executed on client device 104 may include client-side application, which presents Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) through which a user of the client device may interact with and request services from corresponding server-side applications hosted in services 102. Accordingly, under user control, client device 104 may request/select programs from services 102, stream the selected programs from the services, and then present the streamed programs, in other words, playback the streamed programs.

Network services 102 include, but are not limited to, one or more media provider(s) 112 to originate source programs, and one or more media distributor(s) 114 to encode, store, and distribute the programs to client device 104. Each of the services 102 may be implemented as one or more computer servers that execute one or more associated server-side computer program applications suited to the given service. Media providers 112, such as Netflix®, HBO®, cable networks, and so on, utilize network services 102 to manage and deliver their revenue bearing programs to client device 104. Media providers 112 download their source programs to distributor 114, which encodes, stores, and then streams the encoded programs to client device 104 when requested to do so.

Distributor 114 includes an encoded 122 and a stream manager 126. Encoded 122 may encode each program into a number of alternative streams to support adaptive bitrate streaming of the program. The alternative streams encode the same program in different ways, such as at one or more of different bitrates, one or more different resolutions, and/or one of more different frame rats. As will be described more fully below in connection with FIG. 2, each of the encoded streams is typically stored in one or more container files. Encoder 122 also generates a program index file for the container files associated with the encoded program. Stream manager 126 manages streaming of the encoded program from the container files to client device 104 when the client device requests the program. Stream manager 126 cooperates with the requesting client device 104 to support adaptive bitrate streaming of the program from the container files to the client device.

Distributor 114 may also store auxiliary streams which contain information associated with the program streams mentioned above. The auxiliary streams are encoded at low bitrates, e.g., at bitrates of 200 kbps or much less. The auxiliary streams may include metadata synchronized in time with and descriptive of the content in associated main program streams. The metadata may include cues indicating or bracketing, e.g., commercial segments, or other non-program segments/content, such as level-drop information for encoded section swapping as will be described below, interspersed throughout the program streams. Typically, such auxiliary streams would be streamed simultaneously with their associated program streams and handled appropriately at the client device. However, the auxiliary streams may be streamed before the program streams.

As discussed above, client-side GUIs provide a user with access to services and program offerings. Such client-side GUIs typically include easily navigable program guides, and may present programs and channel selection options, program descriptions, advertisements, programming/user control options, and other typical programming features, as would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the relevant arts. The client-side GUIs accept user selections/requests, such as a request to view a program. In response to such GUI selections/requests, the client-side application sends appropriate requests to a counterpart server-side application residing in distributor 114, to initiate the appropriate actions among services 102 that will satisfy the client selections/requests, e.g., enable a client device to stream the selected program from the distributor for presentation to the user.

Container Files—Streaming Sources

As described above, distributor 114 encodes source programs from providers 112. To support adaptive bitrate streaming, distributor 122 may encode the source programs at multiple bitrates to produce multiple streams for each source program, as will be described more fully below in connection with FIG. 2. While streaming such encoded programs, client device 104 may switch between streams (and thus between encoded bitrates and corresponding streaming rates) according to conditions at the client device.

FIG. 2 is an illustration of an example encoded video program 200 generated by distributor 112. Encoded video program 200 includes multiple (encoded) video streams 1-4 encoded at multiple corresponding bitrates Rate 1-Rate 4. Encoded video streams 1-4 encode video at multiple video resolutions Res 1-Res 4, which may be equal to or different from each other. Encoded video program 200 includes a program stream index 204 and multiple container files 208(1)-208(4) corresponding to streams 1-4.

Program stream index 204 includes pointers 210(1)-(4), e.g., Uniform Resource Locators (URLs), to corresponding container files 208(1)-(4), and lists encoding parameters used to encode each of the streams 1-4, including, but not limited to, encoded bitrates Rate 1-Rate 4, encoding resolutions Res 1-Res 4, frame rates, and encoding techniques/standards. Exemplary, non-limiting, bitrates may range from below 125 kilo-bits-per-second (kbps) up to 15,000 kbps, or even higher, depending on the type of encoded media.

Each of container files 208 comprises sequential clusters 212 of a larger media sector (not shown in FIG. 2), and sequential blocks 214 of encoded media (which may also include audio, text, multimedia, etc., in addition to video) within each of the clusters. Each cluster 212, and each block 214, includes a time code TC indicating a start time for the media encoded in the blocks of that cluster, and encodes a fixed duration of media. For example, each cluster 212 of container file 208(1) encodes two seconds of video. In other embodiments, each cluster may encode a different duration of media, which may vary from two seconds. Each cluster 212 is a self-contained unit of media that may be decoded and presented on client devices 204 without reference to any other clusters. Clusters 212 may also include successive cluster members identifying a streaming sequence of the clusters.

Each cluster/block 212/214 in a given one of the container files 208 encodes the same content (e.g., video content) as corresponding clusters in the other ones of the container files. For example, the cluster/block indicated at A in container file 208(1) has encoded therein the same video as that encoded in the clusters/blocks indicated at B, C, and D of container files 208(2), 208(3), and 208(4), respectively. Corresponding clusters/blocks are also referred to herein as “co-located” clusters/blocks because they encode the same video and share the same time code TC, i.e., they are aligned or coincide in time.

Container files may encode a single stream, such as a video stream (as depicted in FIG. 2), an audio stream, or a text stream (e.g., subtitles). Alternatively, each container file may encode multiple multiplexed streams, such as a mix of video, audio, and text streams. FIGS. 3-5 are further illustrations of diverse container files.

FIG. 3 is an illustration of a container file 300 that encodes a single audio stream.

FIG. 4 is an illustration of a container file 400 that encodes multiplexed audio and video streams.

FIG. 5 is an illustration of a container file 500 that encodes multiplexed video, audio, text, and metadata streams.

In addition, a container file may encode only a metadata stream at a relatively low bitrate.

The encoded container files depicted in FIGS. 2-5 support adaptive streaming to client device 104. If conditions change while streaming, then client device 104 may switch between container files to stream at rates best suited to the conditions.

In embodiments: the container files may be Matroska containers based on Extensible Binary Meta Language (EBML), which is a derivative of Extensible Binary Meta Language (XML), or files encoded in accordance with the Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) standard; the program index may be provided in a Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) format; and client device 104 may implement adaptive streaming from distributor 114 over networks 106 using the HTTP protocol.

The container files described above may support adaptive streaming of encoded video programs across an available spectrum bandwidth that is divided into multiple, i.e., n, levels. Video having a predetermined video resolution for each level may be encoded at a bitrate corresponding to the band-width associated with the given level. For example, in DivX® Plus Streaming, by Royi Corporation, the starting bandwidth is 125 kbps and the ending bandwidth is 8400 kbps, and the number n of bandwidth levels is eleven (11). Each bandwidth level encodes a corresponding video stream, where the maximum encoded bitrate of the video stream (according to a hypothetical reference decoder model of the video coding standard H.264) is set equal to the bandwidth/bitrate of the given level. In DivX® Plus Streaming, the 11 levels are encoded according to 4 different video resolution levels, in the following way: mobile (2 levels). standard definition (4 levels), 720p (2 levels), and 1080p (3 levels).

Section Swapping: Objective Quality vs. Perceptual Quality

Adaptive streaming embodiments described herein take into consideration certain characteristics in the content in video programs (also referred to herein simply as “video”) to be streamed, to reduce streaming bitrates. as will now be described. The human visual system is able to detect small changes in the perceptual or presentation quality of presented video. However, perceptual quality and changes in perceptual quality are difficult to measure directly. Instead, certain characteristics or properties of encoded video, that are indicative of perceptual quality video as actually presented (i.e., once the encoded video is decoded and presented), may be determined, e.g., measured directly, in a straight forward manner. Such measured properties represent an objective quality of the video. As the content of encoded video varies across successive sections of the encoded Video, and between co-located sections of encoded video in different video streams, the objective quality correspondingly varies, and may be measured to determine a level of objective quality corresponding to each of the aforementioned sections. The term “section” as used herein refers to a number of successive frames of video, including, but not limited to, multimedia audio-visual content, which may be collected into successive blocks and clusters in container files for streaming, as described above.

The difference in objective quality levels between co-located sections of encoded video (e.g., between co-located clusters from two container files that encode the same video but at different bitrates) may be used to determine a corresponding difference in the perceptual quality of the two video sections. Specifically, the difference in objective quality levels may be used to determine whether that difference is sufficiently large as to cause a visually noticeable difference in the perceptual quality of the two sections (once decoded and presented). With this in mind, there exists a criterion of objective quality (referred to as a predetermined “swap criterion” of objective quality), for the two objective quality levels, that translates to a virtually imperceptible difference in perceptual quality. Two co-located sections having objective quality levels that meet this criterion are considered interchangeable or swappable with each other for purposes of streaming to a client device because of their imperceptible or nearly imperceptible difference in perceptual quality. “Co-located” sections are also referred to herein as “corresponding” sections.

Swappable, co-located, encoded sections may be swapped to reduce streaming bandwidth in cases where co-located sections include a first section encoded at a relatively high bitrate and a (co-located) second section encoded at a relatively low bitrate. Specifically, streaming the (lower bitrate) second section instead of (i.e., in place of) its co-located (higher bitrate) first section reduces streaming bandwidth, while maintaining perceptual quality. The first section is referred to herein as a “replaceable section” and the second section that is streamed instead of the first section is referred to herein as the “replacement section.” The more often high bitrate sections are replaced with their co-located low bitrate sections while streaming, i.e., the more often bitrate swapping occurs, the more streaming bandwidth is conserved.

Measures of objective quality of a section of encoded video (e.g., of a cluster/block of encoded video) include, but are not limited to, a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the section, a peak SNR (PSNR) of the section, a structural similarity index (SSIM) that measures a similarity between sections, and so on.

PSNR is a commonly used measure for assessing a quality of reconstructed video after compression (encoding). PSNR is measured on a logarithmic scale and depends on the Mean Squared Error (MSE) between an original source image and an impaired image or video frame. A higher PSNR generally indicates better quality, while a lower PSNR generally indicates poorer quality. Formulas for PSNR are given below:

MSE = 1 mn i = 0 m - 1 j = 0 n - 1 [ l ( i , j ) - K ( i , j ) ] 2 PSNR = 10 · log 10 ( MAX i 2 / MSE )
Where: m & n are dimensions of an image; I & K are components of an image (Y, U, V); and MAX, is a maximum possible pixel value.

Each section of encoded video may be assigned one or more scores based on the different possible objective quality measures. Multiple successive encoded sections may have their objective quality levels combined into and, therefore, associated with, a single measurement of objective quality, which may include, e.g., a mean or variance of the SNR (or PSNR) or each of the multiple sections.

A criterion of objective quality that indicates co-located sections may be swapped with little or no impact on perceptual quality—if the co-located section have levels of objective quality that each meet that criterion—may be based on one of:

    • a. an absolute level of objective quality, e.g., co-located clusters are declared swappable if the PSNR of each cluster is above a threshold PSNR; and
    • b. a difference between respective levels objective quality of co-located encoded sections, e.g., co-located clusters are declared swappable if a difference between their respective PSNR values is less than a certain PSNR difference threshold.

For relative criterion (b), a variable scale may be defined using as a base PSNR a highest level PSNR among encoded sections under consideration; e.g., for encoded section PSNR levels in a range of 29 dB and 31 dB, an acceptable difference value may be 1.5 dB, and for encoded section PSNR levels in a range of 27 dB and 29 dB, an acceptable PSNR difference level may be only 1 dB. The variable scale may be extended to cover all encoded section PSNR levels that are expected as part of an encoding process, and may also extend to cover other objective quality metrics such as a mean, a variance, a difference between highest and lowest PSNR levels in a cluster, or a formula combining some or all of these or other metrics. Such assignments may be altered based on the type of objective quality that is used.

Embodiments directed to adaptive streaming using section swapping described below include (i) a “swapping-while-streaming” embodiment in which swappable co-located sections from different files are swapped while streaming, and (ii) a “pre-swapped streaming” embodiment in which a single file containing pre-swapped sections is constructed from multiple encoded files before streaming is initiated, and then all of the sections in the single file, including the pre-swapped sections, are streamed from that file. Examples of these embodiments are described below.

Swapping-While-Streaming

In swapping-while-streaming, swappable co-located sections are swapped while streaming from multiple different container files in real-time, such as from multiple container files 208 in FIG. 2.

FIG. 6 is an illustration of an example of swapping-while-streaming from container files 208 of FIG. 2. With reference to FIG. 6, the example assumes the following:

    • a. Separate container files 208(1), 208(2), and 208(3) represent three levels N, N−1 and N−2, respectively, of the n levels available for e.g., DivX® Plus Streaming;
    • b. Levels N, N−1, and N−2 are each encoded at successively decreasing bitrates but may be at the same resolution. In other examples, the Levels are each encoded at successively decreasing bitrates but may be at different resolutions;
    • c. Swappable, co-located clusters (including a replaceable section, and its corresponding replacement section) have been determined and identified across the container files 208(1)-208(3). As described above, the swappable, co-located clusters are determined based on determined/measured objective quality levels of the clusters in the container files and a comparison of the determined/measured objective quality levels (of co-located sections) against a predetermined criterion of objective quality indicative of a minimal difference in perceptual quality; and
    • d. Level N is initially selected for streaming.

Traversing left-to-right in FIG. 6, initially, encoded sections from level N are streamed from container file 208(1). Encoded sections are streamed predominantly from level N. However, while the sections from Level N are streamed, replaceable (swappable) sections thereof are encountered and replaced with co-located replacement (swappable) sections from level N−1, or level N−2, as indicated at LD1, or LD2, respectively. That is, the lower level, co-located replacement sections are streamed instead of the higher level replaceable sections, resulting in conserved streaming bandwidth. Each replacement section is streamed at the same time its corresponding co-located replaceable section would have been streamed had it not been replaced, so as to maintain a proper encoded video sequence. A section swap is referred to as a “level-drop” because the source level (n) from which the replacement section is streamed is lower than the current level, e.g., in a swap, the level drops from level N to Level N−1, or Level N−2. In swapping while streaming, client device 104 and distributor 114 cooperate with each other to swap sections from different container files.

Pre-Swapped Streaming

In pre-swapped streaming, a single file containing swappable sections, i.e., level-drops, is constructed from multiple files before streaming. Then, the sections in the single file, including the pre-swapped sections, are streamed from that file.

FIG. 7 is an illustration of an example of pre-swapped streaming using container files 208 of FIG. 2. Before streaming, swappable, co-located clusters are determined and identified across levels N, N−1, and N−2, similar to the swapping-while-streaming embodiment. The determined swaps, or level-drops, are incorporated into Level N. In other words, determined and identified replaceable sections of Level N are replaced with co-located replacement sections of Levels N−1 and N−2, as identified. As a result, a new, pre-swapped Level N file is constructed that incorporates original sections of Level N that were not indicated as replaceable, and the determined/identified replacement sections (i.e., level-drops) instead of the replaceable sections. Then, sections are streamed only from the new, pre-swapped Level N file. In pre-swapped streaming, streaming of the pre-swapped sections is transparent to client device 104, which simply requests streaming sections from the single file. The examples of FIGS. 6 and 7 may be extended over more container files at different bitrates, and thus more levels and corresponding level-drops.

Level-Drop Information

FIG. 8 is an illustration of example level-drop (or swap) information 800 that identifies swappable, co-located clusters, as determined in the cluster swapping examples of FIGS. 6 and 7. In the manner described above, and further below, distributor 114 measures objective quality levels of sections, e.g., clusters in container files 208, and then determines swappable co-located clusters between the files based on the measured objective quality levels and a predetermined swap criterion. Distributor 114 generates level-drop information 800 as records 802, 804 and 806 that identify the determined, swappable, co-located clusters in the different files. Each record identifies swappable clusters including a starting cluster and its contiguous following clusters (if any), and also blocks within clusters. Each record may include one or more of cluster/block numbers, time codes TC, location/addresses of the clusters in the file. Level-drop information 800 includes:

    • a. records 802 linked vertically to indicate determined, time-ordered, replaceable clusters among the clusters of level N, e.g., in container file 208(1);
    • b. records 804 linked vertically to indicate determined, time-ordered replacement clusters among the clusters of level N−1, e.g., in container file 208(2); and
    • c. records 806 to indicate a determined replacement cluster among the clusters of level N−2, e.g., in container file 208(3).
    • Horizontal links 810 between records indicating co-located, replaceable and replacement clusters, e.g., between Level N and Levels N−1, N−2.

Distributor 114 may embed level-drop information 800 as in container files and metadata. Alternatively, or additionally, level-drop information may be stored as an auxiliary/metadata, level-drop file that is stored and indexed separately from the container files. Therefore, in the swapping-while-streaming embodiment, level-drop information 800 may be streamed from distributor 114, to client device 104, with streamed clusters. Alternatively, level-drop information may be streamed from the auxiliary file separately from the clusters.

In the pre-swapped embodiment, distributor 114 uses level-drop information 800 to construct a single pre-swapped file and need not be streamed to client device 104. However, client device 104 does not need the level-drop information.

Server-Client Sequence Diagram

FIG. 9 is a sequence diagram of example high-level interactions 900 between distributor 114 and client device 104 in network environment 100. Interactions 900 progress in time from top-to-bottom in FIG. 9, as a sequence of phases beginning with an initialization/set-up phase 904 indicated in the top left-hand corner of FIG. 9.

During initialization/set-up phase 904, distributor 114 encodes video programs and stores the encoded video programs in container files for subsequent streaming to client device 104. Distributor 114 determines swappable co-located sections among the container files associated with each program based on determined objective quality measures and a predetermined swap criterion for the objective quality measures of co-located clusters in different files, as discussed above. Distributor 114 embeds drop-level information, such as information 900, in the container files, or stores the information in a separate drop-level file. In the pre-swapped embodiment, distributor 114 constructs a single file for streaming using the drop-level information and the multiple container files.

During a user interaction phase 920, client device 104 presents client-side GUIs to a user. At 924, the user selects a program from the GUIs, and, in response, client device 104 sends a request for the program to distributor 114.

During a pre-streaming phase 930, in response to the client device request (at 924), at 932, the distributor 114 sends an index of URLs associated with the requested program to client device 104. In the swapping-while-streaming embodiment, distributor 114 may also sends drop-level information if such information is provided in a separate file. Alternatively, distributor 114 may stream the drop-level information to client 104 in subsequent pre-streaming and streaming phases 930, 940, described below. The URLs may include a first URL directed to a program index (e.g., index 204 in FIG. 2) for the encoded program corresponding to the requested program and stored in distributor 114, and a second URL directed to a drop-level file, if available.

During streaming phase 940, streaming of the requested program from distributor 114 to client device 104 commences. Client device 104 determines a streaming bandwidth available at the client device and selects a stream from among the multi-bitrate streams, as indicated in the program index, that best matches the determined bandwidth. Client device 104 continually requests encoded stream sections from container files in distributor 114 based on the index information and the level-drop information (in the swapping-while-streaming embodiment), and receives the requested blocks from the distributor. In the swapping-while-streaming embodiment, the level-drop information may have been received during pre-streaming phase 930, may be streamed from a separate level-drop file, and/or may be embedded as records in the encoded video sections streamed during stage 940. Client device 104 buffers the received sections, decodes the buffered sections, and then presents the decoded sections. As streaming conditions change, client device 104 may switch to a new stream, i.e., request sections from another stream having a bitrate better suited to the changed conditions.

In yet another embodiment, level-drop information may be calculated dynamically at client device 104 instead of distributor 114 based on objective quality levels embedded in streamed sections. In this embodiment, distributor 114 embeds measured objective quality levels in corresponding encoded video sections, and streams the sections to the client device 104. Client device 104 calculates level-drop information based on the received objective quality levels, and performs swapping-while-streaming based on the dynamically calculated objective quality levels.

In both the swapping-while-streaming and pre-swapped embodiments, client device 104 intermittently requests replacement blocks having a lower encoded bitrate than the co-located replaceable block, which advantageously conserves streaming bandwidth at the client device. Each replacement block is streamed at the same its corresponding or co-located replaceable block would have been streamed had it not been replaced.

Client-Side Method

FIG. 10 is a flowchart of an example summary method 1000 of stream a video program with swapped sections, which may be performed at client device 104.

    • 1005 includes requesting to stream the video program.
    • 1010 includes receiving an index to multiple files containing the video encoded at different bitrates, including at least a first bitrate and a second bitrate that is less than the first bit rate.
    • 1015 includes determining an available streaming bandwidth.
    • 1020 includes selecting from the received index the file encoded at the first bitrate based on the determined streaming bandwidth.
    • 1025 includes initiating streaming of the selected file.
    • 1030 includes streaming the selected file, including requesting successive sections of encoded video and receiving the requested sections. The swapping-while-streaming embodiment also includes receiving level-drop information in any number of ways, including streaming the level-drop information from an auxiliary file before or while streaming the encoded video, or as metadata embedded with the streamed encoded sections. The streaming in the swapping-while-streaming embodiment includes requesting encoded sections from multiple levels (e.g., levels N, N−1, and N−2, etc.), i.e., requesting swappable sections, based on the level-drop information, so as to conserve bandwidth.

Server/Network-Side Method

FIG. 11 is a flowchart of an example summary method 1100 of preparing, and adaptive streaming of, a video program with swapped sections from services 102 to client device 104, which may be performed in distributor 114.

    • 1110 includes encoding video at a first bitrate to produce first encoded sections.
    • 1115 includes encoding the video at a second bitrate that is less than the first bitrate to produce second encoded sections, each having encoded therein the video of a corresponding one of the first encoded sections. The first and second encoded sections may encode video that has the same resolution for each of the first and second encoded sections, or may encode video having different resolution.
    • 1120 includes measuring levels of objective quality, indicative of perceptual quality, of the first and second encoded sections.
    • 1125 includes determining, based on the measured objective quality levels and a predetermined criterion of objective quality indicative of a relatively small difference in perceptual quality, swappable sections, including replaceable sections among the first encoded sections, and corresponding replacement sections among the second encoded sections, each of the replacement sections to replace a corresponding/co-located one of the replaceable sections. This can be through of as declaring or identifying certain co-located sections as swappable sections if they meet the predetermined criterion. A result of the determining in 1125 is to identify sections in lower levels (e.g., N−1, N−2) which may be swapped with higher levels (e.g., N) with little or no impact to the subjective/perceptual quality of the video.
    • 1130 includes generating, from the determining in 1125, level-drop information identifying the replaceable sections and their corresponding replacement sections in the first and second container files, respectively.
    • 1135 includes streaming the first encoded sections except for the replaceable sections, and the replacement sections instead of their corresponding replaceable sections, thereby conserving streaming bandwidth. Each replacement section is streamed at the same time its corresponding or co-located replaceable section would have been streamed had it not been replaced.

FIG. 12 is a flowchart of a method 1200 expanding on the streaming at 1140, corresponding to the swapping-while-streaming embodiment described above, in which streaming is from multiple files.

    • 1205 includes streaming the replacement sections instead of the replaceable sections from a second file containing the second encoded sections. Each replacement section is streamed from the second file at the same time its corresponding replaceable section would have been streamed from the first file.
    • 1210 includes streaming the replacement sections from a second file containing the second encoded sections.

FIG. 13 is a flowchart of a method 1300 expanding on the streaming at 1140, corresponding to the pre-swapped embodiment described above, in which streaming is from a single file constructed from multiple different bitrate files.

    • 1305 includes constructing a file containing (i) the first encoded sections, except for the replaceable sections, and (ii) the replacement sections instead of their corresponding replaceable sections.
    • 1310 includes streaming the first encoded sections, except for the replacement section, and the replacement sections from the constructed file.

Methods and systems disclosed herein may be implemented with respect to one or more of a variety of systems including one or more consumer systems, such as described below with reference to FIGS. 13 and 14. Methods and systems disclosed herein are not, however, limited to the examples of FIGS. 13 and 14.

Prototype Example

In a prototype example, a full length feature movie (video program) (2hours and 25 minutes) was encoded at three bitrates: 8400 kbps, 5300 kbps, and 3500 kbps utilizing a 2-pass encoding process at a resolution of 1920×816 pixels and 24 frames per second. The PSNR for each frame was determined against the original source video, and the frames were grouped into clusters of 48 frames, corresponding to 2 seconds of video frames. From here, the lowest PSNR of the frames in a cluster was determined for each cluster, and a minimum PSNR of 40 dB was chosen as the least acceptable objective quality metric for a cluster. If the minimum PSNR for a cluster at a lower level was available, that cluster was swapped for the higher level cluster. This approach was used for 8400 kbps (using 8400 kbps, 5300 kbps, and 3500 kbps), and for 5300 kbps (using 5300 kbps and 3500 kbps). The results were an accumulative bandwidth savings of 36% for an 8400 kbps stream and 18% for a 5300 kbps stream, with minimal impact on perceptual quality.

System and Computer Block Diagrams

FIG. 14 is a block diagram of an example computer system 1400 corresponding to any of services 102, including distributor 114. Computer system 1400, which may be, e.g., a server, includes one or more processors 1405, a memory 1410 in which instruction sets and databases for computer program applications are stored, a mass storage 1420 for storing, e.g., encoded programs and drop-level information, and an input/output (I/O) module 1415 through which components of computer system 1400 may communicate with networks 106.

FIG. 15 is a block diagram of an example system 1500 representing, e.g., client device 104, and may be implemented, and configured to operate, as described in one or more examples herein.

System 1500 or portions thereof may be implemented within one or more integrated circuit dies, and may be implemented as a system-on-a-chip; (SoC).

System 1500 may include one or more processors 1504 to execute client-side application program stored in memory 1505.

System 1500 may include a communication system 1506 to interface between processors 1504 and communication networks, such as networks 106. Communication system 1506 may include a wired and/or wireless communication system.

System 1500 may include a stream processor 1507 to process program streams, received over channel 1508 and through communication system 1506, for presentation at system 1500. Stream processor 1507 includes a buffer 1507a to buffer portions of received, streamed programs, and a decoder 1507b to decode and decrypt the buffered programs in accordance with encoding and encryption standards, and using decryption keys. In an alternative embodiment, decoder 1507b may be integrated within a display and graphics platform of system 1500. Stream processor 1507 together with processors 1504 and memory 1505 represent a controller of system 1500. This controller includes modules to perform the functions of one or more examples described herein, such as a streaming module to stream programs through communication system 1506.

System 1500 may include a user interface system 1510.

User interface system 1510 may include a monitor or display 1532 to display information from processor 1504, such as client-side storefront GUIs.

User interface system 1510 may include a human interface device (HID) 1534 to provide user input to processor 1504. HID 1534 may include, for example and without limitation, one or more of a key board, a cursor device, a touch-sensitive device, and or a motion and/or image sensor, HID 1534 may include a physical device and/or a virtual device, such as a monitor-displayed or virtual keyboard.

User interface system 1510 may include an audio system 1536 to receive and/or output audible sound.

System 1500 may correspond to, for example, a computer system, a personal communication device, and/or a television set-top box.

System 1500 may include a housing, and one or more of communication system 1506, processors 1504, memory 1505, user interface system 1510, or portions thereof may be positioned within the housing. The housing may include, without limitation, a rack-mountable housing, a desk-top housing, a lap-top housing, a notebook housing, a net-book housing, a set-top box housing, a portable housing, and/or other conventional electronic housing and/or future-developed housing. For example, communication system 1502 may be implemented to receive a digital television broadcast signal, and system 1500 may include a set-top box housing or a portable housing,, such as a mobile telephone housing.

Accordingly, system 1500 may include, but is not limited to, stand-alone equipment, such as personal computers, lap-tops, ultrabooks, and tablets, and mobile phones and smart-phones/Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs). system 150 may also represent and include a suite of interconnected devices, such a set-top box/video game console device, a remote to operate such a device, and an audio-visual display and/or computer. System 1500 may also represent and include (digital video disk) DVD and Blu-ray players, and televisions.

FIG. 16 is a block diagram of a computer system 1600, configured to perform processing of media/programs and adaptive streaming as described herein.

Computer system 1600 includes one or more computer instruction processing units and/or processor cores, illustrated herein as processor 1602, to execute computer readable instructions, also referred to herein as computer program logic.

Computer system 1600 may include memory, cache, registers, and/or storage, illustrated here as memory 1604, which may include a non-transitory computer readable medium encoded with computer programs, illustrated here as computer program 1606.

Memory 1604 may include data 1608 to be used by processor 1602 in executing computer program 1606, and/or generated by processor 1602 during execution of computer program 1606. Data 1608 includes a database 1608a of container files and generated drop-level information for use in the methods described herein.

Compute program 1606 may include the following server-side instructions:

    • a. encoding instructions 1610 to cause processor 1602 to encode programs at different bitrates into different container files;
    • b. measurer instructions 1612 to measure objective quality levels of encoded video sections;
    • c. determiner instructions 1614 to cause processor 1602 to determine, based on the measured objective quality levels and a predetermined criterion of objective quality indicative of a relatively small difference in perceptual quality, swappable, co-located sections among the different container files, e.g., to determine replaceable sections and corresponding replacement sections;
    • d. generating instructions 1616 to generate level-drop information identifying the determined co-located swappable sections;
    • e. streaming instructions 1618 to stream the encoded programs, and swap the swappable sections as appropriate in the swapping-while-streaming embodiment; and
    • f. file constructing instructions 1620 to construct a file from multiple files containing pre-swapped sections in the pre-swapped embodiment.

FIG. 17 is a block diagram of an example computer program 1706 hosted in a client-side computer system similar to computer system 1600. Computer program 1606 may include the following client-side instructions:

    • a. client-side application instructions 1710 to cause a client-side processor to communicate with corresponding server-side distributors, present corresponding client-side navigable GUIs, permit a user to select programs for presentation, and present streamed programs;
    • b. bandwidth determiner instructions 1712 to cause the processor to determine an available streaming bandwidth;
    • c. streaming instructions 1714 to cause the processor to initiate and maintain streaming of programs. Streaming instructions 1714 include instructions to cause the processor to identify swappable co-located sections from drop-level information received from a server-side peer and to stream the identified swappable sections accordingly; and
    • d. decoding instructions 1716 to cause the processor to decode streamed programs.

Methods and system disclosed herein may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, and combinations thereof, including discrete and integrated circuit logic, applications specific integrated circuit (ASIC) logic, and microcontrollers, and may be implemented as part of a domain-specific integrated circuit package, and/or a combination of integrated circuit packages. Software may include a computer readable medium encoded with a computer program including instructions to cause a processor to perform one or more functions in response thereto. The computer readable medium may include a transitory and/or non-transitory medium. The processor may include a general purpose instruction processor, a controller, a microcontroller, and/or other instruction-based processor.

Methods and systems are disclosed herein with the aid of functional building blocks illustrating functions, features, and relationships thereof. At least some of the boundaries of these functional building blocks have been arbitrarily defined herein for the convenience of the description. Alternate boundaries may be defined so long as the specified functions and relationships thereof are appropriately performed.

A method embodiment which may be performed at a client-side or a network/server-side comprises:

    • a. replaceable sections among first sections of video encoded at a first bitrate, and
    • b. replacement sections of the video each encoded at a bitrate that is less than the first bitrate and having encoded therein the video of a corresponding one of the replaceable sections, each replacement section and the corresponding replaceable section having respective measured levels of objective quality that meet a predetermined criterion of objective quality; and

streaming the first sections of video except for the replaceable sections, and the replacement sections instead of the corresponding replaceable sections.

The method may further comprise:

decoding the streamed first sections and the replacement sections to recover the video encoded therein; and

presenting the recovered video.

In the method, the predetermined criterion of objective quality, if met, may translate to an acceptable difference in perceptual quality levels of the video when decoded from the corresponding replaceable and replacement sections, and then presented.

In the method, the replacement sections may include:

first replacement sections encoded at a second bit rate than is less than the first bitrate; and

second replacement sections encoded at a third bitrate than is less than the second bitrate.

In the method, the streaming may include:

streaming the first sections except for the replaceable sections from a first file containing the first sections and the replaceable sections; and

streaming the replacement sections instead of the replicable sections from a second file containing the replacement sections.

The method may further comprise:

requesting to stream the video;

receiving an index to multiple files containing the video encoded at different bitrates, including at least the first bitrate and the bitrate that is less than the first bit rate;

determining an available streaming bandwidth;

selecting the file encoded at the first bitrate based on the determined streaming bandwidth,

wherein

the identifying may include receiving level-drop information identifying the replaceable and replacement sections, and

the streaming may include streaming the first sections except for the replaceable sections, and the replacement sections instead of the corresponding replaceable sections based on the identifying information.

The streaming may include receiving requests for the sections of video and transmitting the requested sections of video.

The identifying may include streaming information identifying the replaceable and replacement sections in streaming sources.

In the method, each of the measured levels of objective quality may be based on a signal to noise ratio (SNR) and the predetermined criterion may be based on a one of an absolute SNR level and a relative SNR between the measured levels of objective quality.

A computer program product embodiment corresponding to the above-recited method embodiment comprises a non-transitory computer readable medium encoded with a computer program, including instructions to cause a processor to:

identify

    • a. replaceable sections among first sections of video encoded at a first bitrate, and
    • b. replacement sections of the video each encoded at a bitrate that is less than the first bitrate and having encoded therein the video of a corresponding one of the replaceable sections, each replacement section and the corresponding replaceable section having respective measured levels of objective quality that meet a predetermined criterion of objective quality; and

stream the first sections of video except for the replaceable sections, and the replacement sections instead of the corresponding replaceable sections.

The predetermined criterion of objective quality, if met may translate to an acceptable difference in perceptual quality levels of the video decoded from the corresponding replaceable and replacement sections, and then presented.

The replacement sections may include:

first replacement sections encoded at a second bit rate that is less than the first bitrate; and

second replacement sections encoded at a third bitrate that is less than the second bitrate.

The instruction to cause the processor to stream may include instructions to cause the processor to:

stream the first sections except for the replaceable sections from the first file containing the first sections and the replaceable sections; and

stream the replacement sections instead of the replaceable sections from the second file containing the replacement sections.

The instructions may further include instructions to cause the processor to:

request to stream the video;

receive an index to multiple files containing the video encoded at different bitrates, including at least the first bitrate and the bitrate that is less than the first bit rate;

determine an available streaming bandwidth;

select the file encoded at the first bitrate based on the determined streaming bandwidth; and

receive the information identifying the replaceable and replacement sections,

wherein

the instructions to cause the processor to identify may include instructions to cause the processor to receive level-drop information that identifies the replaceable and replacement sections, and

the instructions to cause the processor to stream may include instructions to cause the processor to stream the first sections except for the replaceable sections, and the replacement sections instead of the corresponding replaceable sections, based on the identifying information.

The instructions to cause the processor to stream may include instructions to cause the processor to receive requests for the sections of video and transmit the requested sections of video.

The instructions to cause the processor to identify may include instructions to cause the processor to stream information identifying the replaceable and replacement sections in streaming sources.

Each of the measured levels of objective quality may be based on a signal to noise ratio (SNR) and the predetermined criterion is based on a one of an absolute SNR level and a relative SNR between the measured levels of objective quality.

An apparatus embodiment corresponding to the above method and computer program product embodiments comprises:

a processor and memory configured to:

identify

    • a. replaceable sections among first sections of video encoded at a first bitrate, and
    • b. replacement sections of the video each encoded at a bitrate that is less than the first bitrate and having encoded therein the video of a corresponding one of the replaceable sections, each replacement section and the corresponding replaceable section having respective measured levels of objective quality that meet a predetermined criterion of objective quality; and

stream the first sections of video except for the replaceable sections, and the replacement sections instead of the corresponding replaceable sections.

The predetermined criterion of objective quality, if met, may translate to an acceptable difference in perceptual quality levels of the video decoded from the corresponding replaceable and replacement sections, and then presented.

The replacement sections may include:

first replacement sections encoded at a second bit rate that is less than the first bitrate; and

second replacement sections encoded at a third bitrate that is less than the second bitrate.

The processor and memory, configured to stream, may be configured to:

stream the first sections except for the replaceable sections from a first file containing the first sections and the replaceable sections; and

stream the replacement sections instead of the replaceable sections from a second file containing the replacement sections.

The processor and memory may be further configured to:

request to stream the video;

receive an index to multiple files containing the video encoded at different bitrates, including at least the first bitrate and the bitrate that is less than the first bit rate;

determine an available streaming bandwidth;

select the file encoded at the first bitrate based on the determined streaming bandwidth,

wherein

the processor and memory, configured to identify, may be further configured to receive level-drop information identifying the replaceable and replacement sections, and

the processor and memory, configured to stream, may be further configured to stream the first sections except for the replaceable sections, and the replacement sections instead of the corresponding replaceable sections, based on the identifying information.

The processor and memory, configured to stream, may be further configured to receive request for the sections of video and transmit the requested sections of video.

The processor and memory, configured to steam, may be further configured to identify the replaceable and replacement sections from streamed information.

The apparatus may further comprise:

a user interface system;

a communication system to communicate with a network; and

a housing to house the processor and memory, the communication system, and the user interface system.

The communication system may include a wireless communication system; and

the housing includes a mobile hand-held housing to receive the processor and memory, the user interface system, the communication system, and a battery.

While various embodiment are disclosed herein it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. It will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the methods and systems disclosed herein. Thus, the breadth and scope of the claims should not be limited by any of the examples disclosed herein.

Claims

1. A method of encoding video, the method performed by an encoding system, comprising:

encoding video at a first bitrate to produce first encoded sections using an encoding system;
encoding the video at a second bitrate that is less than the first bitrate to produce second encoded sections using the encoding system, each having encoded therein the video of a corresponding one of the first encoded sections;
measuring levels of objective quality levels using the encoding system, indicative of perceptual quality, of the first and second encoded sections;
determining, based on the measured objective quality levels, non-replaceable sections among the first encoded sections and replaceable sections among the first encoded sections, and replacement sections among the second encoded sections using the encoding system, each to replace a corresponding one of the replaceable sections;
generating identifying information that identifies the replaceable sections and their corresponding replacement sections in the a first and second container files, respectively, using the encoding system;
constructing a file containing (1) the non-replaceable sections from the first encoded sections and (2) the replacement sections from the second encoded sections;
streaming the identifying information using the encoding system; and
in response to requests from a streaming client device that are dependent on the streamed identifying information, streaming the first encoded non-replaceable sections except for the replaceable sections using the encoding device, and streaming the replacement sections instead of their corresponding replaceable sections, at a same time as the corresponding replaceable section would have been streamed had the corresponding replaceable section not been replaced wherein the streaming includes streaming from the file the non-replaceable sections, and streaming from the file the replacement sections.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining includes:

determining, using the encoding device, if corresponding first and second encoded sections have respective measured objective quality levels that each meet a predetermined criterion of objective quality; and
declaring, using the encoding device, the corresponding first and second encoded sections as corresponding replaceable and replacement sections, respectively, if the respective measured objective quality levels each meet the predetermined criterion.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the predetermined criterion of objective quality is indicative of an acceptable difference in the perceptual quality levels of the corresponding replaceable and replacement sections when decoded and presented.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the predetermined criterion of objective quality is one of:

a threshold level of objective quality that must be exceeded by each of the respective measured objective quality levels; and
a maximum difference between the respective measured objective quality levels that must not be exceeded.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the measuring includes measuring a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as the objective quality level; and
the determining includes determining whether the measured objective quality levels meet a predetermined criterion that is based on one of an absolute objective quality level and a relative objective quality level.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

constructing a first file containing the first encoded sections, including the replaceable sections;
constructing a second file containing the second encoded sections, including the replacement sections; and
wherein the streaming includes:
streaming the first encoded sections, except for the replaceable sections, from the first container file; and
streaming the replacement sections from the second container file.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising constructing a file containing the first encoded sections, except for the replaceable sections which are replaced by their corresponding replacement sections, wherein the streaming includes streaming from the file the first encoded sections, except for the replaceable sections, and the replacement sections.

8. A non-transitory computer readable medium encoded with a computer program, including instructions to cause a processor to:

encode video at a first bitrate to produce first encoded sections;
encode the video at a second bitrate that is less than the first bitrate to produce second encoded sections, each having encoded therein the video of a corresponding one of the first encoded sections;
measure objective quality levels, indicative of perceptual quality levels, of the first and second encoded sections;
determine, based on the measured objective quality levels, non-replaceable sections among the first encoded sections and replaceable sections among the first encoded sections, and replacement sections among the second encoded sections, each to replace a corresponding one of the replaceable sections;
generate identifying information that identifies the replaceable sections and their corresponding replacement sections in the a first and second container files, respectively, using the encoding system;
constructing a file containing (1) the non-replaceable sections from the first encoded sections and (2) the replacement sections from the second encoded sections;
stream the identifying information; and
in response to requests from a playback device that are dependent on the streamed identifying information, stream the first encoded non-replaceable sections except for the replaceable sections, and stream the replacement sections instead of their corresponding replaceable sections, at a same time as the corresponding replaceable section would have been streamed had the corresponding replaceable section not been replaced wherein the streaming includes streaming from the file the non-replaceable sections, and streaming from the file the replacement sections.

9. The computer readable medium of claim 8, wherein the instructions to cause the processor to determine include instructions to cause the processor to:

determine if corresponding first and second encoded sections have respective measured objective quality levels that each meet a predetermined criterion of objective quality; and
declare the corresponding first and second encoded sections as corresponding replaceable and replacement sections, respectively, if the respective measured objective quality levels each meet the predetermined criterion.

10. The computer readable medium of claim 9, wherein the predetermined criterion of objective quality is indicative of an acceptable difference in the perceptual quality levels of the corresponding replaceable and replacement sections when decoded and presented.

11. The computer readable medium of claim 9, wherein the predetermined criterion of objective quality is one of:

a threshold level of objective quality that must be exceeded by each of the respective measured objective quality levels; and
a maximum difference between the respective measured objective quality levels that must not be exceeded.

12. The computer readable medium of claim 8, wherein:

the instructions to cause the processor to measure include instructions to cause the processor to measure a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as the objective quality level; and
the instructions to cause the processor to determine include instructions to cause the processor to determine whether the measured objective quality levels meet a predetermined criterion that is based on one of an absolute objective quality level and a relative objective quality level.

13. The computer readable medium of claim 8, wherein the instructions further include instructions to cause the processor to:

construct a first file containing the first encoded sections, including the replaceable sections;
construct a second file containing the second encoded sections, including the replacement sections; and
wherein the instructions to cause the processor to stream include instructions to cause the processor to:
stream the first encoded sections, except for the replaceable sections, from the first container file; and
stream the replacement sections from the second container file.

14. The computer readable medium of claim 8, further comprising constructing a file containing the first encoded sections, except for the replaceable sections which are replaced by their corresponding replacement sections, wherein the streaming includes streaming from the file the first encoded sections, except for the replaceable sections, and the replacement sections.

15. An encoding apparatus, comprising:

a processor;
and a memory configured to storing computer executable instructions which when executed cause the processor to:
encode video at a first bitrate to produce first encoded sections, and encode the video at a second bitrate that is less than the first bitrate to produce second encoded sections, each having encoded therein the video of a corresponding one of the first encoded sections;
measure objective quality levels, indicative of perceptual quality levels, of the first and second encoded sections;
determine, based on the measured objective quality levels, non-replaceable sections among the first encoded sections and replaceable sections among the first encoded sections, and replacement sections among the second encoded sections, each to replace a corresponding one of the replaceable sections; and
generate identifying information that identifies the replaceable sections and their corresponding replacement sections in the a first and second container files, respectively, using the encoding system;
construct a file containing (1) the non-replaceable sections from the first encoded sections and (2) the replacement sections rom the second encoded sections;
stream the identifying information; and
in response to requests from a playback device that are dependent on the streamed identifying information, stream the first encoded non-replaceable sections except for the replaceable sections, and the replacement sections instead of their corresponding replaceable sections, at a same time as the corresponding replaceable section would have been streamed had the corresponding replaceable section not been replaced wherein the streaming includes streaming from the file the non-replaceable sections, and streaming from the file the replacement sections.

16. The encoding apparatus of claim 15, wherein the processor and memory, configured to determine, are further configured processor when executing the instructions in the memory is further configured to: determine if corresponding first and second encoded sections have respective measured objective quality levels that each meet a predetermined criterion of objective quality; and declare the corresponding first and second encoded sections as corresponding replaceable and replacement sections, respectively, if the respective measured objective quality levels each meet the predetermined criterion.

17. The encoding apparatus of claim 16, wherein the predetermined criterion of objective quality is indicative of an acceptable difference in the perceptual quality levels of the corresponding replaceable and replacement sections when decoded and presented.

18. The encoding apparatus of claim 16, wherein the predetermined criterion of objective quality is one of: a threshold level of objective quality that must be exceeded by each of the respective measured objective quality levels; and a maximum difference between the respective measured objective quality levels that must not be exceeded.

19. The encoding apparatus of claim 16, wherein the processor and memory, configured to measure, are further configured the processor when executing the instructions in the memory is further configured to measure a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as the objective quality level; and the processor and memory, configured to determine, are further configured to determine whether the measured objective quality levels meet a predetermined criterion that is based on one of an absolute objective quality level and a relative objective quality level.

20. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein:

the processor and memory are further configured to
construct a first file containing the first encoded sections, including the replaceable sections, and
construct a second file containing the second encoded sections, including the replacement sections; and
the processor and memory, configured to stream, are further configured to
stream the first encoded sections, except for the replaceable sections, from the first container file, and
stream the replacement sections from the second container file.

21. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein:

the processor and memory are further configured to construct a file containing the first encoded sections, except for the replaceable sections which are replaced by their corresponding replacement sections; and
the processor and memory, configured to stream, are further configured to stream from the file the first encoded sections, except for the replaceable sections, and the replacement sections.

22. The encoding apparatus of claim 15, further comprising: a communication system to communicate with a network; and a housing to house the processor and memory, and the communication system.

23. A content distribution system, comprising:

a set of one or more encoding servers, wherein each server of the set of encoding servers comprises: a non-volatile storage storing computer executable instructions; and at least one processor;
wherein the computer executable instructions, which when executed cause the processors in the set of one or more encoding servers to encode source content by: encoding a portion of video at a first bitrate to produce a first encoded section; encoding the same portion of video at a second bitrate that is less than the first bitrate to produce a second encoded section; measuring objective quality levels with respect to each of the first and second encoded sections; selecting one of the first and second encoded sections based on the measured objective quality levels of the first and second encoded sections; constructing a file containing the selected one of the first and second encoded sections, wherein the file contains at least one encoded section encoded at the first bitrate and at least one encoded section encoded at the second bitrate; storing a video stream comprising the file containing the selected one of the first and second encoded sections; and streaming the stored video stream in response to a request from a playback device.

24. The content distribution system of claim 23, wherein the first and second sections encode video at a same resolution.

25. The content distribution system of claim 23, wherein the first and second encoded sections are each a self-contained unit of media capable of being decoded without reference to any other encoded section.

26. The content distribution system of claim 25, wherein the video stream comprises a plurality of encoded sections including the selected one of the first and second encoded sections and each of the plurality of encoded sections encodes a fixed duration of media.

27. The content distribution system of claim 25, wherein the video stream comprises a plurality of encoded sections including the selected one of the first and second encoded sections and at least some of the plurality of encoded sections encode different durations of media.

28. The content distribution system of claim 23, wherein each of the first and second encoded sections comprises a number of successive frames of video.

29. The content distribution system of claim 23, wherein a measured objective quality of a section of video is at least one measure selected from the group consisting of: a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the section, a peak SNR (PSNR) of the section, and a structural similarity index (SSIM) that measures a similarity between sections.

30. The content distribution system of claim 23, wherein the processor when executing the instructions in the memory is further configured to encode source content by:

determining when the second encoded section has a respective measured objective quality level that meets a predetermined criterion for objective quality; and
selecting the corresponding second encoded section when the measured objective quality level meets the predetermined criterion.

31. The content distribution system of claim 30, wherein the predetermined criterion of objective quality is indicative of an acceptable difference in the perceptual quality levels of the corresponding first and second sections when decoded and presented.

32. The content distribution system of claim 30, wherein the measuring includes measuring a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as the objective quality level; and the determining includes determining whether the measured objective quality level meet a predetermined criterion that is based on one of an absolute objective quality level and a relative objective quality level.

33. A content distribution system, comprising:

a set of one or more encoding servers, wherein each server of the set of encoding servers comprises: a non-volatile storage storing computer executable instructions; and at least one processor;
wherein the computer executable instructions, which when executed, cause the processor to encode source content by: encoding a portion of video at a first bitrate to produce a first encoded section, where the first encoded section is a self-contained unit of media capable of being decoded without reference to any other encoded section; encoding the same portion of video at a second bitrate that is less than the first bitrate to produce a second encoded section, where the second encoded section is a self-contained unit of media capable of being decoded without reference to any other encoded section; measuring objective quality levels with respect to each of the first and second encoded sections; determining when the second encoded section has a respective measured objective quality level that meets a predetermined criterion for objective quality; selecting one of the first and second encoded sections based on the measured objective quality levels of the first and second encoded sections, where the second encoded section is selected when the measured objective quality level of the second encoded section meets the predetermined criterion for objective quality; and; constructing a file containing the selected one of the first and second encoded sections, wherein the file contains at least one encoded section encoded at the first bitrate and at least one encoded section encoded at the second bitrate; storing a video stream comprising the file containing the selected one of the first and second encoded sections; streaming the stored video stream in response to a request from a playback device.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
4009331 February 22, 1977 Goldmark et al.
4694357 September 15, 1987 Rahman et al.
4802170 January 31, 1989 Trottier
4964069 October 16, 1990 Ely
5119474 June 2, 1992 Beitel et al.
5274758 December 28, 1993 Beitel et al.
5361332 November 1, 1994 Yoshida et al.
5396497 March 7, 1995 Veltman
5400401 March 21, 1995 Wasilewski et al.
5404436 April 4, 1995 Hamilton
5420801 May 30, 1995 Dockter et al.
5420974 May 30, 1995 Morris et al.
5471576 November 28, 1995 Yee
5479303 December 26, 1995 Suzuki et al.
5487167 January 23, 1996 Dinallo et al.
5502766 March 26, 1996 Boebert et al.
5509070 April 16, 1996 Schull
5533021 July 2, 1996 Branstad et al.
5537408 July 16, 1996 Branstad et al.
5539908 July 23, 1996 Chen et al.
5541662 July 30, 1996 Adams et al.
5574785 November 12, 1996 Ueno et al.
5583652 December 10, 1996 Ware
5589993 December 31, 1996 Naimpally et al.
5600721 February 4, 1997 Kitazato
5621794 April 15, 1997 Matsuda et al.
5627936 May 6, 1997 Prasad
5633472 May 27, 1997 DeWitt et al.
5642171 June 24, 1997 Baumgartner et al.
5642338 June 24, 1997 Fukushima et al.
5655117 August 5, 1997 Goldberg et al.
5664044 September 2, 1997 Ware
5675382 October 7, 1997 Bauchspies
5675511 October 7, 1997 Prasad et al.
5684542 November 4, 1997 Tsukagoshi
5715403 February 3, 1998 Stefik
5717816 February 10, 1998 Boyce et al.
5719786 February 17, 1998 Nelson et al.
5745643 April 28, 1998 Mishina
5751280 May 12, 1998 Abbott
5751358 May 12, 1998 Suzuki et al.
5754648 May 19, 1998 Ryan et al.
5757968 May 26, 1998 Ando
5763800 June 9, 1998 Rossum et al.
5765164 June 9, 1998 Prasad et al.
5794018 August 11, 1998 Vrvilo et al.
5805700 September 8, 1998 Nardone et al.
5813010 September 22, 1998 Kurano et al.
5822524 October 13, 1998 Chen et al.
5828370 October 27, 1998 Moeller et al.
5841432 November 24, 1998 Carmel et al.
5844575 December 1, 1998 Reid
5848217 December 8, 1998 Tsukagoshi et al.
5854873 December 29, 1998 Mori et al.
5867625 February 2, 1999 McLaren
5887110 March 23, 1999 Sakamoto et al.
5892900 April 6, 1999 Ginter et al.
5903261 May 11, 1999 Walsh et al.
5907597 May 25, 1999 Mark
5907658 May 25, 1999 Murase et al.
5923869 July 13, 1999 Kashiwagi et al.
5946446 August 31, 1999 Yanagihara
5956729 September 21, 1999 Goetz et al.
5959690 September 28, 1999 Toebes, VIII et al.
5970147 October 19, 1999 Davis
5999812 December 7, 1999 Himsworth
6002834 December 14, 1999 Hirabayashi et al.
6009237 December 28, 1999 Hirabayashi et al.
6016381 January 18, 2000 Taira et al.
6031622 February 29, 2000 Ristow et al.
6038257 March 14, 2000 Brusewitz et al.
6044469 March 28, 2000 Horstmann
6046778 April 4, 2000 Nonomura et al.
6047100 April 4, 2000 McLaren
6057832 May 2, 2000 Lev et al.
6058240 May 2, 2000 McLaren
6064794 May 16, 2000 McLaren et al.
6065050 May 16, 2000 DeMoney
6018611 January 25, 2000 Nogami et al.
6079566 June 27, 2000 Eleftheriadis et al.
6097877 August 1, 2000 Katayama et al.
6141754 October 31, 2000 Choy
6155840 December 5, 2000 Sallette
6169242 January 2, 2001 Fay et al.
6175921 January 16, 2001 Rosen
6192075 February 20, 2001 Jeng et al.
6195388 February 27, 2001 Choi et al.
6204883 March 20, 2001 Tsukagoshi
6222981 April 24, 2001 Rijckaert
6266483 July 24, 2001 Okada et al.
6282320 August 28, 2001 Hasegawa et al.
6282653 August 28, 2001 Berstis et al.
6289450 September 11, 2001 Pensak et al.
6292621 September 18, 2001 Tanaka et al.
6308005 October 23, 2001 Ando et al.
6320905 November 20, 2001 Konstantinides
6330286 December 11, 2001 Lyons et al.
6351538 February 26, 2002 Uz
6373803 April 16, 2002 Ando et al.
6374144 April 16, 2002 Viviani et al.
6389218 May 14, 2002 Gordon et al.
6389473 May 14, 2002 Carmel et al.
6395969 May 28, 2002 Fuhrer
6397230 May 28, 2002 Carmel et al.
6415031 July 2, 2002 Colligan et al.
6418270 July 9, 2002 Steenhof et al.
6441754 August 27, 2002 Wang et al.
6445877 September 3, 2002 Okada et al.
6449719 September 10, 2002 Baker
6453115 September 17, 2002 Boyle
6453116 September 17, 2002 Ando et al.
6466671 October 15, 2002 Maillard et al.
6466733 October 15, 2002 Kim
6504873 January 7, 2003 Vehvilaeinen
6510513 January 21, 2003 Danieli
6510554 January 21, 2003 Gordon et al.
6512883 January 28, 2003 Shim et al.
6532262 March 11, 2003 Fukuda et al.
6587506 July 1, 2003 Noridomi et al.
6594699 July 15, 2003 Sahai et al.
6621979 September 16, 2003 Eerenberg et al.
6625320 September 23, 2003 Nilsson et al.
6642967 November 4, 2003 Saunders
6654933 November 25, 2003 Abbott et al.
6658056 December 2, 2003 Duruöz et al.
6665835 December 16, 2003 Gutfreund et al.
6671408 December 30, 2003 Kaku
6690838 February 10, 2004 Zhou
6697568 February 24, 2004 Kaku
6724944 April 20, 2004 Kalevo et al.
6725281 April 20, 2004 Zintel et al.
6751623 June 15, 2004 Basso et al.
6771703 August 3, 2004 Oguz et al.
6807306 October 19, 2004 Girgensohn et al.
6810031 October 26, 2004 Hegde et al.
6810389 October 26, 2004 Meyer
6813437 November 2, 2004 Ando et al.
6819394 November 16, 2004 Nomura et al.
6850252 February 1, 2005 Hoffberg
6856997 February 15, 2005 Lee et al.
6859496 February 22, 2005 Boroczky et al.
6871006 March 22, 2005 Oguz et al.
6912253 June 28, 2005 Li et al.
6912513 June 28, 2005 Candelore
6917652 July 12, 2005 Lyu
6931531 August 16, 2005 Takahashi
6944621 September 13, 2005 Collart
6944629 September 13, 2005 Shioi et al.
6956901 October 18, 2005 Boroczky et al.
6957350 October 18, 2005 Demos
6965724 November 15, 2005 Boccon-Gibod et al.
6965993 November 15, 2005 Baker
6970564 November 29, 2005 Kubota et al.
6983079 January 3, 2006 Kim
6985588 January 10, 2006 Glick et al.
6988144 January 17, 2006 Luken et al.
7006757 February 28, 2006 Ando et al.
7007170 February 28, 2006 Morten
7020287 March 28, 2006 Unger
7023924 April 4, 2006 Keller et al.
7043473 May 9, 2006 Rassool et al.
7103906 September 5, 2006 Katz et al.
7127155 October 24, 2006 Ando et al.
7150045 December 12, 2006 Koelle et al.
7151832 December 19, 2006 Fetkovich et al.
7151833 December 19, 2006 Candelore et al.
7165175 January 16, 2007 Kollmyer et al.
7185363 February 27, 2007 Narin et al.
7188183 March 6, 2007 Paul et al.
7197234 March 27, 2007 Chatterton
7206940 April 17, 2007 Evans et al.
7209892 April 24, 2007 Galuten et al.
7212726 May 1, 2007 Zetts
7231132 June 12, 2007 Davenport
7237061 June 26, 2007 Boic
7242772 July 10, 2007 Tehranchi
7243346 July 10, 2007 Seth et al.
7274861 September 25, 2007 Yahata et al.
7295673 November 13, 2007 Grab et al.
7328345 February 5, 2008 Morten et al.
7330875 February 12, 2008 Parasnis et al.
7340528 March 4, 2008 Noblecourt et al.
7349886 March 25, 2008 Morten et al.
7352956 April 1, 2008 Winter et al.
7356143 April 8, 2008 Morten
7356245 April 8, 2008 Belknap et al.
7366788 April 29, 2008 Jones et al.
7376831 May 20, 2008 Kollmyer et al.
7382879 June 3, 2008 Miller
7397853 July 8, 2008 Kwon et al.
7400679 July 15, 2008 Kwon et al.
7406174 July 29, 2008 Palmer
7418132 August 26, 2008 Hoshuyama
7421411 September 2, 2008 Kontio et al.
7454780 November 18, 2008 Katsube et al.
7457359 November 25, 2008 Mabey et al.
7457415 November 25, 2008 Reitmeier et al.
7472280 December 30, 2008 Giobbi
7478325 January 13, 2009 Foehr
7484103 January 27, 2009 Woo et al.
7493018 February 17, 2009 Kim
7499930 March 3, 2009 Naka et al.
7499938 March 3, 2009 Collart
7515710 April 7, 2009 Russell et al.
7526450 April 28, 2009 Hughes et al.
7546641 June 9, 2009 Robert et al.
7594271 September 22, 2009 Zhuk et al.
7610365 October 27, 2009 Kraft et al.
7639921 December 29, 2009 Seo et al.
7640435 December 29, 2009 Morten
7689510 March 30, 2010 Lamkin et al.
7711052 May 4, 2010 Hannuksela et al.
7720352 May 18, 2010 Belknap et al.
7747853 June 29, 2010 Candelore et al.
7761892 July 20, 2010 Ellis et al.
7779097 August 17, 2010 Lamkin et al.
7788271 August 31, 2010 Soma et al.
7817608 October 19, 2010 Rassool et al.
7853980 December 14, 2010 Pedlow, Jr. et al.
7864186 January 4, 2011 Robotham et al.
7869691 January 11, 2011 Kelly et al.
7882034 February 1, 2011 Hug et al.
7913277 March 22, 2011 Rahrer
7945143 May 17, 2011 Yahata et al.
7949703 May 24, 2011 Matsuzaki et al.
7962942 June 14, 2011 Craner
7974714 July 5, 2011 Hoffberg
7991156 August 2, 2011 Miller
8023562 September 20, 2011 Zheludkov et al.
8046453 October 25, 2011 Olaiya
8054880 November 8, 2011 Yu et al.
8065708 November 22, 2011 Smyth et al.
8069260 November 29, 2011 Speicher et al.
8082442 December 20, 2011 Keljo et al.
8131875 March 6, 2012 Chen
8169916 May 1, 2012 Pai et al.
8195714 June 5, 2012 Mckibben et al.
8201264 June 12, 2012 Grab et al.
8225061 July 17, 2012 Greenebaum
8233768 July 31, 2012 Soroushian et al.
8243924 August 14, 2012 Chen et al.
8245124 August 14, 2012 Gupta
8249168 August 21, 2012 Graves
8261356 September 4, 2012 Choi et al.
8265168 September 11, 2012 Masterson et al.
8270473 September 18, 2012 Chen et al.
8270819 September 18, 2012 Vannier
8275871 September 25, 2012 Ram et al.
8286213 October 9, 2012 Seo
8289338 October 16, 2012 Priyadarshi et al.
8291460 October 16, 2012 Peacock
8296434 October 23, 2012 Miller et al.
8311111 November 13, 2012 Xu et al.
8311115 November 13, 2012 Gu et al.
8312079 November 13, 2012 Newsome et al.
8321556 November 27, 2012 Chatterjee et al.
8325800 December 4, 2012 Holcomb
8341715 December 25, 2012 Sherkin et al.
8369421 February 5, 2013 Kadono et al.
8386621 February 26, 2013 Park
8396114 March 12, 2013 Gu et al.
8401900 March 19, 2013 Cansler et al.
8407753 March 26, 2013 Kuo
8412841 April 2, 2013 Swaminathan et al.
8423889 April 16, 2013 Zagorie et al.
8452110 May 28, 2013 Shoham et al.
8456380 June 4, 2013 Pagan
8472792 June 25, 2013 Butt
8473630 June 25, 2013 Galligan
8510303 August 13, 2013 Soroushian et al.
8510404 August 13, 2013 Carmel et al.
8515265 August 20, 2013 Kwon et al.
8516529 August 20, 2013 Lajoie et al.
8527645 September 3, 2013 Proffit et al.
8595378 November 26, 2013 Cohn et al.
8606069 December 10, 2013 Okubo et al.
8640166 January 28, 2014 Craner et al.
8649669 February 11, 2014 Braness et al.
8656183 February 18, 2014 Russell et al.
8677428 March 18, 2014 Lewis et al.
8681866 March 25, 2014 Jia
8683066 March 25, 2014 Hurst et al.
8689267 April 1, 2014 Hunt
8726264 May 13, 2014 Allen et al.
RE45052 July 29, 2014 Li
8767825 July 1, 2014 Wang et al.
8774609 July 8, 2014 Drake et al.
8781122 July 15, 2014 Chan et al.
8782268 July 15, 2014 Pyle et al.
8805109 August 12, 2014 Shoham et al.
8806188 August 12, 2014 Braness et al.
8819116 August 26, 2014 Tomay et al.
8832434 September 9, 2014 Apostolopoulos et al.
8843586 September 23, 2014 Pantos et al.
8849950 September 30, 2014 Stockhammer et al.
8856218 October 7, 2014 Inskip
8908984 December 9, 2014 Shoham et al.
8909922 December 9, 2014 Kiefer et al.
8914534 December 16, 2014 Braness et al.
8914836 December 16, 2014 Shivadas et al.
8918535 December 23, 2014 Ma et al.
8918636 December 23, 2014 Kiefer
8918908 December 23, 2014 Ziskind et al.
8948249 February 3, 2015 Sun et al.
8997161 March 31, 2015 Priyadarshi et al.
8997254 March 31, 2015 Amidei et al.
9014471 April 21, 2015 Shoham et al.
9025659 May 5, 2015 Soroushian et al.
9038116 May 19, 2015 Knox et al.
9042670 May 26, 2015 Carmel et al.
9060207 June 16, 2015 Scherkus et al.
9094737 July 28, 2015 Shivadas et al.
9098335 August 4, 2015 Muthiah et al.
9124773 September 1, 2015 Chan et al.
9125073 September 1, 2015 Oyman et al.
9184920 November 10, 2015 Grab et al.
9191457 November 17, 2015 Van der Schaar
9197685 November 24, 2015 Soroushian
9203816 December 1, 2015 Brueck et al.
9210481 December 8, 2015 Braness et al.
9215466 December 15, 2015 Zhai et al.
9247311 January 26, 2016 Kiefer
9247312 January 26, 2016 Braness et al.
9247317 January 26, 2016 Shivadas et al.
9253178 February 2, 2016 Blom et al.
9264475 February 16, 2016 Shivadas et al.
9294531 March 22, 2016 Zhang et al.
9313510 April 12, 2016 Shivadas et al.
9343112 May 17, 2016 Amidei et al.
9344517 May 17, 2016 Shivadas et al.
9344721 May 17, 2016 Dikvall
9479805 October 25, 2016 Rothschild et al.
9485546 November 1, 2016 Chen et al.
9571827 February 14, 2017 Su et al.
9584557 February 28, 2017 Panje et al.
9584847 February 28, 2017 Ma et al.
9621522 April 11, 2017 Kiefer et al.
9706259 July 11, 2017 Chan et al.
9712890 July 18, 2017 Shivadas et al.
9798863 October 24, 2017 Grab et al.
9813740 November 7, 2017 Panje et al.
9866878 January 9, 2018 van der Schaar et al.
9883204 January 30, 2018 Braness et al.
9906785 February 27, 2018 Naletov et al.
9967189 May 8, 2018 Patel et al.
9967305 May 8, 2018 Braness
10264255 April 16, 2019 Naletov et al.
10368096 July 30, 2019 Braness et al.
10382785 August 13, 2019 Braness et al.
10715806 July 14, 2020 Naletov et al.
20010021276 September 13, 2001 Zhou
20010030710 October 18, 2001 Werner
20010036355 November 1, 2001 Kelly et al.
20010046299 November 29, 2001 Wasilewski et al.
20010052077 December 13, 2001 Fung et al.
20010052127 December 13, 2001 Seo et al.
20010053222 December 20, 2001 Wakao et al.
20010055337 December 27, 2001 Matsuzaki et al.
20020026560 February 28, 2002 Jordan et al.
20020034252 March 21, 2002 Owen et al.
20020048450 April 25, 2002 Zetts
20020051494 May 2, 2002 Yamaguchi et al.
20020057739 May 16, 2002 Hasebe et al.
20020057898 May 16, 2002 Normile
20020062313 May 23, 2002 Lee et al.
20020067432 June 6, 2002 Kondo et al.
20020076112 June 20, 2002 Devara
20020087569 July 4, 2002 Fischer et al.
20020091665 July 11, 2002 Beek et al.
20020093571 July 18, 2002 Hyodo
20020110193 August 15, 2002 Yoo et al.
20020116481 August 22, 2002 Lee
20020118953 August 29, 2002 Kim
20020120934 August 29, 2002 Abrahams et al.
20020135607 September 26, 2002 Kato et al.
20020136298 September 26, 2002 Anantharamu et al.
20020141503 October 3, 2002 Kobayashi et al.
20020143413 October 3, 2002 Fay et al.
20020143547 October 3, 2002 Fay et al.
20020147980 October 10, 2002 Satoda
20020154779 October 24, 2002 Asano et al.
20020159528 October 31, 2002 Graziani et al.
20020159598 October 31, 2002 Rubinstein et al.
20020161462 October 31, 2002 Fay
20020164024 November 7, 2002 Arakawa et al.
20020169971 November 14, 2002 Asano et al.
20020180929 December 5, 2002 Tseng et al.
20020184159 December 5, 2002 Tadayon et al.
20020184515 December 5, 2002 Oho et al.
20020191112 December 19, 2002 Akiyoshi et al.
20020191959 December 19, 2002 Lin et al.
20020191960 December 19, 2002 Fujinami et al.
20030001964 January 2, 2003 Masukura et al.
20030002577 January 2, 2003 Pinder
20030002578 January 2, 2003 Tsukagoshi et al.
20030005442 January 2, 2003 Brodersen et al.
20030021296 January 30, 2003 Wee et al.
20030031178 February 13, 2003 Haeri
20030035488 February 20, 2003 Barrau
20030035545 February 20, 2003 Jiang
20030035546 February 20, 2003 Jiang et al.
20030041257 February 27, 2003 Wee et al.
20030044080 March 6, 2003 Frishman et al.
20030053541 March 20, 2003 Sun et al.
20030061305 March 27, 2003 Copley et al.
20030061369 March 27, 2003 Aksu et al.
20030063675 April 3, 2003 Kang et al.
20030065777 April 3, 2003 Mattila et al.
20030077071 April 24, 2003 Lin et al.
20030078930 April 24, 2003 Surcouf et al.
20030093799 May 15, 2003 Kauffman et al.
20030123855 July 3, 2003 Okada et al.
20030128296 July 10, 2003 Lee
20030133506 July 17, 2003 Haneda
20030135742 July 17, 2003 Evans
20030142594 July 31, 2003 Tsumagari et al.
20030152370 August 14, 2003 Otomo et al.
20030163824 August 28, 2003 Gordon et al.
20030165328 September 4, 2003 Grecia
20030174844 September 18, 2003 Candelore
20030185302 October 2, 2003 Abrams
20030185542 October 2, 2003 McVeigh et al.
20030206558 November 6, 2003 Parkkinen et al.
20030206717 November 6, 2003 Yogeshwar et al.
20030210821 November 13, 2003 Yogeshwar et al.
20030216922 November 20, 2003 Gonzales et al.
20030229900 December 11, 2003 Reisman
20030231863 December 18, 2003 Eerenberg et al.
20030231867 December 18, 2003 Gates et al.
20030233464 December 18, 2003 Walpole et al.
20030236836 December 25, 2003 Borthwick
20030236907 December 25, 2003 Stewart et al.
20040001594 January 1, 2004 Krishnaswamy et al.
20040006701 January 8, 2004 Kresina
20040021684 February 5, 2004 Millner
20040022391 February 5, 2004 Obrien
20040024688 February 5, 2004 Bi et al.
20040025180 February 5, 2004 Begeja et al.
20040028227 February 12, 2004 Yu
20040031058 February 12, 2004 Reisman
20040037421 February 26, 2004 Truman
20040039916 February 26, 2004 Aldis et al.
20040047592 March 11, 2004 Seo et al.
20040047607 March 11, 2004 Seo et al.
20040047614 March 11, 2004 Green
20040052501 March 18, 2004 Tam
20040071453 April 15, 2004 Valderas
20040076237 April 22, 2004 Kadono et al.
20040081333 April 29, 2004 Grab et al.
20040081434 April 29, 2004 Jung et al.
20040093494 May 13, 2004 Nishimoto et al.
20040093618 May 13, 2004 Baldwin et al.
20040101059 May 27, 2004 Joch et al.
20040105549 June 3, 2004 Suzuki et al.
20040107356 June 3, 2004 Shamoon et al.
20040114687 June 17, 2004 Ferris et al.
20040117347 June 17, 2004 Seo et al.
20040136698 July 15, 2004 Mock
20040139335 July 15, 2004 Diamand et al.
20040143760 July 22, 2004 Alkove et al.
20040146276 July 29, 2004 Ogawa
20040158878 August 12, 2004 Ratnakar et al.
20040184534 September 23, 2004 Wang
20040184616 September 23, 2004 Morten et al.
20040202320 October 14, 2004 Amini et al.
20040217971 November 4, 2004 Kim
20040255115 December 16, 2004 DeMello et al.
20040255236 December 16, 2004 Collart
20050004875 January 6, 2005 Kontio et al.
20050005025 January 6, 2005 Harville et al.
20050013494 January 20, 2005 Srinivasan et al.
20050015797 January 20, 2005 Noblecourt et al.
20050038826 February 17, 2005 Bae et al.
20050055399 March 10, 2005 Savchuk
20050063541 March 24, 2005 Candelore
20050071280 March 31, 2005 Irwin et al.
20050076232 April 7, 2005 Kawaguchi
20050108320 May 19, 2005 Lord et al.
20050114534 May 26, 2005 Lee
20050114896 May 26, 2005 Hug
20050144468 June 30, 2005 Northcutt
20050149450 July 7, 2005 Stefik et al.
20050177741 August 11, 2005 Chen et al.
20050180641 August 18, 2005 Clark
20050183120 August 18, 2005 Jain et al.
20050193070 September 1, 2005 Brown et al.
20050193322 September 1, 2005 Lamkin et al.
20050196147 September 8, 2005 Seo et al.
20050204289 September 15, 2005 Mohammed et al.
20050207442 September 22, 2005 Zoest et al.
20050207578 September 22, 2005 Matsuyama et al.
20050243912 November 3, 2005 Kwon et al.
20050254508 November 17, 2005 Aksu et al.
20050265555 December 1, 2005 Pippuri
20050273695 December 8, 2005 Schnurr
20050275656 December 15, 2005 Corbin et al.
20060013568 January 19, 2006 Rodriguez
20060015580 January 19, 2006 Gabriel et al.
20060026294 February 2, 2006 Virdi et al.
20060026302 February 2, 2006 Bennett et al.
20060036549 February 16, 2006 Wu
20060037057 February 16, 2006 Xu
20060052095 March 9, 2006 Vazvan
20060053080 March 9, 2006 Edmonson et al.
20060064605 March 23, 2006 Giobbi
20060078301 April 13, 2006 Ikeda et al.
20060093320 May 4, 2006 Hallberg et al.
20060120378 June 8, 2006 Usuki et al.
20060129909 June 15, 2006 Butt et al.
20060165163 July 27, 2006 Burazerovic et al.
20060168639 July 27, 2006 Gan et al.
20060173887 August 3, 2006 Breitfeld et al.
20060179239 August 10, 2006 Fluhr
20060181965 August 17, 2006 Collart
20060235880 October 19, 2006 Qian
20060245727 November 2, 2006 Nakano et al.
20060259588 November 16, 2006 Lerman et al.
20060263056 November 23, 2006 Lin et al.
20060267986 November 30, 2006 Bae
20060274835 December 7, 2006 Hamilton et al.
20060294164 December 28, 2006 Armangau et al.
20070005333 January 4, 2007 Setiohardjo et al.
20070031110 February 8, 2007 Rijckaert
20070033419 February 8, 2007 Kocher et al.
20070044010 February 22, 2007 Sull et al.
20070047645 March 1, 2007 Takashima
20070047901 March 1, 2007 Ando et al.
20070053513 March 8, 2007 Hoffberg
20070058928 March 15, 2007 Naito et al.
20070067472 March 22, 2007 Maertens et al.
20070083467 April 12, 2007 Lindahl et al.
20070083617 April 12, 2007 Chakrabarti et al.
20070086528 April 19, 2007 Mauchly et al.
20070100757 May 3, 2007 Rhoads
20070133603 June 14, 2007 Weaver
20070136817 June 14, 2007 Nguyen
20070140647 June 21, 2007 Kusunoki et al.
20070154165 July 5, 2007 Hemmeryckx-Deleersnijder et al.
20070168541 July 19, 2007 Gupta et al.
20070168542 July 19, 2007 Gupta et al.
20070178933 August 2, 2007 Nelson
20070180051 August 2, 2007 Kelly et al.
20070180125 August 2, 2007 Knowles et al.
20070185982 August 9, 2007 Nakanowatari et al.
20070192810 August 16, 2007 Pritchett et al.
20070217339 September 20, 2007 Zhao
20070217759 September 20, 2007 Dodd
20070234391 October 4, 2007 Hunter et al.
20070239839 October 11, 2007 Buday et al.
20070255940 November 1, 2007 Ueno
20070271317 November 22, 2007 Carmel
20070271385 November 22, 2007 Davis et al.
20070274679 November 29, 2007 Yahata et al.
20070277219 November 29, 2007 Toebes et al.
20070277234 November 29, 2007 Bessonov et al.
20070280298 December 6, 2007 Hearn et al.
20070288745 December 13, 2007 Kwan
20070292107 December 20, 2007 Yahata et al.
20070297422 December 27, 2007 Matsuo et al.
20080005175 January 3, 2008 Bourke et al.
20080008455 January 10, 2008 De Lange et al.
20080043832 February 21, 2008 Barkley et al.
20080046718 February 21, 2008 Grab et al.
20080066099 March 13, 2008 Brodersen et al.
20080066181 March 13, 2008 Haveson et al.
20080077592 March 27, 2008 Brodie et al.
20080086456 April 10, 2008 Rasanen et al.
20080086570 April 10, 2008 Dey et al.
20080086747 April 10, 2008 Rasanen et al.
20080101466 May 1, 2008 Swenson et al.
20080101718 May 1, 2008 Yang et al.
20080104633 May 1, 2008 Noblecourt et al.
20080120330 May 22, 2008 Reed et al.
20080120342 May 22, 2008 Reed et al.
20080120389 May 22, 2008 Bassali et al.
20080126248 May 29, 2008 Lee et al.
20080131078 June 5, 2008 Jeong et al.
20080137541 June 12, 2008 Agarwal et al.
20080137736 June 12, 2008 Richardson et al.
20080137847 June 12, 2008 Candelore et al.
20080151817 June 26, 2008 Fitchett
20080172441 July 17, 2008 Speicher et al.
20080187283 August 7, 2008 Takahashi
20080192818 August 14, 2008 DiPietro et al.
20080195664 August 14, 2008 Maharajh et al.
20080195744 August 14, 2008 Bowra et al.
20080201705 August 21, 2008 Wookey
20080205860 August 28, 2008 Holtman
20080209534 August 28, 2008 Keronen et al.
20080240144 October 2, 2008 Kruse et al.
20080256105 October 16, 2008 Nogawa et al.
20080263354 October 23, 2008 Beuque
20080279535 November 13, 2008 Haque et al.
20080294453 November 27, 2008 Baird-Smith et al.
20080298358 December 4, 2008 John et al.
20080310454 December 18, 2008 Bellwood et al.
20080310496 December 18, 2008 Fang
20090010622 January 8, 2009 Yahata et al.
20090013195 January 8, 2009 Ochi et al.
20090031220 January 29, 2009 Tranchant et al.
20090037959 February 5, 2009 Suh et al.
20090048852 February 19, 2009 Burns et al.
20090055546 February 26, 2009 Jung et al.
20090060452 March 5, 2009 Chaudhri
20090064341 March 5, 2009 Hartung et al.
20090066839 March 12, 2009 Jung et al.
20090077143 March 19, 2009 Macy, Jr.
20090097644 April 16, 2009 Haruki
20090106082 April 23, 2009 Senti et al.
20090132599 May 21, 2009 Soroushian et al.
20090132721 May 21, 2009 Soroushian et al.
20090132824 May 21, 2009 Terada et al.
20090136216 May 28, 2009 Soroushian et al.
20090150557 June 11, 2009 Wormley et al.
20090165148 June 25, 2009 Frey et al.
20090168795 July 2, 2009 Segel et al.
20090169181 July 2, 2009 Priyadarshi et al.
20090172201 July 2, 2009 Carmel et al.
20090178090 July 9, 2009 Oztaskent
20090196139 August 6, 2009 Bates et al.
20090201988 August 13, 2009 Gazier et al.
20090217317 August 27, 2009 White et al.
20090226148 September 10, 2009 Nesvadba et al.
20090228395 September 10, 2009 Wegner et al.
20090249081 October 1, 2009 Zayas
20090265737 October 22, 2009 Issa et al.
20090276636 November 5, 2009 Grab et al.
20090282162 November 12, 2009 Mehrotra et al.
20090290706 November 26, 2009 Amini et al.
20090290708 November 26, 2009 Schneider et al.
20090293116 November 26, 2009 DeMello
20090303241 December 10, 2009 Priyadarshi et al.
20090307258 December 10, 2009 Priyadarshi et al.
20090307267 December 10, 2009 Chen et al.
20090310819 December 17, 2009 Hatano
20090310933 December 17, 2009 Lee
20090313544 December 17, 2009 Wood et al.
20090313564 December 17, 2009 Rottler et al.
20090316783 December 24, 2009 Au et al.
20090328124 December 31, 2009 Khouzam et al.
20090328228 December 31, 2009 Schnell
20100040351 February 18, 2010 Toma et al.
20100057928 March 4, 2010 Kapoor et al.
20100058405 March 4, 2010 Ramakrishnan et al.
20100074324 March 25, 2010 Qian et al.
20100074333 March 25, 2010 Au et al.
20100083322 April 1, 2010 Rouse
20100094969 April 15, 2010 Zuckerman et al.
20100095121 April 15, 2010 Shetty et al.
20100106968 April 29, 2010 Mori et al.
20100107260 April 29, 2010 Orrell et al.
20100111192 May 6, 2010 Graves
20100138903 June 3, 2010 Medvinsky
20100142915 June 10, 2010 Mcdermott et al.
20100142917 June 10, 2010 Isaji
20100158109 June 24, 2010 Dahlby et al.
20100161825 June 24, 2010 Ronca et al.
20100166060 July 1, 2010 Ezure et al.
20100186092 July 22, 2010 Takechi et al.
20100189183 July 29, 2010 Gu et al.
20100218208 August 26, 2010 Holden
20100228795 September 9, 2010 Hahn
20100235472 September 16, 2010 Sood et al.
20100250532 September 30, 2010 Soroushian et al.
20100290761 November 18, 2010 Drake et al.
20100299522 November 25, 2010 Khambete et al.
20100306249 December 2, 2010 Hill et al.
20100313225 December 9, 2010 Cholas et al.
20100313226 December 9, 2010 Cholas et al.
20100316126 December 16, 2010 Chen
20100319014 December 16, 2010 Lockett et al.
20100319017 December 16, 2010 Cook
20100332595 December 30, 2010 Fullagar et al.
20110002381 January 6, 2011 Yang et al.
20110010466 January 13, 2011 Fan et al.
20110016225 January 20, 2011 Park et al.
20110047209 February 24, 2011 Lindholm et al.
20110055585 March 3, 2011 Lee
20110058675 March 10, 2011 Brueck et al.
20110060808 March 10, 2011 Martin et al.
20110066673 March 17, 2011 Outlaw
20110067057 March 17, 2011 Karaoguz et al.
20110078440 March 31, 2011 Feng et al.
20110080940 April 7, 2011 Bocharov
20110082924 April 7, 2011 Gopalakrishnan
20110096828 April 28, 2011 Chen et al.
20110103374 May 5, 2011 Lajoie et al.
20110107379 May 5, 2011 Lajoie et al.
20110116772 May 19, 2011 Kwon et al.
20110126191 May 26, 2011 Hughes et al.
20110129011 June 2, 2011 Cilli et al.
20110135090 June 9, 2011 Chan et al.
20110138018 June 9, 2011 Raveendran et al.
20110142415 June 16, 2011 Rhyu
20110145726 June 16, 2011 Wei et al.
20110145858 June 16, 2011 Philpott et al.
20110149753 June 23, 2011 Bapst et al.
20110150100 June 23, 2011 Abadir
20110153785 June 23, 2011 Minborg et al.
20110153835 June 23, 2011 Rimac et al.
20110173345 July 14, 2011 Knox et al.
20110179185 July 21, 2011 Wang et al.
20110184738 July 28, 2011 Kalisky et al.
20110191439 August 4, 2011 Dazzi et al.
20110191803 August 4, 2011 Baldwin et al.
20110197237 August 11, 2011 Turner
20110197261 August 11, 2011 Dong et al.
20110197267 August 11, 2011 Gravel et al.
20110213827 September 1, 2011 Kaspar et al.
20110222786 September 15, 2011 Carmel et al.
20110225302 September 15, 2011 Park et al.
20110225315 September 15, 2011 Wexler et al.
20110225417 September 15, 2011 Maharajh et al.
20110239078 September 29, 2011 Luby et al.
20110246657 October 6, 2011 Glow
20110246659 October 6, 2011 Bouazizi
20110246661 October 6, 2011 Manzari et al.
20110252118 October 13, 2011 Pantos et al.
20110264530 October 27, 2011 Santangelo et al.
20110268178 November 3, 2011 Park
20110276695 November 10, 2011 Maldaner et al.
20110283012 November 17, 2011 Melnyk
20110291723 December 1, 2011 Hashimoto
20110296048 December 1, 2011 Knox et al.
20110302319 December 8, 2011 Ha et al.
20110305273 December 15, 2011 He et al.
20110314130 December 22, 2011 Strasman
20110314176 December 22, 2011 Frojdh et al.
20110314500 December 22, 2011 Gordon et al.
20120005312 January 5, 2012 Mcgowan et al.
20120005368 January 5, 2012 Knittle
20120017282 January 19, 2012 Kang et al.
20120023251 January 26, 2012 Pyle et al.
20120036365 February 9, 2012 Kyslov et al.
20120036544 February 9, 2012 Chen et al.
20120042090 February 16, 2012 Chen et al.
20120047542 February 23, 2012 Lewis et al.
20120066360 March 15, 2012 Ghosh
20120093214 April 19, 2012 Urbach
20120110120 May 3, 2012 Willig et al.
20120114302 May 10, 2012 Randall
20120124191 May 17, 2012 Lyon
20120137336 May 31, 2012 Applegate et al.
20120144117 June 7, 2012 Weare et al.
20120144445 June 7, 2012 Bonta et al.
20120147958 June 14, 2012 Ronca et al.
20120166633 June 28, 2012 Baumback et al.
20120167132 June 28, 2012 Mathews et al.
20120170642 July 5, 2012 Braness et al.
20120170643 July 5, 2012 Soroushian et al.
20120170906 July 5, 2012 Soroushian et al.
20120170915 July 5, 2012 Braness et al.
20120173751 July 5, 2012 Braness et al.
20120177101 July 12, 2012 van der Schaar
20120179834 July 12, 2012 Van Der et al.
20120201475 August 9, 2012 Carmel et al.
20120201476 August 9, 2012 Carmel et al.
20120233345 September 13, 2012 Hannuksela
20120240176 September 20, 2012 Ma et al.
20120254455 October 4, 2012 Adimatyam et al.
20120257678 October 11, 2012 Zhou et al.
20120260277 October 11, 2012 Kosciewicz
20120263434 October 18, 2012 Wainner et al.
20120265562 October 18, 2012 Daouk et al.
20120278496 November 1, 2012 Hsu
20120289147 November 15, 2012 Raleigh et al.
20120294355 November 22, 2012 Holcomb et al.
20120297039 November 22, 2012 Acuna et al.
20120307883 December 6, 2012 Graves
20120311094 December 6, 2012 Biderman et al.
20120311174 December 6, 2012 Bichot et al.
20120314778 December 13, 2012 Salustri et al.
20120317235 December 13, 2012 Nguyen et al.
20120331167 December 27, 2012 Hunt
20130007223 January 3, 2013 Luby et al.
20130013730 January 10, 2013 Li et al.
20130013803 January 10, 2013 Bichot et al.
20130019107 January 17, 2013 Grab et al.
20130019273 January 17, 2013 Ma et al.
20130041808 February 14, 2013 Pham et al.
20130044821 February 21, 2013 Braness et al.
20130046849 February 21, 2013 Wolf
20130046902 February 21, 2013 Villegas Nuñez et al.
20130051554 February 28, 2013 Braness et al.
20130054958 February 28, 2013 Braness et al.
20130055084 February 28, 2013 Soroushian et al.
20130058480 March 7, 2013 Ziskind et al.
20130061040 March 7, 2013 Kiefer et al.
20130061045 March 7, 2013 Kiefer et al.
20130064466 March 14, 2013 Carmel et al.
20130066838 March 14, 2013 Singla et al.
20130080267 March 28, 2013 McGowan
20130094565 April 18, 2013 Yang et al.
20130097309 April 18, 2013 Ma et al.
20130114944 May 9, 2013 Soroushian et al.
20130124859 May 16, 2013 Pestoni et al.
20130128962 May 23, 2013 Rajagopalan et al.
20130152767 June 20, 2013 Katz et al.
20130166580 June 27, 2013 Maharajh
20130166765 June 27, 2013 Kaufman
20130166906 June 27, 2013 Swaminathan et al.
20130170561 July 4, 2013 Hannuksela
20130170764 July 4, 2013 Carmel et al.
20130173513 July 4, 2013 Chu et al.
20130179199 July 11, 2013 Ziskind et al.
20130179589 July 11, 2013 McCarthy
20130179992 July 11, 2013 Ziskind et al.
20130182952 July 18, 2013 Carmel et al.
20130196292 August 1, 2013 Brennen et al.
20130212228 August 15, 2013 Butler et al.
20130223812 August 29, 2013 Rossi
20130226578 August 29, 2013 Bolton et al.
20130226635 August 29, 2013 Fisher
20130227081 August 29, 2013 Luby et al.
20130227122 August 29, 2013 Gao
20130301424 November 14, 2013 Kotecha et al.
20130311670 November 21, 2013 Tarbox et al.
20130329781 December 12, 2013 Su et al.
20140003516 January 2, 2014 Soroushian
20140019593 January 16, 2014 Reznik et al.
20140037620 February 6, 2014 Ferree et al.
20140052823 February 20, 2014 Gavade et al.
20140059156 February 27, 2014 Freeman, II et al.
20140096171 April 3, 2014 Shivadas et al.
20140101722 April 10, 2014 Moore
20140115650 April 24, 2014 Zhang et al.
20140119432 May 1, 2014 Wang et al.
20140140253 May 22, 2014 Lohmar et al.
20140140396 May 22, 2014 Wang et al.
20140140417 May 22, 2014 Shaffer et al.
20140143301 May 22, 2014 Watson et al.
20140143431 May 22, 2014 Watson et al.
20140143440 May 22, 2014 Ramamurthy et al.
20140149557 May 29, 2014 Lohmar et al.
20140177734 June 26, 2014 Carmel et al.
20140189065 July 3, 2014 Schaar et al.
20140201382 July 17, 2014 Shivadas et al.
20140211840 July 31, 2014 Butt et al.
20140211859 July 31, 2014 Carmel et al.
20140241420 August 28, 2014 Orton-jay et al.
20140241421 August 28, 2014 Orton-jay et al.
20140247869 September 4, 2014 Su et al.
20140250473 September 4, 2014 Braness et al.
20140258714 September 11, 2014 Grab
20140269927 September 18, 2014 Naletov et al.
20140269936 September 18, 2014 Shivadas et al.
20140280763 September 18, 2014 Grab et al.
20140297804 October 2, 2014 Shivadas et al.
20140297881 October 2, 2014 Shivadas et al.
20140355668 December 4, 2014 Shoham et al.
20140359678 December 4, 2014 Shivadas et al.
20140359679 December 4, 2014 Shivadas et al.
20140359680 December 4, 2014 Shivadas et al.
20140376720 December 25, 2014 Chan et al.
20150006662 January 1, 2015 Braness
20150026677 January 22, 2015 Stevens et al.
20150049957 February 19, 2015 Carmel et al.
20150063693 March 5, 2015 Carmel et al.
20150067715 March 5, 2015 Koat et al.
20150104153 April 16, 2015 Braness et al.
20150117836 April 30, 2015 Amidei et al.
20150117837 April 30, 2015 Amidei et al.
20150139419 May 21, 2015 Kiefer et al.
20150188758 July 2, 2015 Amidei et al.
20150188842 July 2, 2015 Amidei et al.
20150188921 July 2, 2015 Amidei et al.
20150189017 July 2, 2015 Amidei et al.
20150189373 July 2, 2015 Amidei et al.
20150288530 October 8, 2015 Oyman
20150288996 October 8, 2015 Van Der Schaar et al.
20150334435 November 19, 2015 Shivadas et al.
20150373421 December 24, 2015 Chan et al.
20160070890 March 10, 2016 Grab et al.
20160112382 April 21, 2016 Kiefer et al.
20160149981 May 26, 2016 Shivadas et al.
20160219303 July 28, 2016 Braness et al.
20170214947 July 27, 2017 Kiefer et al.
20170280203 September 28, 2017 Chan et al.
20180007451 January 4, 2018 Shivadas et al.
20180060543 March 1, 2018 Grab et al.
20180131980 May 10, 2018 Van Der Schaar et al.
20180220153 August 2, 2018 Braness et al.
20180262757 September 13, 2018 Naletov et al.
20180332094 November 15, 2018 Braness
20190045219 February 7, 2019 Braness et al.
20190045220 February 7, 2019 Braness et al.
20190268596 August 29, 2019 Naletov et al.
20190356928 November 21, 2019 Braness et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
2010203605 May 2015 AU
2237293 July 1997 CA
2823829 January 2019 CA
1169229 December 1997 CN
1221284 June 1999 CN
1723696 January 2006 CN
757484 February 1997 EP
813167 December 1997 EP
0936812 August 1999 EP
1056273 November 2000 EP
1187483 March 2002 EP
2004013823 January 2004 EP
1420580 May 2004 EP
1453319 September 2004 EP
2807821 December 2004 EP
1553779 July 2005 EP
1657835 May 2006 EP
1283640 October 2006 EP
1718074 November 2006 EP
2180664 April 2010 EP
2360923 August 2011 EP
2486517 August 2012 EP
2486727 August 2012 EP
2507995 October 2012 EP
2564354 March 2013 EP
2616991 July 2013 EP
2616991 July 2013 EP
2617192 July 2013 EP
2617192 July 2013 EP
2661696 November 2013 EP
2661875 November 2013 EP
2661895 November 2013 EP
2486727 March 2014 EP
2564354 March 2014 EP
2616991 March 2014 EP
2617192 March 2014 EP
2716048 April 2014 EP
2721826 April 2014 EP
2486517 June 2014 EP
2486517 June 2014 EP
2751990 July 2014 EP
2751990 July 2014 EP
2807821 December 2014 EP
2751990 April 2015 EP
2661696 May 2020 EP
1125765 August 2009 HK
08046902 February 1996 JP
08111842 April 1996 JP
08163488 June 1996 JP
08287613 November 1996 JP
09037225 February 1997 JP
11164307 June 1999 JP
11275576 October 1999 JP
11328929 November 1999 JP
2000201343 July 2000 JP
02001043668 February 2001 JP
2001209726 August 2001 JP
2001346165 December 2001 JP
2002164880 June 2002 JP
2002170363 June 2002 JP
2002518898 June 2002 JP
2002218384 August 2002 JP
2003179597 June 2003 JP
2003250113 September 2003 JP
2004013823 January 2004 JP
2004515941 May 2004 JP
2004172830 June 2004 JP
2004187161 July 2004 JP
2004234128 August 2004 JP
2004304767 October 2004 JP
2004328218 November 2004 JP
2005027153 January 2005 JP
2005504480 February 2005 JP
2005080204 March 2005 JP
2005286881 October 2005 JP
2006155500 June 2006 JP
2006521035 September 2006 JP
2006524007 October 2006 JP
2007036666 February 2007 JP
2007174375 July 2007 JP
2007235690 September 2007 JP
2007535881 December 2007 JP
2008235999 October 2008 JP
2009522887 June 2009 JP
2009530917 August 2009 JP
5200204 June 2013 JP
2014506430 March 2014 JP
5723888 May 2015 JP
6038805 December 2016 JP
6078574 February 2017 JP
2017063453 March 2017 JP
2018160923 October 2018 JP
6453291 January 2019 JP
6657313 February 2020 JP
202080551 May 2020 JP
100221423 September 1999 KR
2002013664 February 2002 KR
1020020064888 August 2002 KR
20040039852 May 2004 KR
20060106250 October 2006 KR
100669616 January 2007 KR
20070005699 January 2007 KR
20100106418 October 2010 KR
1020130133830 December 2013 KR
101874907 July 2018 KR
101917763 November 2018 KR
102072839 January 2020 KR
102122189 June 2020 KR
2328040 June 2008 RU
146026 December 2010 SG
1995015660 June 1995 WO
1996013121 May 1996 WO
1997031445 April 1998 WO
1999010836 March 1999 WO
1999065239 December 1999 WO
2000049762 August 2000 WO
2000049763 August 2000 WO
0104892 January 2001 WO
2001031497 May 2001 WO
2001050732 July 2001 WO
2001065762 September 2001 WO
2002001880 January 2002 WO
2002008948 January 2002 WO
2002035832 May 2002 WO
2002037210 May 2002 WO
2002054196 July 2002 WO
2003030000 April 2003 WO
2003047262 June 2003 WO
2003096136 November 2003 WO
2004012378 February 2004 WO
2004054247 June 2004 WO
2004097811 November 2004 WO
2004100158 November 2004 WO
2004102571 November 2004 WO
2005008385 January 2005 WO
2005015935 February 2005 WO
2005109224 November 2005 WO
2006018843 February 2006 WO
2006018843 December 2006 WO
2007044590 April 2007 WO
2007113836 October 2007 WO
2008010275 January 2008 WO
2008042242 April 2008 WO
2008086313 July 2008 WO
2007113836 November 2008 WO
2008135932 November 2008 WO
2007113836 December 2008 WO
2009006302 January 2009 WO
2009065137 May 2009 WO
2009070770 June 2009 WO
2009109976 September 2009 WO
2010060106 May 2010 WO
2010080911 July 2010 WO
2010089962 August 2010 WO
2010108053 September 2010 WO
2010111261 September 2010 WO
2010122447 October 2010 WO
2010147878 December 2010 WO
2011042898 April 2011 WO
2011042900 April 2011 WO
2011068668 June 2011 WO
2011087449 July 2011 WO
2011101371 August 2011 WO
2011103364 August 2011 WO
2011132184 October 2011 WO
2011135558 November 2011 WO
2012035533 March 2012 WO
2012035534 March 2012 WO
2012035534 July 2012 WO
2012094171 July 2012 WO
2012094181 July 2012 WO
2012094189 July 2012 WO
20120094181 July 2012 WO
20120094189 July 2012 WO
2012035533 August 2012 WO
2012162806 December 2012 WO
2012171113 December 2012 WO
2013030833 March 2013 WO
2013032518 March 2013 WO
2013103986 July 2013 WO
2013111126 August 2013 WO
2013111126 August 2013 WO
2013032518 September 2013 WO
2013144942 October 2013 WO
2014506430 March 2014 WO
2014145901 September 2014 WO
2014193996 December 2014 WO
2014193996 February 2015 WO
2015031982 March 2015 WO
2013111126 June 2015 WO
Other references
  • Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2007/063950, completed Mar. 1, 2008, dated Mar. 19, 2008, 6 pgs.
  • Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2008/087999, completed Feb. 7, 2009, dated Mar. 19, 2009, 4 pgs.
  • “DVD-Mpeg differences”, retrieved from http://dvd.sourceforge.net/dvdinfo/dvdmpeg.html, printed on Jul. 2, 2009, 1 pg.
  • Nelson, Mark, “Arithmetic Coding + Statistical Modeling = Data Compression: Part 1—Arithmetic Coding”, Doctor Dobb's Journal, Feb. 1991, printed from http://www.dogma.net/markn/articles/arith/part1.htm on printed Jul. 2, 2003, 12 pgs.
  • Author Unknown, “Turbo-Charge Your Internet and PC Performance”, printed Oct. 30, 2008 from Speedtest.net—The Global Broadband Speed Test, 1 pg.
  • Author Unknown, “White paper, The New Mainstream Wireless LAN Standard”, Broadcom Corporation, Jul. 2003, 12 pgs.
  • Blasiak, “Video Transrating and Transcoding: Overview of Video Transrating and Transcoding Technologies”, Ingenient Technologies, TI Developer Conference, Aug. 6-8, 2002, 22 pgs.
  • Bloom et al., “Copy Protection for DVD Video”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 87, No. 7, Jul. 1999, pp. 1267-1276.
  • Bross et al., “High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) text specification draft 10 (for FDIS & Last Call)”, Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, Document: JCTVC-L1003_v34, 12th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Jan. 14-23, 2013 (presented in three parts).
  • Casares et al., “Simplifying Video Editing Using Metadata”, DIS2002, 2002, pp. 157-166.
  • Concolato et al., “Live HTTP Streaming of Video and Subtitles within a Browser”, MMSys 2013, Feb. 26-Mar. 1, 2013, Oslo, Norway, 5 pgs.
  • De Cock et al., “Complexity-Based Consistent-Quality Encoding in the Cloud”, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Date of Conference Sep. 25-28, 2016, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 1484-1488.
  • Deutscher, “IIS Transform Manager Beta—Using the MP4 to Smooth Task”, Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20130328111303/http://blog.johndeutscher.com/category/smooth-streaming, Blog post of Apr. 29, 2011, 14 pgs.
  • Eskicioglu et al., “An Integrated Approach to Encrypting Scalable Video”, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Aug. 26-29, 2002, Lausanne, Switzerland, 4 pgs.
  • Fecheyr-Lippens, “A Review of HTTP Live Streaming”, Internet Citation, Jan. 25, 2010, pp. 1-37.
  • Garg et al., “An Experimental Study of Throughput for UDP and VoIP Traffic in IEEE 802.11b Networks”, Wireless Communications and Networkings, Mar. 2003, pp. 1748-1753.
  • Gast, “When is 54 Not Equal to 54? A Look at 802.11a, b and g Throughput”, Aug. 8, 2003, printed Oct. 30, 2008 from www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/wireless/2003/08/08/wireless_throughput.html, 4 pgs.
  • Ghosh, “Enhancing Silverlight Video Experiences with Contextual Data”, Retrieved from: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/ee336025.aspx, 2010, 15 pgs.
  • Griffith, Eric, “The Wireless Digital Picture Frame Arrives”, Wi-Fi Planet, printed May 4, 2007 from http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/news/article.php/3093141, Oct. 16, 2003, 3 pgs.
  • Hartung et al., “DRM Protected Dynamic Adaptive HTTP Streaming”, MMSys 2011 Proceedings of the Second Annual ACM Conference on Multimedia Systems, San Jose, California, Feb. 23-25, 2011, pp. 277-282.
  • Hurtado Guzman, Juan Esteban, “Development and Implementation of an Adaptive HTTP Streaming Framework for H264/MVC Coded Media”, Politecnico di Torino, Nov. 2010, 108 pgs.
  • Hwang et al., “Efficient and User Friendly Inter-domain Device Authentication/Access control for Home Networks”, Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing, Seoul, Korea, Aug. 1-4, 2006, pp. 131-140.
  • Inlet Technologies, “Adaptive Delivery to iDevices”, 2010, 2 pages.
  • Inlet Technologies, “Adaptive delivery to iPhone 3.0”, 2009, 2 pgs.
  • Inlet Technologies, “HTTP versus RTMP”, 2009, 3 pages.
  • Inlet Technologies, “The World's First Live Smooth Streaming Event: The French Open”, 2009, 2 pages.
  • I-O Data, “Innovation of technology arrived”, Nov. 2004, Retrieved from http://www.iodata.com/catalogs/AVLP2DVDLA_Flyer200505.pdf, 2 pgs.
  • Kaspar et al., “Using HTTP Pipelining to Improve Progressive Download over Multiple Heterogeneous Interfaces”, IEEE ICC proceedings, 2010, 5 pgs.
  • Kim, Kyuheon, “MPEG-2 ES/PES/TS/PSI”, Kyung-Hee University, Oct. 4, 2010, 66 pages.
  • Kozintsev et al., “Improving last-hop multicast streaming video over 802.11”, Workshop on Broadband Wireless Multimedia, Oct. 2004, pp. 1-10.
  • Kurzke et al., “Get Your Content Onto Google TV”, Google, Retrieved from: http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/io2012/presentations/live&20to%20website/1300.pdf, 2012. 58 pgs.
  • Lang, “Expression Encoder, Best Practices for live smooth streaming broadcasting”, Microsoft Corporation, 2010, retrieved from http://www.streamingmedia.com/conferences/west2010/presentations/SMWest-12010-Expression-Encoder.pdf, 20 pgs.
  • Levkov, “Mobile Encoding Guidelines for Android Powered Devices”, Adobe Systems Inc., Addendum B, Dec. 22, 2010, 42 pgs.
  • Li et al., “Content-Aware Playout and Packet Scheduling for Video Streaming Over Wireless Links”, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 10, No. 5, Aug. 2008, pp. 885-895.
  • Lian et al., “Efficient video encryption scheme based on advanced video coding”, Multimed. Tools Appl. vol. 38, 2008, pp. 75-89.
  • Lin et al., “Multipass Encoding for Reducing Pulsing Artifacts in Cloud Based Video Transcoding”, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Date of Conference Sep. 27, 30, 2015, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 5 pgs.
  • Liu et al., “A Formal Framework for Component Deployment”, OOPSLA 2006, Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Language, and Applications, Portland, Oregon, Oct. 22-26, 2006, pp. 325-344.
  • Long et al., “Silver: Simplifying Video Editing with Metadata”, Demonstrations, CHI 2003: New Horizons, Apr. 5-10, 2003, pp. 628-629.
  • Matroska, “Diagram”, Matroska, Technical/Info, Diagram, 2016, retrieved from https://www.matroska.org/technical/diagram/index.html on Jul. 20, 2017, 9 pages.
  • Matroska, “Specifications”, Matroska, Technical/Info, Specifications, Jun. 25, 2017, retrieved from https://www.matroska.org/technical/specs/index.html on Jul. 20, 2017, 20 pages.
  • Miras, “On Quality Aware Adaptation of Internet Video”, University of London, PhD dissertation, 2004, 181 pgs.
  • Morrison, “EA IFF 85 Standard for Interchange Format Files”, Jan. 14, 1985, printed from http://www.dcs.ed.ac.uk/home/mxr/gfx/2d/IFF.txt on Mar. 6, 2006, 24 pgs.
  • Moscoso, Pedro Gomes, “Interactive Internet TV Architecture Based on Scalable Video Coding”, Instituto Superior Techico, Universidad Technica de Lisboa, May 2011, 103 pgs.
  • MSDN, “Adaptive streaming, Expression Studio 2.0”, Apr. 23, 2009, 2 pgs.
  • Nelson, “Arithmetic Coding + Statistical Modeling = Data Compression: Part 1—Arithmetic Coding”, Doctor Dobb's Journal, Feb. 1991, USA, pp. 1-12.
  • Nelson, Michael, “IBM's Cryptolopes”, Complex Objects in Digital Libraries Course, Spring 2001, Retrieved from http://www.cs.odu.edu/˜mln/teaching/unc/inls210/?method=display&pkg_name=cryptolopes.pkg&element_name=cryptolopes.ppt, 12 pages.
  • Noboru, “Play Fast and Fine Video on Web! codec”, Co.9, No. 12, Dec. 1, 2003, pp. 178-179.
  • Noe, Alexander, “AVI File Format”, http://www.alexander-noe.com/video/documentation/avi.pdf, Dec. 14, 2006, pp. 1-26.
  • Noe, Alexander, “Definitions”, Apr. 11, 2006, retrieved from http://www.alexander-noe.com/video/amg/definitions.html on Oct. 16, 2013, 2 pages.
  • Ooyala, “Widevine Content Protection”, Ooyala Support Center for Developers. Ooyala, Inc., Jun. 3, 2013. http://support.ooyala.com/developers/documentation/concepts/player_v3_widevine_integration.html, 7 pgs.
  • Oyman et al., “Quality of Experience for HTTP Adaptive Streaming Services”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Apr. 2012, vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 20-27, DOI: 10.1109/MCOM.2012.6178830.
  • Ozer, Jan, “Adaptive Streaming in the Field”, Streaming Media, Dec. 2010-Jan. 2011, pp. 36-47.
  • Padiadpu, Rashmi, “Towards Mobile Learning: A SCORM Player for the Google Android Platform”, Master Thesis, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, 2008, 66 pgs.
  • “IBM Closes Cryptolopes Unit,” Dec. 17, 1997, CNET News, Printed on Apr. 25, 2014 from http://news.cnet.com/IBM-closes-Cryptolopes-unit/2100-1001_3206465.html, 3 pages.
  • “Information Technology—Coding of Audio Visual Objects—Part 2: Visual” International Standard, ISO/IEC 14496-2, Third Edition, Jun. 1, 2004, pp. 1-724. (presented in three parts).
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/905,804, “Notice of Allowance,” dated Aug. 12, 2015, 8 pgs.
  • Broadq—The Ultimate Home Entertainment Software, printed May 11, 2009 from ittp://web.srchive.org/web/20030401122010/www.broadq.com/qcasttuner/, 1 pg.
  • Cloakware Corporation, “Protecting Digital Content Using Cloakware Code Transformation Technology”, Version 1.2, May 2002, pp. 1-10.
  • EP11774529 Supplementary European Search Report, completed Jan. 31, 2014, 2 pgs.
  • European Search Report Application No. EP 08870152, Search Completed May 19, 2011, dated May 26, 2011, 9 pgs.
  • European Supplementary Search Report for Application EP09759600, completed Jan. 25, 2011, 11 pgs.
  • Extended European Search Report for European Application EP10821672, completed Jan 30, 2014, 3 pgs.
  • Extended European Search Report for European Application EP11824682, completed Feb. 6, 2014, 4 pgs.
  • Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 14763140.2, Search completed Sep. 26, 2016, dated Oct. 5, 2016, 9 Pgs.
  • Final draft ETSI ES 202 109, V1.1.1, ETSI Standard, Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA); Security; Synchronization mechanism for end-to-end encryption, Oct. 2002, 17 pgs.
  • “Container format (digital)”, printed Aug. 22, 2009 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Container_format_(digital), 4 pgs.
  • “Diagram | Matroska”, Dec. 17, 2010, Retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/201 01217114656/http:I/matroska.org/technical/diagram/index.html on Jan. 29, 2016, 5 pages.
  • “Draft CR: Trick Mode for HTTP Streaming”, 3GPP TSG-SA4 Meeting #58, Apr. 26-30, 2010, Vancouver, Canada, S4-100237, 3 pgs.
  • “DVD—MPeg differences”, printed Jul. 2, 2009 from http://dvd.sourceforge.net/dvdinfo/dvdmpeg.html, 1 pg.
  • “DVD subtitles”, sam.zoy.org/writings/dvd/subtitles, dated Jan. 9, 2001, printed Jul. 2, 2009, 4 pgs.
  • “Final Committee Draft of MPEG-4 streaming text format”, International Organisation for Standardisation, Feb. 2004, 22 pgs.
  • “IBM Spearheading Intellectual Property Protection Technology for Information on the Internet; Cryptolope Containers Have Arrived”, May 1, 1996, Business Wire, Printed on Aug. 1, 2014 from http://www.thefreelibrary.com/IBM+Spearheading+Intellectual+Property+Protection+Technology+for...-a018239381, 6 pg.
  • “Information Technology—Coding of audio-visual objects—Part 14: MP4 file format”, International Standard, ISO/IEC 14496-14, First Edition, Nov. 15, 2003, 18 pages.
  • “Information Technology—Coding of audio-visual objects—Part 17: Streaming text”, International Organisation for Standardisation, Feb. 2004, 22 pgs.
  • “Information technology—Coding of audio-visual objects—Part 18: Font compression and streaming”, ISO/IEC 14496-18, First edition Jul. 1, 2004, 26 pgs.
  • “Information technology—Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information: Systems”, International Standard ISO/IEC 13818-1, Second Edition, Dec. 1, 2000, 174 pages (presented in two parts).
  • “Information-Technology—Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio: Systems, Recommendation H.222.0”, International Standard, ISO/IEC 13818-1, Draft 1209, Apr. 25, 1995, 151 pages.
  • “Information-Technology—Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio: Systems, Recommendation H.222.0”, International Standard, ISO/IEC 13818-1, Draft 1540, Nov. 13, 1994, 161 pages.
  • “KISS Players, KISS DP-500”, retrieved from http://www.kiss-technology.com/?p=dp500 on May 4, 2007, 1 pg.
  • “Matroska”, Wikipedia, Jul. 10, 2017, retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matroska on Jul. 20, 2017, 3 pages.
  • “Matroska Streaming | Matroska”, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://web.archive.org/web/201 0121711431 O/http://matroska.org/technical!streaming/index.html [retrieved on Jan. 29, 2016], Dec. 17, 2010, 2 pgs.
  • “MovieLabs Specification for Next Generation Video—Version 1.0”, Motion Picture Laboratories, Inc., 2013, Retrieved from: http://movielabs.com/ngvideo/MovieLabs%20Specification%20for%20Next%20Generation%20Video%20v1.0.pdf, 5 pgs.
  • “MPEG-2”, Wikipedia, Jun. 13, 2017, retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG-2 on Jul. 20, 2017, 13 pages.
  • “MPEG-4 File Format, Version 2”, Sustainability of Digital Formats: Planning for Library of Congress Collections, Retrieved from: https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd000155.shtml, Last updated Feb. 21, 2017, 8 pgs.
  • “MPEG-4 Part 14”, Wikipedia, Jul. 10, 2017, retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG-4_Part_14 on Jul. 20, 2017, 5 pages.
  • “Netflix turns on subtitles for PC, Mac streaming”, Yahoo! News, Apr. 21, 2010, Printed on Mar. 26, 2014, 3 pgs.
  • “OpenDML AVI File Format Extensions”, OpenDML AVI M-JPEG File Format Subcommittee, retrieved from www.the-labs.com/Video/odmIff2-avidef.pdf, Sep. 1997, 42 pgs.
  • “OpenDML AVI File Format Extensions Version 1.02”, OpenDMLAVI MJPEG File Format Subcommittee. Last revision: Feb. 28, 1996. Reformatting: Sep. 1997, 29 pgs.
  • “QCast Tuner for PS2”, printed May 11, 2009 from http://web.archive.org/web/20030210120605/www.divx.com/software/detail.php?ie=39, 2 pgs.
  • “Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video; High efficiency video coding”, International Telecommunication Union, ITU-T H.265, Apr. 2015, 634 pages (presented in six parts).
  • “Smooth Streaming Client”, The Official Microsoft IIS Site, Sep. 24, 2010, 4 pages.
  • “Specifications | Matroska”, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://web.archive.org/web/201 00706041303/http:/1www.matroska.org/technical/specs/index.html, retrieved on Jan. 29, 2016, Jul. 6, 2010, 14 pgs.
  • “Specifications Matroska”, Dec. 17, 2010, [retrieved on Mar. 2, 2018], 12 pages.
  • “Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 10834935, International Filing Date Nov. 15, 2010, Search Completed May 27, 2014, 9 pgs.”
  • “Supported Media Formats”, Supported Media Formats, Android Developers, Printed on Nov. 27, 2013 from developer.android.com/guide/appendix/media-formats.html, 3 pgs.
  • “Text of ISO/IEC 14496-18/COR1, Font compression and streaming”, ITU Study Group 16—Video Coding Experts Group—ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG(ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG16 06), No. N8664, Oct. 27, 2006, 8 pgs.
  • “Text of ISO/IEC 14496-18/FDIS, Coding of Moving Pictures and Audio”, ITU Study Group 16—Videocoding Experts Group—ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG(ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG16 06), No. N6215, Dec. 2003, 26 pgs.
  • “Thread: SSME (Smooth Streaming Medial Element) config.xml review (Smooth Streaming Client configuration file)”, Printed on Mar. 26, 2014, 3 pgs.
  • “Transcoding Best Practices”, From movideo, Printed on Nov. 27, 2013 from code.movideo.com/Transcoding_Best_Practices, 5 pgs.
  • “Using HTTP Live Streaming”, iOS Developer Library, http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/networkinginternet/conceptual/streamingmediaguide/UsingHTTPLiveStreaming/UsingHTTPLiveStreaming.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40008332-CH102-SW1, Feb. 11, 2014, 10 pgs.
  • “Video Manager and Video Title Set IFO file headers”, printed Aug. 22, 2009 from http://dvd.sourceforge.net/dvdinfo/ifo.htm, 6 pgs.
  • “What is a DVD?”, printed Aug. 22, 2009 from http://www.videohelp.com/dvd, 8 pgs.
  • “What is a VOB file”, http://www.mpucoder.com/DVD/vobov.html, printed on Jul. 2, 2009, 2 pgs.
  • “What's on a DVD?”, printed Aug. 22, 2009 from http://www.doom9.org/dvd-structure.htm, 5 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,298, “Final Office Action Received”, dated May 19, 2014, 26 pgs.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/905,804, “Non-Final Office Action Received”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/905,804, “Non-Final Office Action Received”, dated Jul. 25, 2014, 15 pgs.
  • Adams et al., “Will http adaptive streaming become the dominant mode of video delivery in cable networks?”, https://www.nctatechnicalpapers.com/Paper/2011/2011-will-http-adaptive-streaming-become-the-dominant-mode-of-video-delivery-in-cable-networks-, 10 pgs.
  • Adhikari et al., “Unreeling Netflix: Understanding and Improving Multi-CDN Movie Delivery”, 2012 Proceedings IEEE InfoCom, Mar. 25-30, 2012, Orlando, Florida, 9 pgs.
  • Adzic et al., “Optimized Adaptive HTTP Streaming for Mobile Devices”, International Society for Optics and Photonics, Applications of Digital Image Processing XXXIV, vol. 8135, Sep. 2011, p. 81350T.
  • Akhshabi et al., “An Experimental Evaluation of Rate-Adaptation Algorithms in Adaptive Streaming over HTTP”, MMSys'11, Feb. 23-25, 2011, 12 pgs.
  • Author Unknown, “Blu-ray Disc—Blu-ray Disc—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia”, printed Oct. 30, 2008 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray_Disc, 11 pgs.
  • Author Unknown, “Blu-ray Movie Bitrates Here—Blu-ray Forum”, printed Oct. 30, 2008 from http://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=3338, 6 pgs.
  • Author Unknown, “MPEG-4 Video Encoder: Based on International Standard ISO/IEC 14496-2”, Patni Computer Systems, Ltd., printed Jan. 24, 2007, USA, pp. 1-15.
  • Author Unknown, “O'Reilly—802.11 Wireless Networks: The Definitive Guide, Second Edition”, printed Oct. 30, 2008 from http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596100520, 2 pgs.
  • Papagiannaki et al., “Experimental Characterization of Home Wireless Networks and Design Implications”, INFOCOM 2006, 25th IEEE International Conference of Computer Communications, Proceedings, Apr. 2006, 13 pgs.
  • Peek, David, “Consumer Distributed File Systems”, Dissertation, Doctor of Philosophy, Computer Science and Engineering, The University of Michigan, 2009, 118 pgs.
  • Phamdo, “Theory of Data Compression”, printed on Oct. 10, 2003, 12 pgs.
  • Rosenberg et al., “Indicating User Agent Capabilities in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)”, Network Working Group, RFC 3840, Aug. 2004, 36 pgs.
  • Schulzrinne, H., “Real Time Streaming Protocol 2.0 (RTSP): draft-ietfmmusic-rfc2326bis-27”, MMUSIC Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Mar. 9, 2011, 296 pgs. (presented in two parts).
  • Silvia, “adaptive HTTP streaming for open codecs”, Oct. 9, 2010, retrieved on: Mar. 2, 2018, 15 pgs.
  • Tan, Yap-Peng et al., “Video transcoding for fast forward/reverse video playback”, IEEE ICIP, 2002, pp. I-713 to I-716.
  • Taxan, “AVel LinkPlayer2 for Consumer”, I-O Data USA—Products—Home Entertainment, printed May 4, 2007 from http://www.iodata.com/usa/products/products.php?cat=HNP&sc=AVEL&pld=AVLP2/DVDLA&ts=2&tsc, 1 pg.
  • Tripathi et al., “Improving Multimedia Streaming with Content-Aware Video Scaling”, Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/computerscience-pubs/96, 2001, 17 pgs.
  • Unknown, “AVI RIFF File Reference (Direct X 8.1 C++ Archive)”, printed from http://msdn.microsoft.com/archive/en-us/dx81_c/directx_cpp/htm/avirifffilereference.asp?fr . . . on Mar. 6, 2006, 7 pgs.
  • Unknown, “Entropy and Source Coding (Compression)”, TCOM 570, Sep. 1999, pp. 1-22.
  • Unknown, “MPEG-4 Video Encoder: Based on International Standard ISO/IEC 14496-2”, Patni Computer Systems, Ltd., publication date unknown, 15 pgs.
  • Venkatramani et al., “Securing Media for Adaptive Streaming”, Multimedia 2003 Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Nov. 2-8, 2003, Berkeley, California, 4 pgs.
  • Wang et al., “Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Apr. 2004, vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 600-612.
  • Zambelli, “IIS Smooth Streaming Technical Overview”, Microsoft Corporation, Mar. 2009, 17 pgs.
  • IBM Corporation and Microsoft Corporation, “Multimedia Programming Interface and Data Specifications 1.0”, Aug. 1991, printed from http://www.kk.iij4u.or.jp/˜kondo/wave/mpidata.txt on Mar. 6, 2006, 100 pgs.
  • InformationWeek, “Internet on Wheels”, InformationWeek: Front End: Daily Dose, Jul. 20, 1999, Printed on Mar. 26, 2014, 3 pgs.
  • International Preliminary Report for Application No. PCT/US2011/066927, Filed Dec. 22, 2011, dated Jul. 10, 2013, 13 pgs.
  • International Preliminary Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/067243, International Filing Date Dec. 23, 2011, dated Jul. 10, 2013, 7 pgs.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US14/30747, dated Sep. 15, 2015, dated Sep. 24, 2015, 6 Pgs.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2007/063950, Report Completed Dec. 18, 2009, 3 pgs.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2008/083816, dated May 18, 2010, 6 pgs.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2010/56733, dated Jun. 5, 2012, 5 pgs.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2011/068276, dated Mar. 4, 2014, 23 pgs.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2011/067167, dated Feb. 25, 2014, 8 pgs.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2013/043181 dated Dec. 31, 2014, dated Jan. 8, 2015, 11 Pgs.
  • International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2014/039852, dated Dec. 1, 2015, dated Dec. 5, 2015, 8 Pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US07/63950, completed Feb. 19, 2008; dated Mar. 19, 2008, 9 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US08/87999, completed Feb. 7, 2009, dated Mar. 19, 2009, 6 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US09/46588, completed Jul. 13, 2009, dated Jul. 23, 2009, 7 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2004/041667, completed May 24, 2007, dated Jun. 20, 2007, 6 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2005/025845, completed Feb. 5, 2007, dated May 10, 2007, 8 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/083816, completed Jan. 10, 2009, dated Jan. 22, 2009, 7 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/020372, Completed Feb. 10, 2009, dated Mar. 1, 2010, 8 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/56733, Completed Jan. 3, 2011, dated Jan. 14, 2011, 9 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/067243, International Filing Date Dec. 23, 2011, Search Completed Apr. 24, 2012, dated May 8, 2012, 8 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/043181, completed Nov. 27, 2013, dated Dec. 6, 2013, 12 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/30747, completed Jul. 30, 2014, dated Aug. 22, 2014, 7 Pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US14/39852, completed Oct. 21, 2014, dated Dec. 5, 2014, 11 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2011/066927, completed Apr. 3, 2012, dated Apr. 20, 2012, 14 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2011/067167, completed Jun. 19, 2012, dated Jul. 2, 2012, 11 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2011/068276, completed Jun. 19, 2013, dated Jul. 8, 2013, 24 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/020572, International Filing Date Jan. 7, 2013, Search Completed Mar. 19, 2013, dated Apr. 29, 2013, 10 pgs.
  • International Telecommunication Union, Telecommunication Standardization Sector of ITU, H.233, Line Transmission of Non-Telephone Signals, Confidentiality System for Audiovisual Services, ITU-T Recommendation H.233, Mar. 1993, 18 pgs.
  • ITS International, “Fleet System Opts for Mobile Server”, Aug. 26, 1999, Printed on Oct. 21, 2011 from http://www.itsinternational.com/News/article.cfm?recordID=547, 2 pgs.
  • Lifehacker—Boxqueue Bookmarklet Saves Videos for Later Boxee Watching, printed Jun. 16, 2009 from http://feeds.gawker.com/˜r/lifehacker/full/˜3/OHvDmrlgZZc/boxqueue-bookmarklet-saves-videos-for-late-boxee-watching, 2 pgs.
  • Linksys Wireless-B Media Adapter Reviews, printed May 4, 2007 from http://reviews.cnet.com/Linksys_Wireless_B_Media_Adapter/4505-6739_7-30421900.html?tag=box, 5 pgs.
  • Linksys, KISS DP-500, printed May 4, 2007 from http://www.kiss-technology.com/?p=dp500, 2 pgs.
  • LINKSYS®: “Enjoy your digital music and pictures on your home entertainment center, without stringing wires!”, Model No. WMA 11B, printed May 9, 2007 from http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_Product_C2&childpagename=US/Layout&cid=1115416830950&p, 4 pgs.
  • Microsoft Corporation, “Chapter 8, Multimedia File Formats” 1991, Microsoft Windows Multimedia Programmer's Reference, 3 cover pgs, pp. 8-1 to 8-20.
  • Microsoft Media Platform: Player Framework, “Microsoft Media Platform: Player Framework v2.5 (formerly Silverlight Media Framework)”, May 3, 2011, 2 pages.
  • Microsoft Media Platform: Player Framework, “Silverlight Media Framework v1.1”, Jan. 2010, 2 pages.
  • Microsoft Windows® XP Media Center Edition 2005, Frequently asked Questions, printed May 4, 2007 from http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/mediacenter/evaluation/faq.mspx, 6 pgs.
  • Microsoft Windows® XP Media Center Edition 2005: Features, printed May 9, 2007, from http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/mediacenter/evaluation/features.mspx, 4 pgs.
  • Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. CN200880127596.4, dated May 6, 2014, 8 pgs.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/223,210, dated Apr. 30, 2015, 14 pgs.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/564,003, dated Apr. 17, 2015, 28 pgs.
  • Open DML AVI-M-JPEG File Format Subcommittee, “Open DML AVI File Format Extensions”, Version 1.02, Feb. 28, 1996, 29 pgs.
  • pc world.com, Future Gear: PC on the HiFi, and the TV, from http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,108818-page,1/article.html, printed May 4, 2007, from IDG Networks, 2 pgs.
  • Qtv—About BroadQ, printed May 11, 2009 from http://www.broadq.com/en/about.php, 1 pg.
  • Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 04813918, Search Completed Dec. 19, 2012, 3 pgs.
  • Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP 10729513, completed Dec. 9, 2013, 4 pgs.
  • Supplementary European Search Report for EP Application 11774529, completed Jan. 31, 2014, 2 pgs.
  • Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 07758499.3, Report Completed Jan. 25, 2013, 8 pgs.
  • Windows Media Center Extender for Xbox, printed May 9, 2007 from http://www.xbox.com/en-US/support/systemuse/xbox/console/mediacenterextender.htm, 2 pgs.
  • Windows® XP Media Center Edition 2005, “Experience more entertainment”, retrieved from http://download.microsoft.com/download/c/9/a/c9a7000a-66b3-455b-860b-1c16f2eecfec/MCE.pdf on May 9, 2007, 2 pgs.
  • Invitation to Pay Add'l Fees Rcvd for International Application PCT/US14/39852, dated Sep. 25, 2 Pgs, Sep. 25, 2014.
  • 3GPP TS 26.247, V1.3.0, 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects Transparent end-to-end Packet-switches Streaming Services (PSS);, Progressive Download and Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (3GP-DASH) (Release 10), Mar. 2011, 72 pgs.
  • “Best Practices for Multi-Device Transcoding”, Kaltura Open Source Video, Printed on Nov. 27, 2013 from knowledge.kaltura.com/best-practices-multi-device-transcoding, 13 pgs.
  • Bocharov et al, “Portable Encoding of Audio-Video Objects, The Protected Interoperable File Format (PIFF)”, Microsoft Corporation, First Edition Sep. 8, 2009, 30 pgs.
  • Bulterman et al., “Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 3.0)”, W3C Recommendation Dec. 1, 2008, https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-SMIL3-20081201/, 321 pgs. (presented in five parts).
  • Cahill et al., “Locally Adaptive Deblocking Filter for Low Bit Rate Video”, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 10-13, 2000, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4 pgs.
  • Candelore, U.S. Appl. No. 60/372,901, filed Apr. 16, 2002, 5 pgs.
  • Chaddha et al., “A Frame-work for Live Multicast of Video Streams over the Internet”, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 19, 1996, Lausanne, Switzerland, 4 pgs.
  • Cheng, “Partial Encryption for Image and Video Communication”, Thesis, Fall 1998, 95 pgs.
  • Cheng et al., “Partial encryption of compressed images and videos”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 48, No. 8, Aug. 2000, 33 pgs.
  • Cheung et al., “On the Use of Destination Set Grouping to Improve Fairness in Multicast Video Distribution”, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'96, Conference on Computer Communications, vol. 2, IEEE, 1996, 23 pgs.
  • Collet, “Delivering Protected Content, An Approach for Next Generation Mobile Technologies”, Thesis, 2010, 84 pgs.
  • Diamantis et al., “Real Time Video Distribution using Publication through a Database”, Proceedings SIBGRAPI'98. International Symposium on Computer Graphics, Image Processing, and Vision (Cat. No. 98EX237), Oct. 1990, 8 pgs.
  • Dworkin, “Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of Operation: Methods and Techniques”, NIST Special Publication 800-38A, 2001, 66 pgs.
  • Fang et al., “Real-time deblocking filter for MPEG-4 systems”, Asia-Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems, Oct. 28-31, 2002, Bail, Indonesia, 4 pgs.
  • Fecheyr-Lippens, “A Review of HTTP Live Streaming”, Jan. 2010, 38 pgs.
  • Fielding et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP1.1”, Network Working Group, RFC 2616, Jun. 1999, 114 pgs.
  • Fukuda et al., “Reduction of Blocking Artifacts by Adaptive DCT Coefficient Estimation in Block-Based Video Coding”, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 10-13, 2000, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4 pgs.
  • Huang, U.S. Pat. No. 7,729,426, U.S. Appl. No. 11/230,794, filed Sep. 20, 2005, 143 pgs.
  • Huang et al., “Adaptive MLP post-processing for block-based coded images”, IEEE Proceedings—Vision, Image and Signal Processing, vol. 147, No. 5, Oct. 2000, pp. 463-473.
  • Huang et al., “Architecture Design for Deblocking Filter in H.264/JVT/AVC”, 2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo., Jul. 6-9, 2003, Baltimore, MD, 4 pgs.
  • Jain et al., U.S. Appl. No. 61/522,623, filed Aug. 11, 2011, 44 pgs.
  • Jung et al., “Design and Implementation of an Enhanced Personal Video Recorder for DTV”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 47, No. 4, Nov. 2001, 6 pgs.
  • Kalva, Hari, “Delivering MPEG-4 Based Audio-Visual Services”, 2001, 113 pgs.
  • Kang et al., “Access Emulation and Buffering Techniques for Steaming of Non-Stream Format Video Files”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 43, No. 3, Aug. 2001, 7 pgs.
  • Kim et al, “A Deblocking Filter with Two Separate Modes in Block-based Video Coding”, IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, vol. 9, No. 1, 1999, pp. 156-160.
  • Kim et al., “Tree-Based Group Key Agreement”, Feb. 2004, 37 pgs.
  • Laukens, “Adaptive Streaming—A Brief Tutorial”, EBU Technical Review, 2011, 6 pgs.
  • Legault et al., “Professional Video Under 32-bit Windows Operating Systems”, SMPTE Journal, vol. 105, No. 12, Dec. 1996, 10 pgs.
  • Li et al., “Layered Video Multicast with Retransmission (LVMR): Evaluation of Hierarchical Rate Control”, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'98, the Conference on Computer Communications. Seventeenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Gateway to the 21st Century, Cat. No. 98, vol. 3, 1998, 26 pgs.
  • List et al., “Adaptive deblocking filter”, IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 2003, pp. 614-619.
  • Massoudi et al., “Overview on Selective Encryption of Image and Video: Challenges and Perspectives”, EURASIP Journal on Information Security, Nov. 2008, 18 pgs.
  • McCanne et al., “Receiver-driven Layered Multicast”, Conference proceedings on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, Aug. 1996, 14 pgs.
  • Meier, “Reduction of Blocking Artifacts in Image and Video Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 9, No. 3, Apr. 1999, pp. 490-500.
  • Newton et al., “Preserving Privacy by De-identifying Facial Images”, Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science, Technical Report, CMU-CS-03-119, Mar. 2003, 26 pgs.
  • O'Brien, U.S. Appl. No. 60/399,846, filed Jul. 30, 2002, 27 pgs.
  • O'Rourke, “Improved Image Decompression for Reduced Transform Coding Artifacts”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 5, No. 6, Dec. 1995, pp. 490-499.
  • Park et al., “A postprocessing method for reducing quantization effects in low bit-rate moving picture coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 9, No. 1, Feb. 1999, pp. 161-171.
  • Richardson, “H.264 and MPEG-4 Video Compression”, Wiley, 2003, 306 pgs. (presented in 2 parts).
  • Sima et al., “An Efficient Architecture for Adaptive Deblocking Filter of H.264 AVC Video Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 50, No. 1, Feb. 2004, pp. 292-296.
  • Spanos et al., “Performance Study of a Selective Encryption Scheme for the Security of Networked, Real-Time Video”, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, IC3N'95, Sep. 20-23, 1995, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 2-10.
  • Srinivasan et al., “Windows Media Video 9: overview and applications”, Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2004, 25 pgs.
  • Stockhammer, “Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP—Standards and Design Principles”, Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Multimedia, Feb. 2011, pp. 133-145.
  • Timmerer et al., “HTTP Streaming of MPEG Media”, Proceedings of Streaming Day, 2010, 4 pgs.
  • Tiphaigne et al., “A Video Package for Torch”, Jun. 2004, 46 pgs.
  • Trappe et al., “Key Management and Distribution for Secure Multimedia Multicast”, IEEE Transaction on Multimedia, vol. 5, No. 4, Dec. 2003, pp. 544-557.
  • Van Deursen et al., “On Media Delivery Protocols in the Web”, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Jul. 19-23, 2010, 6 pgs.
  • Ventura, Guillermo Albaida, “Streaming of Multimedia Learning Objects”, AG Integrated Communication System, Mar. 2003, 101 pgs.
  • Waggoner, “Compression for Great Digital Video”, 2002, 184 pgs.
  • Watanabem et al., “MPEG-2 decoder enables DTV trick plays”, esearcher System LSI Development Lab, Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., Kawasaki, Japan, Jun. 2001, 2 pgs.
  • Wiegand, “Joint Video Team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG and ITU-T VCEG”, Jan. 2002, 70 pgs.
  • Willig et al., U.S. Appl. No. 61/409,285, filed Nov. 2, 2010, 43 pgs.
  • Yang et al., “Projection-Based Spatially Adaptive Reconstruction of Block-Transform Compressed Images”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 4, No. 7, Jul. 1995, pp. 896-908.
  • Yang et al., “Regularized Reconstruction to Reduce Blocking Artifacts of Block Discrete Cosine Transform Compressed Images”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 3, No. 6, Dec. 1993, pp. 421-432.
  • Yu et al., “Video deblocking with fine-grained scalable complexity for embedded mobile computing”, Proceedings 7th International Conference on Signal Processing, Aug. 31-Sep. 4, 2004, pp. 1173-1178.
  • Zakhor, “Iterative Procedures for Reduction of Blocking Effects in Transform Image Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 2, No. 1, Mar. 1992, pp. 91-95.
  • Apple HTTP Live Streaming specification, Aug. 2017, 60 pgs.
  • Microsoft Smooth Streaming specification, Jul. 22, 2013, 56 pgs.
  • ISO/IEC 14496-12:2008(E) Informational Technology—Coding of Audio-Visual Objects Part 12: ISO Base Media Filea Format, Oct. 2008, 120 pgs.
  • Server-Side Stream Repackaging (Streaming Video Technologies Panorama, Part 2), Jul. 2011, 15 pgs.
  • Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), ETSI TS 126 233 V9.1.0 (Jun. 2011) 3GPP TS 26.233 version 9.1.0 Release 9, 18 pgs.
  • Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems (UMTS); ETSI TS 126 244 V9.4.0 (May 2011) 3GPP TS 26.244 version 9.4.0 Release 9, 58 pgs.
  • HTTP Live Streaming, Mar. 2011, 24 pgs.
  • HTTP Live Streaming, Sep. 2011, 33 pgs.
  • Information Technology—MPEG Systems Technologies—Part 7: Common Encryption in ISO Base Media File Format Files (ISO/IEC 23001-7), Apr. 2015, 24 pgs.
  • ISO/IEC 14496-12 Information technology—Coding of audio-visual objects—Part 12: ISO base media file format, Feb. 2004 (“MPEG-4 Part 12 Standard”), 62 pgs.
  • ISO/IEC FCD 23001-6 MPEG systems technologies Part 6: Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH), Jan. 28, 2011, 86 pgs.
  • Microsoft Corporation, Advanced Systems Format (ASF) Specification, Revision 01.20.03, Dec. 2004, 121 pgs.
  • MPEG-DASH presentation at Streaming Media West 2011, Nov. 2011, 14 pgs.
  • Pomelo, LLC Tech Memo, Analysis of Netflix's Security Framework for ‘Watch Instantly’ Service, Mar.-Apr. 2009, 18 pgs.
  • Text of ISO/IEC 23001-6: Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH), Oct. 2010, 71 pgs.
  • “Data Encryption Decryption using AES Algorithm, Key and Salt with Java Cryptography Extension”, Available at https://www.digizol.com/2009/10/java-encrypt-decrypt-jce-salt.html, Oct. 200, 6 pgs.
  • “Delivering Live and On-Demand Smooth Streaming”, Microsoft Silverlight, 2009, 28 pgs.
  • “HTTP Based Adaptive Streaming over HSPA”, Apr. 2011, 73 pgs.
  • “Java Cryptography Architecture API Specification & Reference”, Available at https://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/CryptoSpec.html, Jul. 25, 2004, 68 pgs.
  • “Java Cryptography Extension, javax.crypto.Cipher class”, Available at https://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/crypto/Cipher.html, 2004, 24 pgs.
  • “JCE Encryption—Data Encryption Standard (DES) Tutorial”, Available at https://mkyong.com/java/jce-encryption-data-encryption-standard-des-tutorial/, Feb. 25, 2009, 2 pgs.
  • “Live and On-Demand Video with Silverlight and IIS Smooth Streaming”, Microsoft Silverlight, Windows Server Internet Information Services 7.0, Feb. 2010, 15 pgs.
  • “Single-Encode Streaming for Multiple Screen Delivery”, Telestream Wowza Media Systems, 2009, 6 pgs.
  • “The MPEG-DASH Standard for Multimedia Streaming Over the Internet”, IEEE MultiMedia, vol. 18, No. 4, 2011, 7 pgs.
  • “Windows Media Player 9”, Microsoft, Mar. 23, 2017, 3 pgs.
  • Abomhara et al., “Enhancing Selective Encryption for H.264/AVC Using Advanced Encryption Standard”, International Journal of computer Theory and Engineering, Apr. 2010, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 223-229.
  • A.M. Alattar et al., “Improved selective encryption techniques for secure transmission of MPEG video bit-streams”, In Proceedings 1999 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. 99CH36348), vol. 4, IEEE, 1999, pp. 256-260.
  • Antoniou et al., “Adaptive Methods for the Transmission of Video Streams in Wireless Networks”, 2015, 50 pgs.
  • Apostolopoulos et al., “Secure Media Streaming and Secure Transcoding”, Multimedia Security Technologies for Digital Rights Management, 2006, 33 pgs.
  • Asai et al., “Essential Factors for Full-Interactive VOD Server: Video File System, Disk Scheduling, Network”, Proceedings of Globecom '95, Nov. 14-16, 1995, 6 pgs.
  • Beker et al., “Cipher Systems, The Protection of Communications”, 1982, 40 pgs.
  • Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 20172313.7 Search completed Aug. 19, 2020, dated Aug. 27, 2020, 11 Pgs.
  • “Supported Media Formats”, Supported Media Formats, Android Developers, Nov. 27, 2013, 3 pgs.
  • European Search Report for Application 11855103.5, search completed Jun. 26, 2014, 9 pgs.
  • European Search Report for Application 11855237.1, search completed Jun. 12, 2014, 9 pgs.
  • Federal Computer Week, “Tool Speeds Info to Vehicles”, Jul. 25, 1999, 5 pages.
  • HTTP Live Streaming Overview, Networking & Internet, Apple, Inc., Apr. 1, 2011, 38 pages.
  • Informationweek: Front End: Daily Dose, “Internet on Wheels”, Jul. 20, 1999, 3 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2011/066927, International Filing Date Dec. 22, 2011, Report Completed Apr. 3, 2012, Mailed Apr. 20, 2012, 14 pgs.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2011/067167, International Filing Date Dec. 23, 2011, Report Completed Jun. 19, 2012, Mailed Jul. 2, 2012, 11 pgs.
  • ITS International, “Fleet System Opts for Mobile Server”, Aug. 26, 1999, 1 page.
  • Microsoft, Microsoft Media Platform: Player Framework, “Silverlight Media Framework v1.1”, 2 pages.
  • Microsoft, Microsoft Media Platform: Player Framework, “Microsoft Media Platform: Player Framework v2.5 (formerly Silverlight Media Framework)”, 2 pages.
  • The Official Microsoft IIS Site, Smooth Streaming Client, 4 pages.
  • “Adaptive Streaming Comparison”, Jan. 28, 2010, 5 pgs.
  • “Best Practices for Multi-Device Transcoding”, Kaltura Open Source Video, 13 pgs.
  • “Netflix turns on subtitles for PC, Mac streaming”, 3 pgs.
  • “Thread: SSME (Smooth Streaming Medial Element) config.xml review (Smooth Streaming Client configuration file)”, 3 pgs.
  • “Transcoding Best Practices”, From movideo, Nov. 27, 2013, 5 pgs.
  • “Using HTTP Live Streaming”, iOS Developer Library, Retrieved from: http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/networkinginternet/concept ual/streamingmediaguide/UsingHTTPLiveStreaming/UsingHTTPLiveStreaming.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40008332-CH102-SW1, 10 pgs.
  • Akhshabi et al., “An Experimental Evaluation of Rate-Adaptation Algorithms in Adaptive Streaming over HTTP”, MMSys'11, Feb. 24-25, 2011, 12 pgs.
  • Anonymous, “Method for the encoding of a compressed video sequence derived from the same video sequence compressed at a different bit rate without loss of data”, ip.com, ip.com No. IPCOM000008165D, May 22, 2002, pp. 1-9.
  • Author Unknown, “Tunneling QuickTime RTSP and RTP over HTTP”, Published by Apple Computer, Inc.: 1999 (month unknown), 6 pages.
  • Deutscher, “IIS Transform Manager Beta—Using the MP4 to Smooth Task”, Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20130328111303/http://blog.johndeutscher.com/category/smooth-streaming, Blog post of Apr. 17, 2010, 14 pgs.
  • Gannes, “The Lowdown on Apple's HTTP Adaptive Bitrate Streaming”, GigaOM, Jun. 10, 2009, 12 pgs.
  • Inlet Technologies, “The World's First Live Smooth Streaming Event: The French Open”, 2 pages.
  • Nelson, “Smooth Streaming Deployment Guide”, Microsoft Expression Encoder, Aug. 2010, 66 pgs.
  • Noe, A., “Matroska File Format (under construction!)”, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://web.archive.org web/20070821155146/www.matroska.org/technical/specs/matroska.pdf, retrieved on Jan. 19, 2011, Jun. 24, 2007, 1-51.
  • Ozer, “The 2012 Encoding and Transcoding Buyers' Guide”, Streamingmedia.com, Retrieved from: http://www.streamingmedia.com/Articles/Editorial/Featured-Articles/The-20- 12-Encoding-and-Transcoding-Buyers-Guide-84210.aspx, 2012, 8 pgs.
  • Pantos, “HTTP Live Streaming, draft-pantos-http-live-streaming-10”, IETF Tools, Oct. 15, 2012, Retrieved from: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pantos-http-live-streaming-10, 37 pgs.
  • Pantos, R, “HTTP Live Streaming: draft-pantos-http-live-streaming-06”, Published by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Mar. 31, 2011, 24 pages.
  • RGB Networks, “Comparing Adaptive HTTP Streaming Technologies”, Nov. 2011, Retrieved from: http://btreport.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/RGB-Adaptive-HTTP-Streamin- g-Comparison-1211-01.pdf, 20 pgs.
  • Schulzrinne, H et al., “Real Time Streaming Protocol 2.0 (RTSP): draft-ietfmmusic-rfc2326bis-27”, MMUSIC Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Mar. 9, 2011, 296 pages.
  • Siglin, “HTTP Streaming: What You Need to Know”, streamingmedia.com, 2010, 15 pages.
  • Siglin, “Unifying Global Video Strategies, MP4 File Fragmentation for Broadcast, Mobile and Web Delivery”, Nov. 16, 2011, 16 pgs.
  • Wu, Feng et al., “Next Generation Mobile Multimedia Communications: Media Codec and Media Transport Perspectives”, In China Communications, Oct. 2006, pp. 30-44.
Patent History
Patent number: RE48761
Type: Grant
Filed: Apr 11, 2018
Date of Patent: Sep 28, 2021
Assignee: DIVX, LLC (San Diego, CA)
Inventors: Abhishek Shivadas (San Diego, CA), William David Amidei (San Diego, CA)
Primary Examiner: Woo H. Choi
Application Number: 15/950,950
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Quantization (375/240.03)
International Classification: H04N 19/102 (20140101); H04N 19/164 (20140101); H04N 19/177 (20140101); H04N 19/46 (20140101); H04N 19/154 (20140101);