Methods of providing electricity used in a fracturing operation
Methods and systems for integral storage and blending of the materials used in oilfield operations are disclosed. A modular integrated material blending and storage system includes a first module comprising a storage unit, a second module comprising a liquid additive storage unit and a pump for maintaining pressure at an outlet of the liquid additive storage unit. The system further includes a third module comprising a pre-gel blender. An output of each of the first module, the second module and the third module is located above a blender and gravity directs the contents of the first module, the second module and the third module to the blender. The system also includes a pump that directs the output of the blender to a desired down hole location. The pump may be powered by natural gas or electricity.
Latest Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Patents:
Notice: More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 8,834,012. The reissue applications are U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/079,027, now U.S. Pat. No. RE46,725, which is a reissue application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,834,012; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/853,076, now U.S. Pat. No. RE47,695, which is a divisional reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/079,027, now U.S. Pat. No. RE46,725; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/537,070, which is a continuation reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/853,076, now U.S. Pat. No. RE47,695; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/537,124, which is a continuation reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/853,076 now U.S. Pat. No. RE47,695; the present U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/221,242, which is a continuation reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/537,070 and the following co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 17/221,152, 17/221,176, 17/221,186, 17/221,204, 17/221,221, 17/221,267, 17/221,281, 17/221,317, 17/352,956, and 17/353,091, each of which is a continuation reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 16/537,070 and 16/537,124 and a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 8,843,012.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONSThis application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/557,730, filed Sep. 11, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,444,312 entitled “Improved Methods and Systems for Integral Blending and Storage of Materials,” the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.This application is a continuation reissue of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/537,070 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/537,124, both filed on Aug. 9, 2019, which are reissue applications of U.S. Pat. No. 8,834,012 and continuation reissue applications of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/853,076, filed on Dec. 22, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. RE47,695, which is a reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 8,834,012 and a divisional reissue application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/079,027, filed on Mar. 23, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. RE46,725, which is a reissue of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/744,959, filed on May 6, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,834,012, issued on Sep. 16, 2014, entitled “Electric or Natural Gas Fired Small Footprint Fracturing Fluid Blending and Pumping Equipment,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/557,730, filed Sep. 11, 2009, now U.S. Patent No. 8,444,312, issued on May 21, 2013, entitled “Improved Methods and Systems for Integral Blending and Storage of Materials,” the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUNDThe present invention relates generally to oilfield operations, and more particularly, to methods and systems for integral storage and blending of the materials used in oilfield operations.
Oilfield operations are conducted in a variety of different locations and involve a number of equipments, depending on the operations at hand. The requisite materials for the different operations are often hauled to and stored at the well site where the operations are to be performed.
Considering the number of equipments necessary for performing oilfield operations and ground conditions at different oilfield locations, space availability is often a constraint. For instance, in well treatment operations such as fracturing operations, several wells may be serviced from a common jobsite pad. In such operations, the necessary equipment is not moved from well site to well site. Instead, the equipment may be located at a central work pad and the required treating fluids may be pumped to the different well sites from this central location. Accordingly, the bulk of materials required at a centralized work pad may be enormous, further limiting space availability.
Typically, in modem well treatment operations, equipment is mounted on a truck or a trailer and brought to location and set up. The storage units used are filled with the material required to prepare the well treatment fluid and perform the well treatment. In order to prepare the well treatment fluid, the material used is then transferred from the storage units to one or more blenders to prepare the desired well treatment fluid which may then be pumped down hole.
For instance, in conventional fracturing operations a blender and a pre-gel blender are set between the high pressure pumping units and the storage units which contain the dry materials and chemicals used. The dry materials and the chemicals used in the fracturing operations are then transferred, often over a long distance, from the storage units to the mixing and blending equipments. Once the treating process is initiated, the solid materials and chemicals are typically conveyed to the blender by a combination of conveyer belts, screw type conveyers and a series of hoses and pumps.
The equipment used for transferring the dry materials and chemicals from the storage units to the blender occupy valuable space at the job site. Additionally, the transfer of dry materials and chemicals to the blender consumes a significant amount of energy as well as other system resources and contributes to the carbon foot print of the job site. Moreover, in typical “on land” operations the entire equipment spread including the high horsepower pumping units are powered by diesel fired engines and the bulk material metering, conveying and pumping is done with diesel fired hydraulic systems. Emissions from the equipment that is powered by diesel fuel contributes to the overall carbon footprint and adversely affects the environment.
Some specific example embodiments of the disclosure may be understood by referring, in part, to the following description and the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a pumping system in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
While embodiments of this disclosure have been depicted and described and are defined by reference to example embodiments of the disclosure, such references do not imply a limitation on the disclosure, and no such limitation is to be inferred. The subject matter disclosed is capable of considerable modification, alteration, and equivalents in form and function, as will occur to those skilled in the pertinent art and having the benefit of this disclosure. The depicted and described embodiments of this disclosure are examples only, and not exhaustive of the scope of the disclosure.
SUMMARYThe present invention relates generally to oilfield operations, and more particularly, to methods and systems for integral storage and blending of the materials used in oilfield operations.
In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to an integrated material blending and storage system comprising: a storage unit; a blender located under the storage unit; wherein the blender is operable to receive a first input from the storage unit; a liquid additive storage module having a pump to maintain constant pressure at an outlet of the liquid additive storage module; wherein the blender is operable to receive a second input from the liquid additive storage module; and a pre-gel blender; wherein the blender is operable to receive a third input from the pre-gel blender; wherein gravity directs the contents of the storage unit, the liquid additive storage module and the pre-gel blender to the blender; a first pump; and a second pump; wherein the first pump directs the contents of the blender to the second pump; and wherein the second pump directs the contents of the blender down hole; wherein at least one of the first pump and the second pump is powered by one of natural gas and electricity.
In another exemplary embodiment, the present invention is directed to a modular integrated material blending and storage system comprising: a first module comprising a storage unit; a second module comprising a liquid additive storage unit and a pump for maintaining pressure at an outlet of the liquid additive storage unit; and a third module comprising a pre-gel blender; wherein an output of each of the first module, the second module and the third module is located above a blender; and wherein gravity directs the contents of the first module, the second module and the third module to the blender; a pump; wherein the pump directs the output of the blender to a desired down hole location; and wherein the pump is powered by one of natural gas and electricity.
The features and advantages of the present disclosure will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the description of exemplary embodiments, which follows.
DESCRIPTIONThe present invention relates generally to oilfield operations, and more particularly, to methods and systems for integral storage and blending of the materials used in oilfield operations.
Turning now to
In one exemplary embodiment, the storage units 102 may be connected to load sensors (not shown) to monitor the reaction forces at the legs of the storage units 102. The load sensor readings may then be used to monitor the change in weight, mass and/or volume of materials in the storage units 102. The change in weight, mass or volume can be used to control the metering of material from the storage units 102 during well treatment operations. As a result, the load sensors may be used to ensure the availability of materials during oilfield operations. In one exemplary embodiment, load cells may be used as load sensors. Electronic load cells are preferred for their accuracy and are well known in the art, but other types of force-measuring devices may be used. As will be apparent to one skilled in the art, however, any type of load-sensing device can be used in place of or in conjunction with a load cell. Examples of suitable load-measuring devices include weight-, mass-, pressure- or force-measuring devices such as hydraulic load cells, scales, load pins, dual sheer beam load cells, strain gauges and pressure transducers. Standard load cells are available in various ranges such as 0-5000 pounds, 0-10000 pounds, etc.
In one exemplary embodiment the load sensors may be communicatively coupled to an information handling system 104 which may process the load sensor readings. While
The information handling system 104 may then compare the load sensor readings to the threshold value to determine if the threshold value is reached. If the threshold value is reached, the information handling system 104 may alert the user. In one embodiment, the information handling system 104 may provide a real-time visual depiction of the amount of materials contained in the storage units 102. Moreover, as would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the load sensors may be coupled to the information handling system 104 through a wired or wireless (not shown) connection.
As depicted in
In one exemplary embodiment, the legs 204 of the pre-gel storage unit 202 are attached to load sensors 212 to monitor the reaction forces at the legs 204. The load sensor 212 readings may then be used to monitor the change in weight, mass and/or volume of materials in the pre-gel storage unit 202. The change in weight, mass or volume can be used to control the metering of material from the pre-gel storage unit 202 at a given set point. As a result, the load sensors 212 may be used to ensure the availability of materials during oilfield operations. In one exemplary embodiment, load cells may be used as load sensors 212. Electronic load cells are preferred for their accuracy and are well known in the art, but other types of force-measuring devices may be used. As will be apparent to one skilled in the art, however, any type of load-sensing device can be used in place of or in conjunction with a load cell. Examples of suitable load-measuring devices include weight-, mass-, pressure- or force-measuring devices such as hydraulic load cells, scales, load pins, dual sheer beam load cells, strain gauges and pressure transducers. Standard load cells are available in various ranges such as 0-5000 pounds, 0-10000 pounds, etc.
In one exemplary embodiment the load sensors 212 may be communicatively coupled to an information handling system 214 which may process the load sensor readings. Although
Moreover, as would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the load sensors 212 may be coupled to the information handling system 214 through a wired or wireless (not shown) connection. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, in one exemplary embodiment, the dry polymer material may be replaced with a Liquid Gel Concentrate (“LGC”) material that consists of the dry polymer mixed in a carrier fluid. In this exemplary embodiment, the feeder and mixer mechanisms would be replaced with a metering pump of suitable construction to inject the LGC into the water stream, thus initiating the hydration process.
The materials from the central core 304 of the pre-gel storage unit 302 may be directed to a mixer 310 as a first input through a feeder 312. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, in one embodiment, the mixer 310 may be a growler mixer and the feeder 312 may be a screw feeder which may be used to provide a volumetric metering of the materials directed to the mixer 310. A water pump 314 may be used to supply water to the mixer 310 as a second input. A variety of different pumps may be used as the water pump 314 depending on the user preferences. For instance, the water pump 314 may be a centrifugal pump, a progressive cavity pump, a gear pump or a peristaltic pump. The mixer 310 mixes the gel powder from the pre-gel storage unit 302 with the water from the water pump 314 at the desired concentration and the finished gel is discharged from the mixer 310. As discussed above with reference to the storage units 102, the pre-gel storage unit 302 may rest on load sensors 316 which may be used for monitoring the amount of materials in the pre-gel storage unit 302. The change in weight, mass or volume can be used to control the metering of material from the pre-gel storage unit 302 at a given set point.
In this embodiment, once the gel having the desired concentration is discharged from the mixer 310, it is directed to the annular space 306. The gel mixture is maintained in the annular space 306 for hydration. Once sufficient time has passed and the gel is hydrated, it is discharged from the annular space 306 through the discharge line 318.
The materials from the central core 406 of the pre-gel storage unit 402 may be directed to a mixer 412 as a first input through a feeder 414. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, in one embodiment, the mixer 412 may be a growler mixer and the feeder 414 may be a screw feeder which may be used to provide a volumetric metering of the materials directed to the mixer 412. A water pump 416 may be used to supply water to the mixer 412 as a second input. A variety of different pumps may be used as the water pump 416 depending on the user preferences. For instance, the water pump 416 may be a centrifugal pump, a progressive cavity pump, a gear pump or a peristaltic pump. The mixer 412 mixes the gel powder from the pre-gel storage unit 402 with the water from the water pump 416 at the desired concentration and the finished gel is discharged from the mixer 412. As discussed above with reference to
In this embodiment, once the gel having the desired concentration is discharged from the mixer 412, it is directed to the annular space 408 where it enters the tubular hydration loop 410. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the portions of the gel mixture are discharged from the mixer 412 at different points in time, and accordingly, will be hydrated at different times. Specifically, a portion of the gel mixture discharged from the mixer 412 into the annular space 408 at a first point in time, t1, will be sufficiently hydrated before a portion of the gel mixture which is discharged into the annular space 408 at a second point in time, t2. Accordingly, it is desirable to ensure that the gel mixture is transferred through the annular space 408 in a First-In-First-Out (FIFO) mode. To that end, in the third exemplary embodiment, a tubular hydration loop 410 is inserted in the annular space 408 to direct the flow of the gel as it is being hydrated.
As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, in order to achieve optimal performance, the tubular hydration loop 410 may need to be cleaned during a job or between jobs. In one embodiment, the tubular hydration loop 410 may be cleaned by passing a fluid such as water through it. In another exemplary embodiment, a pigging device may be used to clean the tubular hydration loop 410.
Returning to
Returning to
As depicted in more detail in
In one embodiment, when preparing a well treatment fluid, a base gel is prepared in the IPB 106. In one embodiment, the gel prepared in the IPB may be directed to an annular space 406 for hydration. In another exemplary embodiment, the annular space may further include a hydration loop 410. In one exemplary embodiment, the resulting gel from the IPB 106 may be pumped to the centrally located blender 108. Each of the base gel, the fluid modifying agents and the solid components used in preparing a desired well treatment fluid may be metered out from the IPB 106, the liquid additive storage module 110 and the storage unit 102, respectively. The blender 108 mixes the base gel with other fluid modifying agents from the liquid additive storage modules 110 and the solid component(s) from the storage units 102. As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, when preparing a fracturing fluid the solid component may be a dry proppant. In one exemplary embodiment, the dry proppant may be gravity fed into the blending tub through metering gates. Once the blender 108 mixes the base gel, the fluid modifying agent and the solid component(s), the resulting well treatment fluid may be directed to a down hole pump (not shown) through the outlet 114. A variety of different pumps may be used to pump the output of the IMSBS down hole. For instance, the pump used may be a centrifugal pump, a progressive cavity pump, a gear pump or a peristaltic pump. In one exemplary embodiment, chemicals from the liquid additive storage modules 110 may be injected in the manifolds leading to and exiting the blender 108 in order to bring them closer to the centrifugal pumps and away from other chemicals when there are compatibility or reaction issues.
As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the mixing and blending process may be accomplished at the required rate dictated by the job parameters. As a result, pumps that transfer the final slurry to the down hole pumps typically have a high horsepower requirement. FIG. 7 depicts a pumping system in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, denoted generally with reference numeral 700. In one exemplary embodiment, shown in FIG. 7, the transfer pump 702 may be powered by a natural gas fired engine or a natural gas fired generator set 714. In another exemplary embodiment, the transfer pump may be powered by electricity from a power grid. Once the fluid system is mixed and blended with proppant and other fluid modifiers it is boosted to the high horsepower down hole pumps 704. The down hole pumps pump the slurry through the high pressure ground manifold 706 to the well head 708 and down hole. In one embodiment, the down hole pumps 704 may be powered by a natural gas fired engine, a natural gas fired generator set 714 or electricity from a power grid. The down hole pumps typically account for over two third of the horsepower on location, thereby reducing the carbon footprint of the overall operations.
In one exemplary embodiment, the natural gas used to power the transfer pumps, the down hole pumps or the other system components may be obtained from the field on which the subterranean operations are being performed 720. In one embodiment, the natural gas may be converted to liquefied natural gas 712 and used to power pumps and other equipment that would typically be powered by diesel fuel. In another embodiment, the natural gas may be used to provide power through generator sets 714. The natural gas from the field may undergo conditioning 710 before being used to provide power to the pumps and other equipment. The conditioning process may include cleaning the natural gas, compressing the natural gas in compressor stations and if necessary, removing any water contained therein.
As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the IMSBS may include a different number of storage units 102, IPBs 106 and/or liquid additive storage modules 110, depending on the system requirements. For instance, in another exemplary embodiment (not shown), the IMSBS may include three storage units, one IPB and one liquid additive storage module.
As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, an IMSBS 600 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention which permits accurate, real-time monitoring of the contents of the storage units 602, the liquid additive storage modules 604 and/or the IPBs 606 provides several advantages. For instance, an operator may use the amount of materials remaining in the storage units 602, the liquid additive storage modules 604 and/or the IPBs 606 as a quality control mechanism to ensure that material consumption is in line with the job requirements. Additionally, the accurate, real-time monitoring of material consumption expedites the operator's ability to determine the expenses associated with a job.
As would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, the different equipment used in an IMSBS in accordance with the present invention may be powered by any suitable power source. For instance, the equipment may be powered by a combustion engine, electric power supply which may be provided by an on-site generator or by a hydraulic power supply.
Therefore, the present invention is well-adapted to carry out the objects and attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those which are inherent therein. While the invention has been depicted and described by reference to exemplary embodiments of the invention, such a reference does not imply a limitation on the invention, and no such limitation is to be inferred. The invention is capable of considerable modification, alteration, and equivalents in form and function, as will occur to those ordinarily skilled in the pertinent arts and having the benefit of this disclosure. The depicted and described embodiments of the invention are exemplary only, and are not exhaustive of the scope of the invention. Consequently, the invention is intended to be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims, giving full cognizance to equivalents in all respects. The terms in the claims have their plain, ordinary meaning unless otherwise explicitly and clearly defined by the patentee.
Claims
1. An integrated material blending and storage system comprising:
- a storage unit;
- a blender located under the storage unit;
- wherein the blender is operable to receive a first input from the storage unit through a hopper;
- a liquid additive storage module having a first pump to maintain constant pressure at an outlet of the liquid additive storage module;
- wherein the blender is operable to receive a second input from the liquid additive storage module; and
- a pre-gel blender, wherein the pre-gel blender comprises at least a pre-gel storage unit resting on a leg, further wherein the pre-gel storage unit comprises a central core and an annular space, wherein the annular space hydrates the contents of the pre-gel blender;
- wherein the blender is operable to receive a third input from the pre-gel blender;
- wherein gravity directs the contents of the storage unit, the liquid additive storage module and the pre-gel blender to the blender;
- a second pump; and
- a third pump;
- wherein the second pump directs the contents of the blender to the third pump; and
- wherein the third pump directs the contents of the blender down hole;
- wherein at least one of the second pump and the third pump is powered by one of natural gas and electricity.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the storage unit comprises a load sensor.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the pre-gel blender comprises:
- a feeder coupling the pre-gel storage unit to a first input of a mixer; a fourth pump coupled to a second input of the mixer;
- wherein the pre-gel storage unit contains a solid component of a well treatment fluid;
- wherein the feeder supplies the solid component of the well treatment fluid to the mixer;
- wherein the fourth pump supplies a fluid component of the well treatment fluid to the mixer; and wherein the mixer outputs a well treatment fluid.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein the well treatment fluid is a gelled fracturing fluid.
5. The system of claim 4, wherein the solid component is a gel powder.
6. The system of claim 4, wherein the fluid component is water.
7. The system of claim 3, wherein the central core contains the solid component of the well treatment fluid.
8. The system of claim 3, wherein the well treatment fluid is directed to the annular space.
9. The system of claim 3, wherein the annular space comprises a tubular hydration loop.
10. The system of claim 9, wherein the well treatment fluid is directed from the mixer to the tubular hydration loop.
11. The system of claim 3, wherein the well treatment fluid is selected from the group consisting of a fracturing fluid and a sand control fluid.
12. The system of claim 3, further comprising a power source to power at least one of the feeder, the mixer and the pump.
13. The system of claim 12, wherein the power source is selected from the group consisting of a combustion engine, an electric power supply and a hydraulic power supply.
14. The system of claim 13, wherein one of the combustion engine, the electric power supply and the hydraulic power supply is powered by natural gas.
15. The system of claim 1, further comprising a load sensor coupled to one of the storage unit, the liquid additive storage module or the pre-gel blender.
16. The system of claim 15, further comprising an information handling system communicatively coupled to the load sensor.
17. The system of claim 15, wherein the load sensor is a load cell.
18. The system of claim 15, wherein a reading of the load sensor is used for quality control.
19. The system of claim 1, wherein the electricity is derived from one of a power grid and a natural gas generator set.
20. A modular integrated material blending and storage system comprising:
- a first module comprising a storage unit;
- a second module comprising a liquid additive storage unit and a first pump for maintaining pressure at an outlet of the liquid additive storage unit; and
- a third module comprising a pre-gel blender, wherein the pre-gel blender comprises at least a pre-gel storage unit resting on a leg, further wherein the pre-gel storage unit comprises a central core and an annular space, wherein the annular space hydrates the contents of the pre-gel blender;
- wherein an output of each of the first module, the second module and the third module is located above a blender; and
- wherein gravity directs the contents of the first module through a hopper, the second module and the third module to the blender;
- a second pump;
- wherein the second pump directs the output of the blender to a desired down hole location; and
- wherein the second pump is powered by one of natural gas and electricity.
21. The system of claim 20, wherein each of the first module, the second module and the third module is a self erecting module.
22. The system of claim 20, wherein the third module comprises:
- a feeder coupling the pre-gel storage unit to a first input of a mixer;
- a third pump coupled to a second input of the mixer;
- wherein the pre-gel storage unit contains a solid component of a well treatment fluid;
- wherein the feeder supplies the solid component of the well treatment fluid to the mixer;
- wherein the third pump supplies a fluid component of the well treatment fluid to the mixer; and
- wherein the mixer outputs a well treatment fluid.
23. The system of claim 22, wherein the well treatment fluid is directed to the blender.
24. The system of claim 20, wherein the blender mixes the output of the first module, the second module and the third module.
25. The system of claim 20, further comprising a fourth pump for pumping an output of the blender down hole.
26. The system of claim 25, wherein the fourth pump is selected from the group consisting of a centrifugal pump, a progressive cavity pump, a gear pump and a peristaltic pump.
27. A method of providing electric power used in a fracturing operation comprising:
- generating electricity used in the fracturing operation using at least one on-site generator powered by one or more of conditioned field gas, compressed natural gas, or liquefied natural gas; and
- providing the electricity powering a plurality of pumps pumping a fracturing fluid down hole during the fracturing operation, wherein only the electricity powers the plurality of pumps during the fracturing operation.
28. The method of claim 27, wherein the fracturing fluid is prepared using a blender, and wherein sand or proppant is delivered to the blender from a storage unit using at least gravity and without the use of a powered conveyer.
29. The method of claim 28, wherein the blender is powered using the electricity.
30. The method of claim 27, wherein the conditioned field gas is derived from natural gas obtained from a field on which the fracturing operation is performed.
31. The method of claim 27, wherein an amount of a material used in the fracturing operation is monitored using an information handling system.
32. The method of claim 27, wherein at least a portion of the fracturing fluid is pre-hydrated.
33. The method of claim 27, further comprising providing the electricity powering at least one blender during the fracturing operation.
34. A method of providing electric power used in a fracturing operation comprising:
- generating electricity used in the fracturing operation using at least one on-site generator powered by one or more of conditioned field gas, compressed natural gas, or liquefied natural gas; and
- providing the electricity powering a plurality of pumps pumping a fracturing fluid down hole during the fracturing operation, wherein the plurality of pumps is powered without using diesel during the fracturing operation.
35. The method of claim 34, wherein the fracturing fluid is prepared using a blender, and wherein sand or proppant is delivered to the blender from a storage unit using at least gravity and without the use of a powered conveyer.
36. The method of claim 35, wherein the blender is powered using the electricity.
37. The method of claim 34, wherein the conditioned field gas is derived from natural gas obtained from a field on which the fracturing operation is performed.
38. The method of claim 34, wherein an amount of a material used in the fracturing operation is monitored using an information handling system.
39. The method of claim 34, wherein at least a portion of the fracturing fluid is pre-hydrated.
40. The method of claim 34, further comprising providing the electricity powering at least one blender during the fracturing operation.
41. A method of providing electric power used in a fracturing operation comprising:
- generating electricity used in the fracturing operation using at least one on-site generator powered by one or more of conditioned field gas, compressed natural gas, or liquefied natural gas; and
- providing the electricity powering equipment preparing and pumping a fracturing fluid during the fracturing operation,
- wherein the equipment pumping the fracturing fluid comprises a plurality of pumps pumping the fracturing fluid down hole, and
- wherein only the electricity powers the plurality of pumps.
42. The method of claim 41, wherein the equipment comprises a blender, and wherein sand or proppant is delivered to the blender from a storage unit using at least gravity and without the use of a powered conveyer.
43. The method of claim 41, wherein the conditioned field gas is derived from natural gas obtained from a field on which the fracturing operation is performed.
44. The method of claim 41, wherein an amount of a material used in the fracturing operation is monitored using an information handling system.
45. The method of claim 41, wherein at least a portion of the fracturing fluid is pre-hydrated.
46. The method of claim 41, wherein the equipment preparing the fracturing fluid comprises a blender.
47. The method of claim 27 wherein the liquefied natural gas is derived from natural gas obtained from a field on which the fracturing operation is performed.
48. The method of claim 27 wherein the compressed natural gas is derived from natural gas obtained from a field on which the fracturing operation is performed.
548793 | October 1895 | Winship |
1730173 | October 1929 | Stearns |
2795403 | June 1957 | Mead |
2821854 | February 1958 | Franke |
3155248 | November 1964 | Haller |
3259190 | July 1966 | Parsons |
3279550 | October 1966 | Kersten |
3291234 | December 1966 | Woodburn |
3381943 | May 1968 | Miller |
3547291 | December 1970 | Batterton et al. |
3587760 | June 1971 | Othmar et al. |
3591147 | July 1971 | Anderson et al. |
3687319 | August 1972 | Adam et al. |
3792790 | February 1974 | Brubaker |
3854540 | December 1974 | Holmstrom, Jr. |
3857452 | December 1974 | Hartman |
3893655 | July 1975 | Sandiford |
3931999 | January 13, 1976 | McCain |
3934739 | January 27, 1976 | Zumsteg et al. |
3962877 | June 15, 1976 | Schiemichen |
4063605 | December 20, 1977 | Graham |
4103752 | August 1, 1978 | Schmidt |
4163626 | August 7, 1979 | Batterton et al. |
4169506 | October 2, 1979 | Berry |
4187047 | February 5, 1980 | Squifflet |
4249838 | February 10, 1981 | Harvey et al. |
4265266 | May 5, 1981 | Kierbow et al. |
4345628 | August 24, 1982 | Campbell et al. |
4345872 | August 24, 1982 | Arnold |
4411327 | October 25, 1983 | Lockery et al. |
4465420 | August 14, 1984 | Dillman |
4621972 | November 11, 1986 | Grotte |
4634335 | January 6, 1987 | Van Den Pol |
4708569 | November 24, 1987 | Nijenhuis |
4726435 | February 23, 1988 | Kitagawa et al. |
4730118 | March 8, 1988 | Quarles et al. |
4775275 | October 4, 1988 | Perry |
4819750 | April 11, 1989 | Carnevale |
4844189 | July 4, 1989 | Shisgal et al. |
4850750 | July 25, 1989 | Cogbill et al. |
4854714 | August 8, 1989 | Davis |
4898473 | February 6, 1990 | Stegemoeller et al. |
4913198 | April 3, 1990 | Hayahara et al. |
5016666 | May 21, 1991 | McKinney et al. |
5044861 | September 3, 1991 | Kirchhoff et al. |
5127450 | July 7, 1992 | Saatkamp |
5133212 | July 28, 1992 | Grills et al. |
5161628 | November 10, 1992 | Wirth |
5205370 | April 27, 1993 | Paul et al. |
5318382 | June 7, 1994 | Cahill |
5333695 | August 2, 1994 | Walter |
5343000 | August 30, 1994 | Griffen et al. |
5452615 | September 26, 1995 | Hilton |
5452954 | September 26, 1995 | Handke et al. |
5546683 | August 20, 1996 | Clark |
5578798 | November 26, 1996 | Nuyts |
5606853 | March 4, 1997 | Birch et al. |
5635680 | June 3, 1997 | Dojan |
5637837 | June 10, 1997 | Merz et al. |
5665910 | September 9, 1997 | Knutson et al. |
5717167 | February 10, 1998 | Filing et al. |
5752768 | May 19, 1998 | Assh |
5764522 | June 9, 1998 | Shalev |
5769058 | June 23, 1998 | Scogin |
5811737 | September 22, 1998 | Gaiski |
5811738 | September 22, 1998 | Boyovich et al. |
5850757 | December 22, 1998 | Wierenga |
5880410 | March 9, 1999 | Neuman |
5884232 | March 16, 1999 | Buder |
5981446 | November 9, 1999 | Qiu et al. |
6118083 | September 12, 2000 | Boyovich et al. |
6148667 | November 21, 2000 | Johnson |
6186657 | February 13, 2001 | Fuchsbichler |
6242701 | June 5, 2001 | Breed et al. |
6284987 | September 4, 2001 | Al-Modiny |
6313414 | November 6, 2001 | Campbell |
6384349 | May 7, 2002 | Voll |
6414455 | July 2, 2002 | Watson |
6474926 | November 5, 2002 | Weiss |
6495774 | December 17, 2002 | Pederson |
6532830 | March 18, 2003 | Jansen et al. |
6601763 | August 5, 2003 | Hoch et al. |
6769315 | August 3, 2004 | Stevenson et al. |
6817376 | November 16, 2004 | Morgan et al. |
6928886 | August 16, 2005 | Meusel et al. |
6948535 | September 27, 2005 | Stegemoeller |
7048432 | May 23, 2006 | Phillippi et al. |
7114322 | October 3, 2006 | Yamanaka et al. |
7202425 | April 10, 2007 | Knudsen et al. |
7214028 | May 8, 2007 | Boasso |
7214892 | May 8, 2007 | Williamson |
7240549 | July 10, 2007 | Kimbara et al. |
7267001 | September 11, 2007 | Stein |
7353875 | April 8, 2008 | Stephenson et al. |
7472542 | January 6, 2009 | Yamanaka et al. |
7528329 | May 5, 2009 | Nuyts |
7836949 | November 23, 2010 | Dykstra |
7841394 | November 30, 2010 | McNeel et al. |
7946340 | May 24, 2011 | Surjaatmadja et al. |
8146665 | April 3, 2012 | Neal |
8444312 | May 21, 2013 | Hagan |
20010038018 | November 8, 2001 | Bell et al. |
20030047387 | March 13, 2003 | Bogat |
20030047603 | March 13, 2003 | Lustenberger et al. |
20030117890 | June 26, 2003 | Dearing et al. |
20030202869 | October 30, 2003 | Posch |
20040008571 | January 15, 2004 | Coody et al. |
20040011523 | January 22, 2004 | Sarada |
20050110648 | May 26, 2005 | Lehrman et al. |
20050155667 | July 21, 2005 | Stegemoeller |
20060015414 | January 19, 2006 | Congram et al. |
20060225924 | October 12, 2006 | Ivan et al. |
20070107540 | May 17, 2007 | Davies |
20070120367 | May 31, 2007 | Scherzer |
20070125543 | June 7, 2007 | McNeel et al. |
20070125544 | June 7, 2007 | Robinson et al. |
20070201305 | August 30, 2007 | Heilman et al. |
20070277982 | December 6, 2007 | Shampine et al. |
20080017369 | January 24, 2008 | Sarada |
20080029267 | February 7, 2008 | Shampine et al. |
20080066911 | March 20, 2008 | Luharuka et al. |
20080135238 | June 12, 2008 | Cugnet et al. |
20080165613 | July 10, 2008 | Dykstra |
20080173480 | July 24, 2008 | Annaiyappa et al. |
20080203734 | August 28, 2008 | Grimes et al. |
20080238101 | October 2, 2008 | Ziegenfuss |
20080264625 | October 30, 2008 | Ochoa |
20080264641 | October 30, 2008 | Slabaugh et al. |
20080271927 | November 6, 2008 | Crain |
20090068031 | March 12, 2009 | Gambier et al. |
20090078410 | March 26, 2009 | Krenek et al. |
20090090504 | April 9, 2009 | Weightman |
20090095482 | April 16, 2009 | Surjaatmadja |
20090107734 | April 30, 2009 | Lucas |
20090178387 | July 16, 2009 | Schultz et al. |
20090301725 | December 10, 2009 | Case et al. |
20100018710 | January 28, 2010 | Leshchyshyn et al. |
20100038907 | February 18, 2010 | Hunt et al. |
20100071284 | March 25, 2010 | Hagan et al. |
20100071899 | March 25, 2010 | Coquilleau et al. |
20110197988 | August 18, 2011 | Van Vliet et al. |
20120157356 | June 21, 2012 | Dawson et al. |
1877079 | December 2006 | CN |
3717417 | December 1988 | DE |
29518215 | May 1996 | DE |
0605113 | July 1994 | EP |
A 0 605 113 | July 1994 | EP |
2474335 | July 1981 | FR |
2474335 | July 1981 | FR |
PCT/GB2009/001675 | February 2011 | GB |
1994019263 | September 1994 | WO |
WO 94/19263 | September 1994 | WO |
2007113528 | October 2007 | WO |
WO 2007/113528 | October 2007 | WO |
2009065858 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2009/065858 | May 2009 | WO |
- Tomlinson, H. L., A. C. Byrd, and C. F. VanBerg “Fracturing process control and automation.” Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1988.
- Stephenson, S. V., et al. “Fracturing process control and automation: Phase 2.” Petroleum Computer Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1993.
- Purvis, D. L., R. J. Novotny, and B. T. Carlson. “Field-Applied Computerized Tracking System: A Practical Approach to On-Site Quality Control.” SPE Computer Applications 3.05 (1991): 22-28.
- Invalidity Chart, Mud Pump and Associated Materials HHUS Sold to Nabors, U.S. Well Services, LLC v. TOPS Well Services, LLC et al., Case 3:19-cv-00237, D.I. 76-13 (S.D. Tex.), Apr. 29, 2020, 135 pages.
- “The Jet Frac Revolution,” Turbine Stimulation Technologies, BIC Magazine, Apr. 2006, 3 pages.
- Archive of MTT Website, available at https://web.archive.org/web/20090615185330/marineturbine.com/frac.asp, Jun. 15, 2009, 3 pages.
- Excerpts from manual related to Halliburton Stim Star vessel, admitted as prior art, 7 pages.
- 1966 Halliburton Sales and Service Catalog, 3 pages.
- “Hydraulic Fracturing and Flowback Hazards Other than Respirable Silica.” Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA 3763-12 2014, 2014, 27 pages.
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration. “Hazard alert: Worker exposure to silica during hydraulic fracturing.” Retrieved from http://www.osha.gov/dts/hazardalerts/hydraulic_frac_hazard_alert.html (2012), 7 pages.
- “Auxiliary Pump Plants,” Halliburton Special Services, dated May 24, 2000.
- “2,400 Hydraulic Horsepower Electric Pump Plant With All Support Equipment,” Halliburton Special Services, dated May 24, 2000.
- “Electric Pumping Equipment SCR Drive,” Pumping Equipment Data Book Manual No. 277.17165, Halliburton Services, Section 17, pp. 187-194, dated Sep. 1980.
- Takacs, Gabor. Chapter 1—Electrical Submersible Pumps Manual: Design, Operations, and Maintenance. Gulf Professional Publishing, Mar. 2009, 8 pages.
- Railroad Commission of Texas, Injection / Disposal Well: Permitting, Testing, and Monitoring Manual, Summary of Standards and Procedures, Technical Review at Section 6 (“Injection Pressure Requirements”), available at https://www.rrc.texas.gov/oil-and-gas/publications-and-notices/manuals/injection-disposal-well-manual/summary-of-standards-and-procedures/technical-review/, accessed Jan. 24, 2022, 15 pages.
- Declaration of Harold E. McGowen III, PE, Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.132, dated Jan. 24, 2022, 16 pages.
- U.S. Pat. No. 548,793, issued Oct. 29, 1895 to James H. Winship for “Rendering Apparatus”.
- Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/422,450 dated Jun. 18, 2010.
- “Truck-Back Turbines”, Machine Design, vol. 32, No. 5, Mar. 3, 1960, p. 12, 3 pages.
- Boerger pump—available at: http://www.boerger-pumps.com/contero/gallery/Prospekte_USA/us_p_ssr_boerger_powerfeed_0309.pdf.
- Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/741,509, Aug. 19, 2009.
- Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/741,509, Jan. 28, 2010.
- Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,756, Mar. 18, 2009.
- Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,756, Jul. 7, 2009.
- Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,756, Jan. 28, 2010.
- Advisory Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,756, Mar. 31, 2010.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/GB2011/000678 mailed on Oct. 12, 2012.
- Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/422,450, Jun. 18, 2010.
- Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/435,551, Jun. 15, 2011.
- Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,756, dated May 27, 2010.
- International Search Report for Application No. PCT/GB2010/000512, Jun. 25, 2010.
- Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/635,009, Jul. 23, 2012.
- Fenna et al., “Dictionary of Weights, Measures, and Units,” Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. I, 65 and 66, 2002.
- Kutz et al., “Mechanical Engineers' Handbook,” 2nd Ed., 1998, pp. I, II, and 1332, 1998.
- Abulnaga, “Slurry Systems Handbook,” 2002, pp. I, II, and 1.20, 2002.
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/GB2009/001675 issued Feb. 1, 2011.
- Office Action issued in Canadian Application No. 2, 731, 840 on Jul. 25, 2012.
- Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/235,270, Mar. 4, 2011.
- International Search Report in PCT/GB2010/001717, May 10, 2011.
- Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,297, Apr. 21, 2011.
Type: Grant
Filed: Apr 2, 2021
Date of Patent: Aug 2, 2022
Assignee: Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (Houston, TX)
Inventors: Leonard R. Case (Duncan, OK), Ed B. Hagan (Hastings, OK), Calvin L. Stegemoeller (Sagerton, TX), Ron Hyden (Spring, TX)
Primary Examiner: William C Doerrler
Application Number: 17/221,242