Distributed digital antenna system

An optical medium, such as fiber, is tapped to provide an antenna port wherever radio service coverage is desired. Each antenna port is a bi-directional remote unit that receives a digital optical signal from a host unit and transforms the signal to a radio frequency signal for transmission by the remote unit. The remote unit receives radio frequency signals that are converted to digital signals and summed with signals from other remote units and converted to an optical signal for transmission to the host unit.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
RELATED APPLICATION

This application Notice: More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 8,958,789. The reissue applications are reissue application Ser. No. 15/436,605 filed on Feb. 17, 2017; and this continuation reissue application Ser. No. (the present continuation reissue application). All reissue applications are reissues of the same issued U.S. Pat. No. 8,958,789 (application Ser. No. 10/395,743 filed Mar. 24, 2003), which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/430,434 filed Dec. 3, 2002, and titled “Distributed Digital Antenna System,” which is commonly assigned and incorporated by reference herein.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to communications and particularly to communications through a distributed antenna system.

BACKGROUND

Various types of wireless communication systems have become prevalent around the world. For example, cellular communication systems cover most major metropolitan areas as well as major highways through remote areas. Cellular systems permit individuals with cellular handsets to communicate with base stations that are connected to the public switched telephone network (PSTN) or some other communication network.

As with any communication system, cellular systems can leave coverage “holes” where the signal from the base stations cannot reach. The holes can be in tunnels, valleys, city streets between tall buildings, or any other location where a radio frequency (RF) signal is blocked.

Placing additional base stations where these coverage holes are located is not always an option. Base stations tend to be very expensive due not only to the cost of the equipment but also because of land acquisition costs. Additionally, large base station antennas may not fit within an area either physically or aesthetically.

One solution to hole coverage is to use smaller remote antennas where coverage is needed but a base station is not warranted or desired. One problem with remote antennas, however, is that coaxial cable cannot be run long distances due to attenuation. Remote antennas are difficult to install along a highway or through a tunnel due to this attenuation problem. Using repeaters may not be an option since this only adds to the expense and complexity of the system. There is a resulting need in the art for a distributed antenna system that does not suffer from attenuation problems.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The embodiments of the present invention encompass a distributed digital antenna system that has a host unit for converting radio frequency signals to digital optical signals and digital optical signals to radio frequency signals. The digital optical signals are transmitted over an optical medium to a plurality of remote units that are daisy-chained along the optical medium. Each remote unit transmits an analog representation of the digital optical signals from the host unit and receives radio frequency signals that are converted by the remote unit to digital optical signals for use by the host unit.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a distributed digital antenna system of the present invention.

FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of another embodiment of a distributed digital antenna system of the present invention.

FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a remote unit in accordance with the system of FIG. 1.

FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a remote unit in accordance with the system of FIG. 2.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The embodiments of the present invention provide a digital distributed antenna system that enables a communication system to fill coverage holes without the expense of additional base stations. This is accomplished by distributing a fiber optic cable through the area in which coverage is desired and tapping into the fiber at desired antenna locations.

The embodiments of the present invention refer to fiber optics as a means of communication between remote units and the host unit. However, any optical medium, such as a laser through the air, can be substituted for the optical fiber.

FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a distributed digital antenna system of the present invention. The system has a base station (100) that communicates over an RF link using an antenna (110). The base station communicates over the RF link using any appropriate air interface standard. For example, the air interface standard comprises one of Advanced Mobile Phone System (AMPS), code division multiple access (CDMA), time division multiple access (TDMA), or Global System for Mobile communications (GSM) or any other appropriate air interface standard.

The RF link is made up of a forward link over which the base station (100) transmits to a subscriber unit wireless terminal (150). The subscriber unit (150) transmits back to the base station (100) over a reverse link. The subscriber unit (150) is either a mobile station or a fixed station such as in a wireless local loop system.

The base station (100) has the transmitters and receivers that enable the subscriber unit (150) to communicate with the public switched telephone network (PSTN) (130). In one embodiment, the base station also links the subscriber unit (150) to other subscriber units that are communicating with other base stations. In one embodiment, the base station (100) is connected to the PSTN through a mobile switching center that handles the switching of calls with multiple base stations.

A host unit (101) is connected to the base station (100) through an RF link (115). In one embodiment, this link (115) is a coaxial cable. Other embodiments use other types of connections such as an air interface or an optical fiber carrying digital RF signals. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/619,431, assigned to ADC Telecommunications, Inc. and incorporated herein by reference, discusses digital RF signals.

The host unit (101) is responsible for converting the RF signal from the base station (100) to an optical signal for transmission over an optical medium. The host unit (101) also converts a received optical signal to an RF signal for transmission to the base station (100). In other embodiments, the host unit (101) performs additional functions.

One or more remote units (105-108) are connected to the host unit (101) through an optical medium, such as fiber optic lines (120 and 125), in a daisy-chain arrangement. The remote units (105-108) are placed in locations that require additional signal coverage due to a lack of coverage by the base station (100). The remote units (105-108) communicate with subscriber units in a particular remote unit's coverage area over an RF link provided by the remote unit antennas (135-138).

For purposes of illustration, four remote units (105-108) are shown. However, alternate embodiments use other quantities of remote units. If only a small geographic area requires coverage, as few as one remote unit (105) is used. If a highway in a remote area requires additional coverage, more than four remote units are typically used.

The embodiment of FIG. 1 uses a separate fiber optic line for each direction of communication. Each fiber carries a different wavelength. For example, the fiber optic line (120) from the host unit (101) to the remote units (105-108) carries a wavelength of λ1. The fiber optic line (125) from the remote units (105-108) to the host unit (101) carries a wavelength of λ2. In alternate embodiments, each fiber carries the same wavelength.

The fiber optic line (120) from the host unit (101) to the remote units (105-108) carries the digital optical signal for transmission by the (105-108). The fiber optic line (125) from the remote units (105-108) carries a digital optical signal comprising the sum of the received signals from each of the remote units (105-108). The generation of this summation signal from the remote units is discussed subsequently.

FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of another embodiment of a distributed digital antenna system of the present invention. This system is similar to the embodiment of FIG. 1 except that the remote units (205-208) are connected to the host unit (201) over a single optical medium (220).

The system of FIG. 2 has a base station (200) that communicates over an RF link using an antenna (210). The base station can communicate over the RF link using any air interface standard. For example, the air interface standard may be code division multiple access (CDMA), time division multiple access (TDMA), or Global System for Mobile communications (GSM).

The RF link is made up of a forward link over which the base station (200) transmits to a subscriber unit (250). The subscriber unit (250) transmits back to the base station (200) over a reverse link. The subscriber unit (250) may be a mobile station or a fixed station such as in a wireless local loop system.

The base station (200) has the transmitters and receivers that enable the subscriber unit (250) to communicate with the public switched telephone network (PSTN) (230). The base station may also link the subscriber unit (250) to other subscriber units that are communicating with other base stations. In one embodiment, the base station (200) is connected to the PSTN through a mobile switching center that handles the switching of calls with multiple base stations.

A host unit (201) is connected to the base station (200) through an RF link (215). In one embodiment, this link (215) is a coaxial cable. Other embodiments use other types of connections such as an air interface or an optical fiber carrying digital RF signals.

The host unit (201) is responsible for converting the RF signal from the base station (200) to a digital optical signal for transmission over an optical medium. The host unit (201) also converts a received optical signal to an RF signal for transmission to the base station (200). In other embodiments, the host unit (201) performs additional functions.

One or more remote units (205-208) are connected to the host unit (201) through an optical medium, such as a fiber optic line (220), that is connected in a daisy-chain arrangement. The remote units (205-208) are placed in locations that require additional signal coverage due to a lack of coverage by the base station (200).

For purposes of illustration, four remote units (205-208) are shown. However, alternate embodiments use other quantities of remote units.

The embodiment of FIG. 2 uses a single fiber optic line (220) for communication both to and from the remote units (205-208). This is accomplished by the single fiber (220) carrying multiple wavelengths. For example, the fiber optic line (220) uses a wavelength of λ1 for the digital signal from the host unit to the remote units (205-208). The fiber optic line (220) also carries a digital summation signal with a wavelength of λ2. This digital summation signal is the sum of the received signals from the remote units (205-208). The generation of this summation signal from the remote units is discussed subsequently.

FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a remote unit (105) of FIG. 1. Each of the remote units (105-108) of the embodiment of FIG. 1 are substantially identical in functional composition.

The remote unit (105) transmits and receives RF signals over the antenna (135). Both the receive and transmit circuitry is connected to the antenna (135) through a diplexer (301).

Alternate embodiments use other quantities of antennas. For example, one embodiment uses three antennas to cover three different sectors of an area.

An analog signal that is received on the antenna (135) is split off by the diplexer (301) to an analog-to-digital converter (305). The analog-to-digital converter (305) digitizes the received analog signal by periodically sampling the signal. The sampling generates a digital representation of the received analog signal.

The digitized received signal is input to a summer (315) to be added to the digitized signals from the preceding remote units in the daisy-chain. The input of the summer (315), therefore, is coupled to an output of a previous remote unit. The output of the summer (315) is a summation signal that is coupled to either the input of a subsequent remote unit or to the host unit. The host unit thus receives a summation signal that represents the sum of all the signals received by the remote units (105-108) of the system.

A digital signal from the host unit is coupled to a digital-to-analog converter (310). The digital-to-analog converter (310) takes the digital representation of an analog signal and converts it to the analog signal for transmission by the antenna (135).

Optical-to-Electrical converters (320-323) are located at the optical ports (330 and 335) of the remote unit (105). Each optical port (330 and 335) has an input and an output that are each coupled to an Optical-to-Electrical converter (320-323).

Since the remote unit (105) operates with electrical signals that are represented by the optical signals coming in through the optical ports (330 and 335), the Optical-to-Electrical converters (320-323) are responsible for converting the optical signals to electrical signals for processing by the remote unit (105). The Optical-to-Electrical converters (320-323) are also responsible for converting received electrical signals from electrical to an optical representation for transmission over the optical fiber.

FIG. 4 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a remote unit (205) of FIG. 2. Each of the remote units (205-208) of the embodiment of FIG. 1 is substantially identical in functional composition.

The remote unit (205) transmits and receives RF signals over the antenna (435). Both the receive and transmit circuitry are connected to the antenna (435) through a diplexer (401).

Alternate embodiments use other quantities of antennas. For example, one embodiment uses three antennas to cover three sectors of an area.

An analog signal that is received on the antenna (435) is split off by the diplexer (401) to an analog-to-digital converter (405). The analog-to-digital converter (405) digitizes the received analog signal by periodically sampling the signal. The sampling generates a digital representation of the received analog signal.

The digitized received signal is input to a summer (415) to be added to the digitized signals from the preceding remote units in the daisy-chain. The host unit thus receives a summation signal that represents the sum of all the signals received by the remote units (205-208) of the system.

A digital signal from the host unit is coupled to a digital-to-analog converter (410). The digital-to-analog converter (410) takes the digital representation of an analog signal and converts it to the analog signal for transmission by the antenna (435).

Optical-to-Electrical converters (420-423) are located at the optical ports (440 and 445) of the remote unit (205). Each optical port (440 and 445) has an input and an output that are each coupled to an Optical-to-Electrical converter (420-423).

Since the remote unit (205) operates with electrical signals that are represented by the optical signals coming in through the optical ports (440 and 445), the Optical-to-Electrical converters (420-423) are responsible for converting the optical signals to electrical signals for processing by the remote unit (205). The Optical-to-Electrical converters (420-423) are also responsible for converting received electrical signals from electrical to an optical representation for transmission over the optical fiber.

A wavelength division multiplexer (WDM) (430 and 431) is located at each optical port (440 and 445). The WDMs (430 and 431) perform the optical processing necessary to combine several optical signals having several wavelengths. The WDMs (430 and 431) also perform the optical demultiplexing necessary to split the multiple wavelengths of a single fiber to their own signal paths.

In summary, the distributed digital antenna system provides multiple daisy-chained antennas on a single medium such as optical fiber. The fiber can be tapped anywhere along its length multiple times to provide economical radio coverage in areas where a base station would be cost prohibitive.

Numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.

Claims

1. A distributed digital antenna system comprising:

a host unit that converts a first signal to a transmitted digital optical signal and that converts a received digital optical signal to a second signal;
an optical medium coupled to the host unit to carry the transmitted and received digital optical signals; and
a plurality of remote units daisy-chained along the optical medium such that each remote unit transmits an analog representation of the transmitted digital optical signal and receives radio frequency signals that are converted by the remote unit to a digitized received spectrum, each of the remote units including a summer that sums the digitized received spectrum with a corresponding digitized received spectrum from any preceding remote unit of the daisy-chained remote units to generate the received digital optical signal for transmission to the host unit.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein the first and second signals are transported over an optical, electrical or wireless medium.

3. The system of claim 1 wherein the optical medium is an optical fiber.

4. The system of claim 1 and further including a base station, coupled to the host unit, that communicates with subscriber units over a radio frequency air interface.

5. The system of claim 4 wherein the base station transmits the first signal and receives the second signal.

6. The system of claim 4 wherein the base station communicates signals from the host unit to a public switched telephone network.

7. A distributed digital antenna system that communicates signals with a base station that is coupled to a data network, the system comprising:

a host unit that converts radio frequency signals from the base station to digital optical signals and that converts digital optical signals from the digital antenna system to radio frequency signals for use by the base station;
an optical medium coupled to the host unit that carries the digital optical signals; and
a plurality of remote units daisy-chained along the optical medium such that each remote unit transmits radio frequency signals over an air interface as an analog representation of the digital optical signals from the base station and receives radio frequency signals over the air interface that are converted by a receiving remote unit to a digitized received spectrum, each of the remote units and the receiving remote unit including a summer that sums the digitized received spectrum with a corresponding digitized received spectrum from any preceding remote unit of the daisy-chained remote units to generate the received digital optical signals for use by the host unit.

8. The system of claim 7 wherein the radio frequency signals between the base station and the host unit are carried over an optical link.

9. The system of claim 7 wherein the optical medium is an optical fiber that carries multiple wavelengths.

10. The system of claim 7 wherein the optical medium is a first optical fiber that carries a first wavelength from the host unit to the plurality of remote units and a second optical fiber that carries a second wavelength from the plurality of remote units to the host unit.

11. The system of claim 10 wherein the second wavelength carries a digital signal that represents a summation of signals received by each of the plurality of remote units.

12. The system of claim 7 wherein the plurality of remote units each comprise:

an antenna that communicates the radio frequency signals over the air interface;
a plurality of optical-to-electrical converters that convert forward link digital optical signals input to the remote unit to forward link digital electrical signals and that convert reverse link electrical signals in the digitized received spectrum to reverse link digital optical signals for output to the host unit;
a digital to analog converter that converts the forward link digital electrical signals to the analog representation;
an analog-to-digital converter that converts the received radio frequency signals to the reverse link electrical signals in the digitized received spectrum; and
wherein the summer sums the reverse link electrical signals in the digitized received spectrum with corresponding reverse link electrical signals in the digitized received spectrum from the preceding remote units of the optical medium daisy-chain to generate the received digital optical signals.

13. A remote unit in a distributed digital antenna system that communicates signals with a base station, the remote unit comprising:

an antenna that communicates radio frequency signals using an air interface standard;
a plurality of optical-to-electrical converters that convert input digital optical signals, from a host unit coupled to the base station and a daisy-chain of previous remote units, to forward link digital electrical signals;
a digital to analog converter that converts the forward link digital electrical signals to analog signals for transmission by the antenna as radio frequency signals;
an analog-to-digital converter that converts radio frequency signals from the antenna to a digitized spectrum of reverse link electrical signals; and
a summer that sums the reverse link electrical signals in the digitized spectrum from the analog-to-digital converter to corresponding reverse link electrical signals from the daisy-chain of previous remote units to generate an output digital optical signal.

14. The remote unit of claim 13 and further including:

a first optical port that is coupled to either the host unit or a subsequent remote unit of the daisy-chain of remote units; and
a second optical port that is coupled to the daisy-chain of previous remote units.

15. The remote unit of claim 13 wherein a first optical-to-electrical converter of the plurality of optical-to-electrical converters converts an optical summation signal from the daisy-chain of previous remote units to the output digital optical signal and a second optical-to-electrical converter converts an optical transmit signal from the host unit to the forward link digital electrical signal for conversion to an analog signal by the digital to analog converter.

16. A remote unit in a distributed digital antenna system that communicates signals with a base station, the remote unit comprising:

an antenna that communicates radio frequency signals using an air interface standard;
a plurality of optical-to-electrical converters that convert digital optical signals, from a host unit coupled to the base station and a daisy-chain of previous remote units, to forward link digital electrical signals, the plurality of optical-to-electrical converters further convert reverse link digital electrical signals to digital optical signals, each digital optical signal comprising a wavelength;
a digital to analog converter that converts the forward link digital electrical signals to analog signals for transmission by the antenna as radio frequency signals;
an analog-to-digital converter that converts radio frequency signals from the antenna to a digitized spectrum of reverse link electrical signals;
a summer that sums the reverse link electrical signals in the digitized spectrum from the analog-to-digital converter to an output digital optical signal from the daisy-chain of previous remote units; and
a wavelength division multiplexer that demultiplexes an input digital optical signal, comprising a plurality of wavelengths, to the digital optical signals each having a wavelength in the plurality of wavelengths, the wavelength division multiplexer further multiplexes digital optical signals to the output digital optical signal comprising the plurality of wavelengths.

17. A method for communicating over a distributed digital antenna system, the method comprising:

converting a first radio frequency signal from a base station to a digital optical signal;
transmitting the digital optical signal over an optical medium to a plurality of remote units in a daisy-chain configuration along the optical medium;
converting the digital optical signal to a forward link digital electrical signal at each remote unit;
converting the forward link digital electrical signal to an analog signal for transmission by at least one of the remote units as a second radio frequency signal;
receiving a third radio frequency signal over an air interface of at least one of the remote units;
converting the third radio frequency signal to a received electrical signal within a digitized spectrum; and
summing the digitized spectrum of the received electrical signal with a corresponding digitized spectrum of received electrical signals from previous remote units in the daisy-chain configuration.

18. The method of claim 17 and further including:

converting a result of the summing of the digitized spectrum of the received electrical signals to a digital optical signal;
transmitting the digital optical signal over the optical medium; and
converting the digital optical signal to a fourth radio frequency signal for use by the base station.

19. The method of claim 17 and further including demultiplexing the digital optical signal into a plurality of optical signals each having one wavelength.

20. The method of claim 18 and further including the base station transmitting information in the fourth radio frequency signal to a public switched telephone network.

21. The method of claim 18 and further including multiplexing single wavelength optical signals from the remote unit into a single optical signal comprising a plurality of wavelengths.

22. A method for a remote terminal to communicate with a wireless terminal in a geographic area, the method comprising:

converting an optical signal to a forward link electrical signal;
converting the forward link electrical signal to a forward link analog signal;
transmitting the forward link analog signal to the wireless terminal;
receiving a reverse link analog signal from the wireless terminal;
converting the reverse link analog signal to a reverse link electrical signal;
summing a digitized spectrum of the reverse link electrical signal with a corresponding digitized spectrum of other reverse link electrical signals from other remote terminals that are daisy-chained together over an optical link; and
converting the summed digitized spectrum of reverse link electrical signals to a reverse link summed optical signal for transmission to a host unit.

23. The system of claim 1, wherein the host unit receives a total digitized received spectrum representing the sum of all digitized received spectrum from the plurality of remote units.

24. The method of claim 22, wherein the summed digitized spectrum of reverse link electrical signals represents a sum of the digitized spectrum of the reverse link electrical signals of all the remote terminals that are daisy-chained together over the optical link.

25. A distributed antenna system comprising:

a host unit communicatively coupled to a base station, the base station configured to communicate with subscriber units using an air interface standard;
a plurality of remote units communicatively coupled to the host unit using a daisy chain;
wherein the host unit is configured to receive a first analog base station radio frequency signal from the base station for communicating with said subscriber units, generate a first digital signal derived from the first analog base station radio frequency signal, and communicate the first digital signal over the daisy chain to the remote units;
wherein the host unit is further configured to receive a second digital signal from the daisy chain, generate a second analog base station radio frequency signal comprising transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station, and communicate the second analog base station radio frequency signal to the base station;
wherein each of the remote units is configured to receive the first digital signal from the daisy chain, generate a respective first analog wireless radio frequency signal for communicating with said subscriber units that is derived from the first digital signal, and wirelessly transmit the respective first analog wireless radio frequency signal;
wherein each of the remote units is configured to receive a respective second analog wireless radio frequency signal, generate a respective digitized radio frequency version of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station, generate a respective second digital signal derived from the respective digitized radio frequency version generated at that remote unit, and communicate the respective second digital signal over the daisy chain in a direction towards the host unit;
wherein each of the remote units is configured to receive any respective second digital signal communicated over the daisy chain by any preceding remote unit along the daisy chain, said any respective second digital signal communicated over the daisy chain by any preceding remote unit along the daisy chain comprising a respective corresponding digitized radio frequency version of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station; and
wherein each of the remote units comprises a respective summer to sum the respective digitized radio frequency version of all of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station generated at that remote unit and the respective corresponding digitized radio frequency version of all of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station received by that remote unit from any preceding remote unit along the daisy chain in connection with generating the respective second digital signal communicated from that remote unit over the daisy chain in the direction towards the host unit.

26. The distributed antenna system of claim 25, wherein the daisy chain comprises a plurality of communication lines in a daisy-chain arrangement.

27. The distributed antenna system of claim 26, wherein the plurality of communication lines comprise optical lines.

28. The distributed antenna system of claim 26, wherein the plurality of communication lines comprise an optical fiber that carries multiple wavelengths through the optical fiber.

29. The distributed antenna system of claim 28, wherein the daisy chain comprises a plurality of wavelength division multiplexers for multiplexing and demultiplexing the multiple wavelengths through the optical fiber.

30. The distributed antenna system of claim 28, wherein a first wavelength of the multiple wavelengths is used for the first digital signal; and

wherein a second wavelength of the multiple wavelengths is used for the second digital signal.

31. The distributed antenna system of claim 26, wherein the plurality of communication lines comprise an optical fiber that carries a single wavelength through the optical fiber.

32. The distributed antenna system of claim 25, wherein the air interface standard comprises one of a code division multiple access (CDMA) air interface standard and a time division multiple access (TDMA) air interface standard.

33. The distributed antenna system of claim 32, wherein the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station comprises one of CDMA transmissions and TDMA transmissions.

34. A method for a distributed antenna system that comprises a host unit communicatively coupled to a base station, the base station configured to communicate with subscriber units using an air interface standard, the distributed antenna system further comprising a plurality of remote units communicatively coupled to the host unit using a daisy chain, the method comprising:

receiving, by the host unit, a first analog base station radio frequency signal from the base station for communicating with said subscriber units;
generating, by the host unit, a first digital signal derived from the first analog base station radio frequency signal;
communicating, by the host unit, the first digital signal over the daisy chain to the remote units;
receiving, by the host unit, a second digital signal from the daisy chain;
generating, by the host unit, a second analog base station radio frequency signal comprising transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station;
communicating, by the host unit, the second analog base station radio frequency signal to the base station;
receiving, by each of the remote units, the first digital signal from the daisy chain;
generating, by each of the remote units, a respective first analog wireless radio frequency signal for communicating with said subscriber units that is derived from the first digital signal;
wirelessly transmitting, by each of the remote units, the respective first analog wireless radio frequency signal;
receiving, by each of the remote units, a respective second analog wireless radio freguency signal;
generating, by each of the remote units, a respective digitized radio frequency version of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station;
generating, by each of the remote units, a respective second digital signal derived from the respective digitized radio frequency version generated at that remote unit;
communicating, by each of the remote units, the respective second digital signal over the daisy chain in a direction towards the host unit; and
receiving, by each of the remote units, any respective second digital signal communicated over the daisy chain by any preceding remote unit along the daisy chain, said any respective second digital signal communicated over the daisy chain by any preceding remote unit along the daisy chain comprising a respective corresponding digitized radio frequency version of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station; and
wherein generating, by each of the remote units, the respective second digital signal derived from the respective digitized radio frequency version generated at that remote unit comprises summing, by that remote unit, the respective digitized radio frequency version of all of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station generated at that remote unit and the respective corresponding digitized radio frequency version of all of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station received by that remote unit from any preceding remote unit along the daisy chain.

35. The method of claim 34, wherein the daisy chain comprises a plurality of communication lines in a daisy-chain arrangement.

36. The method of claim 35, wherein the plurality of communication lines comprise optical lines.

37. The method of claim 35, wherein the plurality of communication lines comprise an optical fiber that carries multiple wavelengths through the optical fiber.

38. The method of claim 37, wherein the daisy chain comprises a plurality of wavelength division multiplexers for multiplexing and demultiplexing the multiple wavelengths through the optical fiber.

39. The method of claim 37, wherein a first wavelength of the multiple wavelengths is used for the first digital signal; and

wherein a second wavelength of the multiple wavelengths is used for the second digital signal.

40. The method of claim 35, wherein the plurality of communication lines comprise an optical fiber that carries a single wavelength through the optical fiber.

41. The method of claim 34, wherein the air interface standard comprises one of a code division multiple access (CDMA) air interface standard and a time division multiple access (TDMA) air interface standard.

42. The method of claim 41, wherein the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station comprises one of CDMA transmissions and TDMA transmissions.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3783385 January 1974 Dunn et al.
3931473 January 6, 1976 Ferris, Jr.
4101834 July 18, 1978 Stutt et al.
4112488 September 5, 1978 Smith, III
4144409 March 13, 1979 Utano et al.
4144411 March 13, 1979 Frenkiel
4183054 January 8, 1980 Patisaul et al.
4231116 October 1980 Sekiguchi et al.
4244046 January 6, 1981 Brouard et al.
4354167 October 12, 1982 Terreault et al.
4402076 August 30, 1983 Krajewski
4451699 May 29, 1984 Gruenberg
4451916 May 29, 1984 Casper et al.
4456793 June 26, 1984 Baker et al.
4475010 October 2, 1984 Huensch et al.
4485486 November 27, 1984 Webb et al.
4525861 June 25, 1985 Freeburg
4531239 July 23, 1985 Usui
4556760 December 3, 1985 Goldman
4596051 June 17, 1986 Feldman
4611323 September 9, 1986 Hessenmuller
4613990 September 1986 Halpern
4628501 December 9, 1986 Loscoe
4654843 March 31, 1987 Roza et al.
4667319 May 19, 1987 Chum
4669107 May 26, 1987 Eriksson-Lennartsson
4691292 September 1, 1987 Rothweiler
4701909 October 20, 1987 Kavehrad et al.
4704733 November 3, 1987 Kawano
4718004 January 5, 1988 Dalal
4726644 February 23, 1988 Mathis
4754451 June 28, 1988 Eng et al.
4755795 July 5, 1988 Page
4759000 July 19, 1988 Reitz
4759051 July 19, 1988 Han
4759057 July 19, 1988 De Luca et al.
4760573 July 26, 1988 Calvignac et al.
4779064 October 18, 1988 Monser
4790000 December 6, 1988 Kinoshita
4797947 January 10, 1989 Labedz
4812846 March 14, 1989 Noro
4816825 March 28, 1989 Chan et al.
4831662 May 16, 1989 Kuhn
4849963 July 18, 1989 Kawano et al.
4868862 September 19, 1989 Ryoichi et al.
4881082 November 14, 1989 Graziano
4916460 April 10, 1990 Powell
4920533 April 24, 1990 Dufresne et al.
4932049 June 5, 1990 Lee
4959829 September 25, 1990 Griesing
4977593 December 11, 1990 Ballance
4999831 March 12, 1991 Grace
5067147 November 19, 1991 Lee
5067173 November 1991 Gordon et al.
5084869 January 28, 1992 Russell
5134709 July 28, 1992 Bi et al.
5136410 August 4, 1992 Heiling et al.
5138440 August 11, 1992 Radice
5159479 October 27, 1992 Takagi
5164914 November 17, 1992 Anderson
5175867 December 29, 1992 Wejke et al.
5193109 March 9, 1993 Chien-Yeh Lee
5243598 September 7, 1993 Lee
5251053 October 5, 1993 Heidemann
5265039 November 23, 1993 Curbelo et al.
5267261 November 30, 1993 Blakeney, II et al.
5272700 December 21, 1993 Hansen et al.
5278690 January 11, 1994 Vella-Coleiro
5280472 January 18, 1994 Gilhousen et al.
5285469 February 8, 1994 Vanderpool
5297193 March 22, 1994 Bouix et al.
5299198 March 29, 1994 Kay et al.
5301056 April 5, 1994 O'Neill
5303287 April 12, 1994 Laborde
5305308 April 19, 1994 English et al.
5309474 May 3, 1994 Gilhousen et al.
5313461 May 17, 1994 Ahl et al.
5321736 June 14, 1994 Beasley
5321849 June 14, 1994 Lemson
5339184 August 16, 1994 Tang
5379455 January 3, 1995 Koschek
5381459 January 10, 1995 Lappington
5392453 February 21, 1995 Gudmundson et al.
5400391 March 21, 1995 Emura et al.
5442681 August 15, 1995 Kotzin et al.
5442700 August 15, 1995 Snell et al.
5457557 October 10, 1995 Zarem et al.
5461627 October 24, 1995 Rypinski
5499047 March 12, 1996 Terry et al.
5513176 April 30, 1996 Dean et al.
5519691 May 21, 1996 Darcie et al.
5528582 June 18, 1996 Bodeep et al.
5533011 July 2, 1996 Dean et al.
5545397 August 13, 1996 Spielvogel et al.
5552920 September 3, 1996 Glynn
5566168 October 15, 1996 Dent
5579341 November 26, 1996 Smith et al.
5586121 December 17, 1996 Moura et al.
5587734 December 24, 1996 Lauder et al.
5592470 January 7, 1997 Rudrapatna et al.
5603080 February 11, 1997 Källander et al.
5606736 February 25, 1997 Hasler et al.
5619202 April 8, 1997 Wilson et al.
5621730 April 15, 1997 Kelley
5621786 April 15, 1997 Fischer et al.
5627879 May 6, 1997 Russell et al.
5630204 May 13, 1997 Hylton et al.
5631757 May 20, 1997 Bodeep et al.
5642405 June 24, 1997 Fischer et al.
5644622 July 1, 1997 Russell et al.
5657374 August 12, 1997 Russell et al.
5682256 October 28, 1997 Motley et al.
5708961 January 13, 1998 Hylton et al.
5715235 February 3, 1998 Sawahashi et al.
5724385 March 3, 1998 Levin et al.
5732076 March 24, 1998 Ketseoglou et al.
5748683 May 5, 1998 Smith et al.
5752170 May 12, 1998 Clifford
5761619 June 2, 1998 Danne et al.
5765097 June 9, 1998 Dail
5765099 June 9, 1998 Georges et al.
5771449 June 23, 1998 Blasing et al.
5774085 June 30, 1998 Yanagimoto et al.
5774660 June 30, 1998 Brendel et al.
5774789 June 30, 1998 Van der Kaay et al.
5781541 July 14, 1998 Schneider
5781859 July 14, 1998 Beasley
5781865 July 14, 1998 Gammon
5802173 September 1, 1998 Hamilton-Piercy et al.
5805983 September 8, 1998 Naidu et al.
5809395 September 15, 1998 Hamilton-Piercy et al.
5809422 September 15, 1998 Raleigh et al.
5809431 September 15, 1998 Bustamante et al.
5812605 September 22, 1998 Smith et al.
5818883 October 6, 1998 Smith et al.
5822324 October 13, 1998 Kostresti et al.
5852651 December 22, 1998 Fischer et al.
5874914 February 23, 1999 Krasner
5878325 March 2, 1999 Dail
5880863 March 9, 1999 Rideout et al.
5883882 March 16, 1999 Schwartz
5907544 May 25, 1999 Rypinski
5930682 July 27, 1999 Schwartz et al.
5946622 August 31, 1999 Bojeryd
5969837 October 19, 1999 Farber et al.
5978650 November 2, 1999 Fischer et al.
5987014 November 16, 1999 Magill et al.
6005506 December 21, 1999 Bazarjani et al.
6005884 December 21, 1999 Cook et al.
6009130 December 28, 1999 Lurey et al.
6014366 January 11, 2000 Ichiyoshi
6034950 March 7, 2000 Sauer et al.
6061089 May 9, 2000 Tonkin et al.
6108113 August 22, 2000 Fee
6108550 August 22, 2000 Wiorek et al.
6108626 August 22, 2000 Cellario et al.
6112086 August 29, 2000 Wala
6122529 September 19, 2000 Sabat, Jr. et al.
6128470 October 3, 2000 Naidu et al.
6128471 October 3, 2000 Quelch et al.
6147786 November 14, 2000 Pan
6150993 November 21, 2000 Dobrovolny
6157659 December 5, 2000 Bird
6181687 January 30, 2001 Bisdikian
6188693 February 13, 2001 Murakami
6192216 February 20, 2001 Sabat, Jr. et al.
6198558 March 6, 2001 Graves et al.
6222660 April 24, 2001 Traa
6223021 April 24, 2001 Silvia et al.
6226274 May 1, 2001 Reese et al.
6253094 June 26, 2001 Schmutz
6259910 July 10, 2001 Fairfield et al.
6262981 July 17, 2001 Schmutz
6263135 July 17, 2001 Wade
6275990 August 14, 2001 Dapper et al.
6298246 October 2, 2001 Lysejko et al.
6307877 October 23, 2001 Philips et al.
6308085 October 23, 2001 Shoki
6317884 November 13, 2001 Eames et al.
6336042 January 1, 2002 Dawson et al.
6337754 January 8, 2002 Imajo
6349200 February 19, 2002 Sabat, Jr. et al.
6353600 March 5, 2002 Schwartz et al.
6356369 March 12, 2002 Farhan
6356374 March 12, 2002 Farhan
6362908 March 26, 2002 Kimbrough et al.
6373611 April 16, 2002 Farhan et al.
6373887 April 16, 2002 Aiyagari et al.
6374124 April 16, 2002 Slabinski
6377640 April 23, 2002 Trans
6442405 August 27, 2002 Hiramatsu et al.
6449071 September 10, 2002 Farhan et al.
6463301 October 8, 2002 Bevan et al.
6466572 October 15, 2002 Ethridge et al.
6480551 November 12, 2002 Ohishi et al.
6480702 November 12, 2002 Sabat, Jr.
6486907 November 26, 2002 Farber et al.
6496546 December 17, 2002 Allpress et al.
6498936 December 24, 2002 Raith
6504831 January 7, 2003 Greenwood et al.
6535720 March 18, 2003 Kintis et al.
6567473 May 20, 2003 Tzannes
6580905 June 17, 2003 Naidu et al.
6594496 July 15, 2003 Schwartz
6622013 September 16, 2003 Miyoshi et al.
6643498 November 4, 2003 Miyajima
6667973 December 23, 2003 Gorshe et al.
6674966 January 6, 2004 Koonen
6697603 February 24, 2004 Lovinggood et al.
6704545 March 9, 2004 Wala
6729929 May 4, 2004 Sayers et al.
6731904 May 4, 2004 Judd
6738581 May 18, 2004 Handelman
6745003 June 1, 2004 Maca et al.
6751417 June 15, 2004 Combs et al.
6768745 July 27, 2004 Gorshe et al.
6771933 August 3, 2004 Eng et al.
6785558 August 31, 2004 Stratford et al.
6799020 September 28, 2004 Heidmann et al.
6801767 October 5, 2004 Schwartz et al.
6807374 October 19, 2004 Imajo et al.
6826163 November 30, 2004 Mani et al.
6826164 November 30, 2004 Mani et al.
6831901 December 14, 2004 Millar
6865390 March 8, 2005 Goss et al.
6907048 June 14, 2005 Treadaway et al.
6917614 July 12, 2005 Laubach et al.
6963552 November 8, 2005 Sabat, Jr. et al.
6967966 November 22, 2005 Donohue
6980831 December 27, 2005 Matsuyoshi et al.
7016308 March 21, 2006 Gallagher
7031335 April 18, 2006 Donohue et al.
7035671 April 25, 2006 Solum
7047313 May 16, 2006 Broerman
7075369 July 11, 2006 Takenaka
7103279 September 5, 2006 Koh et al.
7103377 September 5, 2006 Bauman et al.
7127175 October 24, 2006 Mani et al.
7171244 January 30, 2007 Bauman
7184728 February 27, 2007 Solum
7190903 March 13, 2007 Combs et al.
7205864 April 17, 2007 Schultz, Jr. et al.
7215651 May 8, 2007 Millar
7257328 August 14, 2007 Levinson et al.
7289972 October 30, 2007 Rieser et al.
7313415 December 25, 2007 Wake et al.
7359447 April 15, 2008 Sage
RE40564 November 4, 2008 Fischer et al.
7505747 March 17, 2009 Solum
7512419 March 31, 2009 Solum
7539509 May 26, 2009 Bauman et al.
7548695 June 16, 2009 Wake
7610046 October 27, 2009 Wala
7614074 November 3, 2009 Mobley et al.
7639982 December 29, 2009 Wala
7702985 April 20, 2010 Millar
7761093 July 20, 2010 Sabat, Jr. et al.
5627879 May 6, 1997 Russell et al.
5657374 August 12, 1997 Russell et al.
7848747 December 7, 2010 Wala
7848770 December 7, 2010 Scheinert
7917177 March 29, 2011 Bauman
7920858 April 5, 2011 Sabat, Jr. et al.
7962111 June 14, 2011 Solum
8019221 September 13, 2011 Zancewicz
8032916 October 4, 2011 Oyadomari et al.
8160570 April 17, 2012 Sabat, Jr. et al.
8290483 October 16, 2012 Sabat, Jr. et al.
8326218 December 4, 2012 Wala
8346091 January 1, 2013 Kummetz et al.
RE43964 February 5, 2013 Fischer et al.
8446530 May 21, 2013 Bellers
8559939 October 15, 2013 Sabat, Jr. et al.
8577286 November 5, 2013 Wala
RE45321 January 6, 2015 Fischer et al.
8958410 February 17, 2015 Fischer et al.
8958789 February 17, 2015 Bauman et al.
9332402 May 3, 2016 Wala
9467876 October 11, 2016 Kummetz et al.
9867052 January 9, 2018 Sabat, Jr. et al.
10075243 September 11, 2018 Fischer et al.
10321328 June 11, 2019 Sabat, Jr. et al.
10498434 December 3, 2019 Wala
10505635 December 10, 2019 Wala
RE49377 January 17, 2023 Bauman et al.
20010031014 October 18, 2001 Subramanian et al.
20010036163 November 1, 2001 Sabat, Jr. et al.
20020003645 January 10, 2002 Kim et al.
20020072329 June 13, 2002 Bandeira et al.
20020167954 November 14, 2002 Highsmith et al.
20020191565 December 19, 2002 Mani et al.
20030015943 January 23, 2003 Kim et al.
20030043928 March 6, 2003 Ling et al.
20030060178 March 27, 2003 Ghassemzadeh et al.
20030066087 April 3, 2003 Sawyer et al.
20030133182 July 17, 2003 Ng et al.
20030143947 July 31, 2003 Lyu
20030157943 August 21, 2003 Sabat, Jr.
20030162516 August 28, 2003 Solum
20040010609 January 15, 2004 Vilander et al.
20040037565 February 26, 2004 Young et al.
20040198453 October 7, 2004 Cutrer et al.
20040203339 October 14, 2004 Bauman
20040219950 November 4, 2004 Pallonen et al.
20050007993 January 13, 2005 Chambers et al.
20050131645 June 16, 2005 Panopoulos
20050147067 July 7, 2005 Mani et al.
20050201323 September 15, 2005 Mani et al.
20050243785 November 3, 2005 Sabat, Jr. et al.
20050250503 November 10, 2005 Cutrer
20060121944 June 8, 2006 Buscaglia et al.
20060193295 August 31, 2006 White et al.
20070166036 July 19, 2007 Combs et al.
20090034979 February 5, 2009 Zancewicz
20090067841 March 12, 2009 Combs et al.
20100061291 March 11, 2010 Wala
20110182583 July 28, 2011 Rakib
20110265140 October 27, 2011 Rakib
20130122952 May 16, 2013 Wala
20140016583 January 16, 2014 Smith
20140036758 February 6, 2014 Wala
20160056874 February 25, 2016 Wala
20170026857 January 26, 2017 Kummetz et al.
20180278299 September 27, 2018 Morrison
Foreign Patent Documents
2008900 October 1990 CA
2008900 January 1998 CA
1127056 July 1996 CN
1127056 July 1996 CN
1362799 August 2002 CN
3707244 September 1988 DE
3707244 January 1990 DE
0166885 January 1986 EP
0346925 December 1989 EP
0368673 May 1990 EP
0391597 October 1990 EP
0468688 January 1992 EP
0642243 March 1995 EP
0346925 April 1995 EP
0664621 July 1995 EP
0664621 July 1995 EP
0876073 November 1998 EP
1334630 September 2004 EP
2290850 March 2011 EP
1303929 October 2011 EP
1303929 October 2011 EP
1570626 November 2013 EP
2290850 May 2016 EP
3035562 June 2016 EP
2345865 October 1977 FR
2345865 October 1977 FR
2253770 September 1992 GB
2289198 November 1995 GB
2300549 November 1996 GB
2315959 February 1998 GB
2320653 June 1998 GB
540424 April 1957 IT
58-164007 September 1983 JP
58164007 September 1983 JP
3-26031 February 1991 JP
3026031 February 1991 JP
512374 January 1993 JP
512374 January 1993 JP
H05153021 June 1993 JP
H05268128 October 1993 JP
6318905 November 1994 JP
8510878 November 1996 JP
11234200 August 1999 JP
2002354534 December 2002 JP
19990064537 August 1999 KR
1020000060899 October 2000 KR
1020010018675 March 2001 KR
20010048227 June 2001 KR
1020010048227 June 2001 KR
100594770 June 2006 KR
9115927 October 1991 WO
9115927 October 1991 WO
9428690 December 1994 WO
9533350 December 1995 WO
9628946 September 1996 WO
9705704 February 1997 WO
9716000 May 1997 WO
9732442 September 1997 WO
9824256 June 1998 WO
9837715 August 1998 WO
9937035 July 1999 WO
9948312 September 1999 WO
0021221 April 2000 WO
0021337 April 2000 WO
0156197 August 2001 WO
0174013 October 2001 WO
0174100 October 2001 WO
0209319 January 2002 WO
0209319 January 2002 WO
0239624 May 2002 WO
02067468 August 2002 WO
2004051322 June 2004 WO
2004051322 June 2004 WO
Other references
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.8” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01393, Sep. 2, 2021, pp. Cover through 3, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,286, from U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.8” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01394, Sep. 2, 2021, pp. Cover through 3, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 9,332,402, from U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Petition for Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01390, Dec. 29, 2009, pp. Cover through 116, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Petition for Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Interpartes Review, IPR No. 2021-01391, Dec. 29, 2009, pp. Cover through 115, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Petition for Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Interpartes Review, IPR No. 2021-01392, Dec. 4, 2012, pp. Cover through 105, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,326,218, from U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Petition for Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Interpartes Review, IPR No. 2021-01393, Nov. 5, 2013, pp. Cover through 72, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,286, from U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Petition for Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Interpartes Review, IPR No. 2021-01394, May 3, 2016, pp. Cover through 87, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 9,332,402, from U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Wala, “A New Microcell Architecture Using Digital Optical Transport”, cited in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR Nos. 2021-01390, 2021-01391, 2021-01392, 2021-01393, 2021-01394, Aug. 12, 2021, 26 Pages, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982, 8,326,218, 8,577,286, and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223.
  • Wala, “A New Microcell Architecture Using Digital Optical Transport”, 1993, 43rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Secaucus, NJ, US, May 18-20, 1993, pp. 585 through 588.
  • Wikipedia, “Free Lossless Audio Codec”, Nov. 7, 2021, 7 Page(s), https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Lossless_Audio_Codec&oldid=217065127.
  • Wikipedia, “Global System for Mobile Communications”, Jan. 9, 2019, pp. 1 through 24, Wikipedia.
  • Wikipedia, “Summation”, Dec. 18, 2018, pp. 1 through 11, Wikipedia.
  • Wikipedia, “T-carrier”, Oct. 21, 2018, pp. 1 through 6, Wikipedia.
  • Wikipedia, “Uplink”, May 10, 2019, pp. 1 through 6, https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uplink&oldid=188425198.
  • Zhaohui et al., “A Rake Type Receiver Structure for CDMA Mobile Communication Systems Using Antenna Arrays”, IEEE, 1996, pp. 528 through 530.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Oct. 2, 1996, pp. 1 through 4, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159, Aug. 19, 1997, pp. 1 through 9, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/410,129, Oct. 17, 1996, pp. 1 through 6, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Aug. 12, 2003, pp. 1 through 9, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273, Aug. 8, 2007, pp. 1 through 8, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Jun. 4, 2014, pp. 1 through 5, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Sep. 12, 2014, pp. 1 through 25, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Aug. 13, 2009, pp. 1 through 12, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255, Sep. 17, 2012, pp. 1 through 11, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215, Aug. 2, 2012, pp. 1 through 11, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948, Jul. 3, 2013, pp. 1 through 10, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223, Aug. 14, 2015, pp. 1 through 5, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223, Dec. 22, 2015, pp. 1 through 9, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Jul. 17, 2019, pp. 1-13, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Nov. 28, 2016, pp. 1 through 5, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Apr. 11, 2019, pp. 1-96, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Apr. 14, 2022, pp. 1 through 10, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, May 6, 2021, pp. 1 through 10, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Aug. 17, 2022, pp. 1 through 39, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,432, Jul. 16, 2019, pp. 1-7, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, Aug. 18, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357, Jun. 22, 2010, pp. 1 through 18, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting / Denying Request For Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357, Mar. 12, 2009, pp. 1 through 10, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362, Jun. 22, 2010, pp. 1 through 16, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363, Dec. 6, 2010, pp. 1 through 21, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Nov. 9, 2009, pp. 1 through 2, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1 through 18, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1 through 32, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1 through 17, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/065,652, May 29, 1995, pp. 1 through 7, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159, Jul. 17, 1995, pp. 1 through 5, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Apr. 4, 1995, pp. 1 through 14, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Oct. 26, 1995, pp. 1 through 8, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/294,742, May 27, 1996, pp. 1-5, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/294,742, Oct. 25, 1995, pp. 1 through 6, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159, Feb. 19, 1997, pp. 1 through 9, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159, Apr. 9, 1996, pp. 1 through 3, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159, Oct. 2, 1996, pp. 1 through 2, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/410,129, Jan. 23, 1996, pp. 1 through 12, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Mar. 13, 2003, pp. 1 through 15, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273, Oct. 6, 2005, pp. 1 through 10, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273, Mar. 30, 2004, pp. 1 through 19, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Jan. 14, 2010, pp. 1 through 31, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Jan. 30, 2006, pp. 1 through 15, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Mar. 28, 2005, pp. 1 through 11, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Apr. 4, 2007, pp. 1 through 11, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, May 21, 2008, pp. 1-14, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Aug. 10, 2016, pp. 1 through 35, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Nov. 15, 2007, pp. 1-16, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Mar. 18, 2009, pp. 1-23, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Sep. 1, 2006, pp. 1-12, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Feb. 27, 2009, pp. 1 through 25, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Apr. 3, 2008, pp. 1 through 21, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Aug. 24, 2006, pp. 1 through 19, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255, Feb. 17, 2011, pp. 1 through 13, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215, Apr. 11, 2012, pp. 1 through 12, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948, Apr. 24, 2013, pp. 1 through 23, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,866, Jan. 22, 2014, pp. 1 through 28, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223, Apr. 29, 2015, pp. 1 through 25, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Apr. 25, 2018, pp. 1 through 38, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Apr. 28, 2017, pp. 1 through 24, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Jan. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 23, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Feb. 28, 2018, pp. 1-9, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Sep. 8, 2021, pp. 1 through 24, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Oct. 24, 2019, pp. 1-34, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,432, Oct. 11, 2017, pp. 1-15, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,432, Dec. 17, 2018, pp. 1-23, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting / Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362, Apr. 17, 2009 pp. 1 through 8, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting / Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363, Apr. 17, 2009 pp. 1 through 10, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Mar. 10, 1995, pp. 1-13, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,866, Sep. 10, 2013, pp. 1 through 8, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Supplemental Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223, Apr. 11, 2016, pp. 1 through 4, Published: US.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Certified Translation of Korean Patent Application Publication KR2001-0048227 in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review”, IPR Nos. 2021-01390, 2021-01391, 2021-01392, 2021-01393, 2021-01394, Aug. 12, 2021, 25 Pages, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982, 8,326,218, 8,577,286, and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Decision Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01394, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 9,332,402, From U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Decision Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01390, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, From U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Decision Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01391, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, From U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Decision Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01392, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,326,218, From U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Decision Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01393, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,286, From U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Declaration of Maria P. Garcia Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.68” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR Nos. 2021-01390, 2021-01391, 2021-01392, 2021-01393, 2021-01394, Oct. 6, 2020, 72 Pages, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982, 8,326,218, 8,577,286, and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Declaration of R. Jacob Baker, Ph.D. P.E Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR Nos. 2021-01390, 2021-01391, 2021-01392, 2021-01393, 2021-01394, Aug. 11, 2021, 440 Pages, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982, 8,326,218, 8,577,286, and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Joint Motion to Dismiss the Petitions” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR Nos. 2021-01390, 2021-01391, 2021-01392, 2021-01393, 2021-01394, Nov. 10, 2021, pp. 1 through 6, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982, 8,326,218, 8,577,286, and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.8” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Interpartes Review, IPR No. 2021-01390, Sep. 2, 2021, pp. Cover through 4, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.8” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01391, Sep. 2, 2021, pp. Cover through 4, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944.
  • USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.8” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01392, Sep. 2, 2021, pp. Cover through 3, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,326,218, from U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notice of Reexamination” from CN Application No. 200710153587, Jun. 21, 2012, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 18, Published: CN.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention” from CN Application No. 200910005002.9, Aug. 19, 2013, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 6, Published: CN.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention”, from CN Application No. 20071053587.X, May 28, 2013, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 3, Published: CN.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention”, from CN 200910005002.9, Aug. 19, 2013, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 6, Published: CN.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention”, from CN Application No. 200380109396.3, Jun. 29, 2010, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, pp. 1 through 4, Published: CN.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, Jul. 8, 2005, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 8, Published: CN.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Office Action” from CN Application No. 200710153587, Nov. 2, 2010, rom Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 9, Published: CN.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Reexamination Decision Revoking Decision of Rejection” from CN Application No. 200710153587.X, Nov. 30, 2012, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 14, Published: CN.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Second Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, May 11, 2007, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 5, Published: CN.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Second Office Action” from CN Application No. 200710153587.X, Feb. 4, 2013, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 7, Published: CN.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Second Office Action” from CN Application No. 200910005002.9, Jan. 23, 2013, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 11, Published: CN.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Third Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, Oct, 26, 2007, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 8, Published: CN.
  • Steele, “Towards a high-capacity digital cellular mobile radio system”, IEE Proceedings˜F, Special Issue on Land Mobile Radio, Aug. 1985, vol. 132, Part F, No. 5, pp. 405-415.
  • Stern et al., “Passive Optical Local Networks for Telephony Applications and Beyond” Electronics Letters: an International Publication, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, Nov. 19, 1987, vol. 23, No. 24, pp. 1255-1257.
  • Tang, “Fiber Optic Antenna Remoting for Multi-Sector Cellular Cell Sites”, GTE Laboratories, at least as early as 070/9/1993, pp. 1 through 22.
  • Tang, “Fiber-Optic Antenna Remoting for MultiSector Cellular Cell Sites”, GTE Laboratories Incorporated, Jan. 1, 1992, pp. 76 through 81, Published in: US.
  • TE Connectivity, “Innovative Solution to Cut Costs of Delivering Mobile Ultra-broadband Access”, Feb. 20, 2014, https://www.ecnmag.cominews/2014/02/innovative-solution-cut-costs-delivering-mobile-ultra-broadband-access, pp. 1 through 4.
  • Tektronix, “Synchronous Optical Network (SONET)”, International Engineering Consortium, as downloaded on Aug. 28, 2002 from http://www.iec.org/online/tutorials/sonet/topic03.html, pp. 1 through 5.
  • The International Search Authority, “International Search Report from PCT/US94/05897”, “from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Oct. 31, 1994, pp. 1-7, Published in: WO.
  • Titch, “Kentrox boosts coverage and capacity”, Telephony, Jan. 25, 1993, pp. 11 through-12.
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. Anthony Acampora Addressing Validity of CommScope's Asserted Patents, including U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,332,402 (the '402 patent); 8,577,286 (the '286 patent); 8,326,218 (the '218 patent); 7,639,982 (the '982 patent); and 7,848,747 (“the '747 patent”), in CommScope Technologies v. SOLiD Gear, Inc. and SOLiD, Inc., Case 3:16-cv-00477-M, 46 Pages, Re: U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223.
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, “Complaint for Patent Infringement”, in CommScope Technologies v. SOLiD Gear, Inc. and SOLiD, Inc., Case 3:16-cv-00477-M, May 18, 2022, pp. 1 through 32, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982; 8,326,218; 8,877,286; and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255, Nov. 3, 2011, pp. 1 through 2, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Jun. 2, 2020, pp. 1 through 7, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Decision on Appeal”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Mar. 20, 2014, pp. 1-6, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Examiner's Answer”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Feb. 4, 2011, pp. 1-29, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Jun. 12, 1996, pp. 1 through 8, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Jul. 21, 2010, pp. 1-23, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Nov. 17, 2008, pp. 1-15, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Aug. 20, 2009, pp. 1-22, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Sep. 1, 2006, pp. 1-12, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Feb. 5, 2007, pp. 1 through 16, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Apr. 25, 2007, pp. 1 through 19, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Jul. 18, 2007, pp. 1 through 21, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Oct. 3, 2007, pp. 1 through 22, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Oct. 14, 2008, pp. 1 through 25, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255, Aug. 29, 2011, pp. 1 through 14, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Oct. 30, 2017, pp. 1 through 33, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Dec. 4, 2018, pp. 1-59, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Mar. 9, 2020, pp. 1 through 24, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363, Jun. 23, 2010, pp. 1 through 21, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,432, dated Jun. 4, 2018, pp. 1-88, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Feb. 22, 2008, pp. 1-3, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Aug. 20, 2008, pp. 1-2, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Nov. 16, 2016, pp. 1-11, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Mar. 26, 2018, pp. 1-13, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Sep. 29, 2017, pp. 1-14, Published: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,432, Mar. 26, 2018, pp. 1-12, Published: US.
  • IEE, “Electronics Letters an International Publication”, Nov. 19, 1987, pp. 1-4, vol. 23, No. 24, Publisher: The Institution of Electrical Engineers.
  • International Preliminary Examining Authority, “International Preliminary Examination Report”, from PCT/US94/05897, May 29, 1995, from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, pp. 1 through 8, Published: WO.
  • International Preliminary Examining Authority, “International Preliminary Examination Report”, from PCT/US/01/21021, Jun. 10, 2002, from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 3, Published: WO.
  • International Preliminary Examining Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, from Application No. PCT/US03/38302, Dec. 14, 2001, from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, pp. 1 through 10, Published: WO.
  • International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT Application No. PCT/US03/38302”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Dec. 14, 2011, pp. 1-10, Published: US.
  • International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Written Opinion” from PCT Application No. PCT/US01/21021, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Mar. 18, 2002, pp. 1-2, Published: WO.
  • International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Written Opinion”, from PCT Application No. PCT/US94/05897, from PCT Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Feb. 14, 1995, pp. 1-7, Published: WO.
  • International Searching Authority, “International Search Report” from PCT Application No. PCT/US01/21021, Nov. 15, 2001, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 7, Published: WO.
  • International Searching Authority, “International Search Report”, from PCT Application No. PCT/US03/38302, from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, May 2, 2005, pp. 1-5, Published: WO.
  • Ishida et al., “A10-GHz 8-b Multiplexer/Demultiplexer Chip Set for the SONET STS-192 System”, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 26, No. 12, Dec. 1991, pp. Cover through 1943.
  • Ishio et al., “A Two-Way Wavelength-Division-Multiplexing Transmission and Its Application to a Switched TV-Distribution System”, “Conference Record, Fourth European Conference on Optical Communication”, Sep. 12, 1978, pp. 645 through 665, Publisher: IIC.
  • Japanese Patent Office, “Notice for Reasons for Rejection”, from JP Application No. 6-525837, from foreign counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Oct. 14, 2003, pp. 1 through 4, Published: JP.
  • Jury Verdict, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V. Commscope Connectivity LLC”, No. 3:16-cv-477, “United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division”, Jun. 20, 2019, pp. 1-19, Published in: US.
  • Kobb, “Personal Wireless”, IEEE Spectrum, Jun. 1993, vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 4 through 5 and 20 through 25, 8, vol. 30, No. 6, Publisher: IEEE, Published in: US.
  • Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Decision to Grant from KR Application No. 2005-7010190”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Feb. 2, 2012, pp. 1-7, Published: KR.
  • Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Final Rejection” from KR2005-7010190, from Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Oct. 31, 2011, pp. 1-4, Published: KR.
  • Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action”, from KR Application No. 2005-7010190, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Sep. 30, 2010, pp. 1-5, Published: KR.
  • Lee et al., “Intelligent Microcell Applications in PCS”, “43rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Personal Communication—Freedom Through Wireless Technology”, May 20, 1993, Secaucus, NJ, USA, pp. Cover through 725, Publisher: Pactel Corporation.
  • Lewis, “ADC/Kentrox Call Report with Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc.”, Oct. 18, 1992, pp. 1 through 3.
  • Merrett et al., “A Cordless Access System Using Radio-Over-Fibre Techniques”, 41st IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Gateway to the Future Technology in Motion, May 22, 1991, pp. Cover through 924.
  • Microwaves & RF, “Digital transport for cellular”, Feb. 1993, p. 1.
  • Nakatsugawa et al., “Software Radio Base and Personal Stations for Cellular/PCS Systems”, IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings, May 18, 2000, pp. 617 through 621.
  • Nullity Action 114950NI934 PL/If against EP 2290850 dated Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-107.
  • Nullity Action 114951NI934 PL/If against EP 1570626 dated Jan. 7, 2019, pp. 1-122.
  • Oades, “The Linear RF Repeater”, ICC '80, 1980 International Conference on Communications, Seattle, WA, US, Jun. 8-12, 1980, pp. 1 through 1, IEEE.
  • O'Byrne, “TDMA and CDMA in a Fiber-Optic Environment”, IEEE 38th Vehicular Technology Conference, Jun. 1992, pp. 727 through 731.
  • Patent Office P.R. China, “Notice of Grant of Patent Right for Invention” from CN Application 94192782.2, Sep. 29, 2000, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, pp. 1 through 4, Published: CN.
  • Patent Office P.R. China, “Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, Mar. 7, 2008, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 8, Published: CN.
  • Patent Office P.R. China, “Office Action” from CN Application No. 200380109396.3, Jan. 4, 2008, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, pp. 1 through 7, Published: CN.
  • Payne et al., “Single Mode Optical Local Networks”, “Globecom '85, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference”, Dec. 2-5, 1985, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp. 1200 through 1206.
  • Quinn, “The Cell Enhancer”, “Vehicular Technology Conference”, May 22, 1986, pp. 77 through 83, Publisher: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems.
  • Replica to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Oct. 14, 2019, pp. 1-49.
  • Rosenbloom et al., “Cell Enhancer: Beyond the Outer Limits”, pp. 1 through 2.
  • Russell, “New Microcell Technology Sets Cellular Carriers Free”, “Telephony Mar. 1993”, 3 Pages, Publisher: ADC Kentrox, Published in: US.
  • Schneiderman, “Offshore Markets Gain in Size, Competitiveness, Even the Smallest Industry Companies Are Expanding Their Global Buisness”, Microwaves and RF, Mar. 1993, vol. 32, No. 3, 8 Pages, Publisher: Penton Publishing, Inc.
  • Siala et al., “Equalization for Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing System”, 1993, pp. 649 through 652, Publisher: IEEE.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “First Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, Jul. 8, 2005, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 8, Published in: CN.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “First Office Action” from CN Application No. 200710153587, Mar. 19, 2010, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 7, Published: CN.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “First Office Action” from CN Application No. 200910005002.9 , Apr. 6, 2012, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 12, Published: CN.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Fourth Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, Mar. 7, 2007. from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 8, Published: CN.
  • State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notice of Grant of Patent Right for Invention” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Oct. 24, 2008, pp. 1-4, Published: CN.
  • ADC Kentrox, “ADC Kentrox Expands RF Technology Base with Acquisition of Waseca Technology Inc.”, ADC Kentrox News Release, Jun. 9, 1993, pp. 1 through 2.
  • ADC Kentrox, “ADC Kentrox Introduces Citycell 824, A Replacement for Conventional Cell Sites; Company's Original Goal Was To Improve Fiber Optic T1 Links Between Cells, MTSOs” Telocator Bulletin, Feb. 1993, pp. 1 through 1, Publisher: CityCell.
  • ADC Kentrox, “ADC Kentrox Introduces Innovative Wireless Network Access Solution: Cellular Subscribers Offered a New Level of Portable Service” ADC Kentrox News Release Mar. 1, 1993, pp. 1 through 3.
  • ADC Kentrox, “ADC Kentrox Wireless Systems Group CityCell (TM) 824—A Positioning White Paper”, Mar. 1993, pp. 1 through 6, Publisher: CITA Trade Show.
  • ADC Kentrox, “And Now a Few Words From Your Customers . . . ”, Aug. 1, 1992, pp. 1 through 4.
  • ADC Kentrox, “First Field Trial Results Exceed Expectations, ADC Kentrox and Cellular One Join Force to Provide a New Level of Portable Service”, News Release, Mar. 2, 1993, pp. 1 through 2, Publisher: ADC Kentrox, Published in: Portland, OR.
  • ADC Kentrox, “Photographs of ADC Kentrox City Cell 824 Components”, Publication Date Unknown, pp. 1 through 14.
  • ADC Telecommunications, Wireless Systems Division, “Widen your Horizons to a World of Solutions We're Wherever in the World You Need Us to Be.”, “ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Advertisement for CityRad Cell Enhancer, CityCell Digital Fiberoptic Microcell, CitySmart Site Diversity System & CityWide”, 1994, pp. 1 through 8.
  • Akos et al., “Direct Bandpass Sampling of Multiple Distinct RF Signals”, Jul. 1999, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 983 through 988.
  • Ameritech, “Broadband Optical Transport Digital Microcell Connection Service—Interface and Performance Specifications”, Issue 1, Dec. 1993, pp. Cover-26.
  • Analog Devices, Inc., “Mastering the Mix in Signal Processing”, “Mixed-Signal Design Seminar”, 1991, p. 3, Publisher: Analog Devices, Inc.
  • Anaren, “Anaren Microwave Components”, pp. 1 through 2.
  • Annex WRST 14 to the Nullity Action 114950NI934 PL/If against EP 2290850 dated Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-50.
  • Annex WRST 16 to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Jan. 7, 2019, pp. 1-53.
  • Annex WRST 17 to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Oct. 14, 2019, pp. 1-4.
  • Annex WRST 18 to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Oct. 14, 2019, pp. 1-6.
  • Annex WRST 2 to the Nullity Action 114950NI934 PL/If against EP 2290850 dated Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-4.
  • Annex WRST 2 to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Jan. 7, 2019, pp. 1-4.
  • Annex WRST 3 to the Nullity Action 114950NI934 PL/If against EP 2290850 dated Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-2.
  • Annex WRST 3 to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Jan. 7, 2019, pp. 1-3.
  • Annex WRST 4 to the Nullity Action 114950NI934 PL/If against EP 2290850 dated Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-6.
  • Anon, “2 GHz Repeater Built Without I-F”, “Microwaves”, Jun. 1976, 2 pages, vol. 15, No. 6, Publisher: Hayden Publishing Company Inc.
  • Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property, “Technical Examination Report for BR Application No. PI0112653-9”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Apr. 17, 2018, pp. 1-6, Published in: BR.
  • Brazilian Patent Office, “Office Action for Brazil Application No. PI0112653-9”, “from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Apr. 8, 2015, pp. 1-14, Published in: BR.
  • Brazilian Patent Office, “Office Action from BR Application No. PI0112653-9”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Jan. 8, 2016, pp. 1 through 7, Published: BR.
  • Brunner et al., “On Space-Time Rake Receiver Structures for WCDMA”, 1999, IEEE, pp. 1546 through 1551.
  • Cellular Industry, The Day Group, “New Signal Transport Technology Digitizes the Cellular Band”, Dec. 22, 2000, pp. 2-3.
  • Cheun, “Performance of Direct-Sequence Spread-Spectrum RAKE receivers with Random Spreading Sequences”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 45, No. 9, Sep. 1997, pp. 1130 through 1143.
  • City Cell, “CityCell 824 Host-Site User Manual”, Sep. 25, 1993, 65-61002101 Issue 1, pp. Cover through 8-34.
  • City Cell, “CityCell 824 Remote-Site Manual”, Preliminary Version, Feb. 1, 1993, pp. Cover through E-2.
  • City Cell, Cellular Industry, the Day Group, “ADC Kentrox CityCell Field Trial Yields Another First: Simultaneous Analog and Digital Calls”, prior to Dec. 22, 2000, 1 page.
  • Citycell, “ADC Kentrox Introduces Citycell 824, A Replacement for Conventional Cell Sites; Company's Original Goal Was To Improve Fiber Optic T1 Links Between Cells, MTSOs”, Telocator Bulletin, Feb. 1993, pp. 1 through 1.
  • Commscope, “CommScope Completes Transformational Acquisition of TE Connectivity's Telecom, Enterprise and Wireless Businesses”, Aug. 28, 2015, pp. 1-4.
  • Cox, “A Radio System Proposal for Widespread Low-Power Tetherless Communications”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Feb. 1991, pp. Cover through 335, vol. 39, No. 2, IEEE.
  • Crofut, “Remote monitoring of wireless base stations”, Urgent Communications, Jun. 1, 1998, http://urgentcomm.com/print/mag/remote-monitoring-wireless-base-stations, pp. 1 through 4.
  • Cyr et al., “The digital age is here—Digital radio frequency transport enhances cellular network performance”, Telephony, Jul. 5, 1993, pp. 20 through 24.
  • Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit A, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 27, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US.
  • Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit B, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 200, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US.
  • Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit D, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 613, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US.
  • Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit C, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 410, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US.
  • Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit E, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 482, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US.
  • Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit F, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 573, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US.
  • Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commscope Technologies LLC, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V. Commscope Connectivity LLC”, “United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division”, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1-23, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published in: US.
  • Zonemaster, “Maximum Coverage for High-Capacity Locations”, “Decibel Products”, 1993, pp. 1-4, Publisher: Decibel Multimedia Microcell System.
  • Derneryd et al., “Adaptive base-station antenna arrays”, Ericsson Review No. 3, 1999, pp. 132 through 137.
  • Detreville et al., “A Distributed Experimental Communications System”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. SAC-1, No. 6, Dec. 1983, pp. Cover through 1075.
  • Ericksson, “Advertisement by Ericksson”, “Telephony”, 1994, pp. 1 through 1.
  • European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3)” from Application No. 03790242.6, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Feb. 11, 2009, pp. 1 through 4, Published: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) from EP Application No. 03790242.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Jul. 24, 2007, pp. 1-4.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Particulars of Infringement by Order of Mr Justice Meade dated Jul. 23, 2021”, Aug. 6, 2021, pp. B1/7 through B1/12, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Defence and Amended Counterclaim”, Aug. 20, 2021, pp. B1/13 through B1/22, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 6”, pp. B3/54 through B3/61, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 5”, pp. B3/49 through B3/53, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 7”, pp. B3/62 through B3/64, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 8”, pp. B3/65 through B3/66, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 9”, pp. B3/67 through B3/68, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Defence and Counterclaim Annex 1”, pp. B3/70 through B3/193, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Defence and Counterclaim Annex 2”, pp. B3/194 through B3/261, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Defence and Counterclaim Annex 3”, pp. B3/262 through B3/266, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Annex 1 to the Reply and Defence to Counterclaim”, pp. B3/267 through B3/272, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Annex 2 to the Reply and Defence to Counterclaim”, pp. B3/273 through B3/281, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Annex 3 to the Reply and Defence to Counterclaim”, pp. B2/282 through B2/289, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C1-2 through C1-65, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Annex A to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora Supplemented Technical Primer”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C1-66 through C1-90, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Third Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Nov. 25, 2021, pp. C1-112 through C1-119 , Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Second Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Nov. 12, 2021, pp. C1-94 through C1-111, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-1 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-2 through C2-46, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-3 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-51 through C2-62, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-2 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-47 through C2-50, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-4 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-63 through C2-70, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-5 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-71 through C2-75, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-6 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-76 through C2-82, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-8 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-88 through C2-96, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-7 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-83 through C2-87, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-9 to the Second Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Nov. 12, 2021, pp. C2-97 through C2-122, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D1-73 through D1-82, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D1-2 through D1-51, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-1 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-2 through D2-5, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-2 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-6 through D2-53, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-4 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-80 through D2-92, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-3 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-54 through D2-79, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-5 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-93 through D2-108, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-6 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-109 through D2-110, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-8 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-113 through D2-114, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-9 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-115 through D2-116, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-10 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-117 through D2-118, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-12 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-121 through D2-122, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-11 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-119 through D2-120, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-15 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-142 through D2-153, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-16 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-154 through D2-160, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-18 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-171 through D2-175, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-17 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-161 through D2-170, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-19 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-176 through D2-179, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-21 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-190 through D2-200, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-20 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-180 through D2-189, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-23 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-207 through D2-235, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-22 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-201 through D2-206, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Proceedings Day 1”, Dec. 7, 2021, pp. T/2 through T/48, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Proceedings Day 2”, Dec. 8, 2021, pp. T/54 through T/99, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Proceedings Day 3”, Dec. 9, 2021, pp. T/109 through T/162, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Proceedings Day 4”, Dec. 14, 2021, pp. 1 through 53, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA1, including Butterweck et al., “Finite wordlength effects in digital filters: a review”, Jan. 1, 1988, EUT report. E, Fac. of Electrical Engineering; vol. 88-E-205, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands, pp. XX-AA/2 through XX-AA/99, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA2, including Acampora, “An Introduction to Broadband Networks, LANs, Mans, ATM, B-ISDN, and Optical Networks for Integrated Multimedia Telecommunications”, (c) 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York, pp. XX-AA/100 through XX-AA/108, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA4, including Gregson, “LCG Gains Patent on LGCell Antenna” RCR Wireless News, Apr. 13, 1998, p. XX-AA/126, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA5, Dagoni, “The lobbyist, the US Representative, and the Israeli Company”, Globes, Oct. 20, 2005, pp. XX-AA/127 through XX-AA/130, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA7, WDD, “Designing Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) Considerations, challenges, and what to expect when designing and deploying DAS.”, (c) 2016, Advantage Business Media, pp. XX-AA/139 through XX-AA/153, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA9, OFCOM, “Citizens' Band (CB) radio spectrum use—information and operation”, Mar. 2018, pp. XX-AA/173 through XX-AA/181, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA10, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, “Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. Anthony Acampora”, pp. XX-AA/182 through XX-AA/572, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA11, Dukda, “Introduction to Structured Cabling”, Division of Information Technology, Ministry of Communication, Sep. 2000, pp. XX-AA/573 through XX-AA/600, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP (UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA12, cleeCOMcen, “History of CV Radio”, downloaded Dec. 1, 2021 from www.cleecomcen.co.uk/history-of-cb-radio/, pp. XX-AA/601 through XX-AA/605, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA13, Ghayas, “What Frequency Was Used by IS-95 (CdmaONE)?”, downloaded Apr. 12, 2021 from https://commsbrief.com/what-frequency-was-used-by-cdmaone/, pp. XX-AA/606 through XX-AA/612, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA14, Wireless Networks Online, “LGCell(TM) Wireless Network System”, downloaded Nov. 19, 2021 from https://www.wirelessnetworksonline.com/doc/lgcell-wireless-network-system-0004, p. XX-AA/613, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA16, “4×200 KHz Sub Chanels”, p. XX-AA/615, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Claimant for Cross Examination—XX-AJS-1, “Oh Forward Path”, p. XX-AJS/2, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Claimant for Cross Examination—XX-AJS-2, Al-Rawshidy et al., “Radio over Fiber Technologies for Mobile Communication Networks”, May 9, 2002, (c) 2002 Artech House, Inc. pp. XX-AJS/3 through XX-AJS/60, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Grounds of Invalidity”, Aug. 26, 2020, pp. B1/23 through B1/27, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Reply and Defence to Counterclaim”, Aug. 6, 2021, pp. B1/28 through B1/31, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Statement of Case on Invalidity” Aug. 20, 2021, pp. B1/33 through B1/46, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Claimant's Notice of discontinuance” Sep. 22, 2021, pp. B1/47, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Defendant's Notice of discontinuance”, Sep. 24, 2021, pp. B1/48, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Consent Order of Birss J” Oct. 29, 2020, pp. B1/49 through B1/53, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Confidentiality Order (by Consent) by Smith J”, Jun. 6, 2021, pp. B1/54 through B1/60, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Consent Order of Meade J”, Jul. 23, 2021, Page(s) B1/61 through B1/65, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Consent Order of HHJ Hacon”, Sep. 21, 2021, pp. B1/66 through B1/67, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Order of HHJ Hacon”, Sep. 28, 2021, pp. B1/68 through B1/70, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Technical Primer”, Jul. 16, 2021, pp. B1/71 through B1/83, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Order of Mellor J”, Nov. 23, 2021, pp. B1/84 through B1/90, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Claim Annex C”, pp. B3/2 through B3/12, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 1”, pp. B3/13 through B3/30, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 2”, pp. B3/31 through B3/34, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 3”, pp. B3/35 through B3/47, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Korean Patent Application Publication KR2001-0048227, pp. A3-36 through A3-43, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Certified Translation of Korean Patent Application Publication KR2001-0048227, pp. A3-44 through A3-53, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Korean Patent Application Publication KR10-2001-0018675, pp. A3-54 through A3-65, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Certified Translation of Korean Patent Application Publication KR10-2001-0018675, pp. A3-66 through A3-82, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Korean Patent Application Publication KR1999-0064537, pp. B2/2 through B2/12, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Certified Translation of Korean Patent Application Publication KR1999-0064537, pp. B2/13 through B2/24, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Claimant for Cross Examination—XX-AJS-3, including European Patent EP 1 334 630 B1, Sep. 22, 2004, pp. XX-AJS/62 through XX-AJS/75, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-7 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-111 through D2-112, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA6, including annotated U.S. Pat. No. 7,848,747 B2, Dec. 7, 2010, pp. XX-AA/131 through XX-AA/138, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA8, including U.S. Pat. No. 9,332,402 B2, May 3, 2016, pp. XX-AA/154 through XX-AA/172, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Neutral Citation No. [2022] EWHC 769 (Pat), Case No. HP-2020-000017, Apr. 1, 2022, “Comptroller Comments re: EP(UK) 1 570 626 B1”, from EP Application No. 03790242.6 from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Oct. 26, 2021, pp. A3/106 through A3/109, Published: GB.
  • Hoberecht, “A Layered Network Protocol for Packet Voice and Data Integration”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas In Communications, vol. SAC-1, No. 6, Dec. 1983, pp. Cover through 1013.
  • Horowitz, “Digital Electronics”, “Chapter 8: Basic Logic Concepts”, “The Art of Electronics”, 1980, p. 316, Publisher: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
  • European Patent Office, “Office Action EP Application No. 01950794.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Feb. 24, 2006, pp. 1-5, Published in: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3)—Reissued” from EP Application No. 10011450.3, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Jan. 26, 2016, pp. 1 through 37, Published in: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC for EP Application No. 01950794.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, May 3, 2011, pp. 1-5, Published in: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) for EP Application No. 03790242.6”, “foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, May 14, 2013, pp. 1-27.
  • European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) from EP Application No. 10011450.3 dated Aug. 11, 2015”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Aug. 11, 2015, pp. 1-40, Published: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3)”, from EP Application No. 10011450.3, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Jul. 14, 2015, pp. 1 through 39, Published in: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “European Office Action for Application Serial No. 10011450.3”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jan. 16, 2015, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report from EP Application No. 10011450.3”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jan. 14, 2011, pp. 1-9, Published in: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report”, from EP Application No. 15020262.0, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, May 16, 2020, pp. 1 through 8, Published: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Office Action for EP Application No. 03790242.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Feb. 11, 2009, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Office Action from EP Application No. 01950794.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 6, 2007, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Office Action from EP Application No. 01950794.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Nov. 16, 2010, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings from EP Application No. 01950794.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, filed May 21, 2010, pp. 1-6, Published in: EP.
  • Federal Patent Court, “Replica to the invalidity matter 6Ni21/19 against EP 2290850 dated Dec. 20, 2019”, pp. 1 through 53, Published: DE.
  • Federal Patent Court, “Statement of Reply including Annex MB1 in the Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 1570626 mailed Jul. 31, 2019”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, pp. 1-57, Published: DE.
  • Federal Patent Court, “Statement of Reply including Annexes MB1 and MB2 in the Nullity Action from EP Application No. 2290850 mailed Sep. 13, 2019”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1-149, Published: DE.
  • Foxcom Wireless, “Litenna In-Building RF Distribution System”, White Paper, 1998, Document No. 42-14-001-09C, pp. 1 through 8.
  • Foxcom Wireless, Application Note, “RFiber(TM)—RF Fiberoptic Links for Wireless Applications”, 1998, Document No. 41-14-001-10E, pp. 3 through 11.
  • German Federal Patent Court, “SOLid Inc.'s Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 1570626”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, May 11, 2021, pp. 1-114, Published: DE.
  • German Federal Patent Court, “Anlage NK 3 in the Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 2 290 850 (DE 601 49 927)”, Mar. 3, 2021, pp. 1-2, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431.
  • German Federal Patent Court, “Anlage NK 4 in the Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 2 290 850 (DE 601 49 927)”, Mar. 3, 2021, pp. 1-2, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431.
  • German Federal Patent Court, “Grounds of Objection to SOLiD Inc.'s Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 2 290 850 (DE 601 49 927)”, Nov. 12, 2021, pp. 1-104, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431.
  • German Federal Patent Court, “SOLiD Inc.'s Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 2 290 850 (DE 601 49 927)”, Mar. 3, 2021, pp. 1-108, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431.
  • German Federal Patent Court, “SOLiD Inc.'s Reply in the Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 2 290 850 (DE 601 49 927)”, Feb. 11, 2022, pp. 1-41, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431.
  • German Federal Patent Court, “Grounds for Objection to SOLiD Inc.'s Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 1 570 626 (DE 603 45 256)”, Sep. 14, 2021, pp. 1 through 112, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431.
  • Grace, “Synchronous Quantized Subcarrier Multiplexing for Transport of Video, Voice and Data”, “IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications”, Sep. 1990, vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 1351-1358.
  • Graf, “Modern Dictionary of Electronics—Seventh Edition”, 1999, pp. 1 through 9.
  • Grundmann et al., “An Empirical Comparison of a Distributed Antenna Microcell System Versus a Single Antenna Microcell System for Indoor Spread Spectrum Communications at 1.8 Ghz”, “ICUPC '93”, 1993, pp. 59 through 63.
  • GTE Laboratories, “Urban Microcell System Layout”, GTE Laboratories Conference, Jun. 14-18, 1992, pp. 1-13.
  • Gupta et al., “Land Mobile Radio Systems—A Tutorial Exposition”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Jun. 1985, vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 34-45.
  • Haas et al., “A Mode-Filtering Scheme for Improvement of the Bandwidth-Distance Product in Multimode Fiber Systems”, Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 11, No. 7, Jul. 1993, pp. 1125 through 1131.
  • Harvey et al., “Cordless Communications Utilising Radio Over Fibre Techniques for the Local Loop”, “IEEE International Conference on Communications”, Jun. 1991, pp. 1171 through 1175.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Indexes”, pp. 1 through 14, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Approved Judgment”, Apr. 1, 2021, pp. 1 through 64, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Application Notice”, Sep. 1, 2021, pp. A2/49 through A2/52, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Statement of Reasons for Amendment of EP (UK) 2290850 B1”, pp. A2/53 through A2/60, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Notice and Statement of Grounds of Opposition”, Oct. 12, 2021, pp. A2/61 through A2/64, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Comptroller Comments”, Oct. 26, 2021, pp. A2/65 through A2/68, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Application Notice”, Sep. 1, 2021, pp. A3-83 through A3-86, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Statement of Reasons for Amendment of EP(UK) 1,570,626 B1”, pp. A3-87 through A3-92, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Annex D to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. A3-93 through A3-105, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Application Notice”, pp. A3/110 through A3/112, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Comptroller Comments re: EP(UK) 1 570 626 B1”, Oct. 26, 2021, pp. A3/106 through A3/109, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Fourth Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Dec. 1, 2021, pp. A3-113 through A3-116, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Claim Form by Order of Mr Justice Meade dated Jul. 23, 2021”, pp. B1/2 through B1/3, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Particulars of Claim by Order of Mr Justice Meade dated Jul. 23, 2021”, Aug. 6, 2021, pp. B1/4 through B1/6, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
  • ADC Kentrox.COPYRGT. A Subsidiary of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. “And now a few words from your Customers . . . ”, Aug. 1992 (4 pages).
  • ADC Kentrox, News Release, “ADC Kentrox Introduces Innovative Wireless Network Access Solution Cellular Subscribers Offered a New Level of Portable Services,” Mar. 1, 1993 (3 pages).
  • ADC Kentrox, News Release, “First Field Trial Results Exceeds Expectations,” Mar. 2, 1993 (2 pages).
  • ADC Kentrox Wireless Systenr Group CityCell.TM. 824—A Positioning White paper, (Mar. 1993) CITA Trade Show.
  • ADC Kentrox Call Report, Oct. 18, 1992, call date Oct. 12, 1992, re: Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc.
  • Akos et al., Jul. 1999, IEEE Transactions on Communications, 47:983-988, Direct Bandpass Sampling of Multiple Distinct RF Signals.
  • Ameritech, “Broadband Optical Transport Digital Microcell Connection Service—Interface and Performance Specifications. A technical descriptionof the User-Network Interface and Performance Specifications,”AM TR-NIS 000117, (pp. 1-26), Issue 1, Dec. 1993.
  • Cellular Industry, The Day Group, “New Signal Transport Technology Digitizes the Cellular Band,” 2 pages, (prior to Dec. 22, 2000).
  • Cox “A Radio System Proposal for Widespread Low-Power Tetherless Communications,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 39(2), Feb. 1991, pp. 324-335.
  • Electronic Letters, an International Publication, Nov. 19, 1987, vol. 23 No. 24, pp. 1255-1257.
  • 1998 Foxcom Wireless Proprietary Information, pp. 1-8, “Litenna In-Building RF Distribution System.”
  • Gupta et al., “Land Mobile Radio Systems—A Tutorial Exposition”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 23(6), Jun. 1985, p. 37.
  • Ishio et al., “A Two-Way Wavelength-Division-Multiplexing Transmission and its Application to a Switched TV Distribution System,” Electrical Communication Laboratories, Nipon Telegrah & Telephone Public Corporation, Yokosuka, Japan and Technical Bureau, Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Public Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, (10 pages) (prior to Dec. 22, 2000).
  • Kobb, “Personal Wireless,” Special Report/Communications, IEEE Spectrum, Jun. 1993, pp. 20-25.
  • Lee et al., 1993 43rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 18-20, 1993, Personal Communication—Freedom Through Wireless Technology, PacTel Corporation, published May 18, 1993, “Intelligent Microcell Applications in PCS,” pp. 722-725.
  • Merrett et al., 41st IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 19-22, 1991, Gateway to the Future Technology, 91CH2944-7, British Telecom Research Laboratories, “A Cordless Access System Using Radio-Over-Fibre Techniques,” pp. 921-924.
  • Miicrowaves & RF, “Digital Transport for Cellular,” Feb. 1993.
  • O'Byrne, Vehicular Technology Society 42nd VTS Conference Frontiers of Technology, From Pioneers to the 21st Century, GTE Laboratories Incorporated, “TDMA and CDMA in a Fiber-Optic Environment,” vol. 2 of 2, pp. 727-731 (May 10, 1992).
  • Payne et al., “Single Mode Optical Local Networks”, Globecom '85, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Dec. 2-5, 1985, pp. 1201-1205.
  • Quinn, “The Cell Enhancer”, Bell Atlanttic Mobile Systems, pp. 77-83.
  • Russell, New Microcell Technology Sets Cellular Carriers Free, Telephony, Mar. 1993, pp. 40, 42 and 46.
  • R. Steele. Towards a High-Capacity Digital Cellular Mobile Radio System. “Towards a High Capacity Digital Cellular Mobile Radio System,” IEE Proceedings, vol. 132, Pt.F, No. 5, Aug. 1985, pp. 405-415.
  • Tang, Fiber Optic Antenna Remoting for Multi-Sector Cellular Cell Sites. GTE Laboratories—Abstract (Conference Jun. 14-18, 1992).
  • Titch, “Kentrox boosts coverage and capacity,” Telephony Jan. 25, 1993 (1 page).
  • Urban Microcell System Layout. GTE Laboratories (Conference Jun. 14-18, 1992).
  • Wala, 1993 43rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 18-20, 1993, Personal Communication—Freedom Through Wireless Technology, Waseca Technology Inc., published May 18, 1993, “A New Microcell Freedom Architecture Using Digital Optical Transport,” pp. 585-588.
  • “ZoneMaster.TM.—Maximum Coverage for High-Capacity Locations”. Decibel Multi Media MicroCELL System. 4 pages 1993 Decibel Products. 2-83-5M.
  • Grace, Martin K., “Synchronous Quantized Subcarrier Multiplexing for Transport of Video, Voice and Data”, “IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications”, Sep. 1990, pp. 1351-1358, vol. 8, No. 7, Publisher: IEEE.
  • Harvey et al., “Cordless Communications Utilising Radio Over Fibre Techniques for the Local Loop”, “IEEE International Conference on Communications”, , pp. 1171-1175, Publisher: IEEE.
  • Harvey et al., “Cordless Communications Utilising Radio Over Fibre Techniques for the Local Loop”, “IEEE International Conference on Communications”, Jun. 1991, pp. 1171-1175, Publisher: IEEE.
  • China Patent Offfice, “Notice of Grant of Patent Right for Invention from CN Application No. 01815499.9 mailed Oct. 24, 2008”, “from Foreign Counterpart of US. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Oct. 24, 2008, pp. 1-4, Published in: CN.
  • Chinese Patent Office, “First Office Action from CN Application No. 01815499.9 mailed Jul. 8, 2005”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jul. 8, 2005, pp. 1-8, Published in: CN.
  • Chinese Patent Office, “Second Office Action from CN Application No. 01815499.9 mailed May 11, 2007”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, May 11, 2007, pp. 1-5, Published in: CN.
  • Chinese Patent Office, “Third Office Action from CN Application No. 01815499.9 mailed Oct. 26, 2007”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Oct. 26, 2007, pp. 1-8, Published in: CN.
  • Chinese Patent Office, “Fourth Office Action from CN Application No. 01815499.9 mailed Mar. 7, 2007”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 7, 2007, pp. 1-8, Published in: CN.
  • Chinese Patent Office, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention from CN Application No. 200710153587. X mailed May 28, 2013”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, May 28, 2013, pp. 1-3, Published in: CN.
  • Chinese Patent Office, “Second Office Action from CN Application No. 200710153587.X mailed Feb. 4, 2013”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Feb. 4, 2013, pp. 1-7, Published in: CN.
  • Chinese Patent Office, “First Office Action from CN Application No. 200710153587.X mailed Mar. 19, 2010”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 19, 2010, pp. 1-12, Published in: CN.
  • Chinese Patent Office, “Decision on Rejection from CN Application No. 200710153587.X mailed Nov. 2, 2010”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Nov. 2, 2010, pp. 1-9, Published in: CN.
  • Chinese Patent Office, “Notice of Reexamination from CN Application No. 200710153587.X mailed Jun. 21, 2012”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jun. 21, 2012, pp. 1-18, Published in: CN.
  • Chinese Patent Office, “Second Office Action from CN Application No. 200910005002.9 mailed Jan. 23, 2013”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jan. 23, 2013, pp. 1-11, Published in: CN.
  • China Patent Office, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention from CN Application No. 200910005002.9 mailed Aug. 19, 2013”, Aug. 19, 2013, pp. 1-6, Published in: CN.
  • Chinese Patent Office, “First Office Action from CN Application No. 200910005002.9 mailed Apr. 6, 2012”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”,Apr. 6, 2012,pp. 1-12, Publishedin: CN.
  • European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC from EPO Application No. 01950794.6-2411 mailed May 3, 2011”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, May 3, 2011, pp. 1-45, Published in: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Office Action from EPO Application No. 019507946-2411 mailed Feb. 24, 2006”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Feb. 24, 2006, pp. 1-5, Published in: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Office Action from EPO Application No. 01950794.6-2411 mailed Mar. 6, 2007”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 6, 2007, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Office Action from EPO Application No. 01950794.6-2411 mailed Nov. 16, 2010”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Nov. 16, 2010, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings from EPO Application No. 01950794.6-2411 mailed May 21, 2010”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, May 21, 2010, pp. 1-6, Published in: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report from EPO Application No. 10011450.3-2411 mailed Jan. 14, 2011”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jan. 14, 2011, pp. 1-9, Published in: EP.
  • U.S. Patent Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Aug. 12, 2003, pp. 1-9.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 13, 2003, pp. 1-15.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Apr. 25, 2007, pp. 1-19.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Jul. 18, 2007, pp. 1-21.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Oct. 3, 2007, pp. 1-22.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Oct. 14, 2008, pp. 1-25.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Aug. 13, 2009, pp. 1-12.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Aug. 24, 2006, pp. 1-19.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Feb. 5, 2007, pp. 1-16.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Apr. 3, 2008.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Feb. 27, 2009, pp. 1-25.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215”, Aug. 2, 2012, pp. 1-11.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215”, Apr. 11, 2012, pp. 1-12.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fees Due”, “from U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948”, Jul. 3, 2013, pp. 1-10, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “from U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948”, Apr. 24, 2013, pp. 1-23, Published in: US.
  • The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Preliminary Examination Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US 01/21021 mailed Jun. 10, 2002”, “from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jun. 10, 2002, pp. 1-3, Published in: WO.
  • International Searching Authority, “International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US 01/21021 mailed Nov. 15, 2001”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Nov. 15, 2001, pp. 1-7, Published in: WO.
  • The International Bureau of WIPO, “Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US 01/21021 mailed Mar. 18, 2002”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 18, 2002, pp. 1-2, Published in: WO.
  • China Patent Office, “Notice of Grant of Patent Right for Invention from CN Application No. 94192782.2 mailed Sep. 29, 2000”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Sep. 29, 2000, pp. 1-4, Published in: CN.
  • Japan Patent Office, “Office Action from JP Application No. 6-525837 mailed Oct. 14, 2003”, “from foreign counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Oct. 14, 2003, pp. 1-2, Published in: JP.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Jun. 12, 1996, pp. 1-8, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Oct. 2, 1996, pp. 1-4, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Apr. 4, 1995, pp. 1-14, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Oct. 26, 1995, pp. 1-8, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159”, Feb. 1-9, 1997, pp. 1-9, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Mar. 10, 1995, pp. 1-13, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexam Certificate”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357”, Jun. 22, 2010, pp. 1-18, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting/Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357”, Mar. 12, 2009, pp. 1-10, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357”, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1-17, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/294,742”, May 27, 1996, pp. 1-5, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/294,742”, Oct. 26, 1996, pp. 1-4, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/298,652”, May 29, 1995, pp. 1-7, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159”, Aug. 19, 1997, pp. 1-9, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159”, Jul. 17, 1995, pp. 1-5, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159”, Apr. 9, 1996, pp. 1-3, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159”, Oct. 2, 1996, pp. 1-2, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/410,129”, Oct. 17, 1996, pp. 1-6, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/410,129”, Jan. 23, 1996, pp. 1-12, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexam Certificate”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362”, Jun. 22, 2010, pp. 1-16, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting/Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362”, Apr. 17, 2009, pp. 1-8, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362”, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1-18, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273”, Aug. 8, 2007, pp. 1-8.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273”, Mar. 30, 2004, pp. 1-19.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273”, Oct. 6, 2005, pp. 1-10.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363”, Jun. 23, 2010, pp. 1-21, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexam Certificate”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363”, Dec. 6, 2010, pp. 1-21, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting/Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/010,363”, Apr. 17, 2009, pp. 1-10, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363”, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1-32, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255”, Nov. 3, 2011, pp. 1-2.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255”, Aug. 29, 2011, pp. 1-14.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255”, Sep. 17, 2012, pp. 1-11.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255”, Feb. 17, 2011, pp. 1-13.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,866”, Jan. 22, 2014, pp. 1-28, Published in: US.
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement”, “U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,866”, Sep. 10, 2013, pp. 1-8, Published in: US.
  • The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT Application No. PCT/US94/05897 mailed May 29, 1995”, May 29, 1995, pp. 1-8, Publisher: from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Published in: WO.
  • The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US94/05897 mailed Oct. 31, 1994”, “from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Oct. 31, 1994, pp. 1-7, Published in: WO.
  • The International Bureau of WIPO, “Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US 94/05897 mailed Feb. 14, 1995”, “from PCT Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Feb. 14, 1995, pp. 1-7, Published in: WO.
  • China Patent Office, “Notification of Grant Patent Right for Invention from CN Application No. 200380109396.3 mailed Jun. 29, 2010”, “from Chinese Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Jun. 29, 2010, pp. 1-4, Published in: CN.
  • China Patent Office, “First Office Action from CN Application No. 200380109396.3 mailed Jan. 4, 2008”, “from Chinese Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Jan. 4, 2008, pp. 1-7, Published in: CN.
  • European Patent Office, “Office Action from EPO Application No. 03790242.6-2415 mailed Jul. 24, 2007”, “from European Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Jul. 24, 2007, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
  • European Patent Office, “Office Action from EPO Application No. 03790242.6-2415 mailed Feb. 11, 2009”, “from European Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Feb. 11, 2009, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
  • Korean Patent Office, “Decision to Grant from KR Application No. 2005-7010190 mailed Feb. 2, 2012”, “from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Feb. 2, 2012, pp. 1-7, Published in: KR.
  • Korean Patent Office, “Office Action from KR Application No. 2005-7010190 mailed Sep. 30, 2010”, “from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Sep. 30, 2010, pp. 1-5, Published in: KR.
  • Korean Patent Office, “Final Rejection from KR Application No. 2005-7010190 mailed Oct. 31, 2011”, “from Korean Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Oct. 31, 2011, pp. 1-3, Published in: KR.
  • The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT Application No. PCT/US03/38302 mailed Dec. 14, 2011”, “from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Dec. 14, 2011, pp. 1-10, Published in: WO.
  • The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US03/38302 mailed May 2, 2005”, “from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, May 2, 2005, pp. 1-5, Published in: WO.
  • Foxcom Wireless Proprietary Information, “Application Note RFIBER-RF Fiberoptic Links for Wireless Applications”, 1998, pp. 3-11 .
  • City Cell, Cellular Industry the Day Group, “ADC Kentrox Citycell Field Trial Yields Another First—Simultaneous Analog and Digital Calls”, prior to Dec. 22, 2000, p. 1.
  • Ericksson, “Advertisement by Ericksson”, “Telephony”, 1994, p. 1.
  • “ADC Kentrox Introduces Citycell 824, A Replacement for Conventional Cell Sites; Company's Original Goal Was to Improve F”, “Telocator Bulletin”, Feb. 1993, p. 1.
  • Foxcom Wireless Preperietary Information, “Litenna In-Building RF Distribution System”, 1998, pp. 1-8.
  • Horowitz, Paul, “Digital Electronics”, “The Art of Electronics”, 1980, p. 316, Publisher: Press Syndicte of the University of Cambridge.
  • Schneiderman, “Offshore Markets Gain in Size, Competitiveness Even the Smallest Industry Companies Are Expanding Their Global Buisness”, “Microwaves and RF”, Mar. 1993, pp. 33-39, vol. 32, No. 3, Publisher: Penton Publishing, Inc, Published in: Berea, OH.
  • Nakatsugawa et al., “Software Radio Base and Personal Stations for Cellular/PCS Systems”, 2000, pp. 617-621, Publisher: IEEE.
  • European Patent Office, “Communication Under Rule 71(3) EPC from EPO Application No. 03790242.6-2415 mailed May 14, 2013”, “from European Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, May 15, 2013, pp. 1-27, Published in: EP.
Patent History
Patent number: RE50112
Type: Grant
Filed: Jan 11, 2023
Date of Patent: Sep 3, 2024
Assignee: Outdoor Wireless Networks LLC (Claremont, NC)
Inventors: Donald R. Bauman (Waseca, MN), Philip M. Wala (Savage, MN), Jeffrey O. Brennan (Waseca, MN)
Primary Examiner: Minh Dieu Nguyen
Application Number: 18/095,889
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Including Specific Optical Interface (398/116)
International Classification: H04W 4/00 (20180101); G06F 1/03 (20060101); H04B 10/00 (20130101); H04B 10/2575 (20130101); H04B 1/40 (20150101); H04W 16/26 (20090101);