Distributed digital antenna system
An optical medium, such as fiber, is tapped to provide an antenna port wherever radio service coverage is desired. Each antenna port is a bi-directional remote unit that receives a digital optical signal from a host unit and transforms the signal to a radio frequency signal for transmission by the remote unit. The remote unit receives radio frequency signals that are converted to digital signals and summed with signals from other remote units and converted to an optical signal for transmission to the host unit.
Latest Outdoor Wireless Networks LLC Patents:
This application Notice: More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 8,958,789. The reissue applications are reissue application Ser. No. 15/436,605 filed on Feb. 17, 2017; and this continuation reissue application Ser. No. (the present continuation reissue application). All reissue applications are reissues of the same issued U.S. Pat. No. 8,958,789 (application Ser. No. 10/395,743 filed Mar. 24, 2003), which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/430,434 filed Dec. 3, 2002, and titled “Distributed Digital Antenna System,” which is commonly assigned and incorporated by reference herein.
TECHNICAL FIELDThe present invention relates generally to communications and particularly to communications through a distributed antenna system.
BACKGROUNDVarious types of wireless communication systems have become prevalent around the world. For example, cellular communication systems cover most major metropolitan areas as well as major highways through remote areas. Cellular systems permit individuals with cellular handsets to communicate with base stations that are connected to the public switched telephone network (PSTN) or some other communication network.
As with any communication system, cellular systems can leave coverage “holes” where the signal from the base stations cannot reach. The holes can be in tunnels, valleys, city streets between tall buildings, or any other location where a radio frequency (RF) signal is blocked.
Placing additional base stations where these coverage holes are located is not always an option. Base stations tend to be very expensive due not only to the cost of the equipment but also because of land acquisition costs. Additionally, large base station antennas may not fit within an area either physically or aesthetically.
One solution to hole coverage is to use smaller remote antennas where coverage is needed but a base station is not warranted or desired. One problem with remote antennas, however, is that coaxial cable cannot be run long distances due to attenuation. Remote antennas are difficult to install along a highway or through a tunnel due to this attenuation problem. Using repeaters may not be an option since this only adds to the expense and complexity of the system. There is a resulting need in the art for a distributed antenna system that does not suffer from attenuation problems.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThe embodiments of the present invention encompass a distributed digital antenna system that has a host unit for converting radio frequency signals to digital optical signals and digital optical signals to radio frequency signals. The digital optical signals are transmitted over an optical medium to a plurality of remote units that are daisy-chained along the optical medium. Each remote unit transmits an analog representation of the digital optical signals from the host unit and receives radio frequency signals that are converted by the remote unit to digital optical signals for use by the host unit.
The embodiments of the present invention provide a digital distributed antenna system that enables a communication system to fill coverage holes without the expense of additional base stations. This is accomplished by distributing a fiber optic cable through the area in which coverage is desired and tapping into the fiber at desired antenna locations.
The embodiments of the present invention refer to fiber optics as a means of communication between remote units and the host unit. However, any optical medium, such as a laser through the air, can be substituted for the optical fiber.
The RF link is made up of a forward link over which the base station (100) transmits to a subscriber unit wireless terminal (150). The subscriber unit (150) transmits back to the base station (100) over a reverse link. The subscriber unit (150) is either a mobile station or a fixed station such as in a wireless local loop system.
The base station (100) has the transmitters and receivers that enable the subscriber unit (150) to communicate with the public switched telephone network (PSTN) (130). In one embodiment, the base station also links the subscriber unit (150) to other subscriber units that are communicating with other base stations. In one embodiment, the base station (100) is connected to the PSTN through a mobile switching center that handles the switching of calls with multiple base stations.
A host unit (101) is connected to the base station (100) through an RF link (115). In one embodiment, this link (115) is a coaxial cable. Other embodiments use other types of connections such as an air interface or an optical fiber carrying digital RF signals. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/619,431, assigned to ADC Telecommunications, Inc. and incorporated herein by reference, discusses digital RF signals.
The host unit (101) is responsible for converting the RF signal from the base station (100) to an optical signal for transmission over an optical medium. The host unit (101) also converts a received optical signal to an RF signal for transmission to the base station (100). In other embodiments, the host unit (101) performs additional functions.
One or more remote units (105-108) are connected to the host unit (101) through an optical medium, such as fiber optic lines (120 and 125), in a daisy-chain arrangement. The remote units (105-108) are placed in locations that require additional signal coverage due to a lack of coverage by the base station (100). The remote units (105-108) communicate with subscriber units in a particular remote unit's coverage area over an RF link provided by the remote unit antennas (135-138).
For purposes of illustration, four remote units (105-108) are shown. However, alternate embodiments use other quantities of remote units. If only a small geographic area requires coverage, as few as one remote unit (105) is used. If a highway in a remote area requires additional coverage, more than four remote units are typically used.
The embodiment of
The fiber optic line (120) from the host unit (101) to the remote units (105-108) carries the digital optical signal for transmission by the (105-108). The fiber optic line (125) from the remote units (105-108) carries a digital optical signal comprising the sum of the received signals from each of the remote units (105-108). The generation of this summation signal from the remote units is discussed subsequently.
The system of
The RF link is made up of a forward link over which the base station (200) transmits to a subscriber unit (250). The subscriber unit (250) transmits back to the base station (200) over a reverse link. The subscriber unit (250) may be a mobile station or a fixed station such as in a wireless local loop system.
The base station (200) has the transmitters and receivers that enable the subscriber unit (250) to communicate with the public switched telephone network (PSTN) (230). The base station may also link the subscriber unit (250) to other subscriber units that are communicating with other base stations. In one embodiment, the base station (200) is connected to the PSTN through a mobile switching center that handles the switching of calls with multiple base stations.
A host unit (201) is connected to the base station (200) through an RF link (215). In one embodiment, this link (215) is a coaxial cable. Other embodiments use other types of connections such as an air interface or an optical fiber carrying digital RF signals.
The host unit (201) is responsible for converting the RF signal from the base station (200) to a digital optical signal for transmission over an optical medium. The host unit (201) also converts a received optical signal to an RF signal for transmission to the base station (200). In other embodiments, the host unit (201) performs additional functions.
One or more remote units (205-208) are connected to the host unit (201) through an optical medium, such as a fiber optic line (220), that is connected in a daisy-chain arrangement. The remote units (205-208) are placed in locations that require additional signal coverage due to a lack of coverage by the base station (200).
For purposes of illustration, four remote units (205-208) are shown. However, alternate embodiments use other quantities of remote units.
The embodiment of
The remote unit (105) transmits and receives RF signals over the antenna (135). Both the receive and transmit circuitry is connected to the antenna (135) through a diplexer (301).
Alternate embodiments use other quantities of antennas. For example, one embodiment uses three antennas to cover three different sectors of an area.
An analog signal that is received on the antenna (135) is split off by the diplexer (301) to an analog-to-digital converter (305). The analog-to-digital converter (305) digitizes the received analog signal by periodically sampling the signal. The sampling generates a digital representation of the received analog signal.
The digitized received signal is input to a summer (315) to be added to the digitized signals from the preceding remote units in the daisy-chain. The input of the summer (315), therefore, is coupled to an output of a previous remote unit. The output of the summer (315) is a summation signal that is coupled to either the input of a subsequent remote unit or to the host unit. The host unit thus receives a summation signal that represents the sum of all the signals received by the remote units (105-108) of the system.
A digital signal from the host unit is coupled to a digital-to-analog converter (310). The digital-to-analog converter (310) takes the digital representation of an analog signal and converts it to the analog signal for transmission by the antenna (135).
Optical-to-Electrical converters (320-323) are located at the optical ports (330 and 335) of the remote unit (105). Each optical port (330 and 335) has an input and an output that are each coupled to an Optical-to-Electrical converter (320-323).
Since the remote unit (105) operates with electrical signals that are represented by the optical signals coming in through the optical ports (330 and 335), the Optical-to-Electrical converters (320-323) are responsible for converting the optical signals to electrical signals for processing by the remote unit (105). The Optical-to-Electrical converters (320-323) are also responsible for converting received electrical signals from electrical to an optical representation for transmission over the optical fiber.
The remote unit (205) transmits and receives RF signals over the antenna (435). Both the receive and transmit circuitry are connected to the antenna (435) through a diplexer (401).
Alternate embodiments use other quantities of antennas. For example, one embodiment uses three antennas to cover three sectors of an area.
An analog signal that is received on the antenna (435) is split off by the diplexer (401) to an analog-to-digital converter (405). The analog-to-digital converter (405) digitizes the received analog signal by periodically sampling the signal. The sampling generates a digital representation of the received analog signal.
The digitized received signal is input to a summer (415) to be added to the digitized signals from the preceding remote units in the daisy-chain. The host unit thus receives a summation signal that represents the sum of all the signals received by the remote units (205-208) of the system.
A digital signal from the host unit is coupled to a digital-to-analog converter (410). The digital-to-analog converter (410) takes the digital representation of an analog signal and converts it to the analog signal for transmission by the antenna (435).
Optical-to-Electrical converters (420-423) are located at the optical ports (440 and 445) of the remote unit (205). Each optical port (440 and 445) has an input and an output that are each coupled to an Optical-to-Electrical converter (420-423).
Since the remote unit (205) operates with electrical signals that are represented by the optical signals coming in through the optical ports (440 and 445), the Optical-to-Electrical converters (420-423) are responsible for converting the optical signals to electrical signals for processing by the remote unit (205). The Optical-to-Electrical converters (420-423) are also responsible for converting received electrical signals from electrical to an optical representation for transmission over the optical fiber.
A wavelength division multiplexer (WDM) (430 and 431) is located at each optical port (440 and 445). The WDMs (430 and 431) perform the optical processing necessary to combine several optical signals having several wavelengths. The WDMs (430 and 431) also perform the optical demultiplexing necessary to split the multiple wavelengths of a single fiber to their own signal paths.
In summary, the distributed digital antenna system provides multiple daisy-chained antennas on a single medium such as optical fiber. The fiber can be tapped anywhere along its length multiple times to provide economical radio coverage in areas where a base station would be cost prohibitive.
Numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.
Claims
1. A distributed digital antenna system comprising:
- a host unit that converts a first signal to a transmitted digital optical signal and that converts a received digital optical signal to a second signal;
- an optical medium coupled to the host unit to carry the transmitted and received digital optical signals; and
- a plurality of remote units daisy-chained along the optical medium such that each remote unit transmits an analog representation of the transmitted digital optical signal and receives radio frequency signals that are converted by the remote unit to a digitized received spectrum, each of the remote units including a summer that sums the digitized received spectrum with a corresponding digitized received spectrum from any preceding remote unit of the daisy-chained remote units to generate the received digital optical signal for transmission to the host unit.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the first and second signals are transported over an optical, electrical or wireless medium.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein the optical medium is an optical fiber.
4. The system of claim 1 and further including a base station, coupled to the host unit, that communicates with subscriber units over a radio frequency air interface.
5. The system of claim 4 wherein the base station transmits the first signal and receives the second signal.
6. The system of claim 4 wherein the base station communicates signals from the host unit to a public switched telephone network.
7. A distributed digital antenna system that communicates signals with a base station that is coupled to a data network, the system comprising:
- a host unit that converts radio frequency signals from the base station to digital optical signals and that converts digital optical signals from the digital antenna system to radio frequency signals for use by the base station;
- an optical medium coupled to the host unit that carries the digital optical signals; and
- a plurality of remote units daisy-chained along the optical medium such that each remote unit transmits radio frequency signals over an air interface as an analog representation of the digital optical signals from the base station and receives radio frequency signals over the air interface that are converted by a receiving remote unit to a digitized received spectrum, each of the remote units and the receiving remote unit including a summer that sums the digitized received spectrum with a corresponding digitized received spectrum from any preceding remote unit of the daisy-chained remote units to generate the received digital optical signals for use by the host unit.
8. The system of claim 7 wherein the radio frequency signals between the base station and the host unit are carried over an optical link.
9. The system of claim 7 wherein the optical medium is an optical fiber that carries multiple wavelengths.
10. The system of claim 7 wherein the optical medium is a first optical fiber that carries a first wavelength from the host unit to the plurality of remote units and a second optical fiber that carries a second wavelength from the plurality of remote units to the host unit.
11. The system of claim 10 wherein the second wavelength carries a digital signal that represents a summation of signals received by each of the plurality of remote units.
12. The system of claim 7 wherein the plurality of remote units each comprise:
- an antenna that communicates the radio frequency signals over the air interface;
- a plurality of optical-to-electrical converters that convert forward link digital optical signals input to the remote unit to forward link digital electrical signals and that convert reverse link electrical signals in the digitized received spectrum to reverse link digital optical signals for output to the host unit;
- a digital to analog converter that converts the forward link digital electrical signals to the analog representation;
- an analog-to-digital converter that converts the received radio frequency signals to the reverse link electrical signals in the digitized received spectrum; and
- wherein the summer sums the reverse link electrical signals in the digitized received spectrum with corresponding reverse link electrical signals in the digitized received spectrum from the preceding remote units of the optical medium daisy-chain to generate the received digital optical signals.
13. A remote unit in a distributed digital antenna system that communicates signals with a base station, the remote unit comprising:
- an antenna that communicates radio frequency signals using an air interface standard;
- a plurality of optical-to-electrical converters that convert input digital optical signals, from a host unit coupled to the base station and a daisy-chain of previous remote units, to forward link digital electrical signals;
- a digital to analog converter that converts the forward link digital electrical signals to analog signals for transmission by the antenna as radio frequency signals;
- an analog-to-digital converter that converts radio frequency signals from the antenna to a digitized spectrum of reverse link electrical signals; and
- a summer that sums the reverse link electrical signals in the digitized spectrum from the analog-to-digital converter to corresponding reverse link electrical signals from the daisy-chain of previous remote units to generate an output digital optical signal.
14. The remote unit of claim 13 and further including:
- a first optical port that is coupled to either the host unit or a subsequent remote unit of the daisy-chain of remote units; and
- a second optical port that is coupled to the daisy-chain of previous remote units.
15. The remote unit of claim 13 wherein a first optical-to-electrical converter of the plurality of optical-to-electrical converters converts an optical summation signal from the daisy-chain of previous remote units to the output digital optical signal and a second optical-to-electrical converter converts an optical transmit signal from the host unit to the forward link digital electrical signal for conversion to an analog signal by the digital to analog converter.
16. A remote unit in a distributed digital antenna system that communicates signals with a base station, the remote unit comprising:
- an antenna that communicates radio frequency signals using an air interface standard;
- a plurality of optical-to-electrical converters that convert digital optical signals, from a host unit coupled to the base station and a daisy-chain of previous remote units, to forward link digital electrical signals, the plurality of optical-to-electrical converters further convert reverse link digital electrical signals to digital optical signals, each digital optical signal comprising a wavelength;
- a digital to analog converter that converts the forward link digital electrical signals to analog signals for transmission by the antenna as radio frequency signals;
- an analog-to-digital converter that converts radio frequency signals from the antenna to a digitized spectrum of reverse link electrical signals;
- a summer that sums the reverse link electrical signals in the digitized spectrum from the analog-to-digital converter to an output digital optical signal from the daisy-chain of previous remote units; and
- a wavelength division multiplexer that demultiplexes an input digital optical signal, comprising a plurality of wavelengths, to the digital optical signals each having a wavelength in the plurality of wavelengths, the wavelength division multiplexer further multiplexes digital optical signals to the output digital optical signal comprising the plurality of wavelengths.
17. A method for communicating over a distributed digital antenna system, the method comprising:
- converting a first radio frequency signal from a base station to a digital optical signal;
- transmitting the digital optical signal over an optical medium to a plurality of remote units in a daisy-chain configuration along the optical medium;
- converting the digital optical signal to a forward link digital electrical signal at each remote unit;
- converting the forward link digital electrical signal to an analog signal for transmission by at least one of the remote units as a second radio frequency signal;
- receiving a third radio frequency signal over an air interface of at least one of the remote units;
- converting the third radio frequency signal to a received electrical signal within a digitized spectrum; and
- summing the digitized spectrum of the received electrical signal with a corresponding digitized spectrum of received electrical signals from previous remote units in the daisy-chain configuration.
18. The method of claim 17 and further including:
- converting a result of the summing of the digitized spectrum of the received electrical signals to a digital optical signal;
- transmitting the digital optical signal over the optical medium; and
- converting the digital optical signal to a fourth radio frequency signal for use by the base station.
19. The method of claim 17 and further including demultiplexing the digital optical signal into a plurality of optical signals each having one wavelength.
20. The method of claim 18 and further including the base station transmitting information in the fourth radio frequency signal to a public switched telephone network.
21. The method of claim 18 and further including multiplexing single wavelength optical signals from the remote unit into a single optical signal comprising a plurality of wavelengths.
22. A method for a remote terminal to communicate with a wireless terminal in a geographic area, the method comprising:
- converting an optical signal to a forward link electrical signal;
- converting the forward link electrical signal to a forward link analog signal;
- transmitting the forward link analog signal to the wireless terminal;
- receiving a reverse link analog signal from the wireless terminal;
- converting the reverse link analog signal to a reverse link electrical signal;
- summing a digitized spectrum of the reverse link electrical signal with a corresponding digitized spectrum of other reverse link electrical signals from other remote terminals that are daisy-chained together over an optical link; and
- converting the summed digitized spectrum of reverse link electrical signals to a reverse link summed optical signal for transmission to a host unit.
23. The system of claim 1, wherein the host unit receives a total digitized received spectrum representing the sum of all digitized received spectrum from the plurality of remote units.
24. The method of claim 22, wherein the summed digitized spectrum of reverse link electrical signals represents a sum of the digitized spectrum of the reverse link electrical signals of all the remote terminals that are daisy-chained together over the optical link.
25. A distributed antenna system comprising:
- a host unit communicatively coupled to a base station, the base station configured to communicate with subscriber units using an air interface standard;
- a plurality of remote units communicatively coupled to the host unit using a daisy chain;
- wherein the host unit is configured to receive a first analog base station radio frequency signal from the base station for communicating with said subscriber units, generate a first digital signal derived from the first analog base station radio frequency signal, and communicate the first digital signal over the daisy chain to the remote units;
- wherein the host unit is further configured to receive a second digital signal from the daisy chain, generate a second analog base station radio frequency signal comprising transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station, and communicate the second analog base station radio frequency signal to the base station;
- wherein each of the remote units is configured to receive the first digital signal from the daisy chain, generate a respective first analog wireless radio frequency signal for communicating with said subscriber units that is derived from the first digital signal, and wirelessly transmit the respective first analog wireless radio frequency signal;
- wherein each of the remote units is configured to receive a respective second analog wireless radio frequency signal, generate a respective digitized radio frequency version of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station, generate a respective second digital signal derived from the respective digitized radio frequency version generated at that remote unit, and communicate the respective second digital signal over the daisy chain in a direction towards the host unit;
- wherein each of the remote units is configured to receive any respective second digital signal communicated over the daisy chain by any preceding remote unit along the daisy chain, said any respective second digital signal communicated over the daisy chain by any preceding remote unit along the daisy chain comprising a respective corresponding digitized radio frequency version of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station; and
- wherein each of the remote units comprises a respective summer to sum the respective digitized radio frequency version of all of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station generated at that remote unit and the respective corresponding digitized radio frequency version of all of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station received by that remote unit from any preceding remote unit along the daisy chain in connection with generating the respective second digital signal communicated from that remote unit over the daisy chain in the direction towards the host unit.
26. The distributed antenna system of claim 25, wherein the daisy chain comprises a plurality of communication lines in a daisy-chain arrangement.
27. The distributed antenna system of claim 26, wherein the plurality of communication lines comprise optical lines.
28. The distributed antenna system of claim 26, wherein the plurality of communication lines comprise an optical fiber that carries multiple wavelengths through the optical fiber.
29. The distributed antenna system of claim 28, wherein the daisy chain comprises a plurality of wavelength division multiplexers for multiplexing and demultiplexing the multiple wavelengths through the optical fiber.
30. The distributed antenna system of claim 28, wherein a first wavelength of the multiple wavelengths is used for the first digital signal; and
- wherein a second wavelength of the multiple wavelengths is used for the second digital signal.
31. The distributed antenna system of claim 26, wherein the plurality of communication lines comprise an optical fiber that carries a single wavelength through the optical fiber.
32. The distributed antenna system of claim 25, wherein the air interface standard comprises one of a code division multiple access (CDMA) air interface standard and a time division multiple access (TDMA) air interface standard.
33. The distributed antenna system of claim 32, wherein the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station comprises one of CDMA transmissions and TDMA transmissions.
34. A method for a distributed antenna system that comprises a host unit communicatively coupled to a base station, the base station configured to communicate with subscriber units using an air interface standard, the distributed antenna system further comprising a plurality of remote units communicatively coupled to the host unit using a daisy chain, the method comprising:
- receiving, by the host unit, a first analog base station radio frequency signal from the base station for communicating with said subscriber units;
- generating, by the host unit, a first digital signal derived from the first analog base station radio frequency signal;
- communicating, by the host unit, the first digital signal over the daisy chain to the remote units;
- receiving, by the host unit, a second digital signal from the daisy chain;
- generating, by the host unit, a second analog base station radio frequency signal comprising transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station;
- communicating, by the host unit, the second analog base station radio frequency signal to the base station;
- receiving, by each of the remote units, the first digital signal from the daisy chain;
- generating, by each of the remote units, a respective first analog wireless radio frequency signal for communicating with said subscriber units that is derived from the first digital signal;
- wirelessly transmitting, by each of the remote units, the respective first analog wireless radio frequency signal;
- receiving, by each of the remote units, a respective second analog wireless radio freguency signal;
- generating, by each of the remote units, a respective digitized radio frequency version of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station;
- generating, by each of the remote units, a respective second digital signal derived from the respective digitized radio frequency version generated at that remote unit;
- communicating, by each of the remote units, the respective second digital signal over the daisy chain in a direction towards the host unit; and
- receiving, by each of the remote units, any respective second digital signal communicated over the daisy chain by any preceding remote unit along the daisy chain, said any respective second digital signal communicated over the daisy chain by any preceding remote unit along the daisy chain comprising a respective corresponding digitized radio frequency version of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station; and
- wherein generating, by each of the remote units, the respective second digital signal derived from the respective digitized radio frequency version generated at that remote unit comprises summing, by that remote unit, the respective digitized radio frequency version of all of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station generated at that remote unit and the respective corresponding digitized radio frequency version of all of the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station received by that remote unit from any preceding remote unit along the daisy chain.
35. The method of claim 34, wherein the daisy chain comprises a plurality of communication lines in a daisy-chain arrangement.
36. The method of claim 35, wherein the plurality of communication lines comprise optical lines.
37. The method of claim 35, wherein the plurality of communication lines comprise an optical fiber that carries multiple wavelengths through the optical fiber.
38. The method of claim 37, wherein the daisy chain comprises a plurality of wavelength division multiplexers for multiplexing and demultiplexing the multiple wavelengths through the optical fiber.
39. The method of claim 37, wherein a first wavelength of the multiple wavelengths is used for the first digital signal; and
- wherein a second wavelength of the multiple wavelengths is used for the second digital signal.
40. The method of claim 35, wherein the plurality of communication lines comprise an optical fiber that carries a single wavelength through the optical fiber.
41. The method of claim 34, wherein the air interface standard comprises one of a code division multiple access (CDMA) air interface standard and a time division multiple access (TDMA) air interface standard.
42. The method of claim 41, wherein the transmissions from said subscriber units communicating with said base station comprises one of CDMA transmissions and TDMA transmissions.
3783385 | January 1974 | Dunn et al. |
3931473 | January 6, 1976 | Ferris, Jr. |
4101834 | July 18, 1978 | Stutt et al. |
4112488 | September 5, 1978 | Smith, III |
4144409 | March 13, 1979 | Utano et al. |
4144411 | March 13, 1979 | Frenkiel |
4183054 | January 8, 1980 | Patisaul et al. |
4231116 | October 1980 | Sekiguchi et al. |
4244046 | January 6, 1981 | Brouard et al. |
4354167 | October 12, 1982 | Terreault et al. |
4402076 | August 30, 1983 | Krajewski |
4451699 | May 29, 1984 | Gruenberg |
4451916 | May 29, 1984 | Casper et al. |
4456793 | June 26, 1984 | Baker et al. |
4475010 | October 2, 1984 | Huensch et al. |
4485486 | November 27, 1984 | Webb et al. |
4525861 | June 25, 1985 | Freeburg |
4531239 | July 23, 1985 | Usui |
4556760 | December 3, 1985 | Goldman |
4596051 | June 17, 1986 | Feldman |
4611323 | September 9, 1986 | Hessenmuller |
4613990 | September 1986 | Halpern |
4628501 | December 9, 1986 | Loscoe |
4654843 | March 31, 1987 | Roza et al. |
4667319 | May 19, 1987 | Chum |
4669107 | May 26, 1987 | Eriksson-Lennartsson |
4691292 | September 1, 1987 | Rothweiler |
4701909 | October 20, 1987 | Kavehrad et al. |
4704733 | November 3, 1987 | Kawano |
4718004 | January 5, 1988 | Dalal |
4726644 | February 23, 1988 | Mathis |
4754451 | June 28, 1988 | Eng et al. |
4755795 | July 5, 1988 | Page |
4759000 | July 19, 1988 | Reitz |
4759051 | July 19, 1988 | Han |
4759057 | July 19, 1988 | De Luca et al. |
4760573 | July 26, 1988 | Calvignac et al. |
4779064 | October 18, 1988 | Monser |
4790000 | December 6, 1988 | Kinoshita |
4797947 | January 10, 1989 | Labedz |
4812846 | March 14, 1989 | Noro |
4816825 | March 28, 1989 | Chan et al. |
4831662 | May 16, 1989 | Kuhn |
4849963 | July 18, 1989 | Kawano et al. |
4868862 | September 19, 1989 | Ryoichi et al. |
4881082 | November 14, 1989 | Graziano |
4916460 | April 10, 1990 | Powell |
4920533 | April 24, 1990 | Dufresne et al. |
4932049 | June 5, 1990 | Lee |
4959829 | September 25, 1990 | Griesing |
4977593 | December 11, 1990 | Ballance |
4999831 | March 12, 1991 | Grace |
5067147 | November 19, 1991 | Lee |
5067173 | November 1991 | Gordon et al. |
5084869 | January 28, 1992 | Russell |
5134709 | July 28, 1992 | Bi et al. |
5136410 | August 4, 1992 | Heiling et al. |
5138440 | August 11, 1992 | Radice |
5159479 | October 27, 1992 | Takagi |
5164914 | November 17, 1992 | Anderson |
5175867 | December 29, 1992 | Wejke et al. |
5193109 | March 9, 1993 | Chien-Yeh Lee |
5243598 | September 7, 1993 | Lee |
5251053 | October 5, 1993 | Heidemann |
5265039 | November 23, 1993 | Curbelo et al. |
5267261 | November 30, 1993 | Blakeney, II et al. |
5272700 | December 21, 1993 | Hansen et al. |
5278690 | January 11, 1994 | Vella-Coleiro |
5280472 | January 18, 1994 | Gilhousen et al. |
5285469 | February 8, 1994 | Vanderpool |
5297193 | March 22, 1994 | Bouix et al. |
5299198 | March 29, 1994 | Kay et al. |
5301056 | April 5, 1994 | O'Neill |
5303287 | April 12, 1994 | Laborde |
5305308 | April 19, 1994 | English et al. |
5309474 | May 3, 1994 | Gilhousen et al. |
5313461 | May 17, 1994 | Ahl et al. |
5321736 | June 14, 1994 | Beasley |
5321849 | June 14, 1994 | Lemson |
5339184 | August 16, 1994 | Tang |
5379455 | January 3, 1995 | Koschek |
5381459 | January 10, 1995 | Lappington |
5392453 | February 21, 1995 | Gudmundson et al. |
5400391 | March 21, 1995 | Emura et al. |
5442681 | August 15, 1995 | Kotzin et al. |
5442700 | August 15, 1995 | Snell et al. |
5457557 | October 10, 1995 | Zarem et al. |
5461627 | October 24, 1995 | Rypinski |
5499047 | March 12, 1996 | Terry et al. |
5513176 | April 30, 1996 | Dean et al. |
5519691 | May 21, 1996 | Darcie et al. |
5528582 | June 18, 1996 | Bodeep et al. |
5533011 | July 2, 1996 | Dean et al. |
5545397 | August 13, 1996 | Spielvogel et al. |
5552920 | September 3, 1996 | Glynn |
5566168 | October 15, 1996 | Dent |
5579341 | November 26, 1996 | Smith et al. |
5586121 | December 17, 1996 | Moura et al. |
5587734 | December 24, 1996 | Lauder et al. |
5592470 | January 7, 1997 | Rudrapatna et al. |
5603080 | February 11, 1997 | Källander et al. |
5606736 | February 25, 1997 | Hasler et al. |
5619202 | April 8, 1997 | Wilson et al. |
5621730 | April 15, 1997 | Kelley |
5621786 | April 15, 1997 | Fischer et al. |
5627879 | May 6, 1997 | Russell et al. |
5630204 | May 13, 1997 | Hylton et al. |
5631757 | May 20, 1997 | Bodeep et al. |
5642405 | June 24, 1997 | Fischer et al. |
5644622 | July 1, 1997 | Russell et al. |
5657374 | August 12, 1997 | Russell et al. |
5682256 | October 28, 1997 | Motley et al. |
5708961 | January 13, 1998 | Hylton et al. |
5715235 | February 3, 1998 | Sawahashi et al. |
5724385 | March 3, 1998 | Levin et al. |
5732076 | March 24, 1998 | Ketseoglou et al. |
5748683 | May 5, 1998 | Smith et al. |
5752170 | May 12, 1998 | Clifford |
5761619 | June 2, 1998 | Danne et al. |
5765097 | June 9, 1998 | Dail |
5765099 | June 9, 1998 | Georges et al. |
5771449 | June 23, 1998 | Blasing et al. |
5774085 | June 30, 1998 | Yanagimoto et al. |
5774660 | June 30, 1998 | Brendel et al. |
5774789 | June 30, 1998 | Van der Kaay et al. |
5781541 | July 14, 1998 | Schneider |
5781859 | July 14, 1998 | Beasley |
5781865 | July 14, 1998 | Gammon |
5802173 | September 1, 1998 | Hamilton-Piercy et al. |
5805983 | September 8, 1998 | Naidu et al. |
5809395 | September 15, 1998 | Hamilton-Piercy et al. |
5809422 | September 15, 1998 | Raleigh et al. |
5809431 | September 15, 1998 | Bustamante et al. |
5812605 | September 22, 1998 | Smith et al. |
5818883 | October 6, 1998 | Smith et al. |
5822324 | October 13, 1998 | Kostresti et al. |
5852651 | December 22, 1998 | Fischer et al. |
5874914 | February 23, 1999 | Krasner |
5878325 | March 2, 1999 | Dail |
5880863 | March 9, 1999 | Rideout et al. |
5883882 | March 16, 1999 | Schwartz |
5907544 | May 25, 1999 | Rypinski |
5930682 | July 27, 1999 | Schwartz et al. |
5946622 | August 31, 1999 | Bojeryd |
5969837 | October 19, 1999 | Farber et al. |
5978650 | November 2, 1999 | Fischer et al. |
5987014 | November 16, 1999 | Magill et al. |
6005506 | December 21, 1999 | Bazarjani et al. |
6005884 | December 21, 1999 | Cook et al. |
6009130 | December 28, 1999 | Lurey et al. |
6014366 | January 11, 2000 | Ichiyoshi |
6034950 | March 7, 2000 | Sauer et al. |
6061089 | May 9, 2000 | Tonkin et al. |
6108113 | August 22, 2000 | Fee |
6108550 | August 22, 2000 | Wiorek et al. |
6108626 | August 22, 2000 | Cellario et al. |
6112086 | August 29, 2000 | Wala |
6122529 | September 19, 2000 | Sabat, Jr. et al. |
6128470 | October 3, 2000 | Naidu et al. |
6128471 | October 3, 2000 | Quelch et al. |
6147786 | November 14, 2000 | Pan |
6150993 | November 21, 2000 | Dobrovolny |
6157659 | December 5, 2000 | Bird |
6181687 | January 30, 2001 | Bisdikian |
6188693 | February 13, 2001 | Murakami |
6192216 | February 20, 2001 | Sabat, Jr. et al. |
6198558 | March 6, 2001 | Graves et al. |
6222660 | April 24, 2001 | Traa |
6223021 | April 24, 2001 | Silvia et al. |
6226274 | May 1, 2001 | Reese et al. |
6253094 | June 26, 2001 | Schmutz |
6259910 | July 10, 2001 | Fairfield et al. |
6262981 | July 17, 2001 | Schmutz |
6263135 | July 17, 2001 | Wade |
6275990 | August 14, 2001 | Dapper et al. |
6298246 | October 2, 2001 | Lysejko et al. |
6307877 | October 23, 2001 | Philips et al. |
6308085 | October 23, 2001 | Shoki |
6317884 | November 13, 2001 | Eames et al. |
6336042 | January 1, 2002 | Dawson et al. |
6337754 | January 8, 2002 | Imajo |
6349200 | February 19, 2002 | Sabat, Jr. et al. |
6353600 | March 5, 2002 | Schwartz et al. |
6356369 | March 12, 2002 | Farhan |
6356374 | March 12, 2002 | Farhan |
6362908 | March 26, 2002 | Kimbrough et al. |
6373611 | April 16, 2002 | Farhan et al. |
6373887 | April 16, 2002 | Aiyagari et al. |
6374124 | April 16, 2002 | Slabinski |
6377640 | April 23, 2002 | Trans |
6442405 | August 27, 2002 | Hiramatsu et al. |
6449071 | September 10, 2002 | Farhan et al. |
6463301 | October 8, 2002 | Bevan et al. |
6466572 | October 15, 2002 | Ethridge et al. |
6480551 | November 12, 2002 | Ohishi et al. |
6480702 | November 12, 2002 | Sabat, Jr. |
6486907 | November 26, 2002 | Farber et al. |
6496546 | December 17, 2002 | Allpress et al. |
6498936 | December 24, 2002 | Raith |
6504831 | January 7, 2003 | Greenwood et al. |
6535720 | March 18, 2003 | Kintis et al. |
6567473 | May 20, 2003 | Tzannes |
6580905 | June 17, 2003 | Naidu et al. |
6594496 | July 15, 2003 | Schwartz |
6622013 | September 16, 2003 | Miyoshi et al. |
6643498 | November 4, 2003 | Miyajima |
6667973 | December 23, 2003 | Gorshe et al. |
6674966 | January 6, 2004 | Koonen |
6697603 | February 24, 2004 | Lovinggood et al. |
6704545 | March 9, 2004 | Wala |
6729929 | May 4, 2004 | Sayers et al. |
6731904 | May 4, 2004 | Judd |
6738581 | May 18, 2004 | Handelman |
6745003 | June 1, 2004 | Maca et al. |
6751417 | June 15, 2004 | Combs et al. |
6768745 | July 27, 2004 | Gorshe et al. |
6771933 | August 3, 2004 | Eng et al. |
6785558 | August 31, 2004 | Stratford et al. |
6799020 | September 28, 2004 | Heidmann et al. |
6801767 | October 5, 2004 | Schwartz et al. |
6807374 | October 19, 2004 | Imajo et al. |
6826163 | November 30, 2004 | Mani et al. |
6826164 | November 30, 2004 | Mani et al. |
6831901 | December 14, 2004 | Millar |
6865390 | March 8, 2005 | Goss et al. |
6907048 | June 14, 2005 | Treadaway et al. |
6917614 | July 12, 2005 | Laubach et al. |
6963552 | November 8, 2005 | Sabat, Jr. et al. |
6967966 | November 22, 2005 | Donohue |
6980831 | December 27, 2005 | Matsuyoshi et al. |
7016308 | March 21, 2006 | Gallagher |
7031335 | April 18, 2006 | Donohue et al. |
7035671 | April 25, 2006 | Solum |
7047313 | May 16, 2006 | Broerman |
7075369 | July 11, 2006 | Takenaka |
7103279 | September 5, 2006 | Koh et al. |
7103377 | September 5, 2006 | Bauman et al. |
7127175 | October 24, 2006 | Mani et al. |
7171244 | January 30, 2007 | Bauman |
7184728 | February 27, 2007 | Solum |
7190903 | March 13, 2007 | Combs et al. |
7205864 | April 17, 2007 | Schultz, Jr. et al. |
7215651 | May 8, 2007 | Millar |
7257328 | August 14, 2007 | Levinson et al. |
7289972 | October 30, 2007 | Rieser et al. |
7313415 | December 25, 2007 | Wake et al. |
7359447 | April 15, 2008 | Sage |
RE40564 | November 4, 2008 | Fischer et al. |
7505747 | March 17, 2009 | Solum |
7512419 | March 31, 2009 | Solum |
7539509 | May 26, 2009 | Bauman et al. |
7548695 | June 16, 2009 | Wake |
7610046 | October 27, 2009 | Wala |
7614074 | November 3, 2009 | Mobley et al. |
7639982 | December 29, 2009 | Wala |
7702985 | April 20, 2010 | Millar |
7761093 | July 20, 2010 | Sabat, Jr. et al. |
5627879 | May 6, 1997 | Russell et al. |
5657374 | August 12, 1997 | Russell et al. |
7848747 | December 7, 2010 | Wala |
7848770 | December 7, 2010 | Scheinert |
7917177 | March 29, 2011 | Bauman |
7920858 | April 5, 2011 | Sabat, Jr. et al. |
7962111 | June 14, 2011 | Solum |
8019221 | September 13, 2011 | Zancewicz |
8032916 | October 4, 2011 | Oyadomari et al. |
8160570 | April 17, 2012 | Sabat, Jr. et al. |
8290483 | October 16, 2012 | Sabat, Jr. et al. |
8326218 | December 4, 2012 | Wala |
8346091 | January 1, 2013 | Kummetz et al. |
RE43964 | February 5, 2013 | Fischer et al. |
8446530 | May 21, 2013 | Bellers |
8559939 | October 15, 2013 | Sabat, Jr. et al. |
8577286 | November 5, 2013 | Wala |
RE45321 | January 6, 2015 | Fischer et al. |
8958410 | February 17, 2015 | Fischer et al. |
8958789 | February 17, 2015 | Bauman et al. |
9332402 | May 3, 2016 | Wala |
9467876 | October 11, 2016 | Kummetz et al. |
9867052 | January 9, 2018 | Sabat, Jr. et al. |
10075243 | September 11, 2018 | Fischer et al. |
10321328 | June 11, 2019 | Sabat, Jr. et al. |
10498434 | December 3, 2019 | Wala |
10505635 | December 10, 2019 | Wala |
RE49377 | January 17, 2023 | Bauman et al. |
20010031014 | October 18, 2001 | Subramanian et al. |
20010036163 | November 1, 2001 | Sabat, Jr. et al. |
20020003645 | January 10, 2002 | Kim et al. |
20020072329 | June 13, 2002 | Bandeira et al. |
20020167954 | November 14, 2002 | Highsmith et al. |
20020191565 | December 19, 2002 | Mani et al. |
20030015943 | January 23, 2003 | Kim et al. |
20030043928 | March 6, 2003 | Ling et al. |
20030060178 | March 27, 2003 | Ghassemzadeh et al. |
20030066087 | April 3, 2003 | Sawyer et al. |
20030133182 | July 17, 2003 | Ng et al. |
20030143947 | July 31, 2003 | Lyu |
20030157943 | August 21, 2003 | Sabat, Jr. |
20030162516 | August 28, 2003 | Solum |
20040010609 | January 15, 2004 | Vilander et al. |
20040037565 | February 26, 2004 | Young et al. |
20040198453 | October 7, 2004 | Cutrer et al. |
20040203339 | October 14, 2004 | Bauman |
20040219950 | November 4, 2004 | Pallonen et al. |
20050007993 | January 13, 2005 | Chambers et al. |
20050131645 | June 16, 2005 | Panopoulos |
20050147067 | July 7, 2005 | Mani et al. |
20050201323 | September 15, 2005 | Mani et al. |
20050243785 | November 3, 2005 | Sabat, Jr. et al. |
20050250503 | November 10, 2005 | Cutrer |
20060121944 | June 8, 2006 | Buscaglia et al. |
20060193295 | August 31, 2006 | White et al. |
20070166036 | July 19, 2007 | Combs et al. |
20090034979 | February 5, 2009 | Zancewicz |
20090067841 | March 12, 2009 | Combs et al. |
20100061291 | March 11, 2010 | Wala |
20110182583 | July 28, 2011 | Rakib |
20110265140 | October 27, 2011 | Rakib |
20130122952 | May 16, 2013 | Wala |
20140016583 | January 16, 2014 | Smith |
20140036758 | February 6, 2014 | Wala |
20160056874 | February 25, 2016 | Wala |
20170026857 | January 26, 2017 | Kummetz et al. |
20180278299 | September 27, 2018 | Morrison |
2008900 | October 1990 | CA |
2008900 | January 1998 | CA |
1127056 | July 1996 | CN |
1127056 | July 1996 | CN |
1362799 | August 2002 | CN |
3707244 | September 1988 | DE |
3707244 | January 1990 | DE |
0166885 | January 1986 | EP |
0346925 | December 1989 | EP |
0368673 | May 1990 | EP |
0391597 | October 1990 | EP |
0468688 | January 1992 | EP |
0642243 | March 1995 | EP |
0346925 | April 1995 | EP |
0664621 | July 1995 | EP |
0664621 | July 1995 | EP |
0876073 | November 1998 | EP |
1334630 | September 2004 | EP |
2290850 | March 2011 | EP |
1303929 | October 2011 | EP |
1303929 | October 2011 | EP |
1570626 | November 2013 | EP |
2290850 | May 2016 | EP |
3035562 | June 2016 | EP |
2345865 | October 1977 | FR |
2345865 | October 1977 | FR |
2253770 | September 1992 | GB |
2289198 | November 1995 | GB |
2300549 | November 1996 | GB |
2315959 | February 1998 | GB |
2320653 | June 1998 | GB |
540424 | April 1957 | IT |
58-164007 | September 1983 | JP |
58164007 | September 1983 | JP |
3-26031 | February 1991 | JP |
3026031 | February 1991 | JP |
512374 | January 1993 | JP |
512374 | January 1993 | JP |
H05153021 | June 1993 | JP |
H05268128 | October 1993 | JP |
6318905 | November 1994 | JP |
8510878 | November 1996 | JP |
11234200 | August 1999 | JP |
2002354534 | December 2002 | JP |
19990064537 | August 1999 | KR |
1020000060899 | October 2000 | KR |
1020010018675 | March 2001 | KR |
20010048227 | June 2001 | KR |
1020010048227 | June 2001 | KR |
100594770 | June 2006 | KR |
9115927 | October 1991 | WO |
9115927 | October 1991 | WO |
9428690 | December 1994 | WO |
9533350 | December 1995 | WO |
9628946 | September 1996 | WO |
9705704 | February 1997 | WO |
9716000 | May 1997 | WO |
9732442 | September 1997 | WO |
9824256 | June 1998 | WO |
9837715 | August 1998 | WO |
9937035 | July 1999 | WO |
9948312 | September 1999 | WO |
0021221 | April 2000 | WO |
0021337 | April 2000 | WO |
0156197 | August 2001 | WO |
0174013 | October 2001 | WO |
0174100 | October 2001 | WO |
0209319 | January 2002 | WO |
0209319 | January 2002 | WO |
0239624 | May 2002 | WO |
02067468 | August 2002 | WO |
2004051322 | June 2004 | WO |
2004051322 | June 2004 | WO |
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.8” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01393, Sep. 2, 2021, pp. Cover through 3, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,286, from U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.8” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01394, Sep. 2, 2021, pp. Cover through 3, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 9,332,402, from U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Petition for Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01390, Dec. 29, 2009, pp. Cover through 116, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Petition for Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Interpartes Review, IPR No. 2021-01391, Dec. 29, 2009, pp. Cover through 115, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Petition for Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Interpartes Review, IPR No. 2021-01392, Dec. 4, 2012, pp. Cover through 105, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,326,218, from U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Petition for Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Interpartes Review, IPR No. 2021-01393, Nov. 5, 2013, pp. Cover through 72, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,286, from U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Petition for Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Interpartes Review, IPR No. 2021-01394, May 3, 2016, pp. Cover through 87, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 9,332,402, from U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Wala, “A New Microcell Architecture Using Digital Optical Transport”, cited in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR Nos. 2021-01390, 2021-01391, 2021-01392, 2021-01393, 2021-01394, Aug. 12, 2021, 26 Pages, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982, 8,326,218, 8,577,286, and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223.
- Wala, “A New Microcell Architecture Using Digital Optical Transport”, 1993, 43rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Secaucus, NJ, US, May 18-20, 1993, pp. 585 through 588.
- Wikipedia, “Free Lossless Audio Codec”, Nov. 7, 2021, 7 Page(s), https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Lossless_Audio_Codec&oldid=217065127.
- Wikipedia, “Global System for Mobile Communications”, Jan. 9, 2019, pp. 1 through 24, Wikipedia.
- Wikipedia, “Summation”, Dec. 18, 2018, pp. 1 through 11, Wikipedia.
- Wikipedia, “T-carrier”, Oct. 21, 2018, pp. 1 through 6, Wikipedia.
- Wikipedia, “Uplink”, May 10, 2019, pp. 1 through 6, https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uplink&oldid=188425198.
- Zhaohui et al., “A Rake Type Receiver Structure for CDMA Mobile Communication Systems Using Antenna Arrays”, IEEE, 1996, pp. 528 through 530.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Oct. 2, 1996, pp. 1 through 4, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159, Aug. 19, 1997, pp. 1 through 9, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/410,129, Oct. 17, 1996, pp. 1 through 6, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Aug. 12, 2003, pp. 1 through 9, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273, Aug. 8, 2007, pp. 1 through 8, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Jun. 4, 2014, pp. 1 through 5, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Sep. 12, 2014, pp. 1 through 25, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Aug. 13, 2009, pp. 1 through 12, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255, Sep. 17, 2012, pp. 1 through 11, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215, Aug. 2, 2012, pp. 1 through 11, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948, Jul. 3, 2013, pp. 1 through 10, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223, Aug. 14, 2015, pp. 1 through 5, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223, Dec. 22, 2015, pp. 1 through 9, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Jul. 17, 2019, pp. 1-13, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Nov. 28, 2016, pp. 1 through 5, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Apr. 11, 2019, pp. 1-96, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Apr. 14, 2022, pp. 1 through 10, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, May 6, 2021, pp. 1 through 10, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Aug. 17, 2022, pp. 1 through 39, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,432, Jul. 16, 2019, pp. 1-7, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, Aug. 18, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357, Jun. 22, 2010, pp. 1 through 18, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting / Denying Request For Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357, Mar. 12, 2009, pp. 1 through 10, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362, Jun. 22, 2010, pp. 1 through 16, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363, Dec. 6, 2010, pp. 1 through 21, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Nov. 9, 2009, pp. 1 through 2, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1 through 18, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1 through 32, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1 through 17, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/065,652, May 29, 1995, pp. 1 through 7, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159, Jul. 17, 1995, pp. 1 through 5, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Apr. 4, 1995, pp. 1 through 14, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Oct. 26, 1995, pp. 1 through 8, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/294,742, May 27, 1996, pp. 1-5, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/294,742, Oct. 25, 1995, pp. 1 through 6, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159, Feb. 19, 1997, pp. 1 through 9, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159, Apr. 9, 1996, pp. 1 through 3, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159, Oct. 2, 1996, pp. 1 through 2, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/410,129, Jan. 23, 1996, pp. 1 through 12, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Mar. 13, 2003, pp. 1 through 15, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273, Oct. 6, 2005, pp. 1 through 10, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273, Mar. 30, 2004, pp. 1 through 19, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Jan. 14, 2010, pp. 1 through 31, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Jan. 30, 2006, pp. 1 through 15, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Mar. 28, 2005, pp. 1 through 11, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Apr. 4, 2007, pp. 1 through 11, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, May 21, 2008, pp. 1-14, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Aug. 10, 2016, pp. 1 through 35, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Nov. 15, 2007, pp. 1-16, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Mar. 18, 2009, pp. 1-23, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Sep. 1, 2006, pp. 1-12, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Feb. 27, 2009, pp. 1 through 25, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Apr. 3, 2008, pp. 1 through 21, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Aug. 24, 2006, pp. 1 through 19, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255, Feb. 17, 2011, pp. 1 through 13, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215, Apr. 11, 2012, pp. 1 through 12, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948, Apr. 24, 2013, pp. 1 through 23, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,866, Jan. 22, 2014, pp. 1 through 28, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223, Apr. 29, 2015, pp. 1 through 25, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Apr. 25, 2018, pp. 1 through 38, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Apr. 28, 2017, pp. 1 through 24, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Jan. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 23, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Feb. 28, 2018, pp. 1-9, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Sep. 8, 2021, pp. 1 through 24, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Oct. 24, 2019, pp. 1-34, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,432, Oct. 11, 2017, pp. 1-15, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,432, Dec. 17, 2018, pp. 1-23, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting / Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362, Apr. 17, 2009 pp. 1 through 8, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting / Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363, Apr. 17, 2009 pp. 1 through 10, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Mar. 10, 1995, pp. 1-13, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,866, Sep. 10, 2013, pp. 1 through 8, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Supplemental Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223, Apr. 11, 2016, pp. 1 through 4, Published: US.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Certified Translation of Korean Patent Application Publication KR2001-0048227 in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review”, IPR Nos. 2021-01390, 2021-01391, 2021-01392, 2021-01393, 2021-01394, Aug. 12, 2021, 25 Pages, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982, 8,326,218, 8,577,286, and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Decision Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01394, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 9,332,402, From U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Decision Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01390, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, From U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Decision Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01391, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, From U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Decision Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01392, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,326,218, From U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Decision Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01393, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,286, From U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Declaration of Maria P. Garcia Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.68” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR Nos. 2021-01390, 2021-01391, 2021-01392, 2021-01393, 2021-01394, Oct. 6, 2020, 72 Pages, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982, 8,326,218, 8,577,286, and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Declaration of R. Jacob Baker, Ph.D. P.E Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR Nos. 2021-01390, 2021-01391, 2021-01392, 2021-01393, 2021-01394, Aug. 11, 2021, 440 Pages, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982, 8,326,218, 8,577,286, and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Joint Motion to Dismiss the Petitions” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR Nos. 2021-01390, 2021-01391, 2021-01392, 2021-01393, 2021-01394, Nov. 10, 2021, pp. 1 through 6, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982, 8,326,218, 8,577,286, and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.8” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Interpartes Review, IPR No. 2021-01390, Sep. 2, 2021, pp. Cover through 4, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.8” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01391, Sep. 2, 2021, pp. Cover through 4, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944.
- USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.8” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01392, Sep. 2, 2021, pp. Cover through 3, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,326,218, from U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notice of Reexamination” from CN Application No. 200710153587, Jun. 21, 2012, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 18, Published: CN.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention” from CN Application No. 200910005002.9, Aug. 19, 2013, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 6, Published: CN.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention”, from CN Application No. 20071053587.X, May 28, 2013, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 3, Published: CN.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention”, from CN 200910005002.9, Aug. 19, 2013, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 6, Published: CN.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention”, from CN Application No. 200380109396.3, Jun. 29, 2010, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, pp. 1 through 4, Published: CN.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, Jul. 8, 2005, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 8, Published: CN.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Office Action” from CN Application No. 200710153587, Nov. 2, 2010, rom Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 9, Published: CN.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Reexamination Decision Revoking Decision of Rejection” from CN Application No. 200710153587.X, Nov. 30, 2012, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 14, Published: CN.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Second Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, May 11, 2007, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 5, Published: CN.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Second Office Action” from CN Application No. 200710153587.X, Feb. 4, 2013, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 7, Published: CN.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Second Office Action” from CN Application No. 200910005002.9, Jan. 23, 2013, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 11, Published: CN.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Third Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, Oct, 26, 2007, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 8, Published: CN.
- Steele, “Towards a high-capacity digital cellular mobile radio system”, IEE Proceedings˜F, Special Issue on Land Mobile Radio, Aug. 1985, vol. 132, Part F, No. 5, pp. 405-415.
- Stern et al., “Passive Optical Local Networks for Telephony Applications and Beyond” Electronics Letters: an International Publication, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, Nov. 19, 1987, vol. 23, No. 24, pp. 1255-1257.
- Tang, “Fiber Optic Antenna Remoting for Multi-Sector Cellular Cell Sites”, GTE Laboratories, at least as early as 070/9/1993, pp. 1 through 22.
- Tang, “Fiber-Optic Antenna Remoting for MultiSector Cellular Cell Sites”, GTE Laboratories Incorporated, Jan. 1, 1992, pp. 76 through 81, Published in: US.
- TE Connectivity, “Innovative Solution to Cut Costs of Delivering Mobile Ultra-broadband Access”, Feb. 20, 2014, https://www.ecnmag.cominews/2014/02/innovative-solution-cut-costs-delivering-mobile-ultra-broadband-access, pp. 1 through 4.
- Tektronix, “Synchronous Optical Network (SONET)”, International Engineering Consortium, as downloaded on Aug. 28, 2002 from http://www.iec.org/online/tutorials/sonet/topic03.html, pp. 1 through 5.
- The International Search Authority, “International Search Report from PCT/US94/05897”, “from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Oct. 31, 1994, pp. 1-7, Published in: WO.
- Titch, “Kentrox boosts coverage and capacity”, Telephony, Jan. 25, 1993, pp. 11 through-12.
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. Anthony Acampora Addressing Validity of CommScope's Asserted Patents, including U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,332,402 (the '402 patent); 8,577,286 (the '286 patent); 8,326,218 (the '218 patent); 7,639,982 (the '982 patent); and 7,848,747 (“the '747 patent”), in CommScope Technologies v. SOLiD Gear, Inc. and SOLiD, Inc., Case 3:16-cv-00477-M, 46 Pages, Re: U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223.
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, “Complaint for Patent Infringement”, in CommScope Technologies v. SOLiD Gear, Inc. and SOLiD, Inc., Case 3:16-cv-00477-M, May 18, 2022, pp. 1 through 32, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982; 8,326,218; 8,877,286; and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255, Nov. 3, 2011, pp. 1 through 2, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Jun. 2, 2020, pp. 1 through 7, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Decision on Appeal”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Mar. 20, 2014, pp. 1-6, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Examiner's Answer”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Feb. 4, 2011, pp. 1-29, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Jun. 12, 1996, pp. 1 through 8, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Jul. 21, 2010, pp. 1-23, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Nov. 17, 2008, pp. 1-15, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Aug. 20, 2009, pp. 1-22, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Sep. 1, 2006, pp. 1-12, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Feb. 5, 2007, pp. 1 through 16, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Apr. 25, 2007, pp. 1 through 19, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Jul. 18, 2007, pp. 1 through 21, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Oct. 3, 2007, pp. 1 through 22, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Oct. 14, 2008, pp. 1 through 25, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255, Aug. 29, 2011, pp. 1 through 14, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Oct. 30, 2017, pp. 1 through 33, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Dec. 4, 2018, pp. 1-59, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Mar. 9, 2020, pp. 1 through 24, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363, Jun. 23, 2010, pp. 1 through 21, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,432, dated Jun. 4, 2018, pp. 1-88, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Feb. 22, 2008, pp. 1-3, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Aug. 20, 2008, pp. 1-2, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Nov. 16, 2016, pp. 1-11, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Mar. 26, 2018, pp. 1-13, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Sep. 29, 2017, pp. 1-14, Published: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,432, Mar. 26, 2018, pp. 1-12, Published: US.
- IEE, “Electronics Letters an International Publication”, Nov. 19, 1987, pp. 1-4, vol. 23, No. 24, Publisher: The Institution of Electrical Engineers.
- International Preliminary Examining Authority, “International Preliminary Examination Report”, from PCT/US94/05897, May 29, 1995, from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, pp. 1 through 8, Published: WO.
- International Preliminary Examining Authority, “International Preliminary Examination Report”, from PCT/US/01/21021, Jun. 10, 2002, from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 3, Published: WO.
- International Preliminary Examining Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, from Application No. PCT/US03/38302, Dec. 14, 2001, from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, pp. 1 through 10, Published: WO.
- International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT Application No. PCT/US03/38302”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Dec. 14, 2011, pp. 1-10, Published: US.
- International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Written Opinion” from PCT Application No. PCT/US01/21021, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Mar. 18, 2002, pp. 1-2, Published: WO.
- International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Written Opinion”, from PCT Application No. PCT/US94/05897, from PCT Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Feb. 14, 1995, pp. 1-7, Published: WO.
- International Searching Authority, “International Search Report” from PCT Application No. PCT/US01/21021, Nov. 15, 2001, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 7, Published: WO.
- International Searching Authority, “International Search Report”, from PCT Application No. PCT/US03/38302, from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, May 2, 2005, pp. 1-5, Published: WO.
- Ishida et al., “A10-GHz 8-b Multiplexer/Demultiplexer Chip Set for the SONET STS-192 System”, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 26, No. 12, Dec. 1991, pp. Cover through 1943.
- Ishio et al., “A Two-Way Wavelength-Division-Multiplexing Transmission and Its Application to a Switched TV-Distribution System”, “Conference Record, Fourth European Conference on Optical Communication”, Sep. 12, 1978, pp. 645 through 665, Publisher: IIC.
- Japanese Patent Office, “Notice for Reasons for Rejection”, from JP Application No. 6-525837, from foreign counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Oct. 14, 2003, pp. 1 through 4, Published: JP.
- Jury Verdict, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V. Commscope Connectivity LLC”, No. 3:16-cv-477, “United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division”, Jun. 20, 2019, pp. 1-19, Published in: US.
- Kobb, “Personal Wireless”, IEEE Spectrum, Jun. 1993, vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 4 through 5 and 20 through 25, 8, vol. 30, No. 6, Publisher: IEEE, Published in: US.
- Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Decision to Grant from KR Application No. 2005-7010190”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Feb. 2, 2012, pp. 1-7, Published: KR.
- Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Final Rejection” from KR2005-7010190, from Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Oct. 31, 2011, pp. 1-4, Published: KR.
- Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action”, from KR Application No. 2005-7010190, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Sep. 30, 2010, pp. 1-5, Published: KR.
- Lee et al., “Intelligent Microcell Applications in PCS”, “43rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Personal Communication—Freedom Through Wireless Technology”, May 20, 1993, Secaucus, NJ, USA, pp. Cover through 725, Publisher: Pactel Corporation.
- Lewis, “ADC/Kentrox Call Report with Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc.”, Oct. 18, 1992, pp. 1 through 3.
- Merrett et al., “A Cordless Access System Using Radio-Over-Fibre Techniques”, 41st IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Gateway to the Future Technology in Motion, May 22, 1991, pp. Cover through 924.
- Microwaves & RF, “Digital transport for cellular”, Feb. 1993, p. 1.
- Nakatsugawa et al., “Software Radio Base and Personal Stations for Cellular/PCS Systems”, IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings, May 18, 2000, pp. 617 through 621.
- Nullity Action 114950NI934 PL/If against EP 2290850 dated Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-107.
- Nullity Action 114951NI934 PL/If against EP 1570626 dated Jan. 7, 2019, pp. 1-122.
- Oades, “The Linear RF Repeater”, ICC '80, 1980 International Conference on Communications, Seattle, WA, US, Jun. 8-12, 1980, pp. 1 through 1, IEEE.
- O'Byrne, “TDMA and CDMA in a Fiber-Optic Environment”, IEEE 38th Vehicular Technology Conference, Jun. 1992, pp. 727 through 731.
- Patent Office P.R. China, “Notice of Grant of Patent Right for Invention” from CN Application 94192782.2, Sep. 29, 2000, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, pp. 1 through 4, Published: CN.
- Patent Office P.R. China, “Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, Mar. 7, 2008, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 8, Published: CN.
- Patent Office P.R. China, “Office Action” from CN Application No. 200380109396.3, Jan. 4, 2008, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, pp. 1 through 7, Published: CN.
- Payne et al., “Single Mode Optical Local Networks”, “Globecom '85, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference”, Dec. 2-5, 1985, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp. 1200 through 1206.
- Quinn, “The Cell Enhancer”, “Vehicular Technology Conference”, May 22, 1986, pp. 77 through 83, Publisher: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems.
- Replica to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Oct. 14, 2019, pp. 1-49.
- Rosenbloom et al., “Cell Enhancer: Beyond the Outer Limits”, pp. 1 through 2.
- Russell, “New Microcell Technology Sets Cellular Carriers Free”, “Telephony Mar. 1993”, 3 Pages, Publisher: ADC Kentrox, Published in: US.
- Schneiderman, “Offshore Markets Gain in Size, Competitiveness, Even the Smallest Industry Companies Are Expanding Their Global Buisness”, Microwaves and RF, Mar. 1993, vol. 32, No. 3, 8 Pages, Publisher: Penton Publishing, Inc.
- Siala et al., “Equalization for Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing System”, 1993, pp. 649 through 652, Publisher: IEEE.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “First Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, Jul. 8, 2005, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 8, Published in: CN.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “First Office Action” from CN Application No. 200710153587, Mar. 19, 2010, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 7, Published: CN.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “First Office Action” from CN Application No. 200910005002.9 , Apr. 6, 2012, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 12, Published: CN.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Fourth Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, Mar. 7, 2007. from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 8, Published: CN.
- State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notice of Grant of Patent Right for Invention” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Oct. 24, 2008, pp. 1-4, Published: CN.
- ADC Kentrox, “ADC Kentrox Expands RF Technology Base with Acquisition of Waseca Technology Inc.”, ADC Kentrox News Release, Jun. 9, 1993, pp. 1 through 2.
- ADC Kentrox, “ADC Kentrox Introduces Citycell 824, A Replacement for Conventional Cell Sites; Company's Original Goal Was To Improve Fiber Optic T1 Links Between Cells, MTSOs” Telocator Bulletin, Feb. 1993, pp. 1 through 1, Publisher: CityCell.
- ADC Kentrox, “ADC Kentrox Introduces Innovative Wireless Network Access Solution: Cellular Subscribers Offered a New Level of Portable Service” ADC Kentrox News Release Mar. 1, 1993, pp. 1 through 3.
- ADC Kentrox, “ADC Kentrox Wireless Systems Group CityCell (TM) 824—A Positioning White Paper”, Mar. 1993, pp. 1 through 6, Publisher: CITA Trade Show.
- ADC Kentrox, “And Now a Few Words From Your Customers . . . ”, Aug. 1, 1992, pp. 1 through 4.
- ADC Kentrox, “First Field Trial Results Exceed Expectations, ADC Kentrox and Cellular One Join Force to Provide a New Level of Portable Service”, News Release, Mar. 2, 1993, pp. 1 through 2, Publisher: ADC Kentrox, Published in: Portland, OR.
- ADC Kentrox, “Photographs of ADC Kentrox City Cell 824 Components”, Publication Date Unknown, pp. 1 through 14.
- ADC Telecommunications, Wireless Systems Division, “Widen your Horizons to a World of Solutions We're Wherever in the World You Need Us to Be.”, “ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Advertisement for CityRad Cell Enhancer, CityCell Digital Fiberoptic Microcell, CitySmart Site Diversity System & CityWide”, 1994, pp. 1 through 8.
- Akos et al., “Direct Bandpass Sampling of Multiple Distinct RF Signals”, Jul. 1999, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 983 through 988.
- Ameritech, “Broadband Optical Transport Digital Microcell Connection Service—Interface and Performance Specifications”, Issue 1, Dec. 1993, pp. Cover-26.
- Analog Devices, Inc., “Mastering the Mix in Signal Processing”, “Mixed-Signal Design Seminar”, 1991, p. 3, Publisher: Analog Devices, Inc.
- Anaren, “Anaren Microwave Components”, pp. 1 through 2.
- Annex WRST 14 to the Nullity Action 114950NI934 PL/If against EP 2290850 dated Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-50.
- Annex WRST 16 to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Jan. 7, 2019, pp. 1-53.
- Annex WRST 17 to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Oct. 14, 2019, pp. 1-4.
- Annex WRST 18 to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Oct. 14, 2019, pp. 1-6.
- Annex WRST 2 to the Nullity Action 114950NI934 PL/If against EP 2290850 dated Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-4.
- Annex WRST 2 to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Jan. 7, 2019, pp. 1-4.
- Annex WRST 3 to the Nullity Action 114950NI934 PL/If against EP 2290850 dated Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-2.
- Annex WRST 3 to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Jan. 7, 2019, pp. 1-3.
- Annex WRST 4 to the Nullity Action 114950NI934 PL/If against EP 2290850 dated Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-6.
- Anon, “2 GHz Repeater Built Without I-F”, “Microwaves”, Jun. 1976, 2 pages, vol. 15, No. 6, Publisher: Hayden Publishing Company Inc.
- Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property, “Technical Examination Report for BR Application No. PI0112653-9”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Apr. 17, 2018, pp. 1-6, Published in: BR.
- Brazilian Patent Office, “Office Action for Brazil Application No. PI0112653-9”, “from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Apr. 8, 2015, pp. 1-14, Published in: BR.
- Brazilian Patent Office, “Office Action from BR Application No. PI0112653-9”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Jan. 8, 2016, pp. 1 through 7, Published: BR.
- Brunner et al., “On Space-Time Rake Receiver Structures for WCDMA”, 1999, IEEE, pp. 1546 through 1551.
- Cellular Industry, The Day Group, “New Signal Transport Technology Digitizes the Cellular Band”, Dec. 22, 2000, pp. 2-3.
- Cheun, “Performance of Direct-Sequence Spread-Spectrum RAKE receivers with Random Spreading Sequences”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 45, No. 9, Sep. 1997, pp. 1130 through 1143.
- City Cell, “CityCell 824 Host-Site User Manual”, Sep. 25, 1993, 65-61002101 Issue 1, pp. Cover through 8-34.
- City Cell, “CityCell 824 Remote-Site Manual”, Preliminary Version, Feb. 1, 1993, pp. Cover through E-2.
- City Cell, Cellular Industry, the Day Group, “ADC Kentrox CityCell Field Trial Yields Another First: Simultaneous Analog and Digital Calls”, prior to Dec. 22, 2000, 1 page.
- Citycell, “ADC Kentrox Introduces Citycell 824, A Replacement for Conventional Cell Sites; Company's Original Goal Was To Improve Fiber Optic T1 Links Between Cells, MTSOs”, Telocator Bulletin, Feb. 1993, pp. 1 through 1.
- Commscope, “CommScope Completes Transformational Acquisition of TE Connectivity's Telecom, Enterprise and Wireless Businesses”, Aug. 28, 2015, pp. 1-4.
- Cox, “A Radio System Proposal for Widespread Low-Power Tetherless Communications”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Feb. 1991, pp. Cover through 335, vol. 39, No. 2, IEEE.
- Crofut, “Remote monitoring of wireless base stations”, Urgent Communications, Jun. 1, 1998, http://urgentcomm.com/print/mag/remote-monitoring-wireless-base-stations, pp. 1 through 4.
- Cyr et al., “The digital age is here—Digital radio frequency transport enhances cellular network performance”, Telephony, Jul. 5, 1993, pp. 20 through 24.
- Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit A, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 27, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US.
- Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit B, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 200, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US.
- Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit D, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 613, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US.
- Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit C, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 410, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US.
- Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit E, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 482, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US.
- Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit F, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 573, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US.
- Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commscope Technologies LLC, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V. Commscope Connectivity LLC”, “United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division”, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1-23, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published in: US.
- Zonemaster, “Maximum Coverage for High-Capacity Locations”, “Decibel Products”, 1993, pp. 1-4, Publisher: Decibel Multimedia Microcell System.
- Derneryd et al., “Adaptive base-station antenna arrays”, Ericsson Review No. 3, 1999, pp. 132 through 137.
- Detreville et al., “A Distributed Experimental Communications System”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. SAC-1, No. 6, Dec. 1983, pp. Cover through 1075.
- Ericksson, “Advertisement by Ericksson”, “Telephony”, 1994, pp. 1 through 1.
- European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3)” from Application No. 03790242.6, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Feb. 11, 2009, pp. 1 through 4, Published: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) from EP Application No. 03790242.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Jul. 24, 2007, pp. 1-4.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Particulars of Infringement by Order of Mr Justice Meade dated Jul. 23, 2021”, Aug. 6, 2021, pp. B1/7 through B1/12, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Defence and Amended Counterclaim”, Aug. 20, 2021, pp. B1/13 through B1/22, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 6”, pp. B3/54 through B3/61, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 5”, pp. B3/49 through B3/53, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 7”, pp. B3/62 through B3/64, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 8”, pp. B3/65 through B3/66, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 9”, pp. B3/67 through B3/68, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Defence and Counterclaim Annex 1”, pp. B3/70 through B3/193, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Defence and Counterclaim Annex 2”, pp. B3/194 through B3/261, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Defence and Counterclaim Annex 3”, pp. B3/262 through B3/266, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Annex 1 to the Reply and Defence to Counterclaim”, pp. B3/267 through B3/272, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Annex 2 to the Reply and Defence to Counterclaim”, pp. B3/273 through B3/281, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Annex 3 to the Reply and Defence to Counterclaim”, pp. B2/282 through B2/289, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C1-2 through C1-65, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Annex A to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora Supplemented Technical Primer”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C1-66 through C1-90, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Third Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Nov. 25, 2021, pp. C1-112 through C1-119 , Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Second Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Nov. 12, 2021, pp. C1-94 through C1-111, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-1 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-2 through C2-46, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-3 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-51 through C2-62, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-2 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-47 through C2-50, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-4 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-63 through C2-70, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-5 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-71 through C2-75, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-6 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-76 through C2-82, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-8 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-88 through C2-96, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-7 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-83 through C2-87, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-9 to the Second Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Nov. 12, 2021, pp. C2-97 through C2-122, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D1-73 through D1-82, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D1-2 through D1-51, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-1 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-2 through D2-5, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-2 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-6 through D2-53, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-4 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-80 through D2-92, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-3 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-54 through D2-79, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-5 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-93 through D2-108, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-6 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-109 through D2-110, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-8 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-113 through D2-114, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-9 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-115 through D2-116, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-10 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-117 through D2-118, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-12 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-121 through D2-122, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-11 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-119 through D2-120, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-15 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-142 through D2-153, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-16 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-154 through D2-160, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-18 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-171 through D2-175, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-17 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-161 through D2-170, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-19 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-176 through D2-179, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-21 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-190 through D2-200, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-20 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-180 through D2-189, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-23 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-207 through D2-235, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-22 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-201 through D2-206, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Proceedings Day 1”, Dec. 7, 2021, pp. T/2 through T/48, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Proceedings Day 2”, Dec. 8, 2021, pp. T/54 through T/99, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Proceedings Day 3”, Dec. 9, 2021, pp. T/109 through T/162, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Proceedings Day 4”, Dec. 14, 2021, pp. 1 through 53, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA1, including Butterweck et al., “Finite wordlength effects in digital filters: a review”, Jan. 1, 1988, EUT report. E, Fac. of Electrical Engineering; vol. 88-E-205, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands, pp. XX-AA/2 through XX-AA/99, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA2, including Acampora, “An Introduction to Broadband Networks, LANs, Mans, ATM, B-ISDN, and Optical Networks for Integrated Multimedia Telecommunications”, (c) 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York, pp. XX-AA/100 through XX-AA/108, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA4, including Gregson, “LCG Gains Patent on LGCell Antenna” RCR Wireless News, Apr. 13, 1998, p. XX-AA/126, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA5, Dagoni, “The lobbyist, the US Representative, and the Israeli Company”, Globes, Oct. 20, 2005, pp. XX-AA/127 through XX-AA/130, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA7, WDD, “Designing Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) Considerations, challenges, and what to expect when designing and deploying DAS.”, (c) 2016, Advantage Business Media, pp. XX-AA/139 through XX-AA/153, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA9, OFCOM, “Citizens' Band (CB) radio spectrum use—information and operation”, Mar. 2018, pp. XX-AA/173 through XX-AA/181, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA10, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, “Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. Anthony Acampora”, pp. XX-AA/182 through XX-AA/572, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA11, Dukda, “Introduction to Structured Cabling”, Division of Information Technology, Ministry of Communication, Sep. 2000, pp. XX-AA/573 through XX-AA/600, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP (UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA12, cleeCOMcen, “History of CV Radio”, downloaded Dec. 1, 2021 from www.cleecomcen.co.uk/history-of-cb-radio/, pp. XX-AA/601 through XX-AA/605, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA13, Ghayas, “What Frequency Was Used by IS-95 (CdmaONE)?”, downloaded Apr. 12, 2021 from https://commsbrief.com/what-frequency-was-used-by-cdmaone/, pp. XX-AA/606 through XX-AA/612, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA14, Wireless Networks Online, “LGCell(TM) Wireless Network System”, downloaded Nov. 19, 2021 from https://www.wirelessnetworksonline.com/doc/lgcell-wireless-network-system-0004, p. XX-AA/613, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA16, “4×200 KHz Sub Chanels”, p. XX-AA/615, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Claimant for Cross Examination—XX-AJS-1, “Oh Forward Path”, p. XX-AJS/2, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Claimant for Cross Examination—XX-AJS-2, Al-Rawshidy et al., “Radio over Fiber Technologies for Mobile Communication Networks”, May 9, 2002, (c) 2002 Artech House, Inc. pp. XX-AJS/3 through XX-AJS/60, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Grounds of Invalidity”, Aug. 26, 2020, pp. B1/23 through B1/27, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Reply and Defence to Counterclaim”, Aug. 6, 2021, pp. B1/28 through B1/31, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Statement of Case on Invalidity” Aug. 20, 2021, pp. B1/33 through B1/46, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Claimant's Notice of discontinuance” Sep. 22, 2021, pp. B1/47, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Defendant's Notice of discontinuance”, Sep. 24, 2021, pp. B1/48, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Consent Order of Birss J” Oct. 29, 2020, pp. B1/49 through B1/53, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Confidentiality Order (by Consent) by Smith J”, Jun. 6, 2021, pp. B1/54 through B1/60, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Consent Order of Meade J”, Jul. 23, 2021, Page(s) B1/61 through B1/65, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Consent Order of HHJ Hacon”, Sep. 21, 2021, pp. B1/66 through B1/67, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Order of HHJ Hacon”, Sep. 28, 2021, pp. B1/68 through B1/70, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Technical Primer”, Jul. 16, 2021, pp. B1/71 through B1/83, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Order of Mellor J”, Nov. 23, 2021, pp. B1/84 through B1/90, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Claim Annex C”, pp. B3/2 through B3/12, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 1”, pp. B3/13 through B3/30, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 2”, pp. B3/31 through B3/34, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 3”, pp. B3/35 through B3/47, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Korean Patent Application Publication KR2001-0048227, pp. A3-36 through A3-43, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Certified Translation of Korean Patent Application Publication KR2001-0048227, pp. A3-44 through A3-53, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Korean Patent Application Publication KR10-2001-0018675, pp. A3-54 through A3-65, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Certified Translation of Korean Patent Application Publication KR10-2001-0018675, pp. A3-66 through A3-82, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Korean Patent Application Publication KR1999-0064537, pp. B2/2 through B2/12, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Certified Translation of Korean Patent Application Publication KR1999-0064537, pp. B2/13 through B2/24, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Claimant for Cross Examination—XX-AJS-3, including European Patent EP 1 334 630 B1, Sep. 22, 2004, pp. XX-AJS/62 through XX-AJS/75, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-7 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-111 through D2-112, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA6, including annotated U.S. Pat. No. 7,848,747 B2, Dec. 7, 2010, pp. XX-AA/131 through XX-AA/138, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA8, including U.S. Pat. No. 9,332,402 B2, May 3, 2016, pp. XX-AA/154 through XX-AA/172, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Neutral Citation No. [2022] EWHC 769 (Pat), Case No. HP-2020-000017, Apr. 1, 2022, “Comptroller Comments re: EP(UK) 1 570 626 B1”, from EP Application No. 03790242.6 from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Oct. 26, 2021, pp. A3/106 through A3/109, Published: GB.
- Hoberecht, “A Layered Network Protocol for Packet Voice and Data Integration”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas In Communications, vol. SAC-1, No. 6, Dec. 1983, pp. Cover through 1013.
- Horowitz, “Digital Electronics”, “Chapter 8: Basic Logic Concepts”, “The Art of Electronics”, 1980, p. 316, Publisher: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
- European Patent Office, “Office Action EP Application No. 01950794.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Feb. 24, 2006, pp. 1-5, Published in: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3)—Reissued” from EP Application No. 10011450.3, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Jan. 26, 2016, pp. 1 through 37, Published in: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC for EP Application No. 01950794.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, May 3, 2011, pp. 1-5, Published in: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) for EP Application No. 03790242.6”, “foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, May 14, 2013, pp. 1-27.
- European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) from EP Application No. 10011450.3 dated Aug. 11, 2015”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Aug. 11, 2015, pp. 1-40, Published: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3)”, from EP Application No. 10011450.3, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Jul. 14, 2015, pp. 1 through 39, Published in: EP.
- European Patent Office, “European Office Action for Application Serial No. 10011450.3”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jan. 16, 2015, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report from EP Application No. 10011450.3”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jan. 14, 2011, pp. 1-9, Published in: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report”, from EP Application No. 15020262.0, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, May 16, 2020, pp. 1 through 8, Published: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Office Action for EP Application No. 03790242.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Feb. 11, 2009, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Office Action from EP Application No. 01950794.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 6, 2007, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Office Action from EP Application No. 01950794.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Nov. 16, 2010, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings from EP Application No. 01950794.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, filed May 21, 2010, pp. 1-6, Published in: EP.
- Federal Patent Court, “Replica to the invalidity matter 6Ni21/19 against EP 2290850 dated Dec. 20, 2019”, pp. 1 through 53, Published: DE.
- Federal Patent Court, “Statement of Reply including Annex MB1 in the Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 1570626 mailed Jul. 31, 2019”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, pp. 1-57, Published: DE.
- Federal Patent Court, “Statement of Reply including Annexes MB1 and MB2 in the Nullity Action from EP Application No. 2290850 mailed Sep. 13, 2019”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1-149, Published: DE.
- Foxcom Wireless, “Litenna In-Building RF Distribution System”, White Paper, 1998, Document No. 42-14-001-09C, pp. 1 through 8.
- Foxcom Wireless, Application Note, “RFiber(TM)—RF Fiberoptic Links for Wireless Applications”, 1998, Document No. 41-14-001-10E, pp. 3 through 11.
- German Federal Patent Court, “SOLid Inc.'s Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 1570626”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, May 11, 2021, pp. 1-114, Published: DE.
- German Federal Patent Court, “Anlage NK 3 in the Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 2 290 850 (DE 601 49 927)”, Mar. 3, 2021, pp. 1-2, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431.
- German Federal Patent Court, “Anlage NK 4 in the Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 2 290 850 (DE 601 49 927)”, Mar. 3, 2021, pp. 1-2, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431.
- German Federal Patent Court, “Grounds of Objection to SOLiD Inc.'s Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 2 290 850 (DE 601 49 927)”, Nov. 12, 2021, pp. 1-104, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431.
- German Federal Patent Court, “SOLiD Inc.'s Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 2 290 850 (DE 601 49 927)”, Mar. 3, 2021, pp. 1-108, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431.
- German Federal Patent Court, “SOLiD Inc.'s Reply in the Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 2 290 850 (DE 601 49 927)”, Feb. 11, 2022, pp. 1-41, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431.
- German Federal Patent Court, “Grounds for Objection to SOLiD Inc.'s Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 1 570 626 (DE 603 45 256)”, Sep. 14, 2021, pp. 1 through 112, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431.
- Grace, “Synchronous Quantized Subcarrier Multiplexing for Transport of Video, Voice and Data”, “IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications”, Sep. 1990, vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 1351-1358.
- Graf, “Modern Dictionary of Electronics—Seventh Edition”, 1999, pp. 1 through 9.
- Grundmann et al., “An Empirical Comparison of a Distributed Antenna Microcell System Versus a Single Antenna Microcell System for Indoor Spread Spectrum Communications at 1.8 Ghz”, “ICUPC '93”, 1993, pp. 59 through 63.
- GTE Laboratories, “Urban Microcell System Layout”, GTE Laboratories Conference, Jun. 14-18, 1992, pp. 1-13.
- Gupta et al., “Land Mobile Radio Systems—A Tutorial Exposition”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Jun. 1985, vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 34-45.
- Haas et al., “A Mode-Filtering Scheme for Improvement of the Bandwidth-Distance Product in Multimode Fiber Systems”, Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 11, No. 7, Jul. 1993, pp. 1125 through 1131.
- Harvey et al., “Cordless Communications Utilising Radio Over Fibre Techniques for the Local Loop”, “IEEE International Conference on Communications”, Jun. 1991, pp. 1171 through 1175.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Indexes”, pp. 1 through 14, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Approved Judgment”, Apr. 1, 2021, pp. 1 through 64, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Application Notice”, Sep. 1, 2021, pp. A2/49 through A2/52, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Statement of Reasons for Amendment of EP (UK) 2290850 B1”, pp. A2/53 through A2/60, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Notice and Statement of Grounds of Opposition”, Oct. 12, 2021, pp. A2/61 through A2/64, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Comptroller Comments”, Oct. 26, 2021, pp. A2/65 through A2/68, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Application Notice”, Sep. 1, 2021, pp. A3-83 through A3-86, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Statement of Reasons for Amendment of EP(UK) 1,570,626 B1”, pp. A3-87 through A3-92, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Annex D to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. A3-93 through A3-105, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Application Notice”, pp. A3/110 through A3/112, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Comptroller Comments re: EP(UK) 1 570 626 B1”, Oct. 26, 2021, pp. A3/106 through A3/109, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Fourth Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Dec. 1, 2021, pp. A3-113 through A3-116, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Claim Form by Order of Mr Justice Meade dated Jul. 23, 2021”, pp. B1/2 through B1/3, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Particulars of Claim by Order of Mr Justice Meade dated Jul. 23, 2021”, Aug. 6, 2021, pp. B1/4 through B1/6, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743.
- ADC Kentrox.COPYRGT. A Subsidiary of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. “And now a few words from your Customers . . . ”, Aug. 1992 (4 pages).
- ADC Kentrox, News Release, “ADC Kentrox Introduces Innovative Wireless Network Access Solution Cellular Subscribers Offered a New Level of Portable Services,” Mar. 1, 1993 (3 pages).
- ADC Kentrox, News Release, “First Field Trial Results Exceeds Expectations,” Mar. 2, 1993 (2 pages).
- ADC Kentrox Wireless Systenr Group CityCell.TM. 824—A Positioning White paper, (Mar. 1993) CITA Trade Show.
- ADC Kentrox Call Report, Oct. 18, 1992, call date Oct. 12, 1992, re: Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc.
- Akos et al., Jul. 1999, IEEE Transactions on Communications, 47:983-988, Direct Bandpass Sampling of Multiple Distinct RF Signals.
- Ameritech, “Broadband Optical Transport Digital Microcell Connection Service—Interface and Performance Specifications. A technical descriptionof the User-Network Interface and Performance Specifications,”AM TR-NIS 000117, (pp. 1-26), Issue 1, Dec. 1993.
- Cellular Industry, The Day Group, “New Signal Transport Technology Digitizes the Cellular Band,” 2 pages, (prior to Dec. 22, 2000).
- Cox “A Radio System Proposal for Widespread Low-Power Tetherless Communications,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 39(2), Feb. 1991, pp. 324-335.
- Electronic Letters, an International Publication, Nov. 19, 1987, vol. 23 No. 24, pp. 1255-1257.
- 1998 Foxcom Wireless Proprietary Information, pp. 1-8, “Litenna In-Building RF Distribution System.”
- Gupta et al., “Land Mobile Radio Systems—A Tutorial Exposition”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 23(6), Jun. 1985, p. 37.
- Ishio et al., “A Two-Way Wavelength-Division-Multiplexing Transmission and its Application to a Switched TV Distribution System,” Electrical Communication Laboratories, Nipon Telegrah & Telephone Public Corporation, Yokosuka, Japan and Technical Bureau, Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Public Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, (10 pages) (prior to Dec. 22, 2000).
- Kobb, “Personal Wireless,” Special Report/Communications, IEEE Spectrum, Jun. 1993, pp. 20-25.
- Lee et al., 1993 43rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 18-20, 1993, Personal Communication—Freedom Through Wireless Technology, PacTel Corporation, published May 18, 1993, “Intelligent Microcell Applications in PCS,” pp. 722-725.
- Merrett et al., 41st IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 19-22, 1991, Gateway to the Future Technology, 91CH2944-7, British Telecom Research Laboratories, “A Cordless Access System Using Radio-Over-Fibre Techniques,” pp. 921-924.
- Miicrowaves & RF, “Digital Transport for Cellular,” Feb. 1993.
- O'Byrne, Vehicular Technology Society 42nd VTS Conference Frontiers of Technology, From Pioneers to the 21st Century, GTE Laboratories Incorporated, “TDMA and CDMA in a Fiber-Optic Environment,” vol. 2 of 2, pp. 727-731 (May 10, 1992).
- Payne et al., “Single Mode Optical Local Networks”, Globecom '85, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Dec. 2-5, 1985, pp. 1201-1205.
- Quinn, “The Cell Enhancer”, Bell Atlanttic Mobile Systems, pp. 77-83.
- Russell, New Microcell Technology Sets Cellular Carriers Free, Telephony, Mar. 1993, pp. 40, 42 and 46.
- R. Steele. Towards a High-Capacity Digital Cellular Mobile Radio System. “Towards a High Capacity Digital Cellular Mobile Radio System,” IEE Proceedings, vol. 132, Pt.F, No. 5, Aug. 1985, pp. 405-415.
- Tang, Fiber Optic Antenna Remoting for Multi-Sector Cellular Cell Sites. GTE Laboratories—Abstract (Conference Jun. 14-18, 1992).
- Titch, “Kentrox boosts coverage and capacity,” Telephony Jan. 25, 1993 (1 page).
- Urban Microcell System Layout. GTE Laboratories (Conference Jun. 14-18, 1992).
- Wala, 1993 43rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 18-20, 1993, Personal Communication—Freedom Through Wireless Technology, Waseca Technology Inc., published May 18, 1993, “A New Microcell Freedom Architecture Using Digital Optical Transport,” pp. 585-588.
- “ZoneMaster.TM.—Maximum Coverage for High-Capacity Locations”. Decibel Multi Media MicroCELL System. 4 pages 1993 Decibel Products. 2-83-5M.
- Grace, Martin K., “Synchronous Quantized Subcarrier Multiplexing for Transport of Video, Voice and Data”, “IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications”, Sep. 1990, pp. 1351-1358, vol. 8, No. 7, Publisher: IEEE.
- Harvey et al., “Cordless Communications Utilising Radio Over Fibre Techniques for the Local Loop”, “IEEE International Conference on Communications”, , pp. 1171-1175, Publisher: IEEE.
- Harvey et al., “Cordless Communications Utilising Radio Over Fibre Techniques for the Local Loop”, “IEEE International Conference on Communications”, Jun. 1991, pp. 1171-1175, Publisher: IEEE.
- China Patent Offfice, “Notice of Grant of Patent Right for Invention from CN Application No. 01815499.9 mailed Oct. 24, 2008”, “from Foreign Counterpart of US. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Oct. 24, 2008, pp. 1-4, Published in: CN.
- Chinese Patent Office, “First Office Action from CN Application No. 01815499.9 mailed Jul. 8, 2005”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jul. 8, 2005, pp. 1-8, Published in: CN.
- Chinese Patent Office, “Second Office Action from CN Application No. 01815499.9 mailed May 11, 2007”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, May 11, 2007, pp. 1-5, Published in: CN.
- Chinese Patent Office, “Third Office Action from CN Application No. 01815499.9 mailed Oct. 26, 2007”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Oct. 26, 2007, pp. 1-8, Published in: CN.
- Chinese Patent Office, “Fourth Office Action from CN Application No. 01815499.9 mailed Mar. 7, 2007”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 7, 2007, pp. 1-8, Published in: CN.
- Chinese Patent Office, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention from CN Application No. 200710153587. X mailed May 28, 2013”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, May 28, 2013, pp. 1-3, Published in: CN.
- Chinese Patent Office, “Second Office Action from CN Application No. 200710153587.X mailed Feb. 4, 2013”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Feb. 4, 2013, pp. 1-7, Published in: CN.
- Chinese Patent Office, “First Office Action from CN Application No. 200710153587.X mailed Mar. 19, 2010”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 19, 2010, pp. 1-12, Published in: CN.
- Chinese Patent Office, “Decision on Rejection from CN Application No. 200710153587.X mailed Nov. 2, 2010”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Nov. 2, 2010, pp. 1-9, Published in: CN.
- Chinese Patent Office, “Notice of Reexamination from CN Application No. 200710153587.X mailed Jun. 21, 2012”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jun. 21, 2012, pp. 1-18, Published in: CN.
- Chinese Patent Office, “Second Office Action from CN Application No. 200910005002.9 mailed Jan. 23, 2013”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jan. 23, 2013, pp. 1-11, Published in: CN.
- China Patent Office, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention from CN Application No. 200910005002.9 mailed Aug. 19, 2013”, Aug. 19, 2013, pp. 1-6, Published in: CN.
- Chinese Patent Office, “First Office Action from CN Application No. 200910005002.9 mailed Apr. 6, 2012”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”,Apr. 6, 2012,pp. 1-12, Publishedin: CN.
- European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC from EPO Application No. 01950794.6-2411 mailed May 3, 2011”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, May 3, 2011, pp. 1-45, Published in: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Office Action from EPO Application No. 019507946-2411 mailed Feb. 24, 2006”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Feb. 24, 2006, pp. 1-5, Published in: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Office Action from EPO Application No. 01950794.6-2411 mailed Mar. 6, 2007”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 6, 2007, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Office Action from EPO Application No. 01950794.6-2411 mailed Nov. 16, 2010”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Nov. 16, 2010, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings from EPO Application No. 01950794.6-2411 mailed May 21, 2010”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, May 21, 2010, pp. 1-6, Published in: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report from EPO Application No. 10011450.3-2411 mailed Jan. 14, 2011”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jan. 14, 2011, pp. 1-9, Published in: EP.
- U.S. Patent Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Aug. 12, 2003, pp. 1-9.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 13, 2003, pp. 1-15.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Apr. 25, 2007, pp. 1-19.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Jul. 18, 2007, pp. 1-21.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Oct. 3, 2007, pp. 1-22.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Oct. 14, 2008, pp. 1-25.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Aug. 13, 2009, pp. 1-12.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Aug. 24, 2006, pp. 1-19.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Feb. 5, 2007, pp. 1-16.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Apr. 3, 2008.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Feb. 27, 2009, pp. 1-25.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215”, Aug. 2, 2012, pp. 1-11.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215”, Apr. 11, 2012, pp. 1-12.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fees Due”, “from U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948”, Jul. 3, 2013, pp. 1-10, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “from U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948”, Apr. 24, 2013, pp. 1-23, Published in: US.
- The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Preliminary Examination Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US 01/21021 mailed Jun. 10, 2002”, “from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jun. 10, 2002, pp. 1-3, Published in: WO.
- International Searching Authority, “International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US 01/21021 mailed Nov. 15, 2001”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Nov. 15, 2001, pp. 1-7, Published in: WO.
- The International Bureau of WIPO, “Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US 01/21021 mailed Mar. 18, 2002”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 18, 2002, pp. 1-2, Published in: WO.
- China Patent Office, “Notice of Grant of Patent Right for Invention from CN Application No. 94192782.2 mailed Sep. 29, 2000”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Sep. 29, 2000, pp. 1-4, Published in: CN.
- Japan Patent Office, “Office Action from JP Application No. 6-525837 mailed Oct. 14, 2003”, “from foreign counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Oct. 14, 2003, pp. 1-2, Published in: JP.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Jun. 12, 1996, pp. 1-8, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Oct. 2, 1996, pp. 1-4, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Apr. 4, 1995, pp. 1-14, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Oct. 26, 1995, pp. 1-8, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159”, Feb. 1-9, 1997, pp. 1-9, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Mar. 10, 1995, pp. 1-13, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexam Certificate”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357”, Jun. 22, 2010, pp. 1-18, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting/Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357”, Mar. 12, 2009, pp. 1-10, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357”, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1-17, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/294,742”, May 27, 1996, pp. 1-5, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/294,742”, Oct. 26, 1996, pp. 1-4, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/298,652”, May 29, 1995, pp. 1-7, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159”, Aug. 19, 1997, pp. 1-9, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159”, Jul. 17, 1995, pp. 1-5, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159”, Apr. 9, 1996, pp. 1-3, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159”, Oct. 2, 1996, pp. 1-2, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/410,129”, Oct. 17, 1996, pp. 1-6, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/410,129”, Jan. 23, 1996, pp. 1-12, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexam Certificate”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362”, Jun. 22, 2010, pp. 1-16, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting/Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362”, Apr. 17, 2009, pp. 1-8, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362”, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1-18, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273”, Aug. 8, 2007, pp. 1-8.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273”, Mar. 30, 2004, pp. 1-19.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273”, Oct. 6, 2005, pp. 1-10.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363”, Jun. 23, 2010, pp. 1-21, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexam Certificate”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363”, Dec. 6, 2010, pp. 1-21, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting/Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/010,363”, Apr. 17, 2009, pp. 1-10, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363”, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1-32, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255”, Nov. 3, 2011, pp. 1-2.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255”, Aug. 29, 2011, pp. 1-14.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255”, Sep. 17, 2012, pp. 1-11.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255”, Feb. 17, 2011, pp. 1-13.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,866”, Jan. 22, 2014, pp. 1-28, Published in: US.
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement”, “U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,866”, Sep. 10, 2013, pp. 1-8, Published in: US.
- The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT Application No. PCT/US94/05897 mailed May 29, 1995”, May 29, 1995, pp. 1-8, Publisher: from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Published in: WO.
- The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US94/05897 mailed Oct. 31, 1994”, “from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Oct. 31, 1994, pp. 1-7, Published in: WO.
- The International Bureau of WIPO, “Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US 94/05897 mailed Feb. 14, 1995”, “from PCT Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Feb. 14, 1995, pp. 1-7, Published in: WO.
- China Patent Office, “Notification of Grant Patent Right for Invention from CN Application No. 200380109396.3 mailed Jun. 29, 2010”, “from Chinese Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Jun. 29, 2010, pp. 1-4, Published in: CN.
- China Patent Office, “First Office Action from CN Application No. 200380109396.3 mailed Jan. 4, 2008”, “from Chinese Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Jan. 4, 2008, pp. 1-7, Published in: CN.
- European Patent Office, “Office Action from EPO Application No. 03790242.6-2415 mailed Jul. 24, 2007”, “from European Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Jul. 24, 2007, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
- European Patent Office, “Office Action from EPO Application No. 03790242.6-2415 mailed Feb. 11, 2009”, “from European Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Feb. 11, 2009, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP.
- Korean Patent Office, “Decision to Grant from KR Application No. 2005-7010190 mailed Feb. 2, 2012”, “from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Feb. 2, 2012, pp. 1-7, Published in: KR.
- Korean Patent Office, “Office Action from KR Application No. 2005-7010190 mailed Sep. 30, 2010”, “from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Sep. 30, 2010, pp. 1-5, Published in: KR.
- Korean Patent Office, “Final Rejection from KR Application No. 2005-7010190 mailed Oct. 31, 2011”, “from Korean Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Oct. 31, 2011, pp. 1-3, Published in: KR.
- The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT Application No. PCT/US03/38302 mailed Dec. 14, 2011”, “from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Dec. 14, 2011, pp. 1-10, Published in: WO.
- The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US03/38302 mailed May 2, 2005”, “from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, May 2, 2005, pp. 1-5, Published in: WO.
- Foxcom Wireless Proprietary Information, “Application Note RFIBER-RF Fiberoptic Links for Wireless Applications”, 1998, pp. 3-11 .
- City Cell, Cellular Industry the Day Group, “ADC Kentrox Citycell Field Trial Yields Another First—Simultaneous Analog and Digital Calls”, prior to Dec. 22, 2000, p. 1.
- Ericksson, “Advertisement by Ericksson”, “Telephony”, 1994, p. 1.
- “ADC Kentrox Introduces Citycell 824, A Replacement for Conventional Cell Sites; Company's Original Goal Was to Improve F”, “Telocator Bulletin”, Feb. 1993, p. 1.
- Foxcom Wireless Preperietary Information, “Litenna In-Building RF Distribution System”, 1998, pp. 1-8.
- Horowitz, Paul, “Digital Electronics”, “The Art of Electronics”, 1980, p. 316, Publisher: Press Syndicte of the University of Cambridge.
- Schneiderman, “Offshore Markets Gain in Size, Competitiveness Even the Smallest Industry Companies Are Expanding Their Global Buisness”, “Microwaves and RF”, Mar. 1993, pp. 33-39, vol. 32, No. 3, Publisher: Penton Publishing, Inc, Published in: Berea, OH.
- Nakatsugawa et al., “Software Radio Base and Personal Stations for Cellular/PCS Systems”, 2000, pp. 617-621, Publisher: IEEE.
- European Patent Office, “Communication Under Rule 71(3) EPC from EPO Application No. 03790242.6-2415 mailed May 14, 2013”, “from European Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, May 15, 2013, pp. 1-27, Published in: EP.
Type: Grant
Filed: Jan 11, 2023
Date of Patent: Sep 3, 2024
Assignee: Outdoor Wireless Networks LLC (Claremont, NC)
Inventors: Donald R. Bauman (Waseca, MN), Philip M. Wala (Savage, MN), Jeffrey O. Brennan (Waseca, MN)
Primary Examiner: Minh Dieu Nguyen
Application Number: 18/095,889
International Classification: H04W 4/00 (20180101); G06F 1/03 (20060101); H04B 10/00 (20130101); H04B 10/2575 (20130101); H04B 1/40 (20150101); H04W 16/26 (20090101);