Method of making an asphalt composition containing ester bottoms

This invention involves the addition of ester bottoms to an asphalt paving composition to improve the usable temperature range (UTR). The ester bottoms are a byproduct of refining a feedstock containing all or a portion of vegetable oil or animal fat.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present patent application is based upon and claims the benefit of provisional patent application No. 62/341,700, filed on May 26, 2016. The present patent application is a divisional reissue application of U.S. Reissue application Ser. No. 17/345,859, filed Jun. 11, 2021, which is a reissue application for U.S. Pat. No. 10,323,148, issued on Jun. 18, 2019, from U.S. application Ser. No. 15/586,860, filed May 4, 2017, which is a non-provisional application claiming priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/341,700, filed May 26, 2016. The content of the above-identified applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The reissue application numbers are U.S. Reissue application Ser. No. 17/345,859, now U.S. Pat. No. RE 49,447, and U.S. Reissue application Ser. No. 18/101,464, the present application, which is a divisional reissue application of U.S. Reissue application Ser. No. 17/345,859. Notice: More than one reissue application has been filed related to U.S. Pat. No. 10,323,148.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to asphalt compositions and the process for the improvement of their properties. The invention further relates to a modified asphalt composition useful for a variety of applications, particularly paving asphalt and for construction materials utilizing such compositions.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to an asphalt paving composition made with ester bottoms. The Environmental Protection Agency provides a discussion of asphalt roads at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/cho4/final/c4s05.pdf which is incorporated herein by reference.

Ester bottoms are a low value by-product of vegetable oil or animal fat refining to produce methyl ester. There is little known value for ester bottoms and they are currently marketed for animal feed, lubricants, or other industrial uses at a low price point.

Asphalt materials are used in a wide variety of applications including but not limited to paving asphalt and asphalt shingles. Paving asphalt must be sufficiently durable to withstand high and low temperature extremes without undue wear, cracking or melting. Paving asphalt hardens while in service (age hardening). Age hardening is caused by an increase in viscosity of the asphalt mixture and the gradual loss of flexibility. The degree and the rate of the hardening of the paving asphalt composition or cement are factors affecting the durability of an applied surface. It is believed that the reaction of the asphalt composition with atmospheric oxygen is the principle cause of asphalt hardening in pavement. Therefore, the asphalt industry has long sought to reduce age hardening.

Some conventional refined asphalts have been found to be incapable of reacting some requirements for resistance to either low temperature thermal cracking or high temperature rutting resistance in certain climates. Modifiers such as elastomers, plasterers, chemical gellants, and chemical modifiers can be effective in improving either, or sometimes both, low temperature thermal cracking or high temperature rutting resistance. These modifiers have varying levels of effectiveness and cost.

Conventional practice to improve low temperature properties adds softer asphaltic compounds, aromatic oils, or other additives to soften or plasticize the asphalt composition. In order to reach acceptable low temperature properties, excessive amounts of soft asphaltic materials or fluxes may be required

In addition, aromatic oils used in combination with polymers can improve the rutting resistance of asphalt. However, many times, the level of polymer required to reach the desired level of rutting resistance becomes undesirable as a result of excessive cost, rendering the composition not feasible for use as a paving composition.

Asphalt compositions may be derived, as indicated from any well-known bituminous or asphaltic substance obtained from natural sources or derived from a number of sources such as, shale oil, coal tar, and the like as well as the mixtures of two or more of such materials. As indicated, paving grade asphalt compositions are preferred in the present invention. Such paving asphalt compositions are often referred to as viscosity, penetration graded, or performance graded (PG) asphalts having penetration up to 400 as measured by ASTM method D5.

As a result of the 1987 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), a $150 million research study was commissioned in which $50 million was spent towards asphalt research for improving asphalt pavements. As a product of that research which was concluded in 1992, the Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) produced what is now known as the Superpave Performance Graded Binder Specification in which asphaltic binders are graded or characterized according to their relative performance in resistance to rutting, shoving or deformation at high temperatures, fatigue at intermediate temperatures, and thermal cracking resistance at low temperatures. Asphalts which normally would be graded either under the penetration or viscosity specifications are now graded as PG (Performance Graded) binders. As such, their designation will be representative of their resistance at both high and low temperature, indicating their useable temperature range (UTR) as a PG AA-BB where AA=high temperature resistance in degrees Celsius and BB is low temperature cracking resistance in minus degrees Celsius, i.e., PG 64-22 would prevent rutting up to 64° C. (147° F.) and low temperature cracking to a minus 22° C. (−72° F.). Preferred asphalts are the performance graded asphalts such as PG 46-40; PG 48-34; PG 46-28, PG 52-40; PG 52-34; PG 52-28; PG 52-22, PG 58-40, PG 58-34, PG 58-28, PG PG 58-22, PG 64-40, PG 64-34, PG64-28, PG 64-22, PG 70-40, PG 70-34, PG 70-28, PG 70-22, PG 76-40, PG 76-34, PG 76-28, PG 76-22, PG 82-34, PG 82-28, or PG 82-22. The PG in the title referring to Performance Graded, the first numeric designation referring to the binders high temperature rutting or deformation resistance temperature range limit. The last numeric designation references the cracking resistance temperature limit of the binder.

Areas of high loading or slow or standing traffic as well as areas where temperature extremes can be experienced in excess of 86° C. (187° F.) between high and low temperature levels will require the use of modifiers to obtain the increased useful temperature range. As a result, it has been common to start with softer asphalts to reach low temperature properties, while adding modifiers such as polymers to achieve high temperature rutting resistance. The use of aromatic oils also aids low temperature properties. As such, extensive levels of polymer addition is required to regain high temperature properties, especially when using aromatic oils. The use of aromatic oils can solvate the polymer to a higher degree and thus require a higher level of polymer to be used to obtain the desired high temperature rutting resistance.

A common practice of softening asphalts in the industry is to add heavy vacuum gas oil (HVGO) to paving asphalt to reach the desired useable temperature range (UTR). HVGO may be added after refining or, in some applications, it is not refined out of the asphalt materials. HVGO is a valuable commodity currently selling at about $150/ton premium over the price of asphalt, depending on the market. Therefore, adding HVGO to asphalt is an undesirable fix as it increases the cost of paving asphalt.

Notwithstanding the considerable efforts previously expended to provide an improved asphalt paving composition, there remains a continued need to increase the useable temperature range and reduce the cost associated with manufacturing asphalt paving materials. The present invention addresses both of these needs.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In producing methyl esters, including biodiesel, a feedstock containing all or a portion of vegetable oil or animal fats is reacted and refined to produce finished products. As a part of this process, a number of by-products are produced, having varying degrees of value. On the low end of the value spectrum are ester bottoms. Ester bottoms are a co-product of refining methyl ester, including biodiesel, that is not glycerin or skimmed fatty acids. Ester bottoms generally contain methyl esters, monoglycerides, diglycerides, triglycerides, sodium soaps produced from the addition of sodium methoxide (catalyst), and unsaponafiables. The unsaponafiables generally make up about 10% of the ester bottoms. Ester bottoms, as used in the preferred embodiment of this invention, have a viscosity range 10-900 cP at 64 degrees Celsius.

In the preferred embodiment, the invention involves the addition of ester bottoms to an asphalt paving composition to improve the useable temperature range (UTR). Very specifically, the ester bottoms affect the low temperature properties more significantly than the high temperature properties. Generally, the modified asphalt composition will comprise (a) about 0.1% to about 50% of ester bottoms, (b) about 0 to about 20% of a polymer modifier, (c) 50 to about 99.9% of an asphalt obtained from conventional vacuum distillation, solvent refining or naturally occurring mineral sources.

Refiners, or user producers, will often add a polymer to paving asphalt to increase the high temperature property of the paving asphalt for warmer climates. The ester bottom modified asphalt paving composition increases the useful temperature range. Therefore the amount of polymer additive required to reach a desirable higher temperature range can be reduced, thus reducing the cost of manufacturing pavement asphalt.

Another advantage of the invention is the amount of ester bottoms used to produce a desired finished product is less than the amount of HVGO (heavy vacuum gas oil), or other modifiers currently available, required to produce an equivalent amount of finished product.

A typical paving asphalt mixture comprises a mixture of components. Principal ingredients of the paving asphalt mixture are an asphalt composition or cement and aggregate or aggregate material. In such mixtures, the ratio of asphalt composition to aggregate material varies, for example, according to the aggregate material type and the nature of the asphalt composition. As used herein, the terms “asphalt composition”, “asphalt cement” or “asphalt binder” are understood to refer to any of a variety of organic materials, solid or semi-solid at room temperature, which gradually liquefy when heated, and in which the predominate constituents are naturally occurring bitumen, e.g., Trinidad Lake, or residues commonly obtained in petroleum, synthetic petroleum, or shale oil refining, or from coal tar or the like. For example, vacuum tower bottoms produced during the refining of conventional or synthetic petroleum oils is a common residue material useful as an asphalt composition. A “paving asphalt composition”, “paving asphalt cement”, or “paving asphalt binder”, accordingly is an asphalt composition or asphalt cement having characteristics which dispose the composition to use as a paving material. This is contrasted, for example, with an asphalt composition suited for use as a roofing material. “Roofing asphalts”, usually have a higher softening point, and are thus more resistant to flow from heat on roofs. The higher softening point is generally imparted by the air blowing processes by which they are commonly produced. Paving asphalt mixtures may be formed and applied in a variety of ways, as well understood by those skilled in the art. For example, the paving asphalt composition and the aggregate can be mixed and applied at elevated temperatures while in the fluid state to form the pavement or road surface. See particularly U.S. patent application Ser. No. 5,580,376 to Hayner.

Some examples of polymers used for modifying asphalts include: Styrene Butadiene (SB), ethylene-vinyl-acetate, ethylene-methyl-acrylate, ethylene butyl acrylate, poly-propylene, atactic polypropylene, polystyrene, polyethylene, LDPE, HDPE, oxidized high density poly-propylene, poly-phosphoric acid (PPA), natural rubber, polybutadiene, epoxy resins, polyurethane resins, acrylic resins, phenolic resins, gilsonite, lignin, diblock polymers, Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene (SBS), triblock polymers which may be either linear or radial, styrene-isoprene-styrene (SIS), diblocked polymers, hydrotreated SBS, Styrene Ethylene Butadiene Styrene polymers (SEBS), Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SBR), polyacrylamide, e.g., those described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,393,155; Glycidyl-containing ethylene copolymers in U.S. Pat. No. 5,331,028; or Crum Rubbers.

Asphalt is the most recycled material in the world. Milled road surfaces are reused. Many new roads are composed of 20% recycled asphalt and as high as 60% in some applications. The reclaimed asphalt is highly oxidized from years of use, and can be rejuvenated. There are rejuvenators currently on the market at a high price point. Another advantage of the invention is the ester bottoms can be used as a rejuvenator for recycled asphalt.

The ester bottom modified asphalt may have many desirable applications including but not limited to paving asphalt, asphalt emulsions, cutback asphalts, and roofing flux.

Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon a review of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and the accompanying drawings.

IN THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram for bio-refining.

FIG. 2 is a plot of ester bottoms vs. HVGO in asphalt.

FIG. 3 is a plot of ester bottoms PG temperatures for a number of different asphalt compositions.

FIG. 4 is a table of test results on a number of different asphalt compositions when mixed with various amounts of ester bottoms.

FIG. 5 is a table of test results on a number of different asphalt compositions when mixed with various amounts of ester bottoms.

FIG. 6 is a plot of results of tensile tests comparing an ester bottom modified asphalt with three polymer modified asphalts.

FIG. 7 is a plot of results of a rutting resistance test of an ester bottom modified asphalt with three polymer modified asphalts.

FIG. 8 is a plot of results of a compaction tension test comparing an ester bottom modified asphalt with two polymer modified asphalts.

FIG. 9 is a plot of a Semi Circular Bend test comparing an ester bottom modified asphalt with two polymer modified asphalts.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 1 feedstock is brought from the storage tanks to the dryer (T2101) wherein moisture is removed. This dry oil is then fed into a three-stage continuous reactor/settler system (T2102) where methoxide catalyst and methanol are added to each stage. Methanol reacts with the dry oil to produce methyl ester and glycerin. The dry oil is reacted to less than 1% monoglyceride and virtually no diglycerides or triglycerides as it leaves the last settler. Glycerin settles out of the of the reaction mixture and is directed from the reactors downstream for further refining. The ester phase is what remains after the glycerin is removed. The ester phase is then transferred to a single stage flash distillation tank (V-2107) to remove any remaining methanol. The ester phase is then water washed (T2103) to remove glycerin, soap, methanol, and methoxide catalyst. The washed methyl esters are dried under vacuum (T2104) to remove more methanol and water. Sodium methoxide is added to the dryer to back react any glycerin and monoglycerides into diglycerides and triglycerides. The methyl esters leave the ester dryer and are preheated before entering an ester surge tank (S2201). The methyl esters from the ester surge tank are then distilled to separate the purified methyl esters from the ester bottoms. The ester bottoms are transferred from the distillation tower (T2211) to an ester bottom surge tank (S2202) while the purified methyl ester is transferred from the distillation tower to a storage tank for distribution or sale.

The ester bottoms produced in methyl ester refining are added to any suitable asphalt composition or cement, for example, industrial asphalts used for coatings, sealants, roofing materials, adhesives, and other applications. However, paving grade asphalts are used in the preferred embodiment of the invention. The asphalt feed composition will determine the amount of ester bottoms required.

Referring now to FIG. 2, there is illustrated a comparison of heavy vacuum gas oil modified asphalt compared with ester bottoms modified asphalt. It can be seen in FIG. 2 that, at similar points, the ester bottoms modified asphalt produces a PG73-23 (UTR=96) versus a HVGO PG71-23 (UTR=94). Similarly, the higher the quantity of modifiers in the asphalt, the ester bottoms produce PG66-29 (UTR=95) versus an HVGO PG63-29 (UTR=92). The ester bottoms modified asphalt presents an improved UTR when compared with HVGO modified asphalts.

The type of asphalt used for the present invention can vary as illustrated by FIGS. 3 and 4. The asphalts may include solvent deasphalting bottoms (SDA). FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate testing which was done on a PG64-22 (Sample A), PG64-22 (Sample B), and two SDA blends (Samples C and D), and two stiff vacuum tower bottoms blends (Samples E and F). For instance, asphalt from two different refineries (Samples A&B), mixed with 3% ester bottoms resulted in different end products. Similarly, ester bottoms added to SDA or coker feeds affect the finished products differently. Therefore, the weight percentage of ester bottoms required for blending is determined by the asphalt composition.

EXAMPLE 1

Referring now to FIG. 4 a conventional PG 64-22 (Sample A) is used. The control sample at high temperature is approximately 65° C., and the low temperature compliance is actually −25° C. Ester bottoms are added to the Sample A and the resulting product has a high temperature compliance of 60.1° C. and a low temperature compliance of −29.6° C. The useable temperature range of the control equals 86° C. whereas the ester modified composition has a useable temperature range of 89.7° C.

EXAMPLE 2

Referring to FIG. 4, Sample B PG 64-22 has an initial high temperature control of 67.7° C. and the low temperature control is −24.6° C. resulting in a UTR of 92.3. After the addition of 3% ester bottoms the high temperature compliance is 62.4° C. and the low temperature compliance is −29.9° C. resulting in a useable temperature range of 93.2° C., while lowering the lower temperature compliance significantly.

EXAMPLE 3

Referring again to FIG. 4, Samples C & D, SOA blends, were tested. Sample C having a high temperature compliance of 67.7° C. and a low temperature compliance of −18° C. Ester bottoms were added in the amount of 2.25% and 5.77%. The 2.25% ester bottoms addition resulted in a UTR of 87.8° C., while the 5.77% ester bottoms addition resulted in a UTR 89° C. In the Sample D test the 3.70% ester bottoms addition resulted in an 89.8° C. UTR and a 7.1% ester bottoms addition resulted in an 88.8° C. UTR.

It can be seen from FIGS. 2-4 that ester bottoms modified asphalts are at least as good as, if not better at maintaining a UTR than the more expensive HVGO and SDA modified asphalts.

Referring now to FIG. 5, tensile strength testing was employed against three SDA modified binders (1, 2, 3) in comparison with an ester bottoms modified binder (4). Moisture sensitivity results for the three SDA modified PG64-22 asphalts and the ester bottoms modified blend show that the ester bottoms modified blend competed very well against binders 1, 2 and 3. Both dry and wet strains are very strong. During this test a disk-shaped sample of the binder is pulled apart to measure the crack initiation and propagation. By measuring the area under the load and the displacement curve, fracture energy is calculated for the sample. This test provides an understanding of a mixture's ability to resist cracking at both low and intermediate temperatures.

Referring now to FIG. 6 the results of a rutting resistance test, known as the Hamburg Wheel Test, compares binders 1, 2 and 3 against ester modified binder 4. Again, the ester modified binder 4 performs favorably when compared to the other refinery produced PG64-22. The test is performed by repeatedly tracking a loaded wheel over samples in heated bath water. The deformation of the samples versus the number of passes is observed. The Hamburg Wheel Test is used to measure both rutting and stripping risks.

Referring now to FIG. 7 the results of a Disk Shaped Compaction Tension test (DCT) are shown. The DCT is a measure of low temperature and reflective cracking. Binder 4 with the ester bottoms additive was compared against binders 2 and 3. Binder 4 again provided results equal and favorable to the refinery binders. During this test, one set of samples is tested as it exists. For this test, two sets of each binder are tested. One set of the mixed binders are tested as is under dry conditions. The second set of test binders is put through a freeze/fall cycle and is then conditioned in water. The strength for each mix is measured from the load required to crack the sample. The reported number of this graph is the strength ratio of the wet versus dry condition. This strength ratio provides information regarding the moisture susceptibility of the asphalt mix.

FIG. 8 provides the results of a Semi Circular Bend test against binder 2, binder 3 and binder 4 with ester bottoms. This test provides an indicator of resistance to crack propagation and predicts fracture performance. The test shows that binder 4 with ester bottoms additive performed better than binders 2 and 3. The test is performed by 3 point bending of a semi-circular shaped specimen with an introduced notch. This induces tension at the bottom of the sample, resulting in crack propagation throughout the specimen. The energy required to fracture the sample is calculated. The test is run at normal temperatures.

The above detailed description of the present invention is given for explanatory purposes. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous changes and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the whole of the foregoing description is to be construed in an illustrative and not a limitative sense, the scope of the invention being defined solely by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method of making paving asphalt comprising:

adding 0.1 wt % to 20 wt % ester bottoms to an asphalt mixture wherein the ester bottoms are a byproduct of methyl ester refining; and
adding 0-20 wt % of a polymer modifier to the ester bottoms and asphalt mixture.

2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the ester bottoms contain methyl esters, sodium soap, monoglycerides, diglycerides, triglycerides, and unsaponifiables.

3. The method according to claim 2 wherein the unsaponifiables make up about 10 wt % of the ester bottoms.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the ester bottoms have a viscosity range of 10-900 cp at 64° C.

5. A method of making a paving asphalt comprising adding ester bottoms to an asphalt mixture to increase the useable temperature range of the paving asphalt, wherein the ester bottoms are a byproduct of methyl ester refining.

6. A method of making a paving asphalt comprising adding ester bottoms to an asphalt mixture to meet a predetermined useable temperature range, wherein the ester bottoms are a byproduct of methyl ester refining.

7. A modified asphalt composition comprising:

50 wt % to about 99.9 wt % of an asphalt;
0 wt % to about 20 wt % of an asphalt-modifying polymer; and
0.1 wt % to about 50 wt % of ester bottoms, the ester bottoms being defined as distillation bottoms of distilled reaction products from reaction of methanol and dry oil that have settled glycerin removed therefrom prior to distillation.

8. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the ester bottoms include unsaponifiables in an amount of at least about 10% thereof.

9. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the ester bottoms are without skimmed fatty acids.

10. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the ester bottoms include one or more sodium soaps.

11. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the ester bottoms have a viscosity range of between about 10 cP and about 900 cP at 64° C.

12. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the ester bottoms include diglycerides and triglycerides.

13. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the asphalt includes from about 20 wt % to about 60 wt % recycled asphalt.

14. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the asphalt-modifying polymer has one or more monomers selected from the group consisting of butadiene, styrene, vinyl acetate, ethylene, propylene, acrylate, isoprene, and acrylamide.

15. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein a useable temperature range of the modified asphalt composition is greater than an asphalt composition without ester bottoms.

16. The modified asphalt composition of claim 7, wherein the dry oil includes one or more of a vegetable oil or an animal fat that has been at least partially dried to remove moisture therefrom.

17. A modified asphalt composition comprising:

50 wt % to about 99.9 wt % of an asphalt;
0 wt % to about 20 wt % of a polymer modifier; and
0.1 wt % to about 50 wt % of ester bottoms, the ester bottoms being defined as distillation bottoms of a water-washed reaction product between methanol and dry oil from which settled glycerin is removed from the water-washed reaction product prior to distillation, the dry oil containing one or more of a vegetable oil or an animal fat that has been dried to remove at least some moisture therefrom.

18. The modified asphalt composition of claim 17, wherein the ester bottoms include unsaponifiables in an amount of at least about 10% thereof.

19. The modified asphalt composition of claim 17, wherein the ester bottoms include one or more sodium soaps.

20. The modified asphalt composition of claim 17, wherein the ester bottoms have a viscosity range of between about 10 cP and about 900 cP at 64° C.

21. The modified asphalt composition of claim 17, wherein the asphalt includes from about 20 wt % to about 60 wt % recycled asphalt.

22. A modified asphalt composition comprising:

50 wt % to about 99.9 wt % of an asphalt;
0 wt % to about 20 wt % of an asphalt modifier selected from the group consisting of a polymer, a resin, polyphosphoric acid, gilsonite, lignin and crumb rubber; and
0.1 wt % to about 50 wt % of ester bottoms, the ester bottoms being defined as distillation bottoms of a water-washed methyl ester reaction product between reagents methanol and at least one of vegetable oil or animal fat from which glycerin is settled and removed from the methyl ester reaction product prior to distillation.

23. The modified asphalt composition of claim 22, wherein the ester bottoms include unsaponifiables in an amount of at least about 10% thereof.

24. The modified asphalt composition of claim 22, wherein the ester bottoms include one or more sodium soaps.

25. The modified asphalt composition of claim 22, wherein the ester bottoms have a viscosity range of between about 10 cP and about 900 cP at 64° C.

26. The modified asphalt composition of claim 22, wherein the asphalt includes from about 20 wt % to about 60 wt % recycled asphalt.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
2027404 January 1936 Small
2102124 December 1937 Lithgow
2290038 July 1942 Folmsbee
2605193 July 1952 Karll
2850436 September 1958 Beuther
2877129 March 1959 Hardman et al.
2906635 September 1959 Teot
3047414 July 1962 Katz
3072284 January 1963 Luhman
3162101 December 1964 Rostler
3221615 December 1965 McGovern
3238173 March 1966 Bailey
3261269 July 1966 McGovern
3344056 September 1967 Rostler
3432321 March 1969 Rostler
3556827 January 1971 McConnaughay
3867111 February 1975 Knowles
3955416 May 11, 1976 Waiwood
3992340 November 16, 1976 Bonitz
4064826 December 27, 1977 Pauli
4073625 February 14, 1978 Kiritani et al.
4082823 April 4, 1978 Augustine
4084915 April 18, 1978 Wiseblood
4112765 September 12, 1978 Hollweck
4130474 December 19, 1978 Anthony
4145322 March 20, 1979 Maldonado
4154710 May 15, 1979 Maldonado
4162999 July 31, 1979 Bohemen
4237052 December 2, 1980 Fitoussi
4242246 December 30, 1980 Maldonado
4320788 March 23, 1982 Lord
4323496 April 6, 1982 Mitani
4330449 May 18, 1982 Maldonado
4373961 February 15, 1983 Stone
4392870 July 12, 1983 Chieffo
4541735 September 17, 1985 Abu-Isa
4549834 October 29, 1985 Allen
4554313 November 19, 1985 Hagenbach
4564834 January 14, 1986 Steele
4585816 April 29, 1986 Vitkuske
4647313 March 3, 1987 Clementoni
4762565 August 9, 1988 Graf
4789946 December 6, 1988 Sinz
4971219 November 20, 1990 Dombeck et al.
5008653 April 16, 1991 Kidd
5023282 June 11, 1991 Neubert
5039342 August 13, 1991 Jelling
5050603 September 24, 1991 Stokes
5083870 January 28, 1992 Sindelar et al.
5118733 June 2, 1992 Gelles
5120777 June 9, 1992 Chaverot
5177130 January 5, 1993 Beavers
5180428 January 19, 1993 Koleas
5234494 August 10, 1993 Sawatzky et al.
5472928 December 5, 1995 Scheuerman et al.
5498327 March 12, 1996 Stangeland et al.
5511573 April 30, 1996 Corte
5559166 September 24, 1996 Bearden
5589057 December 31, 1996 Trimble et al.
5601697 February 11, 1997 Miller
5660715 August 26, 1997 Trimble et al.
5681369 October 28, 1997 Osborne
5766333 June 16, 1998 Lukens
5816708 October 6, 1998 Urich
5853455 December 29, 1998 Gibson
5911817 June 15, 1999 Hayner
5916529 June 29, 1999 Scheuerman
5938130 August 17, 1999 Zickell
5966311 October 12, 1999 Stemporzewski, Jr.
6001162 December 14, 1999 Hayner
6015440 January 18, 2000 Noureddini
6048447 April 11, 2000 Hayner
6074128 June 13, 2000 Marino
6083988 July 4, 2000 Becker
6086749 July 11, 2000 Kramer et al.
6133351 October 17, 2000 Hayner
6153004 November 28, 2000 Hayner
6156113 December 5, 2000 Pasquier
6174501 January 16, 2001 Noureddini
6203585 March 20, 2001 Majerczak
6214103 April 10, 2001 Kitagawa
6223789 May 1, 2001 Koch
6235104 May 22, 2001 Chattopadhyay
6249241 June 19, 2001 Jordan et al.
6290152 September 18, 2001 Zickell
6318402 November 20, 2001 Ladeira
6336479 January 8, 2002 Nanaji
6348074 February 19, 2002 Wenzel
6352637 March 5, 2002 Doolin et al.
6380284 April 30, 2002 Lopez
6384112 May 7, 2002 Boussad
6394149 May 28, 2002 Parsons
6414056 July 2, 2002 Puzic
6414066 July 2, 2002 Lem
6416249 July 9, 2002 Crupi
6417421 July 9, 2002 Yao
6514331 February 4, 2003 Varnadoe et al.
6514332 February 4, 2003 Varnadoe et al.
6548580 April 15, 2003 Rohde
6575326 June 10, 2003 Martin, Jr.
6615658 September 9, 2003 Snelling
6659684 December 9, 2003 Goodhart et al.
6749677 June 15, 2004 Freisthler
6764542 July 20, 2004 Lackey et al.
6776832 August 17, 2004 Spence et al.
6802897 October 12, 2004 Lackey
6852779 February 8, 2005 Planche
6927245 August 9, 2005 Buras et al.
6932123 August 23, 2005 Craig
6935387 August 30, 2005 Blubaugh
6948364 September 27, 2005 Snelling
6952996 October 11, 2005 Sisk et al.
6973828 December 13, 2005 Zimmermann
7008670 March 7, 2006 Freisthler
7028382 April 18, 2006 Fisher
7041717 May 9, 2006 Margulis
7047114 May 16, 2006 Rogers
7241821 July 10, 2007 Hayner et al.
7297204 November 20, 2007 Crews et al.
7309390 December 18, 2007 Falkiewicz
7357594 April 15, 2008 Takamura
7417081 August 26, 2008 Nakajima et al.
7503724 March 17, 2009 Blacklidge
7568835 August 4, 2009 Pils
7645114 January 12, 2010 Cannon et al.
7753618 July 13, 2010 Constantz et al.
7811372 October 12, 2010 Nigen-Chaidron et al.
7829053 November 9, 2010 Constantz et al.
7848912 December 7, 2010 Bertini
7849802 December 14, 2010 Dalrymple
7918624 April 5, 2011 Blacklidge
7951857 May 31, 2011 Crews et al.
7993442 August 9, 2011 Crews et al.
8026380 September 27, 2011 Hassan
8088845 January 3, 2012 Le Clerc et al.
8133316 March 13, 2012 Poncelet et al.
8193401 June 5, 2012 McGehee et al.
8206500 June 26, 2012 Mathis et al.
8278451 October 2, 2012 Becker et al.
8286673 October 16, 2012 Recker et al.
8316708 November 27, 2012 Horst
8337117 December 25, 2012 Vitale et al.
8404037 March 26, 2013 Naidoo et al.
8454979 June 4, 2013 Mitarai et al.
8562864 October 22, 2013 Rodrigues et al.
8634970 January 21, 2014 Lee et al.
8722771 May 13, 2014 Vaidya et al.
8783280 July 22, 2014 Yandle
8789564 July 29, 2014 Jividen et al.
8814464 August 26, 2014 McDade et al.
8821064 September 2, 2014 Morris et al.
8859649 October 14, 2014 Ranka
8926742 January 6, 2015 Coe
8968457 March 3, 2015 Payne
8979982 March 17, 2015 Jordan
8992118 March 31, 2015 Coe
9028602 May 12, 2015 Chughtai et al.
9115295 August 25, 2015 Deneuvillers et al.
9133581 September 15, 2015 Devenney et al.
9139720 September 22, 2015 Avramidis et al.
9139733 September 22, 2015 McDade et al.
9139953 September 22, 2015 Ahluwalia
9150140 October 6, 2015 Girard et al.
9200205 December 1, 2015 Bran et al.
9295992 March 29, 2016 Zickell
9347187 May 24, 2016 Coe
9376565 June 28, 2016 Subotic et al.
9409336 August 9, 2016 De Amorim Novais Da Costa Nóbrega et al.
9416274 August 16, 2016 Frank
9481794 November 1, 2016 Cox
9493633 November 15, 2016 Rowland et al.
9513135 December 6, 2016 MacNeille et al.
9523003 December 20, 2016 Williams et al.
9556631 January 31, 2017 Brooks et al.
9597628 March 21, 2017 Kummerer et al.
9650580 May 16, 2017 Merdrignac et al.
9776165 October 3, 2017 Tour et al.
9790360 October 17, 2017 Puchalski et al.
9862820 January 9, 2018 Kim et al.
9868855 January 16, 2018 Merck et al.
9969884 May 15, 2018 Murthy et al.
9982136 May 29, 2018 Cao et al.
10030145 July 24, 2018 Severance et al.
10076430 September 18, 2018 Klausen
10127515 November 13, 2018 Borgerson et al.
10174201 January 8, 2019 Avramidis
10214617 February 26, 2019 Bruns et al.
10233120 March 19, 2019 Flanigan
10294616 May 21, 2019 Crupi et al.
10316192 June 11, 2019 Kurth et al.
10323147 June 18, 2019 Brewster et al.
10323148 June 18, 2019 Brewster et al.
10329426 June 25, 2019 Kurth et al.
10337154 July 2, 2019 Baumrind
10339478 July 2, 2019 Grant et al.
10363529 July 30, 2019 Alberty
10442872 October 15, 2019 Besse et al.
10449502 October 22, 2019 Rovani, Jr. et al.
10527547 January 7, 2020 Hofko et al.
10570286 February 25, 2020 Williams
10626050 April 21, 2020 Muncy et al.
10626275 April 21, 2020 Coe
10669203 June 2, 2020 Franzen et al.
10669463 June 2, 2020 Bahr
10724183 July 28, 2020 Coe
10767033 September 8, 2020 Kluttz et al.
10793720 October 6, 2020 Puchalski et al.
10794017 October 6, 2020 Coe
10889940 January 12, 2021 Crupi
10961395 March 30, 2021 Williams et al.
10982097 April 20, 2021 Larusso et al.
10988617 April 27, 2021 McClellan, Jr. et al.
11077045 August 3, 2021 Sen et al.
11091642 August 17, 2021 Kurth et al.
11097981 August 24, 2021 Reinke et al.
11124926 September 21, 2021 Fennell et al.
11155696 October 26, 2021 Fini
11193243 December 7, 2021 Chesky
11225576 January 18, 2022 Jorda et al.
11274208 March 15, 2022 Colange et al.
11365318 June 21, 2022 Kwon et al.
11390750 July 19, 2022 Baumgardner et al.
11414549 August 16, 2022 Allen et al.
11421109 August 23, 2022 McCurdy et al.
11427697 August 30, 2022 Reinke et al.
11447637 September 20, 2022 Gabel et al.
11512437 November 29, 2022 McDade
RE49447 March 7, 2023 Brewster et al.
11623990 April 11, 2023 Baumgardner
11634875 April 25, 2023 Fennell et al.
11655419 May 23, 2023 Nicholson
11732108 August 22, 2023 Hayner
11814506 November 14, 2023 Clopotel et al.
20020026884 March 7, 2002 Raad
20070277430 December 6, 2007 Jones et al.
20090036694 February 5, 2009 Hassan et al.
20090056201 March 5, 2009 Morgan
20090127499 May 21, 2009 Blubaugh et al.
20090137705 May 28, 2009 Faucon et al.
20090187450 July 23, 2009 Kocis
20090226254 September 10, 2009 Jones
20100034586 February 11, 2010 Bailey et al.
20100048771 February 25, 2010 Osborn
20100062219 March 11, 2010 Richards
20100088142 April 8, 2010 El-Bakry et al.
20100020918 January 28, 2010 Wiley
20100280750 November 4, 2010 Chen
20100289654 November 18, 2010 Hunter
20110105652 May 5, 2011 Hergenrother
20110233105 September 29, 2011 Bailey
20120017804 January 26, 2012 Venema et al.
20120060722 March 15, 2012 Montpeyroux et al.
20130197134 August 1, 2013 Leal et al.
20130276668 October 24, 2013 Ranka et al.
20130344012 December 26, 2013 Christensen et al.
20140270953 September 18, 2014 Duffy
20140284520 September 25, 2014 Littich et al.
20140310049 October 16, 2014 Goel
20140343192 November 20, 2014 Cochran et al.
20140356526 December 4, 2014 O'Connell et al.
20150012326 January 8, 2015 Furman
20150087753 March 26, 2015 Koleas et al.
20150307013 October 29, 2015 Tremblay et al.
20150324740 November 12, 2015 Shao
20160052169 February 25, 2016 Baumrind et al.
20160122507 May 5, 2016 Cox
20160194581 July 7, 2016 Summers et al.
20160236980 August 18, 2016 Mullenbach et al.
20160289452 October 6, 2016 O'Connell et al.
20160362338 December 15, 2016 Reinke et al.
20160376440 December 29, 2016 Naidoo et al.
20170096092 April 6, 2017 Cannon
20170107376 April 20, 2017 Winship et al.
20170114281 April 27, 2017 Gupta et al.
20170152384 June 1, 2017 Eijkenboom
20170306570 October 26, 2017 Crupi et al.
20170349725 December 7, 2017 Broere
20170370899 December 28, 2017 Porot et al.
20180010305 January 11, 2018 Bentaj et al.
20180032926 February 1, 2018 DeLuca
20180044529 February 15, 2018 Kurth et al.
20180112303 April 26, 2018 Antony
20180148575 May 31, 2018 Kurth et al.
20180200264 July 19, 2018 Blau et al.
20180266578 September 20, 2018 Baxter
20180060808 March 1, 2018 Borgerson et al.
20180340068 November 29, 2018 McCurdy et al.
20180371251 December 27, 2018 Avramidis et al.
20190016965 January 17, 2019 Aldous
20190048191 February 14, 2019 Leon et al.
20190153229 May 23, 2019 Reinke et al.
20190300714 October 3, 2019 Watson et al.
20190375940 December 12, 2019 Franzen et al.
20200002538 January 2, 2020 Wissel et al.
20200032063 January 30, 2020 Lungren et al.
20200050202 February 13, 2020 Suresh
20200094924 March 26, 2020 Gaziotis et al.
20200118068 April 16, 2020 Turetsky et al.
20200123449 April 23, 2020 Nicholson
20200165459 May 28, 2020 Williams et al.
20200265377 August 20, 2020 Al Dhaheri et al.
20200277497 September 3, 2020 Reinke et al.
20200317925 October 8, 2020 Hassan et al.
20200332126 October 22, 2020 Donelson
20200372375 November 26, 2020 Pathak et al.
20210002484 January 7, 2021 Clopotel
20210017386 January 21, 2021 Reinke et al.
20210054210 February 25, 2021 Hemsley et al.
20210079224 March 18, 2021 Cochran et al.
20210095429 April 1, 2021 Murphy et al.
20210139374 May 13, 2021 Bruns et al.
20210147751 May 20, 2021 Fini et al.
20210189133 June 24, 2021 Grzybowski
20210214057 July 15, 2021 Tsujimoto
20210230255 July 29, 2021 Amadoro et al.
20210230818 July 29, 2021 Fennell et al.
20210236815 August 5, 2021 Waldstreicher et al.
20210238093 August 5, 2021 Eyster
20210241221 August 5, 2021 Pathak et al.
20210284574 September 16, 2021 Kurth et al.
20210334650 October 28, 2021 Celano
20210338562 November 4, 2021 Akthakul et al.
20210362637 November 25, 2021 Hanis
20210371339 December 2, 2021 Dennis et al.
20210371567 December 2, 2021 Vanderhoof et al.
20220001345 January 6, 2022 Ahn et al.
20220002548 January 6, 2022 Wissel et al.
20220033305 February 3, 2022 Cochran et al.
20220089832 March 24, 2022 Yi et al.
20220101272 March 31, 2022 Sunde et al.
20220106537 April 7, 2022 Aritake et al.
20220112130 April 14, 2022 Williams et al.
20220153645 May 19, 2022 Zhou
20220243066 August 4, 2022 Noel
20220267602 August 25, 2022 Cooley et al.
20220281212 September 8, 2022 Bhattacharya et al.
20220315766 October 6, 2022 Baumgardner et al.
20220372257 November 24, 2022 Coe
20220389669 December 8, 2022 Miller
20220402819 December 22, 2022 Mangel et al.
20230033496 February 2, 2023 Townsend et al.
20230072410 March 9, 2023 Inoubli et al.
20230085865 March 23, 2023 Bruns et al.
20230086227 March 23, 2023 Bruns et al.
20230092077 March 23, 2023 Lorenzen et al.
20230193031 June 22, 2023 Clopotel et al.
20230193035 June 22, 2023 Clopotel et al.
20230348723 November 2, 2023 Clopotel et al.
20240409815 December 12, 2024 Clopotel
Foreign Patent Documents
1262976 November 1989 CA
2871674 February 2007 CN
106934143 July 2017 CN
206917912 January 2018 CN
111879637 November 2020 CN
111986520 November 2020 CN
113110464 July 2021 CN
113921091 January 2022 CN
114112889 March 2022 CN
114113552 March 2022 CN
4124142 January 1993 DE
9213661 January 1993 DE
19519539 December 1995 DE
0870291 October 1998 EP
2290010 March 2011 EP
3291206 March 2018 EP
3441260 February 2019 EP
2478122 September 1981 FR
2205104 November 1988 GB
293683 March 2018 IN
10-2017-0011981 February 2017 KR
101952894 February 2019 KR
102195378 December 2020 KR
102597632 November 2023 KR
157791 July 1992 PL
1787994 January 1993 RU
2123719 December 1998 RU
816996 March 1981 SU
200055257 September 2000 WO
2007068461 June 2007 WO
WO-2007068461 June 2007 WO
2009/147360 December 2009 WO
2011034423 March 2011 WO
20190234434 December 2019 WO
2021254815 December 2021 WO
Other references
  • Acromag, Whitepaper: Introduction to the Two-Wire Transmitter and the 4-20MA Current Loop, Nov. 8, 2010, available at http://www.automation.com/pdf-articles/Acromag-Intro-TwoWire-Transmitters-4-20mA-Current-Loop-904A.pdf.
  • Dataforth Corporation, Application Note: 4-20 mA Transmitters, May 24, 2002, available at http://www.dataforth.com/catalog/bb/152-138011998.pdf.
  • Raptor Overfill Protection Probe, TPF, Inc., Jun. 3, 2013, available at http://tpftherm.com/pdf/2TPFB.pdf.
  • Lee et al. A decision support system for vessel speed decision in maritime logistics using weather archive big data, 2017, Elsevier, Computers and Operations Research 98, 330-342 (Year: 2017).
  • Torralba A. et al., Paper 132—Smart Navigation System for the Port of Seville, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Sep. 7-11, 2015.
  • Etienne, Mary et al., Intelligent Maritime Modern Ships and Ports, Dell Technologies and Intel Corporation, May 2020.
  • Negenborn, Rudy et al., Smart Port, Smart ships and the changing maritime ecosystem, SmartPort, Sep. 2018.
  • Lind, Mikael et al., Sea Traffic Management—Beneficial for all Maritime Stakeholders, Transportation Research Procedia, Dec. 2016.
  • Xiao, Yi et al., Digital empowerment for shipping development: a framework for establishing a smart shipping index system, Maritime Policy & Management, Feb. 27, 2021.
  • Tian Zhe et al., The Development of Key Technologies in Applications of Vessels Connected to the Internet, Symmetry, 2017.
  • Van Westrenen et al., Maritime traffic management: a need for central coordination?, Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012.
  • Emco Wheaton, Vapor Transfer Vents, 2020. https://www.gardnerdenver.com/en-us/emcowheaton/fuel-systems/tank-truck-equipment/vapor-transfer-vents.
  • Sun, Zhaojie et al., Investigation of the potential application of biodiesel by-product as asphalt modifier, Road Materials and Pavement Design 17(3):1-16, Oct. 2015.
Patent History
Patent number: RE50456
Type: Grant
Filed: Jan 25, 2023
Date of Patent: Jun 10, 2025
Assignee: Marathon Petroleum Company LP (Findlay, OH)
Inventors: Stormy Brewster (Findlay, OH), Stephen J. Jones (Findlay, OH), Dennis Keppers (Findlay, OH)
Primary Examiner: Ling X Xu
Application Number: 18/101,464
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Including Heat Exchanger For Reaction Chamber Or Reactants Located Therein (422/198)
International Classification: C08L 95/00 (20060101); C08K 5/10 (20060101); C11B 13/00 (20060101); C12P 7/64 (20220101);