Surgical incision and closure apparatus with integrated force distribution

- ZipLine Medical, Inc.

Apparatus for closing a surgical incision comprise a base having left and right panels, a force distribution structure coupled to each panel, and a closure component which releasably attaches to the force distribution structure to draw the inner edges of the panels together in order to close adhered tissue edges. The force distribution structures allow the inner edges of the panels to expand while restraining expansion of the outer edges of the panels and limiting elongation of the lateral dimension of the panels. The incision closure appliance may be placed on skin or other tissue prior to forming the incision to be available to close said incision at the end of the surgical procedure.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/286,757, filed Nov. 1, 2011, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to medical apparatus and methods. More particularly, present invention relates to apparatus and methods for forming and closing surgical incisions.

Surgical closure devices including an adhesive based patch with right and left panels are known. Of particular interest of the present invention, such devices are described in co-pending, commonly owned PCT application US 2010/000430, full disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference. As described in the PCT application, an adhesive patch is placed over a patient's skin at a site where it is desired to form a surgical incision. After the patch is placed, an incision is formed along an axial line extending through the middle of the patch. After it is formed, the incision can be opened to perform a desired procedure, and after the procedure is completed the incision may be closed by drawing the inner edges of the panels together with a clip, zipper, or other closure member.

The principal objective of such surgical closure devices is to improved healing and reduce scaring from the incision. This objective, however, has been inhibited by certain characteristics of the presently available devices. For example, the tissue edges are not always brought together along an even line, which can increase the eventual scaring. Many such closure devices do not have the ability to adjust the closure force or distance on the tissue edges, limiting the ability to slightly “pucker” tissue which has been found to reduce scaring. Other shortcomings of the available incision and wound closure devices include difficulty of use and inability to conform to tissue manipulation during subsequent surgical protocols, i.e. those devices which are sufficiently rigid to securely close the tissue are often unable to conform to the tissue movement during the surgical procedure.

A particular problem arises with self-adhesive wound closure patches when they're used beneath an adherent surgical incision drape. Such drapes are used to help maintain the sterility of a tissue surface during a surgical procedure, and the drapes may be placed over a previously positioned tissue closure patch. As the surgical incision drape has an adhesive lower surface which adheres to the tissue, the drape will adhere to an upper surface of an underlying tissue closure patch. Removal of the surgical incision drape will thus often remove or at least displace a previously placed tissue closure patch. If any significant portion of the tissue closure patch is removed or displaced, the patch will no longer be useful for closing a surgical wound.

For these reasons, it would be desirable to provide improved surgical incision closure devices and methods for their use. It would be particularly desirable to provide incision closure devices which are able to adhere to the tissue, allow formation of the incision, conform to the deformation of the tissue during a subsequent surgical procedure, and provide controlled closure of the adjacent tissue edges subsequent to the procedure. In particular, it would be desirable if the incision closure devices were able to provide for the control and the uniform distribution of closure forces on the tissue edges while causing minimum restraint or stretching of the tissue during the surgical procedure. It would be still further desirable to provide improved surgical incision closure devices and methods for their use where the devices will resist removal and dislocation when used beneath a surgical incision drape. At least some of these objectives will be met by the inventions described below.

2. Description of the Background Art

Co-pending, commonly owned PCT application US 2010/000430 as been described above. Other surgical closure devices are described in the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,012,755; 3,516,409; 3,863,640; 3,933,158; 4,114,624; 3,926,193; 4,535,772; 4,676,245; 4,881,546; 4,905,694; 5,377,695; and 7,455,681; and U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2005/0020956 and 2008/0114396. Commercial incision closure devices available from Ethicon, a division of Johnson & Johnson, under the trade name Ethizip™ temporary abdominal wound closure device.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides improved apparatus and methods for closing wounds, particularly wounds resulting from incisions performed during surgical procedures. The incisions would usually be formed in a patient's skin, such as through the abdomen, but in some cases could also be on internal organs, within the oral cavity, within body cavities, or alike.

The devices and methods of the present invention will present minimum disruption of or interference with the surgical procedure which is performed after the incision is made. In particular, the devices and methods will permit the opposed edges of the incised tissue to be opened, stretched, and freely deformed with minimal restraint resulting from the presence of the closure device. Once the procedure has been completed, however, the devices and methods of the present invention will provide for a uniform distribution of closure forces to draw the tissue edges together in a manner which and minimize scaring. In particular, the closure devices can draw the tissue edges together at a slightly closer spacing than initially present at the forming of the incision in order to upwardly evert the tissue edges cause a “pucker” which can reduce scaring.

The devices and methods of the present invention will also be able to avoid or reduce disruption when a incision closure appliance is used beneath surgical incision drape which must be removed from over the closure appliance. A sacrificial layer is provided over at least part of the upper surface of the closure appliance, where the sacrificial cover is held in place while the surgical incision drape is placed over the incision closure appliance. After the incision and surgical procedure have been completed, the surgical incision drape will be pulled from the patient's skin. Instead of adhering to and dislodging the tissue closure appliance, the surgical drape adheres to the sacrificial cover, and only the sacrificial cover is pulled from the patient with the drape, leaving the remainder of the incision closure appliance in place.

In a first aspect of the present invention, an incision closure appliance comprises a base including a left panel and a right panel. Each panel has a tissue adherent lower surface, an upper surface, an inner edge, and an outer edge. The lower tissue adherent surface will typically be coated at least partially with a common tissue-adherent adhesive such as those used in surgical bandages and patches.

The incision closure appliance further includes a force distribution structure coupled to each panel (i.e. each panel will have at least one force distribution structure coupled thereto), where each force distribution structure is adapted to allow axial expansion of the panel along the inner edge while limiting lateral expansion over the entire length and axial expansion along the outer edge. By permitting axial expansion of the panel along the inner edge, the tissue edges are minimally constrained to allow the tissue to deform when stretched during the surgical procedure. Conversely, by limiting both lateral expansion and axial expansion along the outer edge, the panel will be able to apply a controlled and distributed closure force when the panels are drawn together after the surgical procedure is complete, as described in more detail below.

The incision closure appliance still further includes a closure component or assembly which attaches to the force distribution structure to draw the inner edges of the panels together after they had been adhered to the tissue on opposite sides of an incision site and the surgical procedure completed. Each panel of the base will typically comprise an at least partially elastic matrix, typically having an isotropic elasticity (i.e. the panel stretches evenly in all directions) but optionally having an anisotropic elasticity (where the matrix stretches preferentially in one direction or over a portion thereof). The elastic matrix may comprise an elastomeric membrane or sheet (for example Polyurethane sheet or Thermo Plastic Elastomers (TPE)), a woven fabric (typically woven at least partially from elastomeric filaments, threads, or fibers), a spun fabric, or the like. In certain embodiments, the elastomeric matrix may comprise a fabric woven from both elastic elements (typically threads, filaments, fibers, or the like) and having inelastic elements disposed along the outer edge and extending laterally there across in order to provide the expansion characteristics described above with respect to the force distribution structure. That is, in some cases, the force distribution structure may include or consist of inelastic elements woven or otherwise incorporated within a fabric membrane.

Typically, the force distribution structure will comprise a separate component of the incision closure appliance, for example including a spine disposed axially adjacent to the outer edge of the panel and a plurality of axially spaced-apart lateral supports disposed laterally and extending from the spine toward the inner edge of the panel. Such a “comb-like” structure will typically be formed from flexible but non-distensible materials so that the elements can flex together with the tissue deformation but will not stretch along their lengths so that they may provide dimensional stability in the lateral direction as well as along the outer edge of the panel. Examples of such materials include Nylon, Polypropylene, Polyethylene and Polycarbonate or other thermo polymers. Notably, the force distribution structure will not limit the axial stretching of the inner edge of the panel in order to provide the desired expansibility and conforms to the tissue during the surgical procedure. Such separate force distribution structures may be attached to the upper surface of the panel, or alternatively may be embedded in or laminated within the panel. Typically, the force distribution structure will not extend into or past the lower surface of the panel so that it will not interfere with adherence of the panel to the skin or other tissue.

The assembly of the base panels and the force distribution structures will typically be carried on a removable backing which covers and protects the adherent surface of the panels prior to use. The adherent backing may be removed in order to apply the base to the skin or other tissue at the site of the surgical intervention. Additionally, the right and left panels will typically be held together by removable tabs, an axial strip, or other removable covers or structures in order to hold the inner edges of the panel at a pre-determined distance or spacing as they are being adhered to the tissue. For example, removable tabs may be placed at each axial end of the base to temporarily secure the two base panels together. Alternatively, a removable strip or tape may be placed over an axial gap between the right and left panels to hold the panels in place relative to each other as the base is being adhered to the tissue surface. Such tabs or strips will typically be self-adhesive so that they may be secured to the panels and then removed by simply pulling off after the panels are properly placed. The cover, tabs, or strip may then be removed to leave the panels in place but unconnected prior to forming the surgical incision therebetween.

A first exemplary construction of the closure component or assembly comprises a right engagement member, a left engagement member, and a plurality of lateral struts holding the engagement members laterally apart by a pre-determined distance. The right engagement member is adapted to releasably engage the supports of the right panel along an inner edge thereof, and the left engagement member is adapted to releasably engage the supports of the left panel along an inner edge thereof. In the specific embodiments, at least some of the supports of the force distribution component will have cleats near their inner edges, and the engagement members will have slots which receive the cleats. After the surgical intervention is complete, the closure component may then be placed over the force distribution structure with the cleats on one side first being engaged by an engagement member and then the opposite engagement member being pulled over the cleats on the opposite side.

Alternatively, the closure component or assembly may comprise a plurality of independent lateral ties attached to at least some of the lateral supports. Such lateral ties are configured to be secured between the lateral supports, typically being fixed to one panel and being adjustably attachable to the other panel. For the exemplary embodiments, the adjustably attachable end may comprise a ratchet tightening mechanism or similar structure which allows each lateral tie to be independently adjusted at a different spacing between the right and left panels. In this way, the right and left panels may be differentially tensioned along their inner edges in order to control and optimize the forces applied to the adjacent tissue edges which are being drawn together.

Optionally, the closure appliance of the present invention may further comprise a securing layer which is adapted to be placed over the assembly of the base and the closure component after the assembly has been secured over an incision on a patient's skin and the surgical procedure has been completed. A securing layer will typically have a self-adhesive lower surface which can be placed over the assembly of the base and closure component to help secure it in place and to maintain cleanliness. The securing layer may optionally have openings to permit access to the wound for observation, delivery of antiseptics, and the like.

In a further aspect of the present invention, methods for forming an incision in tissue comprise providing an incision closure appliance as described above. The right and left panels of the appliance are adhered to the patient's skin, where the inner edges of the panels are spaced-apart by a pre-selected distance typically from 0.5 mm to 15 mm. An incision (typically linear) is formed in the tissue or skin surface between the inner edges of the panels, and the edges of the incised tissue are then separated to perform a desired surgical procedure. The inner edges of the panels can stretch and conform along with movement and deformation of the tissue edges while the outer edge and lateral extent of each panel remain dimensionally stable. After the procedure is complete, the closure component is secured to the force distribution structure to draw the inner edges of the panels back together. Optionally, the closure component has dimensions (or an adjustable inter-panel spacing) which draw the tissue edges closer together than they were immediately after the incision was formed. Such drawing together of the tissue causes the edges to evert and the tissue to “pucker” which can reduce scarring.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is an exploded view of an incision closure appliance constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a top view of the assembly of a base and a force distribution structure which is part of the incision closure appliance.

FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 3-3 of FIG. 2.

FIGS. 4-7 illustrate use of the incision closure appliance of the present invention for forming and closing an incision in a patient's skin.

FIG. 8 illustrates an alternative construction of a closure component for the closure appliance of the present invention.

FIG. 9 is an exploded view of a further embodiment of an incision closure appliance constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.

FIG. 10 is an enlarged isometric view of the base and force distribution structure of the system of FIG. 9.

FIGS. 11A and 11B illustrate an alternative lateral tie construction which can be used in the appliances of either FIG. 1 or FIG. 9.

FIG. 12 illustrates a sacrificial cover positioned over an incision closure appliance in accordance with the principles of the present invention.

FIGS. 13A through 13E illustrate the principle of operation of the sacrificial cover illustrated in FIG. 12 when used together with a surgical incision drape and performing methods according to the present invention.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The apparatus and methods of the present invention will be used during both the formation and the closure of surgical incisions made to a patient's skin or other tissue during surgical procedures. As described hereinafter, the direction of the incision will define both “axial” and “lateral” directions as those terms are used herein. Most incisions will be made along a generally straight line which will define the axial direction. The lateral direction will generally be across the axial direction, typically but not necessarily being perpendicular or normal to the axial direction. Most incisions will be generally linear but in some cases the incisions could be curved or have other geometries. The term “axial” will then apply to the direction of the incision at any particular location, resulting in lateral directions which could also vary.

Referring now to FIGS. 1-3, an incision closure appliance 10 comprises a base assembly 12 including a right panel 14 and a left panel 16. A right force distribution structure 18 is secured to the right panel 14, typically by laminating the force distribution structure to an upper surface of the panel, and a left force distribution structure 20 is similarly attached to an upper surface of the left panel 16. The incision closure appliance further comprises a closure component 22 which is removably attachable to the right and left forced distribution structures 18 and 20 in order to close an incision, as described in more detail below, and the appliance is completed with an optional securing layer 24 which may be placed over the combined base assembly 12 and closure component 22 after they have been secured to the patient and the incision has been closed by drawing the panels together using the closure component.

The closure component 22 is intended and adapted to draw the inner portions of the force distribution structures 18 and 20 inwardly toward each other to close a surgical incision which has been formed therebetween. In the illustrated embodiment, a plurality of cleats 26 are formed on lateral supports 36 which are held axially by spine 37 of the force distribution structures 18 and 20. The cleats 26 are received in slots 38 formed along inner edges of opposed engagement members 40 of the closure component 22. The opposed engagement members 40 are held together by lateral struts 42 so that the engagement members are held at a fixed, laterally spaced-apart distance (in other embodiments the spaced-apart distance may be adjustable). The slots 38 are preferably formed on flexible tab-like structures 44 which allow the slots to be pulled upwardly over the corresponding cleats in order to secure the closure component 22 over the force distribution structures 18 and 20.

The lower surfaces 32 of each panel 18 and 20 will typically be covered with a pressure-responsive adhesive, where the adhesive is initially covered with a protective layer 48 which may be peeled away immediately prior to use. Additionally, pull-away tabs 50 or other similar structures may be provided in order to hold the right and left panels 14 and 16 together at a pre-determined spaced-apart distance after the layer 48 has been removed but prior to adhering the panels to a patient's skin or other tissue surface. It is important that the distance between the inner edges 28 of each panel 14 and 16 be maintained as close as possible to the original target spacing so that the tissue edges, when closed by the closure component 22, will be precisely brought together, typically with a slight eversion.

Referring now to FIGS. 4 through 7, a protocol for both forming an incision and subsequently closing the incision in accordance with the principles of the present invention will be described. Initially, the right and left panels 14 and 16 are placed on the patient's skin followed by reference letter S, as shown in FIG. 4. The panels 14 and 16 are applied by first pulling away the protective layer 18 and placing the panels onto the tissue, after which time the tabs 50 may be removed, leaving an incision path 52 defined between the inner edges 28. The spacing of the inner edges 28 will be selected to provide a fixed, pre-determined distance d1.

After the right and left panels 14 and 16 are in place, an incision I can be formed in the space between the panels using a scalpel or other surgical cutting device CD, as shown in FIG. 5.

After the incision I is made, a surgical procedure may be performed by opening the inner edges of the incision which in turn deforms the inner edges 28 of the right and left panels 14 and 16, as shown in FIG. 6. As the inner most ends of the supports 36 are not connected, they are free to separate and allow the elastic matrix of the right and left panels 14 and 16 to expand, as clearly in FIG. 6. The dimensional stability of the remainder of the panels, however, will be preserved by the lateral supports 36 as well as the axial spines 37 which do not elongate under the influence of the force applied by stretching opening the incision.

After the surgical procedure is complete, the closure component 22 will be secured over the force distribution structures 18 and 20, as illustrated in FIG. 7. In particular, the slots 38 in the tab-like structures 44 are engaged over opposed cleats 26 in order to draw opposed edges of the panels as well as of the tissue incision together. By properly spacing the depth of the slots 38, the closure component 22 can be tailored so that the panels 14 and 16 are brought together by a pre-selected distance d2. Typically, the distance d2 will be less than the initial separation d1 so that the inner edges of the tissue are brought together to cause the tissue edges along the incision to slightly evert (pucker upwardly) which can improve healing and reduce scarring.

Optionally, as shown in FIG. 8, a closure component 22′ may include engagement members 40′, where one end of each lateral strut 42′ is joined by an adjustable clasp or other mechanism 54 so that the distance between the inner edges of the opposed engagement members 40′ can be adjusted in order to increase or lessen the distance d2 therebetween.

An alternative embodiment 100 of the incision closure appliance of the present invention is illustrated in FIGS. 9 and 10. The appliance 100 includes a base assembly 102 having a right panel 104 and a left panel 106. A positioning or alignment strip 108 is provided to secure the inner edges of each panel together, as shown best in FIG. 10 and includes an end tab 109 that allows the user to pull the strip from the panels 104 and 106 after the panels have been put in place on a tissue surface.

The incision closure appliance 100 further includes a backing 110 having an end which may be partially folded back to expose an underlying adhesive backing on the panels and allow that end of the base assembly 102 to be adhered to the tissue while the remainder of the base assembly is still covered by the backing. A securing layer 112 which includes a reinforcement frame 113 is provided for placement over the right panel 104 and left panel 106 after the base assembly 102 has been closed over an incision, generally is described in connection with the previous embodiment. Usually, a holding tray 114 will be provided for maintain the components of the appliance together in a sterilized condition where the tray 114 will be covered with conventional medical packaging cover.

As illustrated in FIGS. 9 and 10, a right force distribution structure 116 and a left force distribution structure 118 are provided on the upper surfaces of the right panel 104 and the left panel 106, respectively. The right force distribution structure 116 includes a right axial spine 120 and a plurality of lateral supports 122. Typically, the right axial spine 120 comprises a serpentine or zig-zag number which is embedded in or laminated to a base strip 121. The serpentine axial spine 120 would typically be formed from a flexible, resilient plastic, typically a hard plastic, while the base strip 121 will be comprised of a polyurethane or similar plastic layer. The lower surface of the polyurethane layer will be covered with a hydrocolloid layer for tissue adhesion. The structure of the left forced distribution structure 118 will be the same including a left axial spine 124, left lateral supports 126, and a left base strip 127.

The incision closure appliance 100 will include a closure mechanism comprising a plurality of lateral tie assemblies 128 as shown on FIG. 9. As best seen in FIG. 10, each lateral tie assembly 128 will include a rod which is secured at one end to the left lateral support 126 and a ratchet mechanism 132 which is secured to the right lateral support 122. Each rod 130 will usually be aligned with the axis of the left panel 106 parties so that a gap 129 between the right panel 104 and left panel 106 will be left open so that an incision can be made there between. After the incision is made, each rod 130 will be pulled over to the associated ratchet 132 on the right panel 104. A series of ratchet rings on each rod will be pulled into the associated ratchet mechanism 132, and the rod then pulled laterally until the desired closing tension is applied at that point along the base assembly 102. It is a particular advantage that each of the lateral tie assemblies 128 may be individually adjusted to supply the desired closing tension across the tissue along the length of the incision being closed. Once the desired closing tension has been provided along the entire incision, the securing layer 112 may be placed over base assembly 102 to hold the appliance and tissue in place.

Referring now to FIGS. 11A and 11B, an alternative design for the lateral tie assemblies 140 of the present invention is illustrated. These lateral tie assemblies 140 may be utilized with either of the incision closure appliances 10 or 100 described previously. Each lateral tie assembly 140 includes a right force distribution structure 142 and a left force distribution structure 144. The right force distribution structure includes a right spine 146 and a plurality of lateral supports 148. Although three are shown, it will be appreciated that four, five, six or more lateral supports could be included. The left force distribution structure 144 similarly includes a left spine 150 and a plurality of left lateral supports 152. To provide closure, the right force distribution structure 142 includes a rod 154 which extends from the center lateral support 148. Typically, the rod 154 is joined to the support by a live or passive joint 158. A pull loop 156 is provided at the free end of the rod 154, and a plurality of ratchet teeth 162 are provided along the midsection of the rod 154.

The left force distribution structure 144 includes a ratchet mechanism 160 adapted to receive the teeth 162 on the rod 154 of the right force distribution structure. In this way, the rod 154 can be lowered into the ratchet 160 to engage teeth 162, allowing the rod to be pushed forward in order to draw the right and left force distribution structures 142 and 144 together in order to apply tension to the right and left panels.

As illustrated in FIG. 12, a further aspect of the present invention is illustrated. The incision closure appliance 100 is illustrated schematically with only the right and left panels 104 and 106 and the right and left force distribution structures 116 and 118 being illustrated. The remaining system components are not shown for ease of illustration.

The right panel 104 is covered by a right sacrificial cover 170 and the left panel 106 is covered by a left sacrificial cover 172. Each cover 170 and 172 is detachably secured along each edge of the associated base panel so that the covers remain in place during normal handling and placement of the incision closure appliance 100 over the tissue surface to be incised. The use and purpose of these sacrificial covers 170 and 172 is described with reference to FIGS. 13A and 13E.

FIG. 13A illustrates the right and left panels 104 and 106 in place on a tissue surface T prior to an incision being made. The right panel 104 is covered by right sacrificial cover 170 and the left panel 106 is covered by left sacrificial cover 172. As is common in many surgeries, an adherent surgical incision drape 180 is placed over the tissue surface T. Any conventional drape may be used such as the Ioban™ antimicrobial incise drape, available from 3M, St. Paul, Minn.

After the incision drape 180 is in place over the incision closure appliance, a surgical incision I may be made for performing a desired surgical intervention. As can be seen, the incision I will cut through the surgical drape 180 between the right and left panels 104 and 106, respectively. After the surgical procedure is completed, the surgical drape 180 will be removed from the tissue surface T. As the surgical drape has a lower adherent surface, prior to the present invention, removal of the drape might have displaced either or both of the right panel 104 and left panel 106. Presence of the sacrificial layers 170m and 172, however, prevents such displacement. Removal of the surgical drape 180 will remove the sacrificial layer 170 and 172, but as each of these layers is configured to break off with a relatively low separation force, removal of the sacrificial layers will not cause the underlying panels 104 or 106 to be displaced. Thus, the panels 104 and 106 will be left in place, as shown in FIG. 13D, and the force distribution structures 116 and 118 can be used as described previously for closing the panels together to close the incision as shown in FIG. 13E.

Claims

1. An incision closure appliance comprising:

a base including a left panel and a right panel, each panel having a tissue adherent lower surface, an upper surface, a longitudinal axis, an inner edge, and an outer edge;
left and right force distribution structures coupled to the left and right panels, respectively, wherein each force distribution structure comprises an axial spine disposed substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the left or right panel and a plurality of lateral supports extending laterally from the axial spine and disposed substantially perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis of the left or right panel, wherein the axial spine and the plurality of lateral supports are integral with one another, wherein the lateral supports are axially separate and spaced apart from one another, wherein the force distribution structures are configured to allow the inner edges of the panels to expand while restraining expansion of the outer edges of the panels, and wherein the axial spine and lateral supports are configured to preserve dimensional stability of the panels when the panels are deformed; and
a closure assembly securable to the left and right panels to draw the inner edges of the panels together, wherein the closure assembly comprises one or more lateral ties, each lateral tie having a fixed end fixedly coupled to one of the left or right force distribution structures and a free end opposite the fixed end, the free end being adjustably coupled to the opposing left or right force distribution structure.

2. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, wherein each panel of the base comprises an elastic matrix.

3. An incision closure appliance as in claim 2, wherein the elastic matrix comprises an elastomeric membrane, a woven fabric, or a spun fabric.

4. An incision closure appliance as in claim 2, wherein the elastic matrix comprises a fabric woven from elastic elements and having inelastic elements along the outer edge and extending laterally thereacross.

5. An incision closure appliance as in claim 2, wherein the elastic matrix is isotropic.

6. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, wherein the axial spine of each force distribution structure is disposed axially adjacent to the outer edge of the panel, and wherein the plurality of lateral supports are axially spaced-apart and extend laterally from the axial spine toward the inner edge of the panel.

7. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, wherein the axial spine and lateral supports are formed from flexible, non-distensible materials.

8. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, further comprising a removable space maintainer which holds the right and left panels at a fixed distance while they are being adhered to tissue.

9. An incision closure appliance as in claim 8, wherein the removable space maintainer comprises a strip which is removably placed over an axial gap between the right and left panels.

10. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, wherein the fixed end of each lateral tie is fixedly coupled to the axial spine of the one of the left or right force distribution structures.

11. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, wherein the free end of each lateral tie is adjustably coupled to the opposing left or right force distribution structure with an adjustable ratchet tightening mechanism.

12. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, further comprising a securing layer adapted to be placed over an assembly of the base and the closure assembly after the assembly has been secured over an incision on a patient's skin.

13. An incision closure appliance as in claim 12, wherein the securing layer has an inner self-adhesive surface.

14. An incision closure appliance as in claim 1, wherein the fixed end is integral with the one of the left or right force distribution structures.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
2012755 August 1935 Muth
2371978 March 1945 Perham
2747248 May 1956 Mercer
3118201 January 1964 Beghetto, Jr.
3487836 January 1970 Niebel et al.
3516409 June 1970 Howell
3698395 October 1972 Hasson
3863640 February 1975 Haverstock
3926193 December 1975 Hasson
3933158 January 20, 1976 Haverstock
3971384 July 27, 1976 Hasson
3972328 August 3, 1976 Chen
3983878 October 5, 1976 Kawchitch
4038989 August 2, 1977 Romero-Sierra et al.
4114624 September 19, 1978 Haverstock
4210148 July 1, 1980 Stivala
4222383 September 16, 1980 Schossow
4224945 September 30, 1980 Cohen
4526173 July 2, 1985 Sheehan
4531521 July 30, 1985 Haverstock
4535772 August 20, 1985 Sheehan
4539990 September 10, 1985 Stivala
4576163 March 18, 1986 Bliss
4605005 August 12, 1986 Sheehan
4612230 September 16, 1986 Liland et al.
4676245 June 30, 1987 Fukuda
4702251 October 27, 1987 Sheehan
4780168 October 25, 1988 Beisang et al.
4871367 October 3, 1989 Christensen et al.
4881546 November 21, 1989 Kaessmann
4905694 March 6, 1990 Will
4950282 August 21, 1990 Beisang et al.
4966605 October 30, 1990 Thieler
4976726 December 11, 1990 Haverstock
5176703 January 5, 1993 Peterson
5190032 March 2, 1993 Zacoi
5259835 November 9, 1993 Clark et al.
5306236 April 26, 1994 Blumenfeld et al.
5336219 August 9, 1994 Krantz
5377695 January 3, 1995 An Haack
5514155 May 7, 1996 Daneshvar
5533519 July 9, 1996 Radke et al.
5562705 October 8, 1996 Whiteford
5665108 September 9, 1997 Galindo
5725507 March 10, 1998 Petrick
5788660 August 4, 1998 Resnik
5823983 October 20, 1998 Rosofsky et al.
5843123 December 1, 1998 Brazeau
6007564 December 28, 1999 Haverstock
6033654 March 7, 2000 Stedronsky et al.
6074965 June 13, 2000 Bodenschatz
6126615 October 3, 2000 Allen et al.
6176868 January 23, 2001 Detour
6194629 February 27, 2001 Bernhard
6689100 February 10, 2004 Connelly et al.
6726706 April 27, 2004 Dominguez
7066182 June 27, 2006 Dunshee
7361185 April 22, 2008 O'Malley et al.
7455681 November 25, 2008 Wilke
7511185 March 31, 2009 Lebner
7641682 January 5, 2010 Palmaz et al.
7645285 January 12, 2010 Cosgrove et al.
7799042 September 21, 2010 Williamson et al.
8246590 August 21, 2012 Hu et al.
8313508 November 20, 2012 Belson et al.
8323313 December 4, 2012 Belson
8439945 May 14, 2013 Belson et al.
8592640 November 26, 2013 Zepeda et al.
8663275 March 4, 2014 O'Malley et al.
9008784 April 14, 2015 Chan et al.
9050086 June 9, 2015 Belson et al.
9089328 July 28, 2015 Belson
9179914 November 10, 2015 Belson et al.
9271858 March 1, 2016 Ben-Meir et al.
9474529 October 25, 2016 Belson et al.
9554799 January 31, 2017 Belson et al.
9554800 January 31, 2017 Belson et al.
9561034 February 7, 2017 Belson et al.
9642621 May 9, 2017 Belson et al.
9642622 May 9, 2017 Belson
20020099315 July 25, 2002 Lebner
20030065294 April 3, 2003 Pickup et al.
20030108352 June 12, 2003 Hellman
20030120198 June 26, 2003 Barkell et al.
20030163160 August 28, 2003 O'Malley et al.
20030220596 November 27, 2003 Dunshee
20040072964 April 15, 2004 Udding et al.
20040106904 June 3, 2004 Gonnelli et al.
20040204740 October 14, 2004 Weiser
20040210176 October 21, 2004 Diana
20040260234 December 23, 2004 Srinivasan et al.
20050020956 January 27, 2005 Lebner
20050020957 January 27, 2005 Lebner
20050070956 March 31, 2005 Rousseau
20050080453 April 14, 2005 Lebner et al.
20050085757 April 21, 2005 Santanello
20050153090 July 14, 2005 Marchitto et al.
20050234485 October 20, 2005 Seegert et al.
20050277959 December 15, 2005 Cosgrove et al.
20050284801 December 29, 2005 Tacklind
20060030886 February 9, 2006 Clark
20060122522 June 8, 2006 Chavan et al.
20060200198 September 7, 2006 Riskin et al.
20060259033 November 16, 2006 Nesbitt
20070026078 February 1, 2007 Almarsson et al.
20070038247 February 15, 2007 Lebner et al.
20070078366 April 5, 2007 Haggstrom et al.
20070088339 April 19, 2007 Luchetti
20070106277 May 10, 2007 Hood et al.
20070141130 June 21, 2007 Villaneuva et al.
20070179419 August 2, 2007 Simpson
20070185432 August 9, 2007 Etheredge
20070260278 November 8, 2007 Wheeler et al.
20080033334 February 7, 2008 Gurtner et al.
20080069855 March 20, 2008 Bonutti
20080081951 April 3, 2008 Frasier et al.
20080103550 May 1, 2008 Wenzel et al.
20080114396 May 15, 2008 Cory
20080147115 June 19, 2008 O'Malley et al.
20080161731 July 3, 2008 Woods et al.
20080228219 September 18, 2008 Weiser
20080287864 November 20, 2008 Rosenberg
20090036922 February 5, 2009 Riskin et al.
20090062531 March 5, 2009 Kanda
20090099496 April 16, 2009 Heegard et al.
20090149869 June 11, 2009 Lhun
20090158131 June 18, 2009 Choi et al.
20090162531 June 25, 2009 Nesbitt
20090177225 July 9, 2009 Nunez et al.
20090264709 October 22, 2009 Blurton et al.
20090299255 December 3, 2009 Kazala et al.
20090299257 December 3, 2009 Long et al.
20090299303 December 3, 2009 Seegert
20100100022 April 22, 2010 Greener
20100121286 May 13, 2010 Locke et al.
20100228287 September 9, 2010 Jeekel et al.
20100280545 November 4, 2010 Fridman
20110077667 March 31, 2011 Singhatat et al.
20110106026 May 5, 2011 Wu et al.
20110144470 June 16, 2011 Mazar et al.
20120016410 January 19, 2012 Belson et al.
20120029266 February 2, 2012 Holmes et al.
20120095502 April 19, 2012 Bargon et al.
20120116279 May 10, 2012 Munro et al.
20120116485 May 10, 2012 Burgmann
20120203273 August 9, 2012 Riskin et al.
20120221044 August 30, 2012 Archibald et al.
20120226214 September 6, 2012 Gurtner
20120232587 September 13, 2012 Burke et al.
20130072969 March 21, 2013 Zhang
20130108352 May 2, 2013 Ruiz, Sr. et al.
20130178897 July 11, 2013 Wu et al.
20130281885 October 24, 2013 Rowbottom et al.
20130281981 October 24, 2013 Shamir
20130282049 October 24, 2013 Peterson et al.
20130331757 December 12, 2013 Belson
20140074156 March 13, 2014 Belson et al.
20140171849 June 19, 2014 Fischell et al.
20140222070 August 7, 2014 Belson et al.
20140228712 August 14, 2014 Elliott et al.
20140278229 September 18, 2014 Hong et al.
20140316323 October 23, 2014 Kanevsky et al.
20150045700 February 12, 2015 Cavanagh et al.
20150105423 April 16, 2015 Haudenschild et al.
20150148653 May 28, 2015 Fleig et al.
20150209563 July 30, 2015 Amir
20150216527 August 6, 2015 Belson et al.
20150309535 October 29, 2015 Connor et al.
20150313593 November 5, 2015 Patenaude et al.
20150351690 December 10, 2015 Toth et al.
20160007909 January 14, 2016 Singh et al.
20160095597 April 7, 2016 Belson et al.
20160106931 April 21, 2016 Belson et al.
20160114146 April 28, 2016 Belson et al.
20160202755 July 14, 2016 Connor
20160206311 July 21, 2016 Belson et al.
20160206312 July 21, 2016 Belson et al.
20160206313 July 21, 2016 Belson et al.
20160213924 July 28, 2016 Coleman et al.
20160220175 August 4, 2016 Tam et al.
20160220252 August 4, 2016 Belson et al.
20160242646 August 25, 2016 Obma
20160249924 September 1, 2016 Belson et al.
20160296149 October 13, 2016 Polsky et al.
20160302721 October 20, 2016 Wiedenhoefer et al.
20160310140 October 27, 2016 Belson et al.
20170035422 February 9, 2017 Belson et al.
20170042541 February 16, 2017 Belson et al.
20170143341 May 25, 2017 Belson et al.
20170156664 June 8, 2017 Belson et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
1126430 July 1996 CN
1442119 September 2003 CN
1524507 September 2004 CN
1234327 January 2006 CN
1234327 January 2006 CN
101938944 January 2011 CN
202537562 November 2012 CN
202537562 November 2012 CN
102946812 February 2013 CN
104755033 July 2015 CN
104825200 August 2015 CN
1600108 November 2005 EP
1401877 August 1975 GB
S5094788 July 1975 JP
S62243557 October 1987 JP
H07502913 March 1995 JP
2001-149485 June 2001 JP
2005512678 May 2005 JP
2005532134 October 2005 JP
2010504835 February 2010 JP
2013515417 May 2013 JP
2013538603 October 2013 JP
WO-8401805 May 1984 WO
WO 96/29013 September 1996 WO
WO-03053296 July 2003 WO
WO 2006/124671 November 2006 WO
WO-2007004603 January 2007 WO
WO 2007/044647 April 2007 WO
WO 2008/019051 February 2008 WO
WO 2008/060532 May 2008 WO
WO-2009066116 May 2009 WO
WO 2011/019859 February 2011 WO
WO 2011/019859 April 2011 WO
WO 2011/043786 April 2011 WO
WO 2011/139912 November 2011 WO
WO 2011/159623 December 2011 WO
WO 2013/067024 May 2013 WO
WO-2014066879 May 2014 WO
WO-2014070922 May 2014 WO
WO-2015012887 January 2015 WO
WO-2015103556 July 2015 WO
WO-2015168165 November 2015 WO
WO-2017027075 February 2017 WO
WO-2017044120 March 2017 WO
WO-2017181059 October 2017 WO
WO-2017184825 October 2017 WO
Other references
  • dictionary.com definition of “fixed”, accessed on Sep. 13, 2017, http://www.dictionary.com/browse/fixed.
  • Merriam-webster definition of “integral”, accessed on Sep. 13, 2017, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/integral.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/874,046, filed Apr. 30, 2013, Belson et al.
  • International search report and written opinion dated Mar. 19, 2013 for PCT/US2012/062820.
  • European search report and opinion dated Apr. 29, 2015 for EP Application No. 10822334.8.
  • International search report and written opinion dated Apr. 29, 2015 for PCT/US2015/010188.
  • Office action dated Apr. 7, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,909.
  • Office action dated Jun. 5, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/874,046.
  • Office action dated Jun. 17, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/414,176.
  • Office action dated Aug. 18, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,564.
  • European search report and written opinion dated Aug. 12, 2015 for EP Application No. 12844746.3.
  • Notice of allowance dated Sep. 22, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/414,176.
  • Hasson, et al. A new sutureless technique for skin closure. Arch Surg. Jan. 1976;111(1):83-4.
  • International search report and written opinion dated Sep. 10, 2014 for PCT/US2014/016587.
  • Office action dated Aug. 28, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,524.
  • Office action dated Sep. 19, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,909.
  • Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/851,059, filed Sep. 11, 2015.
  • International search report and written opinion dated Sep. 30, 2015 for PCT Application No. US2015/28066.
  • Notice of allowance dated Dec. 19, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,564.
  • Office action dated Dec. 19, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,909.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/414,176, filed Mar. 7, 2012, Belson et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,909, filed Nov. 27, 2012, Belson.
  • International search report dated Jul. 30, 2010 for PCT/US2010/000430.
  • International search report and written opinion dated Jul. 29, 2011 for PCT/US2011/034649.
  • International search report and written opinion dated Oct. 21, 2011 for PCT Application No. US11/40213.
  • Office action dated Mar. 21, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,378.
  • Office action dated Mar. 23, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,757.
  • Office action dated May 2, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/096,602.
  • Office action dated Jul. 23, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,378.
  • Office action dated Jul. 23, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,757.
  • Office action dated Nov. 19, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/096,602.
  • Notice of allowance dated Jan. 17, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/096,602.
  • Notice of allowance dated Sep. 17, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,378.
  • Notice of allowance dated Sep. 20, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,757.
  • Office action dated Mar. 21, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/414,176.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 14/625,366, filed Feb. 18, 2015, Belson et al.
  • Office action dated Feb. 26, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/414,176.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,524, filed Feb. 14, 2014, Belson et al.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,564, filed Feb. 14, 2014, Belson et al.
  • European search report and opinion dated Jan. 7, 2014 for EP Application No. 11796253.0.
  • European search report and opinion dated Jan. 7, 2014 for EP Application No. 11778067.6.
  • International search report and written opinion dated Feb. 6, 2014 for PCT/US2013/067563.
  • Notice of allowance dated Feb. 10, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,524.
  • Office action dated Oct. 14, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,909.
  • Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/958,803, filed Dec. 3, 2015.
  • Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/958,818, filed Dec. 3, 2015.
  • International search report and written opinion dated Jan. 12, 2016 for PCT Application No. US2015/049671.
  • K984204, 510(k) Premarket Notification Summary, Silverlon™ Direct Pressure Wound Closure Strip, May 19, 2007.
  • Office action dated Mar. 4, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/874,046.
  • Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,526, filed Mar. 25, 2016.
  • Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,550, filed Mar. 25, 2016.
  • Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,595, filed Mar. 25, 2016.
  • Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,149, filed Apr. 15, 2016.
  • Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/096,083, filed Apr. 11, 2016.
  • Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,764, filed Apr. 15, 2016.
  • Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Definition of “lateral”. Http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lateral. Accessed on May 5, 2016.
  • Notice of allowance dated Jun. 21, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,526.
  • Office action dated May 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,595.
  • Office action dated May 12, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,550.
  • Office action dated May 26, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,526.
  • Office action dated May 31, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/096,083.
  • Office action dated Jun. 17, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,149.
  • Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/337,768, filed Oct. 28, 2016.
  • Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/369,293, filed Dec. 5, 2016.
  • European search report and opinion dated Jul. 12, 2016 for EP Application No. 13851258.
  • International search report and written opinion dated Aug. 30, 2016 for PCT/US2016/028297.
  • Notice of allowance dated Feb. 23, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,595.
  • Notice of allowance dated Sep. 30, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,149.
  • Notice of allowance dated Oct. 5, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/096,083.
  • Notice of allowance dated Oct. 14, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,550.
  • Notice of allowance dated Dec. 19, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,149.
  • Office action dated Jul. 20, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,764.
  • Office action dated Nov. 17, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/081,595.
  • Zip® Surgical Skin Closure. Fast, non-invasive alternative to staples, sutures and glue. Accessed Aug. 17, 2016. http://www.ziplinemedical.com/products/zip-surgical-skin-closure/.
  • European search report and opinion dated Feb. 17, 2017 for EP Application No. 140829202.
  • European search report with written opinion dated Jul. 12, 2016 for EP13851258.
  • International search report with written opinion dated Jul. 14, 2017 for PCT/US2017/027695.
  • International search report with written opinion dated Jul. 18, 2017 for PCT/US2017/028537.
  • International search report with written opinion dated Aug. 30, 2016 for PCT/US2016/028297.
  • Notice of allowance dated Feb. 21, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/625,366.
  • Office action dated Feb. 1, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,764.
  • Office action dated Jun. 1, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/442,382.
  • Office action dated Jul. 27, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/851,059.
  • PCT/US2017/059286 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 6, 2018.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 14/851,059 Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 14, 2018.
  • Extended European search report and opinion dated Jul. 27, 2017 for EP Application No. 15733186.
  • Office action dated Aug. 24, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/958,803.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/685,909.
  • Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/958,818.
  • Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,764.
  • Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/442,382.
  • “Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 20, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/130,764.”.
  • “Office action dated Jun. 6, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/201,088.”.
  • “U.S. Appl. No. 14/958,803 Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 4, 2018”.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 14/958,803 Notice of Allowance dated May 11, 2018.
Patent History
Patent number: 10123800
Type: Grant
Filed: Oct 31, 2012
Date of Patent: Nov 13, 2018
Patent Publication Number: 20130296930
Assignee: ZipLine Medical, Inc. (Campbell, CA)
Inventors: Amir Belson (Los Altos, CA), Eric Storne (Menlo Park, CA), Eric T. Johnson (Temecula, CA), Robert R. Ragland (Temecula, CA), Phillip C. Burke (Pala, CA), Luke Clauson (Redwood City, CA)
Primary Examiner: Christopher L Templeton
Assistant Examiner: Majid Jamialahmadi
Application Number: 13/665,160
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Screw, Rack And Pinion Or Pawl And Racket (606/218)
International Classification: A61B 17/08 (20060101); A61B 17/00 (20060101); A61B 17/02 (20060101); A61B 17/04 (20060101);