Vehicular vision system

- MAGNA ELECTRONICS INC.

A vehicular vision system includes a processor for processing image data captured by first, second and third cameras disposed at the left side, right side and rear portion, respectively, of the vehicle. The field of view of the first camera overlaps with the field of view of the rear backup camera, and the field of view of the second camera overlaps with the field of view of the rear backup camera. At least in part responsive to processing captured image data, the control outputs a composite image for display at a display disposed in an interior cabin of the vehicle, and determines that a camera is misaligned due to a shift in at least one of yaw, pitch and roll alignment of one of the cameras disposed at the vehicle and, responsive to the determination of misalignment of that camera, at least partially compensates for the misalignment of that camera.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/946,855, filed Nov. 20, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,940,528, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/690,745, filed Apr. 20, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,193,303, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/033,962, filed Sep. 23, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,014,904, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/776,100, filed Feb. 25, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,543,277, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/566,266, filed Aug. 3, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,386,114, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/370,694, filed Feb. 10, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,239,086, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/190,931, filed Jul. 26, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,116,929, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/979,497, filed Dec. 28, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,991,522, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/764,355, filed Apr. 21, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,877,175, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/315,675, filed Dec. 22, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,720,580, which claims benefit of U.S. provisional application, Ser. No. 60/638,687, filed Dec. 23, 2004, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to vision or imaging systems for vehicles and is related to object detection systems and, more particularly, to imaging systems which are operable to determine if a vehicle or object of interest is adjacent to, forward of or rearward of the subject vehicle to assist the driver in changing lanes or parking the vehicle. The present invention also relates generally to a lane departure warning system for a vehicle

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Many lane change aid/side object detection/lane departure warning devices or systems and the like have been proposed which are operable to detect a vehicle or other object that is present next to, ahead of or rearward of the equipped vehicle or in an adjacent lane with respect to the equipped vehicle. Such systems typically utilize statistical methodologies to statistically analyze the images captured by a camera or sensor at the vehicle to estimate whether a vehicle or other object is adjacent to the equipped vehicle. Because such systems typically use statistical methodologies to determine a likelihood or probability that a detected object is a vehicle, and for other reasons, the systems may generate false positive detections, where the system indicates that a vehicle is adjacent to, forward of or rearward of the subject vehicle when there is no vehicle adjacent to, forward of or rearward of the subject vehicle, or false negative detections, where the system, for example, indicates that there is no vehicle adjacent to the subject vehicle when there actually is a vehicle in the adjacent lane.

Such known and proposed systems are operable to statistically analyze substantially all of the pixels in a pixelated image as captured by a pixelated image capture device or camera. Also, such systems may utilize algorithmic means, such as flow algorithms or the like, to track substantially each pixel or most portions of the image to determine how substantially each pixel or most portions of the image has changed from one frame to the next. Such frame by frame flow algorithms and systems may not be able to track a vehicle which is moving at generally the same speed as the equipped vehicle, because there may be little or no relative movement between the vehicles and, consequently, little or no change from one frame to the next. Because the systems may thus substantially continuously analyze substantially every pixel for substantially every frame captured and track such pixels and frames from one frame to the next, such systems may require expensive processing controls and computationally expensive software to continuously handle and process substantially all of the data from substantially all of the pixels in substantially each captured image or frame.

Many automotive lane departure warning (LDW) systems (also known as run off road warning systems) are being developed and implemented on vehicles today. These systems warn a driver of a vehicle when their vehicle crosses the road's land markings or when there is a clear trajectory indicating they will imminently do so. The warnings are typically not activated if the corresponding turn signal is on, as this implies the driver intends to make a lane change maneuver. Additionally, the warning systems may be deactivated below a certain vehicle speed. The driver interface for these systems may be in the form of a visual warning (such as an indicator light) and/or an audible warning (typically a rumble strip sound). One application warns a driver with an indicator light if the vehicle tire is crossing the lane marker and no other vehicle is detected in the driver's corresponding blind spot; and/or further warns the driver with an audible warning if the vehicle is crossing into the adjacent lane and there is a vehicle detected in the driver's blind spot.

There is concern that the current systems will be more of a driver annoyance or distraction than will be acceptable by the consumer market. Using the turn signal as the principle means of establishing to the warning system that the maneuver is intentional does not reflect typical driving patterns and, thus, many intended maneuvers will cause a warning. As a driver gets annoyed by warnings during intended maneuvers, the driver will likely begin to ignore the warnings, which may result in an accident when the warning is appropriate.

Therefore, there is a need in the art for an object detection system, such as a blind spot detection system or lane change assist system or lane departure warning system or the like, which overcomes the short comings of the prior art.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is intended to provide an object detection system, such as a blind spot detection system, a lane change assist or aid system or device, a lane departure warning system, a side object detection system, a reverse park aid system, a forward park aid system, a forward, sideward or rearward collision avoidance system, an adaptive cruise control system, a passive steering system or the like, which is operable to detect and/or identify a vehicle or other object of interest at the side, front or rear of the vehicle equipped with the object detection system. The object detection system of the present invention, such as for a lane change assist system, utilizes an edge detection algorithm to detect edges of objects in the captured images and determines if a vehicle is present in a lane adjacent to the equipped or subject vehicle in response to various characteristics of the detected edges, such as the size, location, distance, intensity, relative speed and/or the like. The system processes a subset of the image data captured which is representative of a target zone or area of interest of the scene within the field of view of the imaging system where a vehicle or object of interest is likely to be present. The system processes the detected edges within the image data subset to determine if they correspond with physical characteristics of vehicles and other objects to determine whether the detected edge or edges is/are part of a vehicle or a significant edge or object at or toward the subject vehicle. The system utilizes various filtering mechanisms, such as algorithms executed in software by a system microprocessor, to substantially eliminate or substantially ignore edges or pixels that are not or cannot be indicative of a vehicle or significant object to reduce the processing requirements and to reduce the possibility of false positive signals.

The object detection system of the present invention may capture images at a side of the vehicle and may process various windows of the images to detect a vehicle in the adjacent lane or other object, such as a bicycle, in the adjacent lane. The system may adjust the image processing to account for misalignment of the camera at the side of the vehicle. The system may adjust the area or zone of interest in response to a turning of the vehicle's wheels, such as when the vehicle is turning or curving along a curve in the road. The system may distinguish between vehicles or other objects and shadows of objects/vehicles so that a shadow of a vehicle two lanes over may not be considered a vehicle in the adjacent lane. The system may switch between daytime and nighttime algorithms and may be operable to detect headlamps of vehicles in the adjacent lane.

According to an aspect of the present invention, an imaging system for a vehicle includes an imaging array sensor and a control. The image array sensor comprises a plurality of photo-sensing pixels and is positioned at the vehicle with a field of view exteriorly of the vehicle. The imaging array sensor is operable to capture an image of a scene occurring exteriorly of the vehicle. The captured image comprises an image data set representative of the exterior scene. The control algorithmically processes the image data set to a reduced image data set of the image data set. The control processes the reduced image data set to extract information from the reduced image data set. The control selects the reduced image data set based on a steering angle of the vehicle.

Optionally, the control may process the reduced image data set with an edge detection algorithm to extract information from the reduced image data set. The image sensor may be one of (a) part of an exterior rearview mirror assembly of the vehicle and with a field of view at least partially sideward of the vehicle, and (b) at an upper windshield area and behind the windshield of the vehicle and with a field of view forward and through the windshield (such as at an area that is cleaned by the windshield wiper or wipers of the vehicle when the windshield wipers are activated). Optionally, the image sensor may be part of an exterior rearview mirror assembly of the vehicle and with a field of view at least partially sideward of the vehicle, wherein the imaging system comprises a side object detection system for detecting objects at a side of the vehicle. Optionally, the image sensor may be at an upper windshield area and behind the windshield of the vehicle and with a field of view forward and through the windshield, wherein the imaging system comprises a lane departure warning system.

Therefore, the present invention provides an imaging system for use as or in association with a side object detection system and/or a lane departure warning system. The system is operable to process captured image data of a scene occurring exteriorly and along one or both sides of the vehicle to determine if a target vehicle or object of interest is located at or in the lane adjacent to the subject or host vehicle. The imaging system of the present invention may process zones or areas of interest in the captured images and may adjust processing to accommodate any misalignment of the camera that may occur during installation of the camera at the side of the vehicle. The side object detection system may also select or adjust the image processing to select/adjust the areas of interest, such as in response to a steering angle of the vehicle, such as a turning of the wheels of the vehicle, so that the zone or area is adapted for the turning of the subject vehicle. The imaging system of the present invention thus provides enhanced processing of captured images to provide the desired function of the imaging system or associated control or control system or alert system.

These and other objects, advantages, purposes and features of the present invention will become apparent upon review of the following specification in conjunction with the drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a top plan view of a vehicle incorporating the object detection system of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a representation of a captured image of a side area of a vehicle as captured by an imaging sensor in accordance with the present invention;

FIGS. 3A-C are schematics of the captured image of FIG. 2 showing the adjustments that may be made to the image processing to account for misalignment of the image sensor;

FIG. 4 is a schematic showing an adjustment of the area of interest when the wheels of the subject vehicle are turned;

FIG. 5 is a plan view of one of the wheels of the subject vehicle showing the angles of the wheel as it is turned;

FIGS. 6-9 are representations of captured images of the side area of the vehicle, showing how different shadows may be detected;

FIG. 10 is a schematic of the image processing windows useful in processing the captured images in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 11 is a representation of a captured image of the side area of the vehicle, showing different processing windows used to detect the vehicle in the adjacent lane;

FIG. 12 is a plot of the gray level values of the rows of pixels as a result of a wide line integration in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 13 is a processing mask for processing the windows of the captured images using gradient calculations in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 14 is a representation of a captured image showing the shadow of the vehicle in the area adjacent to the vehicle;

FIG. 15 is a process flow diagram showing the bicycle detection function of the present invention; and

FIGS. 16-20 are representations of captured images of the side area of the subject vehicle, showing the headlight detection function of the present invention.

 DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring now to the drawings and the illustrative embodiments depicted therein, an object detection system or imaging system, such as a lane change assist or aid system 10, is positioned at a vehicle 12 (such as at an exterior rearview mirror 12a of a vehicle) and is operable to capture an image of a scene occurring sidewardly and rearwardly at or along one or both sides of vehicle 12 (FIG. 1). Lane change assist system 10 comprises an image capture device or sensor or camera 14, which captures an image of the scene occurring toward a respective side of the vehicle 12, and a control 16, which processes the captured image to determine whether another vehicle 18 is present at the side of vehicle 12, as discussed below. Control 16 may be further operable to activate a warning indicator or display or signal device to alert the driver of vehicle 12 that another vehicle is present at the side of vehicle 12. The warning or alert signal may be provided to the driver of vehicle 12 in response to another vehicle being detected at the blind spot area (as shown in FIG. 1) and may only be provided when the driver of vehicle 12 actuates a turn signal toward that side or begins turning the subject vehicle 12 toward that side to change lanes into the lane occupied by the other detected vehicle 18. The control and imaging system may utilize aspects described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/427,051, filed Apr. 30, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,038,577, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. Reference is made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/427,051, for a discussion of image processing techniques and control functions useful with the present invention.

Optionally, the imaging system and object detection system of the present invention may utilize aspects of the imaging systems or detection systems of the types described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,929,786 and/or 5,786,772, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/427,051, filed Apr. 30, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,038,577; and/or Ser. No. 11/239,980, filed Sep. 30, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,496, and/or U.S. provisional applications, Ser. No. 60/628,709, filed Nov. 17, 2004; Ser. No. 60/614,644, filed Sep. 30, 2004; and/or Ser. No. 60/618,686, filed Oct. 14, 2004, or of the reverse or backup aid systems, such as rearwardly directed vehicle vision systems utilizing principles disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 5,760,962; 5,670,935; 6,201,642; 6,396,397; 6,498,620; 6,717,610 and/or 6,757,109, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/418,486, filed Apr. 18, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,005,974, or of automatic headlamp controls, such as the types described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,796,094 and/or 5,715,093; and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/105,757, filed Apr. 14, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,526,103; and U.S. provisional applications, Ser. No. 60/607,963, filed Sep. 8, 2004; and Ser. No. 60/562,480, filed Apr. 15, 2004, or of rain sensors, such as the types described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,250,148 and 6,341,523, or of other imaging systems, such as the types described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,353,392 and 6,313,454, which may utilize various imaging sensors or imaging array sensors or cameras or the like, such as a CMOS imaging array sensor, a CCD sensor or other sensors or the like, such as the types disclosed in commonly assigned, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 5,760,962; 6,097,023 and 5,796,094, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/441,341, filed Nov. 16, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,339,149, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2003/036177 filed Nov. 14, 2003, published Jun. 3, 2004 as PCT Publication No. WO 2004/047421, with all of the above referenced U.S. patents, patent applications and provisional applications and PCT applications being commonly assigned and being hereby incorporated herein by reference.

As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,670,935 (incorporated by reference above), an imaging system of the present invention comprises a vehicle vision system including at least two side image capture devices positioned, respectively, on opposite sides of an equipped vehicle and a center image capture device positioned on the lateral centerline of the vehicle. The vehicle vision system additionally includes an image processor for receiving data signals from image capture devices and synthesizing, from the data signals, a composite image which is displayed on a display.

The images captured by image capture devices are juxtaposed on the display by the image processor in a manner which approximates the view from a single virtual image capture device. The vehicle vision system provides a substantially seamless panoramic view without redundant images of objects. The displayed image provides a sense of perspective, which enhances the ability of the driver to judge location and speed of adjacent trailing vehicles.

A left overlap zone and a right overlap zone exist where the horizontal fields of view of the side image capture devices intersect the field of view of the center image capture device. Each overlap zone defines an area within which an object will be captured both by the center image capture device and one of the side image capture devices.

An image display device displays a composite image made up of a left image portion, a right image portion, and a center image portion. Each image portion is reversed from the image as captured by the respective image capture device utilizing conventional techniques. These techniques include reading the image in reverse with the image capture device, writing the image in reverse to the display device, or reversing the image in the image processor. The left image portion is joined with the central image portion at a boundary. The central image portion is joined with the right image portion at a boundary. The image portions at the boundaries are continuous whereby the composite image is a seamless panoramic view. The central image portion is narrower than either the left image portion or the right image portion. The composite image provides a clear image, which avoids confusion.

The display is preferably positioned within the driver's physiological field of view without obstructing the view through the windshield. It is known that the driver's field of view, with the head and eyes fixed forward, extends further in a downward direction than in an upward direction. The display could be located above the vertical view through the windshield wherein the display may be observed at the upward portion of the driver's field of view. However, the position for the display is preferred wherein the display is within the lower portion of the driver's field of view.

The display is a flat panel display, such as a back-lit liquid crystal display, a plasma display, a field emission display, or a cathode ray tube.

Each image-capturing device is controlled by appropriate supporting electronics located in the vicinity of the imaging array such that, when operating power is supplied, either an analog or a digital data stream is generated on an output signal line supplied to the image processor. The support electronics may be provided partially on the image chip and partially on associated electronic devices. For each exposure period, a value indicative of the quantity of light incident on each pixel of the imaging array during the exposure period is sequentially outputted in a predetermined sequence, typically row-by-row. The sequence may conform to video signal standards which support a direct view such that, when a scene is viewed by an image-capturing device, the image presented on a display represents directly the scene viewed by the image-capturing devices.

Data transmission between image capture devices and the image processor and/or between the image processor and the display may be by electrically conductive leads or fiber-optic cable.

The data streams from image-capturing devices are combined in the image processor and directly mapped to the pixel array of display. The image captured by the side image capture device on the right side of the vehicle is presented on a right image portion and the image from the side image capture device on the left side of the vehicle is displayed on a left image portion. The image from the center image capture device is displayed on a central image portion. The three image portions are presented in horizontal alignment and adjacent to each other. However, the composite image may be positioned at any desired vertical position in the display.

The image sensor may be located at the vehicle so as to have a sideward field of view, such as at an exterior rearview mirror of the vehicle, such as generally or at least partially within an exterior rearview mirror of the vehicle. For example, an image sensor may be located within an exterior rearview mirror assembly of the vehicle and may have a generally rearwardly and sidewardly field of view through a transflective reflective element of the exterior rearview mirror assembly. In such an application, the image sensor may be incorporated in or associated with a side object detection system that detects objects at a side or blind spot area of the controlled or subject vehicle. Optionally, the image sensor may have a generally forward field of view to capture images of a scene occurring forwardly of the vehicle. The image sensor may be located within the vehicle cabin and rearward of the windshield so as to have a field of view forwardly and through the windshield of the vehicle, preferably at a location that is cleaned by the windshield wipers of the vehicle, such as at an interior rearview mirror assembly of the vehicle or at an accessory module or windshield electronics module or the like. In such an application, the image sensor may be incorporated in or associated with a lane departure warning system that detects a departure of the controlled or subject vehicle from a lane as the vehicle travels along a road.

Camera Calibration:

In order to verify that the camera or imaging sensor is mounted at the vehicle (such as at an exterior portion of the vehicle) within a desired tolerance limit so as to provide the desired field of view, the camera may detect the side of the vehicle (shown at 30 in FIG. 2) and/or the door handle or handles (the front door handle is shown at 32a in FIG. 2, while the rear door handle is shown at 32b in FIG. 2) of the vehicle and the control may confirm that they are in the expected location in the captured images. If the control determines that the camera is not aligned or aimed at the desired location (such as by determining that the vehicle edge and/or door handle/handles are not at the expected location), the control may adjust the image and/or image processing to account for any such misalignment of the camera. For example, the degree of misalignment may be calculated, and the image processing may be adjusted or shifted and/or rotated to position the reference structure at the appropriate location in the captured images.

For example, the algorithm may function to preprocess the captured image by a histogram equalization to improve the image contrast. The algorithm may then process the captured images via an edge detection in the area of interest to extract the expected edge of the vehicle (shown at 34 in FIG. 2). The algorithm may filter the image data to remove noise in the edge detected image. The algorithm may perform a coarse structure fitting (such as via a line fitting algorithm or contour fitting algorithm or the like) of the vehicle side and door handles in the captured image for verifying the camera mounting is within the desired or appropriate tolerance limit. The algorithm may further perform a fine structure fitting (such as via a correlation algorithm or contour fitting algorithm or the like) for calculating shift in yaw, pitch and roll. As shown in FIGS. 3A-C, the actual or detected vehicle edges may be misaligned or separated from the expected vehicle edges, such that the image processing may be adjusted to shift the captured image data accordingly to accommodate such misalignment of the camera. Based on the results of the image processing techniques, data or information of the yaw, pitch and roll may be used to set the polygon co-ordinates and H depression pixel calibration parameters, so that the expected vehicle edges are substantially aligned with the actual or detected vehicle edges.

After the image data or image processing is adjusted to account for any misalignment of the camera at the vehicle, the camera may capture images of the scene occurring exteriorly of the vehicle and at that side of the vehicle, and the control may process the images to detect objects or lane markers or the like at the side of the vehicle and/or rearward of the vehicle, and may utilize aspects described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/427,051, filed Apr. 30, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,038,577, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Adjustment of Zone when Vehicle Turning:

Optionally, the control may perform a curve processing or lane divider curve fitting function to select or adjust the reduced image set or zone of interest based on a steering angle of the vehicle (the angle at which the vehicle is steered to either side relative to the longitudinal axis of the vehicle), such as when the front wheels of the subject vehicle are turned. The curve processing function may adjust the zone of interest based on the degree of turning of the steering wheel (or other characteristic indicative of the steering angle of the vehicle) so that areas or regions outside of a revised curve may not be processed or considered as much as the areas or regions within the revised curve. Based on the history of host vehicle information (such as vehicle speed and wheel angle), the control may modify the slope of the adjacent lane divider (at the left side of user specified area of interest) at different positions. As shown in FIG. 4, when the wheels are turned at an angle θ, the control may determine a new curved line 40 that represents the edge of the zone or area of interest. This modification will convert straight line 1-5 in FIG. 4 to the curve 40. Detected targets or objects outside this curve (i.e., to the left of the curve in FIG. 4) will not be considered for the mapping or object detection. As shown in FIG. 5, the wheel angle may be determined by the rotation or pivoting or turning of the front wheels of the vehicle about their generally vertical axis (which may be detected by a rotational measuring device or the like), and the curve may be adjusted as a function of the vehicle speed (such as determined via a wheel speed sensor or the like) and the wheel angle θ.

The following vehicle information history table (VIHT) with the history of multiple (N) frames or captured images may be maintained for fitting of a curve. The table may be updated when the vehicle information is available for each frame.

Frame Host Vehicle Information (VIn) Index/ Wheel Cumulative Point on Curvature Point on Curvature Time Speed Angle Wheel (cm) (pixels) Stamp Tn Vn θn Angle θCn Xn Yn XPn YPn T0 V0 θ0 θC0 X0 Y0 XP0 YP0 T1 V1 θ1 θC1 X1 Y1 XP1 YP1 T2 V2 θ2 θC2 X2 Y2 XP2 YP2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TN−1 VN−1 θN−1 θC(N−1) XN−1 YN−1 XP(N−1) YP(N−1) TN VN θN θCN = θREF XN = XREF YN = YREF XPN YPN

During operation, the control may perform the following computations:

    • 1. Compute Reference Angle (θREF) using polygon vertices (1 & 5).
    • 2. Compute Reference Point (XREF, YREF) using Reference Angle (θREF) and Mirror Wheel Separation Distance (D).
    • 3. For each frame update (add in the circular buffer) following VIHT entries:
      • a. Frame Index or Time Stamp (Tn);
      • b. Host Vehicle Speed (Vn); and
      • c. Host Vehicle Wheel Angle (θn) (note that this angle may be considered without doing any perspective correction, but may require appropriate correction to be added based on height and angle of inclination of the camera).
    • 4. Compute Cumulative Wheel Angle (θCn):

θ CN = θ REF ; θ C ⁡ ( N - 1 ) = θ N - 1 + θ CN ; θ C ⁡ ( N - 2 ) = θ N - 2 + θ C ⁡ ( N - 1 ) ; θ C ⁡ ( N - 3 ) = θ N - 3 + θ C ⁡ ( N - 2 ) ; ⋮ θ C ⁢ ⁢ 0 = θ 0 + θ C ⁢ ⁢ 1 .

    • 5. Compute curve points (Xn, Yn) (such as in cm):
      • The n=N curve point is a reference point and for all other points the following equations may be used to compute the curve points:
        YN-1=F1(TN-1,VN-1,YN); and
        XN-1=F2(θC(N-1),YN-1,XN,YN).
      • Preferably, the functions F1 and F2 are relatively simple trigonometric functions.
    • 6. Replace the curve point (X0, Y0) with the intersection point of the curve and the horizon, and preferably do not allow the curve to cross the horizon.
    • 7. For display purposes, compute the curve points (XPn, YPn) in pixels using the existing cm—pixel relations (CMDistances and PixelSomethingThreshold)

In a preferred embodiment, the steps 1 and 2 above may be a one time computation in the initialization part of the algorithm, while the steps 3-6 are preferably executed during the run-time of the system, and the step 7 preferably is executed in the debug mode for the testing.

Vertical Edge Detection:

Optionally, the object detection system may be operable to detect vertical edges of objects in the field of view of the camera. Such an approach may be useful in detecting target vehicles when the front of the target vehicle is not visible, such as when the target vehicle is alongside the subject vehicle.

The vertical edge detection algorithm may be performed first at a low level Processing. During such low level processing, the vertical edge detection may be applied to an input image, and a noise filtering algorithm may be applied to the edge image. The lateral X histogram may be calculated and analyzed, and any non-significant edge counts may be removed from the histogram. The histogram may be normalized and analyzed to identify probable targets, a different ID may be given for a vertical edge detected target for use during high level processing.

During the high level processing, a map of target information for vertical targets may be generated, such as in a similar manner as for horizontal edge detected targets (such as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/427,051, filed Apr. 30, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,038,577, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, and such as described below). The targets may be filtered out based on various criteria (such as relative speed, number of frames present and/or the like), and a warning may be raised or generated if the object is detected at the side of the vehicle.

Such vertical edge detection functions may be desirable, since a target vehicle's trunk may generate a significant vertical edge. Also, the vertical edges may substantially always be present in both the daytime and nighttime hot zones. Furthermore, tree shadows, lane markings and other structures may be filtered out using such vertical edge detection.

Qualification During Daytime:

Side Object Detection works based on the edges detected. Horizontal edges are used to detect and track vehicle. The detected edges are qualified based on a robust high level vision algorithm, such as the algorithms described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/427,051, filed Apr. 30, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,038,577, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. Vertical edges are being used to detect vehicles close to the camera/passing vehicles, as discussed above.

However, the vehicle identification may be based on the shadow created by the vehicle (for day time operation). A detected shadow could be created by a target vehicle entering into the blind spot or static objects like guard rails or structures on the road side or by the self shadow (of the subject vehicle) or of vehicles passing more than one lane away. It is difficult to identify whether or not the shadow is by a target vehicle entering into the blind spot. Thus, a positive identification or qualification of the edges can help in reducing false alarms.

When a shadow is detected, it is either a shadow created by a vehicle entering into the blind spot, or a shadow created by something else and not the target vehicle (a vehicle entering the blind spot). Referring to FIGS. 6-9, different shadows are shown for different scenarios the system may encounter, such as, for example, the shadow cast by a truck that is one or more lanes over from the target lane (FIG. 6), shadows cast by trees alongside the road (FIG. 7), the shadow cast by the subject vehicle (FIG. 8), and/or dark structures (FIG. 9).

In the case where the shadow is created by something other than the target vehicle, the following characteristics may be assumed:

    • 1. Below the edge (for horizontal edges) the road may have full illumination by daylight, and above the horizontal edge there will be road where daylight is partially occluded by some objects (so lesser illumination); or
    • 2. Below the edge the road may be darker because of partial occlusion by some object causing the shadow, and above the edge the road may have full daylight illumination;
    • 3. The above two scenarios are similar for the areas to the left and right of a vertical shadow.

Therefore, the following characteristics can also be assumed:

1. Above and below the edges there is road;

2. To the left and right of a vertical edge there is road;

3. One side of the edge is not road but is a vehicle.

The problem is that it has heretofore been difficult to distinguish between the shadow and the vehicle. The proposed methodology is intended to increase the confidence in decision. For example, the situations in FIGS. 6 and 7 may cause the system to indicate that it is a false positive (host or self shadow removal (discussed below) will also be resolved), while the situation in FIG. 8 may cause the system to indicate that the edge is due to a vehicle. The situation in FIG. 9 may result in the system indicating that it could not decide so the existing algorithm should continue to process the images.

In order to qualify a detected edge, the system of the present invention may perform the following processing steps:

1. Histogram Analysis:

    • display the edge pixels within the hot zone;
    • determine the start and the endpoint of an edge;
    • create processing windows on either side of the edge; and
    • perform wide line integration.

For Example, and as shown in FIGS. 10 and 11, a plurality of processing windows may be applied at either side of a detected edge. A plot as a result of the wide line integration is expected to be as shown in FIG. 12. The variations in the plot are expected to provide insight in qualifying an edge.

2. Extracting unique features across the edge (mean and range):

    • display the edge pixels within the hot zone;
    • determine the start and the endpoint of an edge;
    • estimate unique features to qualify an edge such as mean and range; and
    • analyze variations in mean and range on either side of the edge.

Comparison of the mean and range of the processing windows across a detected edge is expected to give insight in qualifying an edge.

3. Gradient analysis across the detected horizontal edge:

    • display the edge pixels within the hot zone;
    • determine the start and the endpoint of an edge;
    • gradient calculations are done on the processing windows using local window operators, such as Sobel operators of the mask shown in FIG. 13; and
    • The gradient magnitude gives the amount of the difference between pixels in the neighborhood (the strength of the edge). The gradient orientation gives the direction of the greatest change, which presumably is the direction across the edge (the edge normal). Comparison of the gradient across the edge is expected to provide insight in qualifying an edge.
      Host Shadow Removal:

In side object detection, the host shadow of the vehicle may be detected as a target vehicle if the host shadow is extended in the hot zone (or zone or area of interest alongside the subject or host vehicle). Often, the host shadow may fall on the adjacent lane in the morning or evening time. The host shadow consists of a straight horizontal edge and an edge line with some slope, such as shown in FIG. 14.

The steps involved in processing the image to remove or ignore the host shadow include:

    • obtain the target list at the output of processframe( );
    • for each target, get the row value (y_Pixel);
    • trace for the horizontal edge line around this row value;
    • check whether this line is continuous, starting from the subject vehicle body (approximately) and up to and after the lower border of the hot zone;
    • check whether this horizontal edge is extended in the hot zone and has a significant pixel count in the hot zone (check against the pixelsomething threshold for that particular line);
    • start tracing for the sloped edge line at the end of this horizontal edge;
    • if the sloped line is present for some columns it means that there is a host shadow; and
    • if there is a host shadow, remove the corresponding target from the target list.

Note that this process may be applied before calculating the target list, so that the host shadow edge pixel count can be subtracted from the line counts. In such an application, all the lines may be scanned until the detection of the host shadow. Vertical edge calculations may not be needed for this process, since, often, if the horizontal edge line of the host shadow is present in the hot zone then the host shadow is getting detected.

Bicycle Detection:

The side object detection system may be operable to detect other objects, such as a bicycle in the zone of interest. For a bicycle, there are small edges compared to a target vehicle, since the bicycle tire is small. In order to detect and track such small edges, we need to tune some of the parameters. For example, some or all of the following listed parameters may be changed to enhance the ability of the system to detect a bicycle:

    • SOMETHING_SIZE_CM: some size of the object in cms for reference (Calibration.h);
    • gCalibration.SMOOTHING_ALG_THRESHOLD: threshold applied on the peak normal force of the vehicle to see if the detected vehicle was significant (FindEdgePeaks_A( ));
    • gCalibration.XFILTER_FACTOR: with the pixelsomething threshold of a line, it decides the minimum number of horizontal pixels required for a valid object/target (XFilterNew( ));
    • gCalibration.HOT_ZONE_COUNT_THRESHOLD_DIVISOR: divisor factor of pixel something threshold of a line at the time of detection of valid objects (ComputeLineCountsR( ));
    • gCalibration.X_MUST_WARN: the maximum distance for a target to create a warning (when a target is located inside this position (Target X<X Must Warn), a warning for that target may be displayed);
    • gCalibration.VD_HYSTERESIS_ON: threshold (normal force) at which the algorithm determines a starting point of a target (FindEdgePeaks_A( ));
    • gCalibration.VD_HYSTERESIS_OFF: threshold at which the algorithm determines the falling off point of a target (FindEdgePeaks_A( ));
    • gCalibration.LINEERROR: this is the difference between the projected distance and actual distance of a particular target (i.e. line mapping error).

With the parameter tuning, the system may detect many false edges as well. In order to reduce such false edge detections, the vertical edge detection may be used as an additional feature.

Vertical edge detection:

    • detect the vertical edges for the frame in the area of interest region;
    • the vertical edge image is scanned for the connected pixels along the columns;
    • the maximum connected pixels count is compared against the threshold;
    • based on the comparison result, the decision is made as to whether the target is present or absent.

The vertical edge image may be scanned in the following regions:

    • Lower limit: the lower limit of the area of interest;
    • Upper limit: the upper boundary of the nighttime hot zone (FarCenterIndices_N).
      This is to reduce or substantially avoid a false vertical edge detection of objects outside the adjacent lane. The vertical edges may correspond to the wheels. When the target vehicle is far away, the vertical edge count will be small, and when the target vehicle is closer, the vertical edge count will be greater. A threshold count may be selected to provide the desired accuracy of the system.

The bicycle detection algorithm may be applied during the daytime because the bicycle headlight can be detected with the existing parameters (to be verified), and because little or no vertical edges may be detected during the night time (the detected vertical edges are mainly because of the wheels). Because the bicycle speed is typically low compared to the vehicle speed, the bicycle detection algorithm may be triggered only when the host vehicle speed goes below some threshold speed (such as at or below approximately 20 kph or thereabouts, for example). A flow chart of the bicycle detection process is shown in FIG. 15.

Without the vertical edge detection, some situations may result in false detections. For example, speed breakers beside the road (the system may not consider these as stationary objects because they continuously have edges one after the other which may map with the previous ones, so that some frames in this region are detected as targets), bisectors (the shadow of the bisector may create edges at the upper side of the image, in this region small pixel counts results in edge detection and may result in a detection of a target), roadside dark areas with small white patches. With vertical edge detection as an additional feature, the above false detections may be improved.

Also, it is envisioned that a bicycle rider may not always move straight like a vehicle in the lane. If the front wheel swings, then the projected target may not match with the current detected position. In order to account for this, the line error parameter may be adjusted to some extent. Also, it may be difficult to detect a bicycle if there is a shadow on the road and the bicycle is on the shadowed part of the road.

Target Mapping Tolerance:

Optionally, the object detection system and control may provide a near field detection or target mapping tolerance—line error function. Such a detection may utilize use inputs or calibration parameters. For example, a line error image may provide target-mapping tolerances in the image space due to car vibrations (such as about 3 to 6 pixels), or errors in the image processing (e.g. about 1 pixel for an edge filter), or other inputs. Also, a minimum line error (physical) input may provide target mapping tolerances in the physical space due to small variations in the target vehicle speed (this calibration parameter may be in terms of cms). Likewise, a target speed tolerance factor (such as between 0-100) may provide target mapping tolerances in the physical space, as expected to change with the speed of a target. This factor may determine the size of a tolerance band.

During operation of the object detection system, the control may compute the tolerance (the line error pixels) to be used for the target mapping, which may change with the distance from the camera (i.e., the tolerance may be different for the different lines in the image).

The following provides computations/functions that the control may perform to determine the tolerances and the like.

For example, the computation for the Nth line:
LineErrorPixels=MAX(LineErrorImage,LineErrorPhysicalInPixels_N).
LineErrorPhysicalInPixels_N=CMtoPIXEL(LineErrorPhysical,N).

CMtoPIXEL (LineErrorPhysical, N) is a function that will convert line error in cm to pixels for a specified line.
LineErrorPhysical=MAX(MinLineErrorPhysical,LineErrorPhysicalWindow).
LineErrorPhysicalWindow=(TargetSpeedToleranceFactor*ExpectedDistanceCoveredByTarget)/100.
ExpectedDistanceCoveredByTarget=TargetRelativeSpeed*FrameRate.
Day/Night Switch Algorithm:

Optionally, the side object detection system may switch between a daytime sensitivity and a nighttime sensitivity. For example, the algorithm may include the following steps:

1. Compute image histogram (H);

2. compute accumulated image histogram (Ha) using last N (such as, for example, 30) frames;

3. divide Ha into the following four regions:

    • (1) dark (0<Gray Level<=Td);
    • (2) night (Td<Gray Level<=Tdn);
    • (3) day (Tdn<Gray Level<Tb); and
    • (4) bright (Tb<=Gray Level<=255),
    • using following three thresholds:
    • (1) Td (0): dark threshold;
    • (2) Tdn (80): day-night threshold (which may be selected in such a way that it separates day (with/without shadow) from the night (with/without headlights); this may be a fixed threshold computed using arithmetic mean or a geometric mean and auto-threshold); and
    • (3) Tb (255): bright threshold that is used to separate headlight and overexposed (during day) pixels;

4. count number of pixels into above four regions:

    • (1) dark region count (Cd);
    • (2) night region count (Cn);
    • (3) day region count (Cy); and
    • (4) bright region count (Cb),
    • and compute:
    • (1) difference in Cy and Cn in % of total pixels (Ddn) [where Ddn=(ABS(Cy−Cn)*100)/ImagePixelCount]; and
    • (2) extreme peak count (Cd+Cb) in % of total pixels (P) [where P=((Cd+Cb)*100)/ImagePixelCount]; and

5. apply the following rules to make a decision:

Rule No. Condition(s) Situation Decision 1 Cn > Cy Clear Night Night Ddn >= T1 (sufficient pixels in night region) 2 Cy > Cn Clear Day Day Ddn >= T1 (sufficient pixels in day region) 3 Cn > Cy Night + Headlights Night Ddn < T1 P >= T2 (Extreme peak found) 4 Cn > Cy Night + Street Light, No Ddn < T1 Day + Clouds, Decision P < T2 Day + Shadow (Previous (No extreme peak found) State) 5 Cn < Cy Day + Overexposure, No Ddn < T1 Day + Snow, Decision P >= T2 Night + Blooming (Previous (Extreme peak found) Headlights State) 6 Cn < Cy Day + Shadow Day Ddn < T1 P < T2 (No extreme peak found)

For example, T1=70 percent and T2=2 percent. For rule 4 and 5, additional features may be desired, since the available features may not in all cases be sufficient to differentiate between day and night. If no determination or differentiation is made, the previous state may be retained. The processing time for each frame may be around 1 ms or thereabouts, such as about 0.7 ms.

Headlight Detection:

Optionally, a headlight detection module may be used to improve the nighttime target detection results. Such a module may be integrated with the side object detection algorithm. The headlight detection module or algorithm may use optimized blob analysis code in area of interest, and may identify clusters in an image during nighttime detection mode. The headlight detection module or algorithm may separate out headlights, and saturated and unqualified clusters of lights, and may be able to distinguish between headlights and reflections caused by headlights. The headlight detection module or algorithm may minimize false detections caused because of reflections on the road, or non-headlight light sources. The headlight detection module may detect the position of the headlight, and thus may provide enhanced positional accuracy while target detection. The headlight detection module may also be useful in dusk and dawn condition.

It is envisioned that, by analysis of the saturated clusters, the camera gain and exposure can be controlled in close loop, and thus the day/night switch detection can be improved. It is further envisioned that, for more accuracy, the system may detect both headlights to assist in making the decision of target detection (such as for detecting cars and/or trucks). Also, most or substantially all of the saturated and not qualified clusters may be examined for possible merging of two headlights, such as when the vehicle is far away from the camera on the subject or host vehicle.

Referring now to FIGS. 16-20, the process of identifying the headlights of a target vehicle is shown. As shown in FIG. 16, the headlights and their reflections are identified, and, as shown in FIGS. 17 and 18, the particular location or position of the headlight/headlights is identified as a target position. The non-headlight sources are identified separately (FIG. 19), and the saturated clusters are identified (FIG. 20), such as may be useful in close loop control of the side object detection system.

The table below indicates the effect on the timing of the detection/identification of side objects, as shown with and without the headlight detection function:

With Headlight Without Headlight Detection Detection Modules (mili-second) (mili-second) Process Line 17.5 17.5 Generate Edge 3.4 3.4 image Process Frame 17.5 17.45 Map Targets 1 1 Headlight Detection 12.9 — Total 52.3 39.35 Frame Rate 15 FPS 15 FPS

Optionally, the side object detection system and/or the imaging sensor or camera may be associated with other imaging systems or controls, such as imaging systems having an image sensor (such as a video camera, such as a CMOS imaging array sensor, a CCD sensor or the like, such as the types of imaging sensors or cameras disclosed in commonly assigned, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 6,097,023 and 5,796,094, and/or PCT Application No. PCT/US2003/036177, filed Nov. 14, 2003 and published Jun. 3, 2004 as International Publication No. WO 2004/047421, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference), such as a forward facing video image sensor or system, which may include or may be associated with an intelligent rain sensor (such as the types disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,320,176; 6,353,392 and 6,313,454, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference), an image or vision system (including an imaging sensor, such as a video camera, such as a CMOS imaging array sensor, a CCD sensor or the like, such as the types disclosed in commonly assigned, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,677; 6,097,023 and 5,796,094, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/422,378, filed Apr. 24, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,946,978, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference), such as an imaging or object detection system or back up aid of the types described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,757,109; 6,717,610; 6,590,719; 6,201,642; 5,929,786 and/or 5,786,772, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/427,051, filed Apr. 30, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,038,577; and/or Ser. No. 11/239,980, filed Sep. 30, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,496, and/or U.S. provisional applications, Ser. No. 60/628,709, filed Nov. 17, 2004; Ser. No. 60/614,644, filed Sep. 30, 2004; and/or Ser. No. 60/618,686, filed Oct. 14, 2004, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, or an intelligent headlamp controller (such as the types described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,796,094; 5,715,093 and/or 6,824,281, and/or in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/958,087, filed Oct. 4, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,188,963; and/or Ser. No. 11/105,757, filed Apr. 14, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,526,103, and/or U.S. provisional applications, Ser. No. 60/607,963, filed Sep. 8, 2004; and Ser. No. 60/562,480, filed Apr. 15, 2004, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference), or an intelligent lane departure warning system (such as the types described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/209,173, filed Jul. 31, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,882,287; and/or Ser. No. 10/427,051, filed Apr. 30, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,038,577, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference), and/or the like.

Optionally, the side object detection system of the present invention may include one or more displays, such as a text display, an icon display, a display on demand (DOD) type display (such as may be implemented with a transflective reflective element, such as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,668,663; 5,724,187 and 6,690,268, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein), such as a video or touch screen interface display, or a video display screen, such as the types described in PCT Application No. PCT/US03/40611, filed Dec. 19, 2003 and published on Jul. 15, 2004 as International Publication No. WO 2004/058540, and/or U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/538,724, filed Jun. 13, 2005 and published Mar. 9, 2006 as U.S. Publication No. US-2006-0050018; and Ser. No. Ser. No. 11/284,543, filed Nov. 22, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,370,983; and/or U.S. provisional applications, Ser. No. 60/630,061, filed Nov. 22, 2004; and Ser. No. 60/667,048, filed Mar. 31, 2005, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, or the like.

Therefore, the present invention provides a side object detection system that is operable to process captured image data of a scene occurring exteriorly and along one or both sides of the vehicle to determine if a target vehicle or object of interest is located at or in the lane adjacent to the subject or host vehicle. The side object detection system of the present invention may process zones or areas of interest in the captured images and may adjust processing to accommodate any misalignment of the camera that may occur during installation of the camera at the side of the vehicle. The side object detection system may also adjust the processing to adjust the areas of interest, such as in response to a turning of the wheels of the vehicle so that the zone or area is adapted for the turning of the subject vehicle. The side object detection system may detect horizontal edges and vertical edges of objects in the exterior scene and may identify shadows and discern the shadows in the adjacent lane (which may be shadows cast by objects outside of the adjacent lane) from objects or target vehicles that may be present in the adjacent lane. The side object detection system of the present invention may also discern or distinguish between daytime and nighttime conditions and may adjust the image processing accordingly. The side object detection system may also function to detect headlights of a target vehicle in the adjacent lane and to discern or distinguish the headlights of the target vehicle from other light sources, such as reflections or other non-qualified light sources. The side object detection system of the present invention thus provides enhanced image processing and may utilize aspects of the side object detection system described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/209,173, filed Jul. 31, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,882,287; and/or Ser. No. 10/427,051, filed Apr. 30, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,038,577, which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Changes and modifications in the specifically described embodiments can be carried out without departing from the principles of the present invention, which is intended to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims as interpreted according to the principles of patent law.

Claims

1. A vehicular vision system, said vehicular vision system comprising:

a first camera comprising an imaging sensor having an array of photosensing pixels;
a second camera comprising an imaging sensor having an array of photosensing pixels;
a rear backup camera comprising an imaging sensor having an array of photosensing pixels;
a control comprising a processor for processing image data captured by said first camera, by said second camera and by said rear backup camera;
wherein said first camera is disposed at a left side of a vehicle equipped with said vehicular vision system;
wherein said first camera has a field of view at least rearward of the equipped vehicle and sideward of the left side of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said second camera is disposed at a right side of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said second camera has a field of view at least rearward of the equipped vehicle and sideward of the right side of the equipped vehicle;
wherein, when said first camera is disposed at the left side of the equipped vehicle, a portion of the left body side of the equipped vehicle is present in the field of view of said first camera;
wherein, when said second camera is disposed at the right side of the equipped vehicle, a portion of the right body side of the equipped vehicle is present in the field of view of said second camera;
wherein said first camera is disposed at a left-side exterior mirror assembly of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said second camera is disposed at a right-side exterior mirror assembly of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said rear backup camera is disposed at a rear portion of the equipped vehicle centrally between where said first camera is disposed at the vehicle and where said second camera is disposed at the vehicle;
wherein said rear backup camera has a field of view at least rearward of the equipped vehicle;
wherein the field of view of said first camera overlaps with the field of view of said rear backup camera, and wherein the field of view of said second camera overlaps with the field of view of said rear backup camera;
wherein image data captured by said first camera, by said second camera and by said rear backup camera is processed by said processor of said control and, at least in part responsive to processing by said processor of image data captured by said first camera, by said second camera and by said rear backup camera, said control outputs a composite image for display at a display disposed in an interior cabin of the equipped vehicle at a location viewable by a driver of the equipped vehicle when the driver is operating the equipped vehicle;
wherein the displayed composite image provides a view as would be provided from a single virtual image capture device;
wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said first camera, determines that said first camera is misaligned due to a shift in at least one of yaw, pitch and roll alignment of said first camera disposed at the left side of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said control, responsive to the determination of misalignment of said first camera, at least partially compensates for the misalignment of said first camera by at least one of (i) adjusting processing by said processor of image data captured by said first camera and (ii) adjusting image data captured by said first camera;
wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said second camera, determines that said second camera is misaligned due to a shift in at least one of yaw, pitch and roll alignment of said second camera disposed at the right side of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said control, responsive to the determination of misalignment of said second camera, at least partially compensates for the misalignment of said second camera by at least one of (i) adjusting processing by said processor of image data captured by said second camera and (ii) adjusting image data captured by said second camera;
wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said rear backup camera, determines that said rear backup camera is misaligned due to a shift in at least one of yaw, pitch and roll alignment of said rear backup camera disposed at the rear portion of the equipped vehicle; and
wherein said control, responsive to the determination of misalignment of said rear backup camera, at least partially compensates for the misalignment of said rear backup camera by at least one of (i) adjusting processing by said processor of image data captured by said rear backup camera and (ii) adjusting image data captured by said rear backup camera.

2. The vehicular vision system of claim 1, wherein the displayed composite image provides a seamless panoramic view.

3. The vehicular vision system of claim 2, wherein said imaging array of said first camera comprises a CMOS imaging array sensor.

4. The vehicular vision system of claim 3, wherein said imaging array of said second camera comprises a CMOS imaging array sensor.

5. The vehicular vision system of claim 4, wherein said imaging array of said rear backup camera comprises a CMOS imaging array sensor.

6. The vehicular vision system of claim 1, wherein said first camera is disposed at least partially within the left-side exterior mirror assembly of the equipped vehicle.

7. The vehicular vision system of claim 6, wherein said second camera is disposed at least partially within the right-side exterior mirror assembly of the equipped vehicle.

8. The vehicular vision system of claim 7, wherein the portion of the left body side of the equipped vehicle present in the field of view of said first camera comprises a door handle.

9. The vehicular vision system of claim 8, wherein the portion of the right body side of the equipped vehicle present in the field of view of said second camera comprises a door handle.

10. The vehicular vision system of claim 1, wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said first camera, calculates a degree of misalignment of said first camera.

11. The vehicular vision system of claim 10, wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said second camera, calculates a degree of misalignment of said second camera.

12. The vehicular vision system of claim 11, wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said rear backup camera, calculates a degree of misalignment of said rear backup camera.

13. The vehicular vision system of claim 1, wherein processing by said processor of image data captured by said first camera at least one of (i) adjusts image data, (ii) shifts image data and (iii) rotates image data.

14. The vehicular vision system of claim 13, wherein processing by said processor of image data captured by said second camera at least one of (i) adjusts image data, (ii) shifts image data and (iii) rotates image data.

15. The vehicular vision system of claim 14, wherein processing by said processor of image data captured by said rear backup camera at least one of (i) adjusts image data, (ii) shifts image data and (iii) rotates image data.

16. The vehicular vision system of claim 1, wherein, in accordance with the ambient light level at the equipped vehicle, said control operates with a daytime sensitivity or a nighttime sensitivity.

17. The vehicular vision system of claim 1, wherein processing by said processor of image data comprises use of an algorithmically executed filter.

18. The vehicular vision system of claim 1, wherein said display comprises a flat panel display and wherein said flat panel display comprises a back-lit liquid crystal display.

19. A vehicular vision system, said vehicular vision system comprising:

a first camera comprising an imaging sensor having an array of photosensing pixels;
a second camera comprising an imaging sensor having an array of photosensing pixels;
a rear backup camera comprising an imaging sensor having an array of photosensing pixels;
a control comprising a processor for processing image data captured by said first camera, by said second camera and by said rear backup camera;
wherein said first camera is disposed at a left side of a vehicle equipped with said vehicular vision system;
wherein said first camera has a field of view at least rearward of the equipped vehicle and sideward field of the left side of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said second camera is disposed at a right side of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said second camera has a field of view at least rearward of the equipped vehicle and sideward of the right side of the equipped vehicle;
wherein, when said first camera is disposed at the left side of the equipped vehicle, a portion of the left body side of the equipped vehicle is present in the field of view of said first camera;
wherein, when said second camera is disposed at the right side of the equipped vehicle, a portion of the right body side of the equipped vehicle is present in the field of view of said second camera;
wherein said first camera is disposed at a left-side exterior mirror assembly of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said second camera is disposed at a right-side exterior mirror assembly of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said rear backup camera is disposed at a rear portion of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said rear backup camera has a field of view at least rearward of the equipped vehicle;
wherein the field of view of said first camera overlaps with the field of view of said rear backup camera, and wherein the field of view of said second camera overlaps with the field of view of said rear backup camera;
wherein image data captured by said first camera, by said second camera and by said rear backup camera is processed by said processor of said control and, at least in part responsive to processing by said processor of image data captured by said first camera, by said second camera and by said rear backup camera, said control outputs a composite image for display at a display disposed in an interior cabin of the equipped vehicle at a location viewable by a driver of the equipped vehicle when the driver is operating the equipped vehicle;
wherein the displayed composite image provides a view as would be provided from a single virtual image capture device;
wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said first camera, determines that said first camera is misaligned due to a shift in at least one of yaw, pitch and roll alignment of said first camera disposed at the left side of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said control, responsive to the determination of misalignment of said first camera, at least partially compensates for the misalignment of said first camera by adjusting processing by said processor of image data captured by said first camera;
wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said second camera, determines that said second camera is misaligned due to a shift in at least one of yaw, pitch and roll alignment of said second camera disposed at the right side of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said control, responsive to the determination of misalignment of said second camera, at least partially compensates for the misalignment of said second camera by adjusting processing by said processor of image data captured by said second camera; and
wherein the displayed composite image provides a seamless panoramic view.

20. The vehicular vision system of claim 19, wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said rear backup camera, determines that said rear backup camera is misaligned due to a shift in at least one of yaw, pitch and roll alignment of said rear backup camera disposed at the rear portion of the equipped vehicle, and wherein said control, responsive to the determination of misalignment of said rear backup camera, at least partially compensates for the misalignment of said rear backup camera by adjusting processing by said processor of image data captured by said rear backup camera.

21. The vehicular vision system of claim 20, wherein said imaging array of said first camera comprises a CMOS imaging array sensor, and wherein said imaging array of said second camera comprises a CMOS imaging array sensor, and wherein said imaging array of said rear backup camera comprises a CMOS imaging array sensor.

22. The vehicular vision system of claim 21, wherein said first camera is disposed at least partially within the left-side exterior mirror assembly of the equipped vehicle, and wherein said second camera is disposed at least partially within the right-side exterior mirror assembly of the equipped vehicle.

23. The vehicular vision system of claim 22, wherein the portion of the left body side of the equipped vehicle present in the field of view of said first camera comprises a door handle, and wherein the portion of the right body side of the equipped vehicle present in the field of view of said second camera comprises a door handle.

24. The vehicular vision system of claim 22, wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said first camera, calculates a degree of misalignment of said first camera, and wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said second camera, calculates a degree of misalignment of said second camera, and wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said rear backup camera, calculates a degree of misalignment of said rear backup camera.

25. The vehicular vision system of claim 22, wherein processing by said processor of image data captured by said first camera at least one of (i) adjusts image data, (ii) shifts image data and (iii) rotates image data, and wherein processing by said processor of image data captured by said second camera at least one of (i) adjusts image data, (ii) shifts image data and (iii) rotates image data, and wherein processing by said processor of image data captured by said rear backup camera at least one of (i) adjusts image data, (ii) shifts image data and (iii) rotates image data.

26. The vehicular vision system of claim 22, wherein said display comprises a flat panel display and wherein said flat panel display comprises a back-lit liquid crystal display.

27. The vehicular vision system of claim 19, wherein said rear backup camera is disposed centrally between where said first camera is disposed at the vehicle and where said second camera is disposed at the vehicle.

28. A vehicular vision system, said vehicular vision system comprising:

a first camera comprising a CMOS imaging sensor having an array of photosensing pixels;
a second camera comprising a CMOS imaging sensor having an array of photosensing pixels;
a rear backup camera comprising a CMOS imaging sensor having an array of photosensing pixels;
a control comprising a processor for processing image data captured by said first camera, by said second camera and by said rear backup camera;
wherein said first camera is disposed at a left side of a vehicle equipped with said vehicular vision system;
wherein said first camera has a field of view at least rearward of the equipped vehicle and sideward of the left side of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said second camera is disposed at a right side of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said second camera has a field of view at least rearward of the equipped vehicle and sideward of the right side of the equipped vehicle;
wherein, when said first camera is disposed at the left side of the equipped vehicle, a portion of the left body side of the equipped vehicle is present in the field of view of said first camera;
wherein, when said second camera is disposed at the right side of the equipped vehicle, a portion of the right body side of the equipped vehicle is present in the field of view of said second camera;
wherein said first camera is disposed at least partially within a left-side exterior mirror assembly of the equipped vehicle, and wherein said second camera is disposed at least partially within a right-side exterior mirror assembly of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said rear backup camera is disposed at a rear portion of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said rear backup camera has a field of view at least rearward of the equipped vehicle;
wherein the field of view of said first camera overlaps with the field of view of said rear backup camera, and wherein the field of view of said second camera overlaps with the field of view of said rear backup camera;
wherein image data captured by said first camera, by said second camera and by said rear backup camera is processed by said processor of said control and, at least in part responsive to processing by said processor of image data captured by said first camera, by said second camera and by said rear backup camera, said control outputs a composite image for display at a display disposed in an interior cabin of the equipped vehicle at a location viewable by a driver of the equipped vehicle when the driver is operating the equipped vehicle;
wherein the displayed composite image provides a view as would be provided from a single virtual image capture device;
wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said first camera, determines that said first camera is misaligned due to a shift in at least one of yaw, pitch and roll alignment of said first camera disposed at the left side of the equipped vehicle;
wherein said control, responsive to the determination of misalignment of said first camera, at least partially compensates for the misalignment of said first camera by adjusting image data captured by said first camera;
wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said second camera, determines that said second camera is misaligned due to a shift in at least one of yaw, pitch and roll alignment of said second camera disposed at the right side of the equipped vehicle; and
wherein said control, responsive to the determination of misalignment of said second camera, at least partially compensates for the misalignment of said second camera by adjusting image data captured by said second camera.

29. The vehicular vision system of claim 28, wherein the displayed composite image provides a seamless panoramic view.

30. The vehicular vision system of claim 29, wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said rear backup camera, determines that said rear backup camera is misaligned due to a shift in at least one of yaw, pitch and roll alignment of said rear backup camera disposed at the rear portion of the equipped vehicle.

31. The vehicular vision system of claim 30, wherein said control, responsive to the determination of misalignment of said rear backup camera, at least partially compensates for the misalignment of said rear backup camera by adjusting image data captured by said rear backup camera.

32. The vehicular vision system of claim 31, wherein the portion of the left body side of the equipped vehicle present in the field of view of said first camera comprises a door handle, and wherein the portion of the right body side of the equipped vehicle present in the field of view of said second camera comprises a door handle.

33. The vehicular vision system of claim 31, wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said first camera, calculates a degree of misalignment of said first camera, and wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said second camera, calculates a degree of misalignment of said second camera, and wherein said control, responsive at least in part to processing by said processor of image data captured by said rear backup camera, calculates a degree of misalignment of said rear backup camera.

34. The vehicular vision system of claim 31, wherein processing by said processor of image data captured by said first camera at least one of (i) adjusts image data, (ii) shifts image data and (iii) rotates image data, and wherein processing by said processor of image data captured by said second camera at least one of (i) adjusts image data, (ii) shifts image data and (iii) rotates image data, and wherein processing by said processor of image data captured by said rear backup camera at least one of (i) adjusts image data, (ii) shifts image data and (iii) rotates image data.

35. The vehicular vision system of claim 31, wherein said display comprises a flat panel display and wherein said flat panel display comprises a back-lit liquid crystal display.

36. The vehicular vision system of claim 28, wherein said rear backup camera is disposed centrally between where said first camera is disposed at the vehicle and where said second camera is disposed at the vehicle.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
2632040 March 1953 Rabinow
2827594 March 1953 Rabinow
3985424 October 12, 1976 Steinacher
4037134 July 19, 1977 Loper
4200361 April 29, 1980 Malvano
4214266 July 22, 1980 Myers
4218698 August 19, 1980 Bart et al.
4236099 November 25, 1980 Rosenblum
4247870 January 27, 1981 Gabel et al.
4249160 February 3, 1981 Chilvers
4254931 March 10, 1981 Aikens
4258979 March 31, 1981 Mahin
4266856 May 12, 1981 Wainwright
4277804 July 7, 1981 Robison
4281898 August 4, 1981 Ochiai
4288814 September 8, 1981 Talley et al.
4355271 October 19, 1982 Noack
4357558 November 2, 1982 Massoni et al.
4381888 May 3, 1983 Momiyama
4420238 December 13, 1983 Felix
4431896 February 14, 1984 Lodetti
4443057 April 17, 1984 Bauer
4460831 July 17, 1984 Oettinger et al.
4481450 November 6, 1984 Watanabe et al.
4491390 January 1, 1985 Tong-Shen
4512637 April 23, 1985 Ballmer
4521804 June 4, 1985 Bendell
4529275 July 16, 1985 Ballmer
4529873 July 16, 1985 Ballmer
4532550 July 30, 1985 Bendell et al.
4546551 October 15, 1985 Franks
4549208 October 22, 1985 Kamejima et al.
4571082 February 18, 1986 Downs
4572619 February 25, 1986 Reininger
4580875 April 8, 1986 Bechtel
4600913 July 15, 1986 Caine
4603946 August 5, 1986 Kato
4614415 September 30, 1986 Hyatt
4620141 October 28, 1986 McCumber et al.
4623222 November 18, 1986 Itoh
4626850 December 2, 1986 Chey
4629941 December 16, 1986 Ellis
4630109 December 16, 1986 Barton
4632509 December 30, 1986 Ohmi
4638287 January 20, 1987 Umebayashi et al.
4645975 February 24, 1987 Meitzler et al.
4647161 March 3, 1987 Müller
4653316 March 31, 1987 Fukuhara
4669825 June 2, 1987 Itoh
4669826 June 2, 1987 Itoh
4671615 June 9, 1987 Fukada
4672457 June 9, 1987 Hyatt
4676601 June 30, 1987 Itoh
4690508 September 1, 1987 Jacob
4692798 September 8, 1987 Seko et al.
4697883 October 6, 1987 Suzuki
4701022 October 20, 1987 Jacob
4713685 December 15, 1987 Nishimura et al.
4717830 January 5, 1988 Botts
4727290 February 23, 1988 Smith
4731669 March 15, 1988 Hayashi et al.
4741603 May 3, 1988 Miyagi
4758883 July 19, 1988 Kawahara et al.
4768135 August 30, 1988 Kretschmer et al.
4772942 September 20, 1988 Tuck
4789904 December 6, 1988 Peterson
4793690 December 27, 1988 Gahan
4817948 April 4, 1989 Simonelli
4820933 April 11, 1989 Hong
4825232 April 25, 1989 Howdle
4838650 June 13, 1989 Stewart
4847772 July 11, 1989 Michalopoulos et al.
4855822 August 8, 1989 Narendra et al.
4859031 August 22, 1989 Berman et al.
4862037 August 29, 1989 Farber et al.
4867561 September 19, 1989 Fujii et al.
4871917 October 3, 1989 O'Farrell et al.
4872051 October 3, 1989 Dye
4881019 November 14, 1989 Shiraishi et al.
4882565 November 21, 1989 Gallmeyer
4886960 December 12, 1989 Molyneux
4891559 January 2, 1990 Matsumoto et al.
4892345 January 9, 1990 Rachael, III
4895790 January 23, 1990 Swanson et al.
4896030 January 23, 1990 Miyaji
4900133 February 13, 1990 Berman
4907870 March 13, 1990 Brucker
4910591 March 20, 1990 Petrossian et al.
4916374 April 10, 1990 Schierbeek
4917477 April 17, 1990 Bechtel et al.
4931937 June 5, 1990 Kakinami et al.
4937796 June 26, 1990 Tendler
4942533 July 17, 1990 Kakinami et al.
4953305 September 4, 1990 Van Lente et al.
4956591 September 11, 1990 Schierbeek
4961625 October 9, 1990 Wood et al.
4966441 October 30, 1990 Conner
4967319 October 30, 1990 Seko
4970653 November 13, 1990 Kenue
4971430 November 20, 1990 Lynas
4974078 November 27, 1990 Tsai
4987357 January 22, 1991 Masaki
4987410 January 22, 1991 Berman et al.
4991054 February 5, 1991 Walters
5001558 March 19, 1991 Burley et al.
5003288 March 26, 1991 Wilhelm
5012082 April 30, 1991 Watanabe
5016977 May 21, 1991 Baude et al.
5027001 June 25, 1991 Torbert
5027200 June 25, 1991 Petrossian et al.
5044706 September 3, 1991 Chen
5050966 September 24, 1991 Berman
5055668 October 8, 1991 French
5059877 October 22, 1991 Teder
5064274 November 12, 1991 Alten
5072154 December 10, 1991 Chen
5075768 December 24, 1991 Wirtz et al.
5086253 February 4, 1992 Lawler
5096287 March 17, 1992 Kakinami et al.
5097362 March 17, 1992 Lynas
5121200 June 9, 1992 Choi
5124549 June 23, 1992 Michaels et al.
5128874 July 7, 1992 Bhanu et al.
5130709 July 14, 1992 Toyama et al.
5148014 September 15, 1992 Lynam
5166681 November 24, 1992 Bottesch et al.
5168378 December 1, 1992 Black
5170374 December 8, 1992 Shimohigashi et al.
5172235 December 15, 1992 Wilm et al.
5172317 December 15, 1992 Asanuma et al.
5177606 January 5, 1993 Koshizawa
5177685 January 5, 1993 Davis et al.
5182502 January 26, 1993 Slotkowski et al.
5184956 February 9, 1993 Langlais et al.
5189561 February 23, 1993 Hong
5193000 March 9, 1993 Lipton et al.
5193029 March 9, 1993 Schofield
5204778 April 20, 1993 Bechtel
5208701 May 4, 1993 Maeda
5208750 May 4, 1993 Kurami et al.
5214408 May 25, 1993 Asayama
5243524 September 7, 1993 Ishida et al.
5245422 September 14, 1993 Borcherts et al.
5253109 October 12, 1993 O'Farrell et al.
5276389 January 4, 1994 Levers
5285060 February 8, 1994 Larson et al.
5289182 February 22, 1994 Brillard et al.
5289321 February 22, 1994 Secor
5304980 April 19, 1994 Maekawa
5305012 April 19, 1994 Faris
5307136 April 26, 1994 Saneyoshi
5309137 May 3, 1994 Kajiwara
5313072 May 17, 1994 Vachss
5325096 June 28, 1994 Pakett
5325386 June 28, 1994 Jewell et al.
5329206 July 12, 1994 Slotkowski et al.
5331312 July 19, 1994 Kudoh
5336980 August 9, 1994 Levers
5341437 August 23, 1994 Nakayama
5343206 August 30, 1994 Ansaldi et al.
5351044 September 27, 1994 Mathur et al.
5355118 October 11, 1994 Fukuhara
5359666 October 25, 1994 Nakayama et al.
5365603 November 15, 1994 Karmann
5369590 November 29, 1994 Karasudani
5374852 December 20, 1994 Parkes
5386285 January 31, 1995 Asayama
5394333 February 28, 1995 Kao
5406395 April 11, 1995 Wilson et al.
5408346 April 18, 1995 Trissel et al.
5410346 April 25, 1995 Saneyoshi et al.
5414257 May 9, 1995 Stanton
5414461 May 9, 1995 Kishi et al.
5416313 May 16, 1995 Larson et al.
5416318 May 16, 1995 Hegyi
5416478 May 16, 1995 Morinaga
5424952 June 13, 1995 Asayama
5426294 June 20, 1995 Kobayashi et al.
5430431 July 4, 1995 Nelson
5434407 July 18, 1995 Bauer et al.
5440428 August 8, 1995 Hegg et al.
5444478 August 22, 1995 Lelong et al.
5448484 September 5, 1995 Bullock et al.
5451822 September 19, 1995 Bechtel et al.
5457493 October 10, 1995 Leddy et al.
5461357 October 24, 1995 Yoshioka et al.
5461361 October 24, 1995 Moore
5469298 November 21, 1995 Suman et al.
5471515 November 28, 1995 Fossum et al.
5475494 December 12, 1995 Nishida et al.
5487116 January 23, 1996 Nakano et al.
5498866 March 12, 1996 Bendicks et al.
5500766 March 19, 1996 Stonecypher
5510983 April 23, 1996 Iino
5515448 May 7, 1996 Nishitani
5521633 May 28, 1996 Nakajima et al.
5528698 June 18, 1996 Kamei et al.
5529138 June 25, 1996 Shaw et al.
5530240 June 25, 1996 Larson et al.
5530420 June 25, 1996 Tsuchiya et al.
5535144 July 9, 1996 Kise
5535314 July 9, 1996 Alves et al.
5537003 July 16, 1996 Bechtel et al.
5539397 July 23, 1996 Asanuma et al.
5541590 July 30, 1996 Nishio
5550677 August 27, 1996 Schofield et al.
5555312 September 10, 1996 Shima et al.
5555555 September 10, 1996 Sato et al.
5559695 September 24, 1996 Daily
5568027 October 22, 1996 Teder
5574443 November 12, 1996 Hsieh
5581464 December 3, 1996 Woll et al.
5594222 January 14, 1997 Caldwell
5614788 March 25, 1997 Mullins
5617085 April 1, 1997 Tsutsumi et al.
5619370 April 8, 1997 Guinosso
5634709 June 3, 1997 Iwama
5638116 June 10, 1997 Shimoura et al.
5642093 June 24, 1997 Kinoshita et al.
5642299 June 24, 1997 Hardin et al.
5648835 July 15, 1997 Uzawa
5650944 July 22, 1997 Kise
5660454 August 26, 1997 Mori et al.
5661303 August 26, 1997 Teder
5666028 September 9, 1997 Bechtel et al.
5668663 September 16, 1997 Varaprasad et al.
5670935 September 23, 1997 Schofield et al.
5675489 October 7, 1997 Pomerleau
5677851 October 14, 1997 Kingdon et al.
5699044 December 16, 1997 Van Lente et al.
5715093 February 3, 1998 Schierbeek et al.
5724187 March 3, 1998 Varaprasad et al.
5724316 March 3, 1998 Brunts
5737226 April 7, 1998 Olson et al.
5745310 April 28, 1998 Mathieu
5757949 May 26, 1998 Kinoshita et al.
5760826 June 2, 1998 Nayer
5760828 June 2, 1998 Cortes
5760931 June 2, 1998 Saburi et al.
5760962 June 2, 1998 Schofield et al.
5761094 June 2, 1998 Olson et al.
5765116 June 9, 1998 Wilson-Jones et al.
5781437 July 14, 1998 Wiemer et al.
5786772 July 28, 1998 Schofield et al.
5790403 August 4, 1998 Nakayama
5790973 August 4, 1998 Blaker et al.
5793308 August 11, 1998 Rosinski et al.
5793420 August 11, 1998 Schmidt
5796094 August 18, 1998 Schofield et al.
5798575 August 25, 1998 O'Farrell et al.
5835255 November 10, 1998 Miles
5837994 November 17, 1998 Stam et al.
5844505 December 1, 1998 Van Ryzin
5844682 December 1, 1998 Kiyomoto et al.
5845000 December 1, 1998 Breed et al.
5848802 December 15, 1998 Breed et al.
5850176 December 15, 1998 Kinoshita et al.
5850254 December 15, 1998 Takano et al.
5867591 February 2, 1999 Onda
5877707 March 2, 1999 Kowalick
5877897 March 2, 1999 Schofield et al.
5878370 March 2, 1999 Olson
5883739 March 16, 1999 Ashihara et al.
5884212 March 16, 1999 Lion
5890021 March 30, 1999 Onoda
5890083 March 30, 1999 Franke et al.
5892855 April 6, 1999 Kakinami et al.
5896085 April 20, 1999 Mori et al.
5899956 May 4, 1999 Chan
5904725 May 18, 1999 Iisaka et al.
5914815 June 22, 1999 Bos
5920367 July 6, 1999 Kajimoto et al.
5923027 July 13, 1999 Stam et al.
5929784 July 27, 1999 Kawaziri et al.
5929786 July 27, 1999 Schofield et al.
5940120 August 17, 1999 Frankhouse et al.
5949331 September 7, 1999 Schofield et al.
5956181 September 21, 1999 Lin
5959367 September 28, 1999 O'Farrell et al.
5959555 September 28, 1999 Furuta
5963247 October 5, 1999 Banitt
5964822 October 12, 1999 Alland et al.
5971552 October 26, 1999 O'Farrell et al.
5986796 November 16, 1999 Miles
5990469 November 23, 1999 Bechtel et al.
5990649 November 23, 1999 Nagao et al.
6001486 December 14, 1999 Varaprasad et al.
6005492 December 21, 1999 Tamura et al.
6009336 December 28, 1999 Harris et al.
6009337 December 28, 1999 Väisänen et al.
6020704 February 1, 2000 Buschur
6044321 March 28, 2000 Nakamura et al.
6049171 April 11, 2000 Stam et al.
6049619 April 11, 2000 Anandan et al.
6052124 April 18, 2000 Stein et al.
6066933 May 23, 2000 Ponziana
6084519 July 4, 2000 Coulling et al.
6087953 July 11, 2000 DeLine et al.
6091833 July 18, 2000 Yasui et al.
6097023 August 1, 2000 Schofield et al.
6097024 August 1, 2000 Stam et al.
6100811 August 8, 2000 Hsu et al.
6104552 August 15, 2000 Thau et al.
6116743 September 12, 2000 Hoek
6124647 September 26, 2000 Marcus et al.
6124886 September 26, 2000 DeLine et al.
6139172 October 31, 2000 Bos et al.
6144022 November 7, 2000 Tenenbaum et al.
6169940 January 2, 2001 Jitsukata et al.
6172613 January 9, 2001 DeLine et al.
6173222 January 9, 2001 Seo et al.
6175164 January 16, 2001 O'Farrell et al.
6175300 January 16, 2001 Kendrick
6198409 March 6, 2001 Schofield et al.
6201236 March 13, 2001 Juds
6201642 March 13, 2001 Bos
6218960 April 17, 2001 Ishikawa et al.
6222447 April 24, 2001 Schofield et al.
6222460 April 24, 2001 DeLine et al.
6226061 May 1, 2001 Tagusa
6226389 May 1, 2001 Lemelson et al.
6226592 May 1, 2001 Luckscheiter et al.
6243003 June 5, 2001 DeLine et al.
6246961 June 12, 2001 Sasaki et al.
6249214 June 19, 2001 Kashiwazaki
6250148 June 26, 2001 Lynam
6259412 July 10, 2001 Duroux
6259423 July 10, 2001 Tokito et al.
6266082 July 24, 2001 Yonezawa et al.
6266442 July 24, 2001 Laumeyer et al.
6269308 July 31, 2001 Kodaka et al.
6278377 August 21, 2001 DeLine et al.
6282483 August 28, 2001 Yano et al.
6285393 September 4, 2001 Shimoura et al.
6285778 September 4, 2001 Nakajima et al.
6291906 September 18, 2001 Marcus et al.
6292111 September 18, 2001 Ishikawa et al.
6292752 September 18, 2001 Franke et al.
6294989 September 25, 2001 Schofield et al.
6297781 October 2, 2001 Turnbull et al.
6302545 October 16, 2001 Schofield et al.
6310611 October 30, 2001 Caldwell
6313454 November 6, 2001 Bos et al.
6317057 November 13, 2001 Lee
6320176 November 20, 2001 Schofield et al.
6320282 November 20, 2001 Caldwell
6326613 December 4, 2001 Heslin et al.
6329925 December 11, 2001 Skiver et al.
6330511 December 11, 2001 Ogura et al.
6333759 December 25, 2001 Mazzilli
6341523 January 29, 2002 Lynam
6353392 March 5, 2002 Schofield et al.
6366213 April 2, 2002 DeLine et al.
6370329 April 9, 2002 Teuchert
6396397 May 28, 2002 Bos et al.
6411204 June 25, 2002 Bloomfield et al.
6411328 June 25, 2002 Franke et al.
6420975 July 16, 2002 DeLine et al.
6424273 July 23, 2002 Gutta et al.
6428172 August 6, 2002 Hutzel et al.
6430303 August 6, 2002 Naoi et al.
6433676 August 13, 2002 DeLine et al.
6433817 August 13, 2002 Guerra
6442465 August 27, 2002 Breed et al.
6445287 September 3, 2002 Schofield et al.
6477464 November 5, 2002 McCarthy et al.
6485155 November 26, 2002 Duroux et al.
6497503 December 24, 2002 Dassanayake et al.
6498620 December 24, 2002 Schofield et al.
6513252 February 4, 2003 Schierbeek et al.
6515378 February 4, 2003 Drummond et al.
6516664 February 11, 2003 Lynam
6523964 February 25, 2003 Schofield et al.
6534884 March 18, 2003 Marcus et al.
6539306 March 25, 2003 Turnbull
6542840 April 1, 2003 Okamoto et al.
6547133 April 15, 2003 DeVries, Jr. et al.
6553130 April 22, 2003 Lemelson et al.
6559435 May 6, 2003 Schofield et al.
6570998 May 27, 2003 Ohtsuka et al.
6574033 June 3, 2003 Chui et al.
6578017 June 10, 2003 Ebersole et al.
6580996 June 17, 2003 Friedrich
6587573 July 1, 2003 Stam et al.
6589625 July 8, 2003 Kothari et al.
6590719 July 8, 2003 Bos
6593011 July 15, 2003 Liu et al.
6593565 July 15, 2003 Heslin et al.
6593698 July 15, 2003 Stam et al.
6594583 July 15, 2003 Ogura et al.
6611202 August 26, 2003 Schofield et al.
6611610 August 26, 2003 Stam et al.
6627918 September 30, 2003 Getz et al.
6631316 October 7, 2003 Stam et al.
6631994 October 14, 2003 Suzuki et al.
6636258 October 21, 2003 Strumolo
6648477 November 18, 2003 Hutzel et al.
6650233 November 18, 2003 DeLine et al.
6650455 November 18, 2003 Miles
6671607 December 30, 2003 Ishizu et al.
6672731 January 6, 2004 Schnell et al.
6674562 January 6, 2004 Miles
6678056 January 13, 2004 Downs
6678614 January 13, 2004 McCarthy et al.
6680792 January 20, 2004 Miles
6690268 February 10, 2004 Schofield et al.
6691008 February 10, 2004 Kondo et al.
6700605 March 2, 2004 Toyoda et al.
6703925 March 9, 2004 Steffel
6704621 March 9, 2004 Stein et al.
6708100 March 16, 2004 Russell et al.
6710908 March 23, 2004 Miles et al.
6711474 March 23, 2004 Treyz et al.
6714331 March 30, 2004 Lewis et al.
6717610 April 6, 2004 Bos et al.
6735506 May 11, 2004 Breed et al.
6741377 May 25, 2004 Miles
6744353 June 1, 2004 Sjönell
6748312 June 8, 2004 Russell et al.
6757109 June 29, 2004 Bos
6762867 July 13, 2004 Lippert et al.
6794119 September 21, 2004 Miles
6795221 September 21, 2004 Urey
6802617 October 12, 2004 Schofield et al.
6806452 October 19, 2004 Bos et al.
6807287 October 19, 2004 Hermans
6813371 November 2, 2004 Kakinami
6822563 November 23, 2004 Bos et al.
6823241 November 23, 2004 Shirato et al.
6824281 November 30, 2004 Schofield et al.
6831261 December 14, 2004 Schofield et al.
6847487 January 25, 2005 Burgner
6864930 March 8, 2005 Matsushita et al.
6882287 April 19, 2005 Schofield
6889161 May 3, 2005 Winner et al.
6891563 May 10, 2005 Schofield et al.
6909753 June 21, 2005 Meehan et al.
6917693 July 12, 2005 Kiridena
6941216 September 6, 2005 Isogai et al.
6946978 September 20, 2005 Schofield
6953253 October 11, 2005 Schofield et al.
6968266 November 22, 2005 Ahmed-Zaid et al.
6968736 November 29, 2005 Lynam
6975775 December 13, 2005 Rykowski et al.
7004593 February 28, 2006 Weller et al.
7004606 February 28, 2006 Schofield
7005974 February 28, 2006 McMahon et al.
7038577 May 2, 2006 Pawlicki et al.
7046448 May 16, 2006 Burgner
7049945 May 23, 2006 Breed et al.
7062300 June 13, 2006 Kim
7065432 June 20, 2006 Moisel et al.
7085637 August 1, 2006 Breed et al.
7092548 August 15, 2006 Laumeyer et al.
7113867 September 26, 2006 Stein
7116246 October 3, 2006 Winter et al.
7123168 October 17, 2006 Schofield
7133661 November 7, 2006 Hatae et al.
7149613 December 12, 2006 Stam et al.
7151844 December 19, 2006 Stevenson et al.
7151996 December 19, 2006 Stein
7167796 January 23, 2007 Taylor et al.
7195381 March 27, 2007 Lynam et al.
7202776 April 10, 2007 Breed
7224324 May 29, 2007 Quist et al.
7227459 June 5, 2007 Bos et al.
7227611 June 5, 2007 Hull et al.
7249860 July 31, 2007 Kulas et al.
7253723 August 7, 2007 Lindahl et al.
7255451 August 14, 2007 McCabe et al.
7295682 November 13, 2007 Otsuka et al.
7311406 December 25, 2007 Schofield et al.
7325934 February 5, 2008 Schofield et al.
7325935 February 5, 2008 Schofield et al.
7338177 March 4, 2008 Lynam
7339149 March 4, 2008 Schofield et al.
7344261 March 18, 2008 Schofield et al.
7360932 April 22, 2008 Uken et al.
7370983 May 13, 2008 DeWind et al.
7375803 May 20, 2008 Bamji
7380948 June 3, 2008 Schofield et al.
7388182 June 17, 2008 Schofield et al.
7402786 July 22, 2008 Schofield et al.
7423248 September 9, 2008 Schofield et al.
7423821 September 9, 2008 Bechtel et al.
7425076 September 16, 2008 Schofield et al.
7459664 December 2, 2008 Schofield et al.
7463138 December 9, 2008 Pawlicki et al.
7502048 March 10, 2009 Okamoto
7526103 April 28, 2009 Schofield et al.
7541743 June 2, 2009 Salmeen et al.
7561181 July 14, 2009 Schofield et al.
7565006 July 21, 2009 Stam et al.
7566851 July 28, 2009 Stein et al.
7605856 October 20, 2009 Imoto
7616781 November 10, 2009 Schofield et al.
7619508 November 17, 2009 Lynam et al.
7633383 December 15, 2009 Dunsmoir et al.
7639149 December 29, 2009 Katoh
7655894 February 2, 2010 Schofield et al.
7676087 March 9, 2010 Dhua et al.
7720580 May 18, 2010 Higgins-Luthman
7729580 June 1, 2010 Tanaka et al.
7786898 August 31, 2010 Stein et al.
7792329 September 7, 2010 Schofield et al.
7843451 November 30, 2010 Lafon
7855778 December 21, 2010 Yung et al.
7859565 December 28, 2010 Schofield et al.
7877175 January 25, 2011 Higgins-Luthman
7881496 February 1, 2011 Camilleri
7914187 March 29, 2011 Higgins-Luthman et al.
7914188 March 29, 2011 DeLine et al.
7930160 April 19, 2011 Hosagrahara et al.
7949486 May 24, 2011 Denny et al.
7991522 August 2, 2011 Higgins-Luthman
7994462 August 9, 2011 Schofield et al.
8009977 August 30, 2011 Matsuoka et al.
8017898 September 13, 2011 Lu et al.
8064643 November 22, 2011 Stein et al.
8082101 December 20, 2011 Stein et al.
8095310 January 10, 2012 Taylor et al.
8098142 January 17, 2012 Schofield et al.
8100568 January 24, 2012 DeLine et al.
8164628 April 24, 2012 Stein et al.
8203440 June 19, 2012 Schofield et al.
8218007 July 10, 2012 Lee et al.
8222588 July 17, 2012 Schofield et al.
8224031 July 17, 2012 Saito
8233045 July 31, 2012 Luo et al.
8254635 August 28, 2012 Stein et al.
8300886 October 30, 2012 Hoffmann
8314689 November 20, 2012 Schofield et al.
8324552 December 4, 2012 Schofield et al.
8378851 February 19, 2013 Stein et al.
8386114 February 26, 2013 Higgins-Luthman
8421865 April 16, 2013 Euler et al.
8452055 May 28, 2013 Stein et al.
8514282 August 20, 2013 Imanishi et al.
8534887 September 17, 2013 DeLine et al.
8553088 October 8, 2013 Stein et al.
9014904 April 21, 2015 Higgins-Luthman
9193303 November 24, 2015 Higgins-Luthman
9446713 September 20, 2016 Lu et al.
9469250 October 18, 2016 Lynam
9493072 November 15, 2016 Goto et al.
9796332 October 24, 2017 Lu et al.
9802542 October 31, 2017 Lu et al.
9815408 November 14, 2017 Bonhoure et al.
9900522 February 20, 2018 Lu
9940528 April 10, 2018 Higgins-Luthman
9950738 April 24, 2018 Lu et al.
20010012985 August 9, 2001 Okamoto et al.
20020005778 January 17, 2002 Breed
20020011611 January 31, 2002 Huang et al.
20020080235 June 27, 2002 Jeon
20020113873 August 22, 2002 Williams
20020167589 November 14, 2002 Schofield et al.
20030052773 March 20, 2003 Sjonell
20030103142 June 5, 2003 Hitomi et al.
20030137586 July 24, 2003 Lewellen
20030156015 August 21, 2003 Winner et al.
20030169522 September 11, 2003 Schofield et al.
20030222982 December 4, 2003 Hamdan et al.
20040016870 January 29, 2004 Pawlicki
20040164228 August 26, 2004 Fogg et al.
20050083427 April 21, 2005 Imoto
20050219852 October 6, 2005 Stam et al.
20050237385 October 27, 2005 Kosaka et al.
20060018511 January 26, 2006 Stam et al.
20060018512 January 26, 2006 Stam et al.
20060050018 March 9, 2006 Hutzel et al.
20060091813 May 4, 2006 Stam et al.
20060103727 May 18, 2006 Tseng
20060250501 November 9, 2006 Wldmann et al.
20070024724 February 1, 2007 Stein et al.
20070104476 May 10, 2007 Yasutomi et al.
20070109406 May 17, 2007 Schofield et al.
20070120657 May 31, 2007 Schofield et al.
20070242339 October 18, 2007 Bradley
20080043099 February 21, 2008 Stein et al.
20080147321 June 19, 2008 Howard et al.
20080192132 August 14, 2008 Bechtel et al.
20080266396 October 30, 2008 Stein
20090113509 April 30, 2009 Tseng et al.
20090160987 June 25, 2009 Bechtel et al.
20090190015 July 30, 2009 Bechtel et al.
20090256938 October 15, 2009 Bechtel et al.
20090290032 November 26, 2009 Zhang et al.
20110216201 September 8, 2011 McAndrew et al.
20120045112 February 23, 2012 Lundblad et al.
20120069185 March 22, 2012 Stein
20120176528 July 12, 2012 Denny et al.
20120200707 August 9, 2012 Stein et al.
20120314071 December 13, 2012 Rosenbaum et al.
20120320209 December 20, 2012 Vico
20130141580 June 6, 2013 Stein et al.
20130147957 June 13, 2013 Stein
20130169812 July 4, 2013 Lu et al.
20130286193 October 31, 2013 Pflug
20130321615 December 5, 2013 Schofield
20140022378 January 23, 2014 Higgins-Luthman
20140043473 February 13, 2014 Rathi et al.
20140063254 March 6, 2014 Shi et al.
20140098229 April 10, 2014 Lu et al.
20140247352 September 4, 2014 Rathi et al.
20140247354 September 4, 2014 Knudsen
20140320658 October 30, 2014 Pliefke
20140333729 November 13, 2014 Pflug
20140347486 November 27, 2014 Okouneva
20140350834 November 27, 2014 Turk
20150085121 March 26, 2015 Englander
20150217694 August 6, 2015 Bingle et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
2133182 January 1973 DE
2808260 August 1979 DE
2931368 February 1981 DE
2946561 May 1981 DE
3041692 May 1981 DE
3248511 July 1984 DE
3041612 August 1986 DE
4107965 September 1991 DE
4118208 November 1991 DE
4139515 June 1992 DE
4123641 January 1993 DE
4124654 January 1993 DE
10115043 March 2001 DE
0048810 April 1982 EP
0202460 November 1986 EP
0830267 March 1988 EP
0353200 January 1990 EP
0354261 February 1990 EP
0416222 June 1990 EP
0527665 February 1991 EP
0426503 May 1991 EP
0450553 October 1991 EP
0492591 July 1992 EP
0513476 November 1992 EP
0361914 February 1993 EP
0591743 April 1994 EP
0605045 July 1994 EP
0640903 March 1995 EP
0697641 February 1996 EP
0755524 January 1997 EP
0788947 August 1997 EP
1074430 February 2001 EP
1115250 July 2001 EP
1120746 August 2001 EP
1339228 August 2003 EP
2377094 October 2011 EP
2667325 November 2013 EP
2241085 March 1975 FR
2513198 March 1983 FR
2585991 February 1987 FR
2641237 June 1990 FR
2672857 August 1992 FR
2673499 September 1992 FR
2726144 April 1996 FR
934037 August 1963 GB
1535182 December 1978 GB
2029343 March 1980 GB
2119087 November 1983 GB
2137373 October 1984 GB
2137573 October 1984 GB
2156295 October 1985 GB
2233530 September 1991 GB
2244187 November 1991 GB
2255539 November 1992 GB
2327823 February 1999 GB
S5539843 March 1980 JP
57173801 October 1982 JP
57208530 December 1982 JP
57208531 December 1982 JP
S58110334 June 1983 JP
58209635 December 1983 JP
59114139 July 1984 JP
59133336 July 1984 JP
6079889 May 1985 JP
6080953 May 1985 JP
60212730 October 1985 JP
60261275 December 1985 JP
6243543 February 1987 JP
6216073 April 1987 JP
S6216073 April 1987 JP
6272245 May 1987 JP
62122487 June 1987 JP
62122844 June 1987 JP
S62131837 June 1987 JP
6414700 January 1989 JP
02117935 March 1989 JP
01123587 May 1989 JP
H1168538 July 1989 JP
H236417 August 1990 JP
371399 March 1991 JP
03099952 April 1991 JP
3099952 April 1991 JP
04239400 November 1991 JP
03284413 December 1991 JP
H0424132 January 1992 JP
H0424132 January 1992 JP
04114587 April 1992 JP
H04127280 April 1992 JP
04245886 September 1992 JP
0577657 March 1993 JP
05050883 March 1993 JP
55000883 March 1993 JP
05213113 August 1993 JP
5213113 August 1993 JP
H05189694 September 1993 JP
H05189694 September 1993 JP
06107035 April 1994 JP
06156638 June 1994 JP
6227318 August 1994 JP
06267304 September 1994 JP
06276524 September 1994 JP
06295601 October 1994 JP
07004170 January 1995 JP
0732936 February 1995 JP
0747878 February 1995 JP
07052706 February 1995 JP
0769125 March 1995 JP
07105496 April 1995 JP
730149 June 1995 JP
08166221 June 1996 JP
2630604 July 1997 JP
200274339 March 2002 JP
2002232869 August 2002 JP
200350107 February 2003 JP
200376987 March 2003 JP
2003083742 March 2003 JP
2003329411 November 2003 JP
2003329411 November 2003 JP
20041658 January 2004 JP
WO1994019212 February 1994 WO
WO1994/27262 November 1994 WO
WO1996021581 July 1996 WO
WO1996038319 December 1996 WO
WO1998/14974 April 1998 WO
WO1999/14088 March 1999 WO
WO1999/23828 May 1999 WO
WO2012139636 October 2012 WO
WO2012139660 October 2012 WO
WO2012143036 October 2012 WO
Other references
  • Stein et al., “Stereo-Assist: Top-down Stereo for Driver Assistance Systems”.
  • Taktak et al., “Vehicle Detection at Night Using Image Processing and Pattern Recognition” IEEE 1994.
  • Gordenker, “Fender Mirrors”, The Japan Times webpage Nov. 18, 2013.
  • Thibault, “360° Vision System: Opportunities in Transportation” ImmerVision, Canada.
  • Roulet et al., Multi-task single lens for automotive vision applications: ImmerVision, Proc. of SPIE vol. 731-4, Canada.
  • Thibault, “Novel Compact Panomorph Lens Based Vision System for Monitoring Around a Vehicle” ImmerVision.
  • Valeo webpage, “360 Vue® multi-camera system: perfect view of the vehicle's environment” https://www.valeo.com/en/360-vue, retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • Valeo webpage, “12PM1 Parkman ECU User Manual 12PM1_FCC, IC_ Valeo Schalter und Sensoren GmbH” https://fccid.io/VE2-12PM1/UserManual-pdf-2552374, retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • Valeo Infos News, “Valeo Recieves Innovation Prize at Automechanika for its Lane Change Surveillance System” Paris, France, Sep. 14, 2004.
  • Valeo webpage, “Our Activities” https://www.valeo.com/en/our-activities/, retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • Valeo webpage, “Research & Development” https://www.valeo.com/en/research-development/, retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • Valeo article, “Valeo's LaneVue™ Systems Takes an Automotive News PACE Award 2005”, Paris, France, Apr. 12, 2005.
  • Gardner, “After the battle: as smoke clears, mirror makers arent't looking back” Ward's Auto webpage article, Dec. 1, 1996, https://www.wardsauto.com/news-analysis/after-battle-smoke-clears-mirror-makers-arent-looking-back, retrieved Aug. 14, 2018.
  • Murphy, “Looking Back to the Future—How hard can it be to eliminate a driver's blindspot?” Wards Auto webpage, May 1, 1998, https://www.wardsauto.com/news-analysis/looking-back-future-how-hard-can-it-be-eliminate-drivers-blindspot., retrieved Aug. 14, 2018.
  • Murphy, “Magna Attacking Vehicle Blindspots” Wards Auto webpage, Feb. 23, 2007, https://www.wardsauto.com/news-analysis/magna-attacking-vehicle-blindspots, retrieved Aug. 14, 2018.
  • Adasens Automotive GmbH website article, “Machine Vision Forward Looking Cameras—Vehicle Functions,” http://www.adasens.com/Vision.html., retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • Adasens Automotive GmbH website article, “Safety at every lane change,” http://www.adasens.com/news_details/safety-at-every-lane-change.html, retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • AggNet website article, “A big step in all-round visibility,” https://www.agg-net.com/news/a-big-forward-step-in-all-round-visibility[Aug. 15, 2018 7:28:54 PM].
  • Ambarella, “A9AQ Automotive Multi-Camera Electronic Mirror and Surround View SoC,” Product Brief.
  • Ambarella Camera Products website, “Automotive Camera Products” http://www.ambarella.com/products/automotive-cameras/automotive-camera-products[Aug. 15, 2018 6:00:48 PM].
  • Ambarella, Embedded Computer Vision SoCs website article, “Ambarella Introducts Autmotive Multi-Camera Electronc Mirror and Surround View SoCs” http://www.ambaralla.com/news/103/122/Ambarella-Introducts-Automotive-Multi-Camera retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • ASL iVENCS website article, “Versatile Site or Wide-Area Asset Control System” http:///www.asl-control.co.uk/product/ivencs/ retreived Jul. 25, 2018.
  • Auto Evolution website article, “A Short History of Mercedes-Benz Autonomous Driving Technology,” http://www.autoevolution.com/news/a-short-history-of-mercedes-benz-autonomous-driving-technology-68148.html [Aug. 14, 2018 6:24:02 PM].
  • Autoblog website article, “2012 Nissan Rogue Gains Optional Around View Monitor [w/video]” http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/11/2012-nissan-rogue-gains-optional-around-view-monitor, retreived Jul. 25, 2018.
  • Autoblog, “Continental's 360-degree camera system goes next level with 3D” http://www.autoblog.com/2014/08/15/continental-360-degree-camera-3d-video/ retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • Brown, “Automatic Panoramic Image Stitching using Invariant Features” Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Bigas et al., “Review of CMOS image sensors” Microelectronics Journal 37, www,elsevier.com/locate/mejo, 2006, 433-451.
  • Bosch Mobility Solutions website article, “Multi-camera system” https://www.bosch-mobility-solutions.com/ . . . s/passenger-cars-and-light-commericial-vehicles/driver-assistance-systems/multi-camera-systems [Aug. 15, 2018 7:24:09 PM].
  • Boyle et al., “Charge Coupled Semiconductor Devices” B.S.T.J. Briefs, Jan. 29, 1970, 587-593.
  • Business Wire, “Iteris Technology Chosen by Nissan for Auto Industry's First-Ever Lane Departue Warning System,” Business Wire, Mar. 31, 2004.
  • Business Wire, “Logex Corp.Selects Iteris' AutoVue Lane Deparature Warning Technology on New Truck Purchases” Business Wire, Jun. 26, 2003.
  • Business Wire, “Renesas Electronics and Cogent Embedded Collaborate to Make 3D Surround View Parking Assist System Standard in All New Cars” Business Wire, https://businesswire.com/news/hone/20170913006643/en.retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • Busworld, “No Blind Spot Continental ProViu ASL360 360-Degree Camera System for Retrofitting” https://www.busworld.org/articles/detail/1986[Aug. 13, 2018 3:55:01 PM].
  • Cadillac website article, “Cadillac CT6 Features Industry-first surround-view video recording system” http://media.cadillac.com/media/us/en/cadillac/news/detail.html/content/Pages/news/us/en, retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • CAR Magazine website article “New Panoramic 360-degree parking camera unveiled” CAR Magazine, https://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-news-first-official-pictures/new-panoramic-360 degree. retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • Clarion U.S.A. webpage, “Clarion and Porsche Introduced all-surrouind view overhead camera system for Porsche Panamera,” http://www.clarion.com/us/en/corp/information/news-release/2014/1212-1/index.html, Dec. 12, 2014, retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • CNET webpage, “1956 Buick Centurion Dream Car” https://www.cnet.com/pictures/photos-when-gms-designs-ruled-the-road/11/ retrieved Aug. 10, 2018.
  • CNET webpage, “2011 Range Rover Hands-on: 360-degree view from onboard cameras” https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news.2011-range-rover-hands-on-360-degree-views retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • Surround View-Cogent Embedded website article, “Surround View” https://www.cogentembedded.com/surround-view/ retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • Consumer's Reports webpage, “2012 Nissian Rogue adds around view monitor” https://consumerreports.org/cro/news/2011/11/2012-nissan-rogue-adds-arouns-view-monitor/index.htm [Aug. 15, 2018 6:32:33 PM].
  • PR Newswire Continental webpage “Continental Acquies ASL Vision, a Specialised Company for 360-Degree Surround Detection,” https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/continental-acquires-asl-vision-a-specialized. Jan. 14, 2013.
  • Continental Automotive webpage, “Rear View System RVS3XX” https://continental-automotive.com/en-gl/Passenger-Cars/Chassis-Safety/Advanced retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • Continental webpage article, “The latest camera generation from Continental gives the on-board computer bigger eyes” https://www.continental-corporation.com/en/press/press/releases/mfc-500-camera. retrieved Jul. 30, 2018.
  • Continental Automotive webpage, “Mono Camera, Multi Function Mono Camera” https://www.continental-automotive.com/en/gl/Passenger-Cars-Chasses-Safety/Advanced-Driver-Assistance-Systems/Cameras/Mono-Camera [Aug. 15, 2018 6:40:30 PM].
  • Continental Automotive webpage, “ProViuASL360 Greater situational awareness using advanced driver assistance” https://www.continental-automotive.com/ . . . gl/Trucks-Buses/Vehicle-Chassis-Body/Advanced-Driver-Assistance-Systems/Camera-Based-Systems/ProViu360 [Aug. 15, 2018 5:56:23 PM].
  • Earnest, “Stanford Cart, How a Moon Rover Project was Blocked by a Politician but got kicked by Football into a Self-Driving Vehicle” https://web.stanford.edu/˜learnest/les/cart.html. Mar. 6, 2018.
  • Edmund Optics webpage, “Imaging Electronics 101: Understanding Camera Sensors for Machine Vision Applications” Ittps://www.edmundoptics.com/resources/application-notes/imaging/understanding-camera retrieved Aug. 10, 2018.
  • “Electronic Displays and Information Systems”, SAE Global, International Congress and Exposition Detroit Feb. 24-28, 1986.
  • Fossum et al., “A Review of the Pinned Photodiode for CCD and CMOS Image Sensors” IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society, vol. 2, No. 3, May 2014.
  • Frost & Sullivan webpage article, “In Search of the Ideal Blind-Spot Detection System” http://frost.com/sublib/display-market-insight-top.do?id=19917640 [Aug. 14, 2018 10:11:11 PM].
  • Guiducci, “Camera Calibration for Road Applications,” Computer vision and Image Understanding 79, 2000, 250-266.
  • “History of Photogrammetry”, The Center for Photogrammetric Training, last updated Aug. 24, 2008, 1-36.
  • Nolan, “Survey of Electronic Displays,” Automotive Electronics II, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Feb. 1975.
  • Batavia et al., “Overtaking Vehicle Detection Using Implicit Optical Flow” IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Boston Park Plaza Hotel, Boston, MA Nov. 9-12, 1997.
  • Korea IT Times, “MCNEX—The Eye of Digital Devices” https///www.koreaitimes.com/printstory/20625/mcnex-eyedigital-devices Jun. 19, 2012.
  • Valeo Press Release, “LaneVue System in the running for the finals at the Automotive News PACE Awards 2005” Auburn Hills, MI Oct. 19, 2004.
  • Liang et al., “Video Stabilization for a Camcorder Mounted on a Moving Vehicle” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 53, No. 6, Nov. 2004.
  • Choi et al., “Advanced driver-assistance systems: Challenges and opportunities ahead” McKinsey & Company, Feb. 2016.
  • Moravec, “Obstacle avoidance and navigation in the real world by a seeing robot rover” Stanford University, 1980.
  • NHTSA Driver Assitance Technologies, “Driver Assistance Technologies” webpage, https://www.nhtsa.gov/equipment/driver-assistance-technologies [Aug. 14, 2018 6:56:18 PM].
  • Pomerleau, “RALPH: Rapidly Adapting Lateral Position Handler” The Robotics Instutute, Carnegie Mellong University, 506-511.
  • Otsuka et al., “Flat Dot Matrix Display Module for Vehicle Instrumentation” Proceedings of the Fourth International Pacific Conference on Automotive Engineering., Melbourne, Australia, Nov. 8-14, 1987.
  • Ortega, “An Interactive, Reconfigurable Display System for Automotive Instrumentation” Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., 1987.
  • Softpedia News webpage article, “Fujitsu Creates a 360-degree wrap-around video of your car's surrounding” https://news.softpedia.com/news.Fujitsu-Creates-a-360-Degree-Wrap-Around-Video-of-Your-Cars-Surrounding, Oct. 20, 2010, retrieved Jul. 25, 2018.
  • SRI International webpage, “Shakey the Robot” https://www/.sri.com/work/timeline-/nnocation/timeline.php?timeline=computing-digital, retrieved Aug. 10, 2018.
  • Achler et al., “Vehicle Wheel Detector using 2D Filter Banks,” IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium of Jun. 2004.
  • Ahmed et al., “Differential Methods for Nonmetric Calibration of Camera Lens Distortion,” Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001. CVPR 2001. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on. vol. 2. IEEE, 2001.
  • Aufrere et al., “A fast and robust vision based road following algorithm,” Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2000, Dearborn, MI, Oct. 3-5, 2000.
  • Ballard et al., “Computer Vision”, 1982, p. 88-89, sect. 3.4.1.
  • Batavia et al., “Detecting Overtaking Vehicles with Implicit Optical Flow,” Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Mar. 4, 1998.
  • Behringer et al., “Visuelle Erkennung and Interpretation des Fahrspurver-Laufes durch Rechnersehen fur ein autonomes Strassenfahrzeug”, No. 310.
  • Behringer et al., “Simultaneous Estimation of Pitch Angle and Lane Width from the Video Image of a Marked Road,” pp. 966-973, Sep. 12-16, 1994.
  • Bertozzi et al., “Obstacle and Lane Detection on the ARGO Autonomous Vehicle,” University of Parma, Italy.
  • Bertozzi et al., “Pedestrian Localization and Tracking System with Kalman Filtering,” IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, University of Parma, Italy, Jun. 14-17, 2004.
  • Bertozzi et al., “Vision-based intelligent vehicles: State of the art and perspectives,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2000.
  • Birkland, “See and Be Seen”, Management Techniques, Fleet Equipment, May 1993.
  • Bishop, “Intelligent Vehicle Applications Worldwide,” Intelligent Transportation Systems, Jan.-Feb. 2000.
  • Bogner, “An Introduction to Panosheric Imaging,” IEEE, 1995.
  • Bohrer et al., “An Integrated Obstacle Detection Framework for Intelligent Cruise Control on Motorways,” Research Gate Conference Paper, Oct. 1995.
  • Borenstein et al., “Where am I? Sensors and Method for Mobile Robot Positioning”, University of Michigan, Apr. 1996, pp. 2, 125-128.
  • Bow, Sing T., “Pattern Recognition and Image Preprocessing (Signal Processing and Communications)”, CRC Press, Jan. 15, 2002, pp. 557-559.
  • Braess et al., “Prometheus: Vision des ‘intelligenten Automobils’ auf ‘intelligenter Strasse’?” Forschung, Versuch einer kristischen Wurdigung—Teil 1, pp. 200-205.
  • Braess et al., “Prometheus: Vision des ‘intelligenten Automobils’ auf ‘intelligenter Strasse’?” Forschung, Versuch einer kristischen Wurdigung—Teil 2, pp. 330-336.
  • Brauckmann et al., “Towards All Around Automatic Visual Obstacle Sensing for Cars,” Germany, no date.
  • Broggi et al., “Self-Calibration of a Stereo Vision System for Automotive Applications”, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Seoul, KR, May 21-26, 2001.
  • Broggi et al., “Automatic Vehicle Guidance: The Experience of the ARGO Vehicle”, World Scientific Publishing Co., 1999.
  • Broggi et al., “Multi-Resolution Vehicle Detection using Artificial Vision,” IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium of Jun. 2004.
  • Broggi et al., “Shape-based Pedestrian Detection,” Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2000.
  • Broggi et al., “The Evolution of the PAPRICA System,” Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 4.2,1997, pp. 114-136.
  • Broggi, “Robust Real-Time Lane and Road Detection in Critical Shadow Conditions,” no date.
  • Broggi, “Vision-based Road Detection in Automotive Systems: A real-time expectation-driven approach”, 1995.
  • Brown, A Survey of Image Registration Techniques, vol. 24, ACM Computing Surveys, pp. 325-376, 1992.
  • Brudigam, “Intelligente Fahrmanover sehender autonomer Fahrzeuge in autobahnahnlicher umgebung,” Jun. 22, 1994.
  • Buehler et al., “Non-Metric Image-Based Rendering for Video Stabilization,” IEEE, 2001.
  • Burger et al., “Estimating 3-D Egomotion from Perspective Image Sequences”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 12, No. 11, pp. 1040-1058, Nov. 1990.
  • Burt et al., A Multiresolution Spline with Application to Image Mosaics, ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 2. No. 4, pp. 217-236, Oct. 1983.
  • Carter, “Honda's Intelligent Night Vision System”, Oct. 26, 2004.
  • Chen, “Image Stitching Comparisons and New Techniques,” Computer Science Dept. of the University of Auckland, Oct. 1998.
  • Chicago Sun Times, “Toyota: Cars for today and tomorrow,” Section: Auto Show, Feb. 9, 1992, pp. 1-3.
  • Collins et al., “Calibration of an Outdoor Active Camera System,” The Robotics Institute of Carnegie Mellon University, 1998.
  • Cucchiara et al., Vehicle Detection under Day and Night Illumination, 1999.
  • Denyer et al., “On-Chip CMOS Sensors for VLSI Imaging Systems”, Dept. of Elect. Engineering, University of Edinburgh, pp. 4b1.1-4b1.5, 1991.
  • Derutin et al., “Real-time Collision Avoidance at Road-Crossings on board the Prometheus-ProLab 2 Vehicle,” Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium, 1994, France, pp. 56-61.
  • Dickmanns et al., “A Curvature-based Scheme for Improving Road Vehicle Guidance by Computer Vision,” University of Bundeswehr München, 1986.
  • Dickmanns et al., “Recursive 3-D road and relative ego-state recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 14, No. 2, Feb. 1992.
  • Dickmanns et al., “Scene Recognition and Navigation Capabilities for Lane Changes and Turns in Vision-Based Vehicle Guidance,” Control Eng. Practice, vol. 4, No. 5, 1996, Great Britain.
  • Dickmanns et al., “The seeing passenger car ‘VaMoRs-P’”, Oct. 24, 1994.
  • Dickmanns et al.; “An integrated spatio-temporal approach to automatic visual guidance of autonomous vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 20, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1990.
  • Dickmanns, “Road Vehicle Eyes for High Precision Navigation,” High Precision Navigation, Diimmler Verlag, Bonn, 1995.
  • Dickmanns, “4-D dynamic vision for intelligent motion control”, Universitat der Bundeswehr Munich, 1991.
  • Dickmanns, “Dynamic Vision for Perception and Control of Motion,” Springer Science & Business Media, 2007, Table of Contents, no date.
  • Dickmanns, “The Development of Machine Vision for Road Vehicles in the Last Decade,” Intelligent Vehicle Symposium, 2002. IEEE. vol. 1. IEEE, 2002.
  • Dickmanns, “Vehicles Capable of Dynamic Vision: A New Breed of Technical Beings?” Artificial Intelligence, 1998.
  • Dickmanns, “Vision for Ground Vehicles: History and Prospects,” Int. of Vehicle Autonomous Systems, vol. 1, No. 1, 2002.
  • Donnelly Panoramic Vision™ on Renault Talisman Concept Car At Frankfort Motor Show, PR Newswire, Frankfort, Germany Sep. 10, 2001.
  • Efenberger et al., “Automatic Recognition of Vehicles Approaching from Behind,” Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles' 92 Symposium, 1992, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Enkelmann et al., “Obstacle Detection by Real-Time Optical Flow Evaluation,” Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles' 94 Symposium, 1994.
  • Ernst et al., “Camera calibration for lane and obstacle detection” Intelligent Transportation Systems, 1999 pp. 356-361.
  • Fintzel et al., “3D Vision System for Vehicles,” Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, IEEE, 2003.
  • Frank, “Safety Rules the Road,” Design News, Oct. 11, 2004.
  • Franke et al., “Autonomous driving approaches downtown”, Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, IEEE 13 (6), 40-48, Nov./Dec. 1999.
  • Graefe et al., “A Novel Approach for the Detection of Vehicles on Freeways by Real-Time Visions,” Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles, Tokyo, Sep. 1996.
  • Green, “Computer Image Processing—The Viking Experience,” ASA STI/Recon Technical Report A, Jul. 29, 1977, pp. 281-299.
  • Greene et al., Creating Raster Omnimax Images from Multiple Perspective Views Using the Elliptical Weighted Average Filter, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 21-27, Jun. 1986.
  • Gregor, “A Vision System for Autonomous Ground Vehicles with a Wide Range of Maneuvering Capabilities,” International Conference on Computer Vision Systems, Springer-Verlag Berlin 2001.
  • Gregor, “EMS-Vision: A Perceptual System for Autonomous Vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 3, No. 1, Mar. 2002.
  • Gregor, “EMS-Vision: Combining on- and off-road driving,” Aerospace/Defense Sensing, Simulation, and Controls. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2001.
  • Gregor, “EMS-Vision: Mission Performance on Road Vehicles,” Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Oct. 3-5, 2000.
  • Halme et al., “Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles 1995,” International Federation of Automatic Control, Jun. 12-14, 1995, Part of Table of Contents.
  • Hamit, “360-Degree Interactivity: New Video and Still Cameras Provide a Global Roaming Viewpoint”, Advanced Imaging, Mar. 1997, p. 50.
  • Harris et al., “A Combined Corner and Edge Detector,” Alvey Vision Conference, vol. 15, 1988.
  • Haywood, “Acquisition of a Micro Scale Photographic Survey Using an Autonomous Submersible,” Oceans '86, IEEE 1986.
  • Hicks et al., “Panoramic Electronic Rear Vision for Automotive Applications,” SAE Technical Paper Series, International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, MI, Mar. 1-4, 1999.
  • Hiramatsu et al., “Rearview Camera Based Parking Assist System with Voice Guidance,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0759, 2002.
  • Hock, “Wissensbasierte Fahrzengfurung mit Landmarken fur autonome Roboter,” Universitate der Bundeswehr, 1994.
  • Hofmann, “EMS-Vision: Application to Hybrid Adaptive Cruise Control,” Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Dearborn, MI, Oct. 3-5, 2000.
  • Hofmann, “Radar and Vision Data Fusion for Hybrid Adaptive Cruise Control on Highways,” Machine Vision and Applications, Springer-Verlag, 2003.
  • Holt, “Integrale Multisensorielle Fahrumgebungserfassung nach dem 4D-Ansatz,” Universitat der Bundeswehr München, Nov. 12, 2004.
  • Holt, “Tracking and Classification of Overtaking Vehicles on Autobahnen,” Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, IEEE, 1994.
  • Honda Worldwide, “Honda Announces a Full Model Change for the Inspire.” Jun. 18, 2003.
  • Honda, “Honda Develops World's First Intelligent Night Vision System Able to Detect Pedestrians and Provide Driver Cautions,” Honda Worldwide, Aug. 24, 2004.
  • IEEE 100—The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms, 7th Ed. (2000).
  • Impedovo, “Progress in Image Analysis and Processing III,” World Scientific, Capitolo, Monpoli, Italy, Sep. 22, 1993, Table of Contents.
  • IPR Proceeding No. IPR2014-00221, filed Dec. 4, 2013, re U.S. Pat. No. 7,991,522.
  • IPR Proceeding No. IPR2014-00222, filed Dec. 4, 2013, re U.S. Pat. No. 8,386,114.
  • IPR Proceeding No. IPR2014-00223, filed Dec. 4, 2013, re U.S. Pat. No. 8,386,114.
  • IPR Proceeding No. IPR2014-00227, filed Dec. 4, 2013, re U.S. Pat. No. 7,877,175.
  • IPR Proceeding No. IPR2014-00228, filed Dec. 4, 2013, re U.S. Pat. No. 7,877,175.
  • IPR Proceeding No. IPR2014-01204, filed Jul. 25, 2014, re U.S. Pat. No. 8,386,114.
  • IPR Proceeding No. IPR2014-01206, filed Jul. 25, 2014, re U.S. Pat. No. 7,877,175.
  • IPR Proceeding No. IPR2014-01208, filed Jul. 25, 2014, re U.S. Pat. No. 7,991,522.
  • IPR Proceeding No. IPR2015-00960, filed Mar. 27, 2015, re U.S. Pat. No. 8,116,929.
  • IPR Proceeding No. IPR2015-00961, filed Mar. 27, 2015, re U.S. Pat. No. 8,116,929.
  • Ito, “A Real Time Distance Headway Measurement Method Using Stereo and Optical Flow,” Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, ITTT, 1992.
  • Japanese Article “Television Image Engineering Handbook, The Institute of Television Engineers of Japan”, Jan. 17, 1981.
  • Johannes, “A New Microchip Ushers In Cheaper Digital Cameras”, The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 21, 1998, p. B1.
  • Kan et al., “Model-based vehicle tracking from image sequences with an application to road surveillance,” Purdue University, XP000630885, vol. 35, No. 6, Jun. 1996.
  • Kastrinaki et al., “A survey of video processing techniques for traffic applications”.
  • Kinzel, “Pedestrian Recognition by Modelling Their Shapes and Movements,” Proc. of the 7th Intl. Conf. on Image Analysis and Processing, 1993.
  • Kluge et al., “Representation and Recovery of Road Geometry in YARF,” Carnegie Mellon University, pp. 114-119.
  • Kobe, Gerry, “Hypnotic Wizardry! (interior electronics),” Automotive Industries, vol. 169, No. 5, p. 60, May 1989.
  • Koller et al., “Binocular Stereopsis and Lane Marker Flow for Vehicle Navigation: Lateral and Longitudinal Control,” University of California, Mar. 24, 1994.
  • Koyamaishi et al., “Acquisition of Position and Direction of In-Vehicle Camera for HIR System,” IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium, 2004.
  • Kuhnert, “A vision system for real time road and object recognition for vehicle guidance,” in Proc. SPIE Mobile Robot Conf, Cambridge, MA, Oct. 1986, pp. 267-272.
  • Kujawski, “Deciding the Behaviour of an Autonomous Mobile Road Vehicle,” IFAC Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles, Proceeding of the 2nd IFAC Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles, Finland, 1995.
  • Kumar, “Representation of Scenes from Collections of Images,” Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Representation of Visual Scenes, Jun. 24, 1995, pp. 10-17, Cambridge, MA.
  • Labayrade et al., “Real Time Obstacle Detection in Stereovision on Non Flat Road Geometry Through V-disparity” Representation, Intelligent Vehicle Symposium, 2002. IEEE. vol. 2. IEEE, 2002.
  • Liang, “Video Stabilization for a Camcorder Mounted on a Moving Vehicle,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 53, No. 6, Nov. 2004.
  • Lienert, “Fast Forward: Consepts: Tomorrow's Cars or Drives of Fancy,” Chicago Tribune, Feb. 11, 1996.
  • Linkwitz, “High Precision Navigation 95,” University of Stuttgart, Apr. 1995.
  • Linzmeler et al., “Pedestrian Detection with Thermopiles using an Occupancy Grid,” IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, Washington, D.C., Oct. 3-6, 2004.
  • Luo et al., “Pedestrian Detection in Near-Infrared Night Vision System,” IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, San Diego, CA, Jun. 21-24, 2010.
  • Malik et al., “A Machine Vision Based System for Guiding Lane-change Maneuvers,” Sep. 1995.
  • Masaki, “Vision-based Vehicle Guidance,” Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on Power Electronics and Motion Control, IEEE, 1992.
  • Maurer, “EMS-Vision: Knowledge Representation for Flexible Automation of Land Vehicles,” Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Dearborn, MI Oct. 3-5, 2000.
  • Mei Chen et al., AURORA: A Vision-Based Roadway Departure Warning System, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, published Aug. 9, 1995.
  • Miksch et al., “Automatic Extrinsic Camera Self-Calibration Based on Homography and Epipolar Geometry,”, IEEE, Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2010.
  • Minuro et al., “Functions and Devices of Mitsubishi Active Safety ASV,” IEEE, Jun. 1996.
  • Miro et al., “Real-Time Image Stitching for Automotive 360° Vision Systems,” Audiovisual Engineering, Barcelona, Jul. 2014.
  • Morgan et al., “Road edge tracking for robot road following: a real-time implementation,” vol. 8, No. 3, Aug. 1990.
  • Mori et al., “Shadow and Rhythm as Sign Patterns of Obstacle Detection,” IEEE 1993.
  • Murphy et al., “Application of Panospheric Imaging to a Teleoperated Lunar Rover,” Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Intelligent Systems for the 21st Century, IEEE, 1995.
  • Nathan, Digital Video Data Handling, NASA JPL Tech Report 32-877, Pasadena, CA, Jan. 5, 1966.
  • Nissan Press Release, “Highlights of Nissan's Exhibits at the 2001 Tokyo Motor Show,” Oct. 17, 2001, pp. 1-7.
  • Paetzold, “Road Recognition in Urban Environment,” IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Vehicles, 1998.
  • Parker (ed.), McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms Fifth Edition (1993).
  • Pellkofer et al., “EMS-Vision: Gaze Control in Autonomous Vehicles,” Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Dearborn, MI, Oct. 3-5, 2000.
  • Pellkofer et al., “Interaction of Perception and Gaze Control in Autonomous Vehicles,” Intelligent Robots and Computer Vision XX, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4572, 2001.
  • Philomin et al., “Pedestrian Tracking from a Moving Vehicle”.
  • Pomerleau et al., “Rapidly Adapting Machine Vision for Automated Vehicle Steering”, pp. 19-27, Apr. 30, 1996.
  • Popular Science, “Pioneering Research Tools for Artificial Intelligence, Robot Insects,” Mar. 1991.
  • Porter et al., “Compositing Digital Images,” Computer Graphics (Proc. Siggraph), vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 253-259, Jul. 1984.
  • Pratt, “Digital Image Processing, Passage—ED.3”, John Wiley & Sons, US, Jan. 1, 2001, pp. 657-659, XP002529771.
  • Rasmussen, “Combining Laser Range, Color, and Texture Cues for Autonomous Road Following,” IEEE Conference on Robotics for Automation, Washington, D.C., May 2002.
  • Reexamination Control No. 90/007,519, dated Jun. 9, 2005, Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,222,447, issued to Schofield et al.
  • Reexamination Control No. 90/007,520, dated Jun. 9, 2005, Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 5,949,331, issued to Schofield et al.
  • Reexamination Control No. 90/011,477, dated Mar. 14, 2011, Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 5,949,331, issued to Schofield et al.
  • Reexamination Control No. 90/011,478, dated Mar. 28, 2011, Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 6,222,447, issued to Schofield et al.
  • Regensburger, “Object Classification for Obstacle Avoidance,” SPIE, vol. 1388 Mobile Robots V, 1990.
  • Regensburger, “Zur Erkennung von Hindernissen in der Bahn elnes Stassenfahrzeungs durch maschinelles Echtzeitsehen,” Dec. 17, 1993.
  • Regensburger, Uwe and Volker Graefe; “Visual Recognition of Obstacles on Roads”, 1994.
  • Reichard et al., “A Real-time Approach to Traffic Situation Representation From Image Processing Data,” Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 1995.
  • Rembold, “Intelligent Autonomous Systems IAS-4,” Proceedings of the International Conference, Germany, Mar. 27-30, 1995.
  • Reynaud et al., “On Board Data Fusion and Decision System Used for Obstacle Detection: 2D Vision Versus 1D Sensor Fusion,” Prometheus Prochip, Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, IEEE, 1994.
  • Rieder, “Multisensoriells Fahrzeugerkennung in einem verteilten Rechnersystem fur autonome Fahrzeuge,” Oct. 24, 2000.
  • Risack et al., “Robust Lane Recognition Embedded in a Real-Time Driver Assistance System,” IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Vehicles, 1998.
  • Rombaut, “Prolab 2: A Driving Assistance System,” Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE/Tsukuba International Workshop on Advanced Robotics, Japan, Nov. 8-9, 1993.
  • Ross, “A Practical Stereo Vision System”, IEEE 1993.
  • Sahli et al., “A Kalman Filter-Based Update Scheme for Road Following,” IAPR Workshop on Machine Vision Applications, pp. 5-9, Nov. 12-14, 1996.
  • Saneyoshi, “3-D Image Recognition System for Drive Assistance,” Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles' 93 Symposium, 1993.
  • Sasuki, “3-D Image Location Surveillance System for the Automotive Rear-View,” Vehicle Navigation & Information Systems Conference Proceedings, 1994.
  • Schick, “Gleichzeitige Erkennung von Form and Bewegung durch Rechnersehen,” Uniersitat der Bundeswehr Munchen, Jun. 6, 1992.
  • Schick, “Simultaneous Estimation of 3D Shape and Motion of Objects by Computer Vision,” Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Visual Motion IEEE, 1991.
  • Schiehlen, “Kameraplattformen Fur Aktiv Sehande Fahrzeuge,” Verlag, No. 514, 1995.
  • Schmid, “An Approach to Model-Based 3-D Recognition of Vehicles in Real-Time by Machine Vision,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ/GI International Conference on Advanced Robotic Systems and the Real World, vol. 3, IEEE, 1994.
  • Schmid, “Evaluation of Interest Point Detectors,” International Journal of computer vision 37.2, Dec. 22, 2010.
  • Shum et al., “Panoramic Image Mosaics,” Microsoft Research Technical Report, 1997.
  • Stenkula, “Vehicle Vicinity from Above: a Study of All-around Environment Displaying System for Heavy Vehicles,” Master of Science Thesis, Stockholm, Sweden, 2009.
  • Sun et al., “On-road vehicle detection using optical sensors: a review”, IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2004.
  • Szeliski, Image Mosaicing for Tele-Reality Applications, DEC Cambridge Research Laboratory, CRL 94/2, May 1994.
  • The 35th Tokyo Motor Show, Nissan, IDEO Article, Oct. 2001.
  • Thomanek et al., “Multiple object recognition and scene interpretation for autonomous road vehicle guidance” Oct. 1994.
  • Thomanek et al., “Obstacle Detection, Tracking and State Estimation for Autonomous Road Vehicle Guidance,” Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Raleigh, NC, Jul. 7-10, 1992.
  • Thomanek, “Visuelle Erkennung and Zustandsschatzung von mehreren Strassenfahrzeugen zur autonomen Fahrzeungfuhrung,” VDI Verlag, No. 272, 1996.
  • Thorpe et al., “The 1997 Automated Highway Free Agent Demonstration”, 1997 pp. 496-501, 1997.
  • Thorpe, et al., Vision and Navigation for the Carnegie-Mellon Navlab, IEEE Paper 1988.
  • Tokimaru et al., “CMOS Rear-View TV System with CCD Camera”, National Technical Report vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 329-336, Jun. 1988 (Japan).
  • Toyota Crown Majesta Undergoes Complete Resign Article, 2004.
  • Toyota Motor Corporation, “Present and future of safety technology development at Toyota.” 2004.
  • Tsugawa et al., “An automobile with artificial intelligence,” in Proc. Sixth IJCAI, 1979.
  • Tsugawa et al., “Vision-based vehicles in japan; machine vision systems and driving control systems”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 41, No. 4, Aug. 1994.
  • Turk et al., “Video Road-Following for the Autonomous Land Vehicle,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 4, 1987.
  • Turk et al., “VITS-A Vision System for Autonomous Land Vehicle Navigation,” IEEE, 1988.
  • Tzomakas and von Seelen, Vehicle Detection in Traffic Scenes Using Shadows, Internal report, Institut Für Neuroinformatik Bochum, Internal Report 98-06.
  • Ulmer, “VITA II—active collision avoidance in real traffic” Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles '94 Symposium, Oct. 24-26, 1994.
  • Van Leeuwen et al., “Motion Estimation with a Mobile Camera for Traffic Applications”, IEEE, US, vol. 1, Oct. 3, 2000, pp. 58-63.
  • Van Leeuwen et al., “Motion Interpretation for In-Car Vision Systems”, IEEE, US, vol. 1, Sep. 30, 2002, p. 135-140.
  • Van Leeuwen et al., “Real-Time Vehicle Tracking in Image Sequences”, IEEE, US, vol. 3, May 21, 2001, pp. 2049-2054, XP010547308.
  • Van Leeuwen et al., “Requirements for Motion Estimation in Image Sequences for Traffic Applications”, IEEE, US, vol. 1, May 24, 1999, pp. 145-150, XP010340272.
  • Van Leeuwen et al., “Requirements for Motion Estimation in Image Sequences for Traffic Applications”, IEEE, pp. 354-359, XP002529773, 2000.
  • Vellacott, Oliver, “CMOS in Camera,” IEE Review, pp. 111-114 (May 1994).
  • Visteon, “Innovations: Improving Nighttime Vision,” Oct. 18, 2001.
  • Vlacic et al. (Eds), “Intelligent Vehicle Tecnologies, Theory and Applications”, Society of Automotive Engineers Inc., edited by SAE International, 2001.
  • Wang et al., “CMOS Video Cameras”, article, 4 pages, University of Edinburgh, UK, 1991.
  • Wang et al., CMOS Video Cameras, article, 1991, 4 pages, University of Edinburgh, UK.
  • Wang, “Camera Calibration by Vanishing Lines for 3-D Computer Vision,” IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 13, No. 4, Apr. 1991.
  • Williamson, “A High-Performance Vision System for Obstacle Detection,” Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1998.
  • Wolberg, “A Two-Pass Mesh Warping Implementation of Morphing,” Dr. Dobb's Journal, No. 202, Jul. 1993.
  • Wolberg, Digital Image Warping, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1990.
  • Xiong, “Error Analysis of a Real-Time Stereo System,” Proceedings on the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1997.
  • Yang, “Obstacle Detection in a Sequence of Rearview Images,” International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing ICICS, Singapore, Sep. 9-12, 1997.
  • Zhao, “Obstacle Detection by Vision for an Autonomous Vehicle,” Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 1993.
  • Zheng et al., “An Adaptive System for Traffic Sign Recognition,” IEEE Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles '94 Symposium, pp. 165-170 (Oct. 1994).
  • Zhu et al., “A Real-Time Vision System for Automatic Traffic Monitoring Based on 2D Spatio-Temporal Images,” Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, 1996.
  • Zhu et al., “Panoramic EPI Generation and Analysis of Video from a Moving Platform with Vibration,” IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, 1999.
Patent History
Patent number: 10509972
Type: Grant
Filed: Apr 9, 2018
Date of Patent: Dec 17, 2019
Patent Publication Number: 20180225528
Assignee: MAGNA ELECTRONICS INC. (Auburn Hills, MI)
Inventor: Michael J. Higgins-Luthman (Livonia, MI)
Primary Examiner: Jaime Figueroa
Application Number: 15/948,058
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Vehicular (348/148)
International Classification: G06K 9/00 (20060101); H04N 7/18 (20060101); B60R 1/12 (20060101); B60Q 9/00 (20060101); H04N 5/232 (20060101); B60W 50/14 (20120101); B60R 1/00 (20060101); B60W 40/04 (20060101); H04N 5/374 (20110101);