Connector plug for connecting an ignition coil to a spark plug

A connector plug is described for connecting an ignition coil to a spark plug, comprising an electrical conductor, which has a first end for contacting the ignition coil and a second end for contacting the spark plug, and a protective tube, which surrounds the electrical conductor. In accordance with this disclosure it is proposed that the protective tube has a predetermined bending point with a reduced bending stiffness.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to DE 10 2017 127 174.0, filed Nov. 17, 2017, and also claims priority to DE 10 2018 108 292.4, filed Apr. 9, 2018, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY

This disclosure is based on a connector plug for connecting an ignition coil to a spark plug. Connector plugs of this type are generally known from DE 10 2011 082 231 A1, JP 2011-134857 A and DE 10 2015 110 309 A1, for example.

Depending on the geometric conditions on an engine, connector plugs with either a straight or a curved protective tube are required. The production of both straight and curved protective tubes is expensive. There is therefore a need for connector plugs that can be bent as required, such as the connector plug of known art from JP 2011-134857 A.

This disclosure shows how a connector plug for connecting a spark plug to an ignition coil can be produced cost-effectively, which—if required—can also be mounted in a curved state on an engine with little effort, and is protected from damage by a mechanically robust protective tube.

The protective tube of an inventive connector plug has a predetermined bending point with a reduced bending stiffness. If the connector plug is to be used in a curved state, the protective tube can easily be bent in the desired manner at the one or more bending points, so that the connector plug can be used in either a straight configuration or a curved configuration. In the simplest case, the predetermined bending point can be embodied as a groove or a notch in the outer surface of the protective tube.

In an advantageous refinement of this disclosure the protective tube has a plurality of mutually adjacent reinforcement ribs extending in its longitudinal direction, wherein the predetermined bending point is designed as a recess, or other weakening feature, in one or a plurality of these reinforcement ribs. All the reinforcement ribs, some of the reinforcement ribs, or even just one reinforcement rib, may have such a recess.

It is preferable that reinforcement ribs on opposite sides of the protective tube have a predetermined bending point in the form of a recess, but that reinforcement ribs located in between them have no recess. In this manner, the bending stiffness of the protective tube is reduced only where it is necessary, namely on the inner and outer radius of the intended bend.

The protective tube can have, for example, four reinforcement ribs, wherein two opposing reinforcement ribs have the predetermined bending point, and the two reinforcement ribs located in between them have no predetermined bending point at the corresponding position. The recess forming a predetermined bending point can, for example, be designed in the form of a notch, a rectangular shape, or a U-shaped recess.

In another advantageous refinement of this disclosure the outer surface of the protective tube is closed in the vicinity of the predetermined bending point. In this manner, the protective function of the protective tube is not impaired by the predetermined bending point. In particular, the protective tube can then also fulfil the function of electrical insulation such that no additional electrical insulation is required. In principle, the protective tube can, however, also fulfil its function, albeit to a limited extent, if the predetermined bending point forms an opening in the outer surface of the protective tube, for example a slot passing through its wall.

In another advantageous refinement the protective tube has, at a distance from the predetermined bending point, a section that has an increased wall thickness. In the vicinity of the predetermined bending point, on the other hand, the wall thickness of the protective tube between the reinforcement ribs can be reduced.

The protective tube of an inventive connector plug can have a plurality of predetermined bending points, which are arranged at a distance from each other in the axial direction. However, the protective tube preferably only has one predetermined bending point at one height.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The above-mentioned aspects of exemplary embodiments will become more apparent and will be better understood by reference to the following description of the embodiments taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 shows an example of embodiment of an inventive connector plug;

FIG. 2 shows the connector plug shown in FIG. 1 in a curved state;

FIG. 3 shows another example of embodiment of a protective tube for a connector plug;

FIG. 4 shows a detail of FIG. 3; and

FIG. 5 shows a cross-sectional view of the protective tube shown in FIG. 3 in a curved state.

DESCRIPTION

The embodiments described below are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed in the following detailed description. Rather, the embodiments are chosen and described so that others skilled in the art may appreciate and understand the principles and practices of this disclosure.

The connector plug 10 shown in FIG. 1 is used to connect an ignition coil to a spark plug of an internal combustion engine. For this purpose, the upper end 1 of the connector plug 10 in the figures is connected to the ignition coil, and the lower end 2 in the figures is connected to the spark plug. The connector plug 10 contains an electrical conductor 8 (shown schematically in FIG. 5), for example in the form of a metallic coil spring, which is surrounded by a protective tube 3, and in operation connects the high-voltage contact of an ignition coil to the terminal contact of a spark plug in an electrically conducting manner. The protective tube 3 can be seen in FIGS. 1 and 2, and may be made of silicone, for example. A further example of embodiment of the protective tube 3 is shown in FIGS. 3 to 5.

The protective tube 3 has a plurality of reinforcement ribs 4, which, located side by side around its circumference, extend parallel to its longitudinal direction. In the example of embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 2, the reinforcement ribs 4 extend over the majority of the protective tube 3, for example over three quarters of its length or more. The reinforcement ribs increase the mechanical load-bearing capacity of the protective tube 3, and are preferably dimensioned such that they can support the connector plug 10 on a cylinder head bore of an engine. In addition, the space between the reinforcement ribs 4 facilitates air exchange in the cylinder head bore. At least one of the said reinforcement ribs 4 has a predetermined bending point formed by at least one recess 5.

The protective tube 3 can, for example, have four reinforcement ribs 4, wherein two of the said reinforcement ribs 4 each have predetermined bending points located opposite each other and formed by a recess 5. The two reinforcement ribs 4 located in between them have no recesses in the corresponding position. If the protective tube 3 is curved, one of the said two recesses 5 forming a predetermined bending point is then located on the inside of the curve and the opposing recess 5 is located on the outside of the curve. The recess 5 on the inside of the curve avoids compressive stresses in the reinforcement rib 4. The recess 5 located on the outside of the curve avoids tensile stresses in the corresponding reinforcement rib 4. The reinforcement ribs 4 without recesses located between the said two reinforcement ribs 4 with recesses 5 are only slightly affected by the curvature shown in FIG. 2 and therefore do not require any recesses 5.

In the example of embodiment shown, the recesses 5 have a rectangular shape, but can also be of a different shape, for example they can be wedge-shaped or U-shaped.

At a distance from the predetermined bending points formed by the recesses 5, the protective tube 3 has a section 6 with an increased wall thickness. The increased wall thickness can be thickened up to the height of the reinforcement ribs, as shown in FIG. 1, but can also protrude beyond, or be thinner than, the outer diameter of the reinforcement ribs, so that reinforcement ribs can also be formed in region 6. In this manner, the mechanical stability of the protective tube 3 can be improved. In section 7 of the protective tube 3 containing the recesses 5, the wall thickness between the reinforcement ribs 4 can be significantly reduced so as to save material and facilitate the bending of the protective tube 3.

The recesses 5 of the reinforcement ribs 4 are preferably not so deep that an opening is thereby created in the protective tube 3. The recesses 5 of the reinforcement ribs 4 are preferably approximately as deep as the height of the reinforcement rib. The remaining wall thickness must be thick enough to provide the necessary protection and insulation.

The width of the recess 5 or recesses 5 measured in the longitudinal direction of the reinforcement ribs 4 is preferably as large as, or larger than, the width of the reinforcement ribs 4 measured transversely to their longitudinal direction, but is not more than three times the width of the reinforcement ribs 4.

The width of the recess (measured at rib height) may approach zero on the outer radius of the bend; a narrow slot or cut may be sufficient, as the recess diverges during bending. The recess is preferably slightly wider, so that a bending radius can form at the base of the recess. On the inside of the bend, the width of the recess should be dimensioned so that, during bending, the inner walls of the recess do not come into contact with each other, or only with a low contact pressure.

Only a single recess 5 is shown in FIG. 1. However, a plurality of recesses 5 can also be provided on a reinforcement rib 4.

While exemplary embodiments have been disclosed hereinabove, the present invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. Instead, this application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of this disclosure using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.

LIST OF REFERENCE SYMBOLS

  • 1 End of connector plug adjacent to ignition coil
  • 2 End of connector plug adjacent to spark plug
  • 3 Protective tube
  • 4 Reinforcement rib
  • 5 Recess
  • 6 Protective tube section
  • 7 Protective tube section
  • 8 Electrical conductor
  • 10 Connector plug

Claims

1. A connector plug for connecting an ignition coil to a spark plug, comprising:

an electrical conductor having a first end configured for contacting the ignition coil and a second end configured for contacting the spark plug; and
a protective tube surrounding the electrical conductor;
wherein the protective tube has a predetermined bending point with a reduced bending stiffness;
further wherein the protective tube has a plurality of reinforcement ribs extending in a longitudinal direction thereof, and wherein the predetermined bending point comprises a recess in one or a plurality of the reinforcement ribs.

2. The connector plug in accordance with claim 1, wherein one or more of the reinforcement ribs has no recess for reducing the bending stiffness.

3. The connector plug in accordance with claim 2, wherein the protective tube has four reinforcement ribs, wherein two opposing reinforcement ribs have a predetermined bending point comprising a recess, and two reinforcement ribs have no recess.

4. The connector plug in accordance with claim 1, wherein the width of the recess, measured in the longitudinal direction of the reinforcement ribs, is equal to or greater than the width of the reinforcement ribs measured transversely to their longitudinal direction.

5. The connector plug in accordance with claim 4, wherein the width of the recess measured in the longitudinal direction of the reinforcement ribs is not more than three times the width of the reinforcement ribs measured in their longitudinal direction.

6. The connector plug in accordance with claim 1, wherein the outer surface of the protective tube is closed in the vicinity of the predetermined bending point.

7. The connector plug in accordance with claim 1, wherein the protective tube has a section at a distance from the predetermined bending point in which its wall thickness is increased around its periphery.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3803529 April 1974 Rohrig
4234757 November 18, 1980 Simons
4514712 April 30, 1985 McDougal
4671586 June 9, 1987 DeBolt
4701662 October 20, 1987 Yamanashi
4810198 March 7, 1989 Sturdevan
4884977 December 5, 1989 Sturdevan
4906202 March 6, 1990 Germ
4947809 August 14, 1990 Hocking
4997380 March 5, 1991 Etienne
5026294 June 25, 1991 Hisatomi
5178550 January 12, 1993 Fusselman
5181856 January 26, 1993 Vente
5226837 July 13, 1993 Cinibulk
5280136 January 18, 1994 Yaworski
5324207 June 28, 1994 Itoh
5357233 October 18, 1994 Wada
5370100 December 6, 1994 Benedikt
5382170 January 17, 1995 Imanishi
5411006 May 2, 1995 Noble
5419300 May 30, 1995 Maruyama
5456609 October 10, 1995 Imanishi
5476695 December 19, 1995 Okada
5487676 January 30, 1996 Maruyama
5537983 July 23, 1996 Nakajima
5599195 February 4, 1997 Mitani
5603306 February 18, 1997 Tai
5618193 April 8, 1997 Nakajima
5649830 July 22, 1997 Ellsom
5655491 August 12, 1997 Nishiyama
5682865 November 4, 1997 Maekawa
5685282 November 11, 1997 Murata
5716223 February 10, 1998 Phillips, Jr.
5823802 October 20, 1998 Bartley
5827079 October 27, 1998 Murata
5842458 December 1, 1998 Alstrin
5886294 March 23, 1999 Scrimpshire
5971776 October 26, 1999 Neel
6007378 December 28, 1999 Oeth
6023215 February 8, 2000 Sakamaki
6273733 August 14, 2001 Uchiyama
6340303 January 22, 2002 Hamada
6358072 March 19, 2002 Johnson
6501360 December 31, 2002 Martagni
6668810 December 30, 2003 St. John
6679236 January 20, 2004 Skinner
6724289 April 20, 2004 Moga
6886514 May 3, 2005 Matsuda
6932627 August 23, 2005 Raff
7036495 May 2, 2006 Shimizu
7213588 May 8, 2007 Iwa
7317370 January 8, 2008 Nakamoto
7383830 June 10, 2008 Matsui
7646277 January 12, 2010 Tsunenaga
7681563 March 23, 2010 Idogawa
7838775 November 23, 2010 Montena
7849843 December 14, 2010 Kojima
8033273 October 11, 2011 Kato
8061337 November 22, 2011 Maekawa
8066520 November 29, 2011 Lenfert
8108968 February 7, 2012 Pietryga
8151781 April 10, 2012 Lykowski
8221140 July 17, 2012 Schneider
8225775 July 24, 2012 Idogawa
8388359 March 5, 2013 Mahoney
8474428 July 2, 2013 Lykowski
8499751 August 6, 2013 Idogawa
8529288 September 10, 2013 Montena
8839752 September 23, 2014 Burrows
8851915 October 7, 2014 Fuma
8853542 October 7, 2014 Anderson
9117585 August 25, 2015 Skinner
9160120 October 13, 2015 Schulze
9194359 November 24, 2015 Steinberger
9216530 December 22, 2015 Vaccaro
9281663 March 8, 2016 Johnson
9356433 May 31, 2016 Lewandowski
9608361 March 28, 2017 Vaccaro
9616602 April 11, 2017 Vaccaro
9653895 May 16, 2017 Vaccaro
9912124 March 6, 2018 Tamas
9917394 March 13, 2018 Natoli
9923300 March 20, 2018 Marrs
9938952 April 10, 2018 Akimoto
9941624 April 10, 2018 Zhang
9947463 April 17, 2018 Akimoto
10008830 June 26, 2018 Marrs
10012203 July 3, 2018 Sano
10037846 July 31, 2018 Akimoto
10079475 September 18, 2018 Ohta
10084291 September 25, 2018 Carlson
10090661 October 2, 2018 Vaccaro
10164410 December 25, 2018 Andersson
10164419 December 25, 2018 Vaccaro
10270238 April 23, 2019 Vaccaro
10291000 May 14, 2019 Sugiura
20020014939 February 7, 2002 Martagni
20020028593 March 7, 2002 Uchiyama
20020067233 June 6, 2002 Kondo
20020101701 August 1, 2002 Moga
20030070664 April 17, 2003 Skinner
20060089024 April 27, 2006 Kraus
20060260591 November 23, 2006 Iwa
20070181109 August 9, 2007 Matsui
20080274632 November 6, 2008 Lenfert
20090033451 February 5, 2009 Akimoto
20090289752 November 26, 2009 Akimoto
20100248533 September 30, 2010 Montena
20120161604 June 28, 2012 Lykowski
20120222660 September 6, 2012 Idogawa
20130293332 November 7, 2013 Skinner
20130312721 November 28, 2013 Yamauchi
20140097022 April 10, 2014 Vaccaro
20140154901 June 5, 2014 Schulze
20140295703 October 2, 2014 Nagashima
20150136439 May 21, 2015 Vaccaro
20150167622 June 18, 2015 Skinner
20160211072 July 21, 2016 Kawai
20170016422 January 19, 2017 Akimoto
20170207616 July 20, 2017 Vaccaro
20170321648 November 9, 2017 Sano
20180030947 February 1, 2018 Anderson
20180108473 April 19, 2018 Akimoto
20180294092 October 11, 2018 Sato
20180309268 October 25, 2018 Idogawa
20190157846 May 23, 2019 Schumm
Foreign Patent Documents
10 2011 082 231 July 2012 DE
10 2015 110 309 December 2016 DE
2011-134857 July 2011 JP
WO 2010/149194 December 2010 WO
WO 2012/095252 July 2012 WO
Patent History
Patent number: 10608415
Type: Grant
Filed: Nov 14, 2018
Date of Patent: Mar 31, 2020
Patent Publication Number: 20190157846
Assignee: BorgWarner Ludwigsburg GmbH (Ludwigsburg)
Inventors: Sven Schumm (Walheim), Manfred Adolf (Schwaikheim), Manuel Bauer (Ludwigsburg), Dirk Wüstenhagen (Auma), Alexander Stark (Althengstett)
Primary Examiner: Ross N Gushi
Application Number: 16/190,428
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Inductive Shielding; E.g., Radio Disturbance (439/126)
International Classification: H01T 13/04 (20060101); F02P 3/02 (20060101); H01F 27/28 (20060101); H01F 38/12 (20060101);