WHEEL CHOCK SYSTEM
Vehicle restraint systems are disclosed herein. An example vehicle restraint system includes a base to be positioned adjacent a loading dock and a wheel chock to be positioned on the base. An actuator is coupled to the base and moves the base relative to a wall of the loading dock in a linear direction between a release position and a holding position when the wheel chock is coupled to the base. In the release position, the wheel chock disengages from a wheel of a vehicle positioned at the loading dock. In the holding position, the wheel chock frictionally engages the wheel of the vehicle to restrict movement of the wheel away from the loading dock.
This patent is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/828,039, filed Jul. 25, 2007, entitled “Wheel Chock System,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSUREThe present disclosure generally pertains to restraining a vehicle at a loading dock and more specifically to a wheel chock system.
BACKGROUND OF RELATED ARTWhen a truck, trailer or some other vehicle is parked at a loading dock, often some sort of vehicle restraint is used to keep the truck from inadvertently moving away from an elevated platform of the dock. This allows a forklift truck to safely drive between the dock platform and the truck for the purpose of loading or unloading the cargo inside the truck.
There are a variety of vehicle restraints available that can be installed at a loading dock for engaging the truck's RIG (Rear Impact Guard), also known as an ICC bar. An ICC bar is a beam that extends horizontally across the rear of a truck, just below the truck bed. Its primary purpose is to prevent an automobile from under-riding the truck in a rear-end collision. However, not all trucks have an ICC bar that can be readily engaged by an ICC-style restraint. Moreover, ICC bars are not prevalent outside the United States, so in those cases a wheel restraint can be used for blocking one or more of the truck's wheels.
Perhaps the most common wheel restraint is simply a wheel chock that wedges between the driveway and the underside of the wheel. However, wheel chocks often slip out of position on driveways that are slippery due to oil, rain, ice, sand, gravel or dirt. Moreover, wheel chocks usually are loose items that do not permanently attach to the loading dock area, so they often get misplaced.
One solution to these problems is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,032,720, which shows a wheel chock that is coupled to the loading dock by way of an articulated arm. To help prevent the chock from slipping out of its wheel-blocking position, the chock can be placed in mating engagement upon a serrated base plate that is anchored to the driveway. Although such a system can be effective, it does have some drawbacks.
First, a counterweight spring on the arm tends to prevent the wheel chock from resting its full weight upon the base plate. Second, the length to which the arm must extend to reach the wheel can adversely affect the angular relationship (about a vertical axis) between the mating surfaces of the chock and base plate. Third, although the '720 device includes a sensor for detecting the presence of a wheel, the sensor does not indicate whether the chock is fully engaged with the serrations of the base plate. And fourth, dirt, ice and other contaminants could hinder the engagement between the chock and the base plate, thus reducing the effectiveness of the chock.
Consequently, a need exists for a wheel chock system that overcomes the limitations and drawbacks of current systems.
SUMMARYIn some embodiments, a wheel chock for restraining a vehicle at a loading dock is supported by a spring loaded articulated arm, wherein the spring force can be released.
In some embodiments, a wheel chock is supported by an articulated arm that includes a pivotal joint where the arm connects to the chock, wherein the joint permits the chock to rotate relative to the arm about a vertical axis.
In some embodiments, a wheel chock includes a sensor that detects whether the chock is fully engaged with a lower support surface.
In some embodiments, a manually manipulated wheel chock is coupled to a hydraulic cylinder that can forcibly draw the chock against a vehicle's wheel.
In some embodiments, a wheel chock can be manually placed upon a mating base plate, and a hydraulic cylinder can move the plate to force the chock against a vehicle's wheel.
In some embodiments, a set of hooks or latches selectively engage and release a wheel chock from a lower support surface that is anchored to the ground.
In some embodiments, a manually operated wheel chock includes a cleaning system that inhibits debris, ice and other contaminants from accumulating on a surface upon which the chock is placed.
Wheel restraint 10 includes a wheel chock 22 that may, for example, rest upon a base 24 (lower support surface) when restraint 10 is in the holding position of
To assist the repositioning of chock 22 between the holding and release positions, an elevated articulated arm 30 couples chock 22 to an anchor 32 that is attached to dock 16. Various joints of arm 30, anchor 32 and/or chock 22 enable chock 22 to be moved in three-dimensional space. To ensure that chock 22 can rest flat upon base 24, a joint 34 coupling arm 30 to chock 22, as shown in
To further assist the manual repositioning of chock 22, a spring 42 coupled to arm 30 helps offset the weight of chock 22 and arm 30. Counteracting the weight of arm 30 and chock 22 can be helpful while positioning chock 22; however, counteracting that weight is not always desired. The weight of arm 30 and chock 22, for instance, can actually be useful in holding chock 22 solidly against base 24. Thus, a spring release device 44 might be added so that spring 42 can be selectively stressed (
When chock 22 is in the holding position of
A brush 88 mounted to a movable arm 90 can be used to sweep dirt from base 84. One end 92 of arm 90 is pivotally coupled to an anchor 94. An opposite end 96 of arm 90 provides a cam surface 98 against which wheel 12 can push so that as a vehicle backs into the loading dock, the engagement of wheel 12 against cam surface 98 forces brush 88 to sweep across base 84. When the vehicle departs, a spring 100 can be used to pull arm 90 back to its position of
Although the invention is described with respect to various examples, modifications thereto will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Many of the wheel restraint features disclosed herein are interchangeable among the various examples. The scope of the invention, therefore, is to be determined by reference to the following claims:
Claims
1. A wheel restraint system comprising:
- a base to be positioned adjacent a loading dock;
- a wheel chock to be positioned on the base; and
- an actuator coupled to the base, the actuator to move the base relative to a wall of the loading dock in a linear direction between a release position and a holding position when the wheel chock is coupled to the base, wherein in the release position the wheel chock is to disengage from a wheel of a vehicle positioned at the loading dock, and in the holding position the wheel chock is to frictionally engage the wheel of the vehicle to restrict movement of the wheel away from the loading dock.
2. A wheel restraint system of claim 1, wherein the base is to slide relative to a driveway of the loading dock when the actuator moves the base between the release position and the holding position.
3. A wheel chock of claim 1, wherein in the holding position, the actuator imparts a force to the base in a direction toward the wall of the loading dock and opposite from a force imparted by a wheel of a vehicle to the wheel chock.
4. A wheel restraint system of claim 1, wherein each of the wheel chock and the base includes an engagement surface with at least one protruding tooth.
5. A wheel restraint system of claim 4, wherein in the holding position, the actuator and the wheel impart opposing forces to the tooth of the wheel chock.
6. A wheel restraint system of claim 5, wherein in the release position, the tooth of the base is to disengage the tooth of the wheel chock to enable the wheel chock to be moved away from the base, and in the holding position the tooth of the base is to move into locking engagement with the tooth of the wheel chock to prevent disengagement between the wheel chock and the base.
7. A wheel restraint system of claim 5, wherein each tooth of the base and the wheel chock includes an angled surface and a substantially vertical surface defining a shoulder.
8. A wheel restraint system of claim 7, wherein in the holding position, a shoulder of the tooth of the wheel chock frictionally engages a shoulder of the tooth of the base to lock a position of the wheel chock relative to the base.
9. A wheel restraint system of claim 1, wherein the wheel chock and the base include a plurality of teeth that frictionally engage when the actuator moves the base in the holding position relative to the wheel chock to prevent disengagement between the wheel chock and the base.
10. A wheel restraint system comprising:
- an anchor mountable to a loading dock;
- a base;
- a wheel chock to engage the base, the base to position the wheel chock between a holding position and a release position such that in the holding position the wheel chock is to obstruct a wheel of a vehicle at the loading dock and in the release position the wheel chock is to clear of the wheel and disengage the base;
- a tooth protruding from at least one of the wheel chock and the base, the tooth to help maintain engagement between the wheel chock and the base when the wheel chock is in the holding position; and
- an actuator coupling the base to the anchor, the actuator to slidably move the base between the holding position and the release position such that the actuator is to slide the base toward a wall of the loading dock in the holding position to urge the wheel chock into engagement with the wheel.
11. The wheel restraint system of claim 10, wherein the actuator is a hydraulic cylinder.
12. The wheel restraint system of claim 10, wherein in the holding position, the actuator pulls the base and the wheel chock toward the wall of the loading dock and into frictional engagement with the wheel of the vehicle.
13. The wheel restraint system of claim 12, wherein the actuator provides a continuous pulling force toward the wall of the loading dock when the wheel chock is in the holding position.
14. The wheel restraint system of claim 10, wherein the wheel chock is lifted away from the base when the base is in the release position.
15. The wheel restraint system of claim 14, wherein the wheel chock is manually lifted away from the base.
16. The wheel restraint system of claim 14, wherein the actuator is to push the base away from the wall of the loading dock to move the base from the holding position to the release position.
17. The wheel restraint system of claim 14, wherein a piston of the actuator is operatively coupled to an edge of the base via a pin.
18. A wheel restraint system comprising:
- means for retaining a wheel of a vehicle at a loading dock;
- means for positioning the means for retaining relative to the wheel of the vehicle at the loading dock, the means for positioning to receive the means for retaining; and
- means for slidably moving the means for positioning between a release position to cause the means for retaining to frictionally disengage from the wheel of the vehicle and a holding position to cause the means for retaining to frictionally engage the wheel of the vehicle to prevent the wheel from moving away from a loading dock.
19. The wheel restraint system of claim 18, further comprising means for frictionally interlocking the means for retaining and the means for positioning.
20. The wheel restraint system of claim 18, further comprising means for coupling the means for slidably moving and the means for positioning.
21. A method of restraining a vehicle at a loading dock, the method comprising:
- providing a base at a loading dock to receive a wheel chock; and
- sliding the base relative to a wheel of the vehicle between a release position and a holding position when the wheel chock is coupled to the base such that in the release position the wheel chock is to disengage the wheel and in the holding position the wheel chock is to frictionally engage the wheel.
22. A method of claim 21, wherein sliding the base to the holding position comprises pulling the base and the wheel chock coupled thereto toward the wheel of the vehicle.
23. A method of claim 21, sliding the base to the release position comprises pushing the base and the wheel chock coupled thereto away from the wheel of the vehicle.
Type: Application
Filed: Oct 5, 2012
Publication Date: Feb 14, 2013
Inventors: Jonathan Andersen (Racine, WI), Eric Bublitz (Franklin, WI), Timothy Cotton (Milwaukee, WI), John A. Kish (Grafton, WI), Kurt Lessard (S. Milwaukee, WI), Timothy Muhl (Slinger, WI), Kyle E. Nelson (Cedarburg, WI), Pamala Pietrangelo (Oak Creek, WI), Reinhard E. Sander (Wauwatosa, WI), Matt Sveum (Wauwatosa, WI), Benjamin Wieberdink (Cedar Grove, WI)
Application Number: 13/646,319