EXTRUDED HONEYCOMB CATALYST

An extruded honeycomb catalyst for nitrogen oxide reduction according to the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) method in exhaust gases from motor vehicles includes an extruded active carrier in honeycomb form having a first SCR catalytically active component and with a plurality of channels through which the exhaust gas flows during operation, and a washcoat coating having a second SCR catalytically active component being applied to the extruded body, wherein the first SCR catalytically active component and the second SCR catalytically active component are each independently one of: (i) vanadium catalyst with vanadium as catalytically active component; (ii) mixed-oxide catalyst with one or more oxides, in particular those of transition metals or lanthanides as catalytically active component; and (iii) an Fe- or a Cu-zeolite catalyst.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

The invention concerns an extruded honeycomb catalyst, in particular for exhaust gas cleaning, especially in the domain of motor vehicles, where it is used in particular for nitrogen oxide reduction according to the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) method, i.e. the reduction of oxides of nitrogen using a nitrogenous reductant. The invention also concerns a set of such variously embodied honeycomb catalysts and a method for producing honeycomb catalysts.

Extruded honeycomb catalysts are one-piece, monolithic objects, which have a plurality of channels through which the exhaust gas flows during operation. These channels have an opening width of just a few millimetres. The webs delimiting the individual channels also typically have a width of just 300 μm. In extruded honeycomb catalysts, in which the solid material is catalytically active, a high proportion by volume of the solid body consists of catalytically active components. The result of this is that any modifications of the catalytic components, for example to make adaptations to different requirements and in general to pursue refinements, have a critical effect on extrudability. Altogether, this makes the development period for a new extruded honeycomb catalyst, in which the solid material is catalytically active, expensive.

WO 2010/099395 A1 discloses extruded honeycomb catalyst bodies and methods of manufacturing them. The catalyst body includes a first oxide selected from the group consisting of tungsten oxides, vanadium oxides and combinations thereof, a second oxide selected from the group consisting of cerium oxides, lanthanum oxides, zirconium oxides and combinations thereof and a zeolite. In one embodiment, an extruded zeolite core is coated with a layer of a mixture of a cerium oxide, a zirconium oxide and a tungsten oxide.

On that basis, the invention is based on the problem of specifying a honeycomb catalyst which can be adapted to new requirements with low development costs.

The problem is solved according to the invention by claim 1. According to this claim, provision is made that the honeycomb catalyst as a whole is formed from an extruded, active carrier in honeycomb form, which has at least one catalytically active component and on which in addition a catalytically active coating, in particular a washcoat coating, is applied, which thus likewise has at least one catalytic component.

The problem is further solved according to the invention by a set of honeycomb catalysts which differ in terms of their functionality, but which each have an identical carrier, and by a method for producing honeycomb catalysts of this type.

This embodiment is based on the idea of developing and providing a carrier which can be used universally for several domains of application and making specific adaptations to the respective requirements via the special washcoat coating. The particular advantage is to be seen in the fact that a different extrusion mass does not have to be developed and provided for different honeycomb catalysts. At the same time, because of the option of different combinations between the active carrier and the likewise catalytically active coatings, the entire catalytic activity can be adapted and designed as appropriate. In principle, this provides the option, firstly, of developing the catalyst with a view to a technically optimised functionality or alternatively with a view to a catalyst optimised in terms of cost. In order to achieve the latter, in particular, provision is made that the proportion of the catalytically active component in the carrier is reduced by comparison with conventional catalytically active solid extrudates.

Also it is possible to improve SCR activity of a catalyst which is otherwise sensitive to gas composition, e.g. ratio of NO2:NO (see Fe/ZSM-5 (MFI) SCR in EP 1147801).

Preferred embodiments can be derived from the sub-claims.

The carrier and the washcoat coating are both formed as SCR catalysts. In particular, there are three different known types of catalysts with application in the present invention:

    • a catalyst referred to below as a vanadium catalyst, with vanadium as catalytically active component. This usually contains, as main components, vanadium oxide, titanium oxide and tungsten oxide. In conventional catalytically active solid extrudates the proportion by volume of these catalytically active main components is about 75 to 85 vol. %.
    • The second type of catalyst is a mixed oxide catalyst with one or more oxides or lanthanides as catalytically active components. Typically-used metal oxides are, for example, cerium oxide, zirconium oxide or tungsten oxide, which in conventional catalysts have a proportion by volume of about 75 to 85%. Mixed oxide catalysts of this type are usually free from zeolites and also free from vanadium.
    • As third SCR catalyst type, metal-zeolite catalysts are known with a metal zeolite as catalytically active component. In particular, this is an iron-zeolite or copper-zeolite. In a zeolite catalyst of this type, the proportion by volume of these active components lies in the range of about 60 to 70% in conventional solid extrudates.

The rest of the solid extrudate is formed by catalytically inactive components, such as binders, fillers if necessary to increase strength and optionally a plasticiser for support during extrusion.

Advantageously, the proportion by volume of the active components in the carrier is lower than in conventional solid extrudate catalysts, in which the proportions lie in the range of the upper limits stated above. All in all, the proportion by volume in the carrier can be adjusted from 10 vol. % to the upper limit stated above. In particular, however, a range under 50 vol. % or a range between 10 and 60 or 10 and 40% is set. In some variant embodiments, therefore, the greater proportion by volume of the catalyst is formed by inactive components.

In the variant embodiments with the reduced catalytically active proportion, this is preferably replaced by components which are neutral with respect to the extrusion process. This means that these are easily extrudable masses and/or materials. These include, in particular, clays (this means sheet silicates with a grain diameter of less than 2 μm), aluminium oxide or else kaolin.

The honeycomb catalyst according to the invention, in particular the second SCR catalyst washcoat coating, is free from noble metals, at least in the front area. In one preferred embodiment, a noble metal coating is applied, especially as a washcoat, onto a rear—viewed in the direction of flow of the exhaust gas during operation—area. This serves to prevent ammonia slip. The rear area therefor forms what is known as an ASC catalyst (ammonia slip catalyst).

Advantageously this noble metal coating is thereby embedded in the form of a sandwich between the carrier and a washcoat coating extending over the entire length, which is in particular embodied as an SCR catalyst. That is, the noble metal-containing washcoat is applied as a layer directly onto the carrier and the second SCR catalyst washcoat layer is applied over an entire length of the extruded active carrier, including the noble metal-containing washcoat. This arrangement has the benefit that ammonia which slips past the upstream zone of the first and second SCR catalysts can be oxidised to NOx on the lower, noble metal layer and this NOx then passes through the second SCR catalyst layer to exit the catalyst structure and contacts in-coming ammonia, whereby the NOx is reduced to N2 on the second SCR catalyst.

For all variant embodiments, the washcoat coating has a relatively high porosity, so that the exhaust gas to be cleaned also comes into contact with the catalytically active carrier.

In order to achieve a good catalytic activity, the carrier also has a high porosity. Both the carrier and the washcoat coating typically have a large BET surface area in the range of about 40 to 80 m2/g.

The layer thickness of the washcoat coating preferably lies in the range of 30 to 100 μm, in particular in the range of about 40 to 60 μm. Advantageously, only a single washcoat coating is applied to the carrier. Because the carrier is also active, a multi-layered washcoat coating is not necessary and preferably not provided. It is, however, possible.

In particular, in the case of catalytically active solid extrudates with a reduced proportion of active components in the solid extrudate, the web width of the webs of the honeycomb structure can be reduced. In conventional extruded honeycomb catalysts made from a catalytically active solid extrudate, the web widths are in the range of about 300 μm. This is preferably reduced to a range of about 150 to 220 μm, in particular to a range of about 180 μm.

Using the concept of an active washcoat coating on a carrier, different active honeycomb catalysts can be designed according to requirements to meet different needs.

These different combinations take into account the various advantages and disadvantages of the individual catalysts, which are preferably combined in such a way that their advantages are increased and their disadvantages are reduced. So the individual catalysts differ firstly from an economic viewpoint with respect to their price. Here, for example, the copper-zeolite catalyst is the most expensive, while the vanadium catalyst is the cheapest. With respect to their technical characteristics, NOx-activity across the temperature range is especially important, i.e. the capacity for NOx-reduction at both low and high temperatures. Furthermore, sulphur tolerance and in particular NO2 tolerance are of particular importance. Finally, the temperature stability of different materials is also relevant.

Depending on the intended use, the following preferred combination possibilities are suitable:

    • a) Embodiment of the carrier as a mixed oxide catalyst with a washcoat coating, which can be either an Fe- or a Cu-zeolite catalyst. The advantage of the mixed oxide catalyst here lies in its low storage capacity, in particular ammonia storage capacity. Ammonia is regularly used in the SCR method as a typical reducing agent. This enables simple dosing as a function of the current demand. The mixed oxide catalyst displays weaknesses in the higher temperature range, which are equalised by the washcoat coating. Conversely, in the lower temperature range it is better by comparison with the Fe-zeolites, so that, overall, improved activity is achieved over the entire temperature range.
    • b) A washcoat coating made from a vanadium catalyst is applied to a carrier made from a mixed oxide catalyst. The advantage of the vanadium catalyst consists in its good sulphur tolerance, which is, conversely, a weakness of the mixed oxide catalyst. Conversely, the mixed oxide catalyst has higher activity at lower temperatures. A further advantage of the mixed oxide catalyst can be seen in its good NO2 tolerance.
    • c) A washcoat made from a copper-zeolite is applied to a carrier made from an Fe-zeolite. The very good activity in the lower temperature range of the copper zeolite is supplemented by the good sulphur tolerance of the iron zeolite. Also, a combination of this type is especially tolerant to NO2, since iron has especially good activity when there are medium and high NO2 levels, while copper has a very good activity when there are low NO2 levels in the exhaust gas.
    • d) An Fe-zeolite is applied to a Cu-zeolite as washcoat. Here, the same advantages apply as in the aforementioned combination.
    • e) A vanadium catalyst as washcoat is applied to an Fe-zeolite as carrier. This combination has improved sulphur resistance and a high NO2 tolerance, since the iron-zeolite catalyst has high activity when there are high NO2 levels in the exhaust gas, contrary to the vanadium catalyst.
    • f) The combination of identical catalysts, for example Fe-zeolite catalyst with Fe-zeolite catalyst. This increases catalytic activity overall.
    • g) An Fe-zeolite catalyst is applied to a carrier made from a vanadium catalyst. This achieves a very good activity over a wide range of NO2/NOx-ratios.

The concept described here, namely the provision of an active carrier in combination with an active washcoat coating, therefore also finds expression in the method according to the invention. To produce honeycomb catalysts with different characteristics, therefore, a carrier type is supplied and stored which is then provided, depending on the domain of application, with different washcoat coatings.

According to a further aspect, there is provided an exhaust system for a vehicular lean burn internal combustion engine comprising an extruded honeycomb catalyst according to the invention disposed in a flow conduit thereof.

In one embodiment, the exhaust system comprises means for injecting a nitrogenous reductant or a precursor thereof into the exhaust gas upstream of the extruded honeycomb catalyst.

According to a further aspect according to the present invention, there is provided a lean burn internal combustion engine comprising an exhaust system according to the invention comprising a catalyst for generating NH3 in situ in exhaust gas upstream of the extruded honeycomb catalyst and control means for changing an exhaust gas composition to a composition which promotes in situ NH3 on the catalyst for generating NH3 in situ.

In one embodiment, the catalyst for generating NH3 in situ in exhaust gas upstream of the extruded honeycomb catalyst is a diesel oxidation catalyst or a NOx absorber catalyst and in particular comprises a platinum group metal and preferably also a lanthanide element, preferably cerium optionally in combination with one or more stabilisers such as zirconia and/or a rare earth element.

According to a further aspect, there is provided a vehicle comprising an exhaust system according to the invention or a lean burn internal combustion engine according to the invention.

In order that the present invention may be more fully understood, the following Examples are provided by way of illustration only and with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a graph showing the NOx conversion activity at various temperatures for an extruded honeycomb catalyst according to the present invention comprising an extruded active carrier comprising a V2O5/WO3/TiO2 or Fe—ZSM-5 (MFI) zeolite first SCR catalyst washcoated with a WO3/CeO2—ZrO2 second SCR catalyst compared with the second SCR catalyst coated on an inert cordierite honeycomb and the extruded active carriers without the second SCR catalyst coating;

FIG. 2 is a graph showing the NOx conversion activity at various temperatures for an extruded honeycomb catalyst according to the present invention comprising an extruded active carrier comprising a Fe—ZSM-5 (MFI) zeolite first SCR catalyst washcoated with a Cu—SAPO-34 (CHA) second SCR catalyst compared with the second SCR catalyst coated on an inert cordierite honeycomb and the extruded active carrier without the second SCR catalyst coating;

FIG. 3 is a graph showing the NOx conversion activity at various temperatures for an extruded honeycomb catalyst according to the present invention comprising an extruded active carrier comprising a Fe-Beta zeolite first SCR catalyst washcoated with a Cu—SSZ-13 (CHA) second SCR catalyst at two different washcoat loadings compared with the same loadings of the second SCR catalyst coated on an inert cordierite honeycomb and the extruded active carrier without the second SCR catalyst coating; and

FIG. 4 is a graph showing the NOx conversion activity at various temperatures for an extruded honeycomb catalyst according to the present invention comprising an extruded active carrier comprising a V2O5/WO3/TiO2 first SCR catalyst washcoated with a Cu—SSZ-13 (CHA) second SCR catalyst at two different washcoat loadings compared with the same loadings of the second SCR catalyst coated on an inert cordierite honeycomb and the extruded active carrier without the second SCR catalyst coating.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Preparation of Extruded Active Carrier in Honeycomb from Comprising First SCR Catalyst Example 1A Extruded Active Carrier Containing Fe-Beta Zeolite

Powdered commercially available Beta zeolite in hydrogen form is mixed with iron oxide (Fe—O), glass fibres, Kaolin, powdered synthetic boehmite and the plasticisers polyethylene oxide (2.25 wt. %) and oleic acid (1.62 wt. %) (both based on 100% of the total inorganic solids content) and is processed in an aqueous solution with a pH-value of 5-6 into a shapeable and flowable slip. When the mixture is well plasticised, cellulose is added at 2.25 wt % based on 100% of the total inorganic solids content. The quantitative proportions of the starting materials are selected in such a way that the active material of the finished solid catalyst body contains 70.34% by weight of zeolite, iron and iron compounds; 2.76% by weight of the Kaolin; 15.94% by weight of γ-Al2O3; and 4.84% by weight of glass fibers. The shapeable mixture is extruded into a flow-through honeycomb catalyst body, i.e. with continuous channels and with a circular cross-section exhibiting a cell density of 400 cpsi (cells per square inch). Subsequently, the catalyst body is freeze dried for 1 hour at 2 mbar according to the method described in WO 2009/080155 (the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference) and calcined at a temperature of 580° C. to form a solid catalyst body. It is found that by using the method described that at least some of the iron introduced into the mixture becomes ion-exchanged with the zeolite.

Example 1B Extruded Active Carrier Containing V2O5/WO3/TiO2

Powdered commercially available tungsten-containing TiO2 at 10 wt. % tungsten is mixed with glass fibres, Kaolin, a low alkaline clay filler and powdered synthetic boehmite Ammonium metavanadate: 1.88 wt. %; 2-Aminoethanol: 1.5 litres; Lactic acid 90%; 0.48 wt %; Ammonia 25%: 8.97 wt % and the plasticisers polyethylene oxide (0.86 wt. %) and oleic acid (0.14 wt. %) (all based on 100% of the total inorganic solids content) and is processed in an aqueous solution with a pH-value of 5-6 into a shapeable and flowable slip. When the mixture is well plasticised, cellulose is added at 0.86 wt % based on 100% of the total inorganic solids content. The quantitative proportions of the starting materials are selected in such a way that the active material of the finished solid catalyst body contains approximately 72 wt % V2O5/WO3/TiO2; silica 1.20 wt %; Kaolin 2.85 wt %; clay 2.85 wt. %; and glass fibres 6.93 wt. %. The shapeable mixture is extruded into a flow-through honeycomb catalyst body, i.e. with continuous channels and with a circular cross-section exhibiting a cell density of 400 cpsi (cells per square inch). Subsequently, the catalyst body is freeze dried for 1 hour at 2 mbar according to the method described in WO 2009/080155 (the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference) and calcined at a temperature of 580° C. to form a solid catalyst body.

Example 1C Extruded Active Carrier Containing Fe—ZSM-5 (MFI) Zeolite

An ion-exchanged, synthetic ZSM-5 zeolite, the active material of which contains 5% by weight of iron, is selected as zeolite. The powdered ZSM-5 zeolite is mixed with glass fibers and powdered synthetic boehmite and is processed in an acetous aqueous solution with a pH-value of 3.5 into a shapeable and flowable slip by admixture of cellulose, and oleic acid and polyethylene glycol plasticizers. The quantitative proportions of the starting materials are selected in such a way that the active material of the finished solid catalyst body contains 75% by weight of zeolite containing the iron and iron compounds; 11.8% by weight of γ-Al2O3 and 8% by weight of glass fibers. The shapeable mixture is extruded into a honeycomb catalyst body with continuous channels and with a round cross-section exhibiting a cell density of 400 cpsi (cells per square inch). Subsequently, the catalyst body is dried at a temperature of 90° C. and calcined to form a solid catalyst body at a temperature of 600° C.

Example 2 Preparation of Washcoat Compositions Comprising Second SCR Catalyst Method of Making Fresh 3 wt % Cu/Zeolites Examples 2A and 2B

Commercially available SAPO-34 (CHA) (Example 2A) and SSZ-13 (CHA) (Example 2B) were NH4+ ion exchanged in a solution of NH4NO3, then filtered. The resulting materials were added to an aqueous solution of Cu(NO3)2 with stirring. The slurry was filtered, then washed and dried. The procedure can be repeated to achieve a desired metal loading. The final product was calcined.

Example 2C Method of making WOx/CeO2—ZrO2

A catalyst comprising 15 wt % tungsten supported on a ceria-zirconia mixed oxide comprising 50:50 weight % of ceria and zirconia was prepared by an incipient wetness impregnation method comprising dissolving sufficient ammonium metatungstate to give the desired 15 wt % W loadings in deionised H2O. The total volume of solution was equivalent to the pore volume of the support sample (incipient wetness technique). The solution was added to the mixed oxide support material and the resultant mixture was dried overnight at 105° C. and then calcined at 700° C. for 3 hours.

Example 3 Preparation of Extruded Honeycomb Catalysts

Extruded active carriers of Example 1 were coated with a washcoat comprising the second SCR catalyst of Example 2 using the method disclosed in WO 99/47260, i.e. comprising the steps of (a) locating a containment means on top of a extruded active carrier support, (b) dosing a pre-determined quantity of a liquid component into said containment means, either in the order (a) then (b) or (b) then (a), and (c) by applying pressure or vacuum, drawing said liquid component into at least a portion of the extruded active carrier support, and retaining substantially all of said quantity within the extruded active carrier support. The coated extruded active carriers were then dried in air at 100° C. for 1 hour and calcined at 500° C. for 2 hours.

The following combinations of extruded active carrier and washcoat were prepared.

TABLE 1 Extruded Catalyst Washcoat Extruded Honeycomb Carrier Example Example Washcoat Catalyst Example No. Component Component Loading (g/in3) 3A 1B 2C 3.1 3B 1C 2C 3.1 3C 1C 2A 1.8 3D1 1A 2B 1.5 3D2 1A 2B 0.5 3E1 1B 2B 0.5 3E2 1B 2B 1.5

Example 5 Synthetic Catalytic Activity Tests

A 2.54 cm×14 cm core was cut from each of the extruded honeycomb catalysts of Example 3 and the catalysts were tested at steady state at the following temperature points: 180° C., 215° C., 250° C., 300° C., 400° C. and 500° C. in a synthetic catalytic activity test laboratory apparatus using the following synthetic gas mixture: O2 9.3%; H2O 7.0%; NOx 100 ppm (NO only); NH3 100 ppm; Balance N2 (Swept Volume: 60.000 litres/hr).

The results including comparative data are shown in FIGS. 1 to 4.

FIG. 1 shows the results for Examples 3A and 3B compared with an identical washcoat composition (i.e. Example 2C) coated on an inert cordierite honeycomb carrier at 400 cpsi at 3.4 g/in3 loading; and the extruded catalyst carriers of Examples 1B and 1C per se. As can be seen from the results, Examples 3A and 3B show increased NOx conversion performance across the full temperature range.

FIG. 2 shows the results for Example 3C compared with an identical washcoat composition (i.e. Example 2A) coated on an inert cordierite honeycomb carrier at 400 cpsi at 1.8 g/in3 loading; and the extruded catalyst carrier of Example 1C per se. As can be seen from the results, there is a positive effect in the 200-500° C. temperature range tested.

FIG. 3 shows the results for Examples 3D1 and 3D2 compared with identical washcoat compositions (i.e. Example 2B) coated on an inert cordierite honeycomb carrier at 400 cpsi at 1.5 g/in3 and 0.5 g/in3 loadings; and the extruded catalyst carrier of Example 1A per se. As can be seen from the results, Examples 3D1 and 3D2 show increased NOx conversion performance at <300° C. and >400° C.

FIG. 4 shows the results for Examples 3E1 and 3E2 compared with identical washcoat compositions (i.e. Example 2B) coated on an inert cordierite honeycomb carrier at 400 cpsi at 1.5 g/in3 and 0.5 g/in3 loadings; and the extruded catalyst carrier of Example 1B per se. As can be seen from the results, Examples 3E1 and 3E2 show increased NOx conversion performance at >400° C.

For the avoidance of any doubt the entire contents of all documents cited herein are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

Claims

1. Extruded honeycomb catalyst for nitrogen oxide reduction according to the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) method in exhaust gases from motor vehicles, comprising an extruded active carrier in honeycomb form comprising a first SCR catalytically active component and with a plurality of channels through which the exhaust gas flows during operation, and a washcoat coating comprising a second SCR catalytically active component being applied to the extruded body, wherein the first SCR catalytically active component and the second SCR catalytically active component are each independently selected from the group consisting of:

(i) vanadium catalyst with vanadium as catalytically active component;
(ii) mixed-oxide catalyst with one or more oxides, in particular those of transition metals or lanthanides as catalytically active component; and
(iii) an Fe- or a Cu-zeolite catalyst.

2. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein in the extruded catalyst carrier the and wherein the rest is formed in each case by catalytically inactive components such as binders, fillers as required and, when the active components are reduced, a component which is neutral with respect to the extrusion process.

vanadium catalyst has, as active main components, vanadium oxide, titanium oxide, tungsten oxide in a proportion by volume of 10 to 85%
the mixed oxide catalyst contains as main components mixed oxides in particular of lanthanides or of transition metals, in particular cerium oxide, zirconium oxide and tungsten oxide in a proportion by volume of 10 to 85% and is free from zeolites and from vanadium
the metal zeolite catalyst contains an Fe-zeolite or a Cu-zeolite in a proportion by volume of 10 to 70%,

3. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the proportion of active components in the extruded carrier is reduced by comparison with a conventional uncoated extruded honeycomb catalyst and lies in particular in the range between 10 and 60 vol. %, preferably in the range between 10 and 40 vol. %.

4. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the reduced proportion of the catalytically active component by comparison with a conventional uncoated honeycomb catalyst is replaced by a component which is neutral with respect to the extrusion process, in particular clay.

5. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the proportion of the neutral component lies in the range of 10 to 70 vol. %, in particular in the range of 20-50 vol. %.

6. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the washcoat coating, at least in a frontal area—in relation to a direction of flow of the exhaust gas during operation—is free from noble metals.

7. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the carrier has a rear area—in relation to a direction of flow of the exhaust gas during operation—on which there is preferably a noble metal coating to prevent ammonia slip.

8. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 7, wherein the washcoat coating extends over the entire length of the carrier and also covers the noble metal coating, in particular in the rear area.

9. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the washcoat coating and in particular also the carrier have a high porosity, in particular a BET surface area in the range of about 40-80 m2/g.

10. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the layer thickness of the washcoat coating lies in the range of 30 to 100 jam, in particular in the range of about 40-60 μm.

11. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the honeycomb structure has webs and the web width is reduced by comparison with a conventional uncoated extruded honeycomb catalyst and in particular lies in the range of about 150-220 μm.

12. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the extruded catalyst carrier is a mixed oxide catalyst and the washcoat coating is a metal-zeolite catalyst, in particular an Fe- or a Cu-catalyst.

13. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the extruded catalyst carrier is a mixed oxide catalyst and the washcoat coating is a vanadium catalyst.

14. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the extruded catalyst carrier is an Fe-zeolite catalyst and the washcoat coating is a Cu-zeolite catalyst.

15. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the extruded catalyst carrier is a Cu-zeolite catalyst and the washcoat coating is an Fe-zeolite catalyst.

16. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the extruded catalyst carrier is an Fe-zeolite catalyst and the washcoat coating is a vanadium catalyst.

17. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the extruded catalyst carrier and the washcoat coating are formed from the same catalyst, in particular each being in the form of an Fe-zeolite catalyst.

18. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the extruded catalyst carrier and the washcoat coating are formed from the same catalyst, in particular each being in the form of a Cu-zeolite catalyst.

19. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the extruded catalyst carrier and the washcoat coating are formed from the same catalyst, in particular each being in the form of a vanadium catalyst.

20. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the extruded catalyst carrier and the washcoat coating are formed from the same catalyst, in particular each being in the form of a mixed-oxide catalyst with one or more oxides, in particular those of transition metals or lanthanides as catalytically active component.

21. Honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1, wherein the carrier is a vanadium catalyst and the washcoat coating is an Fe-zeolite catalyst.

22. A set of variously embodied extruded honeycomb catalysts according to claim 1, wherein all the honeycomb catalysts in the set have an identical carrier.

23. Method for producing a set of variously embodied extruded honeycomb catalysts according to claim 1, wherein identically-embodied carriers are provided and coated with different washcoats.

24. An exhaust system for a vehicular lean burn internal combustion engine comprising an extruded honeycomb catalyst according to claim 1 disposed in a flow conduit thereof.

25. An exhaust system according to claim 24, comprising means for injecting a nitrogenous reductant or a precursor thereof into the exhaust gas upstream of the extruded honeycomb catalyst.

26. A lean burn internal combustion engine comprising an exhaust system according to claim 24 comprising a catalyst for generating NH3 in situ in exhaust gas upstream of the extruded honeycomb catalyst and control means for changing an exhaust gas composition to a composition which promotes in situ NH3 on the catalyst for generating NH3 in situ.

27. A lean burn internal combustion engine according to claim 26, wherein the catalyst for generating NH3 in situ in exhaust gas upstream of the extruded honeycomb catalyst is a diesel oxidation catalyst or a NOx absorber catalyst.

28. A vehicle comprising an exhaust system according to claim 24.

Patent History
Publication number: 20160040576
Type: Application
Filed: Aug 17, 2015
Publication Date: Feb 11, 2016
Applicant: Johnson Matthey Public Limited Company (London)
Inventors: Guy Richard Chandler (Cambridge), Neil Robert Collins (Royston), Ralf Dotzel (Nuernberg), Jörg Werner Münch (Lichtenfels), Paul Richard Phillips (Royston), Gudmund Smedler (Bleket), Andrew Peter Walker (Royston)
Application Number: 14/827,918
Classifications
International Classification: F01N 3/20 (20060101); B01J 23/30 (20060101); B01J 35/00 (20060101); B01J 29/48 (20060101); F01N 3/28 (20060101); B01J 29/78 (20060101); B01J 35/04 (20060101); B01J 37/02 (20060101); B01J 23/00 (20060101); B01D 53/94 (20060101); B01J 29/00 (20060101); B01J 29/80 (20060101);