SECURE MESSAGE FILTERING TO VEHICLE ELECTRONIC CONTROL UNITS WITH SECURE PROVISIONING OF MESSAGE FILTERING RULES

Abstract

A method according to one embodiment includes the operations of configuring a host processor to receive a message filtering rule, the host processor associated with a vehicle; configuring a bus controller to verify authenticity of the message filtering rule, wherein the bus controller is programmed through an interface, the interface inaccessible from the host processor; filtering messages from the host processor using the verified message filtering rule, wherein the filtering is performed by the bus controller; and transmitting the filtered messages from the bus controller over a bus to one or more electronic control units (ECUs), the ECUs communicatively coupled to the bus.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/992,304 filed Mar. 18, 2014, which is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US2011/062929 filed Dec. 1, 2011, each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

FIELD

The present disclosure relates to secure message filtering to vehicle electronic control units, and more particularly, to secure message filtering to vehicle electronic control units with secure provisioning of message filtering rules.

BACKGROUND

As vehicle control systems become increasingly complex, interconnected and accessible through wireless communication, these systems also become increasingly vulnerable to security attacks. Embedded controllers (for engines, brakes, etc.) are typically designed to withstand hostile physical environments, but often little attention is paid to the security environment. It has generally been assumed that software running on each controller, connected to a common bus, can be trusted (i.e., not infected with malware), although that philosophy is beginning to change.

The presumption of security safety is no longer justified as recent studies have shown that vehicles with internet connectivity and/or wireless interfaces such as Bluetooth and WiFi may permit a platform in the vehicle to become infected. Such a malicious platform can then reprogram other controllers on the bus and/or send messages to these controllers which are capable of causing catastrophic harm to the vehicle and its occupants. One approach to this problem is to implement specific and unique security enhancements to each individual embedded controller, but this may require significant involvement on the part of all Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and may result in duplication of efforts or adoption of incompatible approaches.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Features and advantages of embodiments of the claimed subject matter will become apparent as the following Detailed Description proceeds, and upon reference to the Drawings, wherein like numerals depict like parts, and in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates a system block diagram of one exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 2 illustrates a flowchart of operations of one exemplary embodiment; and

FIG. 3 illustrates a flowchart of operations of another exemplary embodiment.

Although the following Detailed Description will proceed with reference being made to illustrative embodiments, many alternatives, modifications, and variations thereof will be apparent to those skilled in the art.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Generally, this disclosure provides methods and systems for implementing a rule-based message filter in the firmware of a bus controller for a bus, to which a vehicle's electronic control units are connected. The firmware may be protected from unauthorized manipulation and the message filter rules may be verified for authenticity and security. Additionally, methods are provided for generating secure message filter rules that may be authenticated prior to implementation.

FIG. 1 illustrates a system block diagram 100 of one exemplary embodiment. System 100 of this embodiment generally includes a vehicle based host platform 120. Host platform 120 may be an in-vehicle information and/or entertainment (IVI) system. Host platform 120 may include wireless connectivity to the internet, Bluetooth devices, WiFi networks, and/or any other communication networks. Host platform 120 may comprise host processor 122, bus controller 132, and message filter rule database 128. Host processor 122 may receive message filtering rules 114 from a rule provisioning system 112 through a wireless interface and store those rules 124 in the message filter rule database 128. Host processor 122 also generates unfiltered messages 126 to be sent to the bus controller 132. Host processor 122 may communicate with bus controller 132 through a Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus, a Universal Serial Bus (USB) or other suitable interface.

Bus controller 132 may comprise firmware 134 implemented in a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other suitable programmable logic circuitry. Bus controller firmware 134 may be programmed by a Joint Test Action Group (JTAG) programming unit 140 through a JTAG interface 142 or other suitable programming methods that are similarly inaccessible to the host processor 122 and any other processors or controllers associated with the vehicle. Limiting programmability access to the bus controller firmware 134 increases the security of that firmware 134. Programming of the bus controller firmware 134 includes message filter logic and message filter rule verification logic. The message filter rule verification logic may include a trusted rule-signing key as will be explained in greater detail below.

Bus controller firmware 134 is responsible for receiving unfiltered messages 126 from the host processor 122, filtering those messages and sending the filtered messages 152 to the bus 150. Bus controller firmware 134 performs this filtering based on rules 130 obtained from the message filter rule database 128. The filtering rules may be used to prevent unauthorized and/or potentially malicious messages from being sent over the bus 150 to various vehicle electronic control units (ECUs) 154. The bus 150 may be a Controller Area Network (CAN) bus or other suitable bus. The vehicle ECUs (154) may be embedded controllers for the engine, brakes, transmission or other vehicle systems or sensors.

Most ECU messages are original equipment manufacturer (OEM) specific and proprietary, and therefore the OEM generally determines how message filter rules are constructed so that messages sent to the ECUs 154 will be safe and appropriate. An initial set of rules may be pre-loaded or provisioned in the message filter rule database 128 by the OEM, but it is useful for the rules to be updatable through the wireless connectivity of the host platform 120, so that the OEM can evolve the rules over time to enable new features or close newly-discovered security vulnerabilities. New or updated message filter rules 114 obtained in this manner, however, generally cannot be trusted due to security vulnerabilities inherent in the internet and wireless networks as well as the fact that software running in the host processor 122, which has full access to these message filter rules 114, may be compromised.

In order to verify the authenticity and security of new message filtering rules 114 provided to the host platform 120, a secure rule provisioning system is employed. A trusted rule authoring entity 102, such as the OEM, is provided with rule authoring tools that enable the entity 102 to generate a digital signature to be associated with a newly authored set of rules. The rule authoring entity 102 sends the new set of rules and the digital signature 104 to a rule certification service 106 which can verify the identity of the rule authoring entity 102 based on the digital signature. The rule certification service 106 then generates a digital manifest to be associated with the new rule set to indicate that the rule set is trusted and sends this manifest 110 back to the rule authoring entity 102. The rule authoring entity 102 sends this rule set and manifest 108 to a provisioning system 112 where it can be made available to host platform 120 by any suitable method of transmission. Host platform 120 stores the rule set and associated manifest 124 in the message filter rule database 128.

Bus controller firmware 134 can verify the authenticity and security of message filter rules 130 obtained from the database 128, based on the manifest associated with the rule set, in combination with a trusted rule-signing key that is provided to the firmware 134 as part of the firmware 134 secure programming 142. The key may be an asymmetric key used in combination with the manifest to decrypt the rule set. If the bus controller firmware 134 cannot verify the authenticity of the message filter rules 130, it may ignore the new rules and continue to use an existing rule or it may cease to transmit messages to the vehicle ECUs 154 and signal an error condition.

By providing message filtering capability, executed on secure firmware using trusted message filtering rules, any compromise in the integrity of the host processor or the IVI system will not lead to a compromise in the security of the rest of the vehicle including safety critical ECU functions.

FIG. 2 illustrates a flowchart of operations 200 of one exemplary embodiment. At operation 202, a host processor associated with a vehicle is configured to receive message filtering rules. The rules may be received through a wireless interface from a rule provisioning system external to the vehicle. At operation 204, a bus controller is configured to verify the authenticity of the message filtering rules. At operation 206, the bus controller filters messages from the host processor using the verified message filtering rules. The bus controller is configured to verify rules and perform filtering through a programming interface that is inaccessible to the host processor. The programming interface may be a JTAG interface and the bus controller may be implemented as an FPGA. At operation 208, the bus controller transmits the filtered message over a bus to one or more vehicle ECUs. If the bus controller cannot verify the authenticity of the message filtering rules, it may ignore the new rules and continue to use existing rules or it may cease to transmit messages and signal an error condition.

FIG. 3 illustrates a flowchart of operations 300 of another exemplary embodiment. At operation 302, a rule certification service receives message filtering rules from a rule authoring entity. At operation 304, the rule certification service receives a digital signature associated with the message filtering rules from the rule authoring entity. The rule authoring entity may generate the digital signature using rule authoring tools provided by the rule certification service. At operation 306, the rule certification service verifies the identity of the rule authoring entity as a trusted source based on the digital signature. At operation 308, the rule certification service generates a trusted manifest to be associated with the message filtering rules. At operation 310, the rule certification service provides the trusted manifest to the rule authoring entity. The rule authoring entity may then transmit the message filtering rules and the associated trusted manifest to a vehicle based host platform.

Although the automobile industry and OEMs may, over time, take steps to develop more secure ECUs, the rule based message filtering system described herein may be cooperatively employed with and take advantage of any additional platform security measures that are implemented in the future. In the meantime, the rule based message filtering system described herein may be employed to mitigate the risks posed by IVI platforms which have the greatest exposure to malware infection.

Embodiments of the methods described herein may be implemented in a system that includes one or more storage mediums having stored thereon, individually or in combination, instructions that when executed by one or more processors perform the methods. Here, the processor may include, for example, a system CPU (e.g., core processor) and/or programmable circuitry. Thus, it is intended that operations according to the methods described herein may be distributed across a plurality of physical devices, such as processing structures at several different physical locations. Also, it is intended that the method operations may be performed individually or in a subcombination, as would be understood by one skilled in the art. Thus, not all of the operations of each of the flow charts need to be performed, and the present disclosure expressly intends that all subcombinations of such operations are enabled as would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.

The storage medium may include any type of tangible medium, for example, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, compact disk read-only memories (CD-ROMs), compact disk rewritables (CD-RWs), digital versatile disks (DVDs) and magneto-optical disks, semiconductor devices such as read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs) such as dynamic and static RAMs, erasable programmable read-only memories (EPROMs), electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), flash memories, magnetic or optical cards, or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions.

“Circuitry”, as used in any embodiment herein, may comprise, for example, singly or in any combination, hardwired circuitry, programmable circuitry, state machine circuitry, and/or firmware that stores instructions executed by programmable circuitry.

The terms and expressions which have been employed herein are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described (or portions thereof), and it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the claims. Accordingly, the claims are intended to cover all such equivalents. Various features, aspects, and embodiments have been described herein. The features, aspects, and embodiments are susceptible to combination with one another as well as to variation and modification, as will be understood by those having skill in the art. The present disclosure should, therefore, be considered to encompass such combinations, variations, and modifications.

Claims

1. A system, comprising:

a bus controller configured to communicatively couple to one or more vehicle-based electronic control units (ECUs) via a first bus, the bus controller configured to: receive a plurality of unfiltered bus messages for transmission via the first bus; identify at least one bus message of the plurality of bus messages as unauthorized for transmission via the first bus based on one or more message filtering rules, the message filtering rules being configured to identify potentially malicious code for altering operation of a vehicle; filter the plurality of bus messages to remove the at least one identified unauthorized bus message; and send each of the filtered plurality of bus messages via the first bus.

2. The system of claim 1, further comprising:

a host processor associated with a vehicle, the host processor configured to receive an encrypted new or updated message filtering rule produced by a rule authenticating entity and a trusted manifest associated with the encrypted new or updated message filtering rule.

3. The system of claim 2, wherein the bus controller is configured to receive the plurality of bus messages from the host processor, and wherein filtering the plurality of bus messages by the bus controller further includes using one or more message filtering rules from a message filtering rule data repository to filter the plurality of bus messages, and wherein filtering the plurality of bus messages includes generating filtered messages by removing unfiltered messages that potentially include malicious code for altering operation of the vehicle using the one or more message filtering rules, and sending the filtered messages to at least one of the one or more vehicle-based ECUs via the first bus.

4. The system of claim 2, wherein the bus controller is further configured to:

perform authentication operations to verify the authenticity of the encrypted new or updated message filtering rule with the trusted manifest and a trusted rule-signing key; and

when the encrypted new or updated message filtering rule is determined to be authentic, decrypt the encrypted new or updated message filtering rule using a combination of the trusted manifest and the trusted rule-signing key to produce a decrypted new or updated message filtering rule, and updating a message filtering rule data repository with the decrypted new or updated message filtering rule; and

wherein the bus controller is programmable through an interface that is inaccessible to the host processor.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein the bus controller comprises a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) and the programming interface comprises a Joint Test Action Group (JTAG) interface.

6. The system of claim 2, wherein when the encrypted new or updated message filtering rule is determined to not be authentic, the bus controller ignores the encrypted new or updated message filtering rule.

7. The system of claim 2, wherein when the encrypted new or updated message filtering rule is determined to not be authentic, the bus controller is configured to block messages from the host processor and signal an error.

8. The system of claim 2, wherein the host processor is configured to receive the encrypted new or updated message filtering rule via a wireless connection from a source external to the vehicle.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the first bus comprises a Controller Area Network (CAN) bus.

10. The system of claim 1, further comprising a host processor associated with a vehicle, wherein the host processor comprises an In-Vehicle Infotainment (IVI) platform.

11. A method comprising:

receiving, by a bus controller, a plurality of unfiltered bus messages for transmission via a first bus to one or more vehicle-based electronic control units (ECUs);

identifying, by the bus controller, at least one bus message of the plurality of bus messages as unauthorized for transmission via the first bus based on one or more message filtering rules, the message filtering rules being configured to identify potentially malicious code for altering operation of a vehicle;

filtering, by the bus controller, the plurality of bus messages to remove the at least one identified unauthorized bus message; and

sending, by the bus controller, each of the filtered plurality of bus messages via the first bus.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising:

receiving, by a host processor associated with a vehicle, an encrypted new or updated message filtering rule produced by a rule authenticating entity and a trusted manifest associated with the encrypted new or updated message filtering rule.

13. The method of claim 12, further comprising receiving, by the bus controller, the plurality of bus messages from the host processor, and wherein filtering the plurality of bus messages by the bus controller further includes using one or more message filtering rules from a message filtering rule data repository to filter the plurality of bus messages, and wherein filtering the plurality of bus messages includes generating filtered messages by removing unfiltered messages that potentially include malicious code for altering operation of the vehicle using the one or more message filtering rules.

14. The method of claim 12, further comprising:

performing, by the bus controller, authentication operations to verify the authenticity of the encrypted new or updated message filtering rule with the trusted manifest and a trusted rule-signing key; and

when the encrypted new or updated message filtering rule is determined to be authentic, decrypting, by the bus controller, the encrypted new or updated message filtering rule using a combination of the trusted manifest and the trusted rule-signing key to produce a decrypted new or updated message filtering rule, and

updating, by the bus controller, a message filtering rule data repository with the decrypted new or updated message filtering rule,

wherein the bus controller is programmable through an interface that is inaccessible to the host processor.

15. The method of claim 12, wherein when the encrypted new or updated message filtering rule is determined to not be authentic, blocking, by the bus controller, messages from the host processor and signal an error.

16. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon which when executed by at least one processor cause a process to be carried out, the process comprising:

receiving a plurality of unfiltered bus messages for transmission via a first bus to one or more vehicle-based electronic control units (ECUs);

identifying at least one bus message of the plurality of bus messages as unauthorized for transmission via the first bus based on one or more message filtering rules, the message filtering rules being configured to identify potentially malicious code for altering operation of a vehicle;

filtering the plurality of bus messages to remove the at least one identified unauthorized bus message; and

sending each of the filtered plurality of bus messages via the first bus.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein the process further comprises receiving the plurality of bus messages from a host processor, and wherein filtering the plurality of bus messages further includes using one or more message filtering rules from a message filtering rule data repository to filter the plurality of bus messages.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein filtering the plurality of bus messages includes generating filtered messages by removing unfiltered messages that potentially include malicious code for altering operation of the vehicle using the one or more message filtering rules.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, receiving an encrypted new or updated message filtering rule.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 19, wherein the process further comprises:

when the encrypted new or updated message filtering rule is determined to not be authentic, blocking messages from a host processor and signaling an error.