Optically corrected helmet mounted display

- Virtual I/O, Inc.

The present invention eliminates the relay lens systems found in conventional helmet mounted displays (HMDs) by removing field distortions and aberrations with a contoured fiber optic faceplate placed in close proximity to a liquid crystal display (LCD) or cathode ray tube. The optical system typically consists of a spherical dielectric or holographically made collimator-combiner, a dielectric or holographically made fold mirror, and a contoured fiber optic faceplate. The fold mirror is flat, and the collimator-combiner is made by coating a spherical eye glass blank. The system is configured as a folded and tilted catadioptric projector with the novel feature being the contoured faceplate. There are no dispersive elements in the imaging assembly which means it can be completely polychromatic (full color) without the need for additional color correction optics as found in all refractive color systems. When designed for full color, highest brightness, and see through capability it must be made with two or three narrow spectral and angular sensitive coatings on the fold mirror and on the collimator-combiner. These coatings allow the use of a tilt of the collimator-combiner with respect to the fold mirror which induces a small amount of astigmatism and keystone distortion but at the same time allows image light to pass through the folded optics to the eye with a minimum of loss. The elimination of a corrective refractive lens relay system makes this design polychromatic, less expensive, and lighter in weight, compared to a similar system with an achromatized and corrected refractive lens.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to helmet mounted displays that generate images which constitute all that the observer sees or which are combined with the observer's normal view of the surrounding environment.

2. Description of the Related Art

Helmet mounted stereo displays have been around at least since McCullum described a wireless system using two cathode ray tubes (CRTs) in 1943 (U.S. Pat. No. 2388170). They have been used in avionics, tanks, as sights for soldiers and helicopter pilots, in surgery, at workstations, for robotics and in entertainment devices.

U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,982,278, 4,884,137, 4,970,589, 4,874,214, 4,761,056, 4,398,799, 4,465,347, 3,614,314, 305,919, 2,955,156, 4,859,030, 4,269,476, 4,322,135, 4,761,056, 4,969,724, 4,902,116, 4,468,101, 4,775,217, 4,968,123, 4,961,626, 4,969,714, 4,897,715, 4,028,725, 4,571,628, 4,982,278, 4,933,755, 4,952,024, 4,805,988, 4,385,803, 4,853,764 and 4,874,235 all have some elements of their design in common with the present invention. Most of these designs have complex refractive optical trains to relay the image from a CRT or liquid crystal display (LCD) to the eye. They typically utilize a combination of lenses, mirrors, and holographic optics; a few include fiber optics in some form. Some are monochromatic and some are polychromatic; some, binocular; and a few are biocular (both eyes see the same image).

Foreign patents that are related include German nos. 3532730, 3628458, 224691, and 3532730; French no. 2517916; and Japanese no. 63-82192, 63-177689, 59-117889, 59-219092, 62-272698, and 1-61723WO 84/01680. Most of these are heads up displays (HUD) where the projected image is made to overlay a see through view of the real world, but some are for non-see through wide angle virtual reality projection such as the contoured fiber optic design of Webster, U.S. Pat. No. 4,874,235. In Webster's design two contoured fiber optic bundles are made concave to extend the field of view (FOV) and also greatly distort the input image which is viewed with strong contact lenses, and no see through light is allowed. A coherent image conduit of fibers is in effect an image relay system that can also change the size and shape of an image to control the field of view or concentrate the image light from a large display via a tapered section of fibers. It is also a well known practice to use flexible coherent bundles as image conduit over a meter or more and, furthermore, to divide the bundle into smaller bundles with tapers attached to increase the total number of pixels displayed (SBWP) by combining multiple remote inputs to make one high-resolution output. This practice is not a part of the present invention, and it is extremely expensive to implement.

The popular LEEP lens design of Teitel U.S. Pat. No. 4,982,278, could also not be made to work in a see through configuration because the eye relief (the distance between the eye and the first optical element) is too short to insert a folding optic of any sort, which is necessary for most wide FOV see through or heads up display (HUD) designs.

In the present invention., holographic optical elements (HOEs) have been used to make the fold mirror and the collimator-combiner. Because of this it is useful to know a little about the history of HOEs in spite of the fact that they are not necessary to the workings of this invention, as they may be replaced by conventional dielectric mirrors made commercially in a vacuum chamber.

Historically HOEs have been used as combiners and or collimators in helmet mounted displays (HMDs) at least since Don Close and Andrejs Graube of Hughes aircraft company (Air Force contract no. F33615-73-C-4110), and others at Hughes Aircraft put them on visors in the early 1970s. One fabrication method practiced then was film transfer, a process whereby the hologram was formed in gelatin and processed on a stable flat glass substrate and subsequently loosened, lifted off, and transferred to the cylindrical plastic visor where it was then laminated with a matching visor. The method required considerable skill and patience and some unusual exposure optics to compensate for the cylindrical surface.

An alternative to their method involves subbing (preparing the surface for an aqueous solution) the spherical or cylindrical plastic so that it will take a sensitized gelatin coating and then holding the coated plastic rigidly to obtain the required stability for a two beam exposure to laser light. This method requires developing ways to sub and coat with good optical quality but results in well-corrected optics with relatively low dispersion and flare light compared to flat plates. This method probably has the greatest potential for perfect imaging over the largest field of view but will always leave some flare light from fringes at the substrate and cover interface and, if made for more than one color, will have considerable chromatic aberration. It is the basis of U.S. Pat. No. 4,874,214 belonging to Thompson CSF of France. The present invention will not have any flare light nor any chromatic aberration because, unlike the prior art, the reflection hologram is made to conform to the shape of the plastic sustrate, which is spherical.

When flare light is not a problem for the user and optical bandwidths on playback are less than 15 nm then the HOE on a flat glass or plastic substrate may be used with good imaging quality over a field of view (FOV) of about 20 degrees. These elements have been made with good success by using aspheric optics, decentered or tilted optics and/or computer generated diffractive optics (CGH) to generate the optimum interfering wavefronts. More recently they have been made using simple spherical waves to form intermediate HOEs that will generate the optimum corrected wavefronts when reconstructed in a different geometry or at a different wavelength from the one in which they were originally constructed. This recent method, called a recursive design technique, was developed by Amitai and Friesem and is relatively easy to implement. Variations of this approach were introduced earlier by Ono in the design of holographic scanners, collimators and transform optics and were applied to a biocular HUD design for the U.S. Air Force (contract F33615-86-C-3618) by Richard D. Rallison in 1986. The major advantage with this method is the ease of manufacturing on flat plates. The disadvantages are the limited field of view and the necessity of using only one wavelength with a narrow spectral bandwidth, typically about 15 nanometers. The present invention has no such restrictions on either bandwidth or FOV.

A popular design in recent years is the result of the requirement to make FOVs increasingly larger and to make scenes more natural in color or simply more colorful for better or faster interpretation of displayed information. This design goal may be met by employing an element referred to as a spherical conformal holographic reflector, which has no dispersive qualities and a controllable spectral bandwidth. It has been made and used by many investigators for HUDs or HMDs, including Wood, Margarinos, Tedesco and others, mainly for aircraft and eye protection and is in some ways the simplest holographic element to produce. Fabrication requires the coating of spherical glass or plastic substrates, such as an ophthalmic lens blank, with a holographic quality film but requires only a single beam of low coherence to expose. The object wave is derived from a portion of the reference wave reaching the conformal mercury or simply the film-air interface. This is the preferred method of making a collimator-combiner for the present invention or, if a virtual reality display (VRD) is being made, then the same blank may be coated with aluminum in a vacuum chamber.

A similar technology is used on the ophthalmic (lens blank) substrates popular in several folded catadioptric (CAT) HMD designs. At Honeywell the substrates have been coated by vapor deposition of dielectrics in a vacuum. In addition to folding the optical path, some of their designs have a tilt angle other than 45 degrees between the fold mirror and the collimator to improve image light efficiency. As long as the tilt angle in these systems can remain small, simple inexpensive spherical optics can be used even for a FOV of 50 degrees. Typical tilt, or off-axis angles, range from 6 to 12 degrees with cost and complexity of associated corrective refractive optics going up geometrically as the angle increases. Designs with zero tilt angle do not let the image light that was folded onto the collimator pass through the fold mirror to the eye without a loss in intensity. Much of the collimated light impinges on the fold mirror at about the same angle that it was originally folded toward the collimator, which causes it to be reflected back to the image source, rather than pass through to the eye. The introduction of the tilt allows the light from the collimator to impinge on the fold mirror at an angle at which it does not reflect efficiently. This tilt generates aberrations that are difficult to correct.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is a helmet mounted display (HMD) that can project an image--from an image generator, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT) or a liquid crystal display (LCD)--to the eyes of an observer or both transmit such image and combine it with a direct view of the surrounding environment. The first such HMD is referred to as a non-see through or virtual reality display (VRD); the second, as a see! through or heads up display (HUD).

The present invention consists of three basic elements: a spherical dielectric or holographically made collimator-combiner, a dielectric or holographically made fold mirror, and a contoured fiber optic faceplate. The amount of light which passes from the surrounding environment to the eyes of the observer is controlled by the coatings placed on the surfaces of the collimator-combiner and the fold mirror as well as the angle, i.e., the tilt angle, between these two elements.

Techniques as discussed below, are incorporated to produce an optically corrected image. The invention is, thus, called an optically corrected helmet mounted display.

It is the primary object of this invention to reduce the aberrations and distortions produced by the tilt and the spherical collimator-combiner such as image field curvature, spherical aberration, astigmatism and keystone distortion with a contoured fiber optic faceplate by shaping the output side of the faceplate to match and cancel the errors. Keystone error is reduced by heating and distorting the square faceplate into a trapezoidal shape, roughly identical to the inverse of the keystone distortion. The astigmatism is reduced by bending the collimator-combiner inward in the horizontal direction to make the focal length in the horizontal direction approximately 1/2 diopter shorter than the focal length in the vertical direction. The complex field curvature and spherical aberration are corrected by contouring the output side of the faceplate to match them.

It is a further object of the present invention to simplify the display imaging optics by eliminating any relay lenses or other corrective refractive optics. The collimator-combiner and a fiber optic faceplate image a CRT or LCD display surface mounted above the eye with a simple dielectric or holographic fold mirror reflecting the image toward the collimator at the lowest practical tilt angle. The use of a planer fold mirror at this location is quite common in monochromatic systems and causes very little loss of light if angular bandwidths and tilt angles are properly designed and built. The common practice is to feed the fold mirror an image that has been corrected by a refractive lens, or a computer-generated hologram. The present invention makes these corrections in the contour of the fiber optic faceplate and thereby simplifies the imaging optics by reducing the number of elements to three.

It is also an object of this invention to make a 3-color corrected chromatic HMD without refractive optics. This is done by using reflective imaging optics only and, in order to transmit the image light through the fold mirror to the eye, it is necessary to make the reflectors highly sensitive to angle. The image light is folded and a few degrees of tilt is introduced effectively to move the three spectral peaks of the fold mirror across the three spectral peaks of the collimator-combiner, which not only results in a brighter image by conserving image light but also blocks more see through ambient light (in the case of an HUD). The tilt results in conserving most of the available image light, which is most important; but it blocks more of the ambient light, giving the appearance of a lightly shaded pair of sunglasses that change color slightly over the FOV. This arrangement is favorable to the creation of a simulator environment or a virtual reality. The needs of a pilot or vehicle operator, however, probably require a little more see through light and that can be accomplished by simply reducing spectral bandwidths and reflectivities until a proper balance is reached. The resolution of the system is limited only by the total number of pixels displayed (SBWP) of the display device and the fiber optic faceplate, not by a refractive relay system as is found in some similar HMD or HUD projectors.

It is another object of this invention to use the angle that the output contoured surface of the fiber optic faceplate makes with the fibers of such faceplate and the size of the fibers to control the direction of the exiting image light. This is not a pupil forming lens relay system, but the combination of elements produces an area at the exit pupil or eye position that contains most of the image light energy and so forms a kind of energy window. The effects of fiber size, surface finish, and face cut angles on the output end of the coherent bundle (the faceplate) will in combination with the collimator-combiner define the size and location of this energy window. The window may be redirected, in one plane, i.e., moved up or down, by orienting the contoured output surface of the fiber optic faceplate at an angle other than normal, i e., ninety degrees, to the direction of the fibers, thereby forming a wedge-shaped fiber optic faceplate. The angular displacement of the image is roughly one half the angle between the tangent to the faceplate and the normal to the fibers, or one half of the wedge angle. The fiber size and surface finish determine the size of the energy window: smaller fibers and rougher finishes make larger windows, but too much roughness can reduce resolution. When stereo images are presented to the eyes, it is necessary to design the window so that most of the energy also gets to the eyes. The surface finish, fiber size, and cut angle together can be controlled in a sufficient range to achieve the desired energy window characteristics. Refractive optical systems often relay an image of a lens into the position of the viewer which sharply defines an energy window, usually called the system exit pupil. The energy window has fuzzier edges in the present invention which makes it less likely for the operator accidentally to slide out of the exit pupil or energy window as the operator is moved about in a vehicle or moves in another environment.

It is an additional object of this invention to use the fiber optic faceplate to blur the edges of the pixels of an LCD without losing resolution by selecting the proper numerical aperture (N. A.) of the fibers on the input side of the fiber optic faceplate and the corresponding correct distance of such pixels from the fiber optic faceplate. The blurring is necessary because the collimator-combiner has a high magnification, making every pixel of the display device clearly visible with a black outline that detracts from the realism of the view. The common technique currently used to correct this defect is to place a weak diffuser a short distance away from the pixels. The present invention, however, accomplishes the same task by placing the input side of the coherent bundle of fibers contained in the fiber optic faceplate a certain optimum distance from the display pixels. The minimum distance is fixed by the thickness of the LCD cover glass so that the optimum input N. A. is typically chosen to work best at that distance. In a practical design the required input N. A. may be smaller than the required output N. A.

In this case a sandwich of two fiber optic faceplates with different sized fibers can be used. The finish on the output surface of the two fiber optic faceplates may be a fine grind texture with smaller high N. A. fibers which will scatter light at higher angles and extend the size of the energy window, while the input fibers (contained in the input fiber optic faceplate which will be called the first fiber optic faceplate) may be polished and made large to accept light over an angle just large enough to blur the edges of the pixels, without losing resolution or contrast. This method effectively eliminates the need for a diffuser plate which is now the common practice to effect blurring. The required input and output N. A.s may be close to the same value, especially when a low resolution LCD is being employed; in this special case a sandwich is not necessary and the fiber optic faceplate is a single element.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates the ray trace method used to find the correct contour for the image as it exits the fiber optic faceplate. The trace is made starting from the eye position and follows parallel bundles to the collimator-combiner which reflects and focuses all the bundles into an array of focused spots that, when connected, define the shape and position of the output surface of the fiber optic faceplate for that eye position. For clarity, the final folded path is not shown; folding simply puts the faceplate out of the see through path.

FIG. 2 illustrates the HMD system optical configuration, showing the relative positions of the LCD or other image generator, the fiber optic faceplate, the collimator-combiner, the fold mirror, and the viewer's eye position which is also the system exit pupil, or energy window. The output surface of the fiber optic faceplate has been shaped according to the ray trace of FIG. 1.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The optically corrected helmet mounted display consists of a fiber optic faceplate, a collimator-combiner 34, and a fold mirror 24.

1. Faceplate

The faceplate is composed of two fiber optic faceplates in contact with each other. The second fiber optic faceplate 20 is constructed from coherent fiber image conduit and has 6 to 15 micron diameter fibers with absorptive cladding to improve contrast. The output face 22 of the second fiber optic faceplate 20 is shaped on 260, then 600 and 1200 grit diamond wheels and, finally, finished by hand with finer and finer abrasives until image resolution or N. A. is optimum and the energy window is sized as desired. The first fiber optic faceplate 18 has larger fibers with a lower N. A. than those of the second fiber optic faceplate, a numerical aperture approximately equal to twice the pixel size of the image generator (LCD 16) divided by the distance between said first fiber optic faceplate 18 and said pixels, and may be placed against the LCD 16 in order to collect image light over a smaller angle than the angle at which it is being emitted from the LCD 16. This first fiber optic faceplate 18 is then cemented to the second fiber optic faceplate 20 containing smaller fibers and having a larger N. A. to provide a wider exit energy pupil at the eye position 1, which is also the energy window. This energy window may be moved up or down by orienting the contoured output surface 22 of the second fiber optic faceplate 20 at an angle other than ninety degrees with respect to the direction of the fibers in the second fiber optic faceplate 20.

As an example, a liquid crystal television (LCTV) 14 having an LCD 16 with 160 micron pixels placed 1.2 mm from the faceplate works best for the input to the faceplate at an N. A. of 0.2; but a ray trace shows that an output N. A. of 0.4 for the output of the faceplate would be optimum for light to fill the designed exit energy pupil or energy window. The options for the designer are to make a sandwich of large and small fibers or to make the output surface of the larger fibers rougher so that light is scattered at larger angles, or a combination of the two. A simple fine grind finish can effectively double the N. A. of a fiber optic faceplate and may be all that is necessary to obtain the desired window size. This should be tried first; and if the fine grind causes a net loss of image resolution in order to gain a larger energy window, then a sandwich must be made using a faceplate of higher N. A. and a finer finish.

The size of the LCD or CRT screen 16, can be no longer on its shortest side than the focal length of the collimator-combiner 34, otherwise, it could not be folded out of the FOV 12. This is the reason for a fundamental limit to the FOV 12 in one direction, usually the vertical, because it can be no larger than the angle subtended by the fiber optic faceplate 20 from a position one focal length away. For standard commercially available eye glass type collimator-combiner 34 substrates, this is limited to between 40 and 45 mm and is also the maximum size of the output side of the output surface 22 of the second fiber optic faceplate 20.

2. Collimator-Combiner

The collimator-combiner 34 is the primary image-forming element in this system and as such deserves to be discussed as a necessary part of the present invention. The shape of the collimator-combiner 34 and the position of the eye will define, by ray trace, the shape of the output surface 22 of the second fiber optic faceplate 20; and the fabrication of the collimator-combiner 34 naturally affects the quality of the image. A preferred method of making collimator-combiners is to make all exposures on a single surface of a standard finished plano CR39 ophthalmic lens 28. CR39 is a hard resin with an index of refraction of 1.5 and comes in standard diameters of 75 mm with the concave surface having a radius typically of 80 mm, with some brands having 95 mm and 91 mm radii. In order to make gelatin adhere to most of the brands a hygroscopic sub coating is applied to both or either surface of a blank so that a good even coat of dichromated gelatin (DCG) 32 in thicknesses of 8 to 12 microns can be spun on. Subbing typically involves the use of sulfamic acid, chlorine, ammonium hydroxide, alcohol, and/or ammonium sulfide to prepare the surface for a thin layer of collodion or gelatin over which the final sensitive layer of DCG 32 can be deposited. These processes are detailed in Army SBIR contract report no. DAAA15-90-C-0021. To protect the processed gelatin a second CR39 ophthalmic blank 30 with a small amount of negative power is cemented to the convex surface in a process referred to as capping.

The reflectivity, angular bandwidth, and color of holographic elements are influenced by the angle at which they are exposed, the wavelength of the exposing radiation, the beam ratios, film thickness and absorption, exposure energy, processing, and the amount of shrinkage after processing and sealing. By experimenting with all of the above parameters, the best tricolor reflectors to date were made in a 10 micron coating of DCG 32 with about 40% absorption exposed for blue and green at 6 degrees tilt from the normal using the 457 and 514 nm lines of an argon laser. To get red reflection, the substrate is tipped away from a highly divergent 514 nm line to about 50 degrees from the normal. The exposure and processing are adjusted by trial and error until reflection peaks are centered at 620, 545, and 490 nm, which are the nominal target values found in color LCDs 16 used in liquid crystal televisions 14.

The real world can be seen through holographic collimator-combiners 34 with no distortion except that caused by tilting the substrate down several degrees with respect to the line of sight and the fold mirror 24. A small correction for the astigmatism induced by this tilt may be made by bending the completed assembly; but because of a limited and fairly narrow vertical FOV 12, this is optional and would result in a small distortion of the see through view. If the device is not a see through type, but is a closed virtual reality viewer, then the tilt may be removed and the view will be completely corrected for color, field curvature and all other aberrations and distortions. The 80 mm collimator-combiner radius 4 SILOR brand of lens is used in the prototype demonstrator because of its availability and good optical quality. A comfortable viewing distance for these collimators is 50 mm; and from the ray traces derived from a commercial ray trace program named BEAM 4 it is clear that field curvature is acceptable at this distance but better still at one focal length.

The collimator-combiner distorts the image surface 10 in several ways as shown in the vertical ray trace of FIG. 1. The image plane is curved at varying radii 4 from top to bottom, and it is tilted backward in the vertical plane. The fiber optic faceplate 20, thus, has to be shaped a little like an air foil from top to bottom to reduce the effects of the vertical tilt and is more or less spherical from side to side to match the spherical field. Ray traces are done with a commercial ray trace program to determine the exact shape of the image in three dimensions, and the output surface 22 of the fiber optic faceplate 20 is shaped to match it as closely as possible. The traces must be made in parallel bundles 8 from the eye position 1 to the collimator-combiner radius 4, and the collimator-combiner radius 4 defines the image shape as a locus of focused points 10 in all three dimensions.

3. Fold Mirror

The preferred fold mirror 24 is a good quality 3-line holographic mirror made using the same techniques (including a sensitive layer of DCG 36) used to make the collimator-combiner except that it is capped with an AR coated cover glass 26 to eliminate ghost images. A trace of the spectral transmission of this mirror is similar to that of the collimator-combiner 34 except that the angle it reflects at for any specific wavelength is closer to 51 degrees from the normal than to 6 degrees from the normal for the collimator-combiner 34, and the collimator combiner 34 tilt of 6 degrees with respect to the fold mirror 24 is enough to let the image light from the collimator-combiner 34 pass through the fold mirror 24, with little loss of intensity to the eye.

The configuration shown for the HMD is called a folded and tilted catadioptric design; it can have a maximum vertical FOV of as much as 50 degrees before the projected image meets the edge of the fiber optic faceplate 20. This occurs when the eye is at one focal length away from the collimator-combiner 34. With an eye relief of 50 mm it could have as much as a 45 degree FOV vertically and 80 degrees horizontally; the horizontal FOV is limited by the nose of the observer more than the optics.

Claims

1. A method for blurring edges of pixels of an LCD without losing image resolution, comprising:

placing a fiber optic faceplate, having a numerical aperture and having an input side, in an optical path of light emanating from the LCD at such a physical distance from pixels of the LCD that the numerical aperture of the fiber optic faceplate is substantially equal to twice the pixel size of the LCD divided by a distance between the input side of said fiber optic faceplate and said pixels.

2. Apparatus for use in a head-mounted display, comprising:

an image generator which outputs a plurality of pixels defining a pixel size; and
means for blurring edges of the pixels, positioned in an optical path of light emanating from the image generator at such a physical distance from the pixels that the means for blurring has a numerical aperture substantially twice said pixel size divided by a distance between said means for blurring and said pixels.

3. Apparatus, as claimed in claim 2, wherein said image generator is one of a CRT and an LCD.

4. Apparatus for use in a head-mounted display, said head-mounted display having an image generator which outputs a plurality of pixels defining a pixel size, the apparatus comprising:

an optical element which defines a first numerical aperture, said optical element positioned in an optical path of light emanating from the image generator at such a physical distance from the pixels that said numerical aperture is substantially twice said pixel size divided by a distance between said optical element and said pixels.

5. Apparatus as claimed on claim 4, wherein said optical comprises a fiber optic faceplate.

6. Apparatus as claimed in claim 5 wherein said fiber optic faceplate includes a curved faceplate output surface.

7. A folded catadioptric head-mounted display device for a user comprising:

an image generator;
a fold mirror which receives image light from said image generator and reflects it away from an eye position of the user in a first direction;
a reflector which receives the image light transmitted in said first direction and reflects said image light back towards said fold mirror for at least partial transmission through said fold mirror to the eye position of a user;
a plate positioned between said image generator and said fold mirror, said plate having fibers defining an input surface and an output surface, said output surface being curved.

8. Apparatus as claimed in claim 2 wherein said curved output surface has a shape substantially corresponding to the locus of focused points generated by ray tracing parallel bundles of rays from the eye position to points where the reflector focuses said parallel bundles of rays.

9. Head-mounted display; apparatus comprising:

an image generator;
a fold mirror for receiving light from said image generator and reflecting at least a portion of said image light in a first direction substantially away from an eye of a user;
a reflector for receiving said image light transmitted in said first direction and reflecting said image light toward said eye of the user;
means for reducing image distortion wherein said head-mounted display is provided in the absence of refractive optics.

10. Apparatus as claimed in claim 9 wherein said head-mounted display uses only reflective optics for imaging.

11. Apparatus as claimed in claim 9 wherein said fold mirror is positioned at a tilt so as to obtain a desired balance of image light intensity and environmental light intensity.

12. Apparatus as claimed in claim 9 wherein said fold mirror has a spectral transmission such that the angle said fold mirror reflects at for any specific wave-length is substantially 51 degrees from the normal.

13. Apparatus as claimed in claim 9 wherein said reflector has a spectral transmission such that the angle it reflects at for any specific wave length is substantially six degrees from normal.

14. Apparatus as claimed in claim 9 wherein the reflector is titled at substantially six degrees with respect to an axis passing through the eye and the fold mirror.

15. Apparatus as claimed in claim 9 wherein said reflector has reflection peaks at substantially 620 nm, 545 nm and 490 nm.

Referenced Cited

U.S. Patent Documents

D300476 March 28, 1989 Sestak
D301644 June 13, 1989 Sestak
D334557 April 6, 1993 Hunter et al.
D334742 April 13, 1993 Hunter et al.
D337320 July 13, 1993 Hunter et al.
D338514 August 17, 1993 Holmes
2955156 October 1960 Heilig
2958258 November 1960 Kelly
3043910 July 1962 Hicks
3589795 June 1971 Miyazaki et al.
3614314 October 1971 Rossire
3874783 January 1975 Cole
3915548 October 1975 Opittek et al.
3923370 December 1975 Mostrom
3940204 February 24, 1976 Withrington
3945721 March 23, 1976 Corcoran
4026641 May 31, 1977 Bosserman et al.
4028725 June 7, 1977 Lewis
4042957 August 16, 1977 Ellis
4048653 September 13, 1977 Spooner
4257062 March 17, 1981 Meredith
4269476 May 26, 1981 Gauthier et al.
4310849 January 12, 1982 Glass
4322135 March 30, 1982 Freeman
4348185 September 7, 1982 Breglia et al.
4361384 November 30, 1982 Bosserman
4385803 May 31, 1983 Ellis
4395731 July 26, 1983 Schoolman
4398799 August 16, 1983 Swift
4437113 March 13, 1984 Lee et al.
4439157 March 27, 1984 Breglia et al.
4446480 May 1, 1984 Breglia et al.
4465347 August 14, 1984 Task et al.
4468101 August 28, 1984 Ellis
4550984 November 5, 1985 Reymond
4559555 December 17, 1985 Schoolman
4561723 December 31, 1985 Hamano et al.
4571628 February 18, 1986 Thornton
4636866 January 13, 1987 Hattori
4641931 February 10, 1987 Loy
4651201 March 17, 1987 Schoolman
4652870 March 24, 1987 Steward
4695129 September 22, 1987 Faessen et al.
4706117 November 10, 1987 Schoolman
4711512 December 8, 1987 Upatnieks
4737972 April 12, 1988 Schoolman
4743200 May 10, 1988 Welch et al.
4753514 June 28, 1988 Kubik
4757714 July 19, 1988 Purdy et al.
4761056 August 2, 1988 Evans et al.
4763990 August 16, 1988 Wood
4775217 October 4, 1988 Ellis
4786966 November 22, 1988 Hanson et al.
4791300 December 13, 1988 Yin
4796987 January 10, 1989 Linden
4797736 January 10, 1989 Kloots et al.
4799765 January 24, 1989 Ferrer
4805988 February 21, 1989 Dones
4806011 February 21, 1989 Bettinger
4807202 February 21, 1989 Cherri et al.
4821727 April 18, 1989 Levene et al.
4826287 May 2, 1989 Cook et al.
4853764 August 1, 1989 Sutter
4859030 August 22, 1989 Rotier
4859031 August 22, 1989 Berman et al.
4867551 September 19, 1989 Perera
4869575 September 26, 1989 Kubik
4871228 October 3, 1989 Roos
4874214 October 17, 1989 Cheyason et al.
4874235 October 17, 1989 Webster
4884137 November 28, 1989 Hanson et al.
4884219 November 28, 1989 Waldren
4897715 January 30, 1990 Beamon
4900133 February 13, 1990 Berman
4902083 February 20, 1990 Wells
4902116 February 20, 1990 Ellis
4902120 February 20, 1990 Weyer
4904049 February 27, 1990 Hegg
4930888 June 5, 1990 Freisleben et al.
4932731 June 12, 1990 Suzuki et al.
4933755 June 12, 1990 Dahl et al.
4934773 June 19, 1990 Becker
4952024 August 28, 1990 Gale
4961625 October 9, 1990 Wood et al.
4961626 October 9, 1990 Fournier et al.
4964049 October 16, 1990 Hegg
4968123 November 6, 1990 Fournier et al.
4969714 November 13, 1990 Fournier et al.
4969724 November 13, 1990 Ellis
4970589 November 13, 1990 Hanson et al.
4982278 January 1, 1991 Dahl et al.
4983014 January 8, 1991 Nattermann
4984179 January 8, 1991 Waldern
4993790 February 19, 1991 Vick
4995165 February 26, 1991 Daniels
5003300 March 26, 1991 Wells
5005213 April 1991 Hanson et al.
5019828 May 28, 1991 Schoolman
5034809 July 23, 1991 Katoh
5035473 July 30, 1991 Kuwayama et al.
5039198 August 13, 1991 VanBeek
5046827 September 10, 1991 Frost et al.
5050966 September 24, 1991 Berman
5053755 October 1, 1991 Smith et al.
5081542 January 14, 1992 Efron et al.
5089903 February 18, 1992 Kuwayama et al.
5091719 February 25, 1992 Beamon
5123726 June 23, 1992 Webster
5124821 June 23, 1992 Antier et al.
5129716 July 14, 1992 Holakovszky et al.
5130794 July 14, 1992 Ritchey
5138555 August 11, 1992 Albrecht
5151722 September 29, 1992 Massof et al.
5162828 November 10, 1992 Furness et al.
5162928 November 10, 1992 Taniguchi et al.
5164848 November 17, 1992 Firth et al.
5166778 November 24, 1992 Beamon
5170153 December 8, 1992 Migozzi et al.
5181013 January 19, 1993 Bagshaw et al.
5184231 February 2, 1993 Ellis
5189512 February 23, 1993 Cameron et al.
5192960 March 9, 1993 Komamura
5198928 March 30, 1993 Chauvin
5231379 July 27, 1993 Wood et al.
5255211 October 19, 1993 Redmond
5274405 December 28, 1993 Webster
5276471 January 4, 1994 Yamauchi et al.
5278680 January 11, 1994 Karasawa et al.
5281957 January 25, 1994 Schoolman
5293271 March 8, 1994 Merritt et al.
5300942 April 5, 1994 Dolgoff
5303085 April 12, 1994 Rallison
5305244 April 19, 1994 Newman et al.
5309169 May 3, 1994 Lippert
5321416 June 14, 1994 Bassett et al.
5322441 June 21, 1994 Lewis et al.
5327175 July 5, 1994 Kim
5331149 July 19, 1994 Spitzer et al.
5334991 August 2, 1994 Wells et al.
5335299 August 2, 1994 Atkinson
5347400 September 13, 1994 Hunter
5353042 October 4, 1994 Klapman et al.
5357372 October 18, 1994 Chen et al.
5373857 December 20, 1994 Travers et al.
5383053 January 17, 1995 Hegg et al.
5392158 February 21, 1995 Tosaki
5408346 April 18, 1995 Trissel et al.
5451976 September 19, 1995 Ito

Foreign Patent Documents

91309108 October 1991 EPX
0461942A1 December 1991 EPX
3532730 March 1987 DEX
3628458 February 1988 DEX
4225589A1 February 1994 DEX
59-117889 July 1984 JPX
59-219092 December 1984 JPX
62-272698 November 1987 JPX
63-82192 April 1988 JPX
63-177689 July 1988 JPX
1-61723 March 1989 JPX
5-46161 February 1993 JPX
6-59217 March 1994 JPX
2143948A February 1985 GBX
2266385 October 1993 GBX
2270775 March 1994 GBX
2274727 August 1994 GBX
2279201 December 1994 GBX
2281846 March 1995 GBX
2287551 September 1995 GBX
84/01680 April 1984 WOX
WO92/03756 March 1992 WOX
93/23783 November 1993 WOX
WO94/11855 May 1994 WOX
WO94/14152 June 1994 WOX
WO94/24658 October 1994 WOX
WO95/10106 April 1995 WOX
WO95/10061 April 1995 WOX

Other references

  • Assenheim et al., "Large-Screen-Projection, Avionic, and Helmet-Mounted Displays", Proceedings, The International Society for Optical Engineering, Feb. 26-28, 1991, vol. 1456, pp. 179-190. Benton, "Practical Holography VIII", Proceedings, The International Society for Optical Engineering, Feb. 7-9, 1994, vol. 2176, pp. 241-248. Driscoll et al., Handbook of Optics, McGraw-Hill Company, 1978, pp. 13-16. Fischer, "Fundamental and Optics for Head Mounted Displays", Photonics West '95, Feb. 4-10, 1995. Rotier, "Optical Approaches to the Helmet Mounted Display", SPIE, 1989, vol. 1116, pp. 14-17. Sony, "Visortron" advertisement. "Survey of Head Mounted Displays", Real Time Graphics, Aug. 1984, vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 1, 8-12. Virtual I/O, Inc., "PDS Gamer.TM." advertisement. VR News, Dec. 1994, vol. 3, Issue 10, pp. 4, 8, 12. "Airlines Weigh Benefits, Costs of At-Seat Video", Aviation Week & Space Technology, Aug. 15, 1994, pp. 44-45. Pope, "Say ahhh! Videos help you relax", The Times-Picayune, Oct. 25, 1994, pp. 1, A-6. Farmer, "The right solution to the right problem . . . now", Comdex Daily, Nov. 15, 1994, p. 4. Siggraph, Nikkei Electronics, Aug. 22, 1994, pp. 13-14. Virtual I/O, "i-glasses!", Twice CES Daily, Jan. 6, 1995, p. 30. Virtual I/O, Specifications, Virtual Reality World, Nov./Dec. 1994, p. 11. Virtual I/O, VR News, Aug./Sep. 1994. p. 17. Antonoff, "Real estate is cheap here, but the places you'd most want to visit are still under construction", Popular Science, Jun. 1993, pp. 83-86, 124-125. Burley, et al., "A Full-color wide-field-of-view holographic helmet-mounted display for pilot/vehicle interface development and human factors studies", SPIE, vol. 1290 Helmet-Mounted Displays II (1990), pp. 9-15. Carr, et al., "Is Virtual Reality Virtually Here?", Training & Development, Oct. 1992, pp. 37-41. Fisher et al., "Living in a Virtual World", Byte, Jul. 1990, pp. 215-221. Horn, "Seeing the invisible", U.S. News & World Report, Jan. 28, 1991. James, "Goggles Brighten Dark Subway", The New York Times, Apr. 10, 1992. Jones et al., "Evaluation of conformal and body-axis attitude information for spatial awareness", SPIE, vol. 1695 Helmet-Mounted Displays III (1992), pp. 146-153. Starks, "Stereoscopic video and the quest for virtual reality: and annotated bibliography of selected topics", SPIE, vol. 1457 Stereoscopic Displays and Applications II (1991), pp. 327-343. Stewart, "Through the looking glass into an artificial world--via computer", Smithsonian, vol. 21, No. 10, Jan. 1991, pp. 36-45. Foley, "Interfaces for Advanced Computing", Scientific American, Oct. 1987, vo. 257, No. 4, pp. 126-135. Krueger, Artificial Reality II, 1991, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., pp. 66-82, 102-116, 130-149, 179-182, 237-239, 267-279. Sutherland, "A head-mounted three dimensional display", Fall Joint Computer Conference, 1968, pp. 757-763.

Patent History

Patent number: 5619377
Type: Grant
Filed: May 8, 1995
Date of Patent: Apr 8, 1997
Assignee: Virtual I/O, Inc. (Seattle, WA)
Inventor: Richard D. Rallison (Paradise, UT)
Primary Examiner: Georgia Y. Epps
Assistant Examiner: Ricky Mack
Law Firm: Bogle & Gates, P.L.L.C.
Application Number: 8/436,494