Refrigerant for centrifugal compressors

- RPL Holdings Limited

A refrigerant comprising: a hydrofluorocarbon component comprising a mixture of: R134a, R227ea and optionally R125, and not more than 6.5% of a hydrocarbon component; wherein the amount of R227ea and R125 if present, is at least 35% of the hydrofluorocarbon component.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

This invention relates to a refrigerant for centrifugal compressors and positive displacement, particularly but not exclusively to a refrigerant to replace R12, dichlorodifluoroethane in centrifugal or reciprocating compressor systems which use mineral oil as a lubricant. The refrigerant also finds applications in new equipment lubricated with polyol ethers.

In a typical flooded evaporator the tubes carrying the water or brine to be cooled are nested closely together, concentrating a large heat exchange area within a small volume. The result is very rapid boiling. Since the tubes are surrounded by a turbulent mixture of vapour and liquid, this would be expected to generate an aerosol of droplets containing oil dissolved in refrigerant in the vapour leaving the volume around the heat exchanger tubes. This vapour is wet and should be de-superheated before entering the compressor suction. This is achieved by having an extra heat exchanger area for this purpose within the shell of the flooded evaporator or in a separate vessel. The aerosol droplets will be heated by this heat exchange area and excess refrigerant will flash off leaving a solution of residual refrigerant on oil. In some designs a small quantity of the refrigerant mixture is bled through a tube from the pool in the evaporator and fed into an oil recovery unit where the refrigerant is flashed off as vapour leaving oil that is returned to the compressor bearings.

According to the present invention a refrigerant for a centrifugal compressor comprises:

    • a hydrofluorocarbon component comprising a mixture of: R134a, R227ea and optionally R125,
    • and not more than 6.5% of a hydrocarbon component;
    • wherein the amount of R227ea and R125 if present, is at least 35% of the hydroflourocarbon component.
      Percentages and other amounts referred to in this specification are by weight unless indicated otherwise. Percentages or other proportions are selected to total 100%.

Hydrocarbon is preferably selected from: butane, isobutane (2-methyl propane), propane, cyclopentane, isopentane (2-methyl butane), neopentane (2,2-dimethyl propane) and pentane. Preferred hydrocarbons are butane, isobutane and propane. Mixtures of hydrocarbons may be employed. The most preferred hydrocarbon is butane.

Use of the three components n-butane HFC-227ea and HFC-134a as an R12 replacement in centrifugal compressors affords the following important advantages.

HFC-227ea is a good fire suppressant. The quantity of the flammable component can therefore be maximised while still retaining non-flammability in the blend.

HFC-227ea has a molecular weight substantially higher than that of CFC-12. HFC-227ea can be mixed with components that have lower molecular weights than CFC-12, but contribute other advantages, to produce a blend with a molecular weight similar to that of CFC-12.

Butane promotes the solubility of mineral oil in the blend. Blends containing HFC-227ea and a hydrocarbon, preferably n-butane provides the surprising advantage of emulsifying the lubricating oil in the blend. The emulsion is effective in ensuring oil return to the compressor and/or reservoir. Either of these components alone does not exhibit this effect.

HFC-134a helps improve energy efficiency.

HFC-227ea and butane form azeotropic and near-azeotropic compositions so that the risk of fractionation into flammable mixtures is minimised.

The boiling points of HFC-134a and HFC-227ea differ by only ˜6° C. so the two fluids form near-azeotropic mixtures. This minimises fractionation of the lower MW 134a from the higher MW heavier 227ea preventing the formation of vapour fractions having significantly lower molecular weights than that of the formulated blend.

The amount of R134a in a composition in accordance with this invention is preferably 30–70%, more preferably 40–70%, most preferably 45–65%.

The amount of R227ea in a composition in accordance with this invention is preferably 30–65%, more preferably 30–55%, most preferably 30–50%.

The amount of hydrocarbon in a composition in accordance with this invention is preferably from a trace to 10% , more preferably 0.5–6%, most preferably 2–5%.

The amount of R125 in a composition in accordance with this invention is preferably a trace to 10%, more preferably 6% most preferably 4%.

The total amount of R125 and R227ea is preferably at least 40%, more preferably at least 45% of the hydrofluorocarbon component.

The speed of sound through the vapour of a composition in accordance with this invention, is preferably equal to or less than 138 m/s 25° C. and preferably equal to or less than 136 m/s but greater than 125 m/s.

An acceptable replacement refrigerant may have a maximum pressure not greater than 2 bar greater than that of R12 at 45° C., preferably not greater than 1.5 bar, most preferably not greater than 1 bar than the pressure of R12 at this temperature.

In preferred compositions of this invention the mean molecular weight is at least 118, preferably not less than 121.

Although flammable compositions can be used where appropriate precautions can be taken, for example on chemical plants, preferred compositions are non-flammable.

A preferred embodiment of this invention comprises:

    • R134a 40–55%
    • R227ea 30–55%
    • R125 3–7%
    • butane 2–5%

A particularly preferred embodiment comprises:

    • R134a 45–55%
    • R227ea 35–70%
    • R125 4%
    • butane 3%

The invention is further described by means of example, but not in any limitative sense.

EXAMPLES

Cycle Conditions

The performances of R134a/227ea/isobutane and R134a/227ea/125/isobutane compositions were evaluated using standard refrigeration cycle analysis techniques provided by the NIST ‘CYCLE D’program in order to assess their suitability as retrofit replacements for R12 in centrifugal compressor systems. The operating conditions, used for the analyses were chosen as being typical of those conditions that are found such systems. Comparative data was generated for R12 under the same conditions

COOLING DUTY DELIVERED 1 MW EVAPORATOR Fluid evaporation temperature   0° C. Superheating  5.0° C. Suction line pressure drop (in saturated temperature)  1.5° C. CONDENSER Fluid condensing temperature 45.0° C. Subcooling  5.0° C. Discharge line pressure drop (in saturated temperature)  1.5° C. LIQUID LINE/SUCTION LINE HEAT EXCHANGER Efficiency 0.3  COMPRESSOR Electric motor efficiency 0.85 Compressor isentropic efficiency 0.7  Compressor volumetric efficiency 1.00 PARASITIC POWER Indoor pumps and fans 30 kW Outdoor pumps and fans 40 kW Controls  1 kW

The cycle results for various blends are shown in Table 1. Examples 1 to 4 do not contain R125. Examples 5 to 11 include 125 to boost capacity. Table 2 gives the cycle results for blends containing butane.

TABLE 1 Example No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 R-12 Weight % 134a 30 40 45 50 30 35 40 42 45 50 51 65 Weight % 227ea 60 55 50 45 55 55 50 48 45 42 42 30 Weight % 600a 10 5 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 3 03 5 Weight % 125 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 Mol. Weight 122 125 122 119 120 126 123 122 120 120 120 111 121 Speed of sound 129.0 127.5 129.1 130.7 129.7 126.6 128.2 128.8 129.8 129.8 130.0 135.6 135.3 (m/s 25° C. dew point) Discharge pressure 10.84 11.22 11.42 11.59 11.40 11.59 11.79 11.86 11.96 12.03 11.95 12.00 11.21 (bar) Pressure ratio 4.22 4.26 4.25 4.24 4.20 4.25 4.24 4.24 4.23 4.26 4.26 4.23 3.82 Discharge temperature 74.4 76.2 77.3 78.5 75.2 75.9 77.0 77.5 78.1 79.2 79.3 81.9 96.7 (° C.) COP (system) 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.11 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.16 Capacity 164.9 170.5 173.9 177.1 173.2 175.2 178.7 180.0 181.9 183.3 182.2 184.9 186.4 (MW/m3)

TABLE 2 Example No. 13 14 15 16 Weight % 134a 50 51 50 42 Weight % 227ea 42 42 41 46 Weight % 600 (butane) 3 3 3 5 Weight % 125 5 4 6 7 Mol. Weight 120 120 120 121 Speed of sound 130.4 130.6 130.6 130.3 (m/s 25° C. dew point) Discharge pressure 11.63 11.56 11.74 11.43 (bar) Pressure ratio 4.29 4.30 4.29 4.29 Discharge temperature 79.5 79.5 79.6 78.3 (° C.) COP (system) 2.13 2.13 2.12 2.13 Capacity (MW/m3) 178.0 176.9 179.5 174.7

Example 17

To ensure That oil can return from the flood evaporators, typically found in systems consisting centrifugal compressors, it is required that the mineral oil be miscible with, or dispersible, with the HFC refrigerant blends under the conditions found in such evaporators. As a comparison 1.0 g of Mobile Arctic 155 refrigeration lubricating oil was weighed into a 125 glass formulation vessel capable of withstanding the pressure of the HFC blends being tested as R12 replacements. The vessel was evacuated and 100 g of composition containing 93% R134a, 5% R125 and 2% pentane (by weight) was introduced by liquid transfer. The vessel was shaken vigorously by hand for ˜30 s. The oil rapidly separated forming an upper layer and leaving a clear, lower refrigerant layer. No emulsion was formed.

Example 18

0.9 g of Mobile Arctic 155 lubricating oil was weighed into 125 ml glass formulation vessel capable of withstanding the pressure of the HFC blends being tested as R12 replacements. The vessel was evacuated and a composition 51% 134a, 42% 227ea, 5% 125 and 3% n-butane,(by weight) was introduced by liquid transfer. The vessel was shaken vigorously by hand for ˜30 s. A white emulsion was formed with a small quantity of the oil floating on the surface. The emulsion did not visibly separate after standing for 30 m. On cooling in an ice/water bath the “milkiness” of the emulsion increased but again no other visible separation was noted. On warming the mixture to room temperature the milkiness was reduced, but after further 30 minutes produced no further change was noted.

The COPs of the blends used in the examples are not more than 2% lower than that of R12. This demonstrates that energy efficiencies of the formulations exemplified are acceptable. The discharge temperatures of all blends are below those of R12. i.e. there is no risk of overheating the compressor.

All blends have capacities greater than 85% and are therefore acceptable as replacements for R12. All blends except Blend 1 have capacities greater than 90% of that of R12 and are therefore preferred. Blends 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 have capacities greater than 95% of R12 so are especially preferred.

The discharge pressures of all the blends do not exceed that of R12 by more than 1 bar so all are acceptable.

The speed of sound in all the blends is less than or similar to that of R12 that makes them suited to centrifugal compressors than R12.

R227ea promotes the dispersibility of mineral in the HFC blend and thus assists oil return.

Claims

1. A refrigerant comprising

a hydrofluorocarbon component comprising a mixture of R134a, R227ea and R125,
and from a trace up to 6.5% butane;
wherein the amount of R227ea is 30–65% of the hydrofluorocarbon component and the total combined amount of R227ea and R125, is at least 35% of the hydrofluorocarbon component.

2. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 1, wherein the amount of R134a is 30–70%.

3. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 2, wherein the amount of R134a is 40–70%.

4. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 3, wherein the amount of R134a is 45–65%.

5. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 1, wherein the amount of R227ea is 30–55%.

6. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 5, wherein the amount of R227ea is 30–50%.

7. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 1, wherein the amount of butane is 0.05–6%.

8. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 7, wherein the amount of butane is 2–5%.

9. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 1, wherein the amount of R125 is from a trace to 10%.

10. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 9, wherein the amount of R125 is 2–8%.

11. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 10, wherein the amount of R125 is 3–6%.

12. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 1, wherein the total combined amount of R125 and R227ea is at least 40% of the hydrofluourocarbon component.

13. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 12, wherein the total combined amount of R125 and R227ea is at least 45% of the hydrofluourocarbon component.

14. A refrigerant composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the speed of sound through the vapour of the refrigerant is equal to or less than 138 m/s at 25° C.

15. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 14, wherein the speed of sound is between 136 and 125 m/s at 25° C.

16. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 1 having a maximum pressure not greater than 2 bar greater than that of R12 at 45° C.

17. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 16, wherein the maximum pressure is 1.5 bar greater than that of R12 at 45° C.

18. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 17, wherein the maximum pressure is not greater than 1 bar than the pressure of R12 at 45° C.

19. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 1, having a mean molecular weight of at least 118.

20. A refrigerant as claimed in claim 19, wherein the mean molecular weight is not less than 121.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
4138855 February 13, 1979 Jahan et al.
4198313 April 15, 1980 Bargigia et al.
4272960 June 16, 1981 Wahl, III
4482465 November 13, 1984 Gray
4810403 March 7, 1989 Bivens et al.
4941986 July 17, 1990 Jolly
4944890 July 31, 1990 Deeb et al.
5026497 June 25, 1991 Merchant
5080823 January 14, 1992 Arnaud et al.
5108637 April 28, 1992 Pearson
5182040 January 26, 1993 Bartlett et al.
5304320 April 19, 1994 Barthelemy et al.
5360566 November 1, 1994 Stevenson
5370812 December 6, 1994 Brown
5417871 May 23, 1995 Minor et al.
5425890 June 20, 1995 Yudin et al.
5458798 October 17, 1995 Lunger et al.
5622644 April 22, 1997 Stevenson et al.
5624596 April 29, 1997 Lunger et al.
5626790 May 6, 1997 Minor
5672293 September 30, 1997 Minor et al.
5766511 June 16, 1998 Musso et al.
5785883 July 28, 1998 Minor et al.
5848532 December 15, 1998 Gamble et al.
5924847 July 20, 1999 Scaringe et al.
5954995 September 21, 1999 Goble
6106740 August 22, 2000 Powell et al.
6117356 September 12, 2000 Powell et al.
6176102 January 23, 2001 Novak et al.
6248255 June 19, 2001 Pearson
6695973 February 24, 2004 Musso et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
41 16 274 November 1992 DE
0 430 169 June 1991 EP
0 430 169 June 1991 EP
0 509 673 October 1992 EP
0 539 952 May 1993 EP
557533 September 1993 EP
0 608 164 July 1994 EP
0 659 862 June 1995 EP
0 659 862 June 1995 EP
0 565 265 October 1995 EP
0 720 639 July 1996 EP
06220430 August 1994 JP
07173462 July 1995 JP
08143696 June 1996 JP
08170074 July 1996 JP
09208940 August 1997 JP
04018484 January 1999 JP
11-181414 July 1999 JP
WO 92/11339 July 1992 WO
WO 92/16597 October 1992 WO
WO 94/00529 January 1994 WO
WO 94/26835 November 1994 WO
WO 95/08602 March 1995 WO
WO 96/03473 February 1996 WO
WO 97/15637 May 1997 WO
WO 98/08912 May 1998 WO
Patent History
Patent number: 6991743
Type: Grant
Filed: Mar 18, 2003
Date of Patent: Jan 31, 2006
Patent Publication Number: 20040026655
Assignee: RPL Holdings Limited
Inventors: John Edward Poole (Cheshire), Richard Powell (Cheshire), James Victor Thomas (Nova Scotia)
Primary Examiner: John R. Hardee
Attorney: Beyer Weaver & Thomas LLP
Application Number: 10/393,203
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Vaporization, Or Expansion, Refrigeration Or Heat Or Energy Exchange (252/67)
International Classification: C09K 5/04 (20060101);