Method of implanting intervertebral disk prosthesis
Embodiments disclosed herein provide a method of implanting an intervertebral disk prosthesis that can be assembled and disassembled in a minimally invasive fashion. The prosthesis comprises a first fixing element having an anchoring first face and a co-operation second face; a second fixing element having an anchoring first face and a co-operation second face; a first prosthesis element having an active first face and a co-operation second face, the co-operation faces of the first fixing element and the first prosthesis element serving to fasten the two elements together; a second prosthesis element having an active first face and a co-operation second face, the co-operation faces of the second fixing element and the second prosthesis element serving to fasten the two elements together; and each of the active faces of the prosthesis elements defining at least a portion of a spherical cap that is respectively concave or convex.
This application is a divisional application of, and claims a benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 120 of the filing date of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/735,603, filed Dec. 12, 2003, entitled “Intervertebral Disk Prosthesis,” which claims priority to French Patent Application No. 03 09596, filed Aug. 4, 2002, the content of each application referenced herein is hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein.
FIELD OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention relates generally to an intervertebral disk prosthesis and, more particularly, to a method of implanting said prosthesis.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONOne of the pathological conditions of the vertebral column consists in degeneration of the disks that are interposed between the vertebrae of the vertebral column. This degeneration leads to a reduction in the thickness of the disk and can lead to very severe sensations of pain. When degeneration reaches an advanced stage, it is necessary to remove the natural intervertebral disk and to replace it. In the most frequent cases, a system of intervertebral spacers or cages is put into place to maintain given spacing between the vertebrae and to prevent the two vertebrae from moving relative to each other. That technique naturally presents the drawback, particularly if applied to several vertebrae, of considerably limiting the patient's ability to move.
Another possible technique consists in replacing the natural intervertebral disk with an intervertebral disk prosthesis that is mounted between the vertebrae and which, ideally, conserves for the patient all of the relative mobility between the vertebrae, or at least a large fraction thereof.
Another problem which arises with intervertebral disk prostheses is the surgical technique for putting such a prosthesis into place. Two techniques can be envisaged: an anterior technique, in which the prosthesis is put into place from the front face of the vertebral column; or a posterior technique in which the prosthesis is put into place via the outer face of the vertebral column, i.e. the face which is directly accessible. It will also be understood that when using the posterior technique, one of the major difficulties lies in the fact that the spinal cord is disposed between the outer posterior face of the vertebral column and the intervertebral plates between which the intervertebral disk prosthesis is to be placed.
Patent application EP 00/42271 describes an intervertebral disk prosthesis suitable for being put into place by the posterior technique. However, the prosthesis described in that document gives only very limited mobility (flexion-extension) between the vertebrae between which the prosthesis is installed.
OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONA first object of the present invention is to provide an intervertebral disk prosthesis suitable for being put into place by the posterior technique and which nevertheless provides a large amount of relative mobility for the vertebrae between which the prosthesis is located.
To achieve this object, in a first aspect of the invention, the intervertebral disk prosthesis suitable for being put into place between two vertebrae by the posterior technique or by the anterior technique comprises:
-
- a first fixing element having both an anchoring first face for anchoring in one of the vertebrae and a co-operation second face;
- a second fixing element having both an anchoring first face for anchoring in the other vertebrae and a co-operation second face;
- a first prosthesis element having both an active first face and a co-operation second face, said co-operation faces of the first fixing element and of the first prosthesis element serving to fasten the two elements together in a plane substantially orthogonal to the axis of the vertebrae;
- a second prosthesis element having both an active first face and a co-operation second face, said co-operation faces of the second fixing element and of the second prosthesis element serving to fasten the two elements together in a plane substantially orthogonal to the axis of the vertebrae; and
- each of said active faces of the prosthesis elements defining at least a portion of a spherical cap that is respectively concave or convex, said spherical cap portions co-operating with one another.
It will be understood that in this first aspect of the invention, the prosthesis can be put into place by the posterior technique, in particular because the fixing element of each prosthesis element is constituted by a part that is separate from the prosthesis element proper. This allows the prosthesis to be assembled and disassembled in a minimally invasive fashion. In addition, it can be seen that the active faces in contact with each other of the two prosthesis elements are in the form of spherical caps, thus allowing physiological ball-and-socket type movements to take place between the two vertebrae.
In a first embodiment, each prosthesis element comprises two distinct parts, each active face of one of said parts defining a spherical cap portion such that the spherical cap portions belonging to the same prosthesis element are disposed on the same spherical surface when the two parts are fixed to the vertebrae by said fixing elements.
It will be understood that in this embodiment of the first aspect of the invention, each prosthesis element is constituted by two distinct parts, thus making it easier to put the prosthesis into place by the posterior technique. Nevertheless, when the two parts constituting the prosthesis element occupy their definitive position, they define an active surface that is in the form of a spherical cap.
In a second embodiment of the invention, each prosthesis element is constituted by a single part whose active face is constituted by a substantially plane surface in which a single spherical cap is formed, said spherical caps being respectively concave and convex.
In a second aspect of the invention, the intervertebral disk prosthesis suitable for being put into place between two vertebrae by the anterior technique or by the posterior technique comprises:
-
- two prosthesis elements, each prosthesis element comprising two distinct parts, each part presenting both a first face for fixing to a vertebra and an active second face in the form of a portion of a spherical cap;
- the spherical cap portions forming the active faces of the two parts belonging to the same prosthesis element being disposed on the same spherical surface when said parts are fixed to the vertebra.
It will be understood that in this aspect of the invention, each of the two prosthesis elements is constituted by two distinct parts which can thus be put into place on either side of the spinal cord. Nevertheless, once these two parts form a prosthesis element occupying its definitive position, they together define a portion of a spherical cap, thus enabling the desired ball-and-socket type movements to be obtained.
In a preferred embodiment of this second aspect of the invention, the two parts forming a prosthesis element are fixed to the vertebrae and positioned appropriately relative to each other so as to define the portion of a spherical cap with the help of a fixing element which is distinct from the two parts forming the prosthesis element. This disposition serves to reduce the size of the prosthesis element and thus to simplify putting the intervertebral disk prosthesis into place by the posterior technique. In this way, the prosthesis can be implanted in a less invasive manner.
A second object of the invention is to provide a method of implanting an intervertebral disk prosthesis of the above-defined type by a posterior technique which is particularly adapted to said prosthesis.
This object is achieved by a method comprising the following steps:
-
- providing a posterior access to the intervertebral plate into which said prosthesis is to be implanted;
- moving apart the two vertebrae defining said space;
- removing the natural intervertebral disk; and
- implanting said prosthesis between the vertebrae by performing the following steps:
- a) inserting at least one fixing element between the vertebrae round one side of the dura mater;
- b) causing said fixing element to turn so as to place it beyond the dura mater in its anchoring location;
- c) anchoring said fixing element in the vertebra;
- d) when necessary, repeating steps a), b), and c) for the second fixing element;
- e) introducing the prosthesis elements round at least one side of the dura mater; and
- f) causing each prosthesis element to co-operate with a fixing element.
A third object of the invention is to provide a method of implanting an intervertebral disk prosthesis of the above-defined type by an anterior technique which is specifically adapted to said prosthesis.
This object is achieved by a method comprising the following steps:
-
- providing an anterior access to the intervertebral plate into which said prosthesis is to be implanted;
- moving apart the two vertebrae defining said space;
- removing the natural intervertebral disk; and
- implanting said prosthesis between the vertebrae by performing the following steps:
- a) inserting at least one fixing element between the vertebrae;
- b) anchoring said fixing element in the vertebra;
- c) when necessary, repeating steps a) and b) for the second fixing element;
- d) inserting the prosthesis elements between the vertebrae; and
- e) causing each prosthesis element to co-operate with a fixing element.
Other characteristics and advantages of the invention appear better on reading the following description of embodiments of the invention given as non-limiting examples. The description refers to the accompanying drawings, in which:
With reference initially to
In this figure, there is shown in simplified manner a first vertebra V1 and a second vertebra V2 between which the intervertebral disk prosthesis 10 is to be put into place. The prosthesis 10 is constituted by a first prosthesis element 12 and a second prosthesis element 14, and by a first fixing element 16 and a second fixing element 18. The prosthesis element 12 has a co-operation face 12a and an active face 12b also referred to as a rubbing face or a contact face. This face 12b is in the form of a convex spherical cap. The prosthesis element 14 also has an active face or contact face 14b which is in the shape of a concave spherical cap and which is naturally designed to co-operate with the active surface 12b of the prosthesis element 12. As explained in greater detail below, the radii of curvature of the spherical caps 12b and 14b are not identical. The prosthesis element 14 also has a co-operation face 14a.
The fixing element 16 presents a co-operation face 16a and an anchoring face 16b. The anchoring face 16b is provided with any suitable anchoring member 22 for fixing the fixing element 12 to the plate of the vertebra V1. The co-operation face 16a of the fixing element 16 is provided with fasteners that co-operate with complementary fasteners of the face 12a of the prosthesis element 12 to fasten the prosthesis element to the fixing element, at least in a horizontal plane.
Similarly, the fixing element 18 has a co-operation face 18a and an anchoring face 18b provided with an anchoring member 24.
It will be understood that in this first aspect of the invention, because the prosthesis elements proper and the fixing elements are distinct parts, it is easier to put the intervertebral disk prosthesis into place between the vertebrae while nevertheless ensuring that it is properly secured to the vertebrae. It will also be understood that since each prosthesis element has an active face in the form of a spherical cap, the ball-and-socket type mobility between the two vertebrae is indeed recreated.
Reference is now made to
In these figures, there can be seen the vertebrae V1 and V2 between which the prosthesis is to be put into place. The prosthesis is constituted by a first prosthesis element 12′ and by a second prosthesis element 14′. Each prosthesis element 12′ and 14′ is constituted by two distinct parts referenced 26 and 28 for the prosthesis element 12′ and 30 and 32 for the prosthesis element 14′. Each part forming the prosthesis elements has both a fixing face referenced a, and an active face referenced b. The fixing faces a of the parts 26 to 32 are provided with fasteners for engaging the vertebrae V1 and V2, these fasteners possibly being constituted by separate parts, as explained below and as shown in
The active faces a of the parts constituting the prosthesis elements are defined in such a manner that they form portions of spherical caps that are respectively concave and convex. When the parts 26 and 28 forming the prosthesis element 12′ are put into place on the vertebra V1, their active faces a are disposed on a concave spherical cap C. Similarly, the active faces a of the parts 30 and 32 forming the prosthesis element 14′ are disposed on a spherical cap C′. As mentioned above, these spherical caps C and C′ may have different radii of curvature.
It will be understood that because the two parts constituting the same prosthesis element together constitute a friction or contact surface that is in the form of a spherical cap, the same ball-and-socket mobility is obtained as in
With reference to
In
In
Naturally, the prosthesis as a whole has a second fixing part 40′ identical to the part 40 and a second prosthesis element 62′ which differs from the prosthesis element 62 solely by the fact that its active surface b defines a spherical cap that is concave.
It can be seen that the fixing elements 40 and 40′ in this embodiment serve not only the fix each prosthesis element to the corresponding vertebra, but also to position the two parts constituting the same prosthesis element in such a manner that their active surface does indeed constitute a spherical cap.
In this variant, when the prosthesis elements 64′ and 66′, and the fixing elements 40 and 40′ are assembled together, the plates 42 of the fixing elements form between them an angle A. In order to obtain this result, the co-operation faces a of the parts 64 and 66 forming the prosthesis element 62 are disposed in a plane PP′, P1P1′ which is not orthogonal to the common axis XX′ of the spherical caps C and C′ which are constituted by the active faces of the prosthesis elements.
With reference now to
As shown in
Naturally, the complete prosthesis has a second fixing element 80′.
The second prosthesis element 120 is identical to the prosthesis element 100 with the exception of its active face b which comprises a substantially plane portion 122 and a portion in the form of a convex spherical cap 124 suitable for co-operating with the concave spherical cap 114 of the prosthesis element 100.
In
In
The description above relates to two embodiments of the intervertebral disk prosthesis of the invention, together with variants thereof. As mentioned above, one of the advantages of these prostheses is that they can be put into place using a posterior technique.
With reference initially to
As in the conventional posterior technique for putting intervertebral cages into place, the surgeon begins by providing posterior access to the vertebrae between which the prosthesis is to be placed: the surgeon must also move the two vertebrae apart and remove the natural disk.
Thereafter, the surgeon usually performs certain resections of portions of the two vertebrae onto which the prosthesis is to be fixed. These resections relate essentially to the epiphysis and to the facets of the vertebrae.
Functionally, the major resections are those enabling the fixing elements to be anchored to the vertebrae where that is necessary. These resections performed in the vertebral plate are of a shape that is adapted to the anchoring elements with which the fixing elements are fitted. For the rib-shaped fixing elements (
Initially, the bottom fixing element 40′ is inserted between the vertebrae V1 and V2 via their posterior portions (
As shown in
Still using the posterior technique, the parts 64 and 64′ constituting the right-hand portions of the prosthesis elements are put into place round the right-hand side of the dura mater, going round the spinal cord.
The fastening grooves 68 are engaged on the ends of the fastening strips 48 of the fixing elements. This engagement is made possible by the ability of the strips 48 to deform. The prosthesis elements are pushed until the plates 42 of the fastening elements 40, 40′ penetrate into the setbacks 72 of the prosthesis parts 64 (
Finally, the same operation is performed on the parts 66 of the prosthesis elements by engaging them via the left side of the dura mater.
Thereafter (
As explained above, an important advantage of the intervertebral disk prosthesis is that it can be put into place by the posterior technique. Nevertheless, this prosthesis can naturally also be put into place by the anterior technique.
Firstly, it should be observed that the slots F′1 and F′2 are adapted to anterior placement so they open out into the periphery of the vertebral plate (
Finally, the parts 26, 28, 30, and 32 forming the prosthesis elements are put into place on the fixing elements 40 and 40′.
Claims
1. A method of implanting an intervertebral disk prosthesis by the posterior technique, the prosthesis comprising:
- a first fixing element having an anchoring first face for anchoring the first fixing element to one of the two vertebrae, and a co-operation second face;
- a first prosthesis element having an active first face and a co-operation second face, the co-operation faces of the first fixing element and of the first prosthesis element, respectively, being fixed in opposition to each other such that the first fixing element and the first prosthesis element are fixed to one another in a plane substantially orthogonal to the axis of the vertebrae;
- a second fixing element having an anchoring first face for anchoring the second fixing element to in the other of the two vertebrae and a co-operation second face; and
- a second prosthesis element having an active first face and a co-operation second face, the co-operation faces of the second fixing element and of the second prosthesis element, respectively, being fixed in opposition to each other such that the second fixing element and the second prosthesis element are fixed to one another in a plane substantially orthogonal to the axis of the vertebrae;
- wherein the active first face of the first prosthesis element and the active first face of the second prosthesis element are disposed in moveable opposition to each other, one of the active first faces being concave and the other of the active first faces being convex so as to define a spherical cap,
- wherein the first prosthesis element comprises two distinct parts, each of the two distinct parts comprising the first prosthesis element having respective surfaces arranged so as to collectively define the active first face,
- wherein the second prosthesis element comprises two distinct parts, each of the two distinct parts comprising the second prosthesis element having respective surfaces arranged so as to collectively define the active second face,
- the method comprising: providing a posterior access to an intervertebral space into which the prosthesis is to be implanted; moving apart the two vertebrae intervertebral defining the intervertebral space; removing the natural intervertebral disk; and implanting the prosthesis between the vertebrae by performing the following steps: a) inserting at least one of the fixing elements between the vertebrae around one side of the dura mater; b) causing the inserted fixing element to turn so as to place it beyond the dura mater in its anchoring location; c) anchoring the fixing element in one of the vertebrae; d) when necessary, repeating steps a), b), and c) for the second fixing element; e) introducing the prosthesis elements around at least one side of the dura mater; and f) causing each prosthesis element to co-operate with a fixing element.
2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising forming anchoring resections in the vertebrae prior to implanting the prosthesis.
3. The method according to claim 1, in which the two fixing elements are implanted simultaneously.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein each prosthesis element is constituted by two distinct parts.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein for each prosthesis element, a first part is inserted around a first side of the dura mater and the second part is inserted around the other side of the dura mater.
6. A method of assembling an intervertebral disk prosthesis in-situ in a minimally invasive manner, the prosthesis comprising:
- a first fixing element having an anchoring first face for anchoring the first fixing element to one of the two vertebrae, and a co-operation second face;
- a first prosthesis element having an active first face and a co-operation second face, the co-operation faces of the first fixing element and of the first prosthesis element, respectively, being fixed in opposition to each other such that the first fixing element and the first prosthesis element are fixed to one another in a plane substantially orthogonal to the axis of the vertebrae;
- a second fixing element having an anchoring first face for anchoring the second fixing element to in the other of the two vertebrae and a co-operation second face; and
- a second prosthesis element having an active first face and a co-operation second face, the co-operation faces of the second fixing element and of the second prosthesis element, respectively, being fixed in opposition to each other such that the second fixing element and the second prosthesis element are fixed to one another in a plane substantially orthogonal to the axis of the vertebrae;
- wherein the active first face of the first prosthesis element and the active first face of the second prosthesis element are disposed in moveable opposition to each other, one of the active first faces being concave and the other of the active first faces being convex so as to define a spherical cap,
- wherein the first prosthesis element comprises two distinct parts, each of the two distinct parts comprising the first prosthesis element having respective surfaces arranged so as to collectively define the active first face,
- wherein the second prosthesis element comprises two distinct parts, each of the two distinct parts comprising the second prosthesis element having respective surfaces arranged so as to collectively define the active second face,
- the method comprising: making an incision sufficiently large to allow the first fixing element, the first prosthesis element, the second fixing element, and the second prosthesis element to pass through one at a time; through the incision: providing a posterior access to an intervertebral space into which the prosthesis is to be implanted; moving apart the two vertebrae intervertebral defining the intervertebral space; removing the natural intervertebral disk; and implanting the prosthesis between the vertebrae by performing the following steps: a) inserting the first fixing element between the vertebrae around one side of the dura mater; b) causing the first fixing element to turn so as to place it beyond the dura mater in its anchoring location; c) anchoring the first fixing element in one of the vertebrae; d) repeating steps a), b), and c) for the second fixing element; e) introducing the prosthesis elements around at least one side of the dura mater; and f) causing each prosthesis element to co-operate with a fixing element.
7. The method according to claim 6, further comprising forming anchoring resections in the vertebrae through the incision prior to implanting the prosthesis.
8. The method according to claim 6, wherein each prosthesis element is constituted by two distinct parts.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein for each prosthesis element, a first part is inserted through the incision around a first side of the dura mater and the second part is inserted through the incision around the other side of the dura mater.
| 2004017 | June 1935 | Stenhouse |
| 5562738 | October 8, 1996 | Boyd |
| 5674294 | October 7, 1997 | Bainville et al. |
| 5899941 | May 4, 1999 | Nishijima et al. |
| 6039763 | March 21, 2000 | Shelokov |
| 6113637 | September 5, 2000 | Gill et al. |
| 6368350 | April 9, 2002 | Erickson |
| 6395035 | May 28, 2002 | Bresina et al. |
| 6402785 | June 11, 2002 | Zdeblick et al. |
| 6419706 | July 16, 2002 | Graf |
| 6517580 | February 11, 2003 | Ramadan et al. |
| 6554863 | April 29, 2003 | Paul |
| 6569201 | May 27, 2003 | Moumene |
| 6572653 | June 3, 2003 | Simonson |
| 6582431 | June 24, 2003 | Ray |
| 6641613 | November 4, 2003 | Sennett |
| 6692495 | February 17, 2004 | Zacouto |
| 6699292 | March 2, 2004 | Ogilvie |
| 6706068 | March 16, 2004 | Ferree |
| 6726720 | April 27, 2004 | Ross |
| 6749635 | June 15, 2004 | Bryan |
| 6793678 | September 21, 2004 | Hawkins |
| 6808538 | October 26, 2004 | Paponneau |
| 6966929 | November 22, 2005 | Mitchell |
| 6986789 | January 17, 2006 | Schultz et al. |
| 6994727 | February 7, 2006 | Khandkar et al. |
| 6997954 | February 14, 2006 | Zubok |
| 7001432 | February 21, 2006 | Keller |
| 7018415 | March 28, 2006 | McKay |
| 7048764 | May 23, 2006 | Ferree |
| 7066958 | June 27, 2006 | Ferree |
| 7083649 | August 1, 2006 | Zucherman |
| 7118599 | October 10, 2006 | Errico |
| 7147665 | December 12, 2006 | Bryan et al. |
| 7169181 | January 30, 2007 | Kuras |
| 7179294 | February 20, 2007 | Eisermann et al. |
| 7198644 | April 3, 2007 | Schultz |
| 7201776 | April 10, 2007 | Ferree |
| 7217291 | May 15, 2007 | Zucherman et al. |
| 7273496 | September 25, 2007 | Mitchell |
| 7326250 | February 5, 2008 | Beaurain |
| 7481840 | January 27, 2009 | Zucherman et al. |
| 7494508 | February 24, 2009 | Zeegers |
| 7503935 | March 17, 2009 | Zucherman |
| 7517363 | April 14, 2009 | Rogers et al. |
| 7531001 | May 12, 2009 | De Villiers et al. |
| 7537614 | May 26, 2009 | Baumgartner |
| 7550009 | June 23, 2009 | Arnin |
| 7563286 | July 21, 2009 | Gerber et al. |
| 7575599 | August 18, 2009 | Villiers |
| 7575600 | August 18, 2009 | Zucherman |
| 7611538 | November 3, 2009 | Belliard et al. |
| 7621956 | November 24, 2009 | Paul et al. |
| 7628813 | December 8, 2009 | Link |
| 7637955 | December 29, 2009 | Marik et al. |
| 7637956 | December 29, 2009 | Lechmann et al. |
| 7682396 | March 23, 2010 | Beaurain et al. |
| 7682397 | March 23, 2010 | Berry et al. |
| 7695515 | April 13, 2010 | Sweeney |
| 7695516 | April 13, 2010 | Zeegers |
| 7695517 | April 13, 2010 | Benzel et al. |
| 7704280 | April 27, 2010 | Lechmann et al. |
| 7708760 | May 4, 2010 | Parsons |
| 7708776 | May 4, 2010 | Blain et al. |
| 7708777 | May 4, 2010 | O'Neil et al. |
| 7708780 | May 4, 2010 | Zubok et al. |
| 7717959 | May 18, 2010 | William et al. |
| 7731752 | June 8, 2010 | Edie et al. |
| 7731753 | June 8, 2010 | Reo et al. |
| 7749272 | July 6, 2010 | Robie et al. |
| 7749274 | July 6, 2010 | Razian |
| 7753957 | July 13, 2010 | Albert et al. |
| 7753958 | July 13, 2010 | Gordon et al. |
| 7771479 | August 10, 2010 | Humphreys et al. |
| 7771481 | August 10, 2010 | Khandkar et al. |
| 7776093 | August 17, 2010 | Wolek et al. |
| 7803162 | September 28, 2010 | Marnay et al. |
| 7833272 | November 16, 2010 | Arnin et al. |
| 7842088 | November 30, 2010 | Rashbaum et al. |
| 20040010316 | January 15, 2004 | William et al. |
| 20040024462 | February 5, 2004 | Ferree |
| 20040133278 | July 8, 2004 | Marino et al. |
| 20040138749 | July 15, 2004 | Zucheman |
| 20040172135 | September 2, 2004 | Mitchell |
| 20040225365 | November 11, 2004 | Eisermann |
| 20040226363 | November 18, 2004 | Richelsoph |
| 20050033435 | February 10, 2005 | Belliard et al. |
| 20050143824 | June 30, 2005 | Richelsoph et al. |
| 20050154462 | July 14, 2005 | Zucheman |
| 20050154468 | July 14, 2005 | Rivin |
| 20050159818 | July 21, 2005 | Blain |
| 20050165485 | July 28, 2005 | Trieu |
| 20050197706 | September 8, 2005 | Hovorka et al. |
| 20050228500 | October 13, 2005 | Kim et al. |
| 20050234555 | October 20, 2005 | Sutton et al. |
| 20050256579 | November 17, 2005 | Keller |
| 20050267581 | December 1, 2005 | Marnay |
| 20050283245 | December 22, 2005 | Gordon et al. |
| 20060004377 | January 5, 2006 | Keller |
| 20060004453 | January 5, 2006 | Bartish et al. |
| 20060004454 | January 5, 2006 | Ferree et al. |
| 20060036326 | February 16, 2006 | Baumgartner |
| 20060036327 | February 16, 2006 | Enayati |
| 20060041314 | February 23, 2006 | Millard |
| 20060069438 | March 30, 2006 | Zucherman et al. |
| 20060069439 | March 30, 2006 | Zucherman et al. |
| 20060069440 | March 30, 2006 | Zucherman et al. |
| 20060069441 | March 30, 2006 | Zucherman et al. |
| 20060085076 | April 20, 2006 | Krishna et al. |
| 20060111784 | May 25, 2006 | Grinberg et al. |
| 20060116768 | June 1, 2006 | Krueger et al. |
| 20060116769 | June 1, 2006 | Marnay et al. |
| 20060122703 | June 8, 2006 | Aebi et al. |
| 20060136062 | June 22, 2006 | DiNello et al. |
| 20060136063 | June 22, 2006 | Zeegers |
| 20060149383 | July 6, 2006 | Arnin et al. |
| 20060178745 | August 10, 2006 | Bartish et al. |
| 20060241766 | October 26, 2006 | Felton et al. |
| 20070010887 | January 11, 2007 | Williams et al. |
| 20070021837 | January 25, 2007 | Ashman |
| 20070055378 | March 8, 2007 | Ankney et al. |
| 20070073405 | March 29, 2007 | Verhulst et al. |
| 20070112429 | May 17, 2007 | Muhanna et al. |
| 20070118223 | May 24, 2007 | Allard et al. |
| 20070162137 | July 12, 2007 | Kloss et al. |
| 20070173942 | July 26, 2007 | Heinz et al. |
| 20070233244 | October 4, 2007 | Lopez et al. |
| 20070260316 | November 8, 2007 | Schneid et al. |
| 20070260317 | November 8, 2007 | Ankney et al. |
| 20080015698 | January 17, 2008 | Marino et al. |
| 20080133013 | June 5, 2008 | Duggal et al. |
| 20080228274 | September 18, 2008 | De Villiers et al. |
| 20080234686 | September 25, 2008 | Beaurain et al. |
| 20080288073 | November 20, 2008 | Renganath et al. |
| 20080294259 | November 27, 2008 | De Villiers et al. |
| 20080294260 | November 27, 2008 | Gray |
| 20080300685 | December 4, 2008 | Carls et al. |
| 20080306599 | December 11, 2008 | Morrison, III |
| 20080319548 | December 25, 2008 | Kuras et al. |
| 20090005874 | January 1, 2009 | Fleischmann et al. |
| 20090012619 | January 8, 2009 | Cordaro et al. |
| 20090018663 | January 15, 2009 | Cook et al. |
| 20090076608 | March 19, 2009 | Gordon et al. |
| 20090076615 | March 19, 2009 | Duggal et al. |
| 20090088850 | April 2, 2009 | Froehlich |
| 20090088852 | April 2, 2009 | Chee |
| 20090149960 | June 11, 2009 | Hushka et al. |
| 20090192616 | July 30, 2009 | Zielinski |
| 20090204219 | August 13, 2009 | Beaurain et al. |
| 20090254180 | October 8, 2009 | Pazanowski et al. |
| 20090254183 | October 8, 2009 | Humphreys et al. |
| 20090299478 | December 3, 2009 | Carls et al. |
| 20090326658 | December 31, 2009 | Allard |
| 20100004746 | January 7, 2010 | Arramon |
| 20100004752 | January 7, 2010 | White et al. |
| 20100030336 | February 4, 2010 | Cope |
| 20100057205 | March 4, 2010 | Justin et al. |
| 20100063592 | March 11, 2010 | Dwyer et al. |
| 20100070033 | March 18, 2010 | Doty |
| 20100070036 | March 18, 2010 | Implicito |
| 20100131066 | May 27, 2010 | Keller |
| 20100137992 | June 3, 2010 | Buttner-Janz et al. |
| 20100145461 | June 10, 2010 | Landry et al. |
| 20100168860 | July 1, 2010 | Reichen et al. |
| 20100174371 | July 8, 2010 | Errico et al. |
| 20100222885 | September 2, 2010 | Hurlbert et al. |
| 20100228351 | September 9, 2010 | Ankney et al. |
| 20100241231 | September 23, 2010 | Marino et al. |
| 20100256761 | October 7, 2010 | Komistek et al. |
| 20100256762 | October 7, 2010 | Bertagnoli |
| 20100256763 | October 7, 2010 | Sournac et al. |
| 0699426 | March 1996 | EP |
| 2799638 | April 2001 | FR |
| WO 00/04851 | February 2000 | WO |
| WO 01/01893 | January 2001 | WO |
| WO 01/64140 | September 2001 | WO |
- French Search Report issued in French Patent Application No. 0309596, dated May 3, 2004, 4 pgs.
- Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/735,603, mailed Mar. 6, 2007, 5 pgs.
- Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/735,603, mailed Nov. 29, 2007, 7 pgs.
- Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/735,603, mailed Nov. 20, 2008, 4 pgs.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/FR2004/002078 mailed on Jan. 27, 2005, 15 pgs.
- Translation of International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/FR2004/002078 mailed on Jan. 27, 2005, 7 pgs.
- International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/FR2004/002078 mailed on Feb. 6, 2006, 8 pgs.
- Translation of International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/FR2004/002078, 8 pgs.
Type: Grant
Filed: Oct 7, 2009
Date of Patent: Mar 1, 2011
Patent Publication Number: 20100121454
Assignee: Zimmer Spine S.A.S. (Bordeaux)
Inventors: Karl P. Belliard (La Membrolle), Regis Le Couedic (Bordeaux), Jacques Senegas (Merignac), Pablo Mangione (Pessac)
Primary Examiner: Alvin J Stewart
Attorney: Sprinkle IP Law Group
Application Number: 12/575,319
International Classification: A61F 2/44 (20060101);