E911 call blocking for non-initialized wireless telephones

Calls from a phone identified as being a source of harassing or other undesirable phone calls are blocked at a mobile positioning center (MPC). Upon request by the PSAP, a call record detail can be obtained from the MPC revealing a simulated “callback phone number” as well as a unique number identifier of the phone, such as an ESN or MEID. The MPC then intercepts all future incoming calls from phones with that unique identifier number and routes them to a recording that advises the harasser that the phone has been identified as a harasser and is now blocked. The recording can also advise the caller how to restore service. In a preferred embodiment, the MPC sets a timer to automatically restore service after a designated length of time.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/216,185, filed Jul. 1, 2008, entitled “E911 Call Blocking for Non-Initialized Wireless Telephones” by Richard Dickinson, which in turn is a continuation-in-part (CIP) of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/440,084, filed May 25, 2006, entitled “E911 Call Blocking For Non-Initialized Wireless Telephones” by Richard Dickinson, which in turn claims priority from U.S. Provisional Appl. No. 60/684,554, filed May 26, 2005, entitled “E911 Call Blocking For Non-Initialized Wireless Telephones”, by Richard Dickinson, the entirety of all three of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates generally to wireless services. More particularly, it relates to E911 wireless services.

2. Background of the Related Art

The FCC has mandated that all wireless telephones must be able to dial 9-1-1, even if other service is denied. This includes uninitialized phones (i.e., cellular phones that have not yet been activated by the wireless carrier). Uninitialized phones have no assigned phone number and are virtually untraceable. Because of this, they have become a popular way for mischief-makers to place hundreds or thousands of harassment calls to Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs), thereby compromising the ability of the PSAPs to respond to real emergencies.

FIG. 3 shows conventional elements relating to routing of an E911 call from a cell phone.

In particular, as shown in FIG. 3, a conventional wireless carrier's mobile switching center (MSC) 502 contacts a Mobile Positioning Center (MPC) 504 to ascertain proper routing of an E911 call. The MPC 504 responds with routing information and the MSC 502 then routes the call to the correct PSAP 208. The MPC 504 stores the caller's call-back number and location in a dynamic database and relays that information to the PSAP 208 at the appropriate time.

Currently, uninitialized phones are identified only with a nonfunctional, simulated “callback” number that consists of a portion of the phone's electronic serial number (ESN). The FCC has authorized wireless carriers to terminate service to these phones if the PSAP identifies the phone as a harrasser. Some MSCs are capable of blocking single ESNs, while others are less flexible and must block all uninitialized phones. The effort to block these calls at the MSC 502 is time consuming and troublesome.

Thus, disadvantages of the current solutions include: (1) It requires time consuming manual intervention to block identified calls; (2) Once a call is blocked, it remains blocked until a technician manually restores service; and (3) Some wireless switches cannot block individual telephones.

Moreover, once blocked, the subsequent legitimate user of the phone is not advised that the phone has been blocked.

There is a need for improved technology for blocking E911 calls from a non-initialized wireless telephone deemed to have previously been used to make a harassing or illegitimate call to 9-1-1.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the principles of the present invention, a method of blocking an undesirable call from being routed to an intended recipient comprises associating a simulated callback phone number with the undesirable call. A mobile positioning center (MPC) is queried for routing instructions for the undesirable call. The simulated callback phone number is further refined by ascertaining the unique MEID or ESN of the phone, which is compared with a known list of unique numbers to be blocked. If a match is made by the comparing, routing of the undesirable call to the intended recipient is blocked at the mobile positioning center (MPC).

In accordance with another aspect of the invention, apparatus for identifying an otherwise unidentifable source phone of an E911 call comprises a simulated callback phone number module. The module associates as a callback phone number a 10-digit simulated callback number comprising “911” plus 7 digits of an electronic serial number (ESN) of the source phone. Even though the ESN or MEID is truncated for the purpose of creating the simulated phone number, the complete ESN or MEID remains intact within the call data flow and it can be accessed after the call in completed via call detail reports.

Apparatus for blocking an undesirable wireless call from being routed according to yet another aspect of the invention comprises a blocked unique number list maintained by a mobile positioning center (MPC). A module compares a unique number (MEID or ESN) associated with a received query for routing instructions to entries in the blocked number list. If a match is made between the unique number of the phone and an entry in the blocked number list, routing to an intended destination is refused.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows exemplary network elements relevant to call blocking for E911 harassment calls, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.

FIG. 2 shows exemplary messaging to accomplish call blocking for E911 harassment calls, in the exemplary system shown in FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 shows conventional elements relating to routing of an E911 call from a cell phone.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

In accordance with the principles of the present invention, calls from a phone identified as being a source of harassing or other undersirable phone calls are blocked at a mobile positioning center (MPC), rather than at the MSC as in conventional systems. Upon request by the PSAP (e.g., a PSAP designated as servicing the location from which the harassing call originates or is registered in), a call record detail can be obtained from the MPC revealing a simulated “callback phone number” of the mobile phone identified to have made a harassing call to the specific PSAP at a specific time. Because simulated “call back numbers” can in extremely rare occasions be duplicated, resulting in the remote possibility of blocking legitimate calls from a phone with a similar number, the call detail record is further referenced to obtain a unique identifier number related to that particular phone. Typically, that unique identifier number would be the MEID or the phone's Electronic Serial Number (ESN) The MPC then intercepts all future incoming calls from that phone corresponding to the unique identifier number, and routes this and any future calls therefrom to a recording that advises the harasser that the phone has been identified as a source of harassing phone calls and is now blocked. The recording can also advise the caller how to restore service. In a preferred embodiment, the MPC sets a timer to automatically restore service after a designated length of time.

FIG. 1 shows exemplary network elements relevant to call blocking for E911 harassment calls, in accordance with the principles of the present invention. The disclosed wireless infrastructure is implemented to support subsequent 9-1-1 calls.

In particular, as shown in FIG. 1, a mobile phone 173 communicates with a given cell site 174. The cell site 174 communicates with a mobile switching center (MSC) 202 in a wireless carrier's network. The mobile switching center (MSC) 202 is the wireless equivalent to a landline end office.

Importantly, according to the invention, the MSC 202 includes a simulated callback phone number module 202a. The simulated callback phone number module 202a provides a simulated callback number for a given wireless phone calling 911. In the disclosed embodiments, the simulated callback number comprises “911” plus the last 7 digits of the ESN (totaling 10 digits) of the phone sending the undesirable call. This format is typical per current industry standards for simulated callback number, but it is envisioned that this format can be modified in any manner that uniquely identifies the telephone, and/or is mutually agreeable to the MPC and the MSC and the PSAP.

An appropriate mobile positioning center 204 also communicates with the ALI database 210 and the coordinate routing database (CRDB) 212. The mobile positioning center (MPC) 204 is the call routing “mastermind” that maintains a database of cellular towers and which PSAPs should receive calls from which cellular tower. The MSC 202 relies upon the MPC 204 to determine which selective router should receive the E911 call. The MPC 204 also communicates with the PSAP 208 to inform the PSAP 208 of the caller's phone number and address.

The MSC 202 queries the MPC 204 for call routing instructions, and provides to the MPC 204 the simulated callback number across dedicated data circuits 102. Preferably, the query from the MSC 202 includes not only the simulated callback number (911+last 7 digits of the ESN), but also the cellular tower from where the call originated. The MPC queries the Harrasser Number Data Base 216 to see if the simulated callback number is listed. In the absence of a match in the Harrasser Number Database 216, the MPC 204 queries a coordinate routing database (CRDB) 212, which determines that calls originiating from which cell towers should be routed to which PSAPs. The MPC 204 responds with appropriate call routing instructions. These instructions consist of a pseudo automatic number identifier (pANI) that relates to a specific trunk group 103 (e.g., CAMA or SS7 voice trunk) between the MSC 202 and the selective router 206. The MSC 202 directs the call to the selective router 206 via the identified trunk group 103. The E911 call is routed to the appropriate public safety answering point (PSAP) via the selective router 206, which has been provisioned to relate the specified pANI to a specific trunk group 104 that connects the selective router 206 to the intended PSAP 208. Upon receipt of the emergency call with the specified pANI, the selective router 206 routes the call to the PSAP 208. The selective router is provisioned as is otherwise conventional.

The E911 call continues on to an ANI/ALI controller 275 or similar device within the PSAP 208, which communicates with an automatic location identifier (ALI) database 210, and ultimately on to a PSAP workstation manned by appropriate emergency personnel. The ALI database 210 is provisioned with the pANI so that queries using that pANI are routed to the MPC that initially issued the pANI. The ANI/ALI controller 275 queries the ALI 210 for ALI data related to the pANI. The ALI 210 routes the query to the MPC 204 via existing data circuits 105. The MPC 204 responds with the simulated callback number of the uninitialized phone.

TCP/IP data circuits 105 must be ordered and installed between the MPC 204 and the various ALI databases 210.

Web based Graphical User Interface 107 with appropriate access restrictions must be installed at the Harrassment Number Database 216. This interface is used for the PSAPs to identify harassing telephones according to their simulated callback number. Alternatively, this communications can be verbal, via fax, or other device between authorized personnel at the PSAP and personnel managing the Harrasser Number Database 216.

FIG. 2 shows exemplary messaging to accomplish call blocking for E911 harassment calls, in the exemplary system shown in FIG. 1.

In particular, as shown in FIG. 2, an initial harassing call is placed from the mobile phone 173 through a given cell site 174. The call flow shown in FIG. 2 traces a wireless harassment call from the uninitialized mobile phone 173, then designates it as a harassing call.

As shown in step 101 of FIG. 2, the receiving cell site routes the 911 call to the MSC 202. The MSC 202 receives the call.

In response to receipt of the E911 wireless call, the simulated callback phone number module 202a is activated, and in response appends a 10-digit simulated callback phone number to the E911 call (“911” plus the last 7 digits of the ESN of the uninitialized phone.)

The MSC 202 then queries the MPC 204 for routing information for the E911 call, which at that point includes the 10-digit simulated callback phone number. Preferably, the query from the MSC 202 includes not only the simulated callback number (911+last 7 digits of the ESN), but also the cellular tower from where the call originated.

As shown in step 102, upon determining the appropriate PSAP to receive the call, the MPC 204 responds with an appropriate pANI. This pANI is, e.g., a 10-digit number compatible with the existing selective router 206 that serves that PSAP 208. The ESRK is preferably unique to that PSAP 208.

In step 103, the MSC 202 routes the 911 call to the designated selective router 206.

In step 104, upon reaching the selective router 206, the existing E911 infrastructure delivers the call to the PSAP 208. The selective router 206, previously provisioned to recognize the pANI in the ANI field of the CAMA or SS7 voice call, routes the call to the appropriate PSAP.

In step 105, per current existing technology, the PSAP 208 receives the voice call and using the pANI, queries the ALI database 210 for the location and call-back information. The ALI database 210 steers the pANI to the appropriate MPC 204, which responds to the ALI query with the simulated “callback” number of the originating phone.

In step 106, the harasser harasses. For example, the harasser might merely breath heavily into the phone, whisper juvenile obscenities, whatever, and typically refuse to hang up.

In step 107, the PSAP dispatcher terminates the call, and in accordance with the principles of the present invention, notifies the MPC 204 of the simulated “callback” number associated with a harassing or prank 911 phone call.

In step 108, personnel at the MPC 204 access the call detail report related to the call and ascertain the ESN or MEID or other unique identifier of the phone. This unique identier is listed in a suitable database of calls to be blocked from PSAPs in the future. The database may be a separate, special database, or may be integrated within a larger database. This database is represented by the harasser number database 216 shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.

In a preferred embodiment, personnel at the MPC 204 also assign a “timeout” period after which the simulated callback number that was listed in the harassing database is purged from the harassing database. At this point, the phone 173 would be free to call again, even as a harasser. However, given that a predefined period of time has elapsed since the last harassing call has been given from that phone 173, it is unlikely that the original harasser would harass again from the phone 173.

The timeout period may alternatively be automatically set without the need for operator intervention. Secure IP interfaces may be made available to PSAP personnel who invoke the timeout period directly.

As an alternative, rather than being purged, the callback number may be maintained in the blocked number database but de-activated or enabled in some way that maintains a record of the previous harassing 911 phone call made using that callback number. This allows normal operation of the wireless phone, but also a record of the undesirable harassing call made from that phone 173.

In step 109, the harasser might again dial 911. Again the MSC 202 activates the simulated callback phone number module 202a and appends a 10-digit simulated callback phone number to the 911 call. Again the MSC 202 routes the call to the MPC 204 per otherwise conventional processes.

However, this time, as shown in step 110, the MPC 204 compares the unique identifier of the phone against entries in the harasser number database 216. In the given scenario, this time the MPC 204 recognizes the unique identifier number in the special harassing 911 dialer's database 216. As a result, the MPC 204, this time, responds with routing instructions to a 10-digit PSTN number of a pre-recorded announcement message element 279 instead of routing information to the otherwise designated PSAP 208.

The pre-recorded message played by the recording element 279 can, of course, be programmed to say anything. As an example, the pre-recorded message might state something like: “911 calls from this phone have been blocked because this phone has been identified by law enforcement authorities as a source of telephone harassment. To restore 911 service, please contact XYZ Wireless. Goodbye.”

In step 111, after a given “timeout” period of time later (e.g., several hours, one or more days, etc. later), the relevant entry of the simulated callback number corresponding to the harassing 911 dialer's phone 173 is automatically purged from the harasser number database 216, and normal 911 service is thus restored. Of course, a record of the phone having been listed in the harasser number database 216 along with pertinent information such as when the harassing call was made, the location of the phone when the harassing call was made, etc., may be recorded for later review by appropriate personnel.

Note that the inventive blocking technology will work to block calls from any wireless phone presumably desired not to be routed to a PSAP. The example of an uninitialized phone is used because uninitialized phones are the most commonly used type phones for harassment, and also are the most difficult to trace.

The present invention provides technology that results in the reduction of the waste of 911 emergency service resources caused by prank or harassing 911 calls made from uninitialized wireless devices. In extreme emergencies where time saves lives, the present invention might also be credited with the capability of saving lives that might otherwise be lost due to the delay or even failure of a legitimate 911 caller from a wireless device to reach 911 responders caused while the relevant PSAP 208 is tied up dealing with a prankster or harasser.

The principles of the present invention can also be implemented to route specific legitimate callers to specific 911 resources. For example, a person with a heart condition may purchase a special wireless phone solely for the purpose of dialing 911 in the event of a heart attack. At the prior request of the caller, their phone number may be maintained in a special database similar to the harassing 911 caller's database 216. Then, in accordance with the principles of the present invention, any/all 911 calls made from that particular phone with a phone number previously entered into the special database can be routed directly to a medical responder or other designated phone (e.g., their surgeon, etc.)

While the invention has been described with reference to the exemplary embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art will be able to make various modifications to the described embodiments of the invention without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims

1. A method of blocking an undesirable emergency voice call from being routed to an intended phone device, comprising: associating a simulated callback phone number with said undesirable emergency voice call, said simulated callback phone number comprising “911” plus at least a portion of a device identification number;

querying a mobile positioning center (MPC) that is distinct and remote from a mobile switching center (MSC) for routing instructions for said undesirable emergency voice call;
comparing said simulated callback phone number with a known list of callback phone numbers to be blocked; and
if a match is made by said comparing, blocking at said mobile positioning center (MPC) routing of said undesirable emergency voice call to said intended phone device, by said MPC sending routing instructions including a routing number of a pre-recorded announcement element.

2. The method of blocking an undesirable emergency voice call from being routed to an intended phone device according to claim 1, wherein:

said device identification number is an electronic serial number (ESN).

3. The method of blocking an undesirable emergency voice call from being routed to an intended phone device according to claim 1, wherein:

said undesirable emergency voice call is a 911 call.

4. The method of blocking an undesirable emergency voice call from being routed to an intended phone device according to claim 1, wherein:

said designated recipient is a public safety answering point (PSAP).

5. The method of blocking an undesirable emergency voice call from being routed to an intended phone device according to claim 1, wherein:

said simulated callback phone number is a 10-digit number.

6. The method of blocking an undesirable emergency voice call from being routed to an intended phone device according to claim 1, wherein:

said simulated callback phone number comprises “911” plus 7 digits corresponding to an electronic serial number (ESN) of a phone sending said undesirable emergency voice call.

7. The method of blocking an undesirable emergency voice call from being routed to an intended phone device according to claim 6, wherein:

said 7 digits are the last 7 digits of said ESN.

8. Apparatus for blocking an undesirable emergency voice call from being routed to an intended phone, comprising:

means for associating a simulated callback phone number with said undesirable emergency voice call, said simulated callback phone number comprising “911” plus at least a portion of a device identification number;
means for querying a mobile positioning center (MPC) that is distinct and remote from a mobile switching center (MSC) for routing instructions for said undesirable emergency voice call;
means for comparing said simulated callback phone number with a known list of callback phone numbers to be blocked; and
means for blocking at said mobile positioning center (MPC) routing of said undesirable emergency voice call to said intended phone device if a match is made by said comparing, by said MPC sending routing instructions including a routing number of a pre-recorded announcement element.

9. The apparatus for blocking an undesirable emergency voice call from being routed to an intended phone device according to claim 8, wherein:

said device identification number is an electronic serial number (ESN).

10. The apparatus for blocking an undesirable emergency voice call from being routed to an intended phone device according to claim 8, wherein:

said undesirable emergency voice call is a 911 call.

11. The apparatus for blocking an undesirable emergency voice call from being routed to an intended phone device according to claim 8, wherein:

said designated recipient is a public safety answering point (PSAP).

12. The apparatus for blocking an undesirable emergency voice call from being routed to an intended phone device according to claim 8, wherein:

said simulated callback phone number is a 10-digit number.

13. The apparatus for blocking an undesirable emergency voice call from being routed to an intended phone device according to claim 12, wherein:

said 10-digit simulated callback phone number comprises “911” plus 7 digits corresponding to the electronic serial number (ESN) of a phone sending said undesirable emergency voice call.

14. The apparatus for blocking an undesirable emergency voice call from being routed to an intended phone device according to claim 13, wherein:

said 7 digits are the last 7 digits of said ESN.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
4625081 November 25, 1986 Lotito
6321091 November 20, 2001 Holland
6456852 September 24, 2002 Bar
6529500 March 4, 2003 Pandharipande
6529722 March 4, 2003 Heinrich
6584307 June 24, 2003 Antonucci
6650901 November 18, 2003 Schuster
6678357 January 13, 2004 Stumer
6744856 June 1, 2004 Karnik
6744858 June 1, 2004 Ryan
6771742 August 3, 2004 McCalmont
6775534 August 10, 2004 Lindgren
6799049 September 28, 2004 Zellner
6813264 November 2, 2004 Vassilovski
6940950 September 6, 2005 Dickinson
6963557 November 8, 2005 Knox
6968044 November 22, 2005 Beason
7136466 November 14, 2006 Gao
7177397 February 13, 2007 McCalmont
7177399 February 13, 2007 Dawson
7194249 March 20, 2007 Phillips
7245900 July 17, 2007 Lamb
7260186 August 21, 2007 Zhu
7260384 August 21, 2007 Bales
7330899 February 12, 2008 Wong
7333480 February 19, 2008 Clarke
7366157 April 29, 2008 Valentine
7369530 May 6, 2008 Keagy
7412049 August 12, 2008 Koch
7440442 October 21, 2008 Grabelsky
7573982 August 11, 2009 Breen
7617287 November 10, 2009 Vella
7702081 April 20, 2010 Klesper et al.
7787611 August 31, 2010 Kotelly
20010040886 November 15, 2001 Jimenez
20020118796 August 29, 2002 Menard
20020126656 September 12, 2002 Park
20030026245 February 6, 2003 Ejzak
20030069002 April 10, 2003 Hunter
20030109245 June 12, 2003 McCalmont
20040043775 March 4, 2004 Kennedy
20040132465 July 8, 2004 Mattila
20040150518 August 5, 2004 Phillips
20040152493 August 5, 2004 Phillips
20040176123 September 9, 2004 Chin
20040180671 September 16, 2004 Spain
20040184584 September 23, 2004 McCalmont
20040190497 September 30, 2004 Knox
20040203568 October 14, 2004 Kirtland
20040203575 October 14, 2004 Chin et al.
20040247090 December 9, 2004 Nurmela
20050030977 February 10, 2005 Casey
20050048987 March 3, 2005 Glass
20050083911 April 21, 2005 Grabelsky
20050085257 April 21, 2005 Laird
20050107673 May 19, 2005 Ball
20050169248 August 4, 2005 Truesdale
20050190892 September 1, 2005 Dawson et al.
20050201528 September 15, 2005 Meer
20050201529 September 15, 2005 Nelson et al.
20060058049 March 16, 2006 McLaughlin
20060068753 March 30, 2006 Karpen
20060125692 June 15, 2006 Wang
20060135132 June 22, 2006 Cai
20060188083 August 24, 2006 Breen
20060193447 August 31, 2006 Schwartz
20070019614 January 25, 2007 Hoffmann
20070036139 February 15, 2007 Patel
20070041513 February 22, 2007 Gende
20070115941 May 24, 2007 Patel
20070121601 May 31, 2007 Kikinis
20070160036 July 12, 2007 Smith
20070253429 November 1, 2007 James
20070263610 November 15, 2007 Mitchell
20070293205 December 20, 2007 Henderson
20080081646 April 3, 2008 Morin
20090003535 January 1, 2009 Grabelsky
20100003954 January 7, 2010 Greene
Foreign Patent Documents
WO99/22546 May 1999 WO
WO2004/098213 November 2004 WO
Other references
  • International Search Report in 06851433.0-2413/1935191 dated Aug. 8, 2011, PCT/US2006/033352.
  • Location Services (LCS); Functional description; Stage 2; ETSI TS 101 724, Jun. 2004 (2004-2006), Section 4, Section 5.6.6 Figure 3, Section 7.6.2 Figure 30.
Patent History
Patent number: 8103242
Type: Grant
Filed: Oct 20, 2009
Date of Patent: Jan 24, 2012
Patent Publication Number: 20100069034
Assignee: TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. (Annapolis, MD)
Inventor: Richard Dickinson (Seattle, WA)
Primary Examiner: Charles Appiah
Assistant Examiner: Jaime Holliday
Attorney: William H. Bollman
Application Number: 12/588,569
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Emergency Or Alarm Communication (455/404.1); Call Diversion (455/417)
International Classification: H04M 11/04 (20060101);